{"meta":{"query_hash":"0f5fccb0da6a","filters":{"venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0f5fccb0da6a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=South+African+Journal+on+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W1499299721","doi":"10.1080/19962126.2014.11865109","title":"Global Reasonable Accommodation: How the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Changes the Way We Think About Equality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Realisation; Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Obligation; Convention; Dilemma; Law and economics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Law; Reasonable accommodation; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06527389227856892,"score_gpt":0.30521649099096926,"score_spread":0.23994259871240034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499299721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8858766,0.00006360982,0.00022939034,0.049435597,0.00038419545,0.00065997784,0.000056226523,0.000050181905,0.06324422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99031824,0.0000051600778,0.000013671589,0.0001996046,0.0009933012,0.00001915287,0.000005758243,0.00000922417,0.00843586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608815,0.001905147,0.000284239,0.00024848073,0.0010764702,0.00039753597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978995,0.00060320355,0.00058352726,0.0005096765,0.00027493798,0.00012920919],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026202574,0.0002267081,0.0002560923,0.000051628864,0.0076426268,0.0005911477,0.00078795705,0.00008488869,0.0005677635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001006176,0.0000771014,0.00016041854,0.0003018251,0.0015605967,0.00025344087,0.000026010666,0.00040237315,0.000023958712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055497574,0.000061918705,0.0002243054,0.0000047640497,0.00004956298,5.993222e-7,0.09560722,0.000011561964,0.0000019038813,0.9007544,0.0030567625,0.00017150948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076344976,0.0011881134,0.0072834743,0.0002909127,0.00014922938,0.000007777378,0.09909989,0.00008217337,0.00009886166,0.4742636,0.4163901,0.00038240093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091830565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03249333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42649078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018178696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008124046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226823929","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2000.11827607","title":"The State as Trustee of Land","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; State (computer science); Plaintiff; Constitution; Doctrine; Common law; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Trust law","score_opus":0.022867181371909424,"score_gpt":0.31622755676574815,"score_spread":0.29336037539383875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226823929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65864193,0.00016128615,0.0000021461879,0.00031778202,0.00025200055,0.00012997375,0.000010388721,0.00003471149,0.34044978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435236,0.000016035463,0.000042143907,0.000056309913,0.0005647319,0.0000033467638,5.194829e-7,0.000015859869,0.055777483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726194,0.0005289218,0.00047237842,0.00019577229,0.00097376114,0.00056724227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986194,0.00023507002,0.0003149426,0.00032057613,0.00015165033,0.00035839799],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011434988,0.00016588971,0.00025053218,0.00010016543,0.003333414,0.00026721592,0.0008251136,0.000071657254,0.003284592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007517414,0.000096904914,0.00017210122,0.00031739264,0.0008736372,0.00015447565,0.000020484413,0.00049717136,0.000617843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004561352,0.00018904087,0.0019195047,0.000006732268,0.0001849063,0.00023007997,0.8199571,0.00020705644,0.000013963316,0.16678543,0.0028550837,0.0071949684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053238723,0.00033260207,0.00045717126,0.000037175454,0.000026627597,0.0000059045014,0.0030336739,0.0000025002687,0.00006489562,0.14035194,0.85495895,0.00019616562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049971836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005976912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8521039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113603215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014244822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771410415","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2002.11827658","title":"The Evolution of Standing Rules in South Africa and their Significance in Promoting Social Justice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Journal on Human Rights","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Jurisprudence; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Social justice; Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04690604526550103,"score_gpt":0.29780502622233795,"score_spread":0.25089898095683694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771410415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94718313,0.0011198659,0.00008302752,0.00039845335,0.00029725762,0.00040371506,0.00002522118,0.00003898448,0.05045034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987311,0.0000063047496,0.00007921319,0.0000074554905,0.0005388023,0.000011308309,2.864787e-7,0.000018231704,0.0006073264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967729,0.00087081036,0.0006718151,0.0003083801,0.00064670254,0.0007294243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851173,0.00042651178,0.0005899126,0.00016455185,0.00012714961,0.00018015977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232238,0.00021966531,0.0003587884,0.000338917,0.0029238693,0.00023068565,0.00052854215,0.00012932195,0.00006600233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031752538,0.00014544156,0.00009663192,0.0007029505,0.00087607146,0.00024640546,0.00005305852,0.000765062,0.000012834443],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004082493,0.000074713316,0.00201354,0.000015154062,0.00001437603,0.000022436554,0.91474044,0.000016114338,0.000049444025,0.0826574,0.000042882013,0.0003126669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033767673,0.0007346914,0.009351065,0.0007741872,0.00012235396,0.000007064304,0.7297639,0.0008234845,0.00014081418,0.20716156,0.04651974,0.0012243453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011203953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006198082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18497653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075172575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008665616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99837416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}