{"meta":{"query_hash":"eb67089cd8ec","filters":{"venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/eb67089cd8ec","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Agora+Political+Science+Undergraduate+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W105962659","doi":"10.29173/agora17246","title":"Aboriginal Representation in Canada: Reforming Parliament or Creating a Third Order of Government","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Representation (politics); Government (linguistics); Order (exchange); Corporate governance; Public administration; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02333112729195072,"score_gpt":0.31321935514601906,"score_spread":0.2898882278540683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105962659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9285898,0.000087472275,0.00013044433,0.02619346,0.0007316833,0.00015295409,0.000007659984,0.00000635467,0.04410015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977315,0.00012630991,0.00020920648,0.0004165785,0.00029150717,0.000003070922,1.3701552e-7,0.000003886537,0.0012177827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965503,0.00018446654,0.00035587026,0.00011745918,0.0017042545,0.0010876525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871516,0.00020052744,0.00018317258,0.00013753453,0.000110447894,0.00065313774],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027582909,0.00007182558,0.00014116177,0.00012911209,0.0015064514,0.00022760245,0.000437167,0.000024442852,0.00013787088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071529165,0.000052535695,0.000035487952,0.0009158444,0.0012162375,0.0007273376,0.00003141802,0.0002635474,0.00000538186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058337588,0.00012017992,0.059047095,0.0000136393965,0.000017465536,0.000036992602,0.020948779,0.000075306445,0.0004095765,0.9107673,0.0025831664,0.005922159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014677679,0.0001995263,0.41347203,0.00038449318,0.00012988635,0.00028602852,0.31913057,0.00076685776,0.0011351235,0.045247138,0.2169304,0.00085020554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99821866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8655202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015035758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011916102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W116943990","doi":"10.29173/agora18911","title":"Hope Beats Fear? : The Assent of the Saskatchewan Party to Power and the Fall of the NDP","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Democracy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Realigning election; Political economy; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Work (physics); Law; Sociology; History; Engineering; Socialism","score_opus":0.010988493529052259,"score_gpt":0.2513769525906674,"score_spread":0.24038845906161513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W116943990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55642945,0.000096005635,0.00002337568,0.42670727,0.0005868714,0.00041445874,0.000005871204,0.0000051629468,0.015731562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99225014,0.000043524065,0.000016452062,0.0036920954,0.00016051087,0.0000060916273,2.816997e-8,0.0000056616677,0.0038255006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996435,0.0008145784,0.00034539538,0.00016899573,0.0014141465,0.0008219047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795145,0.00054107996,0.00022223227,0.0005316599,0.00029238305,0.0004611945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042802496,0.000110355046,0.00018478383,0.00008271943,0.004667793,0.0008670839,0.0022407065,0.000047429796,0.00012071261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011238867,0.000041701125,0.0002002012,0.00090404553,0.015192435,0.0002899312,0.00037865262,0.00050380366,0.000025348065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015382968,0.00005059551,0.0014613813,0.0000044369513,0.000028510438,9.376003e-7,0.027125489,0.000020272792,0.0006603554,0.95199656,0.01745567,0.0011804043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071898045,0.00011782816,0.27512336,0.00011240692,0.00014827306,0.00008394505,0.08059855,0.00011198126,0.00041930683,0.57084095,0.071429186,0.00029519675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2655515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29575405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43582073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046733086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023199099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W117043523","doi":"10.29173/agora10084","title":"The American Judiciary Through the Lens of The Federalist Papers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Federalist; Supreme court; Constitution; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Judicial restraint; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Constitutional law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04877377653511141,"score_gpt":0.3215762806192961,"score_spread":0.2728025040841847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W117043523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063436076,0.00009606697,0.00017555844,0.31748012,0.0008883141,0.00021157692,0.000010668572,0.000023435075,0.6176782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892229,0.00023472817,0.000104365274,0.009095086,0.00051124,0.000003946314,1.12325765e-7,0.000007518523,0.0008201263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955068,0.0008885183,0.00040757377,0.00018852636,0.0015363942,0.001472169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972125,0.001240045,0.0004102553,0.0004921875,0.0003157286,0.00032927888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00307075,0.00015861321,0.00019310051,0.000025217274,0.011712495,0.0003424482,0.0026693793,0.000030632957,0.000045932484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013911494,0.000059101894,0.00022912082,0.0010202491,0.05328581,0.00034812416,0.00025278577,0.00062516925,0.0000185533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010779252,0.000026382668,0.00084550155,5.306918e-7,0.000018868617,0.0000018315784,0.0015419708,0.0000039360684,0.000061022478,0.99621373,0.0009270955,0.0003483398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012239888,0.00010392417,0.03776443,0.000027313632,0.00008031718,0.000109542736,0.027849786,0.000017628283,0.00018909636,0.7696073,0.16392735,0.00020089575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030716121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023371854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9257868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003285875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040594516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98957413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W127998565","doi":"10.29173/agora19042","title":"One Nation under God: The Religious Right and the Separation of Church and State in the United States","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of church and state; Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Establishment Clause; Christian right; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Faith; Secular state; First amendment; Sociology; Theology; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023136239373445888,"score_gpt":0.31914986162227893,"score_spread":0.29601362224883304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W127998565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6244622,0.00013658749,0.0011131237,0.35457915,0.0000920276,0.00036682095,0.00000479902,0.000007996803,0.019237332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436885,0.00079404976,0.000046479297,0.00442433,0.000117657095,0.000008055934,0.0000012072898,0.0000030319557,0.00023634435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706054,0.0009831234,0.00030775706,0.00012630729,0.00091850205,0.0006037441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971357,0.0020614425,0.00015892953,0.00015922883,0.00030548178,0.00017919486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004783269,0.000093511626,0.00012857477,0.00009177522,0.002021681,0.0005278413,0.0005681612,0.00002992197,0.000016969496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054269563,0.00003767271,0.000033912256,0.0007998277,0.014294866,0.00035883798,0.00007120507,0.00036816482,0.0000058863875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009727108,0.000019008014,0.00019654684,0.0000014160311,0.000007458072,5.380398e-7,0.0037912496,0.00012462298,0.000032863154,0.9952462,0.0003313391,0.00023907259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003378865,0.00005288862,0.011483144,0.000016211805,0.000025805473,0.00004484164,0.011273482,0.0017049703,0.0000299362,0.97098833,0.00396318,0.00007929677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024014656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009381765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3699067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013835148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008212796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W139180102","doi":"10.29173/agora19895","title":"Ownership and private property from the perspectives of Hegel and Marx","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Marxist philosophy; Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Private property; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Politics; Theme (computing); Political philosophy; Inequality; Law and economics; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02851509869856725,"score_gpt":0.28218521874924024,"score_spread":0.253670120050673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W139180102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70429796,0.00018913692,0.000121183315,0.27438775,0.000102611906,0.00020364337,0.000003742599,0.000013618399,0.02068033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99715257,0.000222417,0.00024592743,0.0016611322,0.00032160513,0.000004886111,1.0242422e-7,0.0000049596383,0.00038641275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976664,0.00037012063,0.00025427347,0.0002270267,0.0004932393,0.0009888965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788195,0.0009034298,0.00010140959,0.00019436453,0.0001726363,0.0007462189],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022924028,0.00011726528,0.00017108436,0.00004307817,0.0017252513,0.0005682443,0.0006771031,0.000050948398,0.00011352025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017151139,0.000047522186,0.0000506762,0.00024501563,0.009911322,0.0007513523,0.0002154709,0.00037093993,0.000019171577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004852769,0.000024009916,0.0027198584,0.0000017914914,0.000010861306,9.800395e-7,0.0046960143,1.7437374e-7,0.00028230628,0.98968905,0.0001620194,0.0024081056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016614469,0.00005125533,0.06970117,0.000023183331,0.000021232345,0.000022849348,0.032375526,0.00013794465,0.00014640964,0.89487976,0.0023679056,0.00010662179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010536633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021290197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29285458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014527862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004259496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488961933","doi":"10.29173/agora19133","title":"Perspectives