{"meta":{"query_hash":"3062939036f9","filters":{"venue":"Syntax"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3062939036f9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Syntax"},"results":[{"id":"W1580250905","doi":"10.1111/synt.12030","title":"Superiority in English and German: Cross‐Language Grammatical Differences?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"German; Linguistics; Grammar; Phrase; Computer science; Rule-based machine translation; English grammar; Noun phrase; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Noun; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042733642252694964,"score_gpt":0.33091889151470083,"score_spread":0.28818524926200584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580250905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859039,0.0004913603,0.00064235314,0.0003319074,0.0000336945,0.000013593908,0.00017920403,0.000021000551,0.012382997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989623,0.00008205828,0.00022476369,0.00019972849,0.000007837627,0.000004814749,0.00010778655,0.0000149894695,0.0003955886],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989544,0.00027175376,0.00011490657,0.00027395046,0.00026784718,0.00011716307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953218,0.0028811244,0.00059119763,0.0005082861,0.0004892454,0.00020835407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023187625,0.00032172014,0.00034456878,0.0006556067,0.0002773913,0.001294545,0.00032284684,0.000514542,0.007402369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006971757,0.0003044635,0.00023504392,0.00047844637,0.0012491632,0.0017171631,0.001189948,0.0006078763,0.00039503875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043582916,0.00083534716,0.2861122,0.0016551772,0.00115676,0.0027779208,0.055470042,0.0010039664,0.47478986,0.06197931,0.0049915616,0.104869656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020121699,0.0003138617,0.9555652,0.000100668614,0.00028976845,0.00093264057,0.0064658374,0.0008555947,0.014327496,0.012001593,0.008844614,0.00010142867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023720406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003176357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007402369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003370222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015721185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024763346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1948191145","doi":"10.1111/synt.12115","title":"Causation without a<scp>cause</scp>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Causative; Transitive relation; Linguistics; Verb; Causation; Simple past; Alternation (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Noun; Simple (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Event structure; Ellipsis (linguistics); Negation; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Astrophysics; Combinatorics; Physics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05844353163430391,"score_gpt":0.26470272961263985,"score_spread":0.20625919797833595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1948191145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15115437,0.0011327924,0.23472229,0.0043234974,0.0006271695,0.00019292839,0.0008914412,0.0016107776,0.6053447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795568,0.00025528454,0.009334315,0.0004080503,0.00014123639,0.00003885912,0.00036356263,0.00048878655,0.009413169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978275,0.00068487274,0.00013077285,0.00045889438,0.00065525196,0.00024267272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628675,0.0011929636,0.000361475,0.00093377905,0.0011401798,0.00008481168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020345624,0.00060591946,0.0005064645,0.0016388382,0.0022501252,0.0038166472,0.0009829459,0.0010723451,0.011441545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028853335,0.00050114206,0.0009183742,0.0014065083,0.006707331,0.0048930338,0.002888879,0.002120637,0.0016205751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003745976,0.000017327933,0.0030360033,0.00011680466,0.000028545102,0.00040532157,0.0035550017,0.00030193964,0.0021733986,0.9753237,0.0029704513,0.012034069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047660873,0.00008218537,0.013588463,0.00020287682,0.00013846798,0.0025498962,0.006205988,0.0042962604,0.007276011,0.67890847,0.28660762,0.00009612366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006843379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067888866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011441545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027141736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025453037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038275838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986634806","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9612.2004.00005.x","title":"A Computational Algebraic Approach to English Grammar","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Simple (philosophy); Iterated function; Context (archaeology); Type (biology); Algebraic number; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Grammar; String (physics); Parsing; Mathematics; Element (criminal law); Rule-based machine translation; Algebra over a field; Pure mathematics; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.008785415566468675,"score_gpt":0.23879661650283318,"score_spread":0.2300112009363645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986634806","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052856743,0.0016997526,0.7820258,0.009383512,0.00026858086,0.0000853862,0.0006043346,0.00044531483,0.1526306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7176134,0.002101039,0.25267404,0.0008696559,0.00047453083,0.00023123829,0.0006207989,0.00017166874,0.025243618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932826,0.0003082524,0.00004590055,0.00009353208,0.00017651582,0.000047584632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988017,0.000768541,0.00007709298,0.00013133806,0.00017036832,0.0000510352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009324356,0.00031145682,0.00038549522,0.00126457,0.0012178766,0.003254944,0.0012291776,0.0004314571,0.008777852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034011137,0.00029915964,0.0009976679,0.0010493351,0.0042092954,0.005428552,0.0019974473,0.0014345298,0.00064976513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035458672,0.000003511659,0.00005127361,0.000018436842,0.00000290513,0.000026739624,0.00011845608,0.001712625,0.000059569364,0.9953414,0.00040253118,0.002259065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007702233,0.000004309516,0.00005810451,0.00001502271,0.0000052489063,0.000038920003,0.00008104225,0.011961722,0.00011584017,0.97845924,0.009247482,0.000005360989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030641742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004539369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008777852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002462358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010399459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029364884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001364423","doi":"10.1111/j.1368-0005.2004.00066.x","title":"Symmetry