{"meta":{"query_hash":"68c4832de60b","filters":{"venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/68c4832de60b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Technology+Pedagogy+and+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W1966139353","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2013.838452","title":"Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); Computer science; Mathematics education; Human–computer interaction; Multimedia; Psychology","score_opus":0.057236803039635006,"score_gpt":0.3871765222807234,"score_spread":0.3299397192410884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966139353","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39453366,0.0006373411,0.5674688,0.0010914899,0.00018169616,0.0012460785,0.00011382071,0.0010548793,0.033672128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63175607,0.00044210322,0.36122546,0.0002597157,0.000026052603,0.0015423753,0.00011559886,0.00012490946,0.004507647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862707,0.0009274214,0.00004974553,0.00013691981,0.00015886036,0.00010004408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714017,0.00210743,0.00011943925,0.00026993427,0.000098307944,0.00026477134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014121749,0.0007834519,0.00030908152,0.00038735886,0.0007556684,0.0023155326,0.0017527863,0.0010342869,0.0051833456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041848263,0.0004199184,0.0007440981,0.0001443127,0.0021943895,0.0015354442,0.0030193154,0.0010427808,0.00065503805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012038806,0.0057385922,0.014805084,0.0032555426,0.00038869437,0.0022018969,0.13329127,0.10643618,0.17735891,0.15350729,0.00763519,0.3941776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016027911,0.00824509,0.013385626,0.0013057737,0.00040161633,0.0033750474,0.030716794,0.13347273,0.08336508,0.13409114,0.5895955,0.0004428469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020927942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005816117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051833456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005025422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006902092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017340004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989054385","doi":"10.1080/14759390500200190","title":"On conversation and design: a socially constructed practice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Autoethnography; Narrative; Reflexivity; Process (computing); Redevelopment; Representation (politics); Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Engineering; Communication; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.0875978831006967,"score_gpt":0.43903674418160066,"score_spread":0.35143886108090394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989054385","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067619674,0.015975215,0.43912098,0.11713898,0.0016961609,0.00060537946,0.00011989937,0.00082404574,0.35689965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9029754,0.0038563225,0.07713106,0.0032927888,0.0003900092,0.00058751693,0.000049118542,0.0003194911,0.01139837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.83555615,0.15358332,0.0012914928,0.0030289292,0.004772433,0.0017676192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91001844,0.076219976,0.0018843729,0.0074547804,0.0023399997,0.0020825132],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058286585,0.0013722209,0.0012241785,0.004727779,0.0144076375,0.027260061,0.003443411,0.007603984,0.0053276476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045869447,0.0010067477,0.0010674578,0.0026686075,0.14116593,0.021899436,0.018048666,0.00779478,0.00097277144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028610086,0.000046989655,0.00043109423,0.00030540428,0.00003286469,0.0003670999,0.26452592,0.00096232834,0.0004121497,0.71155363,0.0038786698,0.017455222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004986975,0.00008410663,0.00019846912,0.0011044779,0.000023468228,0.00053669716,0.10318018,0.0021409576,0.00072450354,0.6668018,0.22510408,0.000051455336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026696508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00171308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98559237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008074806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008577923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30825263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014657102","doi":"10.1080/14759390400200172","title":"Tensions in learning content and technology: the experience of education students in a web-based research project","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.19620919655372132,"score_gpt":0.5026286057511983,"score_spread":0.30641940919747696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014657102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952356,0.00017017145,0.0007707427,0.0012773186,0.00002905108,0.00003331495,0.000012485352,0.000029426734,0.002441927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684525,0.00019311743,0.00043268054,0.00035972495,0.000024457457,0.000048721773,0.000015185184,0.000039123963,0.0020418325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97852784,0.015062536,0.0005430427,0.001177007,0.0017990336,0.002890548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967133,0.019391557,0.0028711015,0.0011894219,0.0015750466,0.007839913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015356968,0.0010677365,0.0016218417,0.0024606148,0.01696987,0.017824354,0.0031128784,0.0054388316,0.003696019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030827444,0.0013770742,0.0008632619,0.001720168,0.017859558,0.009345784,0.014946672,0.011662764,0.0010200527],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007590103,0.00044070143,0.004806538,0.00004801892,0.000010510509,0.0011843612,0.9849406,0.000042070238,0.0012442071,0.00065002777,0.0004272431,0.006129794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023361654,0.00034990272,0.0041508647,0.00006909516,0.000014882193,0.0010020116,0.9844541,0.00018818535,0.00066251634,0.0005012512,0.008538731,0.00004515509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031472715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004503941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017824354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029963467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002604016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081216395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027984049","doi":"10.1080/14759390400200174","title":"Off-line