{"meta":{"query_hash":"12e29023749d","filters":{"venue":"Studies in public choice"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/12e29023749d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Studies+in+public+choice"},"results":[{"id":"W134857282","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4419-6784-8_5","title":"Is the “Veil of Ignorance” in Constitutional Choice a Myth? An Empirical Exploration Informed by a Theory of Power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Viewpoints; Ignorance; Power (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16289089304550908,"score_gpt":0.3929590677827641,"score_spread":0.23006817473725505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134857282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33945367,0.011525199,0.056048736,0.2566695,0.00038308394,0.000086294014,0.00026142446,0.000040161114,0.3355319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912555,0.0013631484,0.0014874098,0.0023823422,0.00021124668,0.000054727807,0.000023236857,0.000018893774,0.0032033487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889714,0.007957659,0.0002746399,0.0007662917,0.0015244355,0.000579821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8877994,0.10266604,0.0039119665,0.003265844,0.0015423975,0.000814321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013505893,0.0004374072,0.00087948266,0.0023621337,0.0037081053,0.009403458,0.0018866764,0.0038375114,0.007661193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063158974,0.00067616726,0.0004834906,0.004569954,0.060527626,0.042304534,0.0047182147,0.006854537,0.0003342837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014535247,0.000022885306,0.0012408948,0.00004916662,0.000009397128,0.000043526783,0.009165911,0.00019961424,0.000021112106,0.98262537,0.0013288162,0.0052787317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063501952,0.000006415681,0.00065393094,0.000071012444,0.0000064335723,0.000030283014,0.005261719,0.00034019383,0.000040416242,0.98935765,0.004220485,0.0000051675042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031378712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00310884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013505893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030675028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028862928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07142681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139857299","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-09720-6_2","title":"Voting Strategically in Canada and Britain","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06826008996738517,"score_gpt":0.31777551457313236,"score_spread":0.2495154246057472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W139857299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7004547,0.0071607446,0.00079189986,0.01728579,0.0002504036,0.00006036879,0.001027794,0.00004580635,0.2729224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282327,0.0010544221,0.00020456681,0.0004428641,0.000020738984,0.000012864288,0.00022942708,0.000028605089,0.069773875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99492055,0.0008056235,0.00008459698,0.00035450948,0.0010973869,0.0027372474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963973,0.00084429805,0.00019873749,0.0001168801,0.001311351,0.0011315299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023972907,0.00028774704,0.0010452663,0.0023456092,0.01711851,0.008920127,0.0020004602,0.002394093,0.007128462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070671705,0.0003908717,0.00045251878,0.00875452,0.0077023827,0.001596577,0.0018248248,0.0026598615,0.00067292724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006425759,0.00025330213,0.06982589,0.00018978502,0.000107455904,0.0008823215,0.09461382,0.0056756693,0.00045020992,0.63854516,0.0753752,0.11343864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015854726,0.00010192433,0.3704556,0.0004090815,0.00008718724,0.0001901709,0.15567605,0.0056375503,0.0007206773,0.046743054,0.41954717,0.00027308927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12051582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12051582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09497156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8744076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142667938","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_2","title":"Internet Voting in a Local Election in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Ranked voting system; The Internet; Turnout; Political science; Single-member district; Group voting ticket; Local election; Straight-ticket voting; Public administration; Electronic voting; Government (linguistics); First-past-the-post voting; Disapproval voting; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03328977762150943,"score_gpt":0.25379929144557345,"score_spread":0.22050951382406403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142667938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9233521,0.0014098139,0.00043057645,0.009440352,0.00013150462,0.000060182178,0.00088890665,0.000034705834,0.06425182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96333903,0.00043763328,0.00012696952,0.00023865774,0.000018778688,0.000006980806,0.00021880111,0.000015218137,0.03559785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983296,0.00016916156,0.000026731906,0.00009490724,0.00027182786,0.0011077474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983223,0.00029189204,0.000098736054,0.000036769954,0.0006754902,0.00057468645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010309779,0.00018807483,0.00056286465,0.0011829721,0.0130528975,0.0035067862,0.001342165,0.0011862167,0.008545369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036027248