in Structure Building","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Specifier; Complement (music); Selection (genetic algorithm); Locality; Head (geology); Computer science; Repertoire; Symmetry (geometry); Composition (language); Mathematics; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Geometry","score_opus":0.00782222753060681,"score_gpt":0.2343997856214841,"score_spread":0.22657755809087732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001364423","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08446816,0.001097481,0.7144267,0.003616521,0.00028533218,0.00030771428,0.00057970104,0.0020703524,0.19314805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78957856,0.0004929983,0.18693893,0.0005581892,0.0001280669,0.00026428667,0.0009044035,0.0005501537,0.020584302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973937,0.0010860948,0.00017040112,0.00059552205,0.0004753713,0.00027888874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736434,0.00082351005,0.00022930789,0.0012110252,0.00023747438,0.00013440265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021190776,0.00042714048,0.00069085154,0.0015102144,0.002412742,0.0034844177,0.0016468798,0.0010964647,0.015796449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058571175,0.00052240206,0.0015431738,0.001183358,0.007229385,0.0071505234,0.0051860805,0.0019474993,0.002677292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013652679,0.000008129336,0.00020034741,0.00003757379,0.00000824629,0.000069362985,0.0003311494,0.0013135044,0.00044167318,0.983733,0.0011567717,0.012686709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007925303,0.000008901603,0.00009186462,0.000015362926,0.00000626226,0.00005749799,0.00008406761,0.0036713306,0.00071959186,0.98523384,0.010097065,0.000006291316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020891053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021871189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015796449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021005145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016311489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052844405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016592353","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00074.x","title":"A Modular account of null objects in French","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Syntax; Computer science; Focus (optics); Null (SQL); Typology; Perspective (graphical); Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02058785156923382,"score_gpt":0.24614063974919473,"score_spread":0.2255527881799609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016592353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32571033,0.0022391235,0.26195243,0.009143863,0.00023057085,0.000081007405,0.00048067397,0.0013216517,0.3988403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98183674,0.00032920335,0.008426513,0.0002445837,0.00007699985,0.000035109064,0.0001342608,0.00017813996,0.008738538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800426,0.00085329264,0.0000876295,0.00033857723,0.00038062016,0.0003356214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974693,0.0011577324,0.00020929665,0.0005109112,0.0005421653,0.000110545785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033915157,0.00091624254,0.0007563121,0.0028513938,0.0041839047,0.007874222,0.0014918126,0.0023167161,0.0067616957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038628883,0.0006893635,0.001421581,0.0015463731,0.011825284,0.011284159,0.0042285086,0.0015104322,0.0007184216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019024534,0.0000035579724,0.00060125225,0.000022539167,0.0000069063335,0.0003583304,0.002657041,0.00030137086,0.0003715426,0.99246055,0.00046703484,0.0027308948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032442967,0.00002387732,0.00181002,0.00007450041,0.000054882,0.00064408145,0.0023273712,0.0069965874,0.0010394438,0.9511599,0.035794787,0.000042140447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023435976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016084738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023435976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00653632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023102697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047424555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048820599","doi":"10.1111/1467-9612.00059","title":"The Fine Structure of Cyclic Agree","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Complement (music); Feature (linguistics); Displacement (psychology); Ergative case; Argument (complex analysis); Phrase; Agreement; Head (geology); Space (punctuation); Distinctive feature; Mathematics; Locality; Pure mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics; Psychology; Geology; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01710416292941274,"score_gpt":0.2231515066143682,"score_spread":0.20604734368495545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048820599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50374204,0.00035979858,0.23748465,0.0021689262,0.00011562713,0.000092118666,0.000340823,0.00093090074,0.25476512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882201,0.00004338866,0.007397149,0.00012194161,0.00002201046,0.000028897786,0.00008556441,0.00014998259,0.0039309626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845994,0.00048880366,0.0000939256,0.00035372298,0.0003608348,0.00024270383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582136,0.0017848097,0.00027643476,0.0014543567,0.0005380292,0.00012497712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002008556,0.00018715586,0.0003799097,0.0010520868,0.0024045464,0.0021541847,0.001014933,0.0008702982,0.010804333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063760406,0.00050611707,0.0005196527,0.0009362717,0.0057813646,0.0071722833,0.0041574873,0.0015610289,0.0008528515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026016827,0.000007801647,0.00084461336,0.000018494917,0.000004657044,0.00011454186,0.001449477,0.00027055969,0.0012686865,0.98724514,0.00038976685,0.008360357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017943665,0.00002713744,0.0020279938,0.000027747597,0.000016983699,0.00029546645,0.0010265697,0.004742233,0.0031575551,0.967496,0.021141374,0.000023129593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025696065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026388178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010804333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013656508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011032721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036144078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067042734","doi":"10.1111/synt.12015","title":"The Syntax of Null Subjects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Null (SQL); Subject (documents); Syntax; Linguistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01717351247642742,"score_gpt":0.22111044859919662,"score_spread":0.2039369361227692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067042734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68056154,0.00062714017,0.12470279,0.0031430793,0.00010694671,0.000060591083,0.00054895296,0.00046223565,0.18978673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929824,0.00007896618,0.004830922,0.00010445191,0.000020928646,0.000028477294,0.000086243985,0.000105096595,0.0017623949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996033,0.0023825879,0.0002875527,0.00047753323,0.00061427825,0.00020503662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937495,0.0035423392,0.00040650938,0.0014363169,0.0007157015,0.00014960257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004294084,0.00040503326,0.00052821904,0.0014011781,0.0020413937,0.0047089714,0.00090009585,0.0008679153,0.0038773757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006057605,0.00045615845,0.00040608348,0.0012998978,0.012531772,0.0060680504,0.003987281,0.0016542572,0.00037981826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025171554,0.0000064934575,0.0012388072,0.000028341654,0.0000065912122,0.00017705075,0.007533489,0.00014185674,0.0011267782,0.98459804,0.00034964012,0.0047678202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003398036,0.00004882986,0.0035368307,0.000074371776,0.000029131432,0.0011449844,0.006599278,0.0027995182,0.0029193815,0.94846684,0.034301143,0.00004561638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012568155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075114425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047089714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013976935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012997227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022709548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081769872","doi":"10.1111/synt.12007","title":"Not Moving Clauses: Connectivity in Clausal Arguments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Semantics (computer science); Movement (music); Variable (mathematics); Linguistics; Computer science; Aside; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematics; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.028750865545144864,"score_gpt":0.2452422876100701,"score_spread":0.21649142206492525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081769872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6721749,0.0007116283,0.19866611,0.0039319266,0.00007148401,0.00008190182,0.00035933917,0.00067801285,0.12332473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911363,0.000085556574,0.0071082874,0.00011655773,0.000024177258,0.0000150202495,0.00010445049,0.00010799233,0.0013015572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978108,0.0011777865,0.00010336735,0.0003215564,0.00045064127,0.00013587589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289083,0.005062209,0.0005501519,0.0010168335,0.00035463955,0.0001253361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021600297,0.000320987,0.000380255,0.0015799708,0.0013368968,0.0033286028,0.001215847,0.0015016561,0.00833313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008930367,0.0005009799,0.00039840254,0.0017631945,0.005460805,0.007794172,0.0031116682,0.0017833335,0.00040045244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039467614,0.000009818833,0.00088604394,0.000038430884,0.0000102875665,0.00019786383,0.0033832649,0.00051235023,0.002109158,0.9838299,0.00039988392,0.008583408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048629037,0.000042847663,0.0028221265,0.0000664897,0.000051538555,0.00082627434,0.0031825348,0.01169874,0.0049062115,0.9521396,0.024175525,0.00003946615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012480654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00113429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00833313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012660415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000554375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027877033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086747158","doi":"10.1111/1467-9612.00057","title":"Anaphoric R–Expressions as Bound Variables","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Upper and lower bounds; Linguistics; Mathematics; Crossover; Combinatorics; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.00929937327015266,"score_gpt":0.2624024794438426,"score_spread":0.2531031061736899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086747158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6925365,0.0011646176,0.17684509,0.0032012847,0.00013466906,0.00009791656,0.0005856582,0.0015891239,0.1238451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826135,0.00024152249,0.012880205,0.00013834555,0.000028224764,0.000026111456,0.00014310362,0.00017819133,0.0037508241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888426,0.00043734568,0.00008756352,0.0002626208,0.00018256751,0.00014565689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825245,0.0005864928,0.0004687622,0.00045793215,0.00019188452,0.000042477175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012173506,0.0003479236,0.00042488115,0.001076005,0.002012696,0.004222706,0.0007639149,0.00095929025,0.004130338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027311423,0.0007333705,0.00042439034,0.0016188987,0.004473382,0.006661247,0.0033597082,0.0018306874,0.00048669335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014744578,0.00001879127,0.003575045,0.00018532068,0.000028291397,0.0007707863,0.010078975,0.00058353046,0.016853176,0.9464182,0.0015264532,0.01981392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017721734,0.0001078537,0.018115869,0.00022701811,0.00036316627,0.003669251,0.016643623,0.014665817,0.045288503,0.6849,0.21559386,0.00024773207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054451595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049369778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054451595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021027285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010832946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0152564645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126926728","doi":"10.1111/synt.12014","title":"Multiple Focus Strategies in<i>Pro</i>‐Drop Languages: Evidence from Ellipsis in Spanish","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Focus (optics); Word order; Linguistics; Syntax; Subject (documents); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.03324564924942823,"score_gpt":0.2582864371449284,"score_spread":0.22504078789550014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126926728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938041,0.00009152818,0.00081065437,0.00015667433,0.000004441191,0.000012381891,0.00007209936,0.00002270465,0.0050254883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987937,0.00006237249,0.000518409,0.00005165046,0.000005089338,0.000009380447,0.00010145638,0.000031975458,0.00042590385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898237,0.00037008428,0.00007959933,0.00017774761,0.00025953568,0.00013074417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98608786,0.008295416,0.001852705,0.0015026651,0.0019412051,0.00032016038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030648021,0.00035973216,0.00054240954,0.00084573566,0.0007640928,0.0018533865,0.00070295983,0.00089154206,0.002875574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009098544,0.0002990681,0.00022780013,0.0011973999,0.0020013,0.0009185677,0.0013842323,0.0006797214,0.00048052508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026987211,0.0012243935,0.36633718,0.0015033076,0.00024815946,0.0078042303,0.17788763,0.0017233149,0.31780946,0.030514576,0.0031435012,0.0891055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063115073,0.0010121634,0.8178829,0.00020833783,0.00014803067,0.0056424304,0.08130372,0.005145177,0.041423835,0.020572104,0.02580078,0.00022933866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007726759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053827395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007726759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005814806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005594736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01620841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147485593","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00104.x","title":"On the Topic of Pseudoclefts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Predicate (mathematical logic); Verb; Inversion (geology); Computer science; Focus (optics); Natural language processing; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.04002802598177866,"score_gpt":0.22716380879904777,"score_spread":0.18713578281726911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147485593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6707897,0.0056164707,0.10570489,0.037288237,0.0007111876,0.000033753393,0.000708342,0.0005808406,0.17856655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458295,0.00033928727,0.0021070903,0.00047315675,0.00022883224,0.000012785019,0.00013105999,0.00009431583,0.0020305149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916005,0.0004410127,0.000033259632,0.00015434904,0.00013320906,0.00007823432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687874,0.0019035325,0.00030308255,0.0005053383,0.00033260736,0.00007677508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084314635,0.00016940704,0.00025451457,0.0009427538,0.001508509,0.002227442,0.0006816952,0.0008119359,0.0062705176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040768893,0.00018662002,0.00020983387,0.0011352699,0.0065870723,0.00593826,0.001728644,0.0014698663,0.00031145918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024826804,0.0000049130053,0.00067978073,0.00003674385,0.0000047961853,0.00018469001,0.0035982956,0.00015317663,0.00074354623,0.9823961,0.0018758415,0.010297238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022105673,0.00002825364,0.0057187476,0.00007922501,0.00001841084,0.00097115786,0.0034470141,0.004277237,0.0028170373,0.88571084,0.096880026,0.000029836354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010317871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006619112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062705176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089409034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003681968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02097702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466255002","doi":"10.1111/synt.12123","title":"Evidentiality and Raising to Object as A′‐Movement: A Romanian Case Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Raising (metalworking); Evidentiality; Movement (music); Object (grammar); Linguistics; Subject (documents); Matrix (chemical analysis); Perception; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Geometry; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04172046842393937,"score_gpt":0.28785708911168006,"score_spread":0.2461366206877407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466255002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7770136,0.0005256927,0.01805989,0.0013512388,0.000035633857,0.000054420867,0.00009447225,0.000085963184,0.20277895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513066,0.00010106482,0.0023379426,0.00003862444,0.000009923504,0.000008873959,0.000018412662,0.000025470781,0.002329052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891627,0.00068748806,0.000055253102,0.00011975932,0.00012547281,0.000095694675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.0006015477,0.00010686876,0.00016246444,0.00005529562,0.000019935698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00109973,0.0003887263,0.00036809663,0.00071834325,0.0016878454,0.0018180002,0.0006521664,0.00096928736,0.0034182712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002658388,0.0002681904,0.00029204114,0.0010246529,0.0074291886,0.0021332745,0.0019830284,0.001581259,0.0003769795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008422269,0.00006347956,0.004113237,0.00009936927,0.000015476828,0.011525202,0.03624673,0.00086976215,0.0035411394,0.9264966,0.0009578288,0.015986852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025362064,0.0004650136,0.037304748,0.00055666256,0.00017071122,0.08825084,0.103615835,0.019072484,0.03973896,0.3728063,0.3374999,0.0002649479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033342217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031758859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034182712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001446135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045561045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527295940","doi":"10.1111/synt.12126","title":"Clause Typing and Feature Inheritance of Discourse Features","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Wilfrid Laurier University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Linguistics; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Order (exchange); Bundle; Agreement; Variation (astronomy); Natural language