{"meta":{"query_hash":"79fc25d0763d","filters":{"venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/79fc25d0763d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+American+Journal+of+Comparative+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W151487474","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.125","title":"The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Analogy; Political science; Field (mathematics); Comparative politics; Constitutional economics; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049900953047995945,"score_gpt":0.3854993611052266,"score_spread":0.3355984080572306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W151487474","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08628046,0.019359607,0.49864754,0.07572087,0.002804063,0.0032803176,0.00056504644,0.00017898042,0.31316304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85420984,0.003622824,0.123218566,0.0075956727,0.001654586,0.0044678766,0.00023835756,0.00008721563,0.0049048904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.71066964,0.26111054,0.004152674,0.010017767,0.011953583,0.0020957557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70688975,0.26439744,0.0065427343,0.015894555,0.005385719,0.0008898118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19061686,0.0006539966,0.001935645,0.0058189468,0.009543119,0.010279745,0.00495118,0.0044700494,0.007322221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2594813,0.0009694586,0.0013266937,0.006521869,0.058700077,0.020418447,0.008294795,0.004773618,0.0006195717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003318609,0.000024293242,0.0007515185,0.00010559893,0.000023174009,0.00005261757,0.0030376026,0.00017331712,0.000039342158,0.98417217,0.0010406921,0.010546523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007787666,0.000088437315,0.0006674558,0.00037161753,0.00003015958,0.00009093613,0.002430765,0.0011784638,0.00028791142,0.97770476,0.01705113,0.000020396157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022570686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022910729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19061686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006240555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006039705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984946490","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2013.0002","title":"Can Class Action Regimes Operate Satisfactorily without a Certification Device? Empirical Insights from the Federal Court of Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Certification; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Empirical research; Political science; Law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.11353519014166352,"score_gpt":0.34800423563009053,"score_spread":0.234469045488427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984946490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8431312,0.0011663388,0.0014942032,0.008726723,0.000028378448,0.000100722275,0.00007640269,0.000010818662,0.14526528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975368,0.0002784134,0.00019766336,0.00043035034,0.000021232237,0.000016958063,0.000018873197,0.000002613021,0.0014970249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768425,0.006894865,0.0014970051,0.0021587692,0.008024672,0.0045821816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.903885,0.055290077,0.02369091,0.0058228076,0.008842137,0.0024691273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01865727,0.00017949527,0.00070936175,0.0030519888,0.0058700475,0.009062639,0.0019627083,0.0036762813,0.005006919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09369429,0.00055895286,0.00056188216,0.0031458791,0.0140095735,0.009442465,0.003863294,0.0043279356,0.00053003896],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089120804,0.0003741649,0.09613862,0.0001981163,0.00007958108,0.00071740453,0.041235186,0.001725211,0.00036165802,0.82894367,0.00356856,0.02656884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019789593,0.00036620424,0.6082365,0.0011638945,0.00038939549,0.0007135701,0.068300605,0.010643247,0.0011960979,0.2456653,0.06292904,0.00019815618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15628569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16702664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15628569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011322003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012370634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31075203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032899432","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2010.0015","title":"The Legacy of Empire: The Common Law Inheritance and Commitments to Legality in Former British Colonies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Colonialism; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Population; Rule of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Sociology; Politics; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.03161779720101658,"score_gpt":0.3712986535816661,"score_spread":0.3396808563806495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032899432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99325484,0.00022807709,0.00004870939,0.0005405874,0.0000044606672,0.000002427636,0.0000044270723,7.240781e-7,0.0059158187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986494,0.00016201394,0.000027992655,0.000054902168,0.0000018112886,0.0000011806428,0.0000035642536,0.0000015950699,0.0010975784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984037,0.0005084611,0.000059575224,0.00017144423,0.0003243381,0.00053239526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963201,0.0011411557,0.0008413937,0.00020698087,0.0006014733,0.00088891183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019966748,0.00008994337,0.00022490046,0.0008553984,0.0066014505,0.0038339037,0.0004868184,0.00064496906,0.0013607545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006949259,0.00017664961,0.000054112857,0.0013693952,0.010911896,0.0016331932,0.0028816438,0.0015423592,0.00009322688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003691601,0.000034091947,0.058680817,0.000032508404,0.000008586934,0.0011762754,0.90654314,0.00008970569,0.00082477275,0.01640423,0.0004659739,0.015702957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006860708,0.00004670035,0.26981986,0.00014291315,0.000008796252,0.00059224106,0.6953464,0.00015727646,0.00023441498,0.002146714,0.03146421,0.000033505286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45783317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7091487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45783317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007154417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00456679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91033655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061848164","doi":"10.2307/840922","title":"The Forms and Limits of Constitutional Interpretation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Law; Philosophy; Classics; Political science; Sociology; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.044316231671212326,"score_gpt":0.35308263258337413,"score_spread":0.3087664009121618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061848164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023256673,0.0071655493,0.032359052,0.045133505,0.0007166954,0.000058499852,0.00033502918,0.0001707655,0.8908041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9480696,0.0042400854,0.006440797,0.003575829,0.0016972581,0.00022789117,0.00026857315,0.00036531469,0.035114735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9604156,0.02220747,0.002068039,0.0035892383,0.009615198,0.0021044197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94727546,0.03483964,0.002053176,0.010306163,0.004328367,0.0011972039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016222456,0.00044311222,0.0010106604,0.0039052109,0.007827745,0.028274167,0.0020095273,0.0061698337,0.02175979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07821646,0.0009883591,0.00072931877,0.0045262096,0.062483568,0.03693428,0.015190311,0.008944884,0.003601847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009732275,0.0000034546931,0.00013605045,0.000024641135,0.0000030972335,0.000025228848,0.0026915355,0.00005539235,0.000056849483,0.99006116,0.0026358543,0.0042970474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008101759,0.000005333825,0.00020807039,0.000121106124,0.0000059277127,0.000053299882,0.0015939092,0.0001416579,0.00008547217,0.9587926,0.038976174,0.000008349806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025211987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021588583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028274167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004964289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049381256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085793614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093017361","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2013.0036","title":"Social and Economic Rights as Fundamental Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Political science; Constitution; Social rights; Constitutional right; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Social security; Due Process Clause; International human rights law; Constitutional law; Bill of rights; Human rights; National security","score_opus":0.03872202326376139,"score_gpt":0.35423673803127065,"score_spread":0.31551471476750925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093017361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049194084,0.0027541283,0.01808792,0.016917765,0.0006863977,0.00007964635,0.00024405602,0.00003823289,0.9562724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7751469,0.008986477,0.03062963,0.016605653,0.0029444634,0.0009849314,0.0007306159,0.00013190683,0.16383946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928047,0.0028558297,0.00033170928,0.0008530808,0.0018474811,0.001307145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627626,0.0015990944,0.00034774013,0.0008031394,0.0007079611,0.00026584265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060001537,0.00062936643,0.00048764976,0.0012513257,0.0039724885,0.008278434,0.001132262,0.0050426335,0.0103844525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005912975,0.00034291288,0.0005941109,0.0014664953,0.027168749,0.008716232,0.0050093783,0.005620423,0.001517127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8818466e-7,0.0000015448114,0.000020499076,0.0000037989187,3.5979704e-7,0.0000040826935,0.00020391592,0.000026249965,0.000010484551,0.99811065,0.0008668695,0.00075100263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061931646,0.000008749943,0.00020831494,0.00009968426,0.0000041323174,0.000037844497,0.000430334,0.00013582187,0.000110504894,0.80523103,0.19371922,0.000008192256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011432498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0103844525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005599345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008192376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040626287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329818661","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2010.0013","title":"Book