{"meta":{"query_hash":"3725c23f80b1","filters":{"venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3725c23f80b1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Stellenbosch+Law+Review+%3D+Stellenbosch+Regstydskrif"},"results":[{"id":"W1513219015","doi":"","title":"From Delgamuukw to Ritchersveld - are land claims in Canadian and South African law comparable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033766206916251665,"score_gpt":0.31571966634487525,"score_spread":0.2819534594286236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513219015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50917315,0.011411712,0.00046766922,0.039529216,0.00022635233,0.00009956051,0.0024284918,0.000030487588,0.4366334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738714,0.0021483572,0.00017836937,0.002655577,0.000040981315,0.00003095728,0.0003684787,0.000022094231,0.020683907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434656,0.00036391176,0.00010509664,0.00046869364,0.0016841654,0.0030315847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99255544,0.001529285,0.0007405185,0.00038164714,0.003129275,0.00166385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002750413,0.00027937308,0.00054640486,0.005693482,0.015442672,0.009752562,0.001650718,0.0022839557,0.02035927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016693193,0.00028989042,0.00048161164,0.009037648,0.010290044,0.0042289984,0.0039641787,0.0035391357,0.00083403854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023708452,0.00009961086,0.081309125,0.00028492988,0.00007888326,0.0009701349,0.09158489,0.0003733635,0.00055650796,0.71862614,0.044239998,0.06163925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006808427,0.000052124866,0.52236795,0.0013307879,0.00018417991,0.00038754477,0.16400774,0.0010652407,0.0007386254,0.044044957,0.2655825,0.00017019064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99483985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105368406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105368406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08360243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76450485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513681246","doi":"","title":"The potential and limits of an equal rights paradigm in addressing poverty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Inequality; Culture of poverty; Social exclusion; Autonomy; Development economics; Human rights; Political science; Social equality; Sociology; Basic needs; Economics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08716142205957537,"score_gpt":0.33115902296851085,"score_spread":0.24399760090893546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513681246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026366975,0.020766657,0.133532,0.31330678,0.0021700312,0.00014196013,0.000060875816,0.00007455795,0.5035803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8910491,0.011531168,0.040354315,0.02819181,0.0038629544,0.00075035845,0.000044016746,0.00011593705,0.024100365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96786946,0.022191733,0.0005675359,0.002340962,0.004574499,0.0024557216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97968584,0.01475188,0.001152788,0.0018609083,0.0013570732,0.0011915135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037834458,0.0010610673,0.001300818,0.0025069676,0.011114904,0.015512341,0.0031395943,0.010557699,0.004849398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022098497,0.00061799266,0.0014647809,0.0015799024,0.09501561,0.030245844,0.019331684,0.016886914,0.0008589452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022000365,0.000004567899,0.000030925567,0.000010465292,0.0000017783847,0.000010922264,0.0007832949,0.000076192446,0.000015741429,0.9975389,0.0002225136,0.0013025436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051532525,0.000009343659,0.000042899133,0.00006647112,0.0000022665847,0.000019205248,0.00052267197,0.00019052767,0.000034440818,0.9876109,0.011490284,0.0000058719293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004661329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004540358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037834458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009068217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011141455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20009011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551700116","doi":"","title":"Feticide : creating a statutory crime in South African law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Law; Legislature; Abortion; Political science; Common law; Position (finance); Criminology; Sociology; Pregnancy; Business","score_opus":0.03016946507801467,"score_gpt":0.3170328084844136,"score_spread":0.28686334340639896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551700116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46239546,0.032115355,0.0062994324,0.077605315,0.0004423037,0.00023226265,0.000062638566,0.000023523964,0.42082375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753493,0.0055851354,0.0008420473,0.006649299,0.00008193188,0.0000760846,0.000015273505,0.000006602951,0.011394345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995492,0.0022867722,0.0002267524,0.0003166084,0.0007616663,0.0009161385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974559,0.0016880203,0.00049091876,0.00009552024,0.00016090972,0.00010877059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037685295,0.0003242726,0.000302079,0.0019019