{"meta":{"query_hash":"d872fc89f84b","filters":{"venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science"},"cohort_total":63,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":63,"exported":63,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d872fc89f84b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Spontaneous+Generations+A+Journal+for+the+History+and+Philosophy+of+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1967818220","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v4i1.11947","title":"Material Culture and the Dobsonian Telescope","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"History and Developments in Astronomy","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amateur; Telescope; Materiality (auditing); Gesture; Art; Astronomy; Physics; History; Computer science; Aesthetics; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010462825632262474,"score_gpt":0.22403124405149832,"score_spread":0.21356841841923585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967818220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23462498,0.006590839,0.0049189157,0.018526077,0.00042375564,0.000023293938,0.00003255267,0.000036475692,0.73482317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830957,0.00096092856,0.0005157743,0.0007372689,0.000056249453,0.000011787873,0.0000075087296,0.000021711881,0.0145931095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956469,0.0025087516,0.00015911224,0.00042056156,0.000774326,0.0004903049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757224,0.0011830694,0.00035027607,0.00025856178,0.00033589068,0.00029992065],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038571495,0.00029420332,0.00022784749,0.0010374221,0.011543635,0.008654313,0.00068978505,0.0019090698,0.00395107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004880788,0.00023181325,0.00017830003,0.0009567829,0.04028454,0.005560496,0.005633865,0.00241629,0.00053434516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018850124,0.000009644536,0.00054867816,0.000027278316,0.0000022324068,0.00011339579,0.06734218,0.000052274783,0.00029267886,0.92358583,0.0012061772,0.0068006804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021322361,0.00008450604,0.003993664,0.00031749706,0.000009345624,0.00042936648,0.0846686,0.00026578672,0.001007346,0.20626566,0.7028947,0.000042177995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011724698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012240774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98845637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010389662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033584468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07538259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969509720","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v1i1.2972","title":"Experts, Evidence, and Epistemic Independence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Western Washington University; University of Washington","keywords":"Epistemology; Intellect; Autonomy; Proposition; Rationality; Empirical evidence; Irrational number; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12328303810701075,"score_gpt":0.29683321272867147,"score_spread":0.17355017462166072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969509720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06789586,0.01509953,0.1021949,0.102109455,0.0006741034,0.00013274567,0.0003162793,0.00012055627,0.7114566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648222,0.002768644,0.011735721,0.005365848,0.0008931211,0.00013624453,0.00009446766,0.000035533918,0.014148153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856651,0.0067972946,0.00081480376,0.0023792794,0.0032664808,0.0010770642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96165866,0.028663639,0.0020526466,0.0035889652,0.0027758458,0.0012602702],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020144047,0.0005913475,0.0010520899,0.003165675,0.004080755,0.0073372885,0.001866074,0.004477304,0.006126386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031745218,0.0006928272,0.00079716236,0.0015547089,0.040718965,0.016916396,0.009146534,0.009267558,0.0005760709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001082204,0.0000055576234,0.00016456512,0.00002144479,0.000006526036,0.000036722944,0.0006115821,0.00013567996,0.000021461343,0.9964395,0.0006149496,0.0019310577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013640187,0.0000039597694,0.00017667419,0.000040282444,0.000006969949,0.000027858827,0.00016163134,0.0002441743,0.000045429148,0.9929229,0.006349132,0.0000074189484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004087361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029048147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046180296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032268218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10653317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976967560","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v2i1.5068","title":"Paul E. Ceruzzi. Internet Alley: High Technology in Tysons Corner, 1945-2005","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Alley; The Internet; History of technology; Politics; History; Media studies; Sociology; Social science; Art history; Political science; Law; Archaeology; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.03771231203758421,"score_gpt":0.23823419514711452,"score_spread":0.2005218831095303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976967560","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001850474,0.5437358,0.00038261895,0.1130251,0.016228406,0.000041196614,0.0009229602,0.00014382103,0.3236696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020077921,0.1496013,0.00035309244,0.010672475,0.0030912873,0.000044401455,0.0004966254,0.0001772062,0.8154857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999678,0.00004331886,0.000017431705,0.00006687318,0.00012820566,0.00006622185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994802,0.00013214555,0.000058026028,0.000015010546,0.00015479776,0.00015983712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045165923,0.0007508994,0.00025676764,0.0031988018,0.00296776,0.0035715594,0.00069467054,0.0025104135,0.049027093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015358508,0.0003513202,0.00018579072,0.0060437657,0.0015084717,0.0042580753,0.0016806106,0.0032248038,0.012571439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008621405,0.0000067984874,0.00024875722,0.00008739589,0.0000010705945,0.000055390017,0.0010373251,0.000021118627,0.000018289325,0.014508303,0.9618971,0.02210992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014004397,0.000001634213,0.00075708865,0.00012100383,5.836176e-7,0.000022831855,0.0004532188,0.0000043239884,0.000017068107,0.00049006625,0.9981281,0.000002616386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12055494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3142456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007561509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23970646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977328337","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v3i1.6574","title":"Cultural Exchange in a Heterogeneous Research Field: Approaching Scienti?c Culture with Anthropological Thought","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Ethnography; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Negotiation; Anthropology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1273568169048577,"score_gpt":0.3981322073471185,"score_spread":0.27077539044226084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977328337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38966158,0.03139766,0.23430575,0.12020547,0.0017835019,0.0005511186,0.00008680708,0.00011808329,0.22189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96630657,0.004238049,0.024242915,0.002107936,0.000318195,0.00038214203,0.000022358317,0.000040639916,0.0023413212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94577533,0.04790666,0.0009339586,0.0017271677,0.0025060428,0.0011508756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9342581,0.054981567,0.0033883613,0.0040564574,0.0016049377,0.00171057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05055595,0.0007140777,0.0010445332,0.00857633,0.018445423,0.023012036,0.0031238652,0.004045833,0.0025259869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046578296,0.0008556809,0.0006590334,0.006762656,0.10349097,0.024979796,0.024252012,0.0050254255,0.00016445009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023317574,0.000061814804,0.0017921583,0.00027183656,0.00004050038,0.00066219404,0.4546417,0.0003992703,0.00030333918,0.5249719,0.00090211595,0.015929969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039502705,0.00004249123,0.0013851873,0.00070691656,0.000025079942,0.00046038756,0.41513258,0.0010789157,0.00023931664,0.53782797,0.043033104,0.000028508413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032455625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004049691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98155457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007852775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073463935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26736856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981217575","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v4i1.14192","title":"Eileen Crist and H. Bruce Rinker, eds. Gaia in Turmoil: Climate Change, Biodepletion and Earth Ethics in an Age of Crisis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Humanity; Conviction; Plea; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Art; Engineering","score_opus":0.05374175120062525,"score_gpt":0.26423062868410235,"score_spread":0.2104888774834771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981217575","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018236974,0.8564728,0.0016506447,0.09378994,0.010737581,0.000022952341,0.000049295784,0.000065643864,0.035387415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043272257,0.87365323,0.0028687194,0.010223493,0.009369032,0.00006939895,0.00011327139,0.000094914394,0.060335696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994803,0.00023946461,0.000023311492,0.00006149186,0.0001411376,0.00005420875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985423,0.00084720884,0.00011358383,0.00004125591,0.00021146677,0.00024412159],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012402199,0.0014705313,0.0008657294,0.0014436047,0.0020554194,0.005987364,0.0011897276,0.0037428718,0.0075108614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022247033,0.0006530766,0.0004619633,0.0019280234,0.0031853954,0.007165468,0.0014995685,0.0036557957,0.0037820335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008683133,0.00005073243,0.0011058296,0.000983814,0.000028416525,0.00031882428,0.008238359,0.0005691072,0.00026452442,0.074221395,0.79005975,0.12407249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008160783,0.000017430551,0.0021728089,0.0012846431,0.000020720583,0.00044082565,0.0062315166,0.00035447223,0.00012245758,0.044379063,0.9449453,0.00002269387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063051865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0129193235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021975122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023680935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025126338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987904330","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v3i1.6125","title":"Was Kekule's Mind Brainbound? The Historiography of Chemistry and the Philosophy of Extended Cognition.\"","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Harvard University","keywords":"Cognition; Historiography; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Psychology; Chemistry; Philosophy; History; Archaeology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.030792363230936516,"score_gpt":0.2236956894567115,"score_spread":0.192903326225775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987904330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2981024,0.074480176,0.018042177,0.21991535,0.0024764158,0.000026629894,0.00011703641,0.00015511342,0.3866846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97177786,0.004754072,0.0012006419,0.0045765047,0.00015290905,0.0000097636985,0.000013179842,0.00001891474,0.017496161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997137,0.00015941908,0.000007447566,0.000053334123,0.000033189448,0.000032943888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.00030845674,0.000051119438,0.00006290479,0.00004566002,0.00003702873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093120604,0.00017321979,0.000105383544,0.00039252455,0.0023580065,0.0027236873,0.00034243218,0.0013614564,0.0022399866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019852265,0.00009863782,0.000117477226,0.0002644478,0.015268204,0.0054288865,0.001578353,0.0021715404,0.00030065447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034055065,0.0000067362535,0.0005926767,0.000041712206,0.0000060108864,0.00015419006,0.03556704,0.00008634311,0.00019233084,0.93959415,0.007848004,0.01587665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014048958,0.000023235762,0.0016988894,0.0001852618,0.000009725612,0.00050207705,0.01705506,0.00031657328,0.0007104168,0.6628995,0.316563,0.000022213962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025741938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038271404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018179094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097098335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013189912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988613067","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v1i1.2973","title":"Managing Public Expectations of Technological Systems: A Case Study of a Problematic Government Project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"London School of Economics and Political Science","keywords":"Deliberation; Government (linguistics); Identification (biology); Public policy; Democracy; Public relations; Process (computing); Identity (music); Identity management; Political science; Business; Public administration; Politics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0896385424886119,"score_gpt":0.3304447176585462,"score_spread":0.2408061751699343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988613067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9353415,0.00014442804,0.014173919,0.015219562,0.000045465757,0.00024497893,0.00005494845,0.00009110143,0.03468404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918196,0.00015251171,0.0040967353,0.0005393467,0.00001773154,0.00018283175,0.000027198226,0.000050983454,0.003113125],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9615826,0.03025237,0.00077700627,0.0011809266,0.0029805072,0.0032266623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9290678,0.055871904,0.00480716,0.0032800303,0.0031373173,0.00383575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022108145,0.00074742193,0.0006601838,0.0020930704,0.03312458,0.010134682,0.0038795865,0.012858395,0.0048692515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061362077,0.0007174405,0.0008404908,0.0027655817,0.017182255,0.008188413,0.009468717,0.009066919,0.000822064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030016594,0.0015708025,0.015168702,0.00028587267,0.00004112805,0.026833696,0.69222116,0.006254538,0.0021000905,0.22150482,0.006988128,0.02673086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009920506,0.0005265489,0.0065838583,0.0003057473,0.000032731554,0.0038210996,0.8514984,0.013979394,0.0028291233,0.045478556,0.07472452,0.00012083316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013749277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013219942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96687543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011801521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005998217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11692047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989612031","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v7i1.19247","title":"REVIEW: Paul Feyerabend, The Tyranny of Science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Philosophy; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.09669830907605469,"score_gpt":0.3717895813490361,"score_spread":0.2750912722729814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989612031","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003749105,0.8416957,0.00010007152,0.09302219,0.064278245,0.000013988128,0.000079322315,0.00001337889,0.00075960514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015187791,0.7930016,0.0001873639,0.110337034,0.091780744,0.0000433076,0.00014540183,0.000019980469,0.002965797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966235,0.00070076657,0.00045304213,0.00063589716,0.0013847392,0.00020212815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98276216,0.008943824,0.0013315354,0.00032409487,0.005372985,0.0012654011],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058103665,0.0017126603,0.0031671275,0.0044999686,0.0014126275,0.0054782797,0.0028366216,0.010012857,0.0047157924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026661947,0.0008930929,0.000998841,0.005455041,0.004108618,0.0077691954,0.0023396828,0.011296922,0.0037391377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027300934,0.0000057004777,0.00004542367,0.002982573,0.000043966214,0.000042168096,0.0000920394,0.000033624823,0.00003477032,0.0020946213,0.9726447,0.021953072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003270563,0.000012453237,0.00021002017,0.002675762,0.000044340693,0.00016710351,0.00008060602,0.000023034316,0.000030444236,0.001893765,0.9948108,0.000018982038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008893183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014569709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99858737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005208654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009467402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03779161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994512439","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v5i1.15324","title":"Periodicals and Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"History of Science and Natural History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Reading (process); Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Hindsight bias; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; History; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.07729824170617906,"score_gpt":0.23011602052261335,"score_spread":0.15281777881643427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994512439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02672243,0.06058119,0.0019476577,0.24834988,0.013524396,0.000044087286,0.0001814501,0.00020581725,0.6484431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6703153,0.02110826,0.0010813903,0.09017804,0.038769335,0.00012942529,0.0003174961,0.00051238027,0.17758836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847536,0.0054017035,0.00082369946,0.0021991867,0.004723398,0.0020983173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639853,0.02381983,0.003459683,0.0023544661,0.003346033,0.0030347635],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014342698,0.0006017599,0.0008605041,0.0066204024,0.020661402,0.024364555,0.0021474753,0.010759045,0.031419355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04181488,0.0006778984,0.00059274834,0.008520559,0.033718675,0.021144187,0.012483043,0.0073083728,0.003723458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031486183,0.000017818236,0.0005560109,0.00009237672,0.0000061859223,0.00023658502,0.013364073,0.00003960461,0.000058063582,0.8999398,0.07155156,0.0141065335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019844503,0.000021403599,0.00085186167,0.00031753958,0.000007577275,0.00020847665,0.0060324348,0.00007100608,0.00008983699,0.10060824,0.8917539,0.000017912922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048296642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034529837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113945035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006405253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10510826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997241531","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.16131","title":"Interpreting Feynman Diagrams as Visual Models","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Bern; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Feynman diagram; Feynman graph; Theoretical physics; Computer science; Mathematics; Physics; Mathematical physics; Particle physics","score_opus":0.045891962473048754,"score_gpt":0.29867040514777055,"score_spread":0.25277844267472177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997241531","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018427119,0.0038761517,0.85001117,0.006421178,0.0012614337,0.0001226286,0.00041216976,0.0014560334,0.118012086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59339184,0.0046452135,0.35781395,0.0023223883,0.0011945572,0.00060788926,0.0006450572,0.0020838345,0.03729523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998374,0.00083965936,0.00007448706,0.00018809701,0.00036188425,0.00016182858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673647,0.002028553,0.00024266992,0.00041615125,0.0004339426,0.00014222224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00286612,0.001091372,0.00067246624,0.0026451226,0.0018396956,0.007779568,0.0015133303,0.0027657463,0.01119416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011101642,0.0006270088,0.001110378,0.0013455509,0.0049958876,0.012542734,0.0024752957,0.0027772475,0.0019794803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005568198,0.0000033099332,0.00003095422,0.000028582199,0.0000039846714,0.000041936928,0.00042696684,0.00075168884,0.0002220394,0.9955384,0.0010757819,0.0018707501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004928413,0.000003487031,0.00003126537,0.000033126904,0.0000045516517,0.000042121454,0.00010837123,0.003779688,0.00028594278,0.9823767,0.013321718,0.000008033311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014752223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008332212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015145139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080499134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037448227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000188163","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.16141","title":"Making the Visual Visible in Philosophy of Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Cell Image Analysis Techniques","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Position (finance); Cognition; Cognitive science; Position paper; Key (lock); Psychology; Sociology; Data science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034141864732801654,"score_gpt":0.3096584891616802,"score_spread":0.27551662442887853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000188163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027596703,0.04702503,0.26758346,0.23553741,0.005866333,0.00012751098,0.00019631305,0.000509574,0.41555774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87826633,0.019262623,0.061958164,0.015196947,0.0032224,0.00038359882,0.00010388254,0.00036922542,0.021236876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98994035,0.0072305803,0.00030146254,0.0007557036,0.0014654825,0.00030646144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98388135,0.012069292,0.0006372675,0.0015281341,0.0013238274,0.00056013046],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012740443,0.00076210615,0.0006799913,0.0024303128,0.0055926107,0.015915142,0.0016815708,0.0058449158,0.0035841903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015376526,0.0005598603,0.00069508963,0.0015761941,0.07849656,0.018127304,0.0061765737,0.008627203,0.00082497724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067045166,0.0000056786,0.000047608813,0.000067093104,0.0000026560217,0.00001845358,0.0035864008,0.0001611704,0.00007922338,0.9915541,0.0012883516,0.0031825292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071702666,0.00000832756,0.000048485763,0.00009304593,0.0000026384832,0.000041575582,0.00095623394,0.00027808946,0.000071331124,0.9667777,0.031705704,0.000009715443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003090748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017757905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052573374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045341104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06737876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020959440","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v4i1.14185","title":"Conceptual Sea Changes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; The arts; Conceptual framework; Conceptual change; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Art; Visual arts; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06227183604278923,"score_gpt":0.27587858269054977,"score_spread":0.21360674664776053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020959440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026486155,0.0048673977,0.11171403,0.07566959,0.0058781244,0.00008982926,0.0003215745,0.0004628393,0.77451044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8461474,0.003841126,0.030861963,0.0128991855,0.0019644294,0.00027810616,0.0005204351,0.0008911644,0.10259618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932034,0.0031931598,0.00029839788,0.0014256269,0.0012199441,0.0006594204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926803,0.0019409236,0.00035973807,0.002655333,0.0016734872,0.00069023715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078807175,0.0008646321,0.0006588949,0.0019856705,0.0049773385,0.011384457,0.0023661093,0.0038346557,0.028271377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016613934,0.00046707215,0.0012716897,0.0020395906,0.02984321,0.024563167,0.007546534,0.00915615,0.0040407996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004823659,0.0000050101844,0.00006173447,0.000012263106,0.0000031172913,0.000017123533,0.0027963521,0.00004888505,0.00004979064,0.9896427,0.002564609,0.004793743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008075589,0.000012757246,0.00017332695,0.000059429964,0.0000063410275,0.000102354425,0.0042287856,0.00031895976,0.00009868727,0.79952633,0.19545317,0.000011699697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031435695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029684952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99502265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063408953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003919151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09457719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025965885","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v3i1.6569","title":"Exploring Epistemic Boundaries Between Scientific and Popular Cultures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Epistemology; Popular culture; Negotiation; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.4705157829439147,"score_gpt":0.39277460876343845,"score_spread":0.07774117418047627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025965885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59208894,0.004952202,0.024661703,0.035126764,0.0004117559,0.000074569456,0.00006436301,0.000036848367,0.34258285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99773574,0.00040278328,0.00083737186,0.0003816915,0.000039859005,0.000027921951,0.000008220453,0.000010214209,0.00055632344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9650333,0.02609755,0.0011614944,0.0016142802,0.004286133,0.0018073702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9066909,0.072893694,0.007300181,0.006082504,0.005043206,0.0019894363],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032420143,0.0004834627,0.00066993636,0.0056283833,0.013935711,0.023192177,0.0021729502,0.00509599,0.0038413173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07092929,0.0007118899,0.00052179967,0.0043385886,0.06320104,0.031509638,0.020864053,0.0071473317,0.00034015733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042150834,0.000032909105,0.0026747272,0.0000725695,0.000017330916,0.00016358857,0.34093004,0.000096205826,0.00027172032,0.6493554,0.00030878972,0.0060345423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004238655,0.00005317392,0.004178185,0.00053015637,0.000044264805,0.00021405704,0.4526241,0.0007598446,0.0008357908,0.5090094,0.03165009,0.000058487745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024423827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019232808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074082715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004573697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17145616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030332463","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v2i1.3516","title":"Gender, Mad Scientists and Nanotechnology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Nanotechnology; Ethical issues; Feminism; Political science; Engineering; Materials science; Law","score_opus":0.08375553216797062,"score_gpt":0.3384694293913257,"score_spread":0.2547138972233551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030332463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30000612,0.01751254,0.0029288619,0.12396634,0.0011775206,0.00001891866,0.00005502182,0.000021453334,0.55431324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836955,0.0024629328,0.00022133144,0.004501227,0.00016377693,0.000009675789,0.0000059632025,0.000014059743,0.008925529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709964,0.0018126996,0.000041207386,0.0002191251,0.00048224328,0.00034513217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683005,0.0020410705,0.00041956417,0.0001320527,0.00025645708,0.00032078542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027441345,0.0002568602,0.00027420907,0.00081082917,0.007005656,0.0052490523,0.00043428116,0.0018823947,0.0055049807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005118054,0.00015916454,0.00019207875,0.0005541124,0.029765423,0.0057050474,0.0030960697,0.0023125978,0.00034063566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027377657,0.000027772274,0.0028816843,0.00007946898,0.00000735565,0.0003146622,0.21714939,0.00006036901,0.0006482387,0.76164687,0.0049828854,0.012173868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018618792,0.00008263831,0.007139744,0.0004425051,0.000015249741,0.000801501,0.35144967,0.00013782244,0.000696748,0.28311363,0.356068,0.00003388392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048454143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004596016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99299437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003035941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001921912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022027433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034270583","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v5i1.15341","title":"A Response to Mike Thike (2011)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Evolution and Science Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fagan inspection; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Sociology; Media studies; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.11309747174298297,"score_gpt":0.2581060468097555,"score_spread":0.14500857506677256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034270583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010193076,0.0012835695,0.000065657856,0.97439903,0.02348542,0.0000055253754,0.000030643074,0.000029395924,0.000598784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010408717,0.0005826671,0.00020354532,0.982711,0.008710226,0.00002814311,0.000017054981,0.00005015186,0.0066563874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904392,0.0025458809,0.000789535,0.001908334,0.0031355105,0.0011816147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953038,0.019151542,0.004134353,0.0019176089,0.012701035,0.009057469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011785843,0.0020235472,0.002134368,0.0014865432,0.009701823,0.01317386,0.0041418592,0.056670893,0.018585099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07583881,0.0014991431,0.0015584001,0.001964193,0.006924049,0.013963449,0.008230211,0.08059176,0.014734523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010803588,0.0000067093288,0.00007045927,0.0000383571,0.0000039880106,0.00008374542,0.00033353854,0.000012662201,0.000052816762,0.0010594134,0.99704665,0.0012808228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010936924,0.000014833122,0.00040114086,0.00024777357,0.0000055834776,0.00031347308,0.0015439091,0.0000563341,0.00011146569,0.001575953,0.9956632,0.00005533081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064797853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011983531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056670893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063643483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011289564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062330306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041341253","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.18644","title":"Visual Representation and Science: Editors' Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Historical Studies in Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Novelty; Variety (cybernetics); Interpretation (philosophy); Representation (politics); Constitution; Diversity (politics); Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Anthropology; Philosophy; Law; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05215858703297944,"score_gpt":0.28624769955740376,"score_spread":0.23408911252442433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041341253","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047958575,0.40297776,0.002728336,0.08746158,0.47464064,0.000051713727,0.00019322155,0.00014758251,0.031319547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0113757495,0.259672,0.0022518248,0.043589253,0.6457112,0.0001788393,0.00019548423,0.00025485278,0.03677083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794585,0.0005996034,0.00022999213,0.00039094372,0.000682324,0.00015124145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98768413,0.007372107,0.0003972475,0.0005214752,0.0030301786,0.0009948051],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004274568,0.0019361464,0.0015534009,0.004588416,0.002446634,0.009499436,0.0026986327,0.005020497,0.019301036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013788218,0.0006039099,0.00082690275,0.00366315,0.006761523,0.0093227625,0.0040644724,0.00906688,0.005417642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057005946,0.00004644187,0.000205629,0.0016584708,0.00002211926,0.00009978079,0.0011421676,0.00021734786,0.0002236377,0.0476303,0.8462217,0.10247558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008588765,0.000023329123,0.00032787377,0.0010331875,0.000008884417,0.00013569261,0.00032847686,0.00008620839,0.00004263622,0.014742183,0.9832492,0.000013787752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019326159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020826387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99755335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028763728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002396098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06456834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061163123","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v7i1.19664","title":"Transition to Science 2.0: “Remoralizing” the Economy of Science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"University-Industry-Government Innovation Models","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Knowledge economy; Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Transition (genetics); Moral economy; Politics; Political science; Economic science; Key (lock); Political economy; Sociology; Economic system; Epistemology; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Positive economics; Social science; Economy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03772146929723863,"score_gpt":0.2233091885634091,"score_spread":0.18558771926617046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061163123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17722729,0.005771765,0.038502973,0.22254281,0.0016441083,0.000069519054,0.0000920509,0.0002532961,0.5538961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812626,0.0010714174,0.0030864342,0.005041611,0.00034741958,0.000055101398,0.00002460356,0.00006810418,0.009042685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578863,0.0024496838,0.00008246146,0.00035710103,0.0006958738,0.0006262509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960394,0.0018825505,0.00035098047,0.0006874994,0.00041543372,0.000624134],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00691255,0.00024826583,0.00036806925,0.0009953973,0.0036594532,0.011958185,0.0008918415,0.004126392,0.0037313339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009483017,0.00022974185,0.0003791246,0.0006556798,0.03318731,0.014991705,0.007572979,0.0069425628,0.00059828744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008850759,0.000009129351,0.000099869656,0.000011082741,9.191758e-7,0.000029461646,0.0024708936,0.0001523118,0.00007793947,0.9931244,0.0011772201,0.0028378558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007395658,0.000018134151,0.0002886784,0.000042409083,0.0000013363515,0.00005567439,0.0029507263,0.0007206357,0.00014933906,0.9378356,0.05791997,0.000010110672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019599325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011630517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006872446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059070997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04986334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062403820","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.17155","title":"Visual Representations of Structure and the Dynamics of Scientific Modeling","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific modelling; Computer science; Dynamics (music); Cognitive science; Representation (politics); Point (geometry); Epistemology; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05114289889937327,"score_gpt":0.25974424114138256,"score_spread":0.2086013422420093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062403820","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10474017,0.0029828933,0.68084174,0.02366244,0.00048978307,0.00011254561,0.0006164348,0.0016540476,0.18489993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85906893,0.0014540444,0.12785804,0.0007784653,0.00014893772,0.00016226349,0.0004697281,0.00046217785,0.00959748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976538,0.0013864224,0.00006871849,0.00034203756,0.0004185252,0.00013052447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99199086,0.0051034675,0.00059068314,0.0012318891,0.00077253545,0.00031057902],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003452826,0.00057765056,0.0003946183,0.0022133263,0.0015766008,0.007909978,0.0015505909,0.0021997509,0.0070893927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022720998,0.000581472,0.0008715225,0.0012067541,0.0096070245,0.016504228,0.0037233462,0.0028910239,0.00090027595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031359603,0.000008851871,0.00038140398,0.000049293907,0.000008731898,0.00006828285,0.0055462,0.006274837,0.00081488176,0.97298527,0.0016400244,0.012190858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002062378,0.000019911338,0.00038138079,0.00006482444,0.0000136116105,0.00011512513,0.0013740339,0.031369742,0.0006858945,0.93951213,0.026409952,0.00003277179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003764872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018480504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034132511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011519645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024764955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074429551","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.16075","title":"The Colour of Risk: An Exploration of the IPCC’s “Burning Embers” Diagram","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Climate change; Diagram; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Convention; Power (physics); Sociology; History; Political science; Geology; Social science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.39682403368113833,"score_gpt":0.4033865308758068,"score_spread":0.0065624971946684485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074429551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16518442,0.0037964885,0.18089683,0.031368952,0.0010961753,0.00017331545,0.00049529644,0.00031545048,0.6166731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529963,0.0016115727,0.03263797,0.0006369072,0.00015119865,0.00009806778,0.00012827168,0.00032911214,0.0114105325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996682,0.0025777475,0.000042933516,0.000106326355,0.00046890328,0.00012201659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935933,0.005365293,0.00020964693,0.0002575447,0.0004046565,0.0001696777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004151648,0.00041699508,0.00022101292,0.0028598963,0.0029658165,0.0068088635,0.0007947698,0.0015883929,0.0059526265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011088954,0.00028157383,0.00042663937,0.0023158852,0.009019918,0.008507316,0.0033906163,0.0022060093,0.00043446748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004870765,0.000011522726,0.00074681296,0.00012480805,0.0000054680586,0.00039220948,0.12308767,0.0014983739,0.00063015707,0.8541453,0.004777821,0.014531195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023315404,0.000033969034,0.001990774,0.0005310528,0.000015634245,0.00061467325,0.100991204,0.005744471,0.0007280182,0.2928739,0.5964005,0.00005248078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0080185225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007739865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041718786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002528463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030269265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075572211","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.17157","title":"“The testimony of my own eyes”: The Strange Case of the Mammal with a Beak","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Gothic Literature and Media Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Wonder; Rhetoric; Skepticism; Monster; George (robot); Casual; Art; Art history; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.02880359583847082,"score_gpt":0.2712810928644088,"score_spread":0.24247749702593802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075572211","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19903968,0.02882635,0.00604651,0.43368152,0.010038831,0.00006779621,0.00019769969,0.00014995379,0.32195172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9093828,0.0058082575,0.0016424963,0.041938916,0.0025833466,0.000040929946,0.000054250522,0.00016321392,0.03838584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929414,0.005608337,0.000090364876,0.00039216905,0.00056916015,0.00039867507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939175,0.004144501,0.0004480686,0.00044296758,0.0005026234,0.00054434163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035441953,0.0007197366,0.00042458338,0.0012415342,0.0218627,0.008130175,0.001454013,0.009142741,0.005669693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022835108,0.0005248802,0.0004399832,0.000917866,0.021444604,0.009335534,0.006725203,0.010865086,0.0015200054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007839671,0.000026421789,0.0012108589,0.00020472362,0.00004253199,0.020266356,0.7029569,0.000093380375,0.00066291756,0.12856941,0.13252427,0.013363729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015374633,0.000037004644,0.0011530195,0.00073875533,0.000028059017,0.019271009,0.4441257,0.00027550146,0.00073217624,0.022349838,0.5112046,0.00006899441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010497285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021293655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030432425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016186652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022080421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087907696","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v4i1.11954","title":"Domesticating the Planets: Instruments and Practices in the Development of Planetary Geology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chemical Heritage Foundation; Jet Propulsion Laboratory; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Geologist; Planet; Mars Exploration Program; Astrobiology; Remote sensing; Geology; Extraterrestrial life; Terrain; Planetary science; Earth science; Geography; Paleontology; Astronomy; Cartography; Physics","score_opus":0.0670518215445371,"score_gpt":0.27986238812532194,"score_spread":0.21281056658078484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087907696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21369247,0.046845157,0.053995404,0.05693382,0.0009820291,0.00012184966,0.000101437436,0.00026018205,0.62706757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94140196,0.012781288,0.018587518,0.0023982348,0.0003693677,0.000089075744,0.000037465732,0.00014525048,0.024189906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907679,0.006595717,0.00032675464,0.000807633,0.0011028906,0.00039901407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866269,0.009606929,0.0008390087,0.0017330864,0.0007025506,0.00049152254],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01203857,0.00032008978,0.00026446898,0.0023929533,0.0055803065,0.0073897494,0.0009044631,0.0017691161,0.0025298428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014576467,0.00036655442,0.00020217511,0.0023043544,0.04423465,0.009905805,0.006287399,0.003136107,0.0005759573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019009662,0.000021923286,0.0026263562,0.000072738374,0.0000031338031,0.00017501094,0.1853044,0.00008453974,0.00045751946,0.7509662,0.0024153595,0.057853777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012487812,0.00009349822,0.0064530144,0.00054793135,0.0000065347053,0.00076371274,0.08799582,0.00022108489,0.0014260389,0.19626299,0.7061792,0.000037704605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024082176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024952376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044355565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003173544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06366682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093252889","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v4i1.14231","title":"Scientific Instruments: Knowledge, Practice, and Culture [Editor’s Introduction]","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Australian Indigenous Culture and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific instrument; Spare time; Visual arts; Engineering; Nanotechnology; Art; Operations management; Physics; Materials science","score_opus":0.023106700735997143,"score_gpt":0.29355408712312264,"score_spread":0.2704473863871255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093252889","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018620687,0.036086734,0.0003641431,0.14397065,0.81374156,0.000043968106,0.000077608805,0.00008834697,0.0054407245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023873663,0.044610787,0.00074455934,0.10862457,0.8242729,0.00013786668,0.00010906049,0.00010320018,0.01900972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968556,0.0010686485,0.00038890846,0.00030210015,0.0012224962,0.00016223949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97715855,0.013264663,0.00091272336,0.00059419323,0.006767875,0.0013021276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044282055,0.0028317743,0.0022074014,0.002287825,0.003432467,0.007984806,0.005225546,0.009758837,0.013253019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02102912,0.0009592377,0.0012817413,0.0029905816,0.0038534137,0.007849711,0.0022908987,0.0124709755,0.006827831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014327902,0.000012626109,0.00003987739,0.0003537703,0.000009212447,0.00005796888,0.0001058307,0.000023008059,0.000046205314,0.0008882143,0.9866042,0.011844737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017848777,0.000023602643,0.0007506665,0.00080249284,0.000016455313,0.00016042525,0.00028771596,0.00012662273,0.000060047583,0.0011624498,0.9965689,0.00002268952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036159907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009932751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99656755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017413467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00345226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044335842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121289069","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v3i1.6086","title":"REVIEW: Daniel Rothbart, Philosophical Instruments: Minds and Tools at Work","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.07069278129736137,"score_gpt":0.2526388113305916,"score_spread":0.1819460300332302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121289069","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004724217,0.87117356,0.0002499466,0.094985045,0.03205511,0.000045033634,0.00018362502,0.000035997575,0.0012244354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001191962,0.8853701,0.00035019644,0.06991521,0.03711807,0.00009659409,0.0002830186,0.000042925996,0.0056319362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714845,0.0006594042,0.00030638967,0.00047244673,0.0012664389,0.0001468849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870701,0.006098544,0.00086014776,0.00025018005,0.004860885,0.0008602175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057114665,0.0021936616,0.004306201,0.006468094,0.0015891229,0.0050205044,0.004709982,0.0064987284,0.011736114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020588465,0.0010480363,0.0011626916,0.010638389,0.0036888572,0.009212264,0.002503151,0.00918363,0.009886976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024234165,0.0000032701867,0.00003684483,0.003320179,0.00003563901,0.000024754314,0.000048339283,0.00004007043,0.000030890675,0.001075035,0.97597414,0.019386673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055894576,0.000025835987,0.0005407572,0.005722185,0.00009070474,0.00019330847,0.00015820847,0.00005751178,0.000072200695,0.0021762704,0.9908606,0.00004663028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012257394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023589617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006371067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008893427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046225548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128421058","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v5i1.14712","title":"REVIEW: Charles E. Rosenberg. Our Present Complaint: American Medicine, Then and Now","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Identity (music); Psychoanalysis; American medicine; Sociology; Psychology; Law; History; Medicine; Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Family