{"meta":{"query_hash":"11ac4f671daa","filters":{"venue":"Strategic Organization"},"cohort_total":70,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":70,"exported":70,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/11ac4f671daa","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Strategic+Organization"},"results":[{"id":"W1966468263","doi":"10.1177/1476127004042844","title":"Management as Life’s Essence: 30 Years of the Nature of Managerial Work","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sociology; Everyday life; Management; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.00812199183154074,"score_gpt":0.2142832503460339,"score_spread":0.20616125851449316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966468263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93627554,0.000072213545,0.0005803547,0.00028102592,0.00081207504,0.00023735735,0.0000010741051,0.00003723831,0.061703112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918985,0.00001988853,0.000043097814,0.00015385148,0.0003547457,0.0000014878569,0.0000093453955,0.000014855134,0.00021288992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993388,0.0000061843602,0.00019972185,0.0001476299,0.00020512132,0.00010254843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935895,0.000008661028,0.0001843954,0.00019853596,0.00024328161,0.0000061860187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000084068124,0.00008692746,0.00010438779,0.00008196967,0.00006398193,0.0000542109,0.0002827061,0.000069451315,0.0006860187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006687406,0.0000733651,0.000035367357,0.0014080042,0.00006385408,0.00017564015,0.00013240651,0.00009696451,0.00020503903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011716495,0.000077402074,0.0049869367,0.00016194482,0.00003059145,0.0000058592645,0.000083233135,0.0004385418,0.0009824822,0.99254674,0.000115936935,0.00055863877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020512252,0.000060301376,0.44547945,0.0013353847,0.00041459038,0.0000041276044,0.007096292,0.00007670334,0.032055683,0.50238746,0.008135234,0.0009035756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004780705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011363076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49015927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017519871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039130206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7511424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974527440","doi":"10.1177/1476127006061029","title":"From ordinary resources to extraordinary performance: environmental moderators of competitive advantage","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Competitive advantage; Human capital; Context (archaeology); Industrial organization; Business; Sample (material); Training (meteorology); Marketing; Knowledge management; Environmental economics; Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.006872446844940241,"score_gpt":0.18214983296113543,"score_spread":0.1752773861161952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974527440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7916437,0.000016388913,0.00025214851,0.000109538094,0.00016810757,0.00017946052,0.00000929999,0.00007065843,0.2075507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976583,0.0000025781374,0.0002222515,0.00024549334,0.00079188676,0.000004436389,0.00049844716,0.000029712304,0.00054689986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913365,0.000008043114,0.00028280172,0.0002286463,0.00019848243,0.00014837332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995922,0.0000076618635,0.00015433584,0.00014291998,0.00009516612,0.000007715735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000084609,0.00014655066,0.0001374462,0.00022270817,0.00014071396,0.000099196375,0.00013527901,0.00004615981,0.00072727347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000053793647,0.00014865503,0.000019804917,0.0007448691,0.00003691414,0.00043913053,0.00011385044,0.000057885343,0.00033347745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012010656,0.0008008497,0.13242298,0.00025118561,0.000058828802,0.000018611798,0.0005606939,0.00065962994,0.06267771,0.79835033,0.0023882915,0.0016907738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009333418,0.0005582143,0.6195849,0.0006789169,0.00058751943,0.000008400157,0.12631464,0.029444156,0.05236446,0.075188346,0.081501484,0.0044355053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057248533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012120906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043172447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009172783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79631346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001627718","doi":"10.1177/1476127005050112","title":"Identity and collaborative strategy in the Canadian HIV/AIDS treatment domain","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Identification (biology); Legitimacy; Public relations; Work (physics); Process (computing); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Core (optical fiber); Sociology; Political science; Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.018390923885092073,"score_gpt":0.2293746116602486,"score_spread":0.21098368777515653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001627718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7824006,0.00034015495,0.00026888456,0.008090697,0.00011445227,0.0008378528,0.000011968983,0.00009074377,0.20784461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978943,0.000055695706,0.00013782867,0.00083707046,0.0005062163,0.000009077116,0.00014712724,0.00001600728,0.0003966954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922603,0.000019565583,0.0001729144,0.00019917969,0.00018756399,0.00019474242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996174,0.000013920798,0.00007628014,0.000100289224,0.00017916519,0.000012972771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020035764,0.00014780396,0.0001114916,0.00019966507,0.0004791367,0.0007366487,0.00013645683,0.000047778456,0.0004654306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025573385,0.00011066979,0.000009980095,0.0017682711,0.00004829635,0.0010885448,0.000033130884,0.000051113748,0.00018504092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029523283,0.000048137586,0.1017323,0.000016904043,0.000020063739,0.000007546102,0.0005183268,0.00023590944,0.000022966517,0.8958842,0.001175574,0.0003350917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035119485,0.00011834339,0.650281,0.000045909626,0.00022776618,0.000007854185,0.04929606,0.0016703827,0.0000844705,0.20155805,0.092068374,0.0011298497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011913249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5442487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69432616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015271598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000085142405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033319199","doi":"10.1177/1476127006069575","title":"Priorities, practices and strategies in successful and failing family businesses: an elaboration and test of the configuration perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Family Business Performance and Succession","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Miller; Elaboration; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Test (biology); Order (exchange); Balance (ability); Business; Marketing; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012943375951556146,"score_gpt":0.2347862043535217,"score_spread":0.22184282840196556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033319199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967908,0.00033826174,0.000070656046,0.00036274994,0.00008300367,0.00022640495,0.000002311333,0.000033300774,0.0020925086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994311,0.0001622729,0.000047362537,0.000071153845,0.00021210511,0.0000033352505,0.000044740358,0.000015038625,0.000012902879],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992349,0.000016116564,0.00025559534,0.00023254383,0.00015198467,0.000108866465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988368,0.000044180848,0.00042818478,0.00009884378,0.00058627035,0.000005726907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017636377,0.00013522238,0.00013801867,0.00014937659,0.00021750704,0.00071096775,0.00006790405,0.000080625985,0.000008875186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016066818,0.00010549902,0.000004905929,0.0009897365,0.0001192465,0.0053707208,0.00004304861,0.000084217376,7.1484425e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018066714,0.00006613912,0.8496097,0.00032773547,0.0000029209264,0.0000013294269,0.0003485698,0.00023740296,0.045981154,0.10314452,0.000007529381,0.00025494923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004429255,0.000016472275,0.9554627,0.00009698286,0.000028428485,0.0000024844303,0.028719267,0.005388473,0.000793792,0.008866928,0.00002893332,0.0001526299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005385935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027466812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002041639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010626038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8141958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097726581","doi":"10.1177/1476127004045252","title":"Research Impact: How Seemingly Innocuous Social Cues in a CEO Survey Can Lead to Change in Board of Director Network Ties","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interpersonal ties; Social network (sociolinguistics); Interlock; Business; Public relations; Survey data collection; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.13252662869712364,"score_gpt":0.3903347632824195,"score_spread":0.25780813458529583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097726581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99577385,0.00017453234,0.0000049137593,0.0017548203,0.0002239872,0.00040522168,0.000017442895,0.000039443825,0.001605775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985892,0.00012920919,0.000019613872,0.000043057284,0.0010298096,0.000015206542,0.00004626898,0.000022112254,0.00010547707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997959,0.00059028115,0.0002013234,0.00021970802,0.00048217445,0.00054748514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991853,0.00013103461,0.00007608349,0.00007556052,0.0004473224,0.00008465444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015460666,0.00011434475,0.00023658817,0.000194426,0.00030432254,0.000116947645,0.00020302091,0.00019197693,0.000047747122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003507877,0.000117451586,0.000024548564,0.00550164,0.00019477955,0.00019323721,0.00005186473,0.0002443182,0.000007827158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060795417,0.00012975014,0.72045416,0.000024150568,0.000012829744,0.000010675415,0.26379168,0.00027397217,0.0003065744,0.01277014,0.00059281423,0.0015724791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038276857,0.00017636595,0.9533084,0.0000720866,0.000003372563,2.02439e-7,0.03639622,0.0000059482463,0.00021692873,0.009180962,0.00003896275,0.00021779326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104213215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47528836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37107515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059225323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005861639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90175194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100605678","doi":"10.1177/1476127012453108","title":"Who is in charge? A property rights perspective on stakeholder governance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Shareholder value; Corporate governance; Stakeholder; Business; Shareholder primacy; Value (mathematics); Shareholder; Externality; Microeconomics; Economics; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.036526517683205806,"score_gpt":0.2158998631903155,"score_spread":0.1793733455071097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100605678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89840317,0.00009447928,0.00005548928,0.0019499474,0.00034802803,0.00030959988,0.0000108343265,0.00008166185,0.098746814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474627,0.000023898328,0.000008509581,0.0013733058,0.00088876823,0.0000063028556,0.000015132099,0.000027382728,0.002910445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904275,0.0000069470143,0.00017005597,0.00025766323,0.00023232562,0.0002902626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999361,0.0000055371675,0.0002217862,0.00017843823,0.00022214778,0.000011082461],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108703935,0.00016785969,0.0001461288,0.000060393424,0.00011189965,0.00011727084,0.00013025204,0.00006860584,0.0009365218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003241584,0.00012242945,0.000018916488,0.0011241018,0.000023398321,0.0015586567,0.000025998837,0.00012542491,0.0011109356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003620144,0.0003070687,0.25106615,0.00005710134,0.000010466614,0.000009095134,0.00057187723,0.000023347142,0.00038544368,0.7355118,0.011814973,0.00020647605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014808526,0.000035315577,0.93538266,0.00022683915,0.000029185556,0.0000028286365,0.0005774162,0.0005131836,0.001682946,0.015652925,0.043704197,0.0007116774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013354991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002211769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7198589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015826015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033940127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108906455","doi":"10.1177/1476127006069427","title":"The power of numbers in strategizing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Competence (human resources); Transparency (behavior); Objectivity (philosophy); Public relations; Standardization; Sociology; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.009367458793140878,"score_gpt":0.19299663778216186,"score_spread":0.18362917898902098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108906455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70155686,0.00017240588,0.00036195005,0.0008255702,0.00028676714,0.00022892993,7.7493104e-7,0.00008721757,0.2964795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999235,0.0000149887865,0.000035638164,0.00007973576,0.00021036656,0.0000016966694,0.000037777267,0.000018051982,0.00036679514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927413,0.00000597975,0.00025895098,0.00012747927,0.00018410258,0.00014934478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995165,0.000022470207,0.00015895852,0.000098748475,0.0002008546,0.000002459178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001665427,0.00009586679,0.00009077382,0.000093834125,0.00019413528,0.0001775087,0.00014258787,0.000031495845,0.0002661575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038367925,0.000073931194,0.000015052199,0.0013932536,0.000049023467,0.0003769462,0.00005884254,0.000046539968,0.000067753164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033988333,0.00003083118,0.15775117,0.000026978028,0.000006786809,0.0000013817512,0.000020080553,0.00031397017,0.000362636,0.8402316,0.0012201262,0.00003105365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092156423,0.000012553004,0.66429764,0.000047729038,0.000046354864,8.784077e-7,0.0055827647,0.0006733886,0.0005955138,0.32073367,0.006664505,0.00042342526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005383727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009491234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51949793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020314541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015927464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30148265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117094542","doi":"10.1177/1476127015589902","title":"Income inequality ignored? An agenda for business and strategic organization","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Economic inequality; Inequality; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Social inequality; Politics; Income inequality metrics; Economics; Income distribution; Political economy; Public economics; Sociology; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.06810244196661683,"score_gpt":0.2608162337682594,"score_spread":0.19271379180164258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117094542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97815585,0.0000985612,0.011816163,0.0008534913,0.0006627997,0.0007837768,0.000016129112,0.0005262262,0.0070869937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568564,0.000025187202,0.0005923354,0.0004927619,0.0012113574,0.000010184619,0.001732876,0.00009040315,0.00015924653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849826,0.000023217845,0.00039614976,0.00046736267,0.0003321516,0.0002828848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700546,0.000026285508,0.0002858069,0.00022578241,0.0024163236,0.00004033488],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042406027,0.00028999755,0.00025780668,0.00022849416,0.00044906914,0.00079135405,0.0002278671,0.00011713448,0.0002546504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042228616,0.00028042658,0.000015161342,0.0028657343,0.00006895386,0.0017227737,0.00017750938,0.00006840685,0.00008428096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035938785,0.00020202794,0.28981954,0.00056724995,0.00006841893,0.0000050785648,0.00030499487,0.00043932593,0.00067959947,0.7063881,0.0012443446,0.00024537352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005513696,0.00016921837,0.39877322,0.00010587512,0.0005625566,0.000012640579,0.01522497,0.00712417,0.00054249744,0.5668461,0.002937544,0.0021875736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032946782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032743346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13954204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006494299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096039854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119860649","doi":"10.1177/1476127007077558","title":"Paradigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Prison; Sociology; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.1665018847389151,"score_gpt":0.33267781065731367,"score_spread":0.16617592591839855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119860649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6978209,0.00008031895,0.00008059831,0.00056266296,0.00022185163,0.00018081462,0.0000038639405,0.000034204022,0.30101475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863386,0.000009198539,0.000033197473,0.00002113358,0.00016370066,8.8498723e-7,0.0000055950695,0.000008277281,0.0011241758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992058,0.000039942144,0.00020714676,0.00013557044,0.00023609701,0.00017539291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995889,0.000057299636,0.00005759226,0.000111459965,0.00014847498,0.00003629283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008542295,0.000054071148,0.000081911436,0.00020518374,0.00018534242,0.000041711963,0.00014696615,0.00003289528,0.001686442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000733005,0.000044172,0.000008692781,0.00036759302,0.00058669475,0.000188721,0.000014972055,0.00010812684,0.00005312809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019011266,0.00006329715,0.00032961956,0.000020775095,0.0000010604216,0.0000059762806,0.01983163,0.000002870128,0.000563276,0.9789866,0.000076522214,0.000099362405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006478612,0.0006455508,0.004187658,0.00011193659,0.000008538764,0.000007658824,0.019962672,0.000064196574,0.003607085,0.95300144,0.017463742,0.00029168522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063325526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009159326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3008129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047694335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012520516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121392610","doi":"10.1177/1476127009349842","title":"Striving