{"meta":{"query_hash":"2113fefac148","filters":{"venue":"Social Science Quarterly"},"cohort_total":82,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":82,"exported":82,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2113fefac148","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+Science+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1486560818","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00716.x","title":"Political Tolerance, Racist Speech, and the Influence of Social Networks*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Politics; Multiculturalism; Social psychology; Ethnic group; Racism; Sociology; Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.008296861394992921,"score_gpt":0.30914143919393533,"score_spread":0.3008445777989424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486560818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94297457,0.000010988165,0.000016816524,0.006269781,0.0009563565,0.00025774143,0.0000074031695,0.0000447761,0.049461573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967631,0.0000024041608,0.0000657299,0.00067512656,0.0023555069,0.000015930751,5.6426893e-7,0.0000076277606,0.00011401979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734825,0.00023854493,0.00030036797,0.0002620951,0.0009095563,0.0009411786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986471,0.00047345101,0.00015274904,0.00013077105,0.00032852846,0.00026737925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017241089,0.00012980169,0.0002791767,0.000065609565,0.0030068718,0.00021699523,0.0006962404,0.00019907371,0.000039926876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056812883,0.0001034381,0.000105527615,0.00090850063,0.02074424,0.00040426783,0.000029259912,0.0004345067,0.000009340759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017529894,0.000018892539,0.0019695102,0.0000032185324,0.0000033683468,0.0000013377535,0.07972584,1.3839849e-7,0.0006014777,0.9102284,0.00008589864,0.0073444126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037175177,0.0002955097,0.22075064,0.000028462955,0.00014050443,0.000012972513,0.33949003,0.00025112796,0.0004216482,0.39655963,0.037217937,0.0011140006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028431595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092809414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5136688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000601609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057755416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521758672","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12076","title":"The Economic Crisis and Medical Care Use: Comparative Evidence from Five High‐Income Countries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement; Princeton University; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation","keywords":"Financial crisis; Context (archaeology); Medical care; Fragility; Demographic economics; Financial fragility; Health care; Measures of national income and output; Economics; Economic growth; Development economics; Business; Medicine; Geography; Macroeconomics; Family medicine","score_opus":0.04195420206959541,"score_gpt":0.41536834928930777,"score_spread":0.37341414721971233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521758672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98353827,0.00035231307,0.000033577602,0.013643644,0.001033669,0.00027233633,0.000037197613,0.000047910922,0.0010411007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984168,0.00007315012,0.000018370294,0.0006488734,0.0006153514,0.000053731936,0.0000019995794,0.000005047087,0.00016666713],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980287,0.0003839052,0.0002959829,0.00032589707,0.0004992754,0.0004662573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970461,0.0023097317,0.00015293513,0.00015675851,0.00019741686,0.00013703451],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010586793,0.00012525308,0.00024951735,0.00003442146,0.006346568,0.00012837088,0.0004109407,0.000094608586,0.00011407117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016798766,0.00008208089,0.000033021664,0.00012530356,0.0015896806,0.00055623264,0.00008077695,0.00026171055,0.0001624635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006612045,0.0000053389676,0.38606766,0.000030455574,0.000035970847,0.000001191623,0.5296683,2.6541034e-7,0.0000127754865,0.06280831,0.017048892,0.004254763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036924685,0.00024832485,0.80266625,0.00014379174,0.000022553826,1.0913727e-7,0.1808914,0.00006296315,0.000006936661,0.0066426005,0.008762284,0.00018354975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010454809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01422941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4165986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002789167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004307179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99613464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526819412","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00732.x","title":"Racial Mismatch: The Divergence Between Form and Function in Data for Monitoring Racial Discrimination of Hispanics*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Racial and Ethnic Identity Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Racism; Census; Proxy (statistics); Identification (biology); Social psychology; Racial formation theory; Metropolitan area; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Demography; Geography; Population; Computer science","score_opus":0.07871350199436193,"score_gpt":0.39326619552281605,"score_spread":0.3145526935284541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526819412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99469566,0.0000211907,0.0004775579,0.0020780494,0.0009429167,0.00050955755,0.000045795143,0.000020066604,0.0012092055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979202,0.000011320162,0.00008200943,0.0000094315365,0.0017454709,0.000025068144,0.00000916077,0.0000056308686,0.00019167378],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977077,0.00011245477,0.0002859459,0.0003734151,0.0009926686,0.00052778947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990672,0.00021438136,0.00013199227,0.00023521774,0.0002455131,0.00010573393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005052796,0.00009532633,0.00016925059,0.000131565,0.0024265433,0.0002634435,0.0011760107,0.00013351445,0.000019589479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006857567,0.000080318205,0.000048176786,0.000857356,0.0018039631,0.0017967649,0.000108144,0.00028988923,0.0000047369085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006472519,0.00006572675,0.04716956,0.000035047597,0.000008904543,4.5790136e-7,0.36899513,5.599291e-7,0.004966753,0.03350572,0.0001630973,0.54502434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010655099,0.0005192369,0.64954853,0.000049698498,0.000089211935,4.278446e-7,0.24626268,0.001550064,0.00049692846,0.08834718,0.011532029,0.00053850026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054108514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013973733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60237896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008549953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042519817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99887216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557040537","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12066","title":"Expectations in Mass Elections: Back to the Future?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wishful thinking; Perception; Phenomenon; Outcome (game theory); National election; Political science; Demographic economics; Panel data; Ordinary least squares; Survey data collection; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Econometrics; Politics; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.022663124410543457,"score_gpt":0.346708315391882,"score_spread":0.32404519098133855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557040537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7824214,0.000037752154,0.00052898715,0.104744315,0.0014555298,0.0012840385,0.0000028983911,0.00007815251,0.10944693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970499,2.9684205e-7,0.000085440966,0.0004191363,0.0011780602,0.00017919492,4.4582958e-7,0.0000035644614,0.0010839591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984132,0.0001935984,0.00018274682,0.00018679697,0.00045774944,0.0005658759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994742,0.00006174709,0.00003758789,0.00009306458,0.00016792475,0.00016544697],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006410323,0.00006210145,0.00007962858,0.00009121105,0.0015268814,0.0003358808,0.00032503065,0.00005044866,0.00037428192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007215423,0.00004727788,0.000035391426,0.0019350535,0.00038286732,0.0005571568,0.0000041674807,0.00009900852,0.0018335341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030020508,0.00006118644,0.009380612,0.0000030313329,0.0000031412574,3.7564473e-7,0.22380698,0.0000033642425,0.004086965,0.7202521,0.010459247,0.031940006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034160604,0.0004628826,0.3896298,0.000022650705,0.0000096661515,5.619539e-7,0.38242236,0.0002133936,0.0001777372,0.14079733,0.085312866,0.00060912775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018703073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03680676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5794548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002575903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002327799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564116160","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12115","title":"A Historical Institutionalist Understanding of Participatory Governance and Aboriginal Peoples: The Case of Policy Change in Ontario's Mining Sector*","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Citizen journalism; Legislation; Natural resource; Politics; Public administration; Participatory action research; Constitution; State (computer science); Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.050444184767344386,"score_gpt":0.2828145870395576,"score_spread":0.2323704022722132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564116160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935107,0.000052498806,0.00038037187,0.00011618102,0.00013264401,0.00005810604,0.0000014218108,0.000011972512,0.0057360968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982363,0.0000019892318,0.000040553292,0.000013956033,0.00008932562,0.000009097403,1.0003219e-7,0.0000032291725,0.000018131836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999384,0.000021872245,0.00014855333,0.0001011522,0.0001650051,0.0001794113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978083,0.000049401104,0.000053140117,0.00006769639,0.000012907263,0.00003600184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004493468,0.0000605717,0.00011410869,0.00007238379,0.0001511852,0.000015807276,0.00010506576,0.000024206563,0.000005498156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019651781,0.00004937739,0.000020742902,0.000335381,0.00034467963,0.000088302484,0.000006877495,0.00007120842,1.7855523e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001006176,0.00003900961,0.039432395,0.00012989467,0.000011833517,0.000027283904,0.4904152,0.00020252199,0.00055126287,0.46030545,0.00007956936,0.008795537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016872584,0.00080868375,0.8329929,0.00041445307,0.0000674021,0.000080717116,0.12057021,0.026422072,0.00010029866,0.0021169083,0.01398169,0.00075740996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062044986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086176716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7935605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010144591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113199225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94420093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595223934","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12091","title":"Is There a Political Bias? A Computational Analysis of Female Subjects' Coverage in Liberal and Conservative Newspapers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Media, Gender, and Advertising","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Politics; Media coverage; Media bias; Set (abstract data type); Cover (algebra); Test (biology); Demographic economics; Scale (ratio); Advertising; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Economics; Geography; Engineering; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.03995467581951699,"score_gpt":0.3420678084968621,"score_spread":0.3021131326773451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595223934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96233994,0.000013825626,0.00049346074,0.0016422154,0.00007338679,0.000105168096,0.000011979248,0.000014699149,0.03530533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986885,0.00000189186,0.00018745394,0.00088809174,0.000086921646,0.0000030947906,0.000002329672,0.0000034330928,0.00013826435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980452,0.0002920758,0.0002330235,0.00029016795,0.00066829426,0.0004712029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912435,0.0003930964,0.00010387417,0.00006693522,0.00012552837,0.00018619017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012806889,0.00008959401,0.00026390323,0.00025039856,0.0005672777,0.00011607075,0.00020580718,0.00006853392,0.0000812549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002072084,0.000086756605,0.0000862771,0.001960779,0.0020670444,0.00033200602,0.00001182304,0.00009399487,0.0000028700504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013521574,0.000059392525,0.33083418,0.000009104833,0.00004568183,0.000002101831,0.44062918,0.000014345128,0.00021161902,0.21694487,0.000032606546,0.011203397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004201101,0.00015727301,0.8475285,0.000016017342,0.000059903035,2.5040208e-7,0.11305409,0.0027066781,0.000025785394,0.035763603,0.000088710214,0.00017903755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042884843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002565815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51669437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118365155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004833914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7616111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1746442198","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12074","title":"A General Approach to Effect Decomposition","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Covariate; Mediation; Decomposition; Path analysis (statistics); Outcome (game theory); Econometrics; Simple (philosophy); Psychology; Regression analysis; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.049040049093019136,"score_gpt":0.41327736973003937,"score_spread":0.36423732063702025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1746442198","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44426286,8.005569e-7,0.4817494,0.00012572705,0.00009924897,0.00036406817,0.0000015360895,0.0003659287,0.073030435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051551,3.5430293e-8,0.09427284,0.00018015942,0.00022352449,0.000080777456,0.0000012871405,0.000011446765,0.00007483203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985938,0.00010375929,0.000166994,0.00032173863,0.00041859492,0.0003950829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941134,0.000108858105,0.00006675732,0.00019827613,0.00008604796,0.00012869197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011914694,0.0001292091,0.00018976747,0.000112341564,0.00040184802,0.00010827435,0.00039045396,0.000059275575,0.000007958565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014243853,0.00011247707,0.00005578669,0.000558435,0.00024799464,0.0003271857,0.000019442039,0.00010707808,0.000041906693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000109557595,0.00006846669,0.000069584436,0.000017936352,0.0000025952363,3.3328558e-7,0.004663475,9.231326e-7,0.079906866,0.82970345,0.00071955734,0.084835865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031274057,0.0020790102,0.0018621155,0.000022729522,0.000019631923,0.000007777091,0.0004559225,0.0016478375,0.023824371,0.96878463,0.0004813309,0.00050188514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001648592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032530806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46089223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013783757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031925993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45866817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1808864770","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12055","title":"Medal Shares in Winter Olympic Games by Sport: Socioeconomic Analysis After Vancouver 2010","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Sport and Mega-Event Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medal; Socioeconomic status; Econometric analysis; Robustness (evolution); Index (typography); Political science; Regional science; Economics; Geography; Sociology; Econometrics; Demography; Computer science; Population","score_opus":0.0066231297362785045,"score_gpt":0.2777597038721856,"score_spread":0.27113657413590714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1808864770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783979,0.000046072888,0.000049172744,0.00093188736,0.0011356405,0.00017588581,0.000014930701,0.00006193923,0.019186575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950735,0.000004023414,0.000029381315,0.00061810185,0.00048325892,0.000030063213,0.000007407253,0.000011112949,0.0037431822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973303,0.00007807176,0.0003701988,0.0005437615,0.0007097481,0.00096794096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991643,0.000045739413,0.00018495852,0.00020834868,0.00008275494,0.00031390693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020860936,0.00019141224,0.00039277106,0.00038982648,0.00064244313,0.000274961,0.00068106136,0.00016683298,0.0018647182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004293935,0.00018634446,0.00025021224,0.0012027492,0.0013895524,0.0011918416,0.000021321013,0.00018349598,0.00018446559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100863705,0.0003043398,0.6498647,0.000011228761,0.00013127095,0.000015278965,0.22615734,0.0000038667777,0.00092313805,0.0101535395,0.03609017,0.07624429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008195911,0.00022668901,0.8056682,0.000018022543,0.00016820105,2.841694e-7,0.025375089,0.00010185548,0.00009962938,0.004044444,0.16264403,0.0008339676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00421062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05686991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20078225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004160735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038975987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822455823","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12155","title":"Blinded by Beauty? Physical Attractiveness and Candidate Selection in the U.S. House of Representatives","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"House of Representatives; Ballot; Physical attractiveness; Attractiveness; Politics; Social psychology; Beauty; Icon; Psychology; Political science; Advertising; Sociology; Voting; Law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.05556087135054305,"score_gpt":0.41251644838332596,"score_spread":0.3569555770327829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822455823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99535394,0.000030554063,0.000034879387,0.00040070468,0.00015825134,0.00014266075,0.000008840231,0.000017901622,0.0038522868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997192,2.8993497e-7,0.000009216879,0.000053797874,0.00009022182,0.000029643708,0.0000013258297,0.000004385163,0.00009191919],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893266,0.00025451413,0.000115830786,0.0002542616,0.00022526809,0.00021744403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996805,0.000056203957,0.0000801079,0.00008173405,0.000057376557,0.000044071967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074646354,0.00006570842,0.00010876269,0.000073264775,0.0002135093,0.000021116955,0.00020318272,0.00005317146,0.000018920897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011255094,0.000051723593,0.000022120894,0.00042946832,0.0012541102,0.0002675872,0.000005071722,0.00015613547,0.000012129127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041503386,0.001514282,0.16782762,0.000003941763,0.000018092875,0.00000894605,0.7430237,5.391156e-7,0.024029437,0.042223573,0.005053997,0.015880825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007213656,0.00049512566,0.9571143,0.0000019075476,0.000009932784,0.000008253884,0.035494674,0.00000537135,0.00011021196,0.005871969,0.000093415,0.00007348897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054543983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013348159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7892867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037411297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006241945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46208212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914269966","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00788.x","title":"Winning and Competitiveness as Determinants of Political Support*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Democracy; Congruence (geometry); Politics; Survey data collection; Affect (linguistics); National election; Regression analysis; Political science; Social psychology; Political economy; Economics; Public economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05395398052505967,"score_gpt":0.36751930839618063,"score_spread":0.31356532787112096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914269966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92782134,0.0000041873636,0.000024535444,0.000205805,0.00009871337,0.00013279133,0.000005385088,0.000027770604,0.07167947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944645,2.1955611e-7,0.00004847366,0.00009960452,0.00019370444,0.000008165039,4.6199776e-7,0.0000053151402,0.00019759459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998039,0.00018413021,0.0002741388,0.00023500857,0.00052080146,0.0007469306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922854,0.00008034011,0.00008925567,0.00007999614,0.00019072952,0.00033114298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010915594,0.000089927395,0.00020439818,0.000075349155,0.000827559,0.00006755212,0.00023695437,0.00008670327,0.0003255751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013327508,0.00008603116,0.00004572102,0.000416773,0.0027553043,0.00046510002,0.000014524029,0.00007836923,0.000036208832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008384865,0.000039311763,0.12806243,0.000011509124,0.000002085286,0.000003377813,0.07339011,1.6438642e-8,0.0003218715,0.79328465,0.0000044575568,0.004871783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005587015,0.0017556193,0.79206955,0.000090436915,0.000046215027,0.000007333967,0.107388735,0.00013673848,0.0032600127,0.09302063,0.0010888041,0.0005772042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023342062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008071737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70026404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008589885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039095586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1923546258","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12046","title":"The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections: Incumbents, Challengers, and Voters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Mobilization; Political science; Voter turnout; Politics; Margin (machine learning); Political economy; Economics; Law; Voting","score_opus":0.012486045839101631,"score_gpt":0.34225188407868856,"score_spread":0.32976583823958694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1923546258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937826,0.000099078956,0.0000052801965,0.0020053308,0.00023367911,0.00028659852,6.4010936e-7,0.0000133574495,0.0035734584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969107,0.000005859591,0.000004363025,0.000016743657,0.00014139386,0.00004704931,1.6746176e-7,0.0000024705776,0.000090885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986349,0.0002595519,0.00018803275,0.00013813273,0.00039305043,0.00038638402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993753,0.00031090283,0.00007500625,0.00004849151,0.00009135574,0.00009897573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017147403,0.0000580924,0.000113263,0.0000537566,0.001180126,0.00014914147,0.00015366539,0.000051896484,0.000019009552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020138313,0.000040143943,0.00002608807,0.00043504883,0.0011868709,0.0003631892,0.000007837046,0.000087470966,0.0000072515877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049013895,0.00007716637,0.26899454,0.000060193935,0.000019509036,0.0000011276109,0.10082941,0.0000017789387,0.026558679,0.2676018,0.00048870785,0.3353181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012756457,0.0018227324,0.9247171,0.00024993657,0.000022319546,0.0000011607709,0.026066082,0.0005705825,0.0024613976,0.03910588,0.0031365822,0.00057057175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017156355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043489607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65572256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009707132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011785428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98938847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970799830","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00660.x","title":"Health Lifestyles in the United States and Canada: Are We Really So Different?