medicine","score_opus":0.10382251709512849,"score_gpt":0.27404328821460244,"score_spread":0.17022077111947395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128421058","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006902936,0.5010393,0.00017112294,0.3789775,0.11364853,0.00008327563,0.00030944782,0.00011975804,0.0055819964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016580909,0.3455078,0.00039081345,0.49093428,0.123866245,0.00022206537,0.00042558086,0.00009417674,0.03690088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970835,0.0005380218,0.00027736698,0.0005009561,0.0014188173,0.00018122884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905939,0.0030480456,0.0010913353,0.0003299294,0.0036734925,0.001263225],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044830358,0.0020480822,0.0039695613,0.0030307467,0.0014656165,0.005562983,0.005512703,0.013406347,0.029899526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019072998,0.0008949532,0.0016809648,0.0045345537,0.0031448847,0.0055074925,0.0021251582,0.0107560465,0.037546802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001106806,0.0000027506344,0.000016227637,0.0006558438,0.000013234573,0.000026128322,0.000013489503,0.000008562192,0.000015933767,0.00027369257,0.9885887,0.010374448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029828774,0.000010037469,0.00014848154,0.0016028163,0.000024092466,0.00012733637,0.000039191425,0.000020421829,0.000021457116,0.00065179716,0.99731076,0.000013759531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058595077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00838983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004127409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071560773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100023925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133699768","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v1i1.2969","title":"Science Democratised = Expertise Decommissioned","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Warwick","keywords":"Sophist; SOCRATES; Episteme; Dialectic; Contemplation; Citizenship; Philosophy; Analogy; Phronesis; Prudence; Socratic method; Literature; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.059004159861663075,"score_gpt":0.27185122031180864,"score_spread":0.21284706045014556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133699768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055742513,0.0012521931,0.006351845,0.026486853,0.00074908754,0.00006707427,0.00017331121,0.00023221082,0.908945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928516,0.0007600933,0.0015599792,0.0048003676,0.00041581888,0.00007768257,0.000107366766,0.0001113057,0.06365127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954455,0.0013989763,0.00022782666,0.0010095945,0.00095373776,0.0009644447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99385864,0.0018760702,0.00091394526,0.0020211507,0.00075004384,0.0005801773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029184713,0.0002923685,0.00053751684,0.0018628582,0.0034984315,0.006934772,0.000535427,0.0026863625,0.030850226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067576324,0.00024776073,0.0005780314,0.0020548764,0.014411192,0.0088194,0.005677629,0.0041439463,0.003832152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032651238,0.00003769229,0.0004414396,0.000084610954,0.000013854137,0.00014738298,0.0037767354,0.00020047046,0.0004962794,0.97404927,0.006756439,0.013963172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072804716,0.00009271485,0.002886217,0.00015934304,0.00002228837,0.0005126599,0.004746337,0.00062135165,0.0015141082,0.57373405,0.4156121,0.000025848476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002011078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030315523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99650156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048926855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004312232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10320431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206497471","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v5i1.14963","title":"Cancer: An Oncologist's View","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emperor; Medicine; Reading (process); History of medicine; Tone (literature); Cancer; Disease; Classics; Family medicine; History; Internal medicine; Literature; Law; Pathology; Art; Ancient history","score_opus":0.09063913659075624,"score_gpt":0.3660049522898413,"score_spread":0.2753658156990851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206497471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026446945,0.2041821,0.0002655752,0.68968093,0.089840524,0.00001049432,0.000023088549,0.000028114213,0.015704669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008160702,0.14303905,0.00041046794,0.6857638,0.13911791,0.0000397169,0.00002346383,0.00004125869,0.02340371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965835,0.0013169541,0.00019371613,0.00039725646,0.0011781439,0.00033042286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944805,0.0023819,0.0001641658,0.00018688165,0.0013674424,0.0014190283],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005655002,0.001009073,0.0015058002,0.0015860285,0.0046358085,0.009247094,0.0023017686,0.014493789,0.0040332056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010236439,0.00064300135,0.0009939929,0.0013672209,0.010698788,0.012190917,0.0048654038,0.03328069,0.002552036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016942044,0.000024748892,0.000121441335,0.00027048416,0.000011261889,0.00021904099,0.0008898351,0.00006746928,0.00007205901,0.03303977,0.9462112,0.01905567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065855725,0.000023431016,0.00009204751,0.00036236216,0.0000048056213,0.00035513815,0.0005408825,0.00001989771,0.000011361315,0.008835331,0.98974144,0.0000067187602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049368534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008978044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061934595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066728014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044936895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313864519","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v1i1.2966","title":"On the Ethics of Medical Care under Resource Constraints","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Medical ethics; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Engineering ethics; Medical care; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Nursing","score_opus":0.1677314233225056,"score_gpt":0.45188269344238385,"score_spread":0.2841512701198783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313864519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068256687,0.025383972,0.018298304,0.35543776,0.0012070895,0.00012475767,0.00012112379,0.000016710548,0.5925846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8128733,0.029187797,0.011352646,0.07935722,0.0088501675,0.0009127328,0.00009891868,0.00008046696,0.057286773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97818345,0.014643401,0.0004571997,0.0009992619,0.0034703182,0.0022464169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98661476,0.010449394,0.0008322045,0.00064490334,0.0008492266,0.0006095408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013733922,0.0006103724,0.0007670881,0.0011708701,0.005051011,0.008703289,0.0023372485,0.013608503,0.0071314895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021721004,0.00041137586,0.0006236584,0.0015267222,0.044333268,0.007701129,0.0063498965,0.008810709,0.00080622843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020653467,0.0000022998415,0.000021691463,0.000011490899,0.0000012167419,0.000022984963,0.00016359802,0.00014990525,0.00000560409,0.997603,0.0014649337,0.0005512805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010276606,0.0000073590263,0.000111122376,0.00018274043,0.0000020899786,0.000054174492,0.00029823036,0.00034039447,0.000019725654,0.9644893,0.034477577,0.0000070183496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006119379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004543801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013733922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01044557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011568702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07578826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314049187","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v2i1.5075","title":"Visual Evidence at the Nanoscale","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nanoscopic scale; Data science; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Nanotechnology; Philosophy; Materials science","score_opus":0.02729420707169411,"score_gpt":0.2952349946138658,"score_spread":0.2679407875421717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314049187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33503997,0.031883124,0.18394925,0.048248317,0.002927189,0.00009136136,0.0006040688,0.0006039075,0.39665273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96445423,0.0052276305,0.020714886,0.0013696596,0.00033990474,0.00004602792,0.00009442155,0.00006335246,0.007689841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988464,0.00035064705,0.000039915627,0.00018378568,0.00049849856,0.00008064347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99397075,0.0041235355,0.00037047354,0.0006688758,0.00066993304,0.00019642047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016005062,0.00020920261,0.00025432633,0.000961049,0.0011838604,0.0022345888,0.0010879956,0.0017004367,0.006107239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013853959,0.0002460071,0.00019393871,0.00033935258,0.006438206,0.006851635,0.0028018754,0.0023055528,0.000734806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007855817,0.000020860856,0.0013996037,0.00043801105,0.00001813479,0.00048113812,0.0017100102,0.0008524949,0.029694138,0.92333174,0.004435061,0.03754017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027758673,0.00009304879,0.0027923824,0.0003840568,0.000023170336,0.0010323987,0.0021650044,0.0028532825,0.044280477,0.84576595,0.1005137,0.00006863809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003832938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036926017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99881613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006819909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004716325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020430744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315283637","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v7i1.20002","title":"Public University Funding and the Privatization of Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Politics; Public administration; Public funding; Public good; Political science; Public value; Ideal (ethics); Proposition; Value (mathematics); Public university; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06496832690918487,"score_gpt":0.25588846395781273,"score_spread":0.19092013704862787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315283637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24065952,0.005487264,0.029343469,0.15347478,0.00045109872,0.00004516654,0.00010115797,0.00018896545,0.57024854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99063617,0.00046806,0.00046538675,0.0019915833,0.00021170199,0.000034628152,0.000011299469,0.000019977408,0.006161114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916892,0.0041982327,0.0001807841,0.00073730835,0.0015472807,0.0016472775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901778,0.0055792253,0.0012267655,0.001600738,0.0008572306,0.00055832416],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008599731,0.00017426479,0.00043907235,0.0012111639,0.005650657,0.008680125,0.0007714009,0.0028358246,0.004227627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016227944,0.00037450722,0.00038558012,0.0016401691,0.028891567,0.008192465,0.005712146,0.0051023373,0.00029623657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005698863,0.00000555373,0.00022458516,0.0000065195063,0.0000022835454,0.000012038541,0.0006931132,0.00029278747,0.000034534987,0.9956428,0.0007330823,0.0023469923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036798334,0.000016557073,0.0014532686,0.00006786936,0.0000063604834,0.000040690265,0.000997313,0.0007589672,0.00018652604,0.9302255,0.066197686,0.000012463415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010685986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069494033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99434936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010276422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009419377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320812212","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v5i1.15165","title":"What are Climate Scientists to do?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contrarian; Skepticism; Global warming; Scientific consensus; Credibility; Newspaper; Political science; Government (linguistics); Nothing; Climate change; Environmental ethics; Scientific evidence; Relevance (law); Conviction; Face (sociological concept); Law; Sociology; Social science; Business; Ecology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.057484244149315536,"score_gpt":0.24285724209430018,"score_spread":0.18537299794498463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320812212","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011747509,0.028883029,0.0013002862,0.925453,0.014281544,0.000012204117,0.00010279304,0.000057079258,0.028735325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1552031,0.08914935,0.0058779498,0.68167347,0.040453374,0.00019489678,0.000297384,0.00023361578,0.026916882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98598355,0.0077224695,0.00032221235,0.0017674337,0.0027699317,0.0014344912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96383667,0.015217486,0.0029253748,0.0033666634,0.006475955,0.008177853],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021446211,0.00085187564,0.0011303336,0.0019432388,0.0074949823,0.015606766,0.002057774,0.014140762,0.0079270145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0485978,0.0005064862,0.00062996475,0.0023271614,0.026147813,0.023094108,0.0039733453,0.013218592,0.0053889155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008368471,0.00016773013,0.0038447015,0.0008933445,0.00011619146,0.00012014543,0.0068968064,0.0003189303,0.00044284243,0.5002608,0.41773075,0.06912406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002880721,0.00002131058,0.00074900506,0.00042380116,0.000019023651,0.00005804351,0.002874419,0.000087764034,0.00014493128,0.37719986,0.61836,0.000033028104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042114384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036971802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056597902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019116078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11341977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322715857","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v1i1.2968","title":"Expertise, Skepticism and Cynicism: Lessons from Science & Technology Studies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Impartiality; Skepticism; Politics; Criticism; Political science; Epistemology; Confusion; Engineering ethics; Science, technology, society and environment education; Science studies; Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Psychology; Science education; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.4778093651825661,"score_gpt":0.46967084242258156,"score_spread":0.008138522759984557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322715857","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1525535,0.050603986,0.0075810417,0.6121414,0.0012088185,0.00006839925,0.0000769831,0.000028427929,0.17573738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567997,0.016893348,0.001334139,0.019581178,0.0012982754,0.0000852358,0.00002603311,0.000037295547,0.0039448133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98313415,0.01331476,0.00038144115,0.00066524744,0.001597062,0.0009072525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.816175,0.16984423,0.0039075725,0.002306135,0.0051152324,0.0026518682],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027964875,0.00037413093,0.0007925252,0.0047866227,0.006803094,0.012433653,0.0024104386,0.007707611,0.005578978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06852191,0.00034127114,0.00050568645,0.003857168,0.03894088,0.019897595,0.006397965,0.007874095,0.0004937544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006561003,0.0001176907,0.0069387415,0.00054975436,0.000041683477,0.0010962477,0.3486431,0.00038750682,0.00010247658,0.57576996,0.01767495,0.048612263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062750725,0.00005006375,0.007954343,0.001546763,0.000020767762,0.00044512056,0.2038426,0.0009142319,0.0001639806,0.6989777,0.08597447,0.00004721155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008562859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011892599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008230974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064030807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14789414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325263694","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.16137","title":"“That