{"meta":{"query_hash":"3e8a000c3756","filters":{"venue":"Strategies of Critique"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3e8a000c3756","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Strategies+of+Critique"},"results":[{"id":"W1531016128","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.30976","title":"The End of Modern Civilization: How Death Can Lead Us Home","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Enlightenment; Productivity; Lead (geology); Natural (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Natural resource economics; Economics; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law; Economic growth; Epistemology; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01907111506065272,"score_gpt":0.336314914138715,"score_spread":0.31724379907806227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531016128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7041048,0.00029806996,0.0010455878,0.024943793,0.00080232887,0.00019456218,0.000029392553,0.000054017783,0.2685275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974967,0.00095238345,0.00013200185,0.000070752605,0.000116413255,0.000009603381,0.000002776493,0.0000054410007,0.0012138839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931276,0.00007871185,0.00013714419,0.000087227156,0.00022852067,0.00015564213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919194,0.00020337678,0.000081383296,0.00016509368,0.0003125695,0.00004564877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025636313,0.000061679515,0.0001038833,0.000019416153,0.00035135617,0.00013515756,0.0002397502,0.00010206355,0.000054947963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014939338,0.000049057042,0.00009135487,0.0001020514,0.0006879627,0.00023082407,0.000013887863,0.00018515858,0.0000010692943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030536405,0.000019326828,0.0006019321,0.000013848582,0.000012941768,5.38352e-7,0.007480455,0.000013434744,0.0057047238,0.98423135,0.0012824038,0.0006359951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003745039,0.00014086775,0.010609026,0.0000804443,0.000037949103,0.000005884718,0.23757504,0.0004085339,0.01019388,0.65302235,0.08721086,0.00034065897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003550357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056933895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33120897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014515321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004439115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9602746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541287089","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.30978","title":"From Tolerance to Repression and Back: Herbert Marcuse and the (Il)-Liberal Politics of Inclusion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Oppression; Politics; Liberalism; Democracy; Sociology; Order (exchange); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.011754679072509162,"score_gpt":0.3359003996008026,"score_spread":0.32414572052829344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541287089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9108014,0.00015863801,0.000055019053,0.012401326,0.00013058611,0.00016874941,0.000049531594,0.000010322798,0.07622443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984276,0.00009802694,0.0007377192,0.00031003254,0.00027894572,0.0000042443344,0.0000015093652,0.000005154963,0.00013676513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991301,0.00022509057,0.00018510468,0.0001463525,0.00016956241,0.00014384849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886644,0.0007125678,0.00003663615,0.00018006825,0.0001029143,0.00010135583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055869727,0.00007457042,0.00018037892,0.0000201859,0.00031620578,0.000049829287,0.00017395886,0.00010190274,0.000110483554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032102628,0.00005436332,0.000032699514,0.00006572007,0.0013725116,0.00020907664,0.00022614002,0.00017325547,0.000001008978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010425897,0.000019912071,0.000106442836,0.000031972377,0.0000036683655,0.0000010602051,0.013182773,0.0000012087587,0.012330146,0.97353166,0.000074753436,0.0006121612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031069486,0.000037090016,0.00055274623,0.00007867886,0.0000080725895,5.8503895e-7,0.0063496195,0.000013420863,0.004275706,0.9849968,0.0033085288,0.000068072346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029660512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028944798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08762621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000034010243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005428393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5057076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560253652","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.30980","title":"Hope for Our Technological Inheritance? From Substantive Critiques of Technology to Marcuse’s Post-Technological Rationality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Ambivalence; Modernity; Critical theory; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02987241157594484,"score_gpt":0.38325991924275604,"score_spread":0.3533875076668112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560253652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91295004,0.00031531087,0.0041361884,0.04975733,0.00013906273,0.0012481717,0.0007027592,0.00035684984,0.030394292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927951,0.00007439916,0.0066708485,0.00020260064,0.00006290951,0.00012066617,0.00001955732,0.000013163438,0.00004076679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816644,0.00023349604,0.0004814086,0.00042688058,0.00029848117,0.0003932942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978627,0.0006731358,0.00010238571,0.00035666002,0.00092231634,0.00008279919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009224936,0.00018927886,0.0005218674,0.00019623607,0.00013578874,0.000046308734,0.00068661943,0.0006918017,0.00015896618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022711481,0.00017683774,0.000159863,0.0005448381,0.0014249678,0.00033824288,0.000110643494,0.00032484136,0.0000136006365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020672745,0.00015668129,0.0004880659,0.000064888714,0.000022350983,0.0000041485036,0.00041506893,0.0000017234148,0.043542963,0.9538792,0.000048017166,0.001170168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023393428,0.00047913272,0.00045649905,0.00010769469,0.000012849662,7.732492e-7,0.054730684,0.0000014848606,0.045663312,0.89367443,0.004447585,0.00019159685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023383813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028370245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079845056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047032474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020831541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7211234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568850463","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.30979","title":"(An)Archiving