{"meta":{"query_hash":"6c119ceb7bc0","filters":{"venue":"The Australian Library Journal"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6c119ceb7bc0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Australian+Library+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1576875018","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2015.1017915","title":"Serving remote communities together: a Canadian joint use library study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College; Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Space (punctuation); Exploratory research; Project commissioning; Joint (building); Business; Knowledge management; Publishing; Library science; Engineering; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.19709272885970153,"score_gpt":0.32111384152819467,"score_spread":0.12402111266849314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576875018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87917995,0.000039615268,0.000005322673,0.086012095,0.00070335256,0.00034683273,0.000018807574,0.00014417653,0.033549815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573369,0.00009428541,0.0012598772,0.0030606778,0.0010102595,0.000001757771,0.000013213617,0.000028092998,0.037194908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996775,0.0014968251,0.0003809175,0.00014045833,0.00057390274,0.00063290505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981274,0.00012315995,0.00017889793,0.0004098521,0.00003591755,0.0011247764],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010892783,0.00017440952,0.00017981045,0.00022613062,0.001974308,0.0036581818,0.0014040499,0.00009242834,0.0019212681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006721823,0.00012505722,0.00009361176,0.0006942845,0.0003607556,0.016704654,0.00014298064,0.0006494948,0.00011751024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075322234,0.00016237411,0.37075382,0.0000059811177,0.000088865796,0.0004412468,0.26222906,0.00015286576,0.000016299591,0.007847112,0.35314265,0.005084413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000494943,0.00039222653,0.045073066,0.000086400934,0.000030485053,0.0001392313,0.3989881,0.00009157987,0.00013352744,0.017057668,0.5371179,0.00039489154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11329469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04247585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32568076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055182376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028057955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968486898","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10722684","title":"Scholarship-in-Practice Bridging the literacy gap between boys and girls: An opportunity for the National Year of Reading 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Reading (process); Literacy; Scholarship; Psychology; Reading motivation; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2237162539941408,"score_gpt":0.4529279603775506,"score_spread":0.22921170638340982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968486898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468975,0.0005285852,0.000030885505,0.14192829,0.0005979284,0.00040987786,0.000055657973,0.000017107044,0.009534186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898282,0.00013143857,0.00033769992,0.00083891395,0.0053777876,0.000006339558,0.000003288502,0.000010161572,0.0034661638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981026,0.0009483625,0.00028557674,0.0000646997,0.00031478607,0.00028394978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997881,0.0013850852,0.00031414535,0.00012239662,0.00008745853,0.00020991627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006072011,0.00007144441,0.00009814214,0.000063359585,0.00094022416,0.0004484294,0.00043138364,0.000050014136,0.00021198101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056483754,0.00003875331,0.000050790804,0.00020888216,0.00016301424,0.0061499677,0.000032371376,0.000389958,0.0000061799533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054691,0.000099901976,0.600038,0.000024298666,0.00012934196,7.631783e-7,0.14644714,0.000007641974,0.000078581055,0.16828473,0.07350862,0.011326285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021568018,0.000025920437,0.39081118,0.00006923478,0.000047010813,0.000048333084,0.038871482,0.0000039565934,0.000062321895,0.006798922,0.56293607,0.00010988257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001992713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004621299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48942745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025088339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031096506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72315395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977745968","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2006.10721863","title":"<b>Focuses on the benefit to the individual: Rubin, Rhea J<i>Demonstrating results: using outcome measurement in your library.</i>PLA results series. Chicago: American Library Association, 2006. 176p US$50.00 (US$45.00 ALA members) soft cover ISBN 0838935605</b>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Outcome (game theory); Cover (algebra); Library science; Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; History; Engineering; Psychology; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Biology","score_opus":0.05051649923834206,"score_gpt":0.24251085337637784,"score_spread":0.19199435413803578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977745968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5503001,0.0005806383,0.00024866473,0.37574935,0.001592458,0.0016798853,0.0007564233,0.0009780026,0.06811445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86218894,0.00027324865,0.011380882,0.025602492,0.0027007174,0.00007684798,0.000121938945,0.00026664924,0.09738826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225706,0.0009404796,0.002192297,0.00088548556,0.002374437,0.0013502521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957481,0.00094405573,0.001646056,0.001133522,0.00008104047,0.00044723297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019649372,0.0007621087,0