{"meta":{"query_hash":"79fc25d0763d","filters":{"venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/79fc25d0763d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+American+Journal+of+Comparative+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W151487474","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.125","title":"The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Constitutional law; Comparative law; Analogy; Political science; Field (mathematics); Comparative politics; Constitutional economics; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049900953047995945,"score_gpt":0.3854993611052266,"score_spread":0.3355984080572306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W151487474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9144327,0.0009909037,0.00096468424,0.0053792824,0.00013856488,0.00016960924,0.0000057282173,0.000007225632,0.07791127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990943,0.000089579415,0.00023250951,0.00025411462,0.00030147465,0.0000039589095,1.9727429e-7,0.0000010847103,0.000022792672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983186,0.00073149207,0.0003797174,0.00006406331,0.0003495812,0.00015656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981613,0.0007474064,0.00054609496,0.00003975809,0.00045962838,0.000045811936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010734784,0.00008135934,0.0003090458,0.000032375418,0.0011444616,0.00003072119,0.00017724166,0.000013268674,0.000012879096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001805659,0.00004688153,0.00007568007,0.00038105558,0.012413,0.00021360283,0.000019177023,0.00021544824,0.000007252777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001897799,0.000057370704,0.00042758734,2.9384836e-7,0.00006522233,0.000007670873,0.0072993254,0.0016357078,0.00007654807,0.9895323,0.00021913463,0.0004890836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018345345,0.0016405489,0.0132242115,0.00025841253,0.00022246352,0.001527021,0.16053288,0.00063371466,0.0025875026,0.42995816,0.38702074,0.00055981916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060814144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05479418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5595741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014812448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026237647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99027467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984946490","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2013.0002","title":"Can Class Action Regimes Operate Satisfactorily without a Certification Device? Empirical Insights from the Federal Court of Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Certification; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Empirical research; Political science; Law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.11353519014166352,"score_gpt":0.34800423563009053,"score_spread":0.234469045488427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984946490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793098,0.000043767257,0.0005074703,0.01618085,0.00025551915,0.00018302942,0.0000034911125,0.000011710713,0.003504369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758554,0.000011737026,0.000084568404,0.0015256976,0.0006089417,0.000009315306,0.0000065179192,0.00000968172,0.00015800355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998817,0.00013959053,0.00044414864,0.00011588676,0.0003336069,0.00014976837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791557,0.00014740501,0.001138587,0.00021298077,0.00055841194,0.000027046648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013802003,0.00015206105,0.0003725513,0.000057348705,0.00032250548,0.00030182773,0.0003298933,0.0000228947,0.00015583464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010448477,0.00008055649,0.00011615372,0.0003690274,0.00048104953,0.000749938,0.0000395639,0.00027077898,0.00008786358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015304569,0.00088401546,0.14893748,0.000046506295,0.0020841463,0.000006785148,0.009138075,0.0030138467,0.057945523,0.55838954,0.21160363,0.006419978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006626167,0.00013510663,0.81655055,0.000090672474,0.00020814271,0.000011892847,0.013502308,0.0035972418,0.0011449533,0.009722085,0.15411414,0.00026026816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053725834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018884685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6676131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005934289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004692999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8121775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032899432","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2010.0015","title":"The Legacy of Empire: The Common Law Inheritance and Commitments to Legality in Former British Colonies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Colonialism; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Population; Rule of law; Jurisprudence; Corporate governance; Sociology; Politics; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.03161779720101658,"score_gpt":0.3712986535816661,"score_spread":0.3396808563806495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032899432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654953,0.0006328699,0.000010105668,0.008911783,0.00022646546,0.0002743488,0.0000074553113,0.0000051744905,0.024436532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998336,0.000049684466,0.00022738744,0.0011409321,0.000119029486,0.000009143241,1.2097516e-7,0.000006208343,0.00011150119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977568,0.0009455294,0.00045277312,0.000095083145,0.00047531747,0.00027453044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975948,0.0012066913,0.0006071015,0.0002578692,0.0002334116,0.000100177196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019783871,0.000106706844,0.00043069673,0.000016058353,0.0009018698,0.00029960592,0.00096025807,0.000022645241,0.000011591934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005229583,0.000060146467,0.000070209164,0.00042378934,0.007014606,0.00038534988,0.00011320823,0.00057394564,0.0000033387523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005091258,0.00017722008,0.027753545,0.000004374132,0.00013753155,0.000013098682,0.33981895,0.000031597745,0.00040158202,0.62366784,0.002523515,0.0049615963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069110206,0.0008614875,0.09122518,0.00009840055,0.000048938673,0.00003242944,0.08476939,0.000014089675,0.00083843747,0.054623257,0.7665428,0.00025451786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0129748415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1543249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76401925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047426376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083286104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061848164","doi":"10.2307/840922","title":"The Forms and Limits of Constitutional Interpretation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional interpretation; Constitutional law; Law; Philosophy; Classics; Political science; Sociology; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.044316231671212326,"score_gpt":0.35308263258337413,"score_spread":0.3087664009121618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061848164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90471166,0.0012102819,0.0019494764,0.005592635,0.00011552763,0.000066949215,0.0000019041673,0.0000029062917,0.08634867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896514,0.00063392543,0.000049932398,0.00022691587,0.00009682638,0.0000011191266,8.849685e-8,6.0111563e-7,0.000025469806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992981,0.00015422303,0.0001906756,0.000032483083,0.0002378611,0.000086646156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875,0.0005697934,0.00034908636,0.00003195996,0.00026671943,0.000032479224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048568577,0.00004286882,0.00016127588,0.000014045683,0.0007383273,0.000024278695,0.00014554446,0.0000056531176,0.000005461595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028593146,0.000020648959,0.000045817353,0.0001513129,0.011156924,0.00011812312,0.000015522732,0.00008036354,0.0000018984946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018296942,0.000011864502,0.0013228194,1.8965929e-7,0.000059029036,8.248694e-7,0.0046003186,0.00003363614,0.00003920631,0.98975444,0.00010091818,0.0038938029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041857682,0.00069849606,0.030001882,0.00008955448,0.000082560924,0.000083541156,0.06821463,0.00006236447,0.00020470697,0.75665486,0.14335026,0.00013854823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027644204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080553314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23309954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002201975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012116602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093017361","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2013.0036","title":"Social and Economic Rights as Fundamental Rights","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fundamental rights; Political science; Constitution; Social rights; Constitutional right; Law; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Social security; Due Process Clause; International human rights law; Constitutional law; Bill of rights; Human rights; National security","score_opus":0.03872202326376139,"score_gpt":0.35423673803127065,"score_spread":0.31551471476750925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093017361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90893024,0.000021884982,0.00004519317,0.0016255858,0.000127478,0.000059382433,7.7660167e-7,0.0000064428204,0.08918303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829817,0.0000053721337,0.00017922667,0.0003878626,0.00058265997,0.0000010191545,2.2489264e-7,0.0000029046034,0.0005425376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987984,0.00045459685,0.00024932777,0.000086448286,0.00022843022,0.00018280075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999153,0.0001939768,0.0004208329,0.000057349993,0.000058364454,0.00011645623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006278203,0.00009461276,0.00033078744,0.000035027337,0.0013036041,0.000114522896,0.00024645985,0.000013580298,0.00020858341],"category_scores_gemma":[9.862308e-7,0.00005159025,0.000066017186,0.000052265113,0.0021300002,0.00016553723,0.000025494392,0.0001345804,0.00008106483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006881504,0.000019632347,0.0001076005,3.2888306e-7,0.000055691435,0.0000020742175,0.035697613,0.0000032301107,0.0000116646515,0.96173686,0.00193843,0.00035808448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033255597,0.00034329182,0.0037784278,0.000008975906,0.000020755777,0.000015911737,0.0032888767,0.000011713645,0.00015169579,0.45165065,0.54026985,0.00012728525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001987385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004382153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53833145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010062956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008844956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329818661","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2010.0013","title":"Book