{"meta":{"query_hash":"07f7a9917647","filters":{"venue":"Social Choice and Welfare"},"cohort_total":75,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":75,"exported":75,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/07f7a9917647","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+Choice+and+Welfare"},"results":[{"id":"W1540875378","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0501-6","title":"Multi-profile intergenerational social choice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Dictatorship; Axiom; Social welfare function; Mathematical economics; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Pareto principle; Choice function; Arrow; Domain (mathematical analysis); Impossibility; Function (biology); Completeness (order theory); Social Welfare; Economics; Mathematics; Welfare; Computer science; Political science; Mathematical optimization; Law; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03204433253756793,"score_gpt":0.2517750078578874,"score_spread":0.21973067532031948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540875378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71112114,0.00076591,0.2503365,0.0048569846,0.000073912735,0.00024198157,0.00180974,0.000103805025,0.030690128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97930396,0.00036396759,0.009057279,0.00013048913,0.000027872251,0.0000795555,0.00021450325,0.000010160502,0.010812199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983858,0.0010558462,0.00005196621,0.00019753467,0.00013098224,0.00017784217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99288756,0.004866696,0.00078632217,0.0006693568,0.0003452971,0.0004449078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032366447,0.00050037925,0.0010224612,0.0008407407,0.0009349679,0.002339075,0.0011633149,0.0017177133,0.010919762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010572962,0.00038650734,0.0006417928,0.0010890139,0.0010662809,0.0035722058,0.0015109177,0.0014602726,0.0008266092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035377062,0.00027345697,0.032243554,0.00013286821,0.00024429723,0.0007505025,0.0010373325,0.03755514,0.00051375944,0.88490933,0.0029588498,0.039027162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006082159,0.00010700063,0.012843266,0.000071052455,0.00008060472,0.00089396746,0.0015449215,0.19324477,0.00032691332,0.78777486,0.0030140374,0.000037886333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002046056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040950216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010919762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013373673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059605064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036530197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545499040","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0903-6","title":"Fiscal policy and corruption","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Economics; Public economics; Language change; Incentive; Tax revenue; Public finance; Revenue; Indirect tax; Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Ad valorem tax; Tax policy; Double taxation; Tax reform; Microeconomics; Business; Finance; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.053892528465531386,"score_gpt":0.3398123204826917,"score_spread":0.28591979201716033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545499040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43680593,0.010540737,0.0024399383,0.18846221,0.00044327494,0.000028212176,0.00047793772,0.000019303008,0.36078244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861466,0.0016083743,0.00011386102,0.0015715795,0.00015052778,0.000008209665,0.00003166725,0.000003251567,0.010365859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884367,0.0005515569,0.000033672426,0.000060892926,0.00014280452,0.00036737637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952591,0.0024879696,0.0010256955,0.00017606854,0.00048557692,0.00056554517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025713805,0.0001887645,0.00031030062,0.0011530811,0.0017226074,0.0044887764,0.00021686761,0.0016350144,0.00956588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075068427,0.00012444696,0.00021691518,0.001514105,0.004288723,0.0019949034,0.0014408709,0.001727768,0.00042960205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005241414,0.000107329506,0.011201823,0.00003201721,0.000025174277,0.00006235662,0.0006499188,0.0012892378,0.000050579103,0.97206265,0.005408217,0.009058328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030417825,0.0000354714,0.018203795,0.0001609657,0.000031650958,0.000070336806,0.0028217672,0.001310656,0.00014829138,0.94247353,0.034699075,0.000014007279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008061656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015682967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00956588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033976182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036225542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032001078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1626260879","doi":"10.1007/s00355-017-1073-5","title":"Combining rights and welfarism: a new approach to intertemporal evaluation of social alternatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Intergenerational equity; Consumption (sociology); Microeconomics; Welfarism; Social discount rate; Shadow price; Equity (law); Public finance; Welfare; Cost–benefit analysis; Macroeconomics; Sustainability; Market economy; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.036803407154575,"score_gpt":0.30910276463013675,"score_spread":0.2722993574755618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1626260879","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018749814,0.0008755596,0.9243526,0.0035448484,0.00023027006,0.0001381173,0.00012119299,0.000048544298,0.051939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7337948,0.0010560271,0.25271034,0.00046150805,0.0005229092,0.0007215964,0.000130359,0.00014726765,0.010455078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706472,0.022880046,0.0008856543,0.0013350407,0.0033073016,0.0009447542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647595,0.028082265,0.0016510156,0.0027668406,0.0017050465,0.0010353491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023198955,0.0024507921,0.0028518427,0.0050964905,0.0020655605,0.010705503,0.0034211546,0.0038045358,0.013769582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043476187,0.0011761748,0.0036462399,0.005058083,0.01193404,0.020929467,0.007680445,0.005271001,0.00046584386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034872894,0.000050443374,0.0002529653,0.00006423957,0.000063056985,0.000039321058,0.00036097146,0.014065147,0.00013708859,0.9725127,0.00041393377,0.012005263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007882996,0.000022675382,0.000058519046,0.000025097277,0.000019772559,0.000012300934,0.00012019589,0.019039968,0.000076684824,0.9793185,0.0012876119,0.000010855764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022274547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003802209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023198955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060153985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035951515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12268925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1648562582","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0925-0","title":"Introduction to the special issue “Experiments on conflicts and conflict resolution”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Interpersonal communication; Conflict resolution research; Resolution (logic); Social conflict; Political science; Positive economics; Social policy; Welfare; Negotiation; Social psychology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0608867681284026,"score_gpt":0.3564326289803791,"score_spread":0.2955458608519765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1648562582","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00058660266,0.10699812,0.023360178,0.12753825,0.70695645,0.00021951852,0.0013990536,0.00062638836,0.032315407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003705511,0.042907614,0.0068982113,0.090762265,0.8134043,0.00048629285,0.0012934133,0.00040413326,0.0401382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970354,0.0012199021,0.00031338015,0.00047317048,0.0008250603,0.0001330025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759957,0.018520974,0.0010819561,0.0015423844,0.0018103361,0.0010486468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005880642,0.0022264323,0.0022518088,0.0037533948,0.0013212337,0.0037355071,0.0029450255,0.006963512,0.044124722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018036066,0.0007447273,0.0022887788,0.00239439,0.0029137253,0.004224517,0.0027493134,0.008948719,0.017391874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038061225,0.000073716656,0.00009208381,0.0005612883,0.00003274031,0.000044532815,0.000024532332,0.00013735594,0.0003630133,0.011529143,0.9614806,0.025622938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042072388,0.000078893034,0.0008613541,0.0004747552,0.00004192415,0.00016859976,0.0000315074,0.00031466843,0.00024386338,0.034195542,0.96351343,0.000033519464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000711389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013282425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044124722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015068543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014746288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14761192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837934503","doi":"10.1007/s00355-016-0999-3","title":"The political choice of social long term care transfers when family gives time and money","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Social policy; Preference; Economics; Voting; Social class; Demographic economics; Politics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.010531614869465966,"score_gpt":0.27792236545609217,"score_spread":0.2673907505866262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837934503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77799016,0.00043490095,0.0057444414,0.0181244,0.00009469731,0.000034419085,0.00016192158,0.000012780834,0.19740225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963971,0.000048851743,0.000100217774,0.00015528014,0.000027041244,0.000007550862,0.0000077710665,0.0000028796717,0.0032534134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969445,0.0018283746,0.000038270373,0.00015124508,0.00016065876,0.00087694504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942,0.0041969432,0.0005004925,0.00016194097,0.00022385585,0.00071671087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033698108,0.00019289326,0.00028843977,0.0005821793,0.0020898709,0.005289647,0.0005917924,0.00316566,0.0220832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101882545,0.00024561337,0.00029908976,0.00053884496,0.004423054,0.0028756151,0.0011092747,0.0021734652,0.00058639917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009407595,0.00042230872,0.02087572,0.000048334085,0.00006364815,0.00064332824,0.0042379284,0.0051537133,0.0008638125,0.946731,0.004292978,0.015726589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023391185,0.00016771826,0.034338314,0.000056779252,0.00006732158,0.0002485689,0.017229848,0.015973896,0.000510177,0.9197341,0.011390439,0.000048947702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005161856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009377695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0220832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031683184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015070682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073875666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964249253","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0645-z","title":"Generalized average rules as stable Nash mechanisms to implement generalized median rules","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Waseda University; Lunds Universitet; Concordia University","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Best response; Outcome (game theory); Epsilon-equilibrium; Interpretation (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Path (computing); Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03412768288190568,"score_gpt":0.2646568772223437,"score_spread":0.23052919434043803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964249253","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16616583,0.00022568632,0.81673044,0.0005521177,0.00014373116,0.00015860218,0.00009605298,0.00040982975,0.0155176865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599952,0.00018750298,0.13006397,0.0002881003,0.00010683455,0.00045913554,0.00011085858,0.00014603639,0.0086424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575114,0.0021282919,0.0002912747,0.0005561507,0.0007168477,0.0005562801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989484,0.0054392684,0.0013031743,0.0019214225,0.0011166133,0.00073554955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005020843,0.00076738995,0.001747073,0.001620731,0.0015529741,0.0045118826,0.003229295,0.002796236,0.0068707736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020283353,0.0007134842,0.0015532374,0.0013988428,0.0030784428,0.0061856573,0.0027358178,0.0023844389,0.00072610687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005736971,0.000047154906,0.0002731592,0.000028872759,0.000041633037,0.000046435172,0.00015606011,0.020445473,0.0007027713,0.96894306,0.00060788874,0.008650197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004514951,0.000027430488,0.00009673974,0.000010542396,0.000015038682,0.000020954283,0.000033439093,0.10202973,0.00028601385,0.89683056,0.0005895201,0.00001480903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009958654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017331906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068707736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014189645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001466707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026553094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972636255","doi":"10.1007/s00355-014-0827-6","title":"An Interview with Kotaro Suzumura","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; International political economy; Social policy; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0686433430638188,"score_gpt":0.38346844846319184,"score_spread":0.31482510539937303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972636255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09065752,0.0076595354,0.006059836,0.8425708,0.011649541,0.00051892264,0.0010473683,0.00014872971,0.039687764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5092652,0.009762309,0.0059268777,0.2585506,0.005158884,0.0016784061,0.00039616865,0.0005319605,0.20872967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645764,0.0022621453,0.00012661403,0.00028799815,0.00029686035,0.00056875416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98149174,0.013300252,0.00065409654,0.00022922026,0.0018076521,0.0025169759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057652765,0.0008707842,0.0012882419,0.0012642094,0.015112803,0.0048874714,0.0009631076,0.0095536,0.023296129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023205202,0.0010808212,0.0004868286,0.0013965812,0.0045209443,0.0076278667,0.0041860365,0.017783245,0.0061242236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005097051,0.00023688938,0.0021812345,0.00050580467,0.000021154754,0.0051488406,0.5197337,0.0004347831,0.005584935,0.027945245,0.42711622,0.010581449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004052611,0.00007862922,0.0019434352,0.0003022508,0.000009528297,0.00076373504,0.3556579,0.000537346,0.00051083026,0.005126746,0.6349059,0.00012322191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007149454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012582621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023296129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006304385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030145552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07793325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974883908","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0505-2","title":"Competition for popular support: a valence model of elections in Turkey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Nash equilibrium; Valence (chemistry); Convergence (economics); Divergence (linguistics); Politics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04295304165449649,"score_gpt":0.3593032542208443,"score_spread":0.3163502125663478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974883908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95064616,0.000472968,0.009801239,0.0015431553,0.00005351899,0.00005571116,0.0004140499,0.000040012335,0.036973212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679106,0.000056945555,0.00024658063,0.000023488385,0.000012548506,0.000013021095,0.000050746377,0.000005095002,0.002800463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830914,0.00076363166,0.000046690486,0.00019262885,0.00008541082,0.00060255534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997624,0.0011955723,0.0003089603,0.00010490453,0.0003370868,0.00042949084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016433548,0.0005960311,0.0014567329,0.0011039622,0.0013663957,0.0044070827,0.0017631744,0.0015558908,0.014231086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036531305,0.00045404557,0.00091439195,0.0009694771,0.0016043648,0.0019900147,0.0012425884,0.001405549,0.0009933742],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020962465,0.00055304,0.034133814,0.0003169814,0.00023495012,0.00083174236,0.001480705,0.21424507,0.0020218303,0.71040577,0.0061244946,0.027555337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063999894,0.0005956304,0.058696385,0.000083183244,0.00039381572,0.00038863716,0.0041276123,0.56028455,0.0004880002,0.36869466,0.0054340404,0.0001735797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016120449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017279297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016120449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004114868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013439525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04760772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976804489","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0512-3","title":"Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on the political economy of elections and bargaining","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"International political economy; Public finance; Politics; Economics; Political economy; Political science; Social policy; Market economy; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.014507229064009367,"score_gpt":0.2331889889553596,"score_spread":0.21868175989135025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976804489","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017152354,0.016155677,0.0022373681,0.04553239,0.9276134,0.000018651217,0.00017751729,0.000081579296,0.0080119455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019639449,0.0073928176,0.00071558583,0.011048438,0.9517032,0.00003795833,0.00014073844,0.00010045221,0.026896872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978656,0.0005385758,0.00023136017,0.0003840411,0.000769258,0.00021111881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98819494,0.006775438,0.0006624572,0.0004783579,0.0029847785,0.00090412475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035569177,0.002675056,0.0024906618,0.0036605697,0.0013456213,0.005964797,0.002320816,0.0049479087,0.030828375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015405475,0.00077223824,0.0024388165,0.0018212654,0.0015007377,0.00415163,0.0015679678,0.010814561,0.012628724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012902175,0.000017498729,0.00005291753,0.00008659232,0.00001150143,0.000033243632,0.000015305806,0.00008657423,0.000043257838,0.0042055403,0.9870697,0.008364888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033484677,0.000036694513,0.0006683932,0.00023576595,0.000044455064,0.00015136872,0.00005219671,0.0009168154,0.000125254,0.017365651,0.9803429,0.000027003194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008108145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021017762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030828375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001474263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011537474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103131235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978569644","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0203-2","title":"Policy convergence under approval and plurality voting: the role of policy commitment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Commit; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Approval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Candidacy; Political science; Competition (biology); Economics; Proportional representation; Politics; Public economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Democracy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.024837491265454804,"score_gpt":0.3375303567993648,"score_spread":0.31269286553390996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978569644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8036406,0.0005478345,0.05918072,0.013131744,0.00019987536,0.00017832196,0.00013723639,0.00011305717,0.12287073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599814,0.00007539303,0.001412802,0.0001825104,0.000079958816,0.000056796922,0.000021377762,0.000021090456,0.0021520173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734827,0.018432697,0.00061224634,0.0021359362,0.0015790005,0.003757427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9019319,0.074463844,0.0072127087,0.0070134746,0.005523853,0.003854236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03532883,0.00048758398,0.0025558213,0.0022989046,0.0033817093,0.009310788,0.0019596098,0.0038314096,0.017781507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112471566,0.0005476679,0.0010346663,0.0015991848,0.008952391,0.008450528,0.0074876472,0.0055176876,0.0008828372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079454645,0.00027424467,0.008364413,0.00012516908,0.00012694344,0.000162657,0.0030538412,0.012668109,0.0005004748,0.94724214,0.0014426128,0.02524483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001835251,0.0001390807,0.0072363275,0.000051006693,0.00005617161,0.0000475044,0.002768938,0.025386484,0.00043827613,0.9620235,0.0016428813,0.000026249962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026873683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002016382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03532883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030600082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036778902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18683898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980313539","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0536-3","title":"Index-number tests and the common-scaling social cost-of-living index","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Homothetic transformation; Index (typography); Economics; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Social welfare function; Function (biology); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Welfare; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04840748167219767,"score_gpt":0.25450983206652894,"score_spread":0.20610235039433128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980313539","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40198463,0.0019497704,0.5360645,0.0043784794,0.0010006252,0.0005401859,0.007655659,0.0009193618,0.045506764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93731004,0.0003185983,0.0548668,0.00023774707,0.00049165933,0.0004971077,0.0028272055,0.00017547663,0.0032753397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9660312,0.024846371,0.0013037862,0.0033831608,0.0036448748,0.00079056685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6589281,0.29315215,0.015122174,0.022849448,0.007133331,0.0028147488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024915451,0.0016880945,0.003194338,0.007725187,0.0020255097,0.0028574294,0.0043601524,0.0026489282,0.023858525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24313232,0.00036603745,0.0027498088,0.010059009,0.0064956234,0.008814383,0.0038061896,0.0032149085,0.0014384654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020115636,0.0007472437,0.15403952,0.00056771503,0.0017099073,0.0006793603,0.0008774438,0.05102442,0.00048286412,0.60531855,0.02594217,0.15659931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002652258,0.00044427853,0.04283748,0.00013898993,0.00025557843,0.00045399,0.0008181213,0.1987881,0.0006341202,0.7492363,0.0059793363,0.00014858946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002651686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018219166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024915451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016634815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017673377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1317671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981262337","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0188-x","title":"Variable-population extensions of social aggregation theorems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variable (mathematics); Extension (predicate logic); Population; Utilitarianism; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Contrast (vision); Econometrics; Economics; Social policy; Public finance; Ex-ante; Random variable; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Sociology; Political science; Demography; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.04997353019053637,"score_gpt":0.3574628823402215,"score_spread":0.30748935214968515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981262337","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05563546,0.00093486084,0.90910447,0.0029250842,0.00017327913,0.00007167519,0.00027678677,0.00016847295,0.030709947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.864479,0.0021191048,0.110143885,0.0010237768,0.0008336418,0.00047134954,0.0003976125,0.00016730334,0.020364301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997212,0.0019224428,0.00007455662,0.00024760913,0.00032055387,0.00022281923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98361105,0.0128418505,0.00094881735,0.0012436674,0.0009070902,0.00044752753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078010336,0.0009848498,0.0015542398,0.0020351307,0.0010952208,0.0027084772,0.0026319267,0.0016623574,0.0070708254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022324786,0.0004708271,0.0020237225,0.0019530207,0.002671114,0.0057945275,0.0029607518,0.0027623984,0.0005178062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006595325,0.000019987874,0.00022839618,0.000023530525,0.000022922943,0.000029715711,0.00009847283,0.014704342,0.000055994115,0.9808456,0.0011316986,0.0028328148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008102694,0.0000042001716,0.00010710586,0.000007518721,0.000006728095,0.000014910739,0.000022338718,0.07711623,0.0000209069,0.9221234,0.0005643383,0.000004260143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023422719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001790363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078010336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018347383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009798253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04125637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982360168","doi":"10.1007/s355-002-8328-x","title":"Equitable insurance premium schemes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Partition (number theory); Public finance; Economics; Lorenz curve; Group (periodic table); Econometrics; Insurance premium; Actuarial science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Inequality; Gini coefficient; Combinatorics; Economic inequality","score_opus":0.03232711827241993,"score_gpt":0.29603026103464647,"score_spread":0.26370314276222656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982360168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41994715,0.002422529,0.11423184,0.029527036,0.00045835748,0.00045578502,0.0009165467,0.0004885548,0.43155214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795094,0.00031099626,0.004335437,0.0009705274,0.00028874972,0.000097822274,0.00009793149,0.000022728867,0.014366396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933348,0.0029180208,0.00024844203,0.0005026611,0.002047152,0.00094899203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922998,0.0031425382,0.00094194093,0.0018800651,0.0011887427,0.0005468506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008957494,0.0003585156,0.0006948526,0.0017695525,0.0009842194,0.003160527,0.0011858841,0.0025121386,0.014122633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03140167,0.0003147517,0.0003429598,0.0011003724,0.0016181968,0.0030036375,0.003374086,0.0019904238,0.00080989825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023906768,0.0005396704,0.008342258,0.000056357676,0.000060107657,0.000080092155,0.00048555905,0.010938358,0.0005844752,0.87760264,0.0058931755,0.095178194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021668969,0.00020085792,0.014920246,0.000108870445,0.000077578065,0.00020230163,0.00034112285,0.024586204,0.0005239137,0.9319816,0.02681382,0.000026798913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011757995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021950232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014122633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019582096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021710962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04737228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990777695","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0379-3","title":"Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Convexity; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Voting; Truth value; Aggregation problem; Valuation (finance); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Function (biology); Aggregate (composite); Majority rule; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04206439249398311,"score_gpt":0.2360745206155012,"score_spread":0.19401012812151808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990777695","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15674052,0.00068964734,0.80298954,0.0042548743,0.00014456814,0.00014069173,0.00050585234,0.0003464925,0.0341878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105959,0.00048970355,0.0709661,0.00036506055,0.00020631499,0.00025098512,0.0005039459,0.00014892317,0.016472979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941947,0.0033379786,0.00022871129,0.0008770043,0.0007902442,0.0005713667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97493017,0.017529188,0.0022375335,0.0026779936,0.0018421931,0.0007829312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054664537,0.0010378037,0.0024323275,0.0021278416,0.0015768079,0.005765894,0.0036089763,0.004204048,0.013836419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043181337,0.0011602069,0.0018716663,0.0028761742,0.0054329922,0.008827999,0.0031835125,0.0029487482,0.0014601015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030773845,0.000019869463,0.00037241023,0.000023287339,0.000021732492,0.00005367273,0.0002001737,0.024581408,0.00010283012,0.96957713,0.00082158606,0.0041951207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016307911,0.000007195618,0.00012496766,0.0000054581437,0.0000060777966,0.000022944934,0.000036919482,0.060488276,0.000028239416,0.9389033,0.00035257504,0.00000769525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048454767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003940899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013836419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027735415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012277167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046287417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994916611","doi":"10.1007/s00355-005-0057-z","title":"Multi_profile welfarism: a generalization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Axiom; Anonymity; Generalization; Mathematical economics; Public finance; Economics; Social choice theory; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Epistemology; Welfare; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026223104817041123,"score_gpt":0.23950218741626156,"score_spread":0.21327908259922043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994916611","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15792921,0.00065384293,0.73770416,0.004323396,0.00028347952,0.00026069707,0.0009132284,0.00026501922,0.09766698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9111531,0.0005161545,0.044172432,0.0008272763,0.00052802503,0.00025805226,0.0005055132,0.00015128532,0.04188828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962088,0.0014919328,0.00018849951,0.00097496103,0.0003764359,0.0007594395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922327,0.003651795,0.00083933916,0.0018810679,0.00059654494,0.0007985775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004492036,0.0007440428,0.0020914008,0.0013511807,0.0029678082,0.0037433323,0.0028285498,0.0028483004,0.0167616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01082148,0.000681855,0.0029982761,0.0017723739,0.0028899203,0.0055970703,0.004568581,0.0051361937,0.0018002087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060022703,0.00006903118,0.00073019316,0.000050830356,0.000030689534,0.00007732342,0.00029908438,0.0034921102,0.00036998303,0.97833556,0.003250905,0.0132343145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027332359,0.000030371359,0.0003831969,0.000015046588,0.0000142136205,0.00014200322,0.00011507199,0.024140682,0.00018266609,0.9719151,0.0030214575,0.000012853225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002082725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019195235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0167616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016801418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011227095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05607313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996324419","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0876-5","title":"Expected utility without full transitivity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transitive relation; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Class (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Completeness (order theory); Subjective expected utility; Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2373221207991091,"score_gpt":0.42417190135042226,"score_spread":0.18684978055131315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996324419","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15259853,0.0018404428,0.7577174,0.009292777,0.000334825,0.00029058626,0.0023738786,0.00036531722,0.0751863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9296142,0.0014175698,0.039945595,0.00088404794,0.00041892094,0.00046073706,0.00066409755,0.00014401824,0.02645086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994886,0.002506599,0.00027066038,0.0009564498,0.00062355306,0.0007567281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97425324,0.020156872,0.0011723643,0.002763489,0.0010861729,0.000567917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008361343,0.0014287028,0.0031084705,0.0022482055,0.000840442,0.004162254,0.002732097,0.0024859703,0.010362526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027662547,0.0016314734,0.0028895633,0.001993168,0.0048254766,0.013076138,0.0034912708,0.0045619197,0.0010241815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009406484,0.00005358958,0.0004077277,0.00011979235,0.00006483783,0.00013560383,0.00010223367,0.009723041,0.0002289311,0.9826806,0.0011261035,0.005263412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020945045,0.000019884172,0.00017412001,0.000023119734,0.000017276474,0.00009640695,0.000021983382,0.0236846,0.00012873355,0.975339,0.00046342774,0.000010542321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022052808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011980531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010362526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002870506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023110656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044219494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996570526","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0600-z","title":"Quasi-transitive and Suzumura consistent relations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transitive relation; Binary relation; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Social choice theory; Consistency (knowledge bases); Conjunction (astronomy); Complement (music); Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.05602464863029017,"score_gpt":0.2198874131003893,"score_spread":0.16386276447009915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996570526","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4053533,0.00077429455,0.4866727,0.005893231,0.00022385956,0.00020880767,0.0011523342,0.00024628194,0.09947518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93198526,0.00037866522,0.049663603,0.0005708578,0.00018220914,0.0002689617,0.0004559764,0.00009910357,0.01639544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957832,0.0022134476,0.00026526523,0.00077421044,0.00045599902,0.0005079329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832283,0.01133252,0.0015381309,0.002224621,0.0010659012,0.00061055063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043628337,0.00047417395,0.0014939437,0.0018551367,0.003314908,0.0043646507,0.0014551952,0.0024387317,0.011313392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014915799,0.00080803817,0.0017234096,0.002010237,0.0036257487,0.007700681,0.0015530541,0.002550546,0.00070782274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019386187,0.000018179293,0.00032117017,0.000016492431,0.000010808608,0.000029666991,0.00016840018,0.00048343884,0.00023064048,0.9966151,0.000585757,0.0015008835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001947205,0.000008353113,0.00029316955,0.0000067870055,0.000011794413,0.000041476364,0.00008324854,0.0049005,0.00013780198,0.99333763,0.0011534378,0.000006375066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018545504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002990589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011313392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016639576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013828732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037847042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998954346","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0784-5","title":"Inefficient committees: small elections with three alternatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Voting; Outcome (game theory); Approval voting; State (computer science); Majority rule; Economics; Condorcet method; Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Contingent vote; Private information retrieval; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Law; Macroeconomics; Group voting ticket; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02875850210327523,"score_gpt":0.20739214596137043,"score_spread":0.1786336438580952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998954346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6368791,0.0003961158,0.32333156,0.0036593676,0.00013372077,0.0003579152,0.00027578254,0.00014952026,0.03481694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551167,0.00009919334,0.01791632,0.00018614723,0.00009187298,0.0002148139,0.00009015108,0.000033306093,0.005856651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98389983,0.012349638,0.00038492618,0.0011808174,0.0010856711,0.0010991335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94689554,0.041082278,0.0040671783,0.004763796,0.0014158727,0.0017754382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012460808,0.0005512016,0.0020501153,0.0010819538,0.002042795,0.005435843,0.0026164164,0.0031385692,0.008056197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041987684,0.00078855734,0.001003676,0.0011417016,0.0046551344,0.004529715,0.002016144,0.002889243,0.0007186839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006773875,0.00048798768,0.0051251333,0.00015165281,0.000158787,0.0003570223,0.00085100153,0.039422106,0.0016566259,0.9250305,0.006032689,0.020049104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002265744,0.00008816689,0.001315985,0.000020780208,0.00007574621,0.00013996995,0.00042045547,0.14707729,0.000551225,0.8483782,0.0016783498,0.000027272014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015109486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026765321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012460808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016110474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014472117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06589985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001032047","doi":"10.1007/s003550200174","title":"Decomposition properties of dual choice functionals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Dual (grammatical number); Decomposition; Property (philosophy); Gini coefficient; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Lebesgue measure; Inequality; Economics; Pure mathematics; Lebesgue integration; Mathematical analysis; Economic inequality; Computer