{"meta":{"query_hash":"20f0faf718bf","filters":{"venue":"Social Justice Research"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/20f0faf718bf","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+Justice+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W142883812","doi":"10.1023/a:1007623026727","title":"You're OK, I'm OK: The Self-Presentation of Affective Reactions to Deprivation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Psychology; Social psychology; Participant observation; Presentation (obstetrics); Developmental psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.10865897172137447,"score_gpt":0.4923712410378505,"score_spread":0.38371226931647606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142883812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65435547,0.00003053107,0.00008745158,0.023493959,0.0005028029,0.00073557073,0.000009439254,0.00007535477,0.32070944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99230283,0.00019328213,0.00008712663,0.00026581396,0.0018278573,0.00010187498,0.0000050580293,0.000012219698,0.0052039404],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662733,0.0015736594,0.00020668269,0.00023610807,0.00088318816,0.0004730124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798673,0.0011076679,0.00005611861,0.00015047818,0.0006001158,0.000098894365],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024584697,0.000074491785,0.0001260764,0.00012931394,0.0022072215,0.00007082696,0.0004128895,0.00017604319,0.0012790979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014841686,0.000065347194,0.0000755439,0.0017215239,0.0005129852,0.00019690329,0.00005241602,0.00040725304,0.00035476376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033306397,0.0005709648,0.0014999359,0.000074777534,0.00014457988,0.000004268158,0.5192082,0.000025064637,0.0053611556,0.15109307,0.11019453,0.21149041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006374447,0.0003388189,0.10497792,0.00003894371,0.00013095958,8.316969e-7,0.41818953,0.00005093542,0.0005726759,0.020764371,0.45402083,0.00027674116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009872626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003292602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3438263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028490412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025904956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973193805","doi":"10.1007/s11211-007-0053-9","title":"The Consequences of Victim Physical Attractiveness on Reactions to Injustice: The Role of Observers’ Belief in a Just World","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Physical attractiveness; Social psychology; Psychology; Harm; Just-world hypothesis; Beauty; Injustice; Attractiveness; Stereotype (UML); Personality; Social policy; Economic Justice; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Law","score_opus":0.16584758561116808,"score_gpt":0.5076712894673878,"score_spread":0.34182370385621974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973193805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93732345,0.00016980185,0.0000091824795,0.0029636812,0.00048688942,0.00047087963,0.000026755515,0.000012879627,0.058536462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974746,0.000014078691,0.00001533752,0.00007044309,0.00045247716,0.00009405064,0.0000025943098,0.000013546408,0.0018628318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997314,0.0009068742,0.00035355127,0.00028319898,0.0005764592,0.00056595076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937445,0.005347428,0.00012249927,0.00034517384,0.0003699823,0.00007044011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035284113,0.00010884385,0.00019972952,0.00028614496,0.000937046,0.000013893707,0.00054329814,0.0001336012,0.00017384607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042733963,0.000077993966,0.000088267116,0.0012481658,0.0017607898,0.000057432866,0.000081656966,0.0010964894,0.00013725013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035298222,0.0027194237,0.011309765,0.00007297459,0.00012659527,0.000036057154,0.064266555,0.000036153495,0.027254023,0.8732521,0.003713058,0.0136834625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004756688,0.0004259515,0.8220361,0.00005713079,0.000111519345,0.000004056349,0.15809639,0.0000033282884,0.0011781569,0.0070813526,0.010412268,0.000118124604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008892612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019910003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86617076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014810827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016244603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7207095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979798566","doi":"10.1007/s11211-007-0058-4","title":"Justice, Morality, and the Dehumanization of Refugees","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":232,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Tyndale University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Refugee; Contempt; Social psychology; Social dominance orientation; Admiration; Psychology; Morality; Social policy; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.23006970938512564,"score_gpt":0.5189910247655429,"score_spread":0.2889213153804173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979798566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7374728,0.0006481963,0.00009573467,0.022625647,0.0007565532,0.000499272,0.0000068413533,0.00005251414,0.23784249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937548,0.0010892745,0.000043190303,0.00028498177,0.0014793616,0.00001881606,0.000002030959,0.000009267727,0.0033182555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968649,0.0015861335,0.00020750705,0.00017802039,0.0007696476,0.00039376825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980762,0.0010478527,0.00007349773,0.000105429055,0.00062776456,0.00006923648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032154236,0.00006453265,0.00017975211,0.00008521503,0.0027475401,0.000038020153,0.00033794864,0.00015400893,0.00013673773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023857846,0.00005011625,0.000055527824,0.0007177963,0.005469398,0.00012376388,0.00012416468,0.00033106035,0.00003215411],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012300104,0.000058481834,0.0005358661,0.00006104278,0.00002141535,0.0000036454644,0.094440155,2.6520425e-7,0.00012567367,0.8861326,0.016823085,0.0016747725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004904037,0.000346809,0.09679878,0.000068272304,0.0005833857,0.0000113636215,0.37766758,0.00008527704,0.0001561484,0.17293292,0.34589434,0.0005511084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002751868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007621199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7131997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006800815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019251663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983600362","doi":"10.1007/s11211-013-0193-z","title":"Integrating Organizational Justice and Affect: New Insights, Challenges, and Opportunities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Organizational justice; Economic Justice; Affect (linguistics); CLARITY; Sociology; Foundation (evidence); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Organizational commitment; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.12581684643331412,"score_gpt":0.33765209615829317,"score_spread":0.21183524972497905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983600362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7573647,0.020135606,0.00074071845,0.078804955,0.0014493301,0.0018927087,0.000010285469,0.00059311383,0.13900858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908164,0.0021274735,0.00023680385,0.0015400766,0.0033129924,0.00001956744,0.00004125631,0.000045656387,0.0018597568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987295,0.000051475683,0.00016997736,0.00025282422,0.0005093812,0.00028682553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987344,0.00025506725,0.000056044493,0.00007237077,0.0008293077,0.000052792795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003575492,0.00013151209,0.00013857418,0.00027591726,0.0009338687,0.0005467855,0.000113601986,0.00010915488,0.0009230917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000764978,0.0001234145,0.000014768177,0.00037107014,0.00017671236,0.0010592184,0.000249017,0.0003079696,0.00026338178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007701611,0.000035621993,0.0012024731,0.0006195675,0.000016222892,0.0000064489122,0.001831636,3.154188e-7,0.00075624435,0.9167594,0.025065279,0.05369912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021366752,0.0000685687,0.5526028,0.00020934688,0.0009408902,0.000023936873,0.18679056,0.0012080217,0.000080210084,0.07035523,0.18446417,0.0011195518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046903657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013912279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84640414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042893244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012282903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992748240","doi":"10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y","title":"Strong Reciprocity and the Roots of Human Morality","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Strong reciprocity; Homo sapiens; Social psychology; Pleasure; Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Sociology; Evolutionary psychology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Game