{"meta":{"query_hash":"ef888493b4e1","filters":{"venue":"Sociological Theory"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ef888493b4e1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Sociological+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1966611625","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00193.x","title":"Financial Altruism or Unilateral Resource Exchanges? Toward a Pure Sociology of Welfare","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Biosocial theory; Altruism (biology); Welfare; Sociology; Positive economics; Social Welfare; Economics; Personality; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.05904230821211658,"score_gpt":0.3494623458688073,"score_spread":0.2904200376566907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966611625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37953863,0.01740789,0.11146814,0.2063772,0.00055665156,0.000059837483,0.00012539659,0.000084746,0.28438163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98754114,0.0018004174,0.004500999,0.0023128162,0.0002885554,0.00003375329,0.000013317379,0.000010120571,0.003498842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986278,0.0008687172,0.000025054296,0.00017964859,0.0001482065,0.00015067744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976489,0.0012159153,0.00046302614,0.00025316584,0.00016813638,0.0002509019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035360712,0.00028750737,0.0003730388,0.0011135929,0.0011578243,0.003247635,0.0006352067,0.0020775474,0.0023478142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004358145,0.00015071133,0.00029445897,0.00073587993,0.020328509,0.008708774,0.0030108127,0.0018129116,0.00021165841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008407089,0.000010649043,0.0008921639,0.000015197886,0.0000024529757,0.000012291694,0.00066708087,0.0001371238,0.000051200106,0.9932314,0.00048756177,0.0044843904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007401638,0.000011276317,0.0014614769,0.000036723133,0.0000032478363,0.00004216331,0.0010944667,0.0006992203,0.0000329771,0.99046445,0.0061416365,0.0000048152997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007030707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006982051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035360712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016823122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009828283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018700778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967363981","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.00337.x","title":"Relational Understanding and White Antiracist Praxis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Racism; Sociology; Consciousness; White (mutation); White privilege; Psychometrics of racism; Gender studies; Anti-racism; Epistemology; Racial formation theory; Critical consciousness; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13338987635134775,"score_gpt":0.39547815880852666,"score_spread":0.2620882824571789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967363981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44386038,0.0021187651,0.04434831,0.024885485,0.00024210408,0.00007117372,0.000018545768,0.00009861648,0.48435655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99072343,0.00034050285,0.0016444919,0.00067883247,0.00003471741,0.00001914599,0.000006224643,0.000014610869,0.0065379133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955225,0.0022789591,0.00008358838,0.0006790403,0.0010156631,0.00042034485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647504,0.0014427631,0.0009757899,0.0003111937,0.00048285717,0.00031243166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005202076,0.00039071892,0.00025474906,0.0015221954,0.007653102,0.005980979,0.000886409,0.0011290304,0.004872286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067446893,0.00023323079,0.00025708313,0.0006785884,0.02827456,0.008205121,0.007456245,0.0035666483,0.00027252824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011514596,0.000058479793,0.0016540454,0.000054973163,0.000009284634,0.00018488814,0.3595755,0.00011684404,0.0008461265,0.62471837,0.0008985859,0.0118713025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021853264,0.0000797001,0.0065702,0.00032434156,0.00003496047,0.0006177046,0.32063714,0.0012882347,0.0016382941,0.51125246,0.15749207,0.000043053325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068846084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007058085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007653102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034274193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029639504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027511477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974686998","doi":"10.1177/0735275114551611","title":"Clines Without Classes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Race (biology); Sociology; Variation (astronomy); Positive economics; Social science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.016873429445919536,"score_gpt":0.28827856620662473,"score_spread":0.2714051367607052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974686998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028071722,0.00088225387,0.010626649,0.03544621,0.0014039248,0.00015773141,0.0005037859,0.00037136622,0.9225363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6086772,0.00092031475,0.0038536093,0.018454693,0.0006540158,0.00035886976,0.0005184641,0.00042546418,0.36613733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610174,0.0010139898,0.00011879147,0.0011961686,0.00062064576,0.000948724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962836,0.0009153425,0.00042699315,0.0010515958,0.00060007675,0.0007224594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027994264,0.0005430627,0.00077811937,0.0020181485,0.006637317,0.006845065,0.0011166725,0.0029063814,0.09826347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144004,0.0004206606,0.0006385387,0.0014689896,0.013721842,0.007257279,0.0062881797,0.0041779866,0.017957563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031423293,0.000026986383,0.002892723,0.000028150549,0.000012782319,0.00012762044,0.003214045,0.00013757852,0.00009838316,0.9350395,0.033374093,0.02501661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049941485,0.000039229923,0.004217021,0.00015080492,0.000015429157,0.00029319548,0.0043414296,0.0003548138,0.00019501484,0.38386148,0.6064479,0.000033774446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008323647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009623581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09826347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027485238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022467982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3287241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978027074","doi":"10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00241.x","title":"Insecurity, Citizenship, and Globalization: The Multiple Faces of State Protection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; State (computer science); Globalization; Sociology; Political economy; Power (physics); Political science; State formation; Law and economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.046163015663547566,"score_gpt":0.30127942537691765,"score_spread":0.2551164097133701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978027074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3172981,0.049643587,0.0149150435,0.215216,0.0007425738,0.00002123426,0.000046148783,0.000028593313,0.40208876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870635,0.006174622,0.00043387973,0.0020070001,0.0003283759,0.000011622013,0.0000071422187,0.0000058209207,0.0023251886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814165,0.0011155688,0.000032672553,0.00014324028,0.0002373324,0.00032943493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983021,0.0009525291,0.00027135728,0.0001272475,0.00011590493,0.00023080099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002185334,0.00024449165,0.00027042604,0.0017632078,0.0052655004,0.009165985,0.00057227706,0.002204684,0.0023236775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001970525,0.00016130661,0.0002543069,0.0018548692,0.047708794,0.008769471,0.0065017254,0.0029450366,0.00009155701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004432614,0.000011043655,0.0020064604,0.000020171987,0.000003389585,0.00011292514,0.016136983,0.00016437155,0.000033187236,0.9732214,0.0010733481,0.007212364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052996015,0.000036880738,0.008423489,0.00044394247,0.000012328161,0.00047828857,0.06392031,0.00055134,0.00016405302,0.7985036,0.12742984,0.000030642284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00264962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004851325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009165985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030267756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013883685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021960855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006480301","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00308.x","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Social: On Living as an Answerable Agent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sociology; Drama; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06966309308549744,"score_gpt":0.32055127419387885,"score_spread":0.2508881811083814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006480301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090770595,0.010398021,0.17924382,0.1795091,0.001192624,0.00011032745,0.000120413475,0.00014599659,0.53850913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95535237,0.0033074769,0.017178105,0.0058094766,0.0006308784,0.00016021874,0.00007115884,0.00008678024,0.01740336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939137,0.0043650214,0.0001468497,0.00047805655,0.00069542055,0.00040106833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936605,0.004299965,0.0005204291,0.0005562743,0.00052287243,0.0004399439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006662711,0.0004471526,0.0004996698,0.0013353768,0.005971102,0.0066340202,0.0013635677,0.00422018,0.0047015618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008565029,0.00025022443,0.0005664358,0.0010014571,0.04820169,0.01575895,0.007123408,0.004037533,0.00063249096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049767814,0.0000072964085,0.00009311877,0.000011666369,0.0000019050472,0.000036865997,0.003447617,0.0001959015,0.00004064777,0.9938645,0.00053525344,0.001760281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004255795,0.0000090084095,0.00007733457,0.00003185789,0.0000024902674,0.000026574175,0.0018755723,0.00049168535,0.000056832374,0.9778972,0.019519607,0.000007566564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034157108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00239868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006662711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003262127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021808457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03523618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016544321","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00296.x","title":"Queer Theory and Sociology: Locating the Subject and the Self in Sexuality Studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":178,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Subject (documents); Queer theory; Sociology; Subjectivity; Epistemology; Criticism; Human sexuality; Gender studies; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0720044770294819,"score_gpt":0.4392284551650691,"score_spread":0.36722397813558716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016544321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11969356,0.13435863,0.071035825,0.25441372,0.0031164167,0.00016639364,0.00010096689,0.00010212628,0.41701236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250932,0.040901624,0.008323252,0.012764403,0.0017013628,0.00019822876,0.000041174062,0.0000882671,0.01088857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230194,0.0064375643,0.0001292725,0.00028473674,0.0005057222,0.00034073912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899961,0.008268012,0.00066735916,0.00028405883,0.00036110912,0.00042334167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009602448,0.0004406951,0.00061520713,0.004797441,0.008665329,0.011188155,0.0012799242,0.0037605353,0.0030941437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008344052,0.00023886011,0.0003737014,0.0042026467,0.065349594,0.015711611,0.006740841,0.0047358857,0.0003360672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042949036,0.0000075664707,0.00051737705,0.00004742408,0.0000013035535,0.000079370184,0.05672754,0.00005227825,0.000054246633,0.9379078,0.00085515797,0.0037455747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009512958,0.000039046,0.0012589901,0.00087207486,0.000006826841,0.00028721784,0.09991955,0.0004113594,0.00024294567,0.7363202,0.16060957,0.000022798822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015701644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020698562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015701644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071264403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057783094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051706135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029099632","doi":"10.1177/0735275113489806","title":"Thinking about Food and Sex","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Deliberation; Instrumentalism; Action (physics); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Automaticity; Rational analysis; Process (computing); Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Politics; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02911562959864675,"score_gpt":0.2910318177301829,"score_spread":0.2619161881315361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029099632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28424558,0.007513773,0.011814479,0.05915714,0.0007236124,0.00003414836,0.00018020863,0.000044698492,0.6362864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97505844,0.0022062697,0.0019871849,0.0019424286,0.00012384805,0.00001310158,0.00005571526,0.000012363593,0.018600743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993666,0.0003466123,0.000015968664,0.000104835126,0.0001043621,0.00006166654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842227,0.00089691044,0.00022700426,0.00013045868,0.00017502077,0.00014827805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016403486,0.00021510359,0.00014468416,0.00075789506,0.0016717003,0.003966245,0.0003723151,0.00091299467,0.0071653253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041223043,0.00013146608,0.00024117876,0.00049120095,0.009863612,0.004711193,0.0010461261,0.0013811456,0.00048129744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008023017,0.000063817126,0.02362098,0.00010697902,0.000033712302,0.00048152663,0.10736943,0.00025370508,0.0008406042,0.80585384,0.0061763795,0.055118904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021845566,0.000092710005,0.023684597,0.00025676415,0.000026718795,0.0006352144,0.091591336,0.00037306873,0.0005253377,0.7086854,0.17406577,0.00004122241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036377597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054874527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071653253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012605806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009714915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023970366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030202603","doi":"10.1111/j.0735-2751.2006.00263.x","title":"The