{"meta":{"query_hash":"328cdebf7dda","filters":{"venue":"Social Policy and Administration"},"cohort_total":81,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":81,"exported":81,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/328cdebf7dda","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+Policy+and+Administration"},"results":[{"id":"W1546332539","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00834.x","title":"Who Wants to Redistribute? An Analysis of 14 Post‐Soviet Nations","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Inequality; Welfare state; Ideology; Population; Development economics; Demographic economics; Welfare; Individualism; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Economic system; Market economy; Sociology; Politics; Demography","score_opus":0.06960277961831444,"score_gpt":0.3978997075027867,"score_spread":0.32829692788447223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546332539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988018,0.000031594696,0.000015757196,0.000043408705,0.000001709396,0.0000035098751,0.000043256296,3.5569786e-7,0.0010586263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993268,0.00006024432,0.000023997221,0.000022034386,0.000002407758,0.000010834327,0.00011106356,6.9270527e-7,0.00044192697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995018,0.00022972199,0.0000191524,0.000035156914,0.000045181954,0.00016892032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991555,0.00030599764,0.000260855,0.000030816427,0.00011289588,0.00013385537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010826333,0.00016179244,0.00020304446,0.0013790414,0.0014403886,0.0009580102,0.0002840144,0.0002880712,0.00260715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017337408,0.0001045372,0.00024016792,0.0017103913,0.0009354727,0.0005170827,0.0011191617,0.00035957497,0.00020869914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017182234,0.00019582812,0.9617601,0.0000321452,0.000032576325,0.00026372774,0.025971482,0.00021733803,0.00032397578,0.0019819015,0.0005883077,0.008460748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000664532,0.00008506764,0.9547837,0.000025443014,0.000013366902,0.000053676515,0.04236016,0.00026235686,0.00009937574,0.00017936438,0.0021262309,0.0000045938914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0224775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027237834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0224775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009299723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056042837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04469335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575113804","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2011.00826.x","title":"Incomes after Job‐loss in the United States: From Programme Rules to Panel Data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Panel Study of Income Dynamics; Unemployment; Incentive; Poverty; Welfare state; Economics; Welfare; Labour economics; Panel data; Compensation (psychology); Demographic economics; Comparative research; Job loss; Economic growth; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.14136642091177773,"score_gpt":0.3110934118180181,"score_spread":0.16972699090624035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575113804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773975,0.00059906027,0.001369659,0.00081106665,0.00005796971,0.00004403181,0.015722735,0.000042758373,0.003955229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97567856,0.00023241798,0.00047217004,0.0001703708,0.00003983228,0.00005967883,0.022171348,0.000012767735,0.0011628338],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968112,0.0019249001,0.00018304634,0.0004131588,0.00030873416,0.00035903338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97515327,0.014407624,0.005340072,0.0024923633,0.0014397575,0.0011669813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060610916,0.00028646764,0.00087058597,0.0020021515,0.0005757446,0.0020223304,0.0010128696,0.00093669764,0.0037367672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012681679,0.0003771303,0.00077889056,0.0039613084,0.0006833555,0.0009152474,0.0020703182,0.0018793079,0.00080026087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004384476,0.00027364964,0.9702987,0.000055400687,0.00077023584,0.00019062494,0.00052205555,0.008445374,0.000082030565,0.0015832817,0.0090630725,0.008277059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004473419,0.0001829059,0.9814321,0.0000681754,0.00025061524,0.00006719517,0.0011458738,0.009568762,0.00025816433,0.001567097,0.005376624,0.000037796886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0635523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052608103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0635523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087951776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005316295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12636477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1627996971","doi":"10.1111/spol.12152","title":"Women's Organizations, Social Learning, and the Federal State: A Case Study of <scp>C</scp>anadian Pension Policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Policy learning; Federalism; State (computer science); Social policy; Work (physics); Public administration; Exploratory analysis; Pension; Political science; Period (music); Public relations; Exploratory research; Public policy; Economics; Sociology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03524771268410429,"score_gpt":0.35535244814292605,"score_spread":0.3201047354588218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1627996971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730061,0.00023584961,0.00035672358,0.005797829,0.000031232856,0.000057282497,0.00003786308,0.0000055878513,0.020471571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958312,0.00020364142,0.00019608431,0.00025911236,0.000017056265,0.00004507651,0.000010576235,0.0000025290924,0.0034347603],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99404645,0.0041343276,0.00007528155,0.00017538088,0.0003434649,0.001225198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491787,0.0032581787,0.0006199498,0.00019634531,0.0002196379,0.00078802137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006064537,0.00021363891,0.0003104894,0.0016144033,0.020569583,0.0047807298,0.0010810693,0.0027147415,0.0036466538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005750459,0.00023263559,0.000266245,0.002085608,0.008393826,0.0025804366,0.0037025094,0.0022737181,0.00019728676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012725174,0.0010016438,0.03369555,0.00011291246,0.000018889947,0.005082743,0.807197,0.00073942216,0.0005954965,0.12091345,0.004898423,0.025617322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024474659,0.00016923467,0.01482291,0.00013259171,0.000010152443,0.00034609367,0.9320776,0.0005007328,0.00040553173,0.0031279796,0.048365965,0.000016784554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070120856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18144181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9298791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013856232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009282346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13942546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915785117","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00750.x","title":"The Politics of Social Policy Language","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Social policy; Reflexivity; Politics; Welfare state; Sociology; Action (physics); Meaning (existential); State (computer science); Social Welfare; Political science; Political economy; Epistemology; Social science; Positive economics; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.05174606008763443,"score_gpt":0.38460122364322247,"score_spread":0.33285516355558803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915785117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04883812,0.007922055,0.014557126,0.25622728,0.0008659687,0.0000372686,0.00006929979,0.00006746013,0.67141545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98333216,0.0012881772,0.0015793624,0.005773003,0.00044099017,0.000069598864,0.000020612071,0.000042531865,0.0074535534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9443473,0.046909373,0.00065413455,0.0019398145,0.004269923,0.0018793836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760669,0.018643858,0.0015196896,0.0011315454,0.0019366537,0.00070133794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027714945,0.0005201126,0.000604925,0.0039873817,0.010528907,0.0195263,0.0012373533,0.005161283,0.0061123525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021414232,0.00036044518,0.00054301193,0.0036596013,0.08372479,0.012220035,0.008344379,0.008080454,0.000610494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020204827,0.0000024714757,0.000037857888,0.0000070536976,0.0000010915227,0.000010795703,0.0030513895,0.000048820246,0.000023737832,0.99556667,0.0005877914,0.00066020543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015402444,0.000019125247,0.00033790924,0.00028396418,0.000008171522,0.000039363156,0.012700712,0.0005941097,0.00022811918,0.90042186,0.08533455,0.000016702796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005372859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032755318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027714945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017002326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008542469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14657241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979706530","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00700.x","title":"Older People's Family Contacts and Long‐term Care Expenditure in OECD Countries: A Comparative Approach Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Long-term care; Government (linguistics); Qualitative comparative analysis; Demographic economics; Sample (material); Developed country; Economic growth; Economics; Medicine; Geography; Environmental health; Nursing; Population","score_opus":0.08852053819207105,"score_gpt":0.4624586696034362,"score_spread":0.3739381314113651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979706530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97921133,0.0035820787,0.0011340803,0.0005099747,0.000021162308,0.0002563661,0.0007102839,0.000003732243,0.0145709105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962549,0.0016316435,0.0011541584,0.000078872945,0.0000050587373,0.00039901413,0.00016174713,0.0000012671195,0.00031328],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918031,0.0069784583,0.00024815596,0.00011313423,0.0003671738,0.0004899469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97937304,0.017032351,0.0012660635,0.00043922616,0.0016700838,0.00021930186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010513633,0.0002995061,0.0005345996,0.009486394,0.0029526227,0.0025796082,0.0006079725,0.0005269068,0.0028588565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016524147,0.00019884612,0.00041858855,0.014348395,0.0024935615,0.0021080582,0.0024828506,0.00039550784,0.000071816285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004005417,0.0004743617,0.2200921,0.0049570636,0.00043322516,0.0022364915,0.6272181,0.0019871518,0.0007489591,0.06712413,0.0022111968,0.07211661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002059636,0.00013669414,0.089725085,0.00178804,0.00009691551,0.00020921894,0.89875305,0.0004506096,0.00027204666,0.00231438,0.006207087,0.000026255462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042887103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043715764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042887103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007767193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028645247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085274935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986816307","doi":"10.1111/1467-9515.00216","title":"How Social is Social Policy? Fiscal and Market Discourse in North American Welfare States","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Marketization; Welfare state; Social policy; Social Welfare; Government (linguistics); Political science; State (computer science); Orthodoxy; Welfare; Political economy; Civil society; Economics; Economic system; Market economy; Politics; Law; China","score_opus":0.024766315036660765,"score_gpt":0.36259582489634523,"score_spread":0.33782950985968446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986816307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44149294,0.00881837,0.000987442,0.38112187,0.000378594,0.000020161227,0.000048532638,0.000021652233,0.16711038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909718,0.0019716087,0.00012470021,0.0047331154,0.00013970662,0.0000209129,0.0000105823865,0.00000814626,0.0020193479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.987369,0.010089648,0.00021560914,0.00045992006,0.0008987279,0.00096703717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897836,0.0066625103,0.0013676874,0.00028759282,0.0010333145,0.0008653144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01094974,0.00025142016,0.00041927825,0.0026763538,0.018386409,0.013372986,0.0008648785,0.0040779635,0.0027496312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124064265,0.00028161114,0.00023800124,0.003375858,0.043120272,0.008466617,0.0056676664,0.003928824,0.00018471816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022777556,0.00007666231,0.0023961018,0.000094284194,0.000011196745,0.000105134095,0.38114217,0.00023217237,0.00015325467,0.5963594,0.008064537,0.011342283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020880048,0.000046043588,0.009625294,0.00078826526,0.000020899211,0.000052646952,0.581432,0.00046147488,0.00025475438,0.22177517,0.18548256,0.00004005868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053761825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07591441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053761825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023534391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016968861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17075473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989609400","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00450.x","title":"Diversity and Identity in the Non‐profit Sector: Lessons from LGBT Organizing in Toronto","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntary sector; Transgender; Lesbian; Conceptualization; Voluntary association; Diversity (politics); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.05198469700508972,"score_gpt":0.3908135184697891,"score_spread":0.3388288214646994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989609400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354462,0.0021762594,0.00043624695,0.012557336,0.00006572885,0.000060025875,0.00011260177,0.000009843641,0.049135834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532086,0.0007770209,0.00010526867,0.00028869443,0.0000090610765,0.0000138291725,0.00002684045,0.0000061900164,0.0034522968],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954997,0.0019492764,0.00008533143,0.00022548295,0.00046662506,0.0017735539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445397,0.0020919526,0.00044674327,0.0003000451,0.0007225024,0.0019847539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003418184,0.0003800633,0.00046691817,0.0017240158,0.03604976,0.008936362,0.0017013815,0.0014268176,0.0036789773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049204393,0.00035555402,0.00027041574,0.0036932689,0.021747366,0.0027607896,0.00908317,0.0023496891,0.00017968382],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029047274,0.000025142735,0.015154626,0.00007133643,0.0000063346083,0.0005660583,0.9501095,0.00014516646,0.0001606785,0.022056194,0.0025109237,0.009165012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003703935,0.000011689227,0.015146423,0.000117341784,0.000005815837,0.000057451678,0.96658975,0.000120082994,0.000095461895,0.0013642113,0.016477812,0.000010245108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97730905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99158925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1220637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1220637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080957726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88563824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006720456","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00608.x","title":"Varieties of Liberalism: Canadian Social Policy from the ‘Golden Age’ to the Present","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Restructuring; Institutionalism; Welfare state; Historical institutionalism; New institutionalism; Political economy; Path dependence; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Social policy; Sociology; Welfare; Period (music); Political science; Economics; Law; Neoclassical economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06347867434912151,"score_gpt":0.3547917529889503,"score_spread":0.2913130786398288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006720456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2197671,0.008971704,0.0016272406,0.24776262,0.00047434567,0.000068627254,0.00029450012,0.00008164056,0.5209522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642317,0.0020949044,0.0006933038,0.0065203244,0.00006479869,0.000019786772,0.00005234692,0.000018860912,0.026303815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915726,0.0012839802,0.00012727937,0.0005221259,0.0029652868,0.0035286953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99321413,0.0015822299,0.00033239464,0.00036514088,0.002334625,0.0021714827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055446955,0.00028937074,0.00035466382,0.0024612455,0.025510006,0.010607052,0.0013795301,0.0030113496,0.0048581045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007462275,0.00028602852,0.00035439513,0.0037107063,0.024186926,0.0024808105,0.004300654,0.0042676753,0.000181542],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004024207,0.00002124677,0.0022005439,0.00005923471,0.000008175954,0.00014236527,0.020817226,0.00053862936,0.0002109644,0.9430182,0.015874393,0.017068883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037846698,0.000044499786,0.032151338,0.00039511893,0.000034033244,0.00008551805,0.03942711,0.0012993474,0.00058156817,0.13041672,0.7953771,0.00014981057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98832196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28126666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28126666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.265719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8336288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007934802","doi":"10.1111/spol.12103","title":"Narrating Sustainability in <scp>C</scp>anadian Health Care Reform Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Health care; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Linguistics; Philosophy; Law; History","score_opus":0.020468049510494517,"score_gpt":0.3530509796399272,"score_spread":0.3325829301294327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007934802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6700835,0.006565362,0.006598297,0.13847613,0.00084352377,0.000119209915,0.00015223846,0.00007075271,0.177091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938221,0.00089480577,0.00055337284,0.0016524129,0.000102074744,0.000044925975,0.000020036,0.000017051652,0.0028930942],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877488,0.0098277945,0.00017955957,0.00033131422,0.0010226094,0.00088980416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893205,0.008046414,0.0009071836,0.0003427787,0.0007856904,0.0005973818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01291317,0.0005228058,0.0005019339,0.0025773346,0.020263208,0.01182986,0.0010546563,0.0041585537,0.0020276678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012384345,0.00030653752,0.00024591002,0.0039755427,0.0415736,0.006989063,0.00897446,0.0049877497,0.00018604439],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016794378,0.000018104703,0.00081011886,0.0000683705,0.000003250114,0.00041439908,0.8513215,0.00011098103,0.00030210154,0.140669,0.0031244648,0.0031409382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048638017,0.000013936227,0.00094685494,0.00029115804,0.0000036604577,0.0001489173,0.837843,0.0002661222,0.0004275799,0.014639633,0.14539716,0.000017108161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01411305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013720828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98588693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016789708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069850436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12181842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008558062","doi":"10.1111/1467-9515.t01-1-00248","title":"Rethinking Politics for a Green Economy: A Political Approach to Radical Reform","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economic system; Law","score_opus":0.07056804455148737,"score_gpt":0.36379419632955284,"score_spread":0.2932261517780655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008558062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031380825,0.007332468,0.1378212,0.27498534,0.0017168911,0.00011435515,0.0000330197,0.000101012236,0.54651487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9362684,0.003752151,0.016044201,0.013217691,0.0013221296,0.00019837874,0.000015843207,0.000074892385,0.029106263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926151,0.0051494073,0.00010964594,0.00040207806,0.0010892188,0.0006345381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965707,0.0021848606,0.0002956999,0.00039302668,0.00031297907,0.00024275614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073581734,0.00040856702,0.000418481,0.0013037962,0.0065603205,0.009785627,0.0010612428,0.0042217155,0.0024770303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056059947,0.00020782245,0.00054616714,0.0011071186,0.046137884,0.007427912,0.005789969,0.0062592486,0.00041383455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010844362,0.000003607497,0.00001132854,0.000004912633,7.353782e-7,0.000005230768,0.0005292121,0.00010706755,0.000029797751,0.99803656,0.0004154182,0.0008549918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052289897,0.0000069365738,0.00006149523,0.000028879054,0.0000018847715,0.00000920422,0.0007331208,0.00035013276,0.00010861684,0.95663184,0.04205843,0.0000041395924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016082964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002654343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009785627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008245525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007175417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059825778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011836408","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00610.x","title":"Social