{"meta":{"query_hash":"4e896ad41529","filters":{"venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4e896ad41529","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Age+of+Human+Rights+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W2809263102","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.n10.5","title":"REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION BASED ON RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR PRACTICES. A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE BETWEEN THE AMERICAN, CANADIAN AND EUROPEAN APPROACHES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Perspective (graphical); Reasonable accommodation; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Positive economics; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14268369864834157,"score_gpt":0.3728837980788236,"score_spread":0.23020009943048203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809263102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1819883,0.017000591,0.0029223745,0.03679611,0.00038309858,0.00006238627,0.00015430401,0.000025942287,0.76066697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849498,0.0028302022,0.000533996,0.002652395,0.000039400893,0.000015260777,0.000031217136,0.000008336689,0.008939234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900922,0.0027442994,0.00025594502,0.000512672,0.0032162531,0.0031784826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944729,0.0016169843,0.0005921305,0.00031716115,0.0019146866,0.0010860775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052958275,0.00025763572,0.00026609754,0.003978232,0.014804229,0.008551585,0.0015469387,0.0031105338,0.002875429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009252212,0.00017720852,0.0004901441,0.004180451,0.039577343,0.0026640184,0.0039436813,0.0035744486,0.00016658685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018050849,0.00002294913,0.0027725731,0.000041070787,0.0000067928722,0.00018155843,0.032272696,0.00017886776,0.000105307176,0.9469856,0.0029140885,0.014500537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029547493,0.00008243683,0.08785867,0.0019906953,0.00008517257,0.00058529794,0.26554206,0.0010276154,0.00069244386,0.15397157,0.48791423,0.0002202067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9073839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09261608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06299999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05987969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45709908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903977729","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.n11.6","title":"A CRITIQUE OF THE DEMISE OF HEADS OF STATE IMMUNITY IN THE AGE OF HUMAN RIGHTS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Impunity; Human rights; State (computer science); State immunity; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Demise; Law and economics; International human rights law; De facto; Punishment (psychology); Sociology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.03305598411274936,"score_gpt":0.3475599199354952,"score_spread":0.31450393582274583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903977729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026402093,0.008160386,0.034604624,0.5174873,0.0025427162,0.00006004697,0.000103498176,0.0001344454,0.41050494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8697332,0.0033543878,0.0058630803,0.08612399,0.0040915012,0.00017747445,0.000029723173,0.00016272183,0.030463923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99291986,0.0031128298,0.00023378173,0.0012894417,0.00165782,0.00078627164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848433,0.0105937375,0.0010552779,0.0012806937,0.0015783178,0.00064852246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011737928,0.000440458,0.0008008246,0.0015763524,0.007047763,0.006764706,0.0022204036,0.012333526,0.005353512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023375163,0.00048102252,0.0007719995,0.0011223695,0.07758438,0.013884563,0.0071934746,0.023762545,0.00071807357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001808534,0.0000011388433,0.0000284206,0.000006137377,7.288854e-7,0.000013179864,0.0015705543,0.000025189272,0.000011822571,0.99630654,0.0013456609,0.00068876613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011511416,0.0000151818285,0.00024629585,0.00013210729,0.0000053514777,0.00007226143,0.0018553085,0.00019769263,0.0001678442,0.8903181,0.10696009,0.00001833307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007640778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076134023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012333526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00623032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067623616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062076867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166672693","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.v16.6317","title":"Critical Legal Essay to Advocate Iranian Children's Right to \"Proper\" Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Education and Islamic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Toleration; Virtue; Islam; Corporate governance; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Islamic