Return of the Native: A Cultural and Social-Psychological Critique of Durkheim's <i>Suicide</i> Based on the Guarani-Kaiowá of Southwestern Brazil","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Action (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Criminology; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041857344758963556,"score_gpt":0.36630585562402473,"score_spread":0.32444851086506116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030202603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86757654,0.009120777,0.00339284,0.07822826,0.00026002445,0.000029734787,0.000018951496,0.000019639856,0.041353278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976858,0.00079203094,0.00020321288,0.0008253722,0.000024356876,0.000006837086,0.0000021397193,0.000003667976,0.00045647981],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979607,0.0015335166,0.00004838199,0.0001211826,0.00016123286,0.00017501196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965385,0.0021878832,0.0005895086,0.00020106873,0.0002841189,0.00019890312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035315042,0.00040562463,0.0005215431,0.0015285362,0.006184538,0.0039397143,0.0014710543,0.0012673065,0.00053360994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005994531,0.0001971837,0.00025669395,0.0012134283,0.027454823,0.0029931376,0.0035837695,0.002873923,0.000050993836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021345037,0.0000199266,0.0080521265,0.00013347394,0.000013419295,0.0012674123,0.71227807,0.000093432005,0.00036699258,0.26351485,0.0013109088,0.012927982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013075484,0.000034554178,0.016739832,0.00056716584,0.00002971844,0.0014622832,0.8482452,0.0005981003,0.0003947504,0.07678167,0.055103306,0.0000304236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053128917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07976547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053128917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067219962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037582316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10563934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038253961","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00317.x","title":"The Social Organization of Desire: The Sexual Fields Approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":284,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Human sexuality; Situational ethics; Sociality; Negotiation; Set (abstract data type); General partnership; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06900884720415244,"score_gpt":0.3069684457279507,"score_spread":0.23795959852379822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038253961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15209739,0.011698894,0.068344004,0.036630318,0.0003265657,0.00008246824,0.00011046357,0.00006077366,0.7306492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864802,0.0020455942,0.0034444097,0.0006463222,0.00016360726,0.0000620799,0.00002191213,0.000016590744,0.0071193012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983785,0.0011563066,0.000024610183,0.0001272627,0.00014656594,0.00016678873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988387,0.00069379434,0.00010971727,0.00009045225,0.00006698873,0.00020030329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018154184,0.00027308616,0.00024602917,0.0025629448,0.0028960921,0.007196186,0.00068090047,0.0013586093,0.003065194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001718468,0.00015617286,0.00031863595,0.0013266015,0.02938764,0.0067080627,0.0031903838,0.0013826039,0.0002249485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028296565,0.000005205711,0.0002595438,0.000009267713,0.0000010700414,0.000029954,0.007120955,0.000104684426,0.00004055722,0.9889721,0.00025335915,0.0032004134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006503564,0.000014360832,0.0007929399,0.00006227458,0.0000024758822,0.00010199884,0.019014295,0.0005138471,0.00007297151,0.9398171,0.039593466,0.000007820026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022412061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018741525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007196186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004096401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018898093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029721618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062943906","doi":"10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00194.x","title":"The Enhancement Imperative: The Evolutionary Neurophysiology of Durkheimian Solidarity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Preconscious; Arousal; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Neuroscience; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034230498185236324,"score_gpt":0.34575476415728074,"score_spread":0.3115242659720444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062943906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201099,0.0024476394,0.0128960265,0.0032092973,0.0001613328,0.000021722948,0.000047281595,0.00004650929,0.061060205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672735,0.0002226037,0.0017669011,0.00011091271,0.000018216608,0.000004753351,0.0000073200717,0.0000060862935,0.0011359482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998635,0.000028229617,0.0000041993967,0.000047765883,0.0000362065,0.00002002379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997744,0.00006741946,0.000049401493,0.000034777255,0.000033881177,0.00004007253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040630673,0.000074872354,0.00014050248,0.00021535724,0.00033957427,0.00078757363,0.0002614796,0.00039755707,0.0012254122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014815158,0.0000989372,0.00006432666,0.00017515018,0.0016078639,0.00091001706,0.0006914868,0.00061842956,0.000085791784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087155675,0.000104502105,0.069781356,0.00032848935,0.0000712264,0.001077299,0.019783683,0.0017064303,0.20368843,0.36788312,0.002268343,0.33243552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005469009,0.00039023545,0.6483069,0.00014538184,0.000046138208,0.0014754065,0.0045297453,0.0047106454,0.010270776,0.29148862,0.03849911,0.000082282735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011570135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011297324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0012254122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050563534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030775598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0040994287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095821588","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01371.x","title":"Beyond