factors contributing to online engagement","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Online learning; Online discussion; Face-to-face; Service-learning; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Gerontology","score_opus":0.0375677295626422,"score_gpt":0.4135139562558817,"score_spread":0.3759462266932395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027984049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975393,0.000044667286,0.00042083542,0.000059520236,0.0000045466822,0.000017618799,0.00002777343,0.000006670767,0.0018791745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993556,0.000026282029,0.0001467164,0.000012235749,0.000006029201,0.000013410751,0.00003524694,0.0000039995493,0.0004005483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632096,0.0018295258,0.00030846172,0.00030778174,0.00075965386,0.00047358684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97080976,0.018690675,0.0045704027,0.0018269932,0.0017904007,0.0023117228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018044052,0.0002699495,0.000337076,0.0011138481,0.0011194993,0.0029804928,0.00047163316,0.0005977329,0.005953803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024178926,0.00017507355,0.0002976118,0.00076630927,0.0007392967,0.0010653879,0.0024305673,0.00086432905,0.0006082382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038604817,0.0007305413,0.93665266,0.00008970176,0.00007048761,0.00041971204,0.017381985,0.00014050685,0.0035653417,0.00041477894,0.0002342099,0.03991394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001056036,0.0004163987,0.9561876,0.000065019776,0.00003673015,0.00062951486,0.037848003,0.0007956508,0.0011031431,0.0009202833,0.0019674224,0.000019607749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081744656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009694319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005953803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031043877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035738348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019917428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069642353","doi":"10.1080/14759390300200155","title":"Inter-rater reliability of an electronic discussion coding system","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Coding (social sciences); Inter-rater reliability; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Rating scale","score_opus":0.011326058785994497,"score_gpt":0.3524828452656446,"score_spread":0.3411567864796501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069642353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.711819,0.0010839372,0.25654563,0.00044996745,0.0010167442,0.006580725,0.0015383625,0.00089962344,0.020066021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269799,0.0001897182,0.06579812,0.00010582443,0.00017364915,0.0041518467,0.00090532494,0.00027195786,0.0014237077],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7334144,0.18115583,0.03041182,0.01259567,0.040250182,0.0021720247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43715876,0.31658804,0.019766051,0.035198558,0.1892859,0.00200273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17054023,0.00076250924,0.0012670712,0.00435095,0.0015021211,0.0024582879,0.0013098227,0.0011416711,0.0013914527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36650077,0.00056551467,0.0013962734,0.003051777,0.0024301994,0.001819374,0.0034991596,0.0014694395,0.0011603483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00903232,0.0012243524,0.38666987,0.0024011687,0.0029327322,0.00051191234,0.0544382,0.013724421,0.028474687,0.01135113,0.010174536,0.47906464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010222786,0.0049808747,0.69367605,0.0017449101,0.001600969,0.0013750715,0.013179993,0.15995133,0.06749623,0.012998572,0.041019373,0.00095443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013439672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012752655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17054023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016550748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018053966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9019137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074682373","doi":"10.1080/14759390701847401","title":"Exploring amplifications and reductions associated with e‐learning: conversations with leaders of e‐learning programs","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"E learning; Perception; Higher education; Educational technology; Psychology; Electronic learning; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.12378880618303925,"score_gpt":0.34788928144217274,"score_spread":0.22410047525913349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074682373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896768,0.00016488107,0.0034381342,0.0020553132,0.00006625948,0.00006231053,0.000009596222,0.00003606274,0.004490795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980387,0.000105507104,0.0006443621,0.00033946222,0.000041408854,0.000043508946,0.000007380268,0.000014621755,0.0007649884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863914,0.0106097525,0.00026626798,0.00047052483,0.0014214867,0.0008406247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94693476,0.042634122,0.0045569856,0.0010389688,0.0024550925,0.002380061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010189554,0.00044077283,0.00042145536,0.0007711771,0.004939776,0.0031114034,0.00090793154,0.0018487532,0.001194944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040004943,0.00043177433,0.0003016597,0.00040817756,0.0056694755,0.00267978,0.0041093887,0.004205098,0.00029898944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011519847,0.0001359178,0.009095281,0.00013120606,0.000013932616,0.00097407185,0.96933985,0.00010779632,0.0053318185,0.0013609724,0.00064061437,0.012753255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023555272,0.00045329626,0.01338978,0.00014998474,0.000019703966,0.0005123897,0.9680448,0.0006227464,0.003757019,0.0016784708,0.011300516,0.00004780556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007583889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010818745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010189554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012116971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001638775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053888142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078669425","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2012.720414","title":"Tacit