theory; Anthropology; Economics","score_opus":0.18912773929613233,"score_gpt":0.47211235442486665,"score_spread":0.2829846151287343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992748240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90682,0.00018074956,0.000036345325,0.003920874,0.000053885648,0.00025742175,0.0000041229414,0.000017882703,0.08870873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682903,0.00019319287,0.000018164335,0.000024384886,0.0005364716,0.000015826972,0.0000020404489,0.000003419006,0.0023774435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964559,0.002360358,0.00013411116,0.0001226157,0.0006675241,0.00025950014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988082,0.00060805504,0.000039053146,0.00008450365,0.00040908437,0.000051077623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058935806,0.000041949403,0.000109045606,0.00003521384,0.00485265,0.000024331359,0.00019631156,0.000078228855,0.000099030556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010089184,0.00003308791,0.000035044435,0.00036914003,0.004001816,0.00014951754,0.00007610143,0.00029347365,0.000009027108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009690694,0.00003584379,0.0007240491,0.000021589349,0.000008073287,0.0000011276459,0.024160491,0.0000017580901,0.0003233399,0.97290933,0.0008907269,0.0008267916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042336076,0.00036785423,0.30505484,0.00006565898,0.0001975272,0.0000048238135,0.32402772,0.0002586643,0.0005547224,0.3494557,0.015262636,0.00051624404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027840335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00126839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62345356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007460911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025940663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997920441","doi":"10.1007/s11211-015-0233-y","title":"The Downside of Being Up: A New Look at Group Relative Gratification and Traditional Prejudice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Psychology; Gratification; Legitimacy; Group (periodic table); Conceptualization; Ingroups and outgroups; Generality; Developmental psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2759288789604479,"score_gpt":0.46449626294720214,"score_spread":0.18856738398675427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997920441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4587779,0.0014611154,0.00051104097,0.061107185,0.0022708746,0.0010839314,0.000028866569,0.00008102013,0.47467807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871478,0.0003340385,0.00009760915,0.000092858754,0.0016600703,0.000029982357,0.0000075358294,0.000009400125,0.010620695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970739,0.001169196,0.00020970924,0.00021840098,0.0009342003,0.0003945891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972394,0.0018818784,0.000091635215,0.0000939462,0.0004951088,0.0001980398],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036360966,0.00006800659,0.00012346436,0.000062529245,0.0022725903,0.000074320895,0.0002570031,0.00016679725,0.000064657346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028154578,0.00005692211,0.000048893733,0.00048985216,0.001822269,0.00024420815,0.00008528955,0.00035619654,0.000044489847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013637097,0.000034453205,0.00025380353,0.000010304886,0.000030270505,0.0000011085297,0.13246924,1.2325289e-7,0.00062254834,0.7884987,0.067174576,0.0107685095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000819334,0.00026334648,0.017400485,0.000030400271,0.000075444725,0.0000018437946,0.2153986,0.000021298853,0.00007618334,0.66286635,0.10288027,0.00016645853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002539334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004003274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5283699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003110314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045838355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001453421","doi":"10.1007/s11211-011-0143-6","title":"Independent Self-Construal and Opposition to Affirmative Action: The Role of Microjustice and Macrojustice Preferences","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Construal level theory; Opposition (politics); Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.25312718586623967,"score_gpt":0.46431332109575535,"score_spread":0.21118613522951568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001453421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714514,0.0006158846,0.000027641843,0.00044266728,0.00021834082,0.00042075868,0.00003645918,0.000025601215,0.026761245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989124,0.00017648152,0.00026570124,0.00005211268,0.00027519788,0.000055041335,0.000003024404,0.000008244093,0.00025179714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981854,0.00060871616,0.00019445432,0.0002800724,0.00037259568,0.00035875133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885136,0.00049865013,0.00007281347,0.00011837886,0.00034160638,0.000117189724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007466522,0.000118220465,0.00016459684,0.00008972442,0.00060336624,0.000069687885,0.00021586099,0.00013776611,0.00034642144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118017946,0.00008212115,0.000028501627,0.00028292587,0.0004088469,0.00011550061,0.00021304184,0.0004102369,0.000049274928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012303719,0.0005715928,0.0069454396,0.00066896563,0.00046373068,0.000014564154,0.62268525,3.5330933e-7,0.016138798,0.15929332,0.0032182932,0.18876933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004450937,0.0005538416,0.31366563,0.00005114168,0.000421256,0.000034903744,0.6763558,0.000033878838,0.0018282395,0.0054686707,0.00094882894,0.00019274159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013203439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020447346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30672017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000332864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052205498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46406662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002124956","doi":"10.1007/s11211-014-0229-z","title":"Predicting Protests by Disadvantaged Skilled Immigrants: A Test of an Integrated Social Identity, Relative Deprivation, Collective Efficacy (SIRDE) Model","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Relative deprivation; Collective efficacy; Social psychology; Psychology; Anger; Disadvantaged; Collective identity; Resentment; Immigration; Social identity theory; Identity (music); Structural equation modeling; Demographic economics; Politics; Political science; Social group; Economics","score_opus":0.05829929116332359,"score_gpt":0.4499538787447578,"score_spread":0.3916545875814342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002124956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9491067,0.000034409833,0.0070279366,0.0026085435,0.00029450166,0.0017145433,0.00010500653,0.0001930062,0.03891536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953572,0.000029863017,0.00038014835,0.00009972414,0.0010921144,0.00016145248,0.000046368372,0.0000444991,0.0027886226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99303025,0.0031927007,0.0005805368,0.00059703086,0.0016394388,0.0009600152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944676,0.0028672325,0.0003172438,0.00017681217,0.0019591968,0.00021187031],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054538543,0.00022342653,0.00047898453,0.0002694904,0.0044470965,0.0001753799,0.00085193716,0.00051489845,0.00008420162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021126743,0.00023129769,0.00016480999,0.0024179395,0.0020421715,0.0010411121,0.00019347643,0.0011487438,0.0000319533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011581308,0.0042821337,0.016937146,0.00022222796,0.00035236182,0.0000073901974,0.77069324,0.000032824897,0.024437265,0.13742878,0.02212919,0.022319281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011850685,0.002969104,0.11886791,0.00039821467,0.000724329,0.0000026671803,0.60574704,0.019000823,0.0018961082,0.23135534,0.0051833442,0.0020044423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007222285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007001275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16494624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007299197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087206194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032868516","doi":"10.1007/s11211-011-0125-8","title":"When Citizens Fight Back: Justice Sensitivity and Resistance to Political Reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Reactance; Economic Justice; Resistance (ecology); Politics; Political