toward the future: aspiration—performance discrepancies and planned organizational change","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Business; Affect (linguistics); Competitive advantage; Marketing; Planned change; Organizational change; Sample (material); Public relations; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.029318581532985298,"score_gpt":0.20949920995723945,"score_spread":0.18018062842425414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121392610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75566083,0.0004159533,0.0016737645,0.05702203,0.002247953,0.0019648217,0.00000644945,0.0009526286,0.18005556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99278986,0.000027944092,0.00005578639,0.0038892864,0.002856768,0.0000088354445,0.00020377239,0.000017660177,0.00015008915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921274,0.000008063273,0.00021043948,0.00019709475,0.00020877847,0.0001628784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932873,0.0000073494543,0.00014676472,0.00013229011,0.0003769229,0.00000793927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018121483,0.00014437242,0.0000921735,0.00013250101,0.00040601223,0.00049707957,0.00014297875,0.000050790444,0.00019114217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035236342,0.00010798074,0.000010467845,0.0015189642,0.000030497991,0.0009341761,0.000058026675,0.00007963751,0.00010952545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006246872,0.00003320398,0.016977249,0.000049352635,0.000008712127,7.881432e-7,0.00025273027,0.000006884396,0.00016981045,0.9783861,0.0003293887,0.0037795552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023724644,0.00026171646,0.8237877,0.00014655139,0.00021744311,0.000019132272,0.02017406,0.021274906,0.0008679496,0.07780178,0.051440574,0.001635724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005952568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023116678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9005843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024254436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020388428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47933495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121725155","doi":"10.1177/1476127015580309","title":"Understanding alliance evolution and termination: Adjustment costs and the economics of resource value","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Value (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Economics; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; Law","score_opus":0.06086966264821173,"score_gpt":0.22214941728916943,"score_spread":0.1612797546409577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121725155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32826012,0.0005606965,0.01308951,0.006350797,0.0007099703,0.0011805999,0.000002674019,0.00014320239,0.6497024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919885,0.000025544292,0.000053548163,0.00029391883,0.00022185098,0.000002496376,0.000024581,0.000009815579,0.00016940896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995421,0.000013845251,0.00017113028,0.00012112262,0.00008029695,0.0000714907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955374,0.000014443178,0.00017175822,0.00008288707,0.00017032372,0.0000068699946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039378906,0.00007280736,0.00008421773,0.000071641276,0.00010280104,0.00012505191,0.00005569442,0.000030190778,0.000009632369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051143063,0.000058828,0.000006356925,0.0003879311,0.00008900913,0.00029092605,0.00006592551,0.000034102308,0.00000764435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015161905,0.000010105178,0.0016144053,0.00004064527,0.000007966569,1.3318756e-7,0.00010176897,0.00006180145,0.000021683123,0.9976788,0.00025420744,0.00019331231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010099678,0.0000709474,0.021485457,0.0001762559,0.00027001087,0.000009674145,0.052925475,0.12788436,0.00020097091,0.7796687,0.006547642,0.0006608645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021498703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020213864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67093873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012836265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021085405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23989363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126485006","doi":"10.1177/1476127007079960","title":"The end of strategy?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Industrial organization; Process management; Computer science","score_opus":0.018627877607387548,"score_gpt":0.2263371499848204,"score_spread":0.20770927237743286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126485006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10261118,0.000027359281,0.0012106445,0.00033695373,0.00042205854,0.00015520838,3.3170494e-7,0.00008203167,0.89515424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984056,0.0000040881637,0.000025264473,0.00020323119,0.00046868937,6.7031914e-7,0.000030446094,0.000013792995,0.0008482532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993371,0.0000031528566,0.00025348988,0.00009833922,0.00016263977,0.00014529418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991946,0.000018021767,0.00017638723,0.00013348501,0.0004735548,0.000003944356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005236033,0.00007500691,0.000060336595,0.00010588386,0.00019921355,0.00016125398,0.0001425633,0.000032890315,0.00026198965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004465608,0.00005503759,0.000013967438,0.0013123224,0.000057184076,0.00021680465,0.00004235808,0.00004955861,0.00019371159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004705403,0.000021156762,0.0021593363,0.000027245354,0.000007654152,8.758099e-7,0.000012990541,0.0000054879806,0.001063612,0.99348766,0.00032155865,0.00288775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033799412,0.000113921706,0.16834609,0.00010867534,0.00024286406,0.000006756813,0.039479442,0.003597695,0.02535512,0.6110699,0.14674635,0.0015531965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002196967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000115009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015720689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020477864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28686032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133585426","doi":"10.1177/1476127014529895","title":"Rarely pure and never simple: Assessing cumulative evidence in strategic management","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Strengths and weaknesses; Simple (philosophy); Empirical evidence; Process (computing); Positive economics; Meta-analysis; Empirical research; Management science; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039602380175441466,"score_gpt":0.25591724543930694,"score_spread":0.21631486526386548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133585426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488495,0.00008261233,0.0036874574,0.0011373404,0.0002349637,0.00043409568,8.0180524e-7,0.00025436864,0.045318834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974387,0.000034548833,0.00032361475,0.0013614122,0.00050100824,0.000006603943,0.00009923872,0.00005562626,0.00017920107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984116,0.000034226225,0.00038250643,0.00049401284,0.00036790088,0.00030973335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991666,0.00005844842,0.0002567886,0.0002190746,0.0002805516,0.000018524775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005275208,0.00025766192,0.00020832045,0.00034873147,0.000262278,0.0010962948,0.00021798571,0.0000929877,0.00032174587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110121095,0.0002554823,0.000018433235,0.0019029196,0.000051359584,0.0028744992,0.00020716357,0.0001455321,0.00015241154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008933176,0.00007008823,0.13381831,0.00042712738,0.000025837304,0.000014306203,0.00005489885,0.0019106765,0.00022791764,0.8623244,0.0003089629,0.00080849516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016461599,0.000032574575,0.56618714,0.00057116884,0.00020748092,0.00000672804,0.00570042,0.05472335,0.00007550162,0.36806297,0.0016515916,0.0011349152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012877115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050721712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49426144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007000705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025446248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137334890","doi":"10.1177/1476127009341625","title":"Why and how do theory groups get ahead in organization studies? Groundwork for a model of discursive moves","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Space (punctuation); Phenomenon; Teleology; Organizational theory; Set (abstract data type); Dynamics (music); Organization studies; Economics; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.025265882791295966,"score_gpt":0.23419179598462192,"score_spread":0.20892591319332596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137334890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85607874,0.0015919493,0.12580149,0.011024763,0.0003808842,0.0017908517,0.000016362403,0.00026271443,0.0030522218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99740916,0.00023925897,0.0005711515,0.0010923448,0.00029920647,0.000006393155,0.0001804107,0.000038853897,0.00016321955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989991,0.000017020418,0.00025453774,0.00032035809,0.00020360558,0.00020533508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988294,0.000054717824,0.00026665314,0.00012912884,0.00070997135,0.000010103535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002829019,0.00021438212,0.00027774362,0.0002500727,0.00023051341,0.0002352734,0.00014225363,0.000073011855,0.000038218386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040699102,0.00019410078,0.000021197673,0.0015733981,0.000072168885,0.001045556,0.000090499445,0.00005665686,0.0000032978996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002759245,0.000103493374,0.022310313,0.00029247036,0.000059008016,8.147615e-7,0.00066214544,0.0011820814,0.0010492506,0.97216916,0.0018096736,0.000334005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016306445,0.00006392535,0.028748767,0.00015036727,0.00021912152,8.203653e-7,0.011844239,0.005924287,0.0004579229,0.9502288,0.00019036095,0.00054074393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073875003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045499386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14133039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045596476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017710869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139231821","doi":"10.1177/1476127008096363","title":"When is the whole bigger than the sum of its parts? Bundling knowledge stocks for innovative success","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Pairwise comparison; Business; Human capital; Interdependence; Intellectual capital; Knowledge flow; Industrial organization; Marketing; Knowledge management; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Engineering; Market economy","score_opus":0.03941579773218455,"score_gpt":0.245494735617741,"score_spread":0.20607893788555642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139231821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98646206,0.00018100074,0.001181632,0.0017339225,0.00020204803,0.00037397002,0.000008470782,0.00003816642,0.009818705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969572,0.000028286398,0.00000797985,0.0005242564,0.0007147468,0.000014415973,0.0001009074,0.000021276845,0.0016309454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992635,0.000010532268,0.00025016174,0.0001550282,0.00015205157,0.00016869056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813914,0.00005960705,0.00021580275,0.00016063233,0.0014201249,0.00000470144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022447539,0.00012916418,0.00013957717,0.00011251336,0.00057871634,0.00013169915,0.00026678547,0.00005292119,0.00056384335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009187047,0.00007371097,0.000046256948,0.0018398933,0.00008547676,0.00058593607,0.000064513544,0.000091830465,0.00016266906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041697777,0.001212986,0.25598174,0.0026755433,0.0015208494,0.0000058548558,0.112718366,0.0027621153,0.018972658,0.43328473,0.1649171,0.0055310614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006090175,0.00071530754,0.09225747,0.0007089645,0.0020585302,0.000033537144,0.07932021,0.24811561,0.18820903,0.14201346,0.23609562,0.0043820855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097089665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102803366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29127127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013964226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005984612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61736894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150520067","doi":"10.1177/1476127015604125","title":"On the risk of studying practices in isolation: Linking what, who, and how in strategy research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Limiting; Perspective (graphical); Best practice; Isolation (microbiology); Resource (disambiguation); Focus (optics); Knowledge management; Practice theory; Business; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Public relations; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Political science; Management; Economics; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.1557397563854555,"score_gpt":0.31500187768471766,"score_spread":0.15926212129926215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150520067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846925,0.00034535798,0.00010348161,0.0032813507,0.00009409789,0.00038502913,3.906481e-7,0.00002281679,0.011074934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921554,0.0003152421,0.000026686446,0.00009443635,0.00020591856,0.000005059143,0.000016825952,0.000017159053,0.000103103266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989184,0.00010304272,0.00019029995,0.00021837743,0.00040626517,0.00016362288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877805,0.0002356857,0.00035216572,0.00012194696,0.0005048384,0.0000072984903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968602,0.000105592866,0.00012978501,0.000344633,0.0001893343,0.00077239855,0.0001501224,0.000048868016,0.00005367753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013153928,0.00008055376,0.000007194016,0.0024892867,0.000057638397,0.0017534946,0.00014475502,0.00020711873,0.000014913335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020955898,0.00007640741,0.6498938,0.00009072166,0.00001884933,0.0000035900985,0.0007915905,0.0013396236,0.000048572245,0.34699875,0.00037931665,0.00033782923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017396971,0.00011292811,0.56186134,0.0004970032,0.00006192924,7.8723707e-7,0.121502236,0.019078992,0.000096842065,0.2941166,0.00052413857,0.00040754193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032603042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011780203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12071064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003955983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038420807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7448257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151401166","doi":"10.1177/1476127010387821","title":"The Strategy Research Initiative: Recognizing and encouraging high-quality research in strategy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Business; Process management; Marketing; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.23470338356094134,"score_gpt":0.4011319471305316,"score_spread":0.16642856356959024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151401166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6731528,0.00003915775,0.000022558093,0.00190667,0.00036593215,0.00043235003,9.63618e-7,0.00006895272,0.3240106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841577,0.000039930314,0.000037442296,0.00012934259,0.00085614325,0.000021473199,0.000052815976,0.000034709446,0.00041239365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976677,0.0002090704,0.00047323786,0.00042833097,0.00064407755,0.00057759177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716586,0.00030799798,0.00014424589,0.0003044842,0.0020576287,0.000019771926],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008206168,0.00015814867,0.00014537793,0.0007040087,0.0012927195,0.001820655,0.00033772658,0.0001270293,0.00022353732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005750725,0.00012943646,0.000014856131,0.0047880765,0.00029760727,0.0008714199,0.00027097325,0.0011234633,0.00025622867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012600642,0.00005264884,0.006506448,0.0000864552,0.000008910953,0.000007162307,0.00010931654,0.0000071228724,0.0034822554,0.98171765,0.0002797862,0.0077296514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014165997,0.00005447316,0.10872604,0.00010727165,0.000015030591,0.0000035942596,0.05092952,0.0019721407,0.0009676639,0.83088404,0.0043430347,0.0005806005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005696743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002847304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32526296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006435612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015441411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153958569","doi":"10.1177/1476127013520265","title":"Business sustainability: It is about time","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":863,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Sustainability organizations; Intergenerational equity; Meaning (existential); Social sustainability; Equity (law); Corporate social responsibility; Business; Sustainability science; Safeguard; Economics; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Ecology; International