science","score_opus":0.1697533057765701,"score_gpt":0.4131884010774077,"score_spread":0.24343509530083757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001032047","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08004914,0.0007341863,0.89406055,0.0010805702,0.00006814469,0.00006530128,0.00022748152,0.00006575046,0.023648906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229817,0.0015131204,0.15632905,0.00033425423,0.00017977816,0.0005095232,0.00062111096,0.00023297925,0.017298639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830014,0.0009470522,0.00006501137,0.00018118435,0.0003015059,0.00020514496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939418,0.004065212,0.000391784,0.00045389804,0.00074377394,0.00040353555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052105715,0.0011575756,0.0011492972,0.0023596855,0.0006958913,0.003212121,0.0007724447,0.00093938294,0.0066280873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013619708,0.0007866214,0.0015033861,0.0013672301,0.0022305802,0.0045459415,0.0024318716,0.0026180095,0.00054427056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005005792,0.000030265768,0.00031147618,0.000048708946,0.00002253223,0.000024071136,0.00013937664,0.0055482253,0.00073942903,0.9858547,0.0007836842,0.006447474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011415821,0.000013158239,0.00015274505,0.000022951921,0.000010048147,0.000026330825,0.000044094446,0.053911414,0.00022707478,0.9447237,0.0008506316,0.0000063649177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008487425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055839133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066280873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016667902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001072946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027556479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003305533","doi":"10.1007/s003550200164","title":"A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Rounding; Majorization; Divisor (algebraic geometry); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Mathematics; Proportional representation; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.11390321613045822,"score_gpt":0.3617299188316292,"score_spread":0.24782670270117096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003305533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046929855,0.0013783037,0.93297845,0.0014487625,0.0002926995,0.0002795724,0.0001212577,0.00036929612,0.016201759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5026545,0.0015548078,0.4661781,0.00088120677,0.00051722716,0.0008921883,0.000398007,0.00074588036,0.026177999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98140115,0.014017858,0.0005546409,0.001155637,0.0020178745,0.0008527507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92809,0.054942016,0.0011161357,0.0111279255,0.003932685,0.0007913304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03113395,0.0010179252,0.0019482028,0.0020105555,0.001353711,0.0035443369,0.0046882397,0.0020706502,0.014538004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08816769,0.00073197024,0.0020938653,0.0023728814,0.002663217,0.008457231,0.004422941,0.0034251756,0.0015315032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015574367,0.00031488462,0.001387968,0.00023732756,0.00015793586,0.000026260936,0.00085323356,0.023944605,0.0010015877,0.6661164,0.005773796,0.2986285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026486034,0.0006649742,0.0014966759,0.00015067373,0.00019726272,0.00018690214,0.00037099418,0.37815323,0.0030309104,0.60162485,0.013791253,0.00006736008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014948501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015097687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03113395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023445974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025726638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16465402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007779524","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0259-1","title":"Coalitional strategy-proof and resource-monotonic solutions for multiple assignment problems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Dictatorship; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Public finance; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.06625046255528268,"score_gpt":0.2471342989240128,"score_spread":0.18088383636873012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007779524","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056337304,0.0004876203,0.9060194,0.002598223,0.00012266554,0.00023043394,0.00025799946,0.00014402802,0.033802357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71933323,0.0012362943,0.24203427,0.0004552883,0.0002502874,0.0012518317,0.00037588237,0.00018567659,0.03487723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780446,0.0012274531,0.00010499549,0.0001982566,0.00035677478,0.0003080214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264413,0.005291915,0.00065925653,0.00045457887,0.00050819904,0.00044188352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004497387,0.001677213,0.0018563546,0.0012036877,0.0013940884,0.0033126117,0.0028589256,0.0031099515,0.008551628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023242304,0.0010108699,0.0014198398,0.0020338886,0.002734477,0.004521977,0.0029021504,0.0035283358,0.0007903599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059209226,0.00009286668,0.00012614627,0.00008807135,0.00003602342,0.00004749938,0.00018519134,0.08712198,0.0005155352,0.8991366,0.0027518363,0.009839064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054294225,0.000012719733,0.00004443897,0.000016067048,0.0000076151427,0.000013823951,0.00004854239,0.16228452,0.000113387694,0.8365583,0.0008374298,0.000008818636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036621701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00396056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008551628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024745127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004355714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028608024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013883413","doi":"10.1007/s003550050176","title":"Strategy-proofness and efficiency in a simple production economy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Pareto efficiency; Profit (economics); Pareto principle; Economics; Production (economics); Pareto optimal; Microeconomics; Public finance; Space (punctuation); Mechanism design; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematics; Operations management; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02026622988858306,"score_gpt":0.22553135533271798,"score_spread":0.20526512544413492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013883413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5676488,0.0010116156,0.3698369,0.005618466,0.00007432412,0.0002041312,0.00030150628,0.0002168992,0.055087276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842668,0.0003006452,0.010854268,0.00014489032,0.000040606803,0.000076276585,0.00004591798,0.000020038166,0.0042505097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799585,0.0012280088,0.00011331356,0.00021412544,0.00024027657,0.00020850879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98437774,0.012697989,0.00095130224,0.0010794207,0.00055877736,0.00033470365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036615576,0.00073357637,0.0016018144,0.0008334622,0.00074492785,0.002809107,0.001232365,0.0021705942,0.003922883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014669781,0.00046486242,0.0010236986,0.0010869136,0.003800327,0.0045273616,0.001650953,0.0011997547,0.00042641757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008294098,0.000088839806,0.0007927892,0.00010734241,0.0000562431,0.000111088215,0.00017080658,0.032677043,0.00072557566,0.9576733,0.0007475446,0.006766609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038488906,0.000023254022,0.00027871222,0.0000074320355,0.000010284701,0.000027084823,0.00003441261,0.031287227,0.00013644747,0.96783733,0.000313355,0.0000058874043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012362918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073337083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003922883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012937437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014920591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019364417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033719953","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0210-5","title":"General concepts of value restriction and preference majority","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Preference; Transitive reduction; Mathematics; Generalization; Net (polyhedron); Value (mathematics); Preference relation; Binary relation; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04472247469128788,"score_gpt":0.25731025243563577,"score_spread":0.2125877777443479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033719953","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02877645,0.0028850783,0.86059964,0.008733083,0.00031254126,0.0001607885,0.00058319577,0.000106793574,0.09784237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81326556,0.0047947164,0.15172857,0.0021101048,0.0019193916,0.0011739212,0.0006440291,0.00011782358,0.024245907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993995,0.0034553495,0.00036807408,0.0007848694,0.000932758,0.00046394445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878015,0.008733876,0.0009541034,0.0014768131,0.0007572518,0.00027649067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074201925,0.0010262551,0.0014363006,0.001691502,0.0015238523,0.005622121,0.0030846128,0.0033894756,0.012512981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0230275,0.0007613777,0.0015580656,0.003129159,0.008211367,0.012888616,0.0026461303,0.004465848,0.0013018957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002408659,0.000004994319,0.000039820025,0.000013326238,0.0000032405499,0.0000055817763,0.000045905093,0.0003691254,0.000027273452,0.99786144,0.00039373827,0.0012332334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023932782,0.000001474667,0.000027681921,0.0000052264086,0.0000014593866,0.000011424042,0.000015964131,0.00090545585,0.00001481705,0.99794406,0.0010684755,0.0000017088094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013540058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091362465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012512981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019357197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015570452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041860104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041590589","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0195-y","title":"Cooperative production under diminishing marginal returns: interpreting fixed-path methods","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Rice University","keywords":"Economics; Production (economics); Context (archaeology); Marginal product; Path (computing); Interpretation (philosophy); Microeconomics; Incentive; Rationality; Public finance; Path dependence; Mathematical economics; Marginal utility; Product (mathematics); Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.06311532810255813,"score_gpt":0.42912470393740565,"score_spread":0.3660093758348475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041590589","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012122041,0.0004600073,0.980142,0.00053407345,0.000040407565,0.000061010353,0.000028281434,0.000047087855,0.006565083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54902405,0.0021724333,0.430204,0.0002962656,0.00020203926,0.0006934058,0.00009008384,0.00018763631,0.017130027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939453,0.004906094,0.00008555009,0.0004061316,0.00045754755,0.00019937464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95452845,0.040685467,0.0011913481,0.0021203354,0.0010645563,0.00040973077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016868882,0.0015463872,0.001701235,0.002181155,0.0009934698,0.0034085975,0.0035738375,0.002581744,0.007273402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05055888,0.0009860839,0.0016531126,0.002263216,0.0070672412,0.007960519,0.0034217073,0.002862096,0.0004832305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035563655,0.000051315114,0.00022359013,0.000084778374,0.00003455212,0.00003619536,0.00023993394,0.07647418,0.00011491196,0.9089965,0.00059035904,0.013118115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015245892,0.000017324612,0.000050395072,0.000023373923,0.0000093049375,0.000011563276,0.000041841387,0.14986336,0.000063594445,0.84920025,0.0006963078,0.000007541443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021887668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014388676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016868882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027005393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022837776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08921218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044698596","doi":"10.1007/s00355-012-0658-2","title":"Public goods provision by asymmetric agents: experimental evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Faculty of Arts, Ryerson University","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Public finance; Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; Asymmetry; Context (archaeology); Marginal cost; Information asymmetry; Experimental economics; Empirical evidence; Public economics; Public goods game; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.1256584447143935,"score_gpt":0.3874670550772041,"score_spread":0.26180861036281056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044698596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671262,0.0017113528,0.008031321,0.0023874668,0.00007975142,0.000120579054,0.00017635709,0.000023033228,0.020343935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938992,0.0015494245,0.002443637,0.00038050007,0.000090087895,0.00012792257,0.00010052283,0.000013919533,0.0013947559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99368906,0.0046471884,0.00029541762,0.000439604,0.0006616526,0.0002670182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82389677,0.14341357,0.017391378,0.011942905,0.0023322997,0.0010230795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013408755,0.0011369707,0.001015362,0.001039368,0.000964436,0.002068848,0.0014013834,0.00237446,0.011887126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057444062,0.0006519672,0.0005224705,0.0011633975,0.0046242718,0.003065981,0.0012965038,0.0022010354,0.00073919987],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.049584728,0.061160192,0.08408749,0.00542218,0.0032789195,0.0006828337,0.003936032,0.04039891,0.028081186,0.4314916,0.010246096,0.28162983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017919132,0.013692504,0.06476414,0.0011269539,0.0020616378,0.00087747717,0.0034588373,0.0707783,0.038817506,0.7694117,0.016739536,0.00035224465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013382732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067060196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013408755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011511467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097453356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07091308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050536663","doi":"10.1007/s00355-007-0272-x","title":"Subgame perfect implementation of stable matchings in marriage problems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Mathematical economics; Outcome (game theory); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Pareto principle; Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Game theory; Statistics","score_opus":0.020809126429007035,"score_gpt":0.2627575820979687,"score_spread":0.24194845566896164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050536663","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42923942,0.00029443472,0.52889425,0.0024251586,0.00007186192,0.00046200157,0.0003260808,0.00034354412,0.03794329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612123,0.00015670247,0.031455718,0.00018923265,0.000040033836,0.0003629158,0.00013373366,0.000053159973,0.006396285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354726,0.0041165343,0.00028428502,0.0006004606,0.00059978984,0.00085166877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713175,0.021888636,0.0018713358,0.0022724809,0.001162828,0.001487166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077120466,0.00065049005,0.002815317,0.0010414142,0.001805669,0.0038508994,0.0030035719,0.0027891397,0.009204655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04081311,0.0010475712,0.0014132304,0.0013414129,0.0027659133,0.0049368585,0.0027888466,0.0030471005,0.0007854305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023988442,0.00020645201,0.0007983259,0.000092027934,0.000059113685,0.00007713812,0.00048188024,0.027727239,0.0007763917,0.95328677,0.0016382263,0.014616539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008275434,0.00006134334,0.00018789402,0.000012203822,0.0000148280105,0.000018726922,0.0001284306,0.09480832,0.00023880103,0.90395504,0.00048236613,0.000009374912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022850218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002402165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009204655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018290291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030909656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04078573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051424146","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0511-4","title":"Intergovernmental negotiation, willingness to compromise, and voter preference reversals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Negotiation; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Outcome (game theory); Ideal point; Bargaining problem; Economics; Preference; Ideal (ethics); Microeconomics; Political science; Law and economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.027061828627450924,"score_gpt":0.22369747764854733,"score_spread":0.1966356490210964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051424146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9232983,0.00030170075,0.019083848,0.0030833173,0.00005948676,0.000048505764,0.00015711282,0.000032864213,0.05393497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982095,0.00003763893,0.00042396088,0.000046202378,0.000009902309,0.00001208411,0.000019650826,0.0000035935857,0.0012375504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675673,0.0020570345,0.00011765896,0.00023265145,0.0002662472,0.0005696611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97269094,0.019548642,0.003726179,0.002056573,0.0010028871,0.0009747876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082969405,0.00024097052,0.00072106544,0.000650152,0.0012820362,0.00318744,0.00094430946,0.0021566038,0.014787047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04024308,0.0002429443,0.0005498326,0.00092511816,0.0018004641,0.002792363,0.000925638,0.0027871404,0.0007769028],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028957017,0.0008203342,0.057391737,0.00020318244,0.000289808,0.00051423226,0.0020173772,0.05200627,0.0037627618,0.8216395,0.005688063,0.052771106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029162134,0.00028900252,0.03701707,0.00004202727,0.00012346376,0.0002539926,0.0039422703,0.078567974,0.0016607142,0.87264025,0.005101259,0.00007028396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016511785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026262903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014787047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016156081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008684323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049467623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053279336","doi":"10.1007/pl00007176","title":"Collusion, renegotiation and implementation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Planner; Outcome (game theory); Public finance; Microeconomics; Simple (philosophy); Social planner; Economics; Focus (optics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.013812592837029318,"score_gpt":0.23721868901430745,"score_spread":0.22340609617727814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053279336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5255411,0.0026671898,0.33203295,0.0115541015,0.00023435864,0.00046806663,0.00035305184,0.00026767838,0.12688139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849865,0.00033001954,0.0088045895,0.00021819244,0.00005518716,0.00016016138,0.00003382121,0.000029167551,0.005382358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861152,0.008379963,0.0006953026,0.001629751,0.0014236132,0.0017561429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9413404,0.03812278,0.0062497673,0.01088087,0.00199936,0.0014068012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014056424,0.00064832874,0.0014398688,0.0011060886,0.0018860983,0.0061971936,0.0016922373,0.0036212245,0.012468063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055335,0.0006899416,0.0012180512,0.0016665467,0.0075892555,0.008568864,0.0045692273,0.0033639146,0.00086517725],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016557364,0.00015333311,0.004924671,0.00013847038,0.00010271625,0.00022898831,0.0013354626,0.008336387,0.0009076767,0.9545628,0.0013313176,0.027812732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003822033,0.00007813285,0.0015469722,0.000037065616,0.000033967062,0.00011207651,0.00062402646,0.011676609,0.00053909584,0.980923,0.004365777,0.000025168216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015522904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017865348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014056424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023579292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026372895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07433838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053346049","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0568-8","title":"Rationality, external