{"meta":{"query_hash":"6c119ceb7bc0","filters":{"venue":"The Australian Library Journal"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6c119ceb7bc0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Australian+Library+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1576875018","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2015.1017915","title":"Serving remote communities together: a Canadian joint use library study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College; Royal Saskatchewan Museum; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Space (punctuation); Exploratory research; Project commissioning; Joint (building); Business; Knowledge management; Publishing; Library science; Engineering; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.19709272885970153,"score_gpt":0.32111384152819467,"score_spread":0.12402111266849314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576875018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98346967,0.0006339146,0.00017202893,0.0016381571,0.000027494458,0.00043288112,0.00024945202,0.000010829172,0.0133654745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910817,0.0010752975,0.0004510756,0.0012653267,0.000012694483,0.00027827075,0.00017421115,0.000018239445,0.0056432276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99270165,0.0015650733,0.00022287249,0.00059266516,0.0017247818,0.0031929926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988214,0.0016859621,0.0008998549,0.0004203068,0.004344094,0.004435689],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074662487,0.00071923167,0.0013265269,0.005146633,0.04741931,0.007839661,0.0030822868,0.0017362639,0.0059307995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011147435,0.0011278017,0.00065584725,0.012415568,0.0065155257,0.003812592,0.008671955,0.0032296819,0.00071009056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001984555,0.00095089636,0.07451066,0.0003450997,0.00003320667,0.0024765206,0.8881315,0.00010349476,0.0005669631,0.0037479016,0.0052424544,0.023692833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019907913,0.00012158844,0.04877218,0.00014757394,0.000020354048,0.00018353773,0.93735045,0.000119820914,0.00008287572,0.00018068742,0.012956312,0.000044742003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9921603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.108336315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1444859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78603864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968486898","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10722684","title":"Scholarship-in-Practice Bridging the literacy gap between boys and girls: An opportunity for the National Year of Reading 2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Reading (process); Literacy; Scholarship; Psychology; Reading motivation; Information literacy; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2237162539941408,"score_gpt":0.4529279603775506,"score_spread":0.22921170638340982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968486898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20475613,0.011903974,0.002085596,0.64217186,0.014308792,0