Review Essay","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Sociology; Commercial law","score_opus":0.039336358567482584,"score_gpt":0.3967041834679328,"score_spread":0.3573678249004502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329818661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000423194,0.27550521,0.00045375034,0.09543038,0.050955407,0.000086730404,0.0016669866,0.00017698266,0.57530135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005616274,0.15834332,0.0005075352,0.025399003,0.021540126,0.00009726152,0.001457123,0.00018489006,0.78685445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998621,0.00015801011,0.000050762457,0.0001553346,0.00086963514,0.00014537691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558616,0.0007913932,0.00014321243,0.0002525802,0.002824411,0.00040218118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010066335,0.0005614046,0.0008947022,0.004952599,0.0033039232,0.006557856,0.0016217375,0.0034913667,0.18576443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071057547,0.00032442753,0.00053012534,0.009058165,0.0015582955,0.00441447,0.0017809625,0.002619584,0.08133437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027467756,0.0000048201255,0.0000218257,0.0001150731,0.000001327275,0.000016024618,0.00004100871,0.000018055875,0.000016176276,0.0047877557,0.97255313,0.022422029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001102607,0.0000011080144,0.0000737482,0.00023242255,0.0000011357354,0.000025494837,0.000060633993,0.000005723254,0.000006426781,0.0006336388,0.9989567,0.000001869098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05337709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08698749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18576443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009025335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011230928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6214439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342974016","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx027","title":"Conceptions of Authority and the Anglo-American Common Law Divide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.06470010365945968,"score_gpt":0.41108569366609915,"score_spread":0.3463855900066395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342974016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12520778,0.008199121,0.012391619,0.021513322,0.00025902892,0.000024736177,0.000030830914,0.00003868284,0.8323349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988862,0.0011805755,0.0009978353,0.0014200945,0.00015167153,0.000027018898,0.00001468971,0.000010631802,0.007335584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523735,0.0017541383,0.0001732283,0.0006622691,0.0013543688,0.000818547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640685,0.0018857323,0.00042500478,0.00024894363,0.00058384513,0.0004496471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004577498,0.000283385,0.00035751093,0.004075395,0.007463165,0.008895789,0.00092237483,0.0023785243,0.002592804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058128815,0.00021075261,0.00032447668,0.0020554261,0.039018244,0.010004385,0.005089831,0.004383302,0.00032399138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013299077,0.000002788336,0.00008995827,0.000002640442,5.775938e-7,0.000007645816,0.0026228754,0.000028714381,0.000011984967,0.9961093,0.0001625867,0.0009596834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000879291,0.000010600268,0.0010820774,0.00008415019,0.000005852785,0.000047824447,0.0049577956,0.0004657111,0.00003665275,0.9484661,0.044822577,0.000011870299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016768578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012410026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016768578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0082104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004722893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05957097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510880950","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0020","title":"Revisiting Qúebec's &lt;I&gt;Jus Commune&lt;/I&gt; in the Era of the Human Rights Charters","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Civil code; Human rights; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Public law","score_opus":0.061877203646745885,"score_gpt":0.35406543297975,"score_spread":0.29218822933300415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510880950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19644664,0.022162978,0.0035694493,0.1557372,0.0016731253,0.00009960585,0.0011239855,0.000102831116,0.61908424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307681,0.00400552,0.0019078619,0.011568044,0.0001750467,0.000031381274,0.00014652239,0.000039942894,0.05135752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784493,0.00051239907,0.000036905083,0.00019444729,0.00064822816,0.00076312886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996843,0.00075546774,0.0001841797,0.00011331724,0.001647476,0.00045653284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002029702,0.0003337503,0.000278897,0.0018339595,0.01655594,0.007852946,0.0012672505,0.0019864417,0.006503453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003599821,0.00015732748,0.0003327765,0.0024639857,0.010951207,0.0022667442,0.0015087697,0.0029244395,0.0002437861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034384346,0.000040644998,0.0075119697,0.0001496398,0.000018190316,0.0008682542,0.0324744,0.0010048397,0.00057376886,0.85675865,0.06839507,0.03217015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018577692,0.000032983346,0.043452244,0.0007908669,0.00004500385,0.00026666428,0.06141113,0.0023311581,0.0007390502,0.031548128,0.85923856,0.00012565998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99827886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1462809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1462809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14903688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512887929","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0007","title":"Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harm; Law; Stereotype (UML); Human rights; Raising (metalworking); Transformative learning; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0628466398633027,"score_gpt":0.313046563790455,"score_spread":0.2501999239271523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512887929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026773445,0.009958463,0.018514657,0.21127966,0.0019651027,0.00006505218,0.00024897745,0.00009778732,0.73109674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942785,0.007058602,0.012587802,0.055246793,0.0010104595,0.00008040737,0.00016474198,0.00015545927,0.029417314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822073,0.004329207,0.00047186244,0.0013148411,0.008574798,0.003101917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98954797,0.0047998074,0.0004346066,0.0009775095,0.0034639598,0.00077614037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016672816,0.00070172956,0.000878871,0.0055153803,0.018270465,0.01754831,0.0030522414,0.00872728,0.0040625734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024753999,0.00040282743,0.00075984,0.004601347,0.055503964,0.015435758,0.0066565224,0.009760901,0.00045818384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004169836,0.0000043106693,0.00031684132,0.00001249648,0.0000023322095,0.0000523176,0.0051100813,0.00007272396,0.000029892795,0.981952,0.005732385,0.0067105033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017612601,0.00001089277,0.0030005514,0.0006907091,0.000031924526,0.00015997453,0.016205905,0.0008216603,0.00034612117,0.7276666,0.2509463,0.000101715195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83650446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86022085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16349554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050681755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048827518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36772358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591481740","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/62.3.809","title":"Jacco Bomhoff, Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meaning of Postwar Legal Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022726149013596306,"score_gpt":0.3270274343780725,"score_spread":0.3043012853644762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591481740","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005456829,0.21399719,0.0025941906,0.54083675,0.0064230417,0.000044579152,0.0003438572,0.0000610672,0.23024249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36258373,0.32528663,0.005043168,0.11652675,0.024249658,0.00029594882,0.0005330621,0.00046014067,0.16502085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981036,0.00097056787,0.00005185297,0.00016407928,0.00056618935,0.0001436326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995027,0.0034038466,0.00029613293,0.00016146999,0.00080026605,0.00031119405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023431357,0.0005376114,0.00038191638,0.003694966,0.008166902,0.007868732,0.001444771,0.006635927,0.012690944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009265474,0.00036607325,0.00020525845,0.0063729184,0.013838409,0.015438433,0.002974471,0.00618812,0.0022505824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020016425,0.000020048923,0.00023379523,0.00014022719,0.0000058417463,0.000086562424,0.006576699,0.00006898904,0.000083078376,0.6232273,0.3519374,0.017600054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001785511,0.000005659456,0.0012623637,0.0006606282,0.000007818664,0.0001540807,0.004566101,0.00012837964,0.00022783206,0.30627623,0.68666506,0.000027895474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035553187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043377887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035553187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005612777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056363633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07069248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605280893","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avw016","title":"Po