{"meta":{"query_hash":"0e289496e8f6","filters":{"venue":"Social Service Review"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0e289496e8f6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+Service+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1782318185","doi":"10.1086/656401","title":"A Contemporary Kleinian Contribution to Understanding Racism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psyche; Racism; Unconscious mind; Relation (database); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.17319348101327534,"score_gpt":0.47487842617262177,"score_spread":0.3016849451593464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1782318185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044826113,0.2265316,0.06379272,0.2696654,0.0027384532,0.00007390095,0.00004240477,0.00009325994,0.3922362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8046884,0.13578615,0.021318823,0.012537358,0.0021983297,0.00014375069,0.000028041613,0.000042065392,0.02325705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963695,0.0021577382,0.00018386431,0.00023890968,0.0008256368,0.00022441304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959776,0.002792715,0.000382745,0.00018231857,0.0005215737,0.00014301875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040468606,0.00031845464,0.0004203251,0.0033610736,0.0035202575,0.004047666,0.0009905645,0.0023095566,0.0019843567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051686163,0.00018398797,0.00032043998,0.0024451006,0.026715748,0.0060972353,0.0029275666,0.0030179664,0.00024436324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047284675,0.000009069627,0.00027394996,0.00018148201,0.0000047314134,0.00008374929,0.012761338,0.00025494504,0.00007009899,0.96009904,0.0033517168,0.02290515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037414643,0.000027711829,0.0006037954,0.00044006552,0.000009189403,0.000398199,0.007882912,0.00040477642,0.00011816605,0.746682,0.24340929,0.000020065587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075346115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008755252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075346115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066830185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075185504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048488915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003178613","doi":"10.1086/668815","title":"The Self-Sufficiency Trap: A Critical Examination of Welfare-to-Work","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Ideology; Work (physics); Ethnography; Thematic analysis; Affect (linguistics); Welfare reform; Social Welfare; Social work; Sociology; Social policy; Labour economics; Political science; Economic growth; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Politics; Qualitative research; Market economy; Social science","score_opus":0.07505659465659313,"score_gpt":0.4437472533222677,"score_spread":0.3686906586656746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003178613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40553364,0.11147578,0.010671355,0.24390478,0.0018538443,0.00031775722,0.00007914688,0.000054825374,0.22610882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745652,0.0156541,0.00078234076,0.0044589234,0.00016737962,0.00008079906,0.000017731567,0.00003375853,0.0042395997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858305,0.009091618,0.00031040248,0.00060277514,0.0021162273,0.002048629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796948,0.015028468,0.0008950591,0.00040173356,0.003236475,0.0007434655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027926082,0.0007230679,0.0010739891,0.0060836603,0.021677347,0.015622039,0.0035469767,0.004000544,0.0014157911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02042748,0.00042519296,0.0004078868,0.0062679597,0.074005075,0.009201428,0.008847932,0.0069112307,0.00013514578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014748448,0.000014323384,0.0007680023,0.00024788803,0.0000064562946,0.00059389306,0.769698,0.000056344743,0.00010878345,0.21606061,0.0024854827,0.009945453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004215919,0.000012692266,0.0013201431,0.00085883087,0.000008129482,0.00020567866,0.877821,0.000054387787,0.00012811938,0.018117351,0.10145792,0.000011528699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30282995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38577196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30282995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05129622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07129805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6021346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020930858","doi":"10.1086/669919","title":"Negotiating within Whiteness in Cross-Cultural Clinical Encounters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Conversation; Sociocultural evolution; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Mental health; Power (physics); Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12726350071367723,"score_gpt":0.4266344073904065,"score_spread":0.2993709066767293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020930858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86763525,0.012611441,0.0059258267,0.017810453,0.00033312864,0.00013031454,0.000020948328,0.000069283364,0.09546322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99072343,0.0025145493,0.0009615684,0.00089924945,0.000040359217,0.00004707508,0.000009741397,0.000027439542,0.0047766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97422236,0.020120334,0.00052602554,0.0010940252,0.0025533945,0.0014838534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852056,0.01002605,0.001980082,0.00047334481,0.001152413,0.0011624498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01704086,0.0006843425,0.0008060448,0.0027568894,0.017101252,0.013815321,0.0019873714,0.002077393,0.0026117666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020371089,0.00048337883,0.0002944455,0.0021192338,0.0343748,0.005571185,0.01258288,0.0023436786,0.00029195985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010866505,0.000013808514,0.000960243,0.00009320406,0.000009971181,0.0006827407,0.97968847,0.000027511263,0.00035072863,0.007849055,0.0004189102,0.00989444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031589498,0.00001435559,0.0012740643,0.00023979529,0.000008685998,0.00046999095,0.97346014,0.000045442288,0.00026887577,0.0029953953,0.021206304,0.000013815818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044245295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095978685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044245295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011663477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020950705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090121806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026245338","doi":"10.1086/342997","title":"Before and After TANF: The Economic Well‐Being of Women Leaving Welfare","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Earnings; Welfare; Quarter (Canadian coin); Survey of Income and Program Participation; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Welfare reform","score_opus":0.014346344072754032,"score_gpt":0.26165836991678054,"score_spread":0.2473120258440265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026245338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972633,0.0004085709,0.00002235564,0.00014213438,0.000006335989,0.000005658783,0.0013131599,0.0000012287784,0.00083730905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965616,0.0007106695,0.000051388386,0.00006346205,0.000013724251,0.000021273818,0.0015405442,0.000001436353,0.0010359037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996013,0.000107520296,0.000027609098,0.00005109808,0.00005671089,0.00015575928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895096,0.00011434757,0.000571139,0.00004190372,0.00012047164,0.00020114283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009490733,0.00016738534,0.00021186151,0.0010623023,0.000612521,0.0008781194,0.000283072,0.00034857815,0.0014965115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025376545,0.000109939865,0.00031078883,0.0013769318,0.00021764215,0.0004517955,0.0004718942,0.00031749243,0.00027679844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066486136,0.000037754624,0.99342984,0.000013811694,0.00004394344,0.000051541007,0.00064231845,0.000037532373,0.00005876627,0.00004980228,0.0004749276,0.0050932327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016995011,0.000049365382,0.9968917,0.000015994163,0.000019732286,0.0000257903,0.001541738,0.00002598685,0.000032932356,0.000019742489,0.0013723543,0.0000030921615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08602671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18007568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08602671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009354348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089923904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17105198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048344656","doi":"10.1086/651572","title":"<i>Impossible Democracy: The Unlikely Success of the War on Poverty Community Action Programs</i>. By Noel A.  Cazenave. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2007. Pp. 282. $80.00 (cloth); $24.95 (paper).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; State (computer science); Poverty; Windsor; Democracy; Download; Political science; Media studies; Public administration; Library science; Sociology; Politics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08126097232583591,"score_gpt":0.2641667089013461,"score_spread":0.18290573657551018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048344656","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012174351,0.3648943,0.0003318397,0.599871,0.0048880954,0.00000810072,0.00018897488,0.00002006384,0.028580178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1149344,0.7139625,0.0008544595,0.10032965,0.015317568,0.00006182661,0.0004096101,0.00009856138,0.054031517],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981323,0.00088361616,0.00005083182,0.00012005569,0.0005107262,0.00030259727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964567,0.0019277476,0.0004362021,0.00010458023,0.00055117765,0.0005236202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028242345,0.00046263819,0.00041082155,0.0009889699,0.001405911,0.004207457,0.0006655669,0.0033676543,0.008621431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009342447,0.000336526,0.00028806296,0.0013063742,0.0040106303,0.0055597047,0.0022134443,0.0047420207,0.0017407293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018517354,0.000010099079,0.00035101883,0.00027942922,0.000016564565,0.00004584545,0.00024613587,0.00013571787,0.000045540586,0.057034165,0.904962,0.03685494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001327143,0.000022836435,0.0056621744,0.0019245839,0.00001743605,0.00012137267,0.0012449177,0.00022533293,0.000148516,0.08470611,0.90589535,0.00001806559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01833491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048682764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01833491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036092352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005854627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036456406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074465963","doi":"10.1086/671072","title":"The