Exclusion and Double Jeopardy: The Management of Lone Mothers in the Market–State Social Field","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Ideology; Social exclusion; Social Welfare; Sociology; Social policy; Social position; Social change; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05387244467103738,"score_gpt":0.3723625396470218,"score_spread":0.31849009497598446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011836408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9241318,0.0018722003,0.0009798086,0.030947583,0.00021478672,0.00007726388,0.000030479221,0.00001736006,0.041728627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994762,0.0006451336,0.0001787011,0.0005097172,0.00003740278,0.00002652201,0.0000071000777,0.000006088984,0.0038272932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749774,0.0011918945,0.00003635577,0.00011049697,0.00024336044,0.00092006853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977848,0.0005613189,0.0003407625,0.00006962477,0.00020340017,0.0010401369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003158366,0.00022549868,0.00029313352,0.00084478,0.020040553,0.0053325896,0.0015689342,0.0015728791,0.004940083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038264536,0.00020099976,0.00021607218,0.00060337083,0.01623507,0.002030075,0.009356589,0.0016352657,0.00020858197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010021259,0.00021938745,0.05217493,0.00016047191,0.000019016108,0.0045499187,0.8378317,0.0002113286,0.0007276982,0.04029171,0.009361022,0.05435262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007431102,0.000104493796,0.018929154,0.0002497377,0.0000080130285,0.00040175818,0.9267887,0.00019881474,0.00019088399,0.0050586336,0.048046537,0.000015740243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11787486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32697666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11787486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015803551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022245824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2343775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012742645","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00612.x","title":"The Changing Conception of Pension Rights in Canada, Mexico and the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Intergenerational equity; Social security; Welfare state; Universalism; Pension; Redistribution (election); Equity (law); Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Economics; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Public economics; Finance; Market economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11816354484964811,"score_gpt":0.3919783834045098,"score_spread":0.27381483855486166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012742645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5957535,0.030854542,0.002221142,0.08913549,0.0004349774,0.000060521474,0.00066648715,0.000043290056,0.28083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98342067,0.0044457307,0.0008676644,0.0020626723,0.00006575641,0.00002316082,0.0000888526,0.000009890491,0.009015523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983992,0.00025287853,0.000039988878,0.00014359927,0.00036407216,0.00080022844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847525,0.00025036556,0.00013252215,0.00006476514,0.00066158635,0.00041559272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020696495,0.00021689245,0.0003059247,0.0027741573,0.010973303,0.008945573,0.0009669003,0.0014384524,0.002361237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026500016,0.00013069464,0.0002932948,0.002891603,0.011361656,0.0026519746,0.0023125426,0.0025672466,0.000057248537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047928825,0.000024766434,0.013555851,0.000042502124,0.000017038481,0.00021967337,0.025857944,0.00055872655,0.00023592607,0.9291716,0.0067388313,0.023529083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059988164,0.000050385144,0.1410361,0.0013072765,0.00010622042,0.0003772214,0.14442316,0.0018342983,0.00074545527,0.073273234,0.63659346,0.00019322724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9854283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98956794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10781241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10781241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07647599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78223747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027972142","doi":"10.1111/1467-9515.00241","title":"Changing Places: Men Replace Women in Mental Health Beds in Britain","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Mental health; Census; Context (archaeology); Gerontology; Demography; Geography; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry; Population","score_opus":0.05081824020652826,"score_gpt":0.44137103869285094,"score_spread":0.3905527984863227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027972142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99192905,0.0013514718,0.00006972146,0.0018421981,0.00007185635,0.0000038727585,0.00010499692,0.000001893103,0.004624888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985322,0.00039806872,0.000019363779,0.00013279718,0.000018459343,0.0000021973538,0.000020581028,0.0000020644334,0.00087420415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890935,0.00040457133,0.000043143205,0.000121066674,0.00017212852,0.0003498683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992275,0.00015892285,0.00026834774,0.00001848896,0.000059566635,0.0002671639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006807788,0.00012487572,0.00026782043,0.0009418596,0.001213325,0.001896365,0.00038965288,0.0004507824,0.004816831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020309784,0.00029107963,0.00015461144,0.0011987569,0.001914974,0.00155621,0.0018992425,0.00070177705,0.0004763149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034860417,0.00007561459,0.7649615,0.00009338144,0.000030008068,0.0012720039,0.18528396,0.00006218747,0.0008972838,0.0041774334,0.004246996,0.03855094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056034614,0.00006001489,0.85279346,0.0000722486,0.0000060252396,0.0004448385,0.13848606,0.00006464863,0.000062519866,0.00029217463,0.0076991194,0.000013329769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04745603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15055145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04745603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014671269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006856687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09435958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036697150","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00611.x","title":"The Healthcare Systems of the USA and Canada: Forever on Divergent Paths?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Divergence (linguistics); Healthcare system; Healthcare service; Health care; Position (finance); State (computer science); Service (business); Political science; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Computer science; Economy; Finance","score_opus":0.07302873621808251,"score_gpt":0.28325659842610373,"score_spread":0.21022786220802123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036697150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8101404,0.014311113,0.0009517673,0.07189823,0.00015379155,0.00008522768,0.0020225924,0.000059560443,0.10037742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539447,0.0015481242,0.00041114425,0.0011083129,0.000010519189,0.000008481767,0.0002678951,0.0000069529724,0.0012440626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493295,0.000746512,0.00012626921,0.0003293874,0.0017316451,0.002133176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99039584,0.000805009,0.00089685246,0.00021906373,0.005193964,0.0024893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023413617,0.0002708226,0.00049197575,0.0048597553,0.0061952616,0.0075220247,0.0013587329,0.0009323343,0.0032065301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008648502,0.00020269665,0.00039610406,0.009247365,0.0053982525,0.0018119297,0.0032144575,0.0013649735,0.00015594368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002793349,0.0001343667,0.46818852,0.00046358217,0.0004391044,0.0007000829,0.038199566,0.004680907,0.0008916805,0.3134818,0.026497232,0.14604378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029933866,0.000053566735,0.84858465,0.0007182371,0.00016081252,0.00017594015,0.06835084,0.0025728785,0.00046474324,0.021448944,0.05729925,0.00014018679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99054587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90519017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.094809815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1191324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6878966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039434977","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00429.x","title":"Facing the Future: America's Post‐multiculturalist Trajectory","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Individualism; Multiculturalism; Politics; Democracy; Affirmative action; Diversity (politics); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.01568449395698256,"score_gpt":0.3303041760733968,"score_spread":0.3146196821164142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039434977","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3976117,0.005151548,0.00035945943,0.39963394,0.0013443448,0.000028637676,0.00019178803,0.000027485066,0.19565113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95461875,0.0028413495,0.0002609599,0.020010129,0.00037392744,0.00003184182,0.00006944521,0.000026945441,0.02176671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854136,0.00032311815,0.000023299523,0.000089839785,0.00019057683,0.0008317646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981128,0.00016762556,0.0001508648,0.000043827185,0.0002741737,0.0012506965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002020468,0.00020151673,0.00021516513,0.0009114462,0.020135181,0.00968855,0.00064840785,0.0042819437,0.010861171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018586027,0.00017473134,0.00021087362,0.0010294768,0.008506021,0.0059337546,0.007981585,0.008583375,0.00072148576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010434351,0.00033643105,0.020360567,0.00014273552,0.000017463495,0.002093071,0.32105842,0.0002561259,0.0008740446,0.48652837,0.12007299,0.048155446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017196566,0.00005167545,0.016811611,0.00019461794,0.000004296764,0.00043776323,0.26531523,0.00017625312,0.00015877544,0.041223485,0.6755697,0.000039451195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046752747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08518804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046752747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007462939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009096154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039736440","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00607.x","title":"Labour Market Policy in the United States, Canada and Sweden: Addressing the Issue of Convergence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Political science; Political economy; Multitude; Restructuring; Politics; Foreign policy; Economics; Development economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06603494989056383,"score_gpt":0.3686772752441649,"score_spread":0.302642325353601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039736440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89149654,0.0037215874,0.00043236412,0.03254144,0.00010068794,0.000059667123,0.00027145614,0.000023518945,0.07135273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946405,0.0010244998,0.00033285582,0.0010685638,0.000010479923,0.000020774703,0.00009015474,0.0000060873635,0.0028061434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485,0.0010710474,0.00010878687,0.00019304638,0.0013935721,0.002383516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937359,0.0012812001,0.0003376654,0.00011312349,0.0033184395,0.0012136708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047165668,0.00021735326,0.0004557308,0.0045389314,0.016203625,0.008195984,0.00157786,0.0014683169,0.0019115647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009729537,0.00016659177,0.00032593077,0.0069710272,0.0065808534,0.001555693,0.005410037,0.0017167708,0.00008595482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044407658,0.00024908324,0.26362416,0.0004844813,0.00019065301,0.0017042819,0.1656104,0.011877215,0.00076476997,0.404315,0.033616476,0.117119394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055073866,0.000079138634,0.3525831,0.0013447546,0.00013769249,0.0001312318,0.48793682,0.0064690514,0.0013398735,0.018307386,0.13146271,0.00015312294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15637329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15637329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2732329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045673669","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00537.x","title":"(Not) Taking Account of Precarious Employment: Workfare Policies and Lone Mothers in Ontario and the UK","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; UNICEF","keywords":"Workfare; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Demographic economics; Welfare; Market economy","score_opus":0.06523211572615825,"score_gpt":0.41300461450328146,"score_spread":0.34777249877712324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045673669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728611,0.0012735105,0.000046599558,0.011199056,0.00005718969,0.000030708394,0.00020755453,0.000005681229,0.014318573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914027,0.001151325,0.00006706156,0.0007114905,0.000012449823,0.00001517002,0.00004761512,0.0000043080086,0.006588008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988238,0.00014497168,0.00004030389,0.000059278314,0.00019469578,0.00073693495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657744,0.0004074363,0.0007207515,0.00007581371,0.00050026417,0.0017182083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009021531,0.0001303085,0.00030093407,0.00055360224,0.0068648797,0.0023995028,0.000903226,0.00082261837,0.0047682025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002763435,0.00024884907,0.00021911945,0.0008731601,0.0023036692,0.0007762822,0.0018894002,0.0009774691,0.00019145341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033562473,0.00015728765,0.70225567,0.00041932752,0.000056787467,0.0034036739,0.21545862,0.00033660192,0.0012329924,0.010128806,0.014014505,0.052200146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027277316,0.000091643626,0.68849677,0.00047480472,0.00002959877,0.00024525047,0.25383547,0.00013716373,0.00018490273,0.00051386806,0.05592456,0.00003870294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99370074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04157527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04157527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04905766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30165112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052793917","doi":"10.1111/spol.12010","title":"Comparing Formal Unemployment Compensation Systems in 15<scp>OECD C</scp>ountries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Unemployment; Redundancy (engineering); Welfare state; Welfare; Economics; Argument (complex analysis); Compensation (psychology); Labour economics; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy; Law; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.08139810700139073,"score_gpt":0.4017012616783611,"score_spread":0.3203031546769704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052793917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907515,0.00020354154,0.000081719256,0.000112223795,0.0000061903293,0.000025254436,0.00090778654,0.000010175146,0.007901534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969098,0.00014623064,0.00009477371,0.000036319376,0.0000059291788,0.000030519644,0.0012011862,0.0000035365933,0.0015717257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861634,0.0003247644,0.00009259166,0.00011330543,0.00023360467,0.00061938853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969716,0.0004978776,0.0011871018,0.00019384015,0.0007034865,0.00044611373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011508968,0.00016573968,0.0002551696,0.0030518568,0.0007403839,0.0016453462,0.0003906463,0.00022956339,0.0036159996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031436414,0.000108223314,0.00023773045,0.0043351576,0.00072510936,0.00038408788,0.0016034793,0.00023192313,0.00030117546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004444848,0.0002281872,0.94007576,0.00018939172,0.0001416286,0.0002654878,0.0045998804,0.0014921189,0.0003929381,0.0058971043,0.004006501,0.04226663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002128632,0.000087673165,0.9880844,0.000052476757,0.000023079743,0.00004612501,0.0058226907,0.00024957594,0.00013849512,0.000113478935,0.0053533665,0.000007451479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12243392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14013854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12243392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029536083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002460631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2434426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055094216","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00549.x","title":"Models of Disability, Work and Welfare in Australia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Obligation; Government (linguistics); Realm; Public relations; Social model of disability; Medical model of disability; Inclusion (mineral); Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social science; Engineering; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.15281304661506537,"score_gpt":0.4610055109120021,"score_spread":0.3081924642969367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055094216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5278733,0.0078068674,0.007460278,0.08634089,0.00057479204,0.00015507275,0.00003556317,0.00004857007,0.36970478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892035,0.0012746891,0.00042029476,0.000887359,0.000042965898,0.00004552568,0.000005041375,0.000007106882,0.008113494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876787,0.008883111,0.0002531422,0.00041134006,0.0014579601,0.001315741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942159,0.0023961377,0.0006802154,0.00030211735,0.0008471846,0.0015584814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009399691,0.00054711016,0.0005177758,0.0032085914,0.014406276,0.011504857,0.0019066392,0.003530806,0.003943031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008594484,0.00032388393,0.00040386865,0.002346626,0.045475733,0.0072775073,0.014713197,0.004452563,0.00032409333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012338967,0.00008521661,0.002016304,0.000102862636,0.000005962809,0.00042158357,0.60000974,0.00043205576,0.00015851308,0.38465938,0.0019599148,0.010136105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021076175,0.000103399616,0.008954424,0.0009838371,0.000015364438,0.0005905655,0.6098537,0.0024859183,0.00013870747,0.15605192,0.22072795,0.00007310918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16077563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10078515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16077563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027011752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02031515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31967962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056164465","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00425.x","title":"Rituals of Degradation: Administration as Policy in the Ontario Works Programme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic policy; Political science; Economics; Public administration; Business; Development economics; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.05316292903692885,"score_gpt":0.3806660196234271,"score_spread":0.32750309058649824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056164465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22136195,0.009276747,0.0050669755,0.28816032,0.00051546446,0.00038919842,0.00024786044,0.00013056856,0.4748508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256739,0.002627004,0.0011252814,0.0043447856,0.00016330364,0.00012560847,0.00005364316,0.000042094758,0.06584433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97884524,0.006572551,0.0005245087,0.0008402538,0.005124511,0.008092877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861857,0.0031674274,0.0017788071,0.00081766193,0.0034111904,0.0046392316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011124582,0.0003245652,0.00044692928,0.0019643828,0.030065833,0.017731598,0.0021604996,0.0046434966,0.004082775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015521847,0.0006266097,0.00036194545,0.0035338239,0.053055085,0.0042666337,0.008025497,0.0037884095,0.00036793944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007534239,0.000075458156,0.014468677,0.00018332513,0.000024055027,0.00031256053,0.11756172,0.0016055494,0.00053343736,0.7871276,0.028550558,0.0494817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051535655,0.00009645331,0.05467562,0.00045430765,0.000033794167,0.0000865421,0.07758021,0.0012766898,0.00058690715,0.06806782,0.7969654,0.0001246696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96575826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97949106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24602479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24602479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33290818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8745044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071643983","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00570.x","title":"The Organization of Decision‐making and the Dynamics of Policy Drift: A Canadian Health Sector Example","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Structuring; Private