the Elementary Forms of Moral Life: Reflexivity and Rationality in Durkheim's Moral Theory","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Reflexivity; Rationality; Scholarship; Presumption; Solidarity; Argument (complex analysis); Social science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.054667043383469116,"score_gpt":0.3673880481470858,"score_spread":0.3127210047636167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095821588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098507,0.016030284,0.09575311,0.09840914,0.0008512542,0.000081826896,0.00006662765,0.0001323897,0.6901684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823843,0.0010900182,0.0067606675,0.0016360465,0.00021381171,0.000065367785,0.000010534152,0.000033576907,0.0078056403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205184,0.005703054,0.00018074883,0.00058685173,0.0009524508,0.0005249915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543977,0.002992765,0.0003433767,0.000611122,0.00039102422,0.00022194457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077044573,0.00044512696,0.00054275006,0.0013299444,0.004523497,0.008349838,0.0013481338,0.002838154,0.0014824648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008752749,0.00026459433,0.0004849776,0.00088684156,0.05947992,0.0076174606,0.0038935556,0.0052770674,0.00028272867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028581624,0.000002575504,0.000034275534,0.0000049785144,7.207515e-7,0.000010402104,0.0013665772,0.00006942197,0.000016125989,0.9973349,0.00025557174,0.0009015682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049586574,0.0000037048846,0.00005492339,0.000017522489,0.0000011392954,0.000011367682,0.00049992604,0.00023313773,0.000042001928,0.989842,0.009285826,0.00000361971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041076015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023409463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008349838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008106967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004151096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058820426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106255227","doi":"10.1111/j.0735-2751.2005.00242.x","title":"From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of Internetworked Social Movements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":277,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Sociology; Globalization; Social movement theory; Public sphere; New social movements; Political economy; Framing (construction); Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07669501396841658,"score_gpt":0.399332279822413,"score_spread":0.32263726585399644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106255227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05454296,0.014083626,0.04877584,0.13958314,0.0019116075,0.00030684858,0.0001139865,0.000091909926,0.74059004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661732,0.004449101,0.0053727007,0.007418606,0.0014643564,0.00036846596,0.000045245113,0.00013173993,0.014576706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152994,0.0063550416,0.00011427456,0.0006689833,0.0005997054,0.00073194224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866942,0.0108370865,0.0007495363,0.0005874981,0.00054679933,0.00058481266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008959336,0.0012866522,0.0006003186,0.00712388,0.013198176,0.020941088,0.0031066178,0.007961705,0.00648897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008575288,0.00046759384,0.00091964833,0.0036520911,0.13093643,0.030416748,0.008921805,0.008824763,0.00057900767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030417027,0.0000073667534,0.000047129128,0.000019924313,0.0000012804746,0.000034423927,0.0100418525,0.000118427146,0.000011186092,0.98848873,0.00056918367,0.0006574089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016557467,0.00001350425,0.00012026376,0.00019780225,0.0000042899705,0.000045682285,0.022212872,0.0007849562,0.00006432578,0.93130577,0.04522196,0.000012145489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005026947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003889345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020941088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015690977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004843964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11384654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112326794","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01394.x","title":"The Moodiness of Action","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Conceptualization; Epistemology; Presupposition; Action (physics); Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Action theory (sociology); Situated; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.08740566056703199,"score_gpt":0.2496988573813909,"score_spread":0.1622931968143589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112326794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20414256,0.005114711,0.17185116,0.021637179,0.00093373633,0.00015297298,0.00014185069,0.00039237714,0.59563345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98895514,0.00050598796,0.005651315,0.0004507325,0.00014661625,0.00005134179,0.000021484877,0.000029922767,0.004187511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785465,0.001132432,0.00010684384,0.00034491028,0.00034893138,0.0002122974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783057,0.0009497984,0.0003622368,0.0003599025,0.00020228248,0.00029512763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020980372,0.00033640058,0.00027327577,0.0009624495,0.0019536177,0.0060894443,0.00065628655,0.0011267494,0.0032410133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050203376,0.00021371266,0.00044735722,0.0004423574,0.015652368,0.005577859,0.0044234907,0.0017879605,0.00041971015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005091457,0.000017898314,0.0012849419,0.000088445755,0.00001257957,0.0001231243,0.015013254,0.00052457757,0.0018346602,0.9533365,0.0013369994,0.026376229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022689957,0.000099507975,0.0039009363,0.000099514815,0.000013441483,0.00025525328,0.006832776,0.0014065178,0.0005895869,0.9254949,0.061246887,0.000037893078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006267097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003909043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060894443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015409654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007498497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01118052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131450121","doi":"10.1177/0735275112466998","title":"Self-relations in Social Relations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social relation; Relation (database); Epistemology; Sociology; Scope (computer science); Relational