{"meta":{"query_hash":"07f7a9917647","filters":{"venue":"Social Choice and Welfare"},"cohort_total":75,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":75,"exported":75,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/07f7a9917647","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+Choice+and+Welfare"},"results":[{"id":"W1540875378","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0501-6","title":"Multi-profile intergenerational social choice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Dictatorship; Axiom; Social welfare function; Mathematical economics; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Pareto principle; Choice function; Arrow; Domain (mathematical analysis); Impossibility; Function (biology); Completeness (order theory); Social Welfare; Economics; Mathematics; Welfare; Computer science; Political science; Mathematical optimization; Law; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03204433253756793,"score_gpt":0.2517750078578874,"score_spread":0.21973067532031948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540875378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718987,0.00024576645,0.00038626188,0.00720364,0.0014306888,0.00015176472,0.00065194856,0.00005952635,0.017971708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99435955,0.000014815847,0.00047478767,0.0004412816,0.0022746571,0.000033000928,0.000088723864,0.00002702557,0.0022861774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989894,0.000009226794,0.00035201563,0.0003561736,0.000023745868,0.000269418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958414,0.000027708105,0.00017447627,0.00010956994,0.000032258584,0.00007187435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020419387,0.00015335127,0.00028211687,0.00006646662,0.00074753514,0.00011364433,0.00016288001,0.00020565711,0.0018501662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006757894,0.00018553576,0.00012008065,0.000071384406,0.00011492234,0.00025794693,0.000083597326,0.0002854542,0.00015164295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008179772,0.00007162703,0.025567483,0.000025825471,0.0000614486,5.734881e-7,0.0025670172,0.0000022210102,0.0005522411,0.9634351,0.0041589523,0.003549328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018153809,0.000038779734,0.25156388,0.0000032874652,0.000015932139,0.000002539978,0.0009472162,0.0015385702,0.00011138709,0.018804591,0.7244539,0.0007045314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005906178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086778804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9446305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032253763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014977778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1545499040","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0903-6","title":"Fiscal policy and corruption","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Economics; Public economics; Language change; Incentive; Tax revenue; Public finance; Revenue; Indirect tax; Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Ad valorem tax; Tax policy; Double taxation; Tax reform; Microeconomics; Business; Finance; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.053892528465531386,"score_gpt":0.3398123204826917,"score_spread":0.28591979201716033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1545499040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72810423,0.00010948072,0.000014599008,0.05500509,0.0003667065,0.00011806173,0.000006921387,0.00006941532,0.21620548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936437,0.00007272099,0.000022630358,0.00060362526,0.0009413349,0.00000556345,0.000005413443,0.0000040840773,0.0047009075],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995124,0.000040279592,0.00007922564,0.00011361055,0.000098034056,0.00015646275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974513,0.000017815973,0.000028802935,0.000026029584,0.000027595066,0.00015461579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025341276,0.00005190604,0.00007771317,0.00003770544,0.00058657856,0.000081035774,0.000040652078,0.0000733804,0.00009702757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013397132,0.000054779768,0.000015788106,0.00008250914,0.00012038186,0.00013510644,0.000036127876,0.000051044884,0.000025623714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001677909,0.000031213935,0.12467735,0.00001267583,0.000015448333,0.000001438575,0.07666933,3.9063994e-7,0.0000056402464,0.2943163,0.0046497555,0.4996037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002518343,0.000008925087,0.17542574,0.0000018919606,0.0000032867729,5.2152456e-7,0.013475987,0.000003725122,2.5473116e-7,0.0009759434,0.809775,0.00007690549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033639285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023365198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80512524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114671115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009078274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50852764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1626260879","doi":"10.1007/s00355-017-1073-5","title":"Combining rights and welfarism: a new approach to intertemporal evaluation of social alternatives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Intergenerational equity; Consumption (sociology); Microeconomics; Welfarism; Social discount rate; Shadow price; Equity (law); Public finance; Welfare; Cost–benefit analysis; Macroeconomics; Sustainability; Market economy; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.036803407154575,"score_gpt":0.30910276463013675,"score_spread":0.2722993574755618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1626260879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293165,0.000013521104,0.000018024291,0.0024733813,0.000046788835,0.00021965614,0.0000037232214,0.0000090627545,0.067899294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985192,0.0000017431586,0.0001468458,0.00009154014,0.00012515011,0.000015355947,0.000009247848,0.000008275323,0.0010826325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990453,0.00004873228,0.00013636996,0.0002469687,0.00033516952,0.00018744814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967897,0.000008079064,0.00012370017,0.000093452196,0.000008316378,0.00008750558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029675761,0.00011924333,0.00015682823,0.00002847124,0.0011605768,0.000080678445,0.00017993842,0.00006814442,0.00027146886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003652568,0.000112681824,0.00002958381,0.000043155527,0.00024175449,0.00031102105,0.00035547462,0.00007623427,0.00001240331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013194678,0.00038296214,0.5392464,0.00011208854,0.00020088449,0.000003874312,0.14108507,0.000036973714,0.0010107371,0.011291104,0.01917668,0.2873213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089157384,0.000024680538,0.98009443,0.0000050737717,0.00003564883,8.2627383e-7,0.002707572,0.00013326848,0.00008019271,0.0037657442,0.012097024,0.00016393718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059487713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001719971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44084808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010785692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009796104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89928025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1648562582","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0925-0","title":"Introduction to the special issue “Experiments on conflicts and conflict resolution”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Interpersonal communication; Conflict resolution research; Resolution (logic); Social conflict; Political science; Positive economics; Social policy; Welfare; Negotiation; Social psychology; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0608867681284026,"score_gpt":0.3564326289803791,"score_spread":0.2955458608519765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1648562582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6382998,0.00049691973,8.403527e-7,0.2564937,0.001947283,0.0005973147,0.000026417883,0.000062243926,0.10207546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636685,0.0000789325,0.00002256124,0.0015464918,0.03136491,0.000051199087,0.000007541918,0.000012499793,0.0032473584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911684,0.000094207215,0.00012039506,0.00024751725,0.00019368496,0.00022735192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996387,0.000023186287,0.000045566747,0.000080853155,0.00006530158,0.00014643204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002982172,0.00010566261,0.00013665571,0.00003102302,0.0015395931,0.00012183993,0.00010087442,0.000076102195,0.0001248291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011507561,0.0000913945,0.000023921219,0.000099492856,0.0003094326,0.00013431745,0.00009014535,0.000098121505,0.00008123307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013207583,0.00011417008,0.0073450212,0.0000059420413,0.000050366,0.0000019345293,0.38380033,0.000003881418,0.00019104879,0.13107708,0.46493313,0.012345024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027972157,0.00009196999,0.0060402355,0.000002252935,0.00000934574,2.788693e-7,0.04786505,5.524549e-7,0.00010422294,0.000089945024,0.9454062,0.00011021099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003907097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017035322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48047307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016435194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024832052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837934503","doi":"10.1007/s00355-016-0999-3","title":"The political choice of social long term care transfers when family gives time and money","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Social policy; Preference; Economics; Voting; Social class; Demographic economics; Politics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.010531614869465966,"score_gpt":0.27792236545609217,"score_spread":0.2673907505866262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837934503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617024,0.00044473173,0.000023749415,0.025250178,0.00017025402,0.00015584758,0.00019604889,0.00002653027,0.012030236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793667,0.00009275562,0.0000055142336,0.00024428195,0.0008471298,0.000009694495,0.000011425684,0.000012524305,0.0008400355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988363,0.00013816419,0.0001708814,0.00019207694,0.00030496655,0.0003576089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994219,0.00021551202,0.000046896803,0.000053549073,0.00016866626,0.0000934684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014623727,0.00011636641,0.00016142956,0.00002727458,0.0020767262,0.00009746672,0.00015790324,0.0001464863,0.000036765592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084634645,0.00008021708,0.00009282288,0.000062386775,0.0006873783,0.00015642733,0.000040789157,0.00008648114,0.000002211677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028920042,0.00003047571,0.058565278,0.000068324574,0.00012031217,0.0000021840378,0.054083098,9.564251e-8,0.0044565783,0.82545495,0.0010368117,0.05615296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000723119,0.00007945594,0.9166693,0.000048452144,0.0000748882,3.8121524e-7,0.047282632,0.0000060606367,0.000055907654,0.002924914,0.031819873,0.0003149912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019502672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049407077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85810405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081473096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083627216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964249253","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0645-z","title":"Generalized average rules as stable Nash mechanisms to implement generalized median rules","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Waseda University; Lunds Universitet; Concordia University","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Best response; Outcome (game theory); Epsilon-equilibrium; Interpretation (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Path (computing); Mathematics; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03412768288190568,"score_gpt":0.2646568772223437,"score_spread":0.23052919434043803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964249253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982616,0.0011720937,0.00071548094,0.0035945026,0.0009956005,0.00040040154,0.0006394118,0.00009037559,0.009776144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479556,0.000050709656,0.0007601225,0.0010527575,0.0011865372,0.00008401157,0.00011632802,0.000044099714,0.0019098851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830115,0.00007789745,0.00051774393,0.00035678656,0.00007994061,0.0006664662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992254,0.000038992723,0.0002271788,0.00020112366,0.000033414675,0.00027391285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009953765,0.00024064693,0.0005184969,0.00013902878,0.0006517708,0.00013608704,0.00017530048,0.00016106364,0.001744827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008573776,0.00026311076,0.00013482619,0.0001345608,0.000027871247,0.00025916248,0.00011710605,0.00012632887,0.0007414027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016363621,0.00004721308,0.0051458427,0.00004574574,0.000073440955,0.0000017174758,0.0033375053,0.0000027001822,0.00018071887,0.9892288,0.0012714395,0.000648526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023393717,0.0001270378,0.02903099,0.000026721815,0.000037176083,0.000011451192,0.0016819799,0.000043147524,0.00078732846,0.20094368,0.7639641,0.0010070091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022157237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012987286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000903338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012410826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972636255","doi":"10.1007/s00355-014-0827-6","title":"An Interview with Kotaro Suzumura","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; International political economy; Social policy; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0686433430638188,"score_gpt":0.38346844846319184,"score_spread":0.31482510539937303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972636255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92716074,0.00007674066,0.013587347,0.03554118,0.00014120193,0.00018663693,0.000023710267,0.00011994148,0.023162497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981758,0.0000025391741,0.000077688615,0.0007428984,0.00032370776,0.000014663115,0.000005316878,0.0000060537213,0.0006513271],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990547,0.0001666712,0.0001605595,0.00024779266,0.00025860046,0.00011171026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993669,0.0001473395,0.00008470584,0.00021062419,0.00011316538,0.000077265264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007859784,0.0000745293,0.00013117601,0.00003897632,0.00064971397,0.00014975472,0.00024878434,0.00004753788,0.00054940645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010674373,0.000049775972,0.000033863747,0.00027948045,0.00012855224,0.0002495573,0.000029318957,0.000082771854,0.00009042926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017594808,0.000082007835,0.009287451,0.000009947258,0.00001615921,4.7595228e-7,0.0022440157,0.000008499125,0.000112513815,0.4601481,0.0044380594,0.52363515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002580949,0.000102820675,0.10040367,0.000005406688,0.00001397106,0.0000037089803,0.0041840193,0.000072841394,0.0000507215,0.06265046,0.8321036,0.00015069578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022722921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006801884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8276655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006318756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008203544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60156155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974883908","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0505-2","title":"Competition for popular support: a valence model of elections in Turkey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Economics; Nash equilibrium; Valence (chemistry); Convergence (economics); Divergence (linguistics); Politics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04295304165449649,"score_gpt":0.3593032542208443,"score_spread":0.3163502125663478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974883908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911194,0.000008653604,0.00019283338,0.005457451,0.00013656341,0.00023940552,0.00005621796,0.000018296489,0.00277121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993388,0.0000022931195,0.000057117708,0.00004381161,0.00027135626,0.00003832634,0.000015100427,0.0000040389973,0.00022912887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944603,0.00003931599,0.00013619418,0.00009032571,0.000104187915,0.00018394175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975,0.000036996527,0.00004484753,0.00003275597,0.00008462395,0.000050766077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000219581,0.00004288372,0.00009878458,0.000031074833,0.0003867034,0.000016970413,0.000043662294,0.000101954494,0.000050600225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013700112,0.000044705168,0.000036135476,0.000115137984,0.00009763852,0.00010622125,0.0000055435753,0.00009088433,9.3603785e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005671612,0.000044992332,0.027222432,0.00004740305,0.000003393111,6.9384264e-8,0.0038610473,0.0000139501135,0.002468429,0.9655973,0.00020899571,0.0005263617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003082326,0.000550456,0.30438444,0.00010916521,0.00016924636,0.0000011359474,0.007802022,0.0115765855,0.0012042051,0.4906887,0.17924584,0.0011858767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016338456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050621018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47490853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002061824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005120482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99021184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976804489","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0512-3","title":"Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue on the political economy of elections and bargaining","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"International political economy; Public finance; Politics; Economics; Political economy; Political science; Social policy; Market economy; Law; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.014507229064009367,"score_gpt":0.2331889889553596,"score_spread":0.21868175989135025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976804489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37453836,0.000055000375,0.00002364133,0.36088353,0.016017428,0.00042723742,0.000110163855,0.00003440356,0.24791022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82431084,8.803515e-7,0.0000036941713,0.00048588662,0.17500392,0.0000112684775,0.0000024331284,0.000007053701,0.000174032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941003,0.000027039958,0.0002011795,0.00017743566,0.000019163663,0.00016515238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996146,0.000109152585,0.00008837783,0.00011805432,0.000024865349,0.000044936976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004531575,0.00007495782,0.00015002248,0.000047809175,0.0005403292,0.000060848994,0.00008918365,0.0000762499,0.00019505943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025022775,0.00005742789,0.00003606391,0.000096724914,0.00010388811,0.000061459665,0.000028787532,0.00023036485,0.000046793008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004583674,0.000011791336,0.0036734552,0.0000058726464,0.000012961859,4.1907594e-8,0.0007439847,2.8037567e-7,0.000011834106,0.97338456,0.021888517,0.00026210546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091736765,0.000049708335,0.015472876,0.0000025091895,0.0000049759165,0.0000016876535,0.0013568565,0.000006414586,0.000055507015,0.036275927,0.9466064,0.00007541056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001683359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010109989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93710864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014348681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005673109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.415583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978569644","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0203-2","title":"Policy convergence under approval and plurality voting: the role of policy commitment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Commit; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Approval voting; Anti-plurality voting; Candidacy; Political science; Competition (biology); Economics; Proportional representation; Politics; Public economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Democracy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.024837491265454804,"score_gpt":0.3375303567993648,"score_spread":0.31269286553390996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978569644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92095053,0.00020795345,0.0000083698005,0.056828834,0.000048349477,0.00022568699,0.000019438869,0.000024144676,0.021686682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981889,0.000005359533,0.000002701051,0.00021243439,0.0012308785,0.0000104007,0.000003618917,0.0000041893886,0.0003415304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991173,0.0001815607,0.00015799054,0.00010579995,0.00018733474,0.0002500114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965674,0.000094682524,0.00007555541,0.000048221173,0.00006226776,0.00006251357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000254796,0.0000683029,0.000117566924,0.000022589034,0.00087692495,0.00004358601,0.00007205859,0.00007691405,0.000027757365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097254495,0.000051686653,0.000034769186,0.00019876655,0.0003985419,0.0000743958,0.00002947361,0.000068952606,0.0000013495003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020993275,0.000017285662,0.0768478,0.000012373611,0.0000062168688,4.0661615e-8,0.0021789449,7.5026514e-7,0.000060744125,0.9195774,0.00008205585,0.0012142479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022098963,0.0000318354,0.8383935,0.000008200069,0.000021709371,2.683304e-7,0.006053463,0.00003235797,0.00008024124,0.09690146,0.058125388,0.0001306056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34280694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01898209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.822676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006087691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009275845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980313539","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0536-3","title":"Index-number tests and the common-scaling social cost-of-living index","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Homothetic transformation; Index (typography); Economics; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Social welfare function; Function (biology); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Welfare; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04840748167219767,"score_gpt":0.25450983206652894,"score_spread":0.20610235039433128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980313539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84758645,0.00057546946,0.00005084238,0.00276372,0.00021527728,0.00024662234,0.00012415845,0.00002913642,0.14840834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989336,0.00003144179,0.000010754671,0.0004864905,0.000423266,0.000020588961,0.000002762614,0.000019812993,0.00007129749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901706,0.000030433957,0.00041971708,0.00023792547,0.00002724167,0.00026759342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993676,0.00018269941,0.00027915265,0.000099329474,0.00001714303,0.0000540731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043093326,0.00014454986,0.00042871587,0.000054518932,0.00060559687,0.000053093416,0.00015829381,0.00018236831,0.00015635624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011668022,0.0001377341,0.00010247966,0.00010917716,0.00039537618,0.00019245359,0.00013740933,0.00022496968,0.000019494706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022158001,0.000024459141,0.6820742,0.000029910152,0.000056613164,3.2033248e-7,0.006845185,2.0168542e-7,1.9866191e-7,0.30801812,0.00031087632,0.0026177652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006320414,0.00000933056,0.9190749,0.000014112782,0.000014696583,0.0000017765968,0.0008771232,0.00014286498,0.0000017333148,0.0739129,0.005132432,0.00018608343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002914341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028183518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23700069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002477799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007657457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5616634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981262337","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0188-x","title":"Variable-population extensions of social aggregation theorems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variable (mathematics); Extension (predicate logic); Population; Utilitarianism; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Contrast (vision); Econometrics; Economics; Social policy; Public finance; Ex-ante; Random variable; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Sociology; Political science; Demography; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.04997353019053637,"score_gpt":0.3574628823402215,"score_spread":0.30748935214968515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981262337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910801,0.000042596635,0.00035956892,0.0015423876,0.0002966073,0.00009333769,0.00005874922,0.000029476068,0.006497194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880457,0.000001360753,0.00031924035,0.000063027685,0.00045585036,0.0000037331733,0.000039586746,0.000009859175,0.00030274558],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847275,0.00009592146,0.0005277115,0.00029114162,0.00045458062,0.00015790707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989326,0.00029457323,0.00033914828,0.00014016953,0.00026188703,0.000031602474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077202386,0.00010844856,0.00026983093,0.00012926741,0.0008012204,0.00014435292,0.00018639749,0.00016049322,0.00028244383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003857551,0.00008939208,0.00010443116,0.00040816542,0.00010379689,0.0002771819,0.00006515686,0.00009754002,0.000018707113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031850774,0.0001271473,0.059513792,0.0000068504232,0.000009362599,0.0000015034052,0.0006998561,0.00006769986,0.000424955,0.3147822,0.0058620996,0.6184727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028013453,0.000020482245,0.50060225,0.000007220319,0.00002412976,0.0000013988533,0.0007360927,0.00013289068,0.000021348318,0.4732308,0.024814311,0.00012892178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089116616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019776492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030534764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021127227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61624205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982360168","doi":"10.1007/s355-002-8328-x","title":"Equitable insurance premium schemes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Partition (number theory); Public finance; Economics; Lorenz curve; Group (periodic table); Econometrics; Insurance premium; Actuarial science; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Inequality; Gini coefficient; Combinatorics; Economic inequality","score_opus":0.03232711827241993,"score_gpt":0.29603026103464647,"score_spread":0.26370314276222656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982360168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6324765,0.0027123906,0.0000147950705,0.011607223,0.00062496087,0.00044504003,0.00004260033,0.00026106465,0.3518154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428433,0.0007284234,0.000049055016,0.00047499035,0.000947711,0.00003872395,0.000004793937,0.000017132244,0.0034548277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982252,0.0001331098,0.0001999031,0.0003234592,0.0004942689,0.0006240682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994942,0.000041203675,0.000096949945,0.00015133136,0.000105697356,0.00011059747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044274708,0.00015758815,0.00020964042,0.000071627415,0.0024520222,0.00017855686,0.00027500393,0.00015069035,0.0006653678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009385507,0.00016812653,0.00010659417,0.00046628597,0.00039714418,0.0004286879,0.00009830277,0.00018047921,0.000057215173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065466747,0.00016531452,0.7558768,0.000118412296,0.00009375872,0.000008040679,0.014792193,9.721618e-7,0.000020983174,0.16782972,0.018073397,0.043013897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029439284,0.000015136366,0.29538703,0.000011065564,0.000020592614,1.5691967e-7,0.003562159,0.0000047958197,0.000006917498,0.0012263034,0.6992489,0.00022250308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024157085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018584164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68117553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055945744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014146772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990777695","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0379-3","title":"Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Convexity; Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Voting; Truth value; Aggregation problem; Valuation (finance); Value (mathematics); Mathematics; Function (biology); Aggregate (composite); Majority rule; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04206439249398311,"score_gpt":0.2360745206155012,"score_spread":0.19401012812151808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990777695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94099075,0.0028942942,0.0011021453,0.0030345095,0.00026244312,0.00023062357,0.00008750157,0.000040351584,0.051357396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931836,0.00004571743,0.00003367745,0.00014973072,0.00012586292,0.0000039220586,0.000009107105,0.0000056028857,0.0003079943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930507,0.00001511506,0.00034018702,0.00017003546,0.000033445227,0.00013614351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995764,0.000022839558,0.00024708442,0.000087240216,0.00003368533,0.000032750995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034120667,0.00007958355,0.00025055377,0.00015149057,0.0001550449,0.000024465839,0.00007044258,0.00007180991,0.000060093655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050894676,0.00009051123,0.00007147212,0.00024255703,0.000032329095,0.000120069,0.000014150649,0.000058941387,0.000015471758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070145543,0.00006306337,0.010274223,0.000052462332,0.000030341127,3.805e-7,0.000842546,0.00004213743,0.000011305274,0.97952265,0.0002684136,0.008885453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023754258,0.00045259856,0.44917902,0.00007804393,0.00004885148,0.0000039556558,0.001768653,0.0012865083,0.00023686622,0.49166816,0.05217169,0.00073021767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011760454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043324953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4878545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028054197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000038719018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36909407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994916611","doi":"10.1007/s00355-005-0057-z","title":"Multi_profile welfarism: a generalization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Axiom; Anonymity; Generalization; Mathematical economics; Public finance; Economics; Social choice theory; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Computer science; Epistemology; Welfare; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026223104817041123,"score_gpt":0.23950218741626156,"score_spread":0.21327908259922043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994916611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9204605,0.0022451528,0.0010182768,0.013047171,0.0005068486,0.00028091812,0.00015442188,0.0001650445,0.062121667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633306,0.000021792444,0.0001351271,0.00036765987,0.00095182954,0.000016602238,0.000026718064,0.000016580912,0.0021306179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992812,0.000021103915,0.00026969658,0.00022228673,0.000022812863,0.00018287048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969363,0.000013923153,0.0001427,0.00008773055,0.000018743844,0.000043259763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026994303,0.00009668716,0.00019630135,0.00006109709,0.00039769683,0.000058707512,0.00008099045,0.00011407548,0.00047184824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045967445,0.0001123359,0.000054811888,0.00010724992,0.00003500546,0.0001744864,0.000027828022,0.00008849875,0.0002326945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050549197,0.000040677438,0.059116688,0.000042489246,0.000028536586,4.5954982e-7,0.0022586568,0.000018984101,0.000027800148,0.93060493,0.0018245311,0.006031181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006871498,0.000025702615,0.0915687,0.0000076030265,0.0000071575714,0.0000022182555,0.0003951797,0.00084567984,0.00004252345,0.007993017,0.8981349,0.00029018914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002916758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041043906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92261195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032646574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003069627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5166407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996324419","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0876-5","title":"Expected utility without full transitivity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transitive relation; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Class (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Preference; Completeness (order theory); Subjective expected utility; Mathematics; Economics; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.2373221207991091,"score_gpt":0.42417190135042226,"score_spread":0.18684978055131315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996324419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881526,0.00007439725,0.00029220944,0.0035116894,0.00039274446,0.00009881424,0.000059542883,0.00006841038,0.007349575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922293,0.0000016617952,0.00010617032,0.00017117572,0.0002677824,0.000005312439,0.0000060232,0.000009748395,0.00020920235],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815446,0.00017563236,0.00037311466,0.0004668545,0.00059425994,0.00023567361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998877,0.0002188408,0.00012771436,0.00026773656,0.00029799095,0.00021070513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013630391,0.0001460011,0.0003412133,0.00008255142,0.00041608466,0.00028925666,0.0003003082,0.0001511679,0.00025192296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092110154,0.00011564814,0.00011445605,0.0003155466,0.00015752275,0.00036368117,0.000084293075,0.00017050165,0.00010585506],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011450277,0.00012709876,0.10883057,0.000002805562,0.000010944792,0.000009177872,0.00430924,0.0000018267893,0.000058819634,0.000449506,0.007818465,0.87826705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017882668,0.00019160341,0.5563156,0.0000114588365,0.000051980038,0.000016103588,0.015929524,0.00034038327,0.00004888118,0.07884764,0.34587651,0.0005820766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002543391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006594844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87768495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003748319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006504317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47159943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996570526","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0600-z","title":"Quasi-transitive and Suzumura consistent relations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transitive relation; Binary relation; Axiom; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Social choice theory; Consistency (knowledge bases); Conjunction (astronomy); Complement (music); Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.05602464863029017,"score_gpt":0.2198874131003893,"score_spread":0.16386276447009915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996570526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8929974,0.0012493036,0.00024256308,0.0017366239,0.00021899439,0.00015857146,0.00014466933,0.000048530103,0.103203386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989827,0.00002303253,0.000034682373,0.000116124924,0.000114195725,0.000008811862,0.0000070026017,0.000010124268,0.0007032857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940497,0.000022263124,0.00022141731,0.0001969124,0.000015309406,0.00013914521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972135,0.000036757923,0.000107131615,0.00006518613,0.000020142577,0.000049404654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024371549,0.000085507876,0.0002003928,0.000050554932,0.00037751728,0.000029471532,0.00004155256,0.000091990754,0.00021996895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039898932,0.00009705684,0.00004635636,0.0000721913,0.00010421195,0.000116220384,0.000017218765,0.00009756943,0.00005891959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006594858,0.000039842565,0.11717941,0.00002539712,0.000037151618,0.0000012870977,0.008727219,5.1873155e-8,0.0000027013473,0.87343884,0.00009254466,0.0004489961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073509174,0.0001341041,0.89103657,0.00002180853,0.000026189044,0.000008035421,0.0054891803,0.000033871405,0.000010339226,0.06406188,0.038111005,0.0003319461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005405204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070307804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80937696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015417532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041457142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39578632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998954346","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0784-5","title":"Inefficient committees: small elections with three alternatives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; Voting; Outcome (game theory); Approval voting; State (computer science); Majority rule; Economics; Condorcet method; Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Contingent vote; Private information retrieval; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Law; Macroeconomics; Group voting ticket; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02875850210327523,"score_gpt":0.20739214596137043,"score_spread":0.1786336438580952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998954346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96960986,0.00035383686,0.0008265282,0.0027333668,0.00014502075,0.00020359458,0.000022851838,0.000051256975,0.026053712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986703,0.0000068767577,0.000037479545,0.00013977794,0.0002651807,0.000044315457,0.000005911919,0.000014106122,0.0008160537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993813,0.000015205059,0.00019257246,0.0002017061,0.000021276024,0.0001879578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965924,0.00003511193,0.00013224411,0.00009323131,0.000034542158,0.000045656765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014199194,0.000102037986,0.00019641955,0.00006535061,0.00043411867,0.00009771799,0.00010011415,0.000056964345,0.00022746278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026877267,0.00009577288,0.0000403338,0.00013657939,0.00007387348,0.00010852275,0.000025611916,0.00012017597,0.0001413867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057859506,0.00008148559,0.4558164,0.00004582642,0.0000838503,6.5471596e-7,0.00238528,0.0000165825,0.000011483761,0.53920037,0.00044653643,0.0019057937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007354993,0.00016204482,0.908243,0.000023672821,0.0000103115835,0.000004329127,0.0017282465,0.00029140158,0.000015348429,0.024416521,0.064019,0.00035064694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019529423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005111993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5147838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024100917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041159506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39055046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001032047","doi":"10.1007/s003550200174","title":"Decomposition properties of dual choice functionals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Dual (grammatical number); Decomposition; Property (philosophy); Gini coefficient; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Lebesgue measure; Inequality; Economics; Pure mathematics; Lebesgue integration; Mathematical analysis; Economic inequality; Computer