on Foreign Intervention in Contemporary Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Intervention (counseling); Obligation; State (computer science); Scholarship; Hindsight bias; Sovereignty; Moral obligation; Law and economics; Political science; Law; International relations; Foreign policy; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03623462803850608,"score_gpt":0.3392608074423191,"score_spread":0.30302617940381305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488961933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58642966,0.00011299806,0.00030082645,0.14921427,0.0002900464,0.00032302874,0.0000029083646,0.000037652473,0.26328865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974215,0.000056867277,0.00009506457,0.0015490006,0.0002808243,0.000005955967,5.6405304e-7,0.0000072236867,0.0005830001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964564,0.0004581319,0.00036719418,0.00024712793,0.0010708718,0.0014003085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983784,0.00025879228,0.0001172657,0.00020968603,0.00033273236,0.0007031521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029343087,0.0001409692,0.00016854538,0.0002351615,0.0013862614,0.0008947893,0.0009092534,0.000072639836,0.00009414681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013011822,0.00009469768,0.00013485379,0.0007399271,0.0028897515,0.0011312634,0.000101172256,0.00060262135,0.00016035853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048723095,0.00013642057,0.0014895665,0.0000015045939,0.000004447424,0.0000101004625,0.0040028044,0.000008446509,0.00002318354,0.9929686,0.0010664185,0.00028359622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030191685,0.00014078183,0.0120341955,0.000048759353,0.0000044297103,0.0000246864,0.12791608,0.0008422854,0.000014492022,0.85720634,0.0013275672,0.00013846958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013363604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062020996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41099188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001140295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073445257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498971682","doi":"10.29173/agora19043","title":"Voltaire: Critique Politique","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monarchy; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Relation (database); Humanities; State (computer science); Absolute monarchy; Exposition (narrative); Middle Ages; Classics; Literature; History; Epistemology; Art; Theology; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.018053048337369912,"score_gpt":0.33135776766267566,"score_spread":0.31330471932530574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498971682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0435511,0.00005008226,0.0026487394,0.43386662,0.0006971469,0.0002575916,0.000006590054,0.000089085326,0.51883304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98377585,0.000077665034,0.0005529353,0.01083509,0.0014320232,0.000013221592,5.824329e-7,0.000010595049,0.0033020063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950219,0.00047423,0.00039378565,0.00025658644,0.0013832687,0.002470278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615866,0.00062052766,0.000121874386,0.00029107963,0.0008286891,0.001979199],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002619011,0.00018040846,0.00019601219,0.00013944978,0.0045844433,0.0010776239,0.0013474718,0.00008203716,0.0006515249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021553927,0.00011830983,0.00014043124,0.00079575134,0.013370461,0.0012464147,0.00013607413,0.0006571658,0.0004975983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014976011,0.000033425393,0.0005540018,0.0000014188174,0.000006509977,0.00000887246,0.000258773,0.0000025495117,0.0001631447,0.9932072,0.0053188866,0.0004437008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012373432,0.000054776745,0.004732963,0.000020773694,0.000017620643,0.00024139424,0.0051206034,0.000060811853,0.00015677908,0.890757,0.098474234,0.00023931025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024562037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003372104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94022477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087286736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007921442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535312762","doi":"10.29173/agora12403","title":"Kant’s Universal History and The Paradox of Ethnocentric Egalitarianism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Ethnocentrism; Epistemology; Sketch; Politics; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Colonialism; Philosophy; Political philosophy; Order (exchange); Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Anthropology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0881991030894426,"score_gpt":0.3064408886474481,"score_spread":0.21824178555800552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535312762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07505404,0.0009225322,0.0011684096,0.3308205,0.001739004,0.00036668722,0.000006384609,0.000058832564,0.5898636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666226,0.00024553598,0.00018990951,0.002171187,0.0003162247,0.0000010881297,7.906024e-8,0.0000061479145,0.0004075583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618393,0.00088524027,0.00035816454,0.00019793084,0.001136157,0.0012385756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974166,0.0010373519,0.00016208069,0.00026505502,0.00027108885,0.00084780116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007682915,0.00013101616,0.00022234659,0.00011679071,0.0017887003,0.00008726738,0.0012000869,0.0000982003,0.000114199145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023579255,0.000069689355,0.00012337425,0.00046642745,0.027428882,0.00050182483,0.00017272549,0.0008059353,0.000018592213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000451539,0.00003949468,0.000093873925,0.0000031217232,0.000012324413,0.000008562441,0.010949914,3.6563372e-7,0.000017615419,0.98840535,0.00024033236,0.00018390549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049280206,0.0000541619,0.002025387,0.00001896442,0.000060796036,0.00004879139,0.0057765776,0.00008695909,0.000069332935,0.9882179,0.0030408897,0.00010743002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008190372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013827458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9216082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063589675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018538998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551763177","doi":"10.29173/agora17243","title":"Plato’s Case Against the Philosopher King","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political philosophy; Ideology; Doctrine; Epistemology; Theme (computing); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07190883211504358,"score_gpt":0.2859237169373698,"score_spread":0.21401488482232622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551763177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19369791,0.00024188442,0.0000987612,0.27120844,0.0026678357,0.0001871781,0.000011774565,0.000071313196,0.5318149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835824,0.000009463861,0.00002608389,0.0070836395,0.00819764,0.000003890663,4.3101315e-7,0.000016582622,0.0010799096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968643,0.00018838211,0.00035866565,0.00017971036,0.0007885675,0.0016203638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809295,0.00045399778,0.00013154789,0.00036494163,0.00015644488,0.00080013665],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021649331,0.00020570043,0.0001721474,0.000080961894,0.0048995353,0.0010559029,0.0008036669,0.000035092427,0.00029913613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002955352,0.000091168666,0.00017352773,0.00019933021,0.004573798,0.0010528029,0.00020972932,0.00084145105,0.00029778288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070517294,0.00007789021,0.0000415012,0.000002319478,0.00001723713,0.00009476795,0.002462824,0.000003898063,0.000041582272,0.99530524,0.0009697475,0.00097591145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019784445,0.00004474432,0.00012881805,0.000022176768,0.000051711668,0.0031437078,0.00321281,0.00026153124,0.00011803399,0.93692744,0.055688705,0.00020249443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009263168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054523967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78988445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020666332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014830708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583581666","doi":"10.29173/agora12406","title":"The EU-China’s Strategic Partnership: A Case Study of the EU’s Arms Embargo against China","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; General partnership; Strategic partnership; Ideology; Politics; Political science; International trade; Business; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.08203107211915493,"score_gpt":0.35661735152298335,"score_spread":0.2745862794038284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583581666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6961711,0.000017894672,0.000026374883,0.020015387,0.0002391897,0.00027041728,0.0000025121005,0.000014342182,0.28324276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979849,0.0000302717,0.00003380862,0.0004359351,0.00036153386,0.00000786575,1.263586e-7,0.000009883778,0.0011356696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957044,0.0007502832,0.00052842934,0.00022707814,0.001594851,0.0011949614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980936,0.00028999962,0.00033806413,0.0004384859,0.0003284896,0.0005113305],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049422714,0.00017242174,0.00016385168,0.00011162599,0.0060968283,0.00054796605,0.0019456642,0.000059249705,0.000053692238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008363278,0.00007588917,0.00017538824,0.0009869265,0.0042226412,0.00044622782,0.0002166184,0.0007165442,0.000023493787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108383265,0.00019628346,0.00070548686,8.530661e-7,0.00002554546,0.000063735744,0.01920329,0.00003340669,0.000015164376,0.97941023,0.0001042184,0.00023091747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031472713,0.00019793799,0.024056055,0.00001963948,0.000048169553,0.00057268795,0.11840217,0.00074691355,0.000040864918,0.8551121,0.0003447384,0.00014404042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010052021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024355627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30181378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036290934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014042814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1912974579","doi":"10.29173/agora19934","title":"Corruption