knowledge in online learning: community, identity, and social capital","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Social capital; Function (biology); Constructivist teaching methods; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science; Teaching method","score_opus":0.05088594925363152,"score_gpt":0.4294914834427193,"score_spread":0.3786055341890878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078669425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6080358,0.004978552,0.09479983,0.016639965,0.00022785417,0.00019948132,0.000073354786,0.00007561298,0.27496955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331725,0.0005957277,0.003772062,0.00013518699,0.000048519672,0.00004916272,0.000013253273,0.0000064766596,0.002062361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957137,0.0026507783,0.00014775035,0.00035864065,0.0008016115,0.00032759656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98614013,0.009207421,0.0016222202,0.001275315,0.00054669846,0.001208347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005199757,0.0002938767,0.00035513513,0.0024946623,0.0033433961,0.0091365995,0.0010612357,0.0015179565,0.003183712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012000372,0.00020776143,0.00029384732,0.0020673699,0.014750814,0.012604488,0.00938014,0.0015569867,0.00021509414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046904268,0.0002946394,0.014657118,0.00024675822,0.00003752237,0.00060785067,0.08148012,0.0016504455,0.0006656467,0.79672354,0.0009859673,0.10260359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020392876,0.00014104336,0.012318257,0.0005125888,0.000030390309,0.00065159594,0.051569626,0.005323781,0.0007963256,0.887476,0.041106004,0.000053967633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015781845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022548467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091365995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020489634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024769679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027499318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123086542","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2014.946957","title":"Designing learning to engage students in the global classroom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Learning design; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Work (physics); Educational technology; Element (criminal law); Global education; Sociology; Psychology; Multimedia; Computer science; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.01992122784563847,"score_gpt":0.4017991734180149,"score_spread":0.3818779455723764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123086542","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1827578,0.0010113337,0.68587464,0.004104956,0.00035651057,0.0012490739,0.000057614434,0.0012103298,0.123377755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62845564,0.0010243779,0.34598666,0.0010542661,0.000058200174,0.0015919596,0.00011147478,0.00032250377,0.021394877],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935144,0.0048308126,0.00019200539,0.0005477361,0.00042565202,0.00048936054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946085,0.003611286,0.00022694646,0.0006189918,0.00028939164,0.0006447819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062958687,0.0009647484,0.00042145615,0.0008677172,0.0025231661,0.007116458,0.0019901234,0.0024748622,0.0053725913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01001228,0.0003852384,0.0007085962,0.0004885433,0.007013214,0.008133728,0.007969889,0.0020120926,0.0017761734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001673222,0.0015003636,0.0070400685,0.0014751191,0.00008966589,0.0013041018,0.3232611,0.007920759,0.01911043,0.24114744,0.009484681,0.38749897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021220208,0.0010917702,0.0019761384,0.00096723303,0.00013672099,0.001358176,0.18545213,0.009926015,0.024397593,0.24718244,0.527195,0.00010458198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029904873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005352826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007116458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015638525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021545137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033296168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268152024","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2015.1120684","title":"Students’ use of personal technologies in the university classroom: analysing the perceptions of the digital generation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Sociology; Perception; The Internet; Public relations; Politics; Higher education; Pedagogy; Power (physics); Qualitative research; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.036033806345298056,"score_gpt":0.3493248641835668,"score_spread":0.3132910578382687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268152024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99815035,0.000056120305,0.00014901355,0.00023357873,0.0000045158286,0.000007338748,0.000008394192,0.000003585592,0.0013872302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999119,0.000073475894,0.000072990304,0.00008757876,0.000002838534,0.00000810926,0.0000074360837,0.0000031661816,0.0006253786],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714154,0.0012797305,0.00014222875,0.00018602422,0.0005502331,0.00070017856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352044,0.0025883487,0.0011070848,0.00022300208,0.00080387475,0.0017573104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036220623,0.00027967637,0.00038863457,0.0013848415,0.003520428,0.007095259,0.00085858844,0.0012705729,0.002650492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008205509,0.000311553,0.0003003594,