norms, and the epistemic value of menus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Criticism; Value (mathematics); Decision maker; Positive economics; Rational choice theory (criminology); Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13705170116549992,"score_gpt":0.3743954543775198,"score_spread":0.2373437532120199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053346049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39228058,0.003493731,0.39864978,0.015552476,0.00021539086,0.00018138076,0.0004307635,0.00021676326,0.1889792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97839296,0.00048816315,0.018481096,0.00024676463,0.000103211816,0.000106805135,0.000056752076,0.00003505589,0.0020892941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98139185,0.013373562,0.00080923707,0.0011098031,0.002398087,0.0009173982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90948653,0.0742251,0.004829228,0.0059996773,0.0037903525,0.0016692023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021576688,0.0008878265,0.0013558845,0.0024644684,0.0021158534,0.010954445,0.0014979352,0.0042663137,0.0074316813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06453116,0.00079817907,0.0010006202,0.0016177932,0.015419281,0.012976517,0.0032327026,0.0037355605,0.0004797214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012894567,0.00006545427,0.00076645176,0.00008472115,0.00005486319,0.000045213714,0.0003607267,0.004383413,0.0002715406,0.9867714,0.00031928913,0.006748131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022714928,0.000011084106,0.00019062175,0.00002124264,0.000013990578,0.0000145594195,0.00008451838,0.0032763353,0.000098024524,0.99585116,0.0004067214,0.000008962342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00100881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012427825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021576688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028493272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019086375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114109814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058073069","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0119-x","title":"Top-Pair and Top-Triple Monotonicity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Unanimity; Axiom; Outcome (game theory); Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Preference; Combinatorics; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Political science","score_opus":0.014572614985093603,"score_gpt":0.21724274845518812,"score_spread":0.20267013347009452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058073069","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16611275,0.0012970075,0.6538776,0.004783181,0.00026951003,0.00016028581,0.00080759835,0.0002559543,0.17243616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221254,0.0006652567,0.058245495,0.00089069124,0.00028893424,0.00034148176,0.00031560825,0.00014473278,0.016982462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961116,0.0019826936,0.00015643124,0.0005419148,0.00061545323,0.0005920472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857298,0.009174972,0.0010107072,0.0021568942,0.0012421985,0.00068540167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004457725,0.0007122386,0.0021335678,0.0011692785,0.002120195,0.0036203365,0.0017992262,0.0017551332,0.018795291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022271706,0.0005321664,0.00178861,0.0012558487,0.003164041,0.008473922,0.002397522,0.0035143746,0.0015211724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039470968,0.00003923371,0.00074711256,0.00006643714,0.000024570143,0.000065015585,0.00012298988,0.0022401486,0.00026528494,0.9803992,0.0029666733,0.013023999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057059287,0.000008399058,0.0002356602,0.000010189938,0.000006157412,0.00007142775,0.000054836626,0.0078970995,0.00011117933,0.9904919,0.0011028546,0.0000044880067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010812362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00133042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018795291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011270676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011837245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06287646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059561827","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0242-x","title":"Maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation with variable probabilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Ranking (information retrieval); Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Majority rule; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Voting; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017390282155391422,"score_gpt":0.2021745656071914,"score_spread":0.18478428345179998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059561827","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074197473,0.0002635885,0.98932856,0.0006864327,0.000034267083,0.000057106765,0.00016957024,0.00013251863,0.0019081857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5094958,0.0009097415,0.470442,0.00041315836,0.0007143006,0.001053174,0.0012316406,0.0002807212,0.01545942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98574466,0.010787338,0.00040444688,0.0012585465,0.0012104576,0.0005945701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94431555,0.05037558,0.0012839944,0.0023248529,0.001337477,0.0003625358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014598628,0.0013105528,0.0053045135,0.0036237817,0.0019894843,0.0055532814,0.0055228444,0.003959424,0.009312502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060661487,0.0025056445,0.0028292197,0.0049635894,0.0039400565,0.00790988,0.0037488597,0.004031379,0.0013173574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015500942,0.00012915037,0.0013131343,0.00016956934,0.00024298375,0.0001356732,0.0004218446,0.36667368,0.00026041974,0.589062,0.0028702617,0.03856631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029148894,0.00001227772,0.00019882758,0.00001741568,0.000019288691,0.000022784512,0.000024101093,0.60741967,0.00009850107,0.39153552,0.000603889,0.000018531946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007366924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007738412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014598628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002889011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021484534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07720584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061278102","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0775-6","title":"Shapley–Shubik methods in cost sharing problems with technological cooperation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Anonymity; Shapley value; Property (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Offset (computer science); Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Cost sharing; Compensation (psychology); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.05032072340237173,"score_gpt":0.2856103721619279,"score_spread":0.23528964875955619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061278102","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01972811,0.0013525833,0.96534747,0.0010471597,0.000106218584,0.0001304454,0.000092329385,0.000058117897,0.012137521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6855872,0.0024453055,0.2920408,0.00042356207,0.00037498333,0.0007635061,0.00025156635,0.00022784203,0.017885279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950203,0.004004894,0.0001270087,0.0002620984,0.00040339536,0.00018233381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984118,0.013900619,0.00041407705,0.00083537126,0.00042427998,0.00030753788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01025524,0.0017218131,0.0031628083,0.0017639088,0.0014762903,0.003163757,0.0048937513,0.0036365292,0.008298462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022151172,0.0010348936,0.0015000413,0.0028185775,0.004214201,0.00744078,0.0027589353,0.0042554517,0.0006213555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085294,0.000118477285,0.00021477946,0.00020105173,0.00009183976,0.00003275641,0.00019136506,0.14884423,0.00020290319,0.8263937,0.0021950481,0.021428427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049142116,0.000019782177,0.000057441994,0.000023404884,0.000014957526,0.00000799986,0.000035579913,0.2555766,0.00007907922,0.7431464,0.0009760344,0.000013586566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002215307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026116488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01025524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032871955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024369159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054235518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067139866","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0303-1","title":"Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding – or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Distributive justice; Distributive property; Inequality; Veil of ignorance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequity aversion; Ignorance; Social welfare function; Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Welfare; Social psychology; Welfare economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.057677384500916425,"score_gpt":0.3749618746046674,"score_spread":0.317284490103751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067139866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6882788,0.010097469,0.03601761,0.049882073,0.0011698188,0.00041916498,0.0005670028,0.00009692854,0.21347104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97795606,0.0022256155,0.007780907,0.0024760943,0.00025140465,0.00031304406,0.000052939962,0.000030706375,0.0089132935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969869,0.0019754313,0.00007515036,0.00039208998,0.00044804843,0.00012237816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804441,0.013750699,0.0014582367,0.0034038012,0.000644168,0.00029895644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008323462,0.00043550998,0.00074066094,0.0005298043,0.0016348844,0.0014726102,0.0008310094,0.0017488928,0.013409342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022805851,0.00028024035,0.0003569087,0.0006203168,0.0066913865,0.0038481054,0.0010651757,0.001583612,0.00062698126],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003406136,0.002713324,0.0054906523,0.0006741709,0.000364177,0.000097973636,0.0030796598,0.0020077508,0.0058653844,0.8483038,0.0150964875,0.11290054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011171603,0.0017022255,0.011118392,0.00024867276,0.00018333935,0.00014924414,0.0015976211,0.0020559211,0.005221709,0.93430436,0.042217817,0.000083551444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002033398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002643782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013409342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013299354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014333301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044858754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068129224","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0448-7","title":"Strategic, sincere, and heuristic voting under four election rules: an experimental study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Heuristics; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Approval voting; Ranked voting system; Anti-plurality voting; Disapproval voting; Heuristic; Economics; Microeconomics; Public finance; Simple (philosophy); Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.056107382864848725,"score_gpt":0.36238059336367967,"score_spread":0.30627321049883094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068129224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980738,0.000013833423,0.00032576855,0.00005021559,0.000012994828,0.000071247865,0.000025891528,0.000003939158,0.0014223417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997207,0.000038110484,0.0011145762,0.000052074272,0.000027317552,0.0002088385,0.00007469781,0.000008314769,0.001269149],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648947,0.0022499736,0.00023038806,0.00031227173,0.00038427958,0.00033367943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93258107,0.05284799,0.0052431272,0.006608822,0.0010176856,0.0017013339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00812469,0.00077685615,0.0009297698,0.0006822938,0.0011512318,0.0021236583,0.0009602161,0.0016078822,0.007978105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038172547,0.00044139367,0.00051140384,0.0005405353,0.0024976935,0.001315872,0.00082648237,0.0020887642,0.00064224587],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12861697,0.3153463,0.18454075,0.0009768506,0.0018450749,0.00072862586,0.014410553,0.040018152,0.058273394,0.1038053,0.006508351,0.1449297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04224735,0.20150255,0.29018772,0.00023548404,0.0017777362,0.0010792952,0.01176634,0.23118804,0.028719664,0.18183036,0.008807304,0.00065818476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009928766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013409556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00812469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000867718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089818623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042967975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071855726","doi":"10.1007/s00355-012-0695-x","title":"p-Weakly constrained Pareto efficiency and aggregation in incomplete markets","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Incomplete markets; Public finance; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Competitive equilibrium; Pareto efficiency; Function (biology); Complete market; Pareto optimal; Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Multi-objective optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.02365192710172064,"score_gpt":0.22609403313901366,"score_spread":0.202442106037293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071855726","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18472426,0.001692003,0.7591672,0.007774979,0.000115002986,0.0002597883,0.00062311953,0.00016647585,0.045477193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303233,0.0015356402,0.04988244,0.000648288,0.00032984675,0.000568453,0.00035890675,0.00012036175,0.016232792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992386,0.004863667,0.00040667097,0.000743781,0.0008734965,0.00072624785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95340455,0.03825862,0.0029576384,0.0024134638,0.0016842154,0.0012814656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013320002,0.0014509846,0.004347764,0.0023959102,0.0023850389,0.007243526,0.0028542913,0.0035502294,0.0075237863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043078512,0.0014340278,0.0025937732,0.0035030474,0.0077712066,0.01206912,0.0049078455,0.0037247613,0.0005226566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000360602,0.000038322127,0.0003481397,0.00005673509,0.000042703177,0.000058010333,0.0001125242,0.020875957,0.00009116651,0.97459733,0.000953684,0.0027893877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014436794,0.000005272037,0.000077491,0.000008492078,0.0000049661944,0.000010480699,0.00002966566,0.026492966,0.000025420597,0.9731006,0.00022607532,0.000004250283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046360907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031379305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013320002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004686609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003320633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07044375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079087968","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0487-0","title":"Judgments regarding the fair division of goods: the impact of verbal versus quantitative descriptions of alternative divisions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; McMaster University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; McMaster University","keywords":"Fair division; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Preference; Social psychology; Sample (material); Maximization; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12635982095345993,"score_gpt":0.30828550238600483,"score_spread":0.1819256814325449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079087968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7847872,0.0031180491,0.054326523,0.02059065,0.0009456115,0.00046329095,0.0008614084,0.0001697157,0.13473758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865725,0.0005730668,0.009797419,0.0010952891,0.00031201795,0.00016448023,0.00023063744,0.0000684396,0.0011861782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460747,0.038469438,0.002478505,0.0023786342,0.009386002,0.0012127853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43753806,0.5159009,0.020932037,0.012130413,0.010454319,0.0030441924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053152114,0.0010155312,0.0010886712,0.0029637797,0.001841885,0.011868624,0.0020754554,0.004446743,0.015217678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3984743,0.0007584608,0.0014060162,0.0026177422,0.008822373,0.0183204,0.00501334,0.005487778,0.00080807204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021346074,0.0024002395,0.04099398,0.0024310332,0.0013880522,0.0009216142,0.017388182,0.037732072,0.007121054,0.62846386,0.014772658,0.2250412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011681463,0.00084494957,0.02860854,0.0007838058,0.00045105166,0.0002913403,0.011121901,0.054465413,0.0033866933,0.89111847,0.007487299,0.00027229625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033187193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003068054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053152114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033052973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017861105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2810986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083273514","doi":"10.1007/s00355-007-0243-2","title":"Social choice, optimal inference and figure skating","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Inference; Set (abstract data type); Markov chain Monte Carlo; Social choice theory; Statistical inference; Computer science; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Markov chain; Posterior probability; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.035218126079915146,"score_gpt":0.281705952480601,"score_spread":0.24648782640068584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083273514","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3362557,0.0015801584,0.6265296,0.008792383,0.00017251156,0.00015882328,0.0005498693,0.00016826707,0.025792709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601618,0.00045194096,0.032678854,0.0002326069,0.000097353215,0.00008032541,0.00021264303,0.00004785693,0.0060365372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481094,0.003259741,0.00020577465,0.00080946647,0.0003444789,0.0005695769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586929,0.035774406,0.0020852995,0.001990637,0.00084746664,0.0006094336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008777063,0.0006351092,0.0024261868,0.0014696353,0.0015018021,0.0038453536,0.0025494762,0.003615563,0.011467807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057010625,0.0008167373,0.001092993,0.0016401745,0.0049225036,0.006804041,0.0016629194,0.0026751605,0.00060112594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035144197,0.00021122234,0.0063293655,0.0001863979,0.00014093083,0.0001315977,0.0005411788,0.1239369,0.0003996989,0.83170223,0.0039477316,0.032121398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004149241,0.000019628735,0.0008235404,0.000019492707,0.00002039532,0.00003166517,0.00012207797,0.15037006,0.00014705457,0.8477444,0.0006436039,0.000016651415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009765677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009840337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011467807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002815447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021647688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04641813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089349773","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0112-4","title":"Maximal Domain for Strategy-proof Rules in Allotment Economies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Domain (mathematical analysis); Preference; Allotment; Variable (mathematics); Characterization (materials science); Disequilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.025099615735910543,"score_gpt":0.2341309164835523,"score_spread":0.20903130074764176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089349773","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24750672,0.0013886228,0.66346955,0.004431162,0.00012670502,0.00020869696,0.0009984449,0.0005364637,0.08133366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435574,0.0006765539,0.043942284,0.0004078755,0.00018539715,0.00037877724,0.00075401616,0.00013396308,0.009963936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962155,0.0016801759,0.00024403402,0.00069274346,0.00057992665,0.00058764574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97368264,0.020889936,0.0009196244,0.0014923491,0.0012120685,0.0018033882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054835035,0.0009443023,0.0028091446,0.002653356,0.0032351464,0.0094215255,0.0026227604,0.0027082413,0.009090894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017812937,0.0010457813,0.002129353,0.0021031657,0.0066892635,0.01243828,0.00383572,0.0062094466,0.0009366214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035671565,0.000034989756,0.00011750514,0.000035192963,0.000012913658,0.000031993506,0.00016420991,0.0018190235,0.0001638848,0.9953949,0.00039854235,0.0017911152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025176847,0.000006931932,0.000051235824,0.000011013793,0.0000062242116,0.000016264203,0.00005174854,0.00623564,0.00014305451,0.9929304,0.00051662425,0.000005589418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001984401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013164537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0094215255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002824076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023467278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030412078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096634455","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0079-1","title":"The 2002 Winter Olympics scandal: rent-seeking and committees","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rent-seeking; Composition (language); Public finance; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.014000880033318158,"score_gpt":0.21107917310464136,"score_spread":0.1970782930713232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096634455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9333838,0.0014237948,0.00045440297,0.02839515,0.00053644687,0.00002197874,0.0015444552,0.00002627011,0.034213677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150336,0.00024971808,0.000052725773,0.000606733,0.00026958814,0.00001033368,0.00050656364,0.000010808565,0.006790126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911886,0.00036687704,0.000036701233,0.00008094783,0.00014178525,0.00025489216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994786,0.00145904,0.0011537147,0.00016298227,0.00065322296,0.0017850213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015930063,0.0002768528,0.00043465514,0.0008272219,0.0018847595,0.0036768822,0.00047706423,0.0017444836,0.006752879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007344478,0.0002059475,0.00034346976,0.0011474299,0.0011524134,0.001297188,0.0012041752,0.002043208,0.00084418815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028093343,0.0009864137,0.6170369,0.00016765713,0.000278955,0.00062624697,0.005603538,0.0049097915,0.0004825899,0.04101698,0.26499003,0.061091643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008433297,0.00019480624,0.9012688,0.00012983008,0.0000889641,0.00019439592,0.02541013,0.007747708,0.00028554874,0.013377006,0.0511655,0.000052924013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060320467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17340472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060320467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017571995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015129795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11993873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096644678","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0131-1","title":"Anonymous Single-profile Welfarism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Anonymity; Public finance; Set (abstract data type); Social choice theory; Economics; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Computer security; Welfare","score_opus":0.02186610708643378,"score_gpt":0.20583522945013813,"score_spread":0.18396912236370436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096644678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5030554,0.00014992683,0.32746083,0.0023698783,0.00021649628,0.0003106669,0.0007247759,0.0005488234,0.16516313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969848,0.00003127005,0.008292705,0.0001536718,0.000042752792,0.000081179234,0.000110298926,0.000036027533,0.021404184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953928,0.0024003035,0.00014911892,0.00070990605,0.00045452296,0.00089334336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895734,0.0040035374,0.000807836,0.0038476242,0.00095869246,0.0008088582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037071032,0.00040856836,0.0011626823,0.00059237925,0.002800746,0.0030483075,0.0016636717,0.002053303,0.017413734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137672,0.0002836618,0.00061199965,0.0006004385,0.0015002397,0.0032626619,0.0024984751,0.001605715,0.00256736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013216892,0.00044454087,0.004844771,0.00014028103,0.00008312208,0.000237987,0.0012308144,0.011105857,0.0026481564,0.90073866,0.012294523,0.06490967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017731603,0.00024477317,0.0028622872,0.00004469156,0.000052929194,0.00042000634,0.00108886,0.08350759,0.0034803697,0.88598746,0.02206241,0.00007127545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080753246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017043842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017413734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009527617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008787015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05825472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104257901","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1","title":"Characterizing best–worst voting systems in the scoring context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Axiom; Context (archaeology); Social choice theory; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Cardinal voting systems; Condorcet method; Approval voting; Choice set; Anti-plurality voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04292224798241957,"score_gpt":0.24666437402838567,"score_spread":0.2037421260459661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104257901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60260224,0.00043729355,0.37403694,0.0018428075,0.000063912914,0.00015017163,0.000251261,0.00012855353,0.02048679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811297,0.000074951684,0.016386606,0.00007201753,0.00005321068,0.00005778521,0.000114076094,0.000034278026,0.0020773285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872764,0.008182708,0.000523698,0.0016824199,0.00086206704,0.0014726606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607874,0.025094949,0.005340599,0.004191089,0.0027318636,0.0018540112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012050719,0.00077339966,0.0018567921,0.0021625452,0.0024919796,0.0075905523,0.0026030242,0.002811665,0.004618183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04611247,0.0007203069,0.0009855935,0.0016756798,0.0051926803,0.006433163,0.0029086373,0.0023400378,0.00048902223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027419708,0.0001633123,0.008984259,0.000092332986,0.0001247552,0.0001260469,0.0006849065,0.095770776,0.0015364379,0.870388,0.0019393271,0.019915586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031542044,0.000050670376,0.0016895498,0.00002352895,0.000030264282,0.00005280329,0.00034462736,0.25817358,0.0004941684,0.73828685,0.0007908044,0.000031618423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002063249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026693896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012050719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002518272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001550162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063731074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104879829","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0132-0","title":"Rationalizability of choice functions on general domains without full transitivity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Rationalizability; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Element (criminal law); Transitive reduction; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Graph; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.02047996664975399,"score_gpt":0.2355434718199226,"score_spread":0.21506350517016862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104879829","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29869607,0.0007690771,0.662743,0.003990435,0.00008890759,0.0002653688,0.0008698685,0.00038234945,0.032194935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96026474,0.0005953779,0.03183285,0.00041605657,0.00018624838,0.00045918516,0.0007045511,0.00013128866,0.0054096053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988782,0.0053378516,0.0006241557,0.0028295175,0.0011846166,0.0012418655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299649,0.052671373,0.0038419587,0.008414237,0.0032457178,0.0018617642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012528758,0.0012602072,0.004468191,0.003237917,0.00171672,0.0066769845,0.0030848018,0.0029106294,0.0056948154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046501122,0.0016943305,0.0038454523,0.0023217958,0.008800808,0.014941126,0.0053765145,0.0069643133,0.0005274168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010589187,0.00005408407,0.00064214447,0.00006184163,0.000054464712,0.00007502545,0.00029031024,0.006831784,0.00035497913,0.9883868,0.00037477145,0.0027678541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028698458,0.000012625702,0.00016553106,0.000008393808,0.000010369003,0.000022768458,0.00004556861,0.016641365,0.000102618484,0.98278606,0.00016927949,0.000006700851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032544937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016146032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012528758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032022535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002301081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066259205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107684075","doi":"10.1007/s00355-014-0857-0","title":"On the measurement of plutonomy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; International political economy; Social policy; Economics; Political science; Macroeconomics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.021373575634945654,"score_gpt":0.24519101901745322,"score_spread":0.22381744338250756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107684075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5254645,0.013619492,0.25535557,0.038193226,0.00059348316,0.00017283158,0.001476312,0.00009538407,0.16502927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97871715,0.003313095,0.012859841,0.0005408023,0.0001796322,0.00015592673,0.00008054868,0.000016919446,0.0041361963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98621607,0.011483466,0.00022900244,0.0007927215,0.0009615056,0.0003172091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93314254,0.057021037,0.004075641,0.0036898523,0.0016217951,0.00044916722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012791578,0.0006698048,0.0008829062,0.00221356,0.0015216069,0.0024595475,0.001117502,0.0016342221,0.0050263125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051516216,0.0002719051,0.0006253497,0.0036683464,0.009836969,0.004872113,0.0033185508,0.0018928745,0.00035519167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013007548,0.00009883737,0.012795034,0.0001422014,0.000100177494,0.000053151125,0.0009751657,0.0026446835,0.00040767755,0.9444595,0.0011950738,0.036998454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019917108,0.00010016217,0.0124205705,0.00016390094,0.000043195058,0.00005854589,0.0007469369,0.00479007,0.0007369739,0.97391915,0.0069714724,0.000029112738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038877751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030768847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012791578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023210505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012230887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067649126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109631663","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0150-y","title":"Dynamic Measures of Individual Deprivation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Index (typography); Class (philosophy); Function (biology); Public finance; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03364405346502612,"score_gpt":0.3081831620640292,"score_spread":0.27453910859900305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109631663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6746365,0.0018338526,0.14733936,0.0044083684,0.00012365414,0.0001227896,0.008358939,0.00017618429,0.16300033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99043906,0.00029828196,0.0041429037,0.0000453181,0.000029550985,0.00005437456,0.0005278979,0.000009060059,0.0044536274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934787,0.0002487859,0.000026834894,0.0001233985,0.0001497974,0.00010333265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813545,0.00081954285,0.00042248977,0.00023483319,0.0002022187,0.00018533586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088752416,0.000296847,0.00036542505,0.0021844474,0.0005681905,0.0017820259,0.00037442564,0.00040098839,0.00819336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005285998,0.00015799268,0.00031507414,0.003254477,0.0010444243,0.0026601674,0.0013086774,0.00067253126,0.0003989449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014652463,0.00013157903,0.040514976,0.000079502555,0.00014702012,0.0000584197,0.0011038604,0.023720449,0.0010051229,0.88097215,0.0043048514,0.047815505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016687696,0.00011818625,0.090061635,0.000060048525,0.000049017333,0.00017641032,0.0020121392,0.046092946,0.0005044448,0.843781,0.017082369,0.000045059573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026374124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003488637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00819336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019421246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044118398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027409554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109642354","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0157-4","title":"Sabotaging Potential Rivals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"CONTEST; Public finance; Economics; Microeconomics; International political economy; Mathematical economics; Political science; Law; Macroeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.016029290983874855,"score_gpt":0.3097917313304424,"score_spread":0.29376244034656757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109642354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94941247,0.00023208454,0.009456659,0.0009683996,0.000066120694,0.00013975767,0.000060955834,0.000059159072,0.0396043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602157,0.000043282507,0.00096416526,0.000093134695,0.000008129937,0.000044750446,0.000009344194,0.000006697741,0.0028090766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964728,0.0020032178,0.00014825353,0.00038232282,0.0005129981,0.0004803909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96749943,0.021274203,0.0026748371,0.006304662,0.00088239374,0.0013643882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005638951,0.00081497565,0.0020805805,0.00079205894,0.0012780464,0.003867368,0.0013299747,0.0034057542,0.013949098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031731736,0.00060453074,0.00067643437,0.00085119205,0.0030441468,0.0027419913,0.0027605204,0.002550278,0.0008474959],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007296075,0.0033958391,0.02389496,0.00087096903,0.00034890213,0.00086553756,0.0031212487,0.04543905,0.023030382,0.8032622,0.003360009,0.08511492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012758095,0.0027843423,0.010165342,0.00010837391,0.00019703679,0.00067845505,0.00290095,0.13838789,0.006288561,0.82925504,0.007846527,0.00011166403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093235786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012707332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013949098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014373898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017376487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046664357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116249082","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0584-8","title":"Free triples, large indifference classes and the majority rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Transitive relation; Majority rule; Preference; Preference relation; Cartesian product; Condorcet method; Domain (mathematical analysis); Voting; Mathematical economics; Relation (database); Social choice theory; Mathematics; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Data mining; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.04263526924719818,"score_gpt":0.21985991371969862,"score_spread":0.17722464447250044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116249082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48442784,0.0024375382,0.4225617,0.008292515,0.00020751366,0.0001963265,0.0006621605,0.00019807174,0.08101641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97363496,0.00050602073,0.017701868,0.0003441399,0.00014405315,0.00018574003,0.00016632902,0.000040465853,0.0072764046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963403,0.0019771361,0.00013945851,0.0005210121,0.0005263004,0.00049585133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98110294,0.014325557,0.0014125886,0.0014868695,0.0006602268,0.0010117237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058219796,0.00058002316,0.0019633838,0.0018835587,0.0033248288,0.0052772495,0.0017835865,0.0026752048,0.00838276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024268338,0.0005243471,0.0008163315,0.0016542202,0.006268738,0.010557371,0.0027709578,0.0028054402,0.00069237704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045878718,0.000023386858,0.00028129757,0.000023829434,0.000011626593,0.000020702582,0.00010292445,0.0031149872,0.00007478201,0.99126035,0.0010054496,0.004034741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009620394,0.0000033141584,0.00006564178,0.000004115398,0.0000017819885,0.000008380595,0.000025389474,0.0041043824,0.000021973303,0.99543375,0.0003186709,0.0000029254597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030130723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023714462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00838276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023788966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013295156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030789912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121886276","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0604-8","title":"Dominant strategy implementation with a convex product space of valuations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Universidade Estadual do Ceará; Lunds Universitet; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Mathematics; Regular polygon; Valuation (finance); Space (punctuation); Product topology; Zero (linguistics); Graph; Product (mathematics); Combinatorics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.1553413309993978,"score_gpt":0.4172641081698142,"score_spread":0.2619227771704164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121886276","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051512193,0.00019139283,0.932031,0.0007865589,0.000033930653,0.00009509484,0.00010992432,0.000121832825,0.0151181845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7850957,0.0003707134,0.19907807,0.00020474085,0.000077984434,0.0004378895,0.00015541645,0.0001372854,0.014442304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072915,0.0053466265,0.00044263835,0.0010248794,0.0016773393,0.0007793292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834274,0.011044371,0.0011301925,0.0022430138,0.0012301337,0.00092484796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009570729,0.001560725,0.0024329498,0.0014878085,0.0008941448,0.007821167,0.0028668956,0.0022880994,0.0064216494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021939673,0.0011118413,0.0016817332,0.001833606,0.0038466365,0.010756512,0.0042151255,0.0034751578,0.0008006716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012755797,0.00010007013,0.0001855462,0.000065952096,0.000057896545,0.00007993083,0.00011379797,0.031641897,0.00086884253,0.9545037,0.00064914563,0.011605832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051540792,0.00009830463,0.00009759572,0.000021160853,0.000022324113,0.000071932656,0.00004933747,0.16190493,0.0005301825,0.83616066,0.00097278814,0.000019226556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008710017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066923373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009570729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021751297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002015816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05061549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123904319","doi":"10.1007/s003550100124","title":"Efficient