{"meta":{"query_hash":"4a23583f3f75","filters":{"venue":"The American Sociologist"},"cohort_total":42,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":42,"exported":42,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4a23583f3f75","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+American+Sociologist"},"results":[{"id":"W1591385052","doi":"10.1007/s12108-009-9066-1","title":"Reconceptualizing the Study of Community Life:","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Social science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.20785602320185312,"score_gpt":0.4346645197056171,"score_spread":0.22680849650376397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591385052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06984747,0.094041094,0.09646496,0.5665417,0.0060105985,0.0001319372,0.00012317125,0.0002459886,0.16659312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943865,0.018394252,0.01589996,0.011944065,0.0018803396,0.00021793306,0.00007022467,0.00013078871,0.0075973715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089855,0.0068583544,0.000121516045,0.0006030412,0.0010101525,0.00050827727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919224,0.004312265,0.00040877945,0.0010486558,0.0009020532,0.0014058215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012065374,0.0007405755,0.0011088267,0.0055817356,0.011270048,0.01881563,0.0047323494,0.008345843,0.004355373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012460286,0.00041249106,0.0005920344,0.004684952,0.09869556,0.027059535,0.013159741,0.0076653557,0.00041807568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065297127,0.000032456584,0.00032831158,0.000093899136,0.0000058473493,0.00004877113,0.024554685,0.00024417936,0.00004248048,0.95537806,0.0045649935,0.014699851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008775887,0.000011319839,0.00047543133,0.0002634429,0.000006314587,0.00009739935,0.031341013,0.0007617678,0.000053240907,0.8858618,0.081106976,0.000012511029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01635973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026389157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01881563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007980282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019393723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06380862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964470205","doi":"10.1007/s12108-000-1018-8","title":"Talcott Parsons and Japan in the 1970s","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026020932533411673,"score_gpt":0.3100665395324354,"score_spread":0.2840456069990237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964470205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29105526,0.04876062,0.0005957049,0.14338373,0.0037640894,0.000038866056,0.00023920259,0.000053827313,0.5121086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7443118,0.015057829,0.00037168767,0.016652087,0.0018628476,0.000037228732,0.000060293034,0.00008392594,0.22156227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989955,0.00022867229,0.000030004032,0.00015962467,0.00016314817,0.00042300424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926764,0.00019440686,0.00010425736,0.000025145871,0.00018301228,0.00022555765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011388221,0.0005080398,0.00034323373,0.0022337248,0.012072897,0.0049702283,0.0004481622,0.0032333634,0.010251901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002165217,0.00039269187,0.00025054815,0.0028717876,0.009515063,0.004571505,0.0029741686,0.0034786058,0.0006754977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023374513,0.00006645536,0.0050897994,0.00031935706,0.00002979716,0.001840475,0.21794732,0.00024212482,0.0008953166,0.6562711,0.07961209,0.037452474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002199057,0.00003394047,0.014298932,0.00025882316,0.000032295233,0.00013190592,0.042009268,0.000073212825,0.00031187566,0.017168358,0.9256153,0.000044161214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3216896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57855225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3216896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01662373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069208494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6396344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969318230","doi":"10.1007/s12108-014-9240-y","title":"The Cloak of Incompetence: A Neglected Concept in the Sociology of Everyday Life","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Everyday life; Competence (human resources); Social psychology; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024048317985995122,"score_gpt":0.3285670118361481,"score_spread":0.304518693850153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969318230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13798185,0.02946547,0.019682541,0.31042612,0.0033103286,0.000062549334,0.0001060509,0.00015088332,0.4988143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814667,0.004031637,0.0007126596,0.0071996697,0.0011415986,0.000056698253,0.000014323182,0.00007220446,0.0053043994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99128234,0.0061046723,0.00016444855,0.00054947083,0.0012400657,0.00065895385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719964,0.02166188,0.001699742,0.0017971671,0.0010236562,0.0018212716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006183714,0.00061016914,0.001020602,0.0051197223,0.010776665,0.018625531,0.0023427042,0.0075180456,0.0057689915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027091868,0.00041283626,0.00032265484,0.0041096015,0.13604642,0.02454986,0.01040332,0.009781151,0.0005949161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020464624,0.000019647781,0.000991373,0.00009576856,0.000004270508,0.00024550722,0.088282324,0.0000484775,0.00009050624,0.897569,0.0043124394,0.008320176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017106107,0.000042629414,0.0012018561,0.00089713064,0.000009125433,0.0009979057,0.1559871,0.00022323543,0.00015314022,0.7122872,0.12814218,0.000041482443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028532993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022827084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018625531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026169503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047775684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032702982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971726950","doi":"10.1007/s12108-014-9250-9","title":"Aristotle’s Theory of Deviance and Contemporary Symbolic Interactionist Scholarship: Learning from the Past, Extending the Present, and Engaging the Future","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Sociology; Symbolic interactionism; Epistemology; Scholarship; Invocation; Morality; The Symbolic; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13085279296307586,"score_gpt":0.36662060991239265,"score_spread":0.23576781694931678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971726950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0559999,0.024339821,0.13464387,0.08703418,0.0009549115,0.00008661211,0.00007131711,0.00013441102,0.696735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95559263,0.0064887023,0.0154967075,0.0031984232,0.00070267176,0.00013037368,0.000032404547,0.000050480427,0.018307732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996617,0.0019685994,0.000096444724,0.00029079965,0.0008018905,0.00022517226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975331,0.0016442969,0.00020494903,0.00024074096,0.00022168708,0.00015531342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033372354,0.0005641526,0.00054595165,0.0024328132,0.006383377,0.006000748,0.0012304425,0.004211284,0.0026657218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034647107,0.00021105826,0.00039400486,0.001665032,0.052713167,0.0077557866,0.003914742,0.005115166,0.00045374615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002642607,0.00000467512,0.00004520959,0.000013328101,8.6431885e-7,0.000032351465,0.0051281066,0.000093100665,0.000020550764,0.99156404,0.00055510487,0.002539959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039199194,0.000011869438,0.00015771556,0.00007713466,0.0000013406263,0.000057752186,0.0022065039,0.000381471,0.00006947328,0.9544557,0.042568773,0.000008350715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003663649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004279795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006383377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060634306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032300272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043993473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981867280","doi":"10.1007/s12108-004-1001-x","title":"Symbolic interaction and classical greek scholarship: Conceptual foundations, historical continuities, and transcontextual relevancies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Scholarship; Epistemology; Sociology; Pragmatism; Situated; The Symbolic; Conceptualization; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.09637948652867526,"score_gpt":0.3623302768369186,"score_spread":0.2659507903082433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981867280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17573996,0.06791487,0.026365174,0.051125027,0.0011298977,0.000051904208,0.00013226172,0.0001146744,0.6774262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838673,0.005491227,0.0017856898,0.0007852032,0.0003712925,0.000041245417,0.000032146665,0.00003408426,0.007591785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641883,0.0021240383,0.00015514527,0.00046298985,0.0006085844,0.00023036975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951748,0.0029950745,0.0004909482,0.00076253834,0.0003412573,0.00023535291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034454768,0.0006424577,0.0007432158,0.005005753,0.0056048944,0.01388297,0.0016270516,0.0035405313,0.0046548583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009675081,0.0003219429,0.0003556676,0.006339759,0.070625976,0.013909107,0.0076414864,0.005210752,0.0004115114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063589073,0.0000070392457,0.00012000827,0.000028975217,0.0000020534233,0.000023029394,0.014861963,0.00007746062,0.00002111644,0.98148763,0.00026533793,0.0030989673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010517684,0.000012552812,0.0003843093,0.00016402858,0.000005328995,0.00009558655,0.009561244,0.0003620556,0.00008194286,0.95448565,0.034827143,0.000009744492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027768565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024016486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01388297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008601524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042225695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062408745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984105958","doi":"10.1007/s12108-006-1024-6","title":"Unveiling the cloak of competence: Cultivating authenticity in graduate sociology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cloak; Sociology; Competence (human resources); Pedagogy; Epistemology; Social