science","score_opus":0.1697533057765701,"score_gpt":0.4131884010774077,"score_spread":0.24343509530083757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001032047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99030524,0.0005260913,0.00031599854,0.001970719,0.00044568547,0.00016390327,0.0000267115,0.000030516894,0.0062151286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870133,0.0000054981324,0.00026084884,0.00025246904,0.00021657438,0.000011059772,0.0000033138558,0.000011439293,0.0005374915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975187,0.0002965148,0.00055978826,0.000376767,0.0010414143,0.00020682318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985299,0.00047549288,0.00023940315,0.00020817688,0.0004718464,0.00007519172],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011327844,0.00014014493,0.00029951686,0.00017326024,0.000570868,0.00020016813,0.00018999059,0.00011738828,0.0009168181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028053485,0.000106550186,0.00011300075,0.00044360908,0.00013617158,0.00040066053,0.000074569805,0.00011570013,0.00004904247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004534513,0.0011108082,0.33652645,0.00026445783,0.00033878768,0.000024372626,0.012547984,0.00017633481,0.16174899,0.16910417,0.039099623,0.27860457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001479575,0.000098772995,0.48429516,0.00006244203,0.000043407872,0.000019240668,0.0046796496,0.00012237983,0.0045027607,0.011027851,0.49322844,0.00044033484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008267785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006879661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45412883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024599145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040792263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003305533","doi":"10.1007/s003550200164","title":"A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Rounding; Majorization; Divisor (algebraic geometry); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Mathematics; Proportional representation; Combinatorics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.11390321613045822,"score_gpt":0.3617299188316292,"score_spread":0.24782670270117096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003305533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96915144,0.0010204064,0.0095231645,0.002009184,0.00027512244,0.00032452864,0.00003696818,0.000027007643,0.017632173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991669,0.000011335465,0.0004120591,0.000016839253,0.00007325394,0.000016171298,0.000017759467,0.0000055360665,0.00028016313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922293,0.0000464811,0.00046525654,0.0001511065,0.000029598079,0.00008460477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995609,0.000026043159,0.00032668305,0.000055090433,0.000014172145,0.00001709684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042126904,0.000052752646,0.00020878366,0.000081331906,0.00008886987,0.000012828601,0.000037858666,0.00006137414,0.00030266406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008142253,0.0000625442,0.00003488665,0.0001634272,0.000031716067,0.00009494033,0.00001286887,0.00005934949,0.000010388414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038044614,0.00010050997,0.75725794,0.000051182826,0.000012615425,1.7104448e-7,0.0033828593,0.000031196825,0.000053894368,0.23293172,0.00011408845,0.0060599972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061678444,0.0000516544,0.9571946,0.000017381128,0.000007204992,6.5199737e-7,0.0020263188,0.0032553426,0.00021812657,0.026372964,0.010073127,0.00016584386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001398423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012112889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20655875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027383438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015294995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33139592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007779524","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0259-1","title":"Coalitional strategy-proof and resource-monotonic solutions for multiple assignment problems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Dictatorship; Object (grammar); Mathematical economics; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Resource allocation; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Public finance; Economics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.06625046255528268,"score_gpt":0.2471342989240128,"score_spread":0.18088383636873012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007779524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8772338,0.011660894,0.011236887,0.008340298,0.0008286004,0.0033791945,0.002942885,0.00019387611,0.084183566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876946,0.000013638119,0.000046421545,0.0000767007,0.00017052627,0.00013110116,0.000035416786,0.000014892287,0.0007418424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990952,0.00003653986,0.0002829061,0.00027229026,0.000026915395,0.00028611787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960184,0.00009294528,0.00014578972,0.00007734365,0.000021160227,0.000060935272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006678893,0.00011023338,0.00021625128,0.000047314767,0.0008001579,0.000075263924,0.000052213763,0.0001084388,0.00006360745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113753966,0.00012575764,0.00006189314,0.000063625346,0.00007642596,0.000095708754,0.000020267467,0.00008903274,0.0000073350834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064588694,0.000049437378,0.01473919,0.00009520972,0.00003812598,1.4874914e-7,0.0005234576,0.000040962623,0.000021318656,0.98370147,0.00046309608,0.0003211368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023087277,0.00019335368,0.047380336,0.00003305446,0.000022929733,0.0000058336204,0.0020933966,0.0008278114,0.000029811215,0.1639527,0.7826708,0.0004812641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007502208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049190057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81974876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041484735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011747149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6154249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013883413","doi":"10.1007/s003550050176","title":"Strategy-proofness and efficiency in a simple production economy","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Pareto efficiency; Profit (economics); Pareto principle; Economics; Production (economics); Pareto optimal; Microeconomics; Public finance; Space (punctuation); Mechanism design; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematics; Operations management; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02026622988858306,"score_gpt":0.22553135533271798,"score_spread":0.20526512544413492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013883413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95364505,0.0009444645,0.000011455882,0.0020694786,0.000067551664,0.00016216825,0.000038055598,0.000019210695,0.04304256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987219,0.00015967763,0.000007889766,0.000100789825,0.00021914238,0.000021872778,0.000010925702,0.0000119667875,0.00074582384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914736,0.000008431715,0.00027889898,0.00034778565,0.000008416744,0.00020909705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997734,0.0000107338665,0.0000745289,0.00009073681,0.000008191753,0.000042443386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002047792,0.00010530618,0.00023447504,0.00006523631,0.00022919591,0.00007609238,0.00006337531,0.00008368866,0.00048951036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012764252,0.0001271187,0.000030750805,0.000087279186,0.0000721858,0.00028941326,0.00002049765,0.00009583203,0.00002580344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029103709,0.00009543825,0.0803205,0.00009930073,0.00002473894,0.0000016093899,0.0029548493,0.00019386304,0.0000033938418,0.8488225,0.00027298954,0.06718175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014723438,0.00010829538,0.28894472,0.000012284749,0.000008762358,0.000006386907,0.0017956579,0.0009371286,0.0000141592345,0.42067534,0.2853753,0.00064964266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006301421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022698632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42814714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003656394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008101227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5359795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033719953","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0210-5","title":"General concepts of value restriction and preference majority","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Preference; Transitive reduction; Mathematics; Generalization; Net (polyhedron); Value (mathematics); Preference relation; Binary relation; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Discrete mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.04472247469128788,"score_gpt":0.25731025243563577,"score_spread":0.2125877777443479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033719953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776784,0.00096003513,0.000075134,0.0002331979,0.00020414125,0.00008351576,0.000055967324,0.000013860182,0.020695716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993324,0.00008526678,0.000048771908,0.00003120697,0.00013214292,0.0000047661065,0.0000039334363,0.000006141168,0.00035533268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941605,0.00004464908,0.00022502645,0.00017646875,0.000020519245,0.00011729224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969476,0.00002857734,0.00015621126,0.0000665528,0.000019635256,0.000034244844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030901423,0.00007233122,0.00020343163,0.000039460447,0.00018882217,0.000022232342,0.000041379088,0.00009185034,0.000045769284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105935425,0.00008228495,0.000030995263,0.00009028545,0.00006945668,0.00009007157,0.000013941838,0.00007922193,0.00000487479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030111523,0.000012823634,0.1438777,0.000043587905,0.000011602943,1.5431468e-7,0.0005032446,0.0000013937099,0.000025442952,0.85521346,0.000058056437,0.00024948982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009566501,0.000109794004,0.8023714,0.000020888468,0.000015453557,0.0000034616783,0.0008028975,0.000060179176,0.00015977633,0.12858446,0.06662526,0.00028978975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005590415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015877702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.726629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014018597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054581724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33554828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041590589","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0195-y","title":"Cooperative production under diminishing marginal returns: interpreting fixed-path methods","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Rice University","keywords":"Economics; Production (economics); Context (archaeology); Marginal product; Path (computing); Interpretation (philosophy); Microeconomics; Incentive; Rationality; Public finance; Path dependence; Mathematical economics; Marginal utility; Product (mathematics); Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.06311532810255813,"score_gpt":0.42912470393740565,"score_spread":0.3660093758348475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041590589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7823777,0.00042213366,0.110039346,0.070809886,0.0012054119,0.0005737407,0.00005169015,0.00023259693,0.03428745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939747,0.0000037323282,0.0019882843,0.00027284896,0.0008991283,0.000031036514,0.000011850764,0.000009993141,0.0028084505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983151,0.00042353955,0.0003420532,0.00043024344,0.00031581405,0.00017326753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893695,0.00043168166,0.00019081275,0.0001650353,0.00023336,0.00004216806],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016628755,0.000120565805,0.00018421361,0.00007040554,0.0013949097,0.0002929031,0.00019436094,0.00009459039,0.0002716984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093799696,0.00009706262,0.000067531655,0.00049440045,0.00018119263,0.00043147153,0.00008074007,0.00021234104,0.00002350953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008690106,0.00019021286,0.015116725,0.000024516447,0.00005820204,0.0000023247092,0.011304957,0.0003937619,0.007228149,0.7489491,0.03077136,0.18587378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005138691,0.0000922129,0.14017063,0.000047568905,0.000072124305,0.000021791398,0.06881094,0.00050414674,0.0035535486,0.3927736,0.39276955,0.0006700118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007981879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006655162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3619982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035311547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002270591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044698596","doi":"10.1007/s00355-012-0658-2","title":"Public goods provision by asymmetric agents: experimental evidence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Faculty of Arts, Ryerson University","keywords":"Public good; Economics; Public finance; Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; Asymmetry; Context (archaeology); Marginal cost; Information asymmetry; Experimental economics; Empirical evidence; Public economics; Public goods game; Econometrics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.1256584447143935,"score_gpt":0.3874670550772041,"score_spread":0.26180861036281056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044698596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93075633,0.016656242,0.000002134412,0.009825941,0.0006115222,0.00040131772,0.000021992633,0.000109911074,0.04161461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981543,0.000305455,0.00003169337,0.00032367036,0.0006050539,0.00006583482,0.000009580824,0.000015906911,0.0004884966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986434,0.00013409574,0.0001776262,0.00023567342,0.00027441062,0.00053479866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995032,0.0000655719,0.00009348968,0.0000797394,0.00003832149,0.00021967482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003865279,0.00014723667,0.00017957321,0.00006291024,0.0020531984,0.00016919525,0.00018902947,0.00012729355,0.00024281318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015415793,0.00015232601,0.00006968914,0.00029484346,0.00030621173,0.0013513457,0.00016929288,0.00011676756,0.000039216655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016081965,0.0008006254,0.7854764,0.00002739011,0.00006162803,0.0000011125063,0.0790398,1.758186e-8,0.0026237401,0.051023122,0.042218156,0.038711935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076214067,0.00019394504,0.12027269,0.000030632567,0.000048687012,8.7729825e-7,0.12511308,0.0000013615233,0.0025718913,0.00013805341,0.75006676,0.00079984637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036002095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017737813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7078486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000343226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031098924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050536663","doi":"10.1007/s00355-007-0272-x","title":"Subgame perfect implementation of stable matchings in marriage problems","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Matching (statistics); Stable marriage problem; Mathematical economics; Outcome (game theory); Stability (learning theory); Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Pareto principle; Mechanism (biology); Computer science; Game theory; Statistics","score_opus":0.020809126429007035,"score_gpt":0.2627575820979687,"score_spread":0.24194845566896164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050536663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919394,0.00033837324,0.00010500828,0.000375988,0.000114859366,0.00017738342,0.00005759765,0.000014240626,0.006877106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959683,0.000012887191,0.000018619372,0.000039152794,0.000110571615,0.000006921572,0.000012678935,0.00001132675,0.00019098155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991528,0.000018901781,0.00042085917,0.00016918828,0.000027264483,0.00021101674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999629,0.000039293638,0.00022697556,0.0000628498,0.000014547969,0.000027298487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001301534,0.000079712016,0.00023760702,0.00011520214,0.00011160135,0.000024066583,0.00006710745,0.00007070164,0.00020617417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022834274,0.00009384843,0.000043843498,0.0001607514,0.000028361781,0.00014509783,0.000022528353,0.00009070628,0.0000112087955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008614715,0.000026876829,0.796214,0.00017190725,0.000015225447,7.917635e-7,0.0067932103,0.0000021165256,0.00013280007,0.1946769,0.000042276504,0.0019152773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083592505,0.0000578977,0.9629595,0.000021759892,0.0000041949515,9.714522e-7,0.005394792,0.0000087516555,0.0001622167,0.017118394,0.013265529,0.00017005055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048350305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001346618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17755851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041900435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052216797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7309152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051424146","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0511-4","title":"Intergovernmental negotiation, willingness to compromise, and voter preference reversals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Negotiation; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Outcome (game theory); Ideal point; Bargaining problem; Economics; Preference; Ideal (ethics); Microeconomics; Political science; Law and economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.027061828627450924,"score_gpt":0.22369747764854733,"score_spread":0.1966356490210964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051424146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928371,0.00007066812,0.0001362733,0.002465631,0.00044479477,0.00014950466,0.00009897999,0.00002521283,0.0037718934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987186,0.0000053565523,0.00007086334,0.00029288203,0.00032119564,0.000011751784,0.0000069446423,0.000011424666,0.00056097785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993368,0.00001296232,0.00022434306,0.0002509876,0.000028754348,0.0001461481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996751,0.000029463923,0.000117309806,0.00009040933,0.000016406346,0.000071342685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024276735,0.00009845101,0.00020049918,0.000030656,0.00025107802,0.000088206936,0.00009291183,0.00009159302,0.00013355001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007804981,0.000109380606,0.000028848897,0.00006630162,0.00004850729,0.00014578547,0.00006109531,0.00013982724,0.000040395647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002788945,0.000047379082,0.6609012,0.00010832568,0.000043984946,7.7267885e-7,0.007198101,0.0000010763623,0.00061238225,0.32793647,0.0009240722,0.0021983727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006533972,0.000063729494,0.8896479,0.000023138608,0.00000850136,0.0000034254288,0.0007542517,0.00005959097,0.00009716476,0.012016253,0.09635039,0.00032223779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028674578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015196393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3159202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018311075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027870085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44604117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053279336","doi":"10.1007/pl00007176","title":"Collusion, renegotiation and implementation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Planner; Outcome (game theory); Public finance; Microeconomics; Simple (philosophy); Social planner; Economics; Focus (optics); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.013812592837029318,"score_gpt":0.23721868901430745,"score_spread":0.22340609617727814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053279336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97697717,0.0006350198,0.000040119205,0.004243042,0.000076856224,0.00010830363,0.00012652305,0.000018774257,0.01777417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982539,0.00039601786,0.00003572661,0.00029674175,0.00017956877,0.0000098419205,0.000034883167,0.000008358577,0.00078497006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994976,0.0000056324484,0.00019598048,0.0001769983,0.0000100067955,0.000113807386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999828,0.000009558973,0.000071746246,0.000049305865,0.000008152047,0.000033227123],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011622509,0.00006373164,0.00012892287,0.000030495927,0.0003432991,0.000052471783,0.00003203378,0.00005363552,0.0017881041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000050209487,0.00007791254,0.000023103783,0.000043892538,0.000028721859,0.00017808488,0.000016613549,0.00003695224,0.000028542476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009852196,0.000013252121,0.04911459,0.000019790283,0.000023132885,2.5400635e-7,0.002898767,0.0000038190565,0.0000056297317,0.887335,0.0011675949,0.05940831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095139653,0.000044412853,0.3821555,0.0000027975113,0.000008273103,0.0000013810723,0.0012333005,0.00011253119,0.00000955549,0.10925422,0.5060012,0.00022542378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007196646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019467623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7780808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024424302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003526138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053346049","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0568-8","title":"Rationality, external