337,0.008273926,0.004891701,0.0009202509,0.007187255,0.0025544723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064142146,0.00040272277,0.00032072517,0.0014643429,0.01670999,0.003562304,0.0052345293,0.0054575433,0.0002048457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000080446025,0.000015684718,0.0015065675,0.0001050947,0.000003902921,0.0028093436,0.021523163,0.000120026496,0.00034898418,0.96406865,0.001508353,0.007982255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008086848,0.00022986873,0.026964344,0.0047289687,0.00007647148,0.010781183,0.11861462,0.001330174,0.0044090566,0.40011525,0.4325426,0.00012666901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02001571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03316931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02001571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058249724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009181323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04226333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578391147","doi":"","title":"Defining the limits of the common-law, South African and European privilege against self-incrimination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Privilege (computing); Common law; Political science; Statutory law","score_opus":0.023421961660647788,"score_gpt":0.2904408270188929,"score_spread":0.2670188653582451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578391147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054829545,0.24914269,0.003931652,0.051182967,0.0007918581,0.000084231055,0.00010219395,0.000013819954,0.6399211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86725867,0.08267284,0.0024179441,0.013693734,0.00086568884,0.00024960484,0.000053404572,0.000024792125,0.03276343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914903,0.0047424957,0.00048715476,0.00070194795,0.0014580961,0.0011200067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939038,0.0046078083,0.00046607654,0.00031635966,0.00055361213,0.00015218135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008773588,0.0003003846,0.00055142335,0.0030134935,0.0047780145,0.010084092,0.000992216,0.005638034,0.0019063244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109322425,0.00038699125,0.0002903814,0.0023288091,0.026764547,0.006744571,0.004930454,0.004571075,0.00035432217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063926336,0.0000055332707,0.00027967995,0.000092182665,0.0000035905039,0.00008994057,0.0023751913,0.00009794423,0.00014044481,0.988941,0.0012223691,0.0067457175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019445273,0.000055731758,0.007997693,0.0034324243,0.000036888752,0.00042695523,0.008395093,0.00029878507,0.000847302,0.48261386,0.49582857,0.00004722276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044039194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05906279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044039194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008132963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013269878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08756572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W187071721","doi":"","title":"Putting appraisal rights into perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Human rights; Law and economics; Argument (complex analysis); International human rights law; Political science; Shareholder; Law; Reservation of rights; Business; Economics; Right to property; Corporate governance; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.014028805895169725,"score_gpt":0.26088852282792563,"score_spread":0.2468597169327559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W187071721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035470051,0.035673168,0.005801905,0.13479975,0.0036672577,0.000095237876,0.00015113875,0.000046560293,0.81621796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4414298,0.05586519,0.007592999,0.16439416,0.012810199,0.0005551931,0.00032678578,0.00026905595,0.3167566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98193043,0.007155272,0.0010870744,0.0025732585,0.005271453,0.0019824898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98909515,0.0068187406,0.00061489793,0.0009655116,0.0021461379,0.0003594703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013329343,0.00077738153,0.0009327742,0.0024994237,0.005639598,0.016811008,0.0021914544,0.015922775,0.010568818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025024705,0.0006645407,0.00082111155,0.0017833192,0.024422634,0.017386977,0.00436109,0.017668927,0.0028966335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038021262,0.0000039525307,0.000054313386,0.00004569687,0.0000019495349,0.00007216775,0.00058848015,0.000051566967,0.000058443507,0.9809725,0.013610325,0.004536766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015350788,0.000024606356,0.00056319707,0.00079451664,0.000008597825,0.00015944852,0.0011811412,0.00009401956,0.00016688593,0.29956663,0.6974034,0.000022275599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023122178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02057447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023122178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090498235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01650148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07049316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214132031","doi":"","title":"Towards the application of the precautionary principle in South African