science; Aesthetics; Psychology; Art; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10818387676567623,"score_gpt":0.3897736469787297,"score_spread":0.2815897702130534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984105958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40211725,0.002460944,0.079491846,0.19273266,0.0011062621,0.00015962703,0.000024760044,0.00025589732,0.32165077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99259394,0.00021899556,0.003536201,0.0013426245,0.00006877214,0.000035229903,0.000005546384,0.000043772634,0.002154908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97837627,0.017764168,0.00030529284,0.00088183646,0.0016321158,0.001040184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9445536,0.032863025,0.0033189245,0.006283936,0.0050193234,0.007961257],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023553234,0.00042420207,0.00049372355,0.0014894742,0.01032098,0.013765134,0.001485733,0.0036474369,0.002989841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075486295,0.00044027984,0.00039219784,0.0007225895,0.054099847,0.019779352,0.021882705,0.008882548,0.00050682406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053397303,0.00022246988,0.0053006806,0.00016820572,0.000013869563,0.00019013639,0.24110512,0.0004065894,0.00083112885,0.6896623,0.005169715,0.056876365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048561567,0.00015048128,0.002249455,0.0004004641,0.000026264966,0.00027733043,0.09639688,0.0016269501,0.0017034899,0.8198867,0.07718091,0.000052583146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016410508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027563993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98967904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028972216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009659578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12456292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994304948","doi":"10.1007/s12108-015-9257-x","title":"George Herbert Mead’s Social Psychology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social science; Criminology; Art history; History","score_opus":0.12814943464262255,"score_gpt":0.4563269928020561,"score_spread":0.3281775581594335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994304948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009827316,0.07331468,0.0014601349,0.81289065,0.027291376,0.000010136996,0.000052059826,0.00003850479,0.08395972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10125604,0.1139832,0.0038119527,0.27425224,0.06296703,0.00009076586,0.00010303812,0.00017977545,0.44335598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771094,0.0010352159,0.00007004585,0.0003215089,0.0006963978,0.00016593812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955596,0.00213455,0.00017533403,0.00027551947,0.0009836104,0.00087145204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027580357,0.0008478214,0.0004690894,0.0029461822,0.0053774347,0.004867096,0.0007458975,0.0056136632,0.01048729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075429385,0.00028733528,0.00033864935,0.0015293356,0.00990855,0.0051148552,0.0028872602,0.0084299445,0.002573617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069352227,0.000033044784,0.00026831616,0.000039889128,0.0000070130254,0.000043936838,0.00089423836,0.00005004984,0.000041056563,0.22643778,0.74223125,0.029946407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031246295,0.0000026106459,0.00017270299,0.000098954006,0.0000019487418,0.000036180427,0.0003316726,0.000036741145,0.000025157715,0.045430202,0.9538559,0.000004852165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016376697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029610218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016376697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055651464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00434319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040378213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005231480","doi":"10.1007/s12108-014-9243-8","title":"Towards a New Normal: Emergent Elites and Feminist Scholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Scholarship; Elite; Opposition (politics); Historical sociology; Sociology of leisure; Social geometry; Epistemology; Conversation; Social science; Sociology of disaster; Political sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Medical sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07840088781483151,"score_gpt":0.37834127601606954,"score_spread":0.29994038820123803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005231480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060224917,0.016208941,0.029798012,0.3535568,0.0026703111,0.00006456753,0.00008918812,0.00014170051,0.5372456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560383,0.00349429,0.0043265503,0.011006734,0.0022143612,0.00011425486,0.000040051807,0.00014763429,0.022617713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400055,0.0037162052,0.00012644607,0.00061655237,0.00086156774,0.0006787366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98851854,0.008062544,0.0005428947,0.0011607452,0.0007839828,0.00093121885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010527204,0.0005035551,0.000821719,0.0039128587,0.012356562,0.018870583,0.0021825493,0.007573015,0.008224258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013045503,0.00041694735,0.000418965,0.003140215,0.119562685,0.029120274,0.010067108,0.010732232,0.00067661045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023878063,0.000007969206,0.000078370365,0.00000925214,6.686006e-7,0.000010852899,0.0057829386,0.000021853739,0.000008888741,0.99072754,0.0015741874,0.0017752264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007523146,0.0000039323904,0.00011755774,0.000050337236,0.0000013403178,0.000015062579,0.0061234157,0.0001258608,0.00002425046,0.9614955,0.032031547,0.0000037600464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062359497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009401227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008363348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00764942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060680628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006084684","doi":"10.1007/s12108-002-1003-5","title":"Prophetic versus priestly sociology: The salient case study of Arthur K. Davis","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11139163415447036,"score_gpt":0.3954072338415097,"score_spread":0.2840155996870394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006084684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18082039,0.01633345,0.0034170353,0.49176067,0.0017315206,0.00011283145,0.000055061126,0.000045596546,0.3057234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89449745,0.011275996,0.0025550465,0.051860135,0.0005502997,0.00007439883,0.000015253009,0.00005209283,0.03911927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977464,0.0014197389,0.000036854104,0.00014215171,0.0003673026,0.00028747818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534273,0.0033232237,0.00033659293,0.00011283249,0.00030838876,0.00057618064],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024533162,0.00030140698,0.000365089,0.00095486094,0.015331572,0.004989686,0.0012751173,0.005425186,0.002605856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00938084,0.00025671086,0.00016160404,0.0010987363,0.011139092,0.0044287336,0.0034019207,0.0045290957,0.00051968393],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005852634,0.00020271051,0.0047770105,0.00026175188,0.000012306785,0.0154754985,0.27821448,0.0002537621,0.00071129383,0.4422885,0.2281584,0.029585779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025212788,0.0000736203,0.0026985374,0.0006922108,0.00001661183,0.0070837033,0.29213732,0.00032353727,0.0006602687,0.048154622,0.64809054,0.000043787884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028181212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104337715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98466843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003211211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003395791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056034386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009340659","doi":"10.1007/s12108-012-9174-1","title":"Public Sociology and the Democratization of Technology: Drawing on User -led Research to Achieve Mutual Education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Sociology; Social science; Public sociology; Epistemology; Media studies; Political science; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.15202429941556184,"score_gpt":0.44637845313046004,"score_spread":0.2943541537148982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009340659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24759977,0.0057290536,0.061223987,0.14443207,0.00048019216,0.00021587513,0.000035542624,0.00015370258,0.5401297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933816,0.0006337455,0.0019397876,0.0012036659,0.000059241756,0.00008460019,0.000005981317,0.000040263134,0.0026511753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659612,0.028626917,0.00040451187,0.0013991428,0.0018771085,0.0017311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89962363,0.08926675,0.0026518616,0.004940232,0.0018852646,0.0016323909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033944342,0.0007188349,0.0006386775,0.00578333,0.014313855,0.026351474,0.0024078176,0.009545228,0.0062380806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042127293,0.0006513421,0.00068554166,0.0034721638,0.08397879,0.03385054,0.015966643,0.0074150106,0.0005565383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014495385,0.00007200919,0.000993446,0.0000631932,0.0000073593037,0.0000802349,0.054069683,0.00027855037,0.0000881804,0.9341596,0.0008080063,0.009365348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029206258,0.00006645244,0.00157116,0.0003772737,0.000024067158,0.0001521213,0.08367044,0.0020171863,0.001011962,0.8400265,0.07102329,0.00003030264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030373153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041186158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011325958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012707462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17951697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015773854","doi":"10.1007/s12108-009-9067-0","title":"The Search for Meaning: Revisiting Herbert Blumer’s Interpretation of G.H. Mead","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Symbolic interactionism; Sociology; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Dualism; Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Pragmatism; Social