trade","score_opus":0.06734859576088707,"score_gpt":0.3505624263694392,"score_spread":0.2832138306085521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153958569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.538804,0.00015054077,0.2824811,0.011152183,0.0014809133,0.0008002182,0.000019305571,0.0004145207,0.16469721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98589236,0.0000010764181,0.00023364346,0.00064651493,0.00026338585,0.0000018847168,0.000006648276,0.000022702121,0.0129317995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969515,0.00023458873,0.0007525633,0.0005841697,0.0012224133,0.00025473692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943406,0.00053524575,0.00029551683,0.0008314576,0.0038905912,0.00010657406],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001981679,0.00016552469,0.00030630687,0.00024185094,0.00028776488,0.0009149933,0.00058059907,0.000106315914,0.0073365816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00519004,0.0001252188,0.00004712268,0.003648501,0.000060341692,0.00036997686,0.00013976338,0.00008065152,0.0030000228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004997117,0.00026369657,0.046732992,0.00009102399,0.000039982195,0.00002090624,0.0042094835,0.0031969734,0.0043223673,0.53487355,0.35954028,0.046658766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004948932,0.00005990284,0.0463401,0.000031239484,0.000013886993,0.000028667704,0.0024051117,0.020615824,0.00021243245,0.83971786,0.089668304,0.00041177875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041286617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013912641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44708833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007754836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023419206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301296798","doi":"10.1177/1476127015615286","title":"Understanding the relational dynamic capability-building process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic capabilities; Process (computing); Macro; Set (abstract data type); Process management; Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Ambidexterity; Phase (matter)","score_opus":0.11071040427929986,"score_gpt":0.26811320107504544,"score_spread":0.1574027967957456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301296798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18196058,0.000023304136,0.08453594,0.0052379407,0.0012784104,0.0006137725,0.00000129438,0.00045582085,0.72589296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985334,4.5489557e-7,0.00009038376,0.000591502,0.00039505164,0.000004954759,0.00008447513,0.000022786091,0.0002769938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991643,0.00001154913,0.00021074625,0.0001851748,0.00027919371,0.00014902714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915665,0.000013966081,0.00014617702,0.00014019465,0.00053420005,0.000008790217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005013771,0.00010901631,0.00007262492,0.00014255078,0.000310367,0.0003198696,0.00015173272,0.000044942153,0.00015684901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015386696,0.00008447335,0.00001407221,0.0017388683,0.00004741867,0.0006010774,0.000057170953,0.000099137746,0.00024094072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035718049,0.00002119083,0.005335764,0.000039059214,0.000008211714,6.593615e-7,0.00016250013,0.0006262741,0.000053725213,0.9934193,0.000306042,0.000023726632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072082545,0.00000953193,0.0023655812,0.000029726147,0.000054223896,0.000002942755,0.02241574,0.057174064,0.000033021162,0.9151455,0.0017272709,0.00032157748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074679674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026995369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8165728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001909828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006898466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34447232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313300281","doi":"10.1177/1476127012460944","title":"Balancing the skill sets of founders: Implications for the quality of organizational outputs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Business; Knowledge management; Process management; Industrial organization; Computer science; Operations management; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.045787053366788746,"score_gpt":0.28137600366790405,"score_spread":0.23558895030111532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313300281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677262,0.00018532616,0.008893849,0.017857734,0.00038269183,0.00111395,0.00001947372,0.00006780439,0.0037530223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906796,0.00002539257,0.000071456576,0.00049534044,0.00022736203,0.000016718926,0.000054204535,0.000012925218,0.00002861631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993103,0.0000111252675,0.00031910476,0.0001228543,0.00012943767,0.000107190775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808335,0.0002160239,0.0003742827,0.00019842047,0.0011237907,0.0000041587978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022347864,0.00008181508,0.00011019645,0.00003142512,0.00028822853,0.00010284993,0.00022543267,0.000030931376,0.00022123157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036158352,0.000047845555,0.000030121491,0.0006812739,0.000088919005,0.0003521468,0.000059552025,0.000033803957,0.000017443776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020448279,0.00003632455,0.37546048,0.000099312114,0.00004246777,5.8083405e-9,0.00022869778,0.0002117875,0.0028042535,0.61976326,0.0010639585,0.0002874045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023598305,0.0000085893325,0.91014034,0.000017116152,0.000058327,3.1603642e-7,0.004476603,0.0003553222,0.00050163,0.083946876,0.00015534183,0.000103549384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004222835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083357234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5358164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010760722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032712065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24223305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317516203","doi":"10.1177/1476127013497618","title":"Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Complement (music); Focus (optics); Institutionalism; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognition; Political science; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.013887379622471384,"score_gpt":0.21423664946789037,"score_spread":0.20034926984541898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317516203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06889734,0.00038392193,0.0032610896,0.007828447,0.00075500127,0.00073502806,0.0000020549278,0.0006279856,0.91750914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924789,0.00007397497,0.00027976793,0.0037243518,0.0011454703,0.000013965224,0.0002424961,0.000041589574,0.0019995028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987237,0.00002146968,0.00027952174,0.00031980893,0.0003970783,0.00025845153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998586,0.000055402423,0.00020032305,0.00017536203,0.0009641393,0.000018745679],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024497957,0.00022009423,0.00014335336,0.00016532917,0.0005898812,0.00081878615,0.00024162131,0.00007951104,0.011403238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042458368,0.00020151984,0.000028547529,0.0013344646,0.00008588879,0.0030773454,0.00015030574,0.00010666376,0.009650162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067846504,0.00007511636,0.002514944,0.00004629808,0.000050750354,0.0000068013965,0.000029206285,0.0001958298,0.00035351797,0.9914039,0.004338233,0.0009786471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013227388,0.000043804554,0.061879694,0.000055242806,0.00032877334,0.000023804743,0.0075789206,0.0011328916,0.0002959663,0.8337922,0.092428826,0.00111715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033073785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024939065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92358154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047080437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006190498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99112093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325827724","doi":"10.1177/1476127012442852","title":"Think different? An investigation of network antecedents and performance consequences of creativity as deviation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Conceptualization; Psychology; Empirical research; Creativity technique; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Knowledge management; Computer science; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030047971080935473,"score_gpt":0.23554676120831283,"score_spread":0.20549879012737737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325827724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834837,0.000022860477,0.00020045678,0.000055644537,0.00018324674,0.00016310383,5.8163926e-7,0.000038084956,0.015852354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934465,0.000017149125,0.00008388078,0.00011266254,0.0002824431,0.0000013707745,0.000103845,0.000010326771,0.00004368705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993609,0.000019692317,0.00024887183,0.00010232192,0.00015259912,0.00011561361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920034,0.0000101285905,0.0003487042,0.00009191403,0.00033883844,0.000010048144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028732623,0.00009367202,0.00012065178,0.000111446374,0.000100492136,0.00005712631,0.00006573257,0.00004606529,0.000095089454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003553729,0.000083524734,0.000007996485,0.00070955424,0.000080778045,0.0011384082,0.000039820017,0.000038461636,0.000013280911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007126227,0.000031465454,0.64848506,0.00017033552,0.0000086428445,3.7263437e-8,0.00026492105,0.000009320342,0.0039634025,0.3467735,0.000011620773,0.00027456848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000351721,0.00004855371,0.9623619,0.00008986631,0.00006213154,9.2821745e-7,0.0018474134,0.0019479346,0.013621395,0.019483138,0.000013216378,0.00017184384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039837814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013596556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32729036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013558082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015687943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34060398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336569683","doi":"10.1177/1476127016641726","title":"Organizational responses to institutional complexity stemming from emerging logics: The role of individuals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensemaking; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Reinterpretation; Expansive; Institutional theory; Organizational field; Action (physics); Complexity theory and organizations; Field (mathematics); Construct (python library); Affect (linguistics); Institutional logic; Legitimacy; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0369263128673427,"score_gpt":0.22985205406619866,"score_spread":0.19292574119885597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336569683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585372,0.00017257084,0.013877216,0.0063671903,0.00042552888,0.0005360979,0.00008859231,0.0002307222,0.019764854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975459,0.0000136618255,0.0006128254,0.0006749949,0.00075608783,0.000005163085,0.00018661785,0.000028322616,0.00017645511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986832,0.000026161631,0.00036223722,0.00027747842,0.00046601568,0.00018488073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875396,0.000114918206,0.0002516254,0.0001850176,0.0006802237,0.000014278564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025633926,0.00017309477,0.00016666856,0.00019117536,0.000541909,0.00016118938,0.00035360767,0.00004987782,0.0026954291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054391683,0.00011043305,0.000024718971,0.001631365,0.0001309652,0.00055300153,0.0003238141,0.000046045603,0.00038308345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000104160345,0.00003396688,0.3438004,0.000012737583,0.000045478893,5.629725e-7,0.000110323665,0.00004740362,0.005033761,0.6502878,0.0003071772,0.00030994942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069180195,0.000017947432,0.46456042,0.00011083412,0.00011941663,0.000001227551,0.0026215236,0.00017453542,0.00435485,0.51348186,0.013405745,0.00045983258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015331987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076560296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13680595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004906929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060256178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345426598","doi":"10.1177/1476127015589981","title":"Qualitatively capturing institutional logics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":426,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Matching (statistics); Institutional theory; Qualitative research; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Management science; Social science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08720988393148167,"score_gpt":0.2511078467895185,"score_spread":0.16389796285803682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345426598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40847996,0.00028192945,0.024205405,0.0032745618,0.0014965485,0.0004797086,0.000005978582,0.0008456308,0.56093025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968901,0.00000632881,0.00044627156,0.00087550527,0.0009407681,0.0000027841468,0.00021923527,0.000021571206,0.00059738726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991215,0.000008733823,0.00019545674,0.00020000621,0.0003165291,0.00015778221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915874,0.000010802843,0.00012278734,0.000084953805,0.0006076408,0.00001506233],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022263428,0.00013592174,0.000108675464,0.00013325475,0.00026236576,0.00023261883,0.00014295492,0.000044251872,0.0004096032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002559511,0.00012559004,0.00001561497,0.0011064071,0.00005688005,0.00090154866,0.00012507862,0.00005788387,0.00096001447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004988266,0.000039921837,0.025084037,0.00004111516,0.000019928219,0.000005299193,0.00017773685,0.0009768928,0.00007152338,0.9700015,0.0035129958,0.00006405357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003224046,0.00004982624,0.098989494,0.00007805935,0.00021363836,0.000010346626,0.017696885,0.003939243,0.00043463972,0.7945062,0.07925491,0.0016026999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011426946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046751367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5884102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006239981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054970715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478831592","doi":"10.1177/1476127016655998","title":"If you aren’t talking about practices, don’t call it a practice-based view: Rejoinder to Bromiley and Rau in <i>Strategic Organization</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Social practice; Public relations; Focus (optics); Business practice; Practice theory; Business; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Business administration","score_opus":0.021659777062574503,"score_gpt":0.24507044220608473,"score_spread":0.22341066514351024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478831592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60454357,0.0016433378,0.031963874,0.17310353,0.0025994834,0.0059340405,0.00005301138,0.001960024,0.17819916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99116784,0.00032573062,0.0007301751,0.005666688,0.00083577505,0.00001874794,0.0002062114,0.00012235757,0.00092648953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975452,0.00006131161,0.00063973636,0.00074945774,0.000535453,0.00046888302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974625,0.00017082383,0.00085106905,0.00031876817,0.0011455074,0.0000513342],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000573201,0.00041198515,0.00034153365,0.00045759222,0.00043043407,0.00085931993,0.00030477895,0.00015830081,0.0013374757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018765838,0.00034374258,0.000024595685,0.0035823863,0.000073287,0.0024073252,0.00025778735,0.00015303661,0.00047102122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023929868,0.000994831,0.7117984,0.0012323132,0.0002842769,0.0001488828,0.0010186498,0.0010775201,0.010982591,0.2329279,0.037341647,0.0019536838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022576846,0.00044497903,0.35515356,0.0033656484,0.0020402407,0.0000825688,0.029323114,0.0038053629,0.003696247,0.04037729,0.5305732,0.008560927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004244523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005829371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49323156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017123671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015419733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740162543","doi":"10.1177/1476127016682973","title":"Maneuvering multimarket competition: The effects of multimarket contact and strategic alliances on performance of single-market firms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Fu Jen Catholic University; York University","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Market share; Industrial organization; Single market; Microeconomics; Economics; International trade; Marketing; European union","score_opus":0.015340471493388836,"score_gpt":0.19589449510982024,"score_spread":0.1805540236164314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740162543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97723913,0.000051080482,0.00009456764,0.000341379,0.00031190706,0.00030850907,0.0000045991887,0.00005429575,0.021594519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993798,0.00012634488,0.000045634235,0.00011075247,0.0001990334,0.000006202197,0.000030929525,0.000024496027,0.00007681959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989608,0.000028371549,0.00037116735,0.00023769758,0.00022642517,0.0001755294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871516,0.00019140272,0.00045733494,0.00019776482,0.00042949972,0.000008861585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026206448,0.00019881621,0.00022030086,0.000121338046,0.00015568797,0.00009412424,0.00016247111,0.00008926022,0.000349051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114538125,0.00012362051,0.000024242476,0.0007272212,0.00013771406,0.0008496918,0.000041746236,0.000076180746,0.000011746719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007848283,0.0006116306,0.101715066,0.005860417,0.00015892625,0.000009934248,0.00013529923,0.00021828065,0.41311032,0.46994647,0.00037991308,0.0070689227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075941123,0.00096586504,0.85448426,0.004803856,0.0003059733,0.000018710343,0.0013303476,0.025468325,0.085407265,0.017509468,0.00070340396,0.001408388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004708808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013537855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75276923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022648515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000282453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5041098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750682399","doi":"10.1177/1476127017729315","title":"Challenging trends in configuration research: Where are the configurations?