sector; Public sector; Public administration; Legislation; Welfare; Order (exchange); Fragmentation (computing); Public policy; Health care; Public economics; Policy studies; Boundary (topology); Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.0250832470049839,"score_gpt":0.3656562036139591,"score_spread":0.34057295660897524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071643983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47037372,0.002942239,0.01473491,0.06398709,0.00018372647,0.00049840164,0.0003420271,0.000101314305,0.44683653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892903,0.00065928965,0.0025499351,0.00055835914,0.000018647299,0.000052191415,0.000045078916,0.000015200769,0.006811087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98634595,0.0051709884,0.00023527771,0.000669994,0.0021665841,0.0054112216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99124444,0.0032925892,0.0008069283,0.0005985304,0.0023268797,0.0017305686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01171287,0.00046465508,0.0005413572,0.0037091235,0.0313994,0.011665088,0.002900851,0.0033828332,0.003877851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014110031,0.00040928277,0.0006866427,0.0065687317,0.03423605,0.0031892583,0.005638817,0.0032911755,0.00021304065],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013273975,0.000077742196,0.013719559,0.00009243831,0.00003233124,0.001567985,0.110811315,0.01181878,0.0005767019,0.834337,0.008618208,0.018215092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026440813,0.000080653546,0.042746473,0.00047548642,0.000078781224,0.00029315415,0.31623378,0.032720737,0.0007988433,0.24075878,0.3653316,0.00021732328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.974065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7938969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20610312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16350675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92080784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076082197","doi":"10.1111/spol.12125","title":"<scp>J</scp>ack (and <scp>J</scp>ill?) of All Trades – A <scp>C</scp>anadian Case Study of Equity in Apprenticeship Supports","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Manitoba","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Apprenticeship; Certification; Equity (law); Entry Level; Wage; Labour economics; Opportunity structures; Inequality; Barriers to entry; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Market structure; Sociology; Management; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.09655272343790525,"score_gpt":0.40102049631992914,"score_spread":0.30446777288202387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076082197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7252862,0.0002911763,0.00079415843,0.0049260994,0.000069088645,0.00007624819,0.000038747086,0.000011545924,0.26850674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977357,0.000104582934,0.00026069235,0.0002968669,0.00001191932,0.000019357598,0.000011879342,0.0000030602619,0.021934785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998833,0.00040539395,0.000022681397,0.000074877564,0.00014481907,0.0005193792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989172,0.00024966107,0.00009191553,0.00007573286,0.00015484136,0.00051065086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012224516,0.00016603166,0.00013209009,0.00059498416,0.010961748,0.00327532,0.00077647273,0.0012124244,0.010418693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011184893,0.00012534182,0.00016634399,0.00060037296,0.00341214,0.0011780659,0.0026521552,0.0013778324,0.0005273329],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032964328,0.002081759,0.1457947,0.00026400425,0.000029368035,0.02192584,0.20588785,0.0025589084,0.0034222633,0.36899242,0.04540369,0.20330957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054226824,0.0004334521,0.08888124,0.00040191677,0.000022967017,0.0046079746,0.45195925,0.002047139,0.0016335209,0.010915311,0.43900147,0.00004146113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07942829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16687222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9205717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045362995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051826253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15793192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080471750","doi":"10.1111/1467-9515.00309","title":"Food Banks and Food Security: Welfare Reform, Human Rights and Social Policy. Lessons from Canada?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":323,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Food security; Right to food; Safety net; Social protection; Economic growth; Redistribution (election); Food systems; Human rights; Economics; Development economics; Political science; Agriculture; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.14048922954356047,"score_gpt":0.4310547956953458,"score_spread":0.29056556615178536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080471750","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055084903,0.06622661,0.0004544723,0.7395806,0.0012347001,0.000055915178,0.0009566351,0.00004288265,0.13636333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7254045,0.08978597,0.001970078,0.10109785,0.000527723,0.00007833034,0.00060216326,0.00006513045,0.080468275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696213,0.0003421076,0.000041658957,0.00016619274,0.0006120758,0.0018757281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950718,0.0007405644,0.0002208779,0.00011220416,0.0018563484,0.001998205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020363543,0.00048660245,0.00062731723,0.0016595443,0.0122897085,0.008401788,0.001643379,0.0041434923,0.01184972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004878933,0.00024794886,0.00050630816,0.0042767846,0.0089040045,0.0045351563,0.0031374383,0.004536123,0.0005247341],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002508256,0.0001907905,0.013461596,0.0008524029,0.00006186616,0.00090009195,0.0118667185,0.0010143123,0.0003828091,0.61919826,0.2092316,0.14258875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014635712,0.00009446499,0.06348813,0.003716222,0.00011954916,0.00025133215,0.055829015,0.0013781241,0.00054366654,0.082333036,0.79191303,0.00018697006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99848455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16789886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16789886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3059013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96511936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085233592","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00584.x","title":"Conservative Ideas and Social Policy in the United States","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Conservatism; Ideology; Presidency; Presidential system; Political science; Public administration; Dominance (genetics); Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.05649923197917828,"score_gpt":0.4094169380343366,"score_spread":0.3529177060551583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085233592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37655327,0.014845696,0.0028636076,0.20089519,0.00067592255,0.000022611579,0.00004160247,0.000027154294,0.404075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99110633,0.0010682561,0.00021486188,0.0037104418,0.0000857546,0.000012162542,0.0000075119424,0.0000029709784,0.0037917963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535525,0.0031179795,0.00008030798,0.00020981832,0.000646138,0.00059060776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701726,0.0017354381,0.00046052033,0.00012364856,0.0003690311,0.0002940763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00556004,0.00018243513,0.0002549775,0.0017654351,0.007054694,0.0067850524,0.00035447435,0.0022587283,0.0022132294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048087505,0.0001423588,0.00016489555,0.001526877,0.021140322,0.00234405,0.0040374794,0.0030096036,0.000098360935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009909914,0.00001601303,0.0010518039,0.000014422926,0.0000036576373,0.000045855726,0.009524658,0.00026334854,0.00005845186,0.98133266,0.0020394314,0.005639692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028512819,0.00007073552,0.010749605,0.0004614038,0.000015205474,0.00007690206,0.032397907,0.0009284537,0.0004067186,0.6563052,0.29851866,0.000040695057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017388597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018305548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017388597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011707875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067948443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08494693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101465825","doi":"10.1111/spol.12128","title":"Diverging Paths? A Comparative Look at Childcare Policies in <scp>J</scp>apan, <scp>S</scp>outh <scp>K</scp>orea and <scp>T</scp>aiwan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Economics; Business; Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.06553433729173866,"score_gpt":0.35483603084828436,"score_spread":0.28930169355654567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101465825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929224,0.00021814508,0.00008569284,0.0003385829,0.0000034812374,0.0000084817075,0.000084988606,0.0000018932973,0.006336342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999204,0.00021225832,0.00007614035,0.000027286143,6.4620156e-7,0.000009056228,0.000063719344,0.0000015153079,0.0004054109],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991536,0.00033480136,0.00003957444,0.00006810879,0.000111617424,0.0002923592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836344,0.0005755562,0.00043348726,0.00008621216,0.00031991495,0.00022149149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001230619,0.000074116084,0.00020082045,0.0016158443,0.0015022355,0.0019084847,0.00033209415,0.0003898331,0.0029271634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038891677,0.00013014892,0.00020070274,0.003470463,0.0013219443,0.0013076962,0.001431723,0.0006212658,0.00013475254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008386995,0.00039204583,0.68929803,0.0003806289,0.00017056904,0.001637497,0.104698166,0.004827869,0.0021120082,0.09905522,0.0017490495,0.094840184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017201686,0.00013756947,0.8060521,0.00020978157,0.000033986365,0.00013043423,0.17515904,0.0008650508,0.00037054456,0.0032462527,0.013747643,0.00003044253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0427639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07010861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0427639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00301967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026202481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08502996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116688202","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00428.x","title":"The Multicultural Welfare State: International Experience and North American Narratives","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Welfare state; Immigration; Redistribution (election); Ethnic group; Political science; Diversity (politics); Political economy; Cultural diversity; Politics; Development economics; Welfare; Narrative; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02689688042771937,"score_gpt":0.37509921705941246,"score_spread":0.3482023366316931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116688202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75726193,0.010614821,0.0003869454,0.049415722,0.00080187357,0.000027771099,0.000040605886,0.000025529194,0.18142477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820941,0.003626476,0.000087855515,0.0041037137,0.00013390413,0.000028439124,0.000016359678,0.000023007171,0.009886117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925291,0.0046802755,0.00015443943,0.000362543,0.0005555222,0.001718148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954116,0.002342988,0.0005335251,0.00021055844,0.00046265044,0.0010386807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075878585,0.0006726355,0.000642304,0.0021144433,0.037898555,0.012638264,0.0014585943,0.0033826,0.0056384965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005759528,0.00041600087,0.00028277072,0.003824558,0.025795143,0.008119508,0.01671463,0.0084169,0.00033667026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009025634,0.00002489174,0.0009189012,0.000030824147,0.0000032716378,0.0002625127,0.96785754,0.00001611856,0.00009078272,0.025604589,0.002426361,0.0027552082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021823762,0.000011289786,0.00096237665,0.0001730272,0.0000042416837,0.00011750201,0.9158602,0.0000292588,0.00006944417,0.0015214208,0.08123692,0.000012195765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06388101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0902799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06388101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011387049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006644042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12701833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141554301","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00469.x","title":"Restructuring of Full-time Workers: A Case of Transitional Dislocation or Social Exclusion in Canada? Lessons from the 1990s","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Restructuring; Relocation; Labour economics; Full-time; Economics; Welfare state; Social exclusion; Welfare; Demographic economics; Displaced workers; Job loss; Unemployment; Market economy; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0655960467952306,"score_gpt":0.41687726875861875,"score_spread":0.3512812219633882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141554301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762255,0.0009855337,0.00014659966,0.0118132625,0.000058706362,0.00004226171,0.00013261907,0.000008389188,0.01058725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954873,0.00064039143,0.0001047084,0.0013321267,0.000016192818,0.000015935313,0.00006816749,0.0000064978876,0.0023287316],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951266,0.00040080733,0.00007706604,0.0002056402,0.0007646077,0.003425298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967829,0.000233289,0.00040130637,0.00013512706,0.0006441439,0.0018032722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001807154,0.00037706937,0.00075663865,0.0014503573,0.036148265,0.004665641,0.0024570418,0.0023248729,0.0020937866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040818756,0.00037985158,0.00053700013,0.0044791494,0.012216502,0.0021745646,0.008705469,0.004871826,0.00013050721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002791844,0.00025297803,0.12843648,0.00012294644,0.000043294134,0.0064824815,0.77153516,0.0005721501,0.00081048644,0.027566789,0.012520359,0.051377725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024591445,0.00006253273,0.13756602,0.00021406953,0.000024512772,0.0009482977,0.82211536,0.00044372192,0.00018485214,0.002497693,0.035839647,0.000078689845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99709046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104295045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.104295045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15940851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7567171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145264089","doi":"10.1111/spol.12064","title":"The Universal Decline of Universality? Social Policy Change in <scp>C</scp>anada, <scp>D</scp>enmark, <scp>S</scp>weden and the <scp>UK</scp>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Democracy; Welfare; Social Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03147636814749545,"score_gpt":0.32643614995860487,"score_spread":0.29495978181110943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145264089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72949785,0.0051530534,0.0025168296,0.14148878,0.00019597453,0.000058744943,0.00017679682,0.000055422573,0.12085652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663615,0.00037860553,0.0001956883,0.0012223442,0.000020890226,0.000011220295,0.000014829106,0.0000053853328,0.0015148142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991734,0.0052252747,0.00033170232,0.00080871116,0.00081057166,0.00290636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876115,0.005726135,0.0014248135,0.0014103637,0.0015931876,0.002234067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013869288,0.00013957178,0.0004499243,0.0011100977,0.0027006534,0.004063245,0.00071379467,0.0019932692,0.0054176245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018335404,0.00019395554,0.0003870691,0.0013928721,0.015023171,0.0046499493,0.0059514553,0.0025817328,0.00014793393],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012226767,0.00012659066,0.019533977,0.00032053213,0.0000452032,0.00023262278,0.017110871,0.0016535756,0.00051795214,0.9080515,0.004421635,0.047863357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108772336,0.00039922917,0.25388616,0.0017522784,0.00008195195,0.00027367956,0.065732725,0.0022214837,0.0024974872,0.41171503,0.2612153,0.00011595474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027447447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025488902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97255254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014414242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0122730555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104583144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147536174","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00763.x","title":"Swedish Family Policy – Continuity and Change in the Nordic Welfare State Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Welfare; Social policy; Context (archaeology); Economics; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Politics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.11251754792242971,"score_gpt":0.3820962420635939,"score_spread":0.2695786941411642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147536174","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35638624,0.004499367,0.010244503,0.028194703,0.00042816257,0.00008455999,0.0004884876,0.00004968845,0.5996243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845814,0.00074759405,0.0012509843,0.0004635421,0.000024636205,0.000030576393,0.00006410514,0.0000091356305,0.012827933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982926,0.0007884339,0.00005626561,0.000221759,0.00018714236,0.0004537087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940443,0.00017367348,0.000087994464,0.00006297106,0.00012653392,0.0001443695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016209694,0.00025396794,0.00042647854,0.0011311258,0.004352086,0.006156644,0.0008237459,0.0016944491,0.0049698697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018292884,0.00019409318,0.0006085125,0.0012232634,0.0049710395,0.0025566784,0.0023868494,0.0017021518,0.00030207555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018118693,0.000019224408,0.0008761068,0.000014496959,0.000008957512,0.00015743243,0.0014557128,0.0047743917,0.00001920786,0.98912233,0.0014460948,0.0020880143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077675686,0.000069100875,0.0060422565,0.0006256601,0.0000540502,0.00042878775,0.020272058,0.017188177,0.00016539109,0.79512644,0.15989448,0.00005584273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102168076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08956704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102168076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013518864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008115841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20314682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161158821","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00451.x","title":"Evidence‐based Engagement in the Voluntary Sector: Lessons from Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Voluntary sector; Corporate governance; Public relations; Public administration; Turnover; Political science; Business; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.13672384209970045,"score_gpt":0.39315762291833195,"score_spread":0.2564337808186315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161158821","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29227263,0.015951296,0.003956544,0.5035304,0.0012224222,0.0006449073,0.0005665429,0.00007578337,0.18177946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575829,0.007819354,0.004348068,0.018891733,0.00008625287,0.00014268878,0.00015514888,0.000042035084,0.010931882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737976,0.010172768,0.00086279714,0.00092241174,0.00590833,0.008336181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9119176,0.036261383,0.0021321927,0.002387438,0.028081408,0.01921999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028817585,0.00034919885,0.00065700617,0.0018835803,0.024207959,0.011946631,0.0031280108,0.004310636,0.0032379292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044730723,0.00039688646,0.00056277827,0.0058473735,0.012730245,0.0029290498,0.008190555,0.006166303,0.00020319241],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047101395,0.00061656896,0.04651946,0.002897682,0.00017120758,0.008407554,0.24652442,0.00409527,0.0018264824,0.33663848,0.09197843,0.25985342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017505861,0.00027742962,0.063891135,0.0050706007,0.00012974485,0.0007860591,0.3659583,0.0027004904,0.0012651037,0.043975644,0.51543677,0.00033362335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99126023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99647313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18144369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18144369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5357375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9494093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222007061","doi":"10.1111/spol.12189","title":"Barriers and Enablers to Safeguarding Children and Adults within a Disability Services Context: Insights from an Australian Delphi Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada)","funders":"State Trustees Australia Foundation","keywords":"Safeguarding; Delphi method; Context (archaeology); Workforce; Neglect; Public relations; Psychology; Business; Political