{"meta":{"query_hash":"726d9b604ab6","filters":{"venue":"Suffolk transnational law review"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/726d9b604ab6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Suffolk+transnational+law+review"},"results":[{"id":"W1195034990","doi":"","title":"Civil Procedure - Second Circuit Upholds Extraterritorial Reach over Foreign Financial Institution under the Anti-Terrorism Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Terrorism; Damages; Political science; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Personal jurisdiction; Constitution; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.023192761975116487,"score_gpt":0.2854697569323346,"score_spread":0.2622769949572181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1195034990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015508502,0.0013414816,0.0021783868,0.024411587,0.0012736546,0.0006772368,0.002854201,0.0004619537,0.951293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23307152,0.0014169279,0.0021351415,0.11364783,0.0013181525,0.00097513216,0.0018931607,0.0001558724,0.64538634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865485,0.0011316276,0.0003851992,0.001280977,0.0056723417,0.0049813767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341077,0.0021527912,0.00028221795,0.000645435,0.0028810645,0.0006277895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043052686,0.0013202991,0.0008055691,0.0018490797,0.009468466,0.009157223,0.0028809402,0.020807322,0.03498718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012285681,0.0012820093,0.0017343328,0.0015455282,0.0037082762,0.002331453,0.0027376048,0.01094465,0.012823549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019858488,0.0002366414,0.0031432696,0.00012063394,0.00004908758,0.0021527004,0.0014363625,0.00068943814,0.0026316317,0.31897828,0.64901495,0.021348441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033814498,0.00023527235,0.011350294,0.00044966795,0.00009173392,0.00090925,0.0011644267,0.0013982278,0.0031778857,0.01588771,0.9647727,0.00022466744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38750172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5517626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38750172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017248096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034777194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77049243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W14063034","doi":"","title":"Foreign Law - a Friend of the Court: An Argument for Prudent Use of International Law in Domestic, Human Rights Related Constitutional Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Supreme court; International human rights law; Political science; Fundamental rights; Municipal law; International law; Sociology","score_opus":0.08173917450153739,"score_gpt":0.3428245931507893,"score_spread":0.2610854186492519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W14063034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04747784,0.006493079,0.013587344,0.25165647,0.001437671,0.000092195005,0.000078237266,0.00008004153,0.6790972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269427,0.0011767916,0.0026930815,0.048875496,0.0011450639,0.00010755573,0.000020159228,0.00003230209,0.019006766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903258,0.0051968144,0.00027060224,0.0011559463,0.0015209384,0.0015299026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821982,0.014239499,0.00084274367,0.000866759,0.001302709,0.0005500874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013543108,0.00032869235,0.0005582271,0.0022702764,0.010421987,0.011237168,0.002223483,0.022387058,0.0047186064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025388565,0.0004935939,0.0008156527,0.0015016362,0.03620363,0.009974883,0.003972206,0.011759775,0.00059317675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044528165,0.0000049957525,0.00010005905,0.000006428287,0.0000019436634,0.0000842617,0.00094478443,0.00005439374,0.000023847886,0.9950287,0.0030145075,0.0007318271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039421197,0.000028293658,0.00056063675,0.00031836925,0.000035681434,0.00018008461,0.0034110008,0.0013390929,0.0004183935,0.9010473,0.09259103,0.00003067413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017146781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017452825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022387058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009183209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006584726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07162368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483085334","doi":"","title":"Neighbors Up North: Nunavut’s Incorporation In Canada As A Model For Multicultural Democracy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Democracy; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03626084878589254,"score_gpt":0.31637967365961644,"score_spread":0.2801188248737239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483085334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44975987,0.0064667994,0.0010935721,0.05313445,0.00052821665,0.00013883482,0.00027503612,0.000028862722,0.48857445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249816,0.0017584126,0.00059785537,0.005649291,0.000029852545,0.000050396568,0.00006150796,0.000024140238,0.06684692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520206,0.00092164753,0.00008142037,0.00036920948,0.0010763094,0.0023493618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959843,0.0007150148,0.00013635472,0.0001569312,0.0016185122,0.0013889732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004111218,0.00029518947,0.00046322047,0.0014556783,0.036277194,0.01279315,0.0024674044,0.0042864433,0.0061972523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066161766,0.00031317337,0.00050050684,0.0026829792,0.008026306,0.002921581,0.0050718756,0.0043171244,0.00029030416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020747898,0.000121745165,0.021830631,0.00015590343,0.00006002684,0.0012006945,0.0719486,0.0017752128,0.00042567463,0.7835357,0.06755928,0.05117901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001456832,0.00010169133,0.048707444,0.0008657714,0.0002770837,0.00032584916,0.2880056,0.0029212416,0.0015311869,0.047256306,0.60958713,0.00027504828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99461925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10349843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10349843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20081371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75093716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W191591966","doi":"","title":"Ninth