0.00095100765,0.0036457374,0.002674606,0.0037711402,0.002028414,0.0006113849],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050347724,0.0004445441,0.10731114,0.000062843195,0.000012147985,0.00045582544,0.86880827,0.00007474424,0.0017106753,0.001193497,0.0005866611,0.019289238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056016843,0.00014565383,0.038143706,0.00004511061,0.000009126852,0.00014906483,0.9545711,0.00018027853,0.0005316259,0.000256097,0.0059399307,0.000022583878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00603293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008701816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007095259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002077999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016866231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019155502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902684084","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2018.1544587","title":"Teacher facilitation support in ubiquitous learning environments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University; University of North Texas","keywords":"Usability; Dashboard; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; System usability scale; Multimedia; Process (computing); Facilitation; Interface (matter); Scale (ratio); Usability engineering; Data science; Psychology","score_opus":0.010622124944427127,"score_gpt":0.3194964294598057,"score_spread":0.3088743045153786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902684084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49024856,0.0018616786,0.4768101,0.001186958,0.00021033367,0.00042453085,0.00011510698,0.014215116,0.014927642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92991626,0.00041512953,0.06405893,0.000119370685,0.000043959146,0.00016712648,0.00006233583,0.000098389144,0.005118535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893683,0.00043686302,0.00007234965,0.000194311,0.0002234843,0.00013602585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979311,0.00084774394,0.00025801867,0.00036051148,0.0002977638,0.00030488847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010478207,0.00039844832,0.00032208042,0.00036562365,0.00071796647,0.0013210425,0.0008668487,0.0007060394,0.0022719123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003996558,0.00031285433,0.00023846963,0.00028366962,0.00033685067,0.0013710754,0.0019397804,0.000463508,0.0008858332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096737384,0.0010655553,0.025505539,0.0017884099,0.000105551866,0.0031768659,0.014245348,0.008779404,0.14993773,0.009271453,0.009051045,0.77610576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082358334,0.00553954,0.07742129,0.0018096877,0.00054386654,0.009693903,0.016467128,0.17714022,0.24083373,0.02619284,0.44301835,0.00051587704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009254127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009949062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022719123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002709489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0076003075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168474701","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2021.1942185","title":"Examining the effects of digital devices on students’ learning performance and motivation in an enhanced one-to-one environment: a longitudinal perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Learning environment; Variety (cybernetics); Longitudinal study; Computer science; Cognition; Mathematics education; Psychology; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.030036561785499682,"score_gpt":0.34694780441728446,"score_spread":0.3169112426317848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168474701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994281,0.0000727684,0.000053434233,0.000026564461,0.0000037157372,0.000021104011,0.000048932638,0.0000023536368,0.00034305197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989937,0.0000607662,0.000111830544,0.000010775618,0.0000034779923,0.0000315518,0.000098182805,0.0000017953437,0.0006879533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986059,0.00036790592,0.000110848465,0.00019805552,0.00039682622,0.0003205641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523133,0.00085608347,0.0013629524,0.00029981384,0.00093595503,0.0013138236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031375566,0.00035876432,0.00048755933,0.0011384223,0.0010661128,0.0016452804,0.00048598758,0.0006983598,0.0020373196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056776637,0.0003373853,0.0007786597,0.0007091062,0.0004942055,0.0011261839,0.0014230452,0.0013690392,0.00054237933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033808808,0.0043596057,0.96755487,0.00005526278,0.000105221356,0.00016060476,0.005661632,0.00012184794,0.0011710925,0.00013828819,0.00019674949,0.02013666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081080825,0.0020106155,0.9935109,0.000023679802,0.000038328868,0.000059517737,0.0027466828,0.0002223955,0.0006789873,0.00003862985,0.0006459517,0.000016293683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040078145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054290416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040078145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006318471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008028177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016593218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210697229","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2021.1997794","title":"Literacies in the Making: exploring elementary students’ digital-physical meaning-making practices while crafting musical instruments from recycled materials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Meaning (existential); Meaning-making; Situated; Pedagogy; Musical; Sociology; Making-of; Psychology; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Computer