{"meta":{"query_hash":"3fb327eda124","filters":{"venue":"Studies in choice and welfare"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3fb327eda124","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Studies+in+choice+and+welfare"},"results":[{"id":"W11392634","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-79832-3_5","title":"Monotonicity and Solidarity Axioms in Economics and Game Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corollary; Solidarity; nobody; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Monotonic function; Game theory; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.05600991476203109,"score_gpt":0.26030724144611855,"score_spread":0.20429732668408745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11392634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.494741,0.16502513,0.0000065864874,0.0007677525,0.0008023219,0.00070399616,0.0003625766,0.000040004925,0.33755064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789414,0.10634276,0.000010937224,0.00011921247,0.00014552417,0.000021991915,0.0000067903775,0.000037519676,0.014373861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828386,0.000026163461,0.0007042336,0.0006813548,0.00002043578,0.000283929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990493,0.000263402,0.0003455817,0.00025951926,0.000018932082,0.00006324545],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008074486,0.00036002387,0.0010861219,0.0002920191,0.00016062359,0.000039328173,0.000117868156,0.00032210795,0.000018081326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012718135,0.00040110652,0.00006152032,0.000031377647,0.0005474172,0.00013338214,0.00026880484,0.00042767654,0.000010918237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034093096,0.000020623076,0.023570914,0.00034120653,0.00017186125,0.000018820647,0.0051005036,0.000010134953,7.425487e-8,0.9665999,0.000052958563,0.0040789456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002058439,0.00016724579,0.044654932,0.00058508344,0.000034098277,0.00006797346,0.00203001,0.0001813542,0.0000014013899,0.56223065,0.38669452,0.001294328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023883484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065787096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40436924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010460781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009507906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1203555955","doi":"10.1007/978-3-662-46439-7_13","title":"Relevant Irrelevance: The Relevance of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives in Family Bargaining","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Independence of irrelevant alternatives; Transferable utility; Mathematical economics; Bargaining problem; Economics; Class (philosophy); Independence (probability theory); Relevance (law); Property (philosophy); Axiom independence; Microeconomics; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Game theory; Social choice theory; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.0785210211365463,"score_gpt":0.35607410631128045,"score_spread":0.27755308517473415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1203555955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09322182,0.22880816,0.000023738736,0.0016565481,0.0024360362,0.0015058224,0.00029687423,0.000057082983,0.6719939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86116385,0.124996446,0.00015977844,0.00009473492,0.00023541941,0.00002787285,0.00000680835,0.000043410408,0.013271686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692565,0.00016204092,0.00087818195,0.00056041125,0.0010202838,0.00045340465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712414,0.0010963586,0.00064162235,0.00041445237,0.00064788316,0.00007552014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017054251,0.00039232508,0.00095290923,0.00023683514,0.00026377084,0.000016816997,0.00063478027,0.00036676228,0.000010700415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014458882,0.00030862758,0.00010441682,0.00022900915,0.0019514853,0.00018272504,0.00036472754,0.0008350293,0.0000022645966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010828866,0.00011048623,0.07514256,0.00095996354,0.000576218,0.0000850388,0.1751298,0.00040750467,0.000040440642,0.729593,0.0010487895,0.016797941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024477008,0.00043576333,0.08476963,0.005841486,0.0002131334,0.000004798466,0.37874457,0.00012837064,0.0000065649197,0.28116244,0.24474157,0.0015039569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020325026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012236207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.767942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025014405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028191277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153583058","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-20441-8_12","title":"Approval Balloting for Fixed-Size Committees","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in choice and welfare","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Approval voting; Secret ballot; Computer science; Political science; Law; Cardinal voting systems; Politics","score_opus":0.13413505250146945,"score_gpt":0.2865264764115325,"score_spread":0.15239142391006305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153583058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026210018,0.042630393,0.00005181899,0.0006242563,0.002232769,0.00087390264,0.00048326657,0.000076399716,0.9504062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6914055,0.00238247,0.00024085579,0.00025316948,0.0010731921,0.0001443812,0.000026513368,0.00011821106,0.3043557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998369,0.000010217157,0.00072660943,0.000556101,0.000029872346,0.00030822016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866176,0.00047108467,0.0004855459,0.00028683312,0.000050730912,0.000044051343],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007731176,0.00034194943,0.0009737738,0.00013956522,0.00026432326,0.000030976727,0.00022007142,0.00026616635,0.00013846972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004294205,0.00036392699,0.0001640506,0.00002849026,0.00020071176,0.0000795517,0.00017647567,0.00028641493,0.000052024665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014795499,0.00001480725,0.0072740386,0.00084135315,0.00027302414,0.0000030779202,0.0017673695,8.869225e-7,1.5677931e-7,0.98680943,0.0015228192,0.0014782522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063841057,0.000110076915,0.001418052,0.00045398079,0.000029503877,0.0000043784917,0.00080882385,0.0000073472866,0.0000010727359,0.24619982,0.7498083,0.00052022364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008897968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014030548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7482855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006365042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000527403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}