theory; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04732738640223788,"score_gpt":0.3411323197340168,"score_spread":0.29380493333177893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131450121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120472156,0.019882882,0.32991678,0.02805928,0.00082424283,0.00020931906,0.00019358683,0.00023390923,0.50020784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639449,0.0038213227,0.02337398,0.0005693246,0.00037528208,0.00015424784,0.000078785844,0.00003692826,0.007645142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953354,0.0028439104,0.00017854867,0.0006143754,0.0008107417,0.00021700762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940667,0.0036633546,0.0006266997,0.0007703659,0.00051424326,0.00035848992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045703813,0.0004554138,0.0004584829,0.002465729,0.003049584,0.0062914426,0.00078696973,0.0014292764,0.0048967036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066539664,0.00025270204,0.00041980934,0.0023648243,0.02555164,0.0116372425,0.0040686224,0.0019732567,0.0005343003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.851557e-7,0.0000033205881,0.00013953977,0.000014744951,0.0000017963575,0.000015441336,0.001229932,0.00015996392,0.000031610103,0.9965501,0.0001360188,0.001716507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035851326,0.000006358628,0.00024740215,0.000022549206,0.0000024572228,0.000053144362,0.0009485792,0.00064657076,0.00004010327,0.97998923,0.018036282,0.0000038157204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014742153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010831718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062914426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033102243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001615066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024170756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168175519","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00318.x","title":"Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":267,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Determinism; Epistemology; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Structure and agency; Individualism; Presupposition; Social theory; Criticism; Reification (Marxism); Methodological individualism; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06408362143287605,"score_gpt":0.37927641007425833,"score_spread":0.3151927886413823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168175519","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016218262,0.012453697,0.416512,0.15306637,0.0011538846,0.00011934456,0.00018278543,0.00023980976,0.40005377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8864936,0.006737536,0.07079016,0.012075924,0.0023319435,0.0006307946,0.00011825274,0.00030691532,0.02051493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98721504,0.0060643516,0.00039870868,0.0020878948,0.0037473436,0.0004866685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818654,0.007896596,0.0010669889,0.0012875659,0.0010706927,0.0004914882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012265248,0.0010326416,0.001202571,0.003769444,0.0049064904,0.009306358,0.0032267235,0.004164403,0.0050362735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01423019,0.0006104937,0.0016680111,0.0027862312,0.06465464,0.013608145,0.006430152,0.008345283,0.0010086275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014362353,0.0000011442795,0.000016140353,0.000008106109,0.000002003871,0.0000046642035,0.00045251267,0.000082099694,0.0000070594406,0.99856704,0.00031502295,0.0005427097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055682794,0.0000032549008,0.000036749876,0.000021428204,0.0000022054908,0.000023954139,0.00020054392,0.00036428243,0.000022589373,0.98627687,0.01303897,0.0000035455828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004788166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028678281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012265248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010907455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004982854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07913953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319953499","doi":"10.1177/0735275116632555","title":"Habit and the Body","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Habit; Action (physics); Loyalty; Action theory (sociology); Automaticity; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Rationality; Subject (documents); Social psychology; Social science; Cognition; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.018965443624530468,"score_gpt":0.2934609306234781,"score_spread":0.27449548699894766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319953499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21433923,0.027450038,0.026794123,0.030509591,0.0007337252,0.00008991096,0.00023112317,0.00020697998,0.69964534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96928227,0.004084743,0.0030478167,0.0010716638,0.00013492488,0.000043404736,0.00004097941,0.000026764126,0.022267438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954706,0.00019997009,0.000014448396,0.000095736024,0.000080317914,0.000062530125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949217,0.00020896306,0.000067305366,0.00007903843,0.000058086956,0.00009435109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064392766,0.0001281209,0.00018875174,0.0006376147,0.0012948181,0.002752716,0.00048206814,0.0011024032,0.0063815624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001532374,0.00011672618,0.00024832453,0.0005535442,0.014439049,0.0023174447,0.00189816,0.0010194455,0.000562722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003700475,0.000042533753,0.0048943283,0.00011553474,0.0000145184085,0.0002811783,0.018148437,0.00055739627,0.0006494328,0.91117376,0.00336329,0.06072252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019947058,0.000078472236,0.020447996,0.00036224048,0.000018520323,0.00097143766,0.009725923,0.00095339085,0.00036897822,0.80878186,0.15823264,0.000038551254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046698945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002620014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063815624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013058144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011231038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021348476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332461647","doi":"10.1177/0735275115572152","title":"Revising as Reframing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Cognitive reframing; Salient; Epistemology; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Social science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05161750631599891,"score_gpt":0.2696173985325881,"score_spread":0.2179998922165892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332461647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2935856,0.014708388,0.20101225,0.11413178,0.021770885,0.0038229977,0.00063289306,0.003072533,0.34726268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8663388,0.0042698416,0.06027031,0.009272505,0.004009634,0.001114124,0.00032241998,0.0012135033,0.053188797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8568343,0.08984899,0.010566937,0.010270626,0.028209353,0.0042698355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5373003,0.2154229,0.031571247,0.11791079,0.08659085,0.011203968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07746773,0.0011709176,0.0009947736,0.00701308,0.007863936,0.019353975,0.0051976014,0.0052537527,0.007791425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37883562,0.00083075685,0.0013221754,0.0049571265,0.016025651,0.022380138,0.01448227,0.0065702535,0.0031008672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013355272,0.00018685976,0.005199941,0.0011545824,0.000087929315,0.0030401617,0.40756932,0.0006142037,0.004638862,0.28639275,0.037201367,0.25378048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003761075,0.00021617685,0.0041882005,0.0013959663,0.00007233432,0.0017513691,0.124053806,0.0012072996,0.002177931,0.19145152,0.6732336,0.00021411828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003318128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031278904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07746773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005677349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015234229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40969342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923786780","doi":"10.1177/0735275119830448","title":"The