{"meta":{"query_hash":"eb67089cd8ec","filters":{"venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/eb67089cd8ec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Agora+Political+Science+Undergraduate+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W105962659","doi":"10.29173/agora17246","title":"Aboriginal Representation in Canada: Reforming Parliament or Creating a Third Order of Government","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02333112729195072,"score_gpt":0.31321935514601906,"score_spread":0.2898882278540683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105962659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.429642,0.007894997,0.0026841306,0.095682114,0.0008835696,0.000084210864,0.00013254043,0.0001052656,0.46289122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660629,0.001727003,0.0006614615,0.003379855,0.000046931647,0.000013602162,0.000032661523,0.000023120829,0.028052524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929402,0.0010461186,0.00007577266,0.0003324862,0.0016237196,0.003981645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972882,0.00039217333,0.00029012735,0.00013427339,0.000765413,0.00112991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002561519,0.00025834658,0.00044250776,0.00095598603,0.026567657,0.008675474,0.0018581819,0.0018627661,0.0041022603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006299721,0.00018960511,0.00036010137,0.002074481,0.017946905,0.002240009,0.0048717633,0.004108243,0.00024534282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092370115,0.000051874966,0.012263393,0.00017729033,0.000022205051,0.0006604181,0.21079086,0.00073108874,0.0007427717,0.6898018,0.024903718,0.05976226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003576653,0.0000644935,0.045190576,0.00045253572,0.00008050662,0.0003153781,0.25201446,0.0010692719,0.0012051426,0.024891887,0.6745365,0.00014338792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8762598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1237402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23562346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89780223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116943990","doi":"10.29173/agora18911","title":"Hope Beats Fear? : The Assent of the Saskatchewan Party to Power and the Fall of the NDP","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Democracy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Realigning election; Political economy; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Work (physics); Law; Sociology; History; Engineering; Socialism","score_opus":0.010988493529052259,"score_gpt":0.2513769525906674,"score_spread":0.24038845906161513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116943990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8041326,0.0014983395,0.00021026006,0.06634687,0.0003173113,0.000020379191,0.000117173644,0.0000111633835,0.12734595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738316,0.00056260906,0.00008206882,0.004730003,0.000017254972,0.00000694054,0.000023155199,0.000013203831,0.0207332],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976388,0.0006537294,0.000032632714,0.00016427194,0.0004019694,0.0011085935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974948,0.0006454149,0.00022579484,0.00010770924,0.00055605546,0.0009702997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022730906,0.00017682437,0.00023586242,0.00085340213,0.03099317,0.009380353,0.001098133,0.0017784974,0.0061210054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036620118,0.00025538137,0.0001587892,0.0014853539,0.015363142,0.0022651292,0.005329672,0.0065874993,0.00048177116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021135357,0.00011068582,0.08186687,0.00009042877,0.000054130098,0.0040339213,0.6051275,0.00025836096,0.0017123272,0.18689227,0.0623222,0.057319984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010506096,0.000021222655,0.049641836,0.0001895166,0.000015530575,0.0003224653,0.80712426,0.00016410214,0.00066127296,0.0067431442,0.1350299,0.00007627761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93930984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060690165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05332059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052544862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38686973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W117043523","doi":"10.29173/agora10084","title":"The American Judiciary Through the Lens of The Federalist Papers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Federalist; Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Judicial restraint; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04877377653511141,"score_gpt":0.3215762806192961,"score_spread":0.2728025040841847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117043523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0084358575,0.018983437,0.0073424676,0.06996991,0.0019703647,0.000016810249,0.00013440962,0.000053923053,0.8930928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8523527,0.013174605,0.0087736305,0.014309131,0.00586932,0.000111688954,0.000104577906,0.00010940875,0.1051949],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981217,0.0009600731,0.000054152,0.00024043226,0.00042654455,0.00019713487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985642,0.0008721009,0.00009156917,0.0001684226,0.0001695457,0.00013425107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026322962,0.00041646036,0.0003175206,0.003012037,0.0075564147,0.01023812,0.00072476227,0.0034098674,0.0062678913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039047252,0.00027421745,0.00039048248,0.0016276039,0.016353125,0.0050016367,0.0018368389,0.007805021,0.0006323656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.4885795e-7,0.000001995702,0.000023863695,0.0000029295472,6.111098e-7,0.0000037831883,0.00030561408,0.000040146762,0.0000073954557,0.9960102,0.0026168358,0.000985804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004730662,0.00000379122,0.00029568747,0.00006692948,0.0000042680176,0.00001617295,0.0004139799,0.00023303364,0.000036574438,0.7926924,0.20622805,0.000004380717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02463763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03909654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02463763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013153809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061422065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127998565","doi":"10.29173/agora19042","title":"One Nation under God: The Religious Right and the Separation of Church and State in the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of church and state; Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Establishment Clause; Christian right; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Faith; Secular state; First amendment; Sociology; Theology; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023136239373445888,"score_gpt":0.31914986162227893,"score_spread":0.29601362224883304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127998565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63717544,0.006507626,0.001060359,0.15146403,0.00049663056,0.000010905879,0.000027722952,0.0000065825116,0.20325072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99222904,0.0006927799,0.000113235714,0.0043150284,0.000073072,0.000004343638,0.0000054851685,0.0000027025799,0.0025643138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981529,0.0010572149,0.000033469147,0.00017682229,0.0001756768,0.00040398113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834764,0.0009189874,0.00026414538,0.00006516151,0.0001019057,0.00030226939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026576952,0.00010169353,0.000194452,0.00076601317,0.0120509565,0.0060166363,0.00051218126,0.0034442262,0.0025248998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030694837,0.00016666946,0.00017414735,0.0010102604,0.016192721,0.0045066127,0.0048552672,0.0066951597,0.0001287072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000494462,0.00006656315,0.009126143,0.0000213532,0.000007975312,0.00044470484,0.08408101,0.00007981098,0.00021886101,0.88786995,0.005818302,0.012215839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006257805,0.00010838617,0.063809395,0.00066937535,0.000056883768,0.00048990344,0.32848325,0.0008382007,0.0011097685,0.3201576,0.28413,0.00008467714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032440785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0876872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032440785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034106143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034493431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06450391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139180102","doi":"10.29173/agora19895","title":"Ownership and private property from the perspectives of Hegel and Marx","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Marxist philosophy; Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Private property; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Politics; Theme (computing); Political philosophy; Inequality; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02851509869856725,"score_gpt":0.28218521874924024,"score_spread":0.253670120050673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W139180102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055446498,0.054565515,0.07441637,0.097400926,0.0009960993,0.000064420085,0.000194796,0.00006906226,0.7168463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507401,0.018461466,0.0057309214,0.0025390375,0.0010956775,0.00008162069,0.00006038443,0.00004066262,0.021250278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800104,0.00096246693,0.000065683846,0.00021482095,0.00048608746,0.00026983544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826765,0.0012083219,0.00013727881,0.00019709546,0.000102202735,0.00008739097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027550443,0.00047443144,0.00055768155,0.0019173477,0.0025422752,0.0065813456,0.0006605888,0.0027801632,0.0030104993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027510186,0.00025486862,0.00053070224,0.0020085291,0.041191105,0.014094736,0.0037688336,0.0040288274,0.00040402287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022677837,0.0000021926433,0.000017077731,0.000006576402,8.4245005e-7,0.000009986873,0.0004552594,0.00009678054,0.000011321619,0.9983386,0.0002562976,0.0008027687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002613395,0.0000038641383,0.000040887633,0.000029667484,0.0000010315907,0.000017665174,0.0002584099,0.00011718385,0.00003446632,0.9841248,0.01536673,0.0000025658926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022547632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015824527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065813456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050968775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002934105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03698063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488961933","doi":"10.29173/agora19133","title":"Perspectives