science; Criminology; Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1682116404926994,"score_gpt":0.4486932579073415,"score_spread":0.28048161741464206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032868516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046077512,0.000074099706,0.00019360271,0.027249437,0.0007890773,0.00040883903,0.000036638692,0.00008262164,0.92508817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97252506,0.00008251054,0.0016026768,0.002543106,0.0032964651,0.000034626115,0.0000034437335,0.000030042682,0.01988206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950425,0.0016035024,0.00025947604,0.00052209065,0.0009420484,0.0016303695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748886,0.0008457409,0.000044316585,0.00020843818,0.00073717197,0.00067548983],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038483937,0.00015648628,0.00028015647,0.00017494962,0.0024191018,0.00011823365,0.00034405966,0.00036052475,0.0010602394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023764141,0.00015822212,0.0000803614,0.0006515815,0.0016503349,0.00020769093,0.00025896746,0.0006890571,0.0007808806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021162926,0.00009438894,0.00015713969,0.00009509553,0.00002274687,0.000055219836,0.06681371,2.7895364e-9,0.00034977234,0.8551659,0.07586387,0.0011705185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008372481,0.00035087252,0.030348374,0.00012522524,0.00026198535,0.0000069729936,0.38894975,0.0000039757374,0.0002747767,0.22592434,0.35212138,0.0007951193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008068918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017091375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9264476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066925696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031714144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035949073","doi":"10.1023/b:sore.0000027411.35832.53","title":"Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":756,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Self-deception; Psychology; Social psychology; Ethical decision; Causation; Perception; Impression management; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3878532040929559,"score_gpt":0.5752180208620336,"score_spread":0.18736481676907762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035949073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9471699,0.00012573738,0.00023600942,0.04451092,0.00050926453,0.00030176286,0.0000035897358,0.000020994761,0.0071218107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987255,0.00008187167,0.00037199972,0.00015503973,0.000513768,0.000051663083,0.0000018096285,0.000008939262,0.00008945426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939521,0.0013215926,0.00049755356,0.0003267439,0.003491479,0.00041054713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908309,0.006942408,0.000099326906,0.00032365613,0.0017297938,0.00007389695],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025195569,0.00007561622,0.00017173646,0.00030869836,0.00069287576,0.00017954333,0.00085077673,0.0006273446,0.00014434235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020401707,0.00005150273,0.00007166861,0.0023397452,0.0007974129,0.00012371753,0.0002141467,0.0030685347,0.00017520525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005823787,0.00055265607,0.0076991036,0.000042003718,0.0000062233344,0.0000051917987,0.05078325,0.0001868075,0.0044804495,0.91019565,0.00083183317,0.025158599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034473898,0.000064821514,0.1623783,0.00004041884,0.00003183963,0.000002703609,0.06293176,0.00017407934,0.00068750285,0.76961344,0.0036188837,0.00011148811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064090174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006127063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1546792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024274217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011036275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045707385","doi":"10.1007/s11211-007-0049-5","title":"Predicting Customer Service Employees’ Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: The Roles of Customer Interactional Injustice and Interdependent Self-Construal","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Psychology; Social psychology; Job satisfaction; Interdependence; Interpersonal communication; Sociology","score_opus":0.044330993043232535,"score_gpt":0.3531182783321269,"score_spread":0.3087872852888944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045707385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773981,0.00014531912,0.00012325725,0.0022500826,0.00052295777,0.00033382743,0.00001081811,0.00008802438,0.019127628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724513,0.000039582486,0.000061904364,0.00064000586,0.0018926566,0.00001557459,0.000009975979,0.000028471979,0.00006669901],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973803,0.00017996936,0.0005038756,0.00035122797,0.0010744754,0.0005101366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740595,0.00091876474,0.00024201532,0.00017249784,0.0012177816,0.000042966236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048731035,0.00019183365,0.00022566301,0.00049018575,0.0011414962,0.0003566701,0.00024294281,0.00014937557,0.00014207691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050794205,0.00016238922,0.00006510269,0.0010265274,0.00032925696,0.0010938775,0.00068244344,0.0009497059,0.00012516946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018008881,0.0007903129,0.6535249,0.010797605,0.0010748208,0.000048782644,0.042704914,0.000040473675,0.007563707,0.15798472,0.009032872,0.11463605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011824403,0.000034716868,0.7909315,0.00028293385,0.0007377615,0.00003169477,0.19148125,0.0010993789,0.00006860421,0.0011448355,0.012610735,0.00039411974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038680104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023602484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15683989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107071195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006823667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99421424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052799666","doi":"10.1007/s11211-015-0239-5","title":"Forging Political Will from a Shared Vision: A Critical Social Justice Agenda Against Neoliberalism and Other Systems of Domination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Sociology; Critical consciousness; Politics; Social justice; Consciousness; Economic Justice; Critical reflection; Social policy; Environmental ethics; Political economy; Public relations; Political science; Public administration; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.32599317663404564,"score_gpt":0.5770009564891867,"score_spread":0.25100777985514106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052799666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72922474,0.0020896057,0.0018923066,0.114276625,0.005462611,0.0046961233,0.0012345057,0.00030427097,0.14081922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903919,0.000031643132,0.00069333194,0.0042374698,0.0035539158,0.00019437374,0.000067128414,0.00004973128,0.00078052527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99242157,0.003741198,0.0007588857,0.0003337845,0.0013340218,0.0014105202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913579,0.0059334147,0.00012655444,0.00022511197,0.0016710275,0.0006859968],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047813626,0.000178878,0.0004720464,0.00025809414,0.0029064512,0.00007446504,0.00030606557,0.00041061078,0.000113332826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005926878,0.00017658359,0.000056784993,0.00048324795,0.0004914752,0.00026642875,0.0005900505,0.001645385,0.00008708189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011362502,0.00040622128,0.0006648086,0.008163659,0.00007193695,0.0000634961,0.1576287,0.0000014880231,0.00026323838,0.6634482,0.16348645,0.004665546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008950581,0.0004466456,0.013643247,0.0019334574,0.00049661566,0.00000814657,0.7352054,0.005397301,0.000015380316,0.032584097,0.20048194,0.00083718693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005165142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033494027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6308641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008339234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022948247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053922202","doi":"10.1007/s11211-015-0236-8","title":"Social Change in Mongolia and South Africa: The Impact of Relative Deprivation Trajectory and Group Status on Well-Being and Adjustment to Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University; University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Social change; Relative deprivation; Group (periodic table); Inner mongolia; Socioeconomics; Development economics; Political science; Psychology; Economic growth; Economics; Social psychology; China","score_opus":0.1750620610490158,"score_gpt":0.4418295342791763,"score_spread":0.2667674732301605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053922202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848139,0.001383857,0.0000139881,0.0007429529,0.000118809745,0.0010280919,0.000017848113,0.000015514932,0.011864991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845636,0.00022492839,0.000031330128,0.000089015644,0.00086392334,0.0001817596,0.000005989452,0.000027735816,0.00011894847],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754363,0.00077531475,0.00020844,0.0003645679,0.0004465744,0.0006614697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989689,0.00048824947,0.00007676387,0.00012400553,0.0001420493,0.00020001772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001686029,0.00016180734,0.00025485,0.00030832915,0.0003305659,0.000041638017,0.000108743094,0.00019418608,0.000020856885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021842918,0.00012982277,0.000039620692,0.00053660315,0.00028894853,0.00016697726,0.00015890057,0.0005450576,0.000013037803],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074989063,0.0001540816,0.012881355,0.000081584796,0.00008286124,0.000013219276,0.93768275,0.0000019925108,0.00008548535,0.013387911,0.0009779809,0.033900898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016362625,0.0009143721,0.90138006,0.000050358576,0.00006848398,0.0000013227498,0.093130894,0.00014975465,0.000008360352,0.0022515722,0.00022797854,0.00018056639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028080405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022604859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8884987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025064894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056383633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5294019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054728048","doi":"10.1007/s11211-011-0141-8","title":"Distinguishing Two Meanings of Moral Exclusion: Exclusion from Moral Principles or Principled Harm-Doing?