{"meta":{"query_hash":"48fef6bcb725","filters":{"venue":"Te Mata Koi : Auckland University Law Review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48fef6bcb725","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Te+Mata+Koi+%3A+Auckland+University+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2224405444","doi":"","title":"Punishing Contract Breakers: Whiten v Pilot Insurance and the Sea Change in Canadian Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Te Mata Koi : Auckland University Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Tort; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Law and economics; Malice; Business; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.0374745736079705,"score_gpt":0.27500955051536646,"score_spread":0.23753497690739597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224405444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061649505,0.39221668,0.0018994138,0.10388242,0.00133317,0.00018710319,0.00044121564,0.000035066678,0.43835533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78651065,0.1466959,0.0014750371,0.02546539,0.00037879302,0.00007934136,0.00019613346,0.000024723244,0.039174117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933728,0.0011262546,0.00020842218,0.00036466937,0.00378012,0.0011478524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945162,0.002322515,0.0005360334,0.00013147708,0.0022075204,0.0002862916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049137855,0.00024581017,0.00032474188,0.0032947047,0.0065967054,0.00478004,0.0012777573,0.0026263688,0.0030241408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011468321,0.00026549416,0.00027038815,0.0054868595,0.008511428,0.0017344127,0.0011209708,0.0024064484,0.00014268851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054575044,0.00005567862,0.008565235,0.0014943419,0.000059339713,0.0007908454,0.009449825,0.0013556706,0.0003205948,0.74903643,0.09452822,0.13428922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042316966,0.00007459326,0.0755077,0.0040355898,0.00016821333,0.00036650914,0.013313277,0.0013372044,0.00057936914,0.045817178,0.8585863,0.0001716921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97806233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98832047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08330361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08330361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12045003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6044128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240798702","doi":"","title":"Truth, Civility, and Religious Battlegrounds: The Contest between Religious Vilification Laws and Freedom of Expression","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Te Mata Koi : Auckland University Law Review","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Islam; CONTEST; Religious freedom; Freedom of expression; Law; Political science; Freedom of religion; Expression (computer science); Sociology; Politics; Theology; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016737982224006572,"score_gpt":0.2537248251873995,"score_spread":0.23698684296339295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240798702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5727038,0.017536715,0.0008859315,0.041352,0.00014034794,0.000046577043,0.00005410379,0.0000058720175,0.3672746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928884,0.001811313,0.000059149585,0.0007369415,0.000038677616,0.000011207776,0.0000098903,0.0000024738108,0.0044420124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467033,0.0024744393,0.00011810783,0.00021655923,0.0012183985,0.0013022327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907894,0.008225624,0.0013846935,0.00021912219,0.00064593414,0.00044568922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040762057,0.00016299031,0.00038584927,0.0021719371,0.0067996862,0.007528271,0.00085495354,0.0026285131,0.0043249717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014243132,0.0003052686,0.00030232532,0.0020839344,0.021552648,0.0050849025,0.0023439117,0.0031876643,0.00023490905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043318025,0.000087882996,0.0117851775,0.000099690056,0.0000138758205,0.00057443103,0.0395578,0.00020552233,0.00012632675,0.92432165,0.0047730994,0.01841119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006500876,0.0001543634,0.19209762,0.0013486368,0.00011710843,0.0008458126,0.3116339,0.0013760877,0.00050786714,0.31957436,0.17220229,0.000076900746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1578582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2575419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1578582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011869289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118676955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31387872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249746254","doi":"","title":"Regulating Access to the Therapeutic Records of Sexual Assault Complainants: An Analysis and Critique of the Current New Zealand Procedure","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Te Mata Koi : Auckland University Law Review","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Government (linguistics); Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Computer security; Medicine; Law; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medical emergency; Computer science","score_opus":0.06664022040070973,"score_gpt":0.35483125599864596,"score_spread":0.28819103559793624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249746254","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17076609,0.016382594,0.030220855,0.4791323,0.0016316787,0.0012925903,0.00034101578,0.0003124297,0.29992035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8161054,0.012923541,0.031453915,0.082125284,0.0009690653,0.0011360368,0.00014429058,0.00022341407,0.054919004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9031955,0.02599613,0.006495788,0.005439306,0.052876357,0.0059968894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8997063,0.061954033,0.0081692925,0.0073025706,0.021375338,0.0014923812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05064625,0.00042356484,0.0008808765,0.004530627,0.011127988,0.017071405,0.005865636,0.013862253,0.0021290842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11164795,0.001086067,0.0012441196,0.0048486134,0.034321055,0.0056547103,0.00585978,0.016163258,0.0005565995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072428185,0.00006592253,0.0056748893,0.0004667825,0.000040129085,0.001881487,0.056725074,0.0004886556,0.0020454621,0.8527798,0.03426871,0.04549066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024401843,0.00033354384,0.06577065,0.0048385994,0.0004216184,0.004075345,0.06121211,0.0065783584,0.004427079,0.10666799,0.74482924,0.0006015016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60959226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66511023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60959226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032693017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.094149284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78541386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}