on Foreign Intervention in Contemporary Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Intervention (counseling); Obligation; State (computer science); Scholarship; Hindsight bias; Sovereignty; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Political science; Law; International relations; Foreign policy; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03623462803850608,"score_gpt":0.3392608074423191,"score_spread":0.30302617940381305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488961933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02121384,0.06174908,0.0035949734,0.17022794,0.0022532162,0.00001645977,0.000033752196,0.000028325734,0.74088234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89669216,0.033457223,0.0011320449,0.024688298,0.004777298,0.00008751712,0.0000522944,0.00009848864,0.03901458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937663,0.0044434797,0.00007263742,0.00037991998,0.00045802043,0.00087971246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702686,0.0022458916,0.00019844965,0.00012848002,0.00013708777,0.00026321065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046318606,0.0005619796,0.0005376329,0.0026741645,0.011542705,0.017716872,0.0011198448,0.0066547696,0.007869675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003194016,0.00026548962,0.00056747574,0.0039330716,0.047982514,0.009392843,0.004751667,0.009017339,0.0007766071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003357488,0.0000062108675,0.00005563063,0.000020666379,0.0000010916656,0.000055518165,0.010954813,0.00006381393,0.000013417214,0.9852716,0.0023981237,0.0011556692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009951896,0.00001938101,0.0004910743,0.0006358086,0.0000051508478,0.00022018593,0.040333465,0.00032290132,0.00008441205,0.4894368,0.4684278,0.000013067007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041537597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003681612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017716872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01192417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036812902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08651626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498971682","doi":"10.29173/agora19043","title":"Voltaire: Critique Politique","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Relation (database); Humanities; State (computer science); Absolute monarchy; Exposition (narrative); Middle Ages; Classics; Literature; History; Epistemology; Art; Theology; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.018053048337369912,"score_gpt":0.33135776766267566,"score_spread":0.31330471932530574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498971682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012330536,0.048492793,0.009676498,0.1003769,0.0010796658,0.000022002436,0.000120140045,0.000074528456,0.82782686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84990466,0.019760618,0.0023491392,0.016301686,0.001663232,0.00012553707,0.000086356595,0.00015250109,0.10965638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954365,0.0027914627,0.00007785718,0.00045011146,0.0007639918,0.00048010674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852425,0.0010066517,0.0000976933,0.00009714497,0.00021716455,0.000057190446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032518143,0.0006096012,0.0005368354,0.0019032276,0.008902401,0.009793092,0.00081314263,0.0042284685,0.0064302105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050955596,0.00027763998,0.0005006689,0.002200179,0.023599029,0.005895354,0.0027605481,0.005009158,0.0008901271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026895862,0.0000013544701,0.000035875826,0.000013813092,0.0000014824309,0.00001755174,0.0015474785,0.00006180865,0.000015855692,0.99318177,0.0039525516,0.0011679487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010214353,0.0000067280207,0.00025791815,0.00025149746,0.000006976905,0.00008211187,0.0026960662,0.00042835885,0.000103707294,0.57442355,0.42172408,0.000008903731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039736487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025912048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039736487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024586646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007465953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17838943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535312762","doi":"10.29173/agora12403","title":"Kant’s Universal History and The Paradox of Ethnocentric Egalitarianism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ethnocentrism; Epistemology; Sketch; Politics; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Colonialism; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Anthropology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0881991030894426,"score_gpt":0.3064408886474481,"score_spread":0.21824178555800552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535312762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12245324,0.019214924,0.055723686,0.07446355,0.00061068207,0.00003719494,0.00010856657,0.0001270558,0.72726107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98936695,0.0012042103,0.0025765144,0.0014141263,0.00016042536,0.000020206797,0.000012819869,0.000037102105,0.0052076806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926146,0.004695318,0.0001870369,0.00080407754,0.0010526943,0.00064621674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994842,0.003187493,0.0004429629,0.0009024531,0.00037910778,0.0002459265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006685234,0.00032034682,0.0004918646,0.001679462,0.004891,0.006552456,0.00089772255,0.0027882298,0.0021863792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008137284,0.00035874738,0.0003290504,0.0013199389,0.059099384,0.008114075,0.0036640149,0.004567668,0.00029763734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038515655,0.0000018158908,0.000048186626,0.000009440923,0.0000016942985,0.00001063141,0.0018085028,0.00009430112,0.000015640566,0.9964612,0.0004048554,0.0011399798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047744793,0.000002638723,0.00015421904,0.000031892534,0.000002107866,0.000028162163,0.0005705428,0.0001593014,0.00009334147,0.98190135,0.017047344,0.0000042406014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003166491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003478318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069885007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069885007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026155468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050705314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551763177","doi":"10.29173/agora17243","title":"Plato’s Case Against the Philosopher King","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Ideology; Doctrine; Epistemology; Theme (computing); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07190883211504358,"score_gpt":0.2859237169373698,"score_spread":0.21401488482232622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551763177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03469756,0.0056428285,0.018525105,0.3496861,0.0026114143,0.000037231213,0.00007235564,0.00007372729,0.58865356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9119254,0.001942713,0.003565799,0.037943818,0.0022175044,0.00007953664,0.000020766485,0.000053462885,0.042251106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662435,0.0017748855,0.00008950942,0.00043543044,0.00059466757,0.00048120273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817693,0.0011452948,0.00014003202,0.00019140214,0.00014209416,0.00020426988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004258425,0.0003075656,0.00034728358,0.00060514844,0.008555038,0.005600808,0.0005278984,0.005334687,0.0031706358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006546276,0.00032914453,0.00034188887,0.00070513465,0.034688573,0.0077353586,0.0032488743,0.009153334,0.0007580984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065365703,0.0000028252446,0.00004254078,0.0000037130094,6.4296563e-7,0.000030064466,0.0014665441,0.00003268821,0.00001691181,0.99356353,0.0037339642,0.0010999921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011787731,0.000008181663,0.00010178957,0.000030120555,0.0000020517984,0.000049227478,0.0005828139,0.000189648,0.00006911359,0.9183348,0.08061432,0.0000060979696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040768986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036359194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008555038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031549344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037779862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022890747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583581666","doi":"10.29173/agora12406","title":"The EU-China’s Strategic Partnership: A Case Study of the EU’s Arms Embargo against China","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; General partnership; Strategic partnership; Ideology; Politics; Political science; International trade; Business; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08203107211915493,"score_gpt":0.35661735152298335,"score_spread":0.2745862794038284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583581666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745787,0.00036848703,0.00054511393,0.0017137212,0.000024595047,0.00006715264,0.000028275213,0.000003837953,0.022670243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953773,0.00041568486,0.0003447835,0.0002909039,0.00000861577,0.000037000893,0.000024562332,0.0000039007846,0.0034971144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959915,0.00260492,0.00008367235,0.0001709299,0.00033258402,0.00081636355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970943,0.0017312412,0.00033475447,0.00016480665,0.00020584434,0.0004691239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004728127,0.00047515152,0.0004854114,0.001274427,0.012293644,0.0036253543,0.0014295132,0.004361036,0.0033572405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049913456,0.00030934153,0.000417166,0.0027005263,0.006721184,0.0032746927,0.0044983905,0.0030198223,0.00019211775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041766535,0.0013852401,0.06547506,0.0004236036,0.00017127639,0.07655722,0.59077185,0.007147923,0.0028105539,0.20989068,0.010793922,0.034155056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001122732,0.0004896798,0.033678126,0.00038848975,0.00006161405,0.0033878605,0.8847331,0.0041169534,0.001847382,0.007955583,0.063152194,0.00007674533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052132044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104599155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052132044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006844818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050535854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103657186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1912974579","doi":"10.29173/agora19934","title":"Corruption