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Harm; Social psychology; Social exclusion; Psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.4969449009972726,"score_gpt":0.42995515148751656,"score_spread":0.06698974950975606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054728048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397654,0.000043017684,0.00020268197,0.0011157969,0.00086192036,0.0004255234,0.000065763576,0.00011086756,0.05740902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925296,0.000048850965,0.0043228404,0.00033976053,0.00093714386,0.00002981471,0.000012661377,0.000038712285,0.0017406631],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522746,0.00078037736,0.0005549217,0.0008003111,0.0017326996,0.0009042054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790895,0.00090049964,0.00024055174,0.00034109512,0.00035994351,0.0002489415],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001821216,0.00024204675,0.00038819312,0.00021218677,0.0014859021,0.00006874929,0.0010324614,0.00017568796,0.0011172927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031203586,0.00020062465,0.0001409786,0.00070974,0.00091225264,0.00028221964,0.0014506414,0.00086427864,0.0001635444],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0076071643,0.0035480377,0.014358322,0.00087888417,0.00011549493,0.0017163301,0.06672759,0.00009591575,0.69232136,0.18394412,0.008176733,0.02051005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017359138,0.0038797297,0.34010828,0.002148807,0.00081161427,0.00018792233,0.03022145,0.010960187,0.44809228,0.11499003,0.027474742,0.003765829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010536733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011171596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32574996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018454535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023872116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059338204","doi":"10.1007/s11211-011-0135-6","title":"Cross-Cultural Preferences for Distributive Justice Principles: Resource Type and Uncertainty Management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Equity (law); Uncertainty avoidance; Equity theory; German; Social psychology; Cultural diversity; Sociology; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Public economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.435754871625571,"score_gpt":0.5231705731241371,"score_spread":0.08741570149856603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059338204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84383535,0.000377008,0.000060000417,0.00021885544,0.0005011236,0.00084835314,0.0001657222,0.00006481106,0.15392879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789864,0.00012891184,0.0002371827,0.000058152833,0.0006321098,0.00018439667,0.00009689082,0.00001609443,0.019659866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776196,0.00031050135,0.00024304037,0.0005102341,0.00041304095,0.00076121883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825937,0.000432526,0.000073171745,0.00018180304,0.00090835174,0.00014477842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093232683,0.0001747132,0.0002121986,0.00006213886,0.0011494057,0.0001966546,0.00039171267,0.00017934373,0.0006236965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004680795,0.00012903212,0.00006262118,0.00042399092,0.00077220186,0.00013211565,0.0002695468,0.00037115513,0.000097766686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003151083,0.00046127685,0.0063072755,0.0017034793,0.0005334912,0.00003647242,0.080319196,0.0000034202576,0.00011311575,0.8252092,0.037657775,0.044504207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016913785,0.0010136934,0.5875833,0.000092776914,0.0007629115,0.0000061672636,0.30495474,0.00010722788,0.000056696714,0.0094732335,0.09373242,0.0005254967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042827477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082421626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.815736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094565075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000382625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8840416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065721727","doi":"10.1023/b:sore.0000041296.99271.52","title":"Restorative Sentencing: Exploring the Views of the Public","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Seriousness; Retributive justice; Criminology; Punitive damages; Proportionality (law); Public opinion; Criminal justice; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.40725673004083085,"score_gpt":0.47541252201737183,"score_spread":0.06815579197654098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065721727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409658,0.00028863957,0.0003023047,0.032626994,0.0009800204,0.0003806426,0.0000038499225,0.00003079215,0.024421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976282,0.0004416136,0.000026573312,0.000091434464,0.001055035,0.00006991551,5.1351344e-7,0.0000081994685,0.0006785085],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649304,0.0012159178,0.00020958546,0.00018137667,0.0013967832,0.00050329167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798876,0.00065297214,0.000087520544,0.0002518497,0.00093912875,0.000079768324],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037441931,0.00007360288,0.00013495788,0.00012913275,0.005326515,0.00015123564,0.00072652614,0.000059812115,0.000059753384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030902405,0.000045534485,0.00017582504,0.0029037537,0.0012834227,0.0002595959,0.00019240023,0.000577,0.000050122155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003512505,0.00023933644,0.00031154713,0.000113489856,0.00010265323,0.000007519467,0.54766434,0.00009181104,0.0009951581,0.37298453,0.0038640518,0.07359043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008215821,0.000021760356,0.0005849695,0.00002514139,0.00016138733,5.073698e-7,0.9627522,0.0000068183704,0.00016209653,0.0017810733,0.034363434,0.00005841106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01789077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074744396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41508788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004401566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001066297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068647023","doi":"10.1007/s11211-009-0095-2","title":"Whose Fault Is it Anyway? Political Orientation, Attributions of Responsibility, and Support for the War in Iraq","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Politics; Mediation; Biology and political orientation; Government (linguistics); Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.18914049376891115,"score_gpt":0.5502539442010246,"score_spread":0.3611134504321134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068647023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56483245,0.00030006716,0.00059165125,0.34511143,0.00077468454,0.0020104612,0.00025023916,0.000042788182,0.086086236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958519,0.00015156454,0.000062096224,0.0012263345,0.00066324836,0.000042729243,0.000006608629,0.000005348054,0.0019902196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973432,0.00077990536,0.00029146796,0.00025791067,0.00059542566,0.00073210464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964968,0.0024853658,0.0000439088,0.00012923789,0.00071832404,0.0001263901],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048504383,0.00007133817,0.00017132745,0.00012044681,0.001330505,0.000039749964,0.00029276806,0.00020444067,0.0001755833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049058716,0.0000610276,0.00007572537,0.00074642524,0.0015219925,0.00012720723,0.000054370572,0.0003364283,0.0000152325565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025933303,0.00022165733,0.0017046637,0.00002947778,0.000014389198,0.0000021784117,0.07322438,1.17435704e-7,0.00038583885,0.8770058,0.041408353,0.005743798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013988635,0.0008192589,0.19095276,0.000028796014,0.00009622812,0.0000013239692,0.4655915,0.000049189588,0.00021647982,0.21322845,0.12738776,0.00022940728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016270641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015668597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66377735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021263142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050109206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076318534","doi":"10.1007/s11211-013-0181-3","title":"Keeping Up with the Joneses Affects Perceptions of Distributive Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Distributive justice; Framing (construction); Social psychology; Social status; Psychology; Perception; Distributive property; Social policy; Social approval; Keeping up with the Joneses; Economic Justice; Political