{"meta":{"query_hash":"8767be12cb6e","filters":{"venue":"Texas A&M Law Review"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8767be12cb6e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Texas+A%26M+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W4317639099","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.3","title":"“Blackstoned” Again: Common Law Liberties, the Canadian Constitution, and the Principles of Fundamental Justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Supreme court; Common law; Political science; Constitution; Economic Justice; Deference; Fundamental rights; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.05786004422079469,"score_gpt":0.3357350044854204,"score_spread":0.27787496026462566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317639099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011096798,0.26468748,0.0000023464402,0.040547017,0.00032102078,0.0019628138,0.00002342957,0.00004718472,0.6813119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95593524,0.03342725,0.00005185469,0.009622071,0.00012020638,0.000015406347,0.000003914701,0.0000050016083,0.0008190669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983973,0.00035544767,0.00037993118,0.00015347378,0.00036098907,0.00035288077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878484,0.0005558054,0.00017727334,0.00020133409,0.00013077556,0.00014994893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029515184,0.00013549408,0.00035098763,0.000007894792,0.0025524616,0.00007813027,0.00032965012,0.000063022686,0.00009731109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027007918,0.00006809064,0.00009291261,0.00019339686,0.0065194564,0.00012369793,0.00009184155,0.00017990379,0.000034261648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005640569,0.000008728303,0.0007183203,0.0002489327,0.00003442584,0.000001974345,0.00334021,4.6935568e-7,5.88503e-7,0.9938141,0.0010433805,0.00078319554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019849632,0.000009334285,0.0024346204,0.0005537695,0.00019959985,0.0000028901243,0.0010242427,0.0000010395873,0.00000744245,0.00060749194,0.99485624,0.00010486113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75111353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96132714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99381286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026696108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001457912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641612","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.5","title":"Work-In-Progress: Evolution and Common Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Phenomenon; Relation (database); Dynamics (music); Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.046572444228166886,"score_gpt":0.2888897015098076,"score_spread":0.2423172572816407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003112958,0.44490784,0.0000013084015,0.024145655,0.00012648012,0.0003831423,0.000008625339,0.00008405305,0.5272299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97789717,0.011465217,0.00003297104,0.009977186,0.00037557364,0.000016472755,0.000006738988,0.000013922871,0.00021475118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991207,0.000102195525,0.00028121757,0.00017657665,0.00013444337,0.00018485056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954563,0.00007317499,0.00006547992,0.00021398341,0.000036611687,0.000065133485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005447481,0.00012732833,0.00030024457,0.000018085677,0.00015087967,0.00008696835,0.00011931375,0.00004921999,0.0008571999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009864531,0.00009889931,0.00006288828,0.000039173217,0.0006335945,0.00021207705,0.00005719719,0.00026084698,0.0002799175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005266463,0.00004465391,0.000028327398,0.00045404234,0.000006514386,0.0000029074106,0.0001382271,1.1779134e-7,1.3090457e-7,0.9905921,0.0001774535,0.008550243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097204145,0.000017270448,0.00005401917,0.0017810657,0.000019130448,0.0000017469952,0.0000036030285,0.000003870541,7.141589e-7,0.3702183,0.6277073,0.00009576889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025005065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032029038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031210166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008693254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641641","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v11.i2.23","title":"Hadley V. Baxendale: Still Crazy After All These Years? Panel Discussion","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panel discussion; Law; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering; Philosophy; Mechanical engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05831587978241727,"score_gpt":0.3523340298958521,"score_spread":0.29401815011343485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03236534,0.20532455,0.00022406514,0.29851288,0.00052060647,0.0051718536,0.00020789575,0.0008607333,0.45681208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9276229,0.044164427,0.00063657097,0.01207753,0.0005391518,0.00011450678,0.000013129576,0.000023122177,0.014808654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867153,0.0001450361,0.00027685397,0.00026369127,0.00032168592,0.0003212081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923944,0.000045903853,0.00009064077,0.00039620482,0.00004375451,0.0001840622],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062193203,0.00012528019,0.00023289454,0.000012760782,0.00007337956,0.00007636171,0.0003578879,0.00006774582,0.0031950723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060947557,0.00007882853,0.00013711426,0.0001914741,0.00017737545,0.00024284208,0.00009777055,0.00015234693,0.0027845083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078849,0.00026161145,0.00049885904,0.0004801583,0.000033685377,0.00001297999,0.004763726,0.0000023225912,0.000025818414,0.7717745,0.020820701,0.20131782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006573639,0.000007250712,0.0016675631,0.00050009903,0.00004273448,0.0000010023884,0.000017637505,0.0000042019765,0.000004624866,0.0006179218,0.99692494,0.00014631002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011395864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025982067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007529516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006122424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641762","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i1.1","title":"Theory