.00064764946,0.0005659507,0.0017690485,0.008038182,0.0041500046,0.00021035585,0.00037597815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003128866,0.000452936,0.00035695592,0.0035926912,0.00023877184,0.01354955,0.0010933707,0.0016397384,0.00015730236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006897254,0.00022416047,0.14351183,0.000013156721,0.00020458693,0.00007676957,0.0016512523,0.01421058,0.00005556906,0.0033545785,0.83491474,0.0010930569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019671724,0.00041042478,0.23568763,0.00041358397,0.000046583536,0.00022331026,0.0011210468,0.0007931571,0.0028940104,0.003906617,0.75143826,0.0010981786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000201885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026704789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35014686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020320987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008190521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981045347","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2013.771764","title":"The continuing relevance of the library as a third place for users and non-users of IT: the case of Canada Bay","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); The Internet; Precinct; World Wide Web; Digital library; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.015495779571621241,"score_gpt":0.26541137934710063,"score_spread":0.2499155997754794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981045347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9125667,0.00018673907,7.13014e-7,0.08409119,0.00057334185,0.00044382605,0.00003982419,0.0000056671793,0.0020919791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884983,0.00031358574,0.000089723704,0.00066009257,0.0003808599,0.000009248777,3.7024432e-7,0.000015343645,0.0100324955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844575,0.00043115643,0.0003851432,0.000079352394,0.0002855533,0.00037304385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648595,0.0025860697,0.00048886094,0.0002366719,0.000056559773,0.00014587477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045390447,0.00010794817,0.00018841246,0.000017578514,0.0007987368,0.00013678719,0.0008120567,0.0000714239,0.00011274002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004347387,0.000049092265,0.00011599671,0.00022502677,0.0010733657,0.0006939871,0.00008110781,0.00033664214,5.628845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021317815,0.000039417744,0.06683358,0.00010818577,0.00029922606,0.000045566045,0.1823826,0.00005824932,0.00056620647,0.04482083,0.70118684,0.0034461077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001298326,0.00024279332,0.032131597,0.00060629623,0.00022307137,0.00033164668,0.5883289,0.000081080856,0.015820252,0.05311555,0.3074378,0.00038266828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05456787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020375025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4059463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016931268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001007604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975006},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1991917344","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2010.10736025","title":"Assessing the collective wealth of Australian research libraries: measuring overlap using <i>WorldCat Collection Analysis</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"State Library of New South Wales","keywords":"Software; Data collection; Order (exchange); Computer science; Library science; Bibliographic database; World Wide Web; Research data; Database; Business; Sociology; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.1192533248206169,"score_gpt":0.34094806494304636,"score_spread":0.22169474012242946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991917344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9428156,0.00009606523,0.0033162178,0.024321605,0.0014814163,0.0006170236,0.000007166924,0.00021499183,0.027129939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94810987,0.0000235837,0.013375049,0.00023019145,0.0005025274,0.000009640684,0.0000029731623,0.0000313508,0.037714813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578756,0.0009273181,0.0007935164,0.00042456255,0.0012847659,0.00078230485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972804,0.00085938995,0.00057063287,0.00076477975,0.00020360843,0.00032118234],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021037024,0.0002824052,0.00040474042,0.0011638644,0.0029991297,0.006903146,0.002678431,0.00014693305,0.0003920716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015618485,0.00017376937,0.00033395505,0.010148125,0.00051966135,0.01287181,0.000603586,0.0019084355,0.000016120106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007274018,0.00070085045,0.46001542,0.00014752724,0.0046242755,0.00020249438,0.029040221,0.008143554,0.018305223,0.06797331,0.4002334,0.009886343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028899382,0.00081634294,0.48438644,0.0004303961,0.0006055681,0.001961606,0.01311297,0.018703457,0.17088732,0.13294452,0.17133649,0.0019249503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038556256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000091891025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2288969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095043935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022505443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014573773","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2002.10756004","title":"Business, knowledge, information: where's the value proposition?