law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Sustainable development; Legislation; Environmental law; Political science; Law and economics; Scale (ratio); Law; Business; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.060024578047306563,"score_gpt":0.34380490210830666,"score_spread":0.2837803240610001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214132031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034898087,0.12230001,0.021087337,0.27351904,0.001596977,0.00022017473,0.000067686036,0.000031275966,0.5462795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84650254,0.05139112,0.011277021,0.046319295,0.0013295196,0.00039891026,0.00003809849,0.00004239644,0.042701073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99163604,0.005051392,0.0004256681,0.0006401807,0.0013014053,0.0009453326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940638,0.0044689756,0.00047072387,0.0002721967,0.0005795261,0.00014494125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014275418,0.0004630871,0.0005480489,0.0029372745,0.0074173943,0.008563494,0.0010570533,0.0083199395,0.0027629407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587327,0.00054998824,0.0005486131,0.0022497505,0.032960124,0.007890185,0.005202498,0.010321093,0.0004902128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012636744,0.0000029272849,0.00004727274,0.00003528386,0.0000011090342,0.00008628852,0.0017430388,0.000073348216,0.000054562683,0.9951414,0.0010062127,0.0018073557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018121082,0.000020673975,0.0010114595,0.001730915,0.000010458251,0.00027744536,0.0042335754,0.00036395533,0.0003438175,0.6607237,0.33123854,0.000027437192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025787806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017655633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025787806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010444062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016015308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07577729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223154558","doi":"","title":"Legal and human rights responses to the HIV / AIDS epidemic (lecture, 12 October 2005)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Politics; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Disease; Population; Quarter (Canadian coin); Medicine; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Virology; History; Psychiatry; Environmental health; Pathology","score_opus":0.026087778470369867,"score_gpt":0.3148526276661343,"score_spread":0.28876484919576445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223154558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018793966,0.33166835,0.000797884,0.43744928,0.016052859,0.000068884365,0.0000814885,0.000042438427,0.2119595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.119056135,0.18173975,0.0015188074,0.20916015,0.020118224,0.00020574778,0.000089659814,0.000059319194,0.46805218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837154,0.00088213285,0.00004453714,0.00013535532,0.00028188556,0.0002846434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991418,0.0005307208,0.000060471742,0.000028449258,0.00011186473,0.00012666991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036263391,0.0003981159,0.00027449732,0.0009446277,0.0047117323,0.0055493936,0.0006694114,0.012907233,0.015853155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046574925,0.00037420815,0.00035128067,0.00060226256,0.0048148083,0.0036390228,0.002118918,0.006223309,0.0029291303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014421393,0.000022307295,0.00015879647,0.00020044543,0.00000797953,0.0002347858,0.0017080818,0.00017494652,0.00017210681,0.22629541,0.74873215,0.022278601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014251288,0.000013285992,0.0012038323,0.0011010158,0.000007360511,0.00014694707,0.0016977136,0.00008033902,0.00009092603,0.04368986,0.95194125,0.000013286385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03886821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075574666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03886821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058897897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006522113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07728398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269976336","doi":"","title":"The development of Charter damages jurisprudence in Canada : guidelines from the Supreme Court","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Punitive damages; Jurisprudence; Political science; Charter; Commonwealth","score_opus":0.07312488672695615,"score_gpt":0.3517869886197988,"score_spread":0.27866210189284263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269976336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023096005,0.073374435,0.042191613,0.4568428,0.0042502964,0.0015154314,0.0019580612,0.0005759155,0.39619544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5885137,0.059678823,0.1147243,0.11593514,0.0014934589,0.00090896373,0.0014207151,0.000601987,0.11672287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9601664,0.005373659,0.0027258103,0.0027042045,0.02339333,0.0056365593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454877,0.012756099,0.001351004,0.0013476016,0.03501248,0.0040451055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030582277,0.0012377129,0.001425218,0.007821697,0.028984925,0.02985656,0.008807736,0.016627753,0.002796296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05886634