processing; Physics; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.018705068457561737,"score_gpt":0.24853088964608944,"score_spread":0.2298258211885277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527295940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8444231,0.0002363527,0.112894036,0.0003670858,0.00004500532,0.000054800017,0.00048296808,0.0006624779,0.040834185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99459237,0.000021812815,0.0039998344,0.000022075115,0.000009144765,0.0000066674966,0.000080652055,0.00009841285,0.0011690856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854076,0.00046698493,0.00012130232,0.0003710145,0.0003084216,0.00019151904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592125,0.002184795,0.00036021572,0.00080804084,0.000629295,0.000096371325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013557439,0.00024114839,0.0002804443,0.0011697598,0.0007533948,0.0022902666,0.0006618851,0.0004019724,0.0036098666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053693764,0.0004259792,0.00030932648,0.0010337805,0.00174183,0.0034142274,0.0018567207,0.0011073737,0.00025862755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000268518,0.00012541769,0.05067945,0.00022930476,0.00008305414,0.0011106287,0.021510387,0.0019370103,0.052403055,0.74852073,0.001646794,0.12148562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001129735,0.0003174678,0.18170576,0.00025923227,0.00036673332,0.003956345,0.014989081,0.049501535,0.09922069,0.57251215,0.076766275,0.0002918393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00287221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025874795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036098666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010395031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033746267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012076199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573472303","doi":"10.1111/synt.12129","title":"On the Positional Distribution of an Armenian Auxiliary: Second‐Position Clisis, Focus, and Phases","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Amgen (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Phrase; Clitic; Parallelism (grammar); Distribution (mathematics); Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Linguistics; Phase (matter); Weighting; Mathematics; Natural language processing; History; Physics; Mathematical analysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022638960572591058,"score_gpt":0.2553066879666166,"score_spread":0.23266772739402553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573472303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96230906,0.00041104213,0.0062754788,0.00025951213,0.000017247126,0.0000084859375,0.00017059082,0.000042671258,0.030506073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990829,0.00004936215,0.0003063307,0.000012604771,0.0000071445597,0.0000027826713,0.000033203636,0.0000103594675,0.00049519655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997073,0.00012014208,0.00002114567,0.000059472033,0.000056668465,0.000035246434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998784,0.00072155346,0.00017500704,0.0001248736,0.00016211708,0.00003243213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007166902,0.00021934856,0.00027705717,0.0015627601,0.0008852312,0.0016753745,0.00038151263,0.00032187783,0.0029353243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025193216,0.00018897143,0.00010991482,0.0017528223,0.0021558437,0.0018918513,0.0011917618,0.00057929,0.0002001182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016125935,0.00010397987,0.051951557,0.0005806333,0.00013180012,0.0016375429,0.08517355,0.0039194035,0.098271824,0.6345322,0.002073061,0.12001175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017209687,0.0006337793,0.61541903,0.000497127,0.00027034516,0.0022087004,0.060881667,0.015056248,0.038843796,0.19322039,0.072530046,0.00026686373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041659633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050706104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041659633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013544888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030598772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009827554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608540995","doi":"10.1111/synt.12135","title":"Little‐v<sup>0</sup>Agreement and Templatic Morphology in Ch'ol","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Ergative case; Morpheme; Agreement; Transitive relation; Linguistics; Subject (documents); Head (geology); Dative case; Possessive; Genitive case; Verb; Predicate (mathematical logic); Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Combinatorics; Biology; Noun","score_opus":0.03695142632210384,"score_gpt":0.26072468531559223,"score_spread":0.22377325899348838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608540995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9447683,0.000059818987,0.0036362694,0.00021181924,0.000009058402,0.0000110023375,0.00007433682,0.00006964689,0.05115971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877673,0.000007255074,0.00026626015,0.000008629305,0.0000021616943,0.0000022241268,0.000013029998,0.000010832517,0.00091289124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996238,0.00013382667,0.000024261266,0.000059333375,0.00008872549,0.0000699132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854904,0.00079805707,0.00022369921,0.00018837613,0.0001833457,0.000057476413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000714561,0.00011194583,0.0001254346,0.00089313835,0.0008618396,0.00150929,0.00036437082,0.00025564618,0.0040751933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011401545,0.00011739503,0.00009760188,0.0007014083,0.0029395937,0.0014372584,0.0013961917,0.00050009415,0.00024425934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003103373,0.00006617246,0.025439842,0.00016313928,0.000028319848,0.0012395894,0.07333567,0.0010947135,0.053595684,0.80056024,0.0012249264,0.042941347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096991236,0.00044863028,0.2908974,0.00014499667,0.000101738464,0.005727173,0.08572967,0.01558954,0.05464193,0.44501474,0.10132572,0.00028144303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044544083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066020917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044544083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011941077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043803055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013632894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891904107","doi":"10.1111/synt.12162","title":"Ergative as Perfective Oblique","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ergative case; Linguistics; Oblique case; Transitive relation; Computer science; History; Mathematics; Philosophy; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.021558818742294917,"score_gpt":0.2551203978939156,"score_spread":0.23356157915162068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891904107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58150643,0.000533624,0.09740674,0.001194313,0.00015026788,0.0000710851,0.00031848636,0.00049867516,0.3183203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945051,0.00005438472,0.0026933628,0.00008091176,0.000018515739,0.00000960266,0.000050559458,0.000059715407,0.0025277562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851006,0.00054225454,0.00013422407,0.00028017763,0.00035589727,0.00017726012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843043,0.00049584627,0.0002439453,0.0004151011,0.0003446268,0.00006999149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001545512,0.00033063622,0.0002878406,0.0010456563,0.0012725088,0.003048261,0.00047556998,0.00046970014,0.004132017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020094018,0.00035548402,0.0003051106,0.0008793637,0.006857936,0.004642187,0.002505599,0.0011051439,0.00051667495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004909566,0.000013926589,0.0022465729,0.000040367617,0.000012191332,0.00020788303,0.006338297,0.00021206785,0.004751454,0.97713476,0.00037191642,0.008621394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040254254,0.000110691646,0.013905728,0.00012721798,0.000058002344,0.0015872482,0.008297311,0.0037050694,0.008935679,0.9077747,0.05539337,0.00006467606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015529091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015031399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004132017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012556955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005239622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013822913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020931036","doi":"10.1111/synt.12195","title":"Locality