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Value proposition; Proposition; Power point; Project commissioning; Publishing; Value (mathematics); Management; Point (geometry); Power (physics); Library science; Engineering; Operations research; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Physics; Philosophy; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.03880395425120205,"score_gpt":0.3094526200898139,"score_spread":0.27064866583861186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014573773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034613993,0.00089362415,0.000025918922,0.6132142,0.0021628446,0.00037943388,0.000009930225,0.00009727791,0.3486028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8410565,0.0008435128,0.00014167064,0.0021012349,0.0070808902,0.000014599568,0.0000034110292,0.000013096416,0.14874509],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869394,0.0004478589,0.00028591597,0.000049802806,0.00026477853,0.00025768607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993061,0.00008172572,0.00019544481,0.00018677198,0.000096588454,0.0001333659],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053386355,0.0000856343,0.00007996344,0.000056721514,0.0019122316,0.0010524672,0.0006082615,0.000059703834,0.006949167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036428784,0.00004505982,0.000065082684,0.00061526714,0.00024656297,0.0032694987,0.000029469998,0.0002951925,0.001433821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021488152,0.00002428128,0.0017188984,0.000007182169,0.000014919356,7.7714986e-7,0.053432684,0.000012636803,0.0000012889799,0.08563992,0.85637593,0.002769313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000935653,0.000009429365,0.0098268315,0.000040591152,0.000009821918,0.00008129386,0.011972563,0.0000060274288,0.0000077943805,0.0024886515,0.9753899,0.00007354488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017264021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000137319685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8064425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034013075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024544995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024264357","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10736059","title":"Website Accessibility: a Comparative Analysis of Australian National and State/Territory Library Websites","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Web accessibility; Screen reader; Ranking (information retrieval); World Wide Web; Web Accessibility Initiative; Guideline; Work (physics); Compliance (psychology); Computer science; Web standards; Web page; Internet privacy; Engineering; Political science; Web development; Psychology; Visually impaired; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.07150974705608026,"score_gpt":0.35400253230517326,"score_spread":0.282492785249093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024264357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357924,0.00028559513,0.0000016700113,0.006893096,0.0002465073,0.00022732635,0.000327798,0.000085089545,0.056140516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960681,0.00006349853,0.00033888133,0.00022056284,0.00050977845,0.000006908915,0.0000434957,0.00001594841,0.038119894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967482,0.00073763076,0.0007472359,0.0002605225,0.00086607446,0.0006403197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981066,0.00056556176,0.00046484303,0.0002759827,0.000079103476,0.0005078889],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011810481,0.00024508685,0.00050591904,0.00039826345,0.0006145903,0.0011169158,0.00090921554,0.00010869477,0.0071254447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089375404,0.00017805542,0.0003352729,0.0013212243,0.0018012807,0.015483319,0.00023021064,0.0004308602,0.00004947348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106047635,0.0002838772,0.9185282,0.000033537162,0.000874051,0.0000020693687,0.019198146,0.00004123057,0.000048995316,0.010058837,0.050276957,0.0005480249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024481796,0.000058812537,0.87316936,0.000044328168,0.00032627527,0.000009877252,0.016265923,0.00001743157,0.0006815453,0.02555749,0.083337,0.00028715478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009975454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060654325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04535888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006287161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037192053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047275852","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2003.10721576","title":"<b>Fresh and original in a well-trodden field: Eva Hemmungs Wirten<i>No trespassing: authorship, intellectual property rights, and the boundaries of globalization.</i>University of Toronto Press ISBN: 080208835X (hard cover) [2003?] np</b>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Globalization; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Cover (algebra); Publishing; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Management; Law; Economics; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017919341524308813,"score_gpt":0.20386119269693678,"score_spread":0.18594185117262796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047275852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5596523,0.011715524,0.00059051724,0.023947658,0.0019155323,0.002076771,0.000036141973,0.00015696033,0.3999086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504682,0.00107388,0.0003652865,0.00070536096,0.00044188276,0.0000017525591,0.000007772643,0.000028283965,0.04690758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860036,0.0002192684,0.0004106665,0.00021709396,0.0002564641,0.00029612274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990665,0.00015308463,0.00032110183,0.00024676026,0.00017142798,0.000041169773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006108026,0.00022790239,0.00036118305,0.000059416783,0.0006116549,0.0008098777,0.0005026003,0.00010777279,0.007982306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031638314,0.000113111644,0.00008500885,0.00026188153,0.00086574536,0.0029405334,0.00018660736,0.000383248,0.000019346644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027382427,0.00009333769,0.0026900878,0.00011939282,0.00011237637,0.000015189884,0.0029851843,0.0000075120506,0.00012261285,0.0152749475,0.9752104,0.00063071057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017650601,0.000102599486,0.00052871543,0.00015462241,0.00011188389,0.000073219206,0.00055252656,0.0014079704,0.00065196847,0.005754681,0.9886919,0.00020484884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062601967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041002315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39081588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025976678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013452972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049032469","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2000.10755925","title":"Racist