and Anti-theory in the Work of Allan Farnsworth","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art","score_opus":0.022100596165111,"score_gpt":0.3161855854937112,"score_spread":0.29408498932860017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047619954,0.17193957,0.00007937396,0.008103742,0.000034854726,0.0011288082,0.000008435591,0.000038701568,0.7710466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821672,0.015270598,0.000050903687,0.0018944306,0.00006348912,0.000018908313,0.0000027606104,0.000004437907,0.0005272876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988964,0.00052290683,0.00019888357,0.000109519955,0.00014127437,0.00013098797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993604,0.00032124794,0.00007941785,0.00019823095,0.000019338306,0.000021398931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029640615,0.000058285434,0.00016354202,0.000008728316,0.0001312721,0.000022810826,0.00023411967,0.000028103952,0.00012802638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049428385,0.000036921865,0.000045253037,0.00029180976,0.0002918485,0.000042799045,0.000029013092,0.00007894948,0.000023317665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.783391e-7,0.000023131652,0.0018001645,0.00008437321,0.0000019699344,5.302428e-7,0.00019277191,2.626598e-7,0.0000015196432,0.9928365,0.0004072578,0.0046505355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004339992,0.0000034684015,0.014955158,0.000376472,0.00002085783,4.676008e-7,0.000076508935,9.082229e-8,0.00000287703,0.09764892,0.8868139,0.00005791311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012162294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001329114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93454725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009145694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025426309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18385832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317641772","doi":"10.37419/twlr.v13.i2.23","title":"The Case of Grace James (1827)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Order (exchange); History; Interpretation (philosophy); Period (music); Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.05023674303032503,"score_gpt":0.3624801892944636,"score_spread":0.3122434462641385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317641772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03450511,0.44407445,0.0000822882,0.00939636,0.0010575159,0.0016135038,0.0000129606915,0.00017700023,0.5090808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863551,0.113508895,0.00026755533,0.0034439315,0.00021462076,0.000006611579,0.0000013747697,0.000012641426,0.01899336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990826,0.00015812833,0.00026148977,0.000106310974,0.00015793963,0.00023347828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992321,0.0002417619,0.00014222621,0.00022752077,0.00006966317,0.00008671404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003357833,0.00006885897,0.00018240052,0.000004260749,0.0006857933,0.00001343722,0.00021665094,0.00005654602,0.00031405865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015002192,0.000046958656,0.0001491122,0.00020933455,0.0006987386,0.00007980737,0.000019332268,0.00011499678,0.00008970595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014376833,0.000016079053,0.00024876554,0.0002846866,0.000010963246,0.00008324105,0.0012297387,4.158698e-8,0.0000011242563,0.9408222,0.04864923,0.008652537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030522722,0.000009107181,0.00011327258,0.0002709359,0.000030857034,0.0000165831,0.00061239203,4.555854e-8,0.000011481227,0.00051498075,0.9983273,0.00006251664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036829258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004438125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94967806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006092116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005333881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55675066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408290791","doi":"10.37419/lr.v12.i2.7","title":"The Excessive Fines Clause in the Federal Courts: A Quarter-Century of Narrowing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas A&M Law Review","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Business; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016926483652978382,"score_gpt":0.3373497357116555,"score_spread":0.3204232520586771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408290791","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011383275,0.6548363,0.000012212971,0.051785048,0.00072481134,0.001606387,0.000004891752,0.000045556855,0.2796015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94258535,0.052969687,0.0000048975917,0.0038617817,0.00015453315,0.000045537046,9.679668e-7,0.0000042107463,0.00037303675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983315,0.0005486553,0.00042003667,0.00014277296,0.00031932723,0.00023774545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901074,0.0004627707,0.00017634548,0.0002137305,0.00011080759,0.000025596346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020351235,0.0000976142,0.00030390444,0.00001582356,0.0006485293,0.00013320161,0.0005191987,0.000050917366,0.00003333338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039151593,0.000050738774,0.00010088497,0.00047561777,0.00027871947,0.00016636903,0.000034337656,0.00014492632,0.00001369104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007023488,0.00005755928,0.0012886414,0.0016830737,0.000026164165,0.0000065386103,0.003813383,3.7844663e-7,0.0000046913547,0.9610324,0.02170672,0.010373462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000982956,0.000015391992,0.00045139698,0.004337305,0.000025401685,5.3365574e-7,0.0015757,8.2977726e-7,0.000003731804,0.0054988936,0.98792243,0.000070113994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015617616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018899526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96621567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036114045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019418479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}