Domains in Syntax: Evidence from Sentence Processing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Southern California","keywords":"Parsing; Computer science; Syntax; Locality; Sentence; Generative grammar; Context (archaeology); Sentence processing; Natural language processing; Sequence (biology); Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Geology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06294952772333982,"score_gpt":0.267152335233901,"score_spread":0.20420280751056114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020931036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9643471,0.00018907375,0.015733767,0.0006328257,0.000009154836,0.000018443434,0.00048726783,0.00019102795,0.01839117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823725,0.00003723813,0.0013779126,0.000032150074,0.000009457172,0.000007757713,0.00010103806,0.000027045491,0.00017014676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990958,0.00042895004,0.00005773571,0.00018913091,0.0001826863,0.00004564732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98373485,0.012321435,0.0013159688,0.001568913,0.00083488756,0.00022393657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016609217,0.00014109537,0.00027955082,0.0013573684,0.000438691,0.0017312792,0.0006282191,0.00056592503,0.0059171133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012543644,0.00032901875,0.00020359132,0.001286597,0.00254404,0.0036452713,0.001632203,0.00075102935,0.00036058438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019155379,0.00048130468,0.13667709,0.0017183842,0.000353017,0.0025829384,0.04621362,0.010947744,0.16464946,0.39141986,0.004417315,0.23862378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002551306,0.00038279046,0.46273398,0.00017059456,0.00018882882,0.0024157506,0.007759274,0.03925663,0.029276442,0.44259706,0.014720119,0.00024348752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009902366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008106012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059171133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039114157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023509635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019794703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195257628","doi":"10.1111/synt.12219","title":"The <i>Done</i>‐State Derived Stative: A Case Study in Building Complex Eventualities in Syntax","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Syntax; Participle; Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Computer science; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Object (grammar); Causative; Grammar; Verb; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Psychology; Programming language; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05861532339046138,"score_gpt":0.30511809232744336,"score_spread":0.24650276893698198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195257628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65969735,0.0003766411,0.069188826,0.0034342902,0.00007395386,0.00014581576,0.00010709852,0.00044547213,0.26653057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98038405,0.00010858165,0.010089891,0.00015438849,0.00001963702,0.00004885862,0.000042978325,0.00016269207,0.00898906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793696,0.0014181735,0.00006234003,0.0001645544,0.00027660388,0.0001414422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971576,0.0019585139,0.00013152238,0.00050541695,0.00014191373,0.000105081126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027248661,0.0004672307,0.0004311167,0.0010117231,0.004804622,0.005204095,0.0014499755,0.0022185545,0.004245393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040224744,0.0005980258,0.00079434126,0.001021383,0.012304118,0.007363573,0.0042999736,0.0036565997,0.0006237256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004050825,0.000087031614,0.0023287402,0.00005113188,0.000012015443,0.0049415957,0.1026931,0.0009511241,0.002560491,0.87673163,0.0015521137,0.008050472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010469911,0.00030460567,0.00747152,0.00033857065,0.000072026276,0.008522578,0.15350507,0.017314037,0.016163582,0.5795229,0.21651496,0.00016544845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033326088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055558495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005204095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026778802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009374567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019429445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293248289","doi":"10.1111/synt.12232","title":"Licensing unergative objects in ergative languages: The view from Polynesian","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ergative case; Samoan; Transitive relation; Linguistics; Object (grammar); Syntax; Subject (documents); Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02051501605603373,"score_gpt":0.24281044059392146,"score_spread":0.22229542453788773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293248289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95553255,0.00017536925,0.004277409,0.000550183,0.0000048369534,0.000007259652,0.00004717641,0.000027243397,0.03937806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982362,0.00006390215,0.0008130126,0.000031119904,0.0000016418732,0.0000036143763,0.000011787623,0.000012443304,0.0008263628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976224,0.00006307368,0.000021550759,0.00007121888,0.000041863506,0.000040011553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994312,0.00020759212,0.00009381714,0.0001356156,0.00009563933,0.00003612533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005544984,0.00021222039,0.00020598697,0.00057881314,0.0009983325,0.0017358582,0.00044877824,0.00035022633,0.002237325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011394509,0.00026180164,0.00017218333,0.0005557593,0.0052346685,0.0023002438,0.0017140703,0.0008083508,0.00011859206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060935883,0.00006616335,0.07802981,0.00047986547,0.00011080181,0.0037081058,0.13899745,0.001928274,0.096460044,0.6296781,0.0006073596,0.049324688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012784613,0.0002279145,0.44436032,0.00029972257,0.00039645148,0.008335363,0.09907298,0.010375941,0.036951117,0.34769392,0.051891375,0.00026713303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035183568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052422296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035183568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023847078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001045578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069957554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360945714","doi":"10.1111/synt.12249","title":"A