Circuit Issues Preliminary Injunction Recognizing Activist Conservation Society as Pirates","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whaling; Ninth; Law; Jurisdiction; International waters; Political science; Commission; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International law; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01850612360824004,"score_gpt":0.26024881679597744,"score_spread":0.2417426931877374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W191591966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025663659,0.003976128,0.0022714096,0.23349947,0.008551249,0.00085944094,0.005799876,0.0010912741,0.71828747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14268689,0.0025544798,0.0019945372,0.4445204,0.0036780792,0.0023034376,0.002219539,0.00020992378,0.39983273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095005,0.0007611834,0.000541766,0.0014217319,0.0031433285,0.003181992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99154526,0.0050921934,0.0003184014,0.00030465,0.002127249,0.0006121746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004902876,0.0018774075,0.0012719223,0.0017201736,0.014590556,0.012361881,0.0041188058,0.053755447,0.021804921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017830232,0.0024717883,0.0023094015,0.0015858661,0.0032209146,0.003950357,0.0034274322,0.021525806,0.008780615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020037756,0.00025197127,0.003972608,0.00013355435,0.000053838186,0.0024164226,0.001342297,0.0003639792,0.001386302,0.18300219,0.7964802,0.010396284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045336102,0.00034232126,0.012090475,0.00065523846,0.0002911036,0.00074664876,0.0015616809,0.0022964757,0.0016455429,0.020597797,0.9590376,0.00028171312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1503327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2166013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1503327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011251158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021722494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29891533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275514020","doi":"","title":"Immigration Law - Alien Denied Entry to Another Country and Returned Involuntarily to United States, Not \"Found In\" United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Law; Alien; Statute; Immigration; Political science; Immigration law; Lawsuit; Federal law; Conviction; Legislation; Citizenship; Politics","score_opus":0.017414930757544828,"score_gpt":0.2883466331919541,"score_spread":0.2709317024344092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275514020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03194563,0.0011775905,0.0006444828,0.025730953,0.001702117,0.00023070253,0.0034486023,0.00021236861,0.9349075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19058387,0.001330342,0.00092744234,0.08512958,0.00054739375,0.00048822045,0.0033069244,0.00010499666,0.7175813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967362,0.00024762537,0.00017837434,0.00057870755,0.0010075168,0.0012516312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981768,0.00043367542,0.00012170251,0.0001831451,0.00082696724,0.00025766488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016013522,0.00081049657,0.0006463139,0.0012297584,0.012652405,0.0066881357,0.0022427528,0.011324138,0.033853076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00451145,0.0007989458,0.0011808532,0.0011215584,0.0023680325,0.0029726035,0.004123213,0.007350341,0.01340023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098007615,0.00026879733,0.008712631,0.000116320116,0.000036542526,0.0027061119,0.004144303,0.00020014535,0.0015422967,0.19746394,0.7688585,0.015852498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010438513,0.00015313523,0.01936757,0.00047524346,0.000099293524,0.0009280475,0.0057258317,0.00036770175,0.0013240608,0.005252913,0.966103,0.000098881894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20499334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48951185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20499334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056904377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01215969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40760028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256026367","doi":"","title":"International Arbitration - ICSID Jurisdiction under NAFTA - Bayview Irrigation District V. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/05/1, Award 19 June 2007","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Tribunal; Treaty; Expropriation; Law; Political science; International