,0.00020948963,0.00036010618,0.0039924392,0.0020501688,0.0008403639,0.00095420924,0.0022250833,0.00056920055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012511634,0.0007666597,0.39359307,0.0002820109,0.00015886278,0.003974032,0.06622142,0.0133724995,0.0010276411,0.1835291,0.16514345,0.17068005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013559786,0.00018033486,0.5863457,0.00021194521,0.00012288039,0.0003620147,0.19812988,0.014436734,0.0011388866,0.010044244,0.18869579,0.00019597168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99924076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06927082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06927082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05617612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50259733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W167124899","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_1","title":"Dissonance in Policy Processes: An Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Persuasion; Rationality; Positive economics; Politics; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Public economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0898930128400268,"score_gpt":0.3093172853234021,"score_spread":0.21942427248337526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W167124899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00831498,0.305522,0.1900734,0.038799785,0.008002344,0.00018852796,0.00039576428,0.000114964576,0.44858828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34429953,0.2723476,0.082059585,0.01609778,0.035394926,0.0011826924,0.00037159846,0.00041131966,0.24783492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987614,0.0005795464,0.000071134964,0.000181879,0.00030190742,0.00010412964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662125,0.002846698,0.000109054796,0.00012472432,0.00022669072,0.000071539806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022367514,0.0010241679,0.0012538891,0.0018600648,0.0011191346,0.003266468,0.0015159523,0.0030919325,0.01187283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00433208,0.00063104887,0.0009308103,0.0031972998,0.0057981904,0.0057492377,0.0019332212,0.004329249,0.0018345733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003753743,0.000023642942,0.000071037306,0.000100223864,0.0000045655547,0.00003195554,0.00018276446,0.00084248907,0.000074903524,0.97471607,0.009417761,0.0145309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046894247,0.000008588293,0.00016408281,0.00015664105,0.0000038410435,0.00006094373,0.00008853394,0.0012041728,0.00005078184,0.928862,0.06938553,0.000010279028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018036678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002467085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01187283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002983077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001430604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03971857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185004948","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-04352-4_3","title":"Indirect Campaigning: Past, Present and Future of Voting Advice Applications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Voting; Political science; Politics; Public relations; The Internet; Voting behavior; Quarter (Canadian coin); Advertising; Internet privacy; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Law; History","score_opus":0.08016413875857054,"score_gpt":0.372398764652964,"score_spread":0.2922346258943935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185004948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09510212,0.08483628,0.022066547,0.02734169,0.0015557087,0.00008747027,0.00044838045,0.00021318076,0.7683487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6826565,0.034709223,0.012816815,0.0019081692,0.0026729333,0.00012939725,0.00058248173,0.00023504985,0.26428938],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984615,0.0007261934,0.000055345154,0.00014992652,0.00045794246,0.00014922529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926455,0.00544193,0.0002703333,0.0004694251,0.00091504393,0.0002576241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002818915,0.000282449,0.00041227567,0.0014267912,0.00080152164,0.00614306,0.0008781667,0.0010669775,0.031421646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009682965,0.00019428502,0.0002527929,0.0021630423,0.0018545496,0.0033858872,0.0010098596,0.0019696625,0.0029259166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009333772,0.00014430271,0.0027721215,0.0003682784,0.000011935657,0.000026977903,0.002259063,0.0004045046,0.00065587676,0.23336305,0.018587632,0.741313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045545978,0.00021222144,0.017387036,0.0019554177,0.00006254759,0.00022709792,0.0029960661,0.0053005903,0.0023691377,0.28041306,0.68898034,0.00005091134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019903923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050639417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031421646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011884725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015363678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10511583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202123134","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-09720-6_1","title":"Introduction: Evidence for Duverger's Law from