Jen Yap, Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia (Oxford University Press, 2015)†","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Commonwealth; Law; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Political science; High Court; Constitutional theory; Common law; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.04189211310654754,"score_gpt":0.31598301007100676,"score_spread":0.2740908969644592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605280893","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034736723,0.3901946,0.0034619172,0.27254587,0.006215681,0.00004163061,0.0004211122,0.000101570586,0.3235439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23793888,0.2682164,0.0034120327,0.04904739,0.0066491263,0.0002604604,0.00053759577,0.00019332583,0.43374485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903846,0.00043845814,0.00004869843,0.00012676763,0.00024125192,0.0001063202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990752,0.00054552505,0.000101002595,0.000052746153,0.00011348957,0.0001120643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015693562,0.000673582,0.00030360548,0.00096069,0.0033271967,0.006187496,0.00072755624,0.003517763,0.015411276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028905112,0.0003763219,0.00026189353,0.0017138395,0.005221991,0.01053332,0.0020947163,0.0040900563,0.0032102785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016950105,0.00001556275,0.00023910879,0.00016728516,0.0000053497256,0.000114271614,0.0032115777,0.00023251606,0.00007417056,0.5843509,0.3795538,0.032018628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006563745,0.0000068560853,0.0007607219,0.00032485428,0.0000029745213,0.00007979892,0.0014198229,0.00015026504,0.00006715105,0.10808332,0.88908625,0.000011385098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014417101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019945746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015411276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004213067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055306046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051555872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898009316","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy034","title":"Proportionality and the Inevitability of the Local: A Comparative Localist Analysis of Canada and Ireland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Scholarship; Legitimacy; Compromise; Law and economics; Political science; Positive economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024037709811256577,"score_gpt":0.32547683500990443,"score_spread":0.30143912519864785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898009316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57185835,0.0047981506,0.0012388881,0.012330876,0.00008586803,0.000113424845,0.0003375198,0.000049066493,0.40918782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984932,0.0010794271,0.00042522038,0.0009226254,0.000010199772,0.000035491208,0.000095783864,0.000032905584,0.012466288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945475,0.0011700534,0.00010534991,0.0004157818,0.0011632477,0.0025980563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965313,0.000768649,0.00027829543,0.00014973064,0.0015333337,0.0007387184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026078012,0.00036756397,0.00088117784,0.0056792414,0.028497726,0.011933775,0.003198028,0.0015535399,0.0058455085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006691564,0.00032718823,0.0006717799,0.010212149,0.022409776,0.003847221,0.006959708,0.0029157943,0.000363601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017715957,0.00011837262,0.026918806,0.0004371823,0.00007966587,0.0021685294,0.25470856,0.0014286739,0.00058854895,0.66304344,0.011422765,0.03890828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004277668,0.000064926884,0.062377013,0.00067873736,0.0001433358,0.00046916268,0.7454967,0.0009789652,0.0005111036,0.020526247,0.16852494,0.00018617616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99351585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19561362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19561362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.108281165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93297416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948548308","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa025","title":"Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility? Legislative Innovation and Judicial Application in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Legislation; Statutory law; Business; Corporate law; Law; Legislature; Fiduciary; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Duty; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05502441046427409,"score_gpt":0.2802558946435457,"score_spread":0.22523148417927163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948548308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718704,0.0006328711,0.0010364936,0.004510987,0.00007276376,0.00013727216,0.000057409015,0.00002917171,0.021652726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943369,0.00020209914,0.00038768727,0.00086799497,0.000051096325,0.000043943903,0.00003446477,0.0000043643627,0.004071518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842886,0.0031163718,0.0009980658,0.0025541275,0.005375324,0.0036675986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96529263,0.019896697,0.0044224435,0.0026506004,0.0056842105,0.002053409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022927213,0.00027483306,0.00064282515,0.0033939,0.008425171,0.0052617607,0.0030029668,0.0032909175,0.004220002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026854798,0.00055311964,0.00081249786,0.0034239176,0.008078332,0.0022328047,0.0037693742,0.0039030302,0.00019408617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023060027,0.00090646616,0.33760136,0.0005650637,0.00022424161,0.011430127,0.08304879,0.0051345844,0.0075125364,0.43644035,0.012780498,0.1041253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003109,0.0010224741,0.72820973,0.00079295447,0.00051599613,0.0015086832,0.029407315,0.03510604,0.011720304,0.059224557,0.13162945,0.00055155845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078691825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08863465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078691825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014600555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02635331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15646762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951270789","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz015","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Law; Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Moral reasoning; Sociology","score_opus":0.039323926762791665,"score_gpt":0.3511782601717788,"score_spread":0.3118543334089871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951270789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080613375,0.0053033186,0.29984066,0.056265563,0.0013511498,0.00021819038,0.00011197767,0.00010683822,0.556189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97487634,0.00046238216,0.01854806,0.0014040205,0.0004419021,0.00019460249,0.000019500014,0.00002994649,0.004023338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94615114,0.046834566,0.0009796212,0.0016314219,0.0032918858,0.0011114153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652945,0.02835685,0.0014899579,0.0023717529,0.0019929665,0.00049397786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037456848,0.00030597957,0.000636435,0.002658445,0.0053480677,0.008563916,0.0014658532,0.0029888789,0.003621424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045424607,0.0006041425,0.0007699692,0.0015884088,0.062428482,0.011303822,0.007151204,0.0061863665,0.0002904714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004178784,0.0000020336654,0.000031976924,0.000005321711,0.0000016193289,0.0000083096165,0.0003155112,0.00009093251,0.000015542393,0.99858224,0.00013522079,0.00080714584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012222743,0.000007635074,0.00008139614,0.00003180283,0.0000030971526,0.000014836222,0.00019047462,0.00056924496,0.00006381859,0.993986,0.0050343554,0.000005133499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035904825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025974608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037456848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009064019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044750604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19809318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991430525","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa018","title":"Enforcement of Chinese Insider Trading Law: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Insider trading; Enforcement; Sanctions; Business; China; Insider; Law enforcement; Empirical research; Accounting; Law; Political science; Finance; Statistics","score_opus":0.11547314081365181,"score_gpt":0.3256408916637385,"score_spread":0.21016775085008668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991430525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971283,0.0023597921,0.0003326853,0.0007212783,0.00002227379,0.000030471996,0.00020861934,0.000007090497,0.025034925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699354,0.0015944106,0.00014569111,0.000055900342,0.000027888438,0.000008960556,0.00018530893,0.0000018334314,0.0009864419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852115,0.00028744122,0.00012408794,0.00015268056,0.00059839967,0.0003163497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583364,0.0014264866,0.001440379,0.00025805208,0.00077529665,0.00026618794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024510568,0.00024492724,0.00032031324,0.008062388,0.0015523613,0.0022337364,0.0007506687,0.0004079961,0.0037279548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004526848,0.00015314638,0.0003207123,0.009878595,0.0026807103,0.0017592064,0.0012662393,0.0004522615,0.00012164148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095187475,0.00019272973,0.7223742,0.00079024007,0.00017535828,0.0038008327,0.03154625,0.0024049887,0.0011067627,0.14182274,0.0035599722,0.0921308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006579547,0.000090388705,0.96468675,0.00021611262,0.00006943965,0.00043076315,0.014615523,0.0033881161,0.00056261086,0.002716911,0.01317696,0.000039819668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06202333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05997773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06202333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042992346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004011278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12332463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121612408","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2012.0017","title":"Justice