norms, and the epistemic value of menus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Criticism; Value (mathematics); Decision maker; Positive economics; Rational choice theory (criminology); Social psychology; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Management science; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13705170116549992,"score_gpt":0.3743954543775198,"score_spread":0.2373437532120199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053346049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99279505,0.00024443443,0.000095769945,0.0023381414,0.00018594063,0.000085796986,0.000028202758,0.000007164455,0.004219483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935484,0.000020564623,0.00012544652,0.00017390966,0.00011882714,0.0000042803267,0.0000011245792,0.000004438305,0.00019658801],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988494,0.00011904795,0.00038089353,0.00020876814,0.00033927476,0.00010261428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999022,0.00044043362,0.00021578559,0.00015770404,0.00012145327,0.000042642416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013523902,0.00008016155,0.00022562414,0.00004403391,0.0003619839,0.000099492456,0.00027654052,0.00006667671,0.0002147107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003691543,0.00004714199,0.000077039775,0.000112026595,0.0003553467,0.00017176494,0.00013396349,0.000089205336,0.000012424522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019448291,0.00008738952,0.16322218,0.000012131718,0.000029267749,0.0000042004226,0.008585555,0.0000019329734,0.00009244785,0.31498298,0.0010658879,0.51172155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082269195,0.000031714633,0.46928814,0.000010732637,0.000028569122,0.000008755179,0.0015847062,0.00005168751,0.00003803858,0.5213079,0.006724121,0.00010296351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057732116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010322869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5116186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010091338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002221218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2784124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058073069","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0119-x","title":"Top-Pair and Top-Triple Monotonicity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Unanimity; Axiom; Outcome (game theory); Social choice theory; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Preference; Combinatorics; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis; Political science","score_opus":0.014572614985093603,"score_gpt":0.21724274845518812,"score_spread":0.20267013347009452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058073069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96867514,0.0015889279,0.000051451658,0.002227154,0.00021792113,0.00012202785,0.00007500175,0.000051194835,0.026991172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731773,0.000017346141,0.000023115392,0.00013142815,0.0005227108,0.000010476044,0.000010552629,0.000012407069,0.0019542493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992298,0.000019533332,0.00026207417,0.00025876125,0.000021928805,0.00020793454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969417,0.000029844608,0.00012842813,0.000092344104,0.000014228791,0.00004096633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030190917,0.00010929046,0.00025706078,0.000055210054,0.00038877685,0.00007933483,0.00007093207,0.00011978574,0.000090444104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035618705,0.00012457775,0.00005522416,0.00009902425,0.000062783154,0.000120452634,0.000039542592,0.000106759224,0.00003471953],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053081617,0.000025261617,0.44505176,0.000045533354,0.000013442242,0.0000010067371,0.0004510499,0.0000011795951,0.000009935123,0.55270505,0.0008708088,0.00081966317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065426616,0.000038004342,0.62923425,0.000008693471,0.0000079304145,0.0000030360604,0.00042620118,0.00007407162,0.000042826254,0.059264977,0.30996954,0.00027616817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021824744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011568966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4934401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024171437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000040262653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5080133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059561827","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0242-x","title":"Maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation with variable probabilities","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Ranking (information retrieval); Independence (probability theory); Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Approval voting; Social choice theory; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Majority rule; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Voting; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017390282155391422,"score_gpt":0.2021745656071914,"score_spread":0.18478428345179998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059561827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8638493,0.0005202592,0.012196729,0.003985816,0.00026661457,0.0007337608,0.00013750675,0.00014717241,0.118162885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977222,0.0000024970761,0.001274255,0.00019188154,0.000300606,0.00005346396,0.000016104183,0.000019186,0.0004198067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917567,0.0000148039835,0.00022840114,0.00030003945,0.000035152105,0.0002459204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996537,0.000013463727,0.000114408336,0.00011771618,0.00003277875,0.00006794469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000341745,0.00012202007,0.00023775846,0.00006753869,0.00035057883,0.000094299176,0.000095776006,0.00009430242,0.000011483149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048074417,0.00012253567,0.000034383662,0.0002170024,0.00004600773,0.00017023772,0.000026596615,0.00010045257,0.00003361698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001844339,0.00007825362,0.013046176,0.00014908359,0.000034253313,3.3133568e-7,0.0042791553,0.00012071671,0.000004083299,0.98138475,0.000064843814,0.00081990345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023573549,0.00038067158,0.05437133,0.000109978064,0.000027240518,0.000012658751,0.004106369,0.000042200314,0.000049550043,0.8337098,0.10400028,0.0008325829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010040404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007419263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14767496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006871491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016528125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49968597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061278102","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0775-6","title":"Shapley–Shubik methods in cost sharing problems with technological cooperation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Axiom; Anonymity; Shapley value; Property (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Offset (computer science); Game theory; Cooperative game theory; Cost sharing; Compensation (psychology); Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.05032072340237173,"score_gpt":0.2856103721619279,"score_spread":0.23528964875955619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061278102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729174,0.0005977528,0.0035705452,0.003990492,0.00009897168,0.000814098,0.000024855823,0.00012303534,0.017862888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987409,0.000013154939,0.00055103254,0.000096681644,0.000083300045,0.00015485981,0.000011446391,0.000013839093,0.00033476585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991196,0.000034450208,0.00030147578,0.00030342487,0.000020187299,0.00022089813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967295,0.000039529645,0.0001255133,0.00010073347,0.000025714931,0.000035552413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006677445,0.00011251228,0.00027231994,0.00009754192,0.00022966291,0.00012521714,0.00012469824,0.00016059773,0.00025697486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009534729,0.00010315385,0.000027115473,0.00024196162,0.0000829253,0.000228829,0.000048552203,0.00019767703,0.00005897719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005403049,0.000052839194,0.27797112,0.00007643831,0.000021971642,9.875595e-7,0.0010998175,0.000031371812,0.00010219908,0.7100227,0.000062694366,0.010552443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023740148,0.00025627122,0.7986874,0.00013687156,0.000013876814,0.000013156967,0.0030790383,0.003488015,0.00011035546,0.09516677,0.095651075,0.0010231632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084176863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015920828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61485595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042300908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037863144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42064917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067139866","doi":"10.1007/s00355-003-0303-1","title":"Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding – or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Distributive justice; Distributive property; Inequality; Veil of ignorance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Inequity aversion; Ignorance; Social welfare function; Economic Justice; Microeconomics; Welfare; Social psychology; Welfare economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.057677384500916425,"score_gpt":0.3749618746046674,"score_spread":0.317284490103751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067139866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99147135,0.00047511593,0.0000024909643,0.0030831245,0.00017756842,0.00023745523,0.00008289313,0.0000564305,0.004413573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859524,0.000052938172,0.00015234383,0.0001932043,0.00073028734,0.000031603468,0.000042645705,0.000013767274,0.00018798783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989059,0.00010428901,0.00024112666,0.00026066115,0.00019687382,0.0002911492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995189,0.0000492877,0.00015088673,0.00007564757,0.0000713017,0.00013398453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020846845,0.00014414212,0.00022714959,0.00003893821,0.0017595442,0.00007896278,0.00015334276,0.00012890191,0.00018204241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059039885,0.00014694475,0.000054011507,0.00013976915,0.00060881785,0.0007279519,0.000088370216,0.00011119525,0.0000060038046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025118043,0.0007116844,0.14394431,0.00011823029,0.00016333158,0.0000074569152,0.56070566,0.0000057063658,0.072458945,0.20476344,0.0035891945,0.0132808415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002391193,0.00052302034,0.10025527,0.00005968229,0.00030504906,0.0000014871416,0.74483365,0.000024144927,0.08918234,0.0012394751,0.06008262,0.0011020672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002429544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023746481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20352396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027670906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007207579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068129224","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0448-7","title":"Strategic, sincere, and heuristic voting under four election rules: an experimental study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Heuristics; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Approval voting; Ranked voting system; Anti-plurality voting; Disapproval voting; Heuristic; Economics; Microeconomics; Public finance; Simple (philosophy); Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.056107382864848725,"score_gpt":0.36238059336367967,"score_spread":0.30627321049883094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068129224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99055207,0.00012776972,6.159789e-7,0.00059323513,0.00030262384,0.00028940107,0.00000784689,0.00006874783,0.008057678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991625,0.000010336226,0.000031309704,0.00006325869,0.0005993935,0.00003202134,0.000004930451,0.000015022771,0.000081249025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990635,0.00009074745,0.00014781413,0.0002981447,0.00014143142,0.00025834926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969655,0.000029889663,0.00007017379,0.000056561326,0.000039395567,0.00010741178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020990058,0.0001360831,0.00016480549,0.00003287321,0.002590853,0.00023245314,0.00008851789,0.00010371006,0.00008372843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015366018,0.0001457023,0.000027957396,0.00006775019,0.00030130905,0.00033533966,0.00006436117,0.00020093123,0.000004188343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006493243,0.00207705,0.49052772,0.000025829593,0.00012103491,0.000016234017,0.18577445,7.700697e-7,0.021153316,0.2928445,0.000103949395,0.007290212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010609145,0.00056094915,0.2657181,0.0000047982985,0.000055635297,0.0000030512672,0.72841495,0.000012234223,0.00026599262,0.0023373927,0.0010745263,0.00049145595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010732932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02803368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5426405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079838275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003374327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071855726","doi":"10.1007/s00355-012-0695-x","title":"p-Weakly constrained Pareto efficiency and aggregation in incomplete markets","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Incomplete markets; Public finance; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Competitive equilibrium; Pareto efficiency; Function (biology); Complete market; Pareto optimal; Mathematical optimization; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Multi-objective optimization; Computer science","score_opus":0.02365192710172064,"score_gpt":0.22609403313901366,"score_spread":0.202442106037293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071855726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725286,0.0025427472,0.000111047404,0.0017994059,0.00019819527,0.00013485164,0.00010576559,0.000017543452,0.022561876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927634,0.00015833313,0.000042900865,0.00017271531,0.00020830419,0.0000123341115,0.000013587005,0.0000109878065,0.00010451954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922067,0.00001477301,0.00028417385,0.00019820171,0.000014473122,0.0002677166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996821,0.00004293488,0.00012562466,0.00007062225,0.000009139064,0.00006954388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038842566,0.00010386625,0.0002374803,0.00007972593,0.00020192534,0.000044253084,0.000055355897,0.000093950344,0.00012599358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005300584,0.00012397906,0.00003301317,0.000079405836,0.00009994023,0.00027163047,0.0000461092,0.00008992998,0.000014412711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009466904,0.000028719045,0.2775506,0.000030081053,0.0000112720745,3.9001395e-7,0.0020498347,0.0000011331197,0.0000035609073,0.71420324,0.00007337573,0.006038335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009984401,0.00003007137,0.8813033,0.000014053537,0.000006083051,0.0000039505658,0.0013115826,0.00040355357,0.0000054666116,0.039455228,0.07612709,0.00034118444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033544024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009392751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.674748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042352272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057863285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50557196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079087968","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0487-0","title":"Judgments regarding the fair division of goods: the impact of verbal versus quantitative descriptions of alternative divisions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; McMaster University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; McMaster University","keywords":"Fair division; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Preference; Social psychology; Sample (material); Maximization; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.12635982095345993,"score_gpt":0.30828550238600483,"score_spread":0.1819256814325449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079087968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949725,0.00019341418,0.00015172308,0.00045212315,0.00024342885,0.00013880822,0.00034563892,0.0000026855434,0.0034996432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997833,0.000073695686,0.00004319394,0.000006640044,0.000042821226,0.0000071348054,0.000012673963,0.000007128108,0.00002346218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993961,0.000023513418,0.00031453103,0.00012909037,0.00003938703,0.00009737023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992764,0.00014876973,0.0004075793,0.00012813511,0.000019057774,0.000020068414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003176298,0.0000790803,0.00020403799,0.000040988572,0.00025916766,0.000011923521,0.00014711237,0.000053901804,0.00013793787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011537396,0.000055920507,0.00014789001,0.00008487543,0.0002294483,0.00016225214,0.00007685394,0.0001256641,0.0000054262464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006274352,0.00016271813,0.70130074,0.00002288693,0.00039163788,8.231879e-8,0.010450227,0.0003525823,0.00097561395,0.2834174,0.00028241333,0.0025809277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067557505,0.0001540754,0.9897389,0.000008216651,0.000018448556,9.3469644e-8,0.0026596652,0.00049454364,0.000116090225,0.005745822,0.00032109433,0.00006747059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019208431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011937132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28843814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003969845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007668288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2903753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083273514","doi":"10.1007/s00355-007-0243-2","title":"Social choice, optimal inference and figure skating","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Inference; Set (abstract data type); Markov chain Monte Carlo; Social choice theory; Statistical inference; Computer science; Order (exchange); Mathematical economics; Markov chain; Posterior probability; Econometrics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.035218126079915146,"score_gpt":0.281705952480601,"score_spread":0.24648782640068584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083273514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96592236,0.00068616285,0.00026157327,0.0013989803,0.00020315518,0.00012755516,0.000055718898,0.000061734165,0.031282783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977132,0.000011811592,0.00005616836,0.00022304725,0.0011914333,0.0000062473828,0.000013470482,0.000019968216,0.00076464866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998849,0.000022686576,0.00039604516,0.00032734283,0.000042719614,0.00036222275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994184,0.00014389183,0.00025107054,0.000076359676,0.00003196878,0.00007831808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077343034,0.00016267961,0.00033722742,0.000090028516,0.0008845069,0.00012283679,0.00011265102,0.00021284068,0.00011928976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021970553,0.00019093495,0.00006809716,0.00016555766,0.00011335773,0.00020530884,0.00006696939,0.00024128659,0.00003697637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001707833,0.00004319206,0.4576056,0.00016384113,0.00006144742,0.0000037002546,0.00731092,0.0000020793673,0.00003716674,0.52307844,0.00045226433,0.011224281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082241936,0.00006341006,0.8335613,0.000025347801,0.000014671123,0.000003170869,0.0023030404,0.0000676977,0.000019199451,0.0075167203,0.15513805,0.00046500014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004025278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010789849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5155617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032994343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074863087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7786101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089349773","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0112-4","title":"Maximal Domain for Strategy-proof Rules in Allotment Economies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Domain (mathematical analysis); Preference; Allotment; Variable (mathematics); Characterization (materials science); Disequilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.025099615735910543,"score_gpt":0.2341309164835523,"score_spread":0.20903130074764176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089349773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725294,0.0009834217,0.0001028116,0.0015974507,0.00015330761,0.00029682927,0.0002602913,0.000023292787,0.024053201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856776,0.000006638244,0.00009666584,0.00005743166,0.00044580695,0.00007439633,0.000044886358,0.00001625656,0.00069013477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990793,0.000015937416,0.00037953324,0.0002596866,0.000014763743,0.0002507724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996945,0.000040202583,0.0001544778,0.00007475284,0.000010554179,0.00002546575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040454598,0.00012072436,0.0002955545,0.00008100134,0.00022246099,0.00007767456,0.000089290246,0.00010749844,0.00007103241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014338521,0.00014028906,0.00007834333,0.000050788145,0.000050004233,0.00012666715,0.000020916437,0.00006952675,0.000025393481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001578406,0.00004578272,0.083127536,0.00006425109,0.000014873756,6.9039737e-7,0.00031515837,0.000016776554,0.000005294142,0.91550845,0.00024878018,0.0006366109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013178432,0.00008183331,0.3845596,0.000012355698,0.0000046080395,0.0000010923385,0.00092887407,0.00006246215,0.00001957413,0.51847875,0.09424318,0.00028986397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093785994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054659136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39702973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006146117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006784477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5720822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096634455","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0079-1","title":"The 2002 Winter Olympics scandal: rent-seeking and committees","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rent-seeking; Composition (language); Public finance; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.014000880033318158,"score_gpt":0.21107917310464136,"score_spread":0.1970782930713232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096634455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90993696,0.013098307,0.00009631699,0.015699064,0.0004898011,0.0001412086,0.00011761451,0.00003852784,0.060382195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955233,0.00060709956,0.000007716333,0.00026005457,0.0005579678,0.0000046425357,0.0000088727265,0.000012589915,0.0030177948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993379,0.0000042138704,0.0002477866,0.00017725103,0.000030541745,0.00020232212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969685,0.000025238794,0.00013044552,0.00009649436,0.00001976201,0.000031186766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018874992,0.00009834543,0.00016824137,0.000037936232,0.0008721346,0.00019976917,0.00008637954,0.00006668177,0.00013539605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010798381,0.00008461295,0.000048789974,0.00008190305,0.00011134031,0.00010607175,0.000047359707,0.000102473176,0.000014508045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005654255,0.000019314628,0.79223293,0.000023565937,0.000031092455,0.0000012746793,0.00037342132,0.0000045722927,0.0000018334453,0.18852611,0.013061163,0.005719054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001849255,0.000010217572,0.42541024,0.0000044936314,0.0000048115035,9.372597e-7,0.00014530023,0.0004067344,0.0000011819159,0.0033585005,0.5703714,0.0001012373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010914366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006552834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5573102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001869131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003789682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67078424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096644678","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0131-1","title":"Anonymous Single-profile Welfarism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Anonymity; Public finance; Set (abstract data type); Social choice theory; Economics; Mathematical economics; Positive economics; Computer science; Computer security; Welfare","score_opus":0.02186610708643378,"score_gpt":0.20583522945013813,"score_spread":0.18396912236370436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096644678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73302895,0.0015709756,0.00012230877,0.0032260874,0.0005247998,0.00016514651,0.00016178624,0.00012744483,0.26107252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423945,0.0000041071053,0.000042316246,0.00013492345,0.0009806742,0.000013413725,0.000033725024,0.000023494173,0.004527877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902755,0.000022947714,0.00034632438,0.00029523415,0.000031114287,0.00027685732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995993,0.000028900693,0.00018968842,0.00012074395,0.000020381754,0.00004101423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000274123,0.00013624862,0.00028843238,0.000076445576,0.00047836895,0.00009735096,0.00011217665,0.00015495102,0.00043345208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034889046,0.00015887094,0.000086195534,0.00014189829,0.00007159779,0.0001340503,0.00003655013,0.00012905855,0.00024330828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006197589,0.00008217048,0.06583471,0.00005878636,0.000022160333,0.000003383149,0.00044782713,0.0000017424095,0.00008760463,0.9287217,0.0031404204,0.0015932446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008542834,0.000082130675,0.2581368,0.000014093622,0.000012543222,0.0000072881544,0.0005577356,0.000046591816,0.00008751916,0.07159176,0.6680975,0.0005117375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014701318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000711167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003919432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000037474185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64785695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104257901","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0417-1","title":"Characterizing best–worst voting systems in the scoring context","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Axiom; Context (archaeology); Social choice theory; Rank (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Contrast (vision); Class (philosophy); Computer science; Cardinal voting systems; Condorcet method; Approval voting; Choice set; Anti-plurality voting; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04292224798241957,"score_gpt":0.24666437402838567,"score_spread":0.2037421260459661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104257901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790661,0.002423818,0.000025882322,0.0040040463,0.0004117823,0.00021707415,0.000022507946,0.000030992385,0.013797817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854904,0.000018240164,0.000002110985,0.00049036735,0.00075713627,0.000012448499,0.0000054712095,0.000010285418,0.00015488199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989942,0.00005724478,0.00040279023,0.00023749226,0.000035819685,0.00027247364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956185,0.00006796598,0.00022353313,0.000103635306,0.000013288216,0.000029737059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009817745,0.00012326428,0.00030409082,0.000081985614,0.0004502652,0.00019967028,0.00017482194,0.00009463563,0.000012893255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084885396,0.00011604469,0.00005936672,0.00017950134,0.000030374433,0.00019549772,0.000017547907,0.00021042269,0.000045143654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064713217,0.000045236353,0.1043201,0.000076102995,0.000014159123,0.000005036644,0.009095325,0.000004172253,0.000039966566,0.881052,0.0000443246,0.0052970764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012970718,0.00016584451,0.8386058,0.0003389501,0.000016313492,0.00002259437,0.02890939,0.00041143177,0.000011539613,0.005967327,0.1235439,0.0007097872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008102963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005292658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037128644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036683118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47321653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104879829","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0132-0","title":"Rationalizability of choice functions on general domains without full transitivity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Rationalizability; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Element (criminal law); Transitive reduction; Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Graph; Nash equilibrium","score_opus":0.02047996664975399,"score_gpt":0.2355434718199226,"score_spread":0.21506350517016862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104879829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726536,0.00013915618,0.0008030482,0.0013152431,0.00021602816,0.00014584724,0.0004016919,0.00003209509,0.024293242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981172,0.0000020293062,0.000023781136,0.00007649068,0.0006800914,0.000014777029,0.000052029533,0.000011641553,0.0010219613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991292,0.000053910317,0.00035944485,0.00025690295,0.000041923595,0.00015866451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955297,0.00007760274,0.00018478662,0.00011796671,0.00003503753,0.000031632448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041859856,0.000112641654,0.0002913478,0.00006065514,0.00035668022,0.000028003526,0.00006262809,0.00010526556,0.00014713859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000552204,0.00012602397,0.00010855408,0.00012980102,0.00010239858,0.000108725435,0.000010439086,0.0001047021,0.00002260362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029361743,0.00015906691,0.33067366,0.00007203656,0.000031707066,2.537106e-7,0.0003334892,0.00007654274,0.00015625397,0.6678666,0.0003761456,0.00022490427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007896372,0.000089156994,0.9247181,0.000009821652,0.000013804316,0.0000011468139,0.00012056382,0.00011128674,0.000044817047,0.022268377,0.051625606,0.0002076915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016800308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060928526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6455982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038746697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008679063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51391083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107684075","doi":"10.1007/s00355-014-0857-0","title":"On the measurement of plutonomy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Radioactive Decay and Measurement Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; International political economy; Social policy; Economics; Political science; Macroeconomics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.021373575634945654,"score_gpt":0.24519101901745322,"score_spread":0.22381744338250756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107684075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6154789,0.000048210968,0.0034195872,0.005868397,0.00012656322,0.00044061142,0.000024583733,0.00005701194,0.3745362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957705,5.3956745e-7,0.000012859007,0.0001117528,0.00023994461,0.000025336356,0.0000022041627,0.0000058200317,0.000024493804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999491,0.00004435688,0.00008877441,0.00009794386,0.00018092668,0.00009701983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997211,0.000036156944,0.00006069392,0.000085973756,0.00007520123,0.000020859266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002904165,0.00007583165,0.0001027278,0.000015293032,0.00023842131,0.000015406418,0.00007687718,0.000021247606,0.00011441329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001229901,0.00005189729,0.000057971865,0.000043883585,0.000050012713,0.000037167494,0.000012615556,0.00008377543,0.0000022047864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009544405,0.000062189494,0.007657432,0.000010193758,0.00006821383,2.048816e-8,0.00041325903,7.182357e-7,0.00079231174,0.9518908,0.0022611665,0.036834136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013130421,0.00032822424,0.15219487,0.000092925,0.00014579037,1.1194564e-7,0.0027805082,0.00004819913,0.051793084,0.13039753,0.6603566,0.0005491235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008866949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036359538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82149327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012768796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001056727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.211631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109631663","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0150-y","title":"Dynamic Measures of Individual Deprivation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Index (typography); Class (philosophy); Function (biology); Public finance; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03364405346502612,"score_gpt":0.3081831620640292,"score_spread":0.27453910859900305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109631663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9538883,0.0002053842,0.00005620679,0.0037555438,0.00017277247,0.00011499718,0.00004501895,0.000043935634,0.041717842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919945,0.000023763343,0.000032688633,0.000120962024,0.00036190482,0.00000380385,0.000028402705,0.000005313792,0.00022368586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902487,0.00012653523,0.00016599824,0.00011634948,0.00039248588,0.00017375388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996775,0.00004566923,0.000094152034,0.000051212955,0.000103561535,0.0000279072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004903886,0.00006571398,0.00012429213,0.000035703128,0.0007887804,0.000042557585,0.00012205761,0.00012267896,0.00005924318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011809262,0.000065529886,0.000050206963,0.00016274714,0.00019165603,0.00016176618,0.000027074708,0.000075126816,0.0000022175047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017207918,0.00016157089,0.45113367,0.000079017205,0.000046896348,8.8476116e-7,0.02569028,0.000002591858,0.00027724815,0.4731413,0.003490567,0.045958754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023235656,0.000014920335,0.9159801,0.0000051215698,0.000021132295,6.4444286e-8,0.004559801,0.0000027280155,0.000028289487,0.009717261,0.069330424,0.00010780187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012292163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012545528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46484643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042743613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004770813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99428505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109642354","doi":"10.1007/s00355-006-0157-4","title":"Sabotaging Potential Rivals","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"CONTEST; Public finance; Economics; Microeconomics; International political economy; Mathematical economics; Political science; Law; Macroeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.016029290983874855,"score_gpt":0.3097917313304424,"score_spread":0.29376244034656757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109642354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9021167,0.00057561725,0.000004446645,0.009731699,0.00027596814,0.00012022752,0.000013272494,0.00008452496,0.087077506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976973,0.000050076684,0.00003852156,0.00012647265,0.0011067685,0.000011493154,0.0000064238757,0.000009219895,0.00095372414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929297,0.000044464556,0.0001183425,0.00016515766,0.00012353284,0.0002555179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982685,0.000014312309,0.000047845457,0.00004041601,0.000029536242,0.00004104284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011978027,0.00008320055,0.00012475897,0.000024152636,0.0019851662,0.00010232668,0.000087151435,0.0000711785,0.00013054976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000085861975,0.00009279704,0.00005515893,0.00007483839,0.00026571038,0.000174638,0.00004214588,0.00006911049,0.000016795557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014211672,0.00019486698,0.3752079,0.00002371974,0.00005207866,0.000015887812,0.02807876,0.000004201291,0.0031534445,0.56143975,0.011710207,0.020104961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009201137,0.000036244328,0.45937678,0.000011126635,0.000069980764,9.989723e-7,0.044547413,0.0000037284237,0.00033221173,0.016018344,0.47803777,0.00064529036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019433359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034389137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5454214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007137161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015687989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116249082","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0584-8","title":"Free triples, large indifference classes and the majority rule","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Transitive relation; Majority rule; Preference; Preference relation; Cartesian product; Condorcet method; Domain (mathematical analysis); Voting; Mathematical economics; Relation (database); Social choice theory; Mathematics; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Data mining; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.04263526924719818,"score_gpt":0.21985991371969862,"score_spread":0.17722464447250044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116249082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95590955,0.0021209288,0.00006236116,0.0012989683,0.00026585613,0.0001714879,0.00031536308,0.00003584031,0.03981964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884194,0.00007061553,0.000015659078,0.00015237082,0.00023479691,0.000016354292,0.000005332478,0.000009941999,0.0006529604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992565,0.000053495423,0.00024114201,0.00021587034,0.000024902825,0.00020812433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954706,0.00007252441,0.00016397983,0.00015893219,0.00001488229,0.000042632273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066534034,0.00010734433,0.00028445525,0.000037942144,0.00055995834,0.00006284547,0.00018701705,0.00010958826,0.0002083582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016649907,0.00008818738,0.000056091205,0.00008541796,0.00016526254,0.00011288932,0.0001016281,0.00015962699,0.000020949861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019741412,0.000022786578,0.17365001,0.000032874967,0.000024434354,7.403962e-7,0.0054856213,2.3788107e-9,4.6101377e-7,0.8202891,0.00021010262,0.000264156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017382408,0.00002280263,0.6294857,0.000007939324,0.000011795984,0.0000032310018,0.0014758777,0.000010263773,0.000005077484,0.34349516,0.023584245,0.00015966693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009704459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013764658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47679392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011051711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000045275324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43068033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121886276","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0604-8","title":"Dominant strategy implementation with a convex product space of valuations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Universidade Estadual do Ceará; Lunds Universitet; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Mathematics; Regular polygon; Valuation (finance); Space (punctuation); Product topology; Zero (linguistics); Graph; Product (mathematics); Combinatorics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Discrete mathematics; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.1553413309993978,"score_gpt":0.4172641081698142,"score_spread":0.2619227771704164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121886276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827085,0.000049619146,0.0028454175,0.0037855466,0.000053971482,0.00040549418,0.00005892727,0.000019601488,0.01007293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992163,0.000003317732,0.00018965152,0.000026099404,0.000076559525,0.000037986774,0.000007573393,0.000004408577,0.0004381041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990789,0.00008926201,0.0002293523,0.00020807004,0.00029905463,0.00009533486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926597,0.00007723414,0.00020567545,0.00014375988,0.00027116784,0.00003617502],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005779769,0.00006523748,0.00012478662,0.00005726338,0.00041575436,0.000029664347,0.00011972956,0.000026021216,0.0010493755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007473603,0.000046023735,0.000030350155,0.00036602723,0.00015707868,0.00020033504,0.000022020304,0.000049773684,0.000015153308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007448335,0.00015548678,0.04631241,0.000015577643,0.00005498322,6.557024e-7,0.01700352,0.0000060958137,0.0018649552,0.8281296,0.0020691927,0.10431308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009879544,0.00022675974,0.7627881,0.0000061581054,0.00008772652,0.0000054572797,0.07668328,0.00001527861,0.010200153,0.119565085,0.029208591,0.00022546216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022961773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023040084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71647567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007354971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047299647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123904319","doi":"10.1007/s003550100124","title":"Efficient