Four Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.16067352596616044,"score_gpt":0.3837402307608182,"score_spread":0.22306670479465776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202123134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047171637,0.06529358,0.0072933305,0.16909869,0.0109423855,0.00018277242,0.02322172,0.00036166995,0.6764342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36918795,0.050425004,0.011244405,0.09028205,0.010780488,0.0006075656,0.019836571,0.00074505346,0.44689086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956304,0.00011803286,0.000027396458,0.000093316135,0.00013527244,0.00006291701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944325,0.0046104044,0.00019397591,0.00018178766,0.00047025585,0.00011112754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009971561,0.00036824157,0.0004353012,0.0024279545,0.0016118654,0.0020805122,0.00093356945,0.0022514134,0.0382781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004743471,0.0002914006,0.00037221995,0.006255219,0.001150082,0.002714216,0.0011010634,0.0022819268,0.0060886475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005524689,0.000065956796,0.0034697873,0.0005370856,0.000013241789,0.00023586431,0.0016599812,0.00042909765,0.00021752765,0.18678738,0.7393191,0.06720973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046084835,0.000036679678,0.023312835,0.0013957085,0.000022448303,0.00031448607,0.0021322125,0.00022989714,0.00054907583,0.07746329,0.89444274,0.000054650947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016469534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025478423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0382781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001109736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014028342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12805301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W202631925","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_8","title":"General Policy Speech of Prime Ministers and Fiscal Choices in France: “Preach Water and Drink Wine!”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prime (order theory); Wine; Economics; Psychology; Art; Mathematics; Visual arts; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.049489080203503066,"score_gpt":0.2800515873864855,"score_spread":0.23056250718298243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W202631925","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21353087,0.038748514,0.0012677528,0.52445877,0.0039950837,0.000037105303,0.0014876273,0.00010861389,0.21636562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7862447,0.006295402,0.0005015238,0.025864754,0.0015567337,0.000050354978,0.0005479763,0.00006671396,0.17887194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975326,0.0012217204,0.000051655938,0.0002364326,0.0003136599,0.0006439439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980683,0.0010017236,0.00026725535,0.00005434543,0.00027540888,0.00033305952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044647097,0.0003770201,0.0004493887,0.00091772265,0.0041742483,0.004665705,0.00061001943,0.0043112827,0.00957529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007641017,0.0003154691,0.00039178642,0.0012789998,0.001991574,0.0020483823,0.0012452553,0.0030359034,0.0011397847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047301105,0.00016450316,0.016810494,0.00018598085,0.000078339035,0.00055352785,0.01922276,0.0013306635,0.00061988394,0.42342922,0.47306958,0.06406201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083961786,0.00009244846,0.068703055,0.00032772843,0.000026923726,0.00018404855,0.012367947,0.00059539045,0.00043278662,0.025323346,0.89175093,0.00011149319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15845893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20249785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15845893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010779634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072328285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31507325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206046219","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_12","title":"Do Parties Matter? A Qualitative Answer with Numbers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Cognitive dissonance; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); Public administration; Dimension (graph theory); Political economy; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0878517228038994,"score_gpt":0.3602703182953137,"score_spread":0.2724185954914143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206046219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08995998,0.0028294658,0.01370214,0.119024225,0.0007066026,0.0002722031,0.0020414824,0.00004329068,0.7714206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301344,0.001340879,0.0033980953,0.0065479986,0.00013223782,0.0004436686,0.00018977253,0.000059627564,0.05775316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.987899,0.007810903,0.00019331607,0.00062836125,0.0024075273,0.0010608239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97126096,0.021802435,0.00095128204,0.0011092967,0.004210285,0.00066575536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014005793,0.0003125282,0.00055382575,0.0022161694,0.010983037,0.008236589,0.0014072955,0.0016506921,0.020191493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043711767,0.00031784072,0.00026810783,0.006839643,0.021381073,0.015651155,0.0032084498,0.0020933074,0.0007960731],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025557021,0.000008821049,0.0014652557,0.00013447578,0.000004164377,0.000034510223,0.07206877,0.0000837738,0.00011303775,0.898581,0.017411312,0.010069383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023592936,0.000015514574,0.0038340725,0.00069605076,0.000017909422,0.000052815412,0.41489634,0.00044859765,0.0003448303,0.29160154,0.28803694,0.000031860745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3548003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43533537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3548003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03563181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019387294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7054703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156410106","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_9","title":"Do