small and unsensible shape”: Visual Representations of the Euclidean Point in Sixteenth-Century Print","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Euclidean geometry; Point (geometry); Representation (politics); Exegesis; Modal; Reading (process); Order (exchange); Geometry; Mathematics; Computer science; Epistemology; Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy; Literature; Politics","score_opus":0.05519566700692383,"score_gpt":0.29232984792077576,"score_spread":0.23713418091385194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325263694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27313152,0.004520779,0.088839315,0.016351098,0.0007689096,0.000041134885,0.00017657332,0.00028011992,0.61589056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98141885,0.000497996,0.0046660663,0.0003118576,0.00008742206,0.000017508506,0.000027960481,0.000084222156,0.012888042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905246,0.0006300148,0.000022412392,0.00009302729,0.00015100841,0.000051053757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855953,0.00088411785,0.00009741011,0.00024552929,0.0001557481,0.000057795212],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015790323,0.00027997943,0.00012731942,0.0010602095,0.0018269584,0.0050966716,0.00040210172,0.0009214376,0.004190565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005443657,0.00013543965,0.00017439827,0.0006314273,0.017990075,0.007745218,0.0022133696,0.0013298026,0.0004458842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036014382,0.0000045472357,0.00046276534,0.00005817825,0.00000350104,0.00012334132,0.14897902,0.00017860175,0.00071229204,0.8319533,0.0023187597,0.015169688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033144126,0.00006307315,0.0024568876,0.00034337584,0.000018164445,0.0011031118,0.08977899,0.0011140358,0.0023986034,0.50431687,0.3983217,0.000051973384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015530585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018894839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99817306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012688187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006769658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014018834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326834790","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v2i1.5072","title":"In Search of Transdisciplinarity: A Review of Two Workshops Supported by Situating Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Multidisciplinary approach; Discipline; Sociology; Empathy; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Occupational science; Boundary object; Social science; Psychology; Social psychology; Negotiation; Engineering","score_opus":0.16676713320394754,"score_gpt":0.45553797876377916,"score_spread":0.2887708455598316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326834790","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040425058,0.99825734,0.00016040415,0.00062346406,0.00016384666,0.00003169109,0.000011964101,0.0000032187736,0.00034382753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045900503,0.993912,0.00053279137,0.0006402402,0.00006981541,0.0001024417,0.00003309147,0.0000047516373,0.00011474425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153453,0.0043977886,0.0017039162,0.0005563685,0.0015864564,0.0002208669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631742,0.028200608,0.0032817775,0.00057376025,0.0043111932,0.0004583778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01301186,0.00083179725,0.002331138,0.008290085,0.000727068,0.002254067,0.0015594453,0.0022014764,0.0014099227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03645254,0.00082576927,0.0011041579,0.014636087,0.0015604679,0.0037784153,0.0016721205,0.001858233,0.00045304708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025458637,0.00008734315,0.0006315048,0.25398946,0.0007154808,0.00036404136,0.004625959,0.00021014146,0.0010832878,0.0035571672,0.01488497,0.719596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015303111,0.0005279314,0.0073738103,0.2923267,0.002073204,0.0024317522,0.0067678117,0.0001615688,0.0011764372,0.0028221868,0.68407786,0.00010777459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036769416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010716554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99927294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029293615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075977286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0688141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326913574","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.16139","title":"A Matter of Scale: The Visual Representation of Nanotechnologies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Nanotechnology research and applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"South African Agency for Science and Technology Advancement","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Nanotechnology; Representation (politics); Data science; Field (mathematics); Living matter; Emerging technologies; Computer science; Materials science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Mathematics; Cartography; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.028238615133649145,"score_gpt":0.27468739193947733,"score_spread":0.2464487768058282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326913574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049332988,0.018757185,0.2954408,0.037640553,0.003916571,0.00013501149,0.00062171835,0.0016725815,0.5924826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84819186,0.007979985,0.09489033,0.005147046,0.0015221089,0.0002649059,0.00038768162,0.0012694781,0.040346626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905175,0.00052613113,0.000027143558,0.000094280564,0.00022279516,0.00007783234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976649,0.0013451683,0.0001455872,0.00036307547,0.0003027303,0.00017855043],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015312735,0.0005701371,0.00030068198,0.0018730797,0.0016891082,0.008315837,0.0009054663,0.0018098586,0.009504342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008604518,0.00025862904,0.00039604818,0.0015534792,0.00932655,0.012288824,0.0042699184,0.0021341424,0.00151236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006559958,0.000009581825,0.0004682844,0.00018421278,0.000009982762,0.0001936698,0.019070389,0.0006221108,0.0022577476,0.9304751,0.016293973,0.030349303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019914289,0.000033058233,0.0009296977,0.00028160514,0.000018457322,0.0008229701,0.010852535,0.0032307552,0.0010370519,0.62791157,0.35481778,0.000044596516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001571787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014129538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99831086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013168694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008389262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031795204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328197738","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v5i1.14969","title":"Media and Science in Disaster Contexts: Deliberations on Earthquakes in the Regional Press in Kerala, India","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Skepticism; Context (archaeology); Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.3924443319718195,"score_gpt":0.37114136667820524,"score_spread":0.02130296529361425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328197738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789894,0.00068834366,0.00017587205,0.00622325,0.000046406403,0.000023144756,0.00002053079,0.000009435282,0.01382355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985273,0.0003037103,0.000047854966,0.0003444787,0.000028181299,0.000007882424,0.000006328176,0.000005065023,0.0007291602],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98977065,0.0074042347,0.0002705215,0.00041124068,0.00056295126,0.0015804537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567657,0.036403224,0.0035834308,0.0006998842,0.0008896624,0.0016581661],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007382821,0.00055696175,0.00043451184,0.0031064898,0.01919138,0.01446366,0.0013625518,0.0038147205,0.0031031128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017025428,0.0006398692,0.00031842486,0.003099694,0.022338497,0.005395875,0.009693112,0.004215378,0.00030390956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068023815,0.000043061737,0.008909684,0.00012724579,0.000018693121,0.0024326902,0.97680795,0.00009293258,0.0005826153,0.0072782,0.00066535076,0.0029735607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007311576,0.000035375513,0.009334422,0.000055431177,0.000014660037,0.00032402313,0.9761153,0.0000676586,0.00038913678,0.0008283427,0.012806232,0.000022059245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013658596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017224558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006931952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034003397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050294995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329913954","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v2i1.4896","title":"Is it Time for an Updated ‘Eco-Evo-Devo’ Definition of Evolution by Natural Selection?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Natural selection; Evolutionary developmental biology; Niche construction; Heredity; Evolutionary biology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Natural (archaeology); Ecology; Evolutionary ecology; Population; Biology; Computer science; Paleontology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Genetics; Demography","score_opus":0.01852163084884803,"score_gpt":0.2599835013690419,"score_spread":0.24146187052019388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329913954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009621986,0.09985032,0.11627123,0.6525008,0.04649837,0.000043628548,0.0002599842,0.00025197357,0.07470175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35418582,0.094035685,0.10137735,0.32782465,0.07700509,0.0005124736,0.00053614913,0.0011373075,0.04338547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387145,0.0022138464,0.00040372772,0.0010594138,0.0020980395,0.0003534993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98653954,0.008082312,0.00079603127,0.0014406389,0.002226051,0.0009153783],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016112698,0.0009598141,0.0031260592,0.0018512777,0.0031008155,0.008367853,0.004223173,0.0067069437,0.005174862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019168667,0.0005656384,0.0010245162,0.002099618,0.034922983,0.027428968,0.0051708138,0.021830939,0.0018610202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003834089,0.000025915002,0.00022550147,0.00016716185,0.00002511404,0.000064755724,0.00079425273,0.00018741301,0.00022352434,0.9626408,0.01477613,0.020831073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017646053,0.000040770286,0.00030263135,0.00012558361,0.000012394467,0.00019668679,0.00040878248,0.00048321052,0.00014478285,0.7164184,0.28181416,0.000035015208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013474252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013281134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045063733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002659392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085213125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331517086","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v6i1.17158","title":"Visual Representation and Science: Visual Figures of the Universe between Antiquity and the Early Thirteenth Century","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Middle Ages; Context (archaeology); Rhetorical question; Epistemology; History; Literature; Linguistics; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.049606292686104524,"score_gpt":0.2746447294785557,"score_spread":0.2250384367924512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331517086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28935254,0.032382384,0.044774115,0.01868596,0.002912422,0.00009553454,0.0006387141,0.0005052372,0.6106531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714139,0.0030273504,0.004426348,0.00040744658,0.00024079066,0.00004108457,0.00008901212,0.00013724365,0.020216819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862874,0.0007591972,0.000058278714,0.00021808328,0.00020547824,0.0001301927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977543,0.0011833084,0.00026571122,0.00029181107,0.0003593815,0.00014559968],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024138968,0.0005660639,0.00032687956,0.0028353569,0.0041909274,0.009145057,0.0006447573,0.0014733921,0.005469705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057556005,0.0002934811,0.00032386632,0.002597731,0.02469646,0.008879291,0.0031713785,0.0026652757,0.0005718498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006637773,0.0000071783725,0.0005154206,0.000110046334,0.000006261852,0.00022788241,0.18279566,0.00019940142,0.00042529317,0.79337156,0.0025521095,0.019722834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003144329,0.00009659027,0.00411981,0.0007161577,0.000026091155,0.0010544766,0.0642061,0.0006171667,0.0014457689,0.25487167,0.672743,0.00007169196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056820097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047384105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067893662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002053045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049260557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527891911","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.28059","title":"Tolstoy’s argument: realism and the history of science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Realism; Bankruptcy; Epistemology; Intervention (counseling); Scientific theory; Scientific realism; Environmental ethics; History; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.05157582884203892,"score_gpt":0.24265878962028514,"score_spread":0.1910829607782462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527891911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019691998,0.016926315,0.019454936,0.34407687,0.0026303541,0.000041088955,0.00019099949,0.00006994841,0.5969174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8388948,0.0047623506,0.005275701,0.060769938,0.0037404655,0.00012824155,0.000088395784,0.00011933665,0.08622076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977003,0.0010694846,0.000057036214,0.0004531719,0.00042331807,0.0002967151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617827,0.0026841883,0.00028382585,0.0003719947,0.00026422698,0.00021753383],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032653878,0.0003608588,0.0004386515,0.0012539541,0.0046610837,0.0068242946,0.0013423951,0.006666266,0.007978369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008113572,0.00025595006,0.0004864279,0.0009266011,0.035592914,0.01122756,0.0037500032,0.009180898,0.000918247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072502094,0.0000021501162,0.00003431758,0.000010032376,0.0000012467367,0.000015728134,0.00072549196,0.000050569193,0.000011701428,0.99577194,0.0027262988,0.0006433789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022827991,0.000007174691,0.00010933093,0.00007475358,0.0000029930532,0.00003272866,0.00048799484,0.0001369161,0.000071976116,0.92513186,0.07391464,0.000006847783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071391175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068016797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072539267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003799735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0526312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606224101","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27047","title":"Machine Learning and the Future of Realism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Cognitive