science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.08241632041628162,"score_gpt":0.4161644271942887,"score_spread":0.3337481067780071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015773854","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009107642,0.04825785,0.048277974,0.6171352,0.006037644,0.00007486845,0.00013204491,0.00011321488,0.27086353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7220531,0.032488033,0.041498907,0.15166834,0.006501731,0.00038844865,0.00010640581,0.00040424065,0.044890728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936293,0.004392762,0.00021985544,0.0005963174,0.0008576706,0.00030410613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898386,0.008390066,0.00028856547,0.0003893825,0.0008477076,0.0002456738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008429291,0.0007883282,0.001049804,0.0032608544,0.00725484,0.007644796,0.0026014773,0.007215108,0.004541298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01594769,0.0004602938,0.00069256313,0.003009741,0.057343017,0.016418057,0.0049566515,0.01066165,0.0010294708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010824499,0.0000070795973,0.000054354125,0.000046313602,0.0000039930173,0.000067415785,0.0061427867,0.00011312134,0.000023936542,0.97248137,0.015799025,0.005249666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010928445,0.0000063654784,0.000084393534,0.00019751441,0.000003789726,0.000084785024,0.0023669982,0.0002609108,0.000084805,0.88208246,0.11480116,0.000015849891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018042501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029442202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018042501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007279899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005542298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05281961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024265317","doi":"10.1007/s12108-005-1010-4","title":"The self as an internal dialogue: Mead, blumer, peirce, and wiley","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Pragmatism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01789591533392032,"score_gpt":0.32517683401992015,"score_spread":0.3072809186859998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024265317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03922627,0.33587965,0.029168488,0.1946118,0.0017856336,0.00008554852,0.0001679957,0.000097882265,0.3989767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487465,0.08002935,0.012201997,0.009839656,0.0011641323,0.00015961599,0.00006427407,0.00015229995,0.047642242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839574,0.0010101681,0.00004077651,0.00018313705,0.00028587648,0.00008427032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942334,0.0045839637,0.00018955857,0.00029673576,0.0004895055,0.00020687717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040235044,0.0006333113,0.0006734462,0.0020670453,0.0048622233,0.01489611,0.0013946872,0.005643024,0.005697586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008551484,0.00063475006,0.00025628728,0.003129473,0.028839478,0.023456294,0.0033853066,0.0042520463,0.00092246186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041916057,0.000024933806,0.00030065374,0.00016580305,0.000007546182,0.000056339224,0.024631185,0.00017949806,0.000039894414,0.94699514,0.012476491,0.015080654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034802244,0.000020429394,0.00052799267,0.0006760555,0.000018731089,0.0002307399,0.020761712,0.0003822762,0.00021598215,0.8113681,0.16573605,0.000027094738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013096189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01797539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01489611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004711623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050742966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03418541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026018164","doi":"10.1007/s12108-010-9088-8","title":"Tough Love: Professional Lessons for Graduate Students","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Institution; Supervisor; Graduate students; Sociology; Graduate education; Higher education; Pedagogy; Academic institution; Engineering ethics; Management; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.43550269753371057,"score_gpt":0.6496522977566502,"score_spread":0.21414960022293966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026018164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016075607,0.014366171,0.0018425072,0.85470116,0.032329068,0.000113016635,0.000045751945,0.00017563386,0.08035118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23876141,0.034174222,0.01012938,0.35694683,0.022919448,0.00089999696,0.0002749208,0.00043143096,0.3354624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963027,0.0017999643,0.00007730495,0.00018428311,0.00067665725,0.00095908326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771926,0.0021816113,0.0002884351,0.00054628256,0.0016320996,0.01815891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00960336,0.0008905708,0.00085189263,0.00092436397,0.019040762,0.011960844,0.0030131082,0.010572658,0.023043947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01885107,0.0005953347,0.0009603684,0.00068898185,0.009125728,0.00951407,0.014947738,0.023213862,0.006616587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031178133,0.00068028126,0.00078944047,0.00012686434,0.000006589024,0.00036734316,0.02417202,0.000041346484,0.00012026486,0.02317317,0.87200755,0.07848396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006041569,0.00015022236,0.0018198319,0.0008595339,0.000008014132,0.0007217608,0.15356378,0.00008109516,0.000108441905,0.061529897,0.78105927,0.000037755144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028715709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015301331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023043947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003984436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021161677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07708973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026957141","doi":"10.1007/s12108-014-9201-5","title":"Riverside Days: Recollection of Robert Nisbet as a Teacher","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Unrest; Sociology; Presentation (obstetrics); Politics; Period (music); Classics; Social science; Law; History; Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Medicine","score_opus":0.07319588035745124,"score_gpt":0.3850383857231264,"score_spread":0.31184250536567515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026957141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015730542,0.032511227,0.0004155807,0.88038754,0.066682674,0.00001642674,0.00003432208,0.00007410848,0.018305043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0363549,0.024165275,0.00060969515,0.6800977,0.052072737,0.00007544812,0.000042681804,0.0004983686,0.20608316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482274,0.0020843984,0.00022776275,0.0006844707,0.0015829859,0.00059761293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914552,0.0027817239,0.00041891562,0.0002524454,0.0020956649,0.0029962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046144756,0.0012260029,0.0009874179,0.0016001391,0.02007027,0.011109821,0.0033950116,0.016610514,0.008858878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020567961,0.0010469492,0.00055381807,0.0009697704,0.009398812,0.008294332,0.007270982,0.039727706,0.004954011],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010374555,0.000019339477,0.00015359183,0.00003829991,0.0000040374352,0.00044481285,0.0061356197,0.000023406705,0.00008173094,0.0032060337,0.9859801,0.0039027194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002640696,0.000008261723,0.00019242387,0.00013007813,0.000002447173,0.0005990017,0.007970186,0.000016418526,0.00006620377,0.000678797,0.990317,0.000016566055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035580188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11452273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035580188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006470417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077347113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07074618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029645962","doi":"10.1007/s12108-003-1014-x","title":"Remembering reuel denney: Sociology as cultural studies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Postmodernism; Bureaucracy; Entertainment; Popular culture; Media studies; Biography; Cultural studies; Order (exchange); Social science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law; Anthropology; Politics; Art history; History","score_opus":0.1868735560194976,"score_gpt":0.46990323592315336,"score_spread":0.2830296799036558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029645962","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079518615,0.17313515,0.0018926194,0.7448604,0.0718145,0.000011696563,0.00006114363,0.00006779753,0.0073615503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043800823,0.1754152,0.004580796,0.5222651,0.15965685,0.000092956696,0.0001172119,0.00041215762,0.09365884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965412,0.0014540179,0.00030569948,0.00050651137,0.0009264468,0.00026610008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833924,0.009446596,0.0007236583,0.0008491681,0.004108516,0.0014795593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062545785,0.0014443528,0.0019634399,0.004834464,0.0070218355,0.009399976,0.0032209975,0.0117003685,0.012683817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014178456,0.0008271036,0.0006292183,0.005143719,0.0127450805,0.02953449,0.004865037,0.020207658,0.0035564627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020604317,0.000031192307,0.00026505018,0.00024728564,0.000017082491,0.00017288724,0.003947472,0.000040203988,0.00011011371,0.086193345,0.8802364,0.028718287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010725104,0.000008596423,0.00042712936,0.00067489676,0.000018507331,0.00020249025,0.0041877306,0.000054927903,0.0001588028,0.044709772,0.94951284,0.000033606997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029024763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06463381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029024763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039387075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037680601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0577116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037469769","doi":"10.1007/s12108-013-9177-6","title":"Sociology on Latin America in the 1960s: Developmentalism, Imperialism, and Topical Tropism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental Health; Carnegie Corporation of New York; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Developmentalism; Latin Americans; Period (music); Sociology; Politics; Tropism; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05696436221068538,"score_gpt":0.3507700049300885,"score_spread":0.29380564271940307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037469769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22277619,0.12527847,0.0016821701,0.10513644,0.0008426414,0.00003167425,0.00011961812,0.00003868428,0.5440941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95245194,0.01952475,0.0005360309,0.0034638192,0.0006651008,0.000032565084,0.00003942255,0.00003827135,0.023248158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931777,0.00038499595,0.00002554916,0.000081210324,0.00005848841,0.00013201525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987802,0.0006722366,0.00016552546,0.00008519911,0.0001453901,0.00015146291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015643262,0.00029065783,0.0003411228,0.0017335099,0.0045300466,0.0044688936,0.00028752902,0.0011481812,0.0032398475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024497923,0.0001627336,0.00020199342,0.0021158736,0.015491397,0.004087369,0.0032035643,0.002878471,0.00014155435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003537594,0.000023741948,0.0038294564,0.00016867407,0.000008860878,0.00037380995,0.07849739,0.00018820578,0.0005614844,0.89191633,0.004955787,0.019440921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002158888,0.000030388313,0.01861705,0.00094510487,0.000018738667,0.00031449838,0.040696964,0.00020473565,0.00040457537,0.11775601,0.8209606,0.000029800492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047049668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06707277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047049668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012379375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058933254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093551636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040255269","doi":"10.1007/s12108-014-9228-7","title":"“Can/Should/Does One Size Fit All? Does the Pacific Sociological Association Still Meet the Needs of Faculty Members at PhD-Granting Institutions?”