{"meta":{"query_hash":"328cdebf7dda","filters":{"venue":"Social Policy and Administration"},"cohort_total":81,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":81,"exported":81,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/328cdebf7dda","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+Policy+and+Administration"},"results":[{"id":"W1546332539","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00834.x","title":"Who Wants to Redistribute? An Analysis of 14 Post‐Soviet Nations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Inequality; Welfare state; Ideology; Population; Development economics; Demographic economics; Welfare; Individualism; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Economic system; Market economy; Sociology; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.06960277961831444,"score_gpt":0.3978997075027867,"score_spread":0.32829692788447223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546332539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8863965,0.000017927186,0.00009114446,0.011899172,0.00012692252,0.00029023405,0.00055305427,0.00006381267,0.10056122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780923,0.000054772318,0.00007178514,0.00041424675,0.00085669,0.000012519521,0.000053305972,0.0000050436,0.00072239747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896175,0.00013675432,0.00024322965,0.00016333195,0.00024850218,0.000246408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993815,0.00004072158,0.00012712179,0.00007382519,0.00022269606,0.00015416849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036343202,0.00009374005,0.00023572052,0.00029850917,0.0013284006,0.00003692505,0.000116369374,0.00014196131,0.000033495606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000675686,0.000089956775,0.00010764466,0.0014666981,0.0003769431,0.00023484121,0.00002454759,0.00006172755,0.000002698283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045806857,0.00011365394,0.0016668541,0.000008277328,0.00022256954,7.252908e-7,0.14498733,3.624496e-7,0.00008072288,0.8498763,0.00038364533,0.0026137386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003632984,0.00060244283,0.8495675,0.000016104372,0.0007390364,5.197982e-7,0.10063941,0.000021059426,0.00062707724,0.043479647,0.0034866966,0.00045720936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012099713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035821024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8479006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004149213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038049134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575113804","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00826.x","title":"Incomes after Job‐loss in the United States: From Programme Rules to Panel Data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Unemployment; Incentive; Poverty; Welfare state; Economics; Welfare; Labour economics; Panel data; Compensation (psychology); Demographic economics; Comparative research; Job loss; Economic growth; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.14136642091177773,"score_gpt":0.3110934118180181,"score_spread":0.16972699090624035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575113804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99042237,0.000041432093,0.000289723,0.0049192435,0.000048941278,0.00017866075,0.0025038011,0.000012696694,0.0015831308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968165,0.00005962342,0.00022762828,0.0017697087,0.00029860827,0.00003139884,0.0007531528,0.000008018216,0.000035355108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991526,0.000048946353,0.0003233237,0.00024826196,0.000033442513,0.0001934376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995413,0.000047148733,0.00010508258,0.00024179762,0.000015417216,0.00004926148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006022998,0.00009432244,0.00015036309,0.0001049904,0.00009618108,0.0001078759,0.0002470258,0.00007535088,0.000023307162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014788972,0.00008473116,0.00002244276,0.00026905554,0.000061618885,0.00017291018,0.00007622223,0.00009236858,0.000017438912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015576319,0.00020497653,0.18440282,0.000022920238,0.00003288366,0.00001500205,0.020227382,4.2854757e-7,0.0000011028561,0.78843665,0.000091547845,0.0064084847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019749894,0.000051191197,0.6582172,0.000004195885,0.0000035954172,4.6844016e-7,0.00065486855,0.00030822007,0.0000010905623,0.32993668,0.010498919,0.00012605265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024380177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005320739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47381437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028239167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040871004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1627996971","doi":"10.1111/spol.12152","title":"Women's Organizations, Social Learning, and the Federal State: A Case Study of <scp>C</scp>anadian Pension Policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Policy learning; Federalism; State (computer science); Social policy; Work (physics); Public administration; Exploratory analysis; Pension; Political science; Period (music); Public relations; Exploratory research; Public policy; Economics; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03524771268410429,"score_gpt":0.35535244814292605,"score_spread":0.3201047354588218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1627996971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808395,0.00004235772,0.0000027827264,0.010550603,0.00006972248,0.00046313618,0.0000138838695,0.000045881854,0.007972162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376774,0.00011218146,0.0000039165975,0.00035729463,0.0028689846,0.000028979228,0.000005243732,0.00001442276,0.0028412614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980917,0.00068187,0.00029489206,0.00018857836,0.00034343346,0.00039951783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999025,0.00021930481,0.00024093885,0.000046974936,0.00026331499,0.00020447062],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009170816,0.00015275562,0.00028441762,0.00012744924,0.0044871047,0.0001959548,0.00008082455,0.00014675084,0.0000018790071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003100339,0.0001205599,0.000037942977,0.0007974711,0.0011953647,0.0001988616,0.00006945911,0.00019703973,0.0000017674278],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038275386,0.00012911839,0.002720416,0.000013563721,0.000067428664,0.00002277076,0.90217066,6.686133e-7,0.0000056153717,0.09113456,0.00074690284,0.0029500078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022412732,0.00037994317,0.0060006534,0.0000035003352,0.00003391233,0.000026528945,0.9578419,0.0000064720393,0.0000076172914,0.028377574,0.004980296,0.000100361416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036248334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062756985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016148621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015236546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99680895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915785117","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00750.x","title":"The Politics of Social Policy Language","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Social policy; Reflexivity; Politics; Welfare state; Sociology; Action (physics); Meaning (existential); State (computer science); Social Welfare; Political science; Political economy; Epistemology; Social science; Positive economics; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05174606008763443,"score_gpt":0.38460122364322247,"score_spread":0.33285516355558803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915785117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4738048,0.00016466147,0.000009261468,0.05507883,0.0002353352,0.00033427114,0.00008273558,0.00009633444,0.47019377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851457,0.00018396096,0.000017268258,0.0004253264,0.008835702,0.000010922397,0.0000036987801,0.00000896679,0.00536844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988194,0.0001753864,0.00024331047,0.000112073045,0.00024946147,0.0004003576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953514,0.0000723349,0.00017082642,0.000057778783,0.000084919266,0.00007899966],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039378382,0.00010736628,0.00015856113,0.00006825873,0.003947764,0.000050285536,0.00015137866,0.00016865954,0.000008016333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055045646,0.00008283381,0.00009942117,0.0003568792,0.0016065573,0.000120522796,0.000041009007,0.00011281787,0.0000040577447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015279096,0.00002709647,0.000069730784,0.000008219427,0.000023849167,5.296046e-7,0.16987552,1.6694315e-9,0.00003970348,0.82163453,0.0004157514,0.007889765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000702082,0.00025648472,0.09051104,0.000013119204,0.000080336504,0.0000023928712,0.30677876,0.0000016202173,0.0017242263,0.550196,0.049256068,0.0004778939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019420724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003688734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5113409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006746783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086171285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99734896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979706530","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00700.x","title":"Older People's Family Contacts and Long‐term Care Expenditure in OECD Countries: A Comparative Approach Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Long-term care; Government (linguistics); Qualitative comparative analysis; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Developed country; Economic growth; Economics; Medicine; Geography; Environmental health; Nursing; Population","score_opus":0.08852053819207105,"score_gpt":0.4624586696034362,"score_spread":0.3739381314113651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979706530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98395514,0.0002037359,0.000087648936,0.0011753922,0.000093436545,0.0005108293,0.00011553095,0.00003034405,0.013827962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819463,0.00007645171,0.0000858613,0.00023124962,0.0012003019,0.00003618237,0.000071248774,0.0000059861013,0.0000980831],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814385,0.00051812886,0.00031172106,0.00032574817,0.00031560264,0.0003849636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991715,0.0002513234,0.00022631163,0.000068385874,0.00014365728,0.0001388523],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047444296,0.00022482469,0.00057981757,0.00022928645,0.0017395193,0.00020389583,0.000095633826,0.00028906917,0.0000079725005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007033665,0.00020658824,0.00009843751,0.0005674159,0.001187892,0.0003888901,0.00003674959,0.00032475736,0.0000015427648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055551816,0.000056567245,0.0065306304,0.00003414445,0.00017708696,0.0000013634041,0.9070767,0.000001148777,0.00007359857,0.0858444,0.000026982025,0.00012178684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055316335,0.000052406223,0.3039141,0.000009966999,0.00015114548,7.1975506e-7,0.69335496,0.00003297569,0.000045007073,0.0015164269,0.00010316775,0.0002659411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012531056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12066216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2973835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116788455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057223794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986816307","doi":"10.1111/1467-9515.00216","title":"How Social is Social Policy? Fiscal and Market Discourse in North American Welfare States","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Marketization; Welfare state; Social policy; Social Welfare; Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Orthodoxy; Welfare; Political economy; Civil society; Economics; Economic system; Market economy; Politics; Law; China","score_opus":0.024766315036660765,"score_gpt":0.36259582489634523,"score_spread":0.33782950985968446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986816307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6448267,0.000023198081,0.000002574085,0.34381008,0.00005252847,0.00020615342,0.0001513634,0.00004893095,0.010878431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842457,0.0007623757,0.000009779945,0.0016219962,0.01059021,0.00003336612,0.000033725108,0.000020281732,0.002682524],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979295,0.0002960927,0.0002810805,0.00034489858,0.00040618874,0.0007422379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944055,0.00005622531,0.00022397102,0.00005208431,0.00006252116,0.00016462876],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003088178,0.00026070283,0.0004019127,0.0001982153,0.0039081494,0.00034467725,0.00013518959,0.0002031119,0.000011270471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022686804,0.00025306412,0.000114459945,0.0011158278,0.0024477213,0.00043111693,0.00007132365,0.00025998187,0.0000014368076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045556988,0.00033505302,0.06339268,0.00007979182,0.00016192617,0.00003182099,0.4056894,1.1680215e-7,0.00001554683,0.29540625,0.009932886,0.22449897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006729555,0.0001314189,0.82100904,0.000005291194,0.00003443766,0.0000026153411,0.13114679,0.0000068590484,0.0000059592467,0.01524274,0.031298578,0.0004433273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023309277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.096891925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75761634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020641861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043157162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989609400","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00450.x","title":"Diversity and Identity in the Non‐profit Sector: Lessons from LGBT Organizing in Toronto","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntary sector; Transgender; Lesbian; Conceptualization; Voluntary association; Diversity (politics); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.05198469700508972,"score_gpt":0.3908135184697891,"score_spread":0.3388288214646994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989609400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9888191,0.00007769541,0.000016249267,0.0053918883,0.00004383364,0.000119951204,0.000009470678,0.000012102149,0.0055097165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829334,0.000083601255,0.000019625893,0.00026662962,0.0012717419,0.0000030744382,0.0000033173337,0.0000030574881,0.000055607623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993427,0.00010610489,0.00010104427,0.00012953974,0.00015518403,0.00016547019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982506,0.00005187926,0.000036400306,0.000037919704,0.000012277525,0.000036480997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004190467,0.00006082029,0.00008311251,0.00002401231,0.0015266311,0.00008363545,0.00009776964,0.00008740842,0.00003114819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079588805,0.000058875397,0.000016381502,0.00015584989,0.000100335965,0.00062326225,0.00009309648,0.00009487671,0.0000011842304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025406838,0.00004762276,0.34812713,0.000012047103,0.000007512837,0.000004840116,0.5022726,2.3112597e-7,0.0008829367,0.1435422,0.000056746692,0.0050207074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022963401,0.000015301428,0.95897794,0.000008054156,0.0000056562862,3.0249848e-7,0.03607145,0.000011997927,0.00007998039,0.0039799903,0.0005329416,0.00008673177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29067057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8204555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6108508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023002677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107387204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006720456","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00608.x","title":"Varieties of Liberalism: Canadian Social Policy from the ‘Golden Age’ to the Present","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Restructuring; Institutionalism; Welfare state; Historical institutionalism; New institutionalism; Political economy; Path dependence; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Social policy; Sociology; Welfare; Period (music); Political science; Economics; Law; Neoclassical economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06347867434912151,"score_gpt":0.3547917529889503,"score_spread":0.2913130786398288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006720456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33793312,0.000102021106,0.000004116947,0.59802157,0.00022089362,0.00048797816,0.00026093153,0.00003777977,0.0629316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96943516,0.00021292617,0.0000091163665,0.0046281754,0.022264615,0.000031654534,0.000017120454,0.000010015482,0.0033912044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984983,0.00028883864,0.00023901403,0.00016149839,0.00037821074,0.00043411055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939877,0.00014190153,0.00011563717,0.00009431285,0.00009259969,0.00015679],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031898502,0.00013586764,0.00019601616,0.00007024114,0.005714832,0.00010237283,0.00028978084,0.00018410398,0.000012282987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045777933,0.00008996182,0.00010979031,0.0005530354,0.0013621768,0.000126783,0.00005864578,0.0001629496,0.000008022419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026003236,0.00002421773,0.0005285059,0.000003955593,0.00007957603,0.0000034919965,0.4172476,5.237891e-7,0.000014165748,0.5414644,0.0361476,0.0044599986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004034769,0.000119658165,0.32270014,0.000011628236,0.00007746219,0.0000023991136,0.07021074,0.0000016794244,0.000117664036,0.16552883,0.44043896,0.00038736028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8372412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63273644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63150203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001352536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002195095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007934802","doi":"10.1111/spol.12103","title":"Narrating Sustainability in <scp>C</scp>anadian Health Care Reform Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Health care; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law; History","score_opus":0.020468049510494517,"score_gpt":0.3530509796399272,"score_spread":0.3325829301294327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007934802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6623165,0.000050809293,0.000039852523,0.29267797,0.00013091446,0.00031248195,0.000008829441,0.000057045814,0.04440558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675015,0.000005951165,0.000022241116,0.028296042,0.003979426,0.0000182204,0.00008051673,0.000009916882,0.000086175234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998574,0.00007283159,0.00040388596,0.00023282108,0.0001020672,0.00061435375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994248,0.00007069459,0.00023937604,0.00010145019,0.0001033647,0.000060290968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090325496,0.00013831556,0.00025430124,0.0001619779,0.0006088115,0.00013873538,0.00009142201,0.00012957036,0.0000028839802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002414449,0.00013344722,0.000042905147,0.00035728433,0.0001296405,0.0004668874,0.00004855927,0.00016740235,0.0000065873746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067449537,0.000036086534,0.004079594,0.00058319635,0.000003901171,0.0000011145323,0.0036522124,0.000012470118,0.0000012536735,0.9461973,0.023765285,0.021660885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052680087,0.00009772019,0.095455624,0.000024463805,0.000004811243,0.0000017596905,0.090998545,0.0009973351,7.7677436e-7,0.04289496,0.7688713,0.00012590537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102415614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03374431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9033023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042860207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055523386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008558062","doi":"10.1111/1467-9515.t01-1-00248","title":"Rethinking Politics for a Green Economy: A Political Approach to Radical Reform","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economic system; Law","score_opus":0.07056804455148737,"score_gpt":0.36379419632955284,"score_spread":0.2932261517780655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008558062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06844549,0.000008377484,0.002139642,0.1418948,0.000081126425,0.0005583799,0.000052054882,0.0000958329,0.78672427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819172,0.000004160906,0.00089562003,0.008036786,0.005942134,0.00007030866,0.000022939892,0.000011147725,0.0030997118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985375,0.00008065601,0.00025232747,0.0002466378,0.00011094776,0.00077196624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991407,0.00010792554,0.00004712087,0.00007496888,0.000055738998,0.00057356997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004976351,0.00011757452,0.00018825929,0.00008510618,0.0011146283,0.0001283058,0.00012806429,0.0002430121,0.000011081289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042544428,0.00012689529,0.00008553824,0.0001448834,0.00045257492,0.00023408813,0.000029334149,0.00012706837,0.000007829882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025835134,0.00005386232,0.00003594321,0.000017137863,0.000009084503,7.8980827e-7,0.0051582456,2.797806e-8,0.0000029476223,0.9922332,0.00015341808,0.00230952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025071486,0.00009739901,0.000515973,0.0000046032446,0.000013544922,0.00000545844,0.0021820338,0.00003372563,0.000021126316,0.67535746,0.32136577,0.00015220554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074041337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008687848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047424258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010034229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011836408","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00610.x","title":"Social