science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03589794720789414,"score_gpt":0.3145758841703717,"score_spread":0.27867793696247756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606224101","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05251537,0.02037334,0.14612176,0.2508324,0.0019892137,0.000073375704,0.00024529253,0.00017983797,0.5276694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654559,0.0019981035,0.011764968,0.0040916805,0.0011314799,0.000078806006,0.00006024119,0.000076470176,0.0153423175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939985,0.0045353975,0.00010147348,0.0005067779,0.00059578277,0.00026207755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98169243,0.014245244,0.00055432564,0.0021978067,0.0008795986,0.00043055057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00944909,0.0004002471,0.00066597416,0.0010034073,0.0027515865,0.0066442187,0.0011459735,0.0033413935,0.007482949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018061168,0.0002985018,0.00064745534,0.00052220863,0.027145976,0.010523548,0.0024140575,0.006639244,0.0007176689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039005326,0.0000031680909,0.000043543747,0.0000074259146,0.0000018199723,0.000003403809,0.00016578213,0.00018768349,0.0000132005935,0.99811816,0.0004792378,0.00097258156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000379006,0.000002140461,0.00003682377,0.000011707097,6.669526e-7,0.0000047412323,0.00006266827,0.0006585406,0.000019416428,0.99509203,0.004105619,0.0000018426027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002309529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020001258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004785422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018857537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049972177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612173403","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27045","title":"Theoretical practices that work: those that mimic Nature’s own","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.10605532613406488,"score_gpt":0.2916458042756914,"score_spread":0.18559047814162655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612173403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12781018,0.002788511,0.089573465,0.13105132,0.0013352532,0.00021957897,0.00008661675,0.00039570525,0.6467393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725434,0.00046873497,0.012549527,0.0036184487,0.00014741413,0.00013797167,0.000026190677,0.00027431437,0.010233944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98611325,0.00968852,0.00027438437,0.0014323245,0.0017657522,0.00072575046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765835,0.009729967,0.0017065564,0.007842287,0.0019384143,0.0021993627],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012465744,0.00048068352,0.00041538052,0.0013240529,0.0072832345,0.010310159,0.002056936,0.00452884,0.006995397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029971529,0.0005145636,0.00035515951,0.0011188271,0.05016319,0.01394199,0.005724471,0.0062886565,0.00135081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008895118,0.000050854418,0.0010257363,0.00006547896,0.000012630785,0.000056406196,0.041557148,0.00015095252,0.00027463917,0.94527864,0.0031003414,0.00841824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003833983,0.000039231072,0.0013427739,0.00026946914,0.000024823723,0.00017286958,0.045444652,0.000848135,0.00061828154,0.83007216,0.12110594,0.000023454644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025670265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048694084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005077931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008116029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065925956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785480740","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26352","title":"A Dilemma for the Scientific Realist","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Common sense; Scientific realism; Epistemology; Realism; Scientific progress; Scientific theory; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09973600425506833,"score_gpt":0.26110697912309117,"score_spread":0.16137097486802282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785480740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016484231,0.0035366458,0.0064756847,0.9546423,0.0024675124,0.00001372961,0.00001999131,0.000034391967,0.031161273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48407862,0.008661468,0.03211811,0.40895015,0.018453645,0.00046467883,0.000109459455,0.0002695468,0.04689426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712403,0.016765464,0.0009827253,0.0031338546,0.006688031,0.0011895513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943933,0.039755035,0.0015934671,0.0051783663,0.0055822795,0.0039577894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049549058,0.0005128112,0.0013553487,0.0018629292,0.011526814,0.012718474,0.0036183281,0.021255704,0.005572683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06637015,0.00069274066,0.0011017417,0.0009994303,0.052197408,0.026234709,0.010602444,0.034189288,0.001979909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007413161,0.000009837003,0.000042860673,0.000022018368,0.000004223638,0.000026169238,0.0010784445,0.00007837841,0.000032653825,0.9762449,0.020067494,0.0023854943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015479365,0.000007179637,0.000026099131,0.000049713188,0.0000021929652,0.000046164438,0.0005005887,0.00020620975,0.000031051946,0.93864423,0.060461033,0.000010004642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002593625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002238641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9884732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00622302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009378132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2620436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785629751","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26998","title":"Being realistic: the challenge of theory change for a metaphysics of scientific realism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Unobservable; Epistemology; Realism; Scientific realism; Modal; Philosophy; Scientific theory; Computer science","score_opus":0.12697611680282986,"score_gpt":0.2734111263907479,"score_spread":0.14643500958791802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785629751","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04719485,0.003958302,0.14425191,0.5628292,0.0016918827,0.00013622965,0.0001490067,0.00017472776,0.23961389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9607666,0.0006931736,0.018573022,0.01317555,0.0011445854,0.00019920665,0.00005820073,0.00010448203,0.00528504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789161,0.01250314,0.0005648793,0.0025180015,0.004185554,0.0013123131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722473,0.018224005,0.0015000766,0.0047690347,0.0021312002,0.0011283847],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022634612,0.00046599197,0.0010808377,0.0012142331,0.007568644,0.009183834,0.0033851024,0.010602528,0.0055917487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038217355,0.0004715729,0.00143324,0.0007267282,0.05438314,0.018119821,0.008196227,0.019968024,0.0008914324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007133074,0.000006839267,0.000047935824,0.000009848601,0.0000030281526,0.000024197941,0.0011145887,0.0001548784,0.000039433344,0.99704033,0.00061274064,0.00093896635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008606077,0.0000047723984,0.000030530435,0.000008838669,0.0000015147317,0.000016831667,0.0002288187,0.00043754396,0.00003646648,0.9958176,0.003404809,0.0000036830963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017750468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095137657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99243134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065388936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035083662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119704664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786116642","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27760","title":"Why the Realism Debate Matters for Science Policy: The Case of the Human Brain Project","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Skepticism; Epistemology; Philosophical realism; Argument (complex analysis); Direct and indirect realism; Scientific realism; Philosophy; Relevance (law); Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0724390958297672,"score_gpt":0.2906151216947566,"score_spread":0.2181760258649894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786116642","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06448349,0.006661176,0.050933108,0.51265407,0.00067840493,0.00006820184,0.000068749745,0.00007474246,0.364378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722543,0.0015052515,0.007902444,0.010919526,0.0004315411,0.000118567244,0.000021121128,0.00007262982,0.0067745713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867539,0.010114601,0.00019276669,0.0010755971,0.001132322,0.0007308286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97954386,0.016657546,0.0006048227,0.0016155299,0.00090654904,0.0006716706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025877282,0.0003544627,0.0005672838,0.0012967793,0.010155681,0.008460026,0.002135956,0.010649501,0.0050007445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028143805,0.00043654867,0.00063218415,0.0011376604,0.04256953,0.017363327,0.007858339,0.011267008,0.0005519302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000773795,0.0000032519613,0.000052741245,0.00000697933,0.0000019856918,0.00003372939,0.0011139254,0.00013872005,0.00002107893,0.99672204,0.0008684667,0.0010294636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011718915,0.000004560011,0.00006631921,0.000039037834,0.0000038498692,0.000024187095,0.0005798687,0.0005033952,0.000091327995,0.9853145,0.013355965,0.000005300891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043213097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039706947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007899817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004647831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13685375},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2787096728","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.28056","title":"Quo Vadis Selective Scientific Realism?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Scientific realism; Realism; Epistemology; Status quo; Simple (philosophy); Position (finance); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06705619345142425,"score_gpt":0.2512294608635059,"score_spread":0.18417326741208165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787096728","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00759741,0.007050742,0.023231028,0.6241062,0.0067558046,0.00003679597,0.00014997892,0.00015426516,0.33091775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6983132,0.0051400103,0.009356736,0.16021048,0.0094436845,0.00030293645,0.00016309171,0.00026587924,0.11680401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352187,0.0032088866,0.00017618749,0.0014147762,0.0011887014,0.0004895175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919356,0.004281801,0.0006998703,0.001600811,0.001031128,0.00045074234],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011154696,0.00036968003,0.0005094085,0.00066306005,0.004111022,0.0063332,0.0014019154,0.0051238555,0.013797227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021238074,0.00024223307,0.00052082294,0.0005254854,0.024381837,0.0116192745,0.004025714,0.00901218,0.0033563888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059725435,0.0000032255487,0.0000728283,0.000028401006,0.000003625897,0.000015066669,0.0006014271,0.000029596802,0.000060126255,0.9871023,0.009722713,0.0023547905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009927085,0.0000090250005,0.0001287283,0.000105054154,0.000005321385,0.0000483524,0.0007740137,0.00018766563,0.00013884337,0.8600675,0.13851836,0.0000071637664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024195632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027105543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99588895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028448016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030656396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058992386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787550840","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27042","title":"Gravitational Waves and Scientific Realism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Gravitational wave; Scientific realism; Gravitational acceleration; Physics; Astronomy; Gravitation; Classical mechanics; Theoretical physics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03825967111312798,"score_gpt":0.2740479001670769,"score_spread":0.23578822905394894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787550840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027844297,0.02748482,0.01663757,0.2798784,0.0062311413,0.000034926976,0.00021782538,0.000120129225,0.64155084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8115301,0.008466346,0.0036152387,0.032414615,0.005396465,0.00010833632,0.00013857271,0.00014211288,0.13818833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858713,0.0007671437,0.000047919668,0.00025406212,0.0002492983,0.000094485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740463,0.0015315531,0.00013289464,0.0004452918,0.0003060872,0.00017950642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002790294,0.00034814127,0.00053121237,0.00058954896,0.002506679,0.0042387103,0.0008553022,0.0030760788,0.0072895223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069028772,0.00019122715,0.00034385765,0.00047390288,0.013602264,0.0055055968,0.0020834962,0.0070699546,0.0012027589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036146282,0.000003453579,0.00003758843,0.0000111291365,0.00000225074,0.000005579897,0.00017291387,0.00004557214,0.000016801947,0.9954385,0.0032081257,0.0010544446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060382727,0.000004529972,0.000066135595,0.000020571666,0.000002401071,0.000012046849,0.00010737323,0.00012529927,0.000032426306,0.9687348,0.030884491,0.000003958436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002232658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017907795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024686628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015007842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02438593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787971493","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26992","title":"What is Scientific Realism?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Scientific realism; Realism; Rationality; sort; Philosophy of science; Scientific theory; Relation (database); Philosophy; Philosophical realism; Moral realism; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07808310197951733,"score_gpt":0.261007127418762,"score_spread":0.18292402543924463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787971493","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048059826,0.037109938,0.010736434,0.879296,0.0053745997,0.000026327678,0.00010815213,0.000046757115,0.062495865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.688319,0.05103484,0.017152958,0.19251443,0.03561342,0.00028512944,0.0003771829,0.00024672036,0.01445639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974919,0.015655095,0.000910721,0.002530629,0.005040016,0.00094451604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94808406,0.038764812,0.0021809996,0.003631226,0.005082293,0.0022565995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03598477,0.00059871987,0.0017073066,0.0033265012,0.007574796,0.014276154,0.0022333295,0.009915822,0.0054528913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050145913,0.0005370048,0.00093798694,0.001998928,0.049826156,0.022500977,0.0049100397,0.017147608,0.0015395047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010109835,0.0000122386655,0.00017882297,0.00009913485,0.000013899553,0.000019989033,0.0014732187,0.00008064942,0.00004615117,0.982732,0.010402648,0.004931132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008470428,0.0000069970956,0.00012234607,0.00022256593,0.00000446178,0.000028512763,0.0008995624,0.00013484084,0.000035325873,0.95343053,0.045097657,0.000008693239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029236735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017534549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007364787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067462325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19030792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788052867","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27046","title":"How Deployment Realism withstands Doppelt's Criticisms","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Software deployment; Realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06983465019851794,"score_gpt":0.2497740693899564,"score_spread":0.17993941919143847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788052867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04001472,0.0052708923,0.16445191,0.29307178,0.0021768701,0.00010406542,0.0002693482,0.0005008465,0.49413943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95123345,0.0012316842,0.014333617,0.0130579155,0.0012601282,0.00016126841,0.00011064161,0.00034606564,0.018265272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907968,0.004817279,0.00034788807,0.0015439627,0.0018643035,0.00062983134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98356307,0.010879566,0.0007116282,0.0028351774,0.0014943412,0.00051626575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012043489,0.0008324165,0.000940373,0.0017967828,0.004575786,0.0076049482,0.002212783,0.006033551,0.0056734043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029555999,0.00054509705,0.0011391157,0.0010083714,0.030368268,0.01332343,0.0062114443,0.008849902,0.0016943766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010659989,0.000005440676,0.00011548252,0.000015497431,0.0000038646604,0.000024547488,0.0010251782,0.00016085079,0.000039261806,0.9946904,0.0018513883,0.0020573414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011076493,0.0000065279864,0.00008236199,0.000043098724,0.0000045852307,0.000037373113,0.0002513616,0.00059549685,0.00010888873,0.9832759,0.01557537,0.000007822043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022393514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014077238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046103816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001785789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06369281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788149393","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27002","title":"Realism