science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.19055893034339394,"score_gpt":0.40999863989935503,"score_spread":0.2194397095559611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076318534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601491,0.000030054709,0.00047190886,0.021563144,0.000299948,0.0005438821,0.000035956487,0.000032869386,0.016873132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749136,0.000052113097,0.00003659331,0.000541868,0.00038716863,0.00009243102,0.0000036518124,0.000010726565,0.0013840905],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975941,0.0006360022,0.00011328588,0.00029673197,0.00083853747,0.00052130735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775594,0.0016175797,0.00005594965,0.00016413446,0.00031508054,0.00009128424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000624062,0.00010056312,0.00014067753,0.000075460346,0.0014362601,0.000060579834,0.00042337293,0.00007419421,0.00031930846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008800698,0.00006418277,0.000054465636,0.0006445872,0.0013803742,0.00016848749,0.00015341371,0.00053187273,0.0004278415],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045227757,0.00093694904,0.0008439268,0.0008713785,0.0000731731,0.00004200961,0.013896743,0.00007920334,0.6435215,0.1103716,0.21437365,0.014537597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004157508,0.0028263545,0.657609,0.0004884029,0.0010519271,0.00012838561,0.24770948,0.0014303057,0.05686541,0.016877946,0.009501484,0.0013538228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105772546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016970953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65676504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009369245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083022642","doi":"10.1023/b:sore.0000041293.24615.f7","title":"The Moral Superiority Effect: Self Versus Other Differences in Satisfaction with Being Overpaid","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Social psychology; Psychology; Perception; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.16833513778212641,"score_gpt":0.38719429017516416,"score_spread":0.21885915239303774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083022642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99060166,0.000020983682,0.0000080487425,0.003585839,0.0004527546,0.00026564635,0.0000033887864,0.00003933249,0.00502234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993712,0.000063321524,0.000032087784,0.00010004006,0.00030141746,0.000039116014,3.4840184e-7,0.000009502744,0.000082996696],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997753,0.0005424632,0.00011043012,0.00030154834,0.00078077026,0.0005117522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987344,0.0010321643,0.000023578043,0.000106103915,0.000042913474,0.00006081641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088789477,0.000098937926,0.00011695838,0.000069696194,0.0011872184,0.00009453959,0.00021902245,0.000081704304,0.000024258517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003715759,0.00006334103,0.000032105534,0.0004331238,0.00047792378,0.00013695132,0.00006477553,0.0005861894,0.000096938835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014753242,0.0013662437,0.444638,0.0004910542,0.00012349409,0.00040208452,0.020297378,0.00016501895,0.08514324,0.38575253,0.0009662908,0.04590139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005098474,0.001616196,0.97334987,0.000074040625,0.00004010523,0.0000090448175,0.002272794,0.000062835454,0.005464733,0.011110686,0.00062772515,0.0002734998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008705032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011450939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52871186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002676032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001010714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9131244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088549801","doi":"10.1007/s11211-009-0099-y","title":"Attachment Style and Political Ideology: A Review of Contradictory Findings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Ideology; Politics; Style (visual arts); Liberalism; Ambivalence; Psychology; Attachment theory; Social psychology; Habit; Sociology; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.168030215583825,"score_gpt":0.5774147338613196,"score_spread":0.40938451827749456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088549801","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003866709,0.94863826,0.000034739875,0.0010996042,0.00032820235,0.0013388138,0.00007813578,0.00002925222,0.048449095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000080117774,0.9946489,0.000045591365,0.00024298532,0.0006750407,0.00013426966,0.00013078048,0.000042063963,0.004000251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99480116,0.0020892955,0.0008732061,0.000521626,0.0007070314,0.0010076808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967841,0.002166398,0.00021864864,0.0003324736,0.0002598624,0.00023851039],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031671762,0.0003156958,0.0017114274,0.00038398043,0.00038655257,0.000023040038,0.0004154607,0.00089211,0.00051335176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005579914,0.00026926547,0.00038172636,0.00064139167,0.0009761429,0.00004088538,0.0001686995,0.0019722367,0.00019476951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012997139,0.0001766304,0.00004676194,0.1357167,0.0003312338,0.00004129053,0.00044745434,2.5683051e-9,7.014819e-8,0.4829144,0.024424963,0.3558875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002866126,0.00016599627,0.00021478684,0.028073234,0.002640573,0.000031517844,0.0005589239,0.0000011263488,1.0900485e-8,0.0008494869,0.9669221,0.00025565657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003615611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002873703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94249713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003557697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051608816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089294616","doi":"10.1007/s11211-007-0030-3","title":"A Vigilante Model of Justice: Revenge, Reconciliation, Forgiveness, and Avoidance","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Forgiveness; Injustice; Resentment; Economic Justice; Anger; Psychology; Distributive justice; Social psychology; Criminology; Procedural justice; Remorse; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1233761619662448,"score_gpt":0.4627157684489032,"score_spread":0.33933960648265843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089294616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95950985,0.0016993553,0.0032361385,0.0005755824,0.00080771215,0.00047969088,0.00007420289,0.000050741604,0.03356674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924267,0.0003878975,0.00031507088,0.00004142204,0.00035166022,0.000029556777,0.00000990457,0.000033199143,0.0064045954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774575,0.00024168176,0.00040543958,0.0003666065,0.0005564561,0.000684038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831074,0.0005476958,0.00012663842,0.00022623251,0.00065819145,0.00013047742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034610708,0.00013524723,0.00026592065,0.00023601465,0.00059163175,0.000021724141,0.0002375108,0.00038878745,0.00012902943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028801328,0.00013110788,0.000070403374,0.0006040522,0.0004779087,0.00010068295,0.000101069665,0.00073524844,0.000056946657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004266171,0.0021065567,0.010393413,0.0060256515,0.0005854194,0.00036217656,0.092810035,0.00046870764,0.07094676,0.6093241,0.031599488,0.17111155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024603033,0.0034676204,0.3566177,0.0024384328,0.008107594,0.00022634787,0.42291138,0.016391575,0.016951595,0.079532735,0.06356422,0.0051877545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020051438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009399993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52979136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010441992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017693338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5346424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094787340","doi":"10.1007/s11211-009-0098-z","title":"Conservative Shift among Liberals and Conservatives Following 9/11/01","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1388803008104072,"score_gpt":0.4909500509930809,"score_spread":0.3520697501826737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094787340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82624066,0.00024326652,0.000029353598,0.037347198,0.00044354756,0.00038767702,0.00000584471,0.00009528518,0.13520715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921886,0.00014892426,0.00010609087,0.0018890363,0.0012257531,0.000027571277,0.0000034963787,0.0000138410005,0.0043967264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956998,0.0018706385,0.00025867473,0.00040540507,0.0008172215,0.0009482648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766034,0.0016280845,0.00007542991,0.00011178339,0.0002777984,0.00024656096],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032529803,0.00014781683,0.00030839417,0.00014959041,0.0031680295,0.0002488297,0.0003723894,0.0003083075,0.00018972997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002203756,0.00015211488,0.00012316901,0.0009215635,0.002155156,0.00046658912,0.000086372456,0.0005882879,0.000047728754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014414931,0.00025962488,0.040828742,0.00004171797,0.00011899323,0.000094079034,0.3616859,1.0720139e-7,0.0010143438,0.5139399,0.069518015,0.012354393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008825012,0.00028793767,0.64831173,0.00007501027,0.00007678554,5.7323103e-7,0.1857299,0.00000756157,0.000058585392,0.10912446,0.05505399,0.00039094925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047190264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042636683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60748297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015083811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031676295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134633687","doi":"10.1007/s11211-008-0072-1","title":"How