{"meta":{"query_hash":"25b4e1675e0e","filters":{"venue":"Social and Economic Bulletin"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/25b4e1675e0e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Social+and+Economic+Bulletin"},"results":[{"id":"W7165399222","doi":"10.70550/sebi.v2i2.218","title":"Strategic Transformation of the Muhammadiyah Islamic Organisation through BPRS Matahari in Strengthening Sharia Financial Inclusion","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Social and Economic Bulletin","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Islam; Microfinance; Grassroots; Financial inclusion; Financial services; Legitimacy; Islamic economics; Sharia; SWOT analysis","score_opus":0.012791840636557509,"score_gpt":0.21553114312162758,"score_spread":0.20273930248507008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165399222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9043863,0.0002594016,0.0027354632,0.002802208,0.00008477872,0.00015461669,0.000010513923,0.000033569395,0.08953327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943205,0.0000830449,0.0014643918,0.00013281414,0.000012086667,0.000022576172,0.000005310276,0.000004490367,0.0039548026],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983563,0.0010353227,0.000029081373,0.00008252655,0.00016030551,0.00033645774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885166,0.00027294309,0.00023682609,0.000091510665,0.00009714606,0.0004499114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020656146,0.00021351101,0.000104257175,0.00053725636,0.0047224667,0.0033162867,0.00054537953,0.00072750635,0.0040610842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018049611,0.00015381064,0.00016870486,0.00042864832,0.003600271,0.0020226287,0.004832177,0.0010199444,0.0005188351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024202923,0.0011147305,0.04229035,0.0005286495,0.000030329498,0.009110924,0.4264186,0.0009121392,0.023688592,0.2055651,0.0066415314,0.28345707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000494701,0.0009788166,0.06949371,0.00083510345,0.00006132172,0.0030293728,0.57127404,0.0035426817,0.0077485284,0.024153398,0.31875703,0.000076496966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012008192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040680952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047224667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014284867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003969305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013585627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165401262","doi":"10.70550/sebi.v1i3.73","title":"Fighting Predatory Journals: A Strategic Solution for the Quality and Sustainability of Scientific Publications in Indonesia","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Social and Economic Bulletin","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Reputation; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Qualitative research; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.5523710859871966,"score_gpt":0.546888739866304,"score_spread":0.0054823461208926005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165401262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7292738,0.010329727,0.01453135,0.091059245,0.00083832594,0.00037538164,0.0001245641,0.00028249703,0.15318516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838187,0.002005941,0.004584038,0.0023021137,0.00011505953,0.000058461563,0.00002811857,0.000026719596,0.0070609096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462175,0.002345319,0.0005413244,0.00046876728,0.0014968629,0.0005259599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792656,0.0067712166,0.006476229,0.00082356983,0.002563989,0.0040994235],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056239683,0.00022967154,0.000279146,0.0014706776,0.0050116847,0.01330497,0.0013089273,0.0020360684,0.0030536838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117539745,0.00028595192,0.00028299564,0.0019481287,0.003705385,0.0054474426,0.0052342713,0.0016721166,0.00081672595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030362047,0.00082627655,0.20480564,0.004414575,0.00021012832,0.014642255,0.1479294,0.0014929466,0.01352858,0.10701945,0.031864062,0.4729631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012414649,0.0006425843,0.14886612,0.0032211945,0.00029602295,0.0087290425,0.22664371,0.005285772,0.009391497,0.10356482,0.49290887,0.0003261884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017349933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029966873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030717726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013617473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029742718},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"}]}