for realistic people","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06773278418694344,"score_gpt":0.3532996750198273,"score_spread":0.28556689083288384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788149393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064401943,0.0060490537,0.05412786,0.09708526,0.002920429,0.00010103523,0.00015508571,0.00013534017,0.83298576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8512113,0.0027669405,0.022708308,0.022124382,0.0023319449,0.00048727813,0.00020424557,0.00023132317,0.09793434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397945,0.0041474504,0.00014462271,0.00066587096,0.00076460553,0.00029796903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949826,0.0025696333,0.0003102503,0.0011926218,0.00057121646,0.00037363314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005652788,0.00068898883,0.0004598838,0.0008577543,0.004586578,0.005513636,0.0010585741,0.0052723764,0.018071685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014875915,0.00035805293,0.0005673319,0.000322101,0.0189436,0.007978728,0.0039042078,0.008204946,0.0033004312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024666303,0.0000024901049,0.000012399289,0.000010182942,9.4111044e-7,0.000006766961,0.00027977812,0.000056429944,0.000016578717,0.99610823,0.0028570537,0.0006466533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005706678,0.0000041324874,0.000025520738,0.000031442098,0.0000012541828,0.000024458377,0.0001655722,0.00021272872,0.00003860623,0.95912623,0.04036106,0.0000033535582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001728032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015481175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002883756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019363805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0604558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788271960","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.28057","title":"A Fond Farewell to \"Approximate Truth\"?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific realism; Realism; Epistemology; Scientific theory; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0668578067437191,"score_gpt":0.25230606178986464,"score_spread":0.18544825504614554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788271960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009933412,0.01462983,0.078111894,0.76513904,0.006638592,0.000033315184,0.0002093802,0.00024835864,0.12505618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78225285,0.008304309,0.035344608,0.12066189,0.01490817,0.00020228785,0.00022972947,0.00057081995,0.037525408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844417,0.010407299,0.00042068475,0.001856112,0.0023624657,0.0005116663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96784455,0.0209502,0.0018641665,0.0054094708,0.002959098,0.00097260496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017011764,0.0007784238,0.0011121167,0.0021943874,0.0047787405,0.011722688,0.0029449037,0.0074753324,0.013658139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07439527,0.00043192372,0.0006681707,0.0013448065,0.04886889,0.036108963,0.0054686726,0.013271215,0.0031244222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019189742,0.000006374137,0.00017158949,0.000028588895,0.000007724182,0.000021000767,0.001645339,0.000101502395,0.00002519847,0.979756,0.012448022,0.0057693818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007257506,0.000007769434,0.000092320945,0.00009477907,0.0000035375892,0.000050052204,0.0012289572,0.00042402156,0.00005514618,0.9561788,0.041846503,0.000010935883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004143077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026346657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99522126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049532875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028054842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08996785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788305039","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27095","title":"Engaging philosophically with the history of science: two challenges for scientific realism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific realism; Epistemology; Sine qua non; Pessimism; Realism; Scientific theory; Scientific progress; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10554651150069665,"score_gpt":0.26245392690294983,"score_spread":0.15690741540225317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788305039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012048256,0.010520056,0.06626039,0.82393414,0.002505262,0.000073014045,0.000065181026,0.000080251906,0.08451338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8546663,0.008470617,0.055129766,0.056448262,0.008867887,0.0007748259,0.00011413195,0.00024679033,0.015281276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759563,0.016390637,0.00075424137,0.0021170336,0.0037516067,0.0010301326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95097095,0.035496376,0.0027243276,0.0052681626,0.0026767757,0.002863423],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03209444,0.0007490392,0.0015024479,0.0028616702,0.011321891,0.019269647,0.0043652244,0.012831713,0.0047240425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04295334,0.00086379505,0.0011286029,0.0016802241,0.083800316,0.03519078,0.015014276,0.023757214,0.0012019691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008272928,0.000017201926,0.00011587788,0.000040722567,0.0000037164966,0.000037966296,0.0051358165,0.00012067712,0.000047442263,0.9906356,0.0020326062,0.0018040976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013158343,0.00000838658,0.000081604245,0.000076959106,0.000002656182,0.00006223512,0.0019630976,0.0003551459,0.000046528814,0.9804585,0.016921086,0.000010684383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002594005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002199595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076456093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065006404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16973364},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2788386580","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26986","title":"The Relevance of Evidence from the History of Science in the Contemporary Realism/Anti-realism Debate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Relevance (law); Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Philosophical realism; Epistemology; Scientific realism; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1710116618925266,"score_gpt":0.28204990347019154,"score_spread":0.11103824157766495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788386580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035773136,0.046450607,0.0155195,0.7602287,0.004774988,0.00003681347,0.00010888774,0.00003172521,0.13707569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89612114,0.021759767,0.006868004,0.056226373,0.0140273655,0.00014450643,0.00010170857,0.00010879172,0.0046423287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97280425,0.018522901,0.000947533,0.0021682587,0.004529766,0.0010271572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7287426,0.24846174,0.007516082,0.0064662984,0.006187382,0.0026259634],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050294977,0.0005054067,0.0015652134,0.005211521,0.0073151845,0.017620329,0.0033645672,0.013930902,0.005454456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114582516,0.00071924296,0.000793128,0.0036840457,0.075647786,0.036577523,0.007219036,0.02062974,0.000605325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016773149,0.00001209026,0.00025040316,0.00010570731,0.000011403658,0.000060480594,0.0027805995,0.00007246861,0.000032356445,0.99262893,0.0015900973,0.0024387387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015484518,0.000010116718,0.00037354493,0.00037178872,0.000009354292,0.00004320838,0.0013905016,0.00016344694,0.00007106297,0.9768952,0.020644555,0.000011776374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024905838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002534282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99268484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065214518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005772453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26598847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788411768","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27048","title":"Motives for Research","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.2352089594682787,"score_gpt":0.341842272141866,"score_spread":0.10663331267358733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788411768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012864142,0.012850411,0.0027181935,0.64734495,0.052893594,0.0017517183,0.005896093,0.00057497656,0.26310596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11262975,0.0037204134,0.00238911,0.263499,0.027348915,0.0045920694,0.0013456414,0.000477642,0.5839975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97645193,0.008604153,0.0016353215,0.0029115858,0.007389627,0.0030072397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89800656,0.0368751,0.0041006655,0.00949119,0.020014014,0.031512477],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028002473,0.0006842049,0.002241572,0.0031768598,0.0036907026,0.009086604,0.003258205,0.01506147,0.14405191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114536606,0.0008175183,0.00078903243,0.0019593607,0.0030892352,0.0055595418,0.00545444,0.008204655,0.047048964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047361653,0.00024356543,0.00491021,0.00096693577,0.0000688029,0.001109288,0.0021349483,0.000061108956,0.00084047666,0.22285597,0.7081791,0.05815605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001566456,0.00006893382,0.0020999955,0.0007006891,0.000026099384,0.0008681101,0.0018121488,0.0002641022,0.00018291418,0.0103134345,0.9834751,0.00003173453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000932899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026476963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053324685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012924068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48190165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788427105","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.27051","title":"BEWARE OF Mad DOG Realist","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Otago","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.049741934786424004,"score_gpt":0.3104106073721627,"score_spread":0.26066867258573867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788427105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14703837,0.0014929526,0.015213829,0.06121656,0.0026662506,0.000091797534,0.00021706572,0.00055136596,0.7715119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88267845,0.0002046353,0.0022488418,0.0056536705,0.00022865715,0.000031914693,0.00006843666,0.00021136462,0.10867408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856395,0.00069789175,0.000027330056,0.00024883146,0.00027896574,0.00018301774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638087,0.0010376684,0.0003212065,0.001104704,0.0005991963,0.00055637606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021614817,0.00024032117,0.00018604065,0.00047887026,0.0036548923,0.0037632233,0.0006097212,0.002104309,0.029217623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012425523,0.00020735612,0.00020003768,0.00026904786,0.004713582,0.005786481,0.0029128112,0.0037158802,0.0042186775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008532506,0.0000618218,0.0038747136,0.00005321429,0.000018632005,0.0007349478,0.027848506,0.00011800568,0.0009006216,0.87468714,0.057735495,0.033881642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027026374,0.000049877595,0.004162647,0.000095454096,0.0000130862,0.0014055466,0.019922243,0.0007164562,0.0011217393,0.29922828,0.6732279,0.000029776624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010832229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022835592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013050827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007265429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09774274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788562148","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26979","title":"Beyond Realism and Antirealism ---At Last?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific realism; Epistemology; Realism; Philosophy; Framing (construction); Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Reflexive pronoun; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.049666120991969334,"score_gpt":0.2424780305266858,"score_spread":0.19281190953471644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788562148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016466409,0.021119019,0.037684966,0.5229452,0.0041284813,0.000033430333,0.00013503888,0.00013325426,0.39735416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89198416,0.0059315,0.009153654,0.046212412,0.003909069,0.00011984313,0.0001223981,0.00021612574,0.04235071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924941,0.004674876,0.00016447442,0.0009023691,0.0012253239,0.0005388588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895371,0.005686157,0.00073395984,0.001770969,0.0014306726,0.00084114727],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00882812,0.0005388352,0.0007352599,0.0010196072,0.005560182,0.0097679645,0.0014770482,0.0044113947,0.007984844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013086998,0.0002727453,0.0006356903,0.0006324997,0.030901762,0.017506193,0.0051611876,0.010384633,0.0018483846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009150224,0.0000067597366,0.00010069774,0.000024788467,0.000005162255,0.0000144162195,0.0012294734,0.000042888674,0.000056061755,0.99393326,0.0028284928,0.0017488118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072884145,0.000012648943,0.000110653586,0.00010447019,0.000004582983,0.000042173517,0.0015479958,0.0001798152,0.0001368788,0.9120913,0.085752524,0.000009633892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029678533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030525257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99443984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050626276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037337774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04668814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788630510","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26993","title":"Four Challenges to Epistemic Scientific Realism—and the Socratic Alternative.