Employee Race Moderates the Relationship Between Non-Contingent Punishment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Test of the Negative Adaptation Hypothesis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Race (biology); Organizational citizenship behavior; Interpersonal communication; Punishment (psychology); Test (biology); White (mutation); Organizational commitment; Sociology","score_opus":0.12752065516505084,"score_gpt":0.3193900429625367,"score_spread":0.19186938779748586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134633687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868055,0.000033828084,0.00025416145,0.011770133,0.000087220345,0.00055003364,0.000021823133,0.000030444624,0.00044685532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797565,0.000009016749,0.00014317506,0.00015351443,0.00086332735,0.000035384484,0.000020183015,0.000031285388,0.00076848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982786,0.00011849294,0.00023312154,0.00021706677,0.0009020184,0.00025068526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959851,0.0024705343,0.00017027196,0.00014032231,0.0012146177,0.00001914151],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067624147,0.00012680543,0.00014928853,0.00014881132,0.0023902361,0.0002891235,0.0002391475,0.00009713637,0.00005322169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006001782,0.00009071301,0.000047539277,0.00131763,0.00042735715,0.0003705864,0.00019018179,0.00035876737,0.000024970497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010164311,0.000033982553,0.987777,0.00005126863,0.000015449521,9.954794e-7,0.0019260063,0.000014715919,0.00044478715,0.0074824523,0.0020234613,0.00021974617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031865528,0.000008552097,0.98805416,0.000022972989,0.00015622449,0.0000012883085,0.0067984625,0.00012597606,0.00034879966,0.0039924397,0.000070626906,0.000101827456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018679282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008157064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011616618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008568641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015179458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169808513","doi":"10.1007/s11211-005-8569-3","title":"Belief in a Just World and Commitment to Long-Term Deserved Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Just-world hypothesis; Social psychology; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Misfortune; Term (time); Injustice; Social policy; Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3831879980726207,"score_gpt":0.47022890329986017,"score_spread":0.08704090522723945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169808513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92895913,0.00005700349,0.000009966506,0.06365487,0.00017160582,0.00039365477,0.000009636337,0.000026909574,0.006717215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907112,0.000057595877,0.0001640933,0.0037471016,0.00032568883,0.00006643028,0.0000017660245,0.00001184826,0.00491425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977424,0.00035730735,0.00020045198,0.0004115018,0.00066211197,0.00062619685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907315,0.00051645876,0.00002231625,0.00014272748,0.00005493198,0.00019041472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091881264,0.00011350578,0.00017486606,0.00032959884,0.0005152211,0.00006586514,0.00032702263,0.000064633445,0.00014761351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041516186,0.00010290132,0.000038714355,0.00063540455,0.00025890503,0.000114900125,0.00030103367,0.00045387866,0.00040671465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014157699,0.0061748843,0.51710534,0.0007769974,0.000068119734,0.00080615206,0.014255754,0.00012965601,0.08651695,0.07572536,0.09535564,0.20166938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095767406,0.00012738949,0.99276286,0.000041122443,0.00001327638,0.0000047405315,0.00033227482,0.000029001763,0.0016499725,0.0005704699,0.0033453873,0.00016581302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058105812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013074933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47565752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021089258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044915792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52276295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235430026","doi":"10.1023/a:1025936712704","title":"Fairness in Bargaining","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"University of British Columbia; Northwestern University","keywords":"Negotiation; Set (abstract data type); Social policy; Positive economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Term (time); Economics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.22566864499312506,"score_gpt":0.5167415842150714,"score_spread":0.2910729392219464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235430026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30097452,0.0002859841,0.0000059904874,0.0007345713,0.00023068038,0.00021869823,0.0000016612541,0.000029087612,0.6975188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747145,0.00013859775,0.000147403,0.000048673533,0.0002427312,0.000058256806,7.194216e-7,0.000012239021,0.0018799027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751484,0.00089261006,0.00016089322,0.0002259953,0.0004700434,0.00073563977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930423,0.00036418933,0.00002369037,0.00007671035,0.00013864134,0.00009251549],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038150009,0.00006889449,0.00014040562,0.00014838442,0.0016611883,0.00009744103,0.000229244,0.00010886957,0.00023863537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011324002,0.0000816102,0.00003768271,0.0006699247,0.0006661805,0.00017514596,0.000083900064,0.00038417618,0.00020365954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009091674,0.00008603458,0.008703123,0.000010816403,0.000004824656,0.00001548657,0.06783911,0.0000014326916,0.00047310104,0.91979015,0.0012887481,0.0017780655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006108172,0.0000490913,0.004334859,0.000023328434,0.000015231723,3.713521e-7,0.909581,0.000005890044,0.0007390947,0.03723208,0.047105666,0.00030255466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034761913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004220378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8825581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069930626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003719068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516398191","doi":"10.1007/s11211-016-0273-y","title":"The Role of Perceived Deservingness in the Toleration of Human Rights Violations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Torture; Social psychology; Human rights; Psychology; Perception; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09950821407029503,"score_gpt":0.47836354910345313,"score_spread":0.3788553350331581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516398191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055572,0.000059954422,0.000011020291,0.005206578,0.00013137843,0.00024013723,0.0000035758771,0.000006741129,0.08878337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988951,0.00003779502,0.000004639733,0.000015042341,0.00049358193,0.000032384713,7.7521025e-7,0.0000035184598,0.0005171424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708694,0.0017008861,0.00021068814,0.00010684592,0.00059389713,0.0003007154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764276,0.0016918214,0.00006732165,0.00012266569,0.0004508389,0.000024586932],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003226957,0.000042210202,0.00009539349,0.00006587791,0.002392987,0.000032135384,0.0005696056,0.000106407024,0.00009876345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006455878,0.000021774018,0.000052360665,0.0005125465,0.0011605833,0.00010663778,0.00004533502,0.0001702915,0.000012507064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033292472,0.00010760915,0.0031206196,0.000009220968,0.000010587089,4.6363726e-7,0.1112588,1.024686e-7,0.03255963,0.84320086,0.0010535913,0.008645235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047683704,0.00017241434,0.32689533,0.000066522996,0.000029942721,1.7817086e-7,0.251644,0.000010241243,0.000555641,0.3925941,0.027442168,0.000112649504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008030005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03408029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45060676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084206986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101172234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755308148","doi":"10.1007/s11211-017-0290-5","title":"Observing Others’ Anger and Guilt Can Make You Feel Unfairly Treated: The Interpersonal Effects of Emotions on Justice-Related Reactions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anger; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Procedural justice; Interpersonal