*","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Population; Population health; Health indicator; Geography; Politics; Political science; Demography; Perspective (graphical); Economic growth; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.07836802475080304,"score_gpt":0.4091827455168918,"score_spread":0.33081472076608875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970799830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8188476,0.00008492988,0.000007858012,0.1798029,0.00014110215,0.00051325216,0.00007079775,0.0000349458,0.00049661944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817502,0.00012615391,0.000022628143,0.01777696,0.00020463769,0.00002191174,0.000034724788,0.0000051189054,0.000057696605],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709535,0.0006629724,0.00047456136,0.000294436,0.0005918377,0.00088086165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894065,0.00028105825,0.00024069517,0.00017597534,0.00012081232,0.00024081809],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012877714,0.0001423029,0.00026275535,0.00018692196,0.005341147,0.00006639955,0.000391325,0.000099525765,0.000022014478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006822958,0.0001052832,0.000023140257,0.0008395319,0.00037542568,0.0002030949,0.000016674778,0.0006200586,0.0000066503135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043826883,0.00016618009,0.11478941,0.00017538629,0.0000048993834,0.000010892732,0.7668039,0.000022724911,0.0000035304863,0.07469841,0.030711982,0.012568865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039568718,0.00031922018,0.74467397,0.00012327559,0.0000040041846,8.463004e-7,0.2371296,0.000791126,9.4545314e-8,0.007471026,0.00895615,0.00013500854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67126566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8746834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62988454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004806781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022433198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99595374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980458813","doi":"10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00293.x","title":"A New Right? Moral Issues and Partisan Change in Canada*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Political economy; Voting; Alliance; Multinomial logistic regression; Political science; Positive economics; Traditionalism; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.04279411382929517,"score_gpt":0.3496974364552854,"score_spread":0.30690332262599024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980458813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691686,0.000102629354,0.00000606496,0.02155352,0.00013403657,0.0002549326,0.00000427854,0.00002990851,0.008746021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99753004,0.0000017531237,0.0000644999,0.00045003532,0.001457024,0.000020621816,7.5037184e-7,0.000004575304,0.00047069407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979986,0.00013806479,0.0002176676,0.00025648784,0.00062207796,0.0007671054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940974,0.00003656792,0.000050683528,0.000072604846,0.00005419163,0.00037622216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063485984,0.000096267606,0.0001627173,0.00006183855,0.00069998147,0.00016447694,0.00021660955,0.000058552836,0.00022619448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037559,0.00009147909,0.000022437303,0.00063918956,0.0004030016,0.0007760656,0.000008337182,0.00010094055,0.000027102562],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094229445,0.00003562496,0.19683976,0.000007970067,0.000003654614,0.000007733182,0.22312991,0.0000027737467,0.000114875584,0.36635563,0.0027466796,0.21074595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008752955,0.000385721,0.8461555,0.000063441614,0.000020151336,0.0000018431815,0.031711824,0.0023592308,0.0001486266,0.026748324,0.090634406,0.0008956288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99402535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6493157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000724091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014917479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5383762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980866198","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00392.x","title":"How Do Voters Form Expectations about the Parties' Chances of Winning the Election?*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Perception; National election; Local election; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Public economics; Politics; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.02415983316027916,"score_gpt":0.32401554663454735,"score_spread":0.2998557134742682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980866198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693138,0.00009926816,0.00065264525,0.0177069,0.00030705353,0.00038011995,0.00000649734,0.000052423216,0.011481302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982109,5.6212724e-7,0.000014591084,0.0000862263,0.0010703593,0.00005516136,0.0000011558426,0.0000050805857,0.0005559366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979116,0.00022718312,0.00024500157,0.00019824064,0.0008092444,0.0006087762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992091,0.00017660981,0.0001768959,0.00012962903,0.00024141885,0.00006636228],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010058256,0.00009629859,0.00012875086,0.000054375807,0.0038922345,0.0006533284,0.00043661415,0.000060529663,0.000021024507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009319205,0.000059373233,0.00008807635,0.001266121,0.0022856754,0.00085506454,0.000007446711,0.00012157246,0.000007962376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005571306,0.000036990252,0.003651974,0.0000060895372,0.0000090591675,2.1134089e-7,0.2449733,0.00002141999,0.0022284484,0.7393208,0.0007768887,0.008969212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042658678,0.00061009923,0.050561212,0.000060020757,0.00008334537,0.0000016131651,0.7273669,0.001544806,0.002079316,0.19201015,0.02464774,0.0006082054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013581549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073559512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5473107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014088015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030149726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987710354","doi":"10.1111/1540-6237.8403013","title":"Acclimation Effects on the Supreme Court of Canada: A Cross‐Cultural Examination of Judicial Folklore*","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Majority opinion; Supreme Court Decisions; Voting; Context (archaeology); Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Precedent; Politics; Generalizability theory; Judicial opinion; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Certiorari; Sociology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.020683654517647698,"score_gpt":0.2891717526265526,"score_spread":0.2684880981089049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987710354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8912314,0.000025298134,0.000020157891,0.0011936346,0.00031009663,0.00027884476,0.000011256126,0.000013374831,0.1069159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995448,0.0000032403057,0.000011628085,0.00013181586,0.00022862341,0.000018599227,0.0000011869845,0.0000027643562,0.000057368772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974609,0.00029374467,0.00026556145,0.00020353985,0.0013909567,0.0003853194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877304,0.0003269551,0.00020345078,0.000080694634,0.0005503139,0.00006554399],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019186104,0.00010581445,0.00018864145,0.00005447243,0.0025118445,0.00007319118,0.00035227003,0.0000615108,0.00004457048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091501244,0.00007805771,0.000072761584,0.0008979806,0.002880761,0.00037921692,0.000010030938,0.00009668939,0.0000032462913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000124496155,0.000044371896,0.0024765646,0.0000076004007,0.000013725338,8.0336144e-7,0.05189379,0.00000782786,0.0012697331,0.9353227,0.00033864233,0.008611806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010336598,0.00083510374,0.73045284,0.00013096612,0.000074955,0.0000010407358,0.17301764,0.00014363359,0.0065440247,0.08308671,0.0040723872,0.0006070643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14301975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094424665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.852236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034301676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015273181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998762267","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00444.x","title":"Ideas and Institutional Change in Social Security: Conversion, Layering, and Policy Drift*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":307,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Hacker; Social security; Social change; Public administration; Public policy; Economic security; Sociology; Political science; Social policy; Policy analysis; Political economy; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.025461733467620793,"score_gpt":0.3523033826137009,"score_spread":0.3268416491460801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998762267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95132655,0.00011536128,0.0000105629115,0.009161134,0.00021449669,0.00030963268,0.000012374703,0.000068684676,0.038781226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955035,0.000075244854,0.000019083927,0.0009556721,0.003332078,0.0000140999355,0.0000011746226,0.0000065451927,0.00009262696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769527,0.00009393297,0.00024836953,0.0003692217,0.00071066467,0.00088254304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942344,0.00008735813,0.00009373849,0.000052027866,0.00011825903,0.00022517685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021790734,0.00016012076,0.00023799918,0.00033931117,0.0053235046,0.00017019441,0.0002542245,0.00020497241,0.000010354442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018522171,0.00015406594,0.000055246757,0.0015017968,0.0057240883,0.00091348204,0.00006347953,0.00022592697,0.0000069100015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014811728,0.000031205007,0.010020119,0.000010969919,0.0000061582573,0.0000070461087,0.5267395,3.160492e-8,0.000036095378,0.4299218,0.00007783601,0.033134438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014397601,0.00022500163,0.45387498,0.000037390935,0.00001998751,0.000005547106,0.37247676,0.000078374025,0.000022305358,0.15956606,0.011556943,0.0006969281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01842556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046805413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44385484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032315476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048990536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014675672","doi":"10.1111/1540-6237.8403010","title":"Do Human Rights Matter in Bilateral Aid Allocation? A Quantitative Analysis of 21 Donor Countries*","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Politics; Civil rights; Political science; Personal Integrity; Developed country; Econometric analysis; Development economics; Economics; Law; Public economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.01609109660506392,"score_gpt":0.33146931847048355,"score_spread":0.31537822186541964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014675672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9213745,0.0000066751154,0.00007160162,0.00092773524,0.00012364547,0.00017104656,0.000015826807,0.00001628369,0.07729268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984471,6.6970296e-7,0.00029037302,0.00014800532,0.00004890496,0.000016622296,0.00000979692,0.000004147917,0.0010343438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976542,0.00021453926,0.0003980697,0.00034952658,0.0009484115,0.00043523315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991831,0.00007958277,0.00017297734,0.0001002603,0.00038501676,0.00007902944],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017269517,0.00012066007,0.0002545524,0.000667845,0.0012174196,0.00022901673,0.00046497266,0.00007763717,0.0013192322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000348709,0.00011205115,0.00011270894,0.0028889256,0.0012175816,0.00074149854,0.000008545754,0.0000965617,0.0001275289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008938362,0.0000642952,0.064281,0.000002634769,0.00005639058,0.0000019230943,0.14384773,0.000015483332,0.0001797321,0.79127514,0.00019775864,0.00006895007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018399651,0.00048186484,0.6430649,0.00009136311,0.00030831932,8.5499477e-7,0.10963473,0.00080284267,0.00073212635,0.21402116,0.027585695,0.0014361494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034707366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045162276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5787839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030722586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033056817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018643698","doi":"10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00343.x","title":"Training and the Earnings of Immigrant Males: Evidence from the Canadian Workplace and Employee Survey*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Disadvantaged; Immigration; Disadvantage; Wage; Demographic economics; Training (meteorology); Panel data; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Econometrics; Economic growth; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.039880328079894514,"score_gpt":0.29441472510182726,"score_spread":0.25453439702193276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018643698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879386,0.0004995853,0.000058398986,0.008144493,0.0000665552,0.00027053227,0.000016797278,0.000017526729,0.0029875003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986388,0.00008870998,0.000081184706,0.000488256,0.00040115084,0.000011828367,0.0000012429246,0.0000055251985,0.00028328094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977924,0.0006319404,0.0002672324,0.0003305351,0.0004774287,0.00050045335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980376,0.0013128732,0.00015151198,0.00015244461,0.00014266923,0.00020291461],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007978607,0.000117218275,0.00021172717,0.00005402686,0.003873308,0.0004929311,0.000626459,0.0000906433,0.000076401215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066090026,0.000079481615,0.000054406726,0.00060209184,0.0057122,0.00089024537,0.000018385363,0.00020186121,0.000011039925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013355257,0.0000037506973,0.1155399,0.00000153853,0.000005303634,1.8432411e-7,0.8565296,0.00000454844,0.000015131724,0.002689822,0.00019667204,0.02500018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034367372,0.00006220787,0.6897102,0.00004269087,0.000020277814,7.006299e-7,0.304576,0.00037252443,0.0000064074443,0.0018996182,0.0027784216,0.00018723808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6367975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9065901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57417035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010374538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008691232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032628051","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00427.x","title":"Hispanic Intermarriage, Identification, and U.S. Latino Population Change*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Ethnic group; Demography; Population; Identification (biology); Geography; Projections of population growth; Population growth; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.020061546671126022,"score_gpt":0.29249923179009585,"score_spread":0.2724376851189698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032628051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98141783,0.000037481503,0.00023982461,0.002282703,0.00038818253,0.0003229169,0.000009587597,0.000100359095,0.015201082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980925,0.0000062448316,0.00009721837,0.00008869707,0.00069891085,0.000024804976,0.000022042475,0.000007923634,0.0009616774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983001,0.00013386329,0.0002761429,0.0003308882,0.0005704134,0.000388617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994338,0.000050847102,0.00014737812,0.000116609386,0.00015574771,0.00009557882],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012828279,0.00010091212,0.00011557617,0.00016913193,0.0028015443,0.00044310628,0.00028942435,0.00011688077,0.000029718129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056226483,0.00010271057,0.000047799054,0.0009024131,0.0009849527,0.0010203972,0.000015284499,0.00012517838,0.000033917997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041812236,0.000060799382,0.09478239,0.000008858244,0.0000045603338,0.0000013817993,0.08933067,0.00000808211,0.0006684534,0.76547724,0.00044315652,0.0492102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014446554,0.000038000464,0.9415687,0.000009739914,0.0000117100235,6.1127554e-7,0.0143726915,0.0025019252,0.0000017901474,0.039629914,0.0015301445,0.00019035202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008092141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015879263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84678626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001996111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009050508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058358510","doi":"10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00294.x","title":"Strategic and Sincere Voting in a One‐Sided Election: The Canadian Federal Election of 1997*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Group voting ticket; First-past-the-post voting; Political science; Ideology; Race (biology); Disapproval voting; Split-ticket voting; Politics; Primary election; Federal election; Public administration; General election; National election; Spoilt vote; Ranked voting system; Economics; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0454306813602413,"score_gpt":0.33119218407163786,"score_spread":0.28576150271139655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058358510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706823,0.000017526152,0.000008882148,0.007663423,0.00007240219,0.00023791811,0.0000024189912,0.000020630025,0.021294465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991241,4.4959532e-7,0.000018179602,0.00012681713,0.0005797854,0.000014461741,9.994124e-7,0.000003963225,0.00013124569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982102,0.00023664608,0.00025346124,0.00020700722,0.0004645652,0.0006281564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945945,0.00007312316,0.00008624267,0.00005447042,0.0001409067,0.00018583515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014313424,0.00007982154,0.00013121717,0.00011092747,0.0023916026,0.00029649946,0.00016621615,0.00009865624,0.00003841574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008370448,0.00006935165,0.00003303304,0.0011059577,0.000802584,0.0004687898,0.000003667993,0.00017294093,0.000008253839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016193088,0.00007450938,0.039061323,0.000014070296,0.000008961415,8.5546986e-7,0.11507045,0.00003807863,0.0019136993,0.81729215,0.00013917784,0.026370509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021450757,0.0024060628,0.6815535,0.00027260653,0.00008061636,0.000013081349,0.16192186,0.025043758,0.0016961029,0.116030514,0.007023229,0.0018136201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7117225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9662133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70126164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006673881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011062777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076664754","doi":"10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00233.x","title":"Faction in Movement: The Impact of Inclusivity on the Anti‐Globalization Movement*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Movement (music); Argument (complex analysis); Legitimacy; Political science; Democracy; Political