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Popularity; Qualitative comparative analysis; Function (biology); Qualitative research; Data science; Qualitative analysis; Comparative case; Cluster analysis; Thematic analysis; Computer science; Management science; Sociology; Social science; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Evolutionary biology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.39314593540787396,"score_gpt":0.5162749329075871,"score_spread":0.12312899749971312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750682399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23675175,0.00033725522,0.0015082001,0.079548754,0.00020977338,0.0005944446,0.000008969388,0.00008417419,0.68095666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436265,0.0002727211,0.0000110205665,0.00002217312,0.00021940806,0.000018068742,0.000029343328,0.000012317707,0.005052312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652004,0.001827158,0.00024395552,0.00026794666,0.0007864944,0.0003544112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976217,0.00031989816,0.00020779794,0.0004338166,0.0013455631,0.000071224065],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033762446,0.00009342728,0.0001445549,0.0003181578,0.004333698,0.0011380421,0.00063014246,0.000092117305,0.0030293395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013480781,0.00007565235,0.000027237931,0.0014030947,0.00078452047,0.0006792741,0.000047495436,0.00034561896,0.00028480703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006629746,0.000054619242,0.011414796,0.0000070875435,0.00002145911,0.0000054195407,0.029674131,0.00010697944,0.001964514,0.9533247,0.0021484552,0.0012712075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008168647,0.0000822805,0.41639277,0.00011947839,0.000018464365,8.573567e-7,0.492521,0.0023153266,0.0019271722,0.06989235,0.0154854,0.0004280378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021724391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029071309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8834323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020553802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024735442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893796540","doi":"10.1177/1476127018801294","title":"Ownership similarity in mergers and acquisitions target selection","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Matching (statistics); Mergers and acquisitions; Sample (material); Selection (genetic algorithm); Business; Industrial organization; Marketing; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.019314832394210956,"score_gpt":0.20974844914982735,"score_spread":0.1904336167556164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893796540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894297,0.000013624114,0.0011416684,0.00080173573,0.00015745148,0.0001014712,0.000002427618,0.000077379256,0.008274549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984722,0.000009723793,0.00010977494,0.000570735,0.0006491066,0.0000020258717,0.000040796087,0.00001348971,0.00013214072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994743,0.000005481088,0.000121848745,0.0001798957,0.00008620603,0.00013226907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963284,0.000004432482,0.00010444857,0.00006406092,0.00018833675,0.0000059053373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010758821,0.00008396792,0.00007515394,0.000094335046,0.00014118425,0.0001164249,0.000050521252,0.000055816152,0.00046085232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039321127,0.000084192056,0.00000755952,0.0012914379,0.00004083086,0.0007792101,0.000018516648,0.000060776856,0.00011284465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022841903,0.00007137185,0.89566034,0.00006444187,0.0000070692276,0.0000042512684,0.000096460986,0.00022692846,0.0047777398,0.09595474,0.0028536504,0.00026015154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005612763,0.000024884139,0.95562154,0.00003481535,0.00002024735,0.0000018749005,0.00025097685,0.007876814,0.0009951147,0.030808587,0.0035228168,0.00028105773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026345986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053997844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065146156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002616993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027410804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50460094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895538834","doi":"10.1177/1476127018803255","title":"Strategy and dialectics: Rejuvenating a long-standing relationship","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Construct (python library); Field (mathematics); Generative grammar; Conversation; Sociology; Process (computing); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03774594064187616,"score_gpt":0.2381381453168291,"score_spread":0.20039220467495292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895538834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67451686,0.0001949853,0.01386904,0.0012200628,0.00057481305,0.0004364728,0.0000020771695,0.00053574366,0.30864993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706674,0.000014462201,0.0002128541,0.0003349861,0.0014934175,0.00000250992,0.00006606319,0.000036729485,0.0007722118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991022,0.000010319314,0.00022737835,0.00026376778,0.00020042213,0.0001959132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992542,0.000039698814,0.00016748394,0.00010641671,0.00042024936,0.0000119021315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002096959,0.00015023362,0.000115745635,0.00019318837,0.0007654247,0.0005331196,0.000097298456,0.000059329785,0.0006921157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032313933,0.00014820277,0.000012274216,0.0014495251,0.00009411627,0.000861342,0.00011450016,0.000078114026,0.00023524427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045289926,0.00001689361,0.3812527,0.00006924001,0.00001796469,0.0000025389625,0.00008037798,0.000018895556,0.00011661567,0.6174933,0.00070233457,0.00022464637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001131701,0.000071845556,0.7208863,0.00011166317,0.00020628344,0.000008597636,0.002457615,0.0048535983,0.00025263376,0.26623648,0.0029474245,0.00083589036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045313012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017883572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3512568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035107845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020393669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75781816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898164576","doi":"10.1177/1476127018804528","title":"Response to Greckhamer et al (2018): Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Qualitative comparative analysis; Sociology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2317021350333595,"score_gpt":0.5168340613201262,"score_spread":0.2851319262867667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898164576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8315972,0.000014942851,0.09873446,0.018087234,0.00005872556,0.00071796525,0.000041911837,0.00012492514,0.0506226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99389666,0.0000057726274,0.0017909018,0.0015722623,0.00005870539,0.000030151845,0.0000967889,0.000016694183,0.0025320363],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905674,0.0070825047,0.00038268277,0.00054224546,0.0010171247,0.0004080473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943615,0.0012415183,0.00020894177,0.00029644786,0.003633669,0.00025790438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004151272,0.00020990691,0.00042338547,0.0007088123,0.0012533641,0.00039959917,0.00031218183,0.000057939695,0.0039747874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009967232,0.00018318958,0.000058426616,0.010996292,0.0008723491,0.00052188244,0.00004491413,0.00017977109,0.0009863018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046222442,0.0001690982,0.002579307,0.0000018559967,0.0011791441,0.0000032209232,0.8213914,0.00042964448,0.01197298,0.15350595,0.008284695,0.000020493266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066759286,0.0010976685,0.023535864,0.000023229668,0.00034352936,5.450621e-7,0.94581896,0.0004888603,0.0035816377,0.0027021733,0.0211557,0.00058422645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011742178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013591948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16229945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002776597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086799863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898298345","doi":"10.1177/1476127018804796","title":"Why should we bother? What are configurations for?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Cluster analysis; Block (permutation group theory); Qualitative comparative analysis; Management science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.26500869854517695,"score_gpt":0.4668396533778413,"score_spread":0.20183095483266433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898298345","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14614025,0.0012866922,0.4822672,0.14914238,0.0015033863,0.0031464375,0.00007858844,0.00068774325,0.21574733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481505,0.00026721027,0.0002996709,0.00076496537,0.0005993141,0.000018320057,0.000053033993,0.000020298958,0.003162118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984985,0.00043083855,0.00018933053,0.00024275856,0.0003836445,0.00025494516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754184,0.00021018891,0.00011674324,0.00015396375,0.0018838629,0.00009337149],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057071034,0.000096510244,0.00014035797,0.00011112587,0.0011215794,0.0006205931,0.00021935618,0.00008840555,0.0057525723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046160055,0.00009218523,0.00003533697,0.0014337966,0.00046507304,0.0007860661,0.00001479994,0.000072423194,0.00039009727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014952598,0.00009763362,0.0012389935,0.000021031026,0.000089008296,9.2139584e-7,0.049080614,0.000024195477,0.013067579,0.89142793,0.04396298,0.0009741627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073591934,0.00030724003,0.0018027581,0.00011449005,0.00007410535,6.867496e-7,0.46479124,0.0016503133,0.020394968,0.20284994,0.30668828,0.0005900703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019092101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044456646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84867483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011508304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002766465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917024105","doi":"10.1177/1476127019828359","title":"Balanced but not fair: Strategic balancing, rating allocations, and third-party intermediaries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intermediary; Credibility; Business; Portfolio; Set (abstract data type); Equity (law); Marketing; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Economics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.012907907636140954,"score_gpt":0.1964757116714923,"score_spread":0.18356780403535136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917024105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988978,0.0000530772,0.0006183329,0.00062628114,0.00049975625,0.00028447242,0.000008580307,0.00019682244,0.008734677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974373,0.00004367468,0.00009426833,0.00089178275,0.00053047336,0.000006734762,0.00014934194,0.00003555139,0.0008108819],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988262,0.0000106685,0.00030663956,0.00037785768,0.00022469128,0.0002539103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990647,0.000026763995,0.0003638809,0.00023512525,0.0002942311,0.000015335463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017325053,0.00021363689,0.00021552488,0.00008568574,0.00018937199,0.0005134945,0.0001709818,0.00009864127,0.0003172383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006542589,0.0002044915,0.000023272723,0.00067849836,0.000071620976,0.0013243102,0.000073826544,0.00014921193,0.00052973686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036439073,0.000062607796,0.57429403,0.00039944856,0.000029670242,0.000010103111,0.00017584504,0.00032591683,0.035355914,0.38779894,0.001232852,0.00027820276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004062911,0.00012324001,0.89756787,0.00046114402,0.00019041232,0.00002658118,0.007630997,0.029752355,0.0060129184,0.048462763,0.0037886195,0.0019202019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019221568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014940223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3393362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034152057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009811527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83389217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936418592","doi":"10.1177/1476127019840765","title":"CEO long-term orientation and elite university education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Upper echelons; Elite; Earnings; Business; Endogeneity; Human capital; Perspective (graphical); Term (time); Accounting; Marketing; Public relations; Economics; Strategic management; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.007903399665922123,"score_gpt":0.1858960004182054,"score_spread":0.17799260075228326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936418592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98924494,0.000027785292,0.00037322455,0.0001577361,0.00032616395,0.00014473917,0.0000015794215,0.00005143982,0.0096723735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975917,0.00006643722,0.000020598327,0.00022172413,0.00022867783,2.6747935e-7,0.00014220882,0.000010630142,0.0017177928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959064,0.0000035489254,0.00007219476,0.00017404626,0.00008246278,0.00007712449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995721,0.0000035428313,0.00013782698,0.00009705949,0.00018388881,0.00000556957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000040428564,0.000070296126,0.00005796256,0.00006351024,0.00007515097,0.00010973181,0.000055558136,0.000036807345,0.00026060303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075676444,0.00007730295,0.00000762374,0.0006148624,0.000012269222,0.0010818117,0.000022129063,0.000036394682,0.00036236885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007950856,0.000027842532,0.92174786,0.00008004597,0.0000028276656,0.0000011360436,0.00002615142,0.0000138532905,0.0010265389,0.07489797,0.00015046113,0.0020173748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027694262,0.0000051899856,0.9965104,0.000036838417,0.000017370618,0.0000010322699,0.00020255466,0.00009894337,0.000050541006,0.001188324,0.0015009393,0.000110932546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110524925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042173986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074762546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002913136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059252474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46576393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951577977","doi":"10.1177/1476127019852726","title":"Tapping into agglomeration benefits by engaging in a community of practice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Economies of agglomeration; Set (abstract data type); Repertoire; Marketing; Business; Isolation (microbiology); Community of practice; Economic geography; Public relations; Industrial organization; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.014846549931954306,"score_gpt":0.22547260890939555,"score_spread":0.21062605897744124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951577977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787239,0.000026614174,0.00011593804,0.0013117644,0.00013511341,0.00015518483,7.43886e-7,0.000043231594,0.019487513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990242,0.000003084428,0.0000735092,0.00030472924,0.00037331975,0.0000013565839,0.00015241945,0.000015395977,0.00005194346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939644,0.000045712968,0.00022187764,0.0001047676,0.00012790339,0.00010330582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933493,0.000055172917,0.0002263289,0.00014504648,0.00023360283,0.000004923918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044507385,0.000086213244,0.00010669217,0.00012303275,0.00012039824,0.00011138802,0.00011220556,0.000079101206,0.00018336394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021346463,0.000093243056,0.000009873325,0.0009683265,0.000012494785,0.0015660634,0.00005315215,0.00027211205,0.00008429715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009798072,0.0017091853,0.41207522,0.0019087411,0.00011937723,0.000012630733,0.007491771,0.016862608,0.321095,0.2239548,0.00840983,0.0062628705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017782075,0.0004762925,0.44373417,0.0036423383,0.0006790303,0.000049382237,0.21257235,0.05735154,0.1093054,0.095448196,0.05357363,0.0053856047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018623997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025648704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2117896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027048969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002580333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38023415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981753628","doi":"10.1177/1476127019883669","title":"Top management team time horizon blending and organizational ambidexterity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Upper echelons; Horizon; Business; Sample (material); Time horizon; Chief executive officer; Team composition; Diversity (politics); Knowledge management; Joint (building); Strategic management; Marketing; Industrial organization; Operations management; Management; Computer science; Economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.025143127636572126,"score_gpt":0.24139006090160023,"score_spread":0.2162469332650281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981753628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84945625,0.000010318315,0.00028065484,0.0003857127,0.00019942157,0.00020825965,0.000005338659,0.000098609766,0.14935541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541867,0.00006677326,0.00024197059,0.000064178224,0.000085819745,3.7320467e-7,0.000058899805,0.000008234002,0.0040551093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992035,0.00008999114,0.00010343012,0.0002030927,0.00024418748,0.00015578521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999654,0.000014143573,0.000052011907,0.00009126335,0.00012662484,0.000061933555],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029161706,0.000070740534,0.000079291334,0.00004949978,0.00035749984,0.00013726062,0.000107181055,0.000071140355,0.0033988596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023575192,0.00007972853,0.000009315148,0.00053968857,0.00004817658,0.0002844885,0.00006154609,0.000051853403,0.000578285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006158879,0.0000761658,0.18618917,0.000069576,0.000036733236,0.0000024931264,0.0069990456,0.000019259294,0.0029292516,0.8023707,0.0008242807,0.00047713812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042608026,0.0007109027,0.5419018,0.00017593469,0.00035031402,0.00001607936,0.18657085,0.0008668068,0.0075017046,0.23010927,0.024837956,0.002697517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011934504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000192635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57226145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008138297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067677465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99751216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990796524","doi":"10.1177/1476127019890380","title":"How