,0.0019955784,0.0012757119,0.008230238,0.02192958,0.005496029,0.0053574285,0.021060595,0.0005101395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013082347,0.000043571115,0.0011567504,0.00018424407,0.000015811098,0.00034469875,0.0064961035,0.00215758,0.0003702076,0.8776522,0.07979514,0.03177065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006208491,0.000043108597,0.006782756,0.0028862956,0.00007974779,0.00016320047,0.007858686,0.005380436,0.0011821201,0.13238375,0.8427226,0.00045520882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99383897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99653375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6929392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.30706078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5864119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8037113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610411114","doi":"","title":"The various policy options for the settlement of disputes in residential community schemes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Settlement (finance); Alternative dispute resolution; Public administration; Mediation; Leasehold estate; Business","score_opus":0.03562624560871863,"score_gpt":0.3707180090891675,"score_spread":0.3350917634804489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610411114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031837802,0.03012115,0.08242893,0.1432814,0.0015548854,0.00065476797,0.00007289071,0.00010433398,0.70994395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7555263,0.027385402,0.052350845,0.011412289,0.0019488155,0.0017531003,0.0000987728,0.00012297867,0.14940138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9500611,0.036099784,0.0016396953,0.0013278247,0.0073393392,0.0035322735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902851,0.0067573637,0.00072277815,0.00078307395,0.00095670036,0.00049500505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023175336,0.0005439672,0.000539403,0.002610093,0.010598213,0.020733444,0.0030421952,0.0095049795,0.008428864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022790518,0.000650108,0.00091732567,0.0032911645,0.025453566,0.012173289,0.008521953,0.0061390023,0.0010817776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037472341,0.000008986815,0.000055767025,0.000025262165,0.0000011117558,0.00003262194,0.0016052076,0.00022566895,0.000024513998,0.98880506,0.002704547,0.0065075886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027406535,0.000033854692,0.00040882692,0.00055114634,0.000008827634,0.00023271152,0.010928566,0.0013533246,0.00021570832,0.6929859,0.29320726,0.000046428417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049687284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054630246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023175336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010715594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009326727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122564375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28862002","doi":"10.1021/acs.joc.7b01841","title":"The inclusivity of communal land tenure : a redefinition of ownership in Canada and South Africa?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stellenbosch Law Review = Stellenbosch Regstydskrif","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs; Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Land tenure; Compromise; Land law; Jurisdiction; Individualism; Property (philosophy); Political science; Law; Institution; Security of tenure; Common law; Property rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography","score_opus":0.044231689386051765,"score_gpt":0.27526492582951534,"score_spread":0.23103323644346357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28862002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8867889,0.002840782,0.00027532794,0.01357753,0.000058026057,0.000033701166,0.00015717199,0.000004450168,0.09626412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99427587,0.0005598834,0.000054522094,0.00037359944,0.0000053335357,0.00000429275,0.000010650872,0.0000021496517,0.004713718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985839,0.00014839743,0.000029937377,0.00011371603,0.0003072682,0.00081687816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805224,0.0004312837,0.00030443963,0.0000974183,0.0005571504,0.00055743376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010097822,0.00013680539,0.00015844377,0.0012141736,0.007986453,0.0034844377,0.0008524493,0.0009614579,0.0052264887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037409805,0.00015542042,0.00013658576,0.0020695687,0.0064286017,0.0015996584,0.0018253304,0.0017476053,0.00011672161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023607911,0.000101897465,0.17382537,0.00027137372,0.000059607068,0.00474983,0.13669689,0.0007467832,0.0052407673,0.5434009,0.013678519,0.12099203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005111013,0.00008535274,0.4263698,0.0009775027,0.0000800596,0.0014648949,0.21837248,0.0011132892,0.0039697257,0.020484013,0.32687005,0.00016174535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94122905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98028344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058770955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035586856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03859488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2582019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}