et le déclin de la République romaine","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Classical Studies and Legal History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Institution; Redaction; Humanities; The Republic; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Literature","score_opus":0.021374771976293176,"score_gpt":0.27220558360282365,"score_spread":0.2508308116265305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1912974579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20309718,0.00012173845,0.0012660684,0.38070673,0.00075717864,0.00016628027,0.0000035384671,0.00007400299,0.41380727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895255,0.00002873916,0.00010681584,0.005338287,0.0006491551,0.000007987509,5.335724e-7,0.000009860813,0.0043331175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980207,0.00025066923,0.00024712167,0.00015702928,0.0004568381,0.0008676124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870723,0.00038299762,0.00008501661,0.0001498362,0.00020856387,0.00046636318],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018924433,0.00012490676,0.00014079506,0.00007421433,0.0020245134,0.0011770091,0.00045843175,0.00003287088,0.00063508697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039124495,0.00007094805,0.000101496444,0.00009077166,0.0041054497,0.00068220723,0.00012030653,0.0006588793,0.00019082981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038471107,0.00007728385,0.000052077714,0.0000017207201,0.00000685598,0.0000044862027,0.0009906122,0.0000053960102,0.0003079712,0.98270994,0.014926502,0.0009133028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027741597,0.00012232356,0.010992902,0.000019588659,0.00001425257,0.0001303938,0.0034739906,0.00094307575,0.00003389792,0.66598827,0.3178432,0.00016067548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070047737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006728307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78642833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038419233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005073237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1915754556","doi":"10.29173/agora12408","title":"Steps Towards Uruguay’s Next Political and Economic Insertion into the World","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"ICT in Developing Communities","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Politics; Democracy; Political science; Political stability; Economic stability; Development economics; Political economy; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06892764014899137,"score_gpt":0.2960760364421871,"score_spread":0.22714839629319572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1915754556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57366526,0.00017717536,0.03213136,0.32903728,0.0022207217,0.00031888514,0.0000015999606,0.00020535153,0.062242374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868282,0.000035300538,0.007971001,0.004527037,0.00025840875,0.0000066829693,1.8118457e-7,0.00001219368,0.00036095994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962834,0.0004525949,0.0005026065,0.00032473216,0.00071728555,0.001719393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746794,0.00048685638,0.00014182342,0.0009403119,0.00018813687,0.00077491615],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033208702,0.00024747988,0.00022042215,0.00031678344,0.0022954426,0.0017488269,0.0042650197,0.00005037767,0.00003244784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033422298,0.00013649272,0.00008988041,0.0006735388,0.0036217612,0.0019572952,0.0016122529,0.0008570283,0.000104303144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060686116,0.00002477834,0.00035392333,0.0000030995623,0.000011316196,0.000007715897,0.0020132917,0.0000021889164,0.00006117621,0.99359065,0.00023552559,0.0036902656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020870402,0.00012159468,0.042982236,0.000041416264,0.000017371449,0.0007957117,0.0018820702,0.00751584,0.0018868416,0.9431072,0.0011715075,0.00026953022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002134295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038627142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41316298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077294325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012870842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956607322","doi":"10.29173/agora17237","title":"Examining Race Privilege in America: The Preservation of Whiteness through the Systematic Oppression of African-Americans","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Racialization; Oppression; Race (biology); Privilege (computing); Gender studies; White privilege; Sociology; Intersectionality; Social justice; Political science; Dominance (genetics); Context (archaeology); Civil rights; Racism; African american; Critical race theory; Criminology; Law; Politics; Ethnology; Geography","score_opus":0.08201619141533564,"score_gpt":0.39336538269962135,"score_spread":0.31134919128428573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1956607322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83413386,0.0002908815,0.008240319,0.14567053,0.0007318531,0.0007854243,0.0000034023856,0.000018026487,0.010125689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869007,0.000071809256,0.00033075685,0.00039444308,0.00028993888,0.000027803522,2.6094966e-7,0.000009541558,0.0001853707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936974,0.0024745334,0.00076145283,0.00017099452,0.0016937922,0.0012018034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930874,0.0051156236,0.00057853165,0.00052722933,0.00040407927,0.00028711138],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011238904,0.00014440042,0.00034108927,0.00010177245,0.001249466,0.00019784315,0.0018169943,0.000050324546,0.000029512745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011085253,0.00006610938,0.00008348082,0.002134932,0.0062318505,0.0017893828,0.0002018122,0.00048005534,0.000006230386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015384012,0.00018363247,0.0021279745,0.00012306082,0.000010883759,3.8882817e-7,0.06373535,0.0001386824,0.0015619776,0.9317451,0.00006682723,0.00029073507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020484118,0.00011659163,0.028585918,0.001126786,0.00012538942,0.000035974812,0.56220067,0.00072520465,0.001255831,0.40502614,0.00038855427,0.00020807993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021906998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014683725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.526719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005237284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072397426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198920179","doi":"10.29173/agora17245","title":"In Pursuit of Women’s Representation: A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Women’s Representation in Canadian Politics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Politics; Representation (politics); Legislation; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Affirmative action; State (computer science); Democracy; Action (physics); Public administration; Sociology; Gender studies; Political economy; Public relations; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03734879345694187,"score_gpt":0.3480186491668957,"score_spread":0.3106698557099538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198920179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374612,0.000023922536,0.00040911985,0.030053671,0.0005620707,0.0005090514,0.000005093434,0.00001169492,0.030964192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723834,0.000012311122,0.0005787754,0.0011566794,0.00048852817,0.0000745542,0.000001299705,0.000013316002,0.00043616953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99241006,0.000734324,0.0007413946,0.0003097453,0.0016223117,0.0041821576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579227,0.00033829839,0.00021115338,0.00035737967,0.00027231054,0.003028617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010539483,0.00016506627,0.00029745046,0.00096006406,0.00084845163,0.00041935305,0.0009832263,0.00008978011,0.000054523145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037321046,0.0001303878,0.00006513438,0.0023406981,0.001101833,0.0012781578,0.0001418603,0.00043271287,0.00002008654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007628804,0.00016827632,0.0289475,0.000015528447,0.0000075048747,0.0000054188777,0.09488563,0.00032990423,0.00040203868,0.8748589,0.00010403976,0.00026759447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079532946,0.000105358275,0.23146766,0.000045464712,0.000017829898,0.00010640797,0.32140356,0.001998768,0.00060282956,0.44195205,0.0010928251,0.00041192176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46403015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04327129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4329069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009159422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003460447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103324058","doi":"10.29173/agora10110","title":"The Liberal Party of Canada: Still Canada’s “Natural Governing Party?”","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberal Party; Politics; Political science; Party platform; Realigning election; Natural (archaeology); Political economy; Public administration; Ethnic group; Core (optical fiber); Law; Sociology; Socialism; Communism; Democracy","score_opus":0.02617756406982969,"score_gpt":0.26064032944339005,"score_spread":0.23446276537356037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103324058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5930949,0.0006137583,0.00012486392,0.19649409,0.0053507257,0.00041108,0.00007363092,0.00003795319,0.203799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316365,0.000036879996,0.000041201612,0.00136201,0.0005036821,0.0000027841456,1.9002263e-7,0.000008659121,0.004880927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364954,0.00042166983,0.00056396343,0.0002324252,0.0025786036,0.0025537827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968731,0.0007596273,0.00034668873,0.0003263747,0.00038745662,0.0013067432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003465189,0.00017806055,0.0002489522,0.000021610522,0.0034185702,0.00024387233,0.0017136907,0.000044927066,0.000052340027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027144412,0.00009167314,0.0000939179,0.0004726146,0.0032962817,0.0004021549,0.00016552203,0.00061675906,0.000004846148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012991841,0.000015356823,0.0019515441,0.0000027156245,0.000015236772,0.000021429421,0.00072212995,0.0000027159467,0.00003302596,0.98363584,0.0131935775,0.00039343277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000535408,0.00012210499,0.28060925,0.00012701344,0.00006676904,0.0001849158,0.009156215,0.0005753342,0.001041179,0.29238003,0.41454652,0.00065526186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6912558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022308482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023138287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143375326","doi":"10.29173/agora10086","title":"“Battle