solutions to bargaining problems with uncertain disagreement points","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Monotone polygon; Rationality; Minimax; Class (philosophy); Mathematics; Property (philosophy); Point (geometry); Bargaining problem; Mathematical optimization; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Path (computing); Axiomatic system; Economics; Social choice theory; Computer science","score_opus":0.055522921491831044,"score_gpt":0.2305636843382545,"score_spread":0.17504076284642345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123904319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92686975,0.0010859936,0.0015394997,0.012177247,0.00024515088,0.0005851248,0.00015071598,0.00010322233,0.05724327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998771,0.0000047498925,0.00006539202,0.00026446837,0.00019228063,0.000041299765,0.0000052062783,0.000016023225,0.000639596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990622,0.000022773636,0.00025802947,0.00028923468,0.000043735265,0.00032405992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996326,0.000026621776,0.0001138586,0.000113889655,0.000021916807,0.000091135546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037812907,0.000121917656,0.00022353855,0.000077578414,0.00063229806,0.000065118424,0.00009575384,0.000057644007,0.00031046924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046837526,0.00012044458,0.00004383898,0.00021211505,0.00004652077,0.00004169853,0.000045680958,0.00009634456,0.00021277872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010217004,0.00016282055,0.058033206,0.00008450253,0.00008419746,0.000002633357,0.014773153,0.0014281638,0.000009480035,0.92257047,0.0008844266,0.0019567183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058953324,0.0013692938,0.33456996,0.00047685817,0.00009215327,0.000025520694,0.017167736,0.01797773,0.000015920781,0.032838143,0.5866342,0.0029371434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037799208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093851435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88973236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008135393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026027221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49115875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138628281","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0942-z","title":"Measuring rank mobility with variable population size","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Economic and Social Research Council; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Variable (mathematics); Econometrics; Population; Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Replication (statistics); Mathematics; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Empirical research; Characterization (materials science); Statistics; Computer science; Economics; Sociology; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Demography; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.0968887391854638,"score_gpt":0.3328352019880299,"score_spread":0.2359464628025661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138628281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354188,0.00014693498,0.000043496046,0.028428607,0.00036934888,0.00016864021,0.000015235485,0.000055657227,0.03535331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997168,0.000004660821,0.00021223501,0.00025529368,0.0011572273,0.00002367293,0.000015882986,0.000004201551,0.0011587952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921286,0.0001052117,0.00010263322,0.00013124934,0.00030244715,0.00014561183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994658,0.000081721744,0.000040237217,0.000035912683,0.00030375412,0.00007256016],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005158185,0.00006282082,0.00009467047,0.00001261868,0.001337937,0.000058132595,0.000050550352,0.000051241608,0.00007614592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004775768,0.0000538518,0.000018848645,0.00013444784,0.00008622317,0.00020335053,0.000016723205,0.000057612728,0.0000041661124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005869296,0.00013970373,0.3606274,0.000039706283,0.00007396477,4.2717366e-7,0.04751144,0.000050548148,0.000015611626,0.5849979,0.0052105333,0.001274079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048762033,0.000043630036,0.73989713,0.000014242815,0.000035859885,4.4271917e-7,0.034759607,0.000008648443,0.0000070137403,0.025253339,0.19924214,0.0002503107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021815797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00693267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55974454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001038642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102096994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141263345","doi":"10.1007/s003550000067","title":"Core in a simple coalition formation game","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":535,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Simple (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Separable space; Class (philosophy); Stochastic game; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08584522714990465,"score_gpt":0.27647019621444513,"score_spread":0.19062496906454046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141263345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984583,0.00023519389,0.00019876855,0.0009637349,0.00009188719,0.00010755785,0.00004588443,0.000027395963,0.01374653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993197,0.000029792323,0.0000040949617,0.00015107855,0.00019817156,0.000012884918,0.000044593322,0.000007297071,0.00023243451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944055,0.000011057056,0.00025222308,0.00012928082,0.000017506547,0.00014937847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976915,0.000020413408,0.0001189794,0.00005546861,0.00001116801,0.000024791347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002936563,0.00006454172,0.00016134401,0.00007520558,0.00013003459,0.00003230451,0.00004756807,0.00007923103,0.00014191368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000462074,0.00007759159,0.000033890756,0.00013869703,0.000021117356,0.00021155842,0.000013605298,0.00007580464,0.00006188303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013968631,0.000034708115,0.28664353,0.00006679949,0.000007240553,0.000002409558,0.0032983674,0.0000059571084,0.000011189369,0.70779616,0.00039567813,0.0017239922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011475292,0.00005178842,0.55566627,0.000023815737,0.0000039329916,0.000008496998,0.0024055182,0.0006688267,0.0000059325234,0.18803436,0.25170836,0.00027518146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052829075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025507572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5197618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040878418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000021525952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31640932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141806469","doi":"10.1007/s00355-011-0638-y","title":"A counterexample to a conjecture of Schwartz","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Tournament; Conjecture; Counterexample; Transitive relation; Constructive; Mathematics; Constructive proof; Combinatorics; Vertex (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Partition (number theory); Discrete mathematics; Probabilistic logic; Set (abstract data type); Graph; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.11645567910200043,"score_gpt":0.42103913811631416,"score_spread":0.3045834590143137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141806469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98723674,0.00010806706,0.00040055014,0.006385693,0.000074658106,0.00012029004,0.00006956221,0.000015713189,0.005588699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885046,8.155759e-7,0.00006867093,0.0004393316,0.00023899881,0.000012807382,0.0000023715152,0.00000412581,0.000382396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921626,0.000056852365,0.00017405531,0.00012937102,0.000267526,0.00015595612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993647,0.00023066197,0.00006899602,0.00014726252,0.00009220277,0.00009618279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058340456,0.000060903163,0.0001430349,0.000048924117,0.000248283,0.000038168564,0.00018568049,0.000052250834,0.000649038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034423807,0.00004580295,0.000044580767,0.00032202576,0.00006937589,0.00012713847,0.00006513633,0.000060099675,0.00009564613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044569122,0.00020608092,0.12922737,0.000024171643,0.00004067659,3.829412e-7,0.03220115,0.000003416212,0.004113308,0.7179148,0.02649998,0.089724064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016343681,0.000027639977,0.25543112,0.0000035045007,0.00001066927,0.0000015923524,0.0038237707,0.0000012568723,0.00029560653,0.017712748,0.72243893,0.0000897029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056620378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000369878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7002021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060966345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009976596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7106511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601718507","doi":"10.1007/s00355-018-1123-7","title":"Working time regulation, unequal lifetimes and fairness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Working time; Inequality; Public finance; Economics; Working hours; Working age; Lived experience; Laissez-faire; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Psychology; Market economy; Work (physics); Demography; Macroeconomics; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.1181806508562141,"score_gpt":0.3925125684484452,"score_spread":0.2743319175922311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601718507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9243243,0.00017567335,0.000014345258,0.015773969,0.0003369716,0.0002430889,0.0000045365955,0.00009886206,0.059028305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961564,0.00002689529,0.000021171401,0.000170617,0.0018979089,0.000008362597,0.00000659291,0.000008693363,0.0017033799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897665,0.0001424514,0.00013838595,0.0002287167,0.0002607637,0.00025305277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996322,0.000057107616,0.000056567536,0.0000714459,0.000087011824,0.000095688556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043952756,0.000093851355,0.00013104317,0.000024381028,0.0020235437,0.00013981132,0.000087586726,0.000111376336,0.00049878965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010590731,0.0000921311,0.000033183802,0.00015633048,0.00069203996,0.00015234202,0.000054139535,0.000057969602,0.000025332252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041538904,0.00011543666,0.67213,0.00006443298,0.0000713598,9.016143e-7,0.12212002,4.2814182e-7,0.00012595434,0.107498504,0.009436033,0.08839539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004981819,0.0000822188,0.54488313,0.000032304466,0.00004733794,1.7583136e-7,0.017675964,0.000023849336,0.000026675036,0.011832457,0.42455903,0.00033869926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017176965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021999357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.415123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004834044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002892674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810838958","doi":"10.1007/s00355-018-1140-6","title":"Intertemporal pro-poorness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Australian Agency for International Development; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg; United States Agency for International Development; International Development Research Centre; Government of Canada","keywords":"Poverty; Public finance; Economics; Distribution (mathematics); European union; Income distribution; Public economics; Econometrics; Economic geography; Macroeconomics; Inequality; International economics; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04569275871152629,"score_gpt":0.3485704602609109,"score_spread":0.3028777015493846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810838958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68740845,0.00007557653,0.000028633318,0.016917909,0.001128112,0.00022941802,0.000022680746,0.00014498626,0.29404423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341744,0.000011939826,0.000014545793,0.0008888847,0.0037806034,0.000009281535,0.0000067997767,0.000009104781,0.0018613749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989422,0.0001633223,0.00014830015,0.00019624193,0.00024253559,0.0003074321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995754,0.00003027632,0.000064268526,0.00007948967,0.00015902834,0.000091586124],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004613417,0.00009623445,0.0001492509,0.000027794638,0.0018799244,0.0001049112,0.00017063715,0.0001462939,0.00047679644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014512516,0.00008859819,0.000057891913,0.000175018,0.00055337185,0.00026413312,0.000057142723,0.00011343546,0.000048691734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055378405,0.00017610194,0.28515726,0.00009785328,0.0000616001,0.00000451698,0.15001173,1.1751839e-8,0.000050894356,0.48079595,0.033125345,0.05046336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002918814,0.00006563359,0.12432725,0.000010576278,0.000013409302,2.4821944e-7,0.015897773,0.000002446713,0.000027150083,0.0042293784,0.85493445,0.0001997829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007712374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010347356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8218091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055930723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007739276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895801305","doi":"10.1007/s00355-019-01221-6","title":"Simple games versus weighted voting games: bounding the critical threshold value","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Conjecture; Tournament; Example of a game without a value; Partition (number theory); Class (philosophy); Measure (data warehouse); Weighted voting; Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.033131961173566475,"score_gpt":0.2740001441258113,"score_spread":0.24086818295224482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895801305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628914,0.0012903874,0.000060128783,0.0034470977,0.0013379784,0.00020497333,0.00006165921,0.0000723228,0.03063407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983895,0.000016362086,0.0000120739705,0.00025237064,0.0008340505,0.000012860381,0.000011269099,0.00002722075,0.0004443245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.000047653473,0.0003667438,0.00035623537,0.00006084277,0.00039131782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920326,0.00036871535,0.00015573949,0.00018089624,0.000029817438,0.00006156579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007475342,0.0001640459,0.00034464625,0.00006131696,0.0007429575,0.00022315582,0.00021552497,0.00014533699,0.00032944517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025617942,0.00014772131,0.00012545424,0.00017317783,0.00012784622,0.00020741817,0.000080543,0.0002663409,0.0002443223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019130151,0.00001667613,0.08079573,0.00006374987,0.00004255858,8.935443e-7,0.0014697897,0.0000032516698,0.00000838438,0.9170109,0.00028278588,0.00028616114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041499604,0.00035704247,0.21559638,0.0001317915,0.000091316586,0.00001003763,0.015572667,0.0047408063,0.00006597021,0.12482473,0.6330468,0.0014124754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023933456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026794254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79218614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005197143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009849775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023829253","doi":"10.1007/s00355-009-0434-0","title":"Can groups solve the problem of over-bidding in contests?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Negotiation; Variance (accounting); Public finance; Group (periodic table); Homogeneous; Microeconomics; Economics; Experimental economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.025479076836590914,"score_gpt":0.32521643728205907,"score_spread":0.29973736044546817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023829253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9544628,0.00035560832,1.8698671e-7,0.018677877,0.0000427465,0.00021247135,0.000010503999,0.00001628443,0.02622148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943984,0.00006445577,0.000023746356,0.0002510681,0.00014291871,0.000011318726,0.0000017578078,0.0000039814454,0.000060910188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999393,0.00004123709,0.0001475306,0.0001200262,0.00010036953,0.0001978679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997873,0.000043338398,0.000075133816,0.000040945935,0.0000242644,0.00002902222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002042259,0.00007166001,0.00014894045,0.000023189248,0.0006625915,0.00003519046,0.00011571204,0.000059117338,0.000023748053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001765845,0.000060978626,0.000041864267,0.00011952484,0.00023556214,0.00010790554,0.00003374376,0.000094813266,6.435321e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013296427,0.00011716818,0.31034073,0.000012470294,0.000018051738,0.0000021592966,0.16603276,8.6319017e-7,0.0009133487,0.5007484,0.00045119895,0.021349574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006966036,0.000107310356,0.8416332,0.000031552114,0.00002035875,2.1955826e-7,0.12893245,0.0000019235822,0.00014885352,0.01683046,0.01135974,0.00023735619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014778333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032583483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53129244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009994108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026058726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99178237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048600008","doi":"10.1007/s00355-022-01413-7","title":"Preference aggregation for couples","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Lexicographical order; Axiom; Revealed preference; Rank (graph theory); Preference elicitation; Aggregation problem; Mathematical economics; Preference theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07007172952497447,"score_gpt":0.24288671215823474,"score_spread":0.17281498263326028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048600008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825002,0.0016982863,0.0004873042,0.0033553415,0.0005792962,0.00038400744,0.0007046142,0.00006289063,0.0102280835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984141,0.0000091396005,0.000020039903,0.00012247596,0.00022252425,0.00011863872,0.0000407322,0.000009562747,0.0010428139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950546,0.000015348827,0.00016968943,0.00016851196,0.00002012476,0.000120847966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997323,0.00004185612,0.00013605306,0.000057143483,0.000012937493,0.00001972082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035025924,0.000057032823,0.00013916468,0.000038535414,0.00080536277,0.000032597727,0.00008260999,0.00003181947,0.00022021892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005450916,0.00007167599,0.0000452687,0.00007561161,0.000021596868,0.00006529505,0.00003720855,0.00007027985,0.000009024022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012112254,0.000022838063,0.03089063,0.000055105374,0.000017740158,1.381212e-7,0.001483499,0.00001192904,0.0000075188796,0.96376264,0.0007971032,0.0029387705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007421523,0.00011976377,0.05686929,0.000005330793,0.000007893961,0.0000016437559,0.0021041753,0.0003790197,0.0000121545745,0.10331915,0.83619714,0.00024229854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012722032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014998975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031985503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000046445602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61942804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082900654","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01283-x","title":"Representative