Governments Manipulate Their Revenue Forecasts? Budget Speech and Budget Outcomes in the Canadian Provinces","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Government revenue; Government (linguistics); Politics; Economics; Business; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08173730707230438,"score_gpt":0.2751667344862426,"score_spread":0.19342942741393826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156410106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93770796,0.0020387652,0.00013231115,0.013289661,0.000070957074,0.000029444862,0.002841185,0.000019433768,0.043870274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921176,0.0007802915,0.00005617504,0.0002700383,0.000013850288,0.0000058135065,0.0005029341,0.000007614953,0.006245822],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971616,0.0002968472,0.00007356296,0.0001812667,0.0008588649,0.0014278265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98938006,0.0021185882,0.00201696,0.00032559285,0.0042740274,0.001884848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028189537,0.0002580566,0.00058927195,0.0016000546,0.0054307175,0.0055410787,0.0014501536,0.001250796,0.0064105876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016585942,0.00037827945,0.0004051698,0.00586736,0.0023574985,0.0014329624,0.001098718,0.0021658146,0.00045815305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009187552,0.00030630024,0.8389763,0.000118735305,0.00024073463,0.000265946,0.021908969,0.0057607684,0.00038003508,0.045472663,0.039989706,0.045660995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007155974,0.000034162025,0.94338065,0.00010161383,0.000088039465,0.000021105947,0.025807725,0.0025407819,0.00024398889,0.0026192672,0.024973113,0.0001178903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10391193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10391193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10334583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75393736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483691456","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0","title":"Behind a Veil of Ignorance?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13846533112016168,"score_gpt":0.4026436335808742,"score_spread":0.2641783024607125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483691456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018376011,0.021594258,0.007109925,0.4626038,0.0015635878,0.000017985794,0.00013498147,0.00004160207,0.48855788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85895336,0.0089161685,0.0019308735,0.04086139,0.0033078606,0.000094794064,0.00007282726,0.00015703466,0.085705735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962108,0.002544484,0.00006780388,0.00029693232,0.00050576363,0.00037421496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98829484,0.008960722,0.00047582542,0.0009259954,0.00087717565,0.00046548565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075938003,0.00041625593,0.00077019085,0.0015070862,0.0050395695,0.009649397,0.00096545776,0.004187369,0.01023784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019748095,0.00032623167,0.00033864885,0.0016900266,0.0400686,0.024947895,0.003410156,0.009578579,0.001034691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047053963,0.000006738022,0.00008418421,0.000013920942,0.000002972616,0.000009492877,0.0015412166,0.000045679455,0.000010649297,0.98673487,0.008115559,0.0034300345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000486815,0.000003207427,0.00009813702,0.00007345961,0.0000026092441,0.000009483266,0.001333121,0.00009312708,0.00003214202,0.9560842,0.042262346,0.0000033817496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010803854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010354706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010803854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004851083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046356614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0401603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W258514237","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_16","title":"Do They Walk Like They Talk? A Conclusion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Empirical research; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12374699665750681,"score_gpt":0.3983582749823356,"score_spread":0.2746112783248288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W258514237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0285543,0.006694996,0.0128519405,0.44489396,0.007567204,0.000060411207,0.0005829978,0.000046746,0.49874753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5074971,0.005994213,0.0032744352,0.08174415,0.0036360277,0.000119458215,0.00039069902,0.00009360211,0.3972504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991725,0.00030885285,0.0000227818,0.00021649469,0.000160747,0.000118601805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979754,0.0010042915,0.000079739475,0.00009698154,0.00061259157,0.00023101785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014732813,0.00032946383,0.00040340365,0.00073817704,0.00212503,0.0041878656,0.00077790394,0.0022882954,0.028565196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004250197,0.00012984114,0.0003783786,0.00081647857,0.003719667,0.006943289,0.001425085,0.0033770427,0.0041417885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003110904,0.00002544148,0.0005736263,0.00007723227,0.000009910234,0.000075394426,0.0033716015,0.00007582193,0.0001768262,0.8905954,0.08258246,0.022405123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018968756,0.000018761553,0.0024252434,0.00021727855,0.000018821607,0.00011323559,0.017912084,0.00043069472,0.0002545938,0.5828848,0.39568782,0.00001768607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007117862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004953259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028565196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021637855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016103167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09556013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243912099","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-09720-6","title":"Duverger's