solutions to bargaining problems with uncertain disagreement points","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Monotone polygon; Rationality; Minimax; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Property (philosophy); Point (geometry); Bargaining problem; Mathematical optimization; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Path (computing); Axiomatic system; Economics; Social choice theory; Computer science","score_opus":0.055522921491831044,"score_gpt":0.2305636843382545,"score_spread":0.17504076284642345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123904319","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05789046,0.00048792368,0.91935927,0.0018341192,0.000107611355,0.00017986826,0.00016512284,0.00010156385,0.01987401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7900582,0.000918639,0.18792519,0.00031847387,0.00026647505,0.00091093226,0.00030963632,0.00014800823,0.019144408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960658,0.0024647727,0.00017054012,0.00038138768,0.00044300474,0.00047447174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98479176,0.013035655,0.0008737997,0.00048668377,0.00042397308,0.000388236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063508474,0.0013668017,0.0027021861,0.0013987422,0.0016524744,0.0043302006,0.0037013823,0.0051572523,0.009832139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02900952,0.0016137932,0.0013294447,0.0018843845,0.0036827214,0.00482159,0.0029532306,0.0036100172,0.0008983069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011143873,0.0000986423,0.00016090792,0.000111972455,0.00004595419,0.000062288775,0.0002772836,0.211541,0.0004415382,0.7730674,0.0021168564,0.0119646825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000898949,0.000022754408,0.00004947684,0.000023513614,0.000010381062,0.000013243864,0.00007448179,0.2583377,0.00013395284,0.74056834,0.00066559674,0.000010532077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013035354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014252316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009832139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002134302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025117444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03358686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138628281","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0942-z","title":"Measuring rank mobility with variable population size","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Economic and Social Research Council; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Variable (mathematics); Econometrics; Population; Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Replication (statistics); Mathematics; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Empirical research; Characterization (materials science); Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Sociology; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Demography; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.0968887391854638,"score_gpt":0.3328352019880299,"score_spread":0.2359464628025661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138628281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98888105,0.00005895649,0.008250905,0.000082812854,0.0000052575565,0.000016308344,0.00025798305,0.000011829244,0.0024349191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969445,0.000017843977,0.0026265935,0.000006947932,0.0000028606232,0.000020112388,0.00010769077,0.0000016747293,0.00027181575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976617,0.001675002,0.00005820629,0.00020992298,0.0002216385,0.00017356568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852341,0.010572048,0.0015837903,0.001736542,0.00059280917,0.00028079285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029529217,0.00023926332,0.00030699378,0.0014625848,0.0006986124,0.000959049,0.00081930176,0.0006136207,0.0028649375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021809153,0.00017799462,0.00037524538,0.0021614486,0.0015464188,0.0018496785,0.0013947794,0.00037900463,0.00026080114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004347667,0.00035215568,0.8702562,0.00009753034,0.0002831513,0.000085479216,0.0014803582,0.034458492,0.0018698985,0.04211924,0.0008030945,0.0477596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008028082,0.0007778379,0.7869826,0.000080633086,0.00025031008,0.00027003023,0.0049308916,0.121705316,0.0045750467,0.07763831,0.0026240742,0.000084664476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071163424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010260638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071163424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074349385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005571242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015616715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141263345","doi":"10.1007/s003550000067","title":"Core in a simple coalition formation game","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":535,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Separable space; Class (philosophy); Stochastic game; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08584522714990465,"score_gpt":0.27647019621444513,"score_spread":0.19062496906454046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141263345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6143398,0.00022855069,0.34637955,0.001290635,0.0000548508,0.00030450313,0.00024337634,0.00014668032,0.037012063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96546435,0.00014321558,0.023183772,0.000120226854,0.00003402317,0.00021637016,0.00010894789,0.000033438944,0.010695672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812824,0.0010759257,0.00007565514,0.00022626747,0.00022314586,0.0002708101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992677,0.0051171533,0.0006388309,0.00044584888,0.0003952195,0.0007259868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028559174,0.0006867733,0.0017053589,0.00092412444,0.0012268663,0.0027421778,0.0018598789,0.002035467,0.005430522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011449454,0.00054113124,0.0007291527,0.0008232339,0.0028112426,0.004159191,0.0023462388,0.0014408674,0.00041905424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024086078,0.00016154598,0.00074928877,0.00008611703,0.000049342798,0.0001245675,0.00040046914,0.04690665,0.001347535,0.9416077,0.0012097879,0.0071161184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010959084,0.00007682162,0.00032622906,0.000014196566,0.00002273389,0.000059703347,0.0001207629,0.23543797,0.00029041656,0.7625813,0.00094494014,0.000015296924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028426624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026626037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005430522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015821325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001725382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0181669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141806469","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0638-y","title":"A counterexample to a conjecture of Schwartz","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tournament; Conjecture; Counterexample; Transitive relation; Constructive; Mathematics; Constructive proof; Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Partition (number theory); Discrete mathematics; Probabilistic logic; Set (abstract data type); Graph; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.11645567910200043,"score_gpt":0.42103913811631416,"score_spread":0.3045834590143137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141806469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15254152,0.003507635,0.19008315,0.40186697,0.0038602683,0.000114701324,0.0011718607,0.0005441933,0.24630968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9223817,0.0029018433,0.024663985,0.020377064,0.004952101,0.00034441284,0.000324383,0.00020625805,0.023848183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971963,0.0012433514,0.00012210889,0.00067777396,0.00046384102,0.00029655785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98135006,0.0149099175,0.00088430214,0.0014420851,0.0009760964,0.00043743956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005221418,0.00087779434,0.0022996299,0.0016910014,0.0027431077,0.004243517,0.0022236514,0.00737932,0.016957086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0284563,0.0006217317,0.001635089,0.0026013153,0.011495452,0.013395005,0.004943464,0.0060272887,0.0018269017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038957784,0.000023325625,0.00022459723,0.000035920002,0.000015839512,0.000051600346,0.00013950374,0.0003851616,0.00006260122,0.9864423,0.009787083,0.0027931314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017584853,0.0000044023805,0.00005511167,0.000011197159,0.0000045109164,0.000030096178,0.00003224814,0.0012031854,0.000027692415,0.99661875,0.0019909726,0.0000041961125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013358822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006998392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016957086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019272491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013417719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05672705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601718507","doi":"10.1007/s00355-018-1123-7","title":"Working time regulation, unequal lifetimes and fairness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Working time; Inequality; Public finance; Economics; Working hours; Working age; Lived experience; Laissez-faire; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Psychology; Market economy; Work (physics); Demography; Macroeconomics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.1181806508562141,"score_gpt":0.3925125684484452,"score_spread":0.2743319175922311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601718507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80927646,0.0019151568,0.02634156,0.019117797,0.00025711046,0.000038339884,0.00012359941,0.000021282696,0.14290872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567825,0.0001303341,0.0005854671,0.00027769947,0.000050458602,0.000016429103,0.000009952047,0.0000046083655,0.0032468939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971545,0.001427919,0.0001154187,0.00037931194,0.00027312426,0.0006497452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902266,0.0054249535,0.0014058723,0.0012990127,0.00071893045,0.00092459813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008173332,0.00016500942,0.0003382702,0.000613903,0.002346423,0.0034561092,0.0006657645,0.0016837585,0.0049777473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013847034,0.00014072734,0.00029637304,0.0005356391,0.008661656,0.0030202803,0.002415381,0.0016232863,0.00019350337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015196802,0.00012931634,0.015261811,0.00002527851,0.000026376647,0.00006129836,0.0045075445,0.0012188769,0.0002897669,0.95915,0.0009007986,0.018276902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041361454,0.000056447505,0.020738486,0.000042926906,0.000020509211,0.0000611825,0.0038579192,0.0016372429,0.00023806137,0.9651392,0.0081451675,0.00002137328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051257326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059281853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008173332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018424488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020923791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04322523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810838958","doi":"10.1007/s00355-018-1140-6","title":"Intertemporal pro-poorness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Australian Agency for International Development; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; United States Agency for International Development; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada","keywords":"Poverty; Public finance; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); European union; Income distribution; Public economics; Econometrics; Economic geography; Macroeconomics; Inequality; International economics; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04569275871152629,"score_gpt":0.3485704602609109,"score_spread":0.3028777015493846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810838958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8517775,0.0014434529,0.023497678,0.007774264,0.000053170304,0.000048025424,0.00086774386,0.000031262603,0.114506945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516535,0.00027432042,0.00093037204,0.000083171995,0.000018729439,0.000013906728,0.000055554337,0.0000031415047,0.0034554135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988907,0.0006631967,0.000040120132,0.00009723383,0.0001300691,0.00017869429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966011,0.001620542,0.00071813725,0.0003610143,0.00028130467,0.00041776474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022876095,0.00026891503,0.00032496738,0.00079634174,0.00063849636,0.0019444858,0.00025184313,0.0006397884,0.008641653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00482842,0.00013868307,0.0002831125,0.00085463177,0.0015153642,0.001585417,0.0013417195,0.0009002219,0.0002491166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046966012,0.00034173828,0.10213174,0.00010934743,0.00020394938,0.00018020901,0.0012979925,0.008190062,0.0013702554,0.8418492,0.0013408366,0.042515006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003451079,0.00016706808,0.09212757,0.00006675032,0.00007775124,0.00025829757,0.0023707184,0.00971841,0.0005153249,0.88520443,0.009437345,0.000021714617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011107504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002668902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008641653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008677577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006630736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028909206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895801305","doi":"10.1007/s00355-019-01221-6","title":"Simple games versus weighted voting games: bounding the critical threshold value","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Conjecture; Tournament; Example of a game without a value; Partition (number theory); Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Weighted voting; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.033131961173566475,"score_gpt":0.2740001441258113,"score_spread":0.24086818295224482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895801305","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20254178,0.0032358917,0.74643993,0.0047625215,0.00027814548,0.00016469504,0.0001829251,0.00018609977,0.042207923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726644,0.0009038658,0.02237116,0.00044610855,0.00018399135,0.00012882966,0.000046857316,0.000069740265,0.003185029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647164,0.0018747614,0.000110344045,0.0005567543,0.0004910388,0.0004954468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487671,0.045038596,0.0021691134,0.0016094443,0.0010652234,0.0013506241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065916483,0.001262936,0.0023155746,0.0022067986,0.0013009945,0.0057470715,0.002931956,0.0039059753,0.004893071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049204186,0.0008997362,0.0009184574,0.0013410157,0.007802806,0.009203181,0.0030079673,0.0042564054,0.0003070494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046172107,0.000037340993,0.000335075,0.00008674171,0.000029795492,0.000043293476,0.00010148748,0.030070588,0.0008368846,0.9645055,0.00088958896,0.003017493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015073344,0.00001293506,0.00011722447,0.00003318235,0.000015061591,0.0000262098,0.000043166856,0.16476035,0.000377435,0.8341861,0.0004000781,0.000013082318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016844205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001370841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065916483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040406636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019956885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034860373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023829253","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0434-0","title":"Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Negotiation; Variance (accounting); Public finance; Group (periodic table); Homogeneous; Microeconomics; Economics; Experimental economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.025479076836590914,"score_gpt":0.32521643728205907,"score_spread":0.29973736044546817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023829253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88443655,0.00047659673,0.06428239,0.0090766065,0.00015636954,0.00020583304,0.000071189235,0.00009384826,0.04120057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888842,0.00018028359,0.0067233914,0.00050318765,0.000055753088,0.00009622307,0.000027865635,0.000028225742,0.0035008483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328774,0.0048179883,0.00014447949,0.0004612923,0.0004019716,0.00088650384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574728,0.030085348,0.00506045,0.004877558,0.0007081373,0.0017956662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015959047,0.0011677141,0.0019085828,0.00068929157,0.0015462568,0.004062558,0.0018145009,0.0057257144,0.013700558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0419116,0.00069420954,0.0009861266,0.0007898697,0.0042566378,0.007178445,0.002504684,0.0028707462,0.0010289052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047357953,0.0040512206,0.028563732,0.0010146799,0.00075485837,0.00038871882,0.0057996707,0.041753408,0.006873861,0.79664534,0.010646946,0.0987718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056285394,0.00041351994,0.0032763637,0.00003498519,0.00008251908,0.00011418103,0.0014813917,0.026488911,0.0007025322,0.96387786,0.002937118,0.000027731785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011608043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015456105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015959047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000862593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017714268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084400475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048600008","doi":"10.1007/s00355-022-01413-7","title":"Preference aggregation for couples","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Lexicographical order; Axiom; Revealed preference; Rank (graph theory); Preference elicitation; Aggregation problem; Mathematical economics; Preference theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07007172952497447,"score_gpt":0.24288671215823474,"score_spread":0.17281498263326028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048600008","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2891527,0.0007003399,0.63176477,0.0017406498,0.00015473564,0.0002829486,0.0019637283,0.00028279348,0.07395734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91510195,0.00030807144,0.06750066,0.00021578943,0.0001176861,0.00021745845,0.0014066409,0.00005062504,0.015081099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997127,0.0014209029,0.00018800833,0.00053969596,0.00036395947,0.00036034329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942631,0.0026438106,0.00055445376,0.0014897562,0.00057691854,0.0004720299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031025123,0.00054889737,0.0013040577,0.0015835492,0.0014536863,0.0030814223,0.0009719612,0.0010494156,0.019526897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011121096,0.00045855562,0.0013886668,0.0026547317,0.0009442124,0.0040600104,0.0017803032,0.0015015613,0.0014849973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018324071,0.00011607036,0.0030603008,0.00010992257,0.00009920728,0.00012777609,0.00074009364,0.0067294077,0.0007086263,0.92534095,0.004874748,0.057909798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040572722,0.00007250764,0.0017834139,0.000025825671,0.00004011518,0.00017664573,0.00037738134,0.036765654,0.00031927254,0.9543548,0.0060229586,0.000020877578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022777522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024845412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019526897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087423023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061543816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06532401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082900654","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01283-x","title":"Representative