strategy comes to matter: Strategizing as the communicative materialization of matters of concern","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Process (computing); Business; Strategic communication; Strategic planning; Public relations; Organization studies; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.023854533330057433,"score_gpt":0.22808817650852212,"score_spread":0.20423364317846468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990796524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555167,0.0000707925,0.0009692381,0.007988903,0.0003418893,0.00092366,0.000011594108,0.0000766876,0.034100536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977226,0.000021708487,0.000067690926,0.0011663388,0.00011573139,0.000004651846,0.00017342308,0.000037869686,0.0006899868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898875,0.000028399681,0.00033327064,0.00019891748,0.00029013978,0.00016052551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860364,0.000033971537,0.00047193433,0.0003138363,0.00056768773,0.000008928762],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001704471,0.00017678087,0.00025002455,0.0001453026,0.00014222796,0.00033195678,0.00042371426,0.00004873099,0.0018772274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002882271,0.00013853976,0.000028545532,0.001230287,0.00008459954,0.0006408511,0.00022590296,0.000053898228,0.00034619853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038604314,0.00008370445,0.16737607,0.0007762507,0.00014152554,6.6457994e-7,0.00064494205,0.0014309085,0.028307585,0.79834646,0.0027657663,0.00008750797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005231047,0.00048663147,0.6161508,0.0010198052,0.0011546399,0.000008794222,0.12877917,0.00259257,0.06507574,0.16132109,0.0152633805,0.0029163517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031081098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040561066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63702536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023299353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028027773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002019548","doi":"10.1177/1476127019900022","title":"Exploring the strategy-identity nexus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Identity (music); Organizational identity; Sociology; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Organizational commitment","score_opus":0.12293908354494838,"score_gpt":0.2270756482547658,"score_spread":0.10413656470981743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002019548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7565452,0.00022653719,0.011614821,0.023410855,0.001335719,0.0008844633,0.00000410822,0.0012410214,0.2047373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99499345,0.000036862286,0.000025353313,0.0027775606,0.0019392507,0.0000065377335,0.000067461886,0.000033076318,0.000120453085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908745,0.000008261229,0.00019888883,0.00023207776,0.00029580566,0.00017754124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994889,0.000013488717,0.00011723785,0.0001190623,0.0002486539,0.000012653391],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011067805,0.00014821628,0.000108862834,0.000050618914,0.0004913158,0.0007141362,0.0003039783,0.000021383581,0.0010923744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012279644,0.000113131195,0.000024637047,0.0020185686,0.00003854521,0.002578516,0.00019591869,0.00009285087,0.0011882938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006059261,0.000025513089,0.01630327,0.0001103746,0.000041818555,0.000005711442,0.000222043,0.0010037466,0.00032816047,0.9775805,0.0039813113,0.0003914784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027139604,0.00010370409,0.58573353,0.000086707136,0.0007911521,0.0000052675846,0.03543986,0.018493688,0.0011509344,0.28861797,0.06431743,0.0025457663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008312633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053795848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6889625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015868389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016052627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010399483","doi":"10.1177/1476127020908781","title":"Becoming a strategist: The roles of strategy discourse and ontological security in managerial identity work","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Strategist; Identity (music); Meaning (existential); Normative; Blueprint; Sociology; Public relations; Work (physics); Sensemaking; Epistemology; Business; Political science; Marketing; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.031970809288884024,"score_gpt":0.250205424726264,"score_spread":0.21823461543738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010399483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98736906,0.0001904426,0.0007350459,0.0031790338,0.00009493277,0.0003067218,0.0000024522924,0.00006647525,0.008055846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902254,0.00004902545,0.000027532324,0.00038024443,0.000436365,0.0000030328708,0.0000436694,0.000016394262,0.00002118623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901026,0.000023213446,0.00031371933,0.00025805217,0.00022627856,0.00016844606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995453,0.000026226075,0.00020292152,0.00009592342,0.00011687806,0.000012775409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020593175,0.0001578856,0.00020423613,0.00006795824,0.00017538728,0.00033370135,0.00022856785,0.000058273166,0.00035925902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110114095,0.000119938195,0.000021696174,0.0014586531,0.00012514468,0.0008582501,0.00021676949,0.000115339644,0.00002108129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003163134,0.00007660531,0.21340929,0.00019605554,0.000034696382,0.000011174066,0.0006885872,0.00036656304,0.00017335216,0.7844823,0.00031681932,0.00021290421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022190397,0.000069181355,0.73587734,0.000105380685,0.00025935826,0.000001881315,0.042369064,0.00501907,0.00013522063,0.21279049,0.00037234728,0.00078160333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013143873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00099319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5716918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013180024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017515464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48909375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039718957","doi":"10.1177/1476127020935449","title":"Capturing emotions in qualitative strategic organization research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenon; Theme (computing); Repertoire; Knowledge management; Organization studies; Coding (social sciences); Management science; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.15413917359771756,"score_gpt":0.32876346164512205,"score_spread":0.17462428804740449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039718957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9101108,0.00008760137,0.0028751106,0.017763337,0.00030274136,0.000838595,0.000006713844,0.0005524924,0.06746266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997312,0.00003583558,0.0001634223,0.00080437155,0.0009600252,0.000006286562,0.0004378594,0.0000753846,0.00020480067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808997,0.00008523708,0.00038930177,0.0004883729,0.00056149694,0.00038562392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834514,0.00006393075,0.00016764023,0.00015151389,0.0012420228,0.000029742974],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005649362,0.00022681865,0.00022243925,0.00041598876,0.00053045613,0.0005673422,0.00030712123,0.00010145034,0.0016849138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006199681,0.00023505476,0.00002111467,0.008338666,0.000086953536,0.0011048416,0.00024537568,0.00027379638,0.0012386519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010845864,0.00012150137,0.029741753,0.00029842305,0.000037325608,0.000017095595,0.004717557,0.0011062659,0.0017109554,0.9596153,0.0025866095,0.000036359706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00472375,0.00015877899,0.15496166,0.00030926586,0.00022616309,0.000005241032,0.33568054,0.013698684,0.0013031927,0.48176974,0.0044614216,0.0027015887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025542095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002310498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47784558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001040079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076839264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091662688","doi":"10.1177/1476127020959253","title":"The communicative constitution of institutional change in expression games","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Institutional change; Constitution; Sanctions; Process (computing); Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Law; Computer science; Public administration","score_opus":0.05670154655251209,"score_gpt":0.24036603209941806,"score_spread":0.18366448554690598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091662688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7189154,0.0029235566,0.008590874,0.038120363,0.0009846172,0.002607667,0.000019140602,0.0005125408,0.22732583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874324,0.0001636286,0.00007217282,0.00062823726,0.00027349495,0.00000802858,0.00009343528,0.0000071989157,0.000010594208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938107,0.000013617703,0.00021495018,0.00012198767,0.0001727598,0.00009561438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948126,0.00002817659,0.00016791886,0.00009334596,0.00022321286,0.0000060616753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011294675,0.00008767107,0.000097705386,0.00005638272,0.00030427438,0.00007993497,0.00020229685,0.000031602936,0.00017417113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016468953,0.000065993125,0.000013250963,0.0010994185,0.00014714632,0.00056598213,0.00017215431,0.000065649234,0.00004554199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014837545,0.00003396097,0.09785226,0.000070960086,0.000009548182,0.0000010762895,0.00031314988,0.00013221678,0.0009630577,0.89986527,0.0003644862,0.00037916008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003923904,0.0000771301,0.83670145,0.00046681953,0.00014720789,0.000002032447,0.010677794,0.018677143,0.007100003,0.07209495,0.048994105,0.0011374886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009990323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091619855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82777035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019445879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023717503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26911214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095282583","doi":"10.1177/1476127020968180","title":"An editorial perspective on judging the quality of inductive research when the methodological straightjacket is loosened","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Creativity; Quality (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Mainstream; Inductive reasoning; Inductive method; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9341467367982395,"score_gpt":0.7600663907279802,"score_spread":0.17408034607025924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095282583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8101711,0.0000047586304,0.0023747813,0.17671302,0.0035769108,0.0018967144,0.00012329144,0.00009080305,0.005048621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796001,0.0000067081255,0.00050262874,0.008355463,0.011442396,0.000029656143,0.000011633118,0.0000179051,0.00003353518],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834532,0.013789842,0.00070762524,0.00041233885,0.0011738032,0.00046318604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903571,0.006127819,0.00044354127,0.00040860483,0.0024788657,0.00018406966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011468095,0.00012226967,0.00022800521,0.00006717744,0.0015896264,0.00004314894,0.00057529495,0.0001888025,0.0022204318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010997799,0.00006826781,0.00002480428,0.0016729379,0.00035952678,0.0002175445,0.000101428115,0.0011757266,0.00015291528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021498006,0.000073407646,0.005980244,0.000087001456,0.000031213785,5.9913907e-7,0.49803513,0.0000328099,0.025122913,0.42806232,0.042154755,0.00020463552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014651564,0.0011184936,0.04382388,0.000038613223,0.000022398855,4.6354276e-7,0.7546859,0.0001984536,0.0072309626,0.18770705,0.0034482004,0.00026043985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012684014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012201617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25665078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030061093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015883791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114017769","doi":"10.1177/1476127020979329","title":"Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":244,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Transparency (behavior); Qualitative research; Computer science; Data science; Qualitative property; Data collection; Qualitative analysis; Sociology; Internet privacy; Social science; Computer security","score_opus":0.6099712351620833,"score_gpt":0.6761771816509065,"score_spread":0.06620594648882316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114017769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.870433,0.00006460901,0.084186316,0.027408116,0.00004285178,0.00087320496,0.000019399957,0.00007198893,0.016900543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851495,0.000038846923,0.014262717,0.00015230561,0.00018090228,0.000018037723,0.000011569613,0.000014436703,0.0001716739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956838,0.0029599848,0.00020169343,0.00028000583,0.000538992,0.0003355529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829286,0.00060152076,0.000041170017,0.000090256945,0.0007685168,0.00020565726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004578962,0.00006586465,0.00011925185,0.00011726891,0.0004926448,0.00013294243,0.00022317856,0.00006028059,0.000425232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034723391,0.00006780218,0.000010671083,0.0058339993,0.00020345146,0.00021241861,0.000047422087,0.00020385663,0.0000898679],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087557955,0.00003942623,0.00054309476,0.0000214359,0.000003891851,0.0000017651005,0.31010333,0.00029933613,0.019867904,0.6681223,0.00016003795,0.0008287142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018134748,0.000101034195,0.00066076114,0.000058907524,0.00000384822,1.5839075e-7,0.8360532,0.0010928318,0.0080627445,0.14909936,0.004384773,0.00030106708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025100464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010135463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52594984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015202933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4655992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118085287","doi":"10.1177/1476127020981353","title":"Painful memories as mnemonic resources: Grand Canyon Dories and the protection of place","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mnemonic; Embodied cognition; Canyon; Aesthetics; Modalities; Semiotics; Sociology; Space (punctuation); History; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Social science; Art; Linguistics; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.33391459543944046,"score_gpt":0.4845271484828406,"score_spread":0.15061255304340015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118085287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854283,0.00016860945,0.0010280737,0.0058286423,0.000063090745,0.0005585783,0.0000026386165,0.000070560076,0.006851528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993615,0.000104085535,0.00008248741,0.00007888475,0.00014661127,0.000011660539,0.0000017676188,0.000010493626,0.0002024875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978358,0.0012684411,0.00016999344,0.00015464489,0.00039729726,0.00017382173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999212,0.00024715153,0.00010716515,0.00008505657,0.00024244665,0.00010615039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017562169,0.0000731248,0.00013629156,0.000026579008,0.00049603864,0.00012323452,0.00013183379,0.000068363384,0.00014332082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004203391,0.000053513333,0.000015064212,0.0009485378,0.0008309431,0.00017927903,0.000035486122,0.00012121615,0.000007870623],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008165186,0.0000554221,0.010189724,0.00028031282,0.00008571601,0.0000054248717,0.51146805,0.00014419056,0.015578675,0.4587156,0.0002052668,0.0024551158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008965656,0.0018255108,0.01708512,0.00019264786,0.0003081675,0.000008551855,0.59728616,0.0045919637,0.1401395,0.19783787,0.030610625,0.0011482347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015528953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006423407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2608777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003828109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036939833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50321555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124427427","doi":"10.1177/1476127008090007","title":"Who enters, where and why? The influence of capabilities and initial resource endowments on the location choices of de novo enterprises","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Endowment; Competition (biology); Economies of agglomeration; Industrial organization; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Asset (computer security); Economics; Economic geography; Microeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.023522025674771036,"score_gpt":0.20801638730150496,"score_spread":0.1844943616267339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124427427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966167,0.0001980355,0.00013706187,0.00064858136,0.000018637895,0.000118565746,0.00002193054,0.000006402005,0.002234054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936736,0.00023022499,0.000014930508,0.00028843028,0.00001942893,0.000002878101,0.000007541705,0.000006780622,0.00006240078],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995055,0.000022819875,0.00026051665,0.000110455076,0.000035530422,0.00006515656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995002,0.000069166446,0.00021796374,0.00011407512,0.00008646989,0.000012134446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016306515,0.00006174578,0.00009985107,0.000058358903,0.000100883,0.000024200575,0.00008109776,0.000035361558,0.000047403653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011855218,0.000046837682,0.000007676502,0.00029148182,0.0001786196,0.00011817707,0.000019129619,0.00005158308,0.0000022317133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001861405,0.00005014768,0.66025496,0.00010223833,0.000026618396,3.7364268e-7,0.0061002183,0.00026077937,0.0006180472,0.332376,0.00015504648,0.000036925183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006914641,0.0002127672,0.9671861,0.0001078932,0.00000926817,0.000019011834,0.0036600353,0.00032022203,0.006871765,0.019815233,0.0009383384,0.00016793603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001699932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020096657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31256077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001642321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020246443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19099852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126118961","doi":"10.1177/1476127005055793","title":"Should