Law of Plurality Voting","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.11822148536253768,"score_gpt":0.4159269962433183,"score_spread":0.2977055108807806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243912099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050083837,0.001308759,0.014187097,0.0092069,0.0006532138,0.000040929757,0.00008781821,0.000028781455,0.9694781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34918946,0.0012467249,0.0055809096,0.006496843,0.0010151714,0.00022313239,0.000063244144,0.0000990938,0.6360854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974324,0.0006868047,0.000092043694,0.00067469274,0.00069930096,0.00041483986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984938,0.0009384211,0.000045152705,0.0002959542,0.000183176,0.000043530443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024236238,0.00041386334,0.00087758835,0.0009243243,0.0036296851,0.0052391123,0.0011772834,0.0047420096,0.016425943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068489164,0.0005355181,0.00060976215,0.001285911,0.012155979,0.0055469153,0.0018630249,0.008501121,0.0025940954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016009993,0.0000015523975,0.00001288736,0.0000021275553,7.2137095e-7,0.0000046074865,0.000076187316,0.000043271055,0.0000082616225,0.99607146,0.0023808493,0.0013965217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005429602,0.0000022452114,0.00004773607,0.00000946441,0.0000014921143,0.000022158363,0.000040832576,0.00016414338,0.000051857405,0.9564472,0.04320398,0.0000034757934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009165876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0112969335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016425943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00445639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002469767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054950237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255453723","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0_1","title":"Introduction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.20860002622469934,"score_gpt":0.3706580175209658,"score_spread":0.16205799129626644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255453723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003818096,0.0016798149,0.004134816,0.0041115633,0.0041959565,0.00012800418,0.0024222923,0.00063543336,0.98231024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020282592,0.0011196237,0.0016924968,0.0017237893,0.0007094071,0.000095837924,0.001826419,0.00024894098,0.99055535],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912244,0.00012104261,0.000032642773,0.00018300314,0.0004396754,0.00010117242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888295,0.00020684506,0.000040015882,0.00016844214,0.00049936946,0.00020229392],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000981618,0.000701153,0.00043712792,0.0015158124,0.0014873587,0.004270322,0.0014394644,0.0018546697,0.5838272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034755478,0.0002470658,0.0004630571,0.0013852338,0.0007946766,0.0028897391,0.002539747,0.0016854464,0.44550085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020092974,0.000025145795,0.00011964167,0.00012994105,0.000001884153,0.00003718218,0.00018718882,0.00009627847,0.00020337514,0.06906164,0.79483217,0.13528545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014102399,0.0000036396295,0.000069175054,0.000053658892,5.855316e-7,0.000016752132,0.000043327425,0.000014866557,0.00004550793,0.0050342726,0.99471503,0.0000018251375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034456684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052015334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4161728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017145935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025708778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59361994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89137513","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0_4","title":"Measuring the Opacity of the ‘Veil of Ignorance’ in Constitutions: Theory, Method, and Some