{"meta":{"query_hash":"726d9b604ab6","filters":{"venue":"Suffolk transnational law review"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/726d9b604ab6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Suffolk+transnational+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1195034990","doi":"","title":"Civil Procedure - Second Circuit Upholds Extraterritorial Reach over Foreign Financial Institution under the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Terrorism; Damages; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Personal jurisdiction; Constitution; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.023192761975116487,"score_gpt":0.2854697569323346,"score_spread":0.2622769949572181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1195034990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041568257,0.030783216,0.0033295536,0.03675571,0.008385152,0.0047532395,0.00021089251,0.00037899122,0.87383497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992739,0.0008888305,0.000009755001,0.0027942446,0.0031183683,0.000107208616,0.000052029067,0.00001616891,0.00027438166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975359,0.00033572374,0.000495484,0.00035677032,0.0009161889,0.00035996543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991263,0.00014206104,0.00018057151,0.00018629781,0.0002510076,0.00011375092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015665159,0.00021033897,0.0003726109,0.00003216324,0.0010894787,0.00015861003,0.00041022184,0.00021510544,0.00084977364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014481189,0.00015349619,0.00020149638,0.00039121154,0.0003441738,0.0007161643,0.000013602182,0.00026108196,0.000023111923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005382266,0.000047039997,0.00012022123,0.00066355045,0.00001405451,0.000001015606,0.00038694587,0.000003687734,0.00004439851,0.9956851,0.0025208155,0.0005077943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003264611,0.000034774384,0.0026315022,0.00039107684,0.000063356936,0.0000040680297,0.000037286103,0.0000048266666,0.000026678004,0.0720357,0.9242143,0.00022997211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001419343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020713758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95117074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001297315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000814756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14063034","doi":"","title":"Foreign Law - a Friend of the Court: An Argument for Prudent Use of International Law in Domestic, Human Rights Related Constitutional Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Supreme court; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Municipal law; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08173917450153739,"score_gpt":0.3428245931507893,"score_spread":0.2610854186492519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14063034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027464498,0.00792384,0.0019518904,0.0108004995,0.0014813027,0.0059481487,0.0022645905,0.000076163225,0.9420891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793255,0.0003813214,0.0009869576,0.00039176943,0.000035732824,0.00013015812,0.00008504234,0.000004313295,0.000052139523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978564,0.00017146952,0.00073632115,0.00022905668,0.0008182928,0.00018850001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985888,0.00038358822,0.0002293557,0.00014216796,0.0005839297,0.00007217439],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081006356,0.00013570077,0.00032603316,0.00004534647,0.00077991193,0.00001670486,0.00040301363,0.00007809057,0.00045520105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010007045,0.00009969627,0.00022989495,0.00024029761,0.0033004754,0.00039742063,0.000032940094,0.00010480117,0.00000221127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002178963,0.000371286,0.00034045457,0.000040643692,0.000079680656,0.000002060366,0.00041291807,0.000014650532,0.000015242956,0.998612,0.000041227388,0.000048051803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049745146,0.000045482877,0.0018717144,0.00068126316,0.00009806166,0.0000040692576,0.000044165055,0.000005553137,0.000062569656,0.71143097,0.28513357,0.00012514036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005976267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04428279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97046804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011012714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021995232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483085334","doi":"","title":"Neighbors Up North: Nunavut’s Incorporation In Canada As A Model For Multicultural Democracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03626084878589254,"score_gpt":0.31637967365961644,"score_spread":0.2801188248737239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483085334","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021414977,0.012277705,0.0015374335,0.93056023,0.00040201086,0.0034333456,0.0003159231,0.000073696974,0.029984668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986759,0.0037428183,0.0014579975,0.006885044,0.00012800487,0.00014297054,0.00007153191,0.000008580382,0.00080401753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865353,0.000079615114,0.0003802334,0.00019575268,0.00042052817,0.00027036527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940276,0.00016818978,0.000099024954,0.000071625225,0.00015943014,0.0000989477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029661218,0.00012842362,0.00024487678,0.000022691776,0.0005066584,0.000014936303,0.000156952,0.000038057344,0.0000924587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010932332,0.000106054205,0.00009373817,0.00021020594,0.00011168111,0.00031561972,0.000008152885,0.00008673224,0.0000065973823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006961938,0.000021984117,0.0005786861,0.00016465131,0.000015352589,6.230626e-7,0.0019485417,0.00065408525,4.915475e-7,0.99194914,0.0024138887,0.0022455917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011369511,0.00002362467,0.008498886,0.0004306969,0.00013227826,0.0000027971648,0.00060314086,0.023453029,0.0000069111493,0.033987246,0.93110055,0.0006238995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50509334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99766755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9653441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006258115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016613954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49820226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191591966","doi":"","title":"Ninth