Voting Games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Benchmark (surveying); Voting; Mathematical economics; Markov perfect equilibrium; Economics; Markov chain; State (computer science); Property (philosophy); Power (physics); Public finance; Microeconomics; Computer science; Politics; Political science; Nash equilibrium; Macroeconomics; Law; Algorithm","score_opus":0.055204845359337715,"score_gpt":0.25993486762734397,"score_spread":0.20473002226800624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082900654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.908877,0.0013963986,0.00042049855,0.027506232,0.00028841125,0.0001997364,0.00012675996,0.00013586147,0.061049078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982536,0.000007496878,0.00002339374,0.0006868401,0.00065838895,0.000006458961,0.0000064663604,0.000012991764,0.00034437852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992991,0.000025345784,0.00023713647,0.00025963777,0.000020740019,0.00015802415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967366,0.00004202201,0.00015513772,0.000050357346,0.000014202769,0.00006462512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018749907,0.000085765605,0.00023054103,0.000024690864,0.0002742881,0.00005754143,0.000087264445,0.00006266944,0.00019619217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020882636,0.000099007484,0.00006154409,0.00012486012,0.000048453203,0.00012017334,0.000045242217,0.000115913725,0.00012751721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009616055,0.000012909967,0.19255278,0.00007990872,0.00004785305,0.0000026086025,0.012204377,0.0000030140818,0.00001853347,0.7921107,0.0019462309,0.0010114866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018358931,0.00018394132,0.45711812,0.00003658057,0.000025863457,0.000004322561,0.017579164,0.0007723651,0.000115876835,0.029796295,0.49162093,0.00091065344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016831247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061587893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7623144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011194044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000027636065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40374082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118498665","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01304-9","title":"Robust incentive compatibility of voting rules with positively correlated beliefs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive compatibility; Social choice theory; Voting; Approval voting; Incentive; Public finance; Mathematical economics; Social preferences; Compatibility (geochemistry); Microeconomics; Choice function; Function (biology); Economics; Anti-plurality voting; Cardinal voting systems; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.03528615211707246,"score_gpt":0.2183439714627839,"score_spread":0.18305781934571144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118498665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98987055,0.0006495758,0.00028428782,0.00044863316,0.00010499865,0.00009471515,0.00024874412,0.000023309436,0.008275179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951637,0.000007077585,0.00009187658,0.000045685123,0.000090368754,0.0000031503362,0.000044904784,0.000011866169,0.00018868466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914944,0.00005313426,0.00033133617,0.00027071068,0.000033063363,0.000162341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938345,0.00009178851,0.00030036195,0.00008427431,0.00010307534,0.00003704086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002815089,0.000105754145,0.00035678258,0.000037308208,0.00029302842,0.000033383953,0.00006664585,0.000090459704,0.0000895968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117455194,0.00011247298,0.000057631347,0.00017245556,0.00011143485,0.000108947526,0.00004427943,0.0001377183,0.000011925991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020753807,0.00008212454,0.7160189,0.00011439213,0.00009161133,0.0000036462131,0.003038297,0.000020494512,0.00001947518,0.2802422,0.000019378263,0.00032871598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068304234,0.000059441878,0.99326247,0.00007871105,0.00001566877,0.0000032399296,0.0020648502,0.00016350647,0.00011565443,0.0024543765,0.00090961513,0.00018941466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055573974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000130172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27778783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036358386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015958509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4586515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121658581","doi":"10.1007/s00355-015-0900-9","title":"Multiple votes, multiple candidacies and polarization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Candidacy; Approval voting; Condorcet method; Polarization (electrochemistry); Instant-runoff voting; Incentive; Anti-plurality voting; Bullet voting; Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Disapproval voting; Microeconomics; Political science; Chemistry; Law","score_opus":0.043210689843947776,"score_gpt":0.23894153170539098,"score_spread":0.1957308418614432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121658581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96343446,0.0056507424,0.00010617092,0.008199572,0.00084297784,0.00044145176,0.0031189828,0.000101114594,0.018104544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977842,0.0001029535,0.00006916006,0.00032635045,0.00091412204,0.00003161638,0.00035318147,0.000038461803,0.00037993336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860466,0.000020014617,0.00045853693,0.00056687056,0.00003183714,0.00031806726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923664,0.000056406574,0.00033954802,0.0001827998,0.00003801838,0.00014659997],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002701028,0.0002749561,0.00057065004,0.00015054879,0.00041462647,0.00020723537,0.00015823825,0.00050913525,0.000031044838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003339994,0.00033848808,0.00009392803,0.00007258,0.00013661443,0.00019301748,0.0003964538,0.00040736323,0.000030734594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000173076,0.000040788163,0.94043154,0.00029656454,0.00010792601,0.0000011519868,0.0029198963,0.000011705013,0.0000035916678,0.051648974,0.0031327896,0.0013877945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014032015,0.000039645165,0.71849954,0.000030268993,0.000030072339,0.0000021940887,0.00052329723,0.0025988915,0.000006243502,0.1560451,0.12004078,0.0007807677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007914465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012234321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22193196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113793416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028626218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123769910","doi":"10.1007/s00355-013-0749-8","title":"Mobility, taxation and welfare","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; International Development Research Centre; Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux","keywords":"Economics; Welfare; Economic inequality; Inequality; Labour economics; Inequity aversion; Income distribution; Gross income; Income tax; Demographic economics; Public economics; State income tax; Tax reform","score_opus":0.024939965812461027,"score_gpt":0.30654748160408074,"score_spread":0.2816075157916197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123769910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89870834,0.0002012245,0.000007864194,0.04004515,0.00026292578,0.00035729288,0.000023964765,0.00008641703,0.060306802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778324,0.0000808951,0.000019734149,0.0005604552,0.00076184556,0.00003275352,0.0000138072455,0.000008692957,0.00073857134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988415,0.0001845415,0.00017255219,0.00023706275,0.0002707441,0.00029357802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994582,0.000055513323,0.00012333097,0.0000881009,0.00015264218,0.0001222275],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039980008,0.00011272023,0.00016623684,0.000030904732,0.002223985,0.0001884741,0.0001078824,0.00018523913,0.00096293684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029305762,0.000105816056,0.000048510403,0.00014758513,0.00030811952,0.00049523247,0.00006381742,0.00013364396,0.000023962477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011124758,0.00015584314,0.42760435,0.00016824665,0.00004205702,0.0000011548191,0.048687574,2.1483434e-7,0.00006089963,0.43965584,0.008603217,0.075009495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023809134,0.000025743027,0.73079765,0.0000047716017,0.000013063794,1.9226488e-7,0.018811574,0.0000054872744,0.0000039678903,0.0073769325,0.24255514,0.0001673841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034720786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046640704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4322789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060892897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030597745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124622408","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0481-6","title":"Incomplete Property Rights and Overinvestment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); CONTEST; Property rights; Microeconomics; Alternative asset; Bargaining power; Incomplete contracts; Economics; Valuation (finance); Investment (military); Business; Finance; Capital asset pricing model; Consumption-based capital asset pricing model; Incentive","score_opus":0.03605306942489591,"score_gpt":0.22961273443418315,"score_spread":0.19355966500928723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124622408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7869297,0.009897321,0.00018470749,0.01480557,0.0011125819,0.0010224273,0.0015513729,0.00014555336,0.18435074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597037,0.00045381096,0.00022655807,0.0007175356,0.00071207125,0.000041234856,0.00008117756,0.000027045522,0.0017701875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859285,0.000016139193,0.00045106185,0.0006351429,0.000024022342,0.0002807591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993246,0.0000141863,0.0003072833,0.00022546221,0.000019442221,0.00010898782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021170182,0.0002802963,0.0006213528,0.000081731705,0.00043434114,0.00018642581,0.00016740231,0.00031438502,0.00014226318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012522974,0.00025572663,0.0001133183,0.000032961718,0.00011598899,0.00012109728,0.00038550058,0.00033298336,0.00002283299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010957306,0.00003904589,0.002455934,0.00016460131,0.000102242215,0.0000024656813,0.0013442575,0.000008870349,9.986325e-7,0.9909738,0.0013311685,0.0035656667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036648248,0.000036995287,0.02238189,0.000021688498,0.000013601978,0.0000014844766,0.000045376208,0.00012727242,0.0000018738747,0.59136736,0.38526487,0.00037113138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030322934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016508023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39960644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009525837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001554217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124716487","doi":"10.1007/s00355-010-0489-y","title":"Multiple votes, ballot truncation and the two-party system: an experiment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Bullet voting; Disapproval voting; Straight-ticket voting; Ballot; Anti-plurality voting; Approval voting; Ranked voting system; Instant-runoff voting; First-past-the-post voting; Single-member district; Condorcet method; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.026615779658356434,"score_gpt":0.3384621539666677,"score_spread":0.31184637430831125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124716487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823459,0.00010631589,0.000013393549,0.010997761,0.0003387761,0.00034006033,0.0000076013375,0.00006299335,0.0057872287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854755,0.0000023211346,0.00001653705,0.00012897972,0.0010859256,0.00006129819,0.000008322579,0.0000064938417,0.0001425476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990332,0.0002628119,0.00014118144,0.00014887653,0.00019029793,0.00022364604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995496,0.00012647848,0.000055916484,0.00007274887,0.00006984547,0.00012535475],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057030556,0.00007602392,0.0001252583,0.000012941914,0.0016273976,0.00014305969,0.00007482267,0.00009321717,0.000040295796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015027338,0.000053857046,0.000028604236,0.00007539989,0.00033091428,0.00018251687,0.000016815513,0.00012126337,0.000004409228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015948173,0.000022986018,0.022920314,0.00002083405,0.000008645499,1.904366e-7,0.012824553,1.5650481e-7,0.0007665313,0.96108514,0.00015911297,0.0021756126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006444458,0.00017871078,0.5371957,0.00004546438,0.00017333486,0.0000031031097,0.05037946,0.0019543278,0.0005032411,0.00820342,0.39409518,0.0008235851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06361282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059422042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003211807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002977446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141113392","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01332-z","title":"Does public debt secure social peace? A diversionary theory of public debt management","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Debt; Internal debt; Creditor; Business; External debt; Government (linguistics); Debt-to-GDP ratio; Debt levels and flows; Cohesion (chemistry); Recourse debt; Senior debt; Economics; Public economics; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028467407477961018,"score_gpt":0.22627964221607474,"score_spread":0.1978122347381137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141113392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36966956,0.003970382,0.00019824506,0.17568769,0.0009609881,0.00034557286,0.0015347959,0.00009553406,0.44753724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946544,0.00025126708,0.000044912664,0.0017028593,0.000533092,0.000017483695,0.0000823589,0.000021331412,0.0026922866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864924,0.000055170392,0.0004046467,0.0003613045,0.000058733298,0.00047088575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993987,0.00007002357,0.00017457966,0.0001488924,0.000066090935,0.00014169356],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002802242,0.0001707251,0.00040841737,0.00011482543,0.0006285209,0.00012221486,0.00020398668,0.00018534077,0.0017970622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007310091,0.00015525646,0.00022231563,0.00024273426,0.00021597823,0.00028125185,0.00028822382,0.00017831381,0.000055657092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046036184,0.00009196266,0.021148946,0.00014258198,0.00013712293,0.0000050061794,0.0008560683,7.476635e-8,7.170438e-7,0.9681064,0.0044541233,0.0050523896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058561424,0.000022439675,0.15329847,0.0000065490053,0.000022561564,0.0000012343415,0.004667051,0.000009422467,0.000004784231,0.21226574,0.6288496,0.00026652523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015833114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009312967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75584066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000750224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024820085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151058323","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01379-y","title":"Childlessness, childfreeness and compensation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Childlessness; Fertility; Imperfect; Social policy; Compensation (psychology); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Population; Psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.01721279559738977,"score_gpt":0.27670633269590306,"score_spread":0.2594935370985133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151058323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693675,0.00097444345,0.000048999736,0.009343812,0.00029105073,0.00009909614,0.00003188188,0.000055993725,0.019787244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977983,0.0005562623,0.00004287365,0.0004753042,0.0007679192,0.0000044583553,0.00004824567,0.000009410342,0.0002972125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991546,0.00011477119,0.000103114675,0.0002155456,0.00019739516,0.00021453027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964905,0.00003961941,0.000043131095,0.00006570721,0.00011964004,0.00008287992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015638133,0.00009111731,0.00014583171,0.000022111546,0.001755707,0.00013418804,0.000069023605,0.00013583821,0.000050219296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062390674,0.000099444835,0.000041808187,0.00020805164,0.00020586269,0.00015478658,0.000049026577,0.0001068906,0.0000023748748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031589063,0.00005475694,0.64441776,0.000045734207,0.00004046954,0.0000060562966,0.03576404,0.0000013494675,0.000033541644,0.3058078,0.000255586,0.01356973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002960517,0.000005554176,0.9118461,0.000007083812,0.000025715653,8.384136e-7,0.038813427,0.000007825391,0.0000021713838,0.002789522,0.046062984,0.00014274768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018976792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007875213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30301827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025955409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008391015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184470869","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01347-6","title":"Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Context (archaeology); Truncation (statistics); Ballot; Approval voting; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Voting; Law","score_opus":0.034021850469177405,"score_gpt":0.24932158966685053,"score_spread":0.21529973919767312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184470869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144358,0.006190932,0.00015479217,0.006260715,0.00084494276,0.00010493921,0.00011436858,0.00007687111,0.07181662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942032,0.00012197671,0.000035326702,0.00034147748,0.00062087557,0.000011261404,0.000011959476,0.000015751375,0.004638142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922585,0.000021254304,0.0002525367,0.00027471402,0.000024189943,0.00020147236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999666,0.000027138625,0.000110312554,0.000110760884,0.000039833758,0.00004598199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018166548,0.00009614657,0.0002272443,0.00005567325,0.00053738104,0.00009506632,0.000065606546,0.000100361875,0.0005094305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006167704,0.000120149314,0.000078167905,0.00025390706,0.000030993215,0.00013459302,0.000033931727,0.00013623822,0.00017171507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005831491,0.00008558162,0.15135568,0.00010108467,0.00011371514,0.000007525449,0.0024307554,6.4313457e-7,0.00006604775,0.8399979,0.0016206277,0.0042145923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073360256,0.0000510716,0.060106326,0.000051460687,0.000022864566,0.000013513694,0.0021957287,0.00006175539,0.00036219583,0.07112518,0.8648167,0.00045957594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034159533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057180005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8631961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003370127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011684756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55779064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217319423","doi":"10.1007/s00355-021-01378-z","title":"Correction to: Weighted scoring elections: is Borda best?