after the Apocalypse: The Death Drive, Representation, and the Rise and Fall and Rise of Civilization in Miller’s A Canticle for Leibowitz","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Nuclear Issues and Defense","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; The Holocaust; Cold war; Civilization; Revelation; Representation (politics); Fall of man; Art history; Art; History; Philosophy; Literature; Theology; Political science; Law; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012613173756099513,"score_gpt":0.336906863728359,"score_spread":0.3242936899722595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568850463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934783,0.00087064924,0.00016456825,0.0025624153,0.000035371042,0.00040182943,0.000007954591,0.0000061452483,0.0024727825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879,0.0008266555,0.00023397447,0.00004404816,0.000041476796,0.000028780787,4.179512e-7,0.0000057140833,0.000028905637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992896,0.00022579984,0.00014733736,0.000119370256,0.00010677358,0.00011114138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991876,0.0004886225,0.000054839093,0.0001488117,0.00009086328,0.000029251682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007781057,0.000056551424,0.00010676488,0.000022188371,0.00021025633,0.00011384555,0.00010854185,0.000040369883,0.0000074345303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002285014,0.00003087422,0.000021170505,0.0000685514,0.0011616035,0.00022867446,0.000032220363,0.00009160443,5.668918e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039374587,0.000045483102,0.063676715,0.00010013056,0.000018746043,0.0000022924157,0.12517038,0.00003992308,0.0024080263,0.8052914,0.00014109451,0.0027120342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017798012,0.00013849157,0.34601447,0.00010100785,0.00006492905,0.000008320715,0.3002833,0.003347243,0.0005523814,0.34349242,0.0040356554,0.00018199165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012761198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07689121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46179903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000022846975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052038355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222719151","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.30977","title":"Space and Nonspace: The Future of Mobility in Global Capitalism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Sophistication; Capitalism; Taste; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Aesthetics; Media studies; Focus (optics); Political science; Social science; The Internet; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law; Physics; Psychology","score_opus":0.00809585696354558,"score_gpt":0.25782984114077523,"score_spread":0.24973398417722964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222719151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8933962,0.000108609485,0.000011675417,0.0012693906,0.00037401693,0.00013695666,0.000062628635,0.000011925931,0.10462862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650675,0.000058013502,0.00005541731,0.000022141287,0.00029106837,0.0000067568876,0.0000035501716,0.000004019989,0.003052302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946064,0.000045931447,0.00017181072,0.000117177515,0.000094287585,0.00011015817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995819,0.00003764673,0.000061212784,0.00017294934,0.0001240295,0.00002227327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015536792,0.00009223659,0.00015303915,0.000024750316,0.00007207959,0.000056458382,0.00009446567,0.00006785121,0.00021970957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001343455,0.00006540881,0.000043841093,0.000029397204,0.0006348795,0.00023954669,0.000019349767,0.00017339579,7.3691484e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012126564,0.000042729294,0.0012868607,0.00007357271,0.0000066884963,0.0000012583272,0.007823414,0.000002404398,0.0006600453,0.98987854,0.00006115794,0.00015121586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084176677,0.00029190196,0.23217379,0.00009064176,0.000034484834,0.000013937258,0.09669236,0.00008286417,0.0017667018,0.48622367,0.18145038,0.00033751377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022440609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06254224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50365484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008600108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061052284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9545639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246978613","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.15369","title":"Adorno’s Negative Dialectics with Bataille: Poisoning the Absolute","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Dialectic; Subjectivity; Fallacy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Absolute (philosophy); Constructive; Negativity