Review Essay","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Sociology; Commercial law","score_opus":0.039336358567482584,"score_gpt":0.3967041834679328,"score_spread":0.3573678249004502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329818661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24907008,0.16166635,0.00043145422,0.1070103,0.0014024205,0.0004667919,0.00000792708,0.00003174035,0.47991294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636242,0.007066093,0.00015522332,0.025970055,0.00058528164,0.000004458319,2.4959007e-7,0.000003991616,0.002590456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864936,0.00040921834,0.00030137913,0.000066515924,0.00042746216,0.00014604007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814814,0.0004974499,0.00059729716,0.00011557871,0.00056596444,0.00007557248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008893511,0.000087271794,0.00041003773,0.000023179913,0.0004212921,0.000037651713,0.000505959,0.0000074787145,0.00089571264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032938693,0.000050779625,0.0001394485,0.00020308928,0.0021696244,0.00023579034,0.00003500351,0.00034097655,0.00006255305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045922327,0.00004352358,0.00008821751,0.0000034595619,0.00011002117,0.0000027951316,0.005666341,0.0000024212163,0.0002098797,0.6605458,0.3324988,0.0007828071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007377273,0.0001504017,0.00057394075,0.00009553454,0.000029321323,0.0000107621145,0.0011153674,0.0000020991804,0.00017626965,0.0047728224,0.9929326,0.00006710445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001820914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000673375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71455413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003181273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014903845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342974016","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx027","title":"Conceptions of Authority and the Anglo-American Common Law Divide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.06470010365945968,"score_gpt":0.41108569366609915,"score_spread":0.3463855900066395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342974016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240686,0.00011036463,0.00032704405,0.029003054,0.00005045264,0.0001515079,0.000014718082,0.000005313623,0.046268906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988498,0.00008860289,0.00021404546,0.0005779991,0.00018773483,0.0000046992477,2.1450874e-7,0.0000032750588,0.00007363278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866414,0.0005790543,0.0002755812,0.00007006504,0.0002690079,0.00014217517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976475,0.00067699194,0.0010693003,0.0003236636,0.00019413594,0.00008838991],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010967433,0.00007625344,0.00042294266,0.000011413276,0.0020190435,0.00014585085,0.00079314737,0.000008950046,0.000012756395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021949967,0.000040554372,0.000106795094,0.00011619202,0.020969199,0.00019642487,0.00010142976,0.0002348737,0.0000031460775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008080009,0.000029028348,0.0011030613,5.8432175e-7,0.000047832975,3.9818252e-7,0.018080903,0.000013600334,0.000080048354,0.97908956,0.00017962481,0.0012945504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019159191,0.00084018765,0.16263671,0.000079193145,0.00031144024,0.000025099083,0.07242417,0.00015798425,0.0007491367,0.33342272,0.4270902,0.00034722307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0162904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065208003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64566684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023743602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000648743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510880950","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0020","title":"Revisiting Qúebec's &lt;I&gt;Jus Commune&lt;/I&gt; in the Era of the Human Rights Charters","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Civil code; Human rights; Doctrine; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Public law","score_opus":0.061877203646745885,"score_gpt":0.35406543297975,"score_spread":0.29218822933300415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510880950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618514,0.0008550849,0.000009034787,0.014290916,0.00015030001,0.00027259547,0.0000035436383,0.000007100553,0.022560028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987976,0.000033595737,0.00009723918,0.00058744155,0.00037395282,0.000005554954,4.0042593e-7,0.0000056035396,0.00009863803],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491835,0.003168404,0.0005769217,0.000103949664,0.00091002474,0.0003223404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704427,0.00084379304,0.0013042021,0.00027706916,0.0004408683,0.000089777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002748432,0.00017494934,0.0006396534,0.000023881128,0.0015415708,0.000090806505,0.0014603275,0.000023620138,0.000017831302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056812823,0.0000741959,0.00022169249,0.0005465082,0.004098279,0.00024111441,0.000119189746,0.00060102757,0.00000880331],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013046683,0.00015111308,0.0024556362,0.000006433088,0.00027717746,0.000009870062,0.6751123,0.00024563615,0.0025759735,0.31163603,0.006401048,0.00099831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026096564,0.0012469727,0.21010946,0.00092592643,0.00034352732,0.000053440857,0.32295358,0.000101931844,0.0010188814,0.036692135,0.42312235,0.00082216423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031423005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007907863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41672128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019339389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000714915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512887929","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0007","title":"Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harm; Law; Stereotype (UML); Human rights; Raising (metalworking); Transformative learning; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0628466398633027,"score_gpt":0.313046563790455,"score_spread":0.2501999239271523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512887929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975112,0.00022158894,0.0013393027,0.004557379,0.00030031102,0.000247325,0.000014894399,0.000012826587,0.018194338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986689,0.000019243382,0.00010475901,0.00052262266,0.00060052576,0.00000194715,0.0000013498221,0.00001053093,0.00007012197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966592,0.0020716372,0.0003648708,0.00013340692,0.0004767618,0.00029408454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979919,0.00018902069,0.00089825824,0.00021138079,0.00035212142,0.00035729274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015683745,0.00014480701,0.00045853152,0.00005840276,0.0011315848,0.00024107532,0.0005528261,0.00001441717,0.000014433587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075332673,0.000079123376,0.00007709363,0.00029908048,0.029216157,0.0004149338,0.00003300103,0.0003017954,0.000005083023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012358592,0.000055304132,0.000350379,0.0000015529388,0.00021360964,0.000019413012,0.18950245,0.000075622105,0.0002343377,0.80587584,0.0007467792,0.0028011228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002006727,0.004318767,0.0039252806,0.00036872044,0.00039703702,0.00006282355,0.4555501,0.00020688746,0.0016433885,0.2746021,0.2560235,0.00089464476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47926408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7003213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5312737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015464345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021616649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97342575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591481740","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/62.3.809","title":"Jacco Bomhoff, Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meaning of Postwar Legal Discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Constitutional law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022726149013596306,"score_gpt":0.3270274343780725,"score_spread":0.3043012853644762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591481740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8828333,0.00044510845,0.0020233192,0.006972601,0.00023566719,0.00009032846,0.000008685614,0.0000065633944,0.10738445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904585,0.000041637926,0.00013225288,0.00041314628,0.00034670017,0.0000011043087,2.646058e-7,0.0000011065973,0.000017921004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987118,0.00040440104,0.0002584909,0.000067890665,0.0004044614,0.00015293744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847186,0.00065818,0.00047933168,0.00006451448,0.00026645232,0.00005966432],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086110365,0.000085833424,0.00032492273,0.000023904759,0.001182888,0.000042469732,0.0002548968,0.000009337333,0.0000140576685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003212667,0.000042227402,0.000076508455,0.00018324766,0.014179068,0.00018880378,0.000038133894,0.00017605674,0.0000039666343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062410276,0.000019332709,0.0013156283,4.878545e-7,0.000088256216,0.0000015008344,0.00505508,0.0000673431,0.00009570485,0.99276316,0.00029387558,0.00023721368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080310804,0.0007906092,0.012608463,0.00020765378,0.00027529465,0.00013714607,0.051198572,0.00007813355,0.0005574267,0.46195817,0.4710519,0.00033353368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038381466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016203063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.530805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004620929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002041165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98850375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605280893","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avw016","title":"Po