{"meta":{"query_hash":"98d2d4239471","filters":{"venue":"Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/98d2d4239471","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Statsvetenskaplig+tidskrift"},"results":[{"id":"W1838994164","doi":"","title":"Moderaterna och välfärdsstaten","year":2010,"lang":"sv","type":"article","venue":"Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift","topic":"Social and Educational Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Ideology; Welfare state; Neoliberalism (international relations); Rhetoric; Welfare; Political economy; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.030625720933319743,"score_gpt":0.340823882729641,"score_spread":0.31019816179632126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1838994164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1376771,0.005552069,0.010957651,0.030047616,0.0014203682,0.000046206587,0.00010217346,0.00014319588,0.8140536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9365366,0.0011153382,0.0020751285,0.003028638,0.00020769489,0.00005170265,0.00005625682,0.000041128784,0.05688757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970421,0.0015190298,0.000102760205,0.00036142886,0.00054997526,0.00042463155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931324,0.00023558702,0.000104035666,0.0001197128,0.00011889543,0.00010853794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027789513,0.0002823879,0.00024001503,0.00071696856,0.0025468003,0.004425352,0.00039810376,0.0012676495,0.0049122674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024960926,0.00015244368,0.00041517784,0.0005846641,0.0057574864,0.002128806,0.004115177,0.002695615,0.00082344736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036684996,0.000020600883,0.0005637439,0.000069116715,0.0000061817027,0.00011506259,0.003891035,0.00027176534,0.00028678175,0.9708298,0.0062940246,0.017615277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003602143,0.000095591255,0.0037287355,0.00044704578,0.000019515302,0.00024357924,0.006672054,0.0008639785,0.0015032515,0.27305004,0.71330404,0.000036076297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031570378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004338856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049122674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042820633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023134516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031068623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1918445008","doi":"","title":"De svenska partierna och Lavaldomen","year":2011,"lang":"sv","type":"article","venue":"Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Opposition (politics); Parliament; Bourgeoisie; Legislation; Law; Political science; Politics; European union; Labour law; Economics","score_opus":0.04570517638439054,"score_gpt":0.29530038921691226,"score_spread":0.24959521283252173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1918445008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042260304,0.021287087,0.0034084101,0.037003774,0.0045653367,0.00005238631,0.0004908345,0.0001877773,0.89074415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6405964,0.012525284,0.0036255147,0.013561769,0.0020009645,0.00013076852,0.0009907599,0.00039014142,0.32617837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943013,0.0019061874,0.00031484637,0.0007858735,0.0014188134,0.0012729804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985014,0.0006992307,0.00017831675,0.00015603115,0.0002673336,0.00019771325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036676268,0.0008243651,0.00062029547,0.0015993981,0.007050253,0.01763691,0.0009309119,0.004175392,0.015642079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061707958,0.0005181849,0.0006243054,0.0014019121,0.0060166568,0.0031977545,0.0060078283,0.006719424,0.006164544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008939342,0.000043475313,0.0011564308,0.00016370666,0.000026127747,0.0010489293,0.009040246,0.00042439927,0.00026424683,0.85742515,0.09546895,0.034848947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016019918,0.000014348457,0.00086734444,0.00047189114,0.000012441084,0.00023603886,0.0043279757,0.00017220539,0.0003531451,0.07005453,0.9234491,0.000024919842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015542773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022680666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01763691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068316283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006541043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05232793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162816589","doi":"","title":"Universal Suffrage for Real? A Global Index of Suffrage Restrictions and an Explanatory Framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suffrage; Voting; Democracy; Political science; Population; Universal suffrage; Politics; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.025633157562284417,"score_gpt":0.37342266360432014,"score_spread":0.34778950604203573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162816589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7365142,0.006852808,0.01974858,0.03488051,0.00037030177,0.00024652787,0.0026606836,0.00014795571,0.19857837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938565,0.00087856146,0.002030468,0.00042533674,0.00009897588,0.00012126617,0.0007455721,0.000034846405,0.0018084933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894613,0.00043516475,0.0000533011,0.00021141132,0.00012988156,0.00022407646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950847,0.0023230673,0.0015397986,0.00034084392,0.00022411255,0.00048738733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025429209,0.0010699929,0.00065685343,0.0059831003,0.00133957,0.005233673,0.00095857994,0.0012248333,0.012242924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044776355,0.00018325665,0.0008403559,0.0094023645,0.009252295,0.0077523305,0.0062646936,0.0023312687,0.0005800118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001035664,0.00021076821,0.34089684,0.0005360394,0.00022985846,0.00045955952,0.027063286,0.0019238746,0.0002477384,0.5796854,0.008988339,0.039654776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005809964,0.00035238353,0.57700205,0.0012944225,0.00020968544,0.0006172497,0.064231955,0.011005194,0.0003330289,0.26723006,0.077550076,0.0001157367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041963756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025645809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012242924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00179143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008464096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040956616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}