effect; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03130362055057613,"score_gpt":0.32886352048184603,"score_spread":0.2975598999312699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246978613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1696047,0.00021218898,0.0006863454,0.009617222,0.00013876148,0.000245824,0.000018803037,0.00007303292,0.8194031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986855,0.00017304368,0.0003600812,0.00020359673,0.00028534513,0.000013620046,0.00000124497,0.000009520013,0.0002680704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988733,0.00030155524,0.0001570288,0.00013817725,0.0002653137,0.00026462367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857146,0.00092101505,0.00004848552,0.00016630557,0.00021767798,0.00007504147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039528447,0.00010146186,0.00015376476,0.000026854013,0.0007658925,0.00005898919,0.00026806563,0.00007231937,0.00015073697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038398086,0.00007026257,0.000055968318,0.00024152765,0.0021296178,0.0003889936,0.000023609084,0.00022975888,0.0000068854565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000456457,0.000025365194,0.000080846425,0.000013387794,0.000015644893,0.000019254143,0.012928984,0.00002387998,0.000040308845,0.9864322,0.00026581885,0.00010869021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002827786,0.0002623342,0.000829307,0.00007684481,0.000025769701,0.000017596623,0.07688447,0.00001056109,0.0009566271,0.9089729,0.01146631,0.0002144624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082652224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82908076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019322537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032946953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7846666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265507302","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.15367","title":"Adorno’s Thought-Image of Kierkegaard","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Philosophy; Idealism; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Epistemology; Hegelianism; Construct (python library); Dialectic; Metaphysics; Aesthetics; Sociology","score_opus":0.030601444977814862,"score_gpt":0.25778446519763926,"score_spread":0.2271830202198244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265507302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17842212,0.00050286396,0.00005030739,0.00038872767,0.00020319448,0.00012051956,0.00012777843,0.000055680564,0.8201288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775696,0.0002149438,0.0004385004,0.00011934809,0.0003615204,0.000011200092,0.000008059461,0.000017385757,0.0010720957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893385,0.000052916854,0.00041705946,0.00017294801,0.00020927534,0.00021396704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990437,0.000089457004,0.00014059129,0.00030225012,0.00036827117,0.000055740846],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011241116,0.00016043367,0.00032960848,0.00009828572,0.00014870579,0.000042818825,0.00026824806,0.0000629474,0.0009182835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055765802,0.00014779992,0.00015713822,0.00005090726,0.0014342318,0.0009754166,0.00003458418,0.00015661745,0.000026633625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031003983,0.00006537359,0.000041026793,0.00015991932,0.000028763961,0.00002251332,0.007336453,0.00000482355,0.0029924838,0.98625565,0.0029444906,0.00011752953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015833188,0.0013656939,0.004163137,0.00055452326,0.00008206563,0.00009302265,0.07193689,0.00002466742,0.09372999,0.5481384,0.27716884,0.0011594492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018545706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005242837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8193348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007935068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017527622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W245929760","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.15361","title":"The Power of Negative Thinking: Defending the Hegel of Adorno and Marcuse","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Dialectic; Contradiction; Philosophy; Epistemology; Negation; Power (physics); Positivism; Order (exchange); Critical theory; Mediation; Relevance (law); Historicism; Critical philosophy; Sociology; Law; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.030942265652307867,"score_gpt":0.3341430165020066,"score_spread":0.3032007508496988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W245929760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6431873,0.0007565274,0.00008947322,0.0045535485,0.00010275655,0.00019210267,0.000021574067,0.0000145300255,0.3510822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993513,0.00040406728,0.00009627635,0.000051022853,0.000048620983,0.000003894247,2.6844668e-7,0.000004502877,0.000040051927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989575,0.00034609885,0.0002146153,0.00008719853,0.00024077535,0.00015381933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764425,0.0019106247,0.0000803371,0.00014984296,0.00017842789,0.000036538873],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008573008,0.00006901224,0.00014925517,0.00002055252,0.00050911965,0.000026708252,0.00028371662,0.000060748243,0.00003984995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005601914,0.00004221617,0.00006824859,0.00012979534,0.0033522225,0.00019990752,0.00004550794,0.00013838819,4.1689026e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039180166,0.00001955378,0.00015364967,0.000022722203,0.000014217123,0.0000023031232,0.02193414,0.0000019404854,0.0003196098,0.97738206,0.000039048584,0.000071558396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008694293,0.0000745848,0.000827494,0.000043418397,0.00000839577,0.0000026162588,0.07016393,9.540761e-7,0.0024690996,0.9254196,0.0008566446,0.00004631064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043485354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013584056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.356164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000060790303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011949969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911739799","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.17799","title":"Moral Divide: Religion and Politics in the Stem Cell Controversy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Stem cell; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Biology; Cell