{"meta":{"query_hash":"df643c4bec2e","filters":{"venue":"Texas review of law & politics"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/df643c4bec2e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Texas+review+of+law+%26+politics"},"results":[{"id":"W277636274","doi":"","title":"Witness for the Defense: The Compulsory Process Clause as a Limit on Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdiction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas review of law & politics","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Innocence; Constitution; Due Process Clause; Parliament; Injustice; Political science; Witness; Jurisdiction; Surrender; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06132121819679193,"score_gpt":0.38702353464976746,"score_spread":0.32570231645297554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277636274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01327202,0.007732783,0.009600742,0.04351713,0.0020119892,0.00015830908,0.00019499575,0.00012071497,0.9233913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7044487,0.006364976,0.00415771,0.03250724,0.003424451,0.0005427045,0.00018151938,0.0001253836,0.24824731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993224,0.002698875,0.00029753172,0.00083741953,0.0018921195,0.0010499927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911807,0.006781278,0.00046049556,0.00053959107,0.00068256183,0.0003553493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069882795,0.00045335075,0.00038789154,0.0010647374,0.0055984296,0.010046994,0.0032860865,0.013185898,0.021352759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01640748,0.0005463689,0.0004150597,0.0013318984,0.010195528,0.0077624973,0.004497748,0.0109497355,0.003027819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008932084,0.000007579795,0.00008474129,0.000016037462,6.582467e-7,0.0001017628,0.00045098437,0.00007066443,0.000058159414,0.9818387,0.014068427,0.0032934223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048931088,0.000115611045,0.0011528329,0.001096073,0.000024566818,0.00030991182,0.0024440093,0.0019625847,0.0008200526,0.45625225,0.5357042,0.00006903892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017810894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018383302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021352759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004819369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067901732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07143211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338014915","doi":"","title":"UNCLOS Key to Increasing Navigational Freedom","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas review of law & politics","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Battle; Political science; Delegation; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Freedom of navigation; National security; Negotiation; International law; Law of the sea; Public international law; History","score_opus":0.021393054091881254,"score_gpt":0.29086459923820357,"score_spread":0.2694715451463223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338014915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035335056,0.005105297,0.006667516,0.21599692,0.009645182,0.00004161724,0.00014987274,0.00042766266,0.7584325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16230051,0.0064731063,0.0075160996,0.090119645,0.004013691,0.00017072834,0.00032570108,0.00086801045,0.7282125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950317,0.0013549468,0.00017359153,0.0006769783,0.0018355749,0.000927226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910262,0.0014141527,0.00046329558,0.0015239952,0.0021565545,0.0034157042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038598697,0.0005373842,0.0004537546,0.00093428313,0.00638708,0.0113371825,0.0014786989,0.004788136,0.10649717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01504882,0.0002965508,0.00036467018,0.000844312,0.009459656,0.0118044065,0.013413147,0.0076742833,0.031967178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036187666,0.000055765537,0.0006042991,0.00012092374,0.000009463047,0.00010838893,0.0021405588,0.00016106576,0.00044447853,0.43929458,0.4719447,0.085079655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045402126,0.00001180563,0.00019369266,0.00012459263,0.0000024423616,0.000057063287,0.0008425714,0.000048917904,0.0001519624,0.040551886,0.9580029,0.00000755494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056167757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010556748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10649717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035784743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007061227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35626853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}