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Professional association; Association (psychology); Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Sociological research; Social science; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11477373908935397,"score_gpt":0.3602892256384764,"score_spread":0.24551548654912242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040255269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002517991,0.0008437641,0.00020848925,0.9904322,0.0017445964,0.0000052677824,0.00004488817,0.000010742116,0.0041920478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17528851,0.00451645,0.0024993985,0.79499584,0.0068827127,0.00007507153,0.00017660859,0.00013934736,0.015426007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490464,0.0022881741,0.00028803482,0.00051281444,0.00094127184,0.001065132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97526973,0.005795834,0.0027164256,0.0008964957,0.008194052,0.007127451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013825076,0.0003850598,0.00050685427,0.0006879528,0.0050744945,0.004884402,0.0019070404,0.008192423,0.016084496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055809043,0.00033577546,0.00057818595,0.0010092844,0.008812649,0.016228553,0.0026079228,0.010738699,0.0038993554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009490476,0.00009390632,0.016171953,0.00017716634,0.000038728856,0.0001283114,0.006014015,0.00006987569,0.0002941739,0.048897576,0.85029435,0.077725016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077738536,0.00012209221,0.029984955,0.0014505048,0.000072064235,0.0003085522,0.07200952,0.000433139,0.0006124779,0.08720619,0.807544,0.0001787416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027600631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064222105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027600631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026566086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014434916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07311487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053963153","doi":"10.1007/s12108-004-1003-8","title":"The myth about “myths of the Chicago School”: Evidence from Floyd Nelson house","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Sociology; Conceptualization; Mythology; Sociological imagination; Epistemology; Social science; History; Classics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06562807922037085,"score_gpt":0.3614933002607407,"score_spread":0.2958652210403699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053963153","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09369964,0.013079109,0.0011214211,0.518358,0.0015474061,0.00003188802,0.000102930986,0.00002564487,0.3720339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89407456,0.004842428,0.0002923915,0.07411042,0.0008647228,0.00007871374,0.00004453965,0.00009454698,0.02559764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948171,0.0032512823,0.00009105624,0.00051861635,0.00067179574,0.000650111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748434,0.018764293,0.0014551763,0.00082216715,0.0019152373,0.0021997862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00870593,0.00034245077,0.0004066409,0.0021769179,0.022722129,0.010867223,0.0015919488,0.006995324,0.014816098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027019355,0.00047262665,0.00019964042,0.0023853374,0.062830105,0.015233078,0.0065856557,0.010675467,0.00094189326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006182508,0.000059877388,0.003784763,0.00010191172,0.000013349091,0.00012691636,0.18795739,0.000069576934,0.00005160582,0.6682579,0.1281385,0.011376422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004067323,0.00001983942,0.005205999,0.0013603703,0.000021956339,0.00011544072,0.2898526,0.000056084587,0.00024877457,0.15426724,0.5487691,0.00004190167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07669381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12001032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07669381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008966965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011068349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15249479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059278263","doi":"10.1007/s12108-004-1004-7","title":"A Canadian rejoinder: Sociology north and south of the border","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Historical sociology; Excellence; Public sociology; Egalitarianism; Sociology of leisure; Social science; Sociology of Education; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.033846350171355274,"score_gpt":0.33295765050234877,"score_spread":0.2991113003309935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059278263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029682226,0.0057438463,0.0004573726,0.9370884,0.010193502,0.00001605718,0.000110987545,0.00003248224,0.043389156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09006414,0.0070731808,0.0022085293,0.7494353,0.005130724,0.000055652512,0.00011102351,0.00018077766,0.14574061],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290234,0.000894802,0.00019879919,0.0010955833,0.002484989,0.00242339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986363,0.002364554,0.00026079806,0.00042070783,0.0071359645,0.0034550014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045782975,0.00070956966,0.0012221751,0.0025408985,0.039206374,0.012668938,0.0036853692,0.025473299,0.014338149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016154032,0.00078122347,0.0012903356,0.003544091,0.019841436,0.0067595276,0.005685095,0.032586258,0.0017884142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006567628,0.000017478975,0.0013519981,0.00009474347,0.000028516355,0.00034456782,0.0069552893,0.000135599,0.00022889917,0.17741859,0.79867274,0.01468601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038024493,0.000008113156,0.0030635265,0.00037899826,0.00004544339,0.00012457493,0.015598541,0.00010492402,0.00013971543,0.02538882,0.95502824,0.00008105697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9773357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05680695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16383918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41216522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079370565","doi":"10.1007/s12108-002-1029-8","title":"The impact of feminism on Canadian sociology","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sociology; Gender studies; Social science","score_opus":0.10479121706464947,"score_gpt":0.4011650733454937,"score_spread":0.29637385628084423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079370565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058968514,0.036206614,0.0011879329,0.49559227,0.0030641237,0.00003854886,0.00036774564,0.00007620092,0.40449804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81055665,0.018308759,0.0019939279,0.049066253,0.0013307382,0.000051320847,0.000101651145,0.0001726182,0.11841799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886615,0.0026852018,0.00016195384,0.0008727964,0.003492388,0.0039215335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795506,0.0078171315,0.0006107122,0.00051439484,0.0068258024,0.0046814037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009924393,0.0005653414,0.0007836079,0.0049382593,0.0418385,0.013891062,0.0022997076,0.0064234966,0.020265074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021536745,0.00068561645,0.0006451931,0.006432258,0.026891544,0.005384111,0.0049251253,0.0076845307,0.0005964556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087306966,0.000025952422,0.002125762,0.00018240795,0.000014703252,0.00022554661,0.022593716,0.00039141363,0.00023121791,0.8536768,0.08125217,0.0391931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028432405,0.000025901732,0.012839622,0.00053533737,0.00003119531,0.00007886353,0.020219209,0.00043565413,0.00028934862,0.052798092,0.91261804,0.00010027258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26877508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28884703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84811723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093859225","doi":"10.1007/s12108-007-9026-6","title":"The Myth of the Independent Variable: Reconceptualizing Class, Gender, Race, and Age as Subcultural Processes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Sociology; Ethnic group; Mythology; Class (philosophy); Social category; Social class; Social psychology; Social force; Epistemology; Social life; Gender studies; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Anthropology; Law; History","score_opus":0.04997917041057489,"score_gpt":0.3130227924594847,"score_spread":0.26304362204890985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093859225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09612537,0.020981971,0.3256062,0.48406425,0.006294768,0.00021571621,0.00073731196,0.00030494438,0.06566944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8690472,0.0044746487,0.07750445,0.037493803,0.005553916,0.00096836797,0.00027583196,0.00026424846,0.0044174846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9713746,0.022262907,0.00069659844,0.0029055637,0.0021602912,0.0006000337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925563,0.058055695,0.003642016,0.0063216332,0.004444115,0.001973603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050026026,0.0014912992,0.0025025215,0.0041540517,0.0051521044,0.00942303,0.007585209,0.005352862,0.0030465731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065074034,0.0010142167,0.0014359929,0.0021436582,0.08347657,0.023451932,0.008166906,0.014608324,0.0004107736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054621156,0.000049686863,0.003387209,0.00009031076,0.00007826403,0.00004402499,0.011239887,0.00029031344,0.00008892749,0.9736385,0.0032028984,0.007835343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042223175,0.0000285904,0.0019383967,0.00020545509,0.000067427034,0.00007824067,0.0037033288,0.0018725641,0.00016641815,0.98190385,0.009954218,0.000039362898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072927778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075935163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050026026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041390755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009526385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26456606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346860594","doi":"10.1007/s12108-016-9318-9","title":"Canadian