{"meta":{"query_hash":"cc4d81d5441b","filters":{"venue":"Social & Legal Studies"},"cohort_total":130,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":130,"exported":130,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cc4d81d5441b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+%26+Legal+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1867789939","doi":"10.1177/a018602","title":"Bring it on Home: Home Drug Testing and the Relocation of the War on Drugs","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Trope (literature); Commodification; Rhetoric; Drug; State (computer science); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Medicine; Pharmacology; Economics","score_opus":0.04415436891994338,"score_gpt":0.32053061864259186,"score_spread":0.27637624972264846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1867789939","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3094803,0.01662075,0.0016426356,0.41386858,0.0010290346,0.000027038044,0.00003422623,0.00003736958,0.25726005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96859443,0.0028888467,0.00023527203,0.01861417,0.00035395395,0.000014350316,0.000007427528,0.000013197533,0.009278291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967313,0.0022789948,0.000037557937,0.00013039558,0.00027328735,0.00054847874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969598,0.0018259649,0.00040195714,0.0001414593,0.00017187814,0.00049901207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003051413,0.00015198259,0.00016564156,0.00086585066,0.011427735,0.006230488,0.0006068633,0.0041610426,0.003919404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049162316,0.00016212014,0.00018626217,0.0007711518,0.033549394,0.0051643173,0.005005741,0.004476044,0.00022121107],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003361858,0.0000784476,0.004979612,0.000045410823,0.0000058741853,0.0011859811,0.14279112,0.00011954522,0.00015686566,0.79061085,0.027038492,0.032954223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030199062,0.00012608132,0.012114724,0.00057922234,0.000014673057,0.0014725024,0.29793,0.00033723353,0.00083206774,0.20143005,0.48509035,0.000042890017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014633907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02407449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014633907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057847695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039760466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041971624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971833369","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103635","title":"Lawless Sovereignty: Challenging the State of Exception","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"State of exception; Sovereignty; Undoing; State (computer science); Law; Power (physics); Lawlessness; Economic Justice; Sovereign state; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Physics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.06294519964535146,"score_gpt":0.3881065053250788,"score_spread":0.32516130567972734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971833369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16774414,0.018239481,0.014753548,0.13461956,0.00057287555,0.000027471213,0.000025472173,0.0000632733,0.66395414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843174,0.0018654554,0.0008723467,0.0033317877,0.0001939209,0.00002414912,0.0000072943817,0.000025787855,0.009361752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966221,0.0022305576,0.0000610748,0.00026768734,0.0004252744,0.00039326426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997013,0.002251419,0.0002312723,0.00025030595,0.00013131194,0.00012264331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037547823,0.0002664835,0.00047344455,0.001109194,0.005895332,0.008522739,0.0011708066,0.0035094216,0.0012449962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068711834,0.00021582058,0.00024476735,0.0008826303,0.051558994,0.006711466,0.0073107705,0.0071356166,0.00017320244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033858007,0.0000020296454,0.000055130335,0.000014216916,0.0000011176254,0.000101536636,0.021323312,0.00007478565,0.000066041415,0.97597605,0.0010925706,0.0012898401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011667745,0.000014494966,0.0005560457,0.00036341572,0.0000060699967,0.00017304688,0.011765235,0.00055729377,0.00022816566,0.7987782,0.18753108,0.000015296311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008277146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088252295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008522739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031552238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03880924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974427809","doi":"10.1177/0964663913513218","title":"<i>Caveat Emptor</i> Under Prudentialism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Industry Canada","keywords":"Caveat emptor; Context (archaeology); Business; Duty; Politics; Consumption (sociology); Disadvantage; Doctrine; Service (business); Law and economics; Law; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04236137167316315,"score_gpt":0.28925895578046157,"score_spread":0.24689758410729842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974427809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026307132,0.004315081,0.02676573,0.30539006,0.0022048012,0.000100452955,0.00032114855,0.00019175395,0.6344039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.816502,0.0017446326,0.0092928065,0.118544236,0.0029148024,0.00032515466,0.000109416,0.00008111427,0.050485898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861028,0.0041501545,0.0008045799,0.0022392161,0.005457383,0.0012458713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98293847,0.0077007925,0.0022954566,0.0035165562,0.003135368,0.00041335242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010656105,0.0002275763,0.00039996352,0.0006501179,0.0041621435,0.0066310824,0.0021264418,0.0056259576,0.0064896154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026067857,0.00022224212,0.00063421426,0.0009602019,0.040717065,0.00600064,0.0033915865,0.008796495,0.0013741036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065673057,0.000006673621,0.00033974048,0.000018070956,0.0000029598682,0.00003813255,0.001065511,0.0000452112,0.000054667333,0.9832373,0.012900992,0.0022841673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014978302,0.0000315114,0.002080545,0.0002654555,0.000012508612,0.00037899878,0.001648368,0.00045572896,0.0005577702,0.76636976,0.22814886,0.000035652276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022231253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016928881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022231253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004431722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072021396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056355536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978841390","doi":"10.1177/0964663904047333","title":"Risky Spaces and Dangerous Faces: Urban Surveillance, Social Disorder andCCTV","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Panopticon; Sociology; The Imaginary; Public space; Metaphor; Elite; Psychoanalytic theory; Public relations; Criminology; Political science; Law; Politics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.029925554789377435,"score_gpt":0.34249650980965335,"score_spread":0.31257095502027593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978841390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9558045,0.0018556284,0.00096306705,0.007003873,0.000033166816,0.000020668176,0.00002953853,0.000007061077,0.034282427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941766,0.00029447887,0.000048645932,0.00007129971,0.000014055434,0.0000038738094,0.0000040472623,6.0993557e-7,0.00014539593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852103,0.00082660257,0.00005950698,0.000104199935,0.00019735128,0.0002912585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777967,0.0009387007,0.0008177438,0.00008750708,0.00009716802,0.00027916484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008373561,0.00019713801,0.00021501971,0.0018898849,0.002640711,0.0029963253,0.00046234083,0.00084781897,0.0016791567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034098886,0.00011554897,0.0001579359,0.0011529016,0.017301286,0.0021894148,0.0050514787,0.0011098483,0.00005380494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016694186,0.00043212497,0.2883497,0.00020563534,0.000042418622,0.0021167211,0.291943,0.00082420063,0.00052634766,0.3503359,0.002281323,0.062775634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023964049,0.00015874862,0.3223902,0.00031793368,0.000037401358,0.0035893887,0.5419395,0.0015067466,0.00039972362,0.112918966,0.016663158,0.000054323507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0090187155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011962095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090187155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021144815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011828527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017932475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980815080","doi":"10.1177/096466390201100401","title":"Policing Property and Moral Risk Through Promotions, Anonymization and Rewards: Crime Stoppers Revisited","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Law enforcement; Morality; Business; Sociology; Enforcement; Criminology; Criminal law; Law; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.14402272930726745,"score_gpt":0.3986132438413767,"score_spread":0.25459051453410925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980815080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95089656,0.00058387563,0.0036915697,0.007547022,0.000039389415,0.00003929539,0.000019895862,0.000026807149,0.03715559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981851,0.00015262757,0.00025574988,0.000091574315,0.000008611225,0.0000048128754,0.0000028519369,0.0000048231677,0.0012939709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98845786,0.006062338,0.00017293791,0.0004975235,0.0032467265,0.001562513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123436,0.0044839047,0.0018951804,0.00052084494,0.0010512115,0.00081454817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049830144,0.00042130673,0.00037652155,0.0022284214,0.015185925,0.007872389,0.0010930581,0.0016388451,0.0018462191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013282396,0.0003684967,0.00018944427,0.002299282,0.04063906,0.004307009,0.0043588914,0.0030615781,0.000091022775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006142912,0.000052569183,0.023059051,0.00013262113,0.000012525967,0.00059146446,0.7938521,0.00041441497,0.0009777885,0.14335994,0.0016270829,0.035859004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015479209,0.00008326428,0.041334555,0.00022660465,0.000024623298,0.00045187227,0.8415184,0.00090871786,0.0011065917,0.018057328,0.09619044,0.00008209535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41590008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53752524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41590008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024678405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025669333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82695854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982297983","doi":"10.1177/0964663905049524","title":"Stages of Development: Marriage of Girls and Teens as an International Human Rights Issue","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Perspective (graphical); Scholarship; Political science; Diversity (politics); Child marriage; Cultural diversity; Order (exchange); International human rights law; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Population; Economics; Demography","score_opus":0.037035982499071876,"score_gpt":0.3946923784933713,"score_spread":0.35765639599429944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982297983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6640122,0.0062472704,0.0026127961,0.021617493,0.0003894174,0.00012538246,0.00006669632,0.000013643918,0.30491507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98949546,0.0015869102,0.00039365762,0.0009620247,0.0000423934,0.000040634837,0.000016260594,0.000009840742,0.00745289],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997883,0.0012246931,0.000056782545,0.00009841562,0.00018456011,0.00055258546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998629,0.0004951849,0.000277975,0.000052633575,0.00012144198,0.0004238483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029299064,0.00017373885,0.00022598963,0.00057787,0.006492014,0.0050151334,0.00048355607,0.0013352857,0.0031998556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042046728,0.0002108334,0.00028986527,0.00054014,0.008734924,0.003812085,0.007726291,0.0030202314,0.0001778097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003664474,0.0000666246,0.020840658,0.000045372766,0.0000071190107,0.00201317,0.50867605,0.000040933646,0.0005284122,0.450288,0.002289819,0.015167227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002888757,0.00015440262,0.031837467,0.0005676508,0.000022503435,0.0020246846,0.7092257,0.0002023037,0.0010403622,0.04388784,0.21097773,0.000030480089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012224705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02092776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012224705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021826166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030067132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024307072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984149805","doi":"10.1177/0964663908089610","title":"Risk in Action: the Practical Effects of the Youth Management Assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Action (physics); Risk management; Risk governance; Process (computing); Risk assessment; Criminology; Population; Public relations; Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Business; Psychology; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07750564683798568,"score_gpt":0.42278303576560633,"score_spread":0.34527738892762067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984149805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2884361,0.0048330333,0.13376114,0.104941234,0.00085818063,0.0009351886,0.000079212055,0.0005596182,0.46559623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605806,0.0009401321,0.0312863,0.0019842056,0.00011292096,0.00028684307,0.000012234721,0.000051015453,0.004745908],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91810584,0.07183834,0.00092355866,0.0023218992,0.004823073,0.0019873227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609866,0.029927518,0.0028895212,0.0026245264,0.0015069346,0.0020648686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04902039,0.0008353517,0.00039453103,0.002430054,0.0090265395,0.011062771,0.0022176723,0.0037490022,0.0041880705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051125538,0.0005477246,0.0006056158,0.0008072793,0.050658632,0.011207997,0.018717466,0.0047808364,0.0005311501],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010293803,0.00043717175,0.021246346,0.00043519362,0.000041496394,0.0016054661,0.4171296,0.0012553043,0.0015823372,0.39993033,0.0060855024,0.15014838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012351872,0.0007328212,0.013939267,0.0020420037,0.0000815311,0.002657186,0.36510783,0.0049085454,0.0027416805,0.33072978,0.27674636,0.00018951182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065475474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071150796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04902039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00536597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011560454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25924772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985158155","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103623","title":"Underage Sex and Romance in Japanese Homoerotic Manga and Anime","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Romance; Comics; Censorship; Harm; Anime; Sociology; Relation (database); Gender studies; Law; Literature; History; Psychology; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02930708131980642,"score_gpt":0.3345436728370814,"score_spread":0.305236591517275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985158155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93232656,0.0012142753,0.0002441662,0.0006194428,0.00003735668,0.000007830049,0.000011474937,0.0000059514164,0.065533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951703,0.00027414787,0.00008854721,0.00006927803,0.000010375597,0.000004727111,0.0000061661094,0.0000049737864,0.004371478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934894,0.00030657332,0.000023680539,0.00006941272,0.00008621984,0.00016514483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991412,0.00032596334,0.00020558035,0.000080704056,0.000058873866,0.0001876744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009190964,0.00035932945,0.00037349714,0.0009069856,0.006258626,0.00466082,0.0003252311,0.00091191486,0.00455665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002207478,0.00028473613,0.00014161578,0.00072125683,0.011642626,0.0027496258,0.0037929327,0.0010861336,0.00030281485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055329197,0.00006034202,0.016016511,0.00007288953,0.000008817611,0.0011999524,0.9397734,0.000019892408,0.0011415071,0.033941634,0.00066325354,0.007046454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015460982,0.00010134829,0.082526155,0.00013460043,0.000033440185,0.0012824251,0.85161716,0.00019829166,0.00059434277,0.006566624,0.056888856,0.000041312454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008240438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023936149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008240438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011365651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006727348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01638496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989352611","doi":"10.1177/09646639080170011102","title":"Book Reviews: DAVID M. ENGEL AND FRANK W. MUNGER, Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003, 274 pp., ISBN: 0226208311, £12 (pbk)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Identity (music); Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Art; Gender studies","score_opus":0.045117018343696504,"score_gpt":0.33281594055626235,"score_spread":0.2876989222125658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989352611","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017247623,0.9407836,0.0007192811,0.013118423,0.0100885,0.000049298393,0.0006488246,0.00015203985,0.034267493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021780252,0.8388936,0.0010802214,0.0063346433,0.006013944,0.0001098439,0.0009294586,0.00016287735,0.14429738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949086,0.00008678634,0.00004961474,0.00007711218,0.00025719655,0.000038413084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978115,0.0011125096,0.0001883884,0.00005647993,0.00066250254,0.00016854334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007995345,0.0027239928,0.002285186,0.0051411036,0.001265897,0.0032132477,0.0019040004,0.002542372,0.06584264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002858102,0.0008667442,0.000623577,0.008093569,0.0011412394,0.005360705,0.0013501066,0.002993186,0.06071084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012227077,0.000010078382,0.000029803079,0.00079602236,0.0000059746044,0.000025037707,0.0001527412,0.000054751672,0.000048312653,0.001244691,0.9530186,0.044601854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009206228,0.000009204692,0.00033787527,0.0014918573,0.000012505982,0.00019108348,0.00018734812,0.00003188247,0.000043200587,0.0012979873,0.9963726,0.000015271446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012753548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024090132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06584264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017341304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023308496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22026557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993124795","doi":"10.1177/0964663910376339","title":"The Constitutionalization of Employment Relations: Multiple Models, Pernicious Problems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); State (computer science); Globalization; Liberalism; Sociology; Industrial relations; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.04953321720349892,"score_gpt":0.3394603730910945,"score_spread":0.2899271558875956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993124795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048854236,0.033716757,0.09927274,0.6217821,0.0025323455,0.000095909185,0.00015965477,0.00016240438,0.19342382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600011,0.0062771076,0.010826803,0.012832971,0.0035388628,0.00028901763,0.000058024943,0.00009357542,0.0060824878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95651776,0.028937502,0.0015061637,0.0045901663,0.0061552273,0.0022931432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659358,0.023699326,0.0021624484,0.0049437135,0.0018423008,0.0014163367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043601334,0.00075927976,0.0017302278,0.0022059043,0.010428319,0.022573015,0.00514266,0.009278347,0.003722674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039299164,0.0008446247,0.0012816412,0.003068359,0.09863068,0.033555668,0.011443459,0.017202746,0.0005131843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002295849,0.0000057595626,0.000036622954,0.000010725723,0.000001347885,0.000006454712,0.0005493595,0.00013829018,0.000007154643,0.9975661,0.000418333,0.0012576781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060150605,0.0000042214415,0.000060963892,0.00004851351,0.0000020449993,0.000011780893,0.00064405246,0.00037583377,0.000021408054,0.9905709,0.008246353,0.000007797343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006100961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037795692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043601334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015802521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009458811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23058867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994679269","doi":"10.1177/0964663911406000","title":"Law Reform, Lesbian Parenting, and the Reflective Claim","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Law reform; Normative; Family law; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political science; Sexual orientation; Law and economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1960715381609999,"score_gpt":0.41249889703093495,"score_spread":0.21642735886993505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994679269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.442483,0.012439684,0.008290477,0.20286979,0.00076467934,0.00009409229,0.000019012467,0.000040556293,0.33299863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863018,0.0013499843,0.0007982368,0.006283704,0.00009782529,0.000034183067,0.0000047148546,0.000010359775,0.005119267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97540957,0.020016255,0.00033931926,0.0009444566,0.0017360518,0.0015544519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836451,0.010381289,0.0028223493,0.0012589488,0.0009360596,0.0009562556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019328523,0.0003539901,0.0004514552,0.001309057,0.019662557,0.011181843,0.0012441344,0.005255867,0.0028014036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025403727,0.000393037,0.0002856497,0.0012960278,0.080217294,0.0075394944,0.009094916,0.007622158,0.00022485288],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010443635,0.00006322378,0.0028089453,0.000042593067,0.0000041680323,0.00065251405,0.35343698,0.000067620014,0.00012710497,0.6312944,0.0019340998,0.0095579075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002677714,0.00012637321,0.0066526122,0.0010376191,0.000021359187,0.0011284057,0.54740626,0.0003067493,0.00058235694,0.24335708,0.19930054,0.000053827633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020233095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024169708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020233095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008288388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098929005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10222018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999604972","doi":"10.1177/0964663914544900","title":"Individual Rights and the Negotiation of Governmental Power","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Norm (philosophy); Power (physics); Population; Criminal law; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01878231625247111,"score_gpt":0.3170622048360965,"score_spread":0.29827988858362536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999604972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09800885,0.0018337794,0.037125695,0.02813627,0.00027379597,0.00009549664,0.000026339703,0.000052651918,0.83444726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98808265,0.00030415642,0.0017834248,0.00064941053,0.00006677938,0.00004490913,0.0000080389045,0.000024695277,0.009035966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760248,0.0146993315,0.0005844565,0.002054546,0.0038787127,0.0027582678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880851,0.0066807554,0.0013116384,0.0017027918,0.0013113958,0.0009084834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01538817,0.00046363042,0.0005033495,0.0023457934,0.011357559,0.011896763,0.0018748894,0.00451943,0.004737136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01982429,0.00037578147,0.00057375414,0.0015450072,0.09806768,0.010285496,0.009601428,0.004453888,0.00043333624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021354053,0.0000037833945,0.00012771631,0.0000039887127,0.0000018948091,0.000030327934,0.0048492155,0.000093511815,0.000028683642,0.9934633,0.00018226479,0.0012132743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011081142,0.00000911729,0.0003435634,0.00005155164,0.0000051898046,0.000047366306,0.0056317663,0.00030369483,0.00014740965,0.9646329,0.028804336,0.000011992134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019309534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012621181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019309534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011391028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011426292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0826481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999703210","doi":"10.1177/0964663905051225","title":"Corporatism and Legal Education in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Context (archaeology); Legal education; Political science; Hierarchy; Power (physics); Period (music); Law; Relation (database); Space (punctuation); Sociology; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.04297319922867225,"score_gpt":0.4026846579921464,"score_spread":0.35971145876347416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999703210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3531025,0.02584423,0.00078060717,0.12656516,0.00086885336,0.000120084565,0.00040491336,0.00010316772,0.4922104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93200046,0.0068356697,0.0005379868,0.007420053,0.00010474864,0.000024093863,0.00010826725,0.00003054645,0.052938104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963613,0.0003795673,0.00007794884,0.00027679524,0.0010225707,0.0018818962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945544,0.0009728797,0.00040868364,0.00009006324,0.0015475908,0.0024263992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016648831,0.0001920769,0.0003678998,0.0018354519,0.026015857,0.005843738,0.0015425421,0.0020332963,0.0114320675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005880901,0.00033645733,0.0002609469,0.0041648103,0.010691695,0.0013724616,0.0029454133,0.0038257665,0.0002495126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008871347,0.00025900258,0.026288016,0.0004553529,0.000039154293,0.0011047199,0.05248238,0.0013793167,0.00051246217,0.7159396,0.07434919,0.12710214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007780795,0.00010692198,0.14716665,0.0011789027,0.00006168519,0.00029711684,0.057156138,0.001387244,0.0005205379,0.02440003,0.76750326,0.00014368248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79931545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20068452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3391914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9270927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006794278","doi":"10.1177/09646639030123005","title":"`Some Strange Things Happening in our Country': Opposing Proposed Changes in Anti-Cruelty Laws in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Legislation; Opposition (politics); Animal welfare; Ideology; Law; Sociology; Animal rights; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.045866471965917,"score_gpt":0.34280832411932854,"score_spread":0.29694185215341157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006794278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77071613,0.002141322,0.00065973366,0.10612238,0.00032313066,0.00011274297,0.00011722174,0.00002615625,0.11978103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96703255,0.0008314217,0.00028584615,0.011859226,0.000024377347,0.00001761268,0.000024200444,0.000011741931,0.019912964],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435,0.00088834355,0.000084505264,0.00033398054,0.00149392,0.0028493165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947444,0.0015571269,0.00041598172,0.00009362874,0.001949723,0.0012390678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003696713,0.00024513333,0.00027576982,0.0010171705,0.038872313,0.008891742,0.0020437604,0.0047160205,0.0027257823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009279812,0.0003363677,0.0003267406,0.0015253731,0.012657844,0.0011371803,0.0028312006,0.006193885,0.00013118632],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039372133,0.00024687644,0.0647271,0.00033548966,0.00013615057,0.004680853,0.41340485,0.0025751344,0.0056206696,0.35429537,0.09119063,0.062393125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008652386,0.00015009126,0.08463729,0.0002744877,0.00014093396,0.00022267445,0.46875358,0.0018489626,0.0023579963,0.010654778,0.43057755,0.0002949929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15593201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15593201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19920799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97899926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007523945","doi":"10.1177/0964663908100335","title":"Love, Freedom and Governance: Same-Sex Marriage in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Sociology; Liberalism; Corporate governance; Meaning (existential); Law; State (computer science); Gender studies; Political science; Politics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028586965676639018,"score_gpt":0.35647341931301746,"score_spread":0.3278864536363784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007523945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63316697,0.011031638,0.0019086363,0.08053766,0.00035220681,0.00014444473,0.00033080898,0.00003816517,0.27248946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749017,0.00267156,0.00040337388,0.0030076914,0.000020909038,0.000018957924,0.00004476212,0.000011676485,0.018919375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731183,0.00041218495,0.000055203614,0.00021586125,0.00067534304,0.0013296601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770504,0.00047861636,0.00013501495,0.0000705631,0.00055358396,0.0010573221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018599373,0.00017714805,0.00045170402,0.0011329608,0.039352056,0.008380655,0.0016679998,0.0024110659,0.0068134307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039035566,0.00027091714,0.00029748358,0.002998772,0.013339656,0.0021829065,0.004542531,0.0038630166,0.00017521082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066105524,0.00009458006,0.024109278,0.00014702884,0.000022720673,0.0014376914,0.21837321,0.0007612886,0.00052311056,0.6877219,0.018673575,0.048069455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004450562,0.00005816841,0.07683569,0.00044922432,0.000044112305,0.0004731896,0.41007185,0.001971722,0.00060932507,0.045175415,0.46407676,0.00019001936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99917907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18752079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18752079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21504046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9423607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007899616","doi":"10.1177/0964663908100336","title":"Unknowable Bodies, Unthinkable Sexualities: Lesbian and Transgender Legal Invisibility in the Toronto Women's Bathhouse Raid","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Invisibility; Queer; Transgender; Gender studies; Human sexuality; Closet; Subjectivity; Ignorance; Sociology; Identity (music); Sexual orientation; Sexual identity; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; History; Art","score_opus":0.08758593279636244,"score_gpt":0.39103278055361745,"score_spread":0.303446847757255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007899616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8433782,0.004045451,0.00050763105,0.043520324,0.00016192418,0.000052354295,0.000044348566,0.00001296129,0.10827674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98332006,0.00149609,0.000116494266,0.0023631793,0.000029695173,0.000016387445,0.0000091647225,0.000006153643,0.012642891],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653256,0.0013241217,0.000099704564,0.00019581207,0.0007041075,0.0011437576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688965,0.0017156432,0.00044149102,0.00010719488,0.0002418703,0.0006042114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024238222,0.0003314982,0.00033942523,0.0011561965,0.041028585,0.008353262,0.0014187605,0.0044030277,0.0046646222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006012594,0.0006609329,0.00025885302,0.001111323,0.040787637,0.0029471475,0.010615928,0.007508829,0.0002025224],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015089216,0.00002325571,0.004095131,0.00004343326,0.0000031784527,0.0041264608,0.92916733,0.000044161054,0.0003018563,0.05620268,0.0026425838,0.0033348189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057664256,0.000019302004,0.005794209,0.00015203618,0.000010096157,0.000727227,0.9615965,0.000060747432,0.00021484174,0.0024853938,0.02891283,0.000021079337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.859721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9490601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.140279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048383843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032144472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35105103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009870025","doi":"10.1177/0964663907082734","title":"Security and Migration Law in the Less Brave New World","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Securitization; Law; Political science; Irregular migration; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.056717541701839305,"score_gpt":0.3800063519771836,"score_spread":0.3232888102753443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009870025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5472348,0.013231532,0.0018496184,0.104734816,0.0006476111,0.00003419429,0.0000371965,0.000025508598,0.33220482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97354907,0.0032885286,0.00035564016,0.007749963,0.00025064647,0.000017441158,0.000019189007,0.000012231019,0.014757284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998271,0.00068978796,0.00007430924,0.00016349615,0.0002844685,0.0005170214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997846,0.000837724,0.00058341294,0.00016072186,0.00019905338,0.00037304292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022741552,0.00019669172,0.00022721574,0.0018600585,0.007997783,0.010094607,0.00061306125,0.004300893,0.0025547394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045334883,0.00018667325,0.00022239493,0.0018120446,0.030708468,0.008317627,0.004769431,0.0049846056,0.00017380364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016780665,0.00004628997,0.0036038994,0.00004128399,0.0000060713783,0.0007723472,0.036345024,0.00035266147,0.00033895986,0.9391783,0.0049208477,0.01437767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034631175,0.00008267594,0.028877871,0.00075623376,0.000016669836,0.0012589534,0.09900027,0.00074168714,0.0003975891,0.4389832,0.42974344,0.00010677595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055449728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08809908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055449728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008167482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070190597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11025393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016130993","doi":"10.1177/0964663909345093","title":"Promoting Equality? Gendered Messages in State Materials for New Immigrants","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Socialization; State (computer science); Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.07418518093480381,"score_gpt":0.39989472481902677,"score_spread":0.32570954388422296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016130993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74443746,0.0012206745,0.0037398299,0.029255072,0.000834032,0.00016097752,0.00006681581,0.00013699272,0.22014816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751585,0.0006692505,0.0016128159,0.0012753229,0.0001960161,0.00008522305,0.000026745442,0.00003952822,0.020936592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974802,0.001895446,0.000075229575,0.000066726534,0.0002591721,0.00022318949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967212,0.0022708445,0.0003184559,0.00020323103,0.00018962736,0.0002966654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004088716,0.0002446887,0.00023105151,0.0008590332,0.0069329664,0.0051185274,0.00047019674,0.0017135075,0.012125908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075391093,0.0001854912,0.0001712641,0.0005412994,0.0050201616,0.0042837146,0.004739067,0.0014918915,0.0008650433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001224633,0.0004961131,0.0049160207,0.00026361988,0.000005948703,0.0007199095,0.72230417,0.00014181597,0.0029281883,0.12095856,0.011955402,0.1351879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047856298,0.00043820418,0.00699025,0.0008048421,0.000021956917,0.00040396297,0.58181304,0.00031200214,0.0035149185,0.011833164,0.39377096,0.00004887922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033881085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008383045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012125908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016991219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021686514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040565193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016504961","doi":"10.1177/0964663912465638","title":"‘Look, a Faggot!’