{"meta":{"query_hash":"d2657bac852e","filters":{"venue":"Studies in Science Education"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d2657bac852e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Studies+in+Science+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W2000534651","doi":"10.1080/03057260802681847","title":"Identity in science learning: exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Structure and agency; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Social identity approach; Epistemology; Personality; Identity formation; Social identity theory; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Science education; Psychology; Self-concept; Social science; Pedagogy; Social group; Computer science","score_opus":0.310549353783829,"score_gpt":0.5688665980168688,"score_spread":0.2583172442330398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000534651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7626857,0.01454472,0.0667798,0.03179521,0.00037332534,0.00014215481,0.000029662899,0.000033760152,0.12361566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344736,0.0018634393,0.0032499423,0.00043977273,0.000049462073,0.000081057195,0.000005679658,0.000012595056,0.00085067283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.963374,0.031994373,0.0004935888,0.00085454487,0.0023210647,0.0009623807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9379056,0.05205974,0.0037785913,0.0028207314,0.0019766924,0.0014586089],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029607479,0.00041803985,0.0008657446,0.005524505,0.01249946,0.013976257,0.0013921553,0.0028938253,0.0017320861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037142396,0.00039349025,0.0007072914,0.005517881,0.049422264,0.018841404,0.016459735,0.003635463,0.00015323402],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004181265,0.000053063115,0.0091108745,0.00023932284,0.000019358537,0.00019303261,0.7709691,0.00014363953,0.00036133608,0.18354686,0.00027154907,0.03505007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021621398,0.0001563588,0.016452048,0.0009631503,0.00003593002,0.00069509697,0.7023128,0.00082660845,0.0006865374,0.24098039,0.036821708,0.00004758534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004540052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005725587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98750055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005949456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005590967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15658116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005828999","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2014.881626","title":"Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":722,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Psychology; Focus (optics); Positive attitude; Social psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5503936245699005,"score_gpt":0.6066563083782814,"score_spread":0.05626268380838095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005828999","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002394125,0.9965197,0.00014092204,0.00023158705,0.000053649102,0.00014205427,0.00026447792,0.000004086497,0.00024942838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020092262,0.978207,0.0006858338,0.00026483493,0.00003618054,0.0003587384,0.00022668373,0.000004014501,0.00012451345],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.98909944,0.0037348387,0.004216755,0.0007858437,0.0018707804,0.00029223124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95942545,0.029412318,0.00629802,0.00061317073,0.0037953462,0.00045572608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012880257,0.0011934721,0.005064922,0.015492902,0.0008378269,0.0024406745,0.0012678227,0.0016221505,0.002416974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04564195,0.0010392284,0.004873176,0.01740715,0.001086037,0.002560312,0.0016564243,0.0009725198,0.00031037073],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017041904,0.000038420956,0.003342613,0.8993645,0.0067861723,0.00019937671,0.000988328,0.00008897133,0.00023150435,0.00037496875,0.0014651003,0.08694978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013743344,0.00025626287,0.019459318,0.9009523,0.046464298,0.00066360773,0.0018271749,0.00006325855,0.0003459989,0.00040637277,0.029365584,0.000058379577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01004808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036976714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015492902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003664976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017351534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068118095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030972164","doi":"10.1080/03057260208560190","title":"Is this the Full Story?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.3019844558646684,"score_gpt":0.4876178170241677,"score_spread":0.1856333611594993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030972164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022432008,0.024499556,0.0008308713,0.9351914,0.00704326,0.000005645957,0.00006889068,0.000035283127,0.030081993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31659582,0.09566033,0.0027517776,0.48111832,0.038955938,0.00009961171,0.00024952504,0.00039269615,0.06417603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551964,0.0023333847,0.000119058794,0.0004658223,0.00084691326,0.0007152274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98087746,0.011953943,0.00085154164,0.0012727114,0.002479564,0.002564686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008537778,0.0005505723,0.0009378336,0.0011613552,0.0047005825,0.0140318405,0.0014417239,0.008663629,0.022429666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029566655,0.0002776871,0.0004881353,0.0015082369,0.016451517,0.032942247,0.0066104033,0.014206056,0.004868013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091173475,0.000058895057,0.0018689493,0.00028048534,0.000039200102,0.00026254318,0.010222494,0.000071393086,0.00014648154,0.46369398,0.46276137,0.060503036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027256201,0.000022818713,0.0010913732,0.0004954255,0.000015542739,0.00019155865,0.017854871,0.00007121976,0.00009178804,0.14361547,0.8364957,0.0000268322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058998265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006983939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024536336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036729996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07503474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036767980","doi":"10.1080/03057260208560176","title":"T. Kuhn