{"meta":{"query_hash":"0acb7d228714","filters":{"venue":"South African Law Journal"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0acb7d228714","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=South+African+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1512674864","doi":"","title":"Interdicts seeking to preserve constitutional rights - of losing litigants, interim interdicts pending appeal, and lessons from Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Interim; Political science; Constitution; High Court; Government (linguistics); Status quo; Legislation; Supreme court; Position (finance); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.029423678572347813,"score_gpt":0.3192401797264142,"score_spread":0.28981650115406643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512674864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10358439,0.0053428467,0.0026290023,0.21419272,0.00067300623,0.00010632837,0.00013331136,0.00006657947,0.67327183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90611815,0.0036258702,0.0023012997,0.026431821,0.00016750958,0.00005844243,0.00005224949,0.000068135596,0.061176475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908602,0.0008405187,0.00021627021,0.00090360217,0.0025192257,0.004660108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928219,0.0023856894,0.00030335062,0.00044316362,0.0023418698,0.0017040983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005894077,0.00040793343,0.00072992855,0.0014210511,0.033870302,0.015580501,0.0040548733,0.009156436,0.00894759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021093415,0.00048688223,0.00077004917,0.0019176678,0.020402998,0.0059301243,0.005933046,0.020668045,0.00048674858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006848529,0.0000439332,0.0023107792,0.000062660714,0.000022339404,0.0010820075,0.009461044,0.0006057274,0.0003144986,0.9476062,0.021653252,0.016769102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016703489,0.00009609834,0.013531534,0.0012109145,0.00028367498,0.00082978304,0.05704604,0.0042567626,0.002208376,0.43988934,0.48009673,0.00038364882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9751184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08723085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08723085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15510774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63290703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579376339","doi":"","title":"Tracing trends : the impact of science and technology on the law of criminal evidence and procedure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Discipline; Scientific evidence; Economic Justice; Criminal law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10407619472656264,"score_gpt":0.38209804877053904,"score_spread":0.2780218540439764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579376339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04964928,0.12312294,0.06989615,0.5723224,0.0042038406,0.00027181886,0.00035037802,0.0002587725,0.1799243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6936952,0.12244534,0.071392894,0.07759064,0.0066807666,0.00047637898,0.00025357763,0.00048538158,0.026979873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93474686,0.031206347,0.003730444,0.0063165124,0.02137487,0.0026249758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8127125,0.15005472,0.010533706,0.0105572445,0.014246485,0.0018952871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0562893,0.0008211742,0.0008840532,0.0077384487,0.0071778507,0.023833353,0.0030357419,0.009786916,0.0044094394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.110249974,0.001110422,0.0012637773,0.0075199236,0.05712364,0.057458315,0.010440297,0.017144596,0.0010653858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035886576,0.000038826813,0.0033901364,0.00039925685,0.00002723912,0.0002562125,0.018574962,0.00048085704,0.00044407015,0.903406,0.006256567,0.06668997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016508428,0.0001965924,0.004984168,0.0021181197,0.000041206276,0.00065767585,0.015109283,0.0013102504,0.0013050981,0.6038268,0.37032032,0.00011394205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013157888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010839851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0562893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015202692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013511801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29768986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579768026","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the pitfall encountered by the Canadian courts when assessing the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials in South Africa - a proposed alternative admissibility framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Supreme court; Order (exchange); Criminal