disinformation on the World Wide Web: initial implications for the LIS community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; The Internet; Racism; Pornography; Censorship; Terminology; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Computer science; Social media; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10754721372139829,"score_gpt":0.3752327489862959,"score_spread":0.2676855352648976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049032469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3588816,0.00002445705,0.000010882749,0.5598449,0.00058647105,0.00051812787,0.000109407956,0.000058642483,0.07996549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97433776,0.00014479517,0.00003646548,0.0067801056,0.002032069,0.000032813106,0.000012715608,0.000011142367,0.016612152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984634,0.0007213358,0.00024617423,0.000040609313,0.00020674494,0.00032174814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99564815,0.0037819757,0.00013175484,0.0002840743,0.000031936463,0.0001220964],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076015946,0.000090252295,0.00008400139,0.000033786942,0.006021606,0.0005928408,0.0009902616,0.00005276232,0.0019140405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002267697,0.000044474782,0.00012986203,0.00032421038,0.00057656615,0.00079507235,0.000023714883,0.0007611052,0.00009078073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007452679,0.000055713765,0.0036575752,0.0000035410744,0.000053156113,4.484095e-7,0.047000334,0.00003378937,0.0000058702835,0.17091791,0.7545301,0.023667043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017846946,0.000037281647,0.023287985,0.00002217509,0.000038119728,0.0000065391578,0.01695631,0.000008748737,0.00010533444,0.05462707,0.90464675,0.00008523097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018475439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021147293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61545616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035248824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022209594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052299855","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2011.10722670","title":"<i>Mentoring in the Library: Building for the Future.</i>By Marta K. Lee. ALA Guides for the Busy Librarian. Chicago: American Library Association, 2011. 122 pp. US$50.00 (US$45.00 ALA members) soft cover ISBN9780838935934 (available from In<i>books</i>)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Cover (algebra); Association (psychology); Sociology; Publishing; Media studies; Management; Engineering; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.026045165278596603,"score_gpt":0.2580350651730031,"score_spread":0.23198989989440652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052299855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1994597,0.015368425,0.00053776125,0.6641572,0.00904436,0.008091246,0.0019705044,0.0008081342,0.10056265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27352422,0.039117508,0.02748701,0.22529036,0.03366787,0.0016807222,0.0009007896,0.00074666133,0.3975849],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943219,0.0010320425,0.0014068319,0.0005414631,0.001106599,0.0015912066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940476,0.0032771626,0.0013707745,0.00087737374,0.00004933851,0.00037777884],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002680921,0.0005403477,0.00054247834,0.0002099054,0.002910814,0.0046461667,0.0051658237,0.00025753607,0.008905836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013572599,0.00029282412,0.00047290427,0.0013217721,0.000690877,0.047897678,0.00041346875,0.0012427358,0.00013666146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020535332,0.000107943175,0.09658053,0.000010778538,0.00013113454,0.000003941711,0.015375852,0.000067040106,0.000031104195,0.010424062,0.8758279,0.0012343779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010649395,0.000119462384,0.020303346,0.00008297295,0.00006396891,0.0000083518435,0.01754473,0.00039906462,0.00058814196,0.0082952455,0.95109403,0.0004357431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013702536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003057566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43886685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000787785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008401398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066570519","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2009.10735879","title":"<b>Essential and timely text for business case writers:<i>Business cases for info pros: here’s why, here’s how</i>. By Ulla De Stricker. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2008. 107 pp. US$39.50 soft cover ISBN 9781573873352.</b>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Business information; Publishing; Library science; Management; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Law; Mechanical engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.034964326167850494,"score_gpt":0.259916594607766,"score_spread":0.2249522684399155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066570519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78740036,0.0035249542,0.07359599,0.12205962,0.003342897,0.005662212,0.0024690207,0.0007149778,0.0012299444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96720314,0.0011220108,0.0027217346,0.014490713,0.006716168,0.00014417896,0.0017787449,0.00017173933,0.00565156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972262,0.00004116108,0.0008703272,0.0003964974,0.00047035908,0.0009954858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767476,0.00019887651,0.00093072094,0.00045789027,0.0006154403,0.00012230423],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005834113,0.0006168494,0.00052141555,0.00031584722,0.0011410184,0.0049239565,0.00087746425,0.0002939622,0.00054792117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031263314,0.00046821925,0.00018561294,0.0011433134,0.00024964497,0.02008963,0.00022503476,0.00045360826,0.000059383547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011662726,0.00019278354,0.004147229,0.0007297899,0.00010652011,0.00021650712,0.00012258037,0.00029569207,0.00048603606,0.00089842826,0.9652118,0.026426338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002366682,0.000117447344,0.0056593926,0.00040194884,0.00036857123,0.0056927954,0.0008949696,0.001855519,0.0008134872,0.0023837066,0.978471,0.0009744962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036876297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029252033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17980278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005385291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021743229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078823204","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2009.10735925","title":"Making a difference –<i>Better Beginnings</i>Family Literacy Program","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Project commissioning; State (computer science); Literacy; Library science; Publishing; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Media studies; Medical education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.08315454155804826,"score_gpt":0.40016049888142324,"score_spread":0.317005957323375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078823204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7918395,0.00019335687,0.000013506912,0.17133185,0.000631871,0.00024898534,0.0000033045978,0.0001519704,0.035585687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95862097,0.00006137489,0.0014903207,0.008636579,0.003909292,0.000007155506,0.0000016830232,0.000011692284,0.027260965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983842,0.00036684587,0.00030461667,0.00012824692,0.00033582724,0.00048029935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992609,0.00006832404,0.0002262401,0.00020039751,0.000039098362,0.00020504628],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042440416,0.00012772135,0.00013962036,0.00008887916,0.0009550748,0.0015207599,0.00067164446,0.000072414696,0.00060587324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025186799,0.00008488724,0.000111387344,0.00039136288,0.00017268241,0.0013214365,0.000022088874,0.000462345,0.000085872234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032264274,0.00021075731,0.05904455,0.000011298337,0.000044351833,0.00004939126,0.12909663,0.0000029818439,0.0003381952,0.051083986,0.41789594,0.34218967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012158208,0.00007370423,0.1771325,0.00013024709,0.0000100538555,0.00006784472,0.003976726,0.0000020908035,0.000022629298,0.012225111,0.8060913,0.00014619429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004351024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010524144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3881954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025158122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023172298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089528207","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2013.878269","title":"Developing community-led public libraries: Evidence from the UK and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Library science; Political science; Publishing; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10623490330290203,"score_gpt":0.29835229301309607,"score_spread":0.19211738971019404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089528207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.663684,0.00012509711,0.00006797419,0.33276394,0.0003855732,0.00009345823,0.0000064238197,0.000031422755,0.0028421178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879462,0.00022642393,0.00081036385,0.0068340003,0.0009303834,0.000002192584,0.000006410838,0.000008317325,0.0032356908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969005,0.0018635599,0.00026539734,0.000118511205,0.00046593833,0.00038607264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973743,0.0018673051,0.00018299074,0.00029087812,0.00002459141,0.00025992293],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001441031,0.000120984274,0.00012161592,0.000025902353,0.0045397095,0.0027916718,0.001647128,0.00005678581,0.00077738083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048554098,0.00006819947,0.000036897127,0.00033179444,0.00062693184,0.0065972316,0.00016631452,0.00069628673,0.000009052973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031363124,0.00001635765,0.49580747,0.000007671673,0.000054076245,0.000015074867,0.031088332,0.000007013331,0.000079245794,0.16243875,0.30319014,0.007264506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020653386,0.00006724009,0.31258833,0.00020758423,0.00001947316,0.00003594189,0.042965073,0.000022842341,0.00042265365,0.07624308,0.56692386,0.0002974047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21690743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23617175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32592994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034011828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028970835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095443512","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2011.10722600","title":"<i>Index It Right! Advice from the Experts, Volume 2.</i>Ed. by Janet Perlman and Enid L. Zafran. Medford, NJ: Information Today in association with the American Society of Indexers, 2010. 