{"meta":{"query_hash":"9e113694db82","filters":{"venue":"Texas international law journal"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9e113694db82","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Texas+international+law+journal"},"results":[{"id":"W163059012","doi":"","title":"Recovery for Injuries and Deaths Suffered on International Flights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Continental shelf; Damages; Wrongful death; International waters; Convention; International law; Political science; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.019333517976616338,"score_gpt":0.31240169277586965,"score_spread":0.2930681747992533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W163059012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09703973,0.040175974,0.0037626987,0.1132163,0.0045775557,0.0003505163,0.001443307,0.00027569252,0.7391583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74870753,0.040343832,0.0021663823,0.063062854,0.004446508,0.000281885,0.0017327017,0.000048828904,0.13920954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647886,0.00079493766,0.00034671466,0.0002617474,0.0011964549,0.0009213017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719536,0.00077715836,0.0008028189,0.00016982446,0.00067315844,0.00038163707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019343043,0.0003328647,0.00020096163,0.0013899826,0.0019553597,0.0025162413,0.0011359222,0.0029143223,0.017997313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005735525,0.00013191249,0.00047484433,0.00077280804,0.00235342,0.0014444917,0.0031896862,0.0026800958,0.0020491583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021317576,0.0002727558,0.044848055,0.0009780014,0.000045206172,0.0038766698,0.00734,0.0012582656,0.0011551174,0.1984589,0.2912721,0.45028183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002160104,0.00060917204,0.061376378,0.0036928235,0.00003378589,0.0039542713,0.012594184,0.00034354077,0.0010427785,0.019347649,0.8968989,0.000084955056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062845876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009333386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017997313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018786275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002475346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06020707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W208580303","doi":"","title":"Recipe for a Tex-Mex Pipeline Project: Considerations in Permitting a Cross-Border Gas Transportation Project*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Cuban History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Law; Investment (military); Natural gas; Politics; Economy; Business; Engineering; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04563273412668607,"score_gpt":0.42592650312117614,"score_spread":0.3802937689944901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W208580303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027158238,0.004454487,0.043718264,0.33100098,0.011550548,0.0031181062,0.0012913749,0.0036110245,0.5740969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10926406,0.0061264057,0.12189025,0.11467038,0.0034171925,0.003530686,0.0012600537,0.001522074,0.6383189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795413,0.00044495286,0.00011506048,0.0002501161,0.00071005145,0.0005255832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633247,0.0009131287,0.00022152925,0.0002641555,0.0010100654,0.0012586733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004393911,0.00081538816,0.00030784958,0.0010840414,0.008109782,0.009786842,0.001818878,0.011377263,0.08562424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074312803,0.0008543236,0.000687195,0.0006808041,0.0020366304,0.008288337,0.0036662037,0.0077557936,0.015411949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083783365,0.00032224908,0.0027705315,0.0003355294,0.000011951392,0.0031758223,0.001109462,0.0017090347,0.0037567778,0.15284541,0.78030974,0.053569734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043697048,0.0002589141,0.0034156118,0.00025858713,0.000007053536,0.0009446184,0.0037146402,0.0009329387,0.00056011695,0.009880926,0.9799131,0.00006981816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013141701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04187404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08562424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002088961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011963182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28644162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W211203258","doi":"","title":"North American Deregulation of Electricity: Sharing Regulatory Sovereignty","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Natural monopoly; Economics; Electricity; Government (linguistics); International trade; Energy law; Sovereignty; Energy policy; Market economy; Electricity market; International economics; Business; Economy; Law; Political science; Monopoly; Engineering; Environmental