Jen Yap, Constitutional Dialogue in Common Law Asia (Oxford University Press, 2015)†","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Dialogic; Commonwealth; Law; Judicial review; Constitutional review; Constitutional law; Political science; High Court; Constitutional theory; Common law; Constitutional court; Sociology; Constitution; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.04189211310654754,"score_gpt":0.31598301007100676,"score_spread":0.2740908969644592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605280893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5395466,0.0006399473,0.0014179192,0.01842006,0.0003315728,0.00020654302,0.000060582588,0.000019105537,0.43935764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890816,0.00036774023,0.00006492435,0.0003274981,0.00021418503,7.074169e-7,4.9291333e-7,0.000001515155,0.00011478773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985618,0.0005635627,0.00023069102,0.00008732435,0.00034796604,0.00020866231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875504,0.00052460964,0.00035069414,0.00007320935,0.00020819827,0.000088255314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051737716,0.00009423891,0.00036543727,0.00003141937,0.00062145514,0.000022048116,0.00038464714,0.000018425844,0.000029406325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010560137,0.00005509487,0.00009082015,0.00022723358,0.013437009,0.0002936163,0.000061963365,0.00015249847,0.000009095252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023071097,0.000051269166,0.0034361412,2.9716452e-7,0.00006263209,0.00001722777,0.0011567435,0.000029439074,0.00003907279,0.9931182,0.0012865808,0.00057167094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079589244,0.0002742556,0.0153354015,0.00010164189,0.00004752202,0.000019500254,0.008230319,0.0000013334998,0.00018387896,0.19148336,0.78333145,0.00019544199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005042378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009752136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80163485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017481488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026655392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98924786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898009316","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy034","title":"Proportionality and the Inevitability of the Local: A Comparative Localist Analysis of Canada and Ireland","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Scholarship; Legitimacy; Compromise; Law and economics; Political science; Positive economics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024037709811256577,"score_gpt":0.32547683500990443,"score_spread":0.30143912519864785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898009316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922693,0.0002150517,0.00038806986,0.0035931452,0.00004212493,0.00014001621,0.000032439264,8.590362e-7,0.003319002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995752,0.000009509412,0.000016748643,0.00029597367,0.000056754645,0.0000014628306,1.1163211e-7,0.0000012495277,0.00004300272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975952,0.0012175121,0.00045789374,0.0000789662,0.00051093946,0.00013947247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715865,0.00096412987,0.0011412121,0.0001591239,0.0004960714,0.00008084175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016348846,0.000076681325,0.00065199746,0.00001290296,0.0003287836,0.000016569593,0.00027508623,0.000010751974,0.000012554687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006487981,0.000031465974,0.00009639627,0.0005549263,0.016883273,0.00006324185,0.00004953469,0.00012809972,7.196278e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005113535,0.00005184176,0.06335185,0.000008084645,0.0008335338,4.4900614e-7,0.022946062,0.00012977388,0.000023847795,0.9115259,0.00046487636,0.0001524345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005486078,0.00024199927,0.95202684,0.000053193893,0.00047854838,0.0000057295956,0.015608453,0.0008079782,0.00031482306,0.021085607,0.008729287,0.000098941666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.697537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81901366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000704281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040478725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948548308","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa025","title":"Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility? Legislative Innovation and Judicial Application in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Legislation; Statutory law; Business; Corporate law; Law; Legislature; Fiduciary; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Duty; Corporate governance","score_opus":0.05502441046427409,"score_gpt":0.2802558946435457,"score_spread":0.22523148417927163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948548308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907894,0.000020778156,0.0010716354,0.0043716175,0.000038575425,0.00016212524,0.0000015960645,0.0000114039685,0.0035328679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966107,0.0000013880604,0.00005735233,0.0024097196,0.00089614734,0.000002941658,0.00000417886,0.0000072271214,0.000010316147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906695,0.00008308095,0.00042112643,0.00012807189,0.00019075391,0.00011003966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980556,0.000051748415,0.0015441462,0.00006993352,0.0002679003,0.000010702758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005081919,0.000116085044,0.0003626868,0.00012109297,0.00019933625,0.00009887472,0.00017668067,0.000014107842,0.00001414851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045759934,0.000080320504,0.000034620734,0.0008615163,0.00061969116,0.00063373847,0.0000578355,0.00024688855,0.000014039897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001384491,0.000041101215,0.0034935423,0.000009797274,0.00002744282,0.000006453972,0.0029038207,0.000044517245,0.0011020055,0.988917,0.0005329348,0.001536888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009671849,0.00019496452,0.20274888,0.00002303884,0.000045246074,0.0000044798135,0.001071361,0.0016440424,0.000116837575,0.7829922,0.009991825,0.00019992943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000089107605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022363849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2059248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023718136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038460686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3275375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951270789","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz015","title":"The Magnetism of Moral Reasoning and the Principle of Proportionality in Comparative Constitutional Adjudication","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Adjudication; Law; Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Political science; Law and economics; Normative; Moral reasoning; Sociology","score_opus":0.039323926762791665,"score_gpt":0.3511782601717788,"score_spread":0.3118543334089871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951270789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742074,0.0012689347,0.0001322059,0.0031555218,0.00007437201,0.0002702164,0.0000061281753,0.000001727886,0.020883473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953175,0.00017923074,0.00012064775,0.000079905374,0.000053892483,0.000005627468,4.475547e-7,8.4800826e-7,0.000027669897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822325,0.0006997982,0.00043902572,0.00006628845,0.00045920612,0.00011245196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749506,0.0009597849,0.0010098652,0.00007962293,0.00042779298,0.000027885926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017807744,0.00006820005,0.00038865063,0.00002170178,0.0004426782,0.000016039881,0.00024834808,0.000010504079,0.000014883361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048129757,0.000032235635,0.00006844892,0.00027069947,0.020225765,0.00011497425,0.00004714684,0.00016347805,0.0000019381328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046496541,0.0000320987,0.02054494,0.0000012002797,0.00006359869,2.474864e-7,0.005650715,0.00023616427,0.000047384103,0.9728014,0.00002300518,0.00013429922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016576607,0.00043605454,0.562017,0.00016642748,0.00007406182,0.000018813478,0.034888394,0.00023235743,0.0002863504,0.38941652,0.010665566,0.00014077644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013925311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084412267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5833849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004066718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034109596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991430525","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa018","title":"Enforcement of Chinese Insider Trading Law: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Insider trading; Enforcement; Sanctions; Business; China; Insider; Law enforcement; Empirical research; Accounting; Law; Political science; Finance; Statistics","score_opus":0.11547314081365181,"score_gpt":0.3256408916637385,"score_spread":0.21016775085008668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991430525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9353738,0.0008710971,0.0011680262,0.0014480787,0.00011967469,0.0001692739,0.00004475116,0.000006787459,0.06079855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976016,0.000044185585,0.00028344,0.0017157687,0.0003337429,0.000002812124,0.000001272664,0.0000104473365,0.000006712251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983857,0.00014198148,0.0009949266,0.00022204148,0.00006712472,0.0001882245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757457,0.00019911966,0.0017346661,0.00015874646,0.0001350008,0.00019791251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047976628,0.00016975895,0.001371953,0.00006454488,0.00014287287,0.00006118984,0.0003018401,0.000023476907,0.00008793909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011228226,0.00014610963,0.00016128209,0.00021284423,0.0016297101,0.00039073295,0.000047626407,0.00024107134,0.000014517677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000315011,0.00007592358,0.01038463,0.0000053767217,0.0002823952,0.0000023224309,0.06397592,0.00037761166,0.000054679676,0.9243375,0.00016775404,0.000020853591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029921585,0.007345645,0.025313765,0.000058247646,0.00007360325,0.00009298212,0.07214075,0.016020732,0.00074940943,0.8643645,0.010059501,0.0007887188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009178017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016657442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062227856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009994119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030744926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60047346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121612408","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2012.0017","title":"Justice