arbitration; Redress; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.02575793599989635,"score_gpt":0.2602780719203664,"score_spread":0.23452013592047005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256026367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00825743,0.005421533,0.00096760865,0.06226898,0.0018365154,0.0004640758,0.0023946841,0.00018376253,0.9182054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13389523,0.004754944,0.0025602705,0.10613271,0.0015414535,0.0012547217,0.0035670905,0.00018089628,0.7461127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993982,0.0008746106,0.00032817718,0.0007970106,0.002084775,0.0019333237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977938,0.00080348074,0.0001982025,0.00016213159,0.0008088247,0.00023360089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00629167,0.0010070269,0.0006248492,0.0017948886,0.0101912515,0.010515458,0.0021538117,0.017580852,0.03928476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010505852,0.0009999083,0.0009387978,0.0018310281,0.0024892017,0.0038916015,0.0036735476,0.011221051,0.007928387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010205371,0.00009275999,0.0022045807,0.000088752255,0.00001937728,0.0005545752,0.0010842632,0.0001394176,0.0005280872,0.24282548,0.74395573,0.008404971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068656846,0.000026996451,0.0029478874,0.00019905735,0.000032805572,0.00011800587,0.0005622665,0.00026434922,0.00047543828,0.006279707,0.9889916,0.000033235032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16190009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26388445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16190009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010072099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020187233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3219155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256412339","doi":"","title":"International Law - Prohibition on Refoulement - Remedies - Maher Arar V. John Ashcroft","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Torture; State (computer science); Damages; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Political science; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028906419059139977,"score_gpt":0.33385052206556276,"score_spread":0.3049441030064228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256412339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019029003,0.0039546727,0.0016552979,0.036044084,0.0009837516,0.00017836482,0.00029611646,0.00020969384,0.93764895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30169594,0.003501565,0.004371352,0.16780668,0.0018006987,0.0005271562,0.00033502877,0.00013865999,0.51982284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351645,0.0007478945,0.00026243253,0.0011581938,0.00271373,0.001601261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974496,0.0013073324,0.00024056109,0.00033137077,0.00047455853,0.00019658642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035551332,0.00090863986,0.00042265916,0.001370595,0.007628293,0.008700302,0.0020536636,0.02145063,0.008678451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065394384,0.00092910166,0.0008745881,0.0008261931,0.0064007905,0.003035687,0.0035227586,0.017835543,0.0027698234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047036043,0.0001336716,0.0015471042,0.000099495475,0.000020327305,0.0013739768,0.0024700467,0.00024141862,0.0018614564,0.8275579,0.14456493,0.02008267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000689017,0.00013903218,0.0037556414,0.00044938404,0.00007242437,0.00089435955,0.0007319982,0.00060038216,0.0028891063,0.019271318,0.9710234,0.000103944156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10653229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18596074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10653229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052280407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009759846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21182436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W256446364","doi":"","title":"International Law and Laws of War and International Criminal Law - Prosecution of Child Soldiers - United States V. Omar Ahmed Khadr","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law of war; International law; Commission; Criminal law; Terrorism; Spanish Civil War","score_opus":0.017152692933661475,"score_gpt":0.2991654915437898,"score_spread":0.28201279861012835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W256446364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015034862,0.027588652,0.00075043936,0.1558202,0.0071322033,0.00067944446,0.0047385306,0.00039913578,0.7878565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12700237,0.019174777,0.002347068,0.25351936,0.0028317794,0.0011487984,0.0027975019,0.00026783493,0.59091055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710375,0.00039519471,0.0003024296,0.00030944418,0.0008895511,0.0009995799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975412,0.00073729246,0.00031727162,0.00012253289,0.0008856019,0.00039620133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020758752,0.0011757738,0.00046123113,0.0018928023,0.010270875,0.006625839,0.0019002904,0.016174598,0.017032403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052601686,0.0010568615,0.0007708524,0.0018315633,0.002218719,0.0026050878,0.0020892404,0.010671433,0.0071779015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046330617,0.00013171973,0.003516139,0.0001199618,0.000015578647,0.00080534274,0.0022174981,0.0001439153,0.0006321606,0.06504567,0.9128503,0.014475406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046432524,0.00005657133,0.016474528,0.0006596287,0.0000374674,0.00024698835,0.0024663894,0.00015803982,0.0005881254,0.0026031588,0.97657996,0.000082582614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33131027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5564837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33131027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008031277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01845868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65876365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2603063009","doi":"","title":"One Turkey, Seven Drumsticks: A Look at Genetically Modified Food Labeling Laws in the United States and the European Union","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Genetically modified food; Genetically modified organism; Food and drug administration; Political science; Biotechnology; Business; Law; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; International