education; Politics; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.021170025492230033,"score_gpt":0.3498844058376475,"score_spread":0.3287143803454175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166672693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019877145,0.009384983,0.008809299,0.54697305,0.007947617,0.000118157084,0.00006831003,0.00006269604,0.40675882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82433414,0.0033334738,0.0058700675,0.1091709,0.0046141897,0.00015741102,0.000039483988,0.000052540763,0.052427802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958046,0.0020113455,0.00012215498,0.00038587896,0.0011084755,0.00056756573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426794,0.0033314584,0.0004394381,0.00019469862,0.0014689512,0.00029743765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006229012,0.0003614031,0.0002728405,0.0012189164,0.0077280314,0.004812988,0.0010970775,0.0063885357,0.0027284212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011886302,0.00016116578,0.0002754608,0.0005901314,0.028296972,0.0043523093,0.0018536663,0.0069280406,0.00033394987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003318044,0.0000082313545,0.00007362516,0.000019355743,0.0000010159893,0.00009128164,0.00468972,0.00006899513,0.000058703794,0.9593178,0.033569217,0.0020987333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001514504,0.000015541691,0.00033118037,0.00034680255,0.0000054423494,0.00016081128,0.011269914,0.00035526115,0.0002929587,0.30964568,0.6775418,0.000019491326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011104211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010229808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011104211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008462307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009579642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061398625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172686569","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.v16.6085","title":"Majoritarian Epistemology on Religious Symbols. A Religiously-Based Stereotyping Technique to “Package Others’ Religious Rights”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious identity; Sociology; Epistemology; Identity (music); Neutrality; Politics; Faith; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0625403256407087,"score_gpt":0.3661117292328628,"score_spread":0.30357140359215407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172686569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03420891,0.0037011877,0.20146804,0.016171835,0.0011380239,0.00011615118,0.00016116817,0.00017646521,0.7428582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91960263,0.0009871131,0.02736948,0.003290327,0.0005633979,0.00020115677,0.00008735431,0.00013279812,0.047765817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638665,0.0019950499,0.00013696485,0.0005227754,0.00069713884,0.00026148593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974896,0.0011140296,0.0003511561,0.0006160237,0.000261879,0.00016739058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032294039,0.00040456848,0.0002889101,0.0014368055,0.0028385066,0.003670081,0.000849686,0.0020023258,0.0045662723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030359237,0.00024371035,0.0006270273,0.00076307263,0.02699433,0.0034449594,0.0037780022,0.0033230563,0.0009885832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003423182,0.0000045180227,0.000115378745,0.000018389503,0.0000015920609,0.0000145395,0.0030612836,0.000038180253,0.00014948814,0.992765,0.0007485365,0.0030797638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012639098,0.000046914556,0.00068459864,0.00012819472,0.000008587781,0.00026895825,0.003212313,0.00062362733,0.00056634704,0.83719003,0.15724263,0.000015177045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015100123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019376774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045662723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023188917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017458725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017078936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283324991","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.v18.7009","title":"Judicial Balacing of Parental Objection to Medical Treatment on the Basis of Religious Beleifs and Children Right to Life in Nigeria","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","topic":"Marriage and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Law; Supreme court; Best interests; Legal guardian; Child protection; Political science; Morality; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.012001425070794975,"score_gpt":0.2768146904737377,"score_spread":0.2648132654029427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283324991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9065092,0.004474938,0.00036509588,0.013902105,0.00027528979,0.00006617542,0.000034672696,0.000004695474,0.07436789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99379057,0.0010381886,0.00010909292,0.0026979293,0.000041682004,0.000014184374,0.000006081663,0.0000018078937,0.0023004243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971789,0.00091760955,0.00030658377,0.00021717456,0.0005561217,0.0008237017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900365,0.006707369,0.0017054243,0.0002702076,0.0007015861,0.00057892915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048517296,0.00009179348,0.0002528411,0.00063976826,0.005023705,0.0034383326,0.0005551031,0.0029161118,0.0022509326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01522659,0.00034813947,0.00023583678,0.00046940567,0.0050705816,0.0012617139,0.0022604463,0.0051249885,0.00009411537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030185122,0.00031002765,0.20836034,0.00056590635,0.000072695104,0.023888782,0.16887441,0.0004649918,0.0036528357,0.536373,0.011438135,0.045696944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021035933,0.0006385903,0.43741485,0.005487546,0.0005196607,0.015063498,0.25143915,0.001534096,0.008669536,0.083459236,0.19528183,0.00028163983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025689535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062324334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025689535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030351183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007124582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051080048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}