for Profit: A Comparative Analysis of Australian, Canadian and U.S. Third Party Litigation Funding","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Class action; Economic Justice; Political science; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Law; Civil litigation; Public administration; Business; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.11209026076870873,"score_gpt":0.3554160378716755,"score_spread":0.2433257771029668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121612408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97697514,0.000077415636,0.0009882222,0.0026720273,0.00014796968,0.00018500483,0.000019754365,0.0000065670497,0.018927878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985755,0.0000052870637,0.00031163168,0.00063735194,0.00031567592,0.0000072724256,0.000009002066,0.0000039351194,0.00013433008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991464,0.00004781971,0.00033261057,0.000071510185,0.00016139742,0.0002402625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984242,0.00016551837,0.00086823356,0.00009285272,0.00038807426,0.00006113746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004938408,0.000108271415,0.00046636836,0.0002940413,0.00026984225,0.00008861273,0.00013877822,0.000014191895,0.00003698063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010971086,0.00007504802,0.00013911509,0.0008996937,0.00038919054,0.0007176641,0.000018473607,0.000115851944,0.0000060144193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018305282,0.000050302282,0.022606192,0.000036370384,0.0013352153,4.3308395e-7,0.0023378683,0.0010597261,0.00042496514,0.9645747,0.0070762592,0.00031492923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008933522,0.00020995733,0.4821288,0.0000983435,0.008460635,0.000014096623,0.05117224,0.013232967,0.00040798137,0.0036537657,0.43930733,0.0004205058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029544008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007693086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96092093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000495749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040831543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44661897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122619448","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2014.0030","title":"Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Göran; Sociology; Law; Art; Humanities; Computer science","score_opus":0.03941342542345785,"score_gpt":0.34522461304100094,"score_spread":0.3058111876175431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122619448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80759865,0.000061600054,0.00015611184,0.006339338,0.00010511376,0.000040760977,0.0000035169269,0.0000032660234,0.18569167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.000011431546,0.00006393178,0.0004175063,0.00036634092,0.000001306668,1.6677379e-7,5.659885e-7,0.000013323718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992736,0.00025736683,0.00016478145,0.000045510253,0.000165138,0.0000935872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935055,0.00030179508,0.0001967537,0.000016494407,0.00010656127,0.000027837077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005740737,0.000045715486,0.0001973158,0.00003350855,0.00076969666,0.000026139322,0.00011148543,0.000007943747,0.000015185712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000072067355,0.00003064804,0.000036032674,0.000079258054,0.0047394894,0.00011123116,0.000015632044,0.00009693639,0.0000112426105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025763718,0.000009133253,0.00066186546,1.2335208e-7,0.000021432803,3.8597088e-7,0.0038078453,0.000046868518,0.000006435471,0.99494666,0.00032741675,0.00014608387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028490386,0.00008967412,0.014688515,0.000010979328,0.000013625403,0.000009248432,0.0043817605,0.000024650368,0.000013772922,0.76699364,0.21340853,0.00008069008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028574062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012259184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.227953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008536808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017518745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99796903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126145115","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx033","title":"The Ahistoricism of Legal Pluralism in International Criminal Law†","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Law; Criminal law; Political science; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Legal history; Comparative law; Wrongdoing; Sociology; Legal realism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04864830365117022,"score_gpt":0.38349915048017735,"score_spread":0.3348508468290071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126145115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.812767,0.000045944296,0.000031514308,0.0056487573,0.0007426563,0.00004795079,0.0000026942278,0.0000019636118,0.18071151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962986,0.00001966561,0.000085450025,0.00025020572,0.0005251791,0.0000013389109,2.3360545e-7,0.0000030461063,0.0028162801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986579,0.0002599658,0.0003381537,0.000059225422,0.0005466349,0.00013813289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979045,0.00034228826,0.0011137149,0.00016143057,0.00043582445,0.00004227845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087141176,0.00007016349,0.00023027946,0.000032701682,0.0011048886,0.00016935599,0.0013881811,0.000011371594,0.000042010073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022489394,0.000037748647,0.00010599734,0.0000265699,0.0037153573,0.00035423183,0.00004726849,0.00022219984,0.0000063369575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018019616,0.00002955844,0.000067124245,3.0162698e-7,0.000044190085,0.000008227852,0.013088751,0.00001916694,0.00004250815,0.9860657,0.00024740442,0.00020686479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006614621,0.00037920204,0.016472017,0.000077286655,0.0000408419,0.000028351425,0.00850467,0.000049338538,0.0005891352,0.608097,0.36493763,0.00016304437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070553063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0137072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3779687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012781043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109268934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138147771","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac036","title":"The Jurisdictional Vacuum: Transnational Corporate Human Rights Claims in Common Law Home States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Plaintiff; Law; Liability; State (computer science); Human rights; Jurisdiction; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.032419617188120683,"score_gpt":0.2640424747262894,"score_spread":0.2316228575381687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138147771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99452883,0.000057367266,0.0000408645,0.0037775815,0.0002683773,0.00015893129,0.000012076384,0.000017751254,0.0011381998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983429,0.0000014631723,0.00001813354,0.0010303226,0.00038614188,0.000016156337,0.000028738086,0.00001330318,0.0001628643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981237,0.00020464836,0.00063077826,0.00014292778,0.00064753566,0.00025038785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979705,0.0002586096,0.0013197798,0.00018256949,0.00024736018,0.000021183712],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087625027,0.00018379431,0.0004472886,0.00013096513,0.0023737499,0.00026754045,0.0007092022,0.000010277392,0.0002850916],"category_scores_gemma":[1.8871775e-8,0.00010795427,0.00014343747,0.0004944477,0.0010707527,0.00054759515,0.000105218816,0.00056966743,0.000017232587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033993958,0.00013734747,0.00058124604,0.0000028403028,0.000077844146,0.000026925685,0.0003813477,0.002046027,0.000077007564,0.995043,0.0012462079,0.000040257364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064644567,0.00017067383,0.012332137,0.000007734157,0.000037227433,0.000022008924,0.000470554,0.0005644122,0.000026274449,0.965961,0.01960595,0.00015561753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110986264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004483008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029082045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088580564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034842353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892503},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W335530575","doi":"","title":"Aline Grenon and Louise Bélanger-Hardy, eds. Elements of Quebec civil law: A comparison with the common law of Canada / Éléments de common law canadienne","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.02019686419435443,"score_gpt":0.30882088386877005,"score_spread":0.28862401967441564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335530575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98437726,0.00034375512,0.0000057322486,0.005169483,0.0001140501,0.00027708846,0.000048855964,0.0000055909895,0.009658169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983067,0.00003668007,0.00019128865,0.001244004,0.00011120571,0.0000058883147,0.0000025076815,0.000009744241,0.000091963004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742025,0.000749027,0.00058537856,0.00013105612,0.000655279,0.00045902355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702615,0.00058797956,0.0014923702,0.00021390327,0.00043964095,0.00023998888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001054071,0.00021866402,0.0009173987,0.000016931912,0.0009592454,0.000053474476,0.0006340991,0.000029391063,0.000030971078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009193505,0.00011660116,0.00007991738,0.000229393,0.0056215837,0.00016636049,0.00009492869,0.0005100857,4.054864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016471718,0.000474169,0.04459801,0.000041367595,0.0016093015,0.000028964278,0.16123424,0.00035384757,0.0034089265,0.7778054,0.007527516,0.0012710938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00572441,0.0042680386,0.17121638,0.00063102064,0.0012387891,0.00007671661,0.27432254,0.00036152638,0.015825259,0.011399818,0.5134222,0.0015133123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99981284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026871674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002942557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99708456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237230563","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa002","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Scholarship; Pleasure; Editorial