{"meta":{"query_hash":"8767be12cb6e","filters":{"venue":"Texas A&M Law Review"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8767be12cb6e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Texas+A%26M+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W4317639099","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.3","title":"“Blackstoned” Again: Common Law Liberties, the Canadian Constitution, and the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Deference; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.05786004422079469,"score_gpt":0.3357350044854204,"score_spread":0.27787496026462566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317639099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027430508,0.085615784,0.008876176,0.26594624,0.001997451,0.00005809187,0.00025411844,0.00004539014,0.6097762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8146154,0.031384356,0.004422968,0.0506038,0.0012863139,0.000067813555,0.00017176436,0.00004943955,0.09739814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971079,0.0006194658,0.00004319579,0.00023890212,0.0013232118,0.00066732586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847466,0.00055289915,0.00011565485,0.000078569916,0.00061468314,0.00016353496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002489094,0.00029545106,0.00032717513,0.0019277206,0.008644489,0.0061086137,0.0013309226,0.0024361461,0.005172435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048672603,0.00015694674,0.00029761862,0.0021923282,0.02265514,0.0038683177,0.0019950666,0.004138965,0.00031773438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034142279,0.0000025583486,0.0001201362,0.000019712765,0.0000020877485,0.00002853259,0.0010944484,0.0000618706,0.000023968832,0.98511225,0.008994577,0.004536386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130142425,0.000011768797,0.0028477507,0.00031023967,0.00001514765,0.000060043334,0.0030282233,0.00028413103,0.00017838569,0.5696963,0.4235279,0.000027183909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88700926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91330713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11299074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038636234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051023025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28032684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641612","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.5","title":"Work-In-Progress: Evolution and Common Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Phenomenon; Relation (database); Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.046572444228166886,"score_gpt":0.2888897015098076,"score_spread":0.2423172572816407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08001886,0.014787412,0.09029565,0.1253936,0.0007484453,0.00027906348,0.00039897294,0.00019834893,0.6878797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563776,0.002813158,0.012197872,0.0037320787,0.00048842764,0.00029040978,0.000098598546,0.000080335,0.023921553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862677,0.0070240707,0.0004431826,0.0029533869,0.0018092146,0.0015025531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779928,0.012323979,0.001952366,0.0032479707,0.0027808377,0.0017021159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015879834,0.00054548896,0.000977417,0.0029089125,0.0071618524,0.010167464,0.0028073096,0.0066638472,0.011649634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028355876,0.0003682707,0.0007045419,0.0025369953,0.05644857,0.01418561,0.005636617,0.0046423706,0.0010054925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070892993,0.000011473045,0.000660316,0.000016498794,0.0000084216335,0.00006758051,0.001319847,0.0004837291,0.000026309992,0.9912845,0.0012918918,0.0048223417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008641018,0.000011673348,0.00078319677,0.000050030816,0.000004140142,0.000060494815,0.0006166271,0.00081444276,0.000028562268,0.9843188,0.013290513,0.0000128802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011964175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073045827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015879834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010892507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005854185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08398163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641641","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.23","title":"Hadley V. Baxendale: Still Crazy After All These Years? Panel Discussion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Law; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05831587978241727,"score_gpt":0.3523340298958521,"score_spread":0.29401815011343485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012592794,0.001971049,0.000111975125,0.97691524,0.006271674,0.000016483853,0.000039282197,0.000008686348,0.013406246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026249,0.0020743974,0.00021113316,0.9493432,0.004014129,0.00006265565,0.000036698784,0.000021812348,0.017987058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98450863,0.006895207,0.0005226025,0.0022906591,0.0027736092,0.0030093107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97371054,0.017320124,0.0007292833,0.0005562355,0.0037494958,0.003934288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030406354,0.0006238513,0.0011408291,0.00094617234,0.02050483,0.016423263,0.004795802,0.047965556,0.021260858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058650825,0.000713301,0.0014691512,0.0015192362,0.008857501,0.0202631,0.006968664,0.049641345,0.0026592226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004944387,0.00003464478,0.00035698927,0.00014517539,0.000013629845,0.00038064565,0.0034745568,0.0000926977,0.00015798667,0.07697532,0.9099309,0.008387985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048707203,0.000048339545,0.0008818023,0.0008377581,0.000027419077,0.00013676475,0.01263547,0.000100407655,0.00020067106,0.03361846,0.95138174,0.00008231401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035084754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06681454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047965556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014565513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02491692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16080612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641762","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i1.1","title":"Theory