et le déclin de la République romaine","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Classical Studies and Legal History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Institution; Redaction; Humanities; The Republic; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Literature","score_opus":0.021374771976293176,"score_gpt":0.27220558360282365,"score_spread":0.2508308116265305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1912974579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33346665,0.010040189,0.0026881867,0.016176775,0.00028677162,0.000039199258,0.00011776965,0.000051633982,0.63713276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508483,0.0021497705,0.0005028753,0.00060704123,0.00012393878,0.000020457926,0.000038525013,0.00002265244,0.045686502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973068,0.0012313243,0.000108287175,0.00017172459,0.0006163627,0.0005655432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981641,0.0005688601,0.0005649997,0.00017673914,0.00031936675,0.00020593336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002052836,0.00012491061,0.0002882006,0.0006045955,0.0024574976,0.0055412627,0.000384884,0.0005572535,0.0038236424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047861123,0.00013839192,0.00019319677,0.0009910322,0.005161525,0.0015848292,0.001960034,0.0020165807,0.0010826148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007494935,0.000048127593,0.013828954,0.00016037314,0.000017603024,0.00061927934,0.030071918,0.0004683479,0.0005060739,0.89013404,0.0069920267,0.057078242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054715303,0.00020397038,0.09382413,0.0011452842,0.000030388437,0.0016355752,0.022724401,0.0010198947,0.002068621,0.07537733,0.80183387,0.000081741295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005913863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076169735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005913863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023831225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029063066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01729089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915754556","doi":"10.29173/agora12408","title":"Steps Towards Uruguay’s Next Political and Economic Insertion into the World","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"ICT in Developing Communities","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political stability; Economic stability; Development economics; Political economy; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06892764014899137,"score_gpt":0.2960760364421871,"score_spread":0.22714839629319572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915754556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4092539,0.06073778,0.012702824,0.24047841,0.0040799063,0.00023596568,0.00042958735,0.0006179295,0.27146366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454744,0.006938485,0.012686598,0.0073969127,0.00030915462,0.00012946292,0.00019302852,0.00018230367,0.026689673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980159,0.0011233963,0.00005411688,0.00010006231,0.00013247762,0.00057396793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989875,0.00011697134,0.0001028971,0.000061043866,0.00034705127,0.0003846049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032437074,0.00033922787,0.0005369669,0.00060043164,0.0042793727,0.0052997,0.0004929488,0.0011791902,0.0064158197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028421367,0.00023129002,0.00035716622,0.00049037265,0.0021682747,0.0032977625,0.0033405866,0.0026103985,0.0008001614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054592534,0.00033080668,0.041771732,0.0009560394,0.00009359886,0.0030123957,0.08461401,0.000983227,0.008154162,0.49003944,0.06561258,0.30388612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026598062,0.00023337125,0.03228177,0.00089132815,0.00004085577,0.00046428805,0.03454422,0.0005371358,0.0013406796,0.018649422,0.91090876,0.00008140808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07774378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07144884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07774378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040124324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077824616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1545825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956607322","doi":"10.29173/agora17237","title":"Examining Race Privilege in America: The Preservation of Whiteness through the Systematic Oppression of African-Americans","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Oppression; Race (biology); Privilege (computing); Gender studies; White privilege; Sociology; Intersectionality; Social justice; Political science; Dominance (genetics); Context (archaeology); Civil rights; Racism; African american; Critical race theory; Criminology; Law; Politics; Ethnology; Geography","score_opus":0.08201619141533564,"score_gpt":0.39336538269962135,"score_spread":0.31134919128428573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1956607322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92187417,0.0012670626,0.0009008009,0.009835948,0.00007443667,0.00001943332,0.00002119099,0.0000028972097,0.06600407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971118,0.00071411213,0.00017316191,0.00052253733,0.00004200185,0.000015563244,0.000006811168,0.0000027760002,0.0014112996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990275,0.0005932963,0.0000137106135,0.000084381085,0.000072008654,0.00020906099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826837,0.0008775888,0.0003739807,0.000111326844,0.0001512009,0.00021739939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002659984,0.0002019915,0.00018843685,0.0014475445,0.006688836,0.003479113,0.00056852197,0.000945193,0.0025263724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038075806,0.00012295331,0.00017235844,0.0011807189,0.01240062,0.0039608404,0.0042882306,0.0019635016,0.000081720755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113596085,0.0003987442,0.089466825,0.00016272959,0.000037887992,0.00045961028,0.32432193,0.0003625374,0.0016837566,0.5233967,0.003963672,0.055632055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027945507,0.00020846403,0.273831,0.00049920386,0.00010806682,0.0002730824,0.49949566,0.0007670141,0.002368758,0.16275191,0.059631668,0.000037154172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022641802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05304775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022641802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027360413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041906945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045020044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198920179","doi":"10.29173/agora17245","title":"In Pursuit of Women’s Representation: A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Women’s Representation in Canadian Politics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Politics; Representation (politics); Legislation; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Affirmative action; State (computer science); Democracy; Action (physics); Public administration; Sociology; Gender studies; Political economy; Public relations; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03734879345694187,"score_gpt":0.3480186491668957,"score_spread":0.3106698557099538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198920179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.113664426,0.0044953926,0.02516634,0.4456292,0.0023367407,0.0007101408,0.00010660989,0.000213779,0.40767732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92057055,0.0019078965,0.013219275,0.029462405,0.00030418613,0.00033096364,0.000045960725,0.00010219564,0.03405651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9602901,0.01989102,0.0005608599,0.0016097779,0.008951048,0.0086973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983757,0.0060229893,0.00087427703,0.00058601773,0.00521172,0.0035480626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033871565,0.0008966151,0.00070928736,0.0042401375,0.06510107,0.016195158,0.0043155914,0.0063728034,0.004258993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035034373,0.00047957673,0.0007004561,0.0046375585,0.040426888,0.0063242274,0.016110023,0.0077990415,0.00040293648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000677048,0.00012516159,0.0045320024,0.00032220656,0.000027143005,0.0005787341,0.46901065,0.0004884034,0.0019819285,0.37956536,0.05423797,0.08906277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035532037,0.000075575306,0.0054869195,0.00058424997,0.00006552635,0.00021004656,0.37088636,0.00067479897,0.001670354,0.044181682,0.57601476,0.000114253715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9065823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9527664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13049662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13049662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24960503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9468237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103324058","doi":"10.29173/agora10110","title":"The Liberal Party of Canada: Still Canada’s “Natural Governing Party?”