Meets T. Rex: Critical Conversations and New Directions in Science Centres and Science Museums","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":164,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Sociology; Normal science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11512945259856684,"score_gpt":0.3574941296748966,"score_spread":0.24236467707632975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036767980","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038749904,0.3475348,0.0026382345,0.56246954,0.012263412,0.000092322465,0.00021986125,0.00017218295,0.0707346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20482925,0.34497312,0.008059048,0.14941835,0.0135903675,0.0008341321,0.00043688956,0.00067377713,0.27718505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966769,0.0019079748,0.00020873685,0.00020338914,0.00078249787,0.00022044357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814336,0.012868751,0.0014467504,0.00033235105,0.0026171296,0.0013015049],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070191463,0.0009776833,0.0006099008,0.0016619541,0.007969671,0.008176657,0.0013268826,0.007236884,0.016080247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018978104,0.00084334036,0.00027042965,0.0029025269,0.006751334,0.028452542,0.0031891037,0.008071908,0.0076686214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063229854,0.000024237519,0.00022331727,0.00041286048,0.000008878487,0.00020423287,0.036796503,0.0000422381,0.00022657025,0.042214952,0.8783739,0.041409057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043730543,0.000028467624,0.0025199805,0.0018141207,0.000022201328,0.00038677233,0.051133234,0.00006896399,0.0005485614,0.040596038,0.90278083,0.000057039182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02007373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036788847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9920303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005246314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006638977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053793848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039413064","doi":"10.1080/03057260903562342","title":"Connecting research in science literacy and classroom practice: a review of science teaching journals in Australia, the UK and the United States, 1998–2008","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Discipline; Science education; Literacy; Science, technology, society and environment education; Social science education; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Nature of Science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Educational research; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.4400631719238048,"score_gpt":0.6649034736467588,"score_spread":0.22484030172295405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039413064","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018137777,0.9971328,0.000052080824,0.00042070227,0.000086220105,0.000011002932,0.00003100953,0.000002381183,0.0004499811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012013552,0.9870734,0.0003045234,0.00028724113,0.000077987024,0.000018065166,0.000051626317,0.0000020199166,0.00017158217],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964504,0.0010919975,0.0010795933,0.00035058506,0.00094666425,0.00008067329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96006894,0.026474811,0.0067114783,0.00035129074,0.005761899,0.00063146255],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005415497,0.0004877727,0.0015222692,0.014670449,0.00043251767,0.0020702553,0.00063602993,0.0009329004,0.0013324356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023180649,0.0006137983,0.00066911,0.022383017,0.0009901507,0.0024706668,0.0009496237,0.0007256413,0.00023993722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012952139,0.000047157315,0.0053088656,0.23976864,0.000732519,0.00039101462,0.003946386,0.00024656553,0.0011497443,0.0012606077,0.0077899047,0.73922914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085182095,0.00039518796,0.103666075,0.30572206,0.0043031396,0.0038890461,0.0072997054,0.00017528175,0.0011537945,0.0012463112,0.57197076,0.00009350837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008867248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032843437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98532957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021115257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00992954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02864021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134277310","doi":"10.1080/03057260903142269","title":"A tool for changing the world: possibilities of cultural‐historical activity theory to reinvigorate science education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Explication; Epistemology; Scholarship; Sociology; Dialectic; Activity theory; Emotive; Ontology; Social science; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1284440538250068,"score_gpt":0.5147718785693909,"score_spread":0.3863278247443841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134277310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025710978,0.031283543,0.2666668,0.10221528,0.0025008712,0.00019401177,0.0001404498,0.0002629983,0.571025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85266423,0.014073858,0.10539575,0.0041383216,0.0009626875,0.00048352178,0.00012688116,0.00016858791,0.021986088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969399,0.0023369542,0.00008347763,0.00022462441,0.0002587557,0.00015638584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961868,0.0023355018,0.00023842548,0.00061474,0.00028693935,0.0003375807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064224284,0.0009576724,0.00069165824,0.0050432626,0.004376619,0.011086287,0.0021584055,0.0029592842,0.00476355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004156445,0.00037085032,0.0008103789,0.0027025794,0.04479062,0.016616054,0.0064591886,0.0042362316,0.00073454593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027664353,0.0000115022385,0.00014679614,0.000031020612,0.0000035881544,0.000030626423,0.0045851157,0.00016491137,0.000022520935,0.98944914,0.0006083338,0.004943559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007851277,0.000014858691,0.0001896224,0.00018086856,0.0000065142335,0.00006548089,0.0059047546,0.0009928531,0.00008603033,0.9279983,0.06453913,0.00001374013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003045875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004335903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011086287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004344446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003291565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03396547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508964360","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573","title":"Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: a systematic review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Field (mathematics); Educational research; Science education; Engineering ethics; Nothing; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Management science; Epistemology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.39456052651405055,"score_gpt":0.5946755390155037,"score_spread":0.2001150125014532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508964360","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015394591,0.9953858,0.0003805976,0.0013152937,0.00030916277,0.00029613322,0.00032130277,0.000010575487,0.0004415483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014247574,0.9813952,0.0015907979,0.0011432171,0.00013632988,0.0010424596,0.00031387035,0.000015481568,0.00011497636],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9278556,0.028269019,0.027420752,0.003847165,0.011041525,0.0015659264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69062334,0.24238233,0.028417986,0.0046953754,0.031483926,0.0023970965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059633125,0.0014788659,0.0072904127,0.03869821,0.0017981449,0.0069601694,0.0028094517,0.003484984,0.0040407404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21420689,0.0021739553,0.006061325,0.0418829,0.0028294162,0.008814646,0.003703375,0.0030133186,0.0007728545],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015102178,0.000039546885,0.0020254736,0.9053859,0.0025732622,0.00014871926,0.0023595963,0.00009707074,0.00026336208,0.0014084675,0.0032364288,0.08231123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054718977,0.0000904178,0.002745709,0.9644747,0.0055160928,0.00021969294,0.0022361362,0.000040122122,0.00012582981,0.00040485692,0.024064455,0.000027384796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019718157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054186277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94036686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011728307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05395713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31537384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609975993","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2017.1319632","title":"University-level teaching of Anthropogenic Global Climate Change (AGCC) via student inquiry","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Curriculum; Geospatial analysis; Strengths and weaknesses; Climate change; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Remote sensing; Geography","score_opus":0.7344263821798732,"score_gpt":0.610001721803148,"score_spread":0.12442466037672517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609975993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6570272,0.050782878,0.037715223,0.020293215,0.0012551068,0.00027553688,0.00013800006,0.0007386805,0.23177406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968475,0.012856682,0.008041839,0.0012257885,0.0002218043,0.000115526105,0.00005518003,0.00006086393,0.008947388],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937164,0.0040550274,0.00025993746,0.00035747697,0.0011582777,0.00045286474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839371,0.0103974715,0.0016099241,0.0010513108,0.0011492668,0.0018549599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071036927,0.00018794843,0.000351479,0.0011835744,0.0009018273,0.0047104442,0.0013576219,0.0012641588,0.006571654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016852172,0.0001334045,0.00033726904,0.0013306405,0.001755377,0.0019397129,0.00454952,0.0013090706,0.0013718578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011441392,0.0017153767,0.031614583,0.003986644,0.00006750737,0.00082621136,0.053735025,0.0020418451,0.0049258308,0.040899213,0.016352491,0.8437208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007904509,0.0014906792,0.04798293,0.006973755,0.00010167464,0.0022345192,0.104127035,0.0024341412,0.015691124,0.031125614,0.7876382,0.000121358775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027993968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069864205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071036927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019107378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035213633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03756839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017165640","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2020.1744796","title":"Models of conceptual change in science learning: establishing an exhaustive inventory based on support given by articles published in major journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conceptual change; Field (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Computer science; Position (finance); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Conceptual model; Management science; Data