communication","score_opus":0.12179178108971118,"score_gpt":0.45196848838771025,"score_spread":0.3301767072979991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755308148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77546585,0.00012274407,0.000008015411,0.034747727,0.001567368,0.00055773766,0.00003498184,0.00005190974,0.18744366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889751,0.0002066031,0.00002319996,0.0002001863,0.0011149363,0.000047148354,0.0000035179025,0.000023130311,0.009406166],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695784,0.001138779,0.00024416237,0.00033515814,0.00068571576,0.0006383737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973687,0.0014783012,0.0001784446,0.00045925108,0.0003633279,0.00015196492],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019308701,0.00014048419,0.00023656368,0.00013247383,0.007213771,0.00024648957,0.001013774,0.00031098636,0.00012311447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046697957,0.00011435393,0.00012583155,0.0003680942,0.002669393,0.00011513199,0.00024378784,0.00079326733,0.000035987665],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003934702,0.00090642547,0.0045072413,0.0007409731,0.0006606626,0.000084103216,0.4782722,0.0000018852757,0.013798137,0.3576271,0.035398014,0.10760981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002381224,0.00095357024,0.43969345,0.0006355932,0.0010940183,0.0000076928345,0.49863654,0.00010244406,0.00029253223,0.022613542,0.032952935,0.00063646154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019040972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011453143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4351862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024777767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020611488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W282157531","doi":"10.1023/a:1022926111093","title":"Egocentric Perceptions of Relationships, Competence, and Trustworthiness in Salary Allocation Choices","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Salary; Interdependence; Egocentrism; Social psychology; Psychology; Sample (material); Interpersonal communication; Competence (human resources); Social policy; Trustworthiness; Allocator; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05746911768348233,"score_gpt":0.3434802726914112,"score_spread":0.28601115500792884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W282157531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986401,0.00021148309,0.00016072708,0.0008939344,0.00015315026,0.00026086814,0.000002644817,0.000030702784,0.011885461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917364,0.00006815677,0.00013050923,0.00007163056,0.00023798407,0.000012858999,0.000025564737,0.000011932469,0.0002677088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894017,0.000110583744,0.00020648408,0.00015586133,0.00039487457,0.000192016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918664,0.00019683337,0.000059783146,0.00006653551,0.00047734778,0.000012872019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010555706,0.00006598247,0.00010482889,0.00047976998,0.00052744005,0.00008413126,0.00008109584,0.0000804396,0.00034942184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093100796,0.00006927938,0.000018795765,0.0018133923,0.00012685837,0.0005301186,0.000042827898,0.0003078773,0.000071583134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007758575,0.00007378526,0.78878605,0.00015543902,0.000003350564,0.0000012755039,0.00024204084,0.000022500335,0.00037146782,0.20871325,0.00052620826,0.0010968944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003012353,0.000002754031,0.98943156,0.00001680403,0.000033514152,7.3547767e-7,0.004970009,0.0002144749,0.0000066116118,0.0030254466,0.0019240218,0.00007282615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021472531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003557845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2056878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056390458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067358415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40566957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952641884","doi":"10.1007/s11211-019-00334-8","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Justice and Health: Different Perspectives in Different Disciplines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Social policy; Empirical research; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Social justice; Health care; Health policy; Public relations; Social science; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.19498660836454373,"score_gpt":0.5752240988808656,"score_spread":0.38023749051632183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952641884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4564195,0.000080788624,0.000006429249,0.53217775,0.004089717,0.001560212,0.000016760256,0.000019168054,0.00562967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69655204,0.00083799276,0.000016449314,0.004782013,0.277054,0.0005250293,0.00002796876,0.000045839974,0.020158665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951749,0.0019010304,0.0004575652,0.0004891368,0.0007333692,0.0012439841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975904,0.0013825254,0.0001019797,0.0003180534,0.00029479933,0.00031221658],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003416005,0.00017034035,0.00033342143,0.00034282316,0.002695342,0.000053812313,0.0002609127,0.00016378693,0.0009956055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012470798,0.00010957371,0.00003527894,0.00069677614,0.0001192025,0.00009184722,0.00029821967,0.0016646371,0.0008645265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017932426,0.00025589188,0.0012555843,0.001340768,0.000008694132,3.2404415e-7,0.18194024,0.000008860348,0.000031663716,0.03627444,0.76849717,0.010207009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042484293,0.000282853,0.29697928,0.00010695259,0.000016556327,3.1011544e-7,0.40184096,0.000077935954,0.000001665433,0.00051274995,0.29964814,0.000107747044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020404868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035566236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5273957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016489478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063955557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011816038","doi":"10.1007/s11211-020-00352-x","title":"Is It All About Retribution? The Flexibility of Punishment Goals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Dalhousie University","funders":"Mitacs; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Retributive justice; Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Recidivism; Social psychology; Salient; Criminology; Deterrence (psychology); Flexibility (engineering); Cognitive psychology; Economic Justice; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.5575332358036397,"score_gpt":0.4960964866366111,"score_spread":0.06143674916702857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011816038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53150576,0.00009189574,0.0000730841,0.44779652,0.00027304844,0.0004521358,0.00012798172,0.000029585723,0.01964995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852169,0.00016425792,0.00002249072,0.013538189,0.00045177434,0.00001804441,0.0000036205893,0.000006504097,0.0005781822],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969266,0.00075143896,0.0002558245,0.00040600475,0.0012009807,0.00045912547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867296,0.0006974074,0.00006384004,0.00020283773,0.0002265309,0.00013644589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00174285,0.000083674626,0.00014900285,0.000033456035,0.000592924,0.0000363477,0.00062271196,0.000096676886,0.00055967306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021338356,0.000063606116,0.0000993093,0.0006080591,0.0008585644,0.0000750005,0.00027929302,0.00058133557,0.0004399673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006682913,0.0006968679,0.0003893466,0.00042693765,0.00004895593,0.000030621926,0.016320338,0.000025901438,0.22922324,0.05901107,0.6872399,0.005918564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033335,0.002075229,0.0909737,0.00012912182,0.00029068958,0.000015333113,0.023019804,0.002073003,0.3503943,0.052750498,0.47409284,0.0008519744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036847137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025734623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45371115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008987405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011554992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6128028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154960690","doi":"10.1007/s11211-021-00365-0","title":"Downloaded Work, Sideloaded Work, and Financial Circumstances: The Contemporary Worker’s Experience of Equity and Need Principles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Saint Mary's University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Operationalization; Equity (law); Earnings; Economic Justice; Sociology; Social psychology; Public relations; Distributive justice; Focus group; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.3362450306827783,"score_gpt":0.5035109843029724,"score_spread":0.16726595362019409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154960690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93805987,0.008948897,0.0000347851,0.025221828,0.00044068453,0.0009095377,0.000023897464,0.000046043355,0.026314482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947255,0.00092825235,0.000038628572,0.0004931006,0.000554916,0.00021639657,0.000006694174,0.000016484655,0.0030199795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960306,0.0014433659,0.0005268526,0.00038859146,0.00083379477,0.0007767547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573785,0.003000887,0.00016277764,0.00024465992,0.0007237461,0.00013008816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025888337,0.0001641609,0.00039602895,0.00007547329,0.0028631825,0.000049323076,0.00028412874,0.00023162771,0.00011319492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030190016,0.00012273958,0.000056020443,0.0010769796,0.0012424403,0.00013827346,0.0018577661,0.0011087841,0.00001245494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016253241,0.00025847077,0.45932096,0.0024661024,0.00017887627,0.00010424881,0.34071973,0.0000012331516,0.0015842802,0.08002008,0.085398644,0.028322069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022370021,0.00010232973,0.5007535,0.0010504767,0.00010508431,0.0000010482381,0.4192065,0.0000047049525,0.0002694249,0.00645983,0.06939875,0.00041131745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022504629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032517823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07848679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093078714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092349795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385603131","doi":"10.1007/s11211-023-00415-9","title":"Confusing the Expression of Social Norms and Justice Motivation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Attribution; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Cognition; Norm (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Epistemology","score_opus":0.2210951519937296,"score_gpt":0.5078044249083984,"score_spread":0.2867092729146688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385603131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.902077,0.000063231,0.000060083505,0.015780093,0.0009956677,0.00036743167,0.000011133508,0.00009398632,0.08055135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946707,0.00021220736,0.000015839028,0.00016402158,0.0027047636,0.000026246531,0.0000066825482,0.000014145209,0.0021854106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687517,0.0011215389,0.00022099179,0.00022885758,0.00096726476,0.00058615685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997522,0.0017203515,0.00009334633,0.000087097185,0.00050831377,0.00006891447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003924771,0.00008247875,0.00016542098,0.00015395024,0.0044048135,0.00009166183,0.0003345884,0.00023683456,0.00015373228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027560226,0.000065542874,0.00006257121,0.0014044492,0.0017782097,0.00016787952,0.00018687673,0.00045972026,0.00006262532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017209857,0.000119521865,0.0007311017,0.00032381076,0.000038790695,0.000008168057,0.412023,0.0000018946293,0.045406267,0.42148668,0.09403362,0.025655033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080666435,0.0001291206,0.08002452,0.0000667083,0.00016922245,7.562642e-7,0.79527706,0.00006951632,0.0008762801,0.025572168,0.09672267,0.00028528963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007788165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017925416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39591452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090118236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017980726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386562641","doi":"10.1007/s11211-023-00426-6","title":"Correction to: Confusing the Expression of Social Norms and Justice Motivation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Social justice; Expression (computer science); Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16980707658273952,"score_gpt":0.49500208390582345,"score_spread":0.32519500732308393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386562641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9011271,0.000028484768,0.0002086071,0.0154227605,0.004543979,0.0005236338,0.0000084972435,0.00011493133,0.078022026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992236,0.00009125236,0.000015416357,0.00022066223,0.0029587203,0.000036247784,0.000005749606,0.000013730003,0.004422224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971682,0.000979544,0.00020898193,0.00023777937,0.000877239,0.00052826345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972839,0.0019127746,0.000078564226,0.00007929669,0.0005614359,0.00008404578],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034425708,0.00007970263,0.00015146643,0.00019067881,0.0040615993,0.000094048904,0.00026822515,0.00017626816,0.00011084728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004707288,0.000066043845,0.00005461695,0.0017754013,0.0008800326,0.00015093923,0.00016497663,0.00043874062,0.00008330732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002461189,0.0001086032,0.00065955933,0.00017302622,0.000028260862,0.000004354823,0.41684723,0.000008036792,0.057459187,0.086937234,0.39341843,0.044109948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060740806,0.00022173194,0.116371684,0.00010560693,0.0001429327,9.448362e-7,0.7726474,0.0001678199,0.0014548053,0.007260319,0.10072303,0.00029633794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014370835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047731734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35580015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013109334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016489296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407162010","doi":"10.1007/s11211-024-00447-9","title":"Conflicting Loyalties: Cognitive Abstraction Drives Whistleblowing Behavior Among Those Who Value Loyalty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of California, Davis; Ohio State University","keywords":"Social policy; Loyalty; Value (mathematics); Cognition; Abstraction; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Marketing; Mathematics; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.31082944592723466,"score_gpt":0.5825664756438599,"score_spread":0.2717370297166252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407162010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9193921,0.00026419738,0.0029270314,0.0025139872,0.002821791,0.0005301439,0.000017914363,0.000067127025,0.0714657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858485,0.00014172193,0.00017400885,0.00016353549,0.00096052676,0.00012976355,0.000010533817,0.000018908802,0.01255253],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420965,0.0010791621,0.0006587562,0.000688853,0.0026922359,0.0006713294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794964,0.01543317,0.00022225775,0.00034328218,0.0043692305,0.00013565266],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013934412,0.00016660779,0.00030904965,0.0007264126,0.0031595007,0.0009021089,0.00061880564,0.00035736442,0.00030078916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03733318,0.0001546571,0.00013488671,0.0023212011,0.0009906605,0.0006519744,0.00031286056,0.0015433753,0.00020856241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041212188,0.0013796929,0.19710942,0.00093727367,0.00021494743,0.0000756727,0.120499924,0.00026024724,0.0030710723,0.23571819,0.049300812,0.39102063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005096566,0.000049645183,0.7194444,0.0007461431,0.00023982137,0.0000012674994,0.24851084,0.0008475729,0.00086906675,0.022700131,0.0057596457,0.00032181272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011177438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032370572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.522335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032232393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011478103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813825},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W66051513","doi":"10.1023/a:1012575724550","title":"Reactions to Affirmative Action: Group Membership and Social Justice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice Research","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Respondent; Social policy; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Action (physics); Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.49260688148685283,"score_gpt":0.4958338842968573,"score_spread":0.0032270028100044867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W66051513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30661792,0.00008358225,0.0007628944,0.10985081,0.0016648361,0.0009730721,0.000055021897,0.00026527428,0.5797266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98774415,0.00024969698,0.00016483384,0.0005817105,0.0034344068,0.000024769164,0.000008749014,0.000011739641,0.00777997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955092,0.0017821883,0.00019092666,0.0003591612,0.001310892,0.00084763183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809,0.00084062625,0.000060602044,0.0001039033,0.0006082676,0.0002965976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045273295,0.000117729614,0.00018174197,0.00019954263,0.008771145,0.00027118906,0.00032500678,0.00025649107,0.00073713734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001231491,0.00013889805,0.00007425199,0.0012838377,0.0007268496,0.0005201422,0.00021278406,0.00071646494,0.00040364158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026920188,0.00028972735,0.00036763714,0.00036687712,0.0000820293,0.00003124106,0.4839683,0.0000032963314,0.00037460908,0.40021667,0.10158774,0.012442669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002395317,0.00005393548,0.0054413103,0.000008856855,0.00012919166,0.0000013110036,0.5321796,0.0000069475573,0.000010007564,0.0032765958,0.45848885,0.00016383482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004148579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00355484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6811262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005159098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028358924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}