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Public finance; International political economy; Computer science; Political science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.019261467797282217,"score_gpt":0.316118194374945,"score_spread":0.29685672657766277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217319423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6124941,0.0013959713,0.00018575009,0.072770216,0.0063014566,0.00032828006,0.00006112593,0.00018544239,0.30627763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97444993,0.000103934675,0.000019959292,0.0010784637,0.001959488,0.000017580693,0.0000026593582,0.000007955582,0.022359999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907494,0.000076859294,0.00011449367,0.00020406781,0.00023034976,0.00029931412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995682,0.00006199376,0.000036494897,0.00005759538,0.00013542944,0.00014028125],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000114127135,0.000071605056,0.00011861577,0.000018377175,0.001545485,0.00011929403,0.000058561483,0.00008302159,0.00022190061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003084935,0.00007733319,0.000052240925,0.00040138536,0.000056305373,0.00015104744,0.000028268569,0.000121234494,0.000039448056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000150512915,0.00019866784,0.08804999,0.00006676412,0.00009451398,0.000020379744,0.028585883,7.2263174e-7,0.00051345985,0.6326807,0.14921227,0.10056159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000990434,0.00001641273,0.04635581,0.00003812127,0.000012147787,0.0000010166658,0.0031326378,0.000003581983,0.0001344892,0.0009953777,0.9490953,0.00011605229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05651924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023652151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79988307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012381158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109299915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206203128","doi":"10.1007/s00355-020-01285-9","title":"Choice resolutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Università di Catania","keywords":"Rationalizability; Preorder; Resolution (logic); Independence (probability theory); Path (computing); Order (exchange); Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2240353870216814,"score_gpt":0.4185354270676562,"score_spread":0.19450004004597476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206203128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9190476,0.00016820332,0.0001275353,0.068469405,0.0003116028,0.00009807212,0.00008084693,0.00008520482,0.011611546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664146,0.0000075103903,0.00010360894,0.0021533184,0.0007566864,0.000004980635,0.0000055024743,0.00001101553,0.00031594097],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998459,0.00007277147,0.0003722809,0.00044338225,0.0004304304,0.000222166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989347,0.00042433647,0.00012857332,0.00018306702,0.00013850973,0.00019083453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037429723,0.00012095899,0.00024702368,0.000062224826,0.00081972557,0.00034062445,0.00042081837,0.00011846183,0.0006471999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019285923,0.0001005355,0.0001219861,0.00047135624,0.00010856014,0.00029021947,0.00018226948,0.0001912274,0.00038682838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021038008,0.00005788583,0.054116398,0.0000056550557,0.000015073127,0.000008510468,0.0024315675,0.000014383705,0.00011358692,0.005845653,0.101535454,0.8358348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026799992,0.000044152468,0.11487098,0.0000030784022,0.000015746964,0.0000013448719,0.0015048526,0.00012534541,0.0000056783924,0.010022989,0.8729783,0.00015948236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013876212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013971509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8356753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022175787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003184392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70863855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226160054","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01563-w","title":"Individual Representation in Approval-Based Committee Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Voting; Representation (politics); Preference; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Majority rule; Domain (mathematical analysis); Interval (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology; Political science; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.07287673766957566,"score_gpt":0.2881955577613382,"score_spread":0.21531882009176256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226160054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793887,0.00117432,0.00014404034,0.003128061,0.0010296692,0.0005376394,0.00070107024,0.00008882534,0.013807671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984606,0.000008414845,0.000047126327,0.00019614807,0.00046215608,0.00013591997,0.00040608295,0.000034926154,0.00024863312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982674,0.00015180923,0.0006399735,0.0005935111,0.000075186916,0.0002721062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990088,0.00011500632,0.0006026492,0.0002143128,0.000017908884,0.00004137042],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012928048,0.00021156251,0.0005513641,0.00027165035,0.00043816803,0.00015614979,0.00031382148,0.00028319017,0.00036531116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017611943,0.00028791494,0.00014660279,0.00023315886,0.00005906423,0.00008168141,0.00041046643,0.000830907,0.0000151623335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017807477,0.000101814345,0.8374964,0.0005019873,0.00007733272,0.000006169603,0.0062350505,0.0006504262,9.4880363e-7,0.15272988,0.00045502282,0.0017271833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016888542,0.000054554155,0.9090617,0.0001019855,0.00003441534,0.0000012987341,0.006201622,0.0014255464,0.0000054089087,0.040931623,0.03957508,0.0009179131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021451206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015576524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11179826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011935055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002510022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294733709","doi":"10.1007/s00355-022-01429-z","title":"The equal share proportional solution in a permit sharing problem","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Autarky; Group (periodic table); Economics; Alpha (finance); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Economy; Welfare; Market economy","score_opus":0.03863432654575027,"score_gpt":0.24293888423506738,"score_spread":0.2043045576893171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294733709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662913,0.0016642826,0.00004129315,0.0093787005,0.00040455748,0.00047448743,0.00026878546,0.000056538436,0.021420026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983913,0.0000058041906,0.000005064392,0.000073468196,0.00021105137,0.0001351729,0.000031179476,0.000010530833,0.0011364294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999169,0.000032856296,0.00030672774,0.00023081095,0.00004645049,0.00021418167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996945,0.000028879702,0.00016706766,0.0000749337,0.000011995528,0.000022578646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009161706,0.00007333244,0.00013907997,0.000053507087,0.0014845562,0.00007352379,0.0001552434,0.00003951323,0.00027716366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044347362,0.00007392402,0.000050319446,0.00015800014,0.0000379587,0.00010056996,0.00014279806,0.00021724348,0.000016617852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000121694975,0.00003169723,0.1583668,0.000034520555,0.000013023052,0.0000014563245,0.0021326377,0.0000260833,0.0000039248366,0.83794445,0.000266442,0.0011667914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011018717,0.00011698177,0.41012594,0.000019891631,0.000006769866,0.0000124078715,0.0061118654,0.0014157473,0.0000017885196,0.19357112,0.3870721,0.0004435503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003846886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015853335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64437336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105577106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011128033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384405638","doi":"10.1007/s00355-023-01472-4","title":"Independent, neutral, and monotonic collective choice: the role of Suzumura consistency","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University of Tokyo","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Impossibility; Veto; Social choice theory; Monotonic function; Axiom; Property (philosophy); Consistency (knowledge bases); Population; Context (archaeology); Mathematics; Economics; Discrete mathematics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024996483644706708,"score_gpt":0.2400744474934093,"score_spread":0.2150779638487026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384405638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97266847,0.0020409408,0.0000013369383,0.0014070786,0.00015640624,0.00022910464,0.00013292443,0.00004008672,0.023323672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985636,0.00011339912,0.0000014053916,0.00006136233,0.00015990088,0.000027755998,0.000006374665,0.000014699584,0.0010515043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916345,0.00004055238,0.00030820922,0.00024179945,0.000031070253,0.00021492451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940985,0.00017647553,0.00022274588,0.00011895553,0.00003159378,0.00004039537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004648682,0.00011264268,0.00030067997,0.00009469755,0.00056167773,0.000057267764,0.00012282064,0.00011706398,0.000041309017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011322916,0.00010431283,0.00007132675,0.00034704464,0.00015822939,0.000098210156,0.00006799387,0.00015773569,0.000027739734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014814183,0.000030624466,0.39161128,0.00008460165,0.000117994765,0.0000010405605,0.006331673,0.0000041953476,0.00006933161,0.6001148,0.00042412992,0.0011954933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006972139,0.00007407558,0.85701853,0.000017314245,0.000021059066,0.0000032799962,0.006901747,0.00013792014,0.00007228266,0.091027506,0.04380493,0.00022416272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008961184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018035396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5090873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028122635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019015944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43200275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385605651","doi":"10.1007/s00355-023-01480-4","title":"Escape poverty trap with trust? An experimental study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Local Government Finance and Decentralization","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Poverty trap; Economics; Endowment; Poverty; Pareto principle; Externality; Trap (plumbing); Matching (statistics); Consumption (sociology); Coordination failure; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.025129331722648876,"score_gpt":0.32053640002693484,"score_spread":0.295407068304286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385605651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887162,0.000040043935,0.0000045093584,0.0020488827,0.00011140476,0.00029029846,0.000009742042,0.00014550048,0.008633433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985722,0.000029537396,0.0000035367002,0.000287362,0.0003489821,0.000025014882,0.000017884575,0.000011269026,0.00070422835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988925,0.00009021982,0.00009243292,0.00021675858,0.00044262505,0.0002654995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976903,0.0000136883355,0.000040090334,0.00006461185,0.00002800838,0.00008457195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016458027,0.00009213526,0.0001135694,0.000025221072,0.001253049,0.000106561994,0.0000990883,0.000068395726,0.00017076444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015681759,0.00007884097,0.000025193543,0.00039199766,0.00009449746,0.00038456413,0.000022296737,0.000059698727,0.000013726493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012008854,0.001208905,0.7441692,0.000015902198,0.000055224747,0.000028554568,0.18981756,0.0000066990883,0.00012477562,0.044966053,0.0068211225,0.012665906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012546438,0.0005561469,0.5896754,0.000005702301,0.000028182225,2.0743069e-7,0.29590282,0.000020594813,0.00005891139,0.00020333169,0.11203101,0.00026304196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018593586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023364595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1544938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059452508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035298708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9637567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387514870","doi":"10.1007/s00355-026-01668-4","title":"On the Ordinal Bayesian Incentive Compatibility of Vote Share and Veto Share Rules","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Incentive compatibility; Compatibility (geochemistry); Incentive; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Computer science; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.06776049486945887,"score_gpt":0.27073662680897764,"score_spread":0.20297613193951877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387514870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842595,0.0007535539,0.00004217978,0.003812099,0.00045690892,0.00048257754,0.0065984987,0.00005495926,0.0035397164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906445,0.00003439252,0.000008307963,0.000084032006,0.00030033637,0.000038378494,0.0001955057,0.000029395933,0.00024522518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985174,0.000102227474,0.0005241402,0.00056610786,0.00006192524,0.0002281835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987629,0.00026741062,0.0005596564,0.00029423388,0.000060465136,0.00005533993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079053605,0.00024602065,0.00064461393,0.00009555775,0.00045643706,0.00011399448,0.00028602078,0.00028794233,0.00016990365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033522965,0.00022449638,0.00015286989,0.000108682645,0.00018121983,0.00005757521,0.00041515316,0.00050606456,0.000028901162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006215277,0.00008940264,0.27061063,0.0016758167,0.00028541798,0.0000032189546,0.0065545505,0.000017152666,0.0000018879407,0.7178063,0.0017305341,0.0011629664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039031287,0.00007886247,0.7497602,0.00042424983,0.00003112555,5.6198286e-7,0.0019477496,0.00032391696,0.0000067371147,0.24281356,0.0038015458,0.00042114916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014878437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030797464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47914958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005821271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001660614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91546965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391515340","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01507-4","title":"Relative measures of economic insecurity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Public finance; International political economy; Social policy; Economics; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.04968408462277102,"score_gpt":0.328887140604155,"score_spread":0.279203055981384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391515340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6198601,0.0011138371,0.0000218372,0.020617012,0.0011235347,0.00016581331,0.000035060253,0.00010896342,0.35695386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787515,0.00017945793,0.000011056344,0.0000548065,0.00029042183,0.0000051599186,0.0000028358866,0.0000042452675,0.0015768724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995487,0.00004231895,0.00011694251,0.00012006915,0.00006436387,0.00010765262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998399,0.000046529934,0.000027122069,0.000026935262,0.000017336071,0.000042154636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028555197,0.000048415954,0.00009446483,0.00003879104,0.0003577895,0.000050599698,0.00005385019,0.00006674858,0.00056246686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031896492,0.000050653212,0.00004591046,0.00005471473,0.00013051758,0.0001809627,0.000022163178,0.00007064936,0.000044712982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000406346,0.000009098521,0.0082936715,0.000029029896,0.000044766854,7.9309575e-7,0.0589807,4.3135378e-7,0.0000062458403,0.8047527,0.0011352059,0.12674329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008141784,0.0000066743946,0.040284716,0.000011882989,0.0000101269525,1.3716117e-7,0.0068739615,0.000006782923,0.0000035855644,0.005053231,0.94758475,0.00008273698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020809644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004516403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011996819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013323268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6158618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392799858","doi":"10.1007/s00355-023-01497-9","title":"Christian Klamler’s ”A distance measure for choice functions” [Social Choice and Welfare 30 (2008) 419–425]: a correction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Università di Catania; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Social policy; Economics; Measure (data warehouse); Welfare; Public finance; International political economy; Social choice theory; Social Welfare; Mathematical economics; Public economics; Welfare economics; Econometrics; Political science; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.02567137158054615,"score_gpt":0.2415691045450605,"score_spread":0.21589773296451437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392799858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5860605,0.08351036,0.026257444,0.097724564,0.033418782,0.004484048,0.01623321,0.0019724849,0.15033859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935852,0.00017460226,0.000025185609,0.0002940439,0.0030226726,0.00020307547,0.00020296955,0.000059129703,0.00243308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798363,0.000037538342,0.00059472315,0.0008339326,0.00005655653,0.00049362605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992352,0.00016950439,0.00017645826,0.00018818848,0.00008448677,0.00014616859],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004559649,0.00034489407,0.0005321484,0.00020209668,0.002768776,0.00041428153,0.00017238641,0.00036472193,0.0006247076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033086873,0.00041366846,0.00023524166,0.00035328133,0.00027251942,0.0007237181,0.00006405254,0.0004291797,0.00011218007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005705229,0.00012825867,0.020438766,0.00051361695,0.00040729126,0.000003053699,0.0027681668,0.000012776522,0.000014176706,0.9138802,0.04193366,0.019842964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082168647,0.00007583976,0.0584876,0.0000465485,0.00007757541,0.000006780945,0.0014337971,0.00036944982,0.000003370649,0.0055228113,0.9326461,0.00050844555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010964891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013653443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9083574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002501873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048383386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402063987","doi":"10.1007/s00355-024-01541-2","title":"Natural interviewing equilibria in matching settings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Choice and Welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev","keywords":"International political economy; Public finance; Matching (statistics); Natural (archaeology); Social policy; Public international law; Economics; Interview; Mathematical economics; Political science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Statistics; Geology; Law","score_opus":0.025654887158264285,"score_gpt":0.26141477117026923,"score_spread":0.23575988401200496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402063987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976534,0.008374271,0.000036225123,0.004346372,0.0009286794,0.00008162802,0.00002822701,0.00008537676,0.00958523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865395,0.000015410678,0.000015489233,0.00019208116,0.00045263217,0.000007162616,0.000008031753,0.000018432878,0.00063681876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918306,0.00002469068,0.00030752274,0.00025898393,0.000020098594,0.0002056696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997932,0.000055456592,0.000059855058,0.0000611604,0.0000055199826,0.00002483345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006198951,0.00010018804,0.00022890666,0.00011835516,0.00013474321,0.00018080583,0.00009502907,0.00007588499,0.00008917922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000463704,0.000110700494,0.000073736854,0.00018224471,0.00002542443,0.00026115752,0.000058754995,0.00023960459,0.00008411027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005371965,0.00001435609,0.022902207,0.0007082194,0.00004656537,0.000013903104,0.015191573,0.0000017013607,0.00014316315,0.9525531,0.0005232854,0.007896542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010824561,0.00006418915,0.17608002,0.0011369598,0.000022108483,0.000027118622,0.007386295,0.0027589686,0.000028870967,0.3047372,0.50551003,0.0011657582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036781523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049695107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6478159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004599362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000041531607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4514235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}