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Cognitive dissonance; Queer; Neutrality; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Law; Judicial restraint; Consonance and dissonance; Trespass; Rationality; Trope (literature); Homicide; Sexual orientation; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Judicial activism; Poison control; Political science; Judicial review; Social psychology; Suicide prevention; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0704233806679287,"score_gpt":0.3881979947561112,"score_spread":0.3177746140881825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016504961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10055236,0.005128974,0.011213676,0.09120116,0.0021769118,0.000048610007,0.00008102969,0.00019807884,0.78939927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9017061,0.00090509315,0.0013794567,0.01559129,0.00037367828,0.000025771213,0.000041203177,0.0001249527,0.07985253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760455,0.0013308383,0.000037025773,0.00020508024,0.00050605787,0.0003165199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998317,0.00096879434,0.00016155922,0.00011939949,0.00031654755,0.000116613366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016880134,0.00035519424,0.00019224345,0.0007644701,0.0074575157,0.004508519,0.00078165834,0.0027607305,0.007665033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007170178,0.0001838617,0.00020099554,0.00041397975,0.014241231,0.0044834316,0.0021845617,0.004788227,0.0019194859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037219357,0.00002196665,0.0007130698,0.0000956325,0.000007414667,0.0010362823,0.3725392,0.00006305834,0.0010093568,0.5266713,0.074904844,0.022900583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086572345,0.000044432516,0.0013914552,0.00020268066,0.000008463903,0.0007181468,0.14080901,0.00019675627,0.00071966264,0.032399233,0.8234667,0.000034673452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013925192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020591123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013925192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021838737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009993698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027688265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021268188","doi":"10.1177/0964663908093966","title":"Enclosure, Common Right and the Property of the Poor","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Gentrification; Property (philosophy); Politics; Injustice; Law and economics; Collective action; Property rights; Sociology; Praxis; Political science; Political economy; Law; Economics; Economic growth; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04064070657454038,"score_gpt":0.3024711120884175,"score_spread":0.2618304055138771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021268188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72343963,0.004654475,0.0029462867,0.04446034,0.000047454952,0.000018487024,0.0000863403,0.00001432154,0.22433265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688524,0.0003969215,0.00010061842,0.00033021727,0.000007711544,0.0000033282715,0.000004639787,0.0000017851963,0.0022694615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838793,0.00073723495,0.000028040973,0.00011966824,0.00015666317,0.0005704802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835783,0.00068307,0.00028899376,0.00017012365,0.000115506424,0.00038437056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015763929,0.00008803127,0.00025016698,0.00083813636,0.006962375,0.0050523197,0.00041433587,0.0012097453,0.0028399401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031704456,0.00013493821,0.0001177967,0.0011135478,0.040340997,0.004701265,0.005079765,0.001358447,0.00010642298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019319661,0.000015465239,0.009389517,0.000030930434,0.0000064705046,0.0001741046,0.02758803,0.0003958599,0.00010649716,0.9541731,0.0015661049,0.00653462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015644944,0.00005223189,0.042696178,0.0003000186,0.000012281284,0.00034707526,0.10108214,0.000608187,0.00027189666,0.75452024,0.100060105,0.00003394233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06940979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124135114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06940979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005265136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002816589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13801157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029487789","doi":"10.1177/0964663909345096","title":"Signs of the Surveillant Assemblage: Privacy Regulation, Urban CCTV, and Governmentality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Assemblage (archaeology); Signage; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Panopticon; Corporate governance; Law; Internet privacy; Politics; Computer security; Political science; Advertising; Business; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.03218669836749183,"score_gpt":0.3322910759439284,"score_spread":0.3001043775764366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029487789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040897,0.00079405884,0.0045895968,0.0034837183,0.000031130287,0.000048436563,0.0000761879,0.000024529887,0.08686261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839056,0.00016197177,0.00054779404,0.000035023342,0.0000070680335,0.000014825263,0.000020323301,0.000005700036,0.0008168131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703777,0.0017104199,0.00013158661,0.00019073498,0.00054601714,0.0003834456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936731,0.0028765453,0.0020223917,0.00042104925,0.0006460387,0.00036083558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017311167,0.00021059152,0.00030071783,0.0025602267,0.003557749,0.007103841,0.0008568325,0.00096580415,0.0039787255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009111135,0.0002734504,0.00019489136,0.0031065086,0.013329319,0.005075371,0.004806574,0.0012682811,0.00017571842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016575112,0.00014748058,0.12724118,0.0001998972,0.00002886094,0.0011877718,0.20212822,0.002270932,0.0020349887,0.5947713,0.0023090558,0.06751462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019981702,0.00020962325,0.2505429,0.00068925635,0.00006995763,0.0008189651,0.5971458,0.0055535575,0.0025632596,0.086607315,0.055653267,0.00012613105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017945156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04074494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017945156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004890471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025816506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035681427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036802468","doi":"10.1177/0964663905054907","title":"Genealogies of the Land: Aboriginality, Law, and Territory in Vancouver’s Stanley Park","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Politics; Law; Sociology; Colonialism; Political science","score_opus":0.026841886250354358,"score_gpt":0.3540512609578963,"score_spread":0.32720937470754197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036802468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9060253,0.0044763107,0.00024048236,0.008262937,0.000049850896,0.00005733465,0.00017351435,0.000014700903,0.080699526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98108727,0.0015186551,0.00020636145,0.0008960172,0.0000062013587,0.00001722777,0.00009263816,0.000010675911,0.016164936],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816495,0.00031587874,0.000052322666,0.00019506844,0.00059293845,0.0006788517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997264,0.0009250724,0.00021651456,0.000087106746,0.00081332575,0.0006940462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010491102,0.0001740164,0.0002844618,0.0022659427,0.02932603,0.0075570336,0.001946115,0.0013634131,0.0033963027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035195765,0.00038255294,0.00012376907,0.0039295387,0.015024673,0.0011510141,0.002947488,0.0026340806,0.00016704717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088903544,0.00008314428,0.119302504,0.00027135314,0.00004346321,0.0057082195,0.6971164,0.00083600194,0.0012569274,0.08842387,0.020654798,0.066214375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014983635,0.00003411533,0.15343224,0.00031081788,0.00003384894,0.00068845076,0.7021917,0.00026430064,0.0003561591,0.004997264,0.13759327,0.00008291848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99488443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99905986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083793506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083793506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07215941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60796726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042331675","doi":"10.1177/0964663906063575","title":"Private Legal Orders: Professional Markets and the Commodification of Financial Governance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Commodification; Corporate governance; Normative; Arbitration; Politics; Legal profession; State (computer science); Law and economics; Economics; Accounting; Market economy; Business; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.01921330339391627,"score_gpt":0.26310155241093097,"score_spread":0.2438882490170147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042331675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33017284,0.0037833287,0.047757354,0.044981387,0.00016991013,0.00008265578,0.00008175992,0.00010370126,0.57286716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919911,0.00057018484,0.0014920396,0.0004917228,0.00011210048,0.000031052146,0.000011186675,0.000016857437,0.0052837105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433595,0.002852977,0.0001783216,0.00063389685,0.0013622511,0.0006366547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98662853,0.0077725393,0.001652115,0.0023405866,0.0008010197,0.0008051413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006762986,0.00020704398,0.0003500738,0.0020630704,0.0040710615,0.012431159,0.00093651924,0.0023840577,0.005345659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013187914,0.00026531957,0.00032456362,0.0018582809,0.054529097,0.01590154,0.0056485096,0.0024181136,0.0003562039],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004150701,0.000006393301,0.00025503,0.000008361378,9.769425e-7,0.000018314224,0.003610743,0.00013839081,0.000041744344,0.99074066,0.00031984603,0.004855393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011164039,0.000013376689,0.0010918438,0.00007573259,0.0000029671778,0.00005910318,0.004965623,0.0012358031,0.00014824342,0.9655497,0.026838548,0.000008001561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042241276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034230698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012431159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006475425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052055833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046982646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062375593","doi":"10.1177/0964663911418720","title":"Taking Exception: The Cases of Financial and Urban Governance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Sovereignty; Notice; Relevance (law); Rule of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.07090299127056233,"score_gpt":0.3542105310448829,"score_spread":0.2833075397743206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062375593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4699768,0.002173934,0.022794034,0.03443147,0.00020079837,0.000071518385,0.00008664667,0.00005912713,0.47020566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955142,0.00026828912,0.00060880964,0.00068908924,0.000044660435,0.00003454917,0.0000139382955,0.000007498666,0.0028188522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993294,0.0038399282,0.00018970194,0.00052826735,0.0007977942,0.0013503211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955117,0.0023799378,0.00084648584,0.00063895434,0.0002833148,0.00033961865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047393576,0.00025949648,0.0005291944,0.001482023,0.009098884,0.008051789,0.0012570514,0.0034819467,0.0022377125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008772439,0.00017820622,0.00056971837,0.0021625124,0.04550214,0.0064345133,0.00962688,0.0038917216,0.00015940088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009441754,0.0000061665833,0.001519709,0.000012042582,0.0000031337154,0.0005636289,0.0071090288,0.0002892274,0.000035963516,0.987887,0.0007496074,0.0018150856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031338754,0.000032434356,0.0063979453,0.00027703357,0.000031500233,0.0014138004,0.03924912,0.0024895219,0.0006494795,0.8519067,0.097474836,0.00004635231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013072089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012391881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013072089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033812209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025820816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025992036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069293253","doi":"10.1177/0964663907076533","title":"Reframing Medical Injury? Viewing People With Hemophilia as Victims of Cultural Injustice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Cognitive reframing; Politics; Compensation (psychology); Criminology; State (computer science); Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.021794789956808124,"score_gpt":0.3677792801025015,"score_spread":0.3459844901456934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069293253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85068846,0.005929919,0.00055334886,0.09798479,0.00058753666,0.000037146667,0.000032437434,0.000020453876,0.044166014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906557,0.0019188853,0.00008188078,0.0048211636,0.0001256276,0.000009342758,0.0000071334607,0.000005533506,0.00237465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963301,0.0025283613,0.00006067635,0.00012647847,0.00021257268,0.0007418383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998209,0.00059212826,0.00044584306,0.00011699015,0.00018973392,0.00044631568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024820275,0.0005942485,0.00046744852,0.001601219,0.01879135,0.0076395487,0.0011119705,0.0048938766,0.0029930493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049281754,0.00041788263,0.00038194493,0.001296097,0.02469274,0.008078516,0.005496667,0.0063540465,0.00026356932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072092903,0.000026887396,0.0033896666,0.000022966533,0.000005507092,0.00087647204,0.97916996,0.000011070856,0.000095377196,0.012533695,0.001594547,0.0022666065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004500356,0.000025154986,0.0017469766,0.000090132446,0.00000962856,0.0008080377,0.9811276,0.00003485955,0.000058029567,0.0022212148,0.013863165,0.000010612609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063150935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075181164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063150935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059851194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049458025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12556672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072955835","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103634","title":"Accommodating Power: the `Common Sense' of Regulators","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Corporate governance; Ideology; Enforcement; Politics; Financial crisis; Power (physics); Law and economics; Law; Business; Public relations; Political economy; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04321765185327824,"score_gpt":0.2922271616844744,"score_spread":0.24900950983119613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072955835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16840424,0.004691494,0.22881304,0.2053387,0.0016747856,0.00027625647,0.00004277061,0.00036285084,0.39039588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878177,0.00045183615,0.0038144172,0.004498377,0.0002642937,0.000093933,0.000012107097,0.00006204874,0.0029853254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87895226,0.079049975,0.0036091441,0.00945361,0.018688876,0.010246209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90263593,0.061284475,0.009204778,0.012005471,0.009349214,0.005520081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.094470985,0.0011994266,0.001612417,0.004965684,0.017446522,0.030811442,0.0048614135,0.014196262,0.002837439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09402439,0.0012206854,0.0013400197,0.0029354459,0.1384268,0.031932887,0.02290436,0.015725488,0.00053758966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002118268,0.00002439605,0.0012728168,0.000059803813,0.00003180018,0.0002172307,0.0874117,0.000735087,0.00045275324,0.8981764,0.0019448297,0.0096520465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003988014,0.00006791102,0.000569799,0.00027682856,0.00003248215,0.00018843624,0.051518455,0.001281546,0.00044812693,0.8567658,0.08871148,0.000099178724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004624972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002326477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094470985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008599707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019046666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49961627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074788000","doi":"10.1177/0964663904042554","title":"Resisting Neo-Liberalism: the Poisoned Water Disaster in Walkerton, Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Resistance (ecology); Politics; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Environmental governance; Power (physics); Hegemony; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Environmental ethics; Political science; Corporate governance; Political economy; History; Economics","score_opus":0.0482825791388401,"score_gpt":0.2710686036909216,"score_spread":0.22278602455208152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074788000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90243006,0.00079105847,0.00034637543,0.032632153,0.00008553516,0.00008362094,0.00011951423,0.000020857462,0.063490875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96091664,0.00085172965,0.0002140216,0.0032824283,0.000017351884,0.000034583194,0.000056643756,0.000020225578,0.034606438],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829036,0.00034946878,0.000026845511,0.00013373562,0.00050031894,0.000699183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975654,0.00054531504,0.0003188752,0.00011692342,0.00064743496,0.0008061902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012958365,0.00016594383,0.00027462377,0.00060437346,0.026991393,0.00397273,0.0012415722,0.0023497136,0.002661291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029930866,0.00032209794,0.00014897592,0.0017258108,0.01176162,0.0012821326,0.0029877753,0.0022661735,0.00014636888],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020903855,0.00009522013,0.042065006,0.00018487251,0.000024096506,0.00997565,0.82415605,0.00068524893,0.0035810848,0.055646684,0.038813297,0.02456367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029578023,0.000066721885,0.08226701,0.00010336324,0.000013578507,0.00038091143,0.6096049,0.000383261,0.0007601424,0.004368496,0.30194405,0.000078050725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98736495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09610994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09610994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10027293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6973297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079334135","doi":"10.1177/0964663908100332","title":"From Incarceration to Restoration: National Responsibility, Gender and the Production of Cultural Difference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Colonialism; Ideology; Meaning (existential); Political science; Criminal justice; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Law; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06687046439152625,"score_gpt":0.39455325619605625,"score_spread":0.32768279180452997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079334135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8813909,0.0029385367,0.0008511899,0.01842712,0.00015599211,0.00001649247,0.000030471874,0.000007052293,0.096182264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975305,0.0005258536,0.000120953526,0.00031930805,0.000011263957,0.000004851392,0.0000030656697,0.000004228853,0.0014799002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758244,0.0014452765,0.000039781906,0.00017536823,0.00034437023,0.0004126237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965969,0.0018463548,0.00057555095,0.00015321533,0.0003616982,0.00046622608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027668471,0.0001446039,0.0002165736,0.000684308,0.004260563,0.0050403182,0.00079690083,0.0006801802,0.0035751755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008637059,0.00011628336,0.00012406755,0.00079091475,0.020428462,0.0027379522,0.0036988277,0.0017789637,0.00012522748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007853851,0.00009021685,0.024821589,0.00007455752,0.000016737818,0.00051117665,0.7613864,0.00008913246,0.0003752692,0.18022688,0.001526195,0.030803315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012369356,0.00006947907,0.06267375,0.00032707446,0.000024989124,0.00036505147,0.84924513,0.0001823334,0.00038214584,0.05988322,0.026796171,0.0000382784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082428634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13141632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082428634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058689094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066149263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1638977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085295168","doi":"10.1177/0964663909346194","title":"(M)Others in Altered States: Prenatal Drug-Use, Risk, Choice, and Responsible Self-Governance","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Politics; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Limiting; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Political science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Criminology; Law; Business","score_opus":0.01231653616054541,"score_gpt":0.2934995606474597,"score_spread":0.2811830244869143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085295168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52256006,0.0023022555,0.010156255,0.09909196,0.0002913566,0.000057168123,0.000055347035,0.000030166653,0.36545545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99528,0.0003122737,0.00039566567,0.0012172452,0.000024467448,0.000009162649,0.0000032333812,0.0000033881054,0.0027546312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985948,0.00094289635,0.00002834396,0.000112683054,0.00013211528,0.00018916321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988201,0.00052153907,0.00024143532,0.0001519767,0.000085415675,0.0001794883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00232363,0.000105566796,0.000098160315,0.0003883255,0.0036219093,0.0038222536,0.00036922935,0.0013884379,0.0023622394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002427152,0.00009013742,0.00015398585,0.0002656157,0.027820231,0.0029258176,0.0032472613,0.0016058006,0.00012120729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014483344,0.00003503955,0.009444029,0.000028099543,0.000006522659,0.00032004758,0.11049329,0.00021980968,0.0002590107,0.8657879,0.002709336,0.010682429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021152915,0.00008099653,0.026873907,0.0002671657,0.00002320576,0.0011001946,0.25182003,0.0010866679,0.0010037383,0.5545018,0.16317277,0.000048516205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008753895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011617368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008753895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016499615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016568328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017405868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085439619","doi":"10.1177/0964663910378434","title":"Between a Hunch and a Hard Place: Making Suspicion Reasonable at the Canadian Border","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Scrutiny; Objectivity (philosophy); Empirical research; Sociology; Law; Sketch; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.06945951445316405,"score_gpt":0.408517035797288,"score_spread":0.3390575213441239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085439619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50843036,0.0056517986,0.008285215,0.099905394,0.0003420659,0.0001314763,0.0002742943,0.00007787708,0.37690142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917429,0.0008996848,0.0008198507,0.0015559798,0.000017044596,0.000007465701,0.000027912683,0.000015306503,0.004913794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98785865,0.0032468492,0.00034234204,0.001032502,0.00449395,0.0030258046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861735,0.004275952,0.0011925901,0.0006571953,0.005309512,0.0023912988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008408563,0.0003726235,0.00059798016,0.003484848,0.044282127,0.019812671,0.0027150733,0.004083933,0.0056767887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031406283,0.0006987253,0.00053699146,0.0036005685,0.040544394,0.006360083,0.00869059,0.0058810576,0.00038742644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000139052,0.000050467355,0.030583696,0.00017486137,0.000055394048,0.0021776902,0.38141042,0.0008785985,0.0011078396,0.5197982,0.019340884,0.044282794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005564044,0.000068434994,0.074527375,0.0011019214,0.00014538069,0.0006289379,0.57290834,0.0021696258,0.0017181035,0.12416833,0.22205916,0.0004487043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98734367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16247295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16247295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15990776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97141266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086408384","doi":"10.1177/096466390401300409","title":"Book Review: Criminal Justice and Political Cultures: National and International Dimensions of Crime Control","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Crime control; Politics; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Control (management); Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04257011037457114,"score_gpt":0.3935034103062262,"score_spread":0.35093329993165506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086408384","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017955816,0.9267481,0.00050776586,0.022474512,0.030253446,0.000043404412,0.00037808265,0.000037899907,0.019377168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015478659,0.90770614,0.0006153525,0.013334056,0.024756981,0.0000926038,0.00052550953,0.000070503964,0.05135097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938,0.0001264289,0.00004626838,0.000078652265,0.00033471567,0.000033909764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601126,0.0023476402,0.00022132207,0.00007137781,0.0011593341,0.00018905837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008693811,0.001097995,0.0027968693,0.0046636327,0.0008071728,0.0027701147,0.001384221,0.0025157877,0.026306428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003744284,0.0005951214,0.00062609714,0.012829853,0.0011079462,0.0027850089,0.00097071653,0.0033713821,0.010629394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010409172,0.000015213989,0.00007953517,0.0012783961,0.000019566043,0.000018498964,0.000040927654,0.00009010746,0.000049125694,0.0020995669,0.9435423,0.05275638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013532204,0.000017876262,0.0006825256,0.0020977566,0.000031630894,0.000113342554,0.00006847714,0.000052677326,0.000030840405,0.0022798998,0.99460125,0.0000100874395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009364154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031946268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026306428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001963594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003298037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088003755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099913502","doi":"10.1177/0964663912443919","title":"Interracial Violence, Western Racialized Masculinities, and the Geopolitics of Violence Against Women","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Masculinity; Foregrounding; Sociology; Sexual violence; Power (physics); Geopolitics; Intersectionality; Criminology; Racialization; Structural violence; Political science; Race (biology); Law","score_opus":0.047816792179618546,"score_gpt":0.35182421260355357,"score_spread":0.304007420423935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099913502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8752923,0.004312135,0.0005955518,0.006634157,0.0000778896,0.000009797735,0.000019406421,0.000004609833,0.11305418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796474,0.0006807896,0.0000425663,0.00021172453,0.000022203303,0.000004017369,0.0000028699155,0.0000015006444,0.001069527],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878854,0.00076923455,0.00002346647,0.000068166286,0.00009710566,0.00025348985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.00028618774,0.00029841202,0.000051584804,0.000049545688,0.00012210885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090220163,0.00023014593,0.00016723332,0.0012764254,0.008400544,0.0029007033,0.00034817713,0.0006894745,0.0026137675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014842786,0.0001397437,0.00011426601,0.000948874,0.021019923,0.0015541442,0.0031088842,0.0008685068,0.00010269414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003878841,0.00006458329,0.09135288,0.00008582554,0.000025280786,0.0009273543,0.56707215,0.00013842488,0.00050741754,0.31850845,0.0018626757,0.019416181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005252533,0.00007344217,0.113122046,0.00034637295,0.000017926312,0.0010414001,0.7837513,0.00014348622,0.00047855842,0.0408697,0.060130123,0.000020378327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021020986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045912478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021020986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018352239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011838496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04179722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100606532","doi":"10.1177/0964663907086454","title":"Postcard from the Edge (of Empire)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Convention; Work (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.07429091018619156,"score_gpt":0.3549087649283203,"score_spread":0.28061785474212875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100606532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003629556,0.0019367769,0.001744394,0.020844553,0.03660857,0.00019204248,0.0016859617,0.00082098594,0.93253714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010743734,0.0006000065,0.0005943323,0.002394625,0.003214749,0.000047071524,0.00040745284,0.0003945436,0.9816034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917245,0.00016807468,0.000055499248,0.00011736737,0.0003490069,0.0001375906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717677,0.0006406242,0.00013542369,0.00040247428,0.0011048375,0.0005398902],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090410764,0.0004562961,0.00041321898,0.0012767853,0.0029297085,0.0046648015,0.0005940812,0.0012548245,0.4813511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006027934,0.0002188113,0.00019194251,0.001446272,0.00081228686,0.002772024,0.002565961,0.0023302664,0.18902759],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046956953,0.000008470913,0.00012022357,0.00004884903,0.0000012364185,0.00010004719,0.0002959117,0.000013766917,0.00025652142,0.011892246,0.9478949,0.039320827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022243455,0.0000074768654,0.00020365098,0.00001848667,3.900166e-7,0.00002460095,0.00013498495,0.000016105916,0.000059761696,0.00039606026,0.99913424,0.0000020576015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030014392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067091114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4813511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012783051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010548759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7397897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101380892","doi":"10.1177/0964663908100333","title":"Being and Doing: The Judicial Use of Remorse to Construct Character and Community","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Character (mathematics); Construct (python library); Attribution; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Population; Law; Sociology; Political science; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.07242550753878162,"score_gpt":0.3694900736243787,"score_spread":0.29706456608559706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101380892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8123445,0.0011358673,0.009580885,0.0060993065,0.00010605804,0.00004293211,0.000031839572,0.000042483356,0.17061618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989525,0.000060191556,0.00029351295,0.000074089636,0.00000851465,0.000002875752,0.000004132672,0.0000061052583,0.00059801055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868058,0.009031126,0.00029351452,0.00063465623,0.0022713763,0.0009635809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98192525,0.008851715,0.0036502029,0.0014932962,0.0028794473,0.0012000266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008337978,0.00027447377,0.0002986077,0.003306405,0.007854269,0.00742601,0.00095355994,0.0012734775,0.0013681613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031784814,0.00018827055,0.00017396231,0.0017300237,0.038172897,0.0047734934,0.0035488463,0.0021606868,0.00013264899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064719396,0.0000374868,0.026225798,0.00006514257,0.000024969786,0.0005485615,0.64473486,0.00020717713,0.002169339,0.28973615,0.0012931258,0.03489271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020128013,0.00009848854,0.099567294,0.0004274102,0.000046914454,0.0010206443,0.7067024,0.0014231934,0.0020292122,0.12469009,0.063803434,0.00017075443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07263767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084444426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07263767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005537877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042294865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14442974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104248018","doi":"10.1177/096466390000900104","title":"Autonomy, Regulation and the Police Beat","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Discretion; Officer; Sociology; Corporate governance; Law; State police; Political science; Public relations; Law enforcement; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.061506299761583165,"score_gpt":0.40575509636630547,"score_spread":0.3442487966047223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104248018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.549068,0.0024887668,0.0114273215,0.031475585,0.0003673633,0.000058937065,0.00003245193,0.000047360372,0.40503427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99654096,0.00027744006,0.00021631652,0.0005290269,0.000053060514,0.000014392309,0.0000064600817,0.000006221327,0.002356077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901272,0.0055612037,0.0002920496,0.00061454443,0.002360323,0.0010447463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99063194,0.003982642,0.0020737955,0.00076202035,0.00093095284,0.0016185921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004580293,0.00021290683,0.00019105294,0.0013658999,0.0071099238,0.005538704,0.0006444879,0.001570105,0.0020410975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0125650605,0.00019914097,0.00019110522,0.0009427996,0.0429404,0.004387945,0.0060153273,0.0030673747,0.00023054761],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032879703,0.000058387566,0.012274566,0.000042797827,0.0000072531393,0.00025474688,0.19407763,0.00040103914,0.00055098097,0.77239513,0.002114703,0.017789952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040100593,0.00015358542,0.032053914,0.00055341056,0.000013121499,0.0006738684,0.24135834,0.0010014091,0.00078714185,0.4243165,0.29894492,0.000103847386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00853348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005759146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00853348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028518357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00503059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024223149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110282663","doi":"10.1177/0964663914565847","title":"Law on a Slanted Globe","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Impunity; Globe; Transitional justice; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Criminal justice; State responsibility; Sociology; Economic Justice; International law; Human rights; History","score_opus":0.12334160513973483,"score_gpt":0.4130511261147644,"score_spread":0.28970952097502956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110282663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038770825,0.0035043776,0.010504474,0.03519921,0.0004173954,0.00005643997,0.00014516516,0.00013375857,0.91126835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8675229,0.002538567,0.004613726,0.009009048,0.00018664742,0.00010479181,0.00015806034,0.00013864203,0.11572766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773896,0.0008919074,0.000076568766,0.00043859705,0.00051607407,0.000337908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986034,0.00039761543,0.00014314128,0.0004387251,0.0002688108,0.00014835574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017439937,0.00021782171,0.0003901398,0.0013360394,0.0062261936,0.010768824,0.00063712103,0.0036001378,0.015221415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050596357,0.0001712953,0.00031503147,0.0016058045,0.021232324,0.01002178,0.0059421984,0.0039229128,0.0017545351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003568107,0.0000043499936,0.00022275558,0.000009189627,0.000002535679,0.000078775614,0.0036094945,0.00011806452,0.00009066655,0.98297,0.0045842393,0.008306351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010033829,0.000019693456,0.0011680245,0.00023974477,0.0000077597715,0.00011312597,0.010581844,0.00038355816,0.00018269024,0.52912337,0.4581522,0.000017956523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01701839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015955918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01701839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038625968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033937485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050920725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111989169","doi":"10.1177/0964663907073444","title":"Framing Same-sex Marriage in Canada and the United States: Goodridge, Halpern and The National Boundaries of Political Discourse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Lesbian; Politics; Sociology; Law; Statutory law; Gender studies; Human rights; Social movement; Political science; Homosexuality; Law reform","score_opus":0.027103830454355292,"score_gpt":0.33742894756400327,"score_spread":0.310325117109648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111989169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3412382,0.031426113,0.0023369712,0.2622983,0.0009792057,0.000096585434,0.00026491986,0.000052886615,0.3613068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736406,0.0050730715,0.00059358246,0.008997775,0.00008548064,0.000030717292,0.00004278255,0.00002269942,0.011513281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934243,0.0016429819,0.00011122958,0.0004966178,0.0020999995,0.0022248887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99165606,0.0034185825,0.0004321192,0.00020199936,0.002864881,0.0014264062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061945603,0.0004214425,0.0005992174,0.0037574193,0.05987772,0.016457435,0.0024846487,0.0043329354,0.0030181576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011936351,0.00044325652,0.0003982275,0.0058668177,0.043916285,0.003821948,0.004822922,0.0072649023,0.00016103077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003276562,0.000035992514,0.007403054,0.000079658326,0.000017440201,0.00039132097,0.25643283,0.0004659126,0.00022089065,0.6907965,0.024572976,0.019550625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003343528,0.000022045737,0.027130665,0.00089681766,0.000091002745,0.00012164675,0.53965914,0.0008911685,0.0006056326,0.064363606,0.3660085,0.00017632259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99873346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27703363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27703363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3024086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8385385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115739919","doi":"10.1177/a017399","title":"Examining the Foreseeable: Assisted Suicide as a Herald of Changing Moralities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.1923875970825527,"score_gpt":0.40439704295322354,"score_spread":0.21200944587067083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115739919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84104365,0.0043900856,0.0010139866,0.06620599,0.00054300006,0.000021675554,0.000019477113,0.000024531118,0.08673758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429154,0.0008575289,0.00012332627,0.001532565,0.00006981191,0.000006502759,0.0000035348107,0.0000062408444,0.0031090442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728835,0.0019431466,0.000023268398,0.00008606611,0.00027270857,0.00038642518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971752,0.001347251,0.0005337455,0.00013249838,0.00028914073,0.000522235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032681809,0.00026000192,0.00020051526,0.00087974954,0.009310809,0.0067284238,0.0009279073,0.0027401352,0.0014051929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074566333,0.00019994691,0.0002268802,0.00050433615,0.026250536,0.0048783957,0.0040884386,0.0062567783,0.00013344672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042265496,0.00010414334,0.007801011,0.00004583839,0.000013794495,0.0019669118,0.76064193,0.00012359099,0.0003994816,0.20661804,0.0068277027,0.015415278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012392228,0.00008537862,0.011131267,0.00013612492,0.000012810279,0.0010304684,0.8663379,0.0002122891,0.0004409161,0.06102024,0.05954927,0.000030914478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011268926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032266937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011268926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061821407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00419374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117776332","doi":"10.1177/0964663907082735","title":"Contributions to a Post-Sovereigntist Understanding of Law: Foucault, Law as Governance, and Legal Pluralism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Private law; Legal profession; Sociology; Political science; Public law; Legal history; Philosophy of law; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05809779354354973,"score_gpt":0.40440448933642253,"score_spread":0.3463066957928728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117776332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053653654,0.040165618,0.07187533,0.3745652,0.0019186751,0.000060564493,0.000053399526,0.000116588584,0.45759103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94188917,0.007263806,0.018544558,0.013634206,0.0018159057,0.00018474877,0.000028723114,0.00009122712,0.016547631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934016,0.0044199685,0.00014531413,0.00047225098,0.0011361111,0.00042469104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929463,0.005135753,0.00039940927,0.0005313464,0.00066233694,0.00032488312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009132802,0.000503861,0.0005991571,0.0029058494,0.008513585,0.0071706227,0.0014188861,0.005816454,0.0018877068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009084766,0.00035218924,0.0006641994,0.0015905261,0.07816551,0.010756563,0.004407947,0.007896702,0.00031182106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014337832,0.000006861444,0.000030754905,0.0000064616897,6.021024e-7,0.0000111932095,0.0020858909,0.00004490232,0.0000104246255,0.9958198,0.0006409619,0.001340648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003646028,0.000005024949,0.00005205482,0.000037250575,0.0000011055625,0.000022437831,0.00045966377,0.00017009814,0.000036314206,0.9775353,0.021673134,0.0000039425595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009004224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007084514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01206895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01206895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086428085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08756673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123220012","doi":"10.1177/0964663913502509","title":"Criminal Justice and Cape Law’s Persons","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Prince Albert Grand Council","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Politics; Criminal law; Jurisdiction; Criminal justice; Law; Personhood; Criminology; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.0639379628286415,"score_gpt":0.3747237199031805,"score_spread":0.310785757074539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123220012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43023807,0.013507476,0.00067140727,0.02606339,0.0004023017,0.00007121881,0.0001271823,0.000018254415,0.5289007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97709364,0.0022136313,0.0002031441,0.0010281546,0.000060877355,0.000023168022,0.000017580041,0.000011724222,0.019347982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904174,0.00043761177,0.000038920654,0.00010887643,0.00016022935,0.00021261949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998845,0.00055514876,0.00022475809,0.00009995308,0.00008076836,0.00019431983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009756242,0.00019556185,0.0001621274,0.0017593262,0.013206071,0.0050927564,0.00053862314,0.0011265584,0.00847034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004261752,0.00020566492,0.00008381905,0.0019504646,0.023030331,0.0035043624,0.0046979687,0.0022409428,0.00031472708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134554,0.00001703911,0.0020565933,0.00008007,0.000004384389,0.0011565547,0.43263832,0.00003438825,0.00041895625,0.5458192,0.0057497155,0.012011232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020484913,0.00004507878,0.025900235,0.0009263527,0.000013428044,0.0014003364,0.3000812,0.00006261781,0.000528062,0.05214814,0.6188358,0.000038291884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058790337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12153683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058790337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00783342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003249557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11689627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124551833","doi":"10.1177/096466390201100201","title":"Recovering Women: Intimate Images and Legal Strategy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Agency (philosophy); Ideology; Invisibility; Sociology; Law; Negotiation; Domestic violence; Political science; Gender studies; Pregnancy; Politics; Poison control; Social science; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.10866541206441807,"score_gpt":0.29692723003350036,"score_spread":0.18826181796908228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124551833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20421447,0.006690695,0.003178048,0.07092114,0.00047763257,0.00008351126,0.000095901036,0.00010912935,0.71422946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244846,0.0020003077,0.0005529514,0.00402822,0.00007262108,0.000020146192,0.000029035815,0.000054845186,0.068757206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977192,0.00095744,0.000023553344,0.00012167329,0.0005115788,0.00066652393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991033,0.0003373964,0.0001231304,0.00007215491,0.00012448027,0.00023954007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017365019,0.00048612515,0.00033255955,0.0015247987,0.02739783,0.009793254,0.0013225072,0.004069077,0.009620577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042044735,0.00025098617,0.00022205719,0.00087477977,0.0476425,0.004087365,0.006757681,0.004485275,0.0009814186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016695005,0.000032234708,0.0010268246,0.000034795044,0.0000043446407,0.0014063371,0.6744213,0.00009403707,0.0004064851,0.28775826,0.015932959,0.018865664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006713895,0.000013793055,0.0012139013,0.00013962999,0.0000066815105,0.000997481,0.6019897,0.00012314128,0.00027283933,0.022516752,0.3727007,0.00001870234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27386212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3323851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27386212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013758126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009192413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5445361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130536036","doi":"10.1177/0964663907073446","title":"In the Shadow of Canada’s Camps","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); State (computer science); National security; Politics; State of exception; Political science; Legislation; Political economy; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Spectacle; Convergence (economics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06123599442645498,"score_gpt":0.39044671581729035,"score_spread":0.32921072139083535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130536036","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16764738,0.005909909,0.0021977844,0.46609354,0.0020653217,0.00009192128,0.0007792109,0.00011107158,0.35510394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8865348,0.0026333532,0.0009498393,0.02910409,0.0002999191,0.000032426215,0.00015974723,0.00007682436,0.08020895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378866,0.0007909685,0.0000797139,0.0005437792,0.001955894,0.0028409592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924446,0.0010281374,0.00035227783,0.00029810652,0.0027247828,0.0031520347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027155536,0.00042276757,0.00046310524,0.0013923111,0.034486685,0.009939079,0.0016884306,0.0028828252,0.012031109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008990266,0.0003179768,0.0004543785,0.0023340052,0.019815452,0.0031185525,0.0042855763,0.006608887,0.0005391337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089071706,0.00005069793,0.013843986,0.0001428257,0.000038665366,0.00091861695,0.057726998,0.00066622556,0.00051333883,0.68256027,0.19560216,0.047847085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024575624,0.000026642241,0.019232146,0.0003233563,0.000028136135,0.00017940662,0.080769606,0.0004734427,0.00035655356,0.024967138,0.8735348,0.00008434883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14547661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14547661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25061584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132659243","doi":"10.1177/0964663910391521","title":"Spatio-Therapeutics: Drug Treatment Courts and Urban Space","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Addiction; Intersection (aeronautics); Drug; Criminology; Space (punctuation); Sociology; The Void; Medicine; Geography; Epistemology; Pharmacology; Psychiatry; Cartography; Computer science","score_opus":0.1232980183475675,"score_gpt":0.37883581058616095,"score_spread":0.25553779223859346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132659243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16794612,0.02356658,0.02605365,0.13261163,0.0005795378,0.00006607748,0.00016731775,0.000083951585,0.6489251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987303,0.002532771,0.0011569205,0.002459616,0.00017316356,0.000025617566,0.00001949837,0.00001681009,0.00631276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968027,0.0021999776,0.000075858625,0.00019479924,0.00044000708,0.00028664045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975521,0.0013050773,0.00050613174,0.00019063566,0.00019954435,0.00024657266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016681182,0.00021283844,0.00031163232,0.0016400933,0.0062570604,0.008926705,0.0010921016,0.0029229454,0.0068859714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030315756,0.00019355946,0.00030178597,0.0016041388,0.04860942,0.0064114807,0.007877665,0.0027178715,0.00038211522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035958171,0.000008924381,0.00053206127,0.000017254903,0.0000017138519,0.00005607906,0.0047955415,0.00015699392,0.000043093652,0.99123317,0.00060511177,0.0025463402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035666424,0.00007505518,0.0056579737,0.0003402824,0.000018353603,0.0004996776,0.05773076,0.0009873969,0.00041599036,0.70362806,0.23057534,0.000035416655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010340959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017710365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010340959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062020533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044305436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0449993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133199511","doi":"10.1177/0964663909339087","title":"Racial Ideas and Gendered Intimacies: the Regulation of Interracial Relationships in North America","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Gender studies; White (mutation); Hegemony; Human sexuality; State (computer science); Power (physics); Masculinity; Social reproduction; Politics; Race (biology); Law; Political science; Social capital; Social science","score_opus":0.05057535156179869,"score_gpt":0.33670099316990587,"score_spread":0.28612564160810716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133199511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6845917,0.0042297626,0.0020460314,0.013087253,0.0001074281,0.000015006704,0.000011488473,0.000015203581,0.29589614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452776,0.00072582,0.00019261612,0.00046339296,0.000016603493,0.000010606816,0.0000023869693,0.000004277522,0.0040565943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839634,0.00085216295,0.000031082505,0.00017421159,0.0002634091,0.00028279217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872714,0.00059068843,0.0002760955,0.00007912539,0.00015522509,0.00017164278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017116234,0.0001371374,0.00015092878,0.00094798475,0.010840234,0.004099197,0.00048148126,0.000825057,0.0016877779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001477383,0.00016685869,0.00014350281,0.0007796316,0.024010874,0.0017813,0.004135315,0.0015483489,0.00007729707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017369757,0.00004348438,0.007345702,0.000035403194,0.000008965374,0.00025388756,0.6681116,0.00012428418,0.001101152,0.3028586,0.0011900747,0.018909492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000133169515,0.0000632042,0.06906554,0.000307032,0.000033812485,0.0002543474,0.55457264,0.00035875567,0.0012678051,0.09552262,0.27848268,0.000058238824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08023508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18396305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91976494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007195123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039905114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15953606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138651256","doi":"10.1177/0964663911418719","title":"The Crown in a Multicultural Age: The Changing Epistemology of (Post)colonial Sovereignty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Sociology; Law; Sovereignty; Honour; State (computer science); Scrutiny; Colonialism; Indigenous; Doctrine; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.04925453594051131,"score_gpt":0.35955331606683916,"score_spread":0.31029878012632783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138651256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4739733,0.03620574,0.0034733699,0.0970536,0.0006714806,0.000028157474,0.000059905142,0.000045754634,0.38848868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99174106,0.002255923,0.00036076547,0.0016317738,0.000067437635,0.00000498453,0.000006284916,0.000011370586,0.003920401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597114,0.001426953,0.000082277424,0.00044878747,0.00091509125,0.0011558231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547523,0.0018768115,0.0002629943,0.00023821337,0.0011379588,0.0010088797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00561516,0.0003590716,0.0005174621,0.0025026987,0.0354472,0.018473146,0.0020404942,0.002715121,0.0024107047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054494147,0.0002695462,0.00026917615,0.002800268,0.09729985,0.005971091,0.006137545,0.0053685056,0.00013377237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012959357,0.000008935447,0.0018046753,0.000045650966,0.0000058989785,0.00033654252,0.4450421,0.0001031714,0.00015818563,0.538966,0.0032507633,0.010265099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013520234,0.000028716637,0.010866662,0.00064993225,0.000031884272,0.00049777696,0.5691706,0.0006523325,0.00036890077,0.14727263,0.27036858,0.00007845217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9152052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93590057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9152052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07533888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067820236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54662436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139608255","doi":"10.1177/0964663909103622","title":"Jurisdiction and Scale: Legal `Technicalities' as Resources for Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":376,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Corporate governance; Law; Temporality; Sociology; Political science; Jurisprudence; Politics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Business","score_opus":0.029557900311957395,"score_gpt":0.3803226695723262,"score_spread":0.3507647692603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139608255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04062912,0.018091269,0.39512596,0.08403227,0.00092218997,0.00023837271,0.00023943385,0.00031403117,0.4604074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93743217,0.00449135,0.048105925,0.002187897,0.0006454342,0.00045431202,0.0000994307,0.00015407722,0.006429483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845889,0.010657138,0.00056914735,0.001486891,0.0019272137,0.000770694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692537,0.022864712,0.0015778238,0.0044559943,0.0012036419,0.0006440419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016986815,0.0010424803,0.0013530782,0.0065691583,0.0063836887,0.013317966,0.0032965622,0.0035794966,0.008594111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029011494,0.0009006625,0.0013310867,0.0064799506,0.11433313,0.037263814,0.012758418,0.0068511064,0.00075072557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.569535e-7,0.0000016243024,0.000041332132,0.000011780341,0.0000011970951,0.0000065341137,0.000555393,0.00009362841,0.000007790363,0.99840945,0.000104230334,0.00076623115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034694026,0.000002753177,0.000062309715,0.000031711137,0.0000018663532,0.000012276451,0.00056799507,0.00025428896,0.000015846734,0.99329007,0.005754162,0.0000032298908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036944782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00236944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016986815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008301104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004535419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08983594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140275335","doi":"10.1177/a016322","title":"Gendering the Pension Promise in Canada: Risk, Financial Markets and Neoliberalism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Marketization; Neoliberalism (international relations); Legislature; Argument (complex analysis); Inequality; Disadvantage; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Political economy; Finance; Law; China","score_opus":0.038299213612278095,"score_gpt":0.2328715597519277,"score_spread":0.1945723461396496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140275335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5105486,0.025080213,0.0026454192,0.14265947,0.00036862722,0.00005194512,0.00063465815,0.000032769032,0.3179782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978028,0.0038751464,0.00037291695,0.0018713677,0.000048120455,0.0000080358,0.000043463755,0.00001021977,0.015742732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762195,0.0003144314,0.000028986025,0.00016472726,0.0007964357,0.0010734091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802184,0.0005446709,0.00022992257,0.00006829818,0.0005972269,0.00053793576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002223663,0.0002627203,0.00041818852,0.0016723888,0.014916366,0.006774338,0.0012156814,0.0016894588,0.005126102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045018145,0.00021754773,0.00030428907,0.0029544553,0.01477182,0.0017939396,0.0028791623,0.002167039,0.00014231334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059175432,0.000031312866,0.022354066,0.00007511724,0.000015927795,0.00044035356,0.036772866,0.00086270145,0.00026744072,0.88429433,0.016221205,0.03860551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040676397,0.00005146855,0.16098309,0.0007938637,0.00006135536,0.0003291878,0.12248096,0.0028363287,0.000907459,0.16978914,0.541545,0.00018148385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99768806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16368257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16368257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12369901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144578655","doi":"10.1177/0964663912474862","title":"Pregnant Men: Repronormativity, Critical Trans Theory and the Re(conceive)ing of Sex and Pregnancy in Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Stryker","keywords":"Pregnancy; Construct (python library); Meaning (existential); Documentation; Psychology; Sex discrimination; Law; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04458220175244935,"score_gpt":0.4005870645203432,"score_spread":0.35600486276789384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144578655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19906545,0.023904702,0.029216893,0.25540087,0.0014954939,0.000117123454,0.00003267682,0.00005738177,0.49070942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783239,0.0027120654,0.0016817353,0.008687727,0.000260136,0.000068935486,0.000006803442,0.000026697002,0.008232052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99049765,0.007927011,0.00012745413,0.0004390871,0.0005784492,0.00043041087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99393445,0.0045890184,0.0005246191,0.00032926243,0.00025876632,0.00036383746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011193025,0.00035014504,0.00032100597,0.0010511661,0.010543661,0.007053405,0.0011437224,0.0038857958,0.002559395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008359913,0.00029057777,0.00029909718,0.00061604264,0.09166318,0.009508815,0.0063661393,0.0070389393,0.00023434042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004677007,0.000009691473,0.00019138266,0.000014306755,8.0329005e-7,0.00009344581,0.07043023,0.000022722148,0.000048635146,0.92653656,0.0006678624,0.0019797434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014138978,0.000038799575,0.0006018317,0.00036034355,0.0000062501676,0.00040783765,0.14178206,0.00028839047,0.00044855854,0.757636,0.09839685,0.000018826575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055651413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00415979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011193025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047176033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003798286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05919504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161878010","doi":"10.1177/09646639030123002","title":"Provocation and `Homosexual' Advance: Masculinized Subjects as Threat, Masculinized Subjects Under Threat","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Normative; Homosexuality; Masculinity; Subject (documents); Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.04360244662888349,"score_gpt":0.3770520259630009,"score_spread":0.33344957933411745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161878010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21622895,0.0030912242,0.009869335,0.011837043,0.00030168137,0.000071619055,0.000028131046,0.000036122117,0.7585359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979086,0.00061291305,0.0004003165,0.0009271297,0.0000895043,0.000019919087,0.000008590803,0.000013872676,0.01884189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955323,0.0017038549,0.00007482775,0.00034864093,0.0013696799,0.0009707027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986683,0.00068182434,0.00015646302,0.00013399491,0.00017182724,0.00018769741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028332893,0.00049427664,0.00033768537,0.00094499806,0.009088922,0.009339111,0.0010747572,0.0037557476,0.004696025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004086614,0.00028505173,0.00036846948,0.0007887528,0.057897482,0.008137785,0.007675148,0.005089732,0.00045771105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010259925,0.0000065966046,0.0003190223,0.000012027463,9.697301e-7,0.00023318322,0.051399138,0.000045046436,0.00016570654,0.9455427,0.00035619427,0.0019090549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042647833,0.00012258206,0.0045383186,0.00032154884,0.000020028268,0.0009054686,0.1510117,0.0004625625,0.0012362604,0.64554894,0.1957283,0.00006164465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040886357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04296195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040886357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007097534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065396647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08129674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166346062","doi":"10.1177/0964663906063579","title":"The