economy; Negotiation; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.018794239264107022,"score_gpt":0.33824334930952515,"score_spread":0.31944911004541815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076664754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463423,0.000006281676,0.00012341543,0.0052526733,0.000091056216,0.0003311985,0.000018507551,0.000019406018,0.04781517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881023,0.0000045785923,0.000003314898,0.00094138837,0.00013142699,0.0000105161935,7.6119426e-7,0.000003585605,0.00009422406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978879,0.00017281437,0.00021815118,0.0002102744,0.0009886872,0.00052216835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939895,0.00009743228,0.0001514614,0.00015984717,0.00011583989,0.00007649796],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017125837,0.0001054832,0.0001274992,0.000054596596,0.001465433,0.00014127408,0.0006093523,0.000064547574,0.000059112084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023229171,0.000063404346,0.00010378033,0.0013005987,0.0014734955,0.00049519073,0.000024392417,0.00014589811,0.000016755977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009764982,0.00011622344,0.0059498427,0.0000016259471,0.0000053730414,5.0133326e-7,0.07996058,0.0003117128,0.00096811325,0.90906966,0.00005646061,0.0035501427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006177119,0.00048839673,0.67692703,0.000039730356,0.000009048175,1.0330666e-7,0.035058778,0.0005720507,0.00080707844,0.28442,0.0008032884,0.00025674835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05055514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019127771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6709772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008869537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057758705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093240968","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00540.x","title":"Latino Group Consciousness and Perceptions of Commonality with African Americans*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Politics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Perception; Social psychology; Identity (music); Psychology; Ethnic group; Population; Incentive; Sociology; Political science; Demography; Geography; Anthropology; Economics","score_opus":0.03406692636502841,"score_gpt":0.329314660292438,"score_spread":0.2952477339274096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093240968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766506,0.00000536956,0.00022776607,0.001129792,0.000036073186,0.00018434438,0.000013194626,0.000039428294,0.021713413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.0000010039757,0.00013294976,0.00007187917,0.0001530856,0.000016558477,0.0000015129458,0.0000046047676,0.00014859303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998217,0.00024160388,0.00021560797,0.00022773375,0.00064568565,0.00045236252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926347,0.00010011488,0.00010970812,0.00009679913,0.00020382703,0.00022606477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066892477,0.00008931174,0.00020846182,0.000058170615,0.0019072653,0.000053960044,0.00019700959,0.00005221342,0.00005795389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044647622,0.00007587712,0.000037770253,0.00089774386,0.00700876,0.00034421863,0.000007917473,0.00009414807,0.0000072024413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025588934,0.0001470244,0.39072952,0.000015275,0.000010351731,0.0000030019455,0.3267233,0.0000016120451,0.0012307061,0.27396378,0.00014498123,0.007004859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003295568,0.0007943182,0.88667744,0.0000181203,0.00002272091,0.0000044391263,0.104569994,0.00011736744,0.000016689983,0.0062155398,0.0009447892,0.00028902333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033451144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041619726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4959479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010161437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029413291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095827451","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00467.x","title":"Validating a Comprehensive Model of Environmental Concern Cross‐Nationally: A U.S.‐Canadian Comparison*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":201,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Confirmatory factor analysis; Construct (python library); Structural equation modeling; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Construct validity; Test (biology); Social psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science; Statistics; Ecology; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.022336430704422962,"score_gpt":0.3094900277743582,"score_spread":0.2871535970699352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095827451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764002,0.000008717029,0.0007901578,0.00022731913,0.000066007946,0.00030682285,0.000050931358,0.000022436745,0.022127436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978946,4.8404866e-7,0.0012782296,0.00043362885,0.00004476652,0.000009696408,0.000013684289,0.000012253217,0.00031267063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719155,0.000052785534,0.0005067226,0.0005286575,0.0010009692,0.00071931473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990524,0.00006808508,0.00019526825,0.00023799682,0.000023796634,0.00042246908],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010175544,0.00018768162,0.0002192749,0.00010573864,0.0009902242,0.00008202912,0.0005844323,0.00009796801,0.0016404005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003500866,0.00020225983,0.000100980564,0.00046308796,0.0036525342,0.00063252164,0.00006564778,0.00018991322,0.00017883697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049273953,0.00067599164,0.7282343,0.000019433219,0.000017218897,0.0000048691995,0.12927917,0.013408598,0.06155916,0.0049072294,0.0003596124,0.061485168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005440725,0.00018547283,0.88722295,0.0000047045837,0.000012348002,0.0000031473191,0.06778369,0.03812263,0.0014699283,0.0031775443,0.0010317117,0.00044178785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046243477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013053691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15898867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001974118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020655668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102444313","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00378.x","title":"Failing the Transition from Welfare to Work: Women Chronically Disconnected from Employment and Cash Welfare*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Disadvantaged; Cash; Welfare reform; Demographic economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics); Single mothers; Labour economics; Economics; Business; Psychology; Economic growth; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.00990832258737824,"score_gpt":0.2521673317653547,"score_spread":0.2422590091779765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102444313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760325,0.00005654496,0.00095874554,0.019244013,0.0003282118,0.00046182977,0.00017348182,0.0001267499,0.0026179226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816597,0.0000045609872,0.0002451976,0.00053090503,0.00085019687,0.00005580991,0.000030555,0.000016475198,0.000100354715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966879,0.000264779,0.00035544,0.00068430003,0.0010140144,0.0009935726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991012,0.00011334275,0.00009757792,0.0002459668,0.00015574333,0.000286169],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010175062,0.00022489215,0.0002620498,0.00008223285,0.0045456844,0.00077134965,0.0007210905,0.0001612062,0.0001654071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004099779,0.00018704304,0.000083494335,0.0012526427,0.0012538568,0.0005390371,0.00003413887,0.00022473055,0.000019565126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054730477,0.00015318887,0.009763515,0.000003944966,0.000032967306,0.000010234766,0.91284627,0.00019028086,0.0009551495,0.034654167,0.0002204026,0.041115157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005658975,0.000199169,0.39850807,0.000019750396,0.000033492404,2.5669698e-7,0.5814971,0.0004033958,0.0000072713674,0.012965239,0.005315136,0.00048524616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03569203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109667955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38874456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006143182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028756954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99675024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117120586","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00496.x","title":"Globalization and Political Change in the Women's Movement: The Politics of Scale and Political Empowerment in the World March of Women*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Politics; Social movement; Empowerment; Left-wing politics; Globalization; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Ideology; Political economy; Collective action; Scale (ratio); Solidarity; Law","score_opus":0.022655785670937817,"score_gpt":0.34657574684000664,"score_spread":0.32391996116906885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117120586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712136,0.000020665997,0.000018074887,0.011425536,0.000056534616,0.00046916987,0.000011684847,0.0000041893218,0.016780553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979912,0.0000031191685,0.00001222787,0.0017054393,0.00020463011,0.00003585022,0.0000010498676,0.0000034386007,0.000043032294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968003,0.00040762618,0.00033909548,0.00021164326,0.0010116985,0.0012296615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.00032761338,0.00007815525,0.00014318865,0.00009179985,0.0001670912],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057493853,0.00009412018,0.00015111295,0.00016871968,0.00060675613,0.00012279325,0.00043991642,0.000059278285,0.000012944461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008685383,0.000057289843,0.000029009114,0.0011600155,0.0031711583,0.00019244275,0.000033157,0.00013449905,5.1184236e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039611014,0.00006778355,0.023713445,0.0000086230975,0.0000014660258,7.361055e-7,0.3418299,1.2177586e-7,0.000023636292,0.6335656,0.0000047959998,0.00077989587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018211381,0.000114574614,0.31745175,0.0000073681085,0.0000035722505,6.6223635e-7,0.56686735,0.000057977883,0.000016984368,0.115060374,0.00018035539,0.00005688405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009067008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023266948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5185053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046910296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020353492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120489256","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12064","title":"The Personal Experience of Community Among Urban Gay Men, Lesbians, and Bisexuals: Melting Pot or Mosaic?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Psychology; Perception; Social psychology; Sexual identity; Sexual minority; Sexual orientation; Cohesion (chemistry); Group cohesiveness; Gender studies; Sociology; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.06285520668715622,"score_gpt":0.3970577494237901,"score_spread":0.33420254273663386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120489256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97104305,0.00015549337,0.000010007969,0.0016231895,0.00040339355,0.00026036086,0.00001149858,0.000032338652,0.026460692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581575,0.000009788386,0.000016752747,0.00022608205,0.00026217283,0.000051991905,0.0000011034169,0.000009005625,0.0036073748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979286,0.00048594858,0.0003228104,0.00021787113,0.000419288,0.00062546844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988794,0.00029729152,0.00020864083,0.00027789638,0.0001529337,0.00018389424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014365056,0.00013241109,0.00018455418,0.00007641667,0.0034488402,0.00025080104,0.00072052435,0.000093562325,0.00027039403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010443692,0.00009282187,0.00004540056,0.0005416872,0.0036019261,0.00053382065,0.00004123219,0.00033342064,0.000047283862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024329815,0.000118658914,0.10571724,0.00005516029,0.000013014268,0.0000012721466,0.7844139,1.1109903e-8,0.0015034952,0.0055910894,0.022907127,0.07965471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002863672,0.00041144248,0.6571718,0.000006320295,0.000010028761,0.0000045929432,0.33999166,0.000029001385,0.000014493399,0.0013082582,0.00061232725,0.00015372229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064772174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024391417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55145454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007226028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016913914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121935780","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12228","title":"An Experimental Study of the Impact of Social Comparison on Investment*","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); Economics; Inequality; Interpretation (philosophy); Public economics; Demographic economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.0882746938537625,"score_gpt":0.43895814267539734,"score_spread":0.3506834488216348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121935780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.944078,0.0000047478784,0.0000017519469,0.00009358567,0.00042262275,0.00036885063,0.000010031274,0.000021659602,0.054998722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955934,4.3377327e-8,0.000006545898,0.00007248709,0.000301864,0.000008536707,7.116474e-7,0.0000054254215,0.00004502433],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674517,0.0007120436,0.00035645545,0.00025224636,0.001539228,0.00039487873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990151,0.000031958218,0.0003297763,0.00020757163,0.00024746207,0.00016811048],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022095002,0.00012277959,0.0002813874,0.00007165629,0.0013389164,0.00008460501,0.00094309857,0.00007525861,0.00004170693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067501445,0.00008588746,0.00014227082,0.0008890188,0.0020483392,0.0005085373,0.00002516561,0.00012627245,0.0000061107216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059176633,0.003123313,0.03858675,0.0000013776441,0.000011324697,2.1912841e-7,0.91575134,0.0000036211625,0.003598633,0.03732577,0.00080450106,0.0007339782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008606924,0.0067651677,0.20493291,0.0000037745106,0.000011033958,6.792608e-8,0.7835455,0.00005062373,0.0011975308,0.0023856568,0.00007806739,0.00016896756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015167801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009921078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16634616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005383016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000872548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133203885","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00840.x","title":"In the Wake of the Spill: Environmental Views Along the Gulf Coast","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oil spill; Socioeconomic status; Quarter (Canadian coin); Resource (disambiguation); Climate change; Geography; Environmental change; Environmental science; Oceanography; Environmental protection; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.17572372214626517,"score_gpt":0.3859617744107225,"score_spread":0.21023805226445733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133203885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9137753,0.0002603014,0.000011102161,0.0042076902,0.0006702285,0.0005520335,0.000017438631,0.000019677513,0.08048621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971868,0.00020461188,0.000013405028,0.0013022923,0.0005781218,0.000048679438,0.000003844789,0.000008145343,0.0006541359],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674124,0.0009668638,0.00032124785,0.00020974573,0.0010846575,0.00067627674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983781,0.00073966244,0.00026125825,0.00049002777,0.000034387795,0.000096579155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051208315,0.0001408026,0.00015647424,0.00006105566,0.0028098957,0.00018974343,0.002101449,0.00010597485,0.00012903301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032621078,0.00007992411,0.00015528384,0.0010409945,0.0032590956,0.0006365723,0.000088270586,0.0003128451,0.00014454417],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.177274e-7,0.00013078169,0.0224038,0.0000035227893,0.0000028191457,1.5471097e-7,0.94010574,2.1847119e-7,0.0037148194,0.017264523,0.002674086,0.013699126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001124443,0.00003974172,0.2901398,0.000008705692,0.0000105995005,0.0000014575531,0.5336335,0.000008249813,0.000044665165,0.0013087542,0.17466211,0.000029990768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015731537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006384947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40647227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020914397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010444071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133762525","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12178","title":"Refighting Pickett's Charge: Mathematical Modeling of the Civil War Battlefield*","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Military Defense Systems Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"US-UK Fulbright Commission","keywords":"Infantry; Artillery; Battle; Victory; Battlefield; Charge (physics); Spanish Civil War; Position (finance); Operations research; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; History; Physics; Economics; Ancient history; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.020818678819662883,"score_gpt":0.23488220738139495,"score_spread":0.21406352856173208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133762525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8725232,0.00016929567,0.008746562,0.00027493673,0.00052701123,0.0001781033,0.0000066946013,0.00016581813,0.117408365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947864,3.565912e-7,0.00018988442,0.000013780977,0.00015222163,0.0000058189944,3.2756077e-7,0.000010903432,0.00014805507],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985214,0.000038932198,0.00032504235,0.00017297384,0.0006324689,0.00030919284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944615,0.000023638344,0.000045983925,0.00026316196,0.00012588977,0.000095147916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010089434,0.00010543448,0.00021032785,0.00007016718,0.00019650995,0.000024952567,0.0004360652,0.00006243023,0.00009326038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079132056,0.00007670168,0.000113259,0.00067801325,0.00018498776,0.00022882181,0.000017975715,0.00013664711,0.00009653767],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003135463,0.00026467213,0.0013585583,0.0010122687,0.00034128624,0.000015264715,0.73661655,0.044493664,0.06697564,0.09224467,0.011903608,0.044742435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020651812,0.00007810582,0.00007854523,0.000063514315,0.000039444574,0.0000055699484,0.016449345,0.9749677,0.00049856433,0.0071040825,0.00023614588,0.00027245856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007361817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004040136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93047404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009645035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007185739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31278038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154997005","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00561.x","title":"What Does it Take for a Canadian Political Scientist to be Cited?*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Citation; Citation index; Politics; Tobit model; Field (mathematics); Political science; Social science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05272878938846906,"score_gpt":0.39141360974146183,"score_spread":0.33868482035299274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154997005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67531866,0.00001252439,0.00023234241,0.23581834,0.0018354435,0.0011243722,0.0001017879,0.00009404059,0.08546249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878323,0.00000407963,0.00032140856,0.006390562,0.0013163377,0.00011394809,0.0000066478133,0.000009530414,0.0040051816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136525,0.00015315283,0.00028023118,0.00071974087,0.0018959446,0.0055856514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925303,0.00023067053,0.000041121348,0.00022858834,0.00063320063,0.006336148],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048441584,0.00016446957,0.00020408879,0.00053375907,0.009482864,0.0015437559,0.0013453857,0.0001360309,0.00042950237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024285761,0.0001395108,0.00012975506,0.0031752603,0.0062797065,0.0025340493,0.000026093525,0.00017219716,0.00020200622],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011107993,0.00009756259,0.0010862845,0.0000073228002,0.000004448242,0.000008545617,0.27345273,5.648201e-7,0.00028188652,0.6955817,0.01155728,0.017910577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030467482,0.0004771625,0.011697218,0.00002998347,0.00001001668,0.0000058862483,0.543501,0.00020971835,0.00014029996,0.037689585,0.40532586,0.0006085791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23047413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30141357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6578921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027952786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012478037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160657274","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00576.x","title":"Neoliberal Knowledge: The Decline of Technocracy and the Weakening of the Montreal Protocol*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Environmental Justice and Health Disparities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technocracy; Public administration; Corporate governance; Democracy; Mandate; Analytics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.016273578002895965,"score_gpt":0.3177258036466609,"score_spread":0.30145222564376495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160657274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9162678,0.0001945238,0.00002333225,0.013701281,0.00014242799,0.014851179,0.0000092322525,0.000035109202,0.054775115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719894,0.000026291455,0.000043780634,0.00035455968,0.00022485624,0.0015493697,1.4141263e-7,0.0000050551635,0.0005970357],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815637,0.0002671021,0.00031352404,0.00017961489,0.00069577334,0.0003875946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991718,0.00027821286,0.00022037496,0.00019084247,0.000075746815,0.000063002815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018262625,0.00009582702,0.00018517248,0.000032266027,0.003894384,0.000049481874,0.00085443066,0.000068826914,0.000022640237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012314384,0.00004845217,0.000089137226,0.000652693,0.014967548,0.00029501767,0.00008692455,0.00020198163,0.0000032353207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100848876,0.00014146612,0.011837189,0.0000923231,0.000009574331,6.9513794e-7,0.8304291,0.0000059044573,0.00016238885,0.11629886,0.00073137233,0.040190276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032613885,0.00048632507,0.3148182,0.0001929509,0.0000961919,0.0000098573,0.6170442,0.0007671178,0.00033032097,0.051181473,0.011423539,0.0003884122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00621141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030033155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30298102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000625816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004364607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169894235","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00554.x","title":"School Readiness of Children of Immigrants: Does Parental Involvement Play a Role?