science; Medicine; Nursing; Geography","score_opus":0.032420645297963395,"score_gpt":0.3530451482852146,"score_spread":0.3206245029872512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222007061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902484,0.0002847071,0.0010484668,0.0026564584,0.000032306754,0.00041187924,0.000034216286,0.000004433242,0.0052790176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947121,0.0007592815,0.0012161776,0.00082710525,0.000016982074,0.00049488735,0.000022082553,0.0000073832325,0.0019441119],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772819,0.016823018,0.00063252804,0.0005723432,0.0018101659,0.002880001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97571534,0.018064903,0.0016066179,0.00047291044,0.002515793,0.0016245148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03201134,0.0005864126,0.0006129777,0.0023992541,0.00991683,0.0043369574,0.0018580686,0.0017543999,0.0022131517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031027978,0.0008025828,0.00043884513,0.0016453147,0.005985369,0.0034000974,0.008242695,0.003392765,0.00029931372],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016910542,0.000042568725,0.0030582312,0.0001023165,0.0000025205927,0.0003239797,0.99164987,0.00002766581,0.00026042035,0.00068729377,0.000297585,0.0035306856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017679095,0.00004564001,0.0030620748,0.00013197311,0.0000017873098,0.000086153465,0.9938729,0.00008044528,0.000067483925,0.00016643044,0.0024746705,0.0000086605105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025114978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02837568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03201134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005962657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008150379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16929418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339108902","doi":"10.1111/spol.12215","title":"Testing the Limits of Welfare State Changes: The Slow‐moving Immigration Policy Reform in Japan","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Immigration policy; Immigration; Public policy; Political science; Modernization theory; Welfare reform; Political economy; Social policy; Development economics; Economic growth; Politics; Welfare; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06501508565255705,"score_gpt":0.36046611210754254,"score_spread":0.2954510264549855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339108902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91177094,0.0025105232,0.0005914005,0.051735226,0.00014093138,0.00011108398,0.000071532,0.000013745477,0.033054642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960056,0.00052493234,0.0002103083,0.0021437497,0.000047383153,0.00006684862,0.00001609117,0.0000036524655,0.0009814366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902592,0.0052127377,0.00052362797,0.0005866405,0.0010088193,0.002408939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98534286,0.0070520546,0.0024871773,0.00073217886,0.0028989778,0.0014868593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024135755,0.00027144433,0.00064159645,0.0013318063,0.0047927126,0.0075559253,0.00088091224,0.0032089178,0.0027247975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024156485,0.0003371191,0.0005355117,0.0015841519,0.0082582235,0.0045862733,0.0056436076,0.0029382105,0.00012058938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018183856,0.0016140899,0.22593603,0.002106152,0.00045126135,0.0016082135,0.12645636,0.006480949,0.0054969094,0.47988567,0.0119111985,0.1362348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003643121,0.0013371531,0.59683657,0.0012691396,0.0005730698,0.00008375155,0.24323052,0.0063135116,0.003192796,0.0610059,0.08561537,0.00017788581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07051684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07732918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07051684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016709866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019186547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14021271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343830056","doi":"10.1111/spol.12230","title":"Deciphering Deservedness: Canadian Employment Insurance Reforms in Historical Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"Government of Canada; Australian Government","keywords":"Unemployment; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Wage; Situated; Service (business); Labour economics; Job security; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Economy","score_opus":0.0760914899476712,"score_gpt":0.4150811677419424,"score_spread":0.33898967779427125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343830056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3980695,0.04440304,0.0006566928,0.3180983,0.0013948454,0.000079449936,0.0017328145,0.000059923594,0.23550537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97112083,0.011627255,0.00021794316,0.0065311687,0.00020369262,0.0000138591695,0.00015642682,0.000025144825,0.010103586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953833,0.0004719033,0.00009708519,0.00026401062,0.0014135332,0.0023700902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941484,0.0010401801,0.00052827445,0.00016042923,0.0022104648,0.001912279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004277045,0.0002508149,0.00039550257,0.0041849217,0.024072187,0.0097401915,0.0017864251,0.0029885338,0.006941678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008982678,0.00029755675,0.00027499764,0.0075564226,0.01532937,0.0036801677,0.0035486273,0.005614552,0.00019532556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000166821,0.000095122836,0.03831447,0.0005801745,0.000044417582,0.0012241658,0.21042575,0.0008472201,0.0006788984,0.6049941,0.074998185,0.06763059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001537142,0.000034440123,0.14481099,0.0009745693,0.00003325728,0.000234351,0.15613487,0.00059531856,0.00035662152,0.010290495,0.68636554,0.00015417411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99561995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27544743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27544743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18625295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8403783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469199753","doi":"10.1111/spol.12211","title":"Reassessing Policy Drift: Social Policy Change in the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Gridlock; Scholarship; Public policy; Policy analysis; Social security; Politics; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Public administration; Public economics; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.09354093560874924,"score_gpt":0.43094592898041983,"score_spread":0.3374049933716706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469199753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8595899,0.0033858481,0.0024005617,0.10938184,0.00039949807,0.000044666343,0.00023114227,0.000046461773,0.024520142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99623626,0.00045010998,0.00036365588,0.0022794602,0.00007780597,0.000013907335,0.000034326513,0.0000058998103,0.0005385344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946188,0.0029835813,0.00024911217,0.00031581763,0.00072810234,0.0011045702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987573,0.0071596773,0.0024377122,0.0007373798,0.0013218469,0.00077045604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014375565,0.0001416913,0.00038521676,0.0020548806,0.003758512,0.005421523,0.000736237,0.0032749386,0.0015293347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027404742,0.00017142552,0.0004582332,0.002774912,0.0057988223,0.0038027707,0.0043696472,0.0037983833,0.00007487071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004289663,0.00041633856,0.13079108,0.00032910306,0.00015457514,0.0014326955,0.05767675,0.012700128,0.0012165038,0.6525069,0.024405338,0.11794165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098656434,0.00050365954,0.36179778,0.0013671336,0.00012894305,0.00029857253,0.103557676,0.019420685,0.0043641217,0.3021143,0.20611449,0.00023398008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040741604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034937523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040741604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01144051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008547882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08300716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472045228","doi":"10.1111/spol.12207","title":"Continuity and Change in Social Policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Punctuated equilibrium; Positive economics; Social change; Reading (process); Sociology; Path dependence; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Law","score_opus":0.07089792388171295,"score_gpt":0.41122930614994385,"score_spread":0.3403313822682309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472045228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16572326,0.03401915,0.09354635,0.24387465,0.0015075945,0.0003035438,0.00019686003,0.00024426138,0.4605843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875178,0.0020655163,0.004388377,0.0018703752,0.0002878658,0.00007275126,0.000029951396,0.000023742361,0.0037436215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758513,0.017442087,0.00068565545,0.0021169966,0.002740662,0.0011633575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829291,0.010991137,0.0016675175,0.0019968175,0.0015870872,0.00082833023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017154738,0.00032450978,0.0006313728,0.0031899924,0.0047199144,0.01146148,0.0013924482,0.0037359348,0.00494125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025436763,0.00035298098,0.0006395945,0.0033606696,0.042845085,0.012436909,0.008825851,0.0054995064,0.00038005912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012220046,0.000018649132,0.0006272591,0.000047512767,0.000009792385,0.000030432335,0.0033642345,0.0007882075,0.000053698768,0.98767173,0.0007839491,0.0065925103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011483149,0.000022511063,0.0010809496,0.00020688552,0.0000068919103,0.000029406592,0.0028825363,0.001083615,0.00014720793,0.9667022,0.027815415,0.000010938213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030293094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014779269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017154738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013021797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072548366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09448022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2485908565","doi":"10.1111/spol.12235","title":"<i>Networking Enforced</i>–<i>Comparing Social Services</i>'<i>Collaborative Rationales across Different Welfare Regimes</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Normative; Welfare; Business; Service (business); Social Welfare; Public relations; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.05021255007173641,"score_gpt":0.3906353910804734,"score_spread":0.340422841008737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2485908565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57030946,0.0009147647,0.014395895,0.01608663,0.00020350682,0.00054543215,0.0006204684,0.00006831688,0.39685544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950165,0.00012785051,0.0013566276,0.0005195743,0.000008761427,0.00012609243,0.00009171627,0.000016204158,0.0027366772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9711042,0.015309071,0.0013273145,0.0019857108,0.00623732,0.0040363907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786604,0.00865512,0.0036176709,0.0022684191,0.0048604193,0.001937959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025709294,0.0002500792,0.00045577902,0.0024258222,0.009531431,0.012270414,0.0019033371,0.0018413757,0.0052642967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029342577,0.00027741693,0.0004998375,0.0023968483,0.024523098,0.00449003,0.00645402,0.0027589144,0.00028317055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010650676,0.00011443892,0.028618734,0.00020447768,0.00004575184,0.00026636483,0.106955625,0.0015434262,0.00093841203,0.827046,0.0047792215,0.02938097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001057815,0.0002625879,0.21398595,0.0025945185,0.0001296506,0.00025227404,0.47736982,0.003791942,0.0030054548,0.084974736,0.21325457,0.00027268677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4017798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46024978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4017798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05093416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04121217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79888237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507456166","doi":"10.1111/spol.12237","title":"Obamacare and the Politics of Universal Health Insurance Coverage in the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Medicaid; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Politics; Presidential system; Political science; Health insurance; Universal coverage; Public administration; Health care; State (computer science); Health care reform; Health policy; Law","score_opus":0.03146213033735856,"score_gpt":0.35805508493958316,"score_spread":0.3265929546022246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507456166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4176809,0.006466096,0.0016105995,0.3028988,0.00060427556,0.00003249311,0.00008940511,0.00003011654,0.27058727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98143804,0.0005674931,0.0001702598,0.014061056,0.0001663668,0.000022583039,0.000011576251,0.00000736572,0.0035552413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925148,0.0036498073,0.0001499696,0.0005263655,0.0008815682,0.0022774613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927448,0.0046674106,0.00070396706,0.0002761527,0.0005301469,0.0010776137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009203137,0.00015598621,0.00035518967,0.0010026533,0.010412549,0.009825351,0.00075893285,0.0063412106,0.004701707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007876256,0.00041310125,0.00049418287,0.0008723659,0.016060555,0.003086103,0.0067569315,0.0068204785,0.00020211498],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003992377,0.00006379295,0.0034323155,0.00002323894,0.000020905027,0.00014277888,0.008108055,0.00031675946,0.00030789577,0.97514516,0.0071598766,0.005239367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013552578,0.0002566837,0.05545702,0.0007943248,0.00014638914,0.00017692083,0.039357238,0.0025568008,0.002043748,0.4187356,0.48016348,0.0001762384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05058371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053625375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05058371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013219189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085866945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100578606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520196486","doi":"10.1111/spol.12250","title":"Return of the Nanny: Public Policy towards In‐home Childcare in the UK, Canada and Australia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Early childhood education; Position (finance); Public policy; Child care; Diversity (politics); Economic growth; Political science; Day care; Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Nursing; Medicine","score_opus":0.03836875039939506,"score_gpt":0.3396779680751578,"score_spread":0.30130921767576274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520196486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90110016,0.0045219846,0.00020326732,0.038583536,0.00009656334,0.000075136435,0.00038498186,0.00001976121,0.05501466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98549324,0.0024031708,0.00021613557,0.002461287,0.000017743349,0.00003172925,0.00008781782,0.0000061479227,0.009282839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545056,0.00095012126,0.00009701529,0.00019366833,0.00082611607,0.0024823977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903824,0.0019286659,0.0009954638,0.00021105718,0.0029411563,0.0035412249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026989048,0.00017002117,0.00030526627,0.0015020038,0.0061498666,0.0034609674,0.0013311558,0.0012146784,0.0034058383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00850773,0.00019124759,0.00023219925,0.0022920258,0.0043301038,0.0010210697,0.003248536,0.0013228965,0.00009518346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045255016,0.0005156031,0.41863215,0.0015182599,0.00018678949,0.0027549325,0.11741146,0.0040914607,0.0018405773,0.23274586,0.055145722,0.1647047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003443013,0.00008434687,0.82065046,0.0011162914,0.000053520336,0.00017911663,0.077979684,0.0011641938,0.0004361395,0.0025080808,0.09571096,0.00008271782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99335444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10157437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10157437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13143854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7369771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525189274","doi":"10.1111/spol.12209","title":"Social Policy Change: Work–family Tensions in Sweden, Australia and Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Rationalisation; Politics; Sociology; Unpaid work; Work (physics); Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.15006206251486595,"score_gpt":0.418436100725532,"score_spread":0.2683740382106661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525189274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8859047,0.0045042965,0.00026078342,0.042360213,0.00016562593,0.000104468716,0.00026496395,0.000019974328,0.06641497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900849,0.001626938,0.00023145194,0.0018458001,0.000017662485,0.000035361998,0.00007677049,0.000009936049,0.0060712453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906641,0.0016024425,0.00022345554,0.00039380623,0.001950841,0.0051654098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919761,0.0014266252,0.0005542485,0.00019511353,0.0025438734,0.003304044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042337077,0.00026247895,0.0005835212,0.0037166376,0.029048052,0.009274885,0.0020856247,0.0025558711,0.0033965688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009382865,0.00031007436,0.00045193356,0.0069754585,0.011735964,0.0016808473,0.0077930363,0.0031501302,0.00015523868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024366453,0.00026398807,0.09731322,0.0005173552,0.00011854056,0.0037823797,0.58153594,0.0018704148,0.0008643309,0.21074674,0.021221554,0.08152187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022724533,0.000047839825,0.1941684,0.0006634555,0.000038981212,0.00019539685,0.68236417,0.00063927966,0.00026536387,0.0056028687,0.115884826,0.00010662345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23863603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23863603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2813976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8830743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530154693","doi":"10.1111/spol.12258","title":"Ideas and Institutions in Social Policy Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Scholarship; Institutionalism; Field (mathematics); Positive economics; Meaning (existential); New institutionalism; Sociology; Social science; Perspective (graphical); Social policy; Institutional analysis; Political science; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.19467530574397354,"score_gpt":0.5130139265502055,"score_spread":0.318338620806232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530154693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042354837,0.05457853,0.05921261,0.58014685,0.006074319,0.00014166172,0.00016379176,0.00015979855,0.2571676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93987477,0.02218851,0.015900299,0.0072323657,0.0040600123,0.00033405796,0.0000805208,0.00007515935,0.0102541745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9672152,0.02789429,0.00082147203,0.0012073888,0.0021859969,0.00067563076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518962,0.04012128,0.0024448016,0.0021086114,0.0020805253,0.0013485316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02960733,0.00041417632,0.00068491243,0.0041704443,0.0044164383,0.01914573,0.0011553097,0.003923621,0.0048318263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029961469,0.00030954924,0.00059944706,0.005458778,0.05977757,0.0119359,0.008037886,0.006451415,0.00038916824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019930494,0.0000050460976,0.00012781833,0.000023815164,0.0000021886049,0.0000085022475,0.0017561141,0.00011545265,0.000014614827,0.99527377,0.00091919856,0.0017515236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005960438,0.000008957291,0.00023097589,0.00023064307,0.00000419526,0.000016934653,0.0020234457,0.00038925384,0.0000550247,0.95395595,0.043070707,0.00000787268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016026604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010473137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02960733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01165918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077969898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15658039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530290761","doi":"10.1111/spol.12254","title":"Citation Classics in Social Policy Journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Social science; Social policy; Citation analysis; Citation index; Sociology; Citation