Insanities of Reproduction: Medico-legal Knowledge and the Development of Infanticide Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Medicalization; Autopoiesis; Sociology; Reproduction; Embodied cognition; Law; Criminology; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.022963132753830426,"score_gpt":0.31823173104809355,"score_spread":0.2952685982942631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166346062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108234584,0.1694365,0.0065344684,0.29116297,0.0006162217,0.000025900417,0.00006399658,0.000029023804,0.42389622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95387274,0.030545754,0.0014750455,0.008460842,0.0006260044,0.000017722512,0.000015294145,0.000008106423,0.004978623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790716,0.0013189135,0.00008101731,0.00014345488,0.00033347926,0.00021599382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916454,0.006583976,0.0007019797,0.00032423725,0.0004445924,0.00029981523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049905144,0.0002404846,0.00034036313,0.0031897817,0.0037657572,0.0053403247,0.0010792634,0.0048401817,0.003520672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070793508,0.000294457,0.00018897576,0.0017839745,0.054106325,0.008170399,0.003890644,0.005355876,0.00023476934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046791574,0.000021426884,0.000506102,0.000040726474,0.0000015390441,0.00018032917,0.014932621,0.000090287496,0.000029986919,0.9725925,0.0017853507,0.009814439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009296698,0.000031975007,0.0028204394,0.00086028303,0.0000051159764,0.0006303715,0.016587634,0.0003714279,0.000180412,0.8345418,0.14393803,0.000023331118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006061735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008020779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006061735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054986305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043057697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039895535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167176265","doi":"10.1177/0964663904042552","title":"Welfare Law, Welfare Fraud, and the Moral Regulation of the ‘Never Deserving’ Poor","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Sociology; Welfare; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Restructuring; Criminal law; Law; Poverty; Law and economics; Economics; Criminology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.029936752194382233,"score_gpt":0.3144928564247015,"score_spread":0.28455610423031924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167176265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35225263,0.012320316,0.016125638,0.29352513,0.000638479,0.00007089274,0.00004264163,0.00003741782,0.32498693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893111,0.001349725,0.0005347963,0.004552228,0.00011005722,0.000032559048,0.0000049821706,0.000008504397,0.0040961592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99127144,0.0063639875,0.00015467888,0.00041493322,0.00076629495,0.0010285972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935894,0.003943137,0.0012206557,0.00034645456,0.00060816156,0.00029214687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00753953,0.0002083971,0.00028387416,0.0017701221,0.00988932,0.008403496,0.0010971298,0.0050031957,0.0015291033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01176733,0.0002148488,0.00022310771,0.0011354294,0.07253982,0.0062471707,0.004907296,0.0052858097,0.00011985236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041925045,0.0000118633725,0.0006485659,0.000017953673,0.0000013184177,0.000068707915,0.024203708,0.00009090729,0.00005895137,0.9710277,0.0013064883,0.0025596346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013765907,0.00004515277,0.004933502,0.00047929664,0.000012810107,0.0003287449,0.07314408,0.00088479946,0.00079477066,0.75238883,0.16692387,0.000050450304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010008065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008978578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010008065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076324446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056502693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055377543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269429033","doi":"10.1177/a018600","title":"Colonization through Disclosure: Confidential Records, Sexual Assault Complainants and Canadian Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sexual assault; Legislature; Narrative; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.047718160511811686,"score_gpt":0.3478209934648231,"score_spread":0.30010283295301143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269429033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6913654,0.010051442,0.00068553607,0.08574335,0.00036494515,0.00006033313,0.0002917073,0.000043373017,0.21139386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775643,0.0040822607,0.00018782292,0.0036670282,0.000048622103,0.000013903961,0.00005168131,0.000018749388,0.014365651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942583,0.0011547568,0.00014233548,0.00032984593,0.0022801799,0.0018345198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217844,0.003282101,0.00097279483,0.0002594676,0.0018362093,0.0014708646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031777509,0.00032586118,0.00035337996,0.0029371602,0.040598147,0.013101632,0.001985335,0.0030821708,0.008764151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014753561,0.0004237082,0.00020717036,0.006075431,0.03511577,0.004289373,0.008029472,0.0041905674,0.0003160748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019423198,0.00002296682,0.0045789266,0.00007808923,0.0000043565724,0.00094930734,0.9200083,0.000059464237,0.00030304946,0.049338106,0.00920706,0.015430986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008441162,0.000019557645,0.010309012,0.00023159113,0.000011274386,0.00050096196,0.80178475,0.000086006046,0.00020606394,0.0028174066,0.1839561,0.00006888191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10657964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10657964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14583841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.773293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272330489","doi":"10.1177/a017400","title":"Towards an Intercultural Legal Theory: The Dialogical Challenge","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Identity, and Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Ethnocentrism; Sociology; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Presentation (obstetrics); Legal realism; Human rights; Law; Intercultural relations; Multiculturalism; Legal research; Economic Justice; Political science; Intercultural communication; Anthropology; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11042452147768232,"score_gpt":0.41017113765695423,"score_spread":0.2997466161792719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272330489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06405742,0.027960356,0.068792656,0.41629636,0.0013362567,0.00011797638,0.0000941841,0.00011534318,0.42122948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705411,0.0047350707,0.0077017127,0.010518337,0.0007087075,0.00017120555,0.000029622755,0.00005039212,0.0055437945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780709,0.017754762,0.00029162923,0.0011176019,0.0015833658,0.0011817329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856528,0.009637846,0.00089747814,0.000983669,0.0011916205,0.0016365403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01853612,0.0009163465,0.0010288713,0.0043355734,0.020665295,0.022543587,0.0036501135,0.0072267093,0.007208849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012113925,0.0004479162,0.00072552165,0.0032002435,0.0894106,0.026688391,0.013356645,0.00888983,0.00064312824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029447026,0.000017305476,0.00016180945,0.000042191397,0.0000044953454,0.00009670316,0.046387248,0.000107107,0.00003238461,0.94881433,0.0010866071,0.003246868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010709216,0.000014903965,0.00037327418,0.00032432727,0.000007403463,0.00015356853,0.11486899,0.0006204676,0.00007607218,0.8201202,0.063413784,0.000016245076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023036657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016346704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023036657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015131297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013917212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109785736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274427865","doi":"10.1177/0964663915574013","title":"Tax Prats and Citizen Stakeholders","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public economics; Government (linguistics); Inclusion (mineral); Business; Set (abstract data type); Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Tax reform; Sociology","score_opus":0.3017590732927539,"score_gpt":0.3143457414575097,"score_spread":0.012586668164755788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274427865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7675538,0.00075529824,0.0040262965,0.057758424,0.00013021039,0.0001071254,0.00010879122,0.000032070817,0.16952795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911923,0.00020945669,0.00032525146,0.0018959984,0.000023997009,0.000032546504,0.000031395815,0.000009062523,0.0062800525],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97920007,0.01297747,0.0006290522,0.0012345385,0.0035053238,0.0024535786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97233105,0.014041916,0.0049762973,0.001670492,0.0038781585,0.0031021154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012469438,0.00015324644,0.0003742702,0.0019204225,0.008749465,0.009367609,0.00083958154,0.002982897,0.007479204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040857844,0.00034406883,0.00031469227,0.0024363282,0.008088082,0.011083909,0.0092466315,0.004473597,0.0006089128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000925791,0.00026772486,0.08401933,0.00021739943,0.00003157879,0.00140373,0.48254797,0.00040174666,0.0009965909,0.34541708,0.017205989,0.0673982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000131977,0.00015074167,0.05269009,0.00052997575,0.000013507842,0.0006501352,0.65323937,0.0008359811,0.00041855563,0.07466182,0.2167244,0.00007223766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067940396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009105653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012469438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004189099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062946817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065945506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290011818","doi":"10.1177/0964663916640032","title":"Cohabitation’s boundaries and the confines of tradition","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Law; Political science; Law reform; Legal culture; Comparative law; Common law; Queer; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Public law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.15543896220636227,"score_gpt":0.42640364107374557,"score_spread":0.2709646788673833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290011818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43138537,0.004473442,0.0050855326,0.025887836,0.0001746656,0.000032962576,0.0000392332,0.00002172645,0.5328993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452645,0.00024151425,0.00025338153,0.00072688586,0.00003504057,0.000009471947,0.0000049236864,0.0000057276184,0.0041965744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969633,0.0013384373,0.000052316675,0.00032591727,0.00055542745,0.0007646085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971975,0.000927339,0.0003663451,0.00028399596,0.0005678785,0.00065686856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029139828,0.00013658732,0.00024724065,0.0011162705,0.013539012,0.0040530134,0.0010463668,0.0011814204,0.0041594505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005086838,0.000118044074,0.0001758324,0.00089308986,0.04465277,0.0028736864,0.0043636872,0.0026568715,0.00015723614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018899284,0.000011006565,0.0039411345,0.000018477407,0.0000049054192,0.0001599859,0.081541,0.000066471075,0.00015866701,0.8993692,0.0011324048,0.013577827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005332079,0.00012697434,0.04149793,0.00060336106,0.000036532143,0.0007542193,0.1914294,0.0006647686,0.00054188777,0.46814406,0.29607865,0.00006891529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25548786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3785412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25548786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0104247015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013075848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5080015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326498535","doi":"10.1177/0964663912458112","title":"Powers of Reach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Law; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Action (physics); Political science; Economic Justice; Statute; Tort; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05550966701075136,"score_gpt":0.38543304180021354,"score_spread":0.3299233747894622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326498535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009562436,0.0018468236,0.02411061,0.009308886,0.00024361027,0.00007803006,0.00008089026,0.00009716473,0.9546715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.891384,0.0017152362,0.006223699,0.0026732744,0.0004010204,0.00028963888,0.000095561416,0.00018918255,0.09702845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98930347,0.003811715,0.000629652,0.002348941,0.0024838026,0.0014224395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898039,0.005071481,0.0008034364,0.0019559772,0.0013561643,0.0010089722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009878553,0.0007094341,0.0008479054,0.0033701102,0.009038725,0.01422585,0.0017576187,0.004481608,0.021658678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020347213,0.000634816,0.0009069061,0.0024655003,0.04904009,0.014295836,0.016932312,0.005188509,0.0037239813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003436382,0.0000017168945,0.00012363204,0.000013428856,0.0000022623924,0.000028629487,0.0017474047,0.000050971474,0.000024901357,0.99455667,0.0007621029,0.0026849888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001343205,0.000016459364,0.0003029375,0.00017857109,0.0000127471885,0.00019346311,0.0021167574,0.00018783234,0.00012751366,0.85310996,0.1437253,0.000015097163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005715557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054502515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021658678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004248309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006425505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072455525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334572056","doi":"10.1177/0964663912463631b","title":"Book Review: Framing Crime: Cultural Criminology and the Image","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Criminology; Cultural criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0597156188142693,"score_gpt":0.3839721397920155,"score_spread":0.3242565209777462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334572056","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000084283514,0.89178514,0.00028682573,0.053406544,0.044076987,0.000030026999,0.0001619172,0.000028569288,0.0101397885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016060056,0.8529258,0.0004301061,0.046072748,0.063122824,0.00010290523,0.00023057999,0.00008759963,0.035421412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880755,0.00039438135,0.000080955484,0.00013183025,0.00051864504,0.00006658563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921483,0.0050467458,0.00044452652,0.00013730007,0.0018504082,0.00037283715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015659365,0.0013859061,0.0024279787,0.005307526,0.0012065863,0.0044259652,0.0017145723,0.005606093,0.02740098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008354514,0.0006286399,0.00070366764,0.009772403,0.0025439179,0.004143498,0.0014807872,0.0056403195,0.010168089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056995186,0.0000072445746,0.000028861938,0.0007574292,0.000008309717,0.000013622743,0.000027504686,0.000030262458,0.000016018726,0.0014138548,0.9767576,0.02093363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012941599,0.000012748774,0.00031592554,0.0030045963,0.000025199952,0.00015183145,0.00008735909,0.00003503719,0.00002269706,0.0028896795,0.99343127,0.00001058905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012905096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038060565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02740098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003712773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005336962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09166539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336968863","doi":"10.1177/0964663915627492","title":"Legal Knowledges and Surveillance in the Condo World","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Commodification; Law; Realm; Corporate governance; Political science; Business; Economics; Finance; Economy","score_opus":0.05627649991443135,"score_gpt":0.32286588511143854,"score_spread":0.2665893851970072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336968863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84165925,0.0019669028,0.0047809277,0.01181813,0.0000774395,0.00003622075,0.00008838329,0.000020989948,0.1395518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973647,0.0004111538,0.0003857426,0.00021509838,0.000010085857,0.000007956177,0.000019950961,0.0000055641735,0.0015797358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598783,0.002329847,0.00011437015,0.00037103952,0.0005845989,0.0006122812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890553,0.006873045,0.00149896,0.00075666135,0.0007516026,0.0010644789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038807953,0.00018817671,0.00023016498,0.0030965966,0.011991002,0.008856387,0.0010094114,0.001434566,0.0039013508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008496621,0.00025280038,0.00014523623,0.003110401,0.047147952,0.010776162,0.0068173716,0.002200532,0.00011929083],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012718483,0.000020756424,0.01264971,0.000047349993,0.000003416676,0.00071741425,0.81098795,0.00012989838,0.00021341532,0.15963249,0.0011131517,0.014471753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025696932,0.000014394896,0.012423618,0.00031154984,0.0000037638597,0.00035847625,0.90623355,0.00023096192,0.0001541321,0.017216496,0.063021876,0.000028628052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12616943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16631949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12616943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008876266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073897713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2508701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339993195","doi":"10.1177/0964663915601166","title":"‘We Are the Monitors Now’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Situated; Experiential knowledge; Conversation; Citizen science; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09591162350397524,"score_gpt":0.38051553303380575,"score_spread":0.2846039095298305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339993195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14405975,0.006915456,0.024707492,0.38906616,0.0021172762,0.0002157394,0.00044963075,0.0004900712,0.43197852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86143064,0.0030962117,0.0056981817,0.03159346,0.00024950504,0.0000904075,0.00018962183,0.00014576752,0.09750625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950282,0.0014737002,0.000093375864,0.0009055501,0.0014179506,0.0010812876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437886,0.0008328578,0.0006273582,0.00046876143,0.0024829356,0.0012092888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034203094,0.00044731158,0.00036381738,0.0009042162,0.014068489,0.0070413826,0.0014620954,0.0028748398,0.011491427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012311445,0.00047919515,0.00031443377,0.0012298422,0.026043897,0.009679518,0.0036128156,0.0061941994,0.0024016097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006342688,0.000069560614,0.022612162,0.00027942873,0.00003985714,0.0012598691,0.55751985,0.00021875897,0.0034515527,0.20327386,0.13342781,0.07778381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007853802,0.000034718134,0.009513144,0.0002948668,0.000029706951,0.00053393503,0.15327945,0.00013318201,0.00073224417,0.013732479,0.8216439,0.000064563676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56185347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6681018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56185347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01294088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021972036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88145375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464129899","doi":"10.1177/0964663916647530a","title":"Book Review: Female Criminality: Infanticide, Moral Panics and the Female Body","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.05648961852579599,"score_gpt":0.3755779442060905,"score_spread":0.3190883256802945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464129899","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008415565,0.9477138,0.00006828378,0.015955064,0.031246671,0.000020117079,0.00011094719,0.000010323495,0.0047906567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012389151,0.88329726,0.00015151194,0.025603713,0.06190509,0.00007062476,0.00017016387,0.000022256321,0.027540365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930847,0.00016110485,0.00006567664,0.00011412197,0.00029946002,0.000051179075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688405,0.0019844498,0.00021902821,0.000044751407,0.00067170884,0.00019605906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008362907,0.001349102,0.002483297,0.0032421027,0.0007911643,0.0025737248,0.0017625039,0.005967291,0.021497712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041886833,0.0006700947,0.00081792346,0.005074538,0.0015885154,0.002006625,0.0010878496,0.0048192064,0.0093861725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022689277,0.00001942398,0.0000824312,0.0019768355,0.000027754451,0.00006109978,0.000020230671,0.000037130743,0.000046377325,0.0008455122,0.9587171,0.03814341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004744477,0.000044031403,0.0010044245,0.0038524698,0.000062008425,0.00063899194,0.000066391534,0.000034058758,0.000038186983,0.0011149453,0.99307925,0.000017886481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007913646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024833025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021497712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018159437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025506346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07191694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590367032","doi":"10.1177/0964663916670718","title":"Review of Comparative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.24479185748340965,"score_gpt":0.5168016569385029,"score_spread":0.27200979945509324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590367032","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036405819,0.9573668,0.00041376642,0.020530133,0.0015661174,0.000013300094,0.00021356776,0.000013207231,0.019518958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025348864,0.9454047,0.0013541551,0.018011127,0.004406454,0.00008499561,0.00077252195,0.00004867087,0.004568511],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911696,0.0039137225,0.00064214185,0.0009959292,0.0028589636,0.00041973134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755788,0.0162897,0.0014076487,0.0014781354,0.0046892376,0.0005563901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104735475,0.0008207095,0.0022244311,0.020177545,0.0023474323,0.008055089,0.002540328,0.0039703967,0.025278874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04581451,0.0004985411,0.00082540733,0.023615438,0.007754903,0.009290563,0.0047403066,0.003598448,0.0030639248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094442374,0.00006188356,0.0010981276,0.015466252,0.00023237264,0.00010996298,0.0011487384,0.00020949198,0.00019939353,0.21324645,0.36302173,0.40511116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014838938,0.000024563487,0.0018758848,0.02081184,0.00008976617,0.00016579856,0.0009461209,0.00005561236,0.000056316167,0.038812768,0.93713474,0.000011777847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0095173605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015735263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025278874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086168265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01620801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084566236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613266508","doi":"10.1177/0964663914549408","title":"Belonging to Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Appeal; Law; Politics; Sociology; Sharia; Religious law; Religious identity; Political science; Islam; Negotiation","score_opus":0.16340785705156136,"score_gpt":0.4638272453016037,"score_spread":0.30041938825004233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613266508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15668386,0.0016301571,0.007995594,0.031170294,0.0005258045,0.00005592107,0.00003163511,0.000044183493,0.80186254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98117995,0.00041208992,0.0004796707,0.002591046,0.00011249098,0.000014572256,0.000013729887,0.000015042919,0.015181347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948472,0.0020165383,0.00014500663,0.0006838191,0.0012079307,0.0010995959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955882,0.0017482972,0.00051119097,0.00053825235,0.00061132794,0.0010027493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036796066,0.0002140024,0.00032088358,0.0009061572,0.014056886,0.008139886,0.0007990599,0.0029545957,0.0077819866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009447135,0.00012371315,0.0003185995,0.0006624663,0.044183344,0.007477898,0.007743059,0.005009343,0.0006251515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042120582,0.000017409184,0.0013124953,0.000020239217,0.0000023059715,0.00013550434,0.05317768,0.000037097994,0.00014669771,0.9331508,0.0021099346,0.009885557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087198605,0.000082201885,0.006182608,0.00035061815,0.000011943349,0.000724313,0.18641457,0.00024332956,0.0003759468,0.36790556,0.43766612,0.000034071392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008984741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007729041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014056886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034567956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004278058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026033342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613320330","doi":"10.1177/0964663917703179","title":"The Social Organization of Access to Justice for Youth in ‘Unsafe’ Urban Neighbourhoods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Sociology; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Criminology; Bureaucracy; Economic Justice; Slum; Ethnography; Political science; Population; Law","score_opus":0.1141979897745427,"score_gpt":0.4394852443944738,"score_spread":0.3252872546199311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613320330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912578,0.0002139102,0.00012335448,0.00091491704,0.000015680816,0.00001233196,0.000028842289,0.000006430235,0.0074266978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914,0.000086855456,0.000031943684,0.00004508207,0.0000034242785,0.000005610273,0.000011183802,0.0000029127596,0.00067294814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962585,0.0014777122,0.00010190692,0.00019070372,0.00032716338,0.0016440639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975026,0.0004984412,0.00043765802,0.00010186636,0.00031136817,0.0011480498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015133901,0.00026659376,0.0004265375,0.0014629309,0.015369959,0.00719171,0.0010882807,0.0009541529,0.002539202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034321311,0.00036101157,0.00030604898,0.0011712534,0.016134143,0.002039635,0.007927416,0.0014592521,0.00013524659],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021576287,0.000028059638,0.042384997,0.000027351327,0.000010528627,0.00068186544,0.9484347,0.00005090023,0.00021414638,0.0042492896,0.00060409046,0.0032924595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019223469,0.000018730521,0.0287662,0.000040165443,0.000006110296,0.00011055494,0.9663599,0.000034101726,0.000043419925,0.0004312581,0.0041786693,0.000008941429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4137096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61573774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4137096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01372705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00992714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8226031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617921869","doi":"10.1177/0964663917709526","title":"From Offender Rehabilitation to the Aesthetic of the Victim","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.04982282980343304,"score_gpt":0.39340440463772886,"score_spread":0.3435815748342958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617921869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25379696,0.033601515,0.014906096,0.16047062,0.004713482,0.00006877259,0.000033531087,0.00019802661,0.532211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96591026,0.006115444,0.0011567896,0.0048354887,0.00075530563,0.000033159242,0.000009781141,0.00009610677,0.021087645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595034,0.0025347571,0.000076467084,0.0002061086,0.0006691415,0.0005631859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987207,0.00052584446,0.00019064196,0.00014960291,0.00020555047,0.00020774646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032311268,0.00065741176,0.00047341458,0.0018822736,0.011101479,0.009535812,0.0012244484,0.0032852432,0.0045126704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004021481,0.00019955743,0.00041911402,0.00069705787,0.04944866,0.007423389,0.0082720835,0.005708451,0.00049445237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051441602,0.00008683234,0.0015765768,0.00018014466,0.000013167271,0.0012239211,0.17845848,0.00021404422,0.00058671983,0.7582723,0.014080133,0.045256216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015855278,0.00015819218,0.0023911279,0.0010468003,0.00002867217,0.0043645017,0.3790402,0.000329418,0.0010497674,0.16891195,0.44261235,0.00005106285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019480481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037981365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011101479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038203583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030650233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027718782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701135309","doi":"10.1177/0964663917710986","title":"Articulations of Aboriginal Title, Indigenous Rights, and Living Customary Law in South Africa","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Colonialism; Indigenous rights; Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Scholarship; Human rights","score_opus":0.039013163952688695,"score_gpt":0.3743865769613492,"score_spread":0.3353734130086605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701135309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72841907,0.014046047,0.0019829988,0.029042332,0.00012834553,0.000053736214,0.000019186533,0.000012568719,0.22629572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563944,0.001485381,0.0001628942,0.00032108166,0.000020149086,0.000016350203,0.0000025234358,0.0000040900304,0.0023479804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966988,0.0019231978,0.00015317621,0.00021106911,0.00040106897,0.0006126347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949443,0.0035108963,0.0007677422,0.00023296486,0.00021244449,0.00033167083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055631334,0.00024293413,0.00032172227,0.0029424042,0.016335117,0.007998063,0.00080548506,0.0019376057,0.0026221492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008913372,0.0002892852,0.00015661695,0.0034118546,0.059743058,0.007040096,0.010423093,0.0033255685,0.000095606636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075523853,0.000010714641,0.0018104356,0.000063019455,0.0000028066577,0.00055526744,0.55560416,0.00005328069,0.00020724653,0.43581495,0.0003120453,0.005558505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012296773,0.000036546364,0.017595643,0.0009833127,0.000018429178,0.00072920625,0.7942656,0.0001832187,0.0005018974,0.10859007,0.077050425,0.000033315093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047484342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06458482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047484342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011717308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008408885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0944159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748279114","doi":"10.1177/0964663917724866","title":"Online Sexual Violence, Child Pornography or Something Else Entirely? Police Responses to Non-Consensual Intimate Image Sharing among Youth","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Child pornography; Pornography; Criminology; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Child sexual abuse; Sexual violence; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Psychology; Law; Sexual abuse; The