Command Theoretic approach to prosodic smothering","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lunds Universitet; McGill University; National University of Singapore; Massachusetts Institute of Technology","keywords":"Smothering; Phenomenon; Prosody; Computer science; Linguistics; Syntax; Element (criminal law); Speech recognition; Natural language processing; Medicine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03477120998099641,"score_gpt":0.2406907034026956,"score_spread":0.20591949342169918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360945714","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25044465,0.0009377479,0.41960394,0.0022098986,0.0001211059,0.0000764295,0.00019315035,0.00050651527,0.3259066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849535,0.00013311925,0.010977537,0.000077146746,0.000041572996,0.000021428024,0.00003360768,0.0000608238,0.0037013362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995919,0.00016341814,0.000015789794,0.00006524995,0.000107923326,0.000055658744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995771,0.00020228996,0.00004244249,0.00007061613,0.00008251281,0.000025116626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049936795,0.00026967705,0.00022378539,0.0010169161,0.00087677874,0.002052832,0.0008493136,0.00045842564,0.0057761814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009416873,0.00020661327,0.00044170345,0.00054842304,0.004649883,0.0024645233,0.0013083845,0.0012581575,0.0002653226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011703597,0.0000056550543,0.00018502034,0.000019768371,0.0000032680414,0.00007801962,0.0011280373,0.0009012138,0.0020475518,0.99153817,0.00016664833,0.003914912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012719728,0.000045304332,0.0019505407,0.000035690377,0.000019132962,0.00030835983,0.0020234531,0.026396357,0.0031414467,0.94943905,0.016599096,0.000028958733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002074464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016514859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057761814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016939467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048899685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01932323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376503946","doi":"10.1111/synt.12251","title":"A tale of two inverses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inverse; Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Linguistics; Computer science; Phenomenon; Psychology; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03946337988951376,"score_gpt":0.26498102806640383,"score_spread":0.22551764817689007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376503946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10839818,0.001385179,0.08916656,0.02818902,0.0012098965,0.00006229719,0.00017937698,0.00051949517,0.77089006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94334155,0.00031114553,0.008624479,0.0023419776,0.00017655395,0.00004250825,0.00008426031,0.00034367843,0.044733845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975921,0.0012475121,0.00006421507,0.00034585892,0.00048129025,0.00026903662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819285,0.0008790595,0.00008252248,0.00045375593,0.00030058727,0.000091209484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025757195,0.00046435135,0.00035580882,0.0013417087,0.004842683,0.0036926372,0.000794135,0.0020933123,0.009545058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055015674,0.00039325192,0.00062175124,0.0005379956,0.017453333,0.00712827,0.004857699,0.004952761,0.0012686326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017950506,0.000005677102,0.00021512923,0.000010600489,0.000003855898,0.00019825212,0.006423599,0.00007087718,0.00030159866,0.9874862,0.0014583308,0.0038080765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024982664,0.000034295877,0.00090804603,0.00010243214,0.000020984033,0.00116209,0.011622657,0.0013728908,0.001467468,0.78006583,0.20316924,0.000048968664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030215166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002910267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009545058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021247377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011120621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0319314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380684859","doi":"10.1111/synt.12256","title":"Agree and the subjects of specificational clauses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Cambridge; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; McMaster University","keywords":"Noun phrase; Subject (documents); Linguistics; Feature (linguistics); Agreement; Modal; Computer science; Phrase; Dependent clause; Non-finite clause; Noun; Set (abstract data type); Simple (philosophy); Natural language processing; Mathematics; Philosophy; Sentence; Programming language","score_opus":0.04199767603881813,"score_gpt":0.24244504399813444,"score_spread":0.2004473679593163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380684859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8640887,0.00046607564,0.0616915,0.0014834615,0.00005503691,0.00010814805,0.00023301464,0.00036231507,0.07151178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708986,0.00003885621,0.001826607,0.00006452778,0.000017926444,0.000015603755,0.00005583312,0.000048369653,0.00084238546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996825,0.0017426806,0.00016820416,0.00038912188,0.000635112,0.00023996652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99288416,0.0052533606,0.00054653897,0.00056363526,0.0006294297,0.00012286394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036129858,0.00039076438,0.00047856176,0.0010530901,0.0016532076,0.0039059883,0.00062179536,0.0009368561,0.0041237064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054139206,0.0005769875,0.0004537736,0.0009858998,0.006499908,0.005185869,0.0021955203,0.0017461436,0.00030903937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013253522,0.000044275905,0.0033159114,0.00008167182,0.00002836053,0.0002462142,0.02207275,0.00057182176,0.009476071,0.95541984,0.00045328925,0.008157227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003150687,0.00030964345,0.018521842,0.00016065393,0.00016791506,0.0007046599,0.030591222,0.015152049,0.034601126,0.8524476,0.04689356,0.00013466913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00299625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018993168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041237064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021757612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010089908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01910752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389790859","doi":"10.1111/synt.12262","title":"Island