impact; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.09010774403557402,"score_gpt":0.4344723268921622,"score_spread":0.34436458285658816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530290761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11577156,0.32912675,0.022648524,0.08717484,0.04541285,0.00042655226,0.005764382,0.0011665957,0.39250788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8167604,0.10881443,0.013917439,0.005568,0.023332855,0.0003158016,0.002957224,0.00043994674,0.02789397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97170514,0.007971552,0.0038536421,0.0017137126,0.013731945,0.0010240523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7278848,0.17507142,0.037878573,0.009191498,0.04587501,0.0040985453],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021935474,0.0006683647,0.0013018207,0.063631356,0.0035498363,0.021071156,0.0016135543,0.0019264193,0.013916605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15204586,0.00041273297,0.00071059016,0.1213513,0.008385087,0.014096958,0.0052056476,0.0019156967,0.0015869355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025832668,0.00004684535,0.019820543,0.010355479,0.0003066829,0.0005835108,0.014587722,0.0009456531,0.0010053915,0.51355153,0.14067718,0.29786116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036239744,0.000076991535,0.022630528,0.0057718656,0.00018134774,0.0011527158,0.007950509,0.00082493864,0.0013350477,0.10273782,0.85720646,0.00009552235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029711993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002727341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93636864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010395666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008468931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11600727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550995074","doi":"10.1111/spol.12271","title":"Workfare under Ontario Works: Making Sense of Jobless Work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Resocialization; Internship; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Work (physics); Welfare; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.09619677948518363,"score_gpt":0.4369275785816831,"score_spread":0.34073079909649945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550995074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87158245,0.0015414506,0.0007810817,0.04714587,0.00027106513,0.000062159095,0.00009188736,0.000019196419,0.07850479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730885,0.0003219284,0.000090471294,0.00060642866,0.0000218375,0.000010490145,0.000013396093,0.000005711307,0.0016207667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900317,0.0045705615,0.00024480067,0.00044493843,0.002314871,0.0023930997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874858,0.0034768232,0.0023316876,0.0006179849,0.0022680892,0.0038197415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008032785,0.00042113787,0.0004596758,0.002045097,0.029154548,0.011657531,0.002641071,0.0024194424,0.002306209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014720907,0.000407624,0.00032441667,0.0017080463,0.042364657,0.004781778,0.0126195345,0.0035691133,0.00014786216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024715422,0.000023251274,0.013436788,0.000044928755,0.000006933559,0.00042440015,0.9651864,0.000047170233,0.00015819176,0.01200407,0.003078031,0.0055650873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036550302,0.000015395768,0.012046703,0.000103273866,0.0000052253536,0.00007513843,0.96333116,0.0000914783,0.000044088734,0.0025688654,0.021694265,0.000020739648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7757231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8546665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2242769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05761336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046543106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45119542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555451487","doi":"10.1111/spol.12208","title":"Privileging Policy Change? Sustaining Automatic Stabilizing Mechanisms in Public Pensions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Blame; Intervention (counseling); Pension; Cartel; Mechanism (biology); Pension system; Sustainability; Psychological intervention; Business; Economics; Public economics; Market economy; Incentive; Finance","score_opus":0.10028199632411952,"score_gpt":0.38718121243901504,"score_spread":0.28689921611489555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555451487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87920785,0.0007750761,0.016689133,0.01126277,0.000116242285,0.00009011921,0.00011200286,0.00024934902,0.091497585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883336,0.00003541375,0.00031835437,0.00009995288,0.00002055016,0.000010171011,0.0000049752407,0.0000038947487,0.0006732965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652916,0.0017566254,0.00014045138,0.00037973933,0.00040530798,0.00078868587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837623,0.006633246,0.0037572335,0.0033656151,0.00116391,0.0013176909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008703552,0.00019888234,0.00027105535,0.0010911449,0.0015829115,0.0034198395,0.00090093754,0.0017100688,0.011732342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022829873,0.00019920383,0.00031871765,0.0005378141,0.004339488,0.0037173617,0.0032147754,0.0011813337,0.0006307227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049998605,0.00043312626,0.035893284,0.00017230085,0.0000767578,0.0002587941,0.0070731957,0.003875945,0.004264286,0.8601248,0.003799627,0.08352795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029762424,0.0006002401,0.06901172,0.00028835615,0.00009631513,0.00022098812,0.007589479,0.013682903,0.0063922284,0.8412847,0.060458913,0.00007646801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019139979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018380922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011732342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028283335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025006724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04602927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560582932","doi":"10.1111/spol.12275","title":"Social Policy Instruments in Motion. Conditional Cash Transfers from Mexico to Peru","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conditional cash transfer; Latin Americans; Certification; Social policy; Indigenous; Standardization; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Poverty; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02592955573571292,"score_gpt":0.34277550669762796,"score_spread":0.31684595096191503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560582932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5191993,0.007283863,0.005949527,0.08518334,0.00031170555,0.0002515833,0.00030372158,0.00017513568,0.38134181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817738,0.001282007,0.0012396852,0.0014119768,0.000068488,0.00013497521,0.000070993025,0.0000119763035,0.014006154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919945,0.00036865138,0.00002494482,0.000086273816,0.000083398765,0.00023737512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992623,0.00031143028,0.00015703442,0.00006102154,0.00013863303,0.00006964407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020073135,0.00019184189,0.00008540138,0.00047580735,0.0026392394,0.002475225,0.0003812432,0.0010151926,0.004957376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003170902,0.00011353754,0.00011268869,0.0006615777,0.0027303267,0.0012808767,0.0028563007,0.0016958396,0.000111656074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001577246,0.00014795111,0.011709357,0.00040691465,0.000018944496,0.0007542707,0.026292214,0.0011340848,0.0016900196,0.85418916,0.011356941,0.09214247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106276624,0.00047516686,0.08650415,0.0009038891,0.00006966482,0.00048048102,0.034508064,0.0012097725,0.003220005,0.059151027,0.8133064,0.00006524892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02831925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030829525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02831925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050788033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006459348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056308806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585506434","doi":"10.1111/spol.12286","title":"The Politics of ‘Minimum Wage’ Welfare States: The Changing Significance of the Minimum Wage in the Liberal Welfare Regime","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minimum wage; Workfare; Economics; Welfare state; Labour economics; Politics; Incentive; Welfare; Welfare reform; Political economy; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.032379339724865036,"score_gpt":0.34638686382035727,"score_spread":0.31400752409549226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585506434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22702906,0.005924027,0.0062249326,0.337169,0.0007198849,0.000016367372,0.000038172537,0.000026572063,0.42285204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861872,0.0007416278,0.00030501757,0.0061590276,0.00015778141,0.0000107415035,0.0000057597417,0.000008640296,0.006424072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932035,0.0044866703,0.00009137897,0.00034334091,0.00082405633,0.0010509328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579656,0.002716601,0.00039307997,0.0002212176,0.00045958292,0.00041301586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069007627,0.000109095214,0.00021015885,0.00084928324,0.0054854257,0.0086880885,0.0005232819,0.002588154,0.0028727492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006436632,0.00013524941,0.0001649693,0.0009648918,0.036912505,0.0038066471,0.0034702965,0.005292769,0.00020863528],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053401864,0.0000069366247,0.00019095924,0.000008264342,7.18821e-7,0.0000143087,0.0035169185,0.000081495906,0.000040957697,0.99215865,0.0014770731,0.002498307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015013702,0.000029397757,0.005224377,0.0002785869,0.000005048826,0.000031942447,0.018087808,0.00064993004,0.0002473412,0.8119073,0.16350183,0.00002140775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014235702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01666897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014235702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010007101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005741878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07260692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744170599","doi":"10.1111/spol.12369","title":"A signaling perspective on bureaucratic encounters: How public officials interpret signals and cues","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Perspective (graphical); Unobservable; Trustworthiness; Public relations; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09986298016777756,"score_gpt":0.4527776538895705,"score_spread":0.3529146737217929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744170599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76049477,0.00060738955,0.07826575,0.008176968,0.00013101654,0.00010384117,0.00010821773,0.00023852593,0.15187356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669445,0.00007168315,0.001776017,0.000096350544,0.000014017697,0.000012666858,0.00001458956,0.00003322116,0.0012870257],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830344,0.012158044,0.00046028497,0.00088034704,0.0018954796,0.0015713779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98189676,0.011358146,0.002668784,0.0013215881,0.0020206564,0.00073411263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009209966,0.0006555348,0.0005715466,0.003256114,0.0056449,0.015522115,0.0013182906,0.0034094267,0.006213838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02900682,0.0006615467,0.0005638833,0.0023213276,0.017375706,0.00889994,0.004244115,0.002972707,0.000955269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039382387,0.00010496997,0.023442099,0.00025598335,0.000047604062,0.00091339194,0.6379686,0.0026007476,0.0065264017,0.2853871,0.0020870734,0.040272284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008435551,0.00034079034,0.031252686,0.0008296205,0.00015793732,0.00058867654,0.68105096,0.023200413,0.0064799897,0.19543386,0.060244385,0.0003364497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010706357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076787514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015522115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046907635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033060058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048707485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895830303","doi":"10.1111/spol.12456","title":"A typology of activation incentives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Typology; Incentive; Affect (linguistics); Order (exchange); Public economics; Economics; Population; Human capital; Business; Microeconomics; Market economy; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.044815415970231254,"score_gpt":0.41244366262823795,"score_spread":0.3676282466580067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895830303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19270177,0.0013099462,0.20299368,0.015604487,0.0006060634,0.0013193002,0.00093833666,0.00045744705,0.5840689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95789355,0.00049423304,0.026932854,0.0009829184,0.00015153682,0.001549419,0.00024405115,0.00006665449,0.011684765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809903,0.008790121,0.0015406472,0.0022191475,0.0040052515,0.0024544618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97180927,0.014685338,0.0044047344,0.003665812,0.0036427728,0.001792103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010835592,0.0006313027,0.000741271,0.005083615,0.0037756267,0.0072217225,0.0019015046,0.0034116472,0.012460744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024568835,0.00043663854,0.0009976779,0.004087522,0.010153979,0.007478716,0.0046944316,0.0028083806,0.0009494084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019375988,0.000046817036,0.0037977705,0.000050387785,0.000008502907,0.00006890222,0.0012659403,0.0011606866,0.00011283945,0.98467654,0.0014553705,0.007336864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084384854,0.00011231838,0.006461739,0.00033191202,0.000026249703,0.00034087166,0.0057266923,0.014455607,0.00055781787,0.8818563,0.08998217,0.00006384219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002141613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015594444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012460744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007628827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044922875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05730474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901977377","doi":"10.1111/spol.12472","title":"I am more than a mom: Stories of parental leave during the transition to motherhood in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Narrative; Parental leave; Position (finance); Embodied cognition; Social policy; Psychology; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.021912738071381162,"score_gpt":0.31675508930524543,"score_spread":0.29484235123386426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901977377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95037603,0.0034100432,0.0011977674,0.021462208,0.0003141744,0.00007277943,0.00034056217,0.00004025615,0.022786159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99258727,0.0015242808,0.00028687622,0.0011565646,0.00003237676,0.00002518361,0.00006073584,0.000036387726,0.0042902054],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942062,0.0027773646,0.00012420016,0.0003606001,0.00087077636,0.0016608656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187744,0.0038941354,0.000685343,0.00025394987,0.0010645284,0.0022246265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042663054,0.0008463084,0.0007888219,0.001276609,0.034590147,0.0074864533,0.002639159,0.0028253305,0.0029238334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010939386,0.0006057298,0.00039735663,0.0017937927,0.019478375,0.0035791767,0.0075394874,0.006655378,0.0002613373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001972261,0.000006786117,0.0013821048,0.000021911326,0.000003690086,0.0008706063,0.9934169,0.00002979946,0.00010710024,0.0013278839,0.0013236918,0.0014898245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014741204,0.0000075730586,0.0013729214,0.00009258566,0.0000041707453,0.000201895,0.9801358,0.000043852146,0.00009174695,0.00020757804,0.017826248,0.0000140914035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85070956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9272042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14929044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053892687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039444473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39102066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903406873","doi":"10.1111/spol.12471","title":"Protective legislation: The “third pillar” of the welfare state","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Welfare; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Social policy; Public economics; Economics; Business; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.033279042732185085,"score_gpt":0.3537521316188936,"score_spread":0.3204730888867085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903406873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20875373,0.005893734,0.045479316,0.10513964,0.0005963114,0.00015021942,0.00033872944,0.0001126222,0.6335356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887205,0.0009623765,0.0025214602,0.0033336517,0.00013181308,0.0000925065,0.00005440615,0.000012500855,0.0041709174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99402535,0.0030426118,0.00022585782,0.00060527714,0.0012150287,0.00088577566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958682,0.0016979614,0.0007974773,0.0006635895,0.0005849124,0.0003878918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004216839,0.00021040605,0.0002679402,0.0020998649,0.0031959736,0.0076822476,0.0009650679,0.0028668547,0.0036320174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064362176,0.00026086182,0.00051639875,0.0017886363,0.027496245,0.0061910767,0.006003436,0.003987787,0.0002413989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032334501,0.000006677118,0.0008758892,0.0000089947325,0.0000023833306,0.000009416362,0.0011653505,0.000054313718,0.000029104773,0.994619,0.00056979246,0.0026559073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022483911,0.00007544974,0.016461356,0.0010101448,0.00004775749,0.00013057176,0.012178544,0.001237207,0.0004499073,0.8204878,0.1478606,0.00003824584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007327019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007975795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076822476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046500065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071263155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033738375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906166200","doi":"10.1111/spol.12482","title":"Coproduction and the third sector in France: Governmental traditions and the French conceptualization of participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Coproduction; Conceptualization; Solidarity; Framing (construction); Sociology; Narrative; Political science; Public relations; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.033617132386676435,"score_gpt":0.34829292074984997,"score_spread":0.31467578836317356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906166200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69671565,0.01129566,0.015983393,0.0364302,0.00017825492,0.000054966444,0.000060901235,0.000060914357,0.2392201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974146,0.00039557193,0.00032660447,0.00039638646,0.00001579991,0.000012342143,0.000006289632,0.0000044269514,0.0014278474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98347294,0.013353059,0.00020688219,0.0007124997,0.0010466368,0.0012080441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99087536,0.00657749,0.001017084,0.0004919769,0.0006568645,0.00038132753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010510042,0.00039931585,0.00033790502,0.0019521585,0.00871248,0.008791603,0.0007780834,0.002495962,0.002304807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062133726,0.00013438247,0.00039946818,0.0023477885,0.028548662,0.003969088,0.004488453,0.0022748867,0.00015164992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020667148,0.000023516885,0.0027876506,0.000056744677,0.0000065020226,0.00031822547,0.26670158,0.0003064626,0.00028594295,0.71964633,0.0009987202,0.008847714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030197243,0.00014340557,0.015268279,0.0011101966,0.000021755568,0.00096183555,0.40423185,0.0018820983,0.00092104037,0.18966943,0.38566285,0.00009697164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049450938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022355875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049450938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017265027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053635403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12526715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944617324","doi":"10.1111/spol.12504","title":"Mandatory occupational welfare: Severance pay as an unemployment compensation instrument","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Severance; Unemployment; Generosity; Economics; Employment protection legislation; Welfare; Legislation; Labour economics; Structural unemployment; Public economics; Political science; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.0364024583355392,"score_gpt":0.36886416341140876,"score_spread":0.3324617050758696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944617324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80067,0.0025759113,0.01789887,0.005147199,0.0001752597,0.00012464213,0.00017880232,0.00003728574,0.17319198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719185,0.00011048616,0.0007797525,0.00006573445,0.00003248315,0.000017885892,0.000016002838,0.0000016623181,0.0017842008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966499,0.001606028,0.00015419816,0.00022685189,0.00082605274,0.0005369438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949569,0.0020474351,0.0014005691,0.00038367303,0.00072328094,0.00048814365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030786917,0.0001572931,0.00020085664,0.0024631477,0.0013759886,0.003541403,0.00064517255,0.0009678496,0.0029877722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058641233,0.00016521834,0.00025100366,0.0012786107,0.006076627,0.001613009,0.002373936,0.0011288336,0.00013088182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024499773,0.00017594315,0.05232399,0.00020700647,0.000031560456,0.0001619818,0.0071865977,0.003592682,0.0006809109,0.87817234,0.0022392375,0.054982726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015456245,0.0010575852,0.53945214,0.0027314841,0.00016313749,0.0006627244,0.03167888,0.02355266,0.0020917933,0.27661085,0.12171485,0.0001293159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009485766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014033068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009485766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038991394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045749177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028290391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969287737","doi":"10.1111/spol.12527","title":"Gatekeeping