you bank on your network? Relational and positional embeddedness in the making of financial capital","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Embeddedness; Competition (biology); Business; Context (archaeology); Web syndication; Relational capital; Investment (military); Social capital; Investment banking; Interpersonal ties; Industrial organization; Banking industry; Marketing; Finance; Venture capital; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03889846585882088,"score_gpt":0.24407125194687804,"score_spread":0.20517278608805717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126118961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820804,0.000032678432,0.00072067697,0.0037358664,0.00019262565,0.00017114126,0.0000034551654,0.000030943844,0.01303224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996511,0.0000024211315,0.00012867714,0.0016856436,0.0014072568,0.0000035105277,0.00022725922,0.0000130861545,0.000021146696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992007,0.000015410085,0.000264374,0.00015990117,0.00022453722,0.00013505608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948746,0.00001804293,0.00017427077,0.00008162897,0.00023634896,0.0000022478894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003169659,0.00011204682,0.00009602452,0.00012653429,0.00016298809,0.00011385594,0.000089334,0.00009803067,0.00021197462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057905778,0.00009298167,0.00001307034,0.0011143554,0.00004235032,0.0008163299,0.000021573805,0.00013794214,0.000021603155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025970376,0.00007215161,0.023057148,0.000033171513,0.0000035050916,0.0000017776397,0.00015382565,0.009851101,0.00020132474,0.9655378,0.00041852464,0.00064373243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000826361,0.000027479067,0.9342856,0.00011613398,0.000034239307,0.000011570735,0.00073517277,0.013394571,0.000049741284,0.04928428,0.00093929423,0.00029555243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021580378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005827677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002035646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000492222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37916824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127212551","doi":"10.1177/1476127020985094","title":"Navigating the tensions of quality in qualitative research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Quality (philosophy); Creativity; Qualitative research; Accountability; Process (computing); Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Process management; Political science; Business; Computer science; Psychology; Epistemology; Engineering; Social science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6352274301645447,"score_gpt":0.6895973906320689,"score_spread":0.05436996046752418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127212551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93438643,0.00020789629,0.0012480953,0.04248236,0.000085241205,0.00023842222,0.000010738862,0.000020662785,0.021320153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972998,0.00021198491,0.0021020605,0.00006106682,0.000062557876,0.0000040916357,0.000014123471,0.000008074731,0.00023627683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749237,0.023384197,0.00032331457,0.00017862867,0.0009111354,0.00027902832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98964524,0.006971697,0.00009341683,0.00017808417,0.0030514018,0.000060164137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033645812,0.000050615796,0.00013392701,0.000031805543,0.0006772978,0.0000722532,0.00017708847,0.000100840516,0.0002594656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027633056,0.000039164133,0.000022018963,0.0036561864,0.0011222435,0.00012611964,0.00006359161,0.0008120845,0.0000128519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020220973,0.000035174617,0.00095988216,0.000019067114,0.00000428634,0.00000207648,0.2746527,0.0000072826438,0.0051659117,0.71866894,0.000020211577,0.00046246906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080657046,0.0000142755025,0.0025605937,0.000056571454,0.0000012005765,1.8453281e-7,0.67241013,0.000012659726,0.0024726952,0.3222487,0.000099132165,0.000043209926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006016308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00567015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39775744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010195709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014907075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169381977","doi":"10.1177/14761270211019484","title":"How do managerial perceptions of performance feedback affect innovation?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perception; Consistency (knowledge bases); Affect (linguistics); Survey data collection; Psychology; Business; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.012675602015407217,"score_gpt":0.2055123941872368,"score_spread":0.19283679217182959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169381977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639508,0.0000202234,0.0051534213,0.0013990878,0.00056448317,0.00018130371,0.0000037544066,0.00016760842,0.028559312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960943,0.000020341391,0.00035729178,0.00035616758,0.0011398622,0.0000034591208,0.0005473383,0.000044072418,0.0014371665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989203,0.000011561342,0.00028267983,0.0002853078,0.0003218759,0.00017827902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795854,0.000013066351,0.00027551726,0.00024349213,0.0015027013,0.0000066881307],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017298048,0.00016234072,0.00016644807,0.00028733138,0.00023980835,0.00065869384,0.0001687168,0.000076142154,0.0012607458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019175214,0.00016848822,0.000026863398,0.004455261,0.000045804147,0.0012123048,0.00013026477,0.00008477457,0.0002039893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001054011,0.00017259496,0.15176558,0.0006152152,0.000060485978,0.0000065075856,0.00007633487,0.0007018704,0.015267646,0.82803947,0.002217701,0.0010660444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037611031,0.00007923266,0.89694655,0.00041051544,0.00058795954,0.00003066135,0.014946032,0.005244091,0.015342735,0.038668502,0.021977622,0.0020050246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009644363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056638214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78937095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036114274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065626016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194635195","doi":"10.1177/14761270211038635","title":"Tackling wicked problems in strategic management with systems thinking","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Systems thinking; Wicked problem; Context (archaeology); Transformative learning; Sociology; Management science; Salient; Critical systems thinking; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Economics; Management; Critical thinking; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10524278909539804,"score_gpt":0.3255673217055416,"score_spread":0.22032453261014356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194635195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8590522,0.00094318355,0.03900576,0.00014793477,0.00088791637,0.00069758977,0.0000051975103,0.00017320916,0.09908702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966012,0.0000125305,0.0011378997,0.000043438522,0.00010849344,0.0000102465065,0.000017424267,0.000035188616,0.0020335387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956664,0.00031065315,0.0010492736,0.0008189738,0.0017998165,0.00035488358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976311,0.00023088181,0.00039811124,0.0007001374,0.0009451923,0.000094575385],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016673841,0.00023286133,0.00040502212,0.0004017474,0.00025665868,0.0017387259,0.00051322853,0.000101604164,0.0004453456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000994918,0.00017267928,0.000037882673,0.0049899374,0.000047214315,0.00039440164,0.00015430567,0.00017961476,0.0001977705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012077502,0.00011731158,0.019619882,0.00010101692,0.00003942125,0.0004263804,0.0016394516,0.086965285,0.0010984429,0.88959026,0.00014353363,0.00024694513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026877488,0.00017142776,0.012174401,0.0011768036,0.000051780513,0.00048316305,0.17949869,0.04685537,0.00030829976,0.7546151,0.0008900016,0.001087178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006943301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029357008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17785923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010975241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022540697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209674266","doi":"10.1177/14761270211057571","title":"The logic of strategic entrepreneurship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Disequilibrium; Complementarity (molecular biology); Competitive advantage; Ideal (ethics); Economics; Construct (python library); Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Business; Computer science; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.043242215544981644,"score_gpt":0.23600091485141178,"score_spread":0.19275869930643014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209674266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9210101,0.0007934383,0.000026646037,0.0024852133,0.0005434928,0.0001135443,0.0000018314471,0.000095518175,0.074930266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865294,0.00024896348,0.000017547767,0.00040246165,0.0003892143,0.0000021935637,0.000036977,0.000014496705,0.00023519712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990916,0.000019469877,0.0002653625,0.00022282981,0.00020375005,0.0001969843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888825,0.00005730351,0.00021417976,0.00024436088,0.0005880763,0.00000780245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001409481,0.000120758865,0.00012760442,0.000034987963,0.00029467308,0.00030456332,0.00019383174,0.000046737106,0.0004906887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014794688,0.00008540119,0.000038051614,0.0010021519,0.000085675136,0.00028848147,0.00009572783,0.00007344456,0.00011168217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058304736,0.000052006722,0.10779637,0.000066694694,0.000028707698,0.00000965749,0.0000400444,0.00019977037,0.0036481114,0.8875468,0.0002669898,0.0003390571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012640037,0.000063209576,0.09835857,0.00014644979,0.000288798,0.000022712744,0.023423567,0.0005633601,0.02044539,0.848709,0.005815926,0.00089903624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054077747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102373946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077642895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001021316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055505934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5372697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213232149","doi":"10.1177/14761270211055777","title":"Communicative Perspectives on Strategic Organization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Variety (cybernetics); Bridge (graph theory); Organization studies; Focus (optics); Sociology; Work (physics); Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03843750577700589,"score_gpt":0.23667515268144357,"score_spread":0.19823764690443768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213232149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45853376,0.00029228604,0.0022497587,0.012050944,0.0008696542,0.0006732492,0.000016483842,0.0014608019,0.52385306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458003,0.00011776101,0.00020029346,0.0018155269,0.0009035015,0.0000047735207,0.0012739219,0.0001114534,0.0009927342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822515,0.000052944957,0.00036015426,0.0005855792,0.0004392094,0.00033698027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972078,0.000052398027,0.00028614415,0.0005369223,0.0018904521,0.000026247548],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016343402,0.0003401437,0.00025138073,0.000274384,0.00057525065,0.0010588666,0.00039393184,0.00014847209,0.004389801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002662643,0.00035247736,0.000042833788,0.0042217458,0.000116388816,0.0012914322,0.00017194997,0.00024646468,0.0016177335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073972,0.0002728615,0.0034709414,0.000084114086,0.0000590607,0.000019781317,0.00046812234,0.00040848626,0.002195694,0.9921384,0.00084456394,0.00003057963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004616354,0.00018562544,0.049145408,0.00036535977,0.00070811575,0.000057843317,0.5442623,0.0020101224,0.0155965155,0.37244838,0.0069150026,0.0036889638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044519427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004378466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011472324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019152187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286716435","doi":"10.1177/14761270221114913","title":"Broad versus narrow organizational scope among nonprofits: The moderating effects of the task environment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamism; Scope (computer science); Scarcity; Social capital; Business; Profit (economics); Task (project management); Marketing; Economics; Sociology; Management; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.011951184858114059,"score_gpt":0.22789938260840903,"score_spread":0.21594819775029497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286716435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993442,0.00015277897,0.00038085034,0.00036265224,0.0016214866,0.0005328505,0.0000081906255,0.000053787986,0.003445426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.000015834836,0.000034841574,0.000044563152,0.00024407035,0.000018223262,0.000023205923,0.000025930673,0.0003554373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844265,0.000357981,0.00018974175,0.00019142743,0.0006205789,0.00019764568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993258,0.000165332,0.000165469,0.00020022325,0.00010633628,0.000036822985],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003489852,0.000103776,0.00009353168,0.000026719734,0.0021062433,0.00007391635,0.00039276612,0.000045942354,0.0010997929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031339185,0.00007739246,0.000030163277,0.0009362303,0.00018834234,0.00013999287,0.00015423831,0.00016483238,0.0000070583105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008593712,0.00042283925,0.44395822,0.00022931617,0.00021966765,0.000008222832,0.09450124,0.070046745,0.13442086,0.25339475,0.0021782035,0.00053400587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010010495,0.0013615137,0.54301524,0.00028319805,0.000804882,0.000015593416,0.18424918,0.014524049,0.217249,0.01864402,0.0066341483,0.0032086528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006378409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025642017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23475072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022409178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026450705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286717107","doi":"10.1177/14761270221114915","title":"Constructing strategic organization: A field whose time has come","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Eclecticism; Field (mathematics); Politics; Strategic planning; Public relations; Organization studies; Work (physics); Sociology; Political science; Management; Business; Marketing; Engineering; Law; Economics; History","score_opus":0.02306170798538271,"score_gpt":0.19969270521455712,"score_spread":0.1766309972291744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286717107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6412539,0.00024188399,0.0030371589,0.013948215,0.0023336478,0.0014154235,0.000038841845,0.0020804037,0.33565053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391687,0.000007742184,0.00017685664,0.0020012036,0.0009491498,0.00001064927,0.0011147587,0.000090114896,0.0017326751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820334,0.000032436434,0.00043068302,0.00045245283,0.0005416534,0.00033945614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872875,0.00005169542,0.00035943504,0.00024771685,0.0005915088,0.00002089157],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025241153,0.00028739005,0.0002629639,0.00029193464,0.0018903275,0.00090172514,0.00042099238,0.000066594526,0.031012869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001594093,0.00031573093,0.000035741843,0.0041779685,0.000071860064,0.0007998994,0.00060070865,0.00022131037,0.00095379114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016278686,0.00017204855,0.12356588,0.00015552301,0.00011397388,0.000034143955,0.00017701555,0.0007652194,0.0008966424,0.8575456,0.016352192,0.00020544771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016380124,0.00087464147,0.05007355,0.00032099325,0.0026512498,0.00041590462,0.13196358,0.042371824,0.0054245656,0.58715075,0.15011296,0.012259884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011125133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034986046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35266295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013754502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009813127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288067399","doi":"10.1177/14761270221118334","title":"It’s strategy. But is it practice? Desperately seeking social practice in strategy-as-practice research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Cornerstone; Field (mathematics); Social practice; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Process (computing); Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08921474460850193,"score_gpt":0.35216587550409983,"score_spread":0.2629511308955979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288067399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02970046,0.0004931513,0.00017067025,0.12557878,0.0005616298,0.0012971566,0.000014507053,0.00028111826,0.84190255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97572446,0.00035170157,0.00022263288,0.0189245,0.001387121,0.00005682845,0.00031152423,0.00011926279,0.0029019464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517167,0.00045123257,0.0007488453,0.0008350497,0.0020354895,0.0007577003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531305,0.0006686113,0.0006599458,0.0003022849,0.0030242698,0.000031856005],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032677215,0.00038824193,0.0003300064,0.0006906134,0.0028421606,0.0020093536,0.00063361303,0.00014756061,0.008479494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038155615,0.0004436798,0.000047427337,0.0068362253,0.00011738106,0.0062555815,0.0008435623,0.0010553794,0.0012542967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007086325,0.0027278527,0.0034871323,0.0004313039,0.0005337447,0.0008799637,0.009123428,0.0031522403,0.0023693528,0.84916186,0.12566276,0.001761697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021914092,0.00021444546,0.002421685,0.000050515613,0.00043683438,0.00007761301,0.5569542,0.0017988604,0.00016229867,0.018449629,0.41603234,0.0012101431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017170303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002535025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042492675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044374575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292838546","doi":"10.1177/14761270221122428","title":"Doing