{"meta":{"query_hash":"d2d77cc2e5d8","filters":{"venue":"Statute Law Review"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d2d77cc2e5d8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Statute+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1993357890","doi":"10.1093/slr/hml006","title":"How Legislation is Drafted and Enacted in Bangladesh","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Parliament; Legislature; Mandate; Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Legislative process; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.01136785493717765,"score_gpt":0.2900013341011395,"score_spread":0.27863347916396186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993357890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32773656,0.0108261695,0.005433276,0.033084612,0.0004605736,0.0006383086,0.0007769905,0.00010693312,0.6209366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89981073,0.013040554,0.005272368,0.002445521,0.0000939722,0.0002859652,0.0003759411,0.00012736392,0.07854765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766103,0.013171217,0.0021370954,0.0009968103,0.0055435183,0.0015409747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98438454,0.008744748,0.002133357,0.0007370585,0.0034461578,0.00055409415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017859148,0.00021819671,0.00038435106,0.003545755,0.0058802045,0.013081202,0.0012519773,0.0023285698,0.0044057462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029066201,0.0006985612,0.00025969846,0.007904467,0.0074821175,0.0031210303,0.0021281273,0.0029758387,0.0016351808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081005346,0.00009679024,0.016993405,0.00085810584,0.00005434227,0.005058158,0.40311086,0.0015560059,0.0036547715,0.44033495,0.020760095,0.1074415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004235026,0.0001332668,0.044225648,0.00157867,0.00004440831,0.00073982414,0.1586448,0.0005562961,0.0017318937,0.018487968,0.77365327,0.00016161449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10885331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17235938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10885331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026469376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02342657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21643943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024819410","doi":"10.1093/slr/24.2.157","title":"Political Control over Policy Development","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Control (management); Political science; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.02297026017162719,"score_gpt":0.3615866356067051,"score_spread":0.33861637543507794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024819410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009108084,0.006047867,0.003362553,0.1226189,0.00092659506,0.00007954002,0.00042793094,0.00006453362,0.857364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76510596,0.005954367,0.0017108899,0.044618167,0.001652842,0.00017453489,0.00030566254,0.0001616951,0.18031588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.977131,0.0044052065,0.0005789554,0.002065953,0.010545518,0.0052733524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97582936,0.010838241,0.0014998259,0.0019006591,0.007450683,0.0024812492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018083958,0.0006104649,0.0006439148,0.003660707,0.009428092,0.021059478,0.0018056743,0.0064983405,0.014637001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03619542,0.0007491597,0.00046944525,0.0041224784,0.019417077,0.0035226836,0.0033498362,0.011254532,0.0012654611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014502625,0.000010779903,0.00042029622,0.00002726396,0.000012103307,0.000020703623,0.0009821717,0.0002868029,0.000094850344,0.9645299,0.028414635,0.0051860325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046418998,0.000013660988,0.0030703272,0.00038401005,0.000048692506,0.000032018677,0.00145275,0.00073303055,0.00050792494,0.36336458,0.63030463,0.000041991654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56254774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.648781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56254774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054394558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11345986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.880057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085476362","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmm002","title":"Legislative Drafting and Language in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Obligation; Normative; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Law; Civilization; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010263075171416171,"score_gpt":0.32080361860021556,"score_spread":0.3105405434287994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085476362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12615766,0.025749799,0.0012381603,0.099609405,0.0018982633,0.00040938403,0.0029525661,0.00029473347,0.74169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6850469,0.012647173,0.0025809903,0.011273141,0.00023220827,0.00018136975,0.0013062519,0.00018560191,0.28654644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98693514,0.0013651438,0.00067546725,0.0010572278,0.005865439,0.004101643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781788,0.005205234,0.0010985294,0.0006578046,0.012164003,0.002695649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008207993,0.0003603313,0.00073910895,0.0049203667,0.024776472,0.012108032,0.0033147251,0.003072234,0.015927829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027492937,0.0007664546,0.0004987044,0.010305625,0.008562414,0.0020918637,0.0039401576,0.0044966782,0.0010822822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067248926,0.00007636321,0.0073300926,0.0004253722,0.000028227782,0.00094677595,0.052834038,0.00097558653,0.00057637447,0.7038467,0.1654509,0.06744229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002967401,0.000022095806,0.025208961,0.00043829254,0.00003151257,0.00008524817,0.010644493,0.00064091885,0.00037557122,0.0075997524,0.9548163,0.000107217704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23569156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23569156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.41278195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88648945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109710830","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmp007","title":"Universal