Voting Games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Voting; Mathematical economics; Markov perfect equilibrium; Economics; Markov chain; State (computer science); Property (philosophy); Power (physics); Public finance; Microeconomics; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Nash equilibrium; Macroeconomics; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.055204845359337715,"score_gpt":0.25993486762734397,"score_spread":0.20473002226800624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082900654","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12690137,0.0015369531,0.5149055,0.0075335638,0.0003216312,0.00035470884,0.00070619414,0.0002697374,0.3474703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88150954,0.00067439035,0.026401656,0.00080164615,0.0002181068,0.00032021536,0.00037072724,0.000046482237,0.089657165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762076,0.0014298018,0.000083854386,0.00031443973,0.0002920368,0.00025911623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967289,0.0020598772,0.00026500336,0.00041187057,0.00028773112,0.0002466052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019140856,0.00062768615,0.0012825332,0.00061916263,0.0012972591,0.003349266,0.001358997,0.0022029392,0.015889712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008649684,0.00034110947,0.0006119836,0.00088086893,0.0015941989,0.0029766683,0.0010318245,0.0016107261,0.0015765527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025955904,0.000032343698,0.00015756156,0.00002345305,0.000014043777,0.000033835062,0.000107138636,0.0038925281,0.00013521303,0.98553836,0.0033222605,0.006717368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027223077,0.000013537445,0.00012854411,0.0000083062205,0.000007693252,0.000039413106,0.00005541207,0.023574958,0.00009515744,0.96939003,0.006654886,0.0000048800425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014917958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018058236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015889712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014116956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009936179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053156376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118498665","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01304-9","title":"Robust incentive compatibility of voting rules with positively correlated beliefs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Social choice theory; Voting; Approval voting; Incentive; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Social preferences; Compatibility (geochemistry); Microeconomics; Choice function; Function (biology); Economics; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.03528615211707246,"score_gpt":0.2183439714627839,"score_spread":0.18305781934571144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118498665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7095145,0.00020704292,0.2731048,0.0016066642,0.00006581363,0.00031255034,0.0005124885,0.0002088555,0.014467289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856243,0.00010299565,0.011310722,0.00015005458,0.00007968076,0.00015585672,0.00022557504,0.000037649766,0.0023131685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470414,0.009001592,0.0008910162,0.002242681,0.0016133335,0.0015473044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7868853,0.16678871,0.024892954,0.012085731,0.005188611,0.004158726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020176535,0.0011075938,0.004359821,0.0018084999,0.001298883,0.0064688567,0.0029930493,0.004175757,0.006224678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11766953,0.0017937475,0.0018573976,0.0014142737,0.0054978896,0.0062132967,0.00285486,0.00408647,0.00079334574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014605469,0.0006970338,0.00728218,0.00020696082,0.00030596106,0.00046282366,0.0005599172,0.07108129,0.0044435947,0.9004913,0.0014880268,0.011520506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005299619,0.00026489946,0.0040746513,0.000042724398,0.00007208646,0.00013059659,0.00012827573,0.2472655,0.0012509403,0.7457909,0.00037881118,0.00007070681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015324615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010288781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020176535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021538988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029819186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10670495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121658581","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0900-9","title":"Multiple votes, multiple candidacies and polarization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Candidacy; Approval voting; Condorcet method; Polarization (electrochemistry); Instant-runoff voting; Incentive; Anti-plurality voting; Bullet voting; Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Disapproval voting; Microeconomics; Political science; Chemistry; Law","score_opus":0.043210689843947776,"score_gpt":0.23894153170539098,"score_spread":0.1957308418614432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121658581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83985174,0.0014040208,0.05601884,0.021820651,0.00033490197,0.00008227493,0.0006521614,0.000071799805,0.07976357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99176264,0.0002366316,0.0019087911,0.00031343632,0.00020554735,0.00003607704,0.000059633083,0.000017675382,0.0054596015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493766,0.0028283189,0.00016003578,0.0005951412,0.00049433607,0.0009844969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96354395,0.025381297,0.004418587,0.002945778,0.0013059487,0.0024043887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008861587,0.0003515279,0.0015665882,0.0011234124,0.0029299438,0.005904944,0.0010645123,0.0027721492,0.020883309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041683502,0.00039554542,0.0007691269,0.0015775573,0.0049740453,0.00620076,0.0027055603,0.003913989,0.0007364924],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007070519,0.00031717072,0.021675436,0.00011421729,0.00011878214,0.00023785548,0.0008922333,0.0061096335,0.0006007528,0.9253226,0.008994636,0.0349098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012205451,0.000040077022,0.0067759384,0.000031550488,0.00003311114,0.00009701938,0.0008270148,0.012260487,0.0002352954,0.9766253,0.0029299369,0.000022245802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025373816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031029312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020883309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016473784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001223468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06986165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123769910","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0749-8","title":"Mobility, taxation and welfare","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; International Development Research Centre; Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux","keywords":"Economics; Welfare; Economic inequality; Inequality; Labour economics; Inequity aversion; Income distribution; Gross income; Income tax; Demographic economics; Public economics; State income tax; Tax reform","score_opus":0.024939965812461027,"score_gpt":0.30654748160408074,"score_spread":0.2816075157916197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123769910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6028303,0.033497557,0.017227743,0.095085576,0.000415703,0.000057260346,0.00071611855,0.000047425285,0.25012228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875694,0.0039326157,0.00054411107,0.00036612392,0.00013139058,0.0000169026,0.000037580146,0.0000034599673,0.0073984815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953437,0.0002319797,0.00001890735,0.00004836945,0.00006288341,0.00010348459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854964,0.0008866037,0.00023704661,0.000109044915,0.00009368506,0.00012399186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011466804,0.0002688012,0.00037835393,0.000834609,0.0011925072,0.0029199466,0.00033997154,0.0014943421,0.008389438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036450652,0.00013740285,0.00027720726,0.0012125919,0.004528651,0.0027415403,0.0013732152,0.0011001859,0.0003760886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005660318,0.00007191598,0.0068488787,0.00004867768,0.000026359701,0.00007294115,0.0005254197,0.0027045556,0.00009784407,0.9752493,0.0019349493,0.012362518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015771819,0.000016988943,0.004266892,0.00006734095,0.0000124012095,0.000051500847,0.0008434716,0.0016196608,0.00006417336,0.9844679,0.008566489,0.0000072484495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072670113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075072334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008389438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023170854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001641647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028065503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124622408","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0481-6","title":"Incomplete Property Rights and Overinvestment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); CONTEST; Property rights; Microeconomics; Alternative asset; Bargaining power; Incomplete contracts; Economics; Valuation (finance); Investment (military); Business; Finance; Capital asset pricing model; Consumption-based capital asset pricing model; Incentive","score_opus":0.03605306942489591,"score_gpt":0.22961273443418315,"score_spread":0.19355966500928723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124622408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62503827,0.0068665342,0.27050385,0.024633883,0.00019971636,0.00012524563,0.0010012882,0.00015254076,0.07147866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814596,0.0018742632,0.0052357106,0.00023019481,0.00017916565,0.00005695146,0.00012830806,0.000030204375,0.0108055975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975459,0.001516667,0.00010039592,0.00022689607,0.0002920029,0.00031807655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676913,0.023849597,0.0038696777,0.0025522695,0.00094249804,0.0010946908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007796939,0.0006842255,0.0015871109,0.0013587744,0.00092697504,0.0042682528,0.0015150922,0.0023025584,0.010902281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029120643,0.0005376575,0.0008646206,0.0016551205,0.007426074,0.011057477,0.0018641895,0.0030672492,0.0003797466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007665573,0.00007984401,0.0019152112,0.00006611061,0.000037495436,0.000104403705,0.00016951664,0.013963242,0.00015730488,0.9741935,0.0017356683,0.0075010117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012723657,0.000006222151,0.00044354668,0.000015423164,0.0000065595405,0.000028356342,0.000050998256,0.009384119,0.000059437472,0.9891205,0.0008677649,0.000004434109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003511677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023228982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010902281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029670012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021427323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041234672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124716487","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0489-y","title":"Multiple votes, ballot truncation and the two-party system: an experiment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Straight-ticket voting; Ballot; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Ranked voting system; Instant-runoff voting; First-past-the-post voting; Single-member district; Condorcet method; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.026615779658356434,"score_gpt":0.3384621539666677,"score_spread":0.31184637430831125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124716487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98182803,0.00008795292,0.0032954838,0.0010007645,0.00023643408,0.0017594929,0.0005517257,0.000052073217,0.011188077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97486013,0.00009938929,0.0051522334,0.0005803519,0.00019700188,0.0035812852,0.00037757345,0.0000402348,0.015111805],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881059,0.007672552,0.0005127704,0.0010186139,0.0010443934,0.0016458913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90448594,0.0759321,0.005578325,0.008865072,0.0009336312,0.004204858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021051295,0.0017499329,0.0036983606,0.0008492473,0.004271685,0.003880646,0.0032196825,0.0071062297,0.040158354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042241465,0.0013360133,0.0014507552,0.0013159761,0.0062017534,0.0039740265,0.003987486,0.006561613,0.003959112],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.43290222,0.260559,0.021490587,0.002110662,0.00089524087,0.0011649765,0.010621758,0.027324468,0.014897531,0.13585131,0.017986247,0.07419602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.35853654,0.18039009,0.038338214,0.00037539683,0.0013978031,0.000560562,0.009300363,0.10489375,0.010197909,0.27038294,0.024926178,0.0007002616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026502877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021038775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040158354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017569546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034043172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13434309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141113392","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01332-z","title":"Does public debt secure social peace? A diversionary theory of public debt management","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Debt; Internal debt; Creditor; Business; External debt; Government (linguistics); Debt-to-GDP ratio; Debt levels and flows; Cohesion (chemistry); Recourse debt; Senior debt; Economics; Public economics; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028467407477961018,"score_gpt":0.22627964221607474,"score_spread":0.1978122347381137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141113392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6750579,0.0020026353,0.085772544,0.06812647,0.00032708992,0.00016191663,0.00060846173,0.00010256567,0.1678404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936813,0.00042316812,0.00056982826,0.000377435,0.00017017973,0.000024480945,0.000030206591,0.0000058793503,0.004717526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990509,0.0003820101,0.000032807366,0.00011102888,0.00010615324,0.0003172138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958916,0.0015913039,0.001395687,0.0002837458,0.0002903298,0.0005472855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031025996,0.0003845572,0.00086767296,0.0012940253,0.001490979,0.0035672144,0.001032654,0.002559322,0.011154344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006362687,0.0003334415,0.0006779947,0.0010783148,0.0059239157,0.0055972748,0.002408865,0.0027956367,0.00039191885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010189543,0.00007425687,0.0028595533,0.0000393593,0.000037767742,0.00008400935,0.00030677108,0.008314519,0.00014446933,0.97898394,0.0025186301,0.006534886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043675223,0.00003059715,0.0018368126,0.000026569378,0.000013279667,0.000029755327,0.00027316913,0.009112093,0.000059645852,0.98683727,0.0017288027,0.000008387458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034914182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044222414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011154344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033834602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019069532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03731501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151058323","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01379-y","title":"Childlessness, childfreeness and compensation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Childlessness; Fertility; Imperfect; Social policy; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01721279559738977,"score_gpt":0.27670633269590306,"score_spread":0.2594935370985133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151058323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97444195,0.0021250332,0.00010178547,0.0069502443,0.000060944414,0.000008747123,0.00007368643,0.000002533956,0.01623499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985655,0.00031433254,0.000011445108,0.00008027372,0.000022966738,0.000002611954,0.000010786273,6.7670055e-7,0.0009913775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883825,0.00044476136,0.000030494493,0.00004794644,0.00011291494,0.0005256526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652314,0.001159504,0.0007323809,0.00008277901,0.00014720073,0.0013550554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013596215,0.00017600786,0.0003026711,0.0011431163,0.0026318217,0.0019566435,0.0005428533,0.0009857616,0.009664272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004318373,0.00011299794,0.00028318187,0.0011677337,0.0046876944,0.0011245077,0.0016186561,0.0011607092,0.00016910734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005273956,0.0017235158,0.8268744,0.00007888403,0.00010343253,0.0007642929,0.01930748,0.00050590053,0.00022370317,0.10593689,0.0034508898,0.040503252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050478793,0.00021629038,0.90097773,0.00017320781,0.000051295337,0.00031834043,0.06562292,0.00066997384,0.0001457901,0.022150058,0.009598295,0.000025586973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03477267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072198465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03477267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002414268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033122213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06914055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184470869","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01347-6","title":"Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Context (archaeology); Truncation (statistics); Ballot; Approval voting; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.034021850469177405,"score_gpt":0.24932158966685053,"score_spread":0.21529973919767312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184470869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39808205,0.010955914,0.29841432,0.13781779,0.0029139204,0.00023694863,0.0014373992,0.0006019415,0.14953975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97765464,0.00095992745,0.012689914,0.0015931409,0.0011990194,0.000077189405,0.00019365222,0.000105089464,0.005527563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751477,0.01815492,0.0007106691,0.0023384267,0.002066423,0.0015819115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94769245,0.03598393,0.0054557226,0.004875228,0.003713872,0.0022787473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02510657,0.00090236624,0.004159569,0.0019535164,0.0029127903,0.011125496,0.0027814356,0.0059184628,0.010891406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092634335,0.000847987,0.00089135434,0.0033184811,0.0076506585,0.013620707,0.0016510598,0.0059118313,0.0016696816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005156251,0.00033528075,0.006362896,0.00033603763,0.00045762872,0.00008040029,0.00071071356,0.0065723523,0.0002729347,0.86350113,0.03521534,0.08563975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000547186,0.00003636746,0.0011606668,0.000040860734,0.00005308427,0.00004209813,0.00029940673,0.012408573,0.00007664472,0.9835074,0.0022963341,0.000023866449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030209522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049278643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02510657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029978515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030774157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217319423","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01378-z","title":"Correction to: Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; International political economy; Computer science; Political