of the Extremes”: Party Polarization in the 2010 Pennsylvanian Senatorial Election","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Appeal; Battle; Politics; Ideology; Political science; Primary election; Democracy; Political economy; Law; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.07085377367858922,"score_gpt":0.33245898461038986,"score_spread":0.26160521093180067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143375326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9186226,0.000020470383,0.00049133104,0.061009172,0.002905448,0.00039132344,0.0000028057168,0.000019020192,0.016537797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985626,0.0000042052175,0.000028507106,0.0004039133,0.0007346741,0.000005150936,2.4900456e-7,0.000005571104,0.00025513655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596304,0.0012268161,0.00043019015,0.0001590111,0.0011953199,0.0010256552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986377,0.000369831,0.00020115728,0.00026425443,0.00025645777,0.00027062625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005379651,0.00010648405,0.0001343273,0.000081294085,0.0016881111,0.00020098424,0.000980186,0.000077623605,0.00007437216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018237256,0.000049181315,0.00009584368,0.0013251158,0.001910176,0.0004937564,0.00005548726,0.00048692225,0.00001894843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012067935,0.00007743063,0.020341454,0.0000022094114,0.0000036337829,9.812835e-7,0.003662942,0.0000023835953,0.0017532076,0.9736149,0.00031681085,0.00021202401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028539562,0.0001317553,0.34057695,0.0000374588,0.0000387721,0.000035091634,0.0031461744,0.00025296494,0.0026537578,0.6510723,0.0016120992,0.00015726025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02332154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007861439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32254255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032072826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007784091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145887152","doi":"10.29173/agora10085","title":"The Hypocrisy in our Democracy: Placing Youth Voting in Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Lawsuit; Perspective (graphical); Voting; Franchise; Democracy; Political science; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Limiting; Sociology; Engineering; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.05079677841113987,"score_gpt":0.3300128408042905,"score_spread":0.2792160623931506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145887152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6117309,0.00026297293,0.00014346263,0.23249906,0.0010089646,0.0003429387,0.0000025404074,0.00005399382,0.1539552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810266,0.00011692538,0.00018752235,0.0007602422,0.00042282313,0.0000028433324,7.2563076e-8,0.000007696552,0.00039918104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957863,0.00064611854,0.00037573118,0.0002683944,0.0010556866,0.001867747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986707,0.00029738486,0.0001432681,0.00018019282,0.00024841033,0.00046005182],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007883436,0.0001469049,0.00016416526,0.000040400682,0.004791682,0.0005489591,0.001422454,0.00008765753,0.000011968138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022656985,0.00007804757,0.00011512145,0.0013801343,0.002307696,0.00074307807,0.00015932007,0.0011441774,0.000025435651],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118755515,0.000043340642,0.00464428,6.7509916e-7,0.00000472328,0.000015322656,0.07793439,0.000008903762,0.000031642823,0.9169908,0.00011022891,0.00020380614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017392157,0.000022080605,0.010958868,0.00003231177,0.000008733578,0.000024267512,0.4428405,0.00010293487,0.000071983945,0.54558665,0.00006874536,0.00010904046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007991495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068738977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38637185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013676386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010086953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155681991","doi":"10.29173/agora19041","title":"Making Liberal Democracy Ethical: Aristotle on the Unity of Ethics and Politics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Relativism; Political philosophy; Liberal democracy; Environmental ethics; Liberalism; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19479896065515076,"score_gpt":0.3870690311676461,"score_spread":0.19227007051249537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155681991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4102844,0.000031804295,0.000017273083,0.5409135,0.0001981827,0.00012935165,0.000005140582,0.000010939435,0.048409373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99149597,0.00004426712,0.000028502687,0.0059474744,0.0005065538,0.0000033473093,2.1798726e-7,0.000007765609,0.0019658857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731916,0.00038829757,0.0003196124,0.0001594308,0.0009135314,0.00089993636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699366,0.0017699855,0.00010937196,0.00022176174,0.00060823135,0.00029699304],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002653966,0.00013899484,0.00017033263,0.000060916664,0.0062235617,0.00092385703,0.00068185723,0.00006299347,0.00047441848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014633128,0.000057095116,0.00008754827,0.00012298906,0.0071039386,0.00027927235,0.00051286886,0.002700667,0.00005476734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057010852,0.00003064887,0.00006814532,0.000007935685,0.0000144623955,0.0000019624524,0.006455818,0.0000014527188,0.00009760146,0.9884788,0.0045751594,0.0002623543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010014264,0.0002789285,0.0035339724,0.00007495235,0.00001567531,0.00007712272,0.016276304,0.0006465538,0.00011514073,0.97313434,0.0056360965,0.00011079815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007672471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013182174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58121157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001359746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018091968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158360620","doi":"10.29173/agora19898","title":"The Unite the Right Movement and the Brokerage of Social Conservative Voices Within the New Conservative Party of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Realigning election; Alliance; Political science; Political economy; Population; Balance (ability); Politics; Banner; Voting; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Socialism; Communism","score_opus":0.015120360052255982,"score_gpt":0.27954866429432984,"score_spread":0.26442830424207386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158360620","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47243926,0.00010447347,0.000078973055,0.5185394,0.0004213525,0.0006385566,0.000012936072,0.0000078762505,0.0077571487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98806816,0.000059040547,0.000035257824,0.009101591,0.00024820393,0.000014724732,3.044488e-7,0.000008191308,0.0024645473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349684,0.0021283687,0.0007268515,0.00022267504,0.0022379244,0.001187352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929213,0.0046960455,0.00085747126,0.0003932005,0.000718755,0.00041320806],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008999664,0.00021719797,0.00030543006,0.00003746235,0.009138052,0.0006713203,0.0023991065,0.000049549904,0.000058850954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020483218,0.00006965265,0.00011015293,0.0008888132,0.020045549,0.0004895816,0.00032518996,0.000684445,0.0000032452242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003324592,0.0000202703,0.0007137345,0.0000024851067,0.00008094177,0.0000013794839,0.018738309,0.00001160266,0.00014152945,0.97164017,0.008487155,0.00012920119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007540901,0.000064637745,0.035501473,0.000038805727,0.00007530355,0.00000766726,0.05288511,0.00066929625,0.0010988086,0.90241116,0.0063417424,0.00015192924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5530176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39530417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5156289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041859676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053888173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233018242","doi":"10.29173/agora17239","title":"“Westernization” and the Politics of Islam in Senegal","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Subversion; Indigenous; Emancipation; Identity (music); State (computer science); Sociology; Gender studies; Islam; Assertion; Argument (complex analysis); Postcolonialism (international relations); Westernization; Political science; Colonialism; Independence (probability theory); Agency (philosophy); Social science; Law; History; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Modernization theory","score_opus":0.022018411464795558,"score_gpt":0.31799745022022896,"score_spread":0.2959790387554334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233018242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9274141,0.00051462936,0.0004966197,0.06377122,0.00045212643,0.00015059154,9.31871e-7,0.000010144705,0.007189604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672556,0.0012702447,0.0002562126,0.0011537097,0.00043930122,0.00000207193,1.4218858e-7,0.0000048259717,0.0001479227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697953,0.000439017,0.00035649995,0.00010935544,0.0009773696,0.0011382527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850637,0.0005672198,0.00012629987,0.00014203483,0.0001932386,0.00046486047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064897696,0.00009468602,0.00015973541,0.00007928128,0.0015336227,0.00023567816,0.00052958523,0.0000488786,0.000011063668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010386262,0.000049176822,0.000061684594,0.00068175344,0.005716684,0.00048001556,0.00012231742,0.000268392,0.000007794234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038949033,0.00003102996,0.009906979,0.0000023677255,0.000004930157,4.6734283e-7,0.066932864,0.000004456163,0.000018146024,0.92257315,0.00046725484,0.00005447165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006261365,0.000019484596,0.14623292,0.000027808843,0.00001996706,0.000059144782,0.09113426,0.00012424304,0.00012548386,0.7606475,0.0008560017,0.00012709452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057693804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016362205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16192567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030510474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007938157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263046125","doi":"10.29173/agora17244","title":"Methodological