{"meta":{"query_hash":"1547eb79837d","filters":{"venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1547eb79837d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=State+Politics+%26+Policy+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W2323068698","doi":"10.1177/153244000500500402","title":"The Endogeneity of the Initiative: A Comment on Marschall and Ruhil","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endogeneity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Democracy; Public economics; State (computer science); Economics; Political science; Law; Econometrics; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.04546561786987586,"score_gpt":0.3610078193877672,"score_spread":0.31554220151789136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323068698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005554196,0.0028520427,0.00030359908,0.9924257,0.0027757187,0.000005835534,0.00015605631,0.000017944634,0.0009075708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020646118,0.0038844366,0.0010355845,0.95463413,0.01644751,0.0001007217,0.000090750524,0.00007196182,0.0030887604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97320044,0.0135466885,0.002034202,0.004512039,0.0057138535,0.0009928677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6959651,0.273283,0.0069171987,0.006115089,0.016011035,0.0017086564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04867147,0.0014081971,0.0032140391,0.0022874235,0.005816396,0.007063337,0.010190583,0.04001018,0.0076482953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14400546,0.00096318475,0.0021385003,0.0050922874,0.016136482,0.014826843,0.004239954,0.039531536,0.004083547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102613405,0.000032099306,0.0020922339,0.00023395532,0.00005472094,0.0003462212,0.0021227773,0.00017030645,0.000106804495,0.052880917,0.9342355,0.0076218112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002737835,0.00009446769,0.009641109,0.003194527,0.00022422482,0.0008273441,0.008171336,0.0025541487,0.0016156586,0.17017691,0.8028143,0.00041216132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022415565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019289594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04867147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048511154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056090765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25740242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498765723","doi":"10.1177/1532440014564984","title":"Polarization without Parties: Term Limits and Legislative Partisanship in Nebraska's Unicameral Legislature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Università degli Studi di Camerino; McGill University","keywords":"Legislature; Polarization (electrochemistry); Politics; Political science; Campaign finance; State (computer science); Public administration; Political economy; State legislature; NOMINATE; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02770360894703285,"score_gpt":0.3441680048385426,"score_spread":0.31646439589150976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498765723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878681,0.00004354645,0.00014983054,0.00044990785,0.0000068201894,0.0000061856076,0.000044804932,0.0000020217894,0.01142873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947435,0.00001685291,0.000027659878,0.000035834095,0.0000061642822,0.000005970486,0.000028512677,0.000001072986,0.0004036096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749905,0.0010069059,0.00010930335,0.0002559585,0.00048527337,0.00064349675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98716146,0.0060490943,0.0034547606,0.0005689797,0.0014960199,0.0012695993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034195292,0.00005650235,0.00022152513,0.0013560738,0.0046292194,0.0029766087,0.0003879679,0.00037268602,0.003960289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013122334,0.00014731062,0.000102889004,0.0013942842,0.0020484135,0.0012240537,0.0024730265,0.0008849284,0.0001959241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028074865,0.00020626263,0.9001003,0.000065061075,0.000036745518,0.000270101,0.043199614,0.00023745303,0.0018972605,0.019985909,0.0023938366,0.031326648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066703446,0.00008292282,0.9497908,0.00005130503,0.000011524751,0.00008993277,0.038881462,0.00042857413,0.00037309993,0.0022392508,0.008031227,0.000013299589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016331676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042956676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016331676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019413364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001141141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032473207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622325340","doi":"10.1177/1532440017713314","title":"A Squire Index Update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Squire; Measure (data warehouse); Legislature; Session (web analytics); Index (typography); Quarter (Canadian coin); Professionalization; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography; Data mining; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026122424876918196,"score_gpt":0.3540305868266478,"score_spread":0.3279081619497296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622325340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069007846,0.0153022,0.0073215705,0.0787647,0.045662947,0.0012892633,0.27817112,0.008840247,0.5577472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03365301,0.017533429,0.019353664,0.021103855,0.029829456,0.0028997194,0.32549465,0.006784121,0.54334813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085134,0.0010034589,0.0013049726,0.0005622405,0.0056953295,0.0005826727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90094465,0.007955426,0.005487342,0.0054026395,0.07519992,0.0050100973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012345852,0.0014974695,0.0013835041,0.02259369,0.0017842879,0.008731869,0.0019953258,0.0018319067,0.15897074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08008074,0.00078266946,0.0012668739,0.015679795,0.0007629596,0.00749808,0.0041933777,0.0030201813,0.14881098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004661133,0.000032775028,0.001602004,0.00022753309,0.000011503647,0.000019750994,0.000041061998,0.00005574242,0.00006262509,0.0019784998,0.94156057,0.054361176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017677912,0.000032215965,0.005083825,0.0004107179,0.000009854141,0.000043485354,0.00005072156,0.000093813505,0.00010844307,0.00093826087,0.9931919,0.000019144993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016063116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0163316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15897074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042090616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005639873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5318101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297243575","doi":"10.1017/spq.2021.22","title":"Governor Partisanship Explains the Adoption of Statewide