Sociology for Sale? Academic Branding in the ‘Neo-Liberal Age’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatization; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Sociology of Education; Neoliberalism (international relations); Narrative; Economic sociology; Public relations; Social science; Media studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.057092354165333106,"score_gpt":0.3723943125635514,"score_spread":0.3153019583982183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346860594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045694135,0.0022812001,0.00037763183,0.20053487,0.0008285276,0.000014105641,0.00013782033,0.00004825549,0.75008345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83293945,0.0018371516,0.00030395444,0.018355632,0.00043533818,0.000011663471,0.00005661829,0.000083902545,0.14597636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970451,0.0004526845,0.000029349792,0.0002452037,0.0008952975,0.0013322735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945845,0.00074667984,0.0002310842,0.0003807219,0.0016914102,0.002365607],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032732063,0.00030976886,0.00037219177,0.002012535,0.030670118,0.018416466,0.0013397175,0.005371024,0.028374508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070903096,0.0002744107,0.00025073838,0.004301718,0.028987084,0.006394622,0.0043120566,0.0060401624,0.0021011832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019867684,0.000021215099,0.0013197211,0.000013616603,0.000002327554,0.000092594746,0.013437004,0.000048062633,0.000084836276,0.90498304,0.06775389,0.0122238835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017064383,0.0000094600455,0.007005961,0.000085843625,0.000006976717,0.00007925477,0.033533305,0.00018606576,0.0001485021,0.07484411,0.88403547,0.00004804299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9226594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95895517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9693299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07688997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077064954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2379710882","doi":"10.1007/s12108-002-1002-6","title":"Dialectical sociology in Québec: About and around Michel Freitag’s dialectique et société","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Sociology; Michel foucault; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03216373767559395,"score_gpt":0.30745324873234103,"score_spread":0.2752895110567471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2379710882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20418143,0.08157237,0.006345442,0.44812083,0.0024739865,0.00009688154,0.0006711479,0.00020331725,0.25633457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89899486,0.008363753,0.0016078954,0.012187341,0.00023235523,0.00006527719,0.000087171946,0.00011030081,0.078350976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973206,0.0011302581,0.00005696168,0.00030629442,0.00041659016,0.0007693352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690276,0.0009651559,0.00019936996,0.00012267796,0.00087817956,0.00093172083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002679088,0.00056017656,0.00058232894,0.0026946396,0.033429608,0.012154044,0.0023204773,0.004770296,0.007641461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038235337,0.0005038653,0.00045202338,0.0059581,0.02884064,0.0051682363,0.0034873476,0.006764863,0.00032550812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044848148,0.000049422906,0.004499127,0.0001154528,0.000028535016,0.00051457237,0.15018295,0.00055670436,0.0004106631,0.7491524,0.066667505,0.02777785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002465644,0.000020921498,0.02115126,0.00039640846,0.000024306142,0.00021659718,0.112939306,0.00088015315,0.0003058384,0.031507555,0.8324225,0.0001104694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99674326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25139618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25139618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18494263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86827433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943701082","doi":"10.1007/s12108-019-9413-9","title":"Look Away: How the Social Constructionist Approach to Social Problems Channels Attention Away from the Marginalized","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Social constructionism; Strict constructionism; Social justice; Gender studies; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.045926357455902886,"score_gpt":0.29952248341293786,"score_spread":0.25359612595703496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943701082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061881337,0.0041883183,0.09608048,0.3489862,0.0020785092,0.00008844079,0.00009057749,0.0003234493,0.48628277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9581973,0.00096791546,0.0077786883,0.012680498,0.00046192986,0.00013370329,0.000031637184,0.00039298236,0.01935537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892442,0.0070876814,0.00014317925,0.00094830856,0.0013083095,0.0012683449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98626256,0.009096145,0.0006039003,0.0012506798,0.0011406499,0.0016460147],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011787221,0.0008453771,0.0013776119,0.003191104,0.020543978,0.021894401,0.0036810734,0.011390449,0.013080322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019791305,0.0007220313,0.0010265425,0.0024247966,0.106569156,0.025997462,0.013266688,0.017047433,0.0010877753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009893184,0.000020537136,0.00027747249,0.000030881063,0.00000716879,0.000081615515,0.03080071,0.00018894373,0.00007455069,0.96230906,0.003268831,0.002930379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017115297,0.000008835998,0.00024406551,0.0000609938,0.000009295217,0.000054982367,0.014539424,0.00048290996,0.00010126026,0.9549827,0.029485278,0.000013088433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017935855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023156729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012261038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013722467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08896041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021065378","doi":"10.1007/s12108-020-09449-x","title":"Pillarization (‘Verzuiling’). On Organized ‘Self-Contained Worlds’ in the Modern World","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; Universiteit Gent","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Population; Protestantism; Political economy; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.039317439215856294,"score_gpt":0.3124121908753792,"score_spread":0.2730947516595229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021065378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2646911,0.028147265,0.016630914,0.01613474,0.00073660817,0.00010276712,0.00008032767,0.00005377794,0.6734224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888833,0.0025992438,0.0008994078,0.00064117374,0.00014474953,0.000032561857,0.000027269289,0.000017052533,0.0067551765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981908,0.0009393356,0.000060575374,0.00024410342,0.00027011256,0.00029509346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885225,0.00043486,0.00034715058,0.00014532714,0.00012052868,0.00009992484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016564187,0.00033699023,0.0003120685,0.0018587144,0.0038857553,0.0054984763,0.00084858434,0.0017231347,0.0024943324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024880974,0.00020575809,0.00024709362,0.002110686,0.038787637,0.006082014,0.005160233,0.0022991255,0.00025156644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075792473,0.000009299998,0.00051508565,0.00003506267,0.0000030604008,0.000097477045,0.019805824,0.000064970445,0.00005802713,0.9724439,0.0009061665,0.00605357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020871426,0.00006535512,0.007990793,0.00051151874,0.000015141005,0.0005546604,0.045598604,0.0010269147,0.00032906947,0.61364204,0.33020395,0.000041025614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005085692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005912019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054984763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037196602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009723646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026988149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152588305","doi":"10.1007/s12108-021-09486-0","title":"Reflecting on the History of Sociology in Nigeria: Strategies to Enhance Endogenous Theory within a Global Dialogue","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Colonialism; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Sociology of knowledge; Sociological theory; Intellectual history; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.16049289663780691,"score_gpt":0.41836371593700444,"score_spread":0.25787081929919753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152588305","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20372863,0.026494784,0.021484245,0.44981986,0.007876583,0.00023792345,0.000052435815,0.000086779146,0.29021883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951175,0.010792284,0.0064628487,0.014495767,0.0008187938,0.00014495967,0.000021736374,0.000103993654,0.015984619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99053127,0.007962095,0.00016626665,0.00031513494,0.00038917683,0.00063609006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98203707,0.013676348,0.0008460501,0.0006553806,0.0009178648,0.0018672762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020895122,0.0008968552,0.0006814029,0.0030965703,0.026547322,0.025800576,0.0011398188,0.005136416,0.0052266247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013876353,0.0004331087,0.00030469755,0.0029064184,0.040098358,0.027065335,0.013837505,0.012206413,0.00040965085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003233864,0.00006873907,0.0015990692,0.000262148,0.00000794125,0.0004146857,0.4617752,0.00020062798,0.0007009506,0.5033387,0.0070070405,0.024592545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007136219,0.000033973254,0.0011443874,0.0013361247,0.000014640211,0.00015371788,0.6128177,0.00022253608,0.0006166537,0.16025811,0.22337262,0.000022332004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067301067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026191553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026547322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013978432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022101888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11050528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159821695","doi":"10.1007/s12108-021-09492-2","title":"Dorothy Pawluch: Outstanding Supervisor, Mentor, and Significant other of the Highest