Results","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opacity; Ignorance; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.24874882157929934,"score_gpt":0.38322782213890083,"score_spread":0.1344790005596015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89137513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46353886,0.00867986,0.38907546,0.012420875,0.00036249126,0.00039385955,0.0009338851,0.00026570068,0.12432904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467104,0.0011479555,0.048718657,0.00028765443,0.00011037932,0.00024980816,0.00016515754,0.00007527129,0.002534606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.969654,0.023377553,0.0007716365,0.0015823964,0.003988517,0.0006258051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59818876,0.37093437,0.010446215,0.013266808,0.0062030046,0.00096081756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04049875,0.0009622359,0.0012013213,0.0042816936,0.0026088308,0.00774955,0.0019052268,0.002458364,0.0054367273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24412456,0.0008248358,0.0010648749,0.00820021,0.016439337,0.016630257,0.0045766635,0.0062671015,0.00039789168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014894363,0.00025652058,0.03288516,0.0003935325,0.0002562416,0.000044675584,0.008318138,0.004354872,0.00058783026,0.88604677,0.0017321539,0.06497505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031111136,0.00010114347,0.018661931,0.0003361442,0.00014142181,0.00004508394,0.0031644886,0.012053174,0.0026628117,0.9577352,0.0049819206,0.00008555902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051597557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050336746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04049875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00336744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028661462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21418041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W960706897","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-14953-0_13","title":"Constitutional Choices Turned into Simple In-Period Choices: A Power Relations Reading of the Chadian and Cameroonian Constitutions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Reading (process); Simple (philosophy); Power (physics); Economics; Econometrics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Physics; Thermodynamics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.09401416740363963,"score_gpt":0.3567318002678532,"score_spread":0.26271763286421357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W960706897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08191961,0.009956034,0.01246898,0.020904975,0.00041360382,0.000072938674,0.00018610344,0.00003382821,0.8740439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625295,0.0015718308,0.0019260301,0.0010441288,0.0001411332,0.00006790528,0.00003442622,0.00004286361,0.032642197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990759,0.0005938643,0.000013359608,0.0000623184,0.00006513142,0.00018941956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989648,0.00075610133,0.00006153033,0.00009158092,0.00008697765,0.00003903646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020847437,0.0004951443,0.0003188468,0.0015004892,0.003875483,0.0051068366,0.0007678527,0.001381541,0.009241055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003537723,0.00034332075,0.00028275806,0.0024072062,0.014410185,0.0077179573,0.0013790934,0.0040414813,0.0002227642],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044107564,0.000002777773,0.000027928543,0.0000055572978,6.131171e-7,0.000017727709,0.0027418789,0.00009434283,0.000025647374,0.9953517,0.0005678854,0.001159612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027533042,0.000019402105,0.0015132937,0.00019196255,0.0000117091995,0.000049471262,0.0068146395,0.0010084484,0.00037830704,0.879314,0.1106527,0.000018596256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033064835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032480724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033064835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008793195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033207214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06574476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W97340422","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-89672-4_4","title":"Party Rhetoric and Practice: A Normative Perspective from Political Science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in public choice","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Rhetoric; Perspective (graphical); Politics; Epistemology; Political rhetoric; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10741115002812072,"score_gpt":0.40758358555977037,"score_spread":0.30017243553164963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W97340422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017405571,0.018627768,0.040383752,0.10125617,0.00083426357,0.000038044644,0.00007473228,0.000046976354,0.82133275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9255009,0.008074417,0.00897015,0.0056806174,0.0021218215,0.00022258637,0.0000627875,0.00015722847,0.049209543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916215,0.005497705,0.00017892967,0.00053136237,0.0017937244,0.00037680188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804952,0.017007435,0.000522216,0.00073468854,0.0009920987,0.0002483527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010342984,0.00057857187,0.00070212083,0.0028525207,0.0037050291,0.012100431,0.0017517271,0.006167425,0.005205048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016007697,0.0004910518,0.00027229034,0.0035975093,0.044712193,0.0133330375,0.0023478821,0.0069070756,0.0006361882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4178625e-7,0.000004316105,0.00001367061,0.0000062830286,4.041882e-7,0.000003558205,0.00047724473,0.00004054321,0.0000105378795,0.9972904,0.0007785737,0.0013735881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027493481,0.0000025824681,0.000059012822,0.000044121327,9.692035e-7,0.00001001942,0.0005647188,0.00020064828,0.000051288935,0.98345023,0.015611342,0.0000023726598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001975398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029910908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012100431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049029994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004377885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0546996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}