for Profit: A Comparative Analysis of Australian, Canadian and U.S. Third Party Litigation Funding","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Class action; Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Law; Civil litigation; Public administration; Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.11209026076870873,"score_gpt":0.3554160378716755,"score_spread":0.2433257771029668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121612408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6396422,0.007529588,0.00042033568,0.019396521,0.0001577198,0.00012470833,0.00071342697,0.00003821532,0.3319773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98100084,0.0036379057,0.00031203113,0.0020003177,0.00004767743,0.000049129125,0.00027369772,0.000018467294,0.012659831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.985823,0.0015078938,0.00025828741,0.0004162777,0.0062676696,0.0057269232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97564566,0.0064762644,0.002487068,0.000573399,0.011193813,0.0036238134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049831797,0.00023513044,0.0006218342,0.012892176,0.01872314,0.009779372,0.002129129,0.002664173,0.0055909194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031587165,0.00032676553,0.00054759544,0.022539742,0.005677995,0.003286961,0.004151045,0.0028299745,0.00032242358],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025650737,0.0002901233,0.14387761,0.0006685546,0.00014006425,0.0027516868,0.22544742,0.0010989886,0.0007321163,0.45569804,0.053041134,0.11599782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025570991,0.00011907884,0.5906885,0.0008611675,0.00015897019,0.00071379845,0.16564447,0.0017389278,0.00041331898,0.007396573,0.2320735,0.0001661316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98908347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11895827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11895827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13123587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8631067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122619448","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2014.0030","title":"Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Göran; Sociology; Law; Art; Humanities; Computer science","score_opus":0.03941342542345785,"score_gpt":0.34522461304100094,"score_spread":0.3058111876175431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122619448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7065334,0.004480116,0.020927537,0.0072106807,0.000339868,0.00022260666,0.02809651,0.00021614163,0.2319732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694633,0.0010153013,0.0064693713,0.00038643146,0.000102656675,0.00020603192,0.015403672,0.00007201759,0.0068812035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024254,0.004145828,0.0012637322,0.001718929,0.0017395072,0.00088948343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96464455,0.019953394,0.006775907,0.005749373,0.0021886914,0.00068806397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077626114,0.00019001577,0.00051960663,0.006165856,0.0022603073,0.0041413894,0.00061643345,0.0005877354,0.013458839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038516708,0.00021146295,0.00036077315,0.012243195,0.004250147,0.0053764554,0.0035227106,0.0016776642,0.0009350454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100781675,0.000065752734,0.083288714,0.00037501936,0.000070721966,0.00019837491,0.01500071,0.0018231191,0.0005388678,0.7948362,0.015461052,0.08824062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004577296,0.00004764267,0.2164548,0.0007251447,0.00005250869,0.00022712543,0.008874738,0.0020400889,0.0008506149,0.26553965,0.505056,0.00008584215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010114101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012546042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013458839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028843046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019955481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045024335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126145115","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx033","title":"The Ahistoricism of Legal Pluralism in International Criminal Law†","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Legal history; Comparative law; Wrongdoing; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04864830365117022,"score_gpt":0.38349915048017735,"score_spread":0.3348508468290071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126145115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054124914,0.014407411,0.03295393,0.115238495,0.0015077052,0.000056174522,0.000066575616,0.00007524118,0.78156954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736153,0.0041605476,0.0037454253,0.006047793,0.0011690554,0.000066937035,0.000029089002,0.00007176455,0.011094047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356383,0.0032983017,0.0003201111,0.000843708,0.0014126229,0.0005613611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926813,0.0041844887,0.0008359919,0.0011600916,0.0006926321,0.00044540293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008989638,0.00032890897,0.0003343366,0.0018786463,0.008050735,0.01246433,0.0010113625,0.0033490623,0.0029166178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00997341,0.00036436785,0.00030125558,0.0020114982,0.0801695,0.012877427,0.0077176066,0.0105881225,0.00042066904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001547932,0.0000037131329,0.0001619489,0.000010145862,5.930048e-7,0.000016684315,0.0031235006,0.000033403252,0.000015777572,0.9937795,0.00075789203,0.002095314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050417802,0.000015169957,0.0006023579,0.00015674112,0.0000026064627,0.00011846863,0.002926266,0.00039850196,0.000082212086,0.9263661,0.069313146,0.000013503318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004371911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004982887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01246433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064726733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004933718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047542274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138147771","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac036","title":"The Jurisdictional Vacuum: Transnational Corporate Human Rights Claims in Common Law Home States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Plaintiff; Law; Liability; State (computer science); Human rights; Jurisdiction; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.032419617188120683,"score_gpt":0.2640424747262894,"score_spread":0.2316228575381687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138147771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201171,0.0009467744,0.017225506,0.0076114363,0.000058195365,0.000029742254,0.0000319279,0.000042379157,0.05393689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887127,0.00006654334,0.0004573137,0.00026463144,0.000015300328,0.0000067484816,0.000004059046,0.0000027692145,0.00031139425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939564,0.0022940796,0.00040658467,0.0007989835,0.0013829127,0.0011611453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98369986,0.010368949,0.0024962074,0.0018206318,0.0009267785,0.0006875676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070947055,0.00012766979,0.00051397167,0.0015345819,0.0049937028,0.009430644,0.0013111496,0.004768626,0.0023375032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015251758,0.0004790679,0.0004811883,0.0014310163,0.024185834,0.009618827,0.009166638,0.006193624,0.00012883637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020595573,0.00004115677,0.0039766394,0.000015001856,0.000008857488,0.0009618179,0.0067408034,0.00040846106,0.0004398275,0.98232204,0.0004802043,0.0045845285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003704961,0.00012703678,0.011889748,0.00032903085,0.000070674454,0.0022251934,0.03619729,0.008172668,0.0019001176,0.922556,0.01637858,0.00011664734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007175401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008320345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009430644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045669763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002733927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037520885},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W335530575","doi":"","title":"Aline Grenon and Louise Bélanger-Hardy, eds. Elements of Quebec civil law: A comparison with the common law of Canada / Éléments de common law canadienne","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.02019686419435443,"score_gpt":0.30882088386877005,"score_spread":0.28862401967441564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335530575","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004197156,0.8151394,0.001137878,0.09599313,0.0033853573,0.000032587646,0.00037609733,0.000045102897,0.07969333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052613832,0.87883836,0.0014218679,0.0041513974,0.002048553,0.00003463135,0.0002748509,0.00006563833,0.060550813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988288,0.00028093875,0.00003018001,0.00010424538,0.000599212,0.00015675672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974911,0.0008595724,0.00011956907,0.000041819985,0.0011368473,0.00035095308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022376326,0.0009790559,0.00072291354,0.0047881883,0.005800189,0.00806206,0.0013616191,0.0028599848,0.019663127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029428238,0.0005940639,0.0003478064,0.010075185,0.004414479,0.006478069,0.0012534657,0.0021977946,0.0025946319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005934575,0.000054677916,0.0036169156,0.00097344385,0.000028698661,0.00022125116,0.01171498,0.00076032325,0.00013632695,0.07832107,0.68678355,0.21732938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010399632,0.000012111381,0.017002452,0.0019442646,0.00002601442,0.00019294176,0.017502818,0.0004873517,0.00010000985,0.008613811,0.9540615,0.000046258752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91745573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9631551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08254427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03107831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027131135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22548997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237230563","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa002","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Scholarship; Pleasure; Editorial