Order","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Supervisor; Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Management; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07164861023922076,"score_gpt":0.3497857425784572,"score_spread":0.2781371323392364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159821695","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00528185,0.032741334,0.0029656806,0.75315094,0.08886189,0.000087580156,0.0004948796,0.0003995895,0.11601624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08245193,0.021250974,0.003965915,0.09404364,0.012419942,0.00009893229,0.00026876162,0.00028368953,0.78521615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987206,0.0003215247,0.000052639403,0.00023634988,0.00047820818,0.00019067104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919337,0.00057236315,0.0003116298,0.0001289001,0.00191388,0.0051395753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016042932,0.00050305476,0.000486615,0.001167778,0.00687914,0.0033921858,0.0010578381,0.001453361,0.065047085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076265167,0.00033205235,0.00016283714,0.0007382041,0.0016669156,0.0027039421,0.0020372102,0.004361618,0.018476436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012165822,0.000022818771,0.00062097516,0.000044962686,0.0000027573753,0.00016642024,0.00076277304,0.000015530184,0.0001148285,0.004818247,0.9713155,0.022102898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004559243,0.000012558735,0.0015903604,0.00011202128,0.000003646921,0.0006896191,0.004413613,0.00004587315,0.00019528608,0.0022372135,0.9906798,0.000015581973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012959189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043311857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065047085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018339998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054303827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21760416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177087914","doi":"10.1007/s12108-021-09493-1","title":"The Constructionist as Claims-Maker? A Pragmatist Intervention into Social Problems Theory","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Social constructionism; Strict constructionism; Pragmatism; Sociology; Epistemology; Constructionism; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030776628754362153,"score_gpt":0.37525369372698747,"score_spread":0.3444770649726253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177087914","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018327316,0.004822647,0.2212131,0.595901,0.0033391295,0.00015449742,0.00007368281,0.00032665025,0.15584195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8944703,0.0017712874,0.0640323,0.016687086,0.003417927,0.00068913377,0.00004306207,0.00043566123,0.018453244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96487224,0.025720622,0.0010915685,0.0027008955,0.004346465,0.0012682163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233848,0.062209696,0.0022429058,0.006955073,0.0033795547,0.0018279557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043059528,0.0014565047,0.0020231456,0.005513592,0.016824678,0.018744692,0.006238959,0.016008208,0.008428521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0619276,0.0014842354,0.0012409568,0.0033468127,0.18772623,0.04677164,0.015520731,0.03180844,0.0011367043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032242476,0.000009757903,0.000028233439,0.000011623536,0.0000018920094,0.000010032545,0.0022497824,0.00008057714,0.000012806466,0.99563676,0.000867031,0.0010882481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069567022,0.000003506045,0.000015533762,0.000021582542,0.0000017745537,0.000011093924,0.0007711943,0.00040106734,0.000033531145,0.9930642,0.0056654303,0.0000039532615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031668367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036931129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043059528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009957898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013046155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2277233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184074373","doi":"10.1007/s12108-021-09508-x","title":"Keeping the Conversation Going: on Mentorship, Otherness, and Belonging","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Mentoring and Academic Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Mentorship; Sociology; Autoethnography; Graduation (instrument); Pedagogy; Set (abstract data type); Gender studies; Visual arts","score_opus":0.03879965018144131,"score_gpt":0.33424087089367277,"score_spread":0.29544122071223144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184074373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46328285,0.021040617,0.0023096693,0.19214657,0.0019101868,0.000066359025,0.00007452242,0.000048479204,0.31912073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885768,0.0036329275,0.0002072263,0.0024307866,0.00030012743,0.0000315853,0.000013611901,0.00002363893,0.0047832783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914551,0.006192461,0.00009951759,0.00032682382,0.000675941,0.0012501619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836909,0.009323741,0.0014490287,0.00063641625,0.0010822734,0.0038176277],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008451655,0.0003887848,0.00059240044,0.0016653135,0.016912654,0.011273582,0.0015892152,0.0033237054,0.008691272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02063803,0.00021895154,0.000421001,0.0016741452,0.023472514,0.011388096,0.008877864,0.0062706694,0.0005020775],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039577266,0.00047560476,0.021870509,0.0003566839,0.00007319117,0.00074284663,0.44829413,0.00014848396,0.00029705052,0.34806207,0.031559538,0.14772414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058158446,0.0001612368,0.0264438,0.0011485306,0.00008539604,0.0005766056,0.6967059,0.00031191297,0.00032274236,0.16132922,0.112761736,0.00009481796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008610923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015916763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99154836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032957697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035075063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044697165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186476281","doi":"10.1007/s12108-021-09507-y","title":"The Future of Religion and Secularity in Sociology’s History","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Sociology; Secularization; Normative; Sociology of religion; Epistemology; Enlightenment; Sociology of knowledge; Social science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01856516327532655,"score_gpt":0.3265915713981225,"score_spread":0.30802640812279597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186476281","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06856357,0.07527236,0.0013899484,0.59203804,0.002954776,0.0000098715045,0.00006045053,0.000025528345,0.25968543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95584625,0.013142653,0.00043474406,0.012441564,0.003393953,0.000015313808,0.000022945424,0.000017738495,0.014684805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981318,0.0013421297,0.000026186186,0.00011695243,0.00015862299,0.0002243448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947463,0.003379441,0.0002652765,0.00020635751,0.0004097871,0.0009927659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043077366,0.00020682694,0.0003416087,0.0019504451,0.0060199196,0.007677785,0.000637766,0.0035705054,0.008032667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040161503,0.00022529537,0.00020587505,0.0019024787,0.03274435,0.009060477,0.0023864042,0.003894993,0.00035320432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014553852,0.000035481382,0.001288725,0.000029478198,0.0000050708704,0.00006176006,0.01067017,0.000105982,0.000065382716,0.96421194,0.012245614,0.01126591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001994466,0.000020465397,0.004344532,0.0001724876,0.0000052739038,0.00007202295,0.014132071,0.00030835517,0.00005780345,0.6725428,0.30830625,0.000017960701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014848274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03093603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014848274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006194334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063740266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044943273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210777818","doi":"10.1007/s12108-021-09524-x","title":"The Value of Strident Agnosticism: Dorothy Pawluch and the Endurance of Ontological Gerrymandering","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Scholarship; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Gerrymandering; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Democracy","score_opus":0.031394240789548,"score_gpt":0.33712955834308034,"score_spread":0.30573531755353234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210777818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041871224,0.023200797,0.012725934,0.736553,0.0024640686,0.00002750172,0.00002458861,0.000043690823,0.18308923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529763,0.006802639,0.0037765307,0.026911052,0.0016435914,0.00007508791,0.000011747965,0.00006783595,0.0077352566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98072284,0.01577194,0.00027960178,0.0008048915,0.0018153401,0.0006052516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95176095,0.04050326,0.0017686042,0.0017733873,0.0024608863,0.0017328687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019872744,0.0003619382,0.00069346593,0.0021808231,0.009016725,0.011747474,0.0016097655,0.004942575,0.002464138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02611535,0.00042948616,0.00029352223,0.0016004712,0.11441116,0.01840246,0.007236339,0.0126475915,0.00039846657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000989832,0.000012779386,0.000100637466,0.000025277694,0.000002648795,0.000049432452,0.012067275,0.00006103266,0.000019897345,0.9803761,0.00476989,0.0025051162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012558296,0.000009198252,0.000152618,0.00016683013,0.0000036414103,0.00006205461,0.008154331,0.00027986921,0.00007685863,0.9477571,0.043307483,0.000017481338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052638925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046970122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019872744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006768578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006821522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10509837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293228965","doi":"10.1007/s12108-022-09529-0","title":"The Rhetoric of the Canon: Functional, Historicist, and Humanist Justifications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Historicism; Sociology; Epistemology; Humanism; Rhetoric; Legitimation; Discipline; Rhetorical question; Critical