*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Parental Involvement in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Cohort; Academic achievement; Developmental psychology; Association (psychology); Psychology; Early childhood; Medicine; Demography; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.017814233418138956,"score_gpt":0.3008390751737866,"score_spread":0.2830248417556476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169894235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917684,0.000058716476,0.000013473205,0.00024146606,0.00037332237,0.0005117303,0.00007484327,0.00005169554,0.0069063623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908704,0.000028901215,0.00013508354,0.00007146359,0.000395511,0.00004221759,0.000026966098,0.00001073814,0.00020209387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655193,0.00018494611,0.0005740913,0.00044503078,0.0016159373,0.00062807556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986866,0.0000558104,0.00041284732,0.00025285428,0.00034260415,0.00024925297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012141485,0.00018546198,0.00032066036,0.00025514592,0.001398498,0.000057209465,0.0010263802,0.00011178333,0.00020549956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011498136,0.0001627224,0.00014908279,0.0014968598,0.0036922062,0.0010046331,0.00003650265,0.00014027194,0.000031152536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030566764,0.0009171123,0.49709627,0.000017014343,0.00003729656,0.0000010216456,0.4704947,0.000003840646,0.017989665,0.009327538,0.00048084566,0.0036041245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073267525,0.00044480432,0.5728802,0.0000836528,0.000042813954,0.000001797142,0.40797237,0.00003902752,0.011118162,0.0059852316,0.00022245251,0.00047681492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029855046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020920497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075783916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040689143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010112745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340277123","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12272","title":"The Environmental Revolution and the Supreme Court of Canada: Empirical Analysis of Postmaterialist Value Change Across Four Decades*","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of the Pacific","keywords":"Supreme court; Value (mathematics); Logistic regression; Law; Environmental change; Relevance (law); Political science; Economics; Climate change; Statistics","score_opus":0.030829361361166766,"score_gpt":0.30778938191153193,"score_spread":0.27696002055036517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340277123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784147,0.00019244036,0.000040698247,0.0192099,0.0002854436,0.00018829585,0.0001280903,0.0000058167266,0.0015345812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995731,0.00006608017,0.0000041084836,0.00011663196,0.00017833855,0.000013453052,5.1154177e-7,0.0000014519761,0.00004628808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982421,0.00019308162,0.00022174275,0.00016417996,0.0008374646,0.0003414351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993703,0.00024478324,0.00016568524,0.00008184856,0.000077703626,0.000059728674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019538305,0.000068860936,0.00019715574,0.000026095504,0.0032364347,0.000041525564,0.00034174483,0.00003787291,0.000012906872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012958761,0.000034166034,0.00007938903,0.00058366865,0.011028025,0.00018062445,0.000036914902,0.00003437319,6.66207e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021749573,0.000052470536,0.10102065,0.0000035608684,0.00030791253,0.0000015783748,0.14375204,2.4056285e-7,0.004952959,0.71849823,0.0005457185,0.030647162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036426977,0.00006363147,0.9548111,0.0000092381015,0.00014543862,4.0131195e-7,0.030369999,0.000015068805,0.0000736026,0.011141033,0.0028943568,0.0001118601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41127947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5193768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85379046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024575685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042712633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99806124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2558564935","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12345","title":"Authoritarianism as a Research Constraint: Political Scientists in China*","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Politics; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); China; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Empirical research; Imperfect; Political economy; Democracy; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03129403992751562,"score_gpt":0.4013996080110439,"score_spread":0.3701055680835283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2558564935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6247735,0.000010105791,0.00003934592,0.019220848,0.0005978832,0.00022919901,0.000013244202,0.00004015153,0.35507575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491787,0.000004471401,0.00006756588,0.00013015166,0.0005952665,0.000021271619,3.0277678e-7,0.000008497305,0.0042546047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954645,0.0002836349,0.0003225837,0.00063471566,0.0014347066,0.0018598823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885935,0.00018836313,0.00008590208,0.00021033315,0.00018952119,0.00046656164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077249664,0.0001290978,0.00021260607,0.00024947507,0.0028357413,0.00042890018,0.0010296522,0.00016493323,0.00044850088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068629225,0.00009612636,0.00009313995,0.0012895282,0.010918002,0.0012347572,0.0000500869,0.00030549974,0.00052242726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057996685,0.00004371201,0.0022182295,0.0000016268556,0.0000013475853,0.0000113167935,0.06390564,5.8939578e-9,0.000800871,0.8922038,0.0002144036,0.040593255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076620665,0.00026343914,0.15645888,0.00005656003,0.0000022209526,0.0000048206707,0.053540584,0.000004468381,0.00010971689,0.7679862,0.020459466,0.00034748283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028742373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073992964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3701444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020225523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026808225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99846244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586734243","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12359","title":"Voting “Ford” or Against: Understanding Strategic Voting in the 2014 Toronto Municipal Election","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Toronto Metropolitan University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Ballot; Affect (linguistics); Disapproval voting; Personality; Group voting ticket; General election; Voting behavior; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Business; Public economics; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1487033136052886,"score_gpt":0.4146765863411959,"score_spread":0.2659732727359073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586734243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84169644,0.000016664468,0.00017132895,0.0025155835,0.00060441025,0.00031256428,0.0000013493193,0.00004683799,0.15463485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989672,9.914066e-7,0.000011328249,0.00011840596,0.0007165874,0.000017932294,6.6976764e-7,0.0000056915032,0.0001612446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976336,0.00033246,0.0002617938,0.00025674145,0.0006974798,0.00081791973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931145,0.0001392689,0.00021597509,0.0001557767,0.000068266214,0.00010928716],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00397926,0.00010162362,0.00013547819,0.000038785198,0.007467358,0.0012555646,0.0007680294,0.00009671987,0.000046648096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002367777,0.00007515525,0.00005522732,0.00027307204,0.00092236634,0.0013691671,0.000013161384,0.00016987446,0.000017012751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011956698,0.00003076727,0.007905104,0.0000067909164,0.000003098714,0.000003323979,0.08132589,0.0000016087268,0.0005436974,0.90708405,0.00009606451,0.0029876507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010722012,0.0010852899,0.10844467,0.00017352747,0.000046103487,0.0000028584955,0.80291253,0.005170079,0.000083893756,0.07879648,0.0012186214,0.0009937547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10884929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5093027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82828754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086338766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034292924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588795943","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12374","title":"The Economic Crisis (2009–2013) and Electoral Support for the Radical Right in Western Europe—Some New and Unexpected Findings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Radical right; Panacea (medicine); Recession; Population; Political science; Western europe; Immigration; Economics; Development economics; Demographic economics; European union; Economic policy; Politics; Demography; Sociology; Macroeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019801731736667737,"score_gpt":0.32674388944032834,"score_spread":0.3069421577036606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588795943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97132015,0.00008635157,0.000030909334,0.026087731,0.000881851,0.0005251061,0.00001257542,0.000035434874,0.0010199061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739856,0.00004129072,0.000041086278,0.00035821996,0.0005945027,0.000021699023,7.852742e-7,0.000010562071,0.0015333281],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980253,0.00010238969,0.00024870093,0.0004322422,0.00041971594,0.0007716314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991098,0.0001952909,0.00017153706,0.00026032247,0.00004830069,0.00021475555],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021014654,0.00014083649,0.00017943826,0.00006363919,0.008098432,0.0018184261,0.0012831861,0.000083862826,0.000023785145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015988696,0.000090840374,0.000047372057,0.00017230363,0.0031016332,0.0011952932,0.00005714376,0.00015941837,0.000016868195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021825185,0.00012609287,0.18244395,0.000017423654,0.00009262134,0.000025525509,0.3490391,7.9742426e-7,0.0023918725,0.26738316,0.06598404,0.13227718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018352375,0.0004909929,0.68214506,0.0000179992,0.000045077133,0.0000027547894,0.01011561,0.00017795907,0.00014010248,0.035545256,0.26890087,0.0005830955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014058501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02809551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4997011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023460505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074790936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609699313","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12408","title":"A Double‐Edged Sword: The Countervailing Effects of Religion on Cross‐National Violent Crime","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; SWORD; Violent crime; Criminology; Social psychology; Cleavage (geology); Test (biology); Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.03208116729760527,"score_gpt":0.3750956620109336,"score_spread":0.34301449471332834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609699313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72223705,0.00007418192,0.00002561243,0.0026021604,0.0014796439,0.0004387543,0.0000038817175,0.000042888878,0.27309582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826634,0.000023685583,0.000020771919,0.00029930938,0.00051812135,0.000032465272,6.990497e-7,0.000004041533,0.000834569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998103,0.000056921606,0.00022901516,0.0002998222,0.0009262676,0.00038492336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989321,0.00013386909,0.00030486498,0.00017586777,0.00038415598,0.0000691362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018825019,0.000113489776,0.00016574354,0.00005169254,0.00878778,0.0007705287,0.0008953508,0.000066442764,0.000012163051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027120876,0.00008327029,0.00010171155,0.0001719565,0.0028785937,0.00058850314,0.000036302146,0.000113745155,0.000050341205],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011939979,0.00018037808,0.022082547,0.00003534939,0.000045430716,0.0000028962104,0.27073693,0.0000015878902,0.0008726239,0.685519,0.0061196713,0.014284221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025710803,0.0005482082,0.8543885,0.00021951184,0.000036929807,6.589974e-7,0.038251255,0.000021989248,0.0019263555,0.056156732,0.04517704,0.00070174073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016423835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007883347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83230597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023530748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044267697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740845955","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12448","title":"Early Trouble, Long‐Term Consequences: Does Family Instability Keep People from Doctors?*","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Distress; Institution; Psychology; Health care; Logistic regression; Term (time); Gerontology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Clinical psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.036488343264546745,"score_gpt":0.3595553368499459,"score_spread":0.32306699358539914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740845955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95445395,0.000054447035,0.00005211099,0.0073550097,0.0033546984,0.0004308727,0.00006931333,0.00013594041,0.03409365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973358,0.000021818369,0.000090477624,0.0009132785,0.0010264843,0.0000359148,0.0000035183475,0.000011427918,0.00056126114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957867,0.00026831267,0.00047227435,0.00073461357,0.0013601129,0.0013779328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997855,0.00025086178,0.00039632455,0.0006536545,0.0002918598,0.0005522876],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022487321,0.00022940268,0.00043336902,0.00008317434,0.0115087535,0.0024151963,0.0022295685,0.00017818481,0.00028685987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054155313,0.0001862987,0.00018471017,0.00038720507,0.0071805017,0.002583397,0.00006795837,0.0002866109,0.00009248307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024387844,0.000069324866,0.7757734,0.000021331061,0.00000974846,0.000008702522,0.13277037,1.956742e-8,0.0002876173,0.03865681,0.000089319656,0.052288935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032316602,0.0000655299,0.9414829,0.00002383787,0.000011710112,1.2385303e-7,0.042158347,0.0000018872711,0.000024597652,0.014860045,0.00076988933,0.0002779579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26068196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15229034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16570948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048398535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019457911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752675207","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12445","title":"A Cross‐National Analysis of the Causes and Consequences of Economic News","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Public opinion; Tone (literature); Politics; Government (linguistics); News media; Economic analysis; Political science; Mass media; Perception; Media coverage; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.04896367677990575,"score_gpt":0.4097029587018327,"score_spread":0.36073928192192695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752675207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634978,0.000010071568,0.0000018030919,0.0014293509,0.00025463858,0.00007262995,0.00004204462,0.000004032151,0.034687635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996037,0.0000061079363,0.000019866744,0.0000877381,0.00011272447,0.000002937657,2.676975e-7,0.000001161324,0.00016552577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888587,0.00006279702,0.00019978003,0.00014460231,0.0004953908,0.00021157357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910843,0.000109910856,0.00035983635,0.0001583904,0.00019572274,0.000067722714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010682107,0.000049642495,0.00016035391,0.000093007584,0.0019639863,0.00021384761,0.00074690126,0.00004750077,0.000066157474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003843412,0.00003806393,0.00008757783,0.00027226677,0.013476397,0.00050670817,0.00002059261,0.000044033477,0.000002608466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002317656,0.00000893119,0.503554,0.0000032804044,0.00003643883,1.3640874e-7,0.05012941,0.000002969705,0.0011743589,0.44293344,0.00003162691,0.0021231174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010353561,0.000036715544,0.95622975,0.0000066562343,0.000085969834,1.3305616e-7,0.014352833,0.00003121364,0.0007590686,0.027648482,0.0006573383,0.000088308734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017206516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01107789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45267576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006680614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012386863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789458942","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12476","title":"Gun Talk Online: Canadian Tools, American Values*","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gun control; Antipathy; Opposition (politics); Politics; Ideology; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.049494382333746964,"score_gpt":0.3964467683197522,"score_spread":0.3469523859860052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789458942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7946774,0.000012637545,0.00002950232,0.009445972,0.0007548576,0.00027721084,0.000039013798,0.00011575637,0.19464765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565077,0.000007661159,0.00016613113,0.00075019273,0.0021277296,0.000010235314,0.000004763679,0.000010608015,0.0012719196],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959412,0.00025474138,0.0001940023,0.00049165124,0.0014232631,0.0016951017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981128,0.0000742866,0.000083469175,0.00022600459,0.0005389747,0.00096443744],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024201912,0.00013727833,0.00018128872,0.00031894352,0.005001325,0.00068086974,0.0013725744,0.000092551265,0.00057315617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003824345,0.00013109247,0.0000874033,0.003130161,0.011101805,0.00094870594,0.000021049533,0.00024123603,0.000478435],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100477355,0.000071369956,0.0049635805,0.0000026429304,0.000007415129,0.000013872606,0.12777194,3.604834e-8,0.0010418284,0.050910357,0.0035620655,0.81164485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033657634,0.0014857134,0.1584881,0.000033213004,0.000016847338,0.00000255334,0.5718704,0.0000769144,0.00016533313,0.012486215,0.2541609,0.00087724125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5764275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72108954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8107676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078284607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044372715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791322463","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12496","title":"Courts and Issue Attention in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Homosexuality; Normative; Publication; Democracy; Gay rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.01184551207464701,"score_gpt":0.28542451609320557,"score_spread":0.27357900401855856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791322463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8545678,0.000037838367,0.00001007703,0.004532401,0.00059419,0.00008537984,0.0000025689055,0.000012835115,0.14015688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989505,0.0000050828285,0.000012267378,0.0002901017,0.0006092327,0.0000042987253,2.0191332e-7,0.0000011624982,0.00012714672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988869,0.000039866023,0.000097594,0.00017253288,0.00048205446,0.00032104307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972034,0.000020818476,0.000032871656,0.000029632674,0.00012134898,0.00007499715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005083212,0.000048649264,0.00007798387,0.000040708164,0.0019296359,0.00006336917,0.00014545445,0.000022436967,0.00006178219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004071068,0.000047939815,0.000011016768,0.00040322726,0.0026749128,0.00025841827,0.000010389105,0.000046535515,0.000021678105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010537551,0.000027221768,0.07952135,0.0000021737576,0.000005080547,0.000008659917,0.065685734,4.1279872e-8,0.0005369306,0.6682253,0.0024662644,0.18351074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018341366,0.00008858045,0.83021486,0.000013682462,0.000004792756,5.759073e-7,0.086539716,0.000010726695,0.000014700831,0.047311258,0.035422057,0.0001956635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7506935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045175612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020050132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898350558","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12540","title":"What Are Good‐Looking Candidates, and Can They Sway Election Results?