board; Publication; Library science; Wish; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; History; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07109406723988082,"score_gpt":0.39132213934061594,"score_spread":0.3202280721007351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237230563","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012844734,0.0035702882,0.0003689906,0.21408366,0.7627679,0.000058977206,0.00037010002,0.00027740365,0.018374257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029245613,0.0048869876,0.0014685647,0.36056313,0.4519997,0.00024252367,0.00037632004,0.00048170227,0.17705646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877175,0.0009815082,0.0012163807,0.002472675,0.0068009947,0.00081084395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358925,0.010314711,0.0028386447,0.0024635727,0.04411892,0.004371735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008637381,0.0016289551,0.0019712558,0.0025647103,0.0044295616,0.01076167,0.004506666,0.010914685,0.06579754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08877754,0.0008405837,0.002094537,0.0026793478,0.0019355862,0.007990217,0.0032040821,0.015564997,0.06417024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003940461,0.0000033960246,0.000032860466,0.000034283134,0.0000016189549,0.000032848217,0.000024579147,0.000007983136,0.000020643802,0.00052156154,0.99551743,0.0037989086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040108657,0.0000045194565,0.00008579862,0.0000917842,0.0000033175918,0.00008785715,0.00004977131,0.000031228537,0.000052889754,0.00043610547,0.9991447,0.00000796742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030160318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075141117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93420243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040146187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010157794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22011471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246971983","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy012","title":"Preface","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06992255438205475,"score_gpt":0.4113477735025587,"score_spread":0.34142521912050394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246971983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012049709,0.00748307,0.0046711946,0.030296072,0.09360621,0.0003724846,0.013610426,0.0015123021,0.84724337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008367421,0.0054886006,0.0030812742,0.009281928,0.020463953,0.0003547504,0.013374289,0.0012539548,0.93833375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987469,0.00022119864,0.000091504815,0.00022798595,0.000603359,0.00010901997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951853,0.0010197345,0.0001885472,0.0005085897,0.002584208,0.00051358325],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014882095,0.0008049499,0.0007109366,0.0026931611,0.0034003186,0.0041966005,0.0017197309,0.0013788476,0.5423339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010594629,0.0003010612,0.00048177986,0.0024272061,0.00093085336,0.0042224634,0.0024009587,0.0034835006,0.31451368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011139124,0.000008747726,0.00006220203,0.000056685458,9.617688e-7,0.00002231664,0.00011776019,0.000017740023,0.00004805463,0.0051066643,0.9771262,0.017421547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011856882,0.000004853322,0.00013259338,0.000058636582,5.9918887e-7,0.000030386333,0.00010415873,0.000011448837,0.000023896017,0.0012829442,0.99834704,0.0000022443683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039017848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004203379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4576661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002140471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020360674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248731791","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy009","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Pleasure; Reading (process); Transition (genetics); Library science; Media studies; Center (category theory); Focus (optics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.053368132011028566,"score_gpt":0.40641438235152816,"score_spread":0.3530462503404996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248731791","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018510378,0.003916482,0.00050875125,0.26408732,0.70563614,0.00008261026,0.0005846046,0.0004400755,0.024558892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004220032,0.0045471024,0.0018692692,0.4259173,0.3358757,0.00029625618,0.0005972122,0.00067158346,0.22600563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98570246,0.0011758902,0.0014091015,0.0032845354,0.007270671,0.0011574212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401853,0.010674924,0.0028873424,0.003174876,0.037366558,0.005710988],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009128475,0.0018301472,0.0019896887,0.0024862483,0.0048677265,0.010467351,0.0050543724,0.013185128,0.10247045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09567255,0.0009024049,0.002232181,0.0022767738,0.0022815405,0.0073073357,0.003966876,0.01752162,0.09134402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005897963,0.0000042288707,0.000037465736,0.00003915569,0.0000019334648,0.00004130746,0.000030131536,0.000007582226,0.000027302796,0.0006381089,0.9943547,0.0048122886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053767862,0.0000056529248,0.00008318225,0.00009866171,0.0000034506306,0.00010488511,0.000050408195,0.000030492756,0.00006877838,0.0005333756,0.99900717,0.000008701431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027750097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006912353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89752954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004084538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012147479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34279782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248916952","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avw007","title":"Why Does Executive Greed Prevail in the United States and Canada but Not in Japan? The Pattern of Low CEO Pay and High Worker Welfare in Japanese Corporations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Welfare; Demographic economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.013709709490557883,"score_gpt":0.21818465047194238,"score_spread":0.2044749409813845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248916952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94919395,0.004133882,0.00012893003,0.0163326,0.0001952296,0.000032665648,0.0022028894,0.00003390392,0.02774597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99058455,0.0019041434,0.00008951232,0.0025113092,0.0000462195,0.000014625423,0.0011365503,0.00003637226,0.0036767698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716777,0.00009630239,0.00010575619,0.000287007,0.00056092633,0.0017822224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99066925,0.00025858346,0.0014953515,0.00021711583,0.0042201504,0.0031394307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011726364,0.00041975893,0.00069938286,0.0046734973,0.0111408355,0.0053246613,0.0012090742,0.001035006,0.0045034587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004446739,0.00042238043,0.0005305917,0.013746386,0.0037233762,0.001945253,0.002395761,0.0021865498,0.0003972593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019717695,0.000060129663,0.94546574,0.00011301796,0.00012304423,0.0006120243,0.015984172,0.000056639576,0.00034796583,0.0038466603,0.016504789,0.016688643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011364884,0.000014374125,0.9561332,0.00015305358,0.000046928664,0.00014026836,0.031631116,0.0000596662,0.00009445756,0.00023768787,0.011433804,0.0000440891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98144203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99237037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02801518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02801518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047125824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20326531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251059082","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz011","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Mandate; Political science; Pleasure; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.037702922187676714,"score_gpt":0.3814900266924708,"score_spread":0.34378710450479405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251059082","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015038146,0.004780496,0.00047150068,0.20387638,0.7556696,0.00006838477,0.00058635994,0.00042832128,0.03396854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033702066,0.0060682725,0.0015789884,0.2952148,0.36079457,0.00026011266,0.0006911622,0.00079022936,0.3312316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871252,0.0009835322,0.0011597985,0.0027701047,0.0069380268,0.0010233662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94389,0.008117594,0.002625836,0.0028155597,0.037061572,0.005489416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077736587,0.0017822313,0.0018283806,0.0028887102,0.0048170662,0.011984783,0.004705969,0.010185539,0.1348183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078029886,0.0008377503,0.0019675975,0.0028504313,0.002010212,0.008406727,0.004071114,0.015297718,0.12179539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004496077,0.000003633514,0.000028938319,0.000037787053,0.0000015112644,0.000027840406,0.0000251687,0.000006620381,0.000023539344,0.0006510318,0.99440455,0.0047849244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003165964,0.0000035723658,0.000055850993,0.000075110656,0.0000023241769,0.000060060906,0.000041001982,0.000018044359,0.000046442554,0.0003596556,0.99932945,0.000005320784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026845706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062651266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1348183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042839996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011112577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45101213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