Exclusion and Double Jeopardy: The Management of Lone Mothers in the Market–State Social Field","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Ideology; Social exclusion; Social Welfare; Sociology; Social policy; Social position; Social change; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05387244467103738,"score_gpt":0.3723625396470218,"score_spread":0.31849009497598446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011836408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75261766,0.00007532986,0.000007863435,0.11104402,0.000074710086,0.00048201845,0.000009740512,0.000021905307,0.13566674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950327,0.0008824753,0.0000072217767,0.00081547425,0.0018343566,0.000026920527,0.0000019285721,0.0000060836583,0.0013928396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988218,0.00022129994,0.00022179952,0.00013798951,0.0003235429,0.00027357924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999669,0.000097509226,0.00013205057,0.000044087144,0.000030612056,0.000026720292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006649067,0.00011053327,0.00016499753,0.0000451676,0.0034672548,0.000048051013,0.0001419021,0.000121325866,0.000007666806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027099863,0.0000746791,0.00006926942,0.0003500509,0.0009715561,0.00011816487,0.000047017656,0.00014402952,7.248006e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035588577,0.000104166385,0.0007607537,0.00008139918,0.000097110016,0.000010450873,0.50979114,1.7091757e-7,0.000042169137,0.4591027,0.0050492696,0.024604816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003750844,0.00035320382,0.4093682,0.000052130195,0.0001562121,0.000009418121,0.29513973,0.000008683536,0.00041220398,0.26081005,0.02924141,0.0006979465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003757028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023497238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40860742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037865306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013372411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012742645","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00612.x","title":"The Changing Conception of Pension Rights in Canada, Mexico and the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Intergenerational equity; Social security; Welfare state; Universalism; Pension; Redistribution (election); Equity (law); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Economics; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Public economics; Finance; Market economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11816354484964811,"score_gpt":0.3919783834045098,"score_spread":0.27381483855486166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012742645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98434544,0.000030545263,0.0000029072028,0.013919232,0.000042337993,0.00017854714,0.000004505556,0.0000036871668,0.0014727854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991983,0.00028778342,0.0000013348173,0.00018615292,0.00019283191,0.0000068035847,0.000009257352,0.0000012591373,0.00011623762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926835,0.00021824527,0.0001350118,0.00006649217,0.00017511012,0.000136813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969465,0.00014081332,0.000069063404,0.000033490684,0.00003314275,0.00002883855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044492714,0.00004265658,0.000069292,0.000024282748,0.0013166694,0.00002185392,0.000039879957,0.000026784006,0.0000030534295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009103771,0.000026872885,0.000013315938,0.0001831283,0.0007542004,0.000052198608,0.000010523775,0.000041312844,1.1796204e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020482147,0.000042793723,0.028791167,0.000020453914,0.000015724096,0.0000016232941,0.20415583,0.000009290494,0.000045782406,0.7630874,0.0007424286,0.0028827055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003335968,0.0002178654,0.5542298,0.00006226678,0.000041964628,0.0000031371708,0.24442509,0.0009342846,0.0010583833,0.14868645,0.04659291,0.00041190072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9252632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9615204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6144009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109546825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050086156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027972142","doi":"10.1111/1467-9515.00241","title":"Changing Places: Men Replace Women in Mental Health Beds in Britain","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Mental health; Census; Context (archaeology); Gerontology; Demography; Geography; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry; Population","score_opus":0.05081824020652826,"score_gpt":0.44137103869285094,"score_spread":0.3905527984863227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027972142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9103052,0.00008173302,0.000002716047,0.07019021,0.00006362908,0.00046083506,0.000019122534,0.000032588505,0.01884393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913862,0.00031807597,0.000006727185,0.0017548742,0.00068666507,0.0001120209,0.000037840255,0.000009333996,0.0056883125],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984855,0.0002697487,0.00034228235,0.00016647288,0.000108951426,0.0006270131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968797,0.000060344675,0.00011441211,0.00004731827,0.000012529638,0.00007743884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010085873,0.00009823716,0.00020228873,0.00019115207,0.0008103398,0.00001084841,0.000038842594,0.00009312696,0.00003083731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087257176,0.00010325107,0.00001637953,0.00036482606,0.00004232501,0.00012565708,0.000043697062,0.00019877081,0.000005555503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059617695,0.00021604921,0.27911493,0.0002711915,0.000026304682,0.000013950615,0.6587046,5.3257213e-7,0.00007402516,0.036179435,0.008855476,0.015947353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048636277,0.0006483802,0.48625043,0.00036932406,0.0000041584476,0.0000042239703,0.41844264,0.00006467185,0.000016578673,0.014406003,0.074476525,0.00045342484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002244843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007816811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24026196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055290293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040612867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.623256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036697150","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00611.x","title":"The Healthcare Systems of the USA and Canada: Forever on Divergent Paths?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Healthcare system; Healthcare service; Health care; Position (finance); State (computer science); Service (business); Political science; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Computer science; Economy; Finance","score_opus":0.07302873621808251,"score_gpt":0.28325659842610373,"score_spread":0.21022786220802123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036697150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92843014,0.00048540824,0.0000131261695,0.06640665,0.00034394325,0.00032667874,0.00023999425,0.0000043902983,0.003749668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970276,0.00055039936,0.0000015129908,0.0012096959,0.00032182536,0.000014167734,0.0000026182988,0.000003917273,0.0008682746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994008,0.000030848296,0.0002637872,0.00011043189,0.000046436424,0.00014770593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996334,0.000032859545,0.0001780187,0.0000901995,0.0000161176,0.00004941096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017894998,0.00006217403,0.00011700214,0.00002192017,0.0007088615,0.000018324215,0.00006277072,0.000043181288,0.0000014899426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072492476,0.00004620835,0.000025350655,0.000068584064,0.00008944739,0.00003323368,0.000026727384,0.000057901572,0.0000011295567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008396901,0.000008754146,0.012811425,0.00004533587,0.000009940764,5.352492e-7,0.00051410415,0.0000011032979,4.093315e-7,0.98389167,0.001953918,0.00075442577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002543367,0.00014205878,0.7410777,0.000017671411,0.000003654684,0.0000052167734,0.00043215824,0.0000622192,0.00002676371,0.0110180555,0.2468285,0.00013161924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76597935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6529335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97287357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008944855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027933097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5452061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039434977","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00429.x","title":"Facing the Future: America's Post‐multiculturalist Trajectory","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Individualism; Multiculturalism; Politics; Democracy; Affirmative action; Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.01568449395698256,"score_gpt":0.3303041760733968,"score_spread":0.3146196821164142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039434977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81325966,0.000258658,0.00014745012,0.16481547,0.00026888377,0.000357552,0.00003493281,0.00010729034,0.020750118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846719,0.00018922905,0.00008955041,0.002627868,0.010063528,0.000013586944,0.000046943696,0.0000048955794,0.002292496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991278,0.00016933744,0.00016935711,0.000132059,0.00021606137,0.00018536556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961597,0.000037793474,0.00009725112,0.000052873183,0.00013191412,0.00006420977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020811011,0.000092332986,0.000083504296,0.000031758795,0.001726611,0.0002082208,0.00008384019,0.000101224156,0.00006196851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019000698,0.000065847125,0.000058733,0.00018708142,0.00028177767,0.00039716042,0.0000058371206,0.00011036386,0.000016591433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046802903,0.00008830101,0.00013087115,0.000011368839,0.00002628008,5.816342e-7,0.27734226,0.0000044568806,0.0041813925,0.46342826,0.015942968,0.23879647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016243588,0.0000718619,0.011503944,0.000004612448,0.00001779923,0.0000016964534,0.05157115,0.000058101505,0.00056354376,0.0008253302,0.93505037,0.00016913006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027738467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046258155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91910744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009390759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031483723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039736440","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00607.x","title":"Labour Market Policy in the United States, Canada and Sweden: Addressing the Issue of Convergence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Political science; Political economy; Multitude; Restructuring; Politics; Foreign policy; Economics; Development economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06603494989056383,"score_gpt":0.3686772752441649,"score_spread":0.302642325353601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039736440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88409287,0.000112187205,9.073866e-7,0.10346802,0.00006786432,0.00018836297,0.0000570949,0.000008881631,0.012003797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915088,0.001859084,0.0000028579025,0.003827133,0.0015307904,0.000008792333,0.000007153994,0.000003825834,0.0012515949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988662,0.00034178523,0.00018768394,0.000096118616,0.00026573372,0.00024245134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995125,0.00022250181,0.000114678034,0.00005230425,0.0000525881,0.00004541683],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004556529,0.000086452135,0.00012571346,0.000058192036,0.001839285,0.00003685048,0.00012359928,0.00007558465,0.000008084505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046636423,0.000055738885,0.000021375698,0.00066847715,0.0010290635,0.00008936804,0.000024316756,0.000121624915,2.1641476e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008697874,0.00007095908,0.011530441,0.00008066663,0.000055948425,0.000015864092,0.41512442,0.0000026662576,0.000026566548,0.5489303,0.020482613,0.003592593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005867611,0.000100829726,0.61758065,0.000029449098,0.000024704053,0.000012098456,0.19875659,0.000033136374,0.00008937594,0.036739178,0.14573315,0.00031408746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94842887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87561107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6060502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006323187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015972524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045673669","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00537.x","title":"(Not) Taking Account of Precarious Employment: Workfare Policies and Lone Mothers in Ontario and the UK","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; UNICEF","keywords":"Workfare; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Demographic economics; Welfare; Market economy","score_opus":0.06523211572615825,"score_gpt":0.41300461450328146,"score_spread":0.34777249877712324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045673669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801507,0.00024399614,0.00000779139,0.012155097,0.000052352425,0.0004061015,0.000008841153,0.000011845735,0.006963301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975196,0.00017512387,0.000010832856,0.0010367422,0.00030834437,0.000019400897,0.000005222413,0.000007438751,0.00091726123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911684,0.00008999692,0.00031754133,0.00011955155,0.00011270343,0.00024334327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945515,0.00021311692,0.00020761119,0.00005133819,0.000038110527,0.000034680514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005582176,0.000102474434,0.0001996844,0.000071027775,0.0006810508,0.000016692122,0.00003515788,0.00011202233,0.000016359727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010580246,0.000076744785,0.000019557605,0.00011023349,0.0003003412,0.00006600458,0.000054310036,0.00020951632,3.5276378e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065176137,0.000032528653,0.6669344,0.000077658224,0.000049613664,0.0000014951138,0.22491382,1.9677346e-7,0.00009943018,0.095967315,0.00018343203,0.011088385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013238958,0.00006774788,0.9807646,0.00006086561,0.000020617317,6.719304e-7,0.009806619,9.2063533e-7,0.000033799286,0.005211083,0.0026276328,0.00008149158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14201881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58643126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44441244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009955411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024526575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86369455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052793917","doi":"10.1111/spol.12010","title":"Comparing Formal Unemployment Compensation Systems in 15<scp>OECD C</scp>ountries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Redundancy (engineering); Welfare state; Welfare; Economics; Argument (complex analysis); Compensation (psychology); Labour economics; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy; Law; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.08139810700139073,"score_gpt":0.4017012616783611,"score_spread":0.3203031546769704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052793917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97644365,0.00011302581,0.00003961655,0.0049978727,0.000264911,0.00087700185,0.000011292377,0.000070413116,0.01718224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964116,0.000044479384,0.000010575874,0.00044670803,0.0013447747,0.0002400945,0.000063453954,0.000011928942,0.0014263621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985001,0.00020199896,0.0005190282,0.0001609477,0.00017814767,0.0004397824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933004,0.00024279651,0.00021982266,0.000064495856,0.00007744469,0.000065394284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033824006,0.00014239362,0.0002516087,0.00010761646,0.0011969983,0.000062680025,0.000056386827,0.00014544706,0.000017401904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001269228,0.00013435517,0.000030058376,0.00011652179,0.000085393265,0.00039168715,0.00006288969,0.00021682282,0.000092479626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025944659,0.0000985213,0.61218315,0.00039969457,0.000046525824,0.0000018525845,0.025936155,0.000008615887,0.00022383229,0.34684613,0.0127139045,0.0015156771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011447755,0.00014017368,0.9488316,0.00010103163,0.00001702318,9.73396e-7,0.018289149,0.00034650025,0.000043480348,0.005266532,0.025703376,0.00011538256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052631632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018635233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34157962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013824322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018284791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9206464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055094216","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00549.x","title":"Models of Disability, Work and Welfare in Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Obligation; Government (linguistics); Realm; Public relations; Social model of disability; Medical model of disability; Inclusion (mineral); Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social science; Engineering; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.15281304661506537,"score_gpt":0.4610055109120021,"score_spread":0.3081924642969367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055094216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89513904,0.000014690379,0.00002057002,0.10006866,0.000027813732,0.000090430454,0.0000044759263,0.000009568,0.0046247714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993932,0.000028115448,0.000037728878,0.00009495181,0.00032055142,0.0000018500328,0.0000029789162,0.0000020254165,0.00011855399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939793,0.00006029441,0.00019128744,0.000087011686,0.000120368735,0.0001431286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979305,0.000035225068,0.000052807703,0.000027194868,0.0000369769,0.00005474574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067618553,0.000041810858,0.00007782152,0.000038542366,0.00019184325,0.00001768803,0.000028592885,0.00011465622,0.000012072037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000820501,0.000045347715,0.000011574448,0.00027482645,0.00034810492,0.000115949486,0.00000757328,0.00006766478,1.9508832e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001771942,0.000028681465,0.0069973045,0.000019303789,0.0000011413706,3.935825e-7,0.008921574,5.1311744e-8,0.000005543123,0.9665412,0.000012484568,0.017454604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045764618,0.00012233152,0.71752584,0.00003151698,0.000004926856,5.18174e-7,0.047977146,0.000003872767,0.000111180954,0.21530208,0.018247334,0.00021560227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001920282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02489461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7512391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048448044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000967928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056164465","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00425.x","title":"Rituals of Degradation: Administration as Policy in the Ontario Works Programme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic policy; Political science; Economics; Public administration; Business; Development economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.05316292903692885,"score_gpt":0.3806660196234271,"score_spread":0.32750309058649824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056164465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8112743,0.000051385152,0.000017283024,0.12826605,0.00004756885,0.0003312661,0.000006049984,0.000014777707,0.059991334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99348843,0.0000604223,0.00011776595,0.0007873423,0.0028291019,0.000017645949,0.000008619384,0.0000034388852,0.0026872135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986106,0.00017777065,0.00028153177,0.00016454057,0.0004588918,0.000306677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950516,0.000094292714,0.00020771661,0.00006913895,0.00005061245,0.000073058014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082831574,0.00009573569,0.00013008829,0.000059695867,0.00056470477,0.00020412322,0.0001903166,0.00014805398,0.000049119564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045289827,0.00008098751,0.000057242876,0.0007062799,0.00044277427,0.0004914959,0.000011495083,0.00013737375,0.000006725995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004017124,0.00016539897,0.0026589076,0.0000057417838,0.000005131413,0.0000014276949,0.1296919,8.840105e-7,0.000022834709,0.7654556,0.00060424395,0.10134775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011584595,0.0007229627,0.35256457,0.00007050759,0.00003410464,0.0000094032775,0.11506041,0.000016863944,0.0004183128,0.09494021,0.4344711,0.0005330934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29019123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80580866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6705154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002389415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030957528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7145355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071643983","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00570.x","title":"The Organization of Decision‐making and the Dynamics of Policy