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal Party; Politics; Political science; Party platform; Realigning election; Natural (archaeology); Political economy; Public administration; Ethnic group; Core (optical fiber); Law; Sociology; Socialism; Communism; Democracy","score_opus":0.02617756406982969,"score_gpt":0.26064032944339005,"score_spread":0.23446276537356037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103324058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28612286,0.012269972,0.002622831,0.31970713,0.0019518855,0.00009107694,0.0015441149,0.00016641236,0.37552375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89241207,0.003009279,0.0011134822,0.014892943,0.00014540249,0.00001762165,0.00032530742,0.00004786112,0.088036016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973941,0.00017551261,0.000021236268,0.0001978314,0.0006806122,0.0015306694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755645,0.00013463176,0.00013300616,0.000076480326,0.00074715295,0.0013523264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013175424,0.00015894508,0.00021385634,0.0008905076,0.016330168,0.007010537,0.0010321189,0.0014481292,0.008688552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030653921,0.00016350976,0.00024453152,0.0017120774,0.00454293,0.0014321137,0.0016468475,0.0022836416,0.00050289126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014520588,0.00005429493,0.039182182,0.00019316199,0.000047624144,0.000697653,0.012213638,0.0004325586,0.000942633,0.5255325,0.2799543,0.14060424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002095769,0.00002059599,0.06407586,0.00021048478,0.000026329235,0.00013666926,0.013991296,0.00052224967,0.00045879232,0.011363111,0.90909934,0.00007437548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07890343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07890343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16652317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5724871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143375326","doi":"10.29173/agora10086","title":"“Battle of the Extremes”: Party Polarization in the 2010 Pennsylvanian Senatorial Election","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Appeal; Battle; Politics; Ideology; Political science; Primary election; Democracy; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07085377367858922,"score_gpt":0.33245898461038986,"score_spread":0.26160521093180067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143375326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659115,0.00016459828,0.00031530272,0.0032180084,0.00003260291,0.0000155544,0.00006949108,0.000004956162,0.030267995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804723,0.00009548067,0.000056752582,0.00021805796,0.000031575702,0.000011605698,0.00007081595,0.0000042890824,0.0014642387],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981578,0.0010076007,0.000036068082,0.00011310392,0.00022133123,0.00046406843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752384,0.0013266492,0.00044378292,0.00007090954,0.0003670897,0.00026774564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019352547,0.00010353039,0.0002398126,0.0015305819,0.006054614,0.0036322537,0.00028029623,0.00095822057,0.0025125388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047239484,0.00015453598,0.00015267063,0.0016062963,0.0024663587,0.0023214025,0.0033678864,0.0023309495,0.00036051683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009683414,0.0003504725,0.29504028,0.00016924967,0.00006242799,0.0023728916,0.48534575,0.00072063593,0.003238314,0.07155394,0.033637665,0.1065401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015568772,0.000119619086,0.40340248,0.00014383561,0.00001886358,0.000511931,0.51477575,0.0007411197,0.0015706796,0.006947749,0.07169824,0.000054061537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008897593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024176152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008897593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022819303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085409044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017691612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145887152","doi":"10.29173/agora10085","title":"The Hypocrisy in our Democracy: Placing Youth Voting in Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Lawsuit; Perspective (graphical); Voting; Franchise; Democracy; Political science; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Limiting; Sociology; Engineering; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.05079677841113987,"score_gpt":0.3300128408042905,"score_spread":0.2792160623931506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145887152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18587057,0.009769229,0.009296902,0.24982908,0.0010280316,0.000043292603,0.00010673746,0.000061873485,0.54399425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806898,0.0013729207,0.00041946615,0.008583612,0.00023010137,0.00001200507,0.00001287638,0.000025642712,0.008653558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944734,0.0027173841,0.000057723788,0.0003019772,0.0006971406,0.0017523288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972308,0.0009950291,0.00026403915,0.000158024,0.00063055713,0.0007215529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043185675,0.00033088189,0.0003374043,0.0016236487,0.017655509,0.014394764,0.0013400874,0.0039014048,0.0037211338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052102897,0.000282358,0.00025389943,0.0015083798,0.060282756,0.005943317,0.0048898654,0.01000848,0.0002420629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018268718,0.000011302121,0.003847681,0.000024925886,0.000007156644,0.00022486012,0.08511871,0.00014972687,0.00017931481,0.89569527,0.0064785043,0.008244262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027503716,0.0000435752,0.01118149,0.0005428861,0.000026998023,0.0002651514,0.19076875,0.000579673,0.00066036824,0.44384846,0.35200685,0.00004828121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3616842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5236519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3616842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024057426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025015075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71915793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155681991","doi":"10.29173/agora19041","title":"Making Liberal Democracy Ethical: Aristotle on the Unity of Ethics and Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Relativism; Political philosophy; Liberal democracy; Environmental ethics; Liberalism; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19479896065515076,"score_gpt":0.3870690311676461,"score_spread":0.19227007051249537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155681991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028781716,0.027187314,0.037537385,0.3317017,0.0030805005,0.00005105036,0.000034922825,0.00009159546,0.57153374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9194025,0.009241176,0.010169289,0.02969597,0.0032275398,0.00010183322,0.00002304645,0.00010243692,0.028036203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897113,0.0066540483,0.00016102268,0.0005516968,0.0020062686,0.0009156409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949334,0.003334189,0.00027352982,0.00037775346,0.000611764,0.00046932756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009062867,0.00046397105,0.00072115305,0.0013051847,0.010633944,0.011043835,0.00080928457,0.005910035,0.0014584007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00876686,0.00038639404,0.00039004072,0.00093161775,0.06402275,0.0088280365,0.0041790456,0.012491911,0.0006040947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047795197,0.000006153622,0.000041176056,0.000009976034,0.000001626795,0.000026220885,0.0031149476,0.00012734627,0.000025103674,0.9912747,0.0029006498,0.0024672586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004860534,0.0000037974355,0.00006985502,0.000053389063,0.0000015079477,0.000014930917,0.00091768854,0.000103746046,0.000029565108,0.96594584,0.032849684,0.0000051384886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064757555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011043835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081085395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00990987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05883187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158360620","doi":"10.29173/agora19898","title":"The Unite the Right Movement and the Brokerage of Social Conservative Voices Within the New Conservative Party of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Realigning election; Alliance; Political science; Political economy; Population; Balance (ability); Politics; Banner; Voting; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Socialism; Communism","score_opus":0.015120360052255982,"score_gpt":0.27954866429432984,"score_spread":0.26442830424207386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158360620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35962382,0.0021119139,0.0027570305,0.07435112,0.0010069154,0.00009628842,0.00008350133,0.000045475106,0.559924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091301,0.00042496977,0.00054122915,0.0035159744,0.00006420418,0.00001277757,0.000016461829,0.000015968993,0.08627827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954904,0.0006136726,0.000041381936,0.00029664938,0.0015461162,0.0020117722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975668,0.0005474846,0.00020229981,0.00009160177,0.0006003413,0.0009915604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025607296,0.00020881637,0.00018949721,0.0008756746,0.027602132,0.007949312,0.00071673014,0.0018970959,0.0042846324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049695065,0.00019028319,0.00021161804,0.0009733035,0.013124352,0.0014664083,0.004422567,0.0034486891,0.00019990842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007574531,0.00002634171,0.0077280626,0.000036803252,0.000014199813,0.00079889083,0.07246935,0.00023507775,0.0008508193,0.8571258,0.02700812,0.03363068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002907574,0.00003125643,0.02458862,0.00010595828,0.000018702765,0.00019231392,0.054009743,0.0008081205,0.0012148292,0.021904731,0.897014,0.00008257282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9443549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98014647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062110968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062110968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08221019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45064873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233018242","doi":"10.29173/agora17239","title":"“Westernization” and the Politics of Islam in Senegal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Subversion; Indigenous; Emancipation; Identity (music); State (computer science); Sociology; Gender studies; Islam; Assertion; Argument (complex analysis); Postcolonialism (international relations); Westernization; Political science; Colonialism; Independence (probability theory); Agency (philosophy); Social science; Law; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Modernization theory","score_opus":0.022018411464795558,"score_gpt":0.31799745022022896,"score_spread":0.2959790387554334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233018242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8509922,0.004837694,0.00017793733,0.007156022,0.000048983795,0.00000971281,0.00002752938,0.0000057049947,0.13674429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636453,0.0007300038,0.00004131917,0.00029702773,0.000009474234,0.000003285747,0.000004582301,0.0000023861155,0.0025474182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991073,0.00047423563,0.000018791421,0.000046405934,0.00003933676,0.00031394872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996948,0.00012208142,0.000099829704,0.00001792388,0.000026748865,0.000038694132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095127954,0.000247384,0.00014473964,0.0007731727,0.005719886,0.0028666405,0.00031147434,0.0006343392,0.0030638129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006743823,0.00018322885,0.00010793638,0.001016048,0.011037457,0.0012057073,0.0029497142,0.0010831888,0.00019031712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028856954,0.00009815206,0.028965874,0.00026477812,0.000057566285,0.0040703095,0.30935198,0.00053929834,0.003466778,0.6004209,0.0031600827,0.04931574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006010421,0.00019023934,0.20753795,0.00061648217,0.000063066575,0.0017434915,0.41725433,0.00055478606,0.002972816,0.05232138,0.3165928,0.00009254701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058848996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.115537316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058848996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051435917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016687504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11701292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263046125","doi":"10.29173/agora17244","title":"Methodological