disability income support: A conceptual model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Process (computing); Grounded theory; Perspective (graphical); Conceptual model; Income Support; Inclusion (mineral); Disability studies; Empirical research; Public economics; Boundary (topology); Qualitative research; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Social science; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.044627948123104146,"score_gpt":0.37745514073883585,"score_spread":0.3328271926157317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969287737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3588992,0.0019657358,0.20459633,0.07264661,0.00035533693,0.0027402916,0.0006531699,0.0002617981,0.35788152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96880317,0.00053895457,0.026156541,0.00056717993,0.000026690248,0.0006712357,0.0001290247,0.000017212627,0.0030899094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220747,0.005142732,0.00023481525,0.0005782702,0.0008513448,0.0009854162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98797417,0.008002677,0.0011164118,0.000481512,0.0011484358,0.0012768438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009239383,0.00084593473,0.000435627,0.005149253,0.0068763713,0.0123625975,0.0039425073,0.003999731,0.005314373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013344811,0.0005494043,0.0009182483,0.0044736243,0.02327729,0.013711489,0.005338787,0.0031512326,0.0004491694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014966909,0.000068645124,0.0022582156,0.00008453132,0.000006388707,0.00015101634,0.031417612,0.0016466238,0.000059355076,0.95683557,0.001107863,0.0063492116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008062462,0.00014161158,0.0052980008,0.0011746692,0.000047950343,0.00030089906,0.14339077,0.028410422,0.00028254735,0.74085724,0.07993116,0.00008412105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019931005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012207621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019931005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018273115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019365994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13258135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969706619","doi":"10.1111/spol.12535","title":"The impacts of housing factors on deprivation in a world city: The case of Hong Kong","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Poverty; Renting; Per capita; Per capita income; Public housing; Living space; Demographic economics; Socioeconomics; Standard of living; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Geography; Demography; Population; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.043455967313905296,"score_gpt":0.28616816894562513,"score_spread":0.24271220163171983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969706619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99661034,0.00018959434,0.00007368494,0.00031632266,0.000007385712,0.000011912418,0.0001461131,0.0000020662314,0.002642611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993299,0.00016021718,0.0000412694,0.000027896429,0.000003035862,0.000004951513,0.00006744234,9.840597e-7,0.00036434623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917585,0.00030483588,0.000024692918,0.00003825776,0.000059432088,0.00039699307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987883,0.0001958593,0.00019092708,0.000078497374,0.00024567056,0.0005007026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073056255,0.00034466208,0.00039834197,0.0011022709,0.0021725069,0.0018063644,0.00066696096,0.00036411925,0.002923201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011047028,0.0002043013,0.0009815698,0.002109494,0.0011964685,0.00075800734,0.0019695265,0.0008436876,0.00019587947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020795742,0.00038548792,0.9622584,0.00010988327,0.0003705637,0.010024824,0.0058427625,0.0062472783,0.00033416908,0.005368187,0.0020858815,0.0067646494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015030966,0.00011642128,0.9605578,0.00007800823,0.00012900605,0.0005887112,0.028526157,0.006946789,0.00010824442,0.00061731983,0.0022817508,0.00003472101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5334677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45857164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5334677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068152477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002553752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009183577","doi":"10.1111/spol.12587","title":"Value‐based issues and policy change: Medical assistance in dying in four narratives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Narrative; Hypocrisy; Newspaper; Accountability; Political science; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Public administration; Law; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.2969554333273978,"score_gpt":0.5638929890481618,"score_spread":0.26693755572076394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009183577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82147574,0.0037383356,0.0037623688,0.07126915,0.00036863622,0.00020449229,0.0004416784,0.000040008577,0.0986997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349654,0.00064929266,0.00043760994,0.0009960294,0.000021431531,0.000038037833,0.00004606504,0.000012391003,0.004302551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98973536,0.0071206247,0.00018383711,0.00034172853,0.00087315845,0.0017452162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98336387,0.011940551,0.0010297867,0.00036653515,0.0017266677,0.0015725523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012707462,0.0007696754,0.00043759277,0.0027672576,0.031937797,0.0127540575,0.0027412912,0.004397565,0.0032695478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016054362,0.00047428766,0.0004170831,0.00302354,0.045090556,0.0068028904,0.0071647866,0.0057824473,0.00016715584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019137266,0.0000119751885,0.0013707029,0.000049296028,0.0000042054667,0.00046014797,0.929901,0.00014222278,0.00011208757,0.0638316,0.0021280153,0.0019695305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040828286,0.000005253507,0.0010409487,0.00018063978,0.0000041383137,0.000066492204,0.9485068,0.00015913152,0.00016151945,0.0034521536,0.046398785,0.000020087862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7136255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77172434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7136255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12156711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051285945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88203526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046335489","doi":"10.1111/spol.12640","title":"Question worth 20 million lives: Why federal housing assistance has not had its Obamacare","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Affordable housing; Equity (law); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Politics; Social policy; Political science; Government (linguistics); Health care; Inequality; Public policy; Public administration; Public housing; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07412549472061837,"score_gpt":0.28100497124192403,"score_spread":0.20687947652130567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046335489","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12671313,0.008380771,0.0011066752,0.8194454,0.0021647594,0.000016548125,0.0003815245,0.000021130381,0.041770108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511682,0.0022011313,0.00031469337,0.039675537,0.0015947032,0.000018885472,0.000099979254,0.000024878073,0.0049020285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971302,0.001172005,0.00010586432,0.00035299448,0.0005751312,0.00066381035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908172,0.005323934,0.00087600003,0.0003164461,0.0017066346,0.00095976284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066192704,0.00013295659,0.00044856698,0.00086306484,0.004458783,0.004279021,0.0007744207,0.0046768878,0.006277813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022473589,0.0001337859,0.0002698211,0.0009844275,0.0065120603,0.004337981,0.001437509,0.0045740553,0.00042526715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015366916,0.000102221056,0.028887654,0.00013025549,0.000042472468,0.00029005102,0.0069114575,0.00053177547,0.0002228754,0.72920257,0.1808014,0.052723598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006382288,0.0001395885,0.08342416,0.0011842899,0.00008769188,0.00032496863,0.03537259,0.0024046302,0.0010147984,0.3198344,0.5559914,0.00015774756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054414853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036491435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054414853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007284449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004323175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10819626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046801448","doi":"10.1111/spol.12629","title":"Public income transfers and wealth accumulation at the bottom: Within and between country differences in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Poverty; Asset (computer security); Economics; Counterfactual thinking; Welfare; Welfare state; Household income; Financial asset; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economic growth; Finance; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.14487042892987947,"score_gpt":0.4212346270310495,"score_spread":0.2763641981011701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046801448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927135,0.0003709449,0.000064460095,0.0005486125,0.000009177853,0.000011919872,0.0022099358,0.0000059834933,0.0040654032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977963,0.00018459036,0.00005396409,0.000048595364,0.0000024532287,0.0000039497595,0.0010175365,0.000003353,0.0008892395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916923,0.00008266861,0.000028540966,0.000078132885,0.00021912117,0.0004222511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963413,0.0004289791,0.0006079644,0.000112090456,0.001698465,0.00081118033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081069244,0.00018112962,0.0003658913,0.0019556873,0.0025312942,0.0019670771,0.000692784,0.00028543491,0.0030548745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043881573,0.00012672677,0.00041169714,0.006267989,0.00089269463,0.00052429264,0.001279592,0.00072807673,0.00019660773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100824924,0.000044752054,0.98650646,0.000017931345,0.00008130225,0.00008845878,0.0026218833,0.0005774242,0.00006759105,0.0011652525,0.0020587684,0.0066693407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034527723,0.000009575826,0.9924688,0.000033872573,0.000025726758,0.000016788861,0.0055862684,0.00034744974,0.000056367164,0.00010458591,0.0013365388,0.00001055373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99784493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019877637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019877637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02398406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14422303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048385348","doi":"10.1111/spol.12644","title":"Using candidacy theory to explore unemployed over‐50s perceptions of suitability of a welfare to work programme: A longitudinal qualitative study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Candidacy; Intervention (counseling); Welfare; Work (physics); Psychological intervention; Agency (philosophy); Unemployment; Psychology; Welfare reform; Pessimism; Perception; Nursing; Feeling; Qualitative research; Health care; Workload; Public relations; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.2942494334203528,"score_gpt":0.5415142245919654,"score_spread":0.2472647911716126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048385348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958716,0.00027319934,0.0012357057,0.0007779549,0.000025192541,0.00018437297,0.00010027551,0.000008860923,0.0015228522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968604,0.0002809215,0.0008497539,0.0003973691,0.000010928594,0.0003121551,0.000056343928,0.00001280484,0.0012193298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932121,0.004770664,0.00021701687,0.00035336264,0.00041706895,0.0010296844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855568,0.009788984,0.0012482585,0.00039917615,0.0012214876,0.0017851972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014914354,0.00051225035,0.0006843301,0.0017087855,0.007664627,0.0034974492,0.0015238865,0.0013746244,0.0024376346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017115485,0.00065723853,0.0005174601,0.0011141066,0.008713373,0.0032968945,0.0049529136,0.0029125037,0.00024477363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027920365,0.00006949534,0.004304084,0.0000664124,0.0000031962945,0.00044729112,0.99135196,0.00003262485,0.00054969545,0.0005962801,0.00021532502,0.002335758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043584346,0.00008990451,0.0036395828,0.00014465232,0.000003679415,0.00011580288,0.9924125,0.00011137802,0.00021645952,0.00021613135,0.0030313737,0.000014100295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018379103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024777964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018379103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005183771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004553971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07887554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088029007","doi":"10.1111/spol.12655","title":"Determinants of social assistance caseloads for employable single adults without dependants in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Treasury; Social assistance; Government (linguistics); Jurisdiction; Social security; Business; Value (mathematics); Demographic economics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Labour economics; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.07564880804417928,"score_gpt":0.4405122136947788,"score_spread":0.3648634056505995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088029007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99204236,0.00028208146,0.000094385214,0.0014158599,0.000019198484,0.000045221306,0.002273143,0.00000839194,0.0038193362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998007,0.00018066916,0.00005797305,0.00007749998,0.0000050088906,0.0000100729285,0.0005197435,0.0000022825022,0.0011398052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882454,0.00007785776,0.000052765517,0.000102583355,0.00035188082,0.0005903777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536383,0.00028128893,0.0010412073,0.00009610883,0.0012161669,0.002001431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005856574,0.00020641678,0.0002248143,0.0016250096,0.0026081435,0.0013129945,0.0011528175,0.00037876767,0.004905673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038312764,0.00020985649,0.00044053717,0.0023260412,0.00088217674,0.00039632103,0.0013623812,0.0010267191,0.00026479544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027254639,0.000046560555,0.9900775,0.000024800393,0.000019663645,0.000100153404,0.0015378876,0.00012016758,0.00014384097,0.00041423333,0.0022732418,0.005214814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016975791,0.000010464283,0.9942204,0.00004154542,0.0000051281127,0.000033213586,0.004053224,0.00019381601,0.000038534163,0.000040592742,0.0013550277,0.000006257609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99614185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019821836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019821836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032305628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1438182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092696214","doi":"10.1111/spol.12661","title":"Accommodation and new hurdles: The increasing importance of politics for immigrants' access to social programmes in <scp>Western</scp> democracies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Immigration; Punitive damages; Welfare state; Politics; Welfare; Accommodation; Political science; Social Welfare; Development economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.10200510559203085,"score_gpt":0.41082527645201816,"score_spread":0.3088201708599873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092696214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98891056,0.00010118742,0.000080114725,0.00062455656,0.0000049284085,0.0000037281065,0.00003292649,0.0000021676324,0.010239812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939156,0.000045683268,0.000031620733,0.000030153846,0.0000037095258,0.0000025581585,0.0000142122835,0.0000010192338,0.00047935228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928254,0.00027904913,0.000029331673,0.00006517043,0.0000704305,0.00027354277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877757,0.00040184395,0.00040479662,0.00006661011,0.00013168543,0.00021751755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010201519,0.00007816387,0.00020389787,0.0009769459,0.0017769354,0.0026564242,0.00022228788,0.0005458338,0.006749323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002128894,0.000091201575,0.00017575965,0.0011518872,0.0023960639,0.0012534442,0.0024348602,0.0007645214,0.000180677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009494293,0.0002921578,0.68188787,0.0002468654,0.00009116542,0.0010785462,0.15324377,0.0008436398,0.0042002397,0.06907512,0.002078823,0.086012326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012294934,0.00009527125,0.8572161,0.000116223135,0.0000183416,0.000092087226,0.13066925,0.0002974492,0.0003670257,0.0021111555,0.008990871,0.000013880714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017503947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03818053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017503947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018873949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012422606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034804106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095286661","doi":"10.1111/spol.12656","title":"Social policy responses to <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 in Canada and the United States: Explaining policy variations between two liberal welfare state regimes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Politics; Pandemic; State (computer science); Social policy; Welfare; Social Welfare; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Public policy; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political economy; Development economics; Public administration; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.054002553652817135,"score_gpt":0.3692774504295438,"score_spread":0.31527489677672665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095286661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94679004,0.00062429876,0.00024063927,0.01571085,0.00003869332,0.000051748062,0.0004043616,0.000012095043,0.036127247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980373,0.00017793394,0.000070617636,0.00060672115,0.0000046683886,0.000011959969,0.0000686321,0.000004356433,0.0010179939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959615,0.0007536499,0.000056531724,0.0001663356,0.0007106487,0.00235135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942802,0.0015651734,0.00078734814,0.00014219401,0.0017328691,0.0014921165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035784522,0.00016025783,0.00036195616,0.001782031,0.00838146,0.0044032643,0.00093048014,0.0013057137,0.0031552045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009658669,0.00014420677,0.0002776744,0.0028159276,0.005937052,0.00093922636,0.002864541,0.002352783,0.00010089846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090990186,0.0005020778,0.39656374,0.00032448192,0.0002978714,0.0010024883,0.17191659,0.010829898,0.0023203313,0.33194977,0.029222958,0.054159887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065218446,0.00008251809,0.6928387,0.00025468523,0.00007548644,0.000033185614,0.24010003,0.003923972,0.0009135955,0.010629687,0.05095024,0.00013260468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12116226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12116226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.083159216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8790978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139466183","doi":"10.1111/spol.12718","title":"Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the <scp>COVID</scp>‐19 crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social policy; Financial crisis; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Keynesian economics; Law; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.07801491981630831,"score_gpt":0.44057368665893964,"score_spread":0.36255876684263133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139466183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02379054,0.022103477,0.0020469348,0.86199164,0.0037600165,0.000056138855,0.00012830597,0.000031541513,0.086091325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6991889,0.07242226,0.0034160796,0.18974522,0.007993619,0.00029025512,0.00025072639,0.00012499264,0.026568025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483657,0.003373475,0.00011464526,0.00021854936,0.00045487698,0.001001828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581784,0.002757204,0.00039447413,0.00011511502,0.00045681835,0.000458584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076374193,0.0004348002,0.00033747812,0.0011995918,0.0034719459,0.0074091596,0.0008820485,0.0076668216,0.005659329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009489486,0.00014319799,0.00045918222,0.0016718752,0.008172048,0.0056378194,0.004566985,0.0063040447,0.0005157325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050132414,0.000080635975,0.0013104673,0.0005099622,0.00003215885,0.00022439698,0.008217949,0.0016568163,0.00046374896,0.8821015,0.07068183,0.034670386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003769478,0.00009457994,0.0057901638,0.0015826175,0.000022318492,0.00010736687,0.024274033,0.0010298637,0.0006424337,0.36396584,0.6024012,0.000051758157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065869386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00944316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008872781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008872781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009528231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06437683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195748619","doi":"10.1111/spol.12755","title":"Translating