effects and amelioration by resumption in Jordanian Arabic: An auditory acceptability‐judgment study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Aarhus Universitet","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Dependency (UML); Arabic; Point (geometry); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020580140563931204,"score_gpt":0.26414614331255126,"score_spread":0.24356600274862006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389790859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938933,0.000030112586,0.000804028,0.000029338658,0.0000047661756,0.0000184653,0.000017693972,0.000012514329,0.005189861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987006,0.000018093675,0.0006841646,0.00003210695,0.000005507229,0.000013937058,0.000014819673,0.000014618245,0.0005161391],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836534,0.00072704995,0.00013301629,0.0002695604,0.00043416952,0.000070853384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97569853,0.01856377,0.0017065797,0.0015116574,0.0021338372,0.0003856997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026211855,0.00039948546,0.00030754422,0.00037309798,0.00059349625,0.0013983839,0.00046505276,0.00051689544,0.005394708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025768837,0.00022623605,0.00015498724,0.00024909497,0.0012865369,0.0014801401,0.0011654072,0.0009872463,0.00035506708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0065435604,0.0016400836,0.12538971,0.0014103411,0.0001859207,0.0020293647,0.1987586,0.0021709495,0.527832,0.007515219,0.0011144301,0.12540984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004300537,0.00417479,0.7269447,0.00017351317,0.00030123457,0.0018586244,0.082397416,0.0107561285,0.14913021,0.010347536,0.013139636,0.00034624306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020705843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024034886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005394708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036061034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002494805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018047035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392372257","doi":"10.1111/synt.12277","title":"Gilaki reverse <scp>Ezafe</scp> : The two faces of a nominal linker","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Amorfix (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Linker; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.027210209023642396,"score_gpt":0.2552774072754818,"score_spread":0.2280671982518394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392372257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76943314,0.0005956583,0.01006658,0.0022362263,0.00023796935,0.000030711188,0.00023211057,0.00033067775,0.21683694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946694,0.00006868609,0.0013729341,0.00008171398,0.000016239355,0.0000045437696,0.00005368064,0.00003976175,0.0036931445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997216,0.000055810335,0.00001790635,0.00006074585,0.000083513034,0.000060417573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994586,0.00017200486,0.00011295372,0.0000966536,0.00013391947,0.000025918775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000472076,0.0002312585,0.00022048649,0.00060940714,0.0012154359,0.001278727,0.00028144606,0.00038759585,0.006020716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012555221,0.00009892757,0.00013213343,0.0005453169,0.0034890946,0.0014910472,0.001073202,0.000791432,0.00076242397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004915126,0.000047258858,0.02196963,0.00039736996,0.000047872738,0.0043887766,0.041068655,0.0009080423,0.030736675,0.7456038,0.007840553,0.14649978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001760149,0.0004334962,0.11086646,0.0003856299,0.0001723381,0.020678975,0.090647094,0.0044941735,0.04148049,0.13894434,0.59149104,0.00022985152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037639064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00481336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006020716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012788073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080343534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020141304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399532014","doi":"10.1111/synt.12289","title":"The syntax of Greek split reciprocals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syntax","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Universität Potsdam; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Syntax; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Arithmetic; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027682961712597366,"score_gpt":0.2534584907573456,"score_spread":0.22577552904474824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399532014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4371847,0.00145968,0.35082534,0.0027670118,0.00017429319,0.00018776242,0.0011652493,0.0018872097,0.20434871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711186,0.00029117847,0.022089383,0.00016912993,0.000029560157,0.00007330456,0.00027294896,0.00023451286,0.0057214033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874616,0.00060304254,0.000110601606,0.00020844377,0.00026793953,0.00006379032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989869,0.00047715745,0.00012809983,0.00022280068,0.00016116562,0.000023890409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012737584,0.00037672225,0.0004162627,0.0011218436,0.000978819,0.0031922797,0.0005583152,0.0007438233,0.005206534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025673,0.00033432132,0.00038532162,0.001294545,0.004782023,0.003924678,0.0020992614,0.0011293063,0.0009853644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022996053,0.000005412418,0.00030031422,0.000052520652,0.000006957434,0.00023548272,0.004274474,0.00044569324,0.0025248616,0.9838313,0.0005011281,0.0077989427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042681204,0.00005697906,0.002580602,0.00011684098,0.000038913116,0.0019380769,0.0046608807,0.007397128,0.0061749904,0.8610839,0.11583848,0.000070466514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096263166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058884727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005206534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00149975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048750872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01741755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}