trade; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.036102176559257584,"score_gpt":0.24376327134432182,"score_spread":0.20766109478506423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2603063009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02866343,0.05514665,0.0024411755,0.42317015,0.009504964,0.000065529064,0.00020581434,0.00013975722,0.48066258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2712449,0.028058415,0.0035125688,0.55918694,0.0035016222,0.00012059007,0.00022408465,0.00020026778,0.13395067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300295,0.0022178686,0.0003462395,0.000900149,0.0022233871,0.0013093238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99244034,0.0047327504,0.0006422208,0.00032487587,0.0013465886,0.00051329937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009497966,0.00050090323,0.00047222676,0.0022433505,0.012178347,0.01717295,0.0021063946,0.0279217,0.008063242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119027,0.0006057581,0.0012100294,0.002721978,0.012410751,0.012756052,0.0037663493,0.013051731,0.0010361065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042091022,0.00011961538,0.0011687977,0.00012862262,0.000009650083,0.00064030325,0.0076828734,0.00026780143,0.0004236271,0.8181166,0.13853653,0.032863505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010079118,0.00006516488,0.0032074687,0.0010070701,0.0000131203215,0.00017925497,0.010371435,0.00020133278,0.00027362435,0.04118604,0.94340837,0.00007712756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04959047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058600046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04959047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011940513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087435655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098603666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2728114247","doi":"","title":"Trademark Law - Extraterritorial Application of the Lanham Act Saves an American Brand from a Canadian Retail Pirate","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lanham Act; Trademark; Law; State (computer science); Business; Political science","score_opus":0.039705343951610086,"score_gpt":0.3163183704445588,"score_spread":0.2766130264929487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2728114247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016060105,0.0017168231,0.0008076244,0.020774543,0.00052018237,0.00018120334,0.0011787427,0.0002511018,0.9585096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16998182,0.0019727834,0.0017380754,0.057434484,0.00039667622,0.00020774547,0.0008524585,0.00011752125,0.76729846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478793,0.0002717497,0.00013171886,0.0004290024,0.002735463,0.0016440521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682176,0.00062803645,0.000120146324,0.00017003142,0.001932896,0.000327192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014300545,0.0006691776,0.00034334205,0.0010889196,0.013212734,0.005903724,0.0018639766,0.011539049,0.039518412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004121889,0.00072437554,0.0008885493,0.0009225066,0.0032359047,0.0014925502,0.0016590569,0.0051536127,0.009202259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085898915,0.00015214733,0.0057871863,0.00012009038,0.000030486222,0.0014259719,0.002727404,0.00029858513,0.0024578178,0.18907934,0.7700356,0.02779939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032908898,0.000069941285,0.010180115,0.00017363692,0.00006351056,0.0003558815,0.0015827833,0.00051466987,0.0013310786,0.0025703767,0.9830277,0.0000974025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8796193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95976466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1203807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018972479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042881142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24217927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W99050741","doi":"","title":"International Human Rights - Corporate Liability Claims Not Actionable under the Alien Tort Statute - Kiobel V. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Suffolk transnational law review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alien Tort Statute; Law; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Political science; Tort; Class action; Statute; Liability; Original jurisdiction; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0635669301774908,"score_gpt":0.264106770321031,"score_spread":0.20053984014354023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W99050741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04489499,0.0015526868,0.0010142344,0.01673937,0.00041824742,0.00017500966,0.0005767014,0.000076120814,0.9345527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6211466,0.0015503352,0.0010192642,0.03648195,0.0005111071,0.0003733998,0.00063889695,0.00005478374,0.33822358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946761,0.00074012944,0.00032573883,0.0006773766,0.0017400668,0.0018405237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972843,0.0014670265,0.00030388002,0.0002579363,0.00045231165,0.00023451123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003096579,0.00062039396,0.0004073919,0.0010097317,0.0056489646,0.006282476,0.0012174874,0.014995282,0.0104171485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00641344,0.00074851466,0.00062857755,0.00096844597,0.004398584,0.0022887143,0.0026826144,0.0062710997,0.0029587792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015609608,0.00018459599,0.0073775896,0.0001832919,0.000055449345,0.00500679,0.0060866885,0.0007917013,0.0039131725,0.8410801,0.11972126,0.015443193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002162787,0.0001830087,0.013477954,0.0006447358,0.00014849924,0.0023427573,0.0030129342,0.0015808137,0.0047796075,0.03957575,0.93386006,0.00017759985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0919886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16872142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0919886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056453473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008163323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18290633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}