Shortcomings in Hannah Arendt’s Conceptualization of Totalitarianism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Epistemology; Imperfect; Ideology; Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Sociology; Nazism; Nazi Germany; Psychoanalysis; Law; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.23468818202134054,"score_gpt":0.44144958360037084,"score_spread":0.2067614015790303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263046125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6048793,0.00029934588,0.019360488,0.2114157,0.0025257296,0.0006759765,0.000020958123,0.000117596486,0.16070493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559027,0.000024475945,0.0017448952,0.0016112735,0.00089074625,0.0000055605083,7.6287364e-7,0.000011673901,0.00012033758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927004,0.0020319333,0.0007561475,0.00027015517,0.0016789347,0.0025624274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959882,0.0015977684,0.00021827391,0.00029997487,0.00032543438,0.0015703514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014359233,0.00019848505,0.00040044202,0.0002802151,0.0010804859,0.00019680668,0.0011898335,0.00014282853,0.00019307397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010353657,0.00013346902,0.00016404434,0.0013286388,0.007079796,0.001265701,0.00022665589,0.00064390636,0.00004516564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011765098,0.00013644739,0.004124455,0.00000384377,0.000007140722,0.000004813611,0.0039186184,0.0000096444755,0.0006202963,0.99075264,0.00015311906,0.0002572277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028253492,0.000092911076,0.023996275,0.00004035988,0.00003031099,0.000046333847,0.0063442355,0.000099216624,0.0014654996,0.9658177,0.0015503771,0.00023423907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017293979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011330126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39071098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077125535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084760436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275894084","doi":"10.29173/agora17240","title":"Mexico’s Political Militarization Returns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Militarization; Military government; Presidency; Political science; Government (linguistics); Politics; Legitimacy; Presidential system; Drug trafficking; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03202031294945768,"score_gpt":0.3459775397313784,"score_spread":0.31395722678192073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275894084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1826227,0.0002264979,0.013855039,0.31057802,0.0050535393,0.0005954416,0.000011907739,0.00027795078,0.48677891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99155664,0.000052274725,0.0020445415,0.0032805842,0.0022428832,0.0000061895907,0.0000011414005,0.000020673497,0.00079509267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078536,0.00096614624,0.0006001043,0.0003606231,0.0026042226,0.004683517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491316,0.00071187405,0.0001998258,0.00050286687,0.0004637439,0.0032084992],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070928223,0.00026369805,0.00027793023,0.00024189617,0.0047824318,0.0005757391,0.0017479443,0.00014064331,0.00042266873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035771444,0.00016350234,0.0001790318,0.0015513544,0.0082780365,0.0016675659,0.00023757655,0.00088537746,0.00032106842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063429493,0.00010693918,0.0073679695,0.0000022148422,0.000010324736,0.0000033515369,0.0030686567,0.0000067535684,0.00019583094,0.9877922,0.00091692497,0.00052247196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023367499,0.000091575675,0.023588793,0.00003585596,0.000059123875,0.00019931687,0.01865492,0.00026624434,0.00065220555,0.9414642,0.014361327,0.00039276492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011285369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008502251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8089339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015884354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017751815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278332232","doi":"10.29173/agora19897","title":"The Justice of Inequality: Argumentation Ethics and Radical Non-Aggression","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Presupposition; Economic Justice; Economic inequality; Law and economics; Politics; Social inequality; Sociology; Positive economics; Property (philosophy); Distributive justice; Economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0793348541639319,"score_gpt":0.40431680139570253,"score_spread":0.32498194723177065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278332232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2864466,0.00015783438,0.0014599194,0.691118,0.00069457374,0.0002634058,0.000002631634,0.000017895816,0.019839173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949555,0.00057753397,0.0002333269,0.0035069596,0.0005567723,0.000004536705,2.4123938e-7,0.0000058845435,0.0001592819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995109,0.001266176,0.00046370598,0.00018963055,0.0017542216,0.0012172417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916482,0.006398311,0.00019953169,0.00022743101,0.00052426575,0.0010022703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012501551,0.00012152387,0.00015973287,0.00006661523,0.0069926465,0.0006302141,0.0008538975,0.00014792335,0.000043766453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136641795,0.00006217527,0.00006845577,0.0005176792,0.013535133,0.00069518696,0.00017128917,0.0016195076,0.000036757174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008101734,0.000030264047,0.00016361802,0.0000125430315,0.0000061526744,0.0000011093254,0.0031936895,0.0000018241387,0.0004921238,0.9939542,0.00025218594,0.0018842354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017994948,0.00007244778,0.004057393,0.00008412638,0.00005509324,0.000023229572,0.00917368,0.00055111403,0.00040134508,0.9844491,0.0008513512,0.00010120311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002313225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009575216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70850885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022283215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012847477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99464417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283142868","doi":"10.29173/agora19080","title":"Why are Extreme Right Parties so Popular in Europe?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extreme right; Immigration; Political science; Right to be forgotten; Media coverage; History; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04605449507133787,"score_gpt":0.30644938743190464,"score_spread":0.2603948923605668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283142868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69067067,0.00010828594,0.0002570661,0.29033208,0.0010118072,0.0003703078,0.0000027586982,0.00008411942,0.017162899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895297,0.00007406156,0.00023495744,0.0077647273,0.0005704913,0.000011599717,4.876826e-7,0.000018074456,0.0017958804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993377,0.0008308633,0.00060206675,0.00040487718,0.002118283,0.0026669125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974217,0.00018190355,0.0002529921,0.0004147135,0.0005029959,0.0012257262],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039978316,0.00024277042,0.00028792268,0.00028700032,0.003533252,0.0019220517,0.0020227921,0.00008320732,0.00045163915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019019541,0.00014850142,0.00010138953,0.0018674541,0.0045351437,0.0018916241,0.0002536597,0.00072594,0.00046312122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074203394,0.0001789664,0.018406393,0.000004796068,0.000014309512,0.00009274317,0.0031516303,0.000023604058,0.00083216775,0.96052784,0.016012289,0.0007478551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004354296,0.0000652597,0.07568008,0.000111152,0.000022886281,0.00005142611,0.0053430605,0.0003852414,0.00041386226,0.85179806,0.065274745,0.0004188068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013107019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003827195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29885906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008257402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009162839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298513719","doi":"10.29173/agora19032","title":"The Future of U.S.