Internet","score_opus":0.11989055625536992,"score_gpt":0.454620913665103,"score_spread":0.33473035740973306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748279114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99165946,0.0002510912,0.000113446265,0.0017372655,0.000038093207,0.000016373591,0.000037692662,0.0000050023386,0.0061415588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807215,0.00051383814,0.00007595539,0.00034905138,0.000020970861,0.000012582368,0.000023186765,0.000006232336,0.0009260657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659973,0.0018751937,0.00017247241,0.00015652835,0.0004889186,0.0007071557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414235,0.0019149019,0.0020335347,0.00027876196,0.0006748398,0.00095567474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024799507,0.0002915087,0.00041468674,0.0011585718,0.0059566284,0.0057070004,0.0006992419,0.0010650058,0.0033802474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011852763,0.00045317967,0.0002720887,0.0012855424,0.004346893,0.003433563,0.0043730442,0.0020015484,0.00037236264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031272633,0.00006160498,0.07538543,0.00006311374,0.000012306517,0.0005237857,0.9131272,0.000020809905,0.0003197761,0.0016106778,0.0011095647,0.0077345534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014902802,0.000015074856,0.013291144,0.000078240926,0.000005012844,0.00013053848,0.9826818,0.000022901162,0.00006867547,0.00013487194,0.0035644653,0.0000058104556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049053088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0768974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049053088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002849025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031152067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09753513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755273629","doi":"10.1177/0964663917722597","title":"Presenting the (Dictatorial) Past in Contemporary Argentina","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Dictatorship; Dramatization; Sociology; Situated; The arts; Epistemology; Interdependence; Law; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Literature","score_opus":0.15665292030063602,"score_gpt":0.41121594663472405,"score_spread":0.254563026334088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755273629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62502474,0.011458638,0.0070709,0.021794626,0.0021151258,0.00007242299,0.00019894484,0.00014347235,0.33212107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833852,0.0013615807,0.00068509777,0.00030760528,0.00019466419,0.000028283106,0.00005521906,0.000044256416,0.013937992],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998064,0.0011922952,0.0000508748,0.00019152235,0.00015718616,0.00034410795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984805,0.0008752626,0.00024172617,0.00009987717,0.00010852757,0.00019409244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019792325,0.00048359524,0.0004845497,0.0010472599,0.010990959,0.0059558074,0.0008540107,0.001852884,0.0083502885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039919293,0.00031165316,0.00023450624,0.0011390466,0.0121046435,0.004930767,0.0037154336,0.002853397,0.0004844924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009927667,0.00004295375,0.003734931,0.00021065936,0.0000068502864,0.001545914,0.71250576,0.0004076211,0.001384473,0.25691175,0.0077013522,0.015448486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002065594,0.00011778703,0.0124215735,0.00081164687,0.00001387777,0.0012407408,0.41903007,0.00088919594,0.0009360651,0.023652293,0.5407939,0.00007218286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015663795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032883767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015663795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00528172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013729256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038321733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768782097","doi":"10.1177/0964663917724867","title":"Looking Back, Looking Forward","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Feminism; Feminist theory; Feminist legal theory; Gender mainstreaming; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Mainstreaming; Key (lock); Feminist philosophy; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Gender equality","score_opus":0.12183133029097984,"score_gpt":0.4299177947922479,"score_spread":0.3080864645012681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768782097","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032780569,0.15809661,0.0040569576,0.59978145,0.039816156,0.00003156583,0.00032955746,0.00011236144,0.19449726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09901097,0.22289993,0.0057108416,0.3583024,0.019912124,0.000113898,0.00057326985,0.00067257276,0.29280394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954196,0.0020388006,0.00016437192,0.00070342177,0.0010472082,0.0006266508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600536,0.0014679965,0.00028679654,0.0003435066,0.0013701342,0.0005261832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048340093,0.00066517247,0.000777186,0.0015802213,0.006195203,0.010115094,0.0016753689,0.0048500174,0.042379554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014486196,0.0003310128,0.00086709566,0.0018855706,0.011801075,0.01794007,0.0050757537,0.010819244,0.01321871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036272668,0.000029864754,0.0010460176,0.00084552914,0.000024366325,0.0003631829,0.014017936,0.00008870121,0.0003341531,0.58141285,0.29539514,0.106406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018670787,0.00001144403,0.00024586657,0.0012217576,0.0000070556684,0.00016255486,0.008432865,0.000015351969,0.0000757231,0.034652937,0.9551608,0.000011888452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019038277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025065951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042379554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00600739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008458818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14177376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769895570","doi":"10.1177/0964663917701304","title":"Hegel’s Hipsters","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; University of California Berkeley","keywords":"Personhood; Autonomy; Property (philosophy); Hegelianism; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Injustice; Power (physics); Identity (music); Private property; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Social science; Geography; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.09018980150818859,"score_gpt":0.2993288300606993,"score_spread":0.20913902855251074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769895570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020864002,0.010906557,0.010762055,0.07637314,0.0019926918,0.00003337443,0.00012823787,0.000111869296,0.87882805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69996524,0.005069172,0.0031932425,0.016149003,0.0010538449,0.000077038545,0.00006798686,0.0001762596,0.27424815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981602,0.0006942785,0.000053619988,0.00040079723,0.000373738,0.00031728478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990927,0.00040443704,0.00006953232,0.00019100602,0.00014061395,0.00010164609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017378879,0.00041768016,0.0003473415,0.0011424484,0.005191892,0.006315929,0.00064992456,0.0024830478,0.006846332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037504612,0.00025393962,0.00035194372,0.0007797825,0.040005364,0.0064827083,0.0043081357,0.0047467584,0.0019112318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058691676,0.0000031414909,0.000062803105,0.000009312664,0.0000013373779,0.000022797745,0.0020845358,0.00003701742,0.000016429418,0.9856516,0.009539374,0.002565692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009248014,0.000010649913,0.00016732955,0.00009561996,0.0000026353648,0.00008644015,0.002304748,0.00015802095,0.00015124465,0.606923,0.3900815,0.000009561828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008919207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010354745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008919207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00616571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00255991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04473561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773424359","doi":"10.1177/0964663917746486","title":"Relived Vulnerabilities of Palestinian Refugees","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Middle East Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Statelessness; Refugee; Palestinian refugees; Political science; Stateless protocol; Internally displaced person; International law; Syrian refugees; Forced migration; Law; Development economics; Computer security; Immigration; Nationality; Economics","score_opus":0.09370621246898646,"score_gpt":0.4310278914394384,"score_spread":0.33732167897045195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773424359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9364679,0.0033193983,0.00025905893,0.018080056,0.00015022708,0.00001983791,0.000034482244,0.000008454332,0.04166054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955296,0.0015728244,0.00008630103,0.0012944784,0.00002566275,0.000008426445,0.000009803134,0.0000030907413,0.0014697768],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847096,0.00071331195,0.000053297343,0.0000931948,0.0001105683,0.00055857614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993969,0.00013771815,0.00013045533,0.000061078026,0.00006643337,0.00020737684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00279014,0.0004014673,0.0004459084,0.0011038086,0.012149401,0.0054445374,0.0006781171,0.0020265018,0.0039353305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002936233,0.00036545147,0.00023889904,0.00090398116,0.015566935,0.0035089948,0.010864742,0.0031751357,0.00034245715],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007544232,0.00011818132,0.0333085,0.0001670559,0.00004035788,0.005457121,0.7720931,0.00020417466,0.0012546472,0.1486253,0.005758121,0.032897886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001455683,0.00010269567,0.032115508,0.00091596006,0.000023518338,0.0035020036,0.8446333,0.00015366232,0.00034507381,0.03134749,0.086801626,0.000044713546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009881848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015997898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012149401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003020566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042451858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021915853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774891554","doi":"10.1177/0964663917746483","title":"Temporary Foreign Workers in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Ethnography; Foreign national; Dual (grammatical number); Focus group; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.04634525703608826,"score_gpt":0.3474794418204695,"score_spread":0.30113418478438125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774891554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98117805,0.0008614251,0.00011092179,0.0024937135,0.0000729873,0.00004814597,0.0001438514,0.000007882862,0.015083106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98631555,0.0012364442,0.00016932921,0.00082438387,0.0000119911565,0.000028060354,0.000104728715,0.000007041229,0.011302414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830854,0.0001420889,0.000024176832,0.00013400514,0.0002554339,0.0011357982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980726,0.00019708101,0.0001417634,0.000040275496,0.0005294425,0.0010188584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010663621,0.00027947433,0.00031760507,0.0011139951,0.025541278,0.0035858902,0.0011019092,0.001038867,0.004522432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019470674,0.00020574554,0.00021746231,0.0021328663,0.0047659627,0.0006715098,0.003385332,0.0019580268,0.00021000019],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015438219,0.00012599213,0.12979458,0.00026363085,0.000017390188,0.003226066,0.7858564,0.00027643467,0.0016456303,0.011793467,0.015378211,0.051467746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005105808,0.00003058896,0.05562089,0.00013758254,0.0000077510085,0.00014833167,0.9105202,0.00008926007,0.00011586959,0.0001782834,0.03312085,0.000025343446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9888758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047272407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047272407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.107334495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34298694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775125487","doi":"10.1177/0964663917746488","title":"What’s in a Category? The Politics of Not Being a Refugee","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Politics; Context (archaeology); Immigration; Sovereignty; Political science; Immigration detention; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Criminology; Political economy; History","score_opus":0.05987300661225521,"score_gpt":0.3932429253493782,"score_spread":0.333369918737123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775125487","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32554471,0.009926021,0.0035038383,0.33186367,0.0028440452,0.000039070957,0.00008893165,0.00003395923,0.3261558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835518,0.001373691,0.00033195582,0.008312001,0.00019551047,0.000020062833,0.00002240832,0.000025478768,0.0061671655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931967,0.0042814203,0.00015457133,0.0005416991,0.00070240133,0.0011231356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960532,0.0014076108,0.00056965847,0.00033065892,0.0006222845,0.0010164689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00590425,0.00027100445,0.0005893958,0.0012035468,0.01833463,0.012295782,0.0009837315,0.003449079,0.004265495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011676221,0.00022070462,0.00035363744,0.0013377564,0.050846107,0.012890611,0.005918824,0.005572831,0.0006552656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002156313,0.000028733635,0.0062957676,0.00008243964,0.000013910324,0.00039460292,0.5236312,0.00003463876,0.00029316446,0.44391587,0.009999387,0.015288602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066649104,0.000028574112,0.0040741432,0.0004844682,0.000013648747,0.000464387,0.79313004,0.00005099816,0.000114069844,0.05985413,0.14174034,0.00003848765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028038293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03139749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028038293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047469656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049946243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05575019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784507763","doi":"10.1177/0964663914548747","title":"Constitutional Property Rights and Elision of the Transnational","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Context (archaeology); Political science; Liberalism; Property rights; Law and economics; Law; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Political economy; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.02331692466927127,"score_gpt":0.2518764389087067,"score_spread":0.22855951423943544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784507763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051915575,0.005717105,0.072188914,0.035226863,0.0003844514,0.000064452455,0.00015559173,0.00009748732,0.83424956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658738,0.0016319525,0.006547265,0.003685305,0.0002911,0.00012601547,0.00008391975,0.000094825664,0.021665828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98610824,0.0057744463,0.00063003844,0.0038649465,0.0022654631,0.0013567763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100846,0.0031114186,0.0007071581,0.0038745985,0.0008434599,0.00045488362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016638812,0.00042249437,0.00069270836,0.00177981,0.005098362,0.013034832,0.0018629637,0.004356657,0.007257513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017041275,0.0005112928,0.0008046373,0.0014142737,0.073772505,0.020204963,0.011542726,0.0070097474,0.0008847737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016869573,0.0000013688392,0.000028106599,0.000003749888,0.0000012886037,0.000007747404,0.0003695993,0.000043411957,0.00002482008,0.9986652,0.00009969959,0.0007532976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005747588,0.0000052050273,0.00007003264,0.00003422294,0.0000030483,0.000019324309,0.00033085136,0.000086509055,0.000085321495,0.98473155,0.014623688,0.0000045137353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004249378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028063315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016638812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005510988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050092405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08799553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792616402","doi":"10.1177/0964663917746487","title":"Exclusion Through <i>Imperio</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Enforcement; Political science; Law; Power (physics); Extension (predicate logic); Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05730319933934249,"score_gpt":0.408592470539175,"score_spread":0.35128927119983255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792616402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19852103,0.0007755786,0.010951111,0.006357243,0.000104699786,0.000044961078,0.000041716612,0.00006095638,0.78314286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97894657,0.00020698596,0.00089504925,0.0008717307,0.00003629273,0.000038865448,0.000025961299,0.0000371338,0.018941382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957848,0.0014879835,0.0002011007,0.00070607493,0.000691222,0.001128818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662614,0.0010874508,0.00075974746,0.0008090057,0.0003798623,0.0003377993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038764898,0.00026671655,0.00042727325,0.0012048635,0.0059728827,0.0072092414,0.0013183785,0.0015303136,0.0062657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007287649,0.00028607732,0.00053103163,0.00092138705,0.031297036,0.0063281544,0.011712339,0.0034609162,0.00074236706],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023287377,0.00002115089,0.0048822965,0.000043107753,0.000007782825,0.00029466386,0.051827326,0.00009745912,0.00029140405,0.927893,0.0018756351,0.01274289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003811128,0.0001388202,0.027940255,0.0008885485,0.000055689645,0.0013710553,0.11731985,0.0008137873,0.001599243,0.35378474,0.49596447,0.00008538838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013463126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014549806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013463126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031132675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004080591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026769578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797723177","doi":"10.1177/0964663918767954","title":"Sexual Violence and the Border: Colonial Genealogies of US and Australian Immigration Detention Regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Colonialism; Immigration; Immigration detention; Criminology; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Sexual violence; Political science; Foreign national; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04011040515842827,"score_gpt":0.3675162128195366,"score_spread":0.32740580766110833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797723177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9575088,0.0017851966,0.0006045019,0.0020175695,0.00003106507,0.000015841431,0.000026725698,0.00000613508,0.03800425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973574,0.00063385937,0.00017432332,0.00009662874,0.0000064772175,0.000009060465,0.000011034658,0.000007697257,0.0017035626],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861884,0.00079313345,0.000048047903,0.00015219684,0.00014820602,0.00023949631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997451,0.0013935971,0.0004373058,0.00020989926,0.00019902545,0.00030913306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001919496,0.000119600736,0.00021417122,0.0019915635,0.0067474945,0.0030187988,0.0006923285,0.0005225619,0.0029790353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069539235,0.00025729256,0.00009917618,0.0018911302,0.013049176,0.0021764683,0.0038828147,0.0018378901,0.000109997956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041174502,0.00002507488,0.024152922,0.00004615096,0.0000079486845,0.00040854997,0.88635844,0.0000857886,0.00034361088,0.062507465,0.00063159736,0.025391225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009395861,0.0001395967,0.2993806,0.0007900633,0.000032468084,0.0011290023,0.58766896,0.00074799336,0.00049261533,0.02378004,0.08576541,0.000063818356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07284485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13474101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07284485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004035643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022896838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14484173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901496119","doi":"10.1177/0964663918810375","title":"Managing Risk and Preempting Immorality in Private Employment of Public Police","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk management; Immorality; Legitimacy; Business; Suspect; Liability; Public relations; Officer; Law; Political science; Accounting; Morality; Finance","score_opus":0.14684828164440886,"score_gpt":0.44588418847441025,"score_spread":0.29903590683000136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901496119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680702,0.0002528587,0.009280418,0.0032695648,0.00003284771,0.000029666095,0.0000060679117,0.000020232488,0.019038167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872464,0.000040205992,0.0005494347,0.00007296191,0.000010519594,0.000006825114,0.0000015943004,0.0000040413247,0.00058977026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.986907,0.008616731,0.00038718307,0.00075662456,0.0019879744,0.0013444397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98244035,0.005584381,0.006785156,0.0018970153,0.0014900072,0.0018032285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064861216,0.00024912134,0.0002652508,0.0009053339,0.0074779578,0.0052570906,0.001042241,0.0011897575,0.0015896661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020331716,0.00037839523,0.00020097695,0.00049021794,0.013943641,0.003004663,0.0062531536,0.0021521726,0.00017729538],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017518828,0.00061651575,0.1888043,0.00016844914,0.00005960089,0.0012706876,0.56363386,0.0014644016,0.0063401726,0.0927912,0.0024352507,0.14224038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041473646,0.0003933394,0.19144273,0.0004819971,0.000040345763,0.0016619648,0.6305122,0.0066968235,0.0032299801,0.09830784,0.067071564,0.00011982533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042290287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006131144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074779578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029861447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005203189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034302294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908545298","doi":"10.1177/0964663918822150","title":"Homophobia and Homonationalism: LGBTQ Law Reform in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Queer; Lesbian; Transgender; Law reform; Queer theory; Government (linguistics); Politics; Sociology; Homosexuality; Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.030820665912469673,"score_gpt":0.3598774335838694,"score_spread":0.32905676767139974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908545298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5289151,0.007954188,0.0012581177,0.30237013,0.0007856849,0.0003373316,0.0003323045,0.000069525624,0.15797764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933483,0.0029854674,0.0007188519,0.031780615,0.00006732665,0.00009205043,0.000109560875,0.00003898415,0.030724104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922111,0.0010592508,0.0001434161,0.0005168697,0.0016499374,0.0044194083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217755,0.0011190795,0.00035302975,0.00021709455,0.0016567939,0.0044763796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004515973,0.00022309409,0.0004753538,0.0017819038,0.045342054,0.011410354,0.0030992446,0.004744531,0.0077248765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009578049,0.00048784618,0.00048237154,0.003515031,0.019153012,0.0028925734,0.010249178,0.008711603,0.00028865517],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013298928,0.00038240693,0.04325924,0.00038426442,0.00006747364,0.0021779106,0.18480155,0.0012756614,0.0013033865,0.6240971,0.05583572,0.08628226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012189876,0.00013741199,0.11003738,0.0009533469,0.00009000345,0.00033763255,0.33706895,0.0016941852,0.0010005697,0.044219725,0.5041078,0.00023113399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99840987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28714424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28714424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5153682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8268117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917738694","doi":"10.1177/0964663919829848","title":"Visions of Public Safety, Justice, and Healing: The Making of the Rape Kit Backlog in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Sexual assault; Framing (construction); Vision; Political science; Economic Justice; Ethnography; Sociology; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Engineering","score_opus":0.09887461274985439,"score_gpt":0.4064259827575586,"score_spread":0.3075513700077042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917738694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7648222,0.0049339766,0.0014392842,0.08890613,0.00071604626,0.000039663046,0.00010755849,0.000036630725,0.13899845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223703,0.0016060392,0.00019298679,0.0016177977,0.00006999845,0.000018089924,0.000020623653,0.000015962065,0.004221489],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983535,0.0011002024,0.000044853634,0.00011145978,0.0001684171,0.00022157401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972097,0.0016819529,0.00040733878,0.00010137927,0.00022241408,0.00037712546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027314865,0.00025171085,0.00020360743,0.0016139584,0.023413327,0.009398164,0.0008058916,0.0022296144,0.0039557866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051955455,0.00036311653,0.00014183931,0.0013486563,0.022489285,0.007773207,0.0060159834,0.0048417253,0.00020262324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001937508,0.000025527492,0.004322091,0.00006786666,0.0000038022845,0.0008230813,0.9073254,0.00006623102,0.00030197602,0.06856674,0.007869694,0.010608243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014205584,0.000009690661,0.003235704,0.0001825253,0.0000040597747,0.00012531843,0.9448182,0.00004932069,0.00015128459,0.002783002,0.048628286,0.00001112067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0894903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18283078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9765867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009262813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064549674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17793882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987492879","doi":"10.1177/0964663919880303","title":"Yelling ‘Fire’ in a Crowded Occupation: Cynical Fire Hazard Claims and the Technocratic Containment of Dissent","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; CONTEST; Context (archaeology); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Public sphere; Social movement; Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.023450769963320937,"score_gpt":0.2847331570342001,"score_spread":0.26128238707087914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987492879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4697889,0.0021221985,0.018562524,0.11913221,0.0006921929,0.00003728455,0.000015799833,0.00008036653,0.3895685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99406815,0.00010101952,0.00035048032,0.0024454326,0.00007056422,0.000014111042,0.0000020419427,0.000017773738,0.0029303995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96822137,0.02329342,0.0004915387,0.0015615706,0.004545249,0.0018867302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677732,0.025553128,0.0022741086,0.0019481669,0.0015716486,0.00087975163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027271455,0.00032361815,0.00042878356,0.0020119816,0.017678158,0.01274487,0.0016946743,0.00636929,0.0025044184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035821326,0.00029061432,0.00037186104,0.0010646537,0.12774824,0.007928859,0.008808157,0.0076820916,0.0004038681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026465697,0.00003027275,0.0011771672,0.000034436725,0.000006305175,0.00018245976,0.2885034,0.00014733616,0.0003524606,0.7005451,0.002970597,0.0060240505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004049327,0.00009765176,0.004005905,0.0004887513,0.000014489274,0.00040764848,0.42933872,0.0012022769,0.0016785555,0.42628926,0.13634954,0.000086693064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007516622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073656407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027271455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064873593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050675417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14422691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998716054","doi":"10.1177/0964663919894734","title":"Towards a Post-Social Right to Life, Liberty and Security of the Person Through Markets? Conceptions of Citizenship and the Implications for Health Law as Governance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Right to health; Citizenship; Corporate governance; Health care; Charter; Social rights; Social security; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Human rights; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.047382887835215375,"score_gpt":0.38834869907697095,"score_spread":0.34096581124175557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998716054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11821814,0.0025843417,0.029435005,0.3609815,0.00042207693,0.00006091112,0.000064533386,0.0000723436,0.48816115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802782,0.0004291825,0.002335374,0.008257816,0.0001186589,0.00003402852,0.000011655213,0.000024706558,0.008510434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141884,0.0043491763,0.00014858789,0.0009611634,0.0014637839,0.0016585485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949833,0.0021044887,0.0005689915,0.0007115637,0.0007275437,0.0009041088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010612017,0.0002901213,0.00044029683,0.0009414815,0.00879746,0.013315266,0.001351991,0.006395504,0.003521281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072950004,0.00025026358,0.00047799596,0.00076369726,0.119484365,0.0134659065,0.0050803456,0.007823829,0.00041052693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016020583,0.000005228088,0.0001250566,0.0000029960431,6.8767906e-7,0.000011398325,0.004395224,0.000025994983,0.00003339363,0.99390924,0.00050384115,0.0009853044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008014477,0.0000113383685,0.00056897564,0.000075543474,0.0000028292825,0.00004727106,0.008268151,0.00027860035,0.00015727938,0.94449,0.046076518,0.000015378706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06290078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05735753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06290078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012054029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020126183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12506932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005543226","doi":"10.1177/0964663919897970","title":"Attachments to Victimhood: Anti-Trafficking Narratives and the Criminalization of the Sex Trade","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Punitive damages; Criminology; Sex work; Sex trafficking; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Criminal law; Government (linguistics); Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Human trafficking","score_opus":0.04852245377426953,"score_gpt":0.3653248800527399,"score_spread":0.31680242627847033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005543226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6823929,0.010740405,0.0024039613,0.12035209,0.0012159492,0.000054435975,0.000065995366,0.000036512025,0.18273771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832727,0.0022635064,0.00018999292,0.0046311202,0.00020346754,0.000025793674,0.000013073693,0.000030125246,0.009370264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98773694,0.00972728,0.00016506697,0.00038659215,0.00090585166,0.0010782921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345833,0.0048479014,0.0005855263,0.00023006457,0.00038541865,0.00049287174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007941513,0.0007352547,0.00058731204,0.002848946,0.033679616,0.012626204,0.0017704606,0.007183266,0.0032444953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010992747,0.0005020928,0.0003616464,0.0018406888,0.07419851,0.011535226,0.01135962,0.010531332,0.00040303348],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007422294,0.000011432549,0.00032604428,0.000023148781,0.0000021505987,0.00048050872,0.9200337,0.000015274518,0.00008491296,0.07647223,0.0014607017,0.0010824596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031005288,0.00001639099,0.00038201094,0.00014460442,0.0000032373496,0.00036679747,0.9400773,0.000051133924,0.00012547775,0.009244688,0.049574636,0.00001064965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013691145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015595993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033679616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006077044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003606006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044092298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026617520","doi":"10.1177/0964663920924764","title":"Punitive Welfare on the Margins of the State: Narratives of Punishment and (In)Justice in Masiphumelele","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Punitive damages; Punishment (psychology); Imprisonment; Criminology; Welfarism; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Sociology; Welfare; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05481837211709723,"score_gpt":0.34012509849192046,"score_spread":0.28530672637482324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026617520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90995544,0.0019170587,0.002806303,0.02174694,0.00021650599,0.000034029727,0.00003317777,0.00002283232,0.06326774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960127,0.00024980505,0.00015583221,0.00042952117,0.000015455324,0.000016193379,0.0000033198767,0.000011755223,0.0031055138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533796,0.003564117,0.0000614979,0.00016499888,0.00023444026,0.00063698366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975642,0.001519802,0.00039868325,0.000076191915,0.00014523331,0.00029584224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032717367,0.0006221816,0.00047681914,0.0011034218,0.025947468,0.006422063,0.00084123196,0.0025972198,0.0025141684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005728253,0.00032873466,0.00020136115,0.00070578384,0.027399022,0.0060999147,0.0062099816,0.004415055,0.00021690982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001940815,0.000011025806,0.00047310028,0.00002949716,0.0000018005176,0.00050475297,0.95634556,0.000029164243,0.00029694437,0.040445272,0.0005824958,0.0012609308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052637174,0.000027596932,0.0013937379,0.00021734467,0.0000047113786,0.0003132173,0.9347407,0.00016330142,0.0004501202,0.008067283,0.054594036,0.000022706896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009154295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019074837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025947468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008230429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023337689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059716225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040755540","doi":"10.1177/0964663920935155","title":"Trading Nudes Like Hockey Cards: Exploring the Diversity of ‘Revenge Porn’ Cases Responded to in Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pornography; Framing (construction); Postmodernism; Sociology; Child pornography; Law; Criminology; Political science; The Internet; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.2877540466961342,"score_gpt":0.4035316686432901,"score_spread":0.1157776219471559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040755540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9571407,0.00066668226,0.00075335527,0.0023052034,0.000026900061,0.0000895679,0.000082932725,0.000014743939,0.038919855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955628,0.000630789,0.0003387438,0.00046445025,0.000013334765,0.0000237181,0.00006649216,0.00001759506,0.0028820008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98815477,0.0046098176,0.00027795267,0.00089276367,0.003638211,0.0024264501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804796,0.012410869,0.0027982823,0.0008601087,0.0023310182,0.0011201575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009192503,0.00034719813,0.00045975624,0.010205109,0.016128974,0.008619486,0.0025551477,0.0023142123,0.0031468915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030783532,0.000534201,0.00022546557,0.008828672,0.022362623,0.004275177,0.0055833105,0.0026411705,0.00026082573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060173952,0.000059886042,0.05583676,0.000080005804,0.000016431843,0.0023488712,0.87968314,0.00016350597,0.0018068817,0.032673586,0.0025468809,0.024723902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005423573,0.000026518246,0.078930736,0.00019048723,0.0000120954965,0.000979406,0.87956816,0.00043713883,0.0007465348,0.0028599463,0.036204174,0.00003938446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53358763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7534604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53358763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031197758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01376547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9383183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047413082","doi":"10.1177/0964663920946430","title":"Securing the Future: Transformative Justice and Children ‘Born of War’","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Criminology; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Transformative learning; Neglect; Sociology; Isolation (microbiology); Conflict resolution; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03834518921580431,"score_gpt":0.3212374992219237,"score_spread":0.28289231000611936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047413082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92508024,0.004772968,0.00025640833,0.023885222,0.00017633931,0.000032880693,0.00005511807,0.000009720895,0.045731112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366343,0.0020662697,0.00012450272,0.00088765105,0.000026698135,0.000023434655,0.000012053077,0.000006702575,0.0031892858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726605,0.0013468317,0.00006855304,0.00013766455,0.00025716648,0.0009237171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794835,0.0006960748,0.000509662,0.00010995273,0.00014931196,0.00058671803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036250856,0.00027673563,0.00041933882,0.00088243437,0.012369841,0.007311428,0.0008237051,0.0019068542,0.004292763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006102063,0.0002829665,0.00027935204,0.0007023585,0.02121439,0.004781202,0.008380291,0.0043885764,0.0002881245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018181534,0.00007886528,0.007870154,0.00004510491,0.000005226214,0.0013612931,0.94822663,0.000016252126,0.0002141774,0.034046125,0.0014301547,0.0066878665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053151075,0.00004288917,0.0070658294,0.0001637247,0.0000064640913,0.001186908,0.9527966,0.00001656748,0.00017801429,0.0048183347,0.033705544,0.000013855446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01192122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032986764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012369841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038994872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055847717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028292894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048724337","doi":"10.1177/0964663920946360","title":"Do the Challenges of LGBTQ Asylum Applicants Under Dublin Register With the European Court of Human Rights?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Transgender; Refugee; Queer; Vulnerability (computing); Lesbian; Harm; Political science; Invisibility; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.08271863423802008,"score_gpt":0.3476663129515226,"score_spread":0.26494767871350255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048724337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81395525,0.0025008575,0.00077691063,0.09695666,0.00042956587,0.000039518418,0.00011770878,0.0000091995435,0.08521438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98825806,0.0008377087,0.000155562,0.0064756707,0.00005514555,0.000024162888,0.000033654964,0.000010687363,0.004149327],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883257,0.0049344483,0.00036556105,0.0008251475,0.0012132896,0.0043358863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99213797,0.002833765,0.0016732716,0.000491279,0.000758909,0.002104742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014087615,0.00019690659,0.0005623694,0.0014368226,0.011322307,0.012334932,0.001712908,0.004019965,0.008096283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024006493,0.00040752845,0.0005039897,0.0022123777,0.025293853,0.0112731615,0.015746005,0.0047338633,0.0006516228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009888427,0.00008395113,0.069772445,0.00013246963,0.000032148855,0.001917826,0.59496224,0.00016453613,0.00035902372,0.2901514,0.013070575,0.029254485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014526716,0.00003603116,0.030588364,0.0005444241,0.0000101648,0.0005538499,0.89450395,0.00011866103,0.0001277747,0.027071346,0.046380445,0.00005047747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057341624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08983668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057341624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008137415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013957423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11401576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083198000","doi":"10.1177/0964663920956278","title":"Book Review: Canadian Law and Indigenous Self-Determination: A Naturalist Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Naturalism; Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.026832294487313082,"score_gpt":0.34210592745449286,"score_spread":0.3152736329671798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083198000","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004791578,0.7548172,0.00028244455,0.12937522,0.03062629,0.000072486,0.001870382,0.000056203757,0.0824206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009964179,0.767237,0.00057493127,0.05207196,0.016315056,0.00012045847,0.0013838379,0.00011703306,0.15221559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997897,0.00014483494,0.000063071275,0.00015115792,0.0015015928,0.0002423374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99107647,0.0019768875,0.00031782384,0.00015595341,0.005974878,0.0004979941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018585826,0.0011777714,0.0016123418,0.008997742,0.0035583915,0.0058892593,0.0029376517,0.004101121,0.034103032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009297074,0.00060965086,0.00065216265,0.024305407,0.0039485637,0.0026634156,0.0012861424,0.0034833315,0.0043104677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035051194,0.000003213529,0.000055155608,0.00045243706,0.0000056276795,0.000008781082,0.0000457977,0.00005784719,0.000010015914,0.0038979833,0.9824285,0.013031139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006804576,0.000003107546,0.00077233015,0.0012819069,0.00001765956,0.000027917844,0.00012400176,0.00002978339,0.000014037586,0.0013228086,0.9963881,0.000011669719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9259781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9738748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074021876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058956232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11467674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4277594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088246073","doi":"10.1177/0964663920960536","title":"The Travels of a Set of Numbers: The Multiple Networks Enabled by the Colombian ‘Estrato’ System","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Subsidy; Zoning; Payment; Core (optical fiber); Class (philosophy); Work (physics); Differential (mechanical device); Sociology; Law; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Telecommunications; Politics; Artificial intelligence; Finance","score_opus":0.0629452444099069,"score_gpt":0.3327908815253552,"score_spread":0.2698456371154483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088246073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20119348,0.0022018885,0.02154079,0.024857223,0.0001911377,0.00006703943,0.00028033758,0.00015120728,0.74951696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848251,0.0003431893,0.0032299436,0.0003831121,0.000023011906,0.000042062933,0.000040589483,0.000032778207,0.011080295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672014,0.0021427132,0.00006987112,0.0003498064,0.00036982098,0.00034768743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979942,0.0006810474,0.0002822844,0.00044999568,0.00030544846,0.00028711258],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017707514,0.00025680193,0.00030601252,0.0011516913,0.008532777,0.0070191333,0.00065440184,0.0008253979,0.007438981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055363956,0.00024958662,0.00014975412,0.0010740423,0.017864201,0.005950818,0.0046643876,0.0018549954,0.00040063437],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003397505,0.000010747336,0.0031628856,0.00007414919,0.000005769589,0.0002187103,0.05952898,0.00048668543,0.00026640136,0.9058028,0.0066591613,0.023749672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003341307,0.000049998107,0.01390402,0.0003849417,0.000024705156,0.00044939286,0.14214966,0.002224252,0.00040447272,0.1835068,0.65677553,0.00009284356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09373095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16097462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99146724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00876265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030562237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18637079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097208368","doi":"10.1177/0964663920941156","title":"Staying with the Social Project: A Review of Feminist Criminology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Scholarship; Publication; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Editorial board; Criminology; Political science; Law; Library science","score_opus":0.25254792696625245,"score_gpt":0.4849930895543061,"score_spread":0.23244516258805364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097208368","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011331343,0.97041816,0.00014198193,0.02114434,0.0068089026,0.000007291209,0.000007232482,0.0000040944233,0.001354639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00535103,0.97252965,0.00045361568,0.008787157,0.0113296695,0.00005717887,0.000020654556,0.000019363564,0.0014516719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97986335,0.013126663,0.0012475123,0.0009441418,0.0042001233,0.0006182587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540967,0.033784147,0.0028145874,0.00063755916,0.0071351277,0.0015320001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016201185,0.0012830066,0.001782518,0.012087726,0.004545555,0.008373208,0.0022388839,0.005585201,0.0036467905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034641404,0.00072752574,0.0009524227,0.011802911,0.012588938,0.007642152,0.00317457,0.0059354007,0.0009955069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005841446,0.000047714246,0.00089373183,0.022512892,0.00011599567,0.00034495082,0.011704891,0.00020534827,0.00016780269,0.07447581,0.49337345,0.3960989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052025307,0.00002715032,0.001300605,0.025717178,0.000028501985,0.00027794688,0.0040023876,0.000039015187,0.000049144503,0.0066653807,0.96186614,0.000021188878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012120781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021232102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016201185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010223197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022670584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08568108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122332989","doi":"10.1177/0964663910372183","title":"The Right to Pass Freely: Circulation, Begging, and The Bounded Self","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Leeds","keywords":"Begging; Subject (documents); Politics; Law and economics; Autonomy; Sociology; Hegemony; The Imaginary; Epistemology; Locality; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03371684385767107,"score_gpt":0.3596583315393533,"score_spread":0.3259414876816822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122332989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15265511,0.0049646636,0.038962953,0.10430368,0.0005788227,0.00004560604,0.00005980862,0.00011271628,0.69831675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980328,0.000490691,0.0015682806,0.0021910202,0.00014068901,0.00003847709,0.000016346807,0.00005273554,0.0151736345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373996,0.0038395552,0.00015906926,0.0006550507,0.00094360305,0.0006628408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927845,0.0046561826,0.000534166,0.00093728316,0.0005466045,0.0005413054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007563947,0.00029050047,0.00042182294,0.0010026753,0.007518252,0.013379467,0.0013684123,0.005612806,0.00357271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009592979,0.00041929798,0.00037454383,0.0007552836,0.09641166,0.014918524,0.008635311,0.0057971757,0.00054356497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038924677,0.000003835547,0.00008674162,0.0000060291745,6.685769e-7,0.000024672203,0.007785779,0.000038377108,0.000042741125,0.9902947,0.000522482,0.0011901845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014799936,0.000011989218,0.00016968802,0.00008909635,0.0000045639545,0.00006876171,0.006982184,0.00025542907,0.00015470042,0.9503381,0.041898947,0.000011693297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062348093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037524106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013379467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046828315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005409211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040002465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123433211","doi":"10.1177/0964663914552214","title":"In Your Face","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Parallels; Face (sociological concept); Law; Supreme court; Sociology; Accommodation; Political science; Psychology; History; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.09108793170566355,"score_gpt":0.4287643821940179,"score_spread":0.3376764504883544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123433211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029936037,0.0033336557,0.001596664,0.07751418,0.025213683,0.00013299444,0.00082119013,0.00093112653,0.887463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01201967,0.0014314157,0.0008376734,0.035346765,0.0025309073,0.00006236341,0.0003562805,0.00032093225,0.94709396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985928,0.00032715872,0.000046746707,0.00020244242,0.00049816194,0.00033260052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978957,0.00021940569,0.0001087587,0.00015017806,0.0007863036,0.00083958055],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093681284,0.00072242145,0.0005842797,0.0006923441,0.006919096,0.0064835595,0.0012474165,0.003479631,0.59309673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007110331,0.0002687884,0.0005631077,0.0004961809,0.0014546183,0.004536894,0.005951983,0.0048122136,0.38148713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001709278,0.000021184165,0.00033515133,0.00004034289,0.000003050006,0.00034247056,0.0006863909,0.000014737764,0.00011469954,0.005667933,0.94876593,0.04399099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019345948,0.000007709372,0.00014269966,0.00004355839,0.0000012374064,0.0003218394,0.0010539748,0.000010941782,0.000031043208,0.00079937023,0.997581,0.0000046322557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005302413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0118780555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59309673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013132397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024157509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5803981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124090111","doi":"10.1177/0964663912472095","title":"Love Suspended","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Citizenship; Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Law; Sociology; Political science; Unification; Nationality; Democratic legitimacy; Democracy; Law and economics; Immigration; Politics","score_opus":0.0586667959804662,"score_gpt":0.35116861583886866,"score_spread":0.29250181985840246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124090111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00399597,0.001015601,0.0008376971,0.010642996,0.0012436961,0.00003719664,0.0002474679,0.00006503513,0.98191434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061009344,0.0006850228,0.00044409948,0.010911258,0.0005515069,0.000057192166,0.00026744392,0.00008236088,0.9259917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981989,0.0004440572,0.000056818073,0.00033709055,0.00060501334,0.00035828116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883205,0.00022662558,0.00009606845,0.00020544874,0.0003692143,0.00027054394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015436764,0.0003445343,0.00044173838,0.0007483823,0.0071315137,0.005138019,0.0009394085,0.0023124195,0.17897397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00422544,0.0002035523,0.00039696405,0.0006843752,0.0027328336,0.0033980815,0.0046081175,0.0032620542,0.05262289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055879216,0.000053116393,0.0018969766,0.00006319307,0.000011043576,0.00057673117,0.010041449,0.000048838472,0.00035532322,0.53732175,0.37286386,0.07671188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028932398,0.000009278945,0.00039774145,0.000032004744,0.0000016467004,0.00013901948,0.0013953624,0.000016229831,0.000058504473,0.004919008,0.99302375,0.000004500792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053728637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012540686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17897397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016541337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015982403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5987276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125565023","doi":"10.1177/0964663913487398","title":"Knowing Women","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Bosnian; Tribunal; Appeal; Genocide; Criminology; International community; Law; Sociology; Harm; Adjudication; Political science","score_opus":0.05975359054858783,"score_gpt":0.35580267000847643,"score_spread":0.2960490794598886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125565023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015807413,0.009138365,0.0016513396,0.057369325,0.002923765,0.00003686375,0.0001964851,0.000051840714,0.9128245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38774076,0.015189221,0.0014408799,0.047108334,0.0017339063,0.00008684481,0.00026465883,0.00008498674,0.54635036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998442,0.00064121897,0.000037366157,0.00020876857,0.00026408976,0.00040659905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988894,0.00038944092,0.00014090545,0.00014048305,0.00016504306,0.00027484246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015847816,0.0003712863,0.00028867138,0.00062715553,0.0075717,0.005165611,0.0005573773,0.002408607,0.061506357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037139761,0.00015724992,0.00025214104,0.00055731484,0.006824508,0.0061277943,0.0041877585,0.002421856,0.01272487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003202733,0.000055300537,0.002954328,0.00016759403,0.000009214813,0.00075183023,0.12815954,0.000052204876,0.00046047123,0.5381543,0.19341782,0.13578537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017287281,0.000011933082,0.0003550738,0.000131407,0.0000018978291,0.00027201328,0.02618768,0.000005800039,0.00006722035,0.011569663,0.96139073,0.0000049742393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004898925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007130757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061506357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001829097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022668282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20575929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134890201","doi":"10.1177/0964663921999696","title":"The Struggle for the Human Right to a Good Life for Everyone: Oscar Correas’s Legacy for the <i>Crítica Jurídica</i> Movement in Latin America","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Marxist philosophy; Latin Americans; Originality; Sociology; Human rights; Movement (music); Perspective (graphical); Law; Critical legal studies; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Social science; Politics; Legal realism; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.051027383676988974,"score_gpt":0.2983430607203441,"score_spread":0.24731567704335514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134890201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026572978,0.09031065,0.001076229,0.6916457,0.0043579875,0.000013844392,0.000031910913,0.00002727247,0.18596347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8548458,0.04717637,0.0008860471,0.04985156,0.005297319,0.00004863866,0.000030082689,0.00015332569,0.041710813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620664,0.0021679641,0.0000679814,0.0004125933,0.00058141054,0.0005634469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953017,0.003045531,0.00037871083,0.00018899847,0.00062056555,0.00046444626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00514917,0.0004292502,0.00049264025,0.0014223198,0.012403091,0.010012356,0.0010728678,0.003682151,0.0026106816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077435505,0.00019423927,0.0002764179,0.0017520881,0.040487874,0.0047610933,0.004829128,0.007922411,0.0003028036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000218975,0.000023717881,0.00051229016,0.00015761328,0.0000101537535,0.0003648407,0.06565517,0.00014227962,0.00015520776,0.8219262,0.09723386,0.013796805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000764564,0.000011517532,0.0006456983,0.00064008834,0.000006618618,0.00022488735,0.02567486,0.00008205755,0.00013640457,0.073430605,0.8991091,0.000030477162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042656947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042021144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042656947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013580138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00923944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098531246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155504115","doi":"10.1177/09646639211007890","title":"Book Review: A Jurisprudence of the Body","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02380261088830227,"score_gpt":0.36349922165052484,"score_spread":0.3396966107622226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155504115","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024141115,0.68350273,0.00086298527,0.17478456,0.09355602,0.000051507446,0.00020617426,0.00006618331,0.0467284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006783219,0.5407446,0.0012734247,0.1627494,0.10742843,0.00019517039,0.00034877498,0.0002737352,0.18020324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964244,0.0011247197,0.0002457482,0.00032206526,0.001688158,0.0001949271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98683435,0.007823923,0.0006387551,0.00050501694,0.0035218382,0.0006762094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003614069,0.00070368336,0.0017623092,0.0051944763,0.0016465364,0.007987916,0.0017586648,0.006953472,0.017477455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01711105,0.00068676216,0.00066432165,0.0059149372,0.004462809,0.00527497,0.002076461,0.0073674084,0.011435129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061681026,0.0000067976202,0.000022651475,0.00038061637,0.0000068825902,0.00002116,0.000049923747,0.00002695062,0.000047780846,0.007887461,0.9725937,0.018949825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004394868,0.000005465382,0.00007265311,0.0008068308,0.0000075308208,0.000059894683,0.000032770535,0.000014198338,0.000021295906,0.0024545086,0.9965161,0.0000042728097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006915523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018671751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017477455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004745916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011324988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058467925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161496390","doi":"10.1177/09646639211015340","title":"<i>Fast</i> Refugee Protection: Temporality and Migration Control","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Temporality; Temporalities; Refugee; Civil servants; Control (management); Political science; Key (lock); State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Computer security; Economics; Computer science; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04094984181489948,"score_gpt":0.34421461170458645,"score_spread":0.303264769889687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161496390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315129,0.0012925074,0.00307519,0.0034479552,0.00003743355,0.000050429117,0.00029738073,0.000022257913,0.060263984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975821,0.00023936726,0.00031596058,0.000059793038,0.0000054740362,0.000007220025,0.000036365087,0.0000062330073,0.0017474637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980749,0.0003941744,0.00010106219,0.00024256975,0.0005533868,0.00063392863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579096,0.0011996493,0.0014902479,0.000424525,0.0007789765,0.00031561143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023882645,0.00012942766,0.00019295322,0.0021540585,0.0049200053,0.006566514,0.00080608786,0.00039855525,0.003998293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007246006,0.00012714387,0.00021894318,0.0029968966,0.011701086,0.0019185342,0.0032444166,0.00090809417,0.00012459894],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018336438,0.000062496925,0.31805483,0.00023207255,0.000063321604,0.0008240332,0.3089862,0.0012490215,0.0021827337,0.2691988,0.0025716412,0.09639148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008251338,0.00004602578,0.5486169,0.00039220983,0.00004566368,0.00025761884,0.36330128,0.00073170086,0.0010556194,0.011218155,0.07425402,0.000072610776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7735558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8280781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7735558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020155242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01935964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4555555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167636482","doi":"10.1177/09646639211020817","title":"Examining the Legal Legitimacy of Informal Economic Activities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Principle of legality; Normative; Lifeworld; Sociology; Informal sector; Space (punctuation); Legitimation; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Social science; Economics; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.08912021347694377,"score_gpt":0.2874269211007344,"score_spread":0.19830670762379066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167636482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72161025,0.0012961727,0.024105065,0.012486821,0.00008152184,0.000080166705,0.00007837203,0.00005335453,0.2402083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861336,0.00013489502,0.0006163602,0.0000624036,0.000019293864,0.000015619418,0.000014759552,0.000004577627,0.0005186224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98644966,0.0057504256,0.0010096913,0.0010204037,0.0044162697,0.0013536242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9094409,0.063969545,0.012871426,0.005329466,0.0068821637,0.0015065323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011058625,0.00018884175,0.000480755,0.0046612914,0.004661991,0.009385255,0.001268022,0.00221503,0.003061409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07273544,0.0003094784,0.0003085098,0.0032903764,0.02894792,0.009780842,0.0071179573,0.0025458073,0.00024764123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019127801,0.000050945822,0.016557105,0.00004269677,0.000009292934,0.00021709941,0.0085982075,0.000559843,0.00017755508,0.96157765,0.00027810267,0.011912444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045372624,0.0000631191,0.04393586,0.0006021879,0.00004025297,0.00047079095,0.024994627,0.005592325,0.00094018976,0.8926196,0.030638918,0.000056755278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008758204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007545919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011058625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053397724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062454124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058484316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171212085","doi":"10.1177/09646639211022786","title":"Settler Colonialism and the South African TRC: Ambivalent Denial and Democratisation Without Decolonisation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Decolonization; Denial; Democratization; Scholarship; Gender studies; Ambivalence; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics; Law; Democracy; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.03660394011820325,"score_gpt":0.3507990178362136,"score_spread":0.31419507771801036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171212085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6764823,0.0026833774,0.002670541,0.029662482,0.00014572326,0.00006271551,0.000022334963,0.000014401378,0.2882561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791604,0.00021780757,0.00015904702,0.00033031547,0.000010483086,0.000007469701,0.000002576103,0.0000027073672,0.0013535838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590224,0.0019409492,0.00020152684,0.00031396633,0.00072548864,0.0009158538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402,0.0028068356,0.0014602264,0.00066049997,0.0005488784,0.00050363253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047004153,0.00019099866,0.00024328528,0.0013130816,0.0083162105,0.005348172,0.0005781515,0.0014911771,0.0026395079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010958192,0.00019117176,0.00023439492,0.0015813231,0.046016693,0.0039460477,0.008136907,0.0045134164,0.00012757827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016440048,0.000024292021,0.0036462606,0.00006653497,0.0000055855503,0.00041910508,0.12361557,0.000085604435,0.00033265236,0.86196333,0.00071029924,0.009114349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052812724,0.00011031666,0.049521793,0.0009838588,0.0000369926,0.002469739,0.28211173,0.00086990505,0.0015572023,0.48148584,0.1807061,0.00009367847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012466631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019927898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012466631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068510836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056344634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049708247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200183430","doi":"10.1177/09646639211041476","title":"Indigenous parents and child welfare: Mistrust, epistemic injustice, and training","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Ignorance; Injustice; Welfare; Sociology; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Political science; Gender