Shortcomings in Hannah Arendt’s Conceptualization of Totalitarianism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Epistemology; Imperfect; Ideology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Sociology; Nazism; Nazi Germany; Psychoanalysis; Law; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.23468818202134054,"score_gpt":0.44144958360037084,"score_spread":0.2067614015790303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263046125","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06230746,0.016663605,0.14043543,0.4446757,0.0035019456,0.00027868533,0.00036204403,0.000155407,0.33161974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923618,0.0054488285,0.0390397,0.016691122,0.0016688589,0.0009253578,0.0001271099,0.00008671714,0.012394364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741819,0.01839386,0.00084334734,0.0019064951,0.0041535343,0.0005208761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760492,0.017670097,0.0013694441,0.0022002936,0.002339624,0.00037128522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027867252,0.00048425974,0.00080868904,0.0031597142,0.0043049417,0.0077420413,0.0028998347,0.003471126,0.0022035933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04221243,0.00040759062,0.00064859976,0.0034015456,0.03539155,0.007407406,0.0056174174,0.0062746666,0.00034172644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047181143,0.0000067305614,0.00013154477,0.000035341443,0.0000042439283,0.000011098154,0.0031915745,0.00008876749,0.000020552605,0.9922044,0.002020704,0.0022802947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017961369,0.00001164172,0.00040717737,0.00023358973,0.000008175755,0.000056179008,0.0031764428,0.00076059904,0.00015093615,0.9396827,0.055479303,0.0000151948925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003485951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037306887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027867252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005344574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005045917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14737791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275894084","doi":"10.29173/agora17240","title":"Mexico’s Political Militarization Returns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Militarization; Military government; Presidency; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Legitimacy; Presidential system; Drug trafficking; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03202031294945768,"score_gpt":0.3459775397313784,"score_spread":0.31395722678192073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275894084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31495005,0.0041036466,0.0007501344,0.045496307,0.00043320027,0.000019373256,0.00037026507,0.000062104846,0.6338149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89564604,0.0025126303,0.0003919814,0.0022679644,0.00030086533,0.000020007712,0.00016528084,0.000022895285,0.0986724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996996,0.000037930775,0.0000036354502,0.00003494037,0.000081148355,0.00014277216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997613,0.000054371307,0.000056532095,0.000025786365,0.000053323434,0.000048758116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059214083,0.0001615418,0.00008940439,0.00045081426,0.0019951465,0.0025538064,0.00021237605,0.0007899029,0.01121147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013129928,0.00006642292,0.00011982803,0.00037721082,0.0009165604,0.0008235999,0.0012650477,0.0013310201,0.00036510293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013934482,0.000053767217,0.023416257,0.00011366964,0.000027247848,0.0007533283,0.0064699594,0.00041322075,0.0012084093,0.72902626,0.09070492,0.1476736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001290707,0.000047809957,0.060358882,0.000094240895,0.00001441157,0.00020178754,0.003523099,0.0002503995,0.0006545553,0.008637828,0.92618865,0.000015496447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03294131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05386934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03294131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034928406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016362531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06549913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278332232","doi":"10.29173/agora19897","title":"The Justice of Inequality: Argumentation Ethics and Radical Non-Aggression","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Presupposition; Economic Justice; Economic inequality; Law and economics; Politics; Social inequality; Sociology; Positive economics; Property (philosophy); Distributive justice; Economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0793348541639319,"score_gpt":0.40431680139570253,"score_spread":0.32498194723177065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278332232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06384142,0.010899343,0.15237509,0.21397562,0.0017784045,0.00009584824,0.000054099746,0.00009246222,0.5568877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97142595,0.00117083,0.012318804,0.0047823437,0.0007376976,0.00011628906,0.00001513917,0.00005600775,0.009376896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706528,0.022950798,0.00068476127,0.0014826376,0.0030271197,0.0012018015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775643,0.017546661,0.0010904658,0.0016700005,0.0014120265,0.0007166025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023986615,0.00048313377,0.00089680473,0.0015096198,0.009811948,0.010263719,0.0017320234,0.009077318,0.0021609878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022619812,0.0003719926,0.00069892575,0.0009515569,0.071330644,0.011397307,0.007370858,0.008254885,0.0003984787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029767968,0.0000040682903,0.00003865047,0.000011801902,0.0000031280574,0.000025241434,0.0020518578,0.000075423435,0.000027072825,0.9960521,0.0005238338,0.0011838706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004972294,0.000002069499,0.000031187697,0.00002021703,0.0000015935719,0.000021162006,0.0005245657,0.00028771802,0.0000344022,0.9928584,0.0062103816,0.0000033100448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012320423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010568977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023986615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005338884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036920023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1268549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283142868","doi":"10.29173/agora19080","title":"Why are Extreme Right Parties so Popular in Europe?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extreme right; Immigration; Political science; Right to be forgotten; Media coverage; History; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04605449507133787,"score_gpt":0.30644938743190464,"score_spread":0.2603948923605668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283142868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7030811,0.012891674,0.0006855811,0.02753415,0.00094865885,0.000010062524,0.00019049723,0.000032120915,0.25462613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860535,0.0019382298,0.00008361648,0.003079503,0.00042361644,0.0000037051534,0.000058145808,0.000016828248,0.008342705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985274,0.00043311546,0.000055587487,0.00024822584,0.0002475072,0.00048819522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981781,0.0006218383,0.0006410211,0.00011986133,0.00011415999,0.0003250959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016887143,0.00013844827,0.00027345354,0.0013196059,0.002687579,0.0065919883,0.00032900335,0.0022517957,0.008733912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041590766,0.000115175506,0.000203595,0.001959025,0.0036493575,0.004484892,0.0020454582,0.0014690021,0.00094660115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047360695,0.00020627418,0.09812218,0.0006577752,0.00018883997,0.0045097587,0.12230607,0.0002454297,0.002843511,0.52850384,0.06537698,0.17656575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047941685,0.0001185038,0.27397203,0.0009046929,0.000054006225,0.002827376,0.095731005,0.00020283581,0.0014058617,0.026559688,0.5981082,0.000067966175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011812842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017187144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008733912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005797192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034087818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02921778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298513719","doi":"10.29173/agora19032","title":"The Future of U.S.