{"meta":{"query_hash":"dd01c899bb42","filters":{"venue":"Stanford Law Review"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dd01c899bb42","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Stanford+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W129869233","doi":"","title":"Doctrines Without Borders: The \"New\" Israeli Exclusionary Rule and the Dangers of Legal Transplantation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stanford Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Exclusionary rule; Political science; Doctrine; Jurisprudence; Common law; Unitary state; Legal doctrine; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02687096107789107,"score_gpt":0.31835366642894186,"score_spread":0.2914827053510508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129869233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22579223,0.015884262,0.050460935,0.12556717,0.00081821677,0.0000689985,0.00008282498,0.00008114959,0.5812442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829966,0.0018223681,0.0032191935,0.0057035643,0.00037406333,0.00003468051,0.000020847505,0.000020291873,0.0058083194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995278,0.0016281836,0.00022950704,0.0006953565,0.0015580349,0.0006109912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506724,0.0028960437,0.00040801402,0.0006915577,0.00057126826,0.00036578084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009691168,0.00016725087,0.000474597,0.0017266645,0.0048345006,0.008808948,0.0015847606,0.004408146,0.0025032714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00983291,0.00023320454,0.0004958622,0.0009380097,0.04155307,0.007285797,0.005522019,0.00776981,0.0002965921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024182502,0.0000037853692,0.00012181686,0.0000036805193,9.43509e-7,0.000026208647,0.000631467,0.000043055352,0.000040550112,0.99605227,0.00037806036,0.002695669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015279782,0.000011460301,0.0005135507,0.000075336495,0.000005165799,0.00009892026,0.0009856577,0.00039922807,0.00016264818,0.9717486,0.025974745,0.000009385847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069919825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073946095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009691168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055471016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005448639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051252365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}