253309197","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx014","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Honor; Excellence; Publishing; Pleasure; Law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07094385192861155,"score_gpt":0.4255015243537143,"score_spread":0.3545576724251027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253309197","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001663663,0.0037449505,0.00046449204,0.22763316,0.74055904,0.00007696013,0.00055529503,0.0004298005,0.026369842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038608073,0.004519901,0.0016236773,0.36265826,0.37085038,0.00029636253,0.00061702845,0.0007414485,0.25483215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98674554,0.0010812393,0.0012841565,0.0028987732,0.0069190804,0.0010712731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479278,0.009941352,0.0025582586,0.0028596735,0.03147497,0.0052380096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00850496,0.0017863835,0.0018133905,0.002729122,0.004981632,0.011181252,0.0049505807,0.012566421,0.11716457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088652596,0.0008669697,0.002162885,0.002380546,0.0022125843,0.0074624904,0.003872572,0.016054187,0.10142032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057066813,0.000004378182,0.000034279987,0.00003900821,0.0000017123931,0.00003747224,0.000028468205,0.0000074207105,0.000027385491,0.0006737765,0.9943188,0.004821573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041290496,0.0000049494565,0.00006718188,0.0000837205,0.000002751335,0.000082195205,0.000043881988,0.000024148714,0.00006109727,0.00046029795,0.99915886,0.0000068183076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025658524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058249505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11716457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039917757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011129095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39195454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281252944","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac008","title":"Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Potential, Risks, and Limitations of Operation Car Wash (<i>Lava Jato</i>)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Language change; Jurisprudence; Cognitive reframing; Law; Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Lava; Criminal law; Organised crime; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21081420278299623,"score_gpt":0.32044446383525477,"score_spread":0.10963026105225854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281252944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36430666,0.007777046,0.010484387,0.10424325,0.00032508702,0.0001444342,0.000049838873,0.0000584753,0.5126108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233377,0.0005154472,0.0007296877,0.0022117642,0.000047442125,0.000020840967,0.000004458886,0.0000064909577,0.0041301674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936516,0.0034456823,0.00016060067,0.00045180556,0.0012700951,0.0010201962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859029,0.008963547,0.0015780206,0.0011542699,0.0017648166,0.00063640793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009514119,0.00030104685,0.00035673537,0.0017840721,0.0053646057,0.008141569,0.0012588444,0.0046432866,0.0030156332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016685063,0.0002420103,0.00043174674,0.0008073759,0.01767026,0.0030498945,0.0036503477,0.0041433643,0.00020832637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024934634,0.000087492874,0.009829025,0.00008950273,0.000024863397,0.0006134651,0.004463586,0.001008263,0.0005324903,0.9589724,0.004690807,0.019663261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009373163,0.00040732912,0.035656355,0.0032624996,0.0003246458,0.0015413751,0.03372306,0.020486018,0.005258856,0.6044566,0.29454786,0.00024168669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053810146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09578424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053810146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006192729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077564246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106993854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613264","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac016","title":"Multicultural Populations and Mixed Legal Systems in the United States: Louisiana and Puerto Rico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.056486827888494,"score_gpt":0.34960018607404464,"score_spread":0.2931133581855506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296613264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766923,0.0026172358,0.00007218646,0.008608222,0.00002492783,0.000021048247,0.00014626104,0.0000040222803,0.011813925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601066,0.0016862482,0.000085004765,0.0009821405,0.000021952723,0.00001903016,0.00009291898,0.0000028028721,0.0010991658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999574,0.0001604868,0.000015465697,0.000042348478,0.000055726738,0.00015193991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927324,0.00013719787,0.0001867032,0.000027605563,0.00013559456,0.00023977945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007392509,0.00015098031,0.00015260426,0.0012683909,0.003679243,0.0022811769,0.0007415306,0.0006100612,0.0023539045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015205077,0.00010960615,0.00012556864,0.0018496185,0.002166261,0.0012946517,0.0028826843,0.0009372851,0.00009753583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009845996,0.00025451987,0.5784902,0.00017238583,0.000090616166,0.0025644565,0.30953565,0.0001782757,0.00093005964,0.025339415,0.012911797,0.06943431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012367938,0.000040874125,0.5455847,0.0003875031,0.00004036962,0.0005879588,0.4151161,0.0002689906,0.00019660263,0.0024756812,0.035250194,0.00003855323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5220019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7175593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5220019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005560839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003508208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96162623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313304229","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac039","title":"Differences in a Minor Archive: Feminist Activists and Scholars on Cohabitation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Autonomy; Minor (academic); Common law; Scholarship; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.030768431541527145,"score_gpt":0.3074869608467308,"score_spread":0.27671852930520363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313304229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6818823,0.00920833,0.0011208256,0.07881043,0.00079949544,0.000059056347,0.00010264808,0.000031180458,0.22798574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873604,0.0007283171,0.000108259366,0.0026707447,0.00009211085,0.000016045316,0.000016094573,0.00001908928,0.008988865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336267,0.003586163,0.00007887997,0.0004095419,0.0007534676,0.001809303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99070483,0.0055611194,0.00053321203,0.00035164016,0.0011849026,0.0016643136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075515388,0.0004518502,0.00061275257,0.002840825,0.051886138,0.009186091,0.0022884314,0.003061229,0.006284885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009822892,0.00030533204,0.00023812655,0.002683196,0.05497668,0.0048190467,0.009522567,0.006648799,0.00018856268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023081931,0.000013434969,0.0012419391,0.000022654836,0.0000021364192,0.00023659374,0.9330345,0.00001745975,0.00013242854,0.058090378,0.0030317504,0.0041537816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004555495,0.000010617348,0.002496059,0.00015390778,0.000003813223,0.000098321536,0.92868364,0.000042917873,0.00015917073,0.003385576,0.06495024,0.00001111488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6493005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79463696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6493005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047941536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02387449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70552963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394014678","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae007","title":"Sovereignty, Territoriality, and Private International Law in Classical Muslim International Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Sovereignty; International law; Law; Political science; Private law; Municipal law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Law of the sea; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04818593056536592,"score_gpt":0.3573031838977954,"score_spread":0.3091172533324295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394014678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46478468,0.0034788118,0.007961462,0.012586841,0.000099689154,0.00002815487,0.00003285635,0.000023827666,0.51100373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974546,0.00017467646,0.0002773284,0.00015729302,0.000026660582,0.000005253727,0.0000039139495,0.0000017498373,0.0018986203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910223,0.0005301366,0.00002910349,0.00008730901,0.0001364871,0.00011480735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861467,0.00080055156,0.00015653892,0.00018164843,0.00013922078,0.00010745095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016638467,0.000098718374,0.00014172899,0.0007539123,0.003418681,0.0039582015,0.00039330948,0.0011504507,0.002152486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021825647,0.00012228124,0.000112100715,0.00075148826,0.03438842,0.0030242659,0.002608945,0.0015178778,0.00009409627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020926334,0.000004958062,0.00023400268,0.000004373606,5.975778e-7,0.000022843198,0.004018245,0.00007835328,0.000030019573,0.9944073,0.00026775323,0.0009294426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013447485,0.000033400844,0.0033794937,0.000106913496,0.000005581352,0.000166109,0.014619636,0.0015603307,0.0002624821,0.94363624,0.03620192,0.000014418972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065255556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00792192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065255556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040356964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002083174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02928114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394725099","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae006","title":"Reasonableness