Drift: A Canadian Health Sector Example","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Structuring; Private sector; Public sector; Public administration; Legislation; Welfare; Order (exchange); Fragmentation (computing); Public policy; Health care; Public economics; Policy studies; Boundary (topology); Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.0250832470049839,"score_gpt":0.3656562036139591,"score_spread":0.34057295660897524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071643983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7763788,0.0004310515,0.0009922698,0.19114386,0.0003206929,0.0010320503,0.00014886253,0.000041294774,0.029511105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974072,0.000652256,0.000030567513,0.0005463903,0.0012326094,0.0000018512287,0.0000054403745,0.0000063129737,0.00011738563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989953,0.00013826108,0.0002924846,0.00008897067,0.00020459907,0.0002803666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880934,0.0006734965,0.00024390842,0.000055467266,0.00012809571,0.000089665664],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014203362,0.00007263394,0.00015753931,0.000089791516,0.0029692408,0.000052592917,0.00009691558,0.00009606299,0.0000015600534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020438952,0.0000471004,0.000034139353,0.0006731638,0.0012474926,0.000072849136,0.000023844734,0.00007791855,1.7544028e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023639222,0.000005961642,0.00067904365,0.000007865082,0.0000138322275,1.12451744e-7,0.048783354,9.698148e-8,0.000001833167,0.91087043,0.00007908894,0.039534725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014556729,0.00019630899,0.3770737,0.00008132805,0.00004551105,0.000005248063,0.12738267,0.000046215373,0.00007322196,0.48801655,0.005307536,0.0003160531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5451605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8554728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4228539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017761145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022444814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076082197","doi":"10.1111/spol.12125","title":"<scp>J</scp>ack (and <scp>J</scp>ill?) of All Trades – A <scp>C</scp>anadian Case Study of Equity in Apprenticeship Supports","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Certification; Equity (law); Entry Level; Wage; Labour economics; Opportunity structures; Inequality; Barriers to entry; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Market structure; Sociology; Management; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.09655272343790525,"score_gpt":0.40102049631992914,"score_spread":0.30446777288202387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076082197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799174,0.00011282445,0.000005060059,0.00049573416,0.00014693085,0.00068598555,0.00014632652,0.000028568518,0.018461188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751073,0.000058248475,0.000027072536,0.000275532,0.0006177327,0.000027677914,0.000035025016,0.000018037532,0.0014299235],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974391,0.00041567362,0.0006170915,0.00037852352,0.00056016556,0.0005894569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814063,0.0005740823,0.00045120556,0.00016818952,0.00019172949,0.0004741478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012922032,0.00023399024,0.00041657014,0.00022714506,0.00046793235,0.0001891678,0.00020540014,0.00027626727,0.000003952406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027395391,0.00023892977,0.000079252546,0.00061870925,0.0005093716,0.00047063312,0.00009074168,0.00021242502,8.4857726e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011301799,0.0025713318,0.048443865,0.00016678753,0.00021472434,0.00032730543,0.75576305,0.0000073679093,0.0003863117,0.18043008,0.0074712564,0.0042065918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029721318,0.0015180393,0.12792294,0.00004889217,0.00023221788,0.000032277923,0.8115394,0.000040748826,0.0005403246,0.019359825,0.035672855,0.00012036197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05133835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1793657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16107026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113914306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010825405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080471750","doi":"10.1111/1467-9515.00309","title":"Food Banks and Food Security: Welfare Reform, Human Rights and Social Policy. Lessons from Canada?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":323,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Food security; Right to food; Safety net; Social protection; Economic growth; Redistribution (election); Food systems; Human rights; Economics; Development economics; Political science; Agriculture; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.14048922954356047,"score_gpt":0.4310547956953458,"score_spread":0.29056556615178536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080471750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85976475,0.00012084054,0.0000011823687,0.12848642,0.00012788617,0.00039716647,0.0017838517,0.000055697088,0.009262165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935674,0.000027939863,0.000016521059,0.0021650398,0.0036347164,0.00004081912,0.00025976385,0.000017234192,0.00027055063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981877,0.00024817063,0.00046625882,0.00032870428,0.00024469604,0.0005244272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992798,0.000051602456,0.00023937967,0.000104264145,0.00007989989,0.00024506598],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015165738,0.0002129178,0.00030768735,0.000121886835,0.008302998,0.000053801097,0.000078297875,0.00044755675,0.00012194137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004812477,0.00022109023,0.000037505903,0.00017855396,0.00019867437,0.00021707192,0.00008332079,0.00056024175,0.0000036856288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003921508,0.00006811685,0.0007400121,0.00024250864,0.00005744168,0.000002549022,0.033689298,2.3355213e-8,0.000007679134,0.9598069,0.003818346,0.0015278695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003858294,0.0015536338,0.4275234,0.00013084812,0.00015383822,0.0000083074865,0.01796052,0.00009214604,0.000026817284,0.3034735,0.24425249,0.00096621626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6628844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9176129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65633345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035840974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057337666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99298805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085233592","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00584.x","title":"Conservative Ideas and Social Policy in the United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Conservatism; Ideology; Presidency; Presidential system; Political science; Public administration; Dominance (genetics); Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05649923197917828,"score_gpt":0.4094169380343366,"score_spread":0.3529177060551583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085233592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8234688,0.00003703954,0.000011004731,0.15503985,0.00004506456,0.00025610306,0.000029288705,0.00003497632,0.02107789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98812807,0.00027310682,0.000008917479,0.006350723,0.004788011,0.000011196972,0.000028183225,0.0000068007685,0.0004049803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863225,0.00029305648,0.00023932917,0.00015058681,0.000259271,0.0004255193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945384,0.00026967406,0.00011636186,0.00003528491,0.00006429285,0.000060518865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012198965,0.00012776227,0.00016261301,0.00019212332,0.0024807083,0.00012716831,0.0001002725,0.00018231075,0.0000020347616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045711568,0.00010045916,0.000042721465,0.0008931088,0.0013609157,0.00016759905,0.000028173834,0.00018571316,0.0000015709123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045429264,0.000034403347,0.0009433265,0.000011448121,0.000015406538,0.0000032652217,0.25021416,5.3465676e-8,0.000009150422,0.7443739,0.00053212227,0.0038173315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006762646,0.00011892058,0.30311102,0.00001013004,0.000021899985,0.000002630922,0.319214,0.0000042864626,0.00003342401,0.33441445,0.042119585,0.0002734084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060683325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035724755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40995947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000911926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042904698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101465825","doi":"10.1111/spol.12128","title":"Diverging Paths? A Comparative Look at Childcare Policies in <scp>J</scp>apan, <scp>S</scp>outh <scp>K</scp>orea and <scp>T</scp>aiwan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Economics; Business; Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.06553433729173866,"score_gpt":0.35483603084828436,"score_spread":0.28930169355654567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101465825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84479856,0.0011087363,0.000007692593,0.002388902,0.0004524595,0.00097491074,0.0003995968,0.00023584791,0.14963329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810201,0.0010678577,0.00004471154,0.0013228264,0.0065432047,0.00011936808,0.0001600441,0.000066021785,0.009655847],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409825,0.0008446137,0.0009818742,0.0009686675,0.0012292287,0.0018773773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99527764,0.0023546228,0.00081991934,0.00028234697,0.00040608578,0.0008594052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012502722,0.0008470736,0.001196651,0.0004995459,0.004288308,0.000693323,0.00051001395,0.0008953967,0.000001791824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080630155,0.00081388484,0.0003173275,0.0014704426,0.0026467976,0.0009976255,0.00046087225,0.0007713483,0.00004937274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012509738,0.00030867252,0.024242653,0.000114503644,0.00024542699,0.000029585084,0.8476551,0.000008804774,0.00016986352,0.09283134,0.033457387,0.0009241268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002358363,0.0005584416,0.12937756,0.00014744342,0.00019207026,0.000018768053,0.7529444,0.000038775357,0.0009287569,0.0383189,0.07490558,0.00021093477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012443521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026179496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13997744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006306847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001541167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116688202","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00428.x","title":"The Multicultural Welfare State: International Experience and North American Narratives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Welfare state; Immigration; Redistribution (election); Ethnic group; Political science; Diversity (politics); Political economy; Cultural diversity; Politics; Development economics; Welfare; Narrative; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02689688042771937,"score_gpt":0.37509921705941246,"score_spread":0.3482023366316931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116688202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8492759,0.000033718723,0.000001248296,0.1447475,0.000083179504,0.00010187354,0.000014922724,0.000028234053,0.005713424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99508286,0.000725393,0.00003297716,0.00041276796,0.0027165757,0.00002048214,0.000004534849,0.0000033723247,0.0010010513],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927294,0.0000807642,0.0001311801,0.00011935888,0.00018457562,0.00021118153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997027,0.0000420481,0.000095649,0.000027701522,0.00006190976,0.00006997737],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011006412,0.000081899765,0.000082459665,0.000016234939,0.003747924,0.00018646098,0.00008670645,0.00002957218,0.000002049177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019976706,0.00005565637,0.000027079717,0.00015745958,0.0016651714,0.0002603046,0.000030151732,0.000078443896,0.0000012643078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050237235,0.00003086773,0.0033839452,0.0000027560081,0.000039513325,7.1748843e-7,0.68803877,4.6202985e-7,0.00002885624,0.15460454,0.00031148916,0.15350786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026115665,0.000075535565,0.41609913,0.000003086011,0.000006210734,0.000001541814,0.37329873,0.000012158443,0.00004137962,0.0028485619,0.20713301,0.00021949339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018920726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032570723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41271517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050018414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008644892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141554301","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00469.x","title":"Restructuring of Full-time Workers: A Case of Transitional Dislocation or Social Exclusion in Canada? Lessons from the 1990s","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Restructuring; Relocation; Labour economics; Full-time; Economics; Welfare state; Social exclusion; Welfare; Demographic economics; Displaced workers; Job loss; Unemployment; Market economy; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0655960467952306,"score_gpt":0.41687726875861875,"score_spread":0.3512812219633882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141554301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9406597,0.000028645405,0.0000149672915,0.05830033,0.000037157468,0.00021188687,0.0002584161,0.0000059109693,0.0004829772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829584,0.000015400112,0.000032775977,0.0002677116,0.001189463,0.000019092302,0.000066197346,0.000005785409,0.000107723885],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905676,0.0001885096,0.00036379823,0.00010264936,0.0001354031,0.00015287644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945486,0.00024464802,0.00018648633,0.000043251246,0.000046809662,0.000023965506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016477892,0.000078819576,0.00015967176,0.000030085788,0.00079139794,0.0000035551902,0.00004225145,0.00008024261,0.000072100265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070075585,0.000059631595,0.000027666558,0.00013156704,0.00008705069,0.00007704592,0.000024521722,0.00013905724,6.3993724e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007409753,0.00062566664,0.08871573,0.001029587,0.00046065592,0.0001298239,0.52703595,0.000070038885,0.015841218,0.14164545,0.026855087,0.19018106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020377575,0.00010924111,0.94001424,0.0002530653,0.00007875321,0.00001150736,0.04947491,0.00018458953,0.00032459263,0.0056659714,0.0015967076,0.00024865667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6085702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94768167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8512985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017498693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017398025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6086873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145264089","doi":"10.1111/spol.12064","title":"The Universal Decline of Universality? Social Policy Change in <scp>C</scp>anada, <scp>D</scp>enmark, <scp>S</scp>weden and the <scp>UK</scp>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Democracy; Welfare; Social Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03147636814749545,"score_gpt":0.32643614995860487,"score_spread":0.29495978181110943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145264089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81535846,0.0005727483,0.000021296893,0.030883597,0.0005084019,0.0013051296,0.00026008853,0.00013032438,0.15095997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97388196,0.0025589224,0.000016099664,0.002106158,0.012087299,0.00006169704,0.0000380045,0.000049017675,0.009200849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445534,0.0016183874,0.00082852546,0.0006299774,0.0010322361,0.0014355392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917066,0.0065076267,0.00087891077,0.00026707374,0.0002785836,0.00036117705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026082513,0.00056836946,0.0008689535,0.00033862147,0.005476679,0.00039437384,0.00073070044,0.00079883414,0.0000020763528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012611491,0.00044277142,0.0003548759,0.0016045399,0.0047113406,0.0006114215,0.00037670997,0.0006882817,0.000010111035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018724484,0.00012723751,0.0016650502,0.00007572197,0.00018355757,0.0000062901477,0.23294471,0.0000010187387,0.00008368708,0.7506106,0.009990697,0.004292721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005145149,0.00043665114,0.10267763,0.0000832351,0.000304693,0.00000796216,0.4318299,0.00010918304,0.00039326647,0.20646258,0.25238034,0.00016943058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052817594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057162676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.544148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036435312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016292151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147536174","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00763.x","title":"Swedish Family Policy – Continuity and Change in the Nordic Welfare State Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Welfare; Social policy; Context (archaeology); Economics; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Politics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.11251754792242971,"score_gpt":0.3820962420635939,"score_spread":0.2695786941411642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147536174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87437147,0.000092733724,0.0000038894063,0.046547405,0.00006114229,0.00043299812,0.00006639324,0.000041432344,0.07838256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944349,0.000540754,0.000011223616,0.002430665,0.0022051542,0.000054442167,0.000004035734,0.0000070650076,0.00031175916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988874,0.00018646222,0.0001842208,0.00016640642,0.00021193609,0.00036356898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996961,0.00003468811,0.00009257406,0.00005699125,0.000041447922,0.00007823797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005248606,0.00012381494,0.00016398246,0.000093057184,0.0015356382,0.00008103091,0.00011920251,0.00011647398,0.0000018777419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018867357,0.00009584607,0.000045078064,0.00036517266,0.0007303186,0.00021809748,0.000038359973,0.0001468773,0.0000013346639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029347673,0.000048467056,0.0013123208,0.000013534776,0.000010313159,0.0000025998497,0.40519887,5.1270305e-8,0.0000069735524,0.57588434,0.00007744062,0.017415768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054871384,0.00012404911,0.6703879,0.000012825844,0.00002273281,0.0000017130466,0.06372689,0.00003728788,0.000010136483,0.26234865,0.0024881838,0.00029089578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06845891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043829907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6690756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050377545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003043342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161158821","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00451.x","title":"Evidence‐based Engagement in the Voluntary Sector: Lessons from Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Voluntary sector; Corporate governance; Public relations; Public administration; Turnover; Political science; Business; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.13672384209970045,"score_gpt":0.39315762291833195,"score_spread":0.2564337808186315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161158821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9114857,0.00012810188,0.000021039774,0.08423073,0.00008918712,0.0001555118,0.000028434706,0.000015311762,0.0038460323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393153,0.0000363194,0.00003997544,0.0027891858,0.0030883749,0.000015891324,0.00001191742,0.000003812659,0.00008298627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899685,0.00028515945,0.00012553127,0.00012437032,0.00027120154,0.00019687072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996108,0.00022788897,0.000042529937,0.000055987282,0.000017048429,0.000045789056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005371112,0.00006804096,0.00007227956,0.00002771662,0.0006765804,0.000086459586,0.000120476965,0.000053943168,0.000072798946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001876592,0.0000607517,0.000023208326,0.00016801157,0.00008268258,0.00019365606,0.000009063109,0.00013451507,0.0000015035812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026010437,0.00040806484,0.16133046,0.00008548528,0.00007816814,0.000049605518,0.29066926,0.000063732776,0.0039358097,0.3539103,0.025722325,0.16348669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040552413,0.000060841052,0.8470851,0.000066561195,0.00002377341,3.530165e-7,0.021564191,0.00016414704,0.00065146346,0.0025413865,0.1271434,0.00029323497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93498373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98994625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68575466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026672575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001893867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5203778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222007061","doi":"10.1111/spol.12189","title":"Barriers and Enablers to Safeguarding Children and Adults within a Disability Services Context: Insights from an Australian Delphi Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"State Trustees Australia Foundation","keywords":"Safeguarding; Delphi method; Context (archaeology); Workforce; Neglect; Public relations; Psychology; Business; Political