170 pp. A$40.00 (A$32.00 ASI members) soft cover ISBN 9781573873963","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Cover (algebra); Association (psychology); Library science; Management; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Economics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.01678444859157707,"score_gpt":0.20005970164542844,"score_spread":0.18327525305385137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095443512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8909909,0.0014682952,0.000053184653,0.08734099,0.00041907525,0.0005334933,0.00041591545,0.00010906767,0.018669065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97911596,0.0016633947,0.0001992289,0.0053671766,0.00041908043,0.000017885128,0.00019419541,0.00003270117,0.012990377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773616,0.0005897662,0.0005658264,0.00015294409,0.0005888431,0.0003664893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779946,0.0003633786,0.0010895629,0.000514469,0.00012488713,0.000108246044],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011870255,0.0002532114,0.00029460748,0.000053402295,0.0008937898,0.0018851513,0.0011698032,0.000109695735,0.0028148447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003317358,0.0001313338,0.00012934656,0.00015749877,0.0004994253,0.009074341,0.00014176815,0.0012132473,0.00002236559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017587445,0.000048429127,0.04169731,0.000005431274,0.00014614896,6.9337534e-7,0.068080194,0.00001650993,0.000017758552,0.00041889702,0.88859403,0.00079869723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076275476,0.00014345194,0.064982176,0.00007739524,0.000062301464,0.000015265296,0.045482274,0.00032363803,0.00007161639,0.0004922921,0.8873403,0.0002465484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044296966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003250399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08812504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007118854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118648466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170630960","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2006.10721878","title":"Providing library resources to 37 medical students at eight remote sites across 2600 km","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Metropolitan area; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); The Internet; Medical education; Internet access; Library science; Geography; Business; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Archaeology","score_opus":0.022672173454050117,"score_gpt":0.32312517040553995,"score_spread":0.30045299695148986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170630960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88919485,0.00072109106,0.0000028525185,0.10357119,0.00045015302,0.00035652868,0.000049093935,0.00015701466,0.0054972493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84504545,0.0002984485,0.0010169444,0.020811427,0.004567011,0.00000457688,0.00010586107,0.00009661952,0.12805367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571735,0.00027356728,0.000846769,0.00033894568,0.0015998173,0.0012235375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997549,0.00020592895,0.00022397564,0.00043147747,0.000026499783,0.0015631148],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009280828,0.00030757184,0.0004781944,0.0001193384,0.0007666942,0.0005023035,0.0009627717,0.00023153068,0.0037458008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009754752,0.00019315784,0.00024645842,0.0005403178,0.00016378557,0.0010095694,0.0005650604,0.0009849463,0.0004391369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008169641,0.00011104974,0.3249941,0.00006797486,0.000046134435,0.0015971321,0.0003791786,0.0000056679055,0.00017132369,0.000058908645,0.66939867,0.0023529325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010848269,0.0002470941,0.40311363,0.0005660286,0.000037422895,0.0034586538,0.0002564343,0.000022303455,0.0013753423,0.0006551666,0.5889611,0.0002219888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034884433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039857987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12255642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006515448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032920082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241707088","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10722697","title":"<i>Implementing Technology Solutions in Libraries: Techniques, Tools and Tips from the Trenches.</i>By Karen C. Knox. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2011. 173 pp. US$35.00 soft cover ISBN 9781573874038","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.021620214832116173,"score_gpt":0.22303194013332692,"score_spread":0.20141172530121074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241707088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46795294,0.021382455,0.021212952,0.45758554,0.0029637597,0.0028018577,0.001479268,0.0024659873,0.022155255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93860507,0.0031167448,0.034567,0.015355202,0.0021587962,0.00013319096,0.0004961735,0.00009910703,0.0054687397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972799,0.00027781492,0.0007794305,0.00024397756,0.00036070676,0.0010582083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982474,0.00033531268,0.0004692798,0.0007041467,0.000023223789,0.00022067911],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007747403,0.00032469313,0.0002890214,0.00022104818,0.00086359936,0.00206541,0.002444628,0.00022370157,0.00093336566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027039567,0.00020875636,0.00009590309,0.0007128358,0.00021103553,0.031641264,0.0013525819,0.000879934,0.000105691135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031211082,0.00008502924,0.10652571,0.00001759336,0.0000885071,0.000007682498,0.003924485,0.000010863817,0.00028857018,0.025344592,0.8310035,0.032672264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047550656,0.00008448671,0.026719974,0.00009711353,0.000023558061,0.00023077968,0.0009288083,0.00034015698,0.0031133431,0.015711794,0.951923,0.00035149098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011018031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000135111595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4706521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000260529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018774111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314106763","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2008.10722455","title":"<b>Where we came from:<i>Uniting a Profession: The Australian Institute of Librarians, 1937–1949,</i>by Jean P Whyte and David J Jones. Canberra: Australian Library and Information Association, 2007. 