Circuit Issues Preliminary Injunction Recognizing Activist Conservation Society as Pirates","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whaling; Ninth; Law; Jurisdiction; International waters; Political science; Commission; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01850612360824004,"score_gpt":0.26024881679597744,"score_spread":0.2417426931877374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W191591966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20014752,0.024964573,0.0024462456,0.26568303,0.0013022822,0.007496988,0.00014234414,0.000895522,0.49692148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756205,0.0030376317,0.002661769,0.013428386,0.0001285212,0.00046564994,0.0004238036,0.000045001078,0.0041887444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979989,0.00012264955,0.00047211206,0.0004468864,0.00070293644,0.00025652835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992291,0.00018391728,0.00015912268,0.00019908995,0.00013964505,0.00008913736],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004536251,0.00024026605,0.0002687737,0.000018907218,0.00025525692,0.00009464026,0.00026964475,0.0000934275,0.025070013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006443268,0.00022997013,0.0002040768,0.00025821745,0.00024363231,0.0012962698,0.00005221748,0.00019022114,0.0024614981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002376806,0.00032250426,0.0036966251,0.00090916804,0.00013218963,0.0000035501748,0.00028998454,0.000055847577,0.0046180515,0.93382025,0.036590457,0.019537603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042474226,0.00024610595,0.033088185,0.00083807594,0.00012977405,0.000044281118,0.000029504085,0.0007488217,0.002884311,0.06674315,0.89417464,0.0006484275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019080846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013534822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8670771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024405215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027723043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275514020","doi":"","title":"Immigration Law - Alien Denied Entry to Another Country and Returned Involuntarily to United States, Not \"Found In\" United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Law; Alien; Statute; Immigration; Political science; Immigration law; Lawsuit; Federal law; Conviction; Legislation; Citizenship; Politics","score_opus":0.017414930757544828,"score_gpt":0.2883466331919541,"score_spread":0.2709317024344092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275514020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44303843,0.0301447,0.0037738378,0.42634743,0.0016170569,0.012050643,0.0014005835,0.000700142,0.08092717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94337285,0.003189302,0.0001726859,0.051843118,0.00014369845,0.00009851817,0.00084724254,0.00002559111,0.00030697483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976073,0.00042869349,0.00054978515,0.00036202447,0.00070312223,0.00034909355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875873,0.00031517746,0.00011143902,0.00014408022,0.00045865314,0.00021191368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015261554,0.00020189988,0.00038418063,0.00015576447,0.00038347536,0.0001792938,0.00022804514,0.00011142125,0.0001330261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013868435,0.0001857439,0.00004315405,0.0016245215,0.00016737069,0.0003917461,0.000019234687,0.00013694813,0.000022054262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045516244,0.00004745689,0.000273917,0.00064633536,0.000020515152,0.0000016465274,0.003586239,0.000133546,0.000032517168,0.99396116,0.0010418412,0.0002093226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039180627,0.00006937941,0.00064201956,0.00085826864,0.000037131,8.468122e-7,0.0002635614,0.000089791945,0.000026125286,0.006115353,0.99124277,0.00026297107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101579845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3416742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016193418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013822783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9044028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256026367","doi":"","title":"International Arbitration - ICSID Jurisdiction under NAFTA - Bayview Irrigation District V. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/1, Award 19 June 2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Treaty; Expropriation; Law; Political science; International