law; Politics","score_opus":0.018829979771780882,"score_gpt":0.2894920654755158,"score_spread":0.27066208570373496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W211203258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08252099,0.013131654,0.02704251,0.10309649,0.0008688897,0.00009202251,0.0001102292,0.00022712647,0.7729102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89639485,0.008292399,0.0068115722,0.0258429,0.00064504234,0.000164887,0.00010702462,0.0000753638,0.06166609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886669,0.003786262,0.00041675504,0.0017866683,0.0040518595,0.0012915992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932433,0.0023956161,0.00069018744,0.0011020132,0.002242961,0.0003259686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011806872,0.00033417536,0.00043970314,0.0011930503,0.0041639875,0.010526652,0.0017859516,0.0052725435,0.0041371374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011800581,0.0005620166,0.0004839367,0.0020140212,0.007855134,0.0065869135,0.0048893224,0.006278188,0.0004763401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002077677,0.000020522086,0.000827231,0.000051651394,0.000017895532,0.00015533036,0.0027036984,0.00168054,0.00039454672,0.9564957,0.010620393,0.027011719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035187015,0.00006151261,0.006799955,0.00042733044,0.00006887496,0.00023805376,0.0028306218,0.004426039,0.0010965919,0.4752417,0.5086733,0.000100879086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052598767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07023592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9474012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008834653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019005207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10458523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143586171","doi":"","title":"Tortious Liability for Negligent Misdiagnosis of Learning Disabilities: A Comparative Study of English and American Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Punitive damages; Jury; Jurisdiction; Common law; Pleading; Tort; English law; Plaintiff; Political science; Trial court; Liability; Supreme court; Sociology","score_opus":0.038290024550209426,"score_gpt":0.3600164189409897,"score_spread":0.32172639439078027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143586171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.948335,0.007861009,0.00035940245,0.0032721234,0.000040705727,0.000018101997,0.000047119654,0.0000032176767,0.040063396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950506,0.0027570103,0.00009024474,0.0004985266,0.000048175436,0.000011541999,0.000019294053,0.0000027811652,0.0015219052],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998293,0.0007280005,0.00009050756,0.00012147965,0.00042081275,0.0003461719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874598,0.009910324,0.0010142782,0.00014120984,0.001056249,0.00041823194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027196321,0.00010843021,0.00030041265,0.0045690755,0.0022984028,0.0027839772,0.0004888999,0.0012707979,0.0044144746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009723607,0.00018254355,0.00020849807,0.003722499,0.00367835,0.0045970744,0.0017786142,0.0009585909,0.00018218378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002781044,0.0010184421,0.15835951,0.00061188167,0.00010437856,0.0068417103,0.5860817,0.00029777066,0.0018852691,0.14066723,0.007466824,0.09638732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002304227,0.0004039296,0.57440704,0.0009003785,0.00006935069,0.0038240752,0.35225296,0.00045821903,0.00033824902,0.008960237,0.05830761,0.000054823206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0128591405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03689526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0128591405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025767388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001059537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025568604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229441601","doi":"","title":"NAFTA Dispute Resolution: Implementing True Rule-Based Diplomacy through Direct Access","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Arbitration; Duty; Political science; Law; International trade; Negotiation; State (computer science); Free trade agreement; Alternative dispute resolution; Settlement (finance); Free trade; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.028552038053283182,"score_gpt":0.2975672585315689,"score_spread":0.26901522047828574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229441601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013184373,0.0014385736,0.4062556,0.02711427,0.0017519642,0.0014743967,0.0004502584,0.0037502325,0.54458034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47169033,0.0014402062,0.4135801,0.009831708,0.0009545081,0.0022973213,0.000753545,0.0005858167,0.09886645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9566086,0.02104619,0.0022339395,0.0036144156,0.014052681,0.002444063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97775966,0.010750832,0.0012730692,0.005256293,0.0044331416,0.00052696845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04122066,0.00052582513,0.0005988035,0.0016861894,0.004155103,0.014985081,0.004750993,0.006699283,0.023630654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061896503,0.0008526662,0.00077785656,0.0011233189,0.009057545,0.0129302675,0.009420769,0.0042304867,0.006524771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058470294,0.00010718169,0.00050921674,0.000118990814,0.00001256335,0.00015549164,0.001750556,0.0025150592,0.00047919765,0.86599135,0.03528273,0.09301925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001952652,0.00010897267,0.00055108627,0.0005803986,0.000027883238,0.00027271148,0.0012568559,0.02207439,0.0016031293,0.44953147,0.52373004,0.00006775553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014084112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012389834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04122066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045715855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011591843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21799833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233770069","doi":"","title":"The