High-hanging Fruit of the Gender Revolution: A Model of Social Reproduction and Social Change","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Inequality; Social inequality; Reproduction; Psychological intervention; Structural inequality; Social change; Social reproduction; Gender inequality; Gender studies; Positive economics; Economics; Social science; Psychology; Economic growth; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12693552397891128,"score_gpt":0.3378173269008328,"score_spread":0.21088180292192155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923786780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08096531,0.0046242685,0.16015689,0.09353807,0.00048373008,0.00018523746,0.00016429655,0.00015610686,0.6597261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96330065,0.0014266892,0.011578887,0.0017602002,0.0002303111,0.00016806203,0.000025098967,0.00003771418,0.02147231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822515,0.0011078289,0.000021421967,0.00023354412,0.00021014533,0.00020192428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905986,0.00048948586,0.00008945083,0.00013548133,0.00007868602,0.0001469841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024587684,0.00046245081,0.00041704238,0.0011876983,0.0033612621,0.006134367,0.0013417299,0.0022657414,0.0064728265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001795438,0.00021484021,0.0007517615,0.00094590697,0.028429091,0.005099862,0.003165132,0.0020687417,0.00064677873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002675761,0.0000055390365,0.000059360194,0.0000050885315,0.0000014010261,0.000019155263,0.000585503,0.00048757473,0.000025705232,0.9978796,0.00019334971,0.0007350264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014168219,0.000015620099,0.00012668864,0.000016572607,0.000002786354,0.000029647788,0.0005923544,0.0021992775,0.00004413642,0.9825696,0.014384544,0.0000046873747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042730137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002678926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064728265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054898704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031211965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039831996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033639354","doi":"10.1177/0735275120926222","title":"Adopting a Cloak of Incompetence: Impression Management Techniques for Feigning Lesser Selves","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Psychology; Impression management; Social psychology; Cloak; Interdependence; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.034108902859146834,"score_gpt":0.25331983967470945,"score_spread":0.2192109368155626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033639354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29514086,0.0074996613,0.40051228,0.027272658,0.0016925051,0.0012547325,0.00007010878,0.0014245567,0.26513278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728755,0.0013669846,0.10937483,0.0010524524,0.0002986361,0.00046180034,0.000031948173,0.00009558233,0.014442338],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903914,0.0069372775,0.00027715848,0.00028977622,0.0018194041,0.0002849791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98263574,0.01273265,0.001613369,0.0017152446,0.0008551077,0.00044784593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009527398,0.0008386433,0.00035228475,0.0027931384,0.004902318,0.006060672,0.0019975947,0.0015526674,0.003298167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026451197,0.0003012751,0.0003871728,0.0015522941,0.015112611,0.0064368458,0.004389635,0.0025190555,0.00055965065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014844337,0.00023809461,0.0050183227,0.0005144909,0.00003782716,0.0009396318,0.37264556,0.0005723829,0.0049570417,0.24136189,0.016000416,0.3575659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001368464,0.0005610868,0.015596109,0.0012189137,0.0001234318,0.0053644944,0.4520961,0.012407724,0.0076896753,0.26763418,0.23685177,0.0003196679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014677941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045226575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009527398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021643662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001625193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05038631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084361679","doi":"10.1177/0735275120946085","title":"Four Galore? The Overlap between Mary Douglas’s Grid-Group Typology and Other Highly Cited Social Science Classifications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Inter-rater reliability; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Developmental psychology; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10902307387919878,"score_gpt":0.3320075361734754,"score_spread":0.2229844622942766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084361679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64472395,0.0032116533,0.07216513,0.029822549,0.0014216156,0.0002301737,0.00033865916,0.00013287086,0.24795334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98139316,0.0004672187,0.011701367,0.0009287261,0.000049686787,0.00010206575,0.000081533464,0.000039939387,0.005236245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98693955,0.008322613,0.0005693788,0.001152443,0.0022344557,0.0007815643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839929,0.007863512,0.0016944025,0.0027242608,0.0027102518,0.0010147349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01157002,0.00038057778,0.0003788892,0.004312116,0.0054013925,0.005729062,0.0011329957,0.0014371817,0.0028608907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02746687,0.00022655574,0.0003756099,0.004739769,0.014223536,0.0072775106,0.004875506,0.0018525568,0.00037528796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017219476,0.000048351074,0.056487042,0.00024586357,0.000027806254,0.00048919645,0.13738003,0.00044368868,0.0005353224,0.7232142,0.010976804,0.06997953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031421972,0.00009684715,0.042607836,0.0007721965,0.00002907413,0.0012080183,0.24670413,0.0035547062,0.0007997163,0.43545914,0.2685865,0.00015043738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008410512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015399951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01157002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004120427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00271124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061188877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210662236","doi":"10.1177/07352751211054121","title":"Domesticating Danger: Coping Codes and Symbolic Security amid Violent Organized Crime in Mexico","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation; Social Science Research Council; International Development Research Centre; Open Society Foundations","keywords":"Coping (psychology); Conversation; Criminology; Sociology; The Symbolic; Social constructionism; Construct (python library); Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Communication; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.025334683707472383,"score_gpt":0.3360776206037957,"score_spread":0.3107429368963233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210662236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935921,0.00020383506,0.00013788568,0.0011735419,0.000011222396,0.000009548698,0.000018306253,0.0000022323154,0.0048513366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990374,0.00019760044,0.00009344664,0.000078270605,0.000005642862,0.00001646577,0.0000146630855,0.0000023169546,0.00055421377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915016,0.000479138,0.000024112973,0.00007622357,0.00007792958,0.00019250305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882334,0.00051485124,0.0004141507,0.000074386095,0.00008150882,0.000091750386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014237554,0.00020425649,0.00030290813,0.0011013708,0.006503493,0.002788832,0.0007744572,0.0008880524,0.0019582952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003183835,0.00019780474,0.00014220834,0.00093481777,0.00903822,0.0018150089,0.004205705,0.001355226,0.000043834665],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006871923,0.00007818244,0.04409092,0.00011503818,0.00001646808,0.00096557033,0.9252293,0.000087172324,0.00052766805,0.018329486,0.0010818515,0.009409644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005022992,0.000026864724,0.044122066,0.0001387511,0.00000852644,0.00015554405,0.9466473,0.000116598036,0.00009927221,0.0011545545,0.0075141843,0.000011256447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051388275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0756385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051388275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017741431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102178276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226190194","doi":"10.1177/07352751221088919","title":"Dueling with Dual-Process Models: Cognition, Creativity, and Context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Cognition; Cognitive science; Dual (grammatical number); Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Psychology; Scholarship; Improvisation; Process (computing); Thinking processes; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.0621842410470288,"score_gpt":0.3188962299125485,"score_spread":0.2567119888655197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226190194","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3199798,0.0071606934,0.47488064,0.022515608,0.00036877283,0.00028736988,0.00009760126,0.00029004613,0.17441949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971185,0.0007942921,0.025178839,0.00039914917,0.000060972576,0.00016065237,0.000023968598,0.000029626244,0.002167464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946808,0.003229591,0.00021123643,0.0008567543,0.0006078424,0.00041378874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877742,0.008880202,0.0013165328,0.0011850315,0.00038699294,0.00045694245],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076026376,0.00094085466,0.0008688978,0.003092122,0.0021890835,0.012049413,0.002350646,0.002989085,0.004110472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016502408,0.0006991349,0.0022293802,0.0015043456,0.020905316,0.018110787,0.00646161,0.00434478,0.0003462749],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062876155,0.000066745386,0.0037891795,0.00013136184,0.00003331766,0.0003120149,0.014816418,0.0030724464,0.00033984013,0.9658401,0.00025779495,0.011277866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019564832,0.000021129425,0.001046911,0.00006956254,0.000016127024,0.00019300684,0.0026098413,0.013370424,0.00023030648,0.97985715,0.0025428238,0.000023175457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026520025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001676217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004270531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022624668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04020703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386440985","doi":"10.1177/07352751231197832","title":"Dorothy Smith’s Legacy of Social Theorizing: Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Tribute; Appeal; Mainstream; Critical theory; Social theory; Silence; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.08279156166731794,"score_gpt":0.3767294653566066,"score_spread":0.2939379036892887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386440985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00291705,0.2567125,0.0102541,0.5919227,0.032649208,0.00005054443,0.00014799893,0.00007975823,0.105266154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23926151,0.37035668,0.018692108,0.19221419,0.08245028,0.0005055673,0.00022887392,0.0004980137,0.09579278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930188,0.0044583296,0.00023197668,0.0007391729,0.0012686019,0.0002830072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877149,0.009655155,0.0003124811,0.00045929538,0.0011998349,0.00065832515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00763974,0.0013537704,0.00095745764,0.0032096654,0.005595218,0.0093600275,0.0014677101,0.0050933654,0.0045366846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012471651,0.00055818644,0.0005989065,0.0031161667,0.031151198,0.013588739,0.0047910865,0.011939163,0.0012711866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019751684,0.000025354844,0.00023969125,0.00044602362,0.000012468701,0.00013006582,0.016208265,0.00018134408,0.00014327327,0.77508265,0.17465672,0.032854352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038106268,0.00001128779,0.00008201284,0.0005185161,0.0000031263144,0.000097989476,0.0033983577,0.000078688485,0.00007143572,0.18013814,0.8155861,0.000010527258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006772785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005820716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093600275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009076319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071320296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065853536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388180749","doi":"10.1177/07352751231206838","title":"Theorizing Omission: State Strategies for Withholding Official Recognition of Personhood","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Typology; Existentialism; Sociology; Identity (music); Politics; State (computer science); Ethnography; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Anthropology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.11288932205300035,"score_gpt":0.35697970538400126,"score_spread":0.24409038333100092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388180749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21928236,0.0019601095,0.2219707,0.034627177,0.00037045407,0.00025671936,0.00006209108,0.00021203046,0.5212583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907065,0.0002560096,0.0053597707,0.00045228802,0.00004343855,0.00011548031,0.00001829209,0.00003909177,0.004645029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849973,0.008942738,0.0006657207,0.0016211331,0.0024803688,0.0012927295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842948,0.008799636,0.0020803097,0.0028509225,0.0015382178,0.00043618053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017718796,0.00058707304,0.0005653498,0.0035880238,0.008293308,0.011624488,0.003045858,0.004442026,0.0022533038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022532135,0.0006486674,0.00070515316,0.0024982924,0.07507131,0.017810669,0.011150474,0.005986286,0.0003854008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031963884,0.000005982584,0.0005953693,0.000015030408,0.0000028263876,0.00007934322,0.022741728,0.0001467588,0.000051084546,0.9741401,0.00021131009,0.0020072304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014921584,0.00002725516,0.0007272879,0.00032321547,0.000026217456,0.0002887406,0.030254187,0.0023149021,0.00055409514,0.92600113,0.039441016,0.000027001286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054102964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003410156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017718796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064530806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070370096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093707025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391109799","doi":"10.1177/07352751231223203","title":"Morality, Affect, and