arbitration; Redress; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.02575793599989635,"score_gpt":0.2602780719203664,"score_spread":0.23452013592047005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256026367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012608701,0.007837486,0.020833373,0.1548921,0.012443028,0.0052436637,0.0010530556,0.0014252677,0.78366333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7242316,0.012281403,0.0014923397,0.21962462,0.0037329437,0.0004749031,0.03482471,0.00016749457,0.0031699825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623317,0.000095564894,0.001258506,0.0006560376,0.0013517097,0.00040501505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973001,0.00012142213,0.00059586216,0.00032475404,0.0015633843,0.00009450227],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000784493,0.00049571623,0.00046789797,0.00043412723,0.000739107,0.00026567868,0.0004006073,0.00015453757,0.003585217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114003546,0.0004778391,0.0003425146,0.0009987534,0.00024403598,0.0026785885,0.000051072948,0.00037474238,0.00068081054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045809626,0.00030134496,0.000072550414,0.0005910409,0.00015305406,0.00013442722,0.000019658955,0.00023843971,0.000049473216,0.9697772,0.028420262,0.00019670399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010329304,0.00003055224,0.00060737267,0.00034121965,0.00020506374,0.00040978545,0.000014234157,0.006394914,0.00003380379,0.013446592,0.9769445,0.0005390434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008353672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045258616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95633066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003317681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016070831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256412339","doi":"","title":"International Law - Prohibition on Refoulement - Remedies - Maher Arar V. John Ashcroft","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Torture; State (computer science); Damages; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028906419059139977,"score_gpt":0.33385052206556276,"score_spread":0.3049441030064228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256412339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007376399,0.0009977364,0.000069885304,0.11405797,0.00072852854,0.00076373806,0.000084427054,0.00012543694,0.8824346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96010697,0.0019687416,0.0006690803,0.02632115,0.0010436728,0.00009011534,0.000528979,0.000018579181,0.009252727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970454,0.00020089604,0.0005270071,0.00038151554,0.0015372677,0.00030789096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990058,0.00009562928,0.00015101174,0.00017662792,0.00045032243,0.00012063553],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009499658,0.00021077052,0.00026234158,0.000074800395,0.0006933813,0.000118099444,0.0004457356,0.000094679155,0.005099748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033391505,0.00018113651,0.00022875839,0.000099352364,0.0002775295,0.000530882,0.000009976417,0.00020320964,0.00021796154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022795766,0.00019236222,0.0000016878884,0.00006417326,0.00004072956,0.000008524145,0.00015254057,0.0000025977342,0.000027750131,0.99620026,0.0024811593,0.0008054004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023166515,0.00006738482,0.0001526053,0.0004399054,0.000026763288,0.000001951162,0.0000032433402,0.000002338102,0.00008760742,0.27279788,0.7260205,0.00016814163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014720412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013864739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030321072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010958244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99580973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256446364","doi":"","title":"International Law and Laws of War and International Criminal Law - Prosecution of Child Soldiers - United States V. Omar Ahmed Khadr","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law of war; International law; Commission; Criminal law; Terrorism; Spanish Civil War","score_opus":0.017152692933661475,"score_gpt":0.2991654915437898,"score_spread":0.28201279861012835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256446364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25100502,0.003894104,0.00020920536,0.06718698,0.0028110351,0.0022627872,0.0018450175,0.00015116636,0.6706347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925145,0.0028368365,0.0007259775,0.0025688796,0.00018640004,0.000033691973,0.00076730776,0.0000158171,0.00035059394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979051,0.00012231166,0.0006181412,0.00030907276,0.00084252696,0.00020287816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984825,0.00018704645,0.00027742007,0.0001255804,0.0008041586,0.00012324564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008506025,0.00018848988,0.00032391527,0.00012559949,0.000381734,0.00004825874,0.000385767,0.00012035366,0.0010331739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005047925,0.00017156395,0.00012696158,0.00010529327,0.0015106451,0.00054210395,0.000040476236,0.00024738035,0.0000026521082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039351242,0.00013113391,0.00004297552,0.00033305443,0.000114116294,0.0000018729713,0.0008341876,0.0000026310317,0.00014636097,0.99808246,0.00008124853,0.00019059941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074593007,0.00006431024,0.00055870716,0.00049339386,0.00013123832,0.00001719908,0.00008467102,0.00010202816,0.0005107149,0.18433292,0.81270754,0.00025136565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015632465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008512533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81374955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044994995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071076574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603063009","doi":"","title":"One Turkey, Seven Drumsticks: A Look at Genetically Modified Food Labeling Laws in the United States and the European Union","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Genetically modified food; Genetically modified organism; Food and drug administration; Political science; Biotechnology; Business; Law; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; International