European Communities Biotech Dispute: How the WTO Fails to Consider Cultural Factors in the Genetically Modified Food Debate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Genetically modified food; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Genetically modified organism; Business; International trade; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.054555696167701236,"score_gpt":0.313391069103551,"score_spread":0.2588353729358498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233770069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01379327,0.021218397,0.0025034847,0.83052534,0.006904852,0.000028111031,0.00004618409,0.00004623468,0.12493421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23078583,0.008197817,0.002165322,0.7174465,0.0058948314,0.00010037845,0.000065641536,0.00018352864,0.03516014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662674,0.021070128,0.0012067213,0.0022570821,0.0058891973,0.003309478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96768266,0.026127094,0.0010964286,0.0013862397,0.0025940265,0.0011134994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044943534,0.00097417383,0.0010764247,0.0021800243,0.015431752,0.024780415,0.0058145546,0.059622824,0.0037743752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053111117,0.0006951056,0.0016836742,0.00381313,0.027875708,0.017766546,0.008167362,0.02569083,0.0008998189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033492433,0.00002730863,0.0002707319,0.00007913167,0.000010362261,0.0004925215,0.008435884,0.0003054875,0.00020643213,0.89082134,0.087145016,0.01217228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030717052,0.00003172698,0.0008270766,0.0010661978,0.000023288032,0.00031152982,0.00923969,0.0007965855,0.0005425554,0.2788118,0.70822096,0.00009789959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01894586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015607879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059622824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009452728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011569301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23768693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233861818","doi":"","title":"Should the Brain Drain Be Plugged? A Behavioral Economics Approach","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emigration; Immigration; Wage; Protectionism; Brain drain; Developing country; Politics; Economics; Political science; Development economics; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Political economy; Economic growth; International economics; Law","score_opus":0.05253026482591006,"score_gpt":0.3416977436248702,"score_spread":0.28916747879896015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233861818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14795978,0.019707127,0.06672395,0.3086244,0.001293462,0.00045671719,0.0012100365,0.0001912126,0.45383343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9342326,0.012891448,0.0062621557,0.02168674,0.000844986,0.00037767808,0.0001563362,0.000050032904,0.02349804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982134,0.0012949705,0.000025956291,0.00011443654,0.00011477437,0.00023643089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263024,0.0059289946,0.00059606443,0.0001274081,0.00029998538,0.00041731508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002660165,0.00058596424,0.0007349415,0.0012628441,0.0012073186,0.0049560447,0.001585648,0.0051341113,0.013902544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006132254,0.00026890502,0.00047007485,0.0017946024,0.0056254836,0.005050055,0.0018508531,0.0033306964,0.00074479444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004095681,0.00024176286,0.004045181,0.00017964012,0.000037658745,0.00016576599,0.0007083147,0.005762387,0.000071479284,0.95992917,0.011593506,0.017224185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048155936,0.00008969778,0.0044412496,0.0006790379,0.000032177122,0.000084324936,0.003667139,0.021439124,0.000087022854,0.9276054,0.041794606,0.00003209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047872453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00354316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013902544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041738916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034429433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04650867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235142587","doi":"","title":"Medical Tourism: A Look at How Medical Outsourcing Can Reshape Health Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical tourism; Tourism; Outsourcing; Health care; Business; Public relations; Economic growth; Marketing; Medicine; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03306858150641654,"score_gpt":0.40830342774370526,"score_spread":0.3752348462372887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235142587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007839573,0.10426318,0.0032422773,0.42456213,0.013896342,0.000102206155,0.00019738816,0.000117932985,0.44577903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16600929,0.41181293,0.007125593,0.12439313,0.021967605,0.00023888571,0.0005070941,0.000244481,0.26770103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998295,0.0007631375,0.000056900542,0.00006237989,0.00043894822,0.00038375522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813205,0.00062789174,0.00015451542,0.00009066123,0.00050793984,0.000486954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393956,0.00037649824,0.00021326198,0.001691192,0.0029314933,0.006080697,0.0009793736,0