Design in Legislation: Eliminating Barriers for People with Disabilities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Universal design; Legislation; Internet privacy; Process (computing); Business; Frustration; Advertising; Marketing; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Political science; Social psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03160544018843139,"score_gpt":0.2628212339566557,"score_spread":0.2312157937682243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109710830","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06876228,0.005777865,0.065635964,0.50709176,0.0051241755,0.0008761654,0.00016914279,0.00206063,0.344502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47311392,0.004719728,0.06456394,0.28230596,0.001134235,0.0019215414,0.000332046,0.0011284219,0.17078017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96281326,0.017676614,0.0020526822,0.002742429,0.009459157,0.0052558263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599819,0.014481579,0.0035397897,0.004408916,0.010839087,0.0067487527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031267554,0.00060196844,0.0007111704,0.0017110565,0.014258323,0.007597049,0.003902044,0.01057029,0.020678245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067703605,0.0008902518,0.001375135,0.00111476,0.014531106,0.023520807,0.021866057,0.011097831,0.0058422205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005088396,0.00058034126,0.00882366,0.00088610756,0.000025553356,0.0015872912,0.17760122,0.0004048843,0.0026274866,0.34651172,0.23204136,0.2288596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026578708,0.00012858551,0.0028996267,0.0013546766,0.000019867728,0.00070379965,0.03610007,0.00029854546,0.00060564175,0.04161387,0.9161933,0.000055515044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023481166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026290964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031267554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008158143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03417086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16536063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955727152","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmz008","title":"The Drafters’ Dance: The Complexity of Drafting Legislation and the Limitations of ‘Plain Language’ and ‘Good Law’ Initiatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Legal Language and Interpretation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislation; Plain language; CLARITY; Law; Simplicity; Political science; Negotiation; Normative; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04602867560778381,"score_gpt":0.33057608494547897,"score_spread":0.2845474093376952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955727152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1203431,0.03421174,0.13942316,0.34635112,0.0022514171,0.00025779475,0.00014272367,0.00045881057,0.35656008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95909494,0.004887343,0.017695716,0.007858796,0.0004767121,0.00015968815,0.000039476654,0.00024063353,0.009546567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88682836,0.09167118,0.0030823408,0.0031273877,0.013135766,0.002154925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7756696,0.19074045,0.008347078,0.010651068,0.012266338,0.0023255486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08343191,0.00044916256,0.00083745184,0.005847737,0.009938943,0.023867955,0.0025065278,0.0057215896,0.003993528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11623278,0.00089373044,0.000903923,0.0038305398,0.0697378,0.02115671,0.008107891,0.009990703,0.0005791379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011967712,0.0000061881074,0.00034203858,0.00012371011,0.000008596852,0.0001289804,0.04132592,0.0003653272,0.0001526234,0.94431615,0.004205817,0.009012604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003977124,0.000057648296,0.0019122856,0.0016501967,0.000034162033,0.00034162798,0.044728655,0.0019580766,0.0007907822,0.55387044,0.39452258,0.000093782095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01807003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017852006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08343191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019007118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016980024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44123536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981268999","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmz010","title":"To Legislate Filial Piety: Is the Elderly Rights Law a Panacea?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); China; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Unintended consequences; Context (archaeology); Population ageing; Life expectancy; Filial piety; Political science; Law; Population; Gender