-Taiwan Arms Sales","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Position (finance); Political science; International trade; Business; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.016605999112194174,"score_gpt":0.3002201949241569,"score_spread":0.28361419581196273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298513719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3418987,0.018709134,0.0002683887,0.12943588,0.000526416,0.000011316059,0.00033569938,0.00003121158,0.5087832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96480477,0.0059302156,0.00009827758,0.0025377506,0.00022624106,0.00001090119,0.000103316495,0.000008720735,0.02627987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961334,0.00009004093,0.000009319591,0.00004057054,0.00006301103,0.00018376128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999003,0.00024268813,0.00019506658,0.00005861073,0.00016057909,0.0003401548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007701526,0.00014094704,0.00014253063,0.0007192468,0.0017427466,0.005979908,0.00032014624,0.0013408521,0.022597836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018707631,0.000113933194,0.00017612654,0.0012063496,0.0018304845,0.004036668,0.0015551207,0.0017654325,0.0012563368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028598125,0.0002033625,0.050653048,0.000187937,0.00003841324,0.0011394907,0.009444423,0.0012280971,0.00089798885,0.64896744,0.084372446,0.20258132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005184552,0.00018747867,0.118259214,0.000949138,0.000031460928,0.00047262755,0.038449273,0.002498231,0.0012765606,0.10368745,0.73407006,0.00006659014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01595984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034460567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022597836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030563024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002482691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075597346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307288511","doi":"10.29173/agora19906","title":"Dragon Fears: An Examination of Canadian Perceptions of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"China; Corporation; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Business; State owned; National security; Power (physics); National interest; Political science; Economy; International trade; Market economy; Finance; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017759339298540757,"score_gpt":0.30272872605920975,"score_spread":0.284969386760669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307288511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9631141,0.0005156097,0.00006809248,0.009084615,0.000048811587,0.000034959834,0.000101972684,0.000006198948,0.027025744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99377406,0.00057684735,0.000041602445,0.0015249808,0.0000104270475,0.000015308098,0.00006493232,0.000006393622,0.0039854604],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570304,0.0006087158,0.000105983425,0.0002178726,0.0016641357,0.0017001976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99205315,0.0016951563,0.001080558,0.00018933762,0.002436715,0.0025451556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004207307,0.0005036199,0.0004684743,0.0033329418,0.03124018,0.006807332,0.0022355532,0.002055076,0.0052377484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008608806,0.00039641,0.00048309326,0.0060932087,0.013689478,0.0028015077,0.005371886,0.003985918,0.0002414544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068245114,0.00006262201,0.061664063,0.00008630884,0.000016994862,0.00054266234,0.91067255,0.00007584696,0.00035098585,0.010121546,0.008484755,0.007853419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050061426,0.00002144309,0.049767196,0.000085777516,0.000008350963,0.000059616934,0.9315255,0.00013439714,0.00006233423,0.00036237226,0.017924564,0.00004339773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98961675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09969502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09969502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.100567974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72334135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330863216","doi":"10.29173/agora12513","title":"On the Passing of North Korea’s ‘Dear Leader:’ Kim Jong-il (1941-2011)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Power (physics); Politics; Authoritarianism; Round table; History; Demography; Political science; Economic history; Law; Sociology; Advertising; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.057879221952939076,"score_gpt":0.3129521408092999,"score_spread":0.2550729188563608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330863216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58128613,0.009612267,0.0006433477,0.1331625,0.011652222,0.000086781845,0.00027604096,0.000039655995,0.26324093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88077575,0.0041287346,0.0002578142,0.013389046,0.001029841,0.0000422533,0.00009890131,0.00006078432,0.100216895],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995134,0.00020876572,0.000017808812,0.00006347878,0.00007589457,0.0001206684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988771,0.00040511964,0.00019398944,0.00003700366,0.00022778181,0.00025898716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012938646,0.00040012272,0.00012865663,0.00035210882,0.0066019474,0.0025038514,0.0003999601,0.0011579159,0.0030773499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025939026,0.0001617468,0.00015997751,0.00030553443,0.0038301575,0.0032256502,0.0019192374,0.0047396044,0.00078817725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009453993,0.000082343686,0.0063331686,0.0003810054,0.000030673633,0.0022731505,0.65748864,0.00016092187,0.0012242495,0.05721208,0.24450107,0.03021815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008086567,0.000059904156,0.014026061,0.00033722437,0.000015555072,0.0004754297,0.32210243,0.000068802976,0.00070586335,0.0015974861,0.6605635,0.00003962978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006950918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025502022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006950918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022569806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016456672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016375601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23367563","doi":"10.29173/agora10090","title":"Canada and Terrorism: A Case Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Government (linguistics); Meaning (existential); International relations; Key (lock); Relation (database); Focus (optics); Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer security; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04888909205560636,"score_gpt":0.319769792715172,"score_spread":0.2708807006595656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23367563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9167512,0.003068296,0.00048112578,0.0069482243,0.00011330539,0.00024747438,0.00060537946,0.00002642331,0.071758576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801656,0.0040851617,0.00072357,0.0011085328,0.0000315188,0.00006837458,0.00019630218,0.000017243774,0.013603657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983993,0.00043407542,0.00003307432,0.00008008481,0.00033169417,0.00072175957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983399,0.0005976555,0.00015656125,0.00005920729,0.00032573764,0.00052092655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007681084,0.0004238506,0.00041032364,0.0021291776,0.023651067,0.003021185,0.0013796391,0.0031595433,0.0051110783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023113703,0.00030686238,0.0004049761,0.006338994,0.0039761146,0.0008829567,0.002835307,0.0025429719,0.0002904149],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049003214,0.0015300039,0.19597179,0.0011631722,0.00015032625,0.13862437,0.4098621,0.0044211964,0.0017804503,0.11327925,0.058663566,0.074063845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000651345,0.00016354835,0.07284333,0.00061292126,0.00010352372,0.0112814205,0.7163048,0.0018116253,0.0007359041,0.002448749,0.19351435,0.00011470381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97155523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98756844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04449087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04449087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038558025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3228054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342069712","doi":"10.29173/agora17241","title":"Respecting Human Rights: Does Treaty Ratification Lead to Compliance?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Human rights; Treaty; Political science; Compliance (psychology); International law; Law; Credibility; Convention; Democracy; International human rights law; Indigenous; Law and economics; State (computer science); International regime; Politics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0694378765129275,"score_gpt":0.3485333682379215,"score_spread":0.27909549172499404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342069712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14813218,0.0021898197,0.011751862,0.14700066,0.0010395846,0.0003548093,0.00014833808,0.00007718515,0.6893056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961898,0.0015408929,0.0024737387,0.010469551,0.00050592516,0.00030429492,0.00009515548,0.0000716606,0.022640811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94705254,0.03021757,0.001868287,0.0032544557,0.009866278,0.0077409027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9341815,0.047586646,0.009260659,0.0037719817,0.004288234,0.0009109859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039645784,0.0002914309,0.0006886606,0.002043947,0.00933572,0.013413097,0.0018119005,0.010226034,0.01503438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12385033,0.00047905513,0.0011078037,0.0048058922,0.024017321,0.016425127,0.0067329407,0.012523213,0.001433685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026313013,0.00008678009,0.0038435918,0.00007390006,0.000012621257,0.00032067831,0.012324069,0.00019582361,0.00009933913,0.9684955,0.004267657,0.0102535905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014190433,0.00015223517,0.016007932,0.0010584876,0.000089062254,0.00044053854,0.03527069,0.0020187618,0.0013302226,0.8131136,0.13027613,0.00010047583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014753567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009776686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039645784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007803984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016240563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20966941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28306332","doi":"10.29173/agora10087","title":"Reformed Development: How Edmonton Can Benefit From Globalization Through Improved Development Strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Disadvantage; Suburbanization; Globalization; Economic growth; Plan (archaeology); Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management; Geography","score_opus":0.04588587257508526,"score_gpt":0.290573712828328,"score_spread":0.24468784025324275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28306332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031177344,0.0060133594,0.0038783164,0.17684156,0.00078499067,0.00004861778,0.000022357557,0.000044767192,0.7811888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73359156,0.0046365997,0.006132482,0.024414012,0.00034583028,0.00008956781,0.00005193589,0.000058243433,0.23067966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854577,0.0006791411,0.000019084766,0.00012459757,0.00020020825,0.00043120078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999466,0.00017110222,0.000049119924,0.00007427527,0.000105897685,0.00013357046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026267038,0.00035070546,0.0002021144,0.0006985255,0.005689642,0.0074340007,0.00092093286,0.0027436465,0.0045089964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027836678,0.00012374725,0.0002718784,0.0006427091,0.011924249,0.005199629,0.0040101507,0.003295165,0.0003214093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036468784,0.000007904371,0.00020001683,0.000012935004,0.0000013051126,0.000049260478,0.0036977385,0.0001536469,0.000037358317,0.9783117,0.011151102,0.0063734213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013635138,0.000018937448,0.0012336732,0.00015813456,0.000008289142,0.00006206651,0.0067891385,0.00044086666,0.00023401929,0.18269248,0.8083351,0.000013516648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07193971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16123873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9280603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017748524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012708934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14304197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991997304","doi":"10.29173/agora19035","title":"Top-Down