studies; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.030217949825514567,"score_gpt":0.3346495993931135,"score_spread":0.30443164956759894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200183430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789163,0.00079535926,0.00017778786,0.007980911,0.000037805636,0.000011558956,0.000009106258,0.000004156576,0.012066975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826115,0.00037305185,0.000047788675,0.00040043393,0.0000068500317,0.000005496046,0.000002476355,0.0000017963624,0.000900945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956429,0.0026803098,0.00008380363,0.00013709831,0.00050548976,0.00095036655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492514,0.0026488744,0.0009427624,0.00023023972,0.00050509546,0.00074782764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043183584,0.00018742177,0.00024384238,0.00059990224,0.016165737,0.0039115953,0.00067497743,0.0011412492,0.0029891448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008910415,0.00022957454,0.00015451816,0.0007487508,0.014886681,0.0018429628,0.0044786986,0.0026207056,0.00009812466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011209539,0.000029829793,0.030009577,0.000033910066,0.0000051726283,0.00057910476,0.9590081,0.000017865328,0.00011335687,0.0032080803,0.0007044361,0.0062792683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001831983,0.000012111746,0.020313129,0.00011472427,0.000005538835,0.00016548317,0.97347516,0.000028969713,0.00005488679,0.0005041963,0.0053157182,0.0000082784045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4129107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5864172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4129107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011295117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013545364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8210146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210818221","doi":"10.1177/09646639221076089","title":"External Intimacy: Community-based Intervention Concerning Crime and the Integral State in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Marxism and Critical Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Civil society; Sociology; Politics; State (computer science); Hegemony; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Intervention (counseling); Borough; Law; Criminology; Public administration; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06477412900453239,"score_gpt":0.31722366650904066,"score_spread":0.25244953750450827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210818221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74965715,0.002056422,0.0018418466,0.018837495,0.00016613954,0.000079020545,0.000096501615,0.00003231456,0.2272331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98851633,0.00031946108,0.00017256854,0.00039966297,0.000010548777,0.000009697955,0.000013245195,0.0000055923033,0.010552893],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988223,0.00048338244,0.00001361984,0.0000957693,0.00013366698,0.0004513266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989598,0.00039873229,0.00014143533,0.000042883166,0.00018083751,0.00027625015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010656259,0.00030512252,0.00017686264,0.00108605,0.02326405,0.005007506,0.0013327898,0.0013957868,0.0061671766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019638753,0.0001116812,0.00014190451,0.0013747881,0.023858061,0.0015216578,0.003918952,0.0018683964,0.00009802927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008508013,0.0001493002,0.029004494,0.00014462187,0.000020312213,0.002380162,0.5020423,0.0012197514,0.00086903886,0.4062436,0.011779219,0.046062164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032782864,0.000080821424,0.062773794,0.00031321376,0.00004028506,0.00038267742,0.63946307,0.0015280595,0.0008836745,0.019483203,0.2749371,0.00008141672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99139786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07852057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07852057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040210973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5697093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221126305","doi":"10.1177/09646639221088529","title":"Book Review: Dispute Resolution in China: Litigation, Arbitration, Mediation, and their Interactions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Dispute resolution; China; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Law; Online dispute resolution; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.015527740736148436,"score_gpt":0.27587493846449207,"score_spread":0.26034719772834364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221126305","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003625509,0.93721443,0.0002170299,0.021091798,0.020232094,0.000049749113,0.00039202537,0.00003210963,0.020408304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037245753,0.91193,0.0002386602,0.0072786007,0.014881061,0.0000845491,0.000557121,0.000031597247,0.06127376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991478,0.00015252393,0.000059129994,0.000090310925,0.00047412503,0.000076125616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616736,0.0015566213,0.00030106527,0.00006493246,0.0016747243,0.00023521027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011837673,0.0010012033,0.0018444493,0.0049205725,0.00087723375,0.0028869375,0.0014315459,0.0022413074,0.030157575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037857345,0.00044991737,0.0004978262,0.01814182,0.0010008352,0.002147414,0.0007971856,0.0022463193,0.0067069056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013448923,0.000018194516,0.0002461508,0.0018927569,0.000016378306,0.000023595041,0.000047077865,0.00016255322,0.00004759303,0.0019822328,0.902446,0.09310402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015131686,0.000040726285,0.0029912193,0.0026514295,0.00003680942,0.000060372015,0.00010726601,0.00011895117,0.000041740615,0.0009617501,0.9929611,0.000013608995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056924615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15571938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056924615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050096423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012601604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11318654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233891557","doi":"10.1177/0964663903012004011","title":"Book Reviews","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08864946230728679,"score_gpt":0.38697956163899483,"score_spread":0.29833009933170807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233891557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033999878,0.062305357,0.0007920739,0.0068237847,0.010592819,0.000117867436,0.00079307315,0.0005169046,0.9177181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005441153,0.013592295,0.00025982127,0.0017119332,0.0013621277,0.000033578555,0.00033867988,0.00010608059,0.9820514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941504,0.000058503534,0.000015437276,0.00006088489,0.00040011606,0.000049977007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988819,0.00024184962,0.000060940336,0.00013780453,0.00046899405,0.00020850131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005507121,0.0009787785,0.0009564128,0.0038380162,0.0013558788,0.0039059045,0.0013141582,0.001743787,0.47148147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022270244,0.00043083524,0.00052939623,0.0045548053,0.000676398,0.002209835,0.0014284457,0.0018572331,0.42763004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007329206,0.000017100418,0.00002938372,0.0001350136,0.0000015145789,0.00001587222,0.000019825993,0.000033882923,0.00008548097,0.001794899,0.91324574,0.084613994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002195682,0.0000042415286,0.000073024195,0.00009301581,0.0000014690813,0.000022496739,0.000015893913,0.0000103591965,0.000023576962,0.00048744938,0.99926466,0.0000016600943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005278048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016094573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47148147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015285129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024957696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7538675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280638195","doi":"10.1177/09646639221099361","title":"Worker Representation in the Regulation of Occupational Health: Explaining the Shift to Knowledge Activism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Corporate governance; Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Capital (architecture); Sociology; Industrial relations; Governmentality; Social capital; Process (computing); Political science; Political economy; Social science; Economics; Politics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.08799407297692578,"score_gpt":0.3569321607849227,"score_spread":0.2689380878079969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280638195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64067507,0.0010336499,0.029710513,0.04183373,0.0001836143,0.000056603993,0.00002196267,0.00006717565,0.2864177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960924,0.00007925061,0.00037791266,0.00034604155,0.00004075552,0.000013300608,0.0000032288162,0.0000071751533,0.0030399528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363315,0.0036645618,0.00009977055,0.00056925154,0.0007132167,0.0013200365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226487,0.0051409504,0.0011037767,0.0007126477,0.0003314625,0.00044637182],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00766103,0.00021032382,0.0001998015,0.0012915147,0.0038376881,0.0052943085,0.0013517688,0.003481493,0.0036084636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008844253,0.00026026162,0.000414453,0.0007079354,0.0319052,0.002958969,0.006883409,0.00244242,0.00037495876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008019475,0.00011234156,0.009071467,0.000056708457,0.0000067077885,0.00073374686,0.29800516,0.0008036154,0.0015937585,0.66613144,0.0014416146,0.021963192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009421857,0.00019778906,0.024941029,0.0003994363,0.000026592987,0.000884115,0.18904208,0.009477565,0.00347572,0.6294678,0.1419047,0.000088992005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050051217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029817317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046382872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030127028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0405159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281706283","doi":"10.1177/09646639221104253","title":"The Embodiment of Contempt: Ontario Provincial Prison Food","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prison; Contempt; Foodways; Criminology; Power (physics); Politics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05063070982675691,"score_gpt":0.3404501322344012,"score_spread":0.28981942240764424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281706283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97051424,0.0003367322,0.0003012268,0.002726514,0.00004479408,0.000026676998,0.000055211065,0.000010968554,0.025983619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667144,0.00012962152,0.00008269395,0.00012687813,0.000003312373,0.000006846249,0.00001196525,0.0000057128955,0.0029614521],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770445,0.00087435875,0.00005051073,0.00013783203,0.00033155724,0.0009012884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975662,0.0005977969,0.00040885695,0.00012241332,0.00046329916,0.0008414576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012232652,0.00032088908,0.00031881066,0.0006146333,0.026024776,0.0037745547,0.0011185814,0.000985204,0.0032497733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041043786,0.0003606167,0.00025843727,0.0009331133,0.018444676,0.001552856,0.00486259,0.0020810477,0.0001206455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035035777,0.000011050905,0.006767981,0.00003329243,0.0000042718307,0.0006549566,0.9857781,0.000036536,0.00046896533,0.0028519833,0.0010354616,0.002322425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024624537,0.000020002573,0.011039737,0.000060652543,0.0000049436994,0.00016370925,0.9679827,0.000046761816,0.00012307637,0.00027966074,0.020260492,0.000015748861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92586887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97770464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07413113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046423797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0354854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33682978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293425604","doi":"10.1177/09646639221123029","title":"Law and Transitions to Capitalism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Realm; Sociology; Law; Naturalization; Capital (architecture); Constructive; Political science; Politics; History","score_opus":0.040709362294822,"score_gpt":0.34902215499388073,"score_spread":0.30831279269905876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293425604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17626692,0.011254994,0.012697274,0.09437548,0.0005089467,0.000045349123,0.0000617681,0.00008806454,0.70470124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98967826,0.0010141355,0.00048601528,0.0015659415,0.00010586594,0.000018333183,0.000010336618,0.000012183671,0.007108954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997407,0.0011815724,0.000062279476,0.00034341592,0.0004005775,0.00060516584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860317,0.00074153347,0.00017999744,0.00015031965,0.00012909308,0.00019590779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025285713,0.00018686127,0.00020265626,0.0010196879,0.0042248718,0.007057891,0.00056644203,0.0020283735,0.0026560856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044392156,0.00011261715,0.00026822265,0.0009771786,0.047321666,0.0061589405,0.0050465725,0.0036588362,0.00029295497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028750494,0.0000039265237,0.00008794962,0.0000037661243,3.9093675e-7,0.000022508393,0.0022466402,0.00006368447,0.000019131887,0.9958884,0.000506655,0.0011540222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004723551,0.000009715557,0.00046043063,0.00004037134,0.0000010007805,0.00004412184,0.003320891,0.00020867985,0.00009361176,0.9523079,0.043503333,0.000005157527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005440421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031298685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008474018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008474018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041602543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06148362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309027090","doi":"10.1177/09646639221138416","title":"‘They Just Let Us Rot to Death:’ Anti-Colonialism, Contestation, and Resistance to Reparations for Indian Residential School Abuse","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Redress; Colonialism; Foregrounding; Resistance (ecology); Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Compensation (psychology); Criminology; Gender studies; Law; History; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.042274851942730084,"score_gpt":0.38730101038971326,"score_spread":0.3450261584469832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309027090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.865325,0.002038728,0.0010191114,0.04644129,0.00026694225,0.000032233318,0.000012170673,0.00002669569,0.08483791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565303,0.00034594632,0.00009985884,0.0010929675,0.00002775996,0.000004358128,0.0000016050742,0.0000070805413,0.0027672446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319905,0.0039344765,0.000120406046,0.00029070248,0.00070959236,0.0017457585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490595,0.0021589384,0.00091776333,0.00040491723,0.0007215113,0.0008909628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064790514,0.00026592994,0.0002654686,0.00088606495,0.024228208,0.010147052,0.0013817389,0.002347584,0.0026056676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015110746,0.0002319353,0.0002664855,0.00088165904,0.04342134,0.0037500015,0.006854488,0.0067484537,0.0002322544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012777983,0.000023637987,0.00395605,0.000030259174,0.000005782212,0.0005757133,0.9317685,0.000037350877,0.00020507457,0.05296411,0.002278738,0.008142124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039435745,0.000025761874,0.005502582,0.00012125565,0.000009711156,0.0003683311,0.94534034,0.000066046,0.00022256158,0.004184888,0.044130772,0.000023898296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12897412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2149846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87102586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008939661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012218666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25644684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311358603","doi":"10.1177/09646639221143509","title":"Confronting Populism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Democratization; Democracy; Politics; Deliberation; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Law; Liberal democracy; Government (linguistics); Political philosophy; Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.08001868701900172,"score_gpt":0.4052472125204494,"score_spread":0.32522852550144765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311358603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07389076,0.008584985,0.017942255,0.42960784,0.0029369928,0.00006383397,0.00004136059,0.000087163615,0.46684486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91758513,0.0017156326,0.002338948,0.05324444,0.0025561864,0.00013647642,0.000021161064,0.00012042394,0.022281703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794255,0.0109528825,0.00035429903,0.0027145199,0.004014378,0.0025384708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98016775,0.013583308,0.0013592902,0.0019623218,0.0014809514,0.0014464272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023486443,0.000674751,0.00095885526,0.002505113,0.019573588,0.013226214,0.001698808,0.010133309,0.006319231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035318423,0.00032489304,0.0007411004,0.0014834448,0.09818327,0.01252227,0.018463526,0.017780831,0.0010141351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066808648,0.000005690274,0.00017321996,0.00001349689,0.0000034002683,0.00006157023,0.008505716,0.000035938403,0.00003462837,0.98539215,0.0036202732,0.0021473374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014977518,0.000012740673,0.0002460944,0.0001250893,0.000003931294,0.0000802712,0.0061186333,0.00020242996,0.00016630154,0.9061557,0.08686269,0.000011103079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033990475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031697615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023486443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075504524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006984796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1242097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318464446","doi":"10.1177/09646639231153124","title":"The ‘Will of the People’: The Populist Challenge to Democracy in the Name of Popular Sovereignty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Populism; Popular sovereignty; Democracy; Politics; Sovereignty; Sociology; Representation (politics); Identity (music); State (computer science); Adversary; Liberal democracy; Law; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.051018318103924265,"score_gpt":0.3689046726983056,"score_spread":0.31788635459438136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318464446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29578087,0.0039468664,0.012477624,0.08897889,0.0007724888,0.000032975666,0.00001713717,0.000039227154,0.597954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909266,0.00031763365,0.00027731806,0.001969447,0.00016656287,0.000012528029,0.000003237304,0.000015206279,0.0063114264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346477,0.004021322,0.000071192946,0.0004311713,0.00104844,0.00096305826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694073,0.0021748464,0.00026981853,0.0002221076,0.00015597562,0.00023666873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062559303,0.00029014703,0.00033185646,0.0012452957,0.009873229,0.010436346,0.00080248766,0.003508498,0.0018891754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007820904,0.00019934252,0.00035351358,0.00091465504,0.054876506,0.006564141,0.009293763,0.004983802,0.00027198342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006804246,0.000005356521,0.00015570714,0.000008417858,0.0000022401885,0.00006729956,0.032213602,0.000054094664,0.000094900526,0.96503186,0.0007883014,0.0015714614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018914869,0.00003523378,0.0009886365,0.00014960217,0.000009337598,0.00016290738,0.04448799,0.00058978784,0.0006362657,0.78651893,0.16637641,0.000026064483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025948714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002314253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010436346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037218393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002856693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03308487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318612073","doi":"10.1177/09646639231153134","title":"Re-viewing Video Evidence and Police Violence in the Criminal Courts in Turkey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Criminology; Trespass; Law; Law enforcement; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1348693409045353,"score_gpt":0.4216770394723221,"score_spread":0.28680769856778676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318612073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860681,0.0007975098,0.00017912366,0.0011068336,0.00002654391,0.00001046966,0.000028011877,0.000003737051,0.011779689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987425,0.0003154596,0.000077169534,0.0001050996,0.000008715569,0.0000033893384,0.000015929072,0.0000031061827,0.00072858913],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676716,0.0015101809,0.00017144943,0.00030340432,0.0006922845,0.0005555428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702317,0.0011118411,0.0008684839,0.00010578715,0.0005789677,0.00031184094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014447537,0.00024433297,0.00025901943,0.002708159,0.0039269025,0.0056729494,0.00070161425,0.0012124314,0.0031098728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071218605,0.00025037,0.00019217766,0.0017625977,0.0040166313,0.0026128562,0.0030190342,0.001346454,0.00024819458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018583075,0.0002660663,0.12868844,0.00029514777,0.000048915055,0.016777677,0.76638246,0.00025800354,0.003542275,0.014509828,0.003995273,0.065050095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052800992,0.000067527806,0.08147659,0.00024929747,0.000025287136,0.0022703924,0.8971245,0.0002566066,0.0005543863,0.0011848289,0.016747983,0.000037229955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03309031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044930242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03309031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040944265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020736163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06579536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320494920","doi":"10.1177/09646639231155606","title":"Jurisdictional Relationships: Democracy and the Administrative State Through the Lens of <i>Caring Society v Canada</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Jurisdiction; Accountability; Democracy; State (computer science); Principle of legality; Political science; Public administration; Indigenous; Law; Rule of law; Sociology; Human rights; Citizenship","score_opus":0.10494261767499226,"score_gpt":0.35428728047102315,"score_spread":0.2493446627960309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320494920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16932333,0.005166785,0.0067999186,0.11322179,0.0002348144,0.00007936729,0.00010817921,0.00004175328,0.70502406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875525,0.00069580023,0.0005390829,0.002185707,0.00003629598,0.000016957498,0.000012777884,0.000012429962,0.008948374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959084,0.0013373916,0.000057910598,0.00027095273,0.00097308523,0.001452298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798536,0.00079288584,0.00018303891,0.0001143118,0.00047601448,0.00044834812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027552827,0.00020038684,0.0002390492,0.0012894302,0.026824148,0.013140952,0.0014982775,0.002337462,0.003085946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040591024,0.00016985701,0.00027165894,0.0016749437,0.07104188,0.0034377659,0.0051855464,0.005324007,0.00013442694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014274704,0.0000031118698,0.00032445526,0.0000057634256,9.085764e-7,0.000054848882,0.01983721,0.00008538526,0.000032095046,0.97736585,0.0012281046,0.0010607489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024043222,0.000015443688,0.0064286175,0.00030327914,0.00002432673,0.0002237487,0.15849718,0.0009962935,0.00032768145,0.46541497,0.36768296,0.0000613587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9424356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9566339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07290643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07290643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11680176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5289756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321241654","doi":"10.1177/09646639231156144","title":"Understanding Populism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Populism; Epitome; Democracy; Meaning (existential); Democratic theory; Constitutionalism; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.48953785867095145,"score_gpt":0.4591671423226077,"score_spread":0.030370716348343763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321241654","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08062449,0.016300436,0.041137382,0.12501723,0.0009780088,0.000060841216,0.00008916152,0.00007883266,0.7357136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97424805,0.00311545,0.003599745,0.0053753844,0.000729199,0.00007390427,0.000034359997,0.00007371598,0.012750172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509525,0.002886791,0.00008071031,0.000563717,0.00068387936,0.0006897389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566877,0.0029683078,0.00034251253,0.0004154915,0.00033773226,0.00026714377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007658851,0.0005311265,0.0005724841,0.0031921521,0.010208958,0.010784338,0.0009777267,0.003697324,0.0042914446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008659834,0.00022499012,0.0005644765,0.002450889,0.057153396,0.012146816,0.007325327,0.004932124,0.0005663845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001492546,0.0000018428234,0.00010140871,0.000007195005,8.298591e-7,0.00001631385,0.004590365,0.000044855795,0.00001315541,0.99357635,0.00055209943,0.0010939834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026976804,0.0000034708507,0.00016119004,0.000052006562,0.0000014616388,0.000030934203,0.0026937944,0.00022257128,0.00004483182,0.95435864,0.04242446,0.0000038786884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045359074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031826242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010784338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066605154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035034388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048325717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367679857","doi":"10.1177/09646639231171674","title":"Children's Legal Geographies, and the “Make-Believe” of Property","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Boundary (topology); Space (punctuation); Law and economics; Sociology; Obstacle; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.040460203135918436,"score_gpt":0.33471974304772084,"score_spread":0.2942595399118024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367679857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88239074,0.001943575,0.0006031616,0.016435465,0.00007918574,0.0000261873,0.000107493426,0.00002274151,0.09839147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967699,0.00055501267,0.00010994959,0.00015081723,0.0000066576176,0.000012186587,0.000016394593,0.000006171858,0.0023729312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969567,0.0012856261,0.00012214617,0.00024726545,0.0005380001,0.0008502228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948731,0.0018471681,0.0017239179,0.0003525429,0.00045501214,0.00074818864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002707617,0.0002355222,0.00034873572,0.0011970184,0.006820698,0.0072492994,0.00072568626,0.0012922013,0.007804168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011918671,0.00028287643,0.00026020454,0.00084144884,0.02354352,0.0044196225,0.0050425925,0.0025030298,0.0003228336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011824793,0.00004010065,0.029639842,0.000060611193,0.00000829704,0.000994738,0.86782056,0.000080385274,0.00026605037,0.08956388,0.0025089562,0.009004721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005761237,0.000025360012,0.030206488,0.00028404937,0.000014905936,0.00094643055,0.89867574,0.00005031022,0.00019966759,0.010101441,0.059464067,0.000025696216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07520417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12706883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07520417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039803884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040149027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14953285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376603807","doi":"10.1177/09646639231173051","title":"Registering Cosmetics? The Constitution of Legal Form and Injurious Substance in Canada (1945–1946)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Kent","keywords":"Cosmetics; Constitution; Law; Legislation; Legislature; Doctrine; Scholarship; Political science; Government (linguistics); Parliament; Materiality (auditing); Sociology; Politics; Art; Medicine; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04559423433124038,"score_gpt":0.2543853888271711,"score_spread":0.20879115449593072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376603807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4996358,0.034247864,0.002464048,0.081448026,0.0010424332,0.00019827404,0.0032745916,0.000106892905,0.3775821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8904634,0.008673483,0.0011171137,0.0047316058,0.00008599174,0.000028661249,0.00032031265,0.000047973437,0.09453145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975145,0.0002007458,0.000081048776,0.00029826205,0.000996427,0.0009090023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728596,0.00064852025,0.00024239466,0.00012164748,0.0011920586,0.00050943077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022657209,0.00032339487,0.0002560411,0.0027097152,0.023712173,0.0064291568,0.0013119433,0.0026048806,0.004809508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005674483,0.00053875096,0.00031463045,0.0050156093,0.021681024,0.0025718391,0.0020290588,0.0037903052,0.00027368488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010594994,0.000070054746,0.016162472,0.0001594038,0.00001896555,0.0008452352,0.17146096,0.0007029859,0.0009662343,0.68980575,0.047130916,0.07257105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012134635,0.00002961168,0.06558627,0.00029094197,0.000024213381,0.00020024602,0.037242353,0.00025998667,0.001065396,0.008654086,0.8865187,0.000116074916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99864584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99925524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27028903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27028903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20367339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8463613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377024036","doi":"10.1177/09646639231175977","title":"Indigenous Anti/Deportation: Contesting Sovereignty, Citizenship, and Belonging in Canada and Australia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Indigenous; Sovereignty; Citizenship; Colonialism; Political science; Solidarity; Immigration; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.05644292418040184,"score_gpt":0.3535088326323759,"score_spread":0.2970659084519741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377024036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95508534,0.0010819979,0.00029027747,0.0038095133,0.000041828647,0.000031007283,0.000016086196,0.000006700406,0.03963732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99494356,0.00046019055,0.00013083397,0.00027108318,0.0000045050915,0.000007091824,0.0000058333135,0.0000046394844,0.0041723624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499184,0.0011107754,0.00009730361,0.00030668481,0.0010125075,0.002480912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962018,0.0010401118,0.00040631596,0.00015800676,0.00082106254,0.0013726745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033952922,0.00032920952,0.00062662584,0.001907908,0.04518998,0.006446841,0.0016714862,0.001843777,0.0018973968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006958716,0.00029250118,0.00022953143,0.002788742,0.027082758,0.002252141,0.009098299,0.004189069,0.000061318686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035067682,0.000035309906,0.015398587,0.00006754819,0.000012794305,0.0020790324,0.9061753,0.0001685443,0.00038421407,0.06227963,0.0015483813,0.011815575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007717489,0.000027957334,0.044590503,0.00024810826,0.000024607874,0.0007543799,0.8912677,0.00046417175,0.00038984694,0.0049070516,0.057234228,0.00008375023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99638677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075903885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.075903885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0846724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5507238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383822577","doi":"10.1177/09646639231187093","title":"Documenting the Document: The Forensic Hospital Report and Its Knowledge Moves","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Skepticism; Knowledge production; Forensic accounting; Production (economics); Psychology; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.03229321907625092,"score_gpt":0.3612828574510367,"score_spread":0.3289896383747858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383822577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42604285,0.0046474114,0.028944446,0.13216315,0.00087921164,0.0013307605,0.0011193699,0.00018837082,0.40468445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608397,0.0012541233,0.012438244,0.002297097,0.00011465129,0.00016931487,0.00020602347,0.00005921751,0.022621583],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683129,0.015150846,0.0014989821,0.0018952107,0.009898983,0.0032430114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169022,0.055905387,0.007829316,0.006793963,0.009684452,0.0028846404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02901164,0.0003776134,0.00032931715,0.004522226,0.027252628,0.022505024,0.0045577576,0.0053539,0.0044466695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098723024,0.00072089984,0.00032168088,0.0062206173,0.028586552,0.007144947,0.007890182,0.0048140795,0.00082397007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842945,0.00005036351,0.0072921757,0.00020098714,0.0000108466575,0.0052677877,0.46876544,0.000746588,0.0011066974,0.44100958,0.018103661,0.05739755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027146873,0.000038638682,0.01133228,0.0010165351,0.000035679197,0.0019469187,0.38743174,0.0013080458,0.0022874507,0.03516296,0.559239,0.00017360294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64047897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6565115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057841122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08137824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7232766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386292199","doi":"10.1177/09646639231198649","title":"Introduction: Democratic Constitutionalism in a Populist Age","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Democracy; Political science; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07972515430084988,"score_gpt":0.4064623010126915,"score_spread":0.3267371467118416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386292199","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005047263,0.059365,0.005128687,0.6559923,0.07501454,0.00003248047,0.00037560172,0.00013244509,0.19891162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22116192,0.049388323,0.0037428744,0.30171615,0.2769534,0.00019227384,0.0004627209,0.00031352197,0.14606887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976162,0.00086842134,0.000080880905,0.00039127647,0.0007564752,0.00028681743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958259,0.0030088716,0.0002213161,0.00023609021,0.00042526363,0.00028261932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023081966,0.0004575985,0.00044647197,0.0010796306,0.0043760664,0.006768033,0.0007767088,0.005811388,0.011450301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064390968,0.00024225134,0.0005503889,0.0018834842,0.0073784254,0.00550319,0.0032672938,0.0110673215,0.001688138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010640455,0.000017644808,0.0002762722,0.00014131948,0.0000047565372,0.000059694914,0.0013194365,0.00015279857,0.00008147345,0.7276691,0.25413093,0.016135953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068973363,0.00001619078,0.0006000245,0.00027059318,0.0000034338684,0.000089810994,0.00044080665,0.00014035647,0.00008458804,0.15275481,0.8455789,0.00001349834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001782601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016281806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011450301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002647899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020193895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038305044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386292286","doi":"10.1177/09646639231194450","title":"Violence, Misrecognition, and Place: Legal Envelopment and Colonial Governmentality in the Upper Skeena River, British Columbia, 1888","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Expansionism; Colonialism; Governmentality; Objectivity (philosophy); Law; Legal pluralism; Performative utterance; Mythology; Sociology; History; Political science; Aesthetics; Legal realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Comparative law; Politics","score_opus":0.020749174473918382,"score_gpt":0.29712878225043665,"score_spread":0.27637960777651827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386292286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97337556,0.0013458784,0.000060058224,0.001749733,0.000016713679,0.000009151357,0.00011291998,0.0000035798832,0.023326369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905309,0.0007921952,0.00005258978,0.000109799345,0.0000042701463,0.0000070994993,0.00004445332,0.0000045837455,0.008454076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991035,0.00019417687,0.000032859818,0.00009735718,0.00019359,0.0003785146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986526,0.00038554354,0.00021079423,0.000049264996,0.00047004753,0.0002317145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063483446,0.00015486701,0.00026857218,0.0017679359,0.010267381,0.0031484806,0.0009552749,0.00061942794,0.0037906577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003012323,0.0003284524,0.00006067969,0.0042591407,0.01051266,0.0010230255,0.0019002516,0.0018294835,0.00020731858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052380718,0.000049973783,0.15839718,0.00012302399,0.000017299291,0.0019926655,0.7681543,0.00019964157,0.00076226535,0.01859557,0.0053187055,0.04633696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003555611,0.000017164362,0.42472452,0.00020412687,0.000012158201,0.0003277276,0.51986307,0.000098935496,0.00019478795,0.00097137125,0.05354482,0.000037685782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9820681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03583401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03583401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019035535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25999516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386604748","doi":"10.1177/09646639231195310","title":"Breaking Through the Legal Binary: Media Labelling of Dominic Ongwen as a Victim–Perpetrator","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Depiction; Narrative; Newspaper; Criminal court; Resistance (ecology); Fair trial; Law; Criminology; Political science; Social media; Sociology; Media studies; Psychology; Human rights; International law; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.08356817149213418,"score_gpt":0.38700910599089433,"score_spread":0.30344093449876014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386604748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659,0.0017487109,0.00027555262,0.002502228,0.00009250044,0.000027499962,0.0002925247,0.000005239163,0.029155664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961056,0.0013647972,0.00029200705,0.00044446214,0.00010595724,0.00003473023,0.0001266223,0.000009316313,0.0015165823],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850154,0.0009570797,0.00008533836,0.00009961464,0.00020727782,0.00014923327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98472136,0.008983012,0.004574652,0.0004455282,0.00094452983,0.00033100147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019122999,0.00020767031,0.00013240812,0.005062354,0.002641178,0.0046454365,0.00035899066,0.0006173639,0.003693569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01390259,0.00019468258,0.00011055508,0.0043046884,0.003524326,0.005314947,0.0021171828,0.0008550929,0.00029765777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001401649,0.00005201268,0.1538843,0.0007198998,0.00004466527,0.0011211989,0.7787438,0.000033168424,0.0018843397,0.013434078,0.0046808445,0.045261517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000500252,0.00005278062,0.21624002,0.001352669,0.000042349628,0.0007393662,0.7279178,0.00010853577,0.0010253319,0.0015327784,0.050957922,0.000025481499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054101883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01091593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054101883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012024672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007200828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012356281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388296126","doi":"10.1177/09646639231210270","title":"The Revolving Door of Im/Migration: Canadian Refugee Protection and the Production of Migrant Workers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Political science; Conceptualization; Immigration; Demographic economics; Development economics; Labour economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.027109057746678836,"score_gpt":0.3097118549355098,"score_spread":0.28260279718883097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388296126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8634407,0.0018412063,0.00048471472,0.01760851,0.00007448236,0.00003254353,0.00038798875,0.00001803271,0.11611167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930419,0.0007675582,0.0002567783,0.00041200512,0.000007777889,0.0000060987254,0.000064114,0.0000068416175,0.0054367925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988661,0.00013379451,0.000019703868,0.00009985992,0.00020497586,0.0006757212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837023,0.00023115221,0.0002788164,0.00008848308,0.00047460487,0.0005566162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011573177,0.00025112357,0.00022363757,0.0019573523,0.01745496,0.004654677,0.0013897417,0.00070183823,0.0057991524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035954677,0.00017338023,0.00018688108,0.00321317,0.009033429,0.0011528218,0.0044579706,0.0015846473,0.00017310915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020745421,0.00007732004,0.19826017,0.00027200292,0.000025335068,0.0016874298,0.403806,0.00065484,0.0014249657,0.29269063,0.019318841,0.08157493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015925743,0.00003914866,0.30741918,0.00039760006,0.00003562956,0.0003525161,0.5405892,0.0005529322,0.0007143065,0.008619744,0.14117432,0.000089446025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99640405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91631067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08368936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09826926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60721165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391483185","doi":"10.1177/09646639241226477","title":"Social Control and Homeless Encampments: Shifting the Role of Shelters Through Judicial Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Social control; Sociology; Criminology; Control (management); Political science; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.06283293506754194,"score_gpt":0.46506938971351974,"score_spread":0.4022364546459778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391483185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3122691,0.015024758,0.0067170914,0.3641095,0.001669361,0.00026178453,0.000062898784,0.000064527594,0.2998209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95938873,0.0017195133,0.0004930615,0.02658314,0.00047880557,0.00006371626,0.000011172548,0.000025526893,0.01123635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96561337,0.017806526,0.0011217943,0.0026783878,0.004863954,0.007916027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307449,0.044312187,0.00618791,0.0037383146,0.0088135,0.006203237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036952432,0.00025363377,0.00052751583,0.0020189532,0.019309152,0.014535681,0.0030390024,0.009266407,0.0060493764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08592805,0.00051776256,0.0005613436,0.0015003219,0.042344455,0.007482001,0.0107470695,0.012504092,0.0004433564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074534815,0.00024053342,0.01517563,0.00019562729,0.0000368368,0.0016572569,0.09972151,0.00033120188,0.00067421066,0.76966125,0.04346637,0.06876503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039382096,0.0002634643,0.04069644,0.0025311864,0.00014248132,0.00113184,0.16677311,0.0016257825,0.00221666,0.31460062,0.4693189,0.00030572887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1417195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01623865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04154651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19542551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393008671","doi":"10.1177/09646639241237178","title":"“The Problem is the Law and Women's Rights…” A Study of Marriage Practices in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law; The Republic; Gender studies; Sociology; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06829204609133378,"score_gpt":0.37949190897994384,"score_spread":0.31119986288861007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393008671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94816184,0.0038614848,0.00069718604,0.019345202,0.00010785214,0.000034419485,0.000032344353,0.0000049235196,0.02775473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548775,0.0009103898,0.0001087597,0.00083561026,0.000016492357,0.000021590487,0.0000047864305,0.000004137028,0.002610397],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969187,0.0025147845,0.000040926174,0.00009315158,0.00014212646,0.00029040704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798644,0.0013119114,0.00030672728,0.000049205657,0.00008409451,0.0002616449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039661657,0.00028837594,0.0002780278,0.0007507163,0.016508648,0.0058944654,0.00073777686,0.0013478389,0.002139954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054903706,0.00026323405,0.00013776914,0.0010586617,0.018145038,0.0040964903,0.0032344654,0.0024110498,0.00015804693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011287907,0.000017759168,0.0035640216,0.000035321555,0.0000023859461,0.00029506368,0.9792588,0.000015001371,0.00019675923,0.012069884,0.00089008734,0.0036435486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002183425,0.000013977111,0.003776416,0.00010843263,0.0000026543569,0.00014567054,0.976168,0.000025981053,0.000102525555,0.00096786075,0.018680438,0.0000058518362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049532518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10175248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049532518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046116905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028132736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09848845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396740436","doi":"10.1177/09646639241249074","title":"“The Law is too Grey”: Liminal Legality and Moral Injury in Encounters with Drug Law Enforcement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HIV Legal Network; Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Liminality; Law; Law enforcement; Political science; Enforcement; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.03273579829456092,"score_gpt":0.35828124005917134,"score_spread":0.3255454417646104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396740436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911089,0.00019604499,0.00014233742,0.0029943539,0.000024618565,0.000020594762,0.000011553706,0.000004240678,0.0054974286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876934,0.000120412755,0.00004979918,0.0004935425,0.000007561819,0.0000069090834,0.000006308756,0.0000039971114,0.0005420644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260193,0.003592796,0.0003042275,0.0003241649,0.001393411,0.0017834257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98932344,0.0034194402,0.003556398,0.00049169647,0.0013902055,0.0018187687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004475177,0.00027450704,0.0005378815,0.0016481299,0.023783127,0.007891622,0.0017122298,0.0025084587,0.0032370277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02076979,0.0006871871,0.00033540322,0.001385325,0.023731096,0.0029847156,0.00864269,0.0044699116,0.00021319772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026665655,0.00007416718,0.04392912,0.000031420055,0.000010235915,0.0005274895,0.948821,0.000016641012,0.00014706685,0.0017231852,0.00091336406,0.0037797354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040662353,0.000016577973,0.02542677,0.000067275905,0.0000057650227,0.00023036366,0.97107744,0.000059320126,0.00002948286,0.00046330376,0.0026067947,0.00001271098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5188928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69015646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5188928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0183298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017970039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.967881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398217556","doi":"10.1177/09646639241254359","title":"‘How Did You Get in There and Make the Law Work?’ Feminist Activism, Doctors and Abortion Law: The Occupation of an Hospital","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kent; Economic and Social Research Council; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Work (physics); Political activism; Abortion law; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Family planning; Engineering; Politics; Pregnancy; Research methodology; Population","score_opus":0.023453661343592922,"score_gpt":0.33998952178498004,"score_spread":0.3165358604413871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398217556","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24578546,0.011685384,0.0017945338,0.45921415,0.0018437386,0.00003422667,0.00005240644,0.00003482924,0.27955532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94064665,0.0024549419,0.00041849172,0.02623749,0.00065253593,0.000021445121,0.000017432183,0.000032336695,0.0295187],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543685,0.003116729,0.000052173244,0.00023731761,0.00038347993,0.0007733203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964043,0.0021873913,0.00046190637,0.00011283321,0.00017009609,0.00066342135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003958715,0.00017343528,0.00012745935,0.00065734476,0.013545687,0.006177868,0.0006372575,0.003936166,0.0050219935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005561646,0.00023176064,0.00013894767,0.0005168769,0.04458019,0.0051031313,0.0028136657,0.0050037964,0.0007539389],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005558823,0.00005696359,0.006971213,0.00010422246,0.0000050527883,0.00082414097,0.49017823,0.000088058056,0.0004876103,0.41052,0.06298481,0.027724234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013877262,0.000062917636,0.008438687,0.00031553282,0.000003687809,0.0005696483,0.285926,0.000109494984,0.00040680365,0.01897049,0.6851487,0.000034124376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016383596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03206966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016383596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008087206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004271482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058677018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399383971","doi":"10.1177/09646639241256011","title":"Abortion Anarchy? The Case for Abortion Decriminalization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Decriminalization; Abortion; Political science; Law; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.0831619919858814,"score_gpt":0.4431583628579142,"score_spread":0.35999637087203284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399383971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0945298,0.02180191,0.0020316497,0.6626608,0.0005110263,0.000046099405,0.000098487966,0.00003138189,0.21828891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9274299,0.0063650045,0.00083790324,0.04609265,0.00020064086,0.000018729012,0.000023128898,0.000024400042,0.019007582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99280316,0.00155889,0.00009443994,0.0005840433,0.0019005003,0.0030589702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309593,0.0033388846,0.0004814176,0.00029005617,0.0014301308,0.0013635866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004678222,0.0001713992,0.0003189712,0.0009999108,0.018786276,0.009085793,0.0014628237,0.005846728,0.002264209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010312602,0.00028924883,0.00032216212,0.0013386677,0.043405984,0.0025522073,0.0028668384,0.008915908,0.0002331343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027966733,0.000015342259,0.0025165526,0.00006011728,0.000007116736,0.00054164755,0.03401039,0.00012111664,0.0002857347,0.92379844,0.018298892,0.02031674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061349216,0.000053363627,0.0125092305,0.0008785703,0.00007055072,0.0008456545,0.060440842,0.00071298564,0.0017105471,0.18480141,0.7377939,0.000121665646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.953705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96118164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.953705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074958816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15134177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5438668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403611959","doi":"10.1177/09646639241288075","title":"From European Roots to Settler Soil: Adapting Foucault’s Biopolitics to Canadian Settler Colonialism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Colonialism; Michel foucault; Governmentality; Sociology; Gender studies; Ethnology; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.03814898830475639,"score_gpt":0.32333980051269506,"score_spread":0.2851908122079387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403611959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1828938,0.011866298,0.02367004,0.06652141,0.0010791675,0.00011561993,0.00009601614,0.000060200422,0.71369755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706781,0.0028205242,0.0058468343,0.0028149025,0.00009993876,0.000037941667,0.000021509679,0.000046121026,0.017634103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733007,0.0010735495,0.000056304714,0.0002544865,0.00061094214,0.0006746151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972325,0.0013533048,0.0001550219,0.00015361204,0.00080348685,0.00030201094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038341912,0.00036899166,0.0003848636,0.0027613253,0.015169924,0.007410334,0.0013668421,0.0018610567,0.0016259475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006543585,0.0001958199,0.00029112957,0.0024863654,0.049618702,0.002475751,0.0038729417,0.0030748404,0.00012747601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009434529,0.000007542356,0.0009761474,0.000025083851,0.0000032148937,0.00024492727,0.07383015,0.00025567578,0.00010764592,0.9104924,0.0025803887,0.011467382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024394749,0.00003307144,0.010713004,0.0005314735,0.000030125475,0.0004170054,0.092567734,0.0017310862,0.0005065903,0.33611143,0.5572306,0.00010356378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92820126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9530077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075368285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.075368285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046654284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54683775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409473507","doi":"10.1177/09646639251333976","title":"Relational Legal Consciousness in the Context of Hate Crime Laws","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Hate crime; Criminology; Consciousness; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.047042464762307314,"score_gpt":0.3552864498856021,"score_spread":0.30824398512329476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409473507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96953243,0.000565115,0.0016820629,0.003722723,0.00004743761,0.000036961505,0.000028297805,0.000016478956,0.024368599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983833,0.00016902812,0.00016140763,0.00020432538,0.000005177254,0.000009456806,0.0000069048915,0.00000980715,0.0010505839],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935881,0.0036767018,0.00011324665,0.00038261028,0.00071301847,0.0015263446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359024,0.0036865263,0.0006022288,0.00032598234,0.00056519324,0.0012298339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005297262,0.00040790509,0.0006813461,0.0015198453,0.025053538,0.010104419,0.0020307899,0.0021237088,0.0035857214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008524157,0.00044813147,0.00028233914,0.001474397,0.056944944,0.007055175,0.01046512,0.005132012,0.00016360692],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038473845,0.000007165432,0.0006557326,0.000011498126,0.0000011441372,0.0002596873,0.992906,0.000010745187,0.00015486393,0.0053401818,0.000073550225,0.0005755251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010043152,0.0000045743514,0.0006501871,0.00002932924,0.0000020147706,0.00009808904,0.9949833,0.000028013153,0.00006787875,0.000713153,0.0034181336,0.000004248033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25774467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31913012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25774467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016051408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020005269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51248884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411288310","doi":"10.1177/09646639251349395","title":"Legal Counsel, Moral Expectations, and Youth with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Economies of Worth in Youth Courts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Moral economy; Intellectual disability; Political science; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.0623797416919309,"score_gpt":0.35921744809790873,"score_spread":0.29683770640597784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411288310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8802401,0.0017109523,0.0005485573,0.02780902,0.000087576605,0.0000329681,0.000020416002,0.000014453344,0.089535944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997926,0.0001855256,0.000058319736,0.00074585894,0.00001041658,0.0000073800466,0.0000031398656,0.0000038576136,0.0010594002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98945075,0.006180019,0.00024246918,0.00044458892,0.0014174003,0.0022647097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915588,0.0033155202,0.0015561954,0.00016511176,0.0009915897,0.002412808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006810063,0.00020049654,0.00045600982,0.0017636075,0.022260282,0.016750325,0.0015367928,0.002989291,0.0024753427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016294122,0.00032319914,0.0002482455,0.0013247543,0.033935696,0.005724384,0.010976342,0.0066416794,0.00017254785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016319673,0.000109933164,0.013696528,0.000023583176,0.00000489082,0.0008577994,0.8503635,0.000060932663,0.00008713107,0.12628643,0.0024573281,0.0060356925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008731412,0.000015462138,0.0076186075,0.00011543157,0.000005643168,0.00023829775,0.95860934,0.00011197982,0.00007354749,0.017613612,0.015573412,0.000016031614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08160202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.123414546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08160202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016514052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017509624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1622541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412587854","doi":"10.1177/09646639251360214","title":"‘Flying Grannies’ and Human-Capital Citizenship: Care in Humanitarian and Compassionate Cases","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; York University; Queen's University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Citizenship; Human rights; Capital (architecture); Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law; History; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039224031181177656,"score_gpt":0.3814036740512748,"score_spread":0.3421796428700971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412587854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159788,0.002039151,0.00073647115,0.026891548,0.00020041339,0.000033586894,0.000020282345,0.00001133436,0.05408848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946867,0.0004329862,0.00016850462,0.0019540354,0.000018892788,0.000014835457,0.000007862726,0.000006364211,0.002709764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466187,0.0032575917,0.00012795774,0.0002895427,0.00036481643,0.0012981906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966492,0.0015715628,0.00051542587,0.00016508772,0.00016432935,0.0009344841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005272306,0.00027098635,0.0002994938,0.0010662834,0.03031878,0.007977591,0.0015368155,0.002527054,0.0032251088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073243557,0.00030784754,0.00020977907,0.00133273,0.04444696,0.0053480985,0.012235671,0.005029306,0.00017146507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120075065,0.000028941638,0.004335747,0.000039209077,0.0000027980407,0.0015367175,0.9026354,0.000037206653,0.00010752825,0.082904324,0.0039280225,0.0044320864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002060562,0.000009987217,0.0017759837,0.00011591293,0.0000015399127,0.00048342443,0.9736593,0.00002292931,0.00003761624,0.003103294,0.020776868,0.000011124695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08830147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24723761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08830147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011992227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013923019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17557502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413161480","doi":"10.1177/09646639251366476","title":"Challenges Faced by Lawyers Representing Chinese Immigrants in Canada: Understanding Lawyer-Client Relationships Through Legal Consciousness","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Immigration; Consciousness; Law; Sociology; Legal profession; Legal service; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.1784854877967362,"score_gpt":0.4221680977939292,"score_spread":0.24368260999719302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413161480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841994,0.00056683365,0.0001868111,0.007746751,0.00002730433,0.000025765887,0.000017569182,0.0000070043047,0.0072225393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962417,0.0005064545,0.0001640078,0.0013516509,0.0000088295565,0.00001558131,0.000013482636,0.000005764305,0.0016925312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936335,0.0021657727,0.00014497706,0.00037999623,0.0010839708,0.0025917594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157715,0.0025479347,0.0012794598,0.00015330684,0.001559112,0.002883047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052489154,0.0004092876,0.0006451747,0.0018219409,0.04548367,0.009963019,0.0023219825,0.002329454,0.0040821605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011055361,0.00050763076,0.0002759968,0.0030883334,0.019721437,0.003024522,0.0099476315,0.0040373798,0.00026247895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001387751,0.000024567493,0.014007185,0.000029637105,0.000005584714,0.0007446637,0.97849166,0.000020383082,0.0002885446,0.0014701951,0.0007855355,0.004118155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012912847,0.00000545563,0.003736852,0.000026144153,0.0000029138066,0.00006475351,0.9940058,0.000025736445,0.000033598615,0.00015687241,0.001933182,0.0000073055094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87776655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9498709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12223345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06218316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10458386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45117247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415439684","doi":"10.1177/09646639251386428","title":"Cultural Rights in Motion: Legal Invisibility, Forced Migration, and the Limits of Universality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Universality (dynamical systems); Politics; Normative; Refugee; Fundamental rights; Harm; International human rights law; Critical legal studies","score_opus":0.03440411803890755,"score_gpt":0.36508370282197544,"score_spread":0.3306795847830679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415439684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2379041,0.017703317,0.030299516,0.16453668,0.0007589603,0.00006700347,0.00004172415,0.00005548429,0.54863316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99230427,0.0011047104,0.0008281571,0.0024315394,0.00013583511,0.000031723837,0.0000064841447,0.000015046542,0.0031422405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917864,0.005432872,0.00021554269,0.0006799757,0.00086554355,0.0010195703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947865,0.003282817,0.00048173562,0.00067577633,0.0003924926,0.00038063712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075737596,0.0003624489,0.0005428329,0.0013520258,0.009018366,0.010403983,0.0013935626,0.0035081562,0.0025267762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012663053,0.000224067,0.0003906176,0.0010605297,0.120098494,0.014684048,0.013444265,0.006868502,0.00017397458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039671786,0.0000046744253,0.00019895355,0.000016852608,0.0000017700238,0.000061625884,0.021439098,0.000058469926,0.00004333037,0.9750656,0.00028977927,0.0028159174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110608835,0.000020696281,0.000625808,0.0003202147,0.0000075525054,0.00016303123,0.043509614,0.00019541447,0.0002009262,0.9178673,0.03706201,0.000016317676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008820209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005818649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010403983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005580264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063639022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040487826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415819567","doi":"10.1177/09646639251391426","title":"“Overriding Health and/or Safety Concerns”: Vague Correctional Policies and Targeted Trans Feminine Governance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; CLARITY; Corporate governance; Transphobia; Construct (python library); Prison; Transgender; Narrative; Inclusion (mineral)","score_opus":0.06380713868904746,"score_gpt":0.43850905415251207,"score_spread":0.3747019154634646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415819567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64954144,0.0029957106,0.017130477,0.117936864,0.00047425588,0.00013748652,0.000072979696,0.00012843967,0.21158232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99060374,0.00018000833,0.0007989318,0.0038698167,0.0000148054505,0.0000135325545,0.000006117053,0.000012979536,0.004500112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873677,0.005988512,0.00043862892,0.0010589747,0.0024597172,0.002686344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98823524,0.005842883,0.0013398564,0.0008541865,0.002587971,0.0011398554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014119798,0.00035256412,0.00033832903,0.0012243878,0.02455579,0.009272353,0.0022953083,0.0041715377,0.002003874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017830366,0.00036665754,0.00029042875,0.0009517709,0.06957944,0.0043275226,0.0068908194,0.00628961,0.00012225873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002268054,0.000022103208,0.0042219874,0.00009259641,0.0000085852935,0.00044022442,0.42817846,0.00037206477,0.0009213286,0.54882395,0.0036183414,0.013277657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000174381,0.000052661162,0.010324405,0.000958765,0.000046099347,0.000427768,0.69224185,0.0010984817,0.0030932848,0.08133511,0.21024068,0.00016356485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75559866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.811581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75559866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067258805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07950429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49168128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}