studies; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.013787845901611985,"score_gpt":0.30130706266378654,"score_spread":0.28751921676217457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981268999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23000777,0.09634857,0.0027894655,0.4244124,0.002507474,0.00009830648,0.00019250595,0.000051557392,0.24359198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91500586,0.022753926,0.0008140267,0.042294588,0.0008715663,0.000052677162,0.00004899158,0.000008696537,0.018149633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973642,0.0007907135,0.00015128253,0.00025381584,0.0008264378,0.0006135584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965449,0.0016288963,0.00042638317,0.00021364432,0.00082067907,0.00036550532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006414926,0.000141612,0.00026220083,0.000818509,0.0027013842,0.0032121057,0.0011754503,0.0031513402,0.0024774713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006879499,0.00010865834,0.00026620846,0.0008446452,0.009667546,0.0026676978,0.0015279433,0.0029402256,0.00020503662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013311269,0.00004652204,0.008230131,0.00024932597,0.000017643972,0.000554185,0.009694625,0.000249008,0.0003812183,0.89504427,0.032279994,0.053239763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044067805,0.00016144887,0.058561254,0.003676622,0.00008912083,0.00054007705,0.023755375,0.0013129149,0.0012124336,0.13872942,0.7718028,0.00011451628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07061485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097664855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07061485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006363206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019583689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14040762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200796409","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmab021","title":"The Plain Meaning Rule: A Quibble about Nomenclature and a Lot More","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Meaning (existential); Law; Statutory interpretation; Jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Original meaning; Statutory law; Tribunal; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024134195680882115,"score_gpt":0.2679788129300756,"score_spread":0.24384461724919346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200796409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011205069,0.04652949,0.04628212,0.78556895,0.018630162,0.000068957146,0.00026019834,0.00017559103,0.091279425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5701249,0.055934083,0.042166907,0.27875957,0.022728091,0.00028405507,0.00037672798,0.0005921362,0.029033458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97335917,0.012966121,0.0018876723,0.002053664,0.008892137,0.00084134634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9500659,0.02649013,0.0017099048,0.0058298684,0.014725499,0.0011785792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042661786,0.0005161116,0.001433836,0.0032983534,0.0057547903,0.013779428,0.0041873865,0.0073919464,0.004773002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053024404,0.00058589806,0.0009489417,0.0027745625,0.051830653,0.03111958,0.0042895866,0.024739392,0.001425059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012590861,0.000007184717,0.00012873052,0.000072936746,0.0000071067843,0.00007020556,0.0017760932,0.00018008756,0.00013419599,0.9673099,0.019642435,0.010658536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001490077,0.00002929993,0.00036973757,0.0008411183,0.000016743707,0.000113317525,0.0026306002,0.00064851454,0.00028599222,0.7899524,0.20504515,0.000052287793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033214316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026403397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042661786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010294425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012870943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2256198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392541952","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmae012","title":"Bilingual Law in Wales (and England): The Implications of Law Being Made in Two Languages","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Linguistics; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02187937403996374,"score_gpt":0.332355396207006,"score_spread":0.31047602216704223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392541952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6803907,0.010121483,0.00059267716,0.061150845,0.00066731113,0.0000688525,0.000101290534,0.000009415119,0.24689746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98251927,0.0015398196,0.00015359139,0.004878586,0.000046394627,0.000021301299,0.000021496147,0.000004780118,0.010814767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922631,0.0035582401,0.00025680312,0.00041949173,0.0011079515,0.0023944445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920167,0.003832579,0.00049666286,0.0002275806,0.0017738166,0.0016526688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006303839,0.0001307319,0.00039835603,0.0017266909,0.00908405,0.008525963,0.0007183555,0.0028377494,0.0070713083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012614634,0.00025733572,0.0002520514,0.0016980433,0.009525895,0.002931301,0.005979973,0.003122541,0.00036237427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031528596,0.00013523771,0.016179522,0.00048031923,0.000033856762,0.006390758,0.1600098,0.00030131356,0.0014605785,0.7610236,0.011433951,0.0422358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015675908,0.000310105,0.10275724,0.0027170656,0.00008578399,0.0018831112,0.48435992,0.00057040656,0.0010775862,0.07443122,0.33146623,0.00018467597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4495442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6589685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4495442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016843082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028126795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8938551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402028087","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmae040","title":"Two Uses of Purpose in Statutory