safe while doing good: Slack, risk management capabilities, and the reliability of value creation through CSR","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Business; Value (mathematics); Enterprise value; Social responsibility; Asset (computer security); Scarcity; Variance (accounting); Accounting; Economics; Microeconomics; Public relations","score_opus":0.011732901479871011,"score_gpt":0.22186584601084028,"score_spread":0.21013294453096926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292838546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8842649,0.00008607425,0.0024016076,0.00048256325,0.00028398252,0.0009329321,0.0000083680425,0.000120612225,0.111418985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978735,0.000041076113,0.0013243845,0.00013300091,0.00019850447,0.0000269574,0.00008424708,0.000033597444,0.00028476882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799484,0.00020943483,0.000669333,0.0004118905,0.0005000393,0.00021447678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980342,0.00020963716,0.0009875488,0.0003994946,0.00035968478,0.000009469049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024685422,0.00017355056,0.00025937296,0.000093447416,0.0009892348,0.00021884208,0.0001892792,0.00004809531,0.00043569837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003921011,0.00015141803,0.000057709734,0.0015163688,0.00020504474,0.0007018203,0.0004163818,0.00021792749,0.00000800414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002567913,0.00013959303,0.112118326,0.0007232806,0.000079962956,0.000006956643,0.0031461995,0.01672867,0.00034215752,0.8611395,0.00010442176,0.005214161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005836697,0.00010650999,0.07315143,0.00014075237,0.0011447722,0.00001831858,0.1007337,0.017605167,0.0004747708,0.7615297,0.03802362,0.0012346077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002461005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009881089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11360859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017685955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009101568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7608494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293221758","doi":"10.1177/14761270221081332","title":"Temporal Work: The Strategic Organization of Time","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; University of Victoria; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Action (physics); Underpinning; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Perception; Temporal scales; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01884419540636881,"score_gpt":0.1929346613922999,"score_spread":0.1740904659859311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293221758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281746,0.00015242555,0.0009821169,0.0033642922,0.00075138366,0.000845893,0.000013954857,0.00047164908,0.065243654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996571,0.000011338914,0.000046422774,0.0005597946,0.00045776746,0.000007876944,0.0007580012,0.00006117735,0.0015266056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998605,0.000034053188,0.0003687119,0.0002668435,0.00051295926,0.00021242388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879706,0.000027150021,0.0004014167,0.00023379552,0.0005319258,0.000008657127],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003271046,0.00019052457,0.00018208358,0.00017932587,0.0009758852,0.00022460484,0.00042850518,0.00003804717,0.0117428815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056541037,0.00015886495,0.000030263125,0.0052542645,0.00006896107,0.00043009783,0.00043640996,0.00013288118,0.00035638822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022566288,0.00029231288,0.29333308,0.00015453578,0.00014027086,0.000007651272,0.0002764404,0.006039271,0.001665376,0.68007284,0.017876463,0.000119171615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00834263,0.00038504472,0.48081478,0.00018229168,0.002257375,0.000045958794,0.06804096,0.014766615,0.003186321,0.35414517,0.06200715,0.005825717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000100365556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011927216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3259277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005660415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058160073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98916054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297184295","doi":"10.1177/14761270221130253","title":"Strategic organization in the digital age: Rethinking the concept of technology","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Perspective (graphical); Process (computing); Action (physics); Competitive advantage; Core (optical fiber); Business; Sociology; Management science; Computer science; Marketing; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0221160427199136,"score_gpt":0.21432860698184097,"score_spread":0.19221256426192737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297184295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66775167,0.00006437519,0.0003170666,0.007998434,0.0006875196,0.0009397487,0.0000066798507,0.00027528405,0.32195923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983438,0.0000016698712,0.000012149311,0.0008850776,0.00019755446,0.000011019045,0.00035271147,0.000026809512,0.00016920359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989378,0.00003099226,0.00034430897,0.00019527771,0.00032634064,0.0001653117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900275,0.000021762611,0.00029405288,0.0002594302,0.00041944731,0.0000025336328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004332598,0.00012513863,0.000116384406,0.0003295921,0.00046671391,0.00040952192,0.00053386413,0.00005070443,0.0005254755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013134074,0.00009012559,0.000014840622,0.008839284,0.00009101386,0.00029590796,0.00023913734,0.0002545483,0.000042289696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023855325,0.00007039447,0.004624964,0.00002172092,0.000008302643,0.0000070933306,0.0006681875,0.00026109023,0.00023933798,0.9936219,0.00024036862,0.00023427451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020822266,0.00011212597,0.008123669,0.000051051742,0.00012658231,0.00003076854,0.254679,0.003049232,0.00079685246,0.715128,0.015002609,0.0008178665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021267795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023431408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33059213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054222783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058279067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5753588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303614920","doi":"10.1177/14761270221134287","title":"The short history and long future of research on market categories","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Construct (python library); Agency (philosophy); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Outcome (game theory); Marketing; Order (exchange); Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Business; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Social science; Computer science; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.034658401548254954,"score_gpt":0.24996519011846025,"score_spread":0.2153067885702053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303614920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5491404,0.005938305,0.00015779493,0.009777981,0.0035256837,0.0012613407,0.000008067871,0.00031569725,0.42987472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959779,0.00014895361,0.000005308851,0.00018433874,0.0006467837,0.000009806767,0.000049407816,0.000021262516,0.0029562868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990286,0.000034236684,0.00014961962,0.00017083582,0.00046902447,0.00014764741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999404,0.000056558903,0.000070814865,0.00013137938,0.00033193742,0.000005320059],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006385178,0.000085170395,0.00008076076,0.00015618755,0.0010719723,0.000098630764,0.000186476,0.000020478255,0.0015188282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050783092,0.00006743764,0.000010742401,0.0010526971,0.00011817186,0.00019018084,0.0003108144,0.00013822425,0.000011940353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027054197,0.00003876784,0.04900279,0.00010279436,0.00002539623,0.0000034182463,0.000108347835,0.00004278645,0.000037397906,0.8911295,0.059115056,0.00036668693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005944979,0.00011391813,0.33898193,0.000028179891,0.00009469912,0.0000039059655,0.029811604,0.0007371424,0.00008950263,0.06949247,0.559545,0.00050716515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005725517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076660166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82163703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095589276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033531353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309110575","doi":"10.1177/14761270221141054","title":"Integration versus segregation: Newspaper diversity and museum formation in US local communities 1872–1976","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Appeal; Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Sociology; Cultural diversity; Race (biology); Community organization; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Media studies; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04420131051245096,"score_gpt":0.2544718174217129,"score_spread":0.2102705069092619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309110575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99227804,0.000019820955,0.00030409053,0.00080453453,0.00026471703,0.00021194144,0.000007119609,0.00006612896,0.0060435967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994088,0.00006775128,0.000029601477,0.0000819948,0.000045718552,0.00000771797,0.00022339348,0.000005077696,0.00012995367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992023,0.00022870138,0.000118066826,0.00007689457,0.00025859117,0.00011544811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996932,0.000035002347,0.00006906179,0.000053801545,0.000117431475,0.000031516076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018742739,0.000065408065,0.00007026312,0.00005005888,0.0028747595,0.00007813249,0.000116726005,0.000056940233,0.0003476654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027585093,0.00006980097,0.000011499365,0.00069650915,0.000116950345,0.00055355264,0.00017250876,0.00013816985,0.000004190268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008063219,0.000099968864,0.03243879,0.00001782472,0.000014675443,0.000004378093,0.39392462,0.0011560657,0.0003638682,0.56665874,0.00021231538,0.0050281202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010771449,0.00012546117,0.04889709,0.000012505929,0.000022718188,0.0000031043326,0.92706496,0.0042339317,0.000045488345,0.017444016,0.0008131534,0.00026043277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071838745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042853616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5492147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033860054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000545178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309535658","doi":"10.1177/14761270221142959","title":"Microfoundations of sensing capabilities: From managerial cognition to team behavior","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microfoundations; Competitor analysis; Business; Knowledge management; Cognition; Dynamic capabilities; Construal level theory; Task (project management); Marketing; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019059144759521838,"score_gpt":0.22336934338197742,"score_spread":0.20431019862245559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309535658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84864414,0.000004146473,0.0017564772,0.00038778025,0.0014146279,0.00065288163,0.00003915952,0.00016406036,0.14693673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651206,4.0692285e-7,0.0003699738,0.0006930479,0.0005953186,0.000016902435,0.0013761353,0.000029102024,0.00040704862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990865,0.000018344375,0.00031111593,0.00022255702,0.00022979711,0.00013166366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919206,0.000012692153,0.00018536087,0.00016400545,0.00043844577,0.000007429796],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001753012,0.00010901491,0.00011785873,0.0003227298,0.00038126553,0.00016859137,0.00012374655,0.000025263487,0.002783358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005026804,0.00013091194,0.00002266267,0.001663008,0.000024568057,0.00027021236,0.00018343584,0.00007430334,0.00020157392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007024988,0.00061469554,0.0056689307,0.00020412946,0.0000852392,0.000009320544,0.00143639,0.00037520833,0.109617524,0.8717149,0.007065513,0.0031379312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012292678,0.0004884183,0.053966627,0.00029477023,0.0029361164,0.000021135073,0.37069187,0.012868748,0.03678655,0.29519296,0.20891845,0.005541691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026859253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069254755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57652193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008028225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003484395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321379299","doi":"10.1177/14761270231152955","title":"Putting categories in their place: A research agenda for theorizing place in category research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Sociology; Collective action; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Identity (music); Sense of place; Action (physics); Collective identity; Organizational identity; Place attachment; Social psychology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.14259499114362006,"score_gpt":0.3471102413526569,"score_spread":0.20451525020903683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321379299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95045185,0.00028400094,0.00037526124,0.0054690056,0.0006082531,0.002141657,0.000007775332,0.00049783796,0.04016433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710554,0.000101050486,0.0000701163,0.00010164317,0.00075828773,0.0000897988,0.00034287796,0.00007743371,0.0013532743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975931,0.00011096987,0.00041371366,0.000509348,0.0005837195,0.0007891244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981947,0.0005669694,0.000097307886,0.00020439968,0.00092369725,0.0000129586515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005274001,0.00019452798,0.00021860836,0.001775119,0.0007993386,0.00058706995,0.00038411055,0.00011401846,0.0001864106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015155063,0.00018478524,0.000023353212,0.01185072,0.00012370084,0.00081795274,0.00044418118,0.00035914342,0.0003525343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059011058,0.0001081495,0.096213825,0.0007528663,0.000026972166,0.000029882136,0.0027812447,0.0021591969,0.001237122,0.88161445,0.014353569,0.00066373096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020489912,0.00004955419,0.062039293,0.00022081201,0.000016201573,0.0000011043381,0.07269744,0.013284303,0.0007129793,0.8356124,0.012679088,0.00063783035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077194424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022254596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069916196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019053533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012888435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75353235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378650448","doi":"10.1177/14761270231181186","title":"Different strokes for different folks: The moderating effect of top managers’ political ideologies on the efficacy of top management team vertical pay disparities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Executive compensation; Corporate governance; Politics; Management styles; Top-down and bottom-up design; Contingency theory; Contingency; Economics; Business; Marketing; Public relations; Political science; Management; Law","score_opus":0.02062675482345868,"score_gpt":0.2330504577486945,"score_spread":0.21242370292523582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378650448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929158,0.000011598961,0.0015163657,0.0030190714,0.00024373588,0.0007230622,0.000011992303,0.000085755295,0.0014725802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992283,0.000021223668,0.000006209978,0.00018820664,0.00024240457,0.000049281636,0.00005432345,0.000025072548,0.0001849921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987904,0.000035856196,0.00032595487,0.00023709975,0.00029431903,0.00031635753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989227,0.0005042138,0.00016617925,0.00029566255,0.00010201917,0.000009199108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021830574,0.00020636855,0.00026849614,0.00007592091,0.00022042426,0.00013340982,0.00028503,0.000055371434,0.00002878287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025831265,0.00009894905,0.000082936465,0.0004738412,0.000115923365,0.00015190167,0.00013665001,0.000104040046,0.000012993507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105502375,0.00008729213,0.10588728,0.00058445364,0.0000671978,0.0000014889416,0.000049423088,0.0006223165,0.00051620486,0.89063627,0.0008849854,0.00055761193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014625405,0.00021458055,0.9371152,0.0002668051,0.00028253408,4.166598e-7,0.0015008486,0.011021344,0.012078152,0.03567937,0.00008999795,0.00028823654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006224572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018507608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85495687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030765357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000931439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40350252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392347779","doi":"10.1177/14761270241239137","title":"Generativity as a heuristic for impact-driven scholars addressing grand challenges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Generativity; Flourishing; Transformative learning; Pragmatism; Action (physics); Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Grand