science; Medicine; Nursing; Geography","score_opus":0.032420645297963395,"score_gpt":0.3530451482852146,"score_spread":0.3206245029872512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222007061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966788,0.000043286982,0.0000011535403,0.0021448673,0.0000887743,0.0005112513,0.00011069226,0.000038745828,0.00038238335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998459,0.0000015842486,0.000014123772,0.00058512733,0.00082360394,0.00001739866,0.000056084365,0.000011497251,0.00003157865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998889,0.00017019206,0.00022983858,0.0004143199,0.000121173245,0.00017542487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993205,0.000028314214,0.000075938755,0.00013032396,0.000030909836,0.0004139902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015636934,0.00016236187,0.00019915416,0.000042519903,0.0002976025,0.00013713344,0.00006643347,0.00011948364,0.000014748688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033710345,0.00015465952,0.000019119107,0.00011378688,0.00014912558,0.00025788727,0.000029412748,0.00011362972,0.0000035846745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016347477,0.00041137976,0.32888997,0.000021341493,0.00024500265,0.000012483812,0.64018804,9.685072e-7,0.00006351714,0.010221676,0.00018347047,0.01812741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001982695,0.00074901775,0.8908614,0.000015133701,0.00004914602,0.0000056547865,0.10378893,0.000004381814,0.00004044224,0.002203491,0.00011397702,0.00018573109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019353021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031055288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5619714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002833983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067416724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9871772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339108902","doi":"10.1111/spol.12215","title":"Testing the Limits of Welfare State Changes: The Slow‐moving Immigration Policy Reform in Japan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Immigration policy; Immigration; Public policy; Political science; Modernization theory; Welfare reform; Political economy; Social policy; Development economics; Economic growth; Politics; Welfare; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06501508565255705,"score_gpt":0.36046611210754254,"score_spread":0.2954510264549855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339108902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6275615,0.000038082268,0.0000037854506,0.35110122,0.00007502501,0.0002997966,0.000028921557,0.000030564785,0.020861104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954809,0.00026661257,0.0000054196685,0.00053779926,0.0029332838,0.000033132612,0.0000018711029,0.000008064454,0.0007329325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878305,0.0002120805,0.0002573025,0.00013879915,0.0002621429,0.0003466043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930656,0.00023927311,0.00023002425,0.00008296859,0.0000956856,0.00004546572],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007865572,0.000114941104,0.00014905073,0.00009401151,0.0020046309,0.000059060527,0.00015858693,0.000107941436,0.000001826215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012687473,0.000057190173,0.00004816983,0.00070107804,0.0007898607,0.00020406932,0.00003653302,0.0001043628,0.0000014470746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038250044,0.000032694625,0.0021343275,0.000022312319,0.000023533992,4.812322e-7,0.11040505,2.3109281e-7,0.0014498472,0.67912835,0.000056295976,0.2067086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000865363,0.00035914086,0.6807788,0.00014748868,0.000035849658,0.0000026347634,0.17420726,0.000010576641,0.0012819464,0.13316664,0.0087279845,0.00041632997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04313552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07832135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6786445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002214936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005015115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343830056","doi":"10.1111/spol.12230","title":"Deciphering Deservedness: Canadian Employment Insurance Reforms in Historical Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Unemployment; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Wage; Situated; Service (business); Labour economics; Job security; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Economy","score_opus":0.0760914899476712,"score_gpt":0.4150811677419424,"score_spread":0.33898967779427125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343830056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8951662,0.00008901048,0.000014589367,0.08357764,0.0001957055,0.0002562036,0.000025431522,0.000031813284,0.020643376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945093,0.000078006924,0.000010183621,0.0005311002,0.0009040953,0.000077693294,0.0000024782478,0.000009401984,0.003877774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908257,0.00008914578,0.00023023492,0.00015954452,0.00009537463,0.00034314327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996383,0.000059661557,0.00006710488,0.00005482718,0.00006742771,0.00011263393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018507896,0.00009365675,0.00013956969,0.00009148864,0.00072444347,0.000006358781,0.0000485065,0.000115600276,0.00002462794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021937645,0.000066245884,0.000025325513,0.00014558987,0.000047937414,0.00014564322,0.000023986518,0.00011902951,0.000012200857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013881456,0.00006268905,0.63923407,0.00004907091,0.000028668284,0.000013010876,0.030425185,6.3198335e-8,0.00030729824,0.31097126,0.0031426577,0.015627239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006881041,0.00009552287,0.94927627,0.00008571539,0.0000036288648,4.404814e-7,0.00405907,3.243285e-7,0.000020586482,0.017722493,0.027905105,0.0001427266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27372628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67168415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3979579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029113027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072939467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7612955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469199753","doi":"10.1111/spol.12211","title":"Reassessing Policy Drift: Social Policy Change in the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Gridlock; Scholarship; Public policy; Policy analysis; Social security; Politics; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Public administration; Public economics; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.09354093560874924,"score_gpt":0.43094592898041983,"score_spread":0.3374049933716706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469199753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39180675,0.00003592422,0.000010595312,0.58262104,0.00010322421,0.00041779794,0.00008432653,0.000093406605,0.024826953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96396923,0.00096274447,0.000006776195,0.006834224,0.02739648,0.000073776086,0.000026248566,0.000016597218,0.00071393466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976655,0.00062201556,0.00032245636,0.00024411251,0.0004331933,0.00071267417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992666,0.00025770304,0.00019523395,0.00008549372,0.00008931915,0.00010562165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008464133,0.00020911748,0.00024347148,0.0004254064,0.0032015152,0.000221361,0.00023960955,0.0002861467,0.0000071523273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011403438,0.00013513585,0.00010445155,0.0017577256,0.0012372514,0.00046728784,0.00005274908,0.00017999805,0.000008061958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003273446,0.00006637955,0.00055119663,0.000013756192,0.00001915014,0.0000033545264,0.17540435,2.4951238e-8,0.00004815024,0.77517813,0.0007171573,0.04796561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017335009,0.00022276107,0.2705207,0.000093109076,0.00004957537,0.000005946062,0.094200194,0.0000059123704,0.00008651396,0.49765155,0.13462879,0.0008014647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12131418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017732918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57578677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030638152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012247826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472045228","doi":"10.1111/spol.12207","title":"Continuity and Change in Social Policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Punctuated equilibrium; Positive economics; Social change; Reading (process); Sociology; Path dependence; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law","score_opus":0.07089792388171295,"score_gpt":0.41122930614994385,"score_spread":0.3403313822682309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472045228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76027536,0.00006586931,0.000003498366,0.20360652,0.000099942765,0.00033341697,0.000057747864,0.000067011046,0.035490647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815051,0.00060282176,0.000005199052,0.0011242882,0.015432222,0.000037635567,0.0000020879372,0.0000080857235,0.0012825436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988301,0.00017739255,0.00019539215,0.00019190837,0.00019209868,0.00041314383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996585,0.00006990959,0.00009835675,0.000033701835,0.000042318476,0.00009720242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040643616,0.00012392826,0.0002027505,0.00013748425,0.0014686652,0.00007054716,0.00006842698,0.00022720976,0.000006230804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046410982,0.0000965881,0.000048473103,0.0003575476,0.0009509528,0.00033098043,0.00004547988,0.000085543674,0.0000041087164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033542372,0.000033746033,0.004652502,0.000012066176,0.000011349391,0.0000017343815,0.080695674,4.287465e-10,0.00011522583,0.79716045,0.00021347111,0.11707024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009904423,0.000085508385,0.79542065,0.000024683803,0.000012796378,0.0000012013211,0.0078583285,3.1943136e-7,0.00007133861,0.17902558,0.016217621,0.00029152492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022375781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023554487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79076815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012957623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039896584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485908565","doi":"10.1111/spol.12235","title":"<i>Networking Enforced</i>–<i>Comparing Social Services</i>'<i>Collaborative Rationales across Different Welfare Regimes</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Normative; Welfare; Business; Service (business); Social Welfare; Public relations; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.05021255007173641,"score_gpt":0.3906353910804734,"score_spread":0.340422841008737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485908565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6307688,0.00012729302,0.00007428252,0.34386218,0.000540768,0.00040079825,0.00012657305,0.00018399695,0.023915358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990108,0.00023166247,0.000011069372,0.0014230352,0.0068020346,0.000058942253,0.00005636221,0.000015028772,0.0012938252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808055,0.0003398151,0.0003523255,0.0002850884,0.0004724792,0.00046971513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926156,0.00009219408,0.00026391222,0.00006937838,0.00019165779,0.00012128823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005259592,0.00017043462,0.00021968539,0.000060572183,0.0047622244,0.00019405386,0.00015373739,0.00018936847,0.00006832581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047525857,0.00014794976,0.000060033446,0.0004202922,0.0003130284,0.0003873604,0.000059364058,0.0001504881,0.0000048843194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068459856,0.000046665675,0.0011703819,0.00004282286,0.000022963086,0.0000017385646,0.03907373,9.153417e-8,0.0001852929,0.9211184,0.00057321927,0.037696227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006259113,0.000067454006,0.011123312,0.00003251178,0.000008388371,0.0000011600104,0.042917393,0.0000034129248,0.00014106838,0.006402277,0.93838894,0.00028815266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028353577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010698723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9378157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025408936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047255697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99653345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507456166","doi":"10.1111/spol.12237","title":"Obamacare and the Politics of Universal Health Insurance Coverage in the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Medicaid; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Politics; Presidential system; Political science; Health insurance; Universal coverage; Public administration; Health care; State (computer science); Health care reform; Health policy; Law","score_opus":0.03146213033735856,"score_gpt":0.35805508493958316,"score_spread":0.3265929546022246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507456166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79959863,0.00009107226,0.000009103677,0.19628851,0.000032258733,0.0001981868,0.000087894754,0.000009064282,0.0036852902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437153,0.0028706605,0.0000018268701,0.0018912893,0.0006003886,0.000004558311,0.0000047264325,0.0000025202637,0.0002525252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901366,0.00042404034,0.00014825941,0.000070927475,0.00015287525,0.00019020659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994208,0.00036205776,0.00010764104,0.000037707297,0.00003932559,0.000032445543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055241474,0.00006010787,0.0001216151,0.000044690274,0.0010607744,0.00002834993,0.000078090605,0.000056839624,8.113781e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002775053,0.000029630028,0.00002671037,0.00028059338,0.0015012398,0.00008778874,0.000016202754,0.00006280947,2.2106529e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033694778,0.000012785576,0.0018986021,0.000011223426,0.000008212876,3.0807104e-7,0.11768384,1.09400986e-7,0.0000021738072,0.8767649,0.00015497407,0.0034291698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027702816,0.00019784461,0.2407482,0.000060977076,0.0000131302895,0.0000015033522,0.19357167,0.0000045905267,0.000025720434,0.5464466,0.015975082,0.00018439961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025519757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006522807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3303183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047577545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003294326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98096937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520196486","doi":"10.1111/spol.12250","title":"Return of the Nanny: Public Policy towards In‐home Childcare in the UK, Canada and Australia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Early childhood education; Position (finance); Public policy; Child care; Diversity (politics); Economic growth; Political science; Day care; Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.03836875039939506,"score_gpt":0.3396779680751578,"score_spread":0.30130921767576274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520196486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8280877,0.0000153702,2.3079654e-7,0.16846155,0.00007267741,0.0001314915,0.000018065059,0.0000027962571,0.0032101253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976704,0.00004837772,0.0000041424805,0.0010379375,0.00056853937,0.000007391325,0.0000023471164,0.0000023040036,0.0006585205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991176,0.00018258952,0.00016910945,0.00009986774,0.00023936258,0.00019146186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972403,0.000047596415,0.000077204895,0.000061746156,0.000035258854,0.00005414314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039156093,0.000062150255,0.00007873236,0.000060123813,0.0003101574,0.000059534726,0.0001302781,0.000070547314,0.000016117066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045368422,0.000036165,0.00001776506,0.00043211662,0.0002307499,0.000103973354,0.000017626153,0.00007641313,2.809962e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010230428,0.00004767486,0.40247053,0.000013312694,0.000009200266,9.999472e-7,0.1111667,2.9520217e-8,0.000048011963,0.46004322,0.0026456537,0.02354442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015701623,0.000011737826,0.97972345,0.000013980268,0.0000014248492,8.2506796e-7,0.0058820355,3.2169677e-8,0.000034782508,0.00828032,0.005837868,0.000056505178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7280924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94832677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5772529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017372477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064896815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525189274","doi":"10.1111/spol.12209","title":"Social Policy Change: Work–family Tensions in Sweden, Australia and Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Rationalisation; Politics; Sociology; Unpaid work; Work (physics); Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.15006206251486595,"score_gpt":0.418436100725532,"score_spread":0.2683740382106661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525189274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7763201,0.000036443806,9.334679e-7,0.21722876,0.00014029384,0.0002553159,0.000056448847,0.000034293345,0.0059273914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847019,0.00030491487,0.000005501632,0.0016750522,0.010309206,0.000038004193,0.0000042675397,0.0000103391485,0.0029508346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985077,0.00016808516,0.00024678124,0.00023228365,0.000296462,0.00054871326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953437,0.000084568506,0.00011023341,0.000047335107,0.0000640473,0.00015947285],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002776173,0.00016501718,0.0002344823,0.00012459556,0.0017565639,0.00007010626,0.00008992162,0.00023930405,0.000005769087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004274374,0.00012964515,0.00004623042,0.00048155873,0.00075724017,0.0002487315,0.00004938274,0.00012631419,0.000002906639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010671684,0.000083134044,0.014907731,0.00003374147,0.000056327346,0.00001939392,0.05052233,1.9457477e-8,0.0003573527,0.8683595,0.014798075,0.050755695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007707751,0.000059617447,0.91529,0.000044171735,0.000021686932,0.0000015173117,0.010817203,1.6252463e-7,0.000037191756,0.037558988,0.03500037,0.00039829573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89917374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9205348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9003823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031831203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016255653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530154693","doi":"10.1111/spol.12258","title":"Ideas and Institutions in Social Policy Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Scholarship; Institutionalism; Field (mathematics); Positive economics; Meaning (existential); New institutionalism; Sociology; Social science; Perspective (graphical); Social policy; Institutional analysis; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.19467530574397354,"score_gpt":0.5130139265502055,"score_spread":0.318338620806232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530154693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5695643,0.00007419645,0.000009409017,0.301923,0.00009089,0.00031579894,0.000047553556,0.000060253853,0.12791464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98513573,0.00069704495,0.000008837824,0.0004217368,0.011252535,0.000034270164,0.0000023429664,0.0000072980997,0.0024401795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983326,0.0003658042,0.00021630165,0.0002147276,0.00033943215,0.00053111615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953145,0.000145378,0.00006010858,0.000044335124,0.00009832583,0.00012038908],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000975898,0.000107332984,0.00016702751,0.00030904575,0.00390736,0.00010408647,0.000094124174,0.00024097295,0.000005903876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001455878,0.000084352396,0.00004322368,0.0008343935,0.002382489,0.00033420758,0.000067111454,0.00016923288,0.00000894401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000233778,0.000033318036,0.00062514254,0.000008355981,0.000008631388,0.0000017422045,0.02373367,6.511942e-9,0.0001428032,0.9518742,0.0007068056,0.022841936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089628843,0.00010423756,0.1364017,0.000034949837,0.000008990296,0.000001907663,0.017737985,3.7629147e-7,0.00007577794,0.78382874,0.060640376,0.00026869532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016217303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017157422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4155715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002486871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018402755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530290761","doi":"10.1111/spol.12254","title":"Citation Classics in Social Policy Journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Social science; Social policy; Citation analysis; Citation index; Sociology; Citation