procedure; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.13898011366843635,"score_gpt":0.38690226068965083,"score_spread":0.24792214702121448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579768026","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16039929,0.021431813,0.15717036,0.18206212,0.0010216008,0.0017748417,0.0005360396,0.00016500596,0.47543892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87294173,0.0032264453,0.10615009,0.010363577,0.00033049166,0.000370885,0.00007433797,0.000033818724,0.0065086326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8695934,0.058717523,0.010052338,0.0056086504,0.044788055,0.011240031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88522464,0.07400396,0.007634308,0.0049129357,0.025522504,0.002701603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10353573,0.0012587209,0.0017349719,0.020444352,0.020300217,0.032907903,0.0078122877,0.012945655,0.0026173946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17683196,0.0017054375,0.0023570678,0.0111740315,0.048666842,0.013803736,0.011872372,0.011348139,0.00031137516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046427536,0.000019611618,0.0031342222,0.00021014937,0.000059808604,0.0004443882,0.0077123623,0.0011077933,0.00030600882,0.9643241,0.0013112072,0.021323912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002217071,0.00039123758,0.019134384,0.004100176,0.0007707714,0.0014853013,0.027122337,0.010035695,0.003132787,0.84276235,0.09029983,0.0005435369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5188369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75621414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5188369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058834314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14553659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9679935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586503322","doi":"","title":"Equality and unfair discrimination : refining the Harksen test","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Charter; Law; Relation (database); Context (archaeology); Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07026810988229498,"score_gpt":0.3092973164572257,"score_spread":0.2390292065749307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586503322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07264428,0.0044252984,0.084717296,0.09075046,0.0029714045,0.00025357626,0.00020849645,0.000084357394,0.7439448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584221,0.0007948647,0.010926399,0.015554083,0.0007267752,0.0001750608,0.000039191982,0.00005080528,0.01331063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668832,0.013302715,0.0013393388,0.0040042433,0.010693182,0.0037773391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548745,0.032989357,0.002096135,0.0033047916,0.0054369005,0.0012983449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03245518,0.0006561752,0.0017160452,0.003635422,0.00874519,0.00960131,0.0038508102,0.010916379,0.008365765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07548736,0.000429487,0.001263291,0.0022528835,0.0739979,0.020640628,0.0112278415,0.013549079,0.00086893555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009662823,0.000004513709,0.00016265664,0.000007727089,0.000002584309,0.000041973028,0.00033497374,0.0001160638,0.000017100727,0.9968886,0.00056656834,0.001847672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016084317,0.00002106905,0.00036237686,0.000080754064,0.0000066129874,0.000058684313,0.00061902916,0.00075323164,0.00015778161,0.9862279,0.011669478,0.00002712654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01711546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012172653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03245518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008655529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011375005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17164141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W160769704","doi":"","title":"Self-incrimination, private records, and required reporting in regulatory statutes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Privilege (computing); Law; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Self-incrimination; Waiver; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.02234647486807,"score_gpt":0.2916551616949299,"score_spread":0.2693086868268599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160769704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108250745,0.012366704,0.06419777,0.05241969,0.0011349401,0.0005617067,0.0005509153,0.00026809386,0.7602495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317155,0.0034186933,0.015527857,0.01406926,0.0013683415,0.0005771535,0.00020424885,0.000076885764,0.03304205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9548053,0.020273322,0.004181766,0.0038738323,0.012357464,0.0045082797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169853,0.06054772,0.0069317617,0.007877092,0.006410226,0.0012479407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034611937,0.00049368665,0.00053449435,0.004109219,0.007938077,0.013636118,0.0028264632,0.012822946,0.004104396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06481078,0.001052938,0.0010181934,0.0037893169,0.03583939,0.009543151,0.005029053,0.008655958,0.00087783753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060685,0.0000121621015,0.00038194115,0.000018093986,0.0000015374742,0.00007160571,0.00090720586,0.00013557983,0.000050246268,0.99483746,0.0011472247,0.0024307359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008481426,0.00015155636,0.0040689385,0.0011049577,0.00005312351,0.0006917036,0.0022639008,0.003126794,0.0023157184,0.8291453,0.15684411,0.00014914908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04690095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030761926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04690095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010066704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017651986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18304765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256544311","doi":"","title":"Mandatory relief and supervisory jurisdiction : when is it appropriate, just and equitable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Government (linguistics); Federal jurisdiction; Constitutional court; Exclusive jurisdiction; Constitution; Constitutional right; Separation of