.0024499425,0.03396375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035703257,0.00017818107,0.00085581705,0.0024568967,0.002475989,0.0057160445,0.0030857597,0.003326471,0.0035009773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031158117,0.0001181998,0.0012094739,0.00074917614,0.000011054473,0.00043987052,0.0034215932,0.00048535707,0.0001486451,0.2648191,0.53623456,0.1923318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053053304,0.000048453578,0.0018487022,0.0012894395,0.00000423201,0.000292486,0.007874369,0.00022468193,0.00005792866,0.02013454,0.96820205,0.000017857676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009339857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02356592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03396375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00499457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007658674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11362004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W249554062","doi":"","title":"Judicialization and Globalization in the North American Free Trade Agreement","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Globalization; Free trade; European union; Political science; Commission; Legislature; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.014123717728847589,"score_gpt":0.23601615168199733,"score_spread":0.22189243395314973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W249554062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037006788,0.01047572,0.008202864,0.023185845,0.0010037231,0.00006865357,0.00007602817,0.00005238087,0.91992795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9195091,0.0062919394,0.0031134782,0.0056176246,0.0017052474,0.0001990195,0.00012584425,0.00003492999,0.06340285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99195296,0.0038286229,0.00043557625,0.0011411684,0.0017887133,0.000852897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164385,0.004831079,0.0012123882,0.00056666066,0.0012542899,0.0004917419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005839958,0.00025747463,0.0004365886,0.0020798924,0.007087014,0.010046273,0.0012235105,0.003958856,0.011438245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007956058,0.00035025142,0.00047178715,0.0035950334,0.01589634,0.0070436,0.003913201,0.0048262393,0.0007814182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041464846,0.000010784476,0.00023897571,0.000015998332,0.0000014605365,0.00008283508,0.0016175967,0.00019222593,0.00002389521,0.988704,0.0038103503,0.0052976445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017428552,0.000019750662,0.002588017,0.00036511978,0.000011288877,0.00017192852,0.0022650512,0.0011438113,0.000108898435,0.74827474,0.24499546,0.000038614347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01902466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018385546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01902466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008827361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008551099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06404728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261386153","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Symposium on International Forum Shopping","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Forum shopping; Economic Justice; Pride; Plaintiff; Principle of legality; Personal jurisdiction; Political science; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.02131975852613543,"score_gpt":0.2982042085360114,"score_spread":0.27688445000987594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261386153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019652983,0.025208296,0.0013978499,0.046645027,0.38730386,0.00061487535,0.0010846527,0.0005490031,0.5352312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0092403,0.020288967,0.0012047578,0.017054789,0.14309621,0.00049387227,0.0018234323,0.00045701902,0.8063406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991798,0.0001147565,0.00004867718,0.00017440549,0.00026946067,0.00021292445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982608,0.00015500265,0.000059923826,0.000049724105,0.00039167845,0.0010829327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011944176,0.001975352,0.0008521123,0.0018837346,0.0033559562,0.006172536,0.0015328367,0.004774212,0.31298867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019217875,0.000538829,0.0012061008,0.0012995692,0.00070011534,0.0044266945,0.0054952754,0.006869729,0.12513326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036406138,0.00012107472,0.000087016866,0.00019059321,0.0000023098096,0.00009826751,0.00017788382,0.00004051494,0.00037257525,0.00279184,0.97125643,0.02482504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044838175,0.000028053919,0.00023020396,0.00014316924,0.0000015413095,0.000045720633,0.00020466605,0.0000145496015,0.000028384771,0.0004921968,0.9988022,0.0000048284974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014168702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004335409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31298867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001762654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024928998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97993827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2670739304","doi":"","title":"An Empirical Research on Piercing the Corporate Veil and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Personal jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Law; Shareholder; Business; Political science; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.18347831347337504,"score_gpt":0.37996439147405037,"score_spread":0.19648607800067533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2670739304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7854667,0.007935938,0.0024460629,0.016399855,0.00027556473,0.0004223817,0.000737313,0.000019969077,0.18629627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700198,0.0064758235,0.0012084962,0.0015473332,0.00017815291,0.00021005102,0.0006724671,0.000015896232,0.019671965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932846,0.0027943493,0.0003616446,0.0006592586,0.0018772007,0.0010229129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90137863,0.07013389,0.016090155,0.0019235816,0.007718308,0.0027554533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007411425,0.0004123317,0.00047603736,0.003386328,0.0051882803,0.0058946135,0.0015096802,0.0017743229,0.055978965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04138681,0.0004049603,0.00054741144,0.005106345,0.0046635265,0.006425633,0.002352334,0.00316356,0.0021686626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016699442,0.0035598017,0.5856022,0.0012787122,0.00012312786,0.002020253,0.047646787,0.00072516,0.00026886724,0.220108,0.038629193,0.099870846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049842583,0.00045070524,0.59934044,0.0040121204,0.00015984618,0.0008739653,0.26692054,0.0021853957,0.0007541618,0.030675326,0.09449274,0.000084979445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016377848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019962791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055978965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006008327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074836193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18726832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293323243","doi":"","title":"Looking Abroad When Interpreting the U.S. Constitution: Some Reflections","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Supreme court; Principal (computer security); Subject (documents); Political science; Constitutional law; Relevance (law); Perplexity; Sociology","score_opus":0.029276174189634734,"score_gpt":0.3500193444613795,"score_spread":0.32074317027174476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293323243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014615227,0.02015297,0.0034038099,0.87385285,0.0050238264,0.000048638987,0.000046538495,0.000043472657,0.08281267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51184124,0.041164488,0.012027981,0.36476678,0.005740383,0.00020854986,0.00010923245,0.00031668466,0.06382464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784112,0.016697513,0.00042278823,0.00094993453,0.001407826,0.002110708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97993696,0.016381152,0.0004821631,0.00041168527,0.0015221776,0.0012660353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032811295,0.000754534,0.0010157257,0.0021286851,0.019944074,0.018531485,0.004246343,0.020377208,0.0066646747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02960522,0.00081183924,0.0012609408,0.0025516297,0.038951304,0.031029347,0.0076613966,0.037056595,0.001627841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007610523,0.00019289684,0.0012577098,0.0003745895,0.000021112284,0.002071968,0.19847645,0.00057912216,0.00039734427,0.6277279,0.1296455,0.03917928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025688056,0.000104031766,0.0008896693,0.002134802,0.000019375057,0.00060245296,0.42857984,0.00062165095,0.00077904644,0.1498896,0.41623506,0.000118789314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0571526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08129014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0571526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015616651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012626001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1735248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293453096","doi":"","title":"Canadian Preference Law Reform","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Legislation; Statutory law; Preference; Discretion; Political science; Law reform; Insolvency; Nothing; Common law; Economics","score_opus":0.04087800652717334,"score_gpt":0.3298105964386153,"score_spread":0.288932589911442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293453096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074080974,0.005985796,0.0027172442,0.06211134,0.0012322115,0.00019881348,0.0019786104,0.00019954442,0.9181684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3072371,0.010765257,0.006701036,0.04374495,0.00076828845,0.00025808517,0.00159996,0.00019211782,0.62873316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99117893,0.00082072103,0.00027501697,0.001096351,0.004595092,0.0020339335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270964,0.0006515307,0.00014601042,0.0004916323,0.0051699704,0.0008311847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040495675,0.00061252894,0.00046724227,0.0038058497,0.015877368,0.0070505836,0.003487679,0.004430634,0.043021534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011951826,0.000495221,0.000649135,0.0056978487,0.008719319,0.0030939144,0.0028323855,0.0055115134,0.0029765605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011260817,0.000012453443,0.0003870537,0.00008727229,0.0000057954107,0.0000965214,0.00087843096,0.00040866752,0.000088308516,0.8340051,0.14383245,0.020186612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013753978,0.000008316941,0.0013305526,0.00016018709,0.000013704551,0.000060586914,0.0005116794,0.00051169796,0.00016867074,0.035629045,0.9615586,0.0000331527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98169804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98442644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16634864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16634864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20808168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9669174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306181283","doi":"","title":"Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Antitrust