*","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Ideal (ethics); Ranking (information retrieval); Physical attractiveness; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.020570496021887544,"score_gpt":0.3397703166170865,"score_spread":0.31919982059519897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898350558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.957787,0.00008606375,0.000012088943,0.0017665747,0.0032603939,0.00014976652,0.000017896697,0.00008508384,0.036835175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955681,0.0000031072252,0.000017998518,0.00040679812,0.0008836447,0.00002059236,0.000005817252,0.00000911748,0.0030848442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984101,0.000111866866,0.00020382747,0.00054724247,0.00022785933,0.00049910764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993869,0.00002916486,0.00014520533,0.0002106306,0.00012458595,0.00010349203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070548453,0.0001255286,0.00012989396,0.00014053864,0.0016965457,0.00018808653,0.00026322945,0.00014414855,0.00022250904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011096622,0.00012015721,0.000034191467,0.00032708372,0.0015978424,0.000537912,0.000011415846,0.00019958804,0.00019334527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068963954,0.0005318913,0.1259977,0.000008853783,0.00006274419,0.000049470375,0.49869952,4.684282e-8,0.012059961,0.14506705,0.021045387,0.19578773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007165383,0.0009673791,0.963776,0.00001866086,0.000021361024,0.00003524424,0.024060097,0.0000025851414,0.000058131536,0.0067844926,0.003330061,0.00022946284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008218552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004984427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8377783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101353704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006604861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902712663","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12563","title":"Political Leaning and Coverage Sentiment: Are Conservative Newspapers More Negative Toward Women?*","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Politics; Tone (literature); Cover (algebra); Political science; Media coverage; Proposition; Advertising; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Business; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02765929266310053,"score_gpt":0.3438257950290125,"score_spread":0.316166502365912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902712663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86225593,0.0000066629673,0.000038622227,0.007831887,0.0004385815,0.00021835872,0.000020682191,0.000067705594,0.12912156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935438,0.0000023119933,0.00010676631,0.004667859,0.0010435486,0.000019716517,6.613314e-7,0.000008005719,0.0006073421],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970167,0.00017615544,0.000216515,0.0004029692,0.00085567916,0.0013319267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985584,0.00022283732,0.00013144547,0.00011256607,0.0003539213,0.00062080316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010170093,0.00015797178,0.00022395646,0.00009871253,0.0025323129,0.0003579935,0.0003785759,0.00011449893,0.00020843079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047815713,0.00015451833,0.000045527533,0.000754882,0.0105029605,0.0008465584,0.000030013518,0.00018269024,0.000082707455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010593941,0.00002002117,0.006574317,0.0000056561403,0.0000087653025,0.0000059403283,0.5656173,1.534865e-8,0.00026700008,0.42352834,0.00023727078,0.0037247776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044532187,0.00043617786,0.044543013,0.000032866228,0.000014712033,0.0000016989657,0.8890705,0.000023070677,0.000299128,0.05649842,0.0082569225,0.00037817727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002006885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027582404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3670299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004802879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007888482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902990926","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12557","title":"Measuring Away the Importance of Institutions: The Case of Seigneurial Tenure and Agricultural Output in Canada East, 1851*","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Interpretation (philosophy); Ethnic composition; Agriculture; Minor (academic); Ethnic group; Test (biology); Land tenure; Middle East; Demographic economics; Political science; Development economics; Geography; Economics; Sociology; Law; Demography; Population; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05293739751429906,"score_gpt":0.22147578670248183,"score_spread":0.16853838918818276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902990926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846519,0.00033365499,0.000014751555,0.0010044008,0.0004168336,0.00012099372,0.000040390914,0.0000026737468,0.013414406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969107,0.0000040050577,0.000008528732,0.000078644465,0.00016916198,0.000007778254,2.113776e-7,0.0000020863217,0.000038509115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991762,0.000016659527,0.0003774426,0.0001811498,0.0000494702,0.00019908264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952066,0.000036636175,0.00025702667,0.00009221004,0.000060665767,0.00003278506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057702477,0.00006909133,0.00021649,0.000031963034,0.00095457793,0.000029820405,0.00020081562,0.000027987004,0.0000072352254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008644148,0.000046411988,0.000039115606,0.000397619,0.0015887748,0.0001533544,0.000021443657,0.00008566977,0.0000025252791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017910017,0.000050499966,0.10001401,0.000019886578,0.000034991845,0.000018736888,0.13684043,0.0000058874034,0.000052801486,0.7528844,0.0009462437,0.009114191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088596414,0.00029113624,0.8185659,0.000021017442,0.000016658048,0.000039191615,0.14141196,0.00025897444,0.000030700157,0.029386574,0.008642935,0.00044896774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5090167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7718546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7234978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004016195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039181657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7341938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910428001","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12582","title":"Social Mobility and Labor Market Outcomes Among the Second Generation of Racial Minority Immigrants in Canada*","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Socioeconomic status; Educational attainment; Immigration; Social mobility; Demographic economics; Population; Social class; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Demography; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01008794380920507,"score_gpt":0.27426109700289225,"score_spread":0.26417315319368717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910428001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907878,0.000009327921,0.0000017578625,0.0012748257,0.00031360865,0.00034264955,0.000045439054,0.000008188014,0.0072163697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850166,0.0000013528455,0.000007498996,0.00021505661,0.00013181196,0.0000089175455,0.000001763576,0.0000027005935,0.0011292291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819696,0.00027586188,0.00026647197,0.0002492748,0.0006779972,0.00033343997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994441,0.000081776176,0.00015180728,0.00009556852,0.00016053788,0.000066176595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017546157,0.00009256929,0.00019240129,0.000052251024,0.0008394305,0.000098298035,0.00030988638,0.00007317893,0.000375468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065947606,0.000074965625,0.000040374576,0.0006908346,0.0009850231,0.00040823792,0.000012672263,0.00013089085,0.0000015075674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008290276,0.000026010148,0.850343,0.000008175205,0.0000035122305,3.7322957e-7,0.13065411,3.990463e-7,0.00058615627,0.01393597,0.0003570433,0.0040769884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019027566,0.00001950201,0.9501288,0.0000013306362,0.0000033216006,3.6294132e-8,0.048114166,0.0005241978,0.000014482638,0.00044607936,0.00046450092,0.0000933055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7812161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99854964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21733354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035814987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017611625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64563054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914837734","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12591","title":"Economic Vulnerability, Cultural Decline, and Nativism: Contingent and Indirect Effects","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological nativism; Immigration; Perception; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Development economics; Psychology; Political economy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.012636847508450543,"score_gpt":0.32300029454984863,"score_spread":0.31036344704139807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914837734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9784861,0.00004235116,0.000004744296,0.0009851718,0.00087676255,0.00047639312,0.000004524572,0.0000706308,0.01905331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889034,0.000006456731,0.00008872172,0.00026419773,0.00025603976,0.0000138139285,0.0000010713229,0.000007035942,0.0004723323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997976,0.00022017302,0.00020619281,0.00051428797,0.00051527866,0.0005680387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930686,0.00017631266,0.00013080149,0.000112429254,0.00006848912,0.0002050907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020334055,0.0001455291,0.00024721256,0.000087936474,0.0014967045,0.0005243764,0.000364983,0.0000924929,0.000042426458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117101656,0.00012759969,0.000045247354,0.00026645174,0.0016300774,0.0009812423,0.000059436104,0.00014154775,0.00006758414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028564797,0.00010702239,0.3876989,0.00005927348,0.000039579536,0.0000051385373,0.3539564,4.2820574e-7,0.012096737,0.08091266,0.00054489984,0.16455041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015701385,0.000608051,0.92661047,0.00004866937,0.000032929922,0.0000018623276,0.026100032,0.00012569265,0.00094584987,0.035592195,0.007608645,0.0007554779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002266778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023407144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5389116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030319925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023838904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944066376","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12662","title":"When Partisan Identification and Economic Evaluations Conflict: A Closer Look at Conflicted Partisans in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Voting; Turnout; Political science; Recession; Voting behavior; State (computer science); Differential (mechanical device); Social psychology; Political economy; Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04605433360746132,"score_gpt":0.37834849186417513,"score_spread":0.3322941582567138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944066376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861753,0.000015049195,0.000017063534,0.008036114,0.00020424576,0.00063838565,0.000015240846,0.000031521613,0.0048670545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854237,0.0000029128873,0.0000035576275,0.0003952724,0.00013507094,0.00007546002,0.000025058536,0.0000050156973,0.000815303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787194,0.00052061665,0.00033111326,0.00029024738,0.000484301,0.0005017583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992617,0.00022202876,0.0001300204,0.00015306774,0.0001143789,0.00011883256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025649697,0.00009128293,0.00013374176,0.00011018623,0.0010250043,0.00036970628,0.00029050923,0.00007552821,0.0002779039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006749626,0.00007644274,0.000032447515,0.0005057868,0.0010020586,0.0004897298,0.000010255649,0.00009658468,0.00029803364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015986643,0.000056172827,0.12188583,0.000010064813,0.000007918701,6.1433457e-7,0.4506528,0.000017456288,0.0038322648,0.42046273,0.0011706242,0.0018875538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092753157,0.00036996967,0.82109934,0.000028463286,0.00004370697,0.0000013191037,0.0740062,0.0049209855,0.00026567973,0.035154026,0.06269991,0.00048287836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029418338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027707841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6992135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032857046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021883917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.990034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968440856","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12707","title":"Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens’ Initiative Review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Pennsylvania State University; Colorado State University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Deliberation; Publics; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology; Deliberative democracy; Public relations; Data collection; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.03636933666537652,"score_gpt":0.3574050253454241,"score_spread":0.3210356886800476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968440856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8287685,0.00034869194,0.000013520395,0.022632373,0.0005697315,0.00069472514,0.000005355349,0.000030252393,0.14693686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500525,0.00017839698,0.000022709784,0.0043737516,0.00029431598,0.000021247302,0.0000014984364,0.0000026525586,0.00010020165],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984912,0.000350941,0.00014448502,0.00016067814,0.00052409864,0.00032857925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994758,0.00021804277,0.00005733501,0.00007401185,0.00011215119,0.00006270209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013629878,0.000060014565,0.0001119387,0.00005241519,0.00095767254,0.00013829053,0.000261128,0.000051004816,0.000079749865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002171152,0.00004824577,0.000031628468,0.0009455651,0.0009694303,0.00040387083,0.0000056653066,0.0001290274,0.00006500472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011068694,0.00002420903,0.004448408,0.000027098897,0.0000017181458,0.0000013089733,0.5667114,1.7153251e-8,0.00011394259,0.3933797,0.0010179655,0.034273133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004485185,0.00028134332,0.14175604,0.00028259782,0.000030863608,0.0000021558635,0.737719,0.000013643292,0.000012221924,0.091905676,0.027169198,0.0003787654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053042365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005353929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.301474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000894565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003536623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001766461","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12770","title":"How Poor Were Quebec and Canada During the 1840s?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of living; Poverty; Population; Geography; Wage; Census; Perspective (graphical); Rest (music); Socioeconomics; Demography; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Development economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.015599433360163636,"score_gpt":0.17923678215779892,"score_spread":0.16363734879763528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001766461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8918913,0.0005619647,0.000100414705,0.07615344,0.00050740846,0.00014652549,0.00005706914,0.000029734769,0.030552147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967292,0.0000072309285,0.000008263617,0.0011652489,0.00035454956,0.0000070419405,3.136484e-7,0.0000054301486,0.001722706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917716,0.000007798332,0.00017750064,0.00029145653,0.000056092147,0.00029000794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996638,0.00001971784,0.000119944125,0.00005982495,0.000018073275,0.000118645534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017196461,0.00008564839,0.00020976466,0.000017683615,0.0013690213,0.00021431132,0.0002712537,0.00003244177,0.000032492793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055298944,0.000078190395,0.00004247707,0.00019280582,0.0004719285,0.00025986013,0.000024160152,0.00010619847,0.000023397208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017849241,0.000025160105,0.033566006,0.000042440242,0.00005696523,0.000010358596,0.09034247,8.4101146e-7,0.00020058783,0.84185404,0.016567308,0.017315974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007594279,0.00016707028,0.29513177,0.0000041820645,0.000009451488,0.0000014656049,0.060157612,0.00022529768,0.000022063581,0.010873337,0.63186234,0.0007859845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61788607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59210795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8309807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046243932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014883406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004836769","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12778","title":"Co‐Ethnic and Neighborhood Ties and Financial Social Capital Formation Among the Urban Poor in Kenya","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Ethnic group; Social capital; Interpersonal ties; Family ties; Payment; Informal sector; Business; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03565245131748736,"score_gpt":0.3625787348310615,"score_spread":0.32692628351357417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004836769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927177,0.00011631197,0.000037489528,0.0032492138,0.00017938127,0.00041339418,0.000018438053,0.000041086158,0.003227014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985868,0.000010581894,0.000004185549,0.0004770074,0.0008359416,0.000047148114,0.000003834977,0.0000081659555,0.000026331278],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983693,0.0002536149,0.0003048713,0.00023643754,0.00034042503,0.0004953579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951714,0.00009723926,0.00014206224,0.000046376375,0.00007988755,0.00011730594],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007341266,0.00012130787,0.00027160227,0.00005161125,0.0028878166,0.000080653226,0.00020479482,0.00016939598,0.000026920696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008997836,0.00009468134,0.000034770634,0.00053558056,0.0009952111,0.0007209308,0.000027570799,0.00042470495,0.000017374237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015684593,0.000010703275,0.035956528,0.00003797451,0.0000014697838,0.0000016448641,0.9249499,1.5764602e-8,0.0002027526,0.020125711,0.00013920579,0.01855843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037171654,0.00010968962,0.49939972,0.000012555531,0.0000055234746,5.0962882e-8,0.49606922,0.00008811624,0.000008006831,0.0037193906,0.00010482356,0.000111187095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076353014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039021922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4634432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009112006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002559811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021225663","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00431.x","title":"The Portfolio Choices of Hispanic Couples*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Net worth; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Asset (computer security); Demographic economics; Equity (law); Economics; Real estate; Position (finance); Asset allocation; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.007048167985952342,"score_gpt":0.22399934009909436,"score_spread":0.21695117211314202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021225663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970265,0.000099279656,0.000016266375,0.00035338564,0.00022199753,0.00017509285,0.000002292666,0.000064621425,0.028802097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974005,0.000002385793,0.000026304426,0.00023554763,0.0014423829,0.00000968555,0.0000103086595,0.000012265747,0.0008605728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770683,0.00001207872,0.00045709332,0.00034943447,0.0009522082,0.000522364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988097,0.000044867833,0.00044085403,0.0002559592,0.00043516018,0.000013472182],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011108923,0.00016714194,0.0002305357,0.00022952505,0.0014890899,0.00056613784,0.0007863739,0.00005508913,0.00018095635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006107961,0.0001255136,0.00016653113,0.0022083928,0.00082179916,0.0015199692,0.000049270675,0.000098398334,0.00015074483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004682994,0.0002145032,0.43871832,0.00006520021,0.000013999538,0.000008082707,0.0011395235,0.00004632129,0.005967728,0.51616436,0.013934956,0.023680154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060817495,0.00009215256,0.84710294,0.000042537788,0.00015989986,7.772079e-7,0.0033248519,0.012088878,0.00011074247,0.025757981,0.11010206,0.00060902984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003892035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049955194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4904064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006148298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008912441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028512398","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12797","title":"Colonial Military Garrisons as Labor‐Market Shocks: Quebec City and Boston, 1760–1775","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Colonialism; Politics; Wage; Shock (circulatory); Demographic economics; Economic history; Economics; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Labour economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.02084901851781269,"score_gpt":0.2317494070552625,"score_spread":0.21090038853744983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028512398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88463587,0.001662697,0.00018115007,0.019782024,0.00069649064,0.00024301682,0.00020061957,0.00008689119,0.09251122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960737,0.000048042766,0.000075096774,0.0021388007,0.00051003456,0.000018583263,0.0000020771533,0.0000116948295,0.0011219298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983327,0.00002528695,0.00044568075,0.0006202619,0.00008716721,0.0004889399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934804,0.00005193255,0.00015575705,0.00010866482,0.000046537458,0.00028906454],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005556374,0.00016998642,0.0004699335,0.00006749707,0.0013031256,0.00009734091,0.00036297383,0.000121040444,0.0004901954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002026952,0.00020387267,0.00010863274,0.0005387389,0.0011395044,0.0004558945,0.00004982215,0.000195029,0.0002515531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001376982,0.0001822181,0.118480094,0.000046923513,0.00009647064,0.00001717718,0.2785987,9.569918e-7,0.00012213619,0.51879704,0.06574005,0.017780565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014842438,0.0011663893,0.44092643,0.000010010122,0.000025869289,0.0000019200827,0.021878647,0.00071219757,0.000016144035,0.06508361,0.46740732,0.0012872219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01776813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033600628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45371342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041955907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001652476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039232134","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12825","title":"(Re)Considering the Sources of Economic Perceptions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Voting; Contrast (vision); Set (abstract data type); Work (physics); Economics; Multilevel model; Voting behavior; Positive economics; Economic model; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Politics","score_opus":0.06178763621701447,"score_gpt":0.3601802492543292,"score_spread":0.2983926130373147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039232134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432247,0.000009810624,0.00007124703,0.024004973,0.00016167748,0.00013334896,0.0000036920158,0.000036926467,0.032353617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895066,3.487889e-7,0.000015780226,0.00033439187,0.000633081,0.0000072495136,1.9099423e-7,0.0000028651189,0.000055435106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989691,0.00012210527,0.00017696597,0.00013984801,0.0002809913,0.00031098834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999591,0.000084498664,0.00007462926,0.00005931238,0.00005304383,0.00013753909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062059634,0.00004927132,0.000097007025,0.00002045679,0.0013059275,0.00010728206,0.0002917294,0.000035373054,0.00025367909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007952492,0.00003838063,0.00005851408,0.0003014828,0.0014739443,0.00027098294,0.000008086355,0.000067889436,0.0000940242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040602804,0.0000136496865,0.020714253,0.0000075107414,0.000005704018,3.4311574e-7,0.4416042,0.000009288736,0.003599899,0.5265194,0.00066304894,0.0068586324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004879046,0.00087760313,0.15434442,0.000030244966,0.00006618107,6.36821e-7,0.7622304,0.0012100998,0.0012722788,0.05626559,0.022510383,0.00070424576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061428268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043836287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47025383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007966907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002808263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043910036","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12831","title":"The Dual Identity of Asian Americans","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Racial and Ethnic Identity Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Identity (music); Pacific islanders; Odds; Gender studies; Politics; Dual (grammatical number); Logistic regression; Geography; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Anthropology; Medicine","score_opus":0.05618471220926019,"score_gpt":0.4064257442359443,"score_spread":0.3502410320266841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043910036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4657966,0.00007095303,0.0005860441,0.103615135,0.00093739346,0.00047902486,0.000013871507,0.0001194732,0.4283815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986873,0.000012415276,0.00002334694,0.00019528747,0.0006213809,0.000005538927,2.5740096e-7,0.0000034941197,0.00045093556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716467,0.00021370496,0.00019752077,0.00021739113,0.0016529933,0.00055370695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992323,0.000076677556,0.00010423494,0.00009764732,0.00025368805,0.00023543122],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021404633,0.00006171892,0.00012448826,0.00003738543,0.0038819225,0.00039839535,0.0010138997,0.000044855133,0.00008982255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051167695,0.000049060625,0.00009359907,0.0021736303,0.0062200506,0.00092820765,0.000037845057,0.00017000435,0.00011044359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023163495,0.00003642205,0.0015115883,0.0000071095387,0.000009769639,0.000004088498,0.37107655,1.2398988e-7,0.0045314874,0.39332858,0.002323496,0.22714762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036833467,0.00072317274,0.070374414,0.000009381115,0.000021177471,5.657159e-7,0.8019312,0.000052939307,0.00032500358,0.058781978,0.06701906,0.00039279516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006090091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049838983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53289074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000828584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079008855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082651084","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12856","title":"Causation and Behavior: The Necessity and Benefits of Incorporating Evolutionary Thinking into Political Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Politics; Behavioural sciences; Epistemology; Biology and political science; Psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political philosophy; Social science; Political science; Systems theory in political science; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033861004384859436,"score_gpt":0.3050908695566118,"score_spread":0.27122986517175235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082651084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979826,0.00009884188,0.000038697006,0.010338758,0.0001064575,0.000168188,0.0000029811265,0.000027613176,0.0093925055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989482,0.0000060776974,0.00046094123,0.00037376003,0.00019403727,0.000007902834,4.6984292e-7,0.0000018213146,0.0000067835663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850386,0.000053304742,0.00017946474,0.0002873059,0.0006137979,0.0003622662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938214,0.00006658114,0.00011888602,0.000046480698,0.00020547926,0.00018042208],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001554614,0.00007426621,0.000116988325,0.000046010657,0.0058465586,0.00022909044,0.0003049509,0.000038880135,0.000004275665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024494124,0.000058666028,0.000017875189,0.0007822715,0.006711654,0.00088760746,0.00008029961,0.0000906055,0.0000013336145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002351663,0.000013213321,0.106548436,0.000006130758,0.0000018049092,2.560802e-7,0.27867642,1.8880941e-7,0.0004668724,0.6034743,0.000027133641,0.010782901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008808237,0.00007229356,0.79004645,0.0000083347395,0.000011921653,5.667929e-7,0.18147266,0.00003597512,0.00007065697,0.028014915,0.00006758901,0.00011054941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020128172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086159504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.683498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013647375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055112963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097375656","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12889","title":"The People and The Nation: The “Thick” and the “Thin” of Right‐Wing Populism in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Ideology; Rhetoric; Nationalism; Politics; Right wing; Immigration; Political economy; Sociology; Moderation; Political science; Media studies; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01231508282128312,"score_gpt":0.25489283346815833,"score_spread":0.2425777506468752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097375656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7558037,0.00028464195,0.000011877664,0.23247373,0.0006070514,0.0006448051,0.000005574937,0.000015914315,0.01015268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972613,0.00002878284,0.000007371664,0.0023172242,0.00025479327,0.000021655622,2.7044217e-7,0.0000043900623,0.000104237944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709046,0.0007099845,0.00030000502,0.00024949404,0.0012204563,0.00042960362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985803,0.0008718373,0.00020134306,0.00015533525,0.0001012506,0.00008996321],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048548817,0.00010662188,0.00019087226,0.000020079797,0.0061858674,0.00038829056,0.0011012509,0.00004218828,0.000011520111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050869246,0.000044921915,0.00004516145,0.0010132933,0.005154754,0.00034101654,0.00006154616,0.0002768713,0.0000012743402],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038235692,0.0000047142703,0.0023734441,0.0000033973035,0.000008771292,0.0000010674981,0.5520036,0.0000011828909,0.000026720287,0.4385606,0.00056315353,0.0064150905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035530082,0.00008567996,0.13564527,0.00003107473,0.000052416253,0.0000017523622,0.6492422,0.002081395,0.00003498232,0.19083452,0.01806774,0.0003699173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8535813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95197874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24772608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001968574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001419374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99755263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121045634","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12910","title":"Democratic Competition for Rank, Cooperation, and Deception in Small Groups","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Incentive; Competition (biology); Ranking (information retrieval); Public good; Rank (graph theory); Position (finance); Temptation; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Political science; Microeconomics; Politics; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.04226517156096901,"score_gpt":0.32483212836634867,"score_spread":0.2825669568053797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121045634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98820144,0.000029931456,0.00084161165,0.0061122384,0.0001479802,0.00049616804,0.0000054781995,0.00003787075,0.0041273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987369,0.000007305524,0.0004922823,0.00048435287,0.00018693873,0.00006199474,0.0000035498383,0.0000043174527,0.000022362474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991422,0.000057050587,0.00017261956,0.0002550795,0.00011441356,0.0002586219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970573,0.000037431415,0.000053456435,0.000030034287,0.00007750511,0.00009581348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052856846,0.00007048677,0.00012439457,0.00004256268,0.0012474007,0.00016899093,0.00014427534,0.000043661883,0.000016027752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005659561,0.000078734985,0.000025799776,0.00034728966,0.0008518935,0.0004858926,0.000010312158,0.000051070245,0.0000099349745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003674629,0.0000619688,0.009649874,0.000012194916,0.0000029101357,7.0331777e-7,0.4231873,0.0000014996597,0.03240741,0.5171107,0.00012830553,0.017400391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051064114,0.0028726046,0.07675405,0.000057998546,0.000055088152,0.0000012696088,0.7862026,0.0024122717,0.0024478312,0.12005776,0.0025061886,0.0015259245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048632373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004481047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39705294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017852987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011385916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95941234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132625123","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12920","title":"Care to Wager Again? An Appraisal of Paul Ehrlich's Counterbet Offer to Julian Simon, Part 2: Critical Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Proxy (statistics); Critical appraisal; Relevance (law); Positive economics; Balance (ability); Economics; Perspective (graphical); Welfare; Period (music); Psychology; History; Law; Statistics; Political science; Philosophy; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.05470053620252566,"score_gpt":0.30071383665371676,"score_spread":0.2460133004511911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132625123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98651,0.0000516503,0.0024504415,0.0015863067,0.00042644356,0.00011286945,0.0002615736,0.000014948813,0.008585761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981143,0.000001326668,0.0005804403,0.0009359809,0.00016333106,0.00002005444,0.00003937087,0.000010298801,0.0001349074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983842,0.000029270475,0.00048170678,0.00061325,0.00011934479,0.00037225994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924695,0.000041237137,0.000102196354,0.00029519343,0.00007388122,0.00024053034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062814885,0.0001216553,0.00036970212,0.000214779,0.0002557656,0.000136556,0.00030203158,0.00007187628,0.0005785974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010513682,0.00015111557,0.00014565718,0.0009769192,0.00022714933,0.00045707152,0.000033215583,0.00007135373,0.0002879736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046831035,0.0006745146,0.686745,0.000053250962,0.00026585534,0.00001684523,0.13847022,0.00069632375,0.0028010912,0.12484469,0.00426209,0.04112332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003268868,0.0006382132,0.9512029,0.000009542458,0.0000765869,5.5724405e-7,0.034730326,0.0008479072,0.0006206632,0.0022408045,0.008750471,0.00055513455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019217648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030988952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26445794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022132599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000476929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6335236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132888130","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.12928","title":"Care to Wager Again? An Appraisal of Paul Ehrlich's Counterbet Offer to Julian Simon, Part 1: Outcomes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Perspective (graphical); Balance (ability); Relevance (law); Period (music); Economics; Welfare; Yield (engineering); Positive economics; Psychology; History; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03055895348661251,"score_gpt":0.28513321573298617,"score_spread":0.25457426224637364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132888130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927429,0.00022532012,0.0006189637,0.004381138,0.002146768,0.0002572826,0.00035680176,0.000050075436,0.06453464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672914,0.0000029511564,0.0002382901,0.0017314864,0.00031372657,0.00003121152,0.000008436832,0.000016077898,0.0009286951],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809,0.000025691961,0.0005916276,0.00063932175,0.00012969531,0.000523617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990142,0.000051119634,0.00017678169,0.00027482247,0.00019363854,0.0002894176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049756764,0.00017400774,0.0006167711,0.00012849696,0.0006059721,0.000120313845,0.0004628321,0.00009511599,0.00018864464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001909267,0.00019826154,0.00016630735,0.0007315026,0.00027794772,0.00033765187,0.00005235679,0.00010556378,0.00045138673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042939195,0.0004978885,0.18449408,0.000056976016,0.00013425227,0.000022670447,0.46846715,0.000021203266,0.00033389925,0.25613883,0.032773454,0.057016674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006979163,0.0009062524,0.30720282,0.00001710362,0.000017385928,4.3437194e-7,0.088030376,0.000026853299,0.000113778566,0.0056971163,0.59627146,0.0010185116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006908255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000763593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.563498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004320507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012925918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80848706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164818095","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13010","title":"Brexit, COVID‐19, and attitudes toward immigration in Britain","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; Immigration; Referendum; Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Political science; Demographic economics; European union; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Negotiation; Feeling; Politics; Development economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Geography; Economics; Medicine; Law; International trade","score_opus":0.034192278058911625,"score_gpt":0.3695798800072994,"score_spread":0.3353876019483878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164818095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97820926,0.00010645263,0.00029734976,0.010967633,0.0003943331,0.00021159205,0.0000060890134,0.000079555546,0.009727746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982323,0.000013938739,0.00026081793,0.0008985556,0.00020352166,0.000014099658,0.0000036993263,0.000005732602,0.00036733114],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976909,0.00021707726,0.0002268447,0.00046285437,0.000834361,0.00056795205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993512,0.00005694883,0.00007984471,0.00010944694,0.000116135474,0.00028643847],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017653083,0.00010705385,0.00015999713,0.00012387075,0.00153816,0.0004415849,0.000341479,0.00009717161,0.00007983218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029107733,0.000115154166,0.000044258984,0.0012509288,0.0014349753,0.00091565767,0.000027368502,0.00013236677,0.00001967722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011587856,0.00019392734,0.08326645,0.000033288463,0.000008694548,0.000082049475,0.57874036,0.0000016547538,0.0070234295,0.2911324,0.00032314006,0.03918305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014407313,0.00022560218,0.59177005,0.00006284982,0.000016743186,0.0000055086116,0.21176252,0.0000321941,0.00047093353,0.18261728,0.010864355,0.0007312415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014759263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04490503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5085036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007796201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020698905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3190412713","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13036","title":"Voters’ view of leaders during the Covid‐19 crisis: Quantitative analysis of keyword descriptions provides strength and direction of evaluations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Université de Montréal; King's College London; University of Toronto; Universität Wien; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Karlstads universitet; University College Dublin; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Descriptive statistics; Sentiment analysis; Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Regression analysis; Measure (data warehouse); Social psychology; Political science; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Statistics; Natural language processing; Data mining; Mathematics; Medicine; Machine learning","score_opus":0.10931587214986108,"score_gpt":0.43078582136202537,"score_spread":0.3214699492121643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3190412713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99461603,0.00014840096,0.0004566378,0.0037248584,0.00008255107,0.00017451166,0.000026367723,0.000011212047,0.0007593999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975055,0.000007659605,0.00008497836,0.00004070362,0.000028024073,0.00001567393,0.0000021109502,0.0000020832567,0.0000682328],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818015,0.00052557763,0.0003439218,0.00017706069,0.00055968313,0.0002136015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988363,0.00023520371,0.00022230296,0.0000963209,0.000512747,0.00009714299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013952891,0.000058472087,0.00022314394,0.00015344405,0.0008803286,0.00004640894,0.00012727028,0.000041889023,0.0000411876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006194219,0.000048027097,0.00010567617,0.0027915891,0.0017722227,0.00030979468,0.00000750748,0.000054452405,5.167731e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019865995,0.00019273852,0.043041687,0.00013739108,0.00027379408,4.0480757e-7,0.57870334,0.000076699485,0.04841244,0.32463804,0.00008629198,0.004417275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003312383,0.00038960052,0.41141877,0.000049290404,0.0010849353,4.4204162e-7,0.5710339,0.0007906226,0.0025833345,0.0116973445,0.00038932066,0.00023123765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015751375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024215693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36837706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011775528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000540995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192345591","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13021","title":"“Deep questions for a Saturday morning”: An investigation of the Australian and Canadian general public's definitions of