Responsibilities of the Poor: Performing Neoliberal Citizenship within the Bureaucratic Field","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Bureaucracy; Citizenship; Service provider; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Sociology; Service (business); Social work; Identity (music); Service delivery framework; Political science; Public administration; Business; Political economy; Politics; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.057914857753428674,"score_gpt":0.39886860204413105,"score_spread":0.34095374429070235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074465963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8607689,0.003373625,0.0014525647,0.06624745,0.00021311648,0.000045808738,0.000009202484,0.0000127429685,0.06787652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538344,0.00057029235,0.00017981844,0.0019957442,0.000027611655,0.000008183938,0.0000014478942,0.0000043176124,0.0018290571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755387,0.019529203,0.00037087503,0.00040671247,0.001341622,0.0028128938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820416,0.00804918,0.003011934,0.0011098624,0.00207039,0.0037170472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019687463,0.00015730422,0.00037886915,0.0014249281,0.015396004,0.008840086,0.00088310434,0.001426906,0.0013661991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017639332,0.00025607258,0.0001549571,0.0012750226,0.040163033,0.0038161755,0.008996033,0.0026441303,0.00016187053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043859396,0.00008322551,0.041913923,0.00016360646,0.000016705913,0.0015870119,0.7881746,0.00012417948,0.00055533776,0.12741551,0.0068774684,0.033044532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138926725,0.00005888604,0.023490036,0.0004243488,0.0000117221,0.000602511,0.8531993,0.00012633117,0.00021888252,0.026227055,0.09559808,0.000028922248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05527683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11938773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05527683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008479051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024844212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10991019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074960970","doi":"10.1086/373911","title":"A Reply to Geoffrey Greif","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Human Behavior and Motivation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Library science; Sociology; Operations research; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.07753810723563427,"score_gpt":0.3964065410138151,"score_spread":0.31886843377818086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074960970","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005315806,0.0026618335,0.000036576836,0.9619094,0.03504116,0.000002256897,0.000018973476,0.000008188767,0.00026844264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011237372,0.0019853846,0.00007035185,0.953258,0.040651478,0.000012508577,0.000016774506,0.000019321169,0.0028625184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943574,0.0016399487,0.0006355919,0.0009031903,0.0018451175,0.0006187494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523882,0.027202941,0.0028373043,0.001665125,0.011790491,0.004115939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008936311,0.0014123115,0.002622457,0.002105612,0.004712061,0.0052494234,0.0034985926,0.050276898,0.0094252555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07425762,0.00096675515,0.0014254432,0.0019076186,0.0053174235,0.006257561,0.0043823887,0.05171237,0.009095698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015899652,0.0000040735904,0.00008225862,0.00004432233,0.000009701474,0.000068582,0.00009098836,0.000007970623,0.000024456209,0.00068662467,0.9968058,0.002159341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036560337,0.000024557881,0.0012141335,0.00047023105,0.000045080164,0.0004280082,0.00097259384,0.00007356191,0.00013921587,0.0039436785,0.99259514,0.000057245183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010182568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013726051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050276898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046645403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005617575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047260344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278233844","doi":"10.1086/591886","title":"Debate with Authors","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Sexual abuse; Neglect; Child sexual abuse; Medicine; Child abuse; Population; Psychiatry; Psychology; Demography; Poison control; Sociology; Suicide prevention; Environmental health","score_opus":0.045842791678885275,"score_gpt":0.34941327433966607,"score_spread":0.3035704826607808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278233844","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022606284,0.0077620423,0.00011262603,0.8657464,0.11867552,0.000015093561,0.00004873888,0.000018649262,0.0073948945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060800808,0.003392767,0.0001829663,0.86207545,0.11162685,0.00007117838,0.000040813928,0.00007276702,0.016457116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96521485,0.007841553,0.0037272898,0.0053225784,0.013463499,0.0044302572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86598253,0.07205194,0.008111531,0.0063264095,0.036858644,0.0106689315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039722122,0.0012592665,0.003563056,0.004419832,0.009406562,0.021097388,0.007131047,0.08843944,0.027332809