{"meta":{"query_hash":"d33b9b63ed4e","filters":{"venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d33b9b63ed4e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+American+Journal+of+Political+Science+Law+and+Criminology"},"results":[{"id":"W4392525383","doi":"10.37547/tajpslc/volume05issue08-05","title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACTS ON PERMISSIBLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FREEDOM OF SCIENCE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology","topic":"Education, Law, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; CITES; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Creativity; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.13980627233329423,"score_gpt":0.4264828789694871,"score_spread":0.2866766066361929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392525383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37749314,0.0039486866,0.005437784,0.0014335559,0.0001235857,0.00019503747,0.0007910922,0.000022522581,0.6105546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817058,0.0017975089,0.0016000393,0.00028869454,0.00004356924,0.0001561376,0.00033851032,0.00002439886,0.01404541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98039997,0.0085878,0.0009440888,0.0009238281,0.0070456862,0.0020986835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95806736,0.02957257,0.00431698,0.002035748,0.0053149695,0.00069234014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008428175,0.0002457708,0.00061181595,0.0062698694,0.0035901826,0.0049991454,0.0009331982,0.001456613,0.008832657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032545276,0.00025820034,0.00071550615,0.0055755116,0.004995876,0.0024130715,0.0025405963,0.0023835644,0.0006349924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021830549,0.00012386031,0.010193283,0.0001703583,0.00008050058,0.00035210367,0.0060266485,0.001986126,0.00049365236,0.9592404,0.0022227399,0.018892135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024673465,0.0010420372,0.35826853,0.0020564594,0.0008553232,0.0015863007,0.04451977,0.007923713,0.0064630555,0.26701084,0.30974865,0.00027871167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020750167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027604526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99640983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005607252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048931544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04457295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395462426","doi":"10.37547/tajpslc/volume06issue04-03","title":"EXAMINING PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY: THE JANUARY 6 RIOT, TRUMP, AND THE 14TH AMENDMENT - AN IMPERATIVE CONSIDERATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Harvard University","keywords":"Law; Federalism; Presidential system; Constitutionalism; Political science; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Sovereign immunity; Politics; Constitutional law; Separation of powers; Democracy","score_opus":0.05564887340956004,"score_gpt":0.3485717218476574,"score_spread":0.29292284843809735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395462426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35004655,0.013959594,0.005664448,0.14785537,0.0015967119,0.00006745315,0.00006432675,0.000023241926,0.48072225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98881537,0.0014773662,0.00054828817,0.0037849476,0.00048525425,0.00004191657,0.000015042693,0.000012004981,0.0048198407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410737,0.0040652375,0.00008773576,0.00041918148,0.0005160403,0.0008044612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881132,0.009589125,0.0010160232,0.00030065887,0.0004920867,0.0004888208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008475592,0.00026581128,0.00044096657,0.0023957836,0.013338214,0.012164709,0.0012900303,0.00451943,0.0027585274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015477032,0.0003095138,0.00042805847,0.0018961537,0.040473696,0.010360576,0.0047180555,0.0074384524,0.00015926156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016632584,0.000027352495,0.0013647267,0.000029336941,0.0000047287313,0.00016628722,0.028893799,0.00012123513,0.000076289696,0.96128505,0.0038767818,0.0041377307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004068086,0.00011751892,0.019939816,0.00061160774,0.000051207942,0.00030853506,0.17629659,0.0010267906,0.0007686105,0.54376626,0.25701457,0.000057803172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014194795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037114054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014194795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010640702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007131453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07720399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403267736","doi":"10.37547/tajpslc/volume06issue09-14","title":"BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THESE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES IN ANGLO-SAXON CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption of innocence; Innocence; Presumption; Burden of proof; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.17731804151152897,"score_gpt":0.43609654220686533,"score_spread":0.25877850069533637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403267736","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001034784,0.99701166,0.0002509086,0.0008167272,0.00010840048,0.000007904641,0.000012886761,0.0000022073536,0.0016857293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019199249,0.996849,0.00042492867,0.00041445706,0.00014312642,0.000012843879,0.00001767624,0.0000023779485,0.00021569461],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601436,0.0014301253,0.0006370665,0.00030162188,0.00146125,0.00015568393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852857,0.011046941,0.0010844423,0.00023277677,0.0021755002,0.000174587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006946199,0.000894827,0.0017751736,0.0075895535,0.0010346451,0.004687314,0.0012323122,0.002333711,0.0030547844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014955612,0.00081562554,0.00074028264,0.007487502,0.0029881147,0.005188263,0.0017222974,0.0030321563,0.0008335309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039785835,0.00006345638,0.00076340634,0.046980012,0.00018691643,0.0001408173,0.0010353408,0.0009518026,0.0003616041,0.10301599,0.026723264,0.8197376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010286783,0.00010669783,0.004013819,0.07629476,0.00023613324,0.0004168962,0.0006433552,0.0002561433,0.00023713274,0.027838184,0.8898877,0.000058858936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011291087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016764104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011291087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045408667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011931673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036735475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}