Reputation in the Making of a Motivated Social Self","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Reputation; Sociology; Social psychology; Morality; Construct (python library); Epistemology; Affect (linguistics); Self; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05946875733195058,"score_gpt":0.39092750985541547,"score_spread":0.3314587525234649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391109799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48186094,0.0017205833,0.03905359,0.023020113,0.00028885555,0.00005496897,0.000029346491,0.00007942118,0.45389217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967493,0.00009091062,0.0012496796,0.00013616229,0.000027727203,0.000009297214,0.0000026068406,0.000009469481,0.0017249344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565506,0.0029212967,0.000084913816,0.00032305488,0.0006720097,0.0003436646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579805,0.0019501603,0.000801039,0.00045394737,0.00035945437,0.0006372629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005363726,0.00026519893,0.00029164602,0.0013756151,0.0046885666,0.0078012957,0.0008825773,0.002136087,0.0029909813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007438301,0.00021824831,0.00032824549,0.00071248505,0.030632572,0.0059376066,0.004955871,0.0019951863,0.00025790607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018137245,0.000034314093,0.0020123192,0.000024271661,0.0000082549295,0.00017841715,0.023662392,0.00044757238,0.00030202727,0.9676453,0.0004713891,0.005195698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015939417,0.000053370837,0.0056258836,0.00006985261,0.000014694739,0.00030222425,0.015687145,0.0025618456,0.00029825975,0.9542989,0.021018479,0.000053425225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015256127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015120346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078012957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024822247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001609351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028366446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401496857","doi":"10.1177/07352751241269126","title":"Four Temporalities: Toward a Typology of Narrative Forms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Teleology; Epistemology; Narrative; Typology; Sociology; Centrality; Proposition; Temporality; Philosophy; Anthropology; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15285733759215395,"score_gpt":0.4050935255987183,"score_spread":0.25223618800656433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401496857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112045534,0.005980427,0.3309999,0.019210879,0.00072710286,0.0009229225,0.00077908835,0.00040887078,0.52892524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043602,0.0024316588,0.0777567,0.0007545258,0.00023390878,0.0010820965,0.00041841035,0.00021882226,0.012743624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944753,0.0034301293,0.00045205373,0.000533855,0.0007402797,0.0003685038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923609,0.0038021035,0.0013193397,0.0010663592,0.00078449096,0.00066684524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052535282,0.00082381815,0.00043130104,0.0058081714,0.0045474325,0.013802041,0.001989866,0.0025826588,0.006138514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011362758,0.00063229265,0.00081758644,0.0043659583,0.024313658,0.029385801,0.0069670505,0.0032452554,0.0006340735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011254456,0.000007554572,0.0008370097,0.00004602987,0.0000034997395,0.0000771495,0.01577127,0.00013963938,0.00007281736,0.97833455,0.00063956634,0.0040596956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017472112,0.000019390634,0.00091196113,0.00030092936,0.000012269343,0.0003175374,0.037956096,0.0014987737,0.00019691438,0.8893082,0.06943602,0.00002441675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027950704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030998734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013802041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004409092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022858994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03199035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408963608","doi":"10.1177/07352751251329755","title":"Theorizing Affective Motivation: Motives, Seeking, and the Mundanity of Pleasure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sociological Theory","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Psychology; Social psychology; Self-determination theory; Sociology; Autonomy; Psychotherapist; Political science","score_opus":0.029173780050305714,"score_gpt":0.3465973631702158,"score_spread":0.31742358311991004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408963608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4491537,0.012056071,0.13376158,0.037742157,0.00038423532,0.00015778674,0.000087012006,0.000093079834,0.36656442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915794,0.00093118,0.004654549,0.00043955745,0.00008367655,0.000057704972,0.000013920578,0.000013590525,0.0022264398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985869,0.00080304034,0.000039546332,0.00012766344,0.0002786576,0.00016418629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812406,0.00093160465,0.00027940294,0.00012917964,0.00017413251,0.00036174618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002308669,0.00033969292,0.0002846943,0.001630479,0.0013933139,0.0037878302,0.00070441875,0.0013382605,0.0018733062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039234236,0.0002172905,0.00048122014,0.00086676935,0.012692849,0.004883563,0.002942831,0.0017508983,0.0001651399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017691778,0.000052728763,0.004576103,0.00010274142,0.000014104282,0.00012540654,0.0065547084,0.00038131114,0.00032520943,0.9766078,0.0005171699,0.010724996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000148048775,0.000051605053,0.0053972513,0.00013538983,0.000013462703,0.00025569575,0.004518586,0.00197798,0.00017334831,0.97593385,0.011508547,0.00001937498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005604754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006335884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037878302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013577169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000959724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012209535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}