science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.019261467797282217,"score_gpt":0.316118194374945,"score_spread":0.29685672657766277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217319423","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018894165,0.0012263291,0.0011682439,0.10581134,0.8839622,0.000036674355,0.0026941162,0.00038299692,0.0045291046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042494986,0.0058830995,0.0061130263,0.115884274,0.61283207,0.00046051203,0.003988188,0.0019915502,0.21035227],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032253,0.0024844983,0.0016340516,0.0017661275,0.00272869,0.0010641273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9278976,0.024936229,0.00313738,0.0068413056,0.033624742,0.0035627403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009136932,0.003016819,0.0049618143,0.0054342216,0.0056331493,0.0084106065,0.0056298086,0.015209505,0.17412417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16168597,0.0017013258,0.0017950756,0.006729119,0.0045535257,0.0054785004,0.0029986424,0.017063798,0.06641457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003600718,0.0000041569147,0.000042982236,0.00007276293,0.000013742508,0.00006171365,0.000023151868,0.000026869908,0.000010637765,0.0017612652,0.9960503,0.0018963721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027288712,0.000026521553,0.0018433245,0.000779281,0.00011496621,0.0004686496,0.0002784724,0.0013890325,0.00032511036,0.029955506,0.96436787,0.00017837928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020581763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025491472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17412417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006125451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007264793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5825034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206203128","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01285-9","title":"Choice resolutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Università di Catania","keywords":"Rationalizability; Preorder; Resolution (logic); Independence (probability theory); Path (computing); Order (exchange); Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2240353870216814,"score_gpt":0.4185354270676562,"score_spread":0.19450004004597476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206203128","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016750652,0.00034060882,0.9216867,0.001330818,0.00016108704,0.0004095062,0.00032754813,0.00065485167,0.058338303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30086064,0.0003762148,0.6719425,0.0005110944,0.00015329148,0.0006912278,0.0007753635,0.00042804983,0.024261644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884044,0.0053451816,0.00079111184,0.0019606599,0.002751932,0.00074666354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98559904,0.0063513485,0.0008152777,0.004434269,0.0020922942,0.0007077627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007922017,0.0009735043,0.0008436397,0.0025315965,0.002309305,0.0044687153,0.0023200181,0.0014904261,0.019525811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019735754,0.00084664277,0.0029608926,0.0017090794,0.006413164,0.008904648,0.0063777263,0.004606519,0.0030221285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028357448,0.000034868583,0.000252287,0.000035831454,0.000023782502,0.00007883961,0.0006879058,0.0021138985,0.0006433441,0.981716,0.001226144,0.013158676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022401779,0.0000256281,0.000164568,0.000053899104,0.000019776193,0.00008383679,0.00033037472,0.015812796,0.002226453,0.940132,0.041101463,0.00002670768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015758077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013525635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019525811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018581323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017621131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06532031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226160054","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01563-w","title":"Individual Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Voting; Representation (politics); Preference; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Majority rule; Domain (mathematical analysis); Interval (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Political science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.07287673766957566,"score_gpt":0.2881955577613382,"score_spread":0.21531882009176256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226160054","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31598863,0.00029046755,0.65432763,0.0011531413,0.00007922273,0.00051416387,0.00024517375,0.0004216539,0.026979908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437154,0.00006458647,0.05321674,0.0001241688,0.000044887405,0.0001966815,0.00023127672,0.000042997413,0.0023632774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662474,0.024394616,0.001130752,0.0025932859,0.0038041712,0.0018298811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9269424,0.052674323,0.0052489345,0.008931272,0.0047304407,0.0014726188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02201922,0.00050875265,0.0017345812,0.0011514889,0.001093545,0.0029794925,0.0023491213,0.0017140426,0.004582724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07469912,0.00043613312,0.00086797064,0.0015236948,0.0019008559,0.0034448893,0.002186528,0.002388177,0.0010221257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002407113,0.00064771087,0.0101664765,0.00035765863,0.00024996282,0.00027559628,0.0013015398,0.26366547,0.0053637163,0.48388153,0.006963927,0.22471935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025985224,0.00037859855,0.0014146642,0.00004940748,0.000055675755,0.000113391194,0.0002361267,0.69990873,0.003350225,0.29047796,0.0037140523,0.000041299216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013448405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011134694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02201922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013848165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00137383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11645019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294733709","doi":"10.1007/s00355-022-01429-z","title":"The equal share proportional solution in a permit sharing problem","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Autarky; Group (periodic table); Economics; Alpha (finance); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economy; Welfare; Market economy","score_opus":0.03863432654575027,"score_gpt":0.24293888423506738,"score_spread":0.2043045576893171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294733709","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18084988,0.00056079426,0.7346694,0.0077574975,0.00024868466,0.00021726984,0.00035006067,0.00014127775,0.07520517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881587,0.00036595142,0.07119166,0.0004975657,0.00021193262,0.00027283473,0.00013740438,0.00008804421,0.0390759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997633,0.0014254204,0.00007465514,0.00029731565,0.00027999294,0.00028961131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944471,0.0045095733,0.00026123464,0.00031314272,0.00023718207,0.00023162016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041846693,0.00079099357,0.002003276,0.0007787507,0.0013140035,0.003432149,0.0024889142,0.0046497863,0.014041245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017504144,0.00088406116,0.001117781,0.0012978584,0.002900098,0.005625657,0.0024877528,0.0025673404,0.00055445795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015598649,0.00011329648,0.0002974859,0.00009790128,0.000046463094,0.0001009984,0.00019191955,0.11460084,0.00038427953,0.86832243,0.0030398334,0.012648518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008883955,0.0000320532,0.00011437333,0.000017321197,0.000016176386,0.00004722393,0.00008134467,0.18305896,0.00015329267,0.81495637,0.0014195148,0.000014608419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024034611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017926533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014041245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016015315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018774307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046972632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384405638","doi":"10.1007/s00355-023-01472-4","title":"Independent, neutral, and monotonic collective choice: the role of Suzumura consistency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University of Tokyo","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Impossibility; Veto; Social choice theory; Monotonic function; Axiom; Property (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Population; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024996483644706708,"score_gpt":0.2400744474934093,"score_spread":0.2150779638487026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384405638","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41496807,0.0009398949,0.46126705,0.008754879,0.0003126646,0.00023406021,0.00019708624,0.00013021626,0.1131961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96096474,0.00016609616,0.034342635,0.00042310054,0.0001261297,0.00020921866,0.000059457252,0.000030867526,0.0036777775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861404,0.009109254,0.000589812,0.0014969765,0.0018022172,0.00086129113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536071,0.030286368,0.004292455,0.0071576573,0.0032012248,0.0014552451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020035453,0.00037572757,0.0014701994,0.0011353823,0.00202465,0.0032760592,0.0018207999,0.0020019875,0.0049391594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043832105,0.0005393904,0.0013499188,0.0008546436,0.008633548,0.0052265874,0.0034588003,0.0032694407,0.000520207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042778654,0.000024848416,0.0009972375,0.00002623167,0.000023458191,0.000048328293,0.00016869808,0.0021286027,0.00030955145,0.9918934,0.00040894162,0.0039279065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054839853,0.000062814026,0.0010017973,0.00003961276,0.00002143132,0.00007016426,0.00016987565,0.019217761,0.00076486636,0.97549176,0.0030821355,0.000023018956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010658015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010467462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020035453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013394105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001987586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10595894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385605651","doi":"10.1007/s00355-023-01480-4","title":"Escape poverty trap with trust? An experimental study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Poverty trap; Economics; Endowment; Poverty; Pareto principle; Externality; Trap (plumbing); Matching (statistics); Consumption (sociology); Coordination failure; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.025129331722648876,"score_gpt":0.32053640002693484,"score_spread":0.295407068304286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385605651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944007,0.000031520245,0.00048702655,0.00034770503,0.000030836716,0.00028669188,0.00005090116,0.0000064423843,0.0043581445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99623114,0.00004485374,0.0008814433,0.0001467117,0.000034758665,0.000560551,0.00003661491,0.0000069683,0.002056976],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948421,0.0031468133,0.00024157386,0.0006314226,0.0005134979,0.0006245998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.921247,0.059743874,0.0073164925,0.008167105,0.0011336707,0.002391784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008248247,0.0010463543,0.0012573093,0.00074887037,0.0029942736,0.003087133,0.0019041618,0.00420523,0.023096612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036193084,0.0010505035,0.00066599133,0.0008486265,0.006981671,0.004449347,0.0030667228,0.0036475116,0.0010291203],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.103044875,0.6453213,0.043704968,0.0014613643,0.0005088968,0.001476398,0.02989559,0.0049129818,0.018754777,0.09818106,0.003488229,0.0492495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.12845527,0.43634513,0.1103291,0.00069116434,0.0016277864,0.0016659816,0.049714845,0.052944787,0.019901106,0.18072374,0.016983507,0.0006175562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021426752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020874657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023096612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017167431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018936321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07726592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387514870","doi":"10.1007/s00355-026-01668-4","title":"On the Ordinal Bayesian Incentive Compatibility of Vote Share and Veto Share Rules","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Incentive compatibility; Compatibility (geochemistry); Incentive; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Computer science; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.06776049486945887,"score_gpt":0.27073662680897764,"score_spread":0.20297613193951877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387514870","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3053856,0.00079542346,0.611737,0.008233434,0.000203354,0.0004369471,0.001026051,0.00016498382,0.0720172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478907,0.00052854547,0.04123243,0.00061870675,0.00044243655,0.0004935814,0.00040262204,0.000105368235,0.008285743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974848,0.016734533,0.0013476006,0.0025397681,0.002903199,0.0016268783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8279982,0.14592832,0.010573615,0.007016662,0.005263844,0.0032194178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029962491,0.0010677491,0.003705015,0.0029741048,0.0023945803,0.0093988925,0.0038212333,0.0062977304,0.016515044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14153424,0.0023050583,0.002110912,0.0027397482,0.008878103,0.019206448,0.0044519776,0.0071141566,0.0011864032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001692241,0.00010251058,0.0008943562,0.000058984886,0.000035002555,0.000042870324,0.00022212185,0.0059642545,0.00031454122,0.9873214,0.00060635526,0.004268452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008678122,0.000042683307,0.0008768443,0.000030311798,0.000019636369,0.000046783625,0.000064028325,0.03638195,0.00015559616,0.96178156,0.00048814694,0.000025655634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018700154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011053802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029962491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002951691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031950513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15845871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391515340","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01507-4","title":"Relative measures of economic insecurity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Public finance; International political economy; Social policy; Economics; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04968408462277102,"score_gpt":0.328887140604155,"score_spread":0.279203055981384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391515340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9006392,0.0012684892,0.035404883,0.0016773449,0.00008345061,0.00006094813,0.0019423522,0.00005077214,0.058872685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997396,0.00013385073,0.0015118509,0.00002556448,0.000021682828,0.00002910326,0.00018419632,0.000003890903,0.0006938611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974746,0.0014263097,0.00015658794,0.00025355624,0.00050732226,0.00018155582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876903,0.0069170515,0.0025419295,0.0012172519,0.001050905,0.0005825155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004233475,0.00036253632,0.00035998638,0.0040936647,0.0006300738,0.0023619372,0.00050201383,0.0005626533,0.007002489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018754018,0.00015429671,0.00042586002,0.0040434566,0.002265406,0.0034853483,0.002017482,0.00093664904,0.00027800657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049181544,0.00026484483,0.25701213,0.00024026605,0.00045160585,0.00008491697,0.002217213,0.0122899,0.0015198314,0.6742993,0.0017564858,0.0493718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003021224,0.0005462022,0.45696193,0.00019905425,0.00016237213,0.00040879523,0.0071887816,0.019882318,0.0012486262,0.5058548,0.007448685,0.00006820535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007501314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012438056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007002489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011922113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037326023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023425698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392799858","doi":"10.1007/s00355-023-01497-9","title":"Christian Klamler’s ”A distance measure for choice functions” [Social Choice and Welfare 30 (2008) 419–425]: a correction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Università di Catania; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Social policy; Economics; Measure (data warehouse); Welfare; Public finance; International political economy; Social choice theory; Social Welfare; Mathematical economics; Public economics; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Political science; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.02567137158054615,"score_gpt":0.2415691045450605,"score_spread":0.21589773296451437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392799858","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016054397,0.011730703,0.041824996,0.58945906,0.32932582,0.00007597607,0.0025219517,0.00096076337,0.02249522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13326234,0.02564041,0.061107103,0.34731662,0.25148436,0.0006057337,0.0015266547,0.0023333482,0.17672351],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900199,0.0031333587,0.0012023676,0.0016487635,0.0035579787,0.0004376353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679124,0.013579118,0.0012122873,0.0027927374,0.013808042,0.0006954086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008967523,0.0020867477,0.0019104752,0.003919568,0.0034614047,0.004858213,0.0037834009,0.009080393,0.018083347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075013556,0.0011254814,0.0015854676,0.0046083364,0.008357165,0.009593582,0.0029148464,0.015257517,0.00832749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004151854,0.000011523522,0.00017292694,0.00020401092,0.00003219525,0.00012325034,0.0002156709,0.00026952874,0.00007727579,0.19007379,0.7989671,0.009811327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007207719,0.000022851005,0.00076216925,0.00045469447,0.000048334998,0.00033932226,0.00013461556,0.0021656533,0.0003272511,0.22207503,0.77346593,0.00013202823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018009605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120273065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018083347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007854224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004901339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06049478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402063987","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01541-2","title":"Natural interviewing equilibria in matching settings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev","keywords":"International political economy; Public finance; Matching (statistics); Natural (archaeology); Social policy; Public international law; Economics; Interview; Mathematical economics; Political science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Statistics; Geology; Law","score_opus":0.025654887158264285,"score_gpt":0.26141477117026923,"score_spread":0.23575988401200496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402063987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5664978,0.00021245345,0.38378197,0.0026481166,0.000048976894,0.00038255117,0.00060948776,0.00030217273,0.045516454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97679895,0.00006934022,0.018893115,0.00027485125,0.000026696858,0.00021704445,0.00012311476,0.000022436201,0.0035745169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936347,0.0040525286,0.00028837114,0.00083711004,0.000504899,0.00068223313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820248,0.012347009,0.0023083917,0.0013336887,0.0007979579,0.0011881123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00646311,0.0004929954,0.0011935385,0.0010942594,0.002044992,0.0024131231,0.001373484,0.0024375455,0.010286136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02321504,0.0004931413,0.000778666,0.00096208934,0.0023871944,0.0034644012,0.0023014818,0.0014095295,0.0009634303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002894523,0.0002123365,0.002812296,0.000111307134,0.00006945994,0.00037401973,0.00080044486,0.021003788,0.0018210276,0.9621622,0.00244088,0.007902888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015483484,0.000074570446,0.0006596543,0.000022940058,0.0000116537385,0.00015965433,0.0004001767,0.10668998,0.00061867584,0.889102,0.0020783655,0.000027441412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010411915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010509539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010286136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001701563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007699303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034410536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}