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Realism; Socratic method; Epistemology; Scientific realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11407621990252223,"score_gpt":0.2586441696231028,"score_spread":0.1445679497205806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788630510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015849685,0.010577362,0.02735137,0.43664062,0.002828052,0.00006292249,0.00009217764,0.00007270541,0.50652504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9015674,0.004190535,0.015043178,0.03862644,0.0039918884,0.0003261384,0.00009227527,0.00016780225,0.03599443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789764,0.013483067,0.0007166384,0.001205347,0.0040644268,0.0015540835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97132194,0.01940267,0.0012491129,0.0034214356,0.0031887149,0.0014160677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019892197,0.00053277216,0.0006395055,0.0016861631,0.010826627,0.011441664,0.0019233503,0.008957905,0.006442322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04258503,0.00050891633,0.0008302942,0.0012843943,0.06429506,0.018108452,0.008773633,0.012572559,0.001081386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000514142,0.0000052859714,0.000031241547,0.000011475106,0.0000013484414,0.000013123066,0.0007015248,0.000033193966,0.00001693585,0.99554247,0.0024567381,0.0011813752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000921947,0.0000035715952,0.000051055486,0.000034078923,0.0000016451373,0.000021125625,0.00048787997,0.00013448084,0.0000470855,0.9814736,0.017729716,0.0000063010452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038659354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035119057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98917335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006356429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066181794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105201244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788878669","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.26990","title":"Referential and Perspectival Realism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Scientific realism; Epistemology; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Scientific theory; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07072039536894542,"score_gpt":0.2543345676364111,"score_spread":0.18361417226746568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788878669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02517296,0.0053758314,0.067719094,0.041551135,0.0009785837,0.000041714888,0.00007146122,0.000107353364,0.85898185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482935,0.0019575905,0.012414104,0.003879034,0.00088689564,0.00010409007,0.00009477861,0.00015272098,0.03221729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037457,0.0064792642,0.00022200952,0.00108611,0.0013911384,0.0004470398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424666,0.0031885642,0.0004667507,0.0013319933,0.0005322993,0.00023378489],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007270958,0.0005284464,0.0003795586,0.0012583919,0.004580195,0.009594909,0.0013035211,0.0033050915,0.005844121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118987635,0.00032137404,0.0007481121,0.0011784541,0.03197125,0.013403502,0.006627308,0.0058364263,0.0010392106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012164769,0.0000016432615,0.000026068054,0.0000049549,8.5981145e-7,0.0000074894997,0.0017534251,0.000022302484,0.000023830447,0.9972012,0.00036342346,0.00059357355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005783479,0.0000055896535,0.000065030465,0.000040122875,0.000002595227,0.00003255543,0.0012319095,0.00014506432,0.000097733326,0.95820075,0.04016872,0.0000040329087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016403478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013493327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004864021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017539923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038452983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789032639","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.29356","title":"Scientific Realism Again","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ontic; Scientific realism; Realism; Metaphysics; Epistemology; Ontology; Philosophy; Scientific theory; Philosophical realism; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Philosophy of science","score_opus":0.07631539203615921,"score_gpt":0.25271899886948473,"score_spread":0.1764036068333255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789032639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009235173,0.014114374,0.11840196,0.17789711,0.006360861,0.00008028877,0.0001460043,0.0001792593,0.67358494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8022388,0.008515414,0.031347033,0.045825873,0.0067676823,0.00032816868,0.000256322,0.00045013725,0.104270555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147695,0.0041832775,0.00032746998,0.0010376126,0.002497413,0.0004771513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376076,0.003816954,0.00038994668,0.0009722735,0.0008129543,0.00024704676],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009064181,0.0005670978,0.0008721348,0.0019014593,0.0047859303,0.0071032955,0.0016127963,0.005604982,0.010947489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014340791,0.00035560335,0.0015159617,0.0010355652,0.026404545,0.0117567275,0.0046803984,0.011946185,0.0022798325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015800084,0.0000015947151,0.000014259947,0.000009162873,0.0000022855224,0.0000055207543,0.00027899517,0.00004460275,0.000024459925,0.9974927,0.0011145187,0.0010104559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037051373,0.0000068467107,0.000038926744,0.000052003372,0.0000029261594,0.00002805029,0.00016762626,0.00018414321,0.000062899904,0.93943334,0.060014535,0.000005128121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025842967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017843778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99521405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050935415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032858145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04793656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789083007","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.28062","title":"Scientific Realism and the History of Chemistry","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Realism; Epistemology; Chemistry; Computer science; Astrobiology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.05400649826019765,"score_gpt":0.22743758335737177,"score_spread":0.17343108509717411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789083007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024721064,0.0133746015,0.01892672,0.061951052,0.0018158059,0.000055478144,0.0001262628,0.00009570957,0.8789333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9020055,0.002646348,0.0035788477,0.0055847443,0.0013867465,0.00006841629,0.00007202704,0.00011069385,0.084546715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971374,0.0017109956,0.000074359836,0.00038107377,0.0004710873,0.00022499204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946754,0.0033542432,0.0002428592,0.0009622118,0.0005248247,0.00024048987],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00487716,0.00035229637,0.00047798458,0.001313954,0.004702385,0.0060600433,0.0009367495,0.0036684007,0.010856787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008302136,0.00034331178,0.0005871122,0.0007002929,0.02826835,0.008535698,0.0026884957,0.007074603,0.0010557465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028365255,0.00000290429,0.000020879763,0.00000560129,7.949434e-7,0.000004081361,0.00023959998,0.000041497326,0.000017909433,0.99880433,0.00045491414,0.00040471344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007355096,0.000005954368,0.00007050923,0.000016651744,0.0000012341214,0.000014875709,0.00015157444,0.0001444277,0.000065470034,0.97146434,0.028054535,0.000003185876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037741526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033627958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058862204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032382112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04270774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206266750","doi":"10.4245/sponge","title":"Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History and philosophy of science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05903338699955731,"score_gpt":0.2877803332640663,"score_spread":0.228746946264509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206266750","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010616501,0.020323489,0.0026227473,0.10509718,0.050565667,0.00006152137,0.0012759536,0.00033430333,0.81865764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01098059,0.006245118,0.00092724705,0.005959858,0.00982606,0.00008660219,0.0004919915,0.00049209764,0.96499044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977731,0.0008166085,0.00012127578,0.00016384703,0.0009934915,0.00013157558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99191564,0.0035894183,0.00032141892,0.00081548124,0.0016200846,0.0017379853],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035904467,0.0007641697,0.00055866974,0.0016228628,0.0032873484,0.017785953,0.0011824724,0.0057212366,0.16239211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011870654,0.0004135559,0.00030349087,0.0027727594,0.0033538535,0.011919413,0.0037300931,0.0053588795,0.043690443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008108839,0.000020369916,0.000038586397,0.00005720664,0.0000018253808,0.000020972879,0.00013737944,0.00004852496,0.00004576946,0.13197297,0.85562384,0.012024495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049986766,0.0000039042943,0.00014538284,0.00005656111,7.901162e-7,0.000015278922,0.00008742838,0.00008694736,0.00002894874,0.021509098,0.97805685,0.000003769581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003230683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006209664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038317353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071521387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5432557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211087879","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.29355","title":"Feyerabendian Pragmatism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Hedge; Realism; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.05829301037144574,"score_gpt":0.2480931225723481,"score_spread":0.18980011220090237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211087879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050349357,0.0074602417,0.012536444,0.12767124,0.0035647124,0.000025246902,0.00019051648,0.00013162103,0.84338504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54019827,0.0055485596,0.011121469,0.08069653,0.00539734,0.00029272318,0.00021196964,0.00028703295,0.3562461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980617,0.0007738588,0.00006017144,0.0004828946,0.000405537,0.0002158339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881375,0.00062762224,0.000087290966,0.00019752268,0.00019840302,0.000075461365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031200084,0.00055503007,0.0003364612,0.000608231,0.0045538563,0.0053370735,0.00091295684,0.0042476975,0.012531968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00594879,0.00024622487,0.00035942163,0.00050470984,0.01258554,0.0048511843,0.0025039823,0.007858506,0.0036411155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047590406,0.0000022117435,0.00001814499,0.0000069231214,8.682534e-7,0.000011680568,0.00038101364,0.000031748805,0.000015040572,0.98841953,0.010018308,0.0010897823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001410907,0.0000063743505,0.000079466714,0.00007986909,0.000002237663,0.000060000068,0.0002857392,0.00026127358,0.00007447316,0.6500797,0.34905022,0.0000065152476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030682466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031687946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99544615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004658412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022044007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041923583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252678547","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v9i1.29354","title":"Editor's Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific realism; Realism; Epistemology; Metaphysics; Philosophical realism; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Historiography; Philosophy of science; Scientific theory; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03735605612453151,"score_gpt":0.24328915529385714,"score_spread":0.20593309916932562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252678547","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052866828,0.0018766456,0.00022202221,0.0466769,0.94354326,0.000055094668,0.00041482097,0.00014400121,0.0070143784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019779883,0.0055302326,0.000908074,0.1100932,0.7824872,0.00021354655,0.0006483069,0.00030300152,0.09783841],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919248,0.0009890044,0.00088798645,0.0013968376,0.0040338663,0.00076740066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604066,0.008801896,0.002291398,0.001971625,0.022396062,0.0041323705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007206468,0.0020488708,0.0020143671,0.0031288303,0.002683533,0.007575782,0.005231578,0.011450561,0.1855158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05731984,0.00082273124,0.0023819243,0.0015755135,0.0019773855,0.0048090722,0.002543654,0.009909809,0.079764195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017734896,0.000007567956,0.000028588556,0.00023450631,0.0000060222724,0.000049782637,0.000012680471,0.000020583298,0.000040701678,0.0005652281,0.9921218,0.0068947556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021623091,0.000016998189,0.0001871227,0.00038815459,0.000010046881,0.00009060209,0.000032018816,0.0000440591,0.00009345315,0.00094928395,0.9981527,0.000013810998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014198499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020173227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1855158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002853108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00607114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6206122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409256141","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v12i1.24241","title":"Mind, Matter, and Mushroom: Shifting Ontological Understandings of Psychedelic Healing and Legitimate Knowledge","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Psychedelics and Drug Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mushroom; Ontology; Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.08701612821334118,"score_gpt":0.35562574927000506,"score_spread":0.26860962105666386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409256141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23950535,0.0156418,0.10980314,0.15382373,0.0010042468,0.00009597524,0.00029837954,0.00015075185,0.47967663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875366,0.0012958781,0.0060249483,0.0019417346,0.00018601584,0.00005361641,0.000048990114,0.000059521855,0.0028526587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705565,0.0018560959,0.00011045327,0.0002788184,0.0004582922,0.00024071088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937085,0.004013027,0.00032384237,0.0010650664,0.00048386748,0.00040560894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066566197,0.0003795036,0.00063491554,0.002378695,0.005608015,0.009036256,0.0019323482,0.0042471876,0.0033334452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008939235,0.0004699048,0.0005010862,0.001629893,0.08687634,0.022239992,0.006574123,0.0070253606,0.00028955092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072091125,0.0000069046223,0.00007931072,0.0000118999715,0.0000014846258,0.000020572685,0.012070027,0.000032900396,0.000051558043,0.9862044,0.0002537926,0.0012598861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068890636,0.000004138994,0.00016017392,0.00003105809,0.000002457231,0.000041407096,0.0053576333,0.0001710319,0.000050374336,0.9885268,0.0056417827,0.0000062718514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044903345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038785199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037268093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003349247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035203993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409256186","doi":"10.4245/sponge.v12i1.24243","title":"Evaluating Alternative Perspectives on Psychiatric Diagnosis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spontaneous Generations A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychiatry; Psychiatric diagnosis; Medicine; Psychology; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)","score_opus":0.09758048883317472,"score_gpt":0.3469109520167887,"score_spread":0.24933046318361396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409256186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5286622,0.01378836,0.06506759,0.13905235,0.0026375682,0.0003828699,0.0010799688,0.00006377338,0.24926531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858867,0.001138398,0.009339867,0.0018652614,0.00047789593,0.00011864579,0.00017284589,0.000013557755,0.0009868492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9542581,0.038951173,0.001053343,0.0011082409,0.0036083346,0.0010208074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7659336,0.21206975,0.006518343,0.0056418492,0.0077826483,0.0020537544],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03778286,0.0007768595,0.0007037876,0.0034280105,0.0034338178,0.008537438,0.0027389184,0.004120245,0.008590199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13815896,0.00034031447,0.0007555698,0.0029029744,0.01254957,0.008508953,0.005911517,0.0045240703,0.0004010352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011601284,0.00016262641,0.009576941,0.00022299972,0.00009810598,0.0004345216,0.01049348,0.0018865031,0.00011760811,0.91533494,0.0024522766,0.05805989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045440026,0.0003980799,0.009448205,0.00059752207,0.00015292595,0.00055576273,0.029695826,0.01467185,0.0003994198,0.9282332,0.0153328795,0.000059785885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004739308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007843638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00769871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046223407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19981724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}