powers","score_opus":0.03790536619238992,"score_gpt":0.2896650696295711,"score_spread":0.2517597034371812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256544311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013482582,0.021712186,0.007870127,0.8466114,0.0034068946,0.00009696888,0.000090886526,0.00006444426,0.10666446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73582447,0.013951117,0.0062251333,0.21910083,0.008515149,0.00027802787,0.000119758966,0.00018776246,0.01579769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96309674,0.014156327,0.0021141097,0.0029229408,0.0115322,0.006177706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631693,0.022964155,0.003059461,0.0018889102,0.0053734197,0.0035448289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038075853,0.00040010252,0.0011463626,0.0014159057,0.008340675,0.013104679,0.0035931708,0.019432118,0.007591188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090737,0.00067164004,0.00050857227,0.001328274,0.03551791,0.018102553,0.005984513,0.018051997,0.0010789616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051216026,0.00006526759,0.0016143472,0.00020340538,0.000016219667,0.00030164837,0.0044672606,0.00016560209,0.00017156143,0.90724385,0.043084417,0.042615365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016451483,0.00010950588,0.004833947,0.0037900242,0.00006131826,0.0005589151,0.008258567,0.00063973287,0.0005978594,0.6804203,0.3004345,0.00013087367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048747975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09757035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048747975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011232331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03275386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20136672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260124866","doi":"","title":"Suing anonymously : when is the personal price to pay for justice too high?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Anonymity; Law; Economic Justice; Harm; Political science; Test (biology); Confidentiality","score_opus":0.025923945083625437,"score_gpt":0.2897686665710277,"score_spread":0.26384472148740223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260124866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20117521,0.0028508897,0.01833724,0.40978888,0.0022966275,0.0001567419,0.00016758428,0.000119807126,0.365107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558933,0.0005659481,0.001740907,0.028979639,0.00061191304,0.00005553413,0.000019105648,0.000033523273,0.0121001005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984698,0.0049569206,0.0005445418,0.0015045359,0.0041368133,0.0041592186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979818,0.01120891,0.0023423592,0.001595057,0.0025361406,0.002499529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013303757,0.00030539083,0.00072692765,0.0010304173,0.0076572895,0.009615934,0.0016116964,0.013335904,0.006664195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04398829,0.0003066109,0.0005215073,0.00063137437,0.024283158,0.010883683,0.0045193224,0.008785261,0.0008855134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046049994,0.000046677585,0.0057753306,0.00003767427,0.000029446148,0.0010911833,0.0068610604,0.000116482544,0.0004151668,0.9515893,0.017224276,0.016767483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006425094,0.00017896657,0.011641714,0.0005102994,0.00009032003,0.0025631194,0.0295316,0.0017490739,0.0013013597,0.83528405,0.11690775,0.00017763143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017321056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02370134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017321056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048668305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071996516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07035786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262056843","doi":"","title":"Twelve years after Canada's access to medicines regime : should South Africa follow the path?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Exportation; Order (exchange); Business; Mechanism (biology); Drug industry; International trade; Developing country; Economic growth; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.09757953290351798,"score_gpt":0.28458232801573463,"score_spread":0.18700279511221665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262056843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036080368,0.041138668,0.0007122269,0.79050195,0.0017962867,0.0000820967,0.00059902354,0.000028413833,0.12906101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5629314,0.053651024,0.0025485745,0.2778723,0.0007086956,0.00007702721,0.00043640012,0.000086997636,0.10168756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955187,0.00041304808,0.00012011658,0.00026633427,0.0013629886,0.0023187725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479586,0.0013072047,0.0004121053,0.00012663032,0.0019266217,0.0014316357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032394764,0.00030487712,0.00043362012,0.0010567653,0.009292196,0.009452951,0.0012589085,0.008167702,0.0082339635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012405358,0.00026614754,0.0007481759,0.0024103285,0.005254949,0.0052088317,0.0022214255,0.008157514,0.00056975585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018141852,0.00007000414,0.0075659836,0.0009582024,0.00008288072,0.0031942117,0.012065706,0.00059431774,0.0014231798,0.73772335,0.1616004,0.07454028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050699815,0.00006094268,0.0135096405,0.0010890095,0.000065480046,0.0004512654,0.008665858,0.00020392041,0.0007697058,0.018820658,0.95621365,0.0000991778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94963175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96337646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93379873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06620128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1806558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48032612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206161984","doi":"","title":"The