Interpretation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03626076538792843,"score_gpt":0.3873370577641982,"score_spread":0.35107629237626975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402028087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0518695,0.0028571247,0.18832996,0.029719666,0.0006590368,0.00020537374,0.00023924133,0.0002645916,0.7258555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775932,0.00051310606,0.013662284,0.0012590397,0.00019742272,0.0001853674,0.00007169637,0.000205818,0.006312077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9290746,0.05077344,0.0024786862,0.0027129636,0.011228863,0.003731528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93225515,0.046194457,0.00267382,0.0076227924,0.010089732,0.0011640952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033741605,0.0008163902,0.0012024472,0.007756524,0.0077659134,0.01855305,0.004031639,0.0061730975,0.004020207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051560536,0.0012687239,0.0013771515,0.006440662,0.08027975,0.017943887,0.009375285,0.009614482,0.00065441773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008866128,0.000002788468,0.00015166869,0.000021593061,0.0000032692276,0.000045869852,0.011185691,0.00005634657,0.000068937916,0.98644173,0.0003706757,0.0016425098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000367752,0.000021944717,0.0010235973,0.0004196839,0.000048965816,0.00016982785,0.010485777,0.0015890085,0.00100285,0.9404555,0.044694435,0.00005155698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039035127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04039888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039035127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018742891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013444487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1784448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402553121","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmae042","title":"Four Years of Anti-COVID-19 Regulations in Greece: Overview of the Legislative and Regulatory Process and of an Exemplary Administrative Codification","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legislative process; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.19679319623347,"score_gpt":0.4943666261211237,"score_spread":0.2975734298876537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402553121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7302519,0.037222415,0.0045882137,0.019077355,0.0016207648,0.0007750383,0.00047415023,0.00010678839,0.20588334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96147424,0.0074107912,0.001670535,0.0024775174,0.00025411995,0.00019242147,0.00016568541,0.000033422984,0.026321212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900265,0.0048479587,0.0009702995,0.0008586233,0.002430803,0.00086601265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880691,0.007571057,0.0016041223,0.00074747234,0.0016056552,0.00040259093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013681664,0.00024128548,0.0003517136,0.0042122346,0.0039423686,0.0059919376,0.00094493764,0.00336516,0.0018287662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013146587,0.00049135496,0.00045905687,0.0035374758,0.006193298,0.0021214737,0.0027777187,0.0030718397,0.0003087234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026223002,0.00063592405,0.023582038,0.0020622632,0.00012311102,0.0074574393,0.18793507,0.0038648178,0.0064100153,0.57784027,0.018674532,0.17115228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037957245,0.00049544434,0.09444368,0.0023879972,0.000062247054,0.0009986274,0.056906953,0.0008904527,0.0039910465,0.016782053,0.82282346,0.0001800615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016805388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015519406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016805388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010898261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013215147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07907277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415294367","doi":"10.1093/slr/hmaf032","title":"Helpful or hollow? Rethinking the interpretive role of Interpretation Acts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statute Law Review","topic":"Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Narodowym Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Normative; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Statutory interpretation; Transparency (behavior); Scrutiny; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.056451586295471846,"score_gpt":0.4712106617099358,"score_spread":0.41475907541446394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415294367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14723426,0.022884725,0.07925793,0.35315144,0.0045498046,0.0003255479,0.00012779362,0.00018419734,0.39228433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714342,0.0028025738,0.007040042,0.012359813,0.00077974214,0.00010606854,0.000024071061,0.00011525023,0.0053382427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8005931,0.16041133,0.00705527,0.0045121997,0.023283547,0.004144602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5778931,0.36465138,0.011934143,0.015908597,0.027105242,0.0025075166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14389335,0.0004737231,0.0009882814,0.004673779,0.011072745,0.017648455,0.0042350306,0.007647864,0.0019422632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16874605,0.00076339155,0.00064586435,0.0029113325,0.10984484,0.0149857765,0.009636332,0.015232848,0.00044638876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021890957,0.00001132573,0.00073377433,0.00021146509,0.000009076253,0.000242116,0.17169955,0.00012701846,0.00028827516,0.8076744,0.004900446,0.014080564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050905062,0.00008558523,0.004103449,0.0066478634,0.00008779524,0.00066439365,0.17215025,0.0018458567,0.0025650044,0.42743415,0.38419977,0.00016493091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022624427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026717627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14389335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016845861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026113892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76098984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}