{"meta":{"query_hash":"4e896ad41529","filters":{"venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4e896ad41529","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Age+of+Human+Rights+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2809263102","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.n10.5","title":"REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION BASED ON RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR PRACTICES. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BETWEEN THE AMERICAN, CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN APPROACHES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Reasonable accommodation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14268369864834157,"score_gpt":0.3728837980788236,"score_spread":0.23020009943048203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809263102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5641972,0.000073104246,0.00009087911,0.009755055,0.00006639982,0.00032963257,0.0000071434806,0.000017155202,0.42546344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828094,0.000025227484,0.00013224361,0.00023202169,0.0008225642,0.000002560232,0.0000046264504,0.000007973179,0.00049186096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979731,0.0011300738,0.00019263042,0.00014445616,0.0003303168,0.00022945597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984074,0.00034671012,0.0006688369,0.00019551162,0.00025607194,0.00012547385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017656358,0.00010541654,0.00016913512,0.0001181085,0.003388935,0.00025467016,0.00042097602,0.00002411499,0.00003409666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015906518,0.00005019088,0.000045197532,0.00021677902,0.0016419668,0.00019440695,0.00002083083,0.00025526562,0.000013210569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052521005,0.0002700075,0.005493364,0.000011553244,0.00031091183,0.00012726299,0.5014435,0.00008692317,0.000116614625,0.39249143,0.09606603,0.003057173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024089192,0.0039542136,0.300721,0.00027080026,0.0006059154,0.000075661446,0.12943214,0.00056992384,0.00046831762,0.49210367,0.068549894,0.0008395451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36424348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58248854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43408373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017813375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021212376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903977729","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.n11.6","title":"A CRITIQUE OF THE DEMISE OF HEADS OF STATE IMMUNITY IN THE AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Impunity; Human rights; State (computer science); State immunity; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Demise; Law and economics; International human rights law; De facto; Punishment (psychology); Sociology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.03305598411274936,"score_gpt":0.3475599199354952,"score_spread":0.31450393582274583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903977729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9679287,0.00004982628,0.000011375103,0.00020823024,0.00013796093,0.00023885793,0.000021692616,0.0000039365195,0.031399384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973824,0.0000060563802,0.000035101948,0.000040787247,0.00023237808,0.0000021645214,0.000002936891,0.000008080818,0.00229011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646723,0.0012220362,0.0009809384,0.00011192523,0.00095509266,0.00026280124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975461,0.00029270252,0.00096984336,0.00047308084,0.0006796332,0.0000386726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029487857,0.00014910415,0.0004242947,0.00015465084,0.0015218654,0.00003379539,0.0019762877,0.0000823996,0.0005824754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035323035,0.000065942215,0.00028731747,0.00015088139,0.0034213776,0.00020282426,0.00009413533,0.0004743068,0.0000017992741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006368233,0.00033086803,0.00021794869,0.000031923315,0.0000825049,0.000017618826,0.06876525,0.0000034482425,0.01961274,0.9105751,0.00028878212,0.000010106714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061354827,0.000376072,0.022848088,0.00036411974,0.000056400248,0.00001052785,0.00040947914,0.0000020033547,0.05329354,0.91921985,0.0027012676,0.00010509297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013020984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063154615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06835578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052402436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104510174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166672693","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.v16.6317","title":"Critical Legal Essay to Advocate Iranian Children's Right to \"Proper\" Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Toleration; Virtue; Islam; Corporate governance; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Islamic