impact; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.09010774403557402,"score_gpt":0.4344723268921622,"score_spread":0.34436458285658816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530290761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47803393,0.000074767755,0.000082765124,0.42197877,0.00025213877,0.00035412348,0.00006041527,0.00010292061,0.09906016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97719854,0.0005798548,0.000015512047,0.00096385775,0.018666264,0.000019718576,0.0000031835407,0.000011058395,0.002542014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983779,0.00028340853,0.00032772336,0.00018323978,0.0003577374,0.0004699657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945116,0.000112875096,0.00018850663,0.00003941973,0.00009966371,0.000108362925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006807558,0.00013557791,0.00020819102,0.00027548362,0.002050525,0.00012452203,0.000103812556,0.000281473,0.000014493767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010922739,0.000106307205,0.00008818299,0.00077019486,0.000713066,0.0004502622,0.000028083983,0.00013080858,0.0000117553045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004608828,0.00004881696,0.0008995273,0.000009081465,0.000018098057,0.0000020866573,0.041722726,2.954423e-8,0.00043477092,0.8660279,0.0012964092,0.08949446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012747293,0.0001291717,0.20347455,0.000049369104,0.000020326632,0.0000018708781,0.01788889,0.000001059795,0.00018509758,0.7474078,0.029154837,0.00041230995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032770182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005376319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4991646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030183763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001166731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550995074","doi":"10.1111/spol.12271","title":"Workfare under Ontario Works: Making Sense of Jobless Work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Resocialization; Internship; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Work (physics); Welfare; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.09619677948518363,"score_gpt":0.4369275785816831,"score_spread":0.34073079909649945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550995074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.951506,0.00006100469,0.00021541861,0.03098126,0.00019609949,0.00024056663,0.000013169868,0.000041514355,0.016744921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910479,0.000033417087,0.000034158176,0.00064084237,0.0010878054,0.000021126485,0.0000048209304,0.000009881257,0.007120009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990825,0.00012356014,0.0002883669,0.00013311241,0.00011827331,0.0002541527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999477,0.00017040168,0.00017689589,0.00006979118,0.000066842,0.000039028706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017832188,0.00010075085,0.00017143557,0.000047398375,0.00072565867,0.00000929941,0.00003343391,0.00015304374,0.00011505123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006572228,0.0000728386,0.000042862135,0.00013956119,0.000111878115,0.00010614212,0.000044461616,0.00013187581,0.000010951332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008089129,0.00013784501,0.40871578,0.00023681669,0.00019022859,0.000007606045,0.05246106,4.597683e-7,0.00047816586,0.45161313,0.012047987,0.07330201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011249488,0.00011160756,0.93838876,0.0011421753,0.00004411694,7.563171e-7,0.006484243,1.3619193e-7,0.00005920647,0.033180308,0.019220753,0.00024298846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016216475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028176177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.529673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013304569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040133527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555451487","doi":"10.1111/spol.12208","title":"Privileging Policy Change? Sustaining Automatic Stabilizing Mechanisms in Public Pensions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Blame; Intervention (counseling); Pension; Cartel; Mechanism (biology); Pension system; Sustainability; Psychological intervention; Business; Economics; Public economics; Market economy; Incentive; Finance","score_opus":0.10028199632411952,"score_gpt":0.38718121243901504,"score_spread":0.28689921611489555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555451487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53427434,0.000058399597,0.00021984747,0.42406106,0.00029164378,0.00087967,0.00003020533,0.00031990715,0.039864916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382716,0.0002494533,0.00007648564,0.00085258513,0.0044272663,0.00007712236,0.0000028722807,0.0000156365,0.0004714287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981616,0.00028622767,0.00029956034,0.00024195356,0.00031356292,0.0006971014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930465,0.00021807915,0.0001541851,0.00007877284,0.00008012499,0.00016416714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081841584,0.00015963668,0.00023372508,0.00034393123,0.0019406456,0.00013880836,0.00012754386,0.00020166354,0.000014098323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002165093,0.00012539371,0.00007106086,0.000789377,0.0005176534,0.0006775344,0.000075977274,0.00011799608,0.000006449436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048317006,0.00003109116,0.00049059617,0.000015898564,0.000009975227,0.0000027366857,0.039062075,1.0857609e-8,0.00022752948,0.9042128,0.000029176952,0.055913303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011918931,0.00017816621,0.060899466,0.00017527209,0.000024926336,0.0000041303115,0.095177256,0.00002427766,0.00018428458,0.83386797,0.007609372,0.0006629723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005605097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011282548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4595528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003707853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012839937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560582932","doi":"10.1111/spol.12275","title":"Social Policy Instruments in Motion. Conditional Cash Transfers from Mexico to Peru","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conditional cash transfer; Latin Americans; Certification; Social policy; Indigenous; Standardization; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Poverty; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02592955573571292,"score_gpt":0.34277550669762796,"score_spread":0.31684595096191503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560582932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80337316,0.000009067678,0.000099167715,0.18319999,0.00011935736,0.00020484472,0.00047736283,0.000033731696,0.012483304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181867,0.00006791915,0.00001883885,0.0017944743,0.0053358064,0.000023802857,0.00010665079,0.000009325862,0.0008245212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987347,0.00017486468,0.00022672002,0.00023716122,0.00030994983,0.00031661167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996333,0.000041130003,0.00005805784,0.000048429833,0.000055242814,0.00016383007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001933669,0.00012067503,0.0001379083,0.00014726791,0.0011130491,0.00009464859,0.00011575774,0.00017338469,0.00014665417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016861316,0.0001155481,0.000060203656,0.00033624904,0.0002541363,0.00039027713,0.000008825209,0.000072670875,0.000023487139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008795472,0.00023926533,0.012053269,0.000008514604,0.00003224303,0.0000014293277,0.089018375,2.2875385e-7,0.00057311164,0.8073681,0.0039330893,0.0866844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012631558,0.00009638,0.77528846,0.000024344848,0.000016549828,9.0868144e-7,0.00871842,0.000001107408,0.00045830043,0.1450405,0.068742596,0.0003492605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017368266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02096273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7632352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035696788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001577836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99690217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585506434","doi":"10.1111/spol.12286","title":"The Politics of ‘Minimum Wage’ Welfare States: The Changing Significance of the Minimum Wage in the Liberal Welfare Regime","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Workfare; Economics; Welfare state; Labour economics; Politics; Incentive; Welfare; Welfare reform; Political economy; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.032379339724865036,"score_gpt":0.34638686382035727,"score_spread":0.31400752409549226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585506434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56889904,0.00011949642,9.345309e-7,0.4078956,0.0002739531,0.0005935553,0.00009526763,0.000012529496,0.022109639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511695,0.00028708018,0.000001943788,0.0005285173,0.0019837755,0.000037254424,0.000003069133,0.000009047281,0.0020323559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981415,0.0004575172,0.0003466632,0.00014897616,0.00043093678,0.0004743749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872905,0.00030386992,0.000523282,0.000307739,0.00009770209,0.00003834987],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012356527,0.0001448019,0.00020355095,0.000036612193,0.011302345,0.00020679274,0.00077126856,0.00014148666,0.0000024128606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009010028,0.000069150614,0.00014193534,0.00029198843,0.0029591755,0.0001712269,0.00011890235,0.00023580364,5.075229e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028846882,0.000041643532,0.00059050065,0.000026191465,0.000034589906,9.280601e-7,0.203387,5.863638e-7,0.000028686485,0.7920841,0.00050986966,0.0032670274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006610388,0.0001765625,0.18597467,0.00007671236,0.00008513464,0.0000016810243,0.64017105,0.000024224006,0.000513564,0.13350046,0.03848676,0.00032815436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007298647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009371178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6585837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050630206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003423234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744170599","doi":"10.1111/spol.12369","title":"A signaling perspective on bureaucratic encounters: How public officials interpret signals and cues","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Perspective (graphical); Unobservable; Trustworthiness; Public relations; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09986298016777756,"score_gpt":0.4527776538895705,"score_spread":0.3529146737217929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744170599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5577198,0.000054063297,0.00013994784,0.32177752,0.00011473774,0.00045255575,0.00008382344,0.000080377475,0.11957714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449927,0.000083133746,0.000024132067,0.0010269439,0.002584006,0.00003053892,0.000009195721,0.00001118902,0.0017316022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981722,0.0003541659,0.00020045106,0.00034343576,0.00047010652,0.00045964285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989056,0.00023610865,0.0001934428,0.00016394746,0.00021154994,0.0002893566],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010965887,0.0001729283,0.00022573277,0.00017865893,0.0041169743,0.0031455345,0.00029266003,0.00020117627,0.000046753576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004700543,0.00017355403,0.00006807373,0.00013513518,0.0012607172,0.0010566486,0.00006059739,0.00021947602,0.0000058024257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055492008,0.000084435385,0.0002044337,0.000015401934,0.000029735553,0.0000060660964,0.019305903,6.2313234e-8,0.0012995251,0.97373277,0.0007672076,0.0044989907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030780998,0.00324751,0.02530749,0.00038964272,0.00013315475,0.000025660396,0.2911235,0.00030323898,0.009548853,0.5658224,0.09877272,0.0022477065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003482247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005270344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43677944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016575475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001568716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895830303","doi":"10.1111/spol.12456","title":"A typology of activation incentives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Typology; Incentive; Affect (linguistics); Order (exchange); Public economics; Economics; Population; Human capital; Business; Microeconomics; Market economy; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.044815415970231254,"score_gpt":0.41244366262823795,"score_spread":0.3676282466580067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895830303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.745179,0.000010583862,0.000056337714,0.02708952,0.000120495206,0.00014129662,0.00001131533,0.000036364152,0.22735512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942811,0.000058548278,0.000029406745,0.00027310362,0.004467714,0.000004083687,0.0000031670454,0.0000029176301,0.0008799642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994539,0.000093284594,0.000117123906,0.000079968966,0.00010780087,0.00014791924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971133,0.00004335787,0.00009634256,0.00002551922,0.00009098552,0.000032457392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017990904,0.0000492602,0.00009295043,0.00005198795,0.0009257722,0.00001534212,0.0000431657,0.00010605218,0.000011702684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035025674,0.00004618584,0.000028180693,0.00021987782,0.0013740484,0.00013040075,0.00001570154,0.000040660856,0.0000039777105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003402845,0.000025277717,0.00048542593,0.000006306417,0.0000144417245,6.93352e-8,0.042605538,3.9697388e-9,0.00051155523,0.94980055,0.00033775368,0.0061790706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009946941,0.00075481815,0.1921014,0.000039475042,0.000049633767,0.0000010672486,0.12432006,0.000004861482,0.018594222,0.6134182,0.049269576,0.00045196296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016855039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010827926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3363823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026138723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028845252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71203846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901977377","doi":"10.1111/spol.12472","title":"I am more than a mom: Stories of parental leave during the transition to motherhood in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Narrative; Parental leave; Position (finance); Embodied cognition; Social policy; Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.021912738071381162,"score_gpt":0.31675508930524543,"score_spread":0.29484235123386426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901977377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987085,0.000020470945,0.000004945693,0.009666282,0.00007598678,0.00014987485,0.000032707703,0.000009518991,0.0029552095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829066,0.000024099969,0.000006537961,0.00015207728,0.0013412728,0.000010885712,0.0000027486124,0.000004477648,0.00016723954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993461,0.000078130644,0.00011798185,0.000098453806,0.00019192805,0.00016744202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998047,0.000025441166,0.000049785307,0.00004273364,0.000033866716,0.000043517095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013192475,0.000059460628,0.00008577726,0.00002766617,0.00036353184,0.00002815405,0.0000721181,0.00004619828,0.000008419618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050129765,0.000054041644,0.00001708844,0.00019563337,0.00022573273,0.000117036325,0.000007676659,0.000054779994,4.2723002e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023626335,0.0000899024,0.077737294,0.000056643337,0.0000290584,0.0000035752616,0.8898637,0.0000069662115,0.0019298957,0.025713537,0.0005864402,0.003746676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017481718,0.00006856584,0.8031426,0.00002150691,0.000004250883,5.096971e-7,0.19417466,0.0000021184605,0.0007299488,0.0010440693,0.00054756936,0.000089342146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7749932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99084246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72540534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025139024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001030501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27960297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903406873","doi":"10.1111/spol.12471","title":"Protective legislation: The “third pillar” of the welfare state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Welfare; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Social policy; Public economics; Economics; Business; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.033279042732185085,"score_gpt":0.3537521316188936,"score_spread":0.3204730888867085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903406873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38935074,0.00006051738,0.00004109685,0.3729787,0.000554093,0.0011473098,0.00006122158,0.000065747445,0.2357406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941374,0.000031784966,0.0000034701072,0.00044178075,0.00404401,0.000018513758,7.5124893e-7,0.000004113962,0.0013181521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910444,0.00022020943,0.0001516425,0.00009575843,0.00024466688,0.00018330224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999553,0.000043639942,0.00015968127,0.00006878392,0.00014641002,0.000028450477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003775457,0.000072556904,0.00009346789,0.000020257541,0.004143672,0.00004984088,0.00012700654,0.00008318105,0.0000053523336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041291292,0.000041568917,0.00006246133,0.0003707362,0.002048933,0.00011473861,0.000039748313,0.000100054436,0.0000020925934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034810313,0.000021767331,0.00029531255,0.000008583808,0.00003601882,1.1798408e-7,0.13165352,1.379985e-7,0.00007001168,0.8568117,0.00065113057,0.0104169035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047675945,0.00033050356,0.2277708,0.000026301099,0.000053115808,0.0000015825783,0.062697336,0.000006770556,0.001629993,0.6000363,0.10668117,0.00028931585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005604682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013519744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6047867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038708487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003866256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906166200","doi":"10.1111/spol.12482","title":"Coproduction and the third sector in France: Governmental traditions and the French conceptualization of participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Coproduction; Conceptualization; Solidarity; Framing (construction); Sociology; Narrative; Political science; Public relations; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.033617132386676435,"score_gpt":0.34829292074984997,"score_spread":0.31467578836317356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906166200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.967183,0.00011799452,0.000056796434,0.026902098,0.00011151411,0.0002722828,0.000017233566,0.000006799331,0.005332277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980714,0.00023072278,0.000008621863,0.00024620257,0.0011605792,0.000020965965,0.000002386434,0.0000017165368,0.00025745842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992057,0.00022064541,0.00014890348,0.00010806662,0.00021276835,0.00010389134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996505,0.00011643156,0.00014006601,0.000032250577,0.000036061374,0.000024724732],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066233845,0.0000470887,0.00009100472,0.000011930769,0.0008242579,0.00006371448,0.00004345194,0.000053085667,0.000011611546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030550154,0.00003207249,0.00001701719,0.00025203958,0.0034405743,0.00020119402,0.0000073451515,0.00004847483,3.0858195e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053944204,0.000019410281,0.0039444575,0.000004855959,0.0000046543187,4.489562e-8,0.12567544,2.1751086e-7,0.0000626783,0.8671765,0.00040755767,0.0026502938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035186147,0.00017146993,0.8142184,0.000024352401,0.00004011579,0.0000011909506,0.06132612,0.00040008547,0.00035537046,0.11198166,0.007795916,0.00016668967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023004526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027895281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81027395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004021813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012524678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944617324","doi":"10.1111/spol.12504","title":"Mandatory occupational welfare: Severance pay as an unemployment compensation instrument","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Severance; Unemployment; Generosity; Economics; Employment protection legislation; Welfare; Legislation; Labour economics; Structural unemployment; Public economics; Political science; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.0364024583355392,"score_gpt":0.36886416341140876,"score_spread":0.3324617050758696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944617324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92679495,0.000010498628,0.0000064783744,0.037440795,0.0003197134,0.000375184,0.000031640942,0.00007110491,0.034949657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941771,0.00008352555,0.000029801307,0.0012026544,0.002516747,0.000022039952,0.00005868154,0.000008174937,0.0019012874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987576,0.00016365814,0.00022426556,0.00021059743,0.00038172005,0.00026213654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958146,0.000035223566,0.00013386241,0.0000671854,0.00007404671,0.00010820126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035049525,0.00012016972,0.00014587684,0.000057804842,0.0016639607,0.0001080565,0.00008539901,0.0001438104,0.000072048344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009377171,0.00010333467,0.000049386184,0.00018501119,0.0002802566,0.00041170063,0.000023352557,0.000106651365,0.000041081516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008220985,0.000078927456,0.004980251,0.000015054916,0.000024384792,6.136338e-7,0.016596382,0.0000010381193,0.000043261123,0.9650965,0.00015562637,0.012925804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020118002,0.00077648624,0.5718423,0.000032396874,0.00004888138,0.0000038204494,0.0333078,0.000048522816,0.00038321418,0.17913096,0.21157943,0.00083441037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003978497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019316585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7859655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014786092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060236466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969287737","doi":"10.1111/spol.12527","title":"Gatekeeping