or Bottom-Up: Approaches for Addressing Land Degradation in Swaziland and Botswana","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Land degradation; Politics; Citizen journalism; Environmental degradation; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Development economics; Economic growth; Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.0777527631505887,"score_gpt":0.27354527217210556,"score_spread":0.19579250902151685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991997304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63950676,0.008840569,0.08002413,0.097849414,0.00037119474,0.0014164287,0.000069735084,0.00021792183,0.17170379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762862,0.0010017343,0.014383228,0.0018909228,0.000015326204,0.00021595786,0.000014383858,0.00001983082,0.006172336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976624,0.0012382613,0.00004736169,0.00020939746,0.00020383211,0.000638741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987393,0.0005457093,0.00013375572,0.00012930266,0.00018171407,0.00027029525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033174437,0.00046162916,0.0002935866,0.0015671969,0.0052500037,0.005345469,0.0013301027,0.0016304518,0.0024132426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029388866,0.00020827753,0.00039988136,0.0011715692,0.005895893,0.001956977,0.007159202,0.0016860082,0.00017525327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014970543,0.0006541284,0.02505487,0.0014109374,0.00016366864,0.0020841686,0.111734666,0.006907027,0.01177778,0.23826954,0.010987292,0.5908063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022133082,0.00087094615,0.06358407,0.003024576,0.00026370503,0.0012113809,0.29356444,0.011437753,0.0122036,0.3138678,0.2996286,0.00012186733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023378119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07091424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023378119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008297627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013974786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06020373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231979502","doi":"10.29173/agora12405","title":"American Media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fourth Estate; Mandate; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; State (computer science); Political science; Power (physics); Media relations; Estate; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Media studies; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.050629892414061975,"score_gpt":0.3234286374825772,"score_spread":0.27279874506851526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231979502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038559884,0.005671997,0.00031171183,0.008159695,0.0024805116,0.00001481922,0.0003972855,0.00007039029,0.9790375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106802434,0.021354148,0.0007192384,0.011868159,0.005323525,0.00007249507,0.0010956116,0.00013758274,0.8526268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993586,0.00009874264,0.000024291196,0.00008882799,0.00030046972,0.00012903252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989667,0.0002739572,0.00011691739,0.00010182944,0.00035825884,0.00018235062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007185185,0.00033525965,0.00013737795,0.002925584,0.0038317863,0.0060993545,0.00043444117,0.0014135427,0.06334893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002328571,0.00011633426,0.0001749232,0.0031396882,0.0010459791,0.0037009248,0.001740233,0.0016404259,0.01828072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030899566,0.000045769142,0.0012852174,0.00014287037,0.0000035797575,0.00022113955,0.0032068288,0.000044062162,0.00040344603,0.380917,0.47011057,0.14358859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.1278903e-7,0.0000029985308,0.00054374133,0.000039910734,9.020385e-7,0.000041025083,0.000408352,0.000008580728,0.000063460226,0.0012665649,0.9976216,0.0000022372064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005202263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010179099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06334893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017409531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013489204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21192324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246009322","doi":"10.29173/agora17411","title":"Letter from the Senior Editors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03451399815021419,"score_gpt":0.27857700442770766,"score_spread":0.24406300627749347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246009322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044153823,0.0008412263,0.00009485052,0.9251171,0.061939765,0.000031179687,0.00007219378,0.00005835819,0.011403772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044068517,0.0005530781,0.00014071792,0.8818577,0.032488912,0.000058831047,0.00003193529,0.000048943937,0.0804129],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679834,0.00061852805,0.00023944734,0.0005680812,0.0011451865,0.0006304947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939393,0.0019573409,0.00033885436,0.00020365424,0.0019256577,0.0016352559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030014706,0.00093472074,0.0014453648,0.00093473896,0.0067686196,0.0068398053,0.0016845352,0.043371182,0.017650994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024441507,0.00095011014,0.0011736791,0.000537909,0.0018627527,0.003165654,0.001777673,0.033114273,0.014775805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025140067,0.000013407817,0.0001227015,0.000011143034,0.0000038995126,0.00032908164,0.00004609058,0.000014341121,0.000042082618,0.00058550626,0.9969259,0.0018808561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004490783,0.000043863904,0.0010757962,0.00013641776,0.00001836336,0.00058486126,0.0006498672,0.00029238712,0.00024057899,0.0027873553,0.99407274,0.00005286921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008721247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016883835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043371182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031483606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058173914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059048474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249834761","doi":"10.29173/agora12407","title":"Bolivian Politics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Politics; Democracy; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Political science; Political economy; Identity (music); Relation (database); Sociology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.054315799991583306,"score_gpt":0.3378740969770443,"score_spread":0.283558296985461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249834761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08723087,0.053476058,0.0012324057,0.015139504,0.00053569674,0.00013012509,0.0020346984,0.0001307301,0.84009004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76183206,0.019383628,0.002361011,0.0043043057,0.00024576057,0.00024907975,0.001463715,0.000089875386,0.21007068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944764,0.00010710221,0.00002078391,0.00009938112,0.00007671204,0.00024840672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998851,0.000024034844,0.00002915503,0.00002024126,0.00002101124,0.000020486284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067977875,0.0004178187,0.00035885634,0.0013240838,0.0032683548,0.004243209,0.00044603914,0.00069008226,0.012351971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060755137,0.00024697866,0.00025577538,0.0017211427,0.0022853415,0.0011888009,0.0028928486,0.0018126994,0.0016329124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016377078,0.0000669163,0.008195294,0.0008296381,0.00007269599,0.00065853226,0.0075919186,0.00086836406,0.0020660951,0.8381955,0.03829708,0.102994055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026245054,0.000023795468,0.021023748,0.000521214,0.00002193666,0.00030181912,0.002159296,0.00015211833,0.00066704,0.017666738,0.9574151,0.0000208971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052835852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035409868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052835852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012299321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037170032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10505664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254111954","doi":"10.29173/agora10082","title":"Introduction to the First Issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05127041929539432,"score_gpt":0.32887135552225405,"score_spread":0.2776009362268597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254111954","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030781992,0.0147524625,0.0008230244,0.20478235,0.6777415,0.00007251817,0.00045396842,0.00016284427,0.100903444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005802392,0.009304292,0.0007600304,0.14335498,0.39997756,0.00017103848,0.0006172858,0.00031223297,0.4397002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773455,0.000394694,0.00012000934,0.0003905962,0.0010152906,0.00034485926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216837,0.0021479353,0.00040691425,0.0007349064,0.002787118,0.0017547751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033620398,0.0010420186,0.0008284528,0.0024893058,0.0033215533,0.008833714,0.0017441781,0.008184789,0.1087597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015398229,0.00042071356,0.001065296,0.0012519934,0.0023865066,0.0049435296,0.0035654744,0.011790221,0.05465675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013383107,0.000015082202,0.000060746854,0.0000740309,0.0000022076451,0.000028052184,0.000036829726,0.000010489116,0.000066657645,0.0068439287,0.98168415,0.011164376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004309374,0.000006191867,0.00018099103,0.0001152054,0.0000024109602,0.00002924188,0.00004967679,0.0000140401935,0.00003641933,0.002225076,0.99733186,0.00000460479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027669168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051743174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1087597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028058484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043854523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36383742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W61883257","doi":"10.29173/agora17238","title":"Why