and Anti-theory in the Work of Allan Farnsworth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art","score_opus":0.022100596165111,"score_gpt":0.3161855854937112,"score_spread":0.29408498932860017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028887852,0.25141263,0.0026501147,0.6286473,0.0052434956,0.000013283272,0.000039515708,0.000027155953,0.109077804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38937473,0.22252253,0.0056541953,0.26061463,0.01596647,0.00022679243,0.00007852235,0.00018089748,0.105381265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922714,0.0051630842,0.00017067647,0.0006696793,0.0012836114,0.000441438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875053,0.010262947,0.0003363252,0.00055891846,0.0008655737,0.0004709147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012494841,0.0006477105,0.0009563071,0.0027696693,0.010720234,0.006629719,0.0013412724,0.0062357453,0.0046150126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014301979,0.00045135862,0.0004820803,0.0022410247,0.03759774,0.011208187,0.0031750586,0.00971953,0.0009945608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009446229,0.000010885179,0.00007582434,0.00006130296,0.000005678003,0.00003288441,0.0015250262,0.00008239395,0.000011592032,0.88813,0.1027888,0.0072662053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137330435,0.000010201619,0.00020585927,0.0005202721,0.000005070789,0.000059490678,0.0010575032,0.00010792196,0.000042432668,0.6070212,0.39094093,0.000015499016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023054646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029972397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023054646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010029182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009965691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07276714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641772","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.23","title":"The Case of Grace James (1827)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Order (exchange); History; Interpretation (philosophy); Period (music); Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.05023674303032503,"score_gpt":0.3624801892944636,"score_spread":0.3122434462641385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05680155,0.008883784,0.00070220296,0.0646777,0.00309256,0.000044931283,0.00022346621,0.00006860814,0.8655052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37603816,0.003416893,0.00065026456,0.079434894,0.0014019972,0.000075345655,0.000091792375,0.0001080964,0.53878254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976375,0.0004917779,0.00006784719,0.00030515066,0.0005642726,0.00093342894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926037,0.00027833277,0.000061468534,0.000053157128,0.000108292435,0.0002383762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018110184,0.00039908921,0.0003202082,0.00062926393,0.017980913,0.0036159721,0.00082222844,0.007814731,0.009574382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004033878,0.00047697558,0.00043597352,0.0007606438,0.007342382,0.0016053658,0.0034922892,0.007811697,0.0021152082],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098907185,0.000028781493,0.0016305555,0.00007961587,0.000015747,0.0071583497,0.05581698,0.000100693615,0.00069420045,0.61231476,0.30525836,0.016803123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005928816,0.000013021403,0.0006876065,0.00007134109,0.000006539816,0.00093577505,0.0039213123,0.00002228236,0.00017750441,0.006668348,0.98746836,0.000021941696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09035588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19820376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09035588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006200249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006284358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1796599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408290791","doi":"10.37419/lr.v12.i2.7","title":"The Excessive Fines Clause in the Federal Courts: A Quarter-Century of Narrowing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Business; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016926483652978382,"score_gpt":0.3373497357116555,"score_spread":0.3204232520586771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408290791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13314076,0.08348102,0.044766508,0.2988084,0.0035572397,0.000063103806,0.00014914472,0.00020399688,0.4358299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91066164,0.01125812,0.0068036416,0.05056592,0.002375215,0.000080117956,0.00005232342,0.000072019466,0.018131021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98929274,0.0043574246,0.00045960088,0.001676747,0.0029777354,0.0012357933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915651,0.0056521087,0.00048294305,0.00082519255,0.0012250494,0.000249571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011136602,0.0003371305,0.00058434514,0.002621613,0.012020957,0.015637431,0.0014581388,0.009519406,0.0013913984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01681333,0.0006844309,0.0005466705,0.0024116659,0.036975723,0.012334822,0.0038124304,0.018347561,0.00026366205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007575687,0.000007697512,0.00016275032,0.0000120062305,0.0000026138512,0.000023401795,0.0022209054,0.000157066,0.000082324535,0.9850891,0.0028070372,0.009427489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020281093,0.00006285813,0.0024349457,0.0006080581,0.000031012867,0.000086053085,0.00355749,0.0009573873,0.0008711077,0.7036208,0.28765345,0.00009663147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060327478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05463462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060327478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016733378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0097762095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121409714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}