science; Art; Advertising","score_opus":0.09068504368328012,"score_gpt":0.36008021701753695,"score_spread":0.26939517333425683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210697229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972722,0.000044532037,0.00031397634,0.00006748614,0.0000013651033,0.000017582695,0.000011260375,0.0000060621087,0.002265599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752396,0.00008088122,0.0005828898,0.000045633566,7.1843664e-7,0.000017664304,0.000017897291,0.0000057832726,0.0017246435],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.00028678818,0.00004897181,0.00016632855,0.00021372596,0.00040767892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854136,0.00043044743,0.00025251711,0.000086949396,0.00024242264,0.00044633742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490082,0.0006279734,0.000525538,0.0022159626,0.0050828382,0.007154814,0.0012975452,0.00092456123,0.0025242043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002465425,0.00045455873,0.0004687492,0.00089801167,0.005357708,0.0023940748,0.0041872873,0.001801424,0.00049098633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041483087,0.00042787864,0.07043716,0.000085823405,0.00001206925,0.00084432063,0.9064198,0.000070190195,0.0038499183,0.0010456962,0.00021811895,0.016547542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004471051,0.00014281442,0.041587636,0.00006933308,0.000015193912,0.0002685896,0.9490893,0.00019380332,0.0014276248,0.0006483558,0.0065209228,0.00003196138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041646328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11027076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041646328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003283935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034017006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08280784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388411403","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2023.2270491","title":"Remote teaching in times of COVID-19: teachers’ adaptation and pupil level of participation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Universidade do Minho; International Council for Canadian Studies","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Adaptation (eye); Portuguese; Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Socioeconomic status; Perception; Workload; Pandemic; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Pupil; Medical education; Sociology; Geography; Computer science; Medicine; Population; Demography","score_opus":0.25058635426962717,"score_gpt":0.5149586780006946,"score_spread":0.26437232373106745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388411403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982664,0.000053537904,0.000058909278,0.00010094085,0.0000042055,0.00000791486,0.000012162473,0.0000016056049,0.0014943928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993569,0.000071567534,0.000029167795,0.000019666006,0.000002873231,0.000009157858,0.000010852234,0.0000014214752,0.00049838837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990876,0.00033172098,0.000047938014,0.000100421705,0.000113239934,0.00031903118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977068,0.0008372146,0.00068018894,0.0000955882,0.00015931876,0.0005208087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011644663,0.00009613477,0.00023907426,0.0004290837,0.0013619609,0.0014960498,0.000304735,0.00037847264,0.0024987615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004766064,0.00016877454,0.00018337394,0.00032023934,0.0009116516,0.0006647608,0.002141772,0.0006629384,0.00026858243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016363342,0.00040002924,0.49358556,0.00013700474,0.000016754208,0.0012806254,0.46545374,0.00008466907,0.0033804735,0.0004230798,0.0004580278,0.03461643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006447387,0.00021258429,0.6457841,0.00007934654,0.000007939003,0.0004582741,0.349134,0.00005865642,0.00034114177,0.00010738638,0.0037945928,0.000015565663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00538479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0095454175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00538479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008786576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008206829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010706902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402343107","doi":"10.1080/1475939x.2024.2391302","title":"Student teacher learning with Ozobots and Makey Makeys during a workshop and field experience","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","topic":"Teaching and Learning Programming","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Educational technology; Technology integration; Teacher education; Electronic learning; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.011200937325314055,"score_gpt":0.33116485902191445,"score_spread":0.3199639216966004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402343107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99387145,0.00006154525,0.0010448657,0.00022387198,0.000031829353,0.00010572604,0.000025794243,0.000047755773,0.0045871786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894106,0.00018749085,0.0017970126,0.00014693731,0.000014453164,0.000116538125,0.00006443007,0.000043349468,0.008219117],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778444,0.0010316396,0.00008068352,0.00027848122,0.0002441197,0.0005807679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409264,0.0026145838,0.00041354093,0.00047364275,0.0005151056,0.001890383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035160563,0.00065443025,0.00094439497,0.0006016335,0.004734088,0.0034155517,0.0016921302,0.001300872,0.0065527232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007443439,0.00065525464,0.000465394,0.0004960863,0.0035586029,0.0025251869,0.0055811927,0.002833012,0.002137356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007411549,0.0043102517,0.01961182,0.00046770315,0.000017720336,0.004210198,0.89916855,0.0003525557,0.010133358,0.0009924589,0.0039045524,0.05608971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113257156,0.0036964468,0.015212893,0.00020754238,0.000022067703,0.0019996702,0.92530596,0.00037211028,0.0061559086,0.0006896658,0.046155218,0.00006931211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014552625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004181416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065527232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010892946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001875865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021921039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}