Challenges; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.14357181013990067,"score_gpt":0.42823434443254255,"score_spread":0.2846625342926419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392347779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791179,0.0014120287,0.0041208933,0.0014593911,0.0020983166,0.00039440414,0.00004463373,0.0002684249,0.011084017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803334,0.00013084008,0.00011400065,0.000079153324,0.00030559176,0.000025814621,0.00005362948,0.000034689372,0.0012229403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899983,0.00010803069,0.00015043822,0.00040124293,0.00012895942,0.00021147661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937457,0.00015465774,0.000063406005,0.00019660371,0.00012657471,0.0000841711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018655104,0.0001376771,0.000120042234,0.00012425442,0.00021771094,0.00034487486,0.00011361175,0.00008884035,0.0010557624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002260481,0.00012348604,0.000040489456,0.00055228977,0.00006800409,0.00025078416,0.000014160621,0.0001331997,0.00022278642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110631845,0.0011679124,0.0059826886,0.0005257524,0.00021694312,0.00008707318,0.03916369,0.00043551857,0.19211216,0.7215829,0.011464022,0.027150733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010747506,0.007823424,0.47910047,0.0018726337,0.0014717543,0.0031832661,0.058844246,0.033724714,0.103845134,0.25025284,0.04154877,0.007585239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016700942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014505227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47311777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060742743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022715307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401485857","doi":"10.1177/14761270241274038","title":"Communities for impact: Empowering early-career researchers in the pursuit of impact","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public relations; Narrative; Sociology; Political science; Career development; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.7706217508618476,"score_gpt":0.6923919458738553,"score_spread":0.07822980498799226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401485857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99207807,0.00004331183,0.0006889611,0.0037393249,0.00015340345,0.0010829333,0.00014315142,0.00004957639,0.0020212624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902946,0.000024843683,0.00007335034,0.0004969678,0.00010650464,0.00006527028,0.000058241934,0.00002477614,0.00012057733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775463,0.0007354975,0.000488091,0.00011379077,0.00043453215,0.00047342893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972049,0.0020041426,0.000103432074,0.00025278048,0.00035720313,0.000077513854],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004199012,0.00009514093,0.00013508639,0.00023952748,0.00035945166,0.00010078366,0.00044357404,0.00008586092,0.0010196599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005788458,0.000063009604,0.000033442928,0.0017026328,0.00007912547,0.0003111903,0.000059668502,0.0003790067,0.000049193368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000629007,0.00005230577,0.35070762,0.0017502625,0.00005976698,0.0000043710193,0.5816917,0.0003448798,0.006281543,0.04407339,0.014112346,0.0008588998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012195996,0.00073775207,0.6608929,0.00055298436,0.000024412599,0.0000051714414,0.31829533,0.0021727323,0.00035610996,0.013183255,0.0022738718,0.00028587063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037254347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007498679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31018528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003255412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016302759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401485874","doi":"10.1177/14761270241274590","title":"Reflections on deep academic–practitioner partnering for generative societal impact","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Ocean Frontier Institute","keywords":"General partnership; Scholarship; Generative grammar; Interdependence; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Point (geometry); Public relations; Political science; Business; Computer science; Social science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.41650718243298035,"score_gpt":0.6262507138717839,"score_spread":0.20974353143880353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401485874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43415213,0.0026775487,0.2395194,0.07356158,0.02261145,0.006034981,0.0007226772,0.0035087406,0.21721148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99180883,0.0002801749,0.00059330574,0.0004725346,0.0021553347,0.00017258928,0.00050795067,0.000054337834,0.003954968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988287,0.00012585938,0.00031017562,0.0002903506,0.00013378442,0.00031109268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990752,0.00026124227,0.00008517294,0.00013138274,0.000337605,0.00010939581],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002451814,0.00014574603,0.00012373645,0.00010848599,0.0012437862,0.000056985467,0.00007015898,0.0002484206,0.0019978785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014976479,0.00012328391,0.00006884601,0.00064771745,0.000029574901,0.0003190841,0.000016587914,0.0005830704,0.0005209923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017234825,0.00008696484,0.0002045383,0.00016118945,0.000118927244,0.0000010340971,0.011724981,0.0021692212,0.0064117354,0.9496374,0.029053072,0.00041368304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035706786,0.0021479318,0.015984384,0.0014869972,0.00075745676,0.000050394734,0.18502073,0.07326822,0.002928451,0.37497708,0.3368957,0.0029119563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026712201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055901644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57466036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046140797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072995434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403791106","doi":"10.1177/14761270241297756","title":"From the margins to the mainstream: Entrepreneurial theorization and the spread of a new collective identity within a mature organizational field","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Trent University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Mainstream; Organizational identity; Field (mathematics); Organizational field; Identity (music); Collective identity; Sociology; Economic geography; Public relations; Political science; Institutional theory; Social science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.010002028445320924,"score_gpt":0.2187514952571063,"score_spread":0.20874946681178538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403791106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9270029,0.0007555311,0.0046729115,0.059642173,0.0020674116,0.0011188609,0.000040742,0.00014631754,0.0045531434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958317,0.00006340682,0.000027499329,0.0017297715,0.0019816267,0.0000060397797,0.000056885197,0.00001786393,0.00028519533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913543,0.000041893127,0.0002210574,0.00024187661,0.00025256202,0.00010720193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991944,0.00026693087,0.00012377177,0.00018864399,0.00021687442,0.000009405662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002493099,0.00013102303,0.00012089722,0.000044447403,0.0003512327,0.0007763812,0.0002673388,0.0000532541,0.00042695034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053636864,0.000063702864,0.00002755642,0.001688987,0.00008477292,0.00046834082,0.00017080789,0.000115090304,0.00003853648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012053172,0.000023386987,0.04199611,0.000045813646,0.00014875094,0.0000020523862,0.009578131,0.0007356427,0.0004221941,0.93258536,0.0139366165,0.00040541653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023808852,0.00006940733,0.08434259,0.0004149404,0.00085685647,0.0000100712095,0.027568655,0.004805267,0.0024586353,0.8711487,0.0053546666,0.00058929203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016857355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010696078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06882881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018483895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105017905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74866617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404552976","doi":"10.1177/14761270241304377","title":"The burden of being atypical: The impact of (A)typicality in leader profiles on organizational reputation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Corporate Identity and Reputation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Scrutiny; Skepticism; Categorization; Argument (complex analysis); Public relations; Transferability; Business; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Logit; Epistemology","score_opus":0.020775594958846996,"score_gpt":0.2608554455524524,"score_spread":0.24007985059360537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404552976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954733,0.000051112514,0.0006085623,0.0018059391,0.00020897138,0.0002736881,0.0000024282217,0.000053990432,0.0015220074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923223,0.000014899844,0.000013627873,0.000019317205,0.0004931274,0.0000028409638,0.00011292062,0.000018949744,0.000092058704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911064,0.00003268852,0.0003532877,0.0001560931,0.00023734488,0.00010995243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915755,0.000118016986,0.00019663412,0.00012607442,0.0003972187,0.0000044905614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004053157,0.00009359064,0.00010138174,0.00011044395,0.00015731217,0.00025861632,0.00012958013,0.0000622475,0.00014388148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002685458,0.00005394703,0.00003965869,0.001994469,0.00008532707,0.00042197647,0.000036186862,0.00011235457,0.000039797596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007542475,0.00008848274,0.040882852,0.00030715266,0.00007155232,0.0000037550315,0.0009111077,0.07111715,0.0064158496,0.8783522,0.00070058694,0.0010738831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004514735,0.00007039343,0.4143235,0.0003624657,0.00009388139,0.000004476476,0.0036476983,0.076082446,0.0018942048,0.50264734,0.00014878172,0.00027332417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047058664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004522451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37570485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005046452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012040696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2493843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406891272","doi":"10.1177/14761270251318648","title":"Steven W. Floyd: His legacy as a scholar and academic community builder","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management Theory and Practice","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Business; Marketing; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.027214334324712413,"score_gpt":0.2734821825834072,"score_spread":0.24626784825869477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406891272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77466667,0.00011972943,0.000831005,0.0028089525,0.0002912205,0.0002554863,7.5357167e-7,0.00020486045,0.2208213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304056,0.00005439465,0.00005949565,0.00430423,0.00022812125,0.0000034311515,0.00006447676,0.000018755321,0.0022265401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992507,0.00010380254,0.00019548307,0.00017471155,0.000121769626,0.00015352598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936616,0.00007701748,0.00013735124,0.0002447646,0.00016232264,0.0000123869795],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009366597,0.00013828614,0.00011756852,0.00019971823,0.000719369,0.0007176932,0.00024930277,0.00010782449,0.0010436261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006681943,0.0001408275,0.000013801555,0.0011405718,0.00004109415,0.0031927808,0.00024092315,0.0006016509,0.00029501686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026882295,0.000053508513,0.0070717144,0.00026713958,0.000043569322,0.0000031424618,0.00011960284,0.000023729843,0.0011756803,0.9872035,0.0021860166,0.0018255523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019371436,0.000034306777,0.03186992,0.00022493846,0.0005634746,0.000007823729,0.012903347,0.00085736596,0.0008910165,0.72103214,0.22892947,0.00074902957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038409984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027218965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2661713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022045318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004036849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407556548","doi":"10.1177/14761270251323115","title":"Performing while transforming: Andrew H. Van de Ven’s enduring contributions to management scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ven; Scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Management; Humanities; Economics; Economic growth; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015299638658010139,"score_gpt":0.24354646522007936,"score_spread":0.2282468265620692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407556548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46966046,0.00029992955,0.12224255,0.00906332,0.00096612045,0.0018346449,0.00001762549,0.0009233492,0.394992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954842,0.000039834358,0.00037751408,0.0020438242,0.00042659932,0.000025726446,0.00013856745,0.000030284304,0.0014335042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881035,0.000010105424,0.00028323897,0.00030964462,0.00022471767,0.0003619199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923235,0.000014941815,0.0000782884,0.00016548234,0.00048656005,0.000022378028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031996774,0.00019824386,0.00016554503,0.0004243269,0.0007810897,0.00048428375,0.00025287192,0.00006819736,0.0006144309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012321686,0.00021103909,0.00003449383,0.0022653558,0.000021570371,0.0008042632,0.00016733198,0.00011661608,0.00029309973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013161495,0.00007271972,0.0337721,0.00035163926,0.00010011188,0.000007798018,0.000087782784,0.00043284363,0.0018171789,0.9606229,0.0016553839,0.0010663775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059003914,0.00007195651,0.2801693,0.0013470448,0.0016806602,0.0000063077205,0.010442506,0.002223099,0.027318703,0.49240324,0.17574811,0.0026886812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002885644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054055057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52582365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020056896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042638116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8605924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408217209","doi":"10.1177/14761270251327988","title":"Constructing an organizational identity with political ideology: The case of Huawei, 1987–2020","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Economic Development and Digital Transformation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Durham University; University of Leeds","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Organizational identity; Identity (music); Business; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Organizational commitment; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.018688169101477404,"score_gpt":0.22356462774422928,"score_spread":0.20487645864275186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408217209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86644995,0.00003052347,0.013354967,0.0008049705,0.00019115125,0.00015980403,0.000057554596,0.000041293548,0.118909806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988061,0.0000055940072,0.0005891723,0.00017520125,0.000038354432,0.000002284796,0.00018839217,0.000012325001,0.00018254718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991108,0.000015194972,0.00049045583,0.00020157482,0.000021999544,0.00015993747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994314,0.00003928504,0.00019122676,0.00014814027,0.00014899771,0.000040952516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021909521,0.000101075304,0.00017812755,0.00011268495,0.00015210138,0.00012553044,0.00013590694,0.00007338203,0.0004660987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006737943,0.00009201849,0.000016135973,0.00078569696,0.0001293188,0.0007924429,0.00002490167,0.000076994256,0.000047435147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035975697,0.000022222783,0.15410483,0.000023001563,0.000026165995,0.000005250373,0.00015367098,0.000016202313,0.000008551533,0.84557074,0.000014450058,0.000051309282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012277467,0.000091361675,0.03827938,0.000030697414,0.000034908662,0.0004794055,0.009372458,0.0024737036,0.0018695114,0.94568723,0.00008094072,0.00037265674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011237108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027915087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1323562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008650757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012623161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5103454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417429723","doi":"10.1177/14761270251410675","title":"A time for monsters: Organizational knowing after large language models","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Organization","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Dialogical self; On Language; Dynamics (music); Organizational theory; Redistribution (election); Organizational learning","score_opus":0.009106724771770387,"score_gpt":0.2124631250473839,"score_spread":0.20335640027561352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417429723","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30940625,0.0013562415,0.37198243,0.006518194,0.0017870493,0.00344912,0.000112116504,0.0019886075,0.3034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904589,0.000008486217,0.00052063906,0.0021315229,0.0005961995,0.000028361352,0.0007527449,0.000050612412,0.005452534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998983,0.0000067788337,0.00025854845,0.00031099108,0.00018546786,0.00025521702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991654,0.000029461886,0.000102347745,0.00015005846,0.0005440393,0.000008679472],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015647328,0.00019309108,0.00016889519,0.00027548225,0.00035748677,0.0003453844,0.00017968126,0.00007431347,0.0015327763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011502471,0.000192675,0.000036747646,0.0017856228,0.000030234989,0.0009125034,0.0001782629,0.000051287592,0.00031892338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036146117,0.00015746026,0.014139057,0.00040070614,0.00014013551,0.0000041159315,0.0002799352,0.0007716639,0.0007666527,0.9706101,0.012554824,0.00013919728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0081629865,0.000050830855,0.023361815,0.0005377957,0.0013286569,0.0000030652768,0.011650403,0.24724032,0.0013572703,0.6646797,0.038872927,0.0027542012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011705291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026515903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6810526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004823787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044339078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}