{"meta":{"query_hash":"6ff0ab75428b","filters":{"venue":"The American Journal of Jurisprudence"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6ff0ab75428b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+American+Journal+of+Jurisprudence"},"results":[{"id":"W4296816607","doi":"10.1093/ajj/auac009","title":"Vignettes of Insight","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Jurisprudence","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Vignette; Appeal; Excellence; Beauty; Epistemology; Form of the Good; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017528702001121003,"score_gpt":0.3281941339692173,"score_spread":0.3106654319680963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296816607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31258437,0.0066655567,0.03630803,0.17281015,0.008715419,0.0016768541,0.001624887,0.00048401175,0.4591307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91927344,0.0034520023,0.013547901,0.015053431,0.00086393027,0.0009044764,0.00060668215,0.00007880083,0.046219267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931851,0.0056048846,0.00011010216,0.0002086829,0.00043815857,0.00045311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99282396,0.005157109,0.0004082586,0.00035114653,0.0006359476,0.0006236544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035316064,0.0007349555,0.00041028587,0.0014962857,0.0070898063,0.0037119193,0.0014174848,0.0040332344,0.013864665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018229205,0.00029173697,0.00043901752,0.0021947725,0.0073174285,0.0033284272,0.0049737906,0.007774258,0.0014837933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003037504,0.0002851054,0.001056433,0.00045461822,0.00001513961,0.009445545,0.28870642,0.0008742636,0.0009855333,0.5677033,0.11030649,0.019863438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033953824,0.00015900162,0.0008993243,0.00050306733,0.0000072057696,0.0033902216,0.1769164,0.0010359025,0.00053240155,0.04993143,0.76652277,0.00006835711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031954872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004753237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013864665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053888853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011552183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04638195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401501975","doi":"10.1093/ajj/auae010","title":"Common Good Constitutionalism and the Individual—A Property Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Jurisprudence","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Subordination (linguistics); Mainstream; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Function (biology); Law; Property rights; Sociology; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.024929922603209524,"score_gpt":0.34408552478137633,"score_spread":0.3191556021781668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401501975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080805376,0.0047261068,0.1352413,0.08985555,0.00054630294,0.00013657403,0.000091284805,0.00009339173,0.68850416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98220426,0.000532768,0.0059737624,0.0030641323,0.00025029943,0.00006824161,0.00001688243,0.000026628673,0.007862925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799483,0.012523237,0.00046921824,0.0025977385,0.0027227027,0.0017387929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98250407,0.01109406,0.0010287542,0.00252331,0.0015358044,0.001314063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021589518,0.00041169891,0.00093603175,0.0023029626,0.0068105888,0.010688418,0.0019594736,0.00668748,0.0042090635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016730107,0.00035971674,0.0008770733,0.0012849083,0.08864185,0.0103494,0.007726079,0.008256431,0.00037233497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015391754,0.0000030181525,0.000035384866,0.0000039407287,0.0000012923191,0.0000102607055,0.0003289382,0.00007863124,0.000016998307,0.99899,0.000129521,0.00040054537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008528101,0.0000115693065,0.0000991188,0.000038084723,0.0000054816355,0.00002241539,0.0003484878,0.00030831998,0.00008146419,0.988891,0.010179227,0.0000063536077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041474113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036046475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021589518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007529749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005945597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114177644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}