Law: What Is a \"Direct, Substantial, and Reasonably Foreseesable Effect\" under the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Consent decree; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Monopolization; Mandate; Commission; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Competition (biology); Political science; Enforcement; Economics; Original jurisdiction; Monopoly","score_opus":0.01377949901417284,"score_gpt":0.23606144575725882,"score_spread":0.222281946743086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306181283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06104247,0.042046692,0.008608692,0.18676391,0.0048059043,0.00026307825,0.00075510633,0.0003351822,0.695379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7885481,0.031378046,0.008175822,0.10212137,0.0051595103,0.00022896715,0.00072708447,0.00010760383,0.06355354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898948,0.002473793,0.0006274063,0.0009974316,0.0048550363,0.0011514379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871432,0.0068221274,0.002185646,0.00048085587,0.0028227125,0.0005454593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065589687,0.00037843187,0.00040137046,0.0021943068,0.0027170922,0.009613433,0.0015936382,0.0068177916,0.00716228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015210347,0.00038239014,0.00047556384,0.001892188,0.009967501,0.0046389387,0.001463878,0.0054876423,0.0025883522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041294137,0.00014075916,0.0060843434,0.00033002673,0.000011486734,0.00045772112,0.0017917157,0.00049725804,0.0007566933,0.84280074,0.08041764,0.066670395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030492889,0.00022404562,0.023024691,0.0041664555,0.00008009006,0.0007280848,0.0042954655,0.002033482,0.0025523766,0.22946519,0.7332599,0.00013968234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018952724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026670827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018952724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006293366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0126691125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045661807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W307601363","doi":"","title":"Judicial supervision of individual settlements with class members in Australia, Canada, and the United States","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Law; Political science; Negotiation; Civil procedure; State (computer science); Geography; Business","score_opus":0.018597823018660073,"score_gpt":0.2494729458172701,"score_spread":0.23087512279861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W307601363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52417964,0.0073685166,0.002094212,0.027912566,0.0006679007,0.0006680332,0.0006461162,0.00030157907,0.43616146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88313055,0.0024706547,0.0018336673,0.00461292,0.00016570558,0.00016537942,0.0004405248,0.000046303554,0.10713422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988713,0.0010493173,0.0005949268,0.0006537542,0.006096258,0.0028926905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981139,0.0033759086,0.0015310505,0.00065110304,0.010263534,0.0030394583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005950914,0.00022509569,0.00032322377,0.0022586691,0.014367681,0.004528075,0.0019674797,0.0030209725,0.00492964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019291904,0.00053044077,0.00032284253,0.0019097915,0.004093727,0.0006522127,0.0025827645,0.0042408924,0.0006417784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023966757,0.0005138094,0.07155882,0.0005230729,0.00010002414,0.0038560242,0.0650759,0.006665738,0.004378178,0.26657838,0.32848793,0.2520225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001310528,0.00015082906,0.26350477,0.00081237504,0.00011266342,0.00064845505,0.020767821,0.0051982705,0.002951641,0.012151977,0.6932711,0.00029908304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8892086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9414442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110791385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03278662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10387592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2378847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121188396","doi":"","title":"Murky Waters: Ambiguous International Law for Ocean Fertilization and Other Geoengineering","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dumping; Geoengineering; Context (archaeology); Convention; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Law; Oceanography; Political science; Fishery; Environmental science; Climate change; Business; Geography; International