-Taiwan Arms Sales","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Military and Defense Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Position (finance); Political science; International trade; Business; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.016605999112194174,"score_gpt":0.3002201949241569,"score_spread":0.28361419581196273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298513719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.329933,0.0016672743,0.00014197186,0.6113681,0.0014606235,0.00028196903,0.0000030367548,0.000037663845,0.05510637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963968,0.0007860316,0.00016760155,0.0006903776,0.001151622,0.0000049374084,1.2480375e-7,0.0000050120816,0.0007975014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964365,0.00041167447,0.0003607548,0.0001693229,0.0012668365,0.0013549193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979247,0.0006110722,0.0001364072,0.0002853594,0.00047781598,0.00056468893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003917864,0.00012529132,0.00016807264,0.000061867024,0.0057965186,0.00040090986,0.0012816939,0.000043928925,0.000076818505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008824088,0.000055883753,0.00013413375,0.000696784,0.009044646,0.0005635515,0.00015753187,0.0004057258,0.00013276958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073686347,0.000022452776,0.0007518744,0.0000017496234,0.000013394268,0.0000017480183,0.0033943928,0.0000021557078,0.00012870901,0.9875079,0.0043879836,0.0037802977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105660074,0.00008384611,0.0150637105,0.000013575019,0.000016403153,0.000030833362,0.08258232,0.00004244504,0.00008126204,0.8803386,0.02153247,0.000108890956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011402024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008954139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6664638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016125628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007049661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307288511","doi":"10.29173/agora19906","title":"Dragon Fears: An Examination of Canadian Perceptions of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"China; Corporation; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Business; State owned; National security; Power (physics); National interest; Political science; Economy; International trade; Market economy; Finance; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.017759339298540757,"score_gpt":0.30272872605920975,"score_spread":0.284969386760669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307288511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426919,0.0000104862775,0.00008703849,0.04564116,0.00014251556,0.00015595352,0.000046281544,0.0000074764457,0.01121716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980619,0.00006952381,0.00012892613,0.0007984393,0.0001757129,0.000003203386,8.289089e-7,0.000006334925,0.0007551219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997306,0.00032812802,0.00034529876,0.00015755251,0.0008485571,0.0010144932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751455,0.00017691814,0.00019500041,0.00023079354,0.00045819188,0.0014245765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018870989,0.00010569189,0.00016429031,0.0005197418,0.001096323,0.00025078794,0.00085811585,0.000046375033,0.0002999237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001113654,0.00007196115,0.00007789051,0.0015056665,0.003022155,0.0011675503,0.00003607122,0.0002276068,0.000028273538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011543761,0.00020521176,0.022765433,0.000015619225,0.000025207784,0.000008835413,0.04342959,0.00008285089,0.007395187,0.90868324,0.0030393535,0.0143379485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014355591,0.00010689537,0.81908274,0.000026595699,0.000009352401,0.000021485896,0.005235129,0.00024651788,0.00018581092,0.17392872,0.0008866102,0.00012661076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.857146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65734655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7963173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059650105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002438293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330863216","doi":"10.29173/agora12513","title":"On the Passing of North Korea’s ‘Dear Leader:’ Kim Jong-il (1941-2011)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Power (physics); Politics; Authoritarianism; Round table; History; Demography; Political science; Economic history; Law; Sociology; Advertising; Business; Physics","score_opus":0.057879221952939076,"score_gpt":0.3129521408092999,"score_spread":0.2550729188563608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330863216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58044577,0.0002995122,0.00038735,0.2936076,0.001724954,0.00028621976,0.000018141745,0.00007123956,0.12315926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943622,0.00009938339,0.000085020074,0.0024908509,0.0014850398,0.0000046682494,3.9370482e-7,0.000013230549,0.0014592421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384123,0.00064302474,0.00051897607,0.00024191839,0.0020964507,0.0026584119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957256,0.0019448097,0.00022347488,0.0003600952,0.00033751084,0.0014085195],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043782135,0.00023477034,0.0003213207,0.000117249314,0.0050029284,0.00026499547,0.001422027,0.000069336354,0.00023162932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030222489,0.000113630995,0.00022525097,0.00082046597,0.00886096,0.0005419886,0.00021666204,0.00080704084,0.00032309332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014223779,0.00014381867,0.0055234935,0.000003585418,0.000019212493,0.0000028786312,0.0022994478,0.000002990076,0.000035104156,0.98453814,0.005985685,0.0014314011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037560082,0.0003389587,0.18149981,0.00007696465,0.00013391257,0.00007272996,0.00665549,0.00008222477,0.00049083284,0.73659945,0.073128186,0.000545862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002562182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032839846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41391644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007832623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006228586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23367563","doi":"10.29173/agora10090","title":"Canada and Terrorism: A Case Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Government (linguistics); Meaning (existential); International relations; Key (lock); Relation (database); Focus (optics); Political economy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer security; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04888909205560636,"score_gpt":0.319769792715172,"score_spread":0.2708807006595656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23367563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97531104,0.000035758785,0.00019343385,0.017178265,0.00097153604,0.00027447258,0.0000060622237,0.00003882401,0.005990635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969765,0.000021568532,0.0000357812,0.0021151276,0.0005121179,0.0000074863383,8.5989456e-8,0.000012582465,0.00031876232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950174,0.0005729303,0.00046241266,0.0003879661,0.0014287393,0.0021305317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996891,0.00031416965,0.00013043608,0.0003729013,0.00028282517,0.0020086188],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034880163,0.00023001297,0.00024881482,0.00012522259,0.0035588045,0.0004474638,0.0010719239,0.000060676066,0.000107599575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006548085,0.00014774004,0.0000631917,0.0006126424,0.0034867218,0.00068964757,0.00021393891,0.000650571,0.000014969267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008746428,0.0011468725,0.07831702,0.000019054689,0.00013539894,0.021781402,0.45977148,0.0000011572314,0.000075844604,0.41977307,0.004085091,0.014806161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046108922,0.00036829544,0.02912123,0.000029987994,0.00009358335,0.0075018457,0.89767456,0.00009146982,0.000040253824,0.063132085,0.0010734064,0.0004122138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9484559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83081675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43790308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075826707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004265767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342069712","doi":"10.29173/agora17241","title":"Respecting Human Rights: Does Treaty Ratification Lead to Compliance?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ratification; Human rights; Treaty; Political science; Compliance (psychology); International law; Law; Credibility; Convention; Democracy; International human rights law; Indigenous; Law and economics; State (computer science); International regime; Politics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0694378765129275,"score_gpt":0.3485333682379215,"score_spread":0.27909549172499404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342069712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91332847,0.000016779311,0.000556668,0.051727116,0.0007680805,0.0002557735,0.0000017773424,0.00008115196,0.0332642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411136,7.000228e-7,0.0001091939,0.0020013682,0.0035113404,0.0000037871796,0.0000013637842,0.000011027451,0.0002498715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967672,0.00006901903,0.0004000276,0.00025107636,0.0007890279,0.0017235993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986893,0.00010243648,0.00018267447,0.00032245077,0.00043305338,0.00027010188],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003073581,0.00019870301,0.00020844788,0.00020328388,0.004439314,0.0016007801,0.0007963583,0.00004571908,0.000041632866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086948194,0.000107101405,0.00011555923,0.0011543982,0.0009775662,0.002593895,0.00017107843,0.00035946793,0.00018373055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012402581,0.00013188802,0.0113398805,0.000013912134,0.000008441399,0.0000027805083,0.00045096013,0.0000072657563,0.00070884486,0.9862011,0.0006619642,0.00046056884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024590406,0.000027835422,0.12176187,0.000042326377,0.000060501618,0.000023312356,0.007849092,0.00018936263,0.00029088563,0.8654325,0.0038025125,0.00027392217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031072767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025235832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120768614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071195647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009360203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28306332","doi":"10.29173/agora10087","title":"Reformed Development: How Edmonton Can Benefit From Globalization Through Improved Development Strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Disadvantage; Suburbanization; Globalization; Economic growth; Plan (archaeology); Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management; Geography","score_opus":0.04588587257508526,"score_gpt":0.290573712828328,"score_spread":0.24468784025324275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28306332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66156197,0.00019338532,0.008323268,0.20722233,0.0013922163,0.00062001165,0.000067952635,0.00015606968,0.12046279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910905,0.00006409667,0.0038879614,0.0030962746,0.00041595628,0.000007848136,0.0000030682627,0.000012041703,0.0014223045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961069,0.00012540835,0.0004008002,0.00034133965,0.0011874309,0.0018380869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981111,0.000086969434,0.00027432106,0.0002574401,0.00030594252,0.0009641909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014365822,0.00021986554,0.00020325383,0.00008311952,0.0036107101,0.0010135621,0.0013218398,0.00010040698,0.00009267452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045497093,0.00015273373,0.000066504486,0.0007865728,0.0019321721,0.0015638482,0.00012585911,0.0003270973,0.000026916086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016107973,0.000037947633,0.0003058782,0.000002581608,0.00002291601,0.000009366462,0.026853353,0.000001677698,0.00019033924,0.967527,0.0007576944,0.0042751697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045692886,0.00005600086,0.0845414,0.00007988734,0.000029535882,0.000031346248,0.018297622,0.000062811836,0.0048527145,0.7873699,0.103687525,0.0005342972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13391964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20731121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32952848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002283045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007458317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99816847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991997304","doi":"10.29173/agora19035","title":"Top-Down