gender","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Meaning (existential); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Identification (biology); Gender gap; Gender studies; Developmental psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0893891081312483,"score_gpt":0.3479830725381061,"score_spread":0.25859396440685783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192345591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731796,0.0000173529,0.00008237986,0.013654708,0.00069641543,0.00021038532,0.00005322821,0.000015872223,0.012090082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985698,0.0000038121107,0.0005989808,0.000356029,0.00024004008,0.000021408758,0.000007475118,0.0000041495864,0.00019831058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987595,0.0002261551,0.00018705399,0.00021066148,0.0002677537,0.0003488442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990277,0.00004588543,0.00011489244,0.00010924318,0.00047837236,0.00022386773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068458146,0.00006329662,0.000113367234,0.00008956515,0.0016274903,0.000092872666,0.00028806314,0.00010989421,0.00005127018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019097776,0.000052634878,0.00006952304,0.0009090547,0.0026461843,0.00038714963,0.000008130659,0.00009640003,8.526501e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014567668,0.000022413606,0.009645727,0.000004596216,0.0000075646917,2.4882243e-7,0.13366303,2.9440804e-7,0.008211284,0.8435002,0.00035197145,0.004591223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030862133,0.0002017166,0.568063,0.000013460981,0.000035676025,0.0000026309904,0.13411278,0.000052734616,0.00044577598,0.2930319,0.0035136505,0.00021805934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055608336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3450646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55841726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001142549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016587896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197003749","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13028","title":"The COVID‐19 pandemic and government responses: A gender perspective on differences in public opinion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Pandemic; Multinomial logistic regression; Public health; Demographic economics; Perspective (graphical); Public opinion; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Descriptive statistics; Demography; Disease; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Economics; Sociology; Medicine; Politics; Law; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.18083440487337543,"score_gpt":0.4619049600881108,"score_spread":0.2810705552147354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197003749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.973505,0.0003558046,0.000044250955,0.012877147,0.0007351042,0.00021724438,0.000017991093,0.000024522125,0.012222909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968497,0.000039030387,0.0000041317817,0.0025206893,0.000099477285,0.0000422476,5.4853456e-7,0.0000036714835,0.00044047198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981395,0.00037147413,0.00014806126,0.00042622272,0.00049583236,0.00041893192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911934,0.00045286093,0.00006163411,0.00014753641,0.00003769492,0.00018090438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012292612,0.000088024855,0.000108130866,0.000043847453,0.0009056263,0.00013521453,0.00020843316,0.00005526704,0.000066401684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018661527,0.00006460568,0.000030051988,0.0004707199,0.00061260455,0.000107609434,0.000022423223,0.00016979076,0.000014843023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003060631,0.00022486184,0.19010313,0.000010705496,0.000011082419,0.000018451025,0.2564224,1.37839615e-8,0.00045052674,0.49149102,0.00041183268,0.060549892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005728693,0.0004646332,0.61618227,0.000004349191,0.0000018491025,0.000012205923,0.36473346,0.0000045515535,0.0000024839974,0.012294938,0.0056262854,0.000100104946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009677186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00198518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4791961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019380145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011360309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69654363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197396911","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13062","title":"Determinants of citizens’ support for democracy in Ghana","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Democratic consolidation; Consolidation (business); Government (linguistics); Educational attainment; Logistic regression; Economic growth; Public administration; Sample (material); Political science; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law; Democratization; Medicine","score_opus":0.04367103730967069,"score_gpt":0.39264674563882085,"score_spread":0.34897570832915015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197396911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98226357,0.0000075929847,0.00008349087,0.00095586374,0.00031595,0.00020578885,0.000010661714,0.000015352773,0.016141757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988433,2.1088937e-7,0.0001490681,0.00008789908,0.00020541734,0.000018815168,0.0000014102003,0.000003942475,0.00068992743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842745,0.00011664299,0.00029611058,0.00020455051,0.00041590375,0.00053935836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930596,0.00011599173,0.00009202444,0.00007558099,0.00029199274,0.000118425385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012313521,0.000058648176,0.00017872808,0.000064487314,0.0005610253,0.00006261195,0.00018940242,0.000069590315,0.00008487854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031091485,0.00006117139,0.00006677711,0.0008094267,0.00062174216,0.00028767285,0.000006031188,0.000048008602,0.0000121713265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027800714,0.00022102305,0.22976045,0.000078378725,0.0000050715084,0.000016656659,0.1041647,2.658134e-7,0.014251141,0.57332265,0.00062451715,0.07752737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019435441,0.0012277268,0.6143918,0.00013373712,0.000047759655,0.0000036964414,0.09308575,0.00033957936,0.020719057,0.26229462,0.004857344,0.000955386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038791066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015619656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38463134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012734855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008790137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8716135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210534777","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13083","title":"Earnings mobility and the Great Recession","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Recession; Unemployment; Economics; Demographic economics; Great recession; Wage; Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Geography; Macroeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.03588209329647057,"score_gpt":0.40615371836644576,"score_spread":0.3702716250699752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210534777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.921303,0.0001214124,0.000022769951,0.024393579,0.000502218,0.00023782962,0.00000205877,0.00004924118,0.05336794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99501616,0.000015120388,0.000017468603,0.0007950204,0.00023228196,0.00004497897,8.96147e-7,0.000003599515,0.0038744807],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998544,0.0003911049,0.00017793891,0.00024644358,0.00029936084,0.00034118976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928963,0.00025454644,0.00008322127,0.000117803815,0.00020085517,0.000053934295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017402812,0.00006931225,0.00014468648,0.000019048275,0.0052689076,0.000031862997,0.00013964585,0.000052277683,0.00017924157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019502678,0.000040775107,0.000035847188,0.00042061973,0.0013034081,0.00018804782,0.000060877137,0.0002496224,0.000039620023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010888059,0.000048947903,0.36894274,0.00006952299,0.000016936106,0.000004916687,0.41560134,2.402568e-8,0.001937459,0.0810651,0.007143494,0.12506063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013942376,0.00009513229,0.8432225,0.000053041058,0.000019486362,7.60837e-7,0.11111009,0.000012625177,0.000037914862,0.02357471,0.020330962,0.00014852502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028285294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017554918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47427976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054854314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019035062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293077290","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13178","title":"Populist media diets","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Distrust; Elitism; Credibility; Ideology; Populism; Elite; Media consumption; News media; Social media; Newspaper; Media content; Political science; Consumption (sociology); Media coverage; Sociology; Content analysis; Media use; Focus group; Media studies; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.02732351287854273,"score_gpt":0.3384140794130309,"score_spread":0.3110905665344882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293077290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7665116,0.00004890618,0.000013135631,0.009546521,0.0066097598,0.00027669428,0.000050210045,0.00024018882,0.21670297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965763,0.0000017219749,0.000044679968,0.0008674004,0.0017838586,0.000055412223,0.0000048940055,0.000009741117,0.0006560063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647874,0.00032778396,0.00018830453,0.00030348857,0.0018173098,0.0008843815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991845,0.00016750212,0.000096023585,0.00012633298,0.00011617753,0.00030949523],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012891847,0.00010075699,0.00015234426,0.000124828,0.009124617,0.0001868464,0.00094791193,0.000054531774,0.000986899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028486602,0.000116023584,0.000096477175,0.0016558457,0.0024406537,0.00035764903,0.000045521792,0.00027026885,0.00008688782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055094506,0.000056615198,0.0032655217,0.0000013743701,0.0000029422044,0.000008480164,0.5794416,1.01995084e-7,0.00035670534,0.37810183,0.0033688433,0.035390485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002236243,0.00016344475,0.008537156,0.0000015093804,0.000012345248,0.0000010771971,0.684666,0.0000038684293,0.000030348387,0.049650494,0.25641465,0.0002955222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045215962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007759149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32845134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005926347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011347644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307562380","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13223","title":"Education and polypharmacy: A national study of racial and ethnic variations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Medical Education and Admissions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Polypharmacy; Ethnic group; Socioeconomic status; Race and health; Gerontology; Health equity; Demography; National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; Social class; Race (biology); Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Health care; Population; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04059027613652525,"score_gpt":0.4330797287431123,"score_spread":0.392489452606587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307562380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99015087,0.000056292403,0.000012956598,0.0056062057,0.00029211317,0.00027237876,0.0000060535913,0.000011350232,0.0035917563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983913,8.965423e-7,0.00008015288,0.000984947,0.00013867789,0.000046542562,0.0000043692025,0.0000022976235,0.00035083172],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900144,0.000054449254,0.00013284021,0.00014813317,0.0005722876,0.00009084277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949795,0.00003414826,0.000060560662,0.00004071594,0.00012274084,0.0002438869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051529583,0.00003871479,0.00007951902,0.00013500835,0.00065564207,0.000013105027,0.00005766076,0.0000115954535,0.00063746836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002716096,0.000036436504,0.000012380602,0.00059707987,0.00019487794,0.00008726182,0.000015982467,0.00011457984,8.1982853e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078803525,0.0062520094,0.009782495,0.000032172433,0.000028872466,0.000001305309,0.49293745,3.0553534e-7,0.0217211,0.04476781,0.0030857234,0.42131197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019805685,0.0017249022,0.76478636,0.000009583735,0.00007117147,0.000029152297,0.22255191,0.00036972953,0.000027169957,0.0042115836,0.0041043498,0.0001335095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000113970906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008203988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75500387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006150331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002554323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69798315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307641523","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13221","title":"Introducing the Worldwide Age Representation in Parliaments (WARP) data set","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Parliament; Representation (politics); Globe; Democracy; Age groups; Population; Data set; Demography; Set (abstract data type); Information Age; Political science; Politics; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08623075334069712,"score_gpt":0.3993710687270499,"score_spread":0.3131403153863528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307641523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88310415,0.000052077095,0.0003844893,0.030641615,0.0028246422,0.0010125786,0.000071681476,0.00009360327,0.08181514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828166,0.0000024246224,0.00006574788,0.0003510157,0.000442035,0.000041294577,0.0000334417,0.0000053398094,0.00077702256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699116,0.00056948257,0.00022665289,0.00047887707,0.0012221998,0.0005116333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992493,0.00009757242,0.000116322364,0.00041717998,0.000048452286,0.0000711997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038657964,0.00006998916,0.000095319396,0.00013360825,0.0038146942,0.00033737358,0.0014652318,0.000022226208,0.000137813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001557842,0.00006208634,0.000030965693,0.0017130171,0.0008244916,0.00062785513,0.00017234062,0.00021945145,0.0000133718195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013695962,0.00010853545,0.01413449,0.0000035154608,0.000009514229,0.000021420436,0.813924,0.0001447792,0.0012572062,0.11514469,0.0068855714,0.048352584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037791498,0.00006975076,0.06356033,0.0000033618867,0.000012540741,0.0000014279269,0.86022925,0.0008382642,0.00003188572,0.056873843,0.017774899,0.00022654115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021006953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005025137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115177505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034720753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041948326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323312751","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13252","title":"The myth of wartime prosperity: Evidence from the Canadian experience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Great Depression; Fell; Economics; World War II; Pace; Gross domestic product; GDP deflator; Spanish Civil War; Economic history; Development economics; Political science; Economy; Economic growth; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.048348012625326404,"score_gpt":0.25751512618904526,"score_spread":0.20916711356371886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323312751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97487736,0.0006207834,0.0000045354036,0.013971421,0.00072957616,0.00025765062,0.0000425037,0.00002090418,0.009475296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882865,0.000029805027,0.000024695402,0.00046311246,0.00011448683,0.000043340482,0.0000016258169,0.000005404549,0.0004888772],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865,0.000014523875,0.00036267168,0.00033005988,0.00013592615,0.00050682883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992551,0.00012927038,0.00018546089,0.00026061074,0.000054594388,0.0001149316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002023708,0.00008665408,0.00015441354,0.00007080372,0.001806557,0.0003396841,0.0010011634,0.00004680557,0.00011932417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021441132,0.000060383758,0.00006635071,0.00085742504,0.00082626485,0.00033898096,0.00003671939,0.0001153961,0.0004962143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028752329,0.000026209898,0.19861664,0.000008890824,0.00005781634,0.00000561877,0.36147457,0.000010701053,0.0005048836,0.17068385,0.020061849,0.24852024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020394729,0.000087750406,0.7689428,0.000027329808,0.000004070931,7.5601275e-7,0.019124884,0.0033337248,0.00015768806,0.052933455,0.15483287,0.00035076254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.099785425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041945666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57032615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032371678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028985483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379882923","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13288","title":"The 1990s party realignment of U.S. presidential elections: Geographic sorting of counties by blue or red","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Polarization (electrochemistry); Voting; Political science; Competition (biology); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political economy; Demographic economics; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.030132729399589022,"score_gpt":0.35431975302096785,"score_spread":0.32418702362137886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379882923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99312997,0.00004355132,0.00003697321,0.0021459558,0.0004805874,0.00033283365,0.000016341875,0.00007099919,0.0037427659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988187,0.000014194747,0.0000038719336,0.000014389697,0.00020246796,0.000040289895,0.0000023497014,0.000004503536,0.00089923147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759465,0.00024194439,0.0004401008,0.00018086642,0.00097490917,0.00056749984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990535,0.0002300237,0.0002792313,0.00011170456,0.00023632348,0.000089221714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026528307,0.000072337185,0.00015483452,0.00007860073,0.0021325226,0.00012028998,0.0003332673,0.00006619599,0.000027010656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002944086,0.000051791954,0.00007864143,0.0017865384,0.0018932797,0.00028166614,0.000011812114,0.000071815266,0.000007152192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016894676,0.00023826874,0.056082584,0.000113864146,0.000098108685,0.0000021321744,0.16880654,0.000010070014,0.09711614,0.61442655,0.036031064,0.02690575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017815098,0.004300065,0.3502118,0.00030031212,0.0002740474,0.0000017018634,0.30224496,0.0008149657,0.032075398,0.23775601,0.068681195,0.0015580436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026598847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011841926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3766705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007813927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036704057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381849168","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13297","title":"Trapped within the logic of modernity/coloniality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autoethnography; Reflexivity; Sociology; Decoloniality; Modernity; Indigenous; Operationalization; Colonialism; Power (physics); Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1307262842788392,"score_gpt":0.4533257781381629,"score_spread":0.3225994938593237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381849168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8646788,0.000004365041,0.00010293561,0.029271957,0.0010536461,0.00021667551,0.000002413138,0.0001282254,0.10454097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978386,8.735229e-7,0.000047483725,0.00032870632,0.00027817822,0.000013119897,8.5606e-7,0.0000032485093,0.0014888991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980197,0.0005270499,0.00019543676,0.00018840564,0.0007509332,0.00031850554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990103,0.00025532648,0.00025625448,0.000110655674,0.000317789,0.00004967453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007262092,0.00006078279,0.000099004516,0.00010777248,0.0029006961,0.00015610363,0.0005820146,0.000053852567,0.00012507472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007982186,0.000045238117,0.000046104236,0.0033970105,0.002883136,0.00044369895,0.000010587483,0.00019623328,0.000112618385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069380985,0.000032829845,0.0011541863,0.0000027557496,0.0000037612585,3.1743738e-7,0.47118804,0.000002637085,0.0012209974,0.5176789,0.0006908904,0.008017702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021339724,0.00022795399,0.140568,0.000008325378,0.000014209335,3.406971e-7,0.75294477,0.00020516968,0.00025894606,0.08158621,0.023736376,0.00023632028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017230128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054045615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43609273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007445032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009805167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390512304","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13336","title":"Subjective economic insecurity and attitudes toward immigration and feminists among voters on the Right in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Voting; Immigration; Voting behavior; Radical right; Public opinion; Populism; Political science; Cleavage (geology); Demographic economics; Globalization; Political