board; Publication; Library science; Wish; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; History; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07109406723988082,"score_gpt":0.39132213934061594,"score_spread":0.3202280721007351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237230563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7872977,0.00036903343,0.0026429829,0.0802433,0.0011982098,0.00012886597,0.000005767932,0.0000207255,0.12809339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99118227,0.000040327337,0.00024544593,0.0031549064,0.0052785883,0.0000011477092,1.5244287e-7,0.000003069951,0.000094107345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987192,0.00038482226,0.0002447636,0.00006664999,0.00045003628,0.00013448417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850076,0.00046336182,0.00045515044,0.00005332941,0.00041724753,0.00011016179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033095368,0.00007854869,0.0003239062,0.000016344477,0.0003765107,0.000048961192,0.00043687894,0.0000068025874,0.00008008075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029922949,0.00004832822,0.00011591912,0.00025271054,0.0015536781,0.00018665678,0.000040394378,0.00019444061,0.000053541546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033321494,0.000043536496,0.00037288893,8.9798976e-7,0.00018039029,0.0000066730668,0.08113711,0.00014376752,0.00039080917,0.82472944,0.0914039,0.0012573656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015461663,0.0005587544,0.0011112561,0.0000108108425,0.000021767833,0.0000024702808,0.019450143,0.00004613045,0.0004615697,0.007618769,0.9704815,0.000082185594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024037628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018938722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8790776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040746796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009486591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57245916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246971983","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy012","title":"Preface","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06992255438205475,"score_gpt":0.4113477735025587,"score_spread":0.34142521912050394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246971983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79628116,0.00016518342,0.00055184244,0.003944998,0.00022498904,0.00005423847,0.0000012634943,0.000006692136,0.19876961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709886,0.00003813323,0.00028588154,0.00083278224,0.0009155417,0.000001265254,7.2941354e-8,0.0000025514073,0.000824916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882036,0.0004027728,0.00021252372,0.000058427016,0.0003639774,0.00014196045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835056,0.0003499761,0.00042968374,0.00008075109,0.00073250855,0.000056507022],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055407867,0.000068625064,0.000254962,0.000026369155,0.00057819986,0.00004644024,0.0004123151,0.0000056584768,0.00015266996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015115948,0.00004052361,0.000081187376,0.00022505438,0.0040292344,0.00017787034,0.000035870726,0.000117552925,0.00008991062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016702659,0.00003491568,0.0004106353,2.1937623e-7,0.00012154291,0.0000011252074,0.031604987,0.000007893868,0.0001761045,0.9560862,0.010638986,0.00075035985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015738966,0.00097324897,0.005186191,0.00001985578,0.000022038892,0.0000076103897,0.01864334,0.000015703119,0.0013638829,0.036454994,0.9370654,0.00009031281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041522188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014857145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9264265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048676047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008112358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248731791","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avy009","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Pleasure; Reading (process); Transition (genetics); Library science; Media studies; Center (category theory); Focus (optics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.053368132011028566,"score_gpt":0.40641438235152816,"score_spread":0.3530462503404996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248731791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7944534,0.0001321531,0.0012882135,0.0077509074,0.001940904,0.00007276315,0.000002498037,0.0000107105825,0.1943485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98868734,0.000025829564,0.0003195517,0.00086021627,0.009650211,0.000001247757,1.07078584e-7,0.0000030410145,0.00045243368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986824,0.0003984055,0.00024209707,0.00006505799,0.00045138158,0.00016067315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980161,0.00047043696,0.00048102945,0.000086264045,0.0008792634,0.00006690429],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061217113,0.00007906412,0.00028717233,0.000033431308,0.0006501958,0.00005253548,0.00044086558,0.000007893359,0.0001256156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021623626,0.000047404515,0.000098650875,0.00024682685,0.0043138494,0.00019881835,0.000039317496,0.00014712983,0.00009058599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023687008,0.000053209216,0.0003509308,3.214417e-7,0.00014308374,0.000002406369,0.041597493,0.000008231326,0.00027219992,0.8813754,0.07438089,0.0015789968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012965949,0.00075042236,0.0024828797,0.000016579641,0.000019049912,0.000005121989,0.012415633,0.000014561155,0.00091384083,0.023448225,0.9597247,0.000079288824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005360075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012305309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88534385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006331272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010312552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248916952","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avw007","title":"Why Does Executive Greed Prevail in the United States and Canada but Not in Japan? The Pattern of Low CEO Pay and High Worker Welfare in Japanese Corporations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Welfare; Demographic economics; Business; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.013709709490557883,"score_gpt":0.21818465047194238,"score_spread":0.2044749409813845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248916952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97831595,0.000055682645,0.000017390405,0.021262128,0.000046878133,0.00019582016,0.000018477018,0.000001801581,0.00008587974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962491,0.000071483024,0.0000030945814,0.0035629768,0.00005773146,0.0000080607615,0.0000036743515,0.00000676731,0.00003712588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989272,0.0001778592,0.00040232608,0.000109245775,0.00021705369,0.00016635923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982781,0.0004372788,0.00094963465,0.00015656115,0.00016804898,0.000010381197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046088212,0.00014565102,0.00035809036,0.00009876595,0.00009706021,0.00007498395,0.00029888633,0.000012096824,0.000017630811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013613485,0.000051043706,0.000024524401,0.0005832722,0.00064489647,0.0003939604,0.0000688686,0.00020513471,4.9108024e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024086882,0.00046805004,0.9296268,0.00009031634,0.000245082,0.00010936924,0.027454622,0.0016544533,0.0013856272,0.021242166,0.0070037553,0.008311034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014750366,0.00011545985,0.9284881,0.00039808883,0.000041112995,0.000011869155,0.058792725,0.0004050081,0.00015100683,0.0026743172,0.007250644,0.00019664083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6329177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8404762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20755851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037214228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042677515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3695267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251059082","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avz011","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Law; Mandate; Political science; Pleasure; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.037702922187676714,"score_gpt":0.3814900266924708,"score_spread":0.34378710450479405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251059082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8509324,0.00013721656,0.00021136932,0.004410335,0.0014106269,0.00008458091,0.0000017412018,0.000006574524,0.14280514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956407,0.000033812717,0.00015657666,0.0006605392,0.0024908492,0.000001188808,1.5950324e-7,0.0000031682018,0.0010130341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869245,0.00037063318,0.00023760754,0.00006674643,0.00048149354,0.00015108452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829316,0.0006051749,0.0004911791,0.00009345327,0.0004601456,0.000056860812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005599233,0.00007955434,0.00033535686,0.00003232555,0.00027580303,0.000048023885,0.00042483487,0.000008002353,0.0001782451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010895181,0.000047877256,0.000119244905,0.00020504852,0.0011719054,0.00021880749,0.000036676658,0.0001824717,0.00016788382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019978653,0.000051358104,0.0015961902,7.3082975e-7,0.0001458315,0.0000020890905,0.023996212,0.000117301504,0.0003717873,0.9474605,0.025258565,0.0007996623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019922607,0.0005154365,0.004651856,0.000023092904,0.000017512371,0.0000046269006,0.017465713,0.000023030621,0.00039643253,0.016021231,0.9605862,0.00009565569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004313938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003439759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93532765