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22153057,0.0012817523,0.002304463,0.0051025795,0.014790945,0.015935147,0.008975333,0.050093517,0.015381963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000812186,0.000016912894,0.00020325778,0.00025494504,0.00004274902,0.0001640071,0.0005485684,0.000025639103,0.000055860448,0.024829278,0.963843,0.00993457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000735505,0.000014252434,0.00027271642,0.00078388245,0.00004585962,0.00012335506,0.0008349548,0.00004341525,0.00009910346,0.01424285,0.9834379,0.000028184506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042254957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005027326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08843944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010379572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01779811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21007323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318173080","doi":"10.1086/674352","title":"<i>Killing with Kindness: Haiti, International Aid, and NGOs</i>. Mark Schuller. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2012. Pp. 256. $72.00 (cloth); $26.95 (paper).","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kindness; George (robot); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Humanities; Art; Art history; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.020203314692457744,"score_gpt":0.27040969731770936,"score_spread":0.25020638262525163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318173080","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000050229497,0.98768497,0.00001508347,0.009035112,0.0018103576,0.0000019676372,0.000010541393,0.000003924168,0.0013878256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021824033,0.98413634,0.000074576674,0.004439489,0.003511451,0.000009999863,0.0000376303,0.000006703162,0.0056014266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999423,0.0002716915,0.00004905237,0.00004106531,0.00013165083,0.000083525374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987923,0.0006188289,0.0001934153,0.000029227114,0.00020853692,0.00015780964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013922248,0.0015163551,0.0009806354,0.0025307564,0.0009774514,0.0025597373,0.0011176431,0.0025118852,0.010535918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002410693,0.0007214036,0.00058779476,0.0034252293,0.0020109718,0.0051065707,0.0019558317,0.0028130142,0.0028061755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047717636,0.000019758776,0.00027776798,0.0029254148,0.0000463429,0.00007411453,0.00045629207,0.00006566809,0.00006537397,0.0046752812,0.869223,0.12212308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001885546,0.000036639653,0.0018645665,0.0059433086,0.00005928222,0.0004480765,0.0016768356,0.00005176687,0.000096612486,0.006924039,0.9828604,0.000019654502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017323928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057751603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017323928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002165316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029484704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035246193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322979491","doi":"10.1086/509833","title":"<i>Integrated Developmental and Life‐Course Theories of Offending</i>. Edited by David P.  Farrington. Advances in Criminological Theory no. 14. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2005. Pp. 279. $49.95 (cloth).","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Reprint; State (computer science); Life course approach; Sociology; Database transaction; Library science; Gerontology; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.02126690369431299,"score_gpt":0.2623044682688376,"score_spread":0.24103756457452458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322979491","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024291467,0.975574,0.0011848154,0.010285882,0.0033079414,0.00001425202,0.00025309913,0.000036886708,0.009100136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0078937905,0.97409093,0.0009690961,0.0012537178,0.0032909068,0.000033495777,0.00043045433,0.00001988816,0.012017741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995498,0.00016135213,0.000035307723,0.000047535257,0.00014883447,0.000057208137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897003,0.0004754909,0.00009781524,0.0000377608,0.00032497948,0.000093975636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011188687,0.00182421,0.001204661,0.0032526786,0.00074972434,0.0021133663,0.001865331,0.0013931912,0.012380315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022628661,0.0008279087,0.0009595389,0.0030198223,0.001555593,0.0031256268,0.0011262355,0.0026788053,0.004478169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035971563,0.000054194883,0.0014246058,0.0026201648,0.00007592244,0.00015319636,0.00054802845,0.00043055715,0.00016394274,0.022787977,0.7486345,0.22307087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015204414,0.00006281323,0.010929517,0.0044803172,0.000106357664,0.0009083162,0.00070551294,0.0004365176,0.00022333072,0.07990629,0.90219325,0.00003258695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020399872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03329771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020399872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002560116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035487688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041416228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514593756","doi":"10.1086/587081","title":"<i>Reading and Writing Disability Differently: The Textured Life of Embodiment</i>. By Tanya  Titchkosky. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. Pp. 192. $55.00 (cloth); $24.95 (paper).","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Reading (process); Media studies; Download; Sociology; Art history; Library science; History; Computer science; Political science; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.028043215373068985,"score_gpt":0.29718499156969047,"score_spread":0.2691417761966215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514593756","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010422013,0.98700666,0.000021981921,0.010036755,0.00074273127,0.0000010851853,0.000008111962,0.0000027415588,0.002075735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0064181765,0.982822,0.00006905677,0.0026765952,0.0017320345,0.000009238724,0.000025631543,0.0000045702645,0.0062427465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990609,0.00044267083,0.00006398935,0.000055375058,0.00025675885,0.00012025956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987967,0.00062063895,0.00017373977,0.00004837664,0.00021377348,0.0001468182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016835275,0.0007217788,0.0007988582,0.0015914624,0.00081978954,0.002736303,0.00090576103,0.0020621056,0.0068451487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031645317,0.00039588733,0.00039708248,0.0023383743,0.0045073316,0.0042759525,0.0017962031,0.0024250227,0.0018994713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000647419,0.000028092776,0.00040773643,0.0041509983,0.000050589286,0.0001278247,0.0025506783,0.000073656054,0.00022077744,0.025140002,0.67835486,0.2888301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012681409,0.000039579492,0.0029617606,0.0044591,0.00002928077,0.00047767602,0.0024201523,0.000020904958,0.00008987052,0.009055975,0.9804208,0.000012190708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025623063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053586546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025623063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023605982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042759464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050947845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557742881","doi":"10.1086/689203","title":"Long-Term Employment and Earnings Patterns of Welfare Recipients: The Role of the Local Labor Market","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Welfare; Labour economics; Economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cash; Diversity (politics); Work (physics); Demographic economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.013423786075730512,"score_gpt":0.27792028941672314,"score_spread":0.2644965033409926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557742881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99447733,0.0041453587,0.000029982746,0.0002625308,0.000004972992,0.0000029438838,0.00007963476,7.6382827e-7,0.0009964699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977564,0.0019452696,0.000014707952,0.00001856807,0.000006631607,0.0000024438793,0.00005983201,6.3234563e-7,0.00019546317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996928,0.00014698552,0.00001663801,0.000032296964,0.000044085773,0.00006712687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993703,0.00015766066,0.0002376472,0.00002518556,0.000090251124,0.00011889472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010337761,0.00008130583,0.00024444482,0.0008587713,0.00040190856,0.0005583937,0.00036522668,0.0002498242,0.0016244851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017335215,0.00006911537,0.00016459175,0.0011282541,0.00040350732,0.00050464633,0.00050066505,0.000185015,0.00021762596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009634718,0.00008529849,0.9686479,0.00010708556,0.00005665201,0.00028066544,0.0038868818,0.00007961703,0.00023265765,0.00034361857,0.00037207,0.025811238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016152793,0.000034312394,0.9929731,0.00005878105,0.0000118892995,0.00010006244,0.0059762723,0.000052776893,0.00002434146,0.000079505735,0.0006846327,0.000002684268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013639798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025385605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013639798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004923897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000423179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027120829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592346282","doi":"10.1086/691148","title":"Poverty among Foster Children: Estimates Using the Supplemental Poverty Measure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Poverty; Demographics; Grandparent; Foster care; Child poverty; Population; Current Population Survey; Scale (ratio); Payment; Demographic economics; Demography; Economics; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Medicine; Environmental health; Economic