social policy ideas: The Beveridge report, transnational diffusion, and<scp>post‐war</scp>welfare state development in Canada, Denmark, and France","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Welfare state; State (computer science); Social policy; Politics; Government (linguistics); Welfare; World War II; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Public administration; Law; History","score_opus":0.016975359960013345,"score_gpt":0.3002763426429964,"score_spread":0.28330098268298304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195748619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74593705,0.0053100227,0.0028376314,0.083054535,0.00030041626,0.0001344392,0.00030224235,0.00007144316,0.16205233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99134725,0.0009177415,0.0007046907,0.0009974187,0.00002650902,0.000029765637,0.000042456417,0.000026929763,0.0059073013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836977,0.0081733,0.0005077081,0.0008839071,0.0039821654,0.0027552561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702299,0.01870396,0.0018151907,0.0011838228,0.0066243475,0.001442723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032703575,0.00034603337,0.00037901764,0.002967052,0.012607479,0.014154854,0.0011067833,0.0022145144,0.0023260775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031915367,0.00026825894,0.00033693787,0.004419161,0.020905873,0.00308538,0.0063038,0.0037745272,0.000118124255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012938598,0.00008377259,0.011572801,0.00019664568,0.000024976564,0.0006525551,0.43361974,0.0019485059,0.00074969936,0.49570996,0.010962515,0.044349406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058498477,0.00009270888,0.055921104,0.000846582,0.00005472636,0.00014268093,0.5068714,0.0024738132,0.0027248121,0.03020895,0.4003944,0.00021034192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88232964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8235431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11767036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11143711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11698611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80853665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204572210","doi":"10.1111/spol.12775","title":"The operation of the social support sector serving siblings of people with disabilities: A cross‐country analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Family and Disability Support Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Sibling; Staffing; Sister; Social support; Family support; Public relations; Business; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Management; Medicine; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.0390245700122398,"score_gpt":0.40299773504594993,"score_spread":0.36397316503371013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204572210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987663,0.0001927836,0.000056078727,0.0001252646,0.000003215014,0.00001168912,0.00012203247,5.2976264e-7,0.00072216644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993337,0.00028885607,0.000089060915,0.000043117467,0.000001995135,0.000016509874,0.000077385426,0.0000012826018,0.00014805658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980678,0.0008980938,0.00016403772,0.00014584306,0.00016310923,0.0005611069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536115,0.0018012103,0.0014150945,0.00025895075,0.0006604636,0.00050316675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027658632,0.00020349292,0.0003100442,0.0017892868,0.0020051263,0.0018352842,0.00045664614,0.00045352688,0.0021065932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049127336,0.00031711248,0.000561472,0.0027031987,0.0013435539,0.0015634722,0.0035046206,0.0010424138,0.00015001853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061201164,0.00008470096,0.92806244,0.00018815184,0.00013869638,0.0011355511,0.060885694,0.00017108627,0.00030913702,0.0014199812,0.0006180795,0.006925199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034700963,0.0000747511,0.7559022,0.00029551398,0.00006606488,0.0005952262,0.24101962,0.00014416073,0.00009947712,0.000094883355,0.0016894483,0.00001513281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06489594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11289133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06489594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019060858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00221338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12903637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206019823","doi":"10.1111/spol.12789","title":"Welfare state change as a double movement: Four decades of retrenchment and expansion in compensatory and employment‐oriented policies across 21 high‐income countries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare state; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Economics; Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Market economy; Public administration","score_opus":0.04229850049818131,"score_gpt":0.37162519442492237,"score_spread":0.3293266939267411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206019823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98179907,0.0009106635,0.0017345207,0.0010816331,0.000042393083,0.000026197775,0.00075703865,0.000020090956,0.0136284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981982,0.00028977735,0.00044314162,0.00009445054,0.000015667547,0.000024174506,0.0003297874,0.0000041643775,0.0006005715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907076,0.0002214967,0.00009142091,0.00015083014,0.00022621067,0.00023922294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749386,0.0004904748,0.0012181884,0.00018746364,0.00039492972,0.00021510283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017867484,0.00014081998,0.00030519758,0.0024019147,0.0008252756,0.0027953987,0.00033002152,0.0005627767,0.001777761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040696254,0.00012819178,0.0004455929,0.0049250405,0.0017669996,0.0021320975,0.0026465433,0.0009738642,0.00013536168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003589654,0.0001358203,0.7916333,0.00025464754,0.0003505246,0.0005141113,0.021580039,0.006958259,0.0015891743,0.07249394,0.004239292,0.09989195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070343785,0.00007030171,0.96861434,0.00015538189,0.000043569846,0.00012630266,0.009051793,0.0017990295,0.0003440437,0.006784324,0.012975212,0.00002869765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018254787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01726616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018254787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028351466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015223266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036297083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281552819","doi":"10.1111/spol.12817","title":"Beyond financial constraints: The politics of Irish health system reform in the aftermath of the great recession","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Irish Research eLibrary","keywords":"Recession; Irish; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Abandonment (legal); Politics; Welfare reform; Government (linguistics); Financial crisis; Economics; Welfare; Economic policy; Public economics; Political economy; Political science; Market economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.049692319072122224,"score_gpt":0.4085966522950271,"score_spread":0.3589043332229049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281552819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38994586,0.0037770018,0.0005320417,0.29897138,0.0011941965,0.00016650821,0.00017285276,0.000033133998,0.30520704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96698874,0.0007523022,0.00012215188,0.01586976,0.0004070378,0.00005494046,0.000032883752,0.000029532855,0.015742576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760167,0.007330733,0.00040872121,0.00059185066,0.001648318,0.014003604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98979086,0.003384706,0.0016397194,0.00030134057,0.0013498239,0.003533545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020877432,0.00028869067,0.0005402499,0.0014617501,0.009135594,0.018483464,0.0018117883,0.0069159223,0.007953924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015695883,0.0004919898,0.0006621138,0.001789568,0.016799346,0.0030584345,0.008623742,0.008537927,0.000585749],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010957733,0.00036061148,0.025452197,0.0004843011,0.00017241268,0.003750283,0.06938716,0.003710485,0.0015012022,0.75931406,0.09088805,0.043883394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041803482,0.00046997803,0.1822183,0.00097485736,0.00010029507,0.00044046034,0.24787316,0.0021524602,0.0013443514,0.05483653,0.5087994,0.00037219175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14322531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17383505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14322531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04210436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038718726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30548996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313590397","doi":"10.1111/spol.12890","title":"The Four Lenses of Population Aging: Planning for the Future in Canada's Provinces. By PatrikMarier, University of Toronto Press, 2021, 368 Pages. £44.95 (Pbk)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Population; Citation; Sociology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.02269108307843096,"score_gpt":0.2865283642855999,"score_spread":0.2638372812071689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313590397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009405609,0.5194732,0.0010240129,0.35018498,0.005801921,0.00011270434,0.003640888,0.00025403453,0.110102616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18456325,0.5785594,0.005058711,0.01346607,0.001098451,0.00015691831,0.00263341,0.00020170817,0.2142621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999033,0.00013198507,0.000025250642,0.000043990673,0.00034231122,0.00042351297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985416,0.000108185224,0.000053635926,0.000021216583,0.00063036283,0.0006449359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013446086,0.0010353674,0.0005905964,0.001482203,0.008426166,0.0063068923,0.0014470628,0.0016050395,0.017667115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026099626,0.0005845028,0.00047561852,0.005122905,0.0043177805,0.0028945021,0.0025276116,0.0028901568,0.0021927373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003724304,0.00001602069,0.003591919,0.0005620537,0.000015593794,0.00011265284,0.0051632165,0.0004833296,0.000098120465,0.020074034,0.83072305,0.1391228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011665617,0.00001216204,0.024272695,0.0015087826,0.000030421008,0.000070900205,0.0277945,0.00033541213,0.00008888969,0.006706279,0.9391168,0.000051542836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07824213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07824213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23093706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56768906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321498683","doi":"10.1111/spol.12904","title":"Monetary redress for abuse in state care. By StephenWinter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2022. <scp>ISBN</scp>: 9781009082662. Open Access (online) ISBN: 9781316514160; 223 pages; £85 (Hbk)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Library science; State (computer science); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10389051069948174,"score_gpt":0.43611045750182575,"score_spread":0.332219946802344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321498683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003068688,0.8968912,0.00015501838,0.06654211,0.009373329,0.000013458376,0.00011008521,0.00004443592,0.026563488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020849278,0.6884772,0.0006690686,0.026801428,0.011634111,0.00010724032,0.00026548584,0.00010394405,0.2510922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992423,0.00021587376,0.000102014346,0.00007072287,0.0002665375,0.00010255827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987613,0.00055512745,0.00023399983,0.000049142905,0.00023992873,0.00016053671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001635026,0.0012540634,0.0008205657,0.0021645022,0.0014348126,0.0026877425,0.00097527605,0.0033696985,0.037478838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041272207,0.00089412654,0.0004900668,0.0025015313,0.0024464512,0.004836102,0.002161174,0.0040556896,0.009508284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022530945,0.000009025215,0.000102176135,0.00034220444,0.0000051273882,0.000038865473,0.00039841572,0.000047200796,0.00003878228,0.009315797,0.91568804,0.073991776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000950391,0.000012357795,0.0017019712,0.0018002157,0.0000058104547,0.00021460094,0.0006275001,0.000058637306,0.00003966899,0.0053510787,0.990168,0.0000106998505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019085305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04077473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037478838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027777888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034702402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1253792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323308397","doi":"10.1111/spol.12901","title":"Constrained ‘choices’: Optional familism and educational divides in work‐family arrangements","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; German; Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Welfare reform; Labour economics; Family income; Economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.06074369920593794,"score_gpt":0.3955724484681597,"score_spread":0.3348287492622218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323308397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929938,0.00009539422,0.0002678854,0.00038677405,0.0000025961347,0.0000039620695,0.00006791625,0.0000014188385,0.006180243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998336,0.000009763393,0.000024654608,0.0000079479905,0.0000012808703,0.0000013225596,0.000016313039,3.584379e-7,0.000104643026],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985114,0.00073259324,0.000058724414,0.00019177036,0.00015876548,0.00034678134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935994,0.0029095463,0.001920102,0.00044862312,0.00022282633,0.00089953816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016190661,0.000093469534,0.00017893598,0.0008962555,0.0011371212,0.0017697201,0.00046195337,0.0004084245,0.0093086185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007219744,0.00011461784,0.00018158683,0.00091467384,0.0047037313,0.001718442,0.0032500315,0.0005633029,0.00018127148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000476427,0.00029571587,0.8468074,0.000044142354,0.00006973143,0.00047488924,0.024863299,0.0011995034,0.00051735836,0.096908174,0.00078728586,0.027556112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025415597,0.000075093085,0.92030036,0.000064966705,0.000015192042,0.00020580382,0.03933762,0.0012501767,0.00016574269,0.03555155,0.0029856667,0.000022337334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008422674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011684295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093086185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001221068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006268134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031140387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382466567","doi":"10.1111/spol.12944","title":"Do governments account for gender when designing their social protection systems? Findings from an analysis of national social protection strategies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre in Green Chemistry and Catalysis; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Social protection; Scholarship; Political science; Gender analysis; Public relations; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.15509228656718196,"score_gpt":0.4054543829842134,"score_spread":0.25036209641703144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382466567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8678404,0.0014463465,0.0032093835,0.011825804,0.000040549134,0.000091080634,0.000100814,0.000017631075,0.11542792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807906,0.00024321147,0.00044239647,0.0003918614,0.000003888736,0.000041477757,0.000016807282,0.0000076045962,0.0007737243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800162,0.013428101,0.0004301798,0.00086138624,0.0017388935,0.0035253267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767293,0.016065646,0.0032754538,0.0015411079,0.0014989916,0.0008896125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015384897,0.00029718367,0.00047718862,0.002477516,0.0063041523,0.008905174,0.0012621911,0.0021517887,0.003266755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028097626,0.00028645288,0.00045810518,0.0054925345,0.010896405,0.007646825,0.006990384,0.00228818,0.00023949132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080554295,0.00014383052,0.07774721,0.0002985213,0.000062348474,0.0004941537,0.5125366,0.0012526382,0.0003850096,0.34533694,0.0028332612,0.058828965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014439071,0.000089150984,0.0688246,0.0005793311,0.000063079235,0.00012775745,0.8028255,0.0010273102,0.0005263373,0.058342155,0.06755114,0.000029240136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013619893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022378538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015938332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015938332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011453735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11564124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387080560","doi":"10.1111/spol.12965","title":"Behavioural knowledge for policy design: The connection between time use Behaviours and (or) desires and support for policy alternatives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Welfare; Work (physics); Policy analysis; Management science; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Public administration","score_opus":0.1932783954084969,"score_gpt":0.4323989652897274,"score_spread":0.23912056988123048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387080560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85820335,0.001079086,0.042968355,0.028803041,0.00009536577,0.00021395569,0.0002868069,0.00005803128,0.068292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963546,0.00021029111,0.0029278884,0.00023861397,0.000008110047,0.00004665839,0.000026075124,0.000003937979,0.00018400345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98946756,0.008356925,0.00039282415,0.000434495,0.0008191508,0.0005290951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94421595,0.044722915,0.0049685403,0.0018319888,0.0027998865,0.0014606717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017756248,0.00029249367,0.00037830992,0.0016471604,0.0016006876,0.0054515754,0.0009199502,0.0017127312,0.0044751647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046589363,0.00039599967,0.00044344645,0.0013417578,0.005605811,0.0046904096,0.0025052798,0.0023940292,0.00023002371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024354737,0.0009661617,0.3685308,0.001496861,0.00020462638,0.00070700765,0.2666843,0.0062930803,0.0017793098,0.13825274,0.0026241303,0.21221747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005996511,0.00042698643,0.30100018,0.0029945483,0.00017625297,0.00035599852,0.3562934,0.017019073,0.0022335907,0.28454563,0.034657437,0.00023691037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005348322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067791906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017756248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004030073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048341933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09390515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387894585","doi":"10.1111/spol.12980","title":"The world politics of social investment: Volume II. Julian L.Garritzmann (Ed.), SiljaHäusermann (Ed.), BrunoPalier (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2022. £64 (hardback). <scp>ISBN</scp>: 9780197601457","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Library science; Citation; Investment (military); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.022411937281424137,"score_gpt":0.30362642829002984,"score_spread":0.2812144910086057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387894585","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011851323,0.9045256,0.0010750698,0.018514285,0.0040202797,0.00002899707,0.00028265786,0.0000582045,0.070309795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02502346,0.8695801,0.0015579013,0.0032916511,0.004641255,0.00012705855,0.0007981057,0.00015878305,0.09482173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991953,0.00025769026,0.00004610295,0.00012239149,0.00027287015,0.000105711704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935347,0.000382502,0.000085214684,0.000042634474,0.000072098395,0.00006410528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087526167,0.00144474,0.00080488663,0.0019770353,0.00088286167,0.0064734523,0.0006803226,0.0021461914,0.021979932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013892852,0.00062449824,0.0004980298,0.005042667,0.0024096419,0.0045459005,0.002136093,0.0027121156,0.007629631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031770334,0.000036053276,0.00061435293,0.0012429717,0.000028752182,0.000108116365,0.0020373676,0.0005427613,0.0002324477,0.093056306,0.6111035,0.29096568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029403084,0.000008351535,0.0013326145,0.0017041757,0.0000044013113,0.00009333527,0.0006930775,0.000063089814,0.000069389665,0.03075741,0.9652609,0.000010248386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004135103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049844543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021979932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034254785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032634109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0735302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387906369","doi":"10.1111/spol.12973","title":"Social