Ukraine Surrendered Security: A Methodological Individualist Approach to Nuclear Disarmament","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Nuclear Issues and Defense","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Ukrainian; Political science; Nuclear weapon; Possession (linguistics); Scrutiny; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14811108165939843,"score_gpt":0.3995358220692804,"score_spread":0.25142474040988194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W61883257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57033414,0.009300122,0.18004437,0.07580252,0.00082309655,0.00021000084,0.00017583481,0.00007045909,0.16323948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832736,0.0011268696,0.01202199,0.0011578276,0.00008167093,0.00005724492,0.000020043812,0.000018056428,0.0022427302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001616,0.00787425,0.0002844208,0.0007039882,0.00061512535,0.00050608657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938747,0.00405735,0.000741986,0.000600745,0.0005409968,0.00018413897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014442483,0.00040506548,0.0007232729,0.0025789556,0.006073335,0.008277686,0.002002002,0.0016545454,0.0017159268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009110017,0.00027485297,0.0007905832,0.0019425425,0.021429652,0.004622332,0.004447668,0.0029899194,0.00015028311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021683134,0.0000347113,0.0029188257,0.00011094605,0.00006984013,0.00020041989,0.03147329,0.0015173879,0.00012215639,0.95589876,0.0006103535,0.007021495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023400067,0.00004474663,0.0026019062,0.000242917,0.00007630759,0.00014743514,0.0337732,0.005290337,0.00041868654,0.93239194,0.024963578,0.0000255317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012299789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019545302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014442483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010842832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063479473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07867062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W649443819","doi":"10.29173/agora19040","title":"A Contribution to Rupert Taylor’s Critique of Consociationalism in Northern Ireland","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sectarianism; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Irish; Nationalism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01510779127076991,"score_gpt":0.3160102365857039,"score_spread":0.300902445314934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W649443819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017965866,0.015604254,0.0059619267,0.29930496,0.0026511378,0.000024836836,0.00004698976,0.00005022842,0.6583898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80794007,0.010590224,0.0035373145,0.06518378,0.0029445353,0.00015377165,0.000033577446,0.00016859449,0.109448105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941948,0.0031980805,0.00015085528,0.00041402108,0.0011133332,0.0009289471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690276,0.0018173272,0.0002462604,0.00020572139,0.00055210793,0.0002757944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038384923,0.000384206,0.0005296183,0.0012787959,0.0061312453,0.007537704,0.0024161085,0.0033046,0.0026225857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007941923,0.00026652336,0.00049848814,0.0012715408,0.027656553,0.0049515767,0.004079949,0.0059249154,0.0005733698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012895293,0.0000124379285,0.00065031636,0.00007769318,0.0000064393353,0.00025621726,0.025996277,0.00022656919,0.00003367965,0.91908777,0.04461877,0.009020767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011750039,0.000011078205,0.0016915943,0.00046884685,0.000010049326,0.00030632087,0.023565838,0.00046725906,0.00014352589,0.26959705,0.7036887,0.00003802267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09565509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12395901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09565509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017194524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009477026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19019663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77216687","doi":"10.29173/agora10083","title":"On the Best Life","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Human life; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; The good life; Order (exchange); Function (biology); Best practice; Natural (archaeology); Relativism; Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science; History; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.16186966955933801,"score_gpt":0.3588770994970647,"score_spread":0.19700742993772669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77216687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007823752,0.020101758,0.013644718,0.18586986,0.0035406267,0.000038658516,0.00012832275,0.000049644485,0.76880264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7736902,0.02525319,0.009563998,0.08191793,0.0061953673,0.00025846963,0.0002069195,0.00022925624,0.10268465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99109674,0.005195984,0.00022120735,0.00091891194,0.0018545041,0.0007127798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961367,0.0018153568,0.00027539593,0.00053338474,0.0008305434,0.00040855052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00685099,0.0006716727,0.00075083144,0.0017675245,0.0090837795,0.008535905,0.0012161459,0.0051679662,0.007883838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010209922,0.0002524528,0.00040174366,0.001092993,0.051056165,0.0147604365,0.007507045,0.008879291,0.0026534721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021298022,0.0000020819896,0.000019260777,0.000008771625,7.493819e-7,0.000008273567,0.0006787188,0.000029755442,0.000007048434,0.99282587,0.0044516157,0.0019656667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037646005,0.000010376211,0.0000678134,0.00015247076,0.000001772978,0.000041953142,0.0014443335,0.00006025446,0.00003857356,0.81013477,0.18803574,0.000008228417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003953542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090837795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071882624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050264294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05215472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94353500","doi":"10.29173/agora12404","title":"What’s Mine is Hers: A Solution to Common Law Property Woes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Division (mathematics); Property law; Law; Common law; Inequality; Common property; Law and economics; Real property; Political science; Sociology; Property rights; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10625960575862008,"score_gpt":0.35225136832048276,"score_spread":0.24599176256186267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94353500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04964799,0.0038057114,0.017856292,0.658792,0.0033120548,0.000110423935,0.000097086544,0.0002326349,0.26614588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7549687,0.002306047,0.00890234,0.07751212,0.0008765564,0.00008600667,0.000092024835,0.00017150417,0.15508471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993523,0.0015803714,0.000110783905,0.00060600485,0.0020591936,0.0021207153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939195,0.0011348106,0.00038771768,0.00066620996,0.0021196585,0.0017721426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061418866,0.0004864392,0.00059611624,0.0016934678,0.022323309,0.009074707,0.0022649353,0.0062285224,0.014555414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015943456,0.00027752167,0.0005783844,0.0014963056,0.029468892,0.009849079,0.0098329885,0.0077428436,0.001525596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041503983,0.00007637873,0.0028966952,0.00011208085,0.000029813542,0.00048142252,0.024520105,0.00039956477,0.00052567903,0.7954352,0.11187479,0.06360678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035518653,0.00006100573,0.0024758375,0.00039199975,0.000035649748,0.00027729268,0.055187404,0.00080544,0.0006023611,0.2276155,0.71245575,0.000056320274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33551934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5785966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33551934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017095843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04758827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6671328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W983164686","doi":"10.29173/agora10088","title":"Multilateralism and Arctic Sovereignty: Canada’s Policy Options","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Arctic; Archipelago; Political science; Treaty; Multilateralism; Law; Power (physics); Convention; International trade; Geography; Politics; Economics; Oceanography","score_opus":0.04634148625003622,"score_gpt":0.3166977977073475,"score_spread":0.2703563114573113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W983164686","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04847729,0.021009495,0.0019738707,0.4823461,0.0007532553,0.000058705,0.0004113272,0.000047717633,0.4449222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872894,0.014308846,0.0022227345,0.05731701,0.0003125223,0.00006409303,0.00020312931,0.00003582339,0.05264186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933937,0.00090083864,0.000117564305,0.00040731733,0.0022731903,0.0029073188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930948,0.0022922591,0.00035406215,0.00016891933,0.0022555937,0.0018343331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004751516,0.00035873355,0.00041024445,0.0016785668,0.016140843,0.012602696,0.0019268264,0.0065349885,0.008880479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010307274,0.0002819327,0.0006588522,0.002618595,0.00785829,0.003723909,0.0048210365,0.0056166267,0.00022830632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004458194,0.000024679393,0.0031484223,0.00013481929,0.000027119233,0.00027253834,0.0023487473,0.0014308437,0.00017774216,0.9440122,0.029820893,0.018557433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011413041,0.000042907246,0.016889604,0.0015062529,0.00010916729,0.00023134708,0.012677234,0.0043551177,0.0006374273,0.18328829,0.7799545,0.00019402578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98373634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100770034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100770034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23287183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7311412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}