trade; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.015462627790865276,"score_gpt":0.2378110726076677,"score_spread":0.22234844481680244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121188396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039688885,0.007450606,0.009867428,0.14534497,0.0020027806,0.00027717257,0.00045097104,0.00019522327,0.79472196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6085067,0.0044768574,0.010378218,0.19809943,0.0007089628,0.00032856176,0.00041298888,0.00017642195,0.17691183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845919,0.002448865,0.0009703602,0.0018346285,0.0073664254,0.0027878839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98806816,0.0051010973,0.0009980969,0.0012120241,0.003886564,0.0007339575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011125191,0.0005896768,0.00049854204,0.0012808492,0.00865573,0.010710964,0.0027067428,0.011786643,0.004989243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019586848,0.00062807096,0.0006888489,0.0013090027,0.018073298,0.0036810194,0.0049748546,0.011470754,0.00070693693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019947383,0.000028166505,0.0026671686,0.000089759764,0.000010644856,0.00053331873,0.0057801805,0.00039906564,0.0005836256,0.92889196,0.048287366,0.012708838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027324146,0.000053902764,0.0062914356,0.0012222376,0.000055035187,0.00035717603,0.0066732736,0.0008941502,0.0014278752,0.056574985,0.9262508,0.00017177181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60023785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64911157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60023785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027051263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06750947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80423284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121581988","doi":"","title":"Constitutional, Remedial, and International Dialogues about Rights: The Canadian Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Supreme court; Scholarship; Conversation; Political science; Judicial opinion; Sociology; Judicial activism; Judicial review; Globalization; Constitution","score_opus":0.04266739919851232,"score_gpt":0.31727766371422883,"score_spread":0.2746102645157165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121581988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08051439,0.026390148,0.0007508135,0.21069539,0.0013005239,0.00011219628,0.00040292615,0.00009529588,0.67973834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84046805,0.016331714,0.0007873528,0.020945283,0.00033272422,0.00008410813,0.0001770121,0.00014224312,0.12073159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870127,0.0027312795,0.00030523184,0.0010242483,0.0038706465,0.0050558588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029386,0.0035539265,0.00037531,0.00037773146,0.0021426778,0.003256598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007169204,0.00092239416,0.0012662405,0.0037645195,0.09182022,0.021168133,0.0041296966,0.010214636,0.0232109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01270279,0.0005337002,0.0007471385,0.011005798,0.05067737,0.0075026234,0.0096875345,0.011984192,0.00092009443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006273446,0.00008702278,0.0016656987,0.00023195035,0.000014711392,0.0011507189,0.31039,0.00025230914,0.00036579027,0.60055614,0.060810685,0.02441217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020504913,0.000019638683,0.0028554895,0.00033511312,0.000016097774,0.000280963,0.16842765,0.00013748983,0.00013638605,0.013502522,0.8141764,0.00009176239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27756673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27756673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27578712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8379202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W344030014","doi":"","title":"The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law's Transport Law Project: An Interim View of a Work in Progress","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International trade law; Convention; Interim; Commission; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; International law; Political science; Arbitration; Common law","score_opus":0.05432570473693623,"score_gpt":0.3105949912310684,"score_spread":0.25626928649413216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W344030014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090765633,0.06474387,0.013401836,0.28772405,0.068438984,0.0018300528,0.0071848924,0.0017034112,0.55406517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030173013,0.13495636,0.07958164,0.120750256,0.028734062,0.0065474464,0.029136721,0.0030179766,0.5671025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96286845,0.009877771,0.0021803586,0.0019817366,0.019987362,0.003104298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694624,0.0041332925,0.0015230858,0.0032863189,0.01830474,0.0032901794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04583686,0.00309734,0.001812997,0.010055426,0.0053065014,0.029415619,0.00975839,0.023314172,0.0533569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042384945,0.001388885,0.0016061853,0.014734815,0.0085630575,0.029764332,0.007718216,0.015521176,0.035763036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022085607,0.0001609975,0.0002570964,0.0004505621,0.000005625493,0.00007479485,0.00021846182,0.0003359459,0.00011130836,0.2316374,0.711453,0.055272732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050158537,0.000012527175,0.00025151044,0.0016174199,0.000002813583,0.00002268294,0.00024428565,0.00012350232,0.000054174587,0.011874951,0.985775,0.000016075765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035747323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013842574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0533569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012098003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07986436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24241132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}