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006811277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097780874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43179345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253309197","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avx014","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Honor; Excellence; Publishing; Pleasure; Law; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07094385192861155,"score_gpt":0.4255015243537143,"score_spread":0.3545576724251027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253309197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7583567,0.00013993209,0.00047964044,0.015591188,0.0018990225,0.00007335856,0.0000031248912,0.0000069248304,0.22345012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99414617,0.000053917247,0.00019428355,0.0003821459,0.0046103257,0.0000014788922,8.7936925e-8,0.000002875334,0.00060873956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884367,0.00027831658,0.00022001521,0.00006358557,0.00044430257,0.00015010139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784166,0.00038891356,0.0009969943,0.0001839405,0.0005208716,0.000067620385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006529195,0.00007956284,0.0003197222,0.000022456397,0.0018534284,0.00018361544,0.00091157516,0.0000080186355,0.00005120484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046748755,0.000047986858,0.0001205748,0.000054610515,0.0035972185,0.00036510034,0.00007175968,0.00017876974,0.000036680358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001689489,0.00004809208,0.0012211389,4.3757217e-7,0.0001504989,0.0000058006162,0.019285528,0.000021495323,0.00013972833,0.94302326,0.033773664,0.0021613967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000198419,0.0003315453,0.019202644,0.000025795132,0.000025643607,0.000004964149,0.009200299,0.000014158381,0.00043249875,0.033193618,0.9372716,0.00009880767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011853459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014360955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055156735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009534442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281252944","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac008","title":"Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Potential, Risks, and Limitations of Operation Car Wash (<i>Lava Jato</i>)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Language change; Jurisprudence; Cognitive reframing; Law; Politics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Lava; Criminal law; Organised crime; State (computer science); Relation (database); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.21081420278299623,"score_gpt":0.32044446383525477,"score_spread":0.10963026105225854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281252944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975303,0.0033616428,0.009321622,0.004164078,0.00018193397,0.00007678278,0.000043638713,0.0000021858207,0.007545135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969649,0.00035049315,0.0011942189,0.0013219696,0.000116781484,0.0000016085651,0.0000012988963,0.0000033088224,0.00004547068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992649,0.00007422249,0.00040742877,0.00009481037,0.00006576409,0.00009289023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989831,0.00016785807,0.00046051055,0.00010356274,0.0002441006,0.00004087991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023431728,0.00008128515,0.00034538563,0.000029627541,0.0003711243,0.00006673653,0.00012766256,0.000009302847,0.000020336363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017587501,0.000053828735,0.0000824882,0.000184492,0.00064875395,0.00016896249,0.000052782663,0.00012218523,0.000011955398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063036125,0.000044433556,0.0003827089,0.0000028420766,0.00014722321,0.000004131711,0.002684568,0.008187252,0.0009609912,0.98704207,0.00022509955,0.00025566647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040481957,0.003846437,0.2049665,0.00040895378,0.0011190684,0.002067053,0.075519174,0.015944239,0.017565424,0.34015194,0.33262837,0.0017346545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032611977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016366008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6468901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031941152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043700857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28544256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613264","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac016","title":"Multicultural Populations and Mixed Legal Systems in the United States: Louisiana and Puerto Rico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.056486827888494,"score_gpt":0.34960018607404464,"score_spread":0.2931133581855506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296613264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99160016,0.00042128982,0.000032798638,0.0068197628,0.00012191823,0.00014609705,0.0000061072374,0.000004260431,0.00084763207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993563,0.0000630164,0.000028745042,0.0004125468,0.00007925814,0.000005788727,0.0000024429787,0.000002257577,0.000049628226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998028,0.0012717837,0.00021803933,0.000058098278,0.0003051341,0.00011897034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992018,0.00029492742,0.00030808616,0.00005981916,0.00008753499,0.000047878613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008255196,0.0000622326,0.00019136317,0.00006005207,0.0008500566,0.00013187944,0.0001749712,0.0000057998036,0.000008133077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073873543,0.00003445047,0.000028666738,0.0004720041,0.0006489515,0.00013830952,0.00002999798,0.00022504972,3.2816448e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040303596,0.00016643081,0.0042189294,0.0000041559283,0.000111590416,0.00003881074,0.51439786,0.013275786,0.00012424451,0.46328953,0.00262198,0.0013476429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052604114,0.0005782577,0.052091703,0.000017301774,0.000045858356,0.000108980545,0.6809156,0.0031856324,0.0000025063778,0.0015180313,0.2608931,0.000117001284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018789098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029527724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4617715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050986557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027414397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98774487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313304229","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac039","title":"Differences in a Minor Archive: Feminist Activists and Scholars on Cohabitation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Autonomy; Minor (academic); Common law; Scholarship; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.030768431541527145,"score_gpt":0.3074869608467308,"score_spread":0.27671852930520363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313304229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860562,0.00010369466,0.00000656959,0.0016582704,0.000081572616,0.000057411835,0.000008117623,0.0000020154982,0.012026159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992134,0.000024487123,0.000035548685,0.00046995434,0.00004487968,0.0000039451056,2.5668268e-7,0.0000019757829,0.00020558231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986522,0.000770996,0.00013322088,0.000059506878,0.00028378493,0.00010024431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920475,0.00036890886,0.00028709133,0.00004723379,0.000026192507,0.00006579376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052845705,0.000042214226,0.00018421862,0.00017109231,0.00091293367,0.00012620124,0.00019954222,0.0000038471103,0.000056584704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013348097,0.000037887927,0.000033202377,0.00024283041,0.0017761047,0.00009055458,0.000020065023,0.0002888212,0.0000024102224],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001295077,0.0003019032,0.021389619,0.000004720589,0.000096646545,0.00006151878,0.46783182,0.00011175541,0.00042438228,0.49162468,0.006392371,0.010465501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000648318,0.0019778176,0.4426095,0.000043387994,0.00003036172,0.000036075355,0.19994596,0.000025639862,0.000014080616,0.023978146,0.33047333,0.00021737661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025274212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16018912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46764654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025279657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022787324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98121655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394014678","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae007","title":"Sovereignty, Territoriality, and Private International Law in Classical Muslim International Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Sovereignty; International law; Law; Political science; Private law; Municipal law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Law of the sea; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04818593056536592,"score_gpt":0.3573031838977954,"score_spread":0.3091172533324295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394014678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6052771,0.0000518991,0.000028832234,0.019250823,0.0030930548,0.00010150267,0.000013132631,0.000020228776,0.3721634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966632,0.00013770371,0.00009189922,0.0010238461,0.0016441242,0.000003090532,0.0000015157806,0.0000055671353,0.00042901526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984687,0.00034910787,0.00033113937,0.00011388353,0.0005398365,0.00019736394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896526,0.00038813436,0.00036104154,0.00007948235,0.0001483347,0.000057717916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009535576,0.000095485564,0.0003119716,0.000065876804,0.00034650962,0.00008723157,0.0005098085,0.000020958982,0.00005871265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018459596,0.000070729075,0.00007969497,0.00020008752,0.0028561219,0.0002130833,0.00015291973,0.00026705753,0.000015486321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109172994,0.00003616343,0.00038344113,6.084912e-7,0.000083046594,0.000013982269,0.022255795,0.000021196605,0.000045515924,0.97492033,0.0017532571,0.00037750974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007669588,0.00020924347,0.0061712633,0.0000491051,0.000019580259,0.000011631525,0.029276067,0.00010705388,0.000028638178,0.24325654,0.71993953,0.00016438749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001734382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006445038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73166376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020508772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056837976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394725099","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae006","title":"Reasonableness