or Bottom-Up: Approaches for Addressing Land Degradation in Swaziland and Botswana","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Land degradation; Politics; Citizen journalism; Environmental degradation; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Political science; Environmental planning; Geography; Development economics; Economic growth; Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.0777527631505887,"score_gpt":0.27354527217210556,"score_spread":0.19579250902151685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991997304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345211,0.000042774154,0.000087456654,0.06447016,0.00016427385,0.0002765441,0.0000053420154,0.000014043545,0.00041833427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978045,0.00006148135,0.00023364353,0.00037875486,0.00033983818,0.0000111061145,0.0000038896696,0.0000011037042,0.0011656433],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827117,0.000061876584,0.00026393414,0.0002269835,0.00033981368,0.00083619624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991323,0.00026295663,0.000085041065,0.000053144493,0.000079458994,0.0003870954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001010012,0.00013073959,0.00016289625,0.000033637432,0.0010622066,0.00072632305,0.00034737887,0.00006320615,0.000050269155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014157646,0.000021220105,0.00005045533,0.00035477013,0.0006069756,0.0005803641,0.000071490096,0.00024322055,0.0000065008544],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002860297,0.00042089098,0.069544785,0.0000594973,0.000050916864,0.000024525594,0.00084606634,0.000033743225,0.02513389,0.16094775,0.0024653752,0.7401865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011119198,0.0006037812,0.5034637,0.000116934134,0.000031982418,0.00058291946,0.0023929093,0.010335953,0.0017733867,0.47450852,0.0046072444,0.00047071846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008361902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007457258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7397158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007305844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007225985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8169741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231979502","doi":"10.29173/agora12405","title":"American Media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fourth Estate; Mandate; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; State (computer science); Political science; Power (physics); Media relations; Estate; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Media studies; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.050629892414061975,"score_gpt":0.3234286374825772,"score_spread":0.27279874506851526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231979502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22056985,0.00010145195,0.0005815709,0.17335567,0.001771687,0.00019137556,0.000004215349,0.00015043472,0.60327375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411714,0.00019383282,0.0010017719,0.00301466,0.0008972584,0.000002267735,1.6545334e-7,0.000006986611,0.00076590566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628574,0.0003145703,0.00023357189,0.00020424227,0.0013512016,0.0016106776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979816,0.00021154294,0.00013242313,0.00022739753,0.00028139394,0.0011656259],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003562801,0.00012083244,0.00014939209,0.000021355225,0.0038200535,0.00036241868,0.0015287846,0.000050714523,0.0003176221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010642894,0.00006822509,0.00013846488,0.00118146,0.013119299,0.00057832204,0.00011292272,0.0005582321,0.00016572997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046656123,0.000039510945,0.00061982026,4.531179e-7,0.0000070964074,0.000008650491,0.018305466,2.1296823e-7,0.0000675333,0.97689867,0.0021767537,0.0018711431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012751903,0.000059738977,0.01329108,0.000010827323,0.000028442093,0.0000705411,0.060907986,0.000012860191,0.00029931706,0.903079,0.021923019,0.00018970092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022264537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055691926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7735473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037043492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009512819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246009322","doi":"10.29173/agora17411","title":"Letter from the Senior Editors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03451399815021419,"score_gpt":0.27857700442770766,"score_spread":0.24406300627749347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246009322","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023702153,0.000061661325,0.0014800507,0.97002214,0.022783691,0.00015446027,0.00002455832,0.00013213197,0.0029710738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07550734,0.00003118939,0.00012507146,0.6155555,0.30740473,0.000010052032,0.00002321472,0.00006624983,0.0012765981],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953142,0.00031376316,0.000463643,0.0002492976,0.0019125327,0.0017465606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982306,0.0005084547,0.000115315575,0.0005896959,0.00015106381,0.00040487942],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019440592,0.0003545284,0.0002538218,0.00012544959,0.0011412181,0.00086815236,0.0015174245,0.0002979837,0.004324729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019862824,0.0001803397,0.00020621173,0.00030843943,0.0014098694,0.00051972095,0.000114462426,0.0038980364,0.0072801583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4954817e-7,0.000005066238,0.000016937824,0.000004642352,0.000025631709,0.000011291325,0.00020590457,0.0000923957,0.00027472543,0.00015974307,0.9987977,0.00040501598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011973937,0.000013120797,0.0021921915,0.000040409355,0.00010419286,0.0001073983,0.00008995855,0.0016383599,0.000056496294,0.016966691,0.97837657,0.0002948987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021809607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000744597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35446662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082893495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022408161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249834761","doi":"10.29173/agora12407","title":"Bolivian Politics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Politics; Democracy; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Political science; Political economy; Identity (music); Relation (database); Sociology; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.054315799991583306,"score_gpt":0.3378740969770443,"score_spread":0.283558296985461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249834761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07847339,0.00005867611,0.0016474461,0.07807781,0.0014086515,0.00019774529,0.000007297747,0.00011865421,0.84001034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99069256,0.00011175581,0.0017786662,0.0045144567,0.001128022,0.0000031048523,2.3146724e-7,0.000014933509,0.0017562746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944153,0.0003803633,0.0004093831,0.00025506408,0.0015323849,0.00300755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967395,0.00031243917,0.00016461765,0.00038398057,0.00035545748,0.0020440263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041028447,0.00017932178,0.00020685716,0.000120371704,0.00546196,0.0005517057,0.0017895994,0.000086381864,0.00041727631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014269451,0.000119539436,0.0001974151,0.00092955155,0.010530028,0.00058610877,0.00018525671,0.0006622597,0.00017224431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016357186,0.000060533624,0.00073103595,0.0000011644128,0.0000107761125,0.000010546401,0.00781426,4.6492067e-7,0.000032991054,0.98968047,0.0011281178,0.0005280324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014621274,0.000082629515,0.0073210993,0.000015641097,0.000032641015,0.00009548249,0.017194198,0.00011478814,0.00018189765,0.9545458,0.020033075,0.00023655426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048003327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007463921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91221917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007580703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022773023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254111954","doi":"10.29173/agora10082","title":"Introduction to the First Issue","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Posthumanist Ethics and Activism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05127041929539432,"score_gpt":0.32887135552225405,"score_spread":0.2776009362268597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254111954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025470559,0.000015815003,0.0010424354,0.8848367,0.0016806808,0.00017716446,0.0000011826382,0.000036865,0.086738616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861156,0.000031583288,0.00017743974,0.006631488,0.0051247627,0.0000044155227,8.3065444e-8,0.0000074579343,0.0019071727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969184,0.00023595296,0.00022175108,0.0002356597,0.0011344366,0.0012537957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845386,0.00017188505,0.000089521054,0.00033999927,0.00028178652,0.0006629405],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006844114,0.00011077956,0.00010472877,0.00009322687,0.0067736707,0.00066965603,0.0016099457,0.000047338388,0.00042007808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013351996,0.0000558402,0.00007364337,0.0008252992,0.0031181092,0.0005194314,0.00016808334,0.0006204883,0.00063265837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070197443,0.000035538356,0.00006130265,6.4406976e-7,0.000004776317,0.0000032910848,0.009295373,0.0000025687743,0.00006326334,0.9764349,0.012885499,0.0012058419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006318527,0.00008548479,0.0055073244,0.000008890666,0.000015591679,0.00006159551,0.0060431063,0.000033034274,0.00046571903,0.5045691,0.48302183,0.00012510031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030454493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015617122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037865157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062518305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W61883257","doi":"10.29173/agora17238","title":"Why