evidentiary value of an accused’s invocation of the pre-trial and trial right to silence through Anglo American case law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Law; Witness; Circumstantial evidence; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Common law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027628740797827317,"score_gpt":0.3128767867875584,"score_spread":0.2852480459897311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206161984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34800237,0.008437339,0.02936643,0.041027956,0.00043847732,0.00008308756,0.0000738217,0.00003643613,0.57253414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99090403,0.0008831038,0.0014418453,0.0015742081,0.00013979302,0.000033663557,0.000010123029,0.000008091822,0.0050051473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879287,0.007108901,0.000561738,0.0011203261,0.0020520254,0.0012283624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96729726,0.02699393,0.0014009416,0.0013105832,0.0024536764,0.0005435419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015972126,0.00024432503,0.00036905377,0.0013029191,0.005193762,0.009972431,0.0015323187,0.0048171715,0.0015503694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02905911,0.0004241675,0.000267871,0.0007996366,0.045567017,0.0069245603,0.0047328635,0.007185463,0.0002667501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001186725,0.0000074740233,0.00036736668,0.000020012629,0.0000034292143,0.00017060613,0.010793673,0.00007171809,0.000177483,0.9857734,0.00039836075,0.0022045944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037582595,0.00013715675,0.005103321,0.0012435336,0.00012588504,0.0010861136,0.02372504,0.0018528966,0.0024090395,0.8692122,0.09494443,0.00012273109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015834494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021064414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015972126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073134913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005732671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084469676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285162040","doi":"10.47348/salj/v139/i2a4","title":"‘I beg to differ’: Are our courts too agreeable?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Dissent; Appeal; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.030339795035629332,"score_gpt":0.2747571318407989,"score_spread":0.24441733680516958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285162040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1265383,0.004685575,0.008607557,0.7075636,0.0042063496,0.00008421568,0.0001329596,0.00008177455,0.1480997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85992366,0.0012181825,0.0022990885,0.12435037,0.001295526,0.000063213694,0.00006823164,0.00007802351,0.010703683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94740427,0.029503264,0.0019096503,0.0045089694,0.010927707,0.005746203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506781,0.018845636,0.008219193,0.005302969,0.011070564,0.005883403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03381927,0.00029562574,0.0006354107,0.0015356635,0.012158814,0.012039086,0.0033692073,0.006979116,0.009168487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16040495,0.00041106244,0.00051403244,0.0019657866,0.033212826,0.016674249,0.005673232,0.01329128,0.0028000015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108535605,0.00008867816,0.027322296,0.0002115352,0.000110699075,0.0014231609,0.19956768,0.00014074003,0.00092643633,0.5178239,0.15887949,0.093396805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062458304,0.000111746405,0.02364776,0.00086646865,0.000054497214,0.0017519146,0.21282355,0.00037263014,0.00079308107,0.30572212,0.45360726,0.00018653508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00884315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010395262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03381927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044913874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054527028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17885554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375833626","doi":"10.47348/salj/v140/i2a9","title":"Book Review: David Cluxton Aviation Law Cause of Action Exclusivity in the Warsaw and Montreal Conventions (2022)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Action (physics); Aviation; Political science; Engineering; Aerospace engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.030369809767922758,"score_gpt":0.327200031896864,"score_spread":0.2968302221289412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375833626","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013508729,0.3692177,0.00036012288,0.33860683,0.14540799,0.000053524163,0.0005938776,0.000064590364,0.14556034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003052075,0.13992047,0.0002808139,0.18593056,0.060411498,0.00012131537,0.00040565262,0.000107514104,0.6097701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875736,0.00023124802,0.00006461289,0.00014657123,0.000692988,0.00010718657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958526,0.0016808007,0.00015112845,0.00013946764,0.0018456948,0.00033041675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015686465,0.00082513446,0.0010013994,0.0037311139,0.0027284771,0.0053241993,0.0019414463,0.009040912,0.055066455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075493483,0.0006673173,0.00058885344,0.0034834757,0.002591412,0.0046295333,0.0020234818,0.007160707,0.024403986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013257006,0.0000012571404,0.000008528782,0.000050586597,9.553045e-7,0.0000058935225,0.000012391825,0.000009591235,0.0000040012233,0.0021361543,0.9932707,0.0044986517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022934582,0.0000015390679,0.000070919,0.00025311715,0.0000017601533,0.000016131686,0.000025640884,0.000007963093,0.000006379016,0.0011552195,0.9984554,0.000003580584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059212323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1485264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059212323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00801323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008247791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1842156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394061971","doi":"10.47348/salj/v141/i2a3","title":"The shareholder’s appraisal remedy under the Companies Act: How should the courts gauge ‘fair value’?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Gauge (firearms); Value (mathematics); Business; Law; Law and economics; Companies Act; Accounting; Corporate law; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; History; Finance; Corporate governance; Statistics","score_opus":0.04683544862480897,"score_gpt":0.2554658100018898,"score_spread":0.2086303613770808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394061971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09655314,0.020630948,0.021055626,0.60470337,0.0033573199,0.00036339572,0.00014728305,0.00010463781,0.25308436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85305685,0.006369446,0.009038169,0.10902368,0.0023530514,0.0003042269,0.000052395153,0.0000766417,0.019725528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471689,0.022500144,0.0028211738,0.0039316155,0.01748057,0.0060975724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92877024,0.055210814,0.0029863967,0.0021526131,0.009658146,0.00122183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05728869,0.0006562002,0.0012359935,0.0025108783,0.011948256,0.025716586,0.0043549347,0.027912896,0.0027315174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16662633,0.0007465848,0.0011877414,0.0023819155,0.029663328,0.02472639,0.004693166,0.027214535,0.0007199466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018978428,0.000016901671,0.000892401,0.00006958213,0.000010360822,0.00026960424,0.0064795827,0.00018583162,0.00033653577,0.9718963,0.010728453,0.009095431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013460402,0.00019955017,0.007026461,0.0022366715,0.00014366659,0.0004913685,0.01687019,0.0029685784,0.004106773,0.74049926,0.22494246,0.00038047912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064086534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06049034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064086534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012123436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02826251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30297518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401656713","doi":"10.47348/salj/v141/i3a6","title":"Realizing South Africa’s contribution to the global biodiversity framework’s area-based targets — The potential impact of new screening trends linked to strategic infrastructure projects, corridors and zones","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Regional science; Business; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.023407582600249388,"score_gpt":0.23972744138447574,"score_spread":0.21631985878422635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401656713","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21136038,0.025271619,0.038044624,0.40629178,0.0040281652,0.0006777272,0.0010136473,0.0001956282,0.31311646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94264245,0.011771544,0.019207789,0.011895116,0.00032045785,0.00017033612,0.00024654152,0.0001149486,0.013630821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955479,0.0018571885,0.00013431431,0.00020284511,0.0012703103,0.0009874372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922261,0.0036979455,0.0010366966,0.00046318595,0.0019973665,0.0005787065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074956426,0.00054602843,0.00024613473,0.00117083,0.003270973,0.005856517,0.00083579123,0.0016527285,0.0048724175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012920169,0.00028588212,0.0004413383,0.001245578,0.00413178,0.005706127,0.004294779,0.0037675628,0.00035857796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015043978,0.00008013811,0.015892517,0.0019832586,0.000106671156,0.002900354,0.030128462,0.0058362936,0.009646647,0.5896113,0.0730004,0.27066362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013447721,0.000108741224,0.022416146,0.0017029077,0.000063593674,0.0007558041,0.037007753,0.0019525143,0.004303468,0.07802797,0.85352147,0.00012612999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051896013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076528475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051896013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008651463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024911894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10318786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}