education; Politics; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.021170025492230033,"score_gpt":0.3498844058376475,"score_spread":0.3287143803454175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166672693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8397803,0.00018589474,0.00007233069,0.039728995,0.0012054832,0.00016194164,0.0000021028482,0.000017555718,0.11884545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96868056,0.00001294456,0.00046210852,0.001309914,0.0015829197,0.0000065599424,0.000002398927,0.000008066302,0.027934521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985357,0.00034250307,0.00027783567,0.00015737652,0.0004102816,0.00027631837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989998,0.0000781581,0.00006262637,0.0002072328,0.00047691874,0.00017528709],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006714268,0.000099577446,0.00017029968,0.000095316434,0.002270167,0.00023821855,0.00040808905,0.000036655536,0.0017225528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023411534,0.000061044346,0.00008646228,0.00026028726,0.00027182006,0.00019057238,0.000055422093,0.00022130192,0.00013840527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001847728,0.0005784231,0.0009811943,0.000009633222,0.00009302029,0.000040306477,0.12999675,0.0000034926716,0.0030373507,0.7777827,0.08473275,0.002725953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044429905,0.00023672631,0.087848246,0.00031276245,0.00014040769,0.00017694055,0.019206082,4.3151894e-7,0.0061036265,0.13957259,0.7454502,0.00050771335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007332891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031561016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6607174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010685112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005471938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172686569","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.v16.6085","title":"Majoritarian Epistemology on Religious Symbols. A Religiously-Based Stereotyping Technique to “Package Others’ Religious Rights”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious identity; Sociology; Epistemology; Identity (music); Neutrality; Politics; Faith; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0625403256407087,"score_gpt":0.3661117292328628,"score_spread":0.30357140359215407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172686569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513016,0.0003626662,0.0019172734,0.012244325,0.0008719967,0.0010948343,0.000021060077,0.0001811657,0.032005094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864307,0.00004718483,0.0019399503,0.0036457796,0.0008650153,0.000025613881,0.000017099637,0.00004279307,0.00698586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957836,0.0013027189,0.00088472164,0.0004404187,0.00081719726,0.0007713007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997468,0.00030319416,0.0004788208,0.0008006299,0.0006257905,0.00032355625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014490567,0.00033744422,0.0005273069,0.00027916813,0.0024169108,0.00028522752,0.0009259801,0.00027019664,0.00021447675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016750424,0.00022021684,0.0003292677,0.0002973061,0.0007487984,0.00016441554,0.00007329272,0.00068945874,0.00009260261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029993252,0.0007553828,0.0011012527,0.000110987,0.0005534519,0.004952308,0.29086182,0.00018544018,0.028150698,0.4379227,0.23495784,0.00014821194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030807587,0.0011260139,0.0022761985,0.0013283318,0.00036829762,0.0010722735,0.00919027,0.00001709349,0.06168867,0.46568352,0.4524555,0.001713066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007173022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029265195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28167155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000943159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005042597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283324991","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.v18.7009","title":"Judicial Balacing of Parental Objection to Medical Treatment on the Basis of Religious Beleifs and Children Right to Life in Nigeria","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Marriage and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Law; Supreme court; Best interests; Legal guardian; Child protection; Political science; Morality; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.012001425070794975,"score_gpt":0.2768146904737377,"score_spread":0.2648132654029427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283324991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99594885,0.000051856216,0.000008789307,0.0012762494,0.00016004045,0.00026411354,0.000010424651,0.000004129279,0.0022755398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942464,0.000049187005,0.000013896651,0.00019688433,0.0002206552,0.0000073823194,0.0000021785331,0.000005226374,0.000079927275],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981832,0.00048511502,0.00037616963,0.00010785683,0.0006786955,0.00016897317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993753,0.00014643866,0.00018583128,0.00013132494,0.000031589825,0.0001295403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001295887,0.000084686646,0.00023191633,0.00014065724,0.0010297728,0.000019778021,0.00031984004,0.000035371577,0.00050672464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079355916,0.000045588622,0.00007828375,0.00021418704,0.0001740904,0.000033516197,0.00008046935,0.00020307612,8.318401e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021912588,0.0030229047,0.16522454,0.000028024571,0.00096235477,0.00045259876,0.7157738,0.0015502699,0.007231213,0.07695527,0.018170081,0.008437688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008281762,0.014442236,0.77229583,0.00085171475,0.0004624373,0.0002653865,0.049709924,0.00022629187,0.006208488,0.13805471,0.007947231,0.0012539645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063603506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022479746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6660639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013674815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011325232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99535745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}