as Responsiveness in Administrative Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada: Kant and Arendt on the Role of the Community in Deferential Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Kingdom; Public administration","score_opus":0.12789518429323685,"score_gpt":0.3925559634415649,"score_spread":0.2646607791483281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394725099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11851185,0.020957762,0.03483156,0.14417115,0.0006505638,0.00026671495,0.00009291949,0.00008115696,0.6804363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849235,0.0016789194,0.0035303663,0.005138081,0.00011734351,0.000058218033,0.000012683981,0.000021189693,0.0045197913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9340182,0.034408826,0.002481971,0.0027311265,0.02034602,0.0060138498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.897786,0.06758398,0.0035720484,0.0030653893,0.023698824,0.0042937114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03975221,0.00032515483,0.0009749927,0.0056674923,0.015326477,0.019906836,0.0018959768,0.0075287484,0.001990635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09918703,0.0006224369,0.00059717515,0.0040090308,0.06868989,0.005965529,0.006380066,0.0075419145,0.00020645378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073294846,0.000005111118,0.0003030612,0.000017380942,0.000007209303,0.00006594479,0.0036525337,0.00047909812,0.000045751385,0.992098,0.0012019443,0.002116589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033648594,0.000020443815,0.0036001916,0.00053851184,0.000054324133,0.00008958304,0.0057957545,0.0032049285,0.00029407567,0.9489165,0.037322354,0.00012966487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7559122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7471816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91591805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084081955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084650025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6100601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396882761","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae005","title":"The War Within Religion: Towards a More Nuanced Resolution of Religion–Equality Conflicts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07249932966153845,"score_gpt":0.4199657214669349,"score_spread":0.34746639180539646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396882761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31864774,0.010060506,0.060619198,0.28915593,0.0011767739,0.00038855584,0.00006315457,0.00005839367,0.31982973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752298,0.0014837377,0.0113147395,0.0094466815,0.00012084424,0.00012447851,0.000021026834,0.000017002572,0.002241713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662252,0.029629156,0.0005267233,0.0008068356,0.0017026804,0.0011094174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608058,0.030770486,0.0024194478,0.0022262398,0.0021735225,0.0016044809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04039659,0.00036550115,0.0005388057,0.003248765,0.012784187,0.012810277,0.0033409311,0.006176917,0.005857858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038327053,0.00042184684,0.00037088039,0.0017792865,0.051324375,0.019853262,0.014661732,0.011095838,0.00031334985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019873632,0.0001803431,0.0020301782,0.00019065548,0.000010919314,0.0003306683,0.16420436,0.00046908512,0.0004777441,0.80403924,0.0036947757,0.024352154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005532001,0.00006895641,0.0033809517,0.0019138007,0.00001815155,0.00023505311,0.33830822,0.001352749,0.00097172137,0.5203,0.13335104,0.000043990745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01022796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02258447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04039659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144628445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2136401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401976499","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae024","title":"Generality and Exception in Islamic Legal Theory: Intent, Language, and the Jurist’s Role","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Generality; Islam; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.011026681272236922,"score_gpt":0.2648492141970209,"score_spread":0.25382253292478396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401976499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20969503,0.009592828,0.06767861,0.039620943,0.0004192669,0.00007378689,0.00004888606,0.00012023818,0.6727504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960716,0.00044987898,0.0015516222,0.0005230092,0.00011108737,0.000011362172,0.0000052094583,0.000007991573,0.0012682553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931705,0.004599833,0.0003728929,0.00046191708,0.0010493295,0.00034551646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882597,0.008188998,0.0011407426,0.0011984089,0.00078187825,0.00043024594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01058211,0.00027343008,0.00054432196,0.0031308597,0.0034857758,0.009298531,0.0011971861,0.0022504625,0.0013899013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008763347,0.00028001415,0.00040150495,0.0020220745,0.06973099,0.0072808214,0.0056897583,0.0043253903,0.0001649781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002162377,0.0000033001352,0.00020044949,0.000007823532,0.0000012958355,0.000027619206,0.0032978011,0.00012353729,0.000023536637,0.99481094,0.00011812633,0.0013834307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007388948,0.000009908856,0.00045960298,0.00012992065,0.0000052152996,0.00007051212,0.0023392509,0.00069726625,0.00007179301,0.9878934,0.008306163,0.000009591545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015295327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012633499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01058211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032482632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023613628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055964172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409111837","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae029","title":"The Legal Innovation Sandbox","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Sandbox (software development); Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.038407258368246516,"score_gpt":0.3082105120734015,"score_spread":0.269803253705155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409111837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019078538,0.0048533687,0.0812993,0.15397605,0.0034131939,0.00027326588,0.00015199096,0.00089927437,0.736055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7995876,0.0032370554,0.029971538,0.047677595,0.0019328281,0.0006770816,0.000108062915,0.00026360794,0.116544574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98289734,0.006683277,0.0006104269,0.0021014174,0.006151465,0.0015561038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833493,0.009383663,0.0011183334,0.0024833505,0.0025434685,0.0011219329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010097981,0.0004566292,0.0005520331,0.0020908206,0.0059722797,0.0151514765,0.0018541269,0.010107377,0.010343293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020551631,0.000398394,0.0008605533,0.0010552256,0.024187136,0.009725013,0.0079638595,0.011125407,0.0019373087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039863844,0.0000070156584,0.0000561156,0.000014819466,0.0000012016727,0.000023072136,0.0002489119,0.00012207383,0.00004638055,0.99146396,0.0041714883,0.0038411012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002939143,0.00006442187,0.00039735576,0.000512139,0.000017362507,0.00014544162,0.0007789132,0.0027692616,0.0012219318,0.55946153,0.43454424,0.000058039237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067012315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051082373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0151514765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010277742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017725809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074570656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410242589","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae032","title":"First Nations’ Citizenship and Kinship Compared: Belonging’s Stake in Legality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Citizenship; Politics; Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Fictive kinship; Sociology","score_opus":0.08467716980806435,"score_gpt":0.37401767553068943,"score_spread":0.2893405057226251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410242589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6848005,0.000589787,0.002254848,0.0101177795,0.00008378211,0.000016439346,0.00003861263,0.000007902427,0.30209035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990101,0.000038900536,0.00003969999,0.00009265643,0.000009913503,0.0000027046008,0.000004627324,0.0000010760612,0.00080041535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713194,0.0015472316,0.000091595895,0.0002853368,0.00040133548,0.00054250634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98992985,0.0044755233,0.0020777956,0.0005966001,0.00084490585,0.0020753634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029614926,0.00013034852,0.0002909947,0.0011357891,0.004272681,0.006357426,0.0005696819,0.0015421426,0.009416236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009972632,0.000089942696,0.00019329185,0.00093568757,0.01937395,0.0064752614,0.006365133,0.002992651,0.00023697165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004258188,0.00011478977,0.020653322,0.00003109014,0.000016034204,0.00033118937,0.02904008,0.0002575057,0.00015564653,0.939668,0.0011751815,0.008514464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033039643,0.00010827085,0.08047329,0.00034025701,0.000036586553,0.00057031633,0.10806985,0.0016497208,0.00054567354,0.77657443,0.031528432,0.000070081005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043752086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027219069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009788913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0315004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412894107","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf017","title":"Daphne