Mask Mandates in Response to COVID-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Governor; Mandate; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Public administration; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Scope (computer science); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Politics; Face masks; Law; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.18113386686900973,"score_gpt":0.44779884736808345,"score_spread":0.2666649804990737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297243575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99296314,0.00021938395,0.00043698956,0.0011197375,0.00003358242,0.000015435433,0.0006161227,0.000006929628,0.004588676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992336,0.00003883784,0.000039764695,0.000052434254,0.000013117894,0.0000051761467,0.00017673659,0.0000032602052,0.00043705406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872524,0.00044013862,0.00007081629,0.00025691843,0.00009972365,0.00040702324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893104,0.002996509,0.004758828,0.00075767766,0.0008019104,0.0013746527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016403557,0.000102221646,0.00019718202,0.00054811576,0.00073988247,0.0009553309,0.00037361518,0.00038081713,0.008466649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008917501,0.00017086153,0.00035683863,0.00072264083,0.0005107102,0.00046265763,0.0009694,0.00091911433,0.00063187635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007692911,0.000043245396,0.9931879,0.000011347747,0.000053027627,0.00004572069,0.0007443149,0.00033627092,0.00014174252,0.00070944836,0.0015197663,0.003130297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003682716,0.000030413106,0.9954555,0.000019471814,0.000017319318,0.000022744805,0.0017413455,0.0006792508,0.00008207053,0.00025862656,0.0016836489,0.0000058285673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039708827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060851146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039708827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066824496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000707839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07895541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306672924","doi":"10.1017/spq.2022.1","title":"Using Social Media Data to Reveal Patterns of Policy Engagement in State Legislatures","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Craig Newmark Philanthropies; John S. and James L. Knight Foundation; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Charles Koch Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Legislator; Legislature; State (computer science); Social media; Politics; Political science; State legislature; Public administration; Public relations; Public policy; Data science; Computer science; Law; Legislation","score_opus":0.13795660796447837,"score_gpt":0.42222605842349653,"score_spread":0.2842694504590182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306672924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718303,0.0003522311,0.0053891256,0.0027260042,0.0000846612,0.00008661031,0.009313164,0.000117959185,0.0100999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909923,0.00015982494,0.0027716022,0.00016440514,0.00009206052,0.00013974801,0.004363446,0.00003148236,0.0012851418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802446,0.001006609,0.00015150686,0.0003268946,0.00031625744,0.00017433961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813492,0.012238048,0.0030380064,0.0011690836,0.0016984635,0.0005072286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00278322,0.00019421037,0.00025269817,0.0044406955,0.00088514347,0.0022107058,0.00036299074,0.0008322202,0.0026850535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018633679,0.00024930428,0.00030116024,0.006296704,0.0005030015,0.002487579,0.0014550678,0.001008675,0.0009924916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018502904,0.00024047837,0.8988508,0.00022180035,0.000189293,0.0001553519,0.010709232,0.0036387763,0.0017581875,0.00766492,0.013565816,0.06282029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002551245,0.00008944007,0.86668134,0.00024389663,0.00011133681,0.00012540602,0.020657778,0.052850906,0.00217813,0.009897946,0.04705306,0.00008508741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011114778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020677995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011114778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009042511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069355324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02210015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386308208","doi":"10.1017/spq.2023.11","title":"Dynamics of Gubernatorial Approval: Evidence from a New Database","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Politics & Policy Quarterly","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honeymoon; Governor; Unemployment; State (computer science); Accountability; Representation (politics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Public administration; Political science; Survey data collection; Actuarial science; Database; Economics; Demographic economics; Law; Politics; Computer science; Economic growth; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06767890095729943,"score_gpt":0.3985266636863819,"score_spread":0.33084776272908245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386308208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9315078,0.0020537288,0.00088615634,0.0039666966,0.00015229279,0.00015783824,0.044796508,0.00011483665,0.016364222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94695175,0.0007787335,0.00069318624,0.00044991868,0.00010809185,0.00018592965,0.04689693,0.00007611292,0.0038593786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98193926,0.00912973,0.0015020035,0.0028661757,0.0030488905,0.0015140388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88434803,0.03884129,0.041413534,0.016625091,0.015003907,0.0037681293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013603467,0.0002767,0.00095886074,0.003315259,0.0015056023,0.00439495,0.0026156313,0.0009927569,0.010093916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08327106,0.00047004188,0.00043318406,0.0104097435,0.0010347698,0.0022055528,0.0036660852,0.0016404134,0.004066789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057816826,0.0002200265,0.94547534,0.0001252544,0.00020114986,0.000115888,0.0020183036,0.0005323337,0.00007140973,0.002727492,0.03123157,0.01670308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006596792,0.00007112848,0.9618492,0.00016928567,0.00006410364,0.00007827955,0.002915453,0.0024683087,0.00012962462,0.00064392475,0.031504847,0.00003991952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1735369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17356881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1735369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002245048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027315083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3450536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}