279pp. $42.50 soft cover ISBN 978086045658</b>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Cover (algebra); Publishing; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.021895168176070064,"score_gpt":0.24135843700409743,"score_spread":0.21946326882802736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314106763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5572196,0.0028940977,0.000038616676,0.42327368,0.0037165903,0.0017051739,0.0019089923,0.0004848613,0.008758352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6371242,0.022004064,0.0012256264,0.0044872686,0.0031286324,0.000035971596,0.00045163886,0.00011695662,0.33142564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947291,0.0012630381,0.0013430031,0.00043739524,0.0011180972,0.00110934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964897,0.00050756737,0.0016208019,0.0005274795,0.000095141615,0.0007593209],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055726,0.0005834925,0.0006804002,0.00016097508,0.0040333085,0.0009961551,0.0012792553,0.0007205445,0.0034073428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016509737,0.00043233306,0.00029141663,0.0008237863,0.0017648004,0.024294103,0.00027055482,0.0020682507,0.0000876159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012208468,0.00006705496,0.08232328,0.00008566219,0.0002146687,0.00003855073,0.030404562,0.000033449473,0.00012776596,0.0025076885,0.88360083,0.00047439497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011049717,0.00009343397,0.025314368,0.00043177314,0.00015077065,0.00009594822,0.01674886,0.0000063363996,0.00033278906,0.0006553386,0.9545036,0.0005617921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008320592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041772724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014572774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010293036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141362884","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2001.10755938","title":"Losing the quality battle in Australian education for librarianship","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Battle; Publishing; Discipline; Political science; Identity (music); Quality (philosophy); Project commissioning; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Social science; Geography; Art; Law","score_opus":0.09317000433473416,"score_gpt":0.37945637284523887,"score_spread":0.2862863685105047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141362884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4166576,0.00010126828,0.000071301736,0.52494854,0.0022340342,0.0006790007,0.00001760852,0.00008728294,0.055203393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88172644,0.00018764586,0.0011420918,0.009978344,0.0028596874,0.000029341625,0.000025991154,0.00001945221,0.10403098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976733,0.00061224133,0.00061249506,0.00014600881,0.0004093417,0.0005466304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986574,0.00048637768,0.00031262814,0.00028237834,0.00003964518,0.00022159482],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002010136,0.00013560923,0.00014094022,0.00014511183,0.0014864022,0.0018907733,0.0012709671,0.00009531025,0.0021436196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020917892,0.0000809873,0.00013711755,0.0009093321,0.0003724866,0.025970621,0.000046298548,0.00045005127,0.00008002377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013025397,0.00013180634,0.09832515,0.000018460363,0.000018794659,0.000004305556,0.033326246,0.00012781961,0.000035465775,0.37893468,0.45340148,0.035545543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022833505,0.000029056893,0.08767275,0.00005011427,0.0000057360544,0.000030893276,0.018723503,0.000017609667,0.00008385938,0.03449573,0.8585212,0.00014118986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015317861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012920368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5149702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004234763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096013566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244472377","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2002.10755972","title":"Letters","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.046639308418055025,"score_gpt":0.2302576674741694,"score_spread":0.18361835905611437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244472377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85983026,0.00024198118,0.000010132363,0.117173284,0.00059811753,0.00012932174,0.000027923448,0.00029901482,0.021689985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9419422,0.000052803647,0.0008450388,0.003475097,0.0016714149,0.0000023026857,0.0000030369906,0.00011876225,0.05188932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839103,0.0002529421,0.00031244635,0.0001386765,0.00036559458,0.0005393212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910647,0.000048971677,0.00018290401,0.00038134956,0.000008872406,0.00027143257],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023170204,0.00018444956,0.00014371859,0.00013085779,0.00040140896,0.0005281594,0.00091794494,0.000043466003,0.03421512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013646201,0.00011495982,0.00016728563,0.00039218858,0.00018575406,0.0023304624,0.00007052277,0.00078893144,0.020654613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001842058,0.000035549117,0.004104271,0.000001812996,0.000051646995,0.00020011266,0.00037484718,0.00009664789,0.007780396,0.0004941156,0.9858936,0.00094857503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011290183,0.00009322521,0.038646754,0.00006708368,0.000075564596,0.007839248,0.00029127242,0.0001537241,0.00699993,0.002526005,0.9416869,0.0004912714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013382385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.04153465e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11369819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002350757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011611189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}