trade; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.036102176559257584,"score_gpt":0.24376327134432182,"score_spread":0.20766109478506423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603063009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6466949,0.014041679,0.0003439883,0.33226404,0.00003510546,0.0020090933,0.0002472605,0.000055147342,0.0043088063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98268074,0.014297365,0.00013509406,0.002568754,0.000051097148,0.0000496829,0.00015097155,0.000003264714,0.000063034924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962509,0.002189164,0.00037263514,0.00030788744,0.0005757054,0.0003036716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981123,0.0014921578,0.000051339954,0.000115304996,0.00014436724,0.00008453646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032342398,0.00015455912,0.00022114906,0.000014287932,0.00024152955,0.000064056105,0.00050583447,0.000047121535,0.00022563679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010904284,0.00004188772,0.00007792672,0.00040896822,0.0004085693,0.000051635918,0.00009097018,0.00014526655,0.000026812118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005065545,0.00014521038,0.00008244718,0.00018678611,0.00004451868,0.000004756506,0.00017033746,0.000043717744,0.014060644,0.94029707,0.00008941342,0.044824433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010049625,0.001973837,0.19137517,0.003804924,0.00055511354,0.00013269478,0.00029839444,0.0011767227,0.0030594096,0.20751366,0.57792,0.002140433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015245115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017900654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73278344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026889584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012451962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24705647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728114247","doi":"","title":"Trademark Law - Extraterritorial Application of the Lanham Act Saves an American Brand from a Canadian Retail Pirate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lanham Act; Trademark; Law; State (computer science); Business; Political science","score_opus":0.039705343951610086,"score_gpt":0.3163183704445588,"score_spread":0.2766130264929487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728114247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0593716,0.008346313,0.00022732776,0.20739795,0.0029837282,0.005629172,0.0015538057,0.00015823892,0.71433187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965897,0.00066468253,0.00012586155,0.001812486,0.00051916024,0.000054111468,0.00006607531,0.000016449589,0.00015143295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980075,0.00048009327,0.00036453753,0.00029688238,0.00057874573,0.00027227763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986935,0.00014046441,0.00025279442,0.00053102284,0.00018886638,0.00019332278],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008741993,0.00014927246,0.0003294081,0.000018168916,0.0014656811,0.00014835317,0.001037149,0.00008901841,0.0005455986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012666456,0.000108316286,0.00016489139,0.00013159515,0.0013740553,0.00046517976,0.0000127038065,0.00017101156,0.00001560479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014650271,0.000030952382,0.00021044984,0.0000666994,0.000028617316,5.496299e-7,0.00081460143,8.741561e-7,0.0002158573,0.99333835,0.00016487688,0.005113499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018620564,0.000035991336,0.0026527243,0.00016792299,0.00007609845,5.562311e-7,0.000031370604,0.000024138695,0.00028845124,0.009011517,0.9873437,0.00018130362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6360074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9437447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98717886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000129941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057706574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W99050741","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights - Corporate Liability Claims Not Actionable under the Alien Tort Statute - Kiobel V. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alien Tort Statute; Law; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Political science; Tort; Class action; Statute; Liability; Original jurisdiction; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0635669301774908,"score_gpt":0.264106770321031,"score_spread":0.20053984014354023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W99050741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1521004,0.0009121197,0.000712977,0.018295243,0.0025901967,0.002395453,0.00024518915,0.00052005186,0.8222284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884,0.000068421155,0.00011860526,0.0048499787,0.00082211423,0.00013806879,0.0009476376,0.000038244925,0.0046169697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974234,0.000058286012,0.00073173904,0.0005520479,0.00087234617,0.00036215963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984054,0.00006080258,0.00050639344,0.00044999024,0.00053591834,0.000041527448],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091009174,0.00035669914,0.00040824452,0.00009191181,0.0011497819,0.00025615963,0.0007219489,0.000095725096,0.012708877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000031796533,0.00024652833,0.00029484803,0.00020900823,0.00030492843,0.001221218,0.000066661996,0.0003000779,0.00039280235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000397045,0.00023218525,0.00047340084,0.00036935983,0.000100007055,0.000008910553,0.000013164241,0.000018297565,0.000017965822,0.99454266,0.004123504,0.000060827904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041275483,0.000012552874,0.011561918,0.000101894715,0.00014259512,0.0000034559735,0.000004403052,0.000099856545,0.00003067141,0.2598363,0.727505,0.00028856331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086279825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003605563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83629954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010790191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054234046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}