economy; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.010419718081132021,"score_gpt":0.2765672753814542,"score_spread":0.2661475573003222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390512304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98999786,0.000035815814,0.0000024169678,0.0041255397,0.0004845642,0.00022477547,0.000010590168,0.00002332521,0.005095088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995743,0.0000088010465,0.0000037538102,0.00021359349,0.00012721347,0.00001609705,7.3793626e-7,0.0000043987293,0.000051088882],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986195,0.0001328711,0.00014964807,0.00035768727,0.00038918218,0.0003511319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962157,0.00014808802,0.000046934656,0.00006799292,0.00001918716,0.00009622154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010733444,0.000101108686,0.000109890956,0.00008169273,0.0010077193,0.00045253785,0.00024712298,0.000046175926,0.000020419286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002594488,0.00007691596,0.000020474943,0.0003242295,0.0012177743,0.0005796538,0.000013953366,0.00015448187,0.0000045328643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001462677,0.00002676311,0.21897021,0.000018295355,0.000018687057,0.000026115344,0.5380495,7.4861674e-7,0.00026656257,0.2237327,0.000662074,0.01821369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093150855,0.000071221875,0.9530484,0.000038207287,0.0000053199883,3.0318117e-7,0.033648256,0.0001714855,0.000088655135,0.012006507,0.00065370597,0.00017476578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88402045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7340782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014955773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015877266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7750664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392167305","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13339","title":"Translating interdisciplinary knowledge for gender equity: Quantifying the impact of NSF ADVANCE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Directorate for STEM Education; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Discipline; Equity (law); Knowledge production; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.24883143319727224,"score_gpt":0.5783130729869924,"score_spread":0.32948163978972017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392167305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7402015,0.0013452794,0.14402264,0.0077217873,0.0025587904,0.0016151677,0.00023078808,0.00015377332,0.10215028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987965,4.7548858e-7,0.0002077346,0.000009864021,0.0004163495,0.00005030472,0.0000021782703,0.000011085862,0.00050546834],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664825,0.00017818056,0.00058904965,0.0005833914,0.0013864056,0.0006147477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977875,0.0008377513,0.00013052633,0.0003155728,0.0008167439,0.00011191092],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007505704,0.0001539881,0.0002446553,0.0003532223,0.0016591888,0.0011673447,0.0014976659,0.000059458453,0.00008495335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026350995,0.000086264234,0.00039481418,0.0036855957,0.0010147324,0.0015980431,0.0001984682,0.00020402465,0.0000674583],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013918628,0.00006935057,0.0001847048,0.0000397891,0.000027983442,0.0000032919038,0.1623424,0.000036475016,0.03997221,0.04224682,0.002596239,0.75234157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005763307,0.0038238626,0.012179049,0.00015593298,0.000033276643,0.00001638004,0.20597209,0.17043965,0.0013367463,0.6038788,0.0010513273,0.0005365381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000087784465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015606363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.751805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023533772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012250766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404511373","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13471","title":"Does it matter how we measure conspiracy beliefs? A test of three measurement approaches","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Test (biology); Psychology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Economics; Data mining","score_opus":0.09324490336631769,"score_gpt":0.3056144322501945,"score_spread":0.21236952888387683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404511373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034164127,0.00048021702,0.0031460996,0.2878871,0.0029105353,0.0014874329,0.00010238614,0.00044930802,0.6693728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821275,0.000005877216,0.00013062143,0.00038860558,0.00038751558,0.0000083360255,8.02452e-7,0.000008724247,0.00085675943],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964275,0.00008509442,0.00028625646,0.0003002357,0.0023322285,0.0005686836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990507,0.0000960976,0.00012984237,0.00016898572,0.00034057323,0.00021382807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036014284,0.00015256875,0.00019851365,0.00019753125,0.0010984167,0.00093994447,0.00058297295,0.00010738869,0.0004742903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034585965,0.00010013285,0.00012263715,0.0012446882,0.0018590393,0.0017843337,0.000016889791,0.00016777475,0.00017226045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007677221,0.00012061807,0.0013443365,0.00013981358,0.00002504254,0.000002367707,0.7018037,4.8581586e-7,0.0030693545,0.070554286,0.020689977,0.20224234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088429556,0.0007636382,0.03800361,0.0007707371,0.0001219523,0.0000039698966,0.7695463,0.00053206284,0.0018251812,0.030399926,0.1557845,0.0013638666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027351166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013236257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9640486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027848964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012397247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9063906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405809882","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.13480","title":"Do Political Endorsements Affect Support for Conspiracy Theories?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideology; Affect (linguistics); Identity (music); Social psychology; Political communication; Voting behavior; Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Positive economics; Psychology; Law; Voting; Economics","score_opus":0.029930025550339582,"score_gpt":0.4068308172674176,"score_spread":0.376900791717078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405809882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07009575,0.000024128056,0.0032909694,0.0057905163,0.002610928,0.00084836275,0.00008188356,0.0003658457,0.91689163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963284,0.0000011338819,0.000119018594,0.00085991906,0.00067788566,0.0000142521785,0.000004610437,0.0000073588653,0.0019874035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976753,0.00007708726,0.00022227223,0.000252378,0.0008424772,0.0009305129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991352,0.00021249785,0.00004485213,0.00010129985,0.00015212313,0.0003540103],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002734054,0.00010777769,0.00012817806,0.00015625946,0.0017284575,0.0012393732,0.00040170693,0.000080108344,0.0007882369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039441118,0.00009474375,0.000114257564,0.0008018964,0.0016203348,0.0015516888,0.000010543408,0.00010178687,0.00029852308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044927992,0.000013165258,0.000028561102,0.000011428587,0.0000042811243,0.0000011886398,0.0956504,1.4959127e-8,0.00013442663,0.8588247,0.0025449167,0.04278243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074625126,0.0010695999,0.0019408286,0.000054402284,0.00004682052,0.0000045278325,0.32325152,0.0001633497,0.00047181605,0.32406664,0.34754622,0.0006380193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016397804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040577906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028067455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013936806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407860269","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.70005","title":"Bridging the Cognitive/Collective and Supply/Demand Divides in Conspiracy Theory Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Cognition; Supply and demand; Economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.046259917841363955,"score_gpt":0.4280618299553998,"score_spread":0.38180191211403586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407860269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65352035,0.000089962654,0.00023618675,0.0062297047,0.00013768922,0.0004519331,0.0000041558915,0.00002592897,0.33930412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969583,0.000013315395,0.000005970474,0.0006648354,0.00009114093,0.0000108638205,3.5619547e-7,0.0000021510846,0.0022530514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975384,0.0007864535,0.0001761072,0.00020594905,0.0007187949,0.0005743061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843514,0.0010655074,0.0000489837,0.000071750386,0.00028693996,0.000091696034],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011516368,0.00007138502,0.00010915859,0.00034783562,0.0046454775,0.00070649665,0.0003566182,0.000058654776,0.000074787415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019191641,0.000054630746,0.000025939358,0.0027671272,0.005105957,0.00095442764,0.00003491352,0.00026823342,0.000016941774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020625132,0.000019041508,0.0030366185,0.0000041472877,0.0000035223306,8.3759e-7,0.52725697,7.5937194e-8,0.000083369865,0.30327454,0.0007078854,0.16559239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047443717,0.00008706095,0.24290286,0.000078481644,0.0000057357092,4.1899284e-7,0.63780975,0.000077216355,0.00009710988,0.11716042,0.001186292,0.000120229146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010537743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012762203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.343438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023779058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015304536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99760157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409836519","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.70032","title":"Conspiracy Theories, Quantum Social Science, and the Political Power of Irrelevant Beliefs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Quantum mechanics; Physics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01014041533228631,"score_gpt":0.33097071593907085,"score_spread":0.3208303006067845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409836519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22188963,0.000041581457,0.0001788745,0.023827836,0.0007942703,0.0004399009,0.000015633223,0.00006379197,0.7527485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968492,0.0000033280971,0.000016763968,0.0026094539,0.00013609823,0.0000037224868,3.733621e-7,0.0000031450882,0.0003779124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965675,0.00020485972,0.0003870859,0.00026289438,0.0016847812,0.00089291565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837476,0.0002922494,0.00016929356,0.00015408423,0.0007956602,0.00021395388],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006577726,0.00012433884,0.00024907856,0.0002773399,0.005441147,0.0005747186,0.00089453015,0.00009298214,0.00008558948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001757107,0.00008765133,0.00007601919,0.002919685,0.034425262,0.0011813275,0.000059219117,0.00018845001,0.00001433137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020750485,0.00002091092,0.00007564525,0.000004216017,0.000003426557,1.657095e-7,0.1658918,5.9738126e-9,0.0002037565,0.8258279,0.0004543072,0.007497145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013481948,0.00014945735,0.02201534,0.000023910781,0.000023751982,0.0000010028932,0.5671158,0.000044490534,0.00021058593,0.3979242,0.010902347,0.00024094009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009407369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007113904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77495956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000257421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037868908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99585366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411121035","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.70042","title":"Does Country Setting Make a Difference? A Cross‐National Study on the Relationship Between Political Ideology and Conspiracy Mentality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05839735975618895,"score_gpt":0.4258036337528938,"score_spread":0.3674062739967049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411121035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937243,0.0000013791391,0.000041809864,0.01567198,0.00022584795,0.0003653169,0.000026864156,0.000040336017,0.08990216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970259,8.028509e-8,0.000008559681,0.0022639656,0.00015115357,0.000008945064,0.0000022864247,0.000001883944,0.00053723535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776715,0.00037487494,0.00027802173,0.00022150938,0.0008992368,0.00045917975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979848,0.0015125355,0.00010152953,0.000094845935,0.0001745771,0.00013169776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036365937,0.00009306527,0.0001225136,0.00010940919,0.004096363,0.00061098917,0.00033452557,0.00008002425,0.000036974507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023769836,0.000055851866,0.000028704342,0.0006839168,0.0028016684,0.00036640986,0.000026182792,0.00020755135,0.000013447433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025047648,0.000022705268,0.41648018,0.0000014917889,0.000003008243,1.2527727e-7,0.048694756,1.0929683e-8,0.0000034299287,0.53371155,0.000040774525,0.001039453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019796543,0.000059839953,0.78109175,0.000006691712,0.0000060569564,8.0036315e-8,0.11782085,0.000005456376,0.000002519797,0.100595415,0.0001518657,0.000061505765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058658264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040224424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43311614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029118804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008346966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411300880","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.70050","title":"Understanding and Addressing the Rise of Conspiracy Theories in the 21st Century—An Introduction to the Special Issue","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.06503055119905521,"score_gpt":0.3667113038736439,"score_spread":0.3016807526745887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411300880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27793482,0.00008628431,0.00057151355,0.27014124,0.0027082756,0.0011217317,0.000010108911,0.000038970986,0.44738704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967078,0.000011868892,0.000011044883,0.000933959,0.0022336452,0.0000026047946,3.209469e-7,0.0000014743563,0.00009729614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850136,0.00036494725,0.00018835376,0.00013517003,0.00053772255,0.00027246997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948335,0.00015851202,0.000092808325,0.00014351214,0.000077112694,0.000044720164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004449448,0.00006478586,0.00008511731,0.00010230723,0.0030310838,0.0006222843,0.0005387417,0.000037680435,0.000074815114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041314797,0.0000343535,0.000023714032,0.0015016991,0.0023158963,0.00081820966,0.000016544907,0.00013424939,0.000004249424],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006716074,0.000007781282,0.000050268543,0.0000015379328,9.2321164e-7,5.0423903e-8,0.4087384,8.515139e-7,0.0000320884,0.55265296,0.0015052205,0.037003227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009567809,0.000052252082,0.0042741713,0.000009058442,0.0000054291268,2.61007e-7,0.9041925,0.00001614155,0.000017713113,0.021545358,0.06974176,0.000049656624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050264143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024378914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71877295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014018241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030359038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414074481","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.70075","title":"From Selective Exposure to Mobilization: Partisan Media, Polarization, and Voting Behaviors","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Voting; Perception; Voting behavior; Politics; Path analysis (statistics)","score_opus":0.012011916829859312,"score_gpt":0.32538286972286046,"score_spread":0.31337095289300115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414074481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886024,0.0000389407,0.00064959767,0.0033156488,0.0013125442,0.00031152854,0.000020475827,0.00010155543,0.005647315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980752,0.0000012237676,0.00020087473,0.0005787956,0.00089233555,0.00003117996,0.0000056265135,0.0000061198457,0.00020866204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817705,0.00017881849,0.00021190342,0.00035597265,0.0005689919,0.00050727115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990312,0.00024028242,0.0000638541,0.00008125501,0.00032966383,0.00025374434],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004925391,0.000106307954,0.00015733393,0.00014491407,0.0023964809,0.0002946671,0.00031587988,0.00013517216,0.000041677693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006727457,0.00011954094,0.00003411974,0.002097368,0.0011476029,0.00041706217,0.000020290609,0.00011897479,0.000013362734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043056366,0.000033668042,0.21432067,0.000002291373,0.0000059665363,9.382399e-7,0.6408451,2.9489235e-7,0.0028587664,0.11145507,0.00043087255,0.030042063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003725072,0.0001888252,0.35131684,0.00003950843,0.0000643966,1.3875994e-7,0.6101263,0.000013298998,0.001090333,0.03238549,0.0040001473,0.00040220108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063694376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034292853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13699616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002115672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076247496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99890226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417482963","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.70089","title":"Revisiting Racial Disparities in NBA Career Longevity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Sport Psychology and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Longevity; Basketball; Race (biology); Regression analysis; Inequality; Statistical discrimination","score_opus":0.021948070780895612,"score_gpt":0.36492467453935545,"score_spread":0.34297660375845984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417482963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7765826,0.00015439044,0.000086312284,0.0015652465,0.001860881,0.0001151342,0.00000391622,0.000043410804,0.2195881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969342,0.0000013837771,0.000026173811,0.0008945282,0.00036871815,0.00003121241,0.000002163602,0.0000041113703,0.0017375224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985412,0.000073958356,0.0002547977,0.00040168237,0.0001959952,0.0005323924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995854,0.000046629404,0.00006938466,0.00019712899,0.00005774142,0.00004375123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011893039,0.00010889231,0.00018861012,0.00020991321,0.00052536634,0.000059699763,0.00041988175,0.00013932426,0.0005237043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002507274,0.00011096968,0.000055702876,0.0011238426,0.0008933152,0.00029166325,0.000014025201,0.00029585214,0.00017547466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094142684,0.00007768795,0.5776334,0.000017035716,0.0000105476,0.000024876643,0.033136975,2.7153658e-7,0.00023437986,0.1140209,0.0016240071,0.2731258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003689289,0.00004955325,0.9902149,0.000022662542,0.0000055793284,0.0000017818032,0.0040902034,0.000006927644,0.000012995214,0.0025579096,0.0025424294,0.00012614994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042286154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021262188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4125815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076442986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011890887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5734195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7082965736","doi":"10.1111/ssqu.70076","title":"Broken Hoop Dreams? Racism in NBA Entry, 1980–2021","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science Quarterly","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"League; Racism; Basketball; Point (geometry); Logistic regression; Association (psychology)","score_opus":0.0067600049997884526,"score_gpt":0.25273848060612636,"score_spread":0.2459784756063379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7082965736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16524132,0.00009889281,0.03398614,0.025996106,0.0018357256,0.0003765472,0.0000028208042,0.00021289701,0.7722496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943825,0.0000017136762,0.00080022204,0.00044917082,0.00010323084,0.00001757764,9.877986e-7,0.000001068647,0.0042435224],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980313,0.0000641302,0.00025722297,0.0006179212,0.00040383864,0.00062557176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926335,0.000063769556,0.00007823481,0.00037588936,0.00013197804,0.00008677757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009304076,0.00014033791,0.0001853064,0.00017769262,0.00052204257,0.0003445734,0.0017452763,0.0001009587,0.000036014553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010467898,0.00013827349,0.000070045484,0.002423728,0.00042393318,0.00063459435,0.000131638,0.00021572743,0.000064523374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000889114,0.00016718684,0.0036894518,0.000029024222,0.000008318033,0.00005136877,0.021464018,0.000009605104,0.019461326,0.42787322,0.0025828592,0.52465475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037533448,0.00063125585,0.24558567,0.0003077212,0.00002472356,0.00003541705,0.019816851,0.021214139,0.020984078,0.5842417,0.10118804,0.0022170602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014172957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003986991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8291412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114590795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003853006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.563863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}