growth; Geography; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Nursing","score_opus":0.051162096056210936,"score_gpt":0.3535322530544746,"score_spread":0.3023701569982637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592346282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4780658,0.20656762,0.05050494,0.0061763134,0.0007947837,0.0010104588,0.17743587,0.00045439004,0.07898981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7412068,0.13929603,0.034647375,0.0004931569,0.00045368145,0.0019192408,0.07791464,0.00008515312,0.003983875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816304,0.000585812,0.00017176945,0.0001431131,0.0008474235,0.00008880409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967918,0.00089480495,0.000912326,0.00012782992,0.0011745646,0.00009866773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003557646,0.00037196954,0.0004210245,0.0069506015,0.00019203515,0.0007343293,0.0005820195,0.00026415774,0.0013557754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00979744,0.00018074473,0.0007070165,0.0065186964,0.00020486698,0.00084061734,0.0011666236,0.00064742635,0.00028756083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017562811,0.00010472932,0.5095793,0.0048382613,0.0040696785,0.0002557573,0.0027988087,0.0042246245,0.00039482646,0.017241502,0.08482683,0.37149003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047890524,0.00015532906,0.7889131,0.004708829,0.0013491503,0.00085133803,0.0022061346,0.0036321,0.00069193623,0.006092777,0.19126526,0.0000862499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030245796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027603485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030245796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009793694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010051826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060139477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978409728","doi":"10.1086/378992","title":"<i>Into Our Own Hands: The Women’s Health Movement in the United States, 1969–1990</i>. By Sandra  Morgen. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 2002. Pp. 320. $60.00 (cloth); $24.00 (paper).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Library science; Movement (music); Media studies; Sociology; Download; Political science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.027108952652927617,"score_gpt":0.29417113693772007,"score_spread":0.26706218428479245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978409728","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005098051,0.8043091,0.00004815999,0.17042132,0.00693916,0.000018999359,0.0011202708,0.000017443504,0.012027495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10261443,0.808005,0.00019994649,0.029289043,0.00843446,0.00007301888,0.0015584715,0.000033769815,0.04979194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935275,0.00024528534,0.000046733767,0.000043624437,0.00017734105,0.000134281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998965,0.00033524807,0.00025249537,0.000021499,0.00019162544,0.00023420989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015227485,0.00045187757,0.00030295868,0.0023137257,0.001293387,0.0020771874,0.0008375527,0.0017935784,0.0064495257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022910219,0.00042242874,0.0002424387,0.005813703,0.0014097481,0.0021709318,0.0013995977,0.0014129262,0.0012388923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056793826,0.000020960539,0.0043204986,0.0010692516,0.00002433402,0.00012211905,0.0037368785,0.00006364266,0.000078550205,0.003368892,0.9264565,0.06068145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001533727,0.000039694914,0.056481298,0.0021595412,0.000034990335,0.00013551749,0.008076175,0.000031776923,0.000121917314,0.0009736809,0.93191355,0.000016457927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19379668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.464836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19379668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050127236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008869523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38533735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300594616","doi":"10.1086/721273","title":"Fact Construction and Categorization in Assessment: Cultivating Epistemic Justice and Resistance in Social Work Assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Service Review","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Framing (construction); Categorization; Obligation; Dignity; Epistemology; Sociology; Conversation; Conversation analysis; Accountability; Resistance (ecology); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1478025762095761,"score_gpt":0.4906335715665985,"score_spread":0.3428309953570224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300594616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4779156,0.007916909,0.29197562,0.077513866,0.00083004765,0.001180304,0.000047763802,0.00023919021,0.14238071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971032,0.00082520547,0.025523175,0.0008461921,0.000053144304,0.0002721306,0.000012526356,0.000034794535,0.0014008811],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.812741,0.16149811,0.004195446,0.0047478606,0.013482093,0.0033354182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80163574,0.16135207,0.012032743,0.013635137,0.007880537,0.003463756],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12212381,0.0008077841,0.0010208256,0.006284313,0.012699429,0.017609768,0.0038390374,0.0052497843,0.0018800193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1394252,0.00083570677,0.0010572523,0.0024105485,0.091313116,0.02167926,0.024996132,0.006892284,0.00033715088],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079314246,0.00014747644,0.0057496545,0.000522425,0.00004472993,0.00057618564,0.6574932,0.00055799197,0.0013466523,0.24806546,0.0011894845,0.08422742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007884154,0.0002484734,0.007256369,0.002421101,0.00008732716,0.0011133776,0.33569157,0.004322353,0.0045093,0.55154246,0.092558555,0.00017024836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005394094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072165965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010630347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015425943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64586014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}