science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31927497475703515,"score_gpt":0.4817052536459942,"score_spread":0.16243027888895906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017165640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7941623,0.035769522,0.07824353,0.017624458,0.0005154066,0.0017589214,0.0039031974,0.00039135778,0.067631334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679937,0.0047084596,0.024052378,0.00038675158,0.00012827621,0.0006242357,0.0015628233,0.000046048866,0.0004971822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9606662,0.015389776,0.0063745123,0.002861544,0.013482789,0.0012251318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5147147,0.37847438,0.043449607,0.02328665,0.03579724,0.004277424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060894635,0.0009479965,0.0011339606,0.05212092,0.0030942687,0.013386644,0.0023930147,0.0016655759,0.0036689898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24035174,0.0006636787,0.0016627461,0.03832858,0.0072365343,0.021046462,0.0067213685,0.0017826485,0.0004826889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006980082,0.00024684914,0.38746986,0.00806377,0.0008309319,0.0008759954,0.08731827,0.0032228911,0.0017564415,0.15249732,0.0060853297,0.35093418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016984926,0.000992896,0.34241283,0.016167942,0.0016200802,0.003044254,0.23216449,0.026964225,0.0032471714,0.24240725,0.13025276,0.0005562778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038572852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003206861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060894635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007237391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009119512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3220455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024979441","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2020.1755802","title":"Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: a critical review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":235,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Discipline; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Ideology; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.5179311334149813,"score_gpt":0.6533157314774267,"score_spread":0.1353845980624454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024979441","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012172322,0.99853516,0.0001097151,0.0006913606,0.00019081224,0.000011349472,0.0000061360893,0.00000186537,0.00033183678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021461588,0.9968772,0.0002795837,0.0004225016,0.00015073309,0.00003075144,0.000011345515,0.0000018054121,0.00007996744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963672,0.0016039793,0.0007549466,0.00035235385,0.0007755442,0.00014605616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971695,0.023187561,0.0014909612,0.0003198321,0.002975861,0.00033076634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007520216,0.0011611583,0.0017474357,0.011242461,0.0012604654,0.003577927,0.0015284525,0.0026833517,0.00225109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023104241,0.0006404812,0.0011682381,0.011744102,0.0025585832,0.004601196,0.00188258,0.0026014168,0.00053179497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011635103,0.00007609144,0.00070060865,0.26323897,0.0005362813,0.00042923028,0.004385604,0.00048870366,0.00064202683,0.023273792,0.02871321,0.6773991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022569153,0.00011238245,0.0018856495,0.34001842,0.0009580644,0.0008300534,0.0035989454,0.00013676623,0.00045825087,0.008279019,0.64363724,0.00006255932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045805755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009650704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011242461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003757266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01254811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03977114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214661623","doi":"10.1080/03057267.2021.2004006","title":"Response of science learners to contradicting information: a review of research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Studies in Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cognition; Isolation (microbiology); Process (computing); Conceptual change; Reflection (computer programming); Psychology; Epistemology; Science education; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Cognitive science; Mathematics education; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.5208798959225118,"score_gpt":0.6762284333550228,"score_spread":0.15534853743251098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214661623","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005857947,0.99848574,0.00013746484,0.00029736015,0.00006365048,0.000021442094,0.000025775998,0.000002957935,0.0003798381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045006755,0.9946989,0.0003467725,0.0002841616,0.000039329636,0.00003763476,0.000029951812,0.0000023117339,0.000060265396],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932899,0.0029538642,0.0016920994,0.0006079408,0.0013103907,0.00014584007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949304,0.045010235,0.0025396973,0.00047566945,0.0024432486,0.00022726445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008918095,0.000844784,0.0027666367,0.0087260725,0.0006737001,0.0033600274,0.0012825173,0.0020823604,0.002012001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036569484,0.00082280766,0.0016070802,0.008732826,0.001817521,0.0035615324,0.001539663,0.001404102,0.00046527784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012379813,0.0000579372,0.0012252385,0.45360613,0.0010992478,0.00036568582,0.0027097191,0.00016540241,0.0006465917,0.0025434152,0.003863309,0.5335935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054534972,0.00026909338,0.0069190105,0.68902004,0.005915018,0.002250555,0.0065228185,0.00010932816,0.001049025,0.0041885874,0.28361878,0.00008319493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003117217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008339685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008918095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019449966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085593015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047163963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}