disability income support: A conceptual model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Process (computing); Grounded theory; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual model; Income Support; Inclusion (mineral); Disability studies; Empirical research; Public economics; Boundary (topology); Qualitative research; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Social science; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.044627948123104146,"score_gpt":0.37745514073883585,"score_spread":0.3328271926157317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969287737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.885263,0.000011796251,0.000020655169,0.017150704,0.00014537727,0.00030155564,0.000034302564,0.00008423613,0.09698833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942817,0.000054680408,0.000028709961,0.00069920113,0.002319321,0.000013744685,0.00000962107,0.000007613923,0.0025853815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988892,0.000118420045,0.00020797255,0.00019563374,0.00024387281,0.00034491395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996182,0.000069493835,0.00009462265,0.00006552376,0.000045987363,0.000106227526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003853091,0.00010963539,0.00018718245,0.000027175804,0.0012031997,0.0000736195,0.0000898005,0.00017475683,0.000032462314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022329851,0.00010596582,0.000078040306,0.00019956932,0.0012863278,0.0002878141,0.000040533658,0.00012494152,0.000027790586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030237808,0.000044558834,0.0039219377,0.000021970407,0.000018699808,4.3055445e-7,0.06782436,0.0000027087196,0.00008748866,0.9240978,0.00009859673,0.0038512242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021706603,0.00058213586,0.1393753,0.000047163412,0.00008512623,0.0000027707358,0.1551274,0.0004930338,0.00038880348,0.68575233,0.014631281,0.0013439858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020936166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017937818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23834544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113805996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056072895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9254162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969706619","doi":"10.1111/spol.12535","title":"The impacts of housing factors on deprivation in a world city: The case of Hong Kong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Poverty; Renting; Per capita; Per capita income; Public housing; Living space; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Standard of living; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Geography; Demography; Population; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.043455967313905296,"score_gpt":0.28616816894562513,"score_spread":0.24271220163171983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969706619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99150175,0.000062774925,0.000015233005,0.0010726874,0.00007834364,0.00014789002,0.000031869295,0.000004380172,0.0070850723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995595,0.00005141605,0.0000073122087,0.00009970661,0.00013668419,0.000002017031,0.000003946348,0.000006816457,0.00013259711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993835,0.000021291542,0.00033139662,0.000110309506,0.000024867984,0.00012865427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994219,0.0001019524,0.00034629783,0.00009906155,0.000013982236,0.000016790658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029758297,0.00007112194,0.00015981316,0.00011754137,0.00016664817,0.000038895476,0.000055266482,0.000054140386,0.000004938024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050688082,0.000055746023,0.00004666566,0.00028965707,0.000083437095,0.00011174576,0.000012709703,0.00008962226,0.0000017431412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006159674,0.000059116745,0.10120305,0.000035872774,0.000017526667,0.0000043530226,0.0065413136,0.000012864125,0.00019240756,0.88706475,0.000039829763,0.0047673155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000861996,0.0002333338,0.9605509,0.000059644313,0.000007943714,0.000008378073,0.0015061153,0.0003993687,0.0036952102,0.028502142,0.003934118,0.00024085784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030687663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046496033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8593478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039774033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005381937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46390772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009183577","doi":"10.1111/spol.12587","title":"Value‐based issues and policy change: Medical assistance in dying in four narratives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Narrative; Hypocrisy; Newspaper; Accountability; Political science; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Public administration; Law; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.2969554333273978,"score_gpt":0.5638929890481618,"score_spread":0.26693755572076394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009183577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4885715,0.00024244764,0.000019730005,0.50814515,0.00005598453,0.00038827033,0.000014355547,0.000022666369,0.002539888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98405546,0.00011838628,0.00008656534,0.011839376,0.0037105754,0.00008397489,0.000008194947,0.000009746291,0.0000877346],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975928,0.0012741141,0.00041348627,0.00020938643,0.00021655802,0.00029364554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992295,0.00031969088,0.00017475119,0.00004317998,0.000031408563,0.00020150637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009663919,0.00010601354,0.00023390642,0.000104817766,0.00041638326,0.000027253194,0.00004910477,0.00027446685,0.00003141814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017256838,0.00010223111,0.0000152338325,0.00036709657,0.000069352565,0.0002564138,0.000024017416,0.00047726842,0.0000044544827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006906542,0.00012149236,0.1562163,0.003118066,0.00002103489,0.000107784814,0.444052,5.257051e-7,0.00043772,0.33686838,0.0011629654,0.057203062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033977695,0.00058545324,0.781378,0.0010691988,0.000007763021,0.0000050581543,0.051519502,0.001455507,0.000030883806,0.009934535,0.15011084,0.0005055219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008706684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009712484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62516165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007928222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016734187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046335489","doi":"10.1111/spol.12640","title":"Question worth 20 million lives: Why federal housing assistance has not had its Obamacare","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Affordable housing; Equity (law); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Politics; Social policy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Health care; Inequality; Public policy; Public administration; Public housing; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07412549472061837,"score_gpt":0.28100497124192403,"score_spread":0.20687947652130567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046335489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9285959,0.00087169535,0.0031943421,0.04370115,0.00033577063,0.0003258988,0.0004367024,0.00015587863,0.022382636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114865,0.00025342632,0.00022611569,0.0056369575,0.0021428422,0.000011127757,0.00008253043,0.000025926154,0.00047242097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876845,0.000032929318,0.0004484555,0.00040246308,0.00006228594,0.0002854299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994043,0.000016949678,0.00033195247,0.00007898714,0.000041687385,0.00012610725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014332905,0.00018600783,0.00030805188,0.00008636486,0.0006807838,0.00034179518,0.00008703289,0.00016554295,0.00002581401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006042953,0.00023793764,0.00009500839,0.00028494323,0.00010380431,0.00042666748,0.000023282491,0.00017933923,0.00004704358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043837068,0.00021390693,0.012861009,0.00036324214,0.00009192111,0.000037605816,0.022232464,0.000044484485,0.0012906317,0.94052047,0.009549617,0.012356257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030582799,0.0009570037,0.12332366,0.00018187596,0.000043731834,0.000018331386,0.0011277759,0.0037470995,0.0036210162,0.014359475,0.84758973,0.0019720243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036995424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045415375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.926161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088378816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012766759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97028154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046801448","doi":"10.1111/spol.12629","title":"Public income transfers and wealth accumulation at the bottom: Within and between country differences in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Poverty; Asset (computer security); Economics; Counterfactual thinking; Welfare; Welfare state; Household income; Financial asset; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.14487042892987947,"score_gpt":0.4212346270310495,"score_spread":0.2763641981011701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046801448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86201906,0.00014115538,0.0000034066518,0.13701804,0.000037937025,0.0004979776,0.00017688144,0.000012284892,0.000093229784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331325,0.00040268438,0.000004024426,0.005787619,0.00033458983,0.000020904352,0.000108559885,0.0000062921904,0.000022091317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984377,0.0006338571,0.0003464374,0.00016177613,0.00017239433,0.00024782837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988323,0.00078535324,0.00013104426,0.00004521359,0.00004328608,0.0001628083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047668477,0.00010957008,0.0002061795,0.000033815035,0.0011845219,0.000043026892,0.000049659786,0.00010410935,0.0000048818933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025245198,0.00007020127,0.0000067232027,0.0002634052,0.0002703763,0.00010674878,0.000038630955,0.00032899724,4.047385e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029908118,0.0000047816698,0.91897744,0.0004088532,0.000019789979,0.0000013769134,0.051213875,7.3701216e-7,0.0000035582084,0.027348682,0.0005370928,0.0011847364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011129804,0.00008705212,0.9793027,0.000036631624,0.000016361702,7.307812e-7,0.014851382,0.0005030856,0.0000018019863,0.0030024934,0.0010000899,0.00008469893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.790662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93093276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14027078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001832989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015704774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9110505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048385348","doi":"10.1111/spol.12644","title":"Using candidacy theory to explore unemployed over‐50s perceptions of suitability of a welfare to work programme: A longitudinal qualitative study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Candidacy; Intervention (counseling); Welfare; Work (physics); Psychological intervention; Agency (philosophy); Unemployment; Psychology; Welfare reform; Pessimism; Perception; Nursing; Feeling; Qualitative research; Health care; Workload; Public relations; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.2942494334203528,"score_gpt":0.5415142245919654,"score_spread":0.2472647911716126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048385348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757222,0.000009988848,0.0002801404,0.021924859,0.000042708078,0.0016417644,0.00010934195,0.00003539807,0.00023361405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987919,0.0000014560536,0.0001661956,0.00032733494,0.00046198536,0.00017297392,0.000015926378,0.000013878257,0.00004834901],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785763,0.0007984188,0.00055087433,0.00025870907,0.00023181057,0.00030254488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991002,0.00020455377,0.00019923848,0.000098079894,0.00021662643,0.0001812877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062377326,0.00015151883,0.00036786802,0.000074755015,0.0008950091,0.0000098660175,0.000078093966,0.00008205349,0.000061611696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085185777,0.00014010961,0.000071943665,0.0006520142,0.00012571,0.00008440033,0.0001136464,0.00016083423,0.000002360938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007949204,0.00027803605,0.19518737,0.00018459371,0.000078008416,7.957289e-7,0.7880144,9.764117e-7,0.0002306184,0.013904952,0.00017327523,0.0011520628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005119717,0.0009996267,0.4614576,0.000048598904,0.000056427303,6.093195e-8,0.5351324,5.654603e-7,0.000017173994,0.0015247291,0.000138259,0.00011257399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020431646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016821694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26627025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009158016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032543292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6883777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088029007","doi":"10.1111/spol.12655","title":"Determinants of social assistance caseloads for employable single adults without dependants in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Social assistance; Government (linguistics); Jurisdiction; Social security; Business; Value (mathematics); Demographic economics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.07564880804417928,"score_gpt":0.4405122136947788,"score_spread":0.3648634056505995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088029007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99258643,0.000030391991,0.000010568436,0.0053287125,0.00013315433,0.0006272471,0.00046818014,0.000016409682,0.0007988761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972848,0.0000043309005,0.000099077224,0.001596865,0.0008403532,0.000051165098,0.000028545724,0.000013708318,0.00008110112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985633,0.00014862916,0.00051772804,0.00019849109,0.00017697384,0.000394918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928635,0.00012262356,0.00029363015,0.00004338267,0.00012571414,0.00012827246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001545259,0.00011233532,0.0003046223,0.000027140428,0.00049209327,0.0000058161227,0.00006837774,0.00014248563,0.000011096343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004187506,0.00012298697,0.000027642951,0.00017752702,0.00004300516,0.00008669664,0.000022293083,0.00015467251,0.000002252255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066600363,0.00031564833,0.8198573,0.0088692615,0.00004079258,0.00006726252,0.09604136,0.0000018120461,0.0018668863,0.012091299,0.030417677,0.023770664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004024541,0.0008558966,0.947436,0.00041989857,0.000035513534,0.0000026330463,0.02586636,0.00033016314,0.0023438076,0.0011297655,0.017057933,0.0004975277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54980254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97272855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42292598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044510968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051547317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9144273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092696214","doi":"10.1111/spol.12661","title":"Accommodation and new hurdles: The increasing importance of politics for immigrants' access to social programmes in <scp>Western</scp> democracies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Punitive damages; Welfare state; Politics; Welfare; Accommodation; Political science; Social Welfare; Development economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.10200510559203085,"score_gpt":0.41082527645201816,"score_spread":0.3088201708599873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092696214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87979394,0.00006661307,0.00007515865,0.118475586,0.000035792287,0.000625474,0.00005529431,0.000027124646,0.0008450273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99354243,0.00010050249,0.00008763558,0.002633349,0.0034894638,0.00003782634,0.000010882397,0.000009384812,0.00008852294],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887955,0.00013393593,0.0002973807,0.00017163015,0.00019263041,0.000324895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992371,0.00035267568,0.00018825564,0.00003492321,0.00006766359,0.000119390956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038814617,0.00012066139,0.00022793179,0.00005354023,0.001296944,0.00020033457,0.00015239502,0.00013565633,3.670225e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019365612,0.000101393685,0.000057903762,0.0004136899,0.00042831787,0.0003344636,0.00006471275,0.000094365634,2.7377877e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092628,0.0000714935,0.07961639,0.00017038458,0.00006141328,7.7889774e-7,0.5154201,8.518795e-7,0.00026121837,0.37991202,0.0015071091,0.022885619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009170568,0.00025362868,0.711887,0.00003830418,0.00006896189,0.0000010330853,0.15431976,0.000014107653,0.00035921726,0.12183192,0.010113853,0.00019515152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074839937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0140390145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6322706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039359427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004731935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095286661","doi":"10.1111/spol.12656","title":"Social policy responses to <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 in Canada and the United States: Explaining policy variations between two liberal welfare state regimes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Politics; Pandemic; State (computer science); Social policy; Welfare; Social Welfare; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Public policy; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political economy; Development economics; Public administration; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.054002553652817135,"score_gpt":0.3692774504295438,"score_spread":0.31527489677672665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095286661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60000813,0.000021622298,0.0000217826,0.39559022,0.000039815783,0.00046491637,0.00033477822,0.00006591293,0.0034528212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97608495,0.00020831129,0.00002069993,0.015195347,0.007511376,0.00006021925,0.000068567286,0.00002206352,0.00082849176],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704033,0.00096833496,0.00047302927,0.00033628714,0.00045739685,0.0007246464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826074,0.0008632289,0.00024480338,0.000076077245,0.00010460711,0.000450555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007180648,0.00025829556,0.00041351755,0.00030054236,0.003876944,0.00027391425,0.00022701808,0.0001389944,0.0000021228514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005422236,0.00022393125,0.000073533294,0.0021787211,0.00077986147,0.0002620403,0.0001294506,0.00031231382,0.000001742727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001588554,0.000016046968,0.0060442374,0.000030638625,0.0000851737,0.0000068364043,0.51819116,0.000019267804,0.0000043767086,0.46950835,0.0027399845,0.0031951023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054537677,0.00031186928,0.31423122,0.0000392851,0.00012468015,0.0000032849427,0.3392326,0.000112785805,0.000024620957,0.20907903,0.13069561,0.000691255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96897656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83980733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38039488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007327475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008856407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139466183","doi":"10.1111/spol.12718","title":"Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social policy; Financial crisis; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Keynesian economics; Law; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.07801491981630831,"score_gpt":0.44057368665893964,"score_spread":0.36255876684263133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139466183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57813025,0.00017157795,0.000024786637,0.39568672,0.000097826494,0.0004704714,0.00026463065,0.000054240787,0.025099525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731372,0.00035966322,0.0000121663315,0.015305805,0.009848061,0.00005282424,0.00000945958,0.000009999274,0.0012648185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685293,0.0012052614,0.00041807204,0.00029356,0.0005916222,0.0006385626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883986,0.0005179941,0.00021032286,0.00014468058,0.0001327379,0.00015442533],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012982398,0.00020840243,0.00031977898,0.00011753227,0.0028706926,0.00019722176,0.00038255024,0.00029538161,0.0000024008864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007600845,0.0001496332,0.00018610684,0.0026786563,0.00081621896,0.00017152623,0.00012408137,0.00023877643,0.000006465434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042428077,0.00010446417,0.0046988316,0.000027393102,0.00004999514,0.0000059653835,0.3161982,0.0000011852364,0.000059038575,0.66130143,0.013807447,0.0037036105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069942063,0.00016155088,0.23192362,0.0000142747485,0.000060331025,0.000013730387,0.42777845,0.0000011936406,0.000058601006,0.1961517,0.14294633,0.00019077257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052324332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043055158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46514976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039969882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005327013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195748619","doi":"10.1111/spol.12755","title":"Translating