Barak Erez, Biblical Judgments: New Legal Readings in the Hebrew Bible","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hebrew Bible; Philosophy; Hebrew; Literature; Biblical studies; Linguistics; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.04481111885028161,"score_gpt":0.3184890451717636,"score_spread":0.27367792632148197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412894107","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005664866,0.27932853,0.0062487265,0.51596785,0.010117573,0.000042419688,0.0005575865,0.00008631765,0.18198615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3678339,0.18209624,0.01239475,0.25382566,0.030174049,0.00032840812,0.0002897071,0.00040109188,0.15265615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735,0.0014851139,0.00013306896,0.00030553673,0.0005535748,0.00017275737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949891,0.0040531657,0.00015457334,0.0001496103,0.0005261167,0.00012735401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033876237,0.00061894464,0.00062714354,0.002273518,0.0070313243,0.0072160945,0.0016791512,0.0088942805,0.008175682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009452876,0.00062654784,0.00032797115,0.0025364633,0.015865153,0.012711525,0.0027315032,0.01056974,0.0019294848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003240424,0.000025401925,0.00014813186,0.00013366005,0.000010716646,0.00007673226,0.005751398,0.00010622379,0.000120962715,0.7860994,0.19524351,0.012251559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006581249,0.000013660753,0.0018545919,0.0006811759,0.000015318605,0.00012063456,0.0050789127,0.0002456804,0.0003851947,0.5130433,0.47843558,0.00006014522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022242844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05505591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022242844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041046534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024560473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044226766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413184867","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf003","title":"Federalism and Vertical Tax Competition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Tax competition; Competition (biology); Economics; Tax reform; Public economics; Ad valorem tax; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02161520301332562,"score_gpt":0.2722460669004744,"score_spread":0.2506308638871488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413184867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46814212,0.0009808869,0.010134277,0.012751286,0.00009701043,0.000030039504,0.00010418236,0.00003560553,0.5077245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976713,0.0000500391,0.00014342615,0.00015841467,0.000014343047,0.0000032931075,0.000009222888,0.0000017073943,0.0019481119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968425,0.0010386212,0.0000875948,0.00037227452,0.0006158813,0.0010431332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969982,0.00092545577,0.00085565733,0.00028972555,0.00048634005,0.00044465557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020578296,0.000099102064,0.00023164622,0.00089564803,0.003970923,0.0035096833,0.0004072874,0.0010860959,0.007159493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047768904,0.00010852135,0.00026943494,0.00096377276,0.009160685,0.0022279157,0.003648255,0.0017257164,0.00024061487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008671301,0.000007633685,0.00209124,0.0000053030217,0.0000031677566,0.000031414525,0.00060830294,0.00042300546,0.000084188534,0.993324,0.00068333553,0.0027299374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035756257,0.00010558896,0.024537444,0.00016232258,0.000018801766,0.0002592802,0.004227707,0.004776458,0.0007514186,0.8778748,0.08721217,0.00003819375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016072374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019383416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016072374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060540545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047101555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043925464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415769809","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf016","title":"Standard Form Contracts and the Erosion of Consent: Is There No Turning Back?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of care; Erosion; Unconscionability; Force majeure; Common law","score_opus":0.03246670550124787,"score_gpt":0.3525477259278332,"score_spread":0.3200810204265853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415769809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0721681,0.02133999,0.06468489,0.30484352,0.0014607157,0.0001226234,0.00019805414,0.0001508964,0.5350312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487346,0.004845232,0.0076843826,0.02475421,0.0007212523,0.00009336124,0.00006185637,0.00011179132,0.012993331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96590203,0.016289052,0.0019423689,0.0024227498,0.010616418,0.0028273861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9206614,0.055700634,0.003645916,0.0082401,0.010612634,0.0011393084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034690432,0.00029294856,0.0008679632,0.0023700397,0.0050849174,0.0124661615,0.0027720951,0.010481902,0.007449367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09028998,0.0005469475,0.0008600451,0.0027844037,0.052831035,0.020397441,0.0057404814,0.011324821,0.00058586145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007130306,0.0000038283265,0.00013264909,0.000015988508,0.0000014488706,0.0000265217,0.0012642007,0.000073420364,0.000015833311,0.99185926,0.0014810408,0.0051188166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018300398,0.0000139302165,0.00060702086,0.00053934794,0.000009254859,0.00011852353,0.001691709,0.00060393417,0.00017310736,0.9287792,0.06741967,0.000026076075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048045844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026436826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048045844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016399493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016633267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18346268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72209951","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.157","title":"Criminal Defense Advocacy in Russia Under the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Saskatchewan; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Criminal law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08588962696890812,"score_gpt":0.396669655413895,"score_spread":0.31078002844498687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72209951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6910559,0.0030451044,0.0005088167,0.08349675,0.000526121,0.000046247478,0.00009039235,0.000022575425,0.22120813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988896,0.0006486231,0.000094200695,0.004613425,0.00011640944,0.000022166316,0.00002640839,0.0000056136373,0.005577126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98826176,0.0053584785,0.0004074121,0.0005446517,0.0021460603,0.0032817177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865155,0.0048409174,0.0047774147,0.00059482973,0.0011942855,0.002077026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072399843,0.00012758144,0.00037112724,0.0015487655,0.009311764,0.0058043557,0.0008777769,0.0055549433,0.0043947645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022215633,0.0002369963,0.00027194712,0.0015508352,0.005663836,0.0022318487,0.0068885386,0.0055754236,0.00047308343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017690784,0.00031607735,0.114838816,0.00023565927,0.000085436324,0.0025739905,0.09966638,0.00063900434,0.001592286,0.6475846,0.05788442,0.07440637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010915738,0.00033180867,0.34663105,0.001903567,0.00011516723,0.0020258208,0.1280983,0.0012395812,0.0020495206,0.055035807,0.46230733,0.00015280332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032469533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059983443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032469533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006891256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01171584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06456107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W813508657","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0017","title":"The Chinese “Oppression” Remedy: Creative Interpretations of Company Law by Chinese Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Law; Political science; Chinese law; Sociology; Law and economics; Common law; Sources of law","score_opus":0.02184111260953948,"score_gpt":0.2928900019215718,"score_spread":0.2710488893120323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W813508657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24722588,0.00621267,0.06796022,0.03594511,0.0006410633,0.00036261446,0.00013057694,0.00017138696,0.6413505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97233844,0.0014107579,0.0077162506,0.00285055,0.00024744283,0.00012458547,0.000037715006,0.000032599954,0.015241723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937211,0.0027602715,0.00028440013,0.00054178847,0.0019416334,0.0007507522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967854,0.0019468509,0.00022828001,0.00047238686,0.00046423764,0.00010288945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007941679,0.000514312,0.00041117592,0.0035154833,0.0057835714,0.008167041,0.0015883452,0.0025898828,0.0033066378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071951165,0.00038320082,0.00071259437,0.0025497298,0.020468429,0.007225194,0.0052213343,0.0033749214,0.00019060496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051605207,0.000005001328,0.00040618968,0.000023575392,0.00000356859,0.00022754406,0.011239895,0.00026072635,0.00021983644,0.9779198,0.0015583566,0.008130347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051974323,0.000050356986,0.004240322,0.0005729954,0.00009011087,0.00035508588,0.016251568,0.011598606,0.002775457,0.78182113,0.1820928,0.00009965209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023346512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030372787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023346512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011292167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012657009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081930816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}