as Responsiveness in Administrative Law in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada: Kant and Arendt on the Role of the Community in Deferential Judicial Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Administrative law; Law; Kingdom; Public administration","score_opus":0.12789518429323685,"score_gpt":0.3925559634415649,"score_spread":0.2646607791483281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394725099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822678,0.00048524747,4.6587428e-7,0.01602349,0.00003339018,0.0002778398,0.00001596912,0.000001945975,0.00089385075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669856,0.0010216882,0.0000017771222,0.0022372215,0.000020445299,0.000008687452,0.0000028426357,0.00000381759,0.000004959737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99022216,0.008607638,0.00039837207,0.000082544844,0.00047514267,0.00021416004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994133,0.00493403,0.00049613585,0.00020392225,0.00018549294,0.00004740851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040942254,0.000120650904,0.00042146497,0.00008048419,0.00055472524,0.000044192107,0.00067614915,0.000016881466,0.0000061917904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023565425,0.000056688412,0.000036647987,0.0016609585,0.002233602,0.00008405575,0.000090125344,0.0006877468,3.1574453e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002052039,0.00014495585,0.006033475,0.00004185381,0.00005405512,0.000050740444,0.08824352,0.0005817657,0.00007971017,0.90182954,0.00047489954,0.00041343697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088572624,0.0012933195,0.22096369,0.00571338,0.00013701405,0.000056208573,0.62384534,0.00018398535,0.0006327963,0.07249412,0.07344628,0.0003481441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87183875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9429221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82933545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009969376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055195595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396882761","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae005","title":"The War Within Religion: Towards a More Nuanced Resolution of Religion–Equality Conflicts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07249932966153845,"score_gpt":0.4199657214669349,"score_spread":0.34746639180539646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396882761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94715315,0.0004280342,0.00034292834,0.03419086,0.000555473,0.00019435336,0.000006461801,0.00004161718,0.01708712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99471366,0.0030698967,0.0001422163,0.001212133,0.0002139425,0.0000060530297,9.798164e-7,0.0000065163795,0.0006346106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971522,0.0011080664,0.0006465731,0.00010272833,0.000742899,0.00024750349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967081,0.0009065478,0.0013221225,0.0002488478,0.00070093694,0.00011342632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025214881,0.00011108496,0.00039925746,0.000042631083,0.001058751,0.000059644935,0.0005567606,0.00003176745,0.000006408619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012024688,0.00006300528,0.0002778048,0.0009747138,0.0029441565,0.00017223734,0.000043740765,0.0003853667,0.000027603855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006281914,0.000061867024,0.00014531473,0.0000043487044,0.00024395216,0.0000049309515,0.25929734,0.0018128789,0.00088363694,0.63564277,0.100811265,0.00046352434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007354392,0.0009879353,0.0045964886,0.00020703295,0.000107778775,0.00003525893,0.2753969,0.0010367988,0.0023901863,0.070759945,0.6434382,0.00030800438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003868757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078412984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5648828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111112255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002572868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401976499","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae024","title":"Generality and Exception in Islamic Legal Theory: Intent, Language, and the Jurist’s Role","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Generality; Islam; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.011026681272236922,"score_gpt":0.2648492141970209,"score_spread":0.25382253292478396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401976499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901186,0.0026786362,0.00021648285,0.003423431,0.00010577113,0.00007040841,6.9194766e-7,0.000008742689,0.0033772094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811244,0.00010877431,0.000018582085,0.0011984408,0.00041599307,0.0000028354598,4.4008064e-7,0.000005158379,0.00013733038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994368,0.00008437332,0.00018986703,0.000081496124,0.000102509024,0.00010495513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995369,0.00014372039,0.00019791996,0.00007101191,0.0000492634,0.000001221977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083138223,0.00009266227,0.0002700942,0.00006132467,0.00011891643,0.00020339603,0.0001215536,0.000006969161,0.0000073431843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007237452,0.00004408913,0.000045980378,0.00021167115,0.00092240947,0.00035431687,0.00007685515,0.00019908318,0.000006582428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028497868,0.000011756532,0.00048085267,0.000013881155,0.000062498046,0.000009812035,0.0049526743,0.000019083149,0.00021976401,0.98073137,0.0006695087,0.012543826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001105064,0.00008848874,0.054593418,0.0002560686,0.00016302805,0.000065250446,0.012677225,0.002403395,0.00006195725,0.9176365,0.010750268,0.00019930935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005058238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002889635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06309484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001255873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008003073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33986562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409111837","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae029","title":"The Legal Innovation Sandbox","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Sandbox (software development); Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.038407258368246516,"score_gpt":0.3082105120734015,"score_spread":0.269803253705155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409111837","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2264707,0.0026882265,0.7153734,0.020720562,0.0015473536,0.00015131281,0.0000012952472,0.000072361385,0.032974824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703026,0.00006765711,0.0007327452,0.0014410674,0.00026747197,0.000001570414,1.2039081e-7,0.0000047505696,0.00045434013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878275,0.00026847073,0.00036458977,0.000103798266,0.00031370635,0.00016669832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985609,0.00058372074,0.00024530108,0.00025149353,0.00032357007,0.000034992478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008092369,0.000098776356,0.00021268577,0.00005677863,0.0003158859,0.0005821129,0.0010695629,0.00000804854,0.00001271937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014834382,0.000040310566,0.00008244256,0.0010625252,0.0012410461,0.0005721331,0.000092741786,0.00031972883,0.000056970668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004953714,0.000012957611,0.0000018455336,0.0000011881057,0.00007548189,0.000007452311,0.0026744474,0.00006414807,0.0012223823,0.95212775,0.023755169,0.020007664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016460266,0.0016183371,0.00010548655,0.000078404846,0.000020830019,0.00042147093,0.0008368706,0.04747324,0.00920122,0.13623266,0.8036647,0.00018219752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017985018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005686436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003909734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013869743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56133276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410242589","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avae032","title":"First Nations’ Citizenship and Kinship Compared: Belonging’s Stake in Legality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Citizenship; Politics; Principle of legality; Political science; Law; Fictive kinship; Sociology","score_opus":0.08467716980806435,"score_gpt":0.37401767553068943,"score_spread":0.2893405057226251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410242589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96164423,0.0022750928,0.00007028079,0.01714911,0.00019894824,0.00016162948,0.000007155044,0.000025067204,0.018468479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989021,0.0002517743,0.0002487405,0.00019038457,0.00022380316,0.000005017731,3.9999122e-7,0.0000053184276,0.00017244944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981764,0.0006697663,0.00035451754,0.00012425671,0.00042968767,0.00024539014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975473,0.0018414253,0.0002449578,0.00007480224,0.00019254426,0.000098967124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012591305,0.00012518706,0.00042182233,0.000078384895,0.0009073486,0.0002321204,0.00027831574,0.0000179371,0.000028685778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008727155,0.00007820021,0.00008617524,0.0007001975,0.0023863532,0.0002268786,0.000044448694,0.00037518406,0.00000938195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013474561,0.00005125396,0.01057996,0.000028529572,0.00027807415,0.00003832776,0.23079188,0.00041841718,0.0000390577,0.75407606,0.0028131518,0.00075051084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010591227,0.000607653,0.4344464,0.000938268,0.00017945601,0.000060248836,0.27543226,0.0007242451,0.00013910241,0.10101887,0.18464702,0.0007473685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028011806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023667648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6530572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022755489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008219355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412894107","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf017","title":"Daphne