social policy ideas: The Beveridge report, transnational diffusion, and<scp>post‐war</scp>welfare state development in Canada, Denmark, and France","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Welfare state; State (computer science); Social policy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Welfare; World War II; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Public administration; Law; History","score_opus":0.016975359960013345,"score_gpt":0.3002763426429964,"score_spread":0.28330098268298304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195748619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83148825,0.00022494623,0.000009661882,0.16459242,0.00007980934,0.00020454224,0.0000788356,0.000015295363,0.0033062375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957962,0.00022274056,0.000036102192,0.0014293516,0.001431377,0.000032828328,0.00003372856,0.000011697665,0.0010059648],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981641,0.00021853442,0.00043179587,0.00028648213,0.0004522179,0.00044686088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993678,0.0001466478,0.00017362111,0.00004631633,0.0001464117,0.00011924822],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045697915,0.00018174345,0.00024569873,0.00006801403,0.0038417776,0.000105401385,0.000080480546,0.00013898709,0.0000044692547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005878281,0.00016067509,0.000045763587,0.00048389897,0.0004896251,0.00020444888,0.000037343194,0.00021612884,2.3182432e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029106415,0.00009042536,0.013357121,0.00013716584,0.00011457966,0.000109207256,0.572631,0.0000020287246,0.00022879445,0.32423767,0.00027558772,0.08878728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006271756,0.000019567738,0.8903557,0.000017448006,0.00002060234,0.000019029678,0.06396466,0.000010131344,0.00009941754,0.014604262,0.03006588,0.0001960961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44289482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91354173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021831911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006772756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204572210","doi":"10.1111/spol.12775","title":"The operation of the social support sector serving siblings of people with disabilities: A cross‐country analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Sibling; Staffing; Sister; Social support; Family support; Public relations; Business; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Management; Medicine; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.0390245700122398,"score_gpt":0.40299773504594993,"score_spread":0.36397316503371013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204572210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903912,0.000017167504,0.000039973027,0.0037582568,0.000054164753,0.00015052783,0.00013653905,0.0000075355515,0.005444649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981692,0.0000021982096,0.000006575224,0.0001354176,0.00033398072,0.000023479572,0.000069695074,0.000006456571,0.0012530322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987771,0.0002254406,0.0003183153,0.00019245977,0.00029109395,0.00019557787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992021,0.00024681358,0.0001356185,0.0001887041,0.00019453307,0.0000322715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004416411,0.00008802875,0.00019296078,0.000038798375,0.0007048017,0.00009612277,0.0001225413,0.00011164259,0.00029997085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030133437,0.00005772604,0.00012772836,0.00090537954,0.0005960712,0.00010638065,0.000045827805,0.00012535103,0.0000012845028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007578673,0.0005745162,0.67308503,0.00030157476,0.00083643314,0.0000018394278,0.11208508,0.000020042136,0.0020966977,0.20750277,0.0008016156,0.0019365406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004405737,0.00016135791,0.9023122,0.000005174957,0.00016312448,0.000004003686,0.09167722,0.000046158242,0.0026241206,0.002136644,0.0003243878,0.00010504415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019222391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010052534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22922717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032769556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073836633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.560955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206019823","doi":"10.1111/spol.12789","title":"Welfare state change as a double movement: Four decades of retrenchment and expansion in compensatory and employment‐oriented policies across 21 high‐income countries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare state; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Economics; Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Market economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.04229850049818131,"score_gpt":0.37162519442492237,"score_spread":0.3293266939267411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206019823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97466683,0.0002762991,3.210805e-7,0.023468258,0.00010064468,0.0004200071,0.00020206663,0.000025797144,0.00083976035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974509,0.0010300867,0.0000056067956,0.00064600544,0.00041549734,0.00009990228,0.000014422176,0.000008143369,0.00032942978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860144,0.0001605048,0.0002901326,0.00020703801,0.00038390118,0.00035699288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956983,0.000048641108,0.00019106537,0.000052289444,0.000050899565,0.000087247055],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048071996,0.00014111068,0.00025351625,0.00012204323,0.0025410464,0.00007076988,0.000068051835,0.000079392754,0.000010695733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044648918,0.00014077457,0.000031767955,0.00035984835,0.00075101765,0.00024009377,0.00016625182,0.00012940407,2.5511414e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037809313,0.00011098226,0.039909184,0.000114056835,0.000057271227,0.000007555268,0.3836403,8.25816e-7,0.000097381104,0.57118416,0.00004802555,0.0044522015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025389406,0.0007056811,0.7709999,0.00005279729,0.000028530116,0.000002797246,0.17296611,0.000003890819,0.0004792485,0.040043,0.011783184,0.00039590654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058523376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019454103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7310907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014146404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017889605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281552819","doi":"10.1111/spol.12817","title":"Beyond financial constraints: The politics of Irish health system reform in the aftermath of the great recession","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Irish Research eLibrary","keywords":"Recession; Irish; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Abandonment (legal); Politics; Welfare reform; Government (linguistics); Financial crisis; Economics; Welfare; Economic policy; Public economics; Political economy; Political science; Market economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.049692319072122224,"score_gpt":0.4085966522950271,"score_spread":0.3589043332229049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281552819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8550319,0.00014538056,0.0000030438146,0.11933474,0.0003055155,0.00086047227,0.00037200152,0.000011932894,0.023934985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668765,0.000026826936,0.0000022562112,0.0023758414,0.00048751585,0.00008712314,0.000013580782,0.0000045845313,0.00031460164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981861,0.0008269267,0.00045118597,0.00008427206,0.00024184992,0.00020962747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929017,0.00013789715,0.0003957632,0.00011580929,0.000041897398,0.000018482251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000969336,0.00007601726,0.00017254252,0.000033501266,0.0025662575,0.0000048578754,0.0001530114,0.000053409753,0.000009674349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009529867,0.00003957917,0.00005007315,0.00024054067,0.00027681328,0.000038462393,0.00010548587,0.00030893093,2.754718e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008931262,0.00008458495,0.016427694,0.00060296216,0.000015065464,9.5015946e-7,0.07889619,2.9045268e-7,0.000033953358,0.88821244,0.012422245,0.003214317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012962933,0.0005526638,0.6076828,0.00033348266,0.000040119998,0.000009380849,0.3480315,0.0000096181975,0.00005230843,0.020157754,0.021668933,0.00016515153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025528423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096224423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8680547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029888455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009394293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313590397","doi":"10.1111/spol.12890","title":"The Four Lenses of Population Aging: Planning for the Future in Canada's Provinces. By PatrikMarier, University of Toronto Press, 2021, 368 Pages. £44.95 (Pbk)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Population; Citation; Sociology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.02269108307843096,"score_gpt":0.2865283642855999,"score_spread":0.2638372812071689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313590397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95368296,0.009121144,0.000056686447,0.032797765,0.00047302555,0.001094072,0.00030646846,0.000033946693,0.0024339308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398655,0.00454714,0.000005846353,0.000019920377,0.0006983757,0.0000037720233,0.000027651588,0.000002875406,0.0007078517],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993842,0.00008550157,0.00012978342,0.00008778167,0.00017181238,0.00014092492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951553,0.00021321628,0.00015751609,0.000043002197,0.000049896677,0.000020835207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032537887,0.000054829474,0.00009086684,0.0000069408384,0.0010929129,0.00002524233,0.00008558528,0.00004575267,0.0000022978168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011074924,0.000043279768,0.000028098837,0.000087601016,0.00011365485,0.00011557818,0.000014537826,0.000039694743,3.0076112e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022562227,0.00004898602,0.05827429,0.00016350989,0.00012593556,0.0000030516908,0.47978285,0.00004032679,0.00008860623,0.09818954,0.26976624,0.09329104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000429449,0.00006486391,0.520893,0.000022966453,0.000045617446,1.1306986e-7,0.07922368,0.00022031752,0.000052306426,0.0044049453,0.39448735,0.00015540821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99768716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4626187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012966135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008102127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84059125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321498683","doi":"10.1111/spol.12904","title":"Monetary redress for abuse in state care. By StephenWinter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2022. <scp>ISBN</scp>: 9781009082662. Open Access (online) ISBN: 9781316514160; 223 pages; £85 (Hbk)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Library science; State (computer science); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10389051069948174,"score_gpt":0.43611045750182575,"score_spread":0.332219946802344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321498683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615917,0.0005494359,0.00004425336,0.014199072,0.0005025779,0.0029797324,0.0067140684,0.00022237754,0.013196744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882539,0.0042054616,0.000026947926,0.0011686424,0.001491545,0.00019907733,0.0034402653,0.00007127236,0.10114283],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973354,0.00045282568,0.00057257334,0.00056893105,0.00026359732,0.00080671546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986608,0.00038880119,0.00035395462,0.00021904267,0.00019081944,0.00018655113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044577348,0.00032510448,0.00049064046,0.00020665146,0.0016416368,0.00016689528,0.0006000183,0.00028439896,0.0000036048054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020325219,0.00035011576,0.00010205085,0.0005908353,0.00018330285,0.0009377473,0.0006195333,0.00047519483,0.000011341756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044285966,0.00027903,0.012396471,0.0008238881,0.00015752847,0.00004377113,0.018653343,0.0000035116227,0.00024695863,0.007377324,0.95664495,0.002930356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076653967,0.0006143656,0.30220267,0.00032903074,0.00015819959,0.0000013945166,0.06810038,0.00017175486,0.0004407235,0.0004666536,0.6192728,0.0005765969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014791914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067276084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33737212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033737894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058964407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323308397","doi":"10.1111/spol.12901","title":"Constrained ‘choices’: Optional familism and educational divides in work‐family arrangements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; German; Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Welfare reform; Labour economics; Family income; Economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.06074369920593794,"score_gpt":0.3955724484681597,"score_spread":0.3348287492622218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323308397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038055,0.00009043712,0.0000019201375,0.055137407,0.00019817338,0.00023219091,0.000041004292,0.00005879804,0.040434547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99315774,0.00058669725,0.00002487457,0.0006243257,0.0029033928,0.000043145068,0.00003857938,0.0000059442705,0.0026152814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989957,0.0001058821,0.00018824798,0.00017431907,0.00024274843,0.00029306882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960965,0.00017133485,0.000066498294,0.000029298537,0.000040185405,0.00008305068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041680122,0.00009962202,0.00013000987,0.00014913589,0.0011426947,0.00009394454,0.00005950335,0.00012616682,0.000008313605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035204372,0.00010084633,0.00003430474,0.00061446533,0.0007219177,0.00021144665,0.000031594733,0.00009683954,0.000010264305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047948484,0.000085338026,0.021299498,0.000035861052,0.000044622917,0.0000026006155,0.042771358,8.7957216e-7,0.00014162037,0.9142175,0.002346551,0.019006236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003896636,0.000024918354,0.85793316,0.00002087071,0.000008609916,3.31791e-7,0.012858952,0.0000039335273,0.0000038596913,0.12415467,0.004451051,0.00014995101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001950904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019480994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8366337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056984038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048075328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87887996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382466567","doi":"10.1111/spol.12944","title":"Do governments account for gender when designing their social protection systems? Findings from an analysis of national social protection strategies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre in Green Chemistry and Catalysis; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Social protection; Scholarship; Political science; Gender analysis; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.15509228656718196,"score_gpt":0.4054543829842134,"score_spread":0.25036209641703144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382466567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98694146,0.0000068520703,0.00711893,0.0022145503,0.00018412886,0.0009727406,0.00057854166,0.00008947558,0.0018933169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968491,0.000005313035,0.000033975717,0.000034629793,0.002440292,0.00019947787,0.0002881252,0.00001249738,0.00013657345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827296,0.000259005,0.00031393478,0.00027283435,0.00061346526,0.00026782305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936396,0.000041270425,0.00027480762,0.000039334536,0.00022914857,0.000051505365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000796692,0.00012690532,0.00021413897,0.00024656157,0.0019157939,0.00040425317,0.00008767748,0.00024860914,0.000008094515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011934244,0.00013305296,0.00013362392,0.00060462777,0.00016294005,0.0005277834,0.00001680658,0.00009025457,0.0000011634986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023650646,0.0001949791,0.0008044631,0.0001516655,0.0010288013,5.7212526e-7,0.31283382,0.0002571182,0.018779177,0.6593203,0.00033368997,0.0060588736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010304654,0.00021618194,0.30315205,0.000015021954,0.00049105735,4.1845564e-7,0.35354653,0.006271558,0.0015914651,0.33207625,0.0010959195,0.0005130806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010260186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011470335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32724407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030046806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006812563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387080560","doi":"10.1111/spol.12965","title":"Behavioural knowledge for policy design: The connection between time use Behaviours and (or) desires and support for policy alternatives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Welfare; Work (physics); Policy analysis; Management science; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Public administration","score_opus":0.1932783954084969,"score_gpt":0.4323989652897274,"score_spread":0.23912056988123048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387080560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96824145,0.000063830645,0.00032022173,0.02850818,0.000095454576,0.0014973417,0.0005708271,0.0001676934,0.00053500594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98897046,0.0002888835,0.00012592685,0.00013043443,0.004088362,0.00015004734,0.00010421964,0.000024146926,0.006117538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986955,0.00021712658,0.00022154729,0.00028005632,0.00015091263,0.0004348393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985329,0.0010145693,0.0001417463,0.000070175985,0.00010140361,0.00013924122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076364697,0.00017095383,0.00021434706,0.0001888979,0.0016227344,0.00039347733,0.000109420194,0.00019006181,0.0000024573528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009759602,0.00014500937,0.000059613594,0.00036654374,0.0007618949,0.0005121345,0.000039551862,0.00008817566,0.0000016935485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010179585,0.0002925942,0.10129579,0.00019385116,0.0002763477,0.0000052629935,0.16919687,0.0000019801191,0.0011063169,0.6019113,0.012668187,0.11203352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017609636,0.0012803497,0.9198462,0.000046374702,0.00019190951,0.000007096111,0.009772542,0.000054445423,0.0005608352,0.05756096,0.008331169,0.00058719254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004112284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039910474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81855035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012817983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010997684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387894585","doi":"10.1111/spol.12980","title":"The world politics of social investment: Volume II. Julian L.Garritzmann (Ed.), SiljaHäusermann (Ed.), BrunoPalier (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2022. £64 (hardback). <scp>ISBN</scp>: 9780197601457","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Library science; Citation; Investment (military); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.022411937281424137,"score_gpt":0.30362642829002984,"score_spread":0.2812144910086057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387894585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4885936,0.00085519225,0.0000069025127,0.07489491,0.0015580639,0.0018060822,0.0016964695,0.00072429987,0.42986447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68581516,0.007347965,0.00002289123,0.0016305875,0.009795884,0.000038438913,0.00023256465,0.00006621835,0.2950503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996552,0.0004927825,0.0005719209,0.00043894225,0.000781747,0.0011626357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984837,0.00032013014,0.0004953374,0.00019652187,0.00020090016,0.0003034222],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008495225,0.00037320028,0.00049074757,0.00023428192,0.009916993,0.00021006727,0.0005162865,0.00042975144,0.000012841634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006407805,0.000350132,0.00031416691,0.0012447027,0.0024118307,0.0004810566,0.00030102854,0.0004321456,0.00001686195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032435113,0.00010151593,0.0004127769,0.00006141858,0.0001776307,0.000007883566,0.033557072,0.0000011753124,0.000029243129,0.70026225,0.2639953,0.0013613264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005512695,0.00014327186,0.016426742,0.000020403484,0.00011224523,8.137902e-7,0.027314438,0.000018521416,0.00012528509,0.0160071,0.93905485,0.00022504774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036836548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038440907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6842551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026060056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010464875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387906369","doi":"10.1111/spol.12973","title":"Social