biology","score_opus":0.017950619197281244,"score_gpt":0.317876735042035,"score_spread":0.29992611584475376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911739799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96422845,0.00070792506,0.000018790557,0.009171739,0.0000759969,0.0002980276,0.0000053223857,0.000036298075,0.025457464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988104,0.00046843383,0.00022258195,0.000320692,0.00008146669,0.00001583823,0.0000020393068,0.000005892043,0.00007264048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993582,0.00002961127,0.00017693605,0.00014534395,0.000107663065,0.00018224897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994258,0.00012119677,0.000043552416,0.00028901818,0.0000859059,0.000034481076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002460213,0.00007834642,0.00017514915,0.00006326,0.00003125973,0.000018486202,0.00008019533,0.0001082353,0.0000023934504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010676666,0.000052635685,0.000024438077,0.000074023694,0.00028568282,0.00010110003,0.000020035688,0.0003840812,7.79152e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044969736,0.00006984945,0.012875076,0.00035195635,0.0000038526914,0.000031116524,0.00031540633,4.1726287e-7,0.0139041655,0.97037655,0.0011258335,0.00090080645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031985755,0.001839807,0.17816432,0.00018791757,0.00005387676,0.00025894472,0.032889005,0.000025573663,0.09227333,0.6759803,0.014840046,0.00028830243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038604217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001047671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29439625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007207879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014039631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2146421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W75755487","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.15363","title":"Enlightenment and Repression: A Comparison of Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno’s Dialectic of Enlightenment and Herbert Marcuse’s Eros and Civilization","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enlightenment; Dialectic; Civilization; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Subjectivity; Critical theory; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.038277052751334695,"score_gpt":0.3687160415358499,"score_spread":0.3304389887845152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W75755487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9772633,0.005685717,0.00013049498,0.0011540527,0.0000432305,0.00030065485,0.00001734384,0.00001314328,0.01539212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578154,0.0036689735,0.0004113911,0.000028486407,0.000046208683,0.000011043186,0.0000020490447,0.000007666208,0.000042643496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876225,0.00027654562,0.00033334285,0.00023061356,0.00024313893,0.00015411618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999165,0.00038850543,0.000106243,0.00012874528,0.000103380495,0.00010813652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004006398,0.00012340593,0.0003486045,0.000050375176,0.00019297721,0.000028227423,0.00006884919,0.00011424353,0.000040948922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012136729,0.00010783186,0.000028783925,0.000086264714,0.0013733237,0.00023752215,0.00006334643,0.000095091105,1.10225955e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027127625,0.00027432173,0.015903136,0.0006636751,0.000064089596,0.00001103179,0.03422661,0.0000028093118,0.012402371,0.93263984,0.00009627155,0.003444575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015636523,0.0013750187,0.03145572,0.0009818242,0.00020918154,0.000041883482,0.060260087,0.00009718814,0.05889023,0.84298486,0.0016006154,0.0005397681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042786665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013583376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089655004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010490405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005468362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50600684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W848616648","doi":"10.25071/1916-7210.15368","title":"Beyond Historical Tragedy: The Frankfurt School and Judeo-Christian Messianism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategies of Critique","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Tragedy (event); Messianism; Philosophy; Perspective (graphical); Meaning (existential); George (robot); Critical theory; Reading (process); Epistemology; Literature; Judaism; Theology; Art history; History; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.024432896904034933,"score_gpt":0.3156562101566219,"score_spread":0.29122331325258694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W848616648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12098287,0.0028155916,0.0006454328,0.02961701,0.0004001299,0.0002616919,0.000017555387,0.00009054107,0.8451692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998026,0.00046886675,0.00018964759,0.00038684777,0.00047151526,0.000012901465,0.0000012369572,0.000009133768,0.00043386442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987054,0.00034708885,0.00022127689,0.00018286986,0.00028798,0.00025538742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907833,0.00042030477,0.000038016722,0.00018225721,0.0000981151,0.00018296375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058047776,0.00011483818,0.00020538834,0.00003485777,0.0007725619,0.000062779756,0.00026853092,0.00014190683,0.0003580235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033949697,0.000090764945,0.00008189761,0.00013764917,0.0014135276,0.00033503788,0.00002623829,0.0003192897,0.000008920538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001742134,0.000036500274,0.00006489367,0.000021507743,0.00000853211,0.000027391774,0.005661417,7.00877e-7,0.00021082985,0.99175805,0.0019950203,0.00019776214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016301165,0.00008091625,0.0008553545,0.000019238652,0.000016508071,0.000014043089,0.014156658,0.0000014685056,0.00019983179,0.9354721,0.048885226,0.00013564715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013735194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001573041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8770431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051530056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025265946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59419996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}