protection, community participation and state‐citizen relations: Evidence from a cash transfer program in south‐central Somalia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation; University of Toronto","funders":"Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid; Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Cash transfers; Spillover effect; Social protection; Cash; Psychological intervention; Conditional cash transfer; Business; Clan; Public economics; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Economic growth; Economics; Finance; Political science; Poverty; Psychology","score_opus":0.08898187110929792,"score_gpt":0.39384488194882916,"score_spread":0.30486301083953127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387906369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99340904,0.0031548182,0.00018693577,0.0007407844,0.0000826841,0.00066417543,0.00018058474,0.0000080695845,0.001573003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706584,0.0012950803,0.00032166738,0.0003268841,0.000043352233,0.00062748033,0.00007918158,0.0000019419228,0.00023850756],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717797,0.010350637,0.0005291155,0.00052780163,0.00056934316,0.0008451401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97438747,0.015715828,0.0063236593,0.001139919,0.00096538983,0.0014677751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010435042,0.0006041627,0.0010367325,0.0006920228,0.0011251501,0.0012844397,0.0011168012,0.0015712013,0.0070415027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024986805,0.00035469964,0.0017533731,0.0012474356,0.0023535385,0.0007736093,0.0013846655,0.0017555802,0.00030240978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2626684,0.13337539,0.19033204,0.023612317,0.021404661,0.00076577853,0.0144208595,0.0026113046,0.0035714468,0.003986956,0.0049726693,0.33827814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.12628338,0.2832271,0.52146125,0.012615379,0.025360374,0.00021860693,0.011549516,0.0030351912,0.0026533618,0.002759136,0.010682969,0.00015378601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008256865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014731175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010435042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017952995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042871516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05518645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388991454","doi":"10.1111/spol.12986","title":"Welfare state regimes and social policy resistance to fiscal consolidations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare state; Social insurance; Economics; Welfare; Social Welfare; Politics; Market economy; Resistance (ecology); Social policy; Economic policy; Political science","score_opus":0.04242969622132733,"score_gpt":0.3857867792510018,"score_spread":0.3433570830296745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388991454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904765,0.00023235951,0.00028776482,0.00082049106,0.000009027093,0.000014572345,0.0001300016,0.000008049762,0.00802137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954957,0.000057181238,0.000025392854,0.000038170663,0.000008071598,0.0000042034026,0.00006084601,0.000001693867,0.00025480174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728143,0.00091125246,0.00021661003,0.00026623197,0.00034726172,0.0009771554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98451656,0.0035692747,0.009375007,0.00065497577,0.0008661117,0.0010180327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039746854,0.00011756789,0.000429079,0.0017380012,0.001011061,0.0033471405,0.00034852204,0.0006388698,0.004926361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016788283,0.00017148764,0.0004723019,0.0019305577,0.0030271986,0.0012901439,0.0030219404,0.0012894842,0.00026854608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042452104,0.0002519261,0.91436386,0.00009328212,0.0003087258,0.0002967102,0.0059912307,0.004655319,0.0009205843,0.045955766,0.001545267,0.025192782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003515481,0.00015141866,0.97753,0.00010176515,0.00006616203,0.000061464176,0.0061341,0.0016305952,0.00039460178,0.007004697,0.006866457,0.000023616865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013311501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012951335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013311501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028985168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016599906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026468039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406716862","doi":"10.1111/spol.13123","title":"Collaboration Through a Computer Screen: Migrant Integration Services and the Challenges of Co‐Producing Services Online","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"World Wide Web; Computer science; Business; Multimedia","score_opus":0.0277687314180221,"score_gpt":0.3537803590944215,"score_spread":0.3260116276763994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406716862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92095256,0.00074699265,0.003423857,0.013223745,0.00014501635,0.0001014854,0.000050970917,0.000064890344,0.061290383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960836,0.00024033476,0.0008223788,0.00033342588,0.000025357347,0.000038971193,0.000013268375,0.000013993511,0.002428667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991991,0.00630573,0.00015893776,0.00032691038,0.0004715363,0.0007459903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117833,0.0051133586,0.001086596,0.0007403393,0.00050995674,0.0013713778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054355953,0.00034769168,0.00024014413,0.0010190954,0.007385012,0.008126784,0.0010673444,0.0016445224,0.013247906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012187587,0.00024300662,0.00036939097,0.0008932711,0.004953614,0.004621428,0.009900199,0.0014009011,0.001032778],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032336562,0.0007037519,0.080163695,0.00060485775,0.000070747075,0.003386757,0.66286165,0.0005354776,0.0025458022,0.028112523,0.008303489,0.2123879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053008564,0.0004612173,0.029294318,0.0006842503,0.00005927015,0.0017406235,0.87600803,0.0012604971,0.00094239815,0.008029345,0.08142484,0.00004213928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005654391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064145066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013247906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017953491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032818646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044318676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409845043","doi":"10.1111/spol.13146","title":"User‐Centred Design in Child Welfare: Importance of an Anti‐Racism Lens","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McMaster University","keywords":"Racism; Lens (geology); Welfare; Through-the-lens metering; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Political science; Computer science; Gender studies; Optics; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.02968960066671857,"score_gpt":0.3275175703396502,"score_spread":0.2978279696729316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409845043","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0561608,0.0040622856,0.7226337,0.04919834,0.0009950062,0.0013213936,0.0001665976,0.00093299185,0.16452886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6668605,0.0018707834,0.30698013,0.0045752157,0.00026340704,0.0026788737,0.00010573741,0.00062940817,0.016035927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.84111094,0.14514832,0.001787842,0.0021414203,0.008140074,0.0016713748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89919037,0.08117653,0.002027289,0.009336315,0.00617632,0.0020932015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07368875,0.0014807105,0.00082633126,0.0030412378,0.0058943816,0.019965107,0.0034283367,0.0048951632,0.0067946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056215722,0.0012315958,0.0010219797,0.0014893989,0.03443214,0.009259532,0.010075005,0.0055740015,0.0011482615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015179656,0.00031258128,0.0028495288,0.0017332687,0.00007315446,0.0004394826,0.26323166,0.00272783,0.0026646766,0.6373531,0.0076000225,0.08086286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014517011,0.00054377486,0.0021336253,0.0041808435,0.00010247781,0.0011005137,0.09636525,0.007225527,0.005812536,0.37102604,0.51121455,0.00014957004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031569204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031629964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07368875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062953644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077969674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38970804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410480531","doi":"10.1111/spol.13141","title":"The Relationship Between Perceptions of Social Service Quality and Subjective Well‐Being","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministry of Innovation; Tel Aviv University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Social network service; Quality (philosophy); Well-being; Service quality; Social psychology; Service (business); Applied psychology; Business; Marketing; Social influence; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.07853840155320543,"score_gpt":0.4504545637574671,"score_spread":0.3719161622042617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410480531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99684674,0.00012859692,0.00051826384,0.00016659749,0.000006243263,0.000008198783,0.00020945285,0.0000027835167,0.0021129511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973375,0.000028013508,0.000077698365,0.000009472,0.0000027919614,0.000004053642,0.000072144474,8.722492e-7,0.000071241506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988016,0.00064382976,0.000099213124,0.00010827896,0.0002035329,0.00014367851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98836106,0.0053139282,0.003387484,0.0005892518,0.0010896404,0.0012586263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021596248,0.00015950807,0.0002488289,0.0009783952,0.00030030214,0.0012530675,0.00019348545,0.0002859271,0.0036222672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009943928,0.000099463345,0.0004033056,0.0010044316,0.0008323618,0.00058448024,0.00082967774,0.0006671196,0.0001761835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078120494,0.000089837624,0.9880294,0.000052835334,0.00026724202,0.000026600306,0.0023635668,0.00034635208,0.00027289207,0.0009333754,0.00018826168,0.007351582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001960846,0.000043560998,0.9965719,0.0000160281,0.000018885825,0.000011859614,0.0021697385,0.00040488032,0.000058012378,0.00037259219,0.00032275746,0.000007791108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053621083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041590194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023001648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012117684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411662694","doi":"10.1111/spol.13155","title":"Street‐Level Bureaucrats Manufacturing Migrants: An Implementation Study of Policy Measures to Address Statelessness in the Dominican Republic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"International Development Research Centre; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Statelessness; Political science; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Citizenship; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07144025743499573,"score_gpt":0.4472981980179208,"score_spread":0.3758579405829251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411662694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893043,0.00012045038,0.00029719045,0.0015981572,0.000010868028,0.00012842668,0.000014136349,0.0000041021585,0.008522355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973394,0.00011454054,0.0002603687,0.0002893616,0.000006465381,0.00009771613,0.000010680685,0.0000038891317,0.001877579],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942153,0.0036605664,0.0001308405,0.0002216259,0.00037898062,0.0013926047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99418867,0.003173774,0.0009389535,0.00038250908,0.0005489308,0.00076712517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009447988,0.00022881888,0.00027181595,0.0011586215,0.008854834,0.004871172,0.0015829146,0.0014144772,0.0026610708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009331349,0.00025191013,0.00019683862,0.0014562365,0.009311684,0.0016008972,0.004099867,0.0022722569,0.00013759309],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014151304,0.0014339318,0.059847504,0.0002409315,0.000025352858,0.0018936107,0.84560895,0.00082046766,0.0022708434,0.04726714,0.0023968285,0.038052894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003846215,0.00034299155,0.05667913,0.00024135188,0.000016995686,0.00007912299,0.9121152,0.00049522193,0.0007912288,0.0014454855,0.027733823,0.000020982385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07164486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13033226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07164486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017026512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0156025095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14245564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412946168","doi":"10.1111/spol.70000","title":"How Do Ideas Get in the Way of Policy Change? A Comparative Study of Homelessness Policy in Toronto and Montréal, Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Sociology; Political science; Regional science","score_opus":0.0618760607189013,"score_gpt":0.4410189251294265,"score_spread":0.3791428644105252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412946168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9356096,0.0020840087,0.00045574352,0.020782648,0.00006979972,0.00017347626,0.00034239865,0.000021712873,0.040460594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944665,0.00066640787,0.00017569274,0.0005637835,0.0000060819116,0.000040365725,0.00005664461,0.000008019798,0.0040165395],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334234,0.0021384112,0.00015982048,0.00026317293,0.0008716624,0.0032246085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149656,0.0028350055,0.0007656289,0.00025412047,0.0021389571,0.002509663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004767354,0.0002554325,0.00039661356,0.002130187,0.021894364,0.007961693,0.002144213,0.0014192099,0.00472101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010204686,0.0003848919,0.00031196585,0.0059708813,0.012513322,0.0019426886,0.0036041066,0.0021962768,0.00013158258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002903962,0.00029872134,0.12580076,0.00055776996,0.00008582187,0.0019883,0.6744826,0.0020267016,0.001919172,0.14057933,0.017219858,0.034750603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000390622,0.00007891654,0.15703346,0.00037879654,0.000039400948,0.00006638959,0.7785514,0.00066689274,0.00037718736,0.00124209,0.061452158,0.00007427826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9970112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32234198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32234198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26255742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78598726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415268365","doi":"10.1111/spol.70016","title":"Measuring the Gender Gap in Unpaid Care Work in Colombia: A Decomposition Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Manitoba Health","funders":"","keywords":"Unpaid work; Socioeconomic status; Care work; Time-use survey; Gender gap; Marital status; Work (physics); Paid work; Child care","score_opus":0.04537471065948938,"score_gpt":0.35954586022058066,"score_spread":0.31417114956109127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415268365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808638,0.0011550187,0.007359446,0.0002360636,0.00004923661,0.0003202056,0.005850004,0.000036148638,0.00412996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885673,0.0003850883,0.0050138487,0.000027956745,0.000017930526,0.00032284047,0.004193474,0.000011862052,0.0011702765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864584,0.00041905005,0.000100941565,0.00024570676,0.0002520738,0.00033644782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982486,0.0006803455,0.00031698137,0.00011292665,0.0005054235,0.00013580489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018734337,0.0007554171,0.0006103997,0.0036369683,0.0007929353,0.0015434339,0.0006124796,0.00031548954,0.003341398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048517687,0.00024205832,0.00096856034,0.0034419587,0.0004935643,0.00040149194,0.001407276,0.0004399188,0.00034200316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002155504,0.000106141095,0.9512994,0.0002779217,0.00022250832,0.00014454652,0.0028639599,0.0017606642,0.00043697044,0.0014047705,0.0023109452,0.038956493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011823996,0.000065149805,0.9737094,0.00017478576,0.00010713489,0.000046152858,0.01124485,0.008904108,0.00023006619,0.0007174808,0.0047645555,0.000024424746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1677985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14467472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1677985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028899177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020728714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33364367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415671352","doi":"10.1111/spol.70023","title":"Explaining Social Policy Expansion: The Curious Case of the Justin Trudeau Era in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McMaster University; McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main","keywords":"Social policy; Politics; Surprise; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Austerity; Neoliberalism (international relations); Coalition government","score_opus":0.018862387606775017,"score_gpt":0.32975441710561476,"score_spread":0.31089202949883976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415671352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29948604,0.0044617,0.0051483675,0.19293845,0.0005250398,0.00013040789,0.00030567174,0.00009118231,0.49691316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96914893,0.00090930425,0.0009446602,0.0056343856,0.000049308645,0.00002332076,0.000039093455,0.00003923759,0.023211846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951756,0.0007491763,0.000056522298,0.00041804454,0.0011398178,0.0024608078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961438,0.0010291913,0.0002431625,0.0002075704,0.0012560477,0.0011201872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003567684,0.00029549107,0.00041568512,0.001684763,0.02703415,0.0077585024,0.0014339356,0.0033881778,0.0058712303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065413807,0.00028813962,0.00044698064,0.0025624158,0.018510178,0.0023362692,0.004726758,0.005343801,0.00026018295],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022729093,0.000022860788,0.0047174627,0.000026399724,0.000011446283,0.0005656923,0.019435387,0.0012192024,0.00024314942,0.9453151,0.020170055,0.008250479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005740419,0.000023778619,0.025130011,0.00027478687,0.000046662328,0.00021091789,0.04897629,0.0063761882,0.0007731443,0.20051086,0.7174369,0.00018297271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99163145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19869493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19869493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14905116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9294003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416533261","doi":"10.1111/spol.70032","title":"What Are the Determinants of Permanent and Temporary Non‐Take‐Up of the French Minimum‐Income Benefit?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Policy and Administration","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Welfare; Renting; Poverty; Credibility; Residence; Solidarity; Order (exchange); Salient","score_opus":0.024806442416992352,"score_gpt":0.326007367652191,"score_spread":0.30120092523519865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416533261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99459404,0.00042539305,0.00017868252,0.0019654927,0.000011944148,0.000009869314,0.00059074623,0.000008435225,0.0022152825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988254,0.0000698218,0.00004043994,0.000041608968,0.000011997423,0.0000042988586,0.00024281188,0.0000020612108,0.0007615216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980241,0.00059322297,0.0000836365,0.00027949887,0.000301332,0.000718223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890884,0.0038654616,0.004335702,0.0004086586,0.00071500853,0.001586706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002108323,0.00014003315,0.00036697122,0.0010333699,0.0007709343,0.0016041786,0.00062963227,0.00073674443,0.0072198124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077250223,0.00012902693,0.0005915626,0.00084716326,0.00065997965,0.00061987416,0.0006893911,0.0009662768,0.0005937209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006754368,0.00006977161,0.99033725,0.000011415337,0.000056791905,0.00010799195,0.00054449687,0.00030077228,0.00012643456,0.0013136179,0.0006757278,0.0063882396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024849764,0.000041024192,0.99677354,0.000012804774,0.000010227976,0.000050430353,0.001080573,0.0005003094,0.000049809754,0.00020295891,0.0012701064,0.000005656257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11075367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09255735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11075367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015423313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011909793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.220218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}