theory; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.07955497943259354,"score_gpt":0.3311119735896085,"score_spread":0.25155699415701493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293228965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015670817,0.01461666,0.041487716,0.39884612,0.0047793696,0.00006264492,0.00017058203,0.00013976592,0.52422625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9074445,0.0033683218,0.011235704,0.042460006,0.0063381973,0.00024420448,0.00009245596,0.00030601255,0.028510641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98350614,0.011200062,0.00037203706,0.0015431069,0.0025880206,0.00079072645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605594,0.031975675,0.0013368585,0.002337411,0.003119443,0.00067117787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026685258,0.0009933913,0.0013586831,0.0052740267,0.0109062,0.011855215,0.003560969,0.0130803045,0.008254151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047192797,0.0006446707,0.00071798323,0.0032708675,0.08785283,0.017564766,0.0041424315,0.01321751,0.0010076133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047654917,0.000002487343,0.00002682969,0.0000118222615,0.0000017713928,0.000009360182,0.00093855866,0.00003304158,0.0000062216,0.9953413,0.0029004542,0.0007234507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018278339,0.0000050978565,0.000072115945,0.00013941272,0.000007492334,0.000030035577,0.0009052762,0.0003793995,0.00008435029,0.95513624,0.04321249,0.000009890231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096992655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010559741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026685258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009991571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069145565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14112681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367182497","doi":"10.1007/s12108-023-09574-3","title":"Moral Panic Studies, Normative Reductionism, and the Problem of Paradigmatic Rigidity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Reductionism; Moral panic; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Criminology","score_opus":0.0926655531464362,"score_gpt":0.3979600730661644,"score_spread":0.30529451991972817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367182497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14290838,0.0108896755,0.05806329,0.26945385,0.0017076128,0.000079482015,0.00013906705,0.0001462142,0.51661235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99118584,0.00085538416,0.0022003003,0.0028837982,0.00054438843,0.00005748777,0.00002329715,0.000024517261,0.0022250852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297947,0.0043501374,0.00016893787,0.00076179864,0.0012181498,0.00052156195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870904,0.009044208,0.00093013915,0.0014964559,0.0010532583,0.00038549645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00961455,0.000394043,0.00082384056,0.0024711145,0.00497685,0.0059930393,0.0021948228,0.003623625,0.0037837066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018067677,0.00028365257,0.0006240886,0.0016923099,0.052107356,0.008169212,0.0036450864,0.009188778,0.00016336031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042867496,0.000008603743,0.00009126712,0.000008518295,0.0000026295218,0.00000832462,0.00058176793,0.00008477809,0.00001463444,0.9971238,0.00067248615,0.0013989607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008025888,0.0000021557325,0.00014150036,0.000008931233,0.000001440367,0.000011394954,0.00036056997,0.0002029253,0.000018134617,0.9970561,0.002186166,0.0000027221142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031108279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002299175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00961455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047050887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031932993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050847173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385240893","doi":"10.1007/s12108-023-09585-0","title":"C. Wright Mills in Copenhagen: Collaboration, Politics, and the Making of 'The Sociological Imagination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"US-UK Fulbright Commission; McGill University","keywords":"Wright; Sociology; Politics; Sociological imagination; Gender studies; Social science; Art history; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04227915056869525,"score_gpt":0.3885576920306916,"score_spread":0.3462785414619964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385240893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21244997,0.11084526,0.0050778617,0.21830016,0.003971433,0.00006608653,0.00015394019,0.00010220583,0.44903314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95780736,0.007961167,0.00063837704,0.0024553968,0.00016968205,0.000016971191,0.000015026711,0.00005334763,0.030882621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928086,0.004538376,0.00015672664,0.0006364526,0.0010430636,0.0008168632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956548,0.0025060112,0.00047925906,0.00019755328,0.0003199629,0.0008423938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006270431,0.00036109868,0.00034650392,0.0013266336,0.01066626,0.01388425,0.00081248424,0.0029899448,0.003658833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005802367,0.0005139403,0.00015942246,0.0015804742,0.021723725,0.007135887,0.0056620287,0.0031172554,0.00053470436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007757869,0.00005286776,0.0013384947,0.00015738486,0.000013789868,0.0005733211,0.26094696,0.00047468132,0.00041242482,0.6582463,0.059462115,0.018244058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017194823,0.000044232223,0.0023280398,0.0006416489,0.000010515336,0.0002835692,0.17405967,0.0002883826,0.00054488116,0.07124451,0.75047857,0.000058829595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032091293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038212128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98933375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009398391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073213056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068190396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386606847","doi":"10.1007/s12108-023-09595-y","title":"Correction to: C. Wright Mills in Copenhagen: Collaboration, Politics, and the Making of 'The Sociological Imagination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"US-UK Fulbright Commission; McGill University","keywords":"Wright; Sociology; Politics; Sociological imagination; Gender studies; Social science; Art history; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03653418828298945,"score_gpt":0.38511898250868126,"score_spread":0.34858479422569183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386606847","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008435872,0.0027271402,0.00020599716,0.2597375,0.7332416,0.000016078418,0.00038049248,0.000111838606,0.0034949833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015720673,0.012530398,0.0015632653,0.31681797,0.38970634,0.0002812414,0.0013466117,0.0006960048,0.2613375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524647,0.0010319236,0.00061210035,0.0007098677,0.0017981537,0.00060152484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733333,0.0089766905,0.0012932074,0.0014171769,0.013309121,0.0016705162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050593526,0.0023262303,0.0019106951,0.002789531,0.005928579,0.006181309,0.00511835,0.012868919,0.043821566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057110235,0.0010197156,0.0015697746,0.003116593,0.00539611,0.004092658,0.0034894063,0.020557253,0.02681189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049865585,0.0000010611034,0.000013888734,0.000022522003,0.0000014888413,0.000026641597,0.00003511135,0.000007630209,0.0000034565599,0.00052562833,0.9985273,0.00083025306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014004132,0.0000061413702,0.00039586495,0.00027948443,0.000007350812,0.0001234471,0.00024257517,0.000058181966,0.00004752357,0.001024031,0.9977823,0.000019140743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06641988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06636661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06641988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006684003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010367927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14659774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393388170","doi":"10.1007/s12108-024-09617-3","title":"Rethinking the Problem of Disproportion: Overreaction, Underreaction, and Normativism in Moral Panic Studies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Panic; Psychology; Panic disorder; Moral panic; Economics; Psychiatry; Anxiety; Criminology","score_opus":0.09371743890657142,"score_gpt":0.39935695780324476,"score_spread":0.30563951889667335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393388170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41816133,0.012532863,0.069424376,0.40025207,0.0041748886,0.00013073205,0.00013011982,0.00015225126,0.09504132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98309755,0.0008293195,0.0047077807,0.008646436,0.0013465179,0.00011252815,0.000016808968,0.00010177284,0.001141218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96265984,0.028866256,0.0012108054,0.0027152183,0.0037276973,0.00082021696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8083526,0.16268389,0.006921462,0.014338013,0.005659405,0.0020446558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09193311,0.00058578636,0.0013068278,0.0033941518,0.0051494315,0.011120084,0.0042938925,0.005357736,0.003469525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16706355,0.00066115725,0.00058190443,0.0021263235,0.06599979,0.027650869,0.0108381575,0.013680416,0.0002599256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014355368,0.00008428002,0.015977515,0.00014565128,0.00008978648,0.00016613146,0.059512135,0.00037218214,0.00036396107,0.8630798,0.005961685,0.054103274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007650336,0.00005912602,0.021234062,0.00043543623,0.00010228948,0.00027874406,0.035568297,0.0033969346,0.0007519317,0.91636115,0.02163744,0.00009814977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00412324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008421968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09193311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028084754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036019974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48619455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400853911","doi":"10.1007/s12108-024-09632-4","title":"Theory Figures and Causal Claims in Sociology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Epistemology; Causal model; Causal analysis; Sociology; Causal theory of reference; Representation (politics); Causal structure; Causality (physics); Sociology of knowledge; Causal reasoning; Cognition; Psychology; Social science; Law; Econometrics; Philosophy; Computer science; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.05552023601961931,"score_gpt":0.39193004608333704,"score_spread":0.33640981006371773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400853911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60198873,0.01203869,0.1512164,0.03598763,0.0012112512,0.00020176877,0.00087473006,0.0005262582,0.19595446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963505,0.001140366,0.007932447,0.00024401766,0.00014182924,0.000054723703,0.00008381494,0.00004942946,0.0007182225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9594244,0.02840758,0.0024252445,0.002077097,0.0070094042,0.0006562323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44165987,0.49224424,0.03658041,0.010178874,0.017355023,0.001981649],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037755307,0.0005249763,0.0007069524,0.021501053,0.0034039565,0.014135745,0.0011655133,0.0021843424,0.012139545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25107357,0.00055180344,0.00044157988,0.015413845,0.018596293,0.017485382,0.005485642,0.002456268,0.00066672044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021498962,0.000074520256,0.037255105,0.0014440942,0.00014434133,0.00069560815,0.103494495,0.0028786368,0.0012830328,0.7956401,0.0039527393,0.05292231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051529674,0.00010742503,0.026837239,0.0030443058,0.0001639571,0.00069210277,0.08951613,0.012031458,0.0024851982,0.80192524,0.063024074,0.00012127522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015048855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012857432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9622447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050529167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038479907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19967157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407389296","doi":"10.1007/s12108-025-09647-5","title":"Does Anyone Use Sociology, Other Than Sociologists? The Interdisciplinary Relevance of ASA Journals, 2000–2023","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Hong Kong; University of Toronto - School of Graduate Studies; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Relevance (law); Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07304866321274146,"score_gpt":0.41754821619724775,"score_spread":0.3444995529845063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407389296","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023288982,0.037570924,0.0008308184,0.80480206,0.034098975,0.000024437162,0.00019711038,0.000088432185,0.099098265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.502295,0.083237424,0.0044344137,0.13269815,0.05913822,0.00012248929,0.00045399103,0.00034091063,0.2172794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963521,0.001172304,0.00034567586,0.00025786777,0.0015289303,0.00034314577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9519466,0.01500721,0.0046982267,0.0015901531,0.021034036,0.0057238],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791171,0.00027826513,0.0003075184,0.0044019497,0.004160746,0.010533454,0.00056968763,0.0038039866,0.014643743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046582438,0.00030997154,0.0001695376,0.006836191,0.00388351,0.008307336,0.0019860514,0.002963584,0.003226544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018170234,0.00014870902,0.017833296,0.00054552755,0.00002910397,0.0003472788,0.0065867854,0.00014084388,0.0011401471,0.06675305,0.726052,0.18024154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018250897,0.00004433896,0.026913505,0.0005387017,0.000014990516,0.00018104818,0.0075218105,0.00014240861,0.00029961026,0.011966064,0.9523381,0.000021214299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005632495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015177326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034205967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048988163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409051300","doi":"10.1007/s12108-025-09650-w","title":"Between Description and Evaluation: How Sociologists Do Normativity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0726741716646435,"score_gpt":0.390708762319339,"score_spread":0.31803459065469547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409051300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0978557,0.0029133398,0.3246016,0.12583996,0.0009460516,0.00024725572,0.00013737162,0.00046190142,0.44699684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98172796,0.00032578994,0.013017252,0.0015917972,0.00014537624,0.00013916912,0.0000394244,0.00014939184,0.0028638854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.825665,0.14142561,0.0047129435,0.007081912,0.016656287,0.0044581676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82367444,0.1288724,0.0095370645,0.017956486,0.016069127,0.00389045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.108687714,0.0007721128,0.0014647131,0.00564558,0.0085875075,0.029720712,0.0038999505,0.008085083,0.0053212936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16585194,0.0010801258,0.00094038324,0.0032825805,0.10602596,0.043617982,0.016231628,0.007699023,0.0007715571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023227396,0.00001371805,0.0005766819,0.00003579982,0.00000819873,0.000045533838,0.012915166,0.0003664734,0.000075108415,0.9792829,0.0010294742,0.005627716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020691725,0.000013212996,0.00020432775,0.000095987394,0.000007771143,0.000034255696,0.006718793,0.0015498629,0.00020588652,0.97508484,0.016039995,0.000024303483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065264585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039525474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108687714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012385715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009644946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5748024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409670538","doi":"10.1007/s12108-025-09651-9","title":"Visualizing Social Theory with Embedded Relational Diagrams: Theoretical Illustration, Development, and Innovation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Development (topology); Epistemology; Social innovation; Computer science; Mathematics; Political science; Public relations; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03937819383810484,"score_gpt":0.35527676285623244,"score_spread":0.31589856901812763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409670538","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046106104,0.0008259615,0.8898588,0.006836402,0.00023570714,0.0000997982,0.00037640287,0.0013175367,0.054343354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61304396,0.00074969896,0.37865484,0.00017072771,0.0000689849,0.00017912408,0.00031499588,0.00039305605,0.0064246384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791425,0.0015474291,0.000067028726,0.00016649491,0.00022916668,0.00007576678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990195,0.007938434,0.0002779136,0.00084754714,0.00047219417,0.0002689976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954023,0.0007057185,0.00033940322,0.002768092,0.0017110582,0.008543753,0.0013945404,0.0016967843,0.014004483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016132342,0.00048648444,0.0008147532,0.0023268845,0.004850542,0.010832751,0.0036170648,0.0016242053,0.0010071128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002619033,0.000029179024,0.0009338548,0.00012419863,0.0000127410885,0.0000972393,0.01090273,0.0036310058,0.00067448645,0.9585894,0.0023146127,0.022664422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039022405,0.000035701698,0.00041574152,0.00021921581,0.00003364635,0.00019240813,0.006713511,0.04812187,0.0014938402,0.8655437,0.07716962,0.000021766104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024557458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027921174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014004483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015560478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019060884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04684961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410956852","doi":"10.1007/s12108-025-09657-3","title":"The City and the North: Canada in the Chicago School of Sociology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.010192214025759731,"score_gpt":0.2637176027548839,"score_spread":0.25352538872912417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410956852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24292584,0.05165512,0.0022047358,0.21232319,0.0022037332,0.00009145516,0.0005578386,0.0001659063,0.48787212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9234442,0.010423336,0.0009896663,0.007304894,0.00018112567,0.000031426032,0.000095052834,0.00010370428,0.057426464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963825,0.0006697766,0.000049035585,0.00035693374,0.00090730854,0.0016343637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952246,0.0010196103,0.00025184258,0.00011499006,0.0013706507,0.002018207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222201,0.00041732192,0.0004578319,0.003440325,0.05438666,0.016360972,0.001206907,0.0021819077,0.006729412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004436888,0.00042057564,0.00027454522,0.0077864802,0.032684498,0.003765802,0.005217967,0.0038454835,0.0003289328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081081984,0.000020500032,0.013787902,0.00022178583,0.000016932225,0.00067615317,0.30443847,0.00044414817,0.00033625984,0.56202495,0.07582489,0.042126875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010014959,0.0000114012855,0.014248534,0.0005334053,0.000026089841,0.00014144336,0.26824796,0.00022102719,0.00017332137,0.019387493,0.6969126,0.00008668188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9971629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23255792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30698413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.890124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414375829","doi":"10.1007/s12108-025-09668-0","title":"Introduction to Special Issue: Theory Visualization in the Social Sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Sociologist","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Visualization; Data visualization; Information visualization; Human science","score_opus":0.058372067297669354,"score_gpt":0.4425586574310829,"score_spread":0.38418659013341355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414375829","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021003197,0.017432494,0.00807089,0.053183578,0.9034053,0.0001398134,0.00055679074,0.0008904023,0.016110592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018813524,0.015842432,0.003542146,0.017990127,0.91124976,0.00017348987,0.00091272936,0.0011910703,0.04721684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960679,0.0009658359,0.0005082877,0.00067641,0.0015211897,0.00026037623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693076,0.012414218,0.0013369491,0.0016239418,0.010579392,0.004737951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053133317,0.0022993335,0.0029911506,0.008838963,0.002955402,0.011927811,0.003019067,0.006292606,0.1695876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02666668,0.00097581896,0.0022650429,0.004032834,0.0022083446,0.007982136,0.0052513033,0.009733079,0.060410403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011944898,0.000021236285,0.000042224416,0.00018035888,0.0000061107735,0.000025450001,0.000019566283,0.000034730638,0.00009209098,0.00092017464,0.9843911,0.014254874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017349908,0.000034887147,0.00046506146,0.0005040865,0.000016015481,0.00021349557,0.00006451082,0.00029677898,0.0001240456,0.004257729,0.9939856,0.000020502053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018951081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043816688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1695876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019658941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030684287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.567327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}