{"meta":{"query_hash":"0f5fccb0da6a","filters":{"venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0f5fccb0da6a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=South+African+Journal+on+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W1499299721","doi":"10.1080/19962126.2014.11865109","title":"Global Reasonable Accommodation: How the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Changes the Way We Think About Equality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Realisation; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Obligation; Convention; Dilemma; Law and economics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Law; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06527389227856892,"score_gpt":0.30521649099096926,"score_spread":0.23994259871240034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499299721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052383095,0.0071352595,0.02686543,0.18229166,0.0015773956,0.000076129574,0.000059329705,0.00008578912,0.72952586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96858764,0.0013766285,0.003296495,0.009376025,0.00021674887,0.000056904923,0.000027323025,0.000058980204,0.017003357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791878,0.014611345,0.0004621706,0.0013232548,0.0023080604,0.0021074032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942568,0.0033434315,0.00043287253,0.0008660378,0.00056922756,0.0005316736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019360004,0.00037605345,0.0004918901,0.0013666339,0.0077834376,0.010472262,0.001449571,0.0063576787,0.007925657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01556808,0.000176165,0.00063247705,0.0012361264,0.061620228,0.010165368,0.012137852,0.00792207,0.00044482815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005763124,0.000006011258,0.00010527056,0.000014563549,0.000001340339,0.000048932954,0.0061709313,0.0001284984,0.000039977658,0.9876627,0.0016130469,0.0042030253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011275086,0.000039824834,0.00076053396,0.00045402258,0.000008798918,0.00015033965,0.015183574,0.00038708132,0.00027328264,0.8269183,0.15577614,0.00003688415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012902957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013263818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019360004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008227043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074561005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10238671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226823929","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2000.11827607","title":"The State as Trustee of Land","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; State (computer science); Plaintiff; Constitution; Doctrine; Common law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Trust law","score_opus":0.022867181371909424,"score_gpt":0.31622755676574815,"score_spread":0.29336037539383875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226823929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21273598,0.005027541,0.011134627,0.03320887,0.00031055076,0.00005203666,0.000050007096,0.00007202128,0.73740834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694798,0.0012226454,0.00044018344,0.00057228055,0.000041372783,0.000011849194,0.000008372238,0.000010070619,0.028213426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857426,0.00039297834,0.00008632564,0.0001468897,0.0003579486,0.000441631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985512,0.0006194379,0.0002189946,0.00019164346,0.00019165607,0.00022707447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011282531,0.00009748849,0.00019256432,0.0006550218,0.00440648,0.006677238,0.00044830405,0.0017965176,0.00558567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038740842,0.00024384935,0.00020122525,0.0008419376,0.008504091,0.0050716614,0.004495374,0.002300698,0.00047738495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055165083,0.00000438404,0.0012263797,0.000018314035,0.0000024209005,0.00020912901,0.007273824,0.000111194335,0.00024191558,0.9833046,0.0011381202,0.00646428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014294736,0.00007654636,0.0063690166,0.0005632541,0.00005470036,0.0013250334,0.02326124,0.0017114767,0.0015834899,0.38112327,0.5838711,0.00004662076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018161062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02915928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018161062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048693507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056890515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0361107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771410415","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2002.11827658","title":"The Evolution of Standing Rules in South Africa and their Significance in Promoting Social Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Social justice; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04690604526550103,"score_gpt":0.29780502622233795,"score_spread":0.25089898095683694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771410415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50443363,0.0072948253,0.022693342,0.017600812,0.00013277333,0.00022578982,0.00008244564,0.00004944538,0.44748694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894979,0.0011556078,0.0035604343,0.00026168284,0.000024571329,0.000036453,0.000011822125,0.000017085797,0.0054345205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640024,0.0014354641,0.00026558686,0.00035461644,0.0007128366,0.00083125447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944015,0.0026731426,0.0012769955,0.00045678572,0.0007073544,0.00048414263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057288343,0.0002632855,0.00030436073,0.0027374106,0.0064169955,0.0067327437,0.0006943627,0.0012937733,0.0029289883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015514358,0.00045683532,0.00026261012,0.0030433668,0.017376592,0.004923459,0.0037088187,0.0027449059,0.00022964591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019649025,0.000012601992,0.0042551323,0.00006375848,0.0000060756056,0.000427595,0.023631949,0.0004906051,0.0012847725,0.93601996,0.0004730293,0.033314835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048981332,0.00012686364,0.065414324,0.0008610354,0.000028696115,0.0009819228,0.026084507,0.0018342662,0.0024915847,0.6370953,0.26488772,0.00014493975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022708517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038442407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022708517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0108777005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077198083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07892358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}