protection, community participation and state‐citizen relations: Evidence from a cash transfer program in south‐central Somalia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation; University of Toronto","funders":"Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Cash transfers; Spillover effect; Social protection; Cash; Psychological intervention; Conditional cash transfer; Business; Clan; Public economics; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Economic growth; Economics; Finance; Political science; Poverty; Psychology","score_opus":0.08898187110929792,"score_gpt":0.39384488194882916,"score_spread":0.30486301083953127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387906369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98234826,0.000051190218,0.000051546034,0.016128646,0.000077537625,0.00061235914,0.00006350345,0.00013854165,0.00052843103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827427,0.00012144298,0.000017771412,0.00009744591,0.000897874,0.00014988235,0.00009486826,0.000008914808,0.00033751462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998365,0.0006651552,0.00025352486,0.00017234345,0.00022110873,0.00032285595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996302,0.000085168474,0.00006350154,0.000056872774,0.00006492439,0.00009933315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051533995,0.000105632585,0.00012661441,0.00009028297,0.0023908739,0.00020278672,0.00007370719,0.00015546255,0.000019354582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037658162,0.000121190176,0.00003626849,0.00056711305,0.00030102732,0.0004933727,0.000011009061,0.00023003799,0.0000064716005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010516021,0.0002343622,0.039488368,0.000046857007,0.000025338653,0.0000014420872,0.9062123,0.0000028907482,0.00011773043,0.015878994,0.00042371266,0.03746286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003300062,0.000079719684,0.9475816,0.00003463242,0.000020287858,1.6551066e-7,0.022140803,0.000070937785,0.000050019495,0.027510652,0.0020259619,0.00015522567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031612813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06836151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9080932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012632259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006892504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388991454","doi":"10.1111/spol.12986","title":"Welfare state regimes and social policy resistance to fiscal consolidations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare state; Social insurance; Economics; Welfare; Social Welfare; Politics; Market economy; Resistance (ecology); Social policy; Economic policy; Political science","score_opus":0.04242969622132733,"score_gpt":0.3857867792510018,"score_spread":0.3433570830296745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388991454","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2990942,0.00004233601,0.000007152267,0.6455093,0.00013226816,0.0004013549,0.0002658378,0.00025695146,0.05429062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97629267,0.00041421424,0.00001887797,0.0014961847,0.005591138,0.000047485737,0.00003399912,0.000014956797,0.01609048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985091,0.00017803595,0.00024107975,0.0002606957,0.00029709187,0.00051400124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995167,0.00007765326,0.00010370355,0.0000578427,0.00008120968,0.00016286629],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038045674,0.00015530063,0.00021860602,0.00022234229,0.005140318,0.00020432132,0.00010026191,0.00016870788,0.0000057924008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005764263,0.00015791674,0.00006311203,0.0010068301,0.0008094007,0.00022314778,0.00007292858,0.0001269118,0.000020097568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046404817,0.000019437775,0.00016353499,0.000030648403,0.000031317082,0.0000030833032,0.08899171,1.5516403e-7,0.0000307098,0.889457,0.01404337,0.0071826195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000738382,0.000120226054,0.17148896,0.000026605267,0.00004417348,0.0000016503841,0.07346215,0.000002775653,0.0001084294,0.25346288,0.49988338,0.00066040194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033753826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009012011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67719847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000819651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005337214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99615484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406716862","doi":"10.1111/spol.13123","title":"Collaboration Through a Computer Screen: Migrant Integration Services and the Challenges of Co‐Producing Services Online","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"World Wide Web; Computer science; Business; Multimedia","score_opus":0.0277687314180221,"score_gpt":0.3537803590944215,"score_spread":0.3260116276763994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406716862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79876024,0.0012849628,0.000113641356,0.1827863,0.00015489313,0.0004833749,0.00007615565,0.000045757966,0.016294662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957239,0.0011159134,0.00017748923,0.0014203273,0.0013574886,0.0000096714275,0.00005816582,0.0000037584953,0.00013327271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989501,0.00024356696,0.00023778502,0.00018962717,0.00024573764,0.00013317955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942005,0.00014259577,0.000199911,0.00007682836,0.0001343931,0.000026200596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057092536,0.00010294129,0.00017210147,0.000048355876,0.0007128044,0.00022750084,0.00012431937,0.000115607705,0.000003774471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028686572,0.00007940983,0.000031086558,0.0003215332,0.00040667306,0.0005631381,0.000031548545,0.00007393483,3.8056737e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013262349,0.0000453247,0.00043588743,0.0001928572,0.000036017773,1.12233785e-7,0.14185543,7.4870246e-7,0.00009580237,0.83969957,0.00008848811,0.017417107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004225913,0.0003957218,0.111650534,0.0006304591,0.00023154262,0.0000013062064,0.6760501,0.0020371436,0.0015100653,0.12937881,0.07332604,0.00056234264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016273646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09508479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7103208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028935621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022229517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99027705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409845043","doi":"10.1111/spol.13146","title":"User‐Centred Design in Child Welfare: Importance of an Anti‐Racism Lens","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Racism; Lens (geology); Welfare; Through-the-lens metering; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Political science; Computer science; Gender studies; Optics; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.02968960066671857,"score_gpt":0.3275175703396502,"score_spread":0.2978279696729316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409845043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93187475,0.00003242422,0.027100794,0.034343638,0.00020035346,0.00032251,0.000007912302,0.00011767988,0.0059999228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980613,0.000005359131,0.0014540545,0.00032207105,0.000079986225,0.000007854419,0.000006973473,0.0000028550826,0.000059528214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925965,0.000072757175,0.0002477088,0.0002029528,0.00007762729,0.00013930377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963266,0.000019367564,0.00013966869,0.00013460404,0.00006192453,0.000011782553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013325215,0.00008333825,0.00012351474,0.0002323782,0.00021697168,0.000044397115,0.00017908856,0.000118904216,0.0000027109716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009224933,0.00009208528,0.000019285915,0.00058879587,0.00009244244,0.0005965903,0.000036307683,0.00014287373,7.9856636e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018796427,0.00008854489,0.0006997329,0.000011291045,0.0000082384595,0.0000056200993,0.00073202164,0.0000023252192,0.0018817561,0.98972756,0.00006112048,0.006763016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019971214,0.0007300467,0.69043976,0.00012299028,0.000019950918,0.00004942406,0.0014036683,0.0042754137,0.15491404,0.14125738,0.004216788,0.0005734175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060798364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019180366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84847015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004993161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013441242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3755129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410480531","doi":"10.1111/spol.13141","title":"The Relationship Between Perceptions of Social Service Quality and Subjective Well‐Being","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministry of Innovation; Tel Aviv University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Social network service; Quality (philosophy); Well-being; Service quality; Social psychology; Service (business); Applied psychology; Business; Marketing; Social influence; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.07853840155320543,"score_gpt":0.4504545637574671,"score_spread":0.3719161622042617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410480531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88998175,0.000017648252,0.00017947902,0.019471034,0.00010748831,0.0001219524,0.000019771913,0.000028806933,0.09007206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975682,0.0000054417096,0.000010247745,0.00047280343,0.0006058999,0.000016117217,0.000020758354,0.0000041662784,0.0012963475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893963,0.00038604156,0.00027492794,0.00017422508,0.000083224935,0.00014193874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989712,0.00074636156,0.0001308441,0.00007005388,0.000051450283,0.000030066041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004488559,0.000084814186,0.00013164317,0.00005677956,0.0011451944,0.00004333173,0.000050507977,0.00019359497,0.000019117677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002328351,0.000073372015,0.00004225352,0.0002993591,0.00021773974,0.00006049347,0.000016846057,0.00019945556,0.0000075795483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007186018,0.000023170904,0.28798723,0.00001587011,0.000031261152,9.2288126e-8,0.0067794565,2.970086e-8,0.00007954461,0.698495,0.00026468065,0.0062518273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002421616,0.000039084993,0.8730255,0.000005827535,0.000025710015,5.928781e-7,0.003819777,6.84679e-7,0.00001142914,0.12202346,0.0007476638,0.000058116228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002385786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58503824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028441244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066345914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8808025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411662694","doi":"10.1111/spol.13155","title":"Street‐Level Bureaucrats Manufacturing Migrants: An Implementation Study of Policy Measures to Address Statelessness in the Dominican Republic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Statelessness; Political science; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Citizenship; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07144025743499573,"score_gpt":0.4472981980179208,"score_spread":0.3758579405829251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411662694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98949,0.000004750925,0.00004256137,0.00835758,0.000042597523,0.000738782,0.000090436966,0.000018394385,0.0012149524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878025,0.000022270342,0.000014123436,0.0006147196,0.00034059325,0.000057674064,0.000045228382,0.0000048893294,0.00012027491],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982722,0.0005914427,0.00036793452,0.00020221884,0.0003425922,0.00022365719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950755,0.00008647842,0.00013603263,0.00012303634,0.00008023697,0.00006666376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088516664,0.00010546281,0.00016107844,0.00028296633,0.00055785757,0.00017491508,0.00020771348,0.00007637326,0.0000074232207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022668495,0.00009320408,0.000027740309,0.0007386276,0.000099958066,0.00026468944,0.000020766254,0.00009542302,1.8479687e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016204489,0.0007147996,0.0048567397,0.000031123527,0.000040951898,0.0000025991162,0.52846014,0.00002734323,0.00016094127,0.30500516,0.00033613207,0.16020201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087446254,0.00025700047,0.4492548,0.000013171543,0.000020325622,1.5078986e-7,0.54262596,0.0000113567585,0.0003202886,0.0035611673,0.0029265485,0.00013476211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07401711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80728817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73327106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099902514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084238104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9321491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412946168","doi":"10.1111/spol.70000","title":"How Do Ideas Get in the Way of Policy Change? A Comparative Study of Homelessness Policy in Toronto and Montréal, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Sociology; Political science; Regional science","score_opus":0.0618760607189013,"score_gpt":0.4410189251294265,"score_spread":0.3791428644105252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412946168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851,0.00072370534,0.0000010862537,0.0096078385,0.00004419386,0.0009698466,0.00007433927,0.000005017591,0.003473973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986435,0.0002528318,0.0000017234506,0.0002357867,0.000589875,0.0001777794,0.000009798894,0.000005861975,0.000082797524],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982834,0.00065175287,0.00042430454,0.00016650699,0.00020019722,0.0002738543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928045,0.00025213574,0.00022980267,0.00010720353,0.00008562958,0.000044787634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003564482,0.00013946768,0.00056248216,0.00015572536,0.00035928903,0.000023718469,0.00011436226,0.00014166778,0.000002310957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018117654,0.00011406535,0.000022315258,0.0005954563,0.00010786318,0.0001599946,0.000052026564,0.00019146924,5.4930673e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014799753,0.00035190565,0.064795084,0.00035758785,0.000033050055,0.0000037741386,0.65050864,3.307004e-7,0.000027416272,0.27650446,0.00005759246,0.0072121387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076175726,0.00010399389,0.4180893,0.00005913862,0.0000081804,3.0329712e-8,0.5775821,0.000004555968,0.000010190086,0.0030405694,0.00027731014,0.000062837804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98090553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35329422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039773848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001967356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.465145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415268365","doi":"10.1111/spol.70016","title":"Measuring the Gender Gap in Unpaid Care Work in Colombia: A Decomposition Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Socioeconomic status; Care work; Time-use survey; Gender gap; Marital status; Work (physics); Paid work; Child care","score_opus":0.04537471065948938,"score_gpt":0.35954586022058066,"score_spread":0.31417114956109127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415268365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97367585,0.00015686556,0.00014132977,0.0035700481,0.00007278137,0.00019306164,0.0000076157,0.00001700446,0.022165434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991317,0.00007010991,0.000031310523,0.00036842376,0.00020407772,0.000019223688,0.00002025622,0.000002683888,0.00015224298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990617,0.0002592826,0.0001785253,0.00015042466,0.00014962288,0.00020046697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997528,0.00006484294,0.00004883266,0.000055730354,0.00004804569,0.000029729443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004020973,0.00007074251,0.00012403984,0.00021306722,0.00055606896,0.00010764712,0.0000853582,0.00012854832,0.0000031744803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086408734,0.00006916326,0.00005490667,0.0019109681,0.00012631538,0.00009161108,0.000015609081,0.00012224606,6.7104014e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008983223,0.000117630625,0.53899103,0.000043816788,0.00011717815,0.000005218437,0.23706837,0.0001978299,0.000067931345,0.21710362,0.00017613704,0.006021413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021845191,0.000010122992,0.92422056,0.000009749803,0.00005813445,5.312873e-8,0.068345584,0.00006522215,0.000007034037,0.006540065,0.0004436135,0.00008141923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040127467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08563364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38522953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023359456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054040307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93105114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415671352","doi":"10.1111/spol.70023","title":"Explaining Social Policy Expansion: The Curious Case of the Justin Trudeau Era in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McMaster University; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main","keywords":"Social policy; Politics; Surprise; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Austerity; Neoliberalism (international relations); Coalition government","score_opus":0.018862387606775017,"score_gpt":0.32975441710561476,"score_spread":0.31089202949883976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415671352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.754335,0.000050192964,0.000002158968,0.23069625,0.00014859623,0.00020474463,0.00015226728,0.0000065092545,0.014404272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907572,0.000025391802,0.0000026343234,0.0059505017,0.0018346175,0.000015149815,0.0000018481373,0.0000044984217,0.0014081189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885094,0.00024585632,0.00025208862,0.00013698723,0.00020603646,0.0003080762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995296,0.00013138047,0.00015737896,0.00008659033,0.000038162223,0.00005690602],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030234628,0.000096133816,0.00014182778,0.000061404484,0.0016522312,0.000056125125,0.00017579885,0.00009670018,0.000008653812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062492955,0.000078021585,0.000054341715,0.00082819874,0.00039717648,0.00009280578,0.000035016255,0.00020018079,2.6749368e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025808606,0.000016770398,0.00041055365,0.000024266013,0.000010762712,0.000031375497,0.04425858,0.000002749849,0.000029445098,0.9145618,0.015384504,0.02524337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021613366,0.00008375836,0.3563035,0.00018680042,0.00009986883,0.00008233655,0.13910049,0.00010603107,0.0007017281,0.087200664,0.4131822,0.00079126016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82736117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006174738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018168755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416533261","doi":"10.1111/spol.70032","title":"What Are the Determinants of Permanent and Temporary Non‐Take‐Up of the French Minimum‐Income Benefit?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Renting; Poverty; Credibility; Residence; Solidarity; Order (exchange); Salient","score_opus":0.024806442416992352,"score_gpt":0.326007367652191,"score_spread":0.30120092523519865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416533261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919839,0.0002121791,0.0000026649354,0.00451087,0.00034163572,0.00020266627,0.00004096453,0.0000054695734,0.002699644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997554,0.00040493175,0.0000048496377,0.000256872,0.00023648627,0.0000057410894,0.0000029895082,0.00000318407,0.0015309466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925923,0.00008766915,0.00022091733,0.00011634581,0.00018067977,0.00013515538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953365,0.00007514326,0.00018967447,0.00009918994,0.000070512026,0.000031853757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025916475,0.00007994453,0.00014358279,0.00003653021,0.0006330685,0.00007447823,0.00014800909,0.00011338507,0.0000017217139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078490906,0.000055965116,0.000052319814,0.00025297204,0.0005460351,0.0001621655,0.00004604937,0.00007320536,1.6363046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003781776,0.00012587679,0.78848666,0.0002552859,0.00005037849,0.0000013217128,0.1017666,0.0000013470788,0.00044369913,0.093956195,0.00044519946,0.014429626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020024112,0.000034927496,0.93002033,0.00007122164,0.000026795482,4.5002295e-7,0.05528997,0.00004386308,0.00018046587,0.013609434,0.00045426373,0.00006803477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017493783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00798103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14153369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020978478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044645747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4869115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}