Ukraine Surrendered Security: A Methodological Individualist Approach to Nuclear Disarmament","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Nuclear Issues and Defense","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disarmament; Ukrainian; Political science; Nuclear weapon; Possession (linguistics); Scrutiny; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14811108165939843,"score_gpt":0.3995358220692804,"score_spread":0.25142474040988194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W61883257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3898052,0.0002543831,0.004110196,0.37060806,0.0020190023,0.0007543546,0.000021896452,0.00023602849,0.23219088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98033476,0.000048606904,0.0052725137,0.0127335135,0.0014176792,0.000004647767,9.045346e-7,0.000019562538,0.00016781576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927648,0.0015692587,0.00042131648,0.0003498212,0.0020790414,0.0028157956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958199,0.000553861,0.00013534166,0.000360282,0.00019901838,0.0029315732],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01342811,0.00022798464,0.00032958758,0.00018084863,0.0033323022,0.0010542907,0.0014309192,0.00010299643,0.00023759062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026355938,0.00013918497,0.00018112382,0.0012519984,0.0030017903,0.0007718652,0.00048225856,0.00070568454,0.00022924737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024651188,0.0002888829,0.00033263437,0.000003151631,0.00001694178,0.000004830583,0.016160896,0.0000050002554,0.000120506724,0.96657586,0.015628906,0.00083775265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051831454,0.00022577084,0.0061567877,0.000029626257,0.00009861303,0.00039746377,0.047320217,0.00024496642,0.00006694187,0.3027277,0.64159036,0.00062322774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014940851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000436062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66384816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005940111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027459871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W649443819","doi":"10.29173/agora19040","title":"A Contribution to Rupert Taylor’s Critique of Consociationalism in Northern Ireland","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sectarianism; Politics; Sociology; Political economy; Irish; Nationalism; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01510779127076991,"score_gpt":0.3160102365857039,"score_spread":0.300902445314934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W649443819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7598529,0.000069858215,0.00041215072,0.2240391,0.00024092695,0.0002919855,0.000005932927,0.000014069214,0.0150730945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736327,0.000047500896,0.000104670755,0.0020623747,0.00026360847,0.000013926885,4.909137e-7,0.0000039744114,0.00014016402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718624,0.0002907462,0.00036301548,0.0001572546,0.0009451873,0.001057573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784946,0.0004241065,0.00009453266,0.00009589435,0.0010527348,0.00048328895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028551288,0.00009159403,0.00019302971,0.00013659167,0.0011608059,0.00028172118,0.0005113426,0.000053477543,0.000058169542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041914876,0.0000639758,0.00006685519,0.0007925889,0.0019164985,0.0004953207,0.000083183695,0.00026170435,0.00006454661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014197003,0.00014700319,0.073964365,0.0000050198746,0.000018344994,0.00001402152,0.004102305,0.000013029216,0.001204939,0.9106335,0.007983816,0.0018994653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065552536,0.00012338301,0.39456487,0.0001039548,0.000017989127,0.000054982607,0.011361128,0.000106867956,0.00043137764,0.5897865,0.0025349818,0.00025839853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012325557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00474445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32084695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060450484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067357015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99425143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77216687","doi":"10.29173/agora10083","title":"On the Best Life","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Human life; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; The good life; Order (exchange); Function (biology); Best practice; Natural (archaeology); Relativism; Subject (documents); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science; History; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.16186966955933801,"score_gpt":0.3588770994970647,"score_spread":0.19700742993772669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77216687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06256484,0.000018285455,0.00020749905,0.39883006,0.00065267936,0.00012241582,0.0000023914715,0.000035859426,0.537566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775472,0.000037625978,0.00006932502,0.020785509,0.0010206563,0.00000381825,7.032554e-8,0.0000090924905,0.0005266789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496734,0.00070816925,0.0003207006,0.00023425078,0.0017398763,0.0020296478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957596,0.0016582437,0.00010120965,0.00039920167,0.000290787,0.0017909557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074382797,0.00015865192,0.00014896531,0.00009407996,0.006070535,0.00049363665,0.0021000826,0.000096264725,0.00037367432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009305567,0.000075730604,0.0001430583,0.00077613216,0.011498811,0.00045848612,0.00015490135,0.0012688477,0.000811057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011752131,0.00008623863,0.000054811633,8.2428306e-7,0.000007870769,0.000008688856,0.0021610977,7.9716216e-7,0.000018250017,0.9966724,0.0008297856,0.0001474783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008688351,0.000122904,0.00092889386,0.000021560032,0.000021873713,0.000019241324,0.0057012453,0.000034084394,0.00012912255,0.9906851,0.002119474,0.0001296398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017255532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000909272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033923914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018169249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94353500","doi":"10.29173/agora12404","title":"What’s Mine is Hers: A Solution to Common Law Property Woes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Division (mathematics); Property law; Law; Common law; Inequality; Common property; Law and economics; Real property; Political science; Sociology; Property rights; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10625960575862008,"score_gpt":0.35225136832048276,"score_spread":0.24599176256186267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94353500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34496394,0.00021953625,0.0001632023,0.57753193,0.0020562934,0.0006520965,0.000004047907,0.00012275961,0.07428617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98774785,0.0001420268,0.0007738452,0.007766944,0.00056289195,0.0000122363335,2.1089929e-7,0.0000101897695,0.0029838078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953745,0.00040050337,0.00039633783,0.00034268026,0.001550003,0.0019359774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771184,0.00015416244,0.00013259512,0.00025957185,0.00048828626,0.001253564],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028353059,0.0002130093,0.00026173776,0.00007275842,0.0057135453,0.0012309239,0.0013387308,0.00007920046,0.00018213532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005623159,0.00010126398,0.0001438991,0.0008458042,0.0053033126,0.0022352862,0.00032942556,0.00046508358,0.00027908225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042099786,0.00017759149,0.00090005656,0.0000055596697,0.00003878152,0.000017490009,0.07571483,0.0000019523509,0.0008731653,0.911601,0.0070083635,0.003619106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081199926,0.00070133014,0.026347926,0.00033747006,0.00016006219,0.00014125732,0.20349012,0.00026010248,0.004172039,0.67715687,0.0852852,0.0011356471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04159741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008673624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64278394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010650114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003622198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W983164686","doi":"10.29173/agora10088","title":"Multilateralism and Arctic Sovereignty: Canada’s Policy Options","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; Arctic; Archipelago; Political science; Treaty; Multilateralism; Law; Power (physics); Convention; International trade; Geography; Politics; Economics; Oceanography","score_opus":0.04634148625003622,"score_gpt":0.3166977977073475,"score_spread":0.2703563114573113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W983164686","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07876347,0.00014863284,0.00019819834,0.65118617,0.00066023343,0.00025048378,0.000011061666,0.000053093023,0.26872864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929598,0.0002648526,0.0004578416,0.004080602,0.0007065988,0.0000029004357,1.1474166e-7,0.000008203868,0.0015191137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967989,0.00023992034,0.00027109066,0.0002191894,0.0008653917,0.0016055376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813336,0.000203957,0.00010598346,0.00019169912,0.00018968704,0.0011752881],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015576328,0.00015068626,0.00016782821,0.00013704065,0.005270082,0.00024974562,0.00067018386,0.0000443123,0.000098589044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011886002,0.00009135942,0.00005681015,0.0005310814,0.0054450897,0.0004437709,0.00020346745,0.00038281464,0.000015340349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045186175,0.000018387818,0.0014501323,0.0000019875167,0.000014051859,0.00001274158,0.0047696247,5.0589676e-7,0.000008093583,0.9922991,0.00096200657,0.00045888513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018022553,0.000036945286,0.07787179,0.000022199214,0.00003178147,0.00016977002,0.010470209,0.00004605861,0.000032561715,0.9047189,0.006234737,0.00018487495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8767138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41790476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095736305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00512643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}