Barak Erez, Biblical Judgments: New Legal Readings in the Hebrew Bible","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Hebrew Bible; Philosophy; Hebrew; Literature; Biblical studies; Linguistics; Art; Theology","score_opus":0.04481111885028161,"score_gpt":0.3184890451717636,"score_spread":0.27367792632148197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412894107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5886021,0.0030980885,0.0010107679,0.04641468,0.00048597393,0.00025434908,0.000007762382,0.000016573664,0.3601097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723384,0.000112911584,0.000046904046,0.026152927,0.00032715578,0.0000043724203,7.536566e-7,0.0000044575895,0.0010121539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987727,0.0002442503,0.00043216895,0.00009654291,0.00026131445,0.00019306102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989161,0.00041003845,0.00032593813,0.00013838794,0.00016529227,0.000044236658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043380033,0.0001300669,0.00040275246,0.0003607545,0.00029227298,0.0003240288,0.00050020573,0.0000103441225,0.00031590488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010473209,0.000062127205,0.00013328939,0.0009497354,0.0009249141,0.0003231801,0.000053731143,0.0003744236,0.000030407666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020936775,0.000069263166,0.00010841591,0.0000023101156,0.00010408405,0.000002189997,0.01361656,0.000016778562,0.000027171693,0.7539438,0.22998752,0.0019125389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003974024,0.0007161811,0.001989825,0.000090588896,0.000048250156,0.0000104788505,0.017756162,0.00010416336,0.000089812915,0.02591682,0.9527899,0.00009043672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013896553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011618078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.728027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036035155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047805403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34589368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413184867","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf003","title":"Federalism and Vertical Tax Competition","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Tax competition; Competition (biology); Economics; Tax reform; Public economics; Ad valorem tax; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02161520301332562,"score_gpt":0.2722460669004744,"score_spread":0.2506308638871488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413184867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96949184,0.00008299839,0.0026631285,0.009301467,0.00011996978,0.000049991726,3.3207067e-7,0.000009201609,0.018281091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923625,0.000007712311,0.00008133775,0.007213281,0.00020846086,9.782863e-7,6.382237e-7,0.0000025280465,0.00012253578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995207,0.00003290675,0.00019743087,0.000056874058,0.00011272239,0.000079362944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993526,0.000080171856,0.00030907162,0.00006714827,0.00018289292,0.0000081140515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001890718,0.000070234055,0.00021443827,0.00006072052,0.00016842043,0.0001627619,0.00012267823,0.0000059291833,0.00002994673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007139918,0.00004488926,0.000038343398,0.00027048338,0.0004017559,0.00029955173,0.000042353106,0.000121648,0.00001994543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016029815,0.000030041356,0.0012965727,0.00000696705,0.000031302858,0.0000028309646,0.00008111275,0.000057935533,0.00095598504,0.99289775,0.003268378,0.0012108105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00234671,0.0002298291,0.19287238,0.00036489125,0.00022318738,0.000047077192,0.005100949,0.0067879516,0.0015708192,0.37887612,0.41113725,0.00044281583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007205022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006369387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61402166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011052205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014233163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1830531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415769809","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaf016","title":"Standard Form Contracts and the Erosion of Consent: Is There No Turning Back?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Standard of care; Erosion; Unconscionability; Force majeure; Common law","score_opus":0.03246670550124787,"score_gpt":0.3525477259278332,"score_spread":0.3200810204265853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415769809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7242821,0.0008551266,0.00034710258,0.005981795,0.0001237182,0.000117057185,0.0000065189192,0.0000027369529,0.26828387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996011,0.0005470405,0.000091952206,0.0020432577,0.00008534795,4.9951564e-7,1.3253063e-7,0.000002855412,0.0012179064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985754,0.0006414457,0.000309833,0.000055189354,0.00030699928,0.00011111699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997147,0.0015441566,0.0006634631,0.000082040206,0.0005220235,0.00004127307],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011758197,0.00007298846,0.00033622546,0.00002587941,0.00027749402,0.00006919325,0.00031229615,0.0000096291715,0.00009546767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006819558,0.000035984347,0.000094051655,0.00012928885,0.0033364173,0.00014137336,0.000026990916,0.0002041074,0.000008418808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014865855,0.000022584312,0.0003159365,0.0000020795126,0.00011958781,0.0000012556529,0.0113952905,0.000007438599,0.0005053716,0.9839847,0.0015032288,0.00065592816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005776777,0.0013505531,0.018072648,0.00122472,0.00022371628,0.000017725963,0.029300869,0.00025119222,0.005220188,0.110552765,0.8277402,0.00026862364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019391405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001336154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8734319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003536209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014504339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W72209951","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/53.1.157","title":"Criminal Defense Advocacy in Russia Under the 2001 Criminal Procedure Code","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Saskatchewan; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Code (set theory); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Criminal law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08588962696890812,"score_gpt":0.396669655413895,"score_spread":0.31078002844498687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W72209951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9471135,0.0005735718,0.00026990197,0.03911034,0.00009536959,0.0001567218,0.0000016707347,0.000010375523,0.012668516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497503,0.00015359899,0.0005396928,0.0034627186,0.0006165787,0.0000053050476,2.2705353e-7,0.000008865221,0.00023798046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973355,0.0009055475,0.00048070538,0.00014594595,0.0006608977,0.0004714056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802023,0.0007524623,0.0006140242,0.00020214442,0.0002447765,0.0001663643],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017434515,0.00017218548,0.00043284363,0.000059326463,0.00065341685,0.000121883786,0.00088199537,0.000025018187,0.00013893563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036225825,0.00009445448,0.00014912587,0.0004440144,0.0028899307,0.00039280122,0.000048638114,0.00055684726,0.000051223044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020095382,0.00046235166,0.0013920051,0.000017131253,0.00012043068,0.00006516217,0.2747269,0.0048110858,0.00052853645,0.69160914,0.019767959,0.00448975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011458979,0.0017858156,0.04513986,0.00039676554,0.00057695445,0.000631423,0.7117659,0.00045278145,0.0009031598,0.042483468,0.19402562,0.00069237873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001679772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0128856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6491257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017858866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005429025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W813508657","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0017","title":"The Chinese “Oppression” Remedy: Creative Interpretations of Company Law by Chinese Courts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Law; Political science; Chinese law; Sociology; Law and economics; Common law; Sources of law","score_opus":0.02184111260953948,"score_gpt":0.2928900019215718,"score_spread":0.2710488893120323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W813508657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9504609,0.00067754753,0.00066999637,0.0022822602,0.0002883138,0.00016257132,0.000010710794,0.00001425206,0.04543342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973165,0.000034403518,0.000086186745,0.0019333861,0.00045027732,0.0000054213187,0.000005046497,0.00001512713,0.00015368934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983938,0.000137827,0.0006028653,0.00012048087,0.0005375352,0.00020750712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586856,0.00035568918,0.0025037536,0.00030014926,0.00093117554,0.000040685994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000720643,0.00022421654,0.00062453974,0.000044949207,0.00032989733,0.0001753699,0.00071980443,0.000015619187,0.000029592697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051702078,0.00010334495,0.0001629431,0.0005690535,0.0015108085,0.0008468419,0.00014393065,0.00028886468,0.00002611649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041637085,0.00063047826,0.019689329,0.000029089488,0.00086214993,0.000024182353,0.008397168,0.00270701,0.003445785,0.8197481,0.13776675,0.0025362463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055619325,0.0013918866,0.07277941,0.00075345,0.00061178574,0.00011244726,0.026637211,0.014110269,0.001198242,0.48317915,0.39239717,0.0012670618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001065985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064178254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33656898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035246616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000559399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5566637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}