{"meta":{"query_hash":"3fb327eda124","filters":{"venue":"Studies in choice and welfare"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3fb327eda124","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Studies+in+choice+and+welfare"},"results":[{"id":"W11392634","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_5","title":"Monotonicity and Solidarity Axioms in Economics and Game Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corollary; Solidarity; nobody; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Monotonic function; Game theory; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05600991476203109,"score_gpt":0.26030724144611855,"score_spread":0.20429732668408745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11392634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025158798,0.014495183,0.41066667,0.01960772,0.0011600099,0.00012803718,0.00046798828,0.0001827383,0.52813286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62113756,0.02024671,0.20719482,0.004704815,0.003656392,0.0009589263,0.0008036372,0.0005186248,0.14077856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985322,0.00065301324,0.000092066046,0.00019692033,0.00041593122,0.000109994915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956939,0.003139098,0.00017774112,0.00036934475,0.00053338864,0.000086465225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027001451,0.000758575,0.0013323183,0.0013119114,0.0018866243,0.0029851866,0.0014398029,0.0019435596,0.0095535405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007171876,0.0007548677,0.00078251655,0.002567538,0.0069611156,0.011373869,0.0013764461,0.0062223123,0.002138088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000277216,0.000008653988,0.00002825409,0.00002036918,0.0000022598367,0.000007049934,0.00004960161,0.0001997091,0.000030941508,0.9923348,0.0025016798,0.0048139077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019745326,0.0000016702179,0.000029061233,0.0000094340285,0.0000012882684,0.0000140875,0.000016464866,0.00045197582,0.000034187127,0.9939441,0.0054939296,0.0000017545716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011642688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010674415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095535405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001706529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015295708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03195983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203555955","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-46439-7_13","title":"Relevant Irrelevance: The Relevance of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in Family Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Bargaining problem; Economics; Class (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Relevance (law); Property (philosophy); Axiom independence; Microeconomics; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Game theory; Social choice theory; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.0785210211365463,"score_gpt":0.35607410631128045,"score_spread":0.27755308517473415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1203555955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04522083,0.009057023,0.28355184,0.01723364,0.0008638213,0.0001382089,0.00017497069,0.000051244107,0.64370835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287001,0.003690444,0.026068438,0.0020396025,0.0014250104,0.00033539956,0.000097719676,0.00012955128,0.037513785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293053,0.004353378,0.00023647347,0.00079065905,0.001156564,0.0005323707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98424375,0.013116623,0.000563614,0.0013264207,0.00052588567,0.0002237172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010612062,0.00096091995,0.0017316929,0.0011068824,0.0033264884,0.0043841535,0.0028818098,0.003404961,0.00992841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024943965,0.00078960485,0.002077577,0.0014237305,0.021526383,0.012069263,0.0031391303,0.013346932,0.00071163476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008635067,0.000010283796,0.000034975394,0.000013730132,0.000005904394,0.000013888574,0.0001678225,0.00037869098,0.000030946874,0.9973832,0.00040697938,0.0015450185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040397254,0.0000025205377,0.000027913236,0.000009620667,0.0000027553474,0.0000065524837,0.000022312983,0.00044959574,0.000017870025,0.998735,0.000719678,0.0000021626702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018461032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021430259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010612062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030414027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021162098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0561226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153583058","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12","title":"Approval Balloting for Fixed-Size Committees","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Approval voting; Secret ballot; Computer science; Political science; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","score_opus":0.13413505250146945,"score_gpt":0.2865264764115325,"score_spread":0.15239142391006305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153583058","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10923777,0.002338677,0.6605369,0.004440038,0.0006654079,0.00085399585,0.0005141747,0.0006413034,0.22077174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70903933,0.0013350465,0.13702197,0.0006528733,0.000745768,0.0013337083,0.0010777847,0.0005215227,0.14827205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789305,0.0133047635,0.00079321,0.0018612264,0.0029964151,0.0021138464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953234,0.032888874,0.002687352,0.0062040947,0.003364822,0.0016208345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013807379,0.0009380544,0.0023510195,0.0013121645,0.0028354647,0.004497961,0.0038943307,0.003917578,0.034639243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075003535,0.0011901327,0.0017718652,0.0017971728,0.0031097222,0.006100542,0.0024138074,0.0047353916,0.0063037877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006611196,0.00027584835,0.0014744335,0.00027971467,0.00006390376,0.00010458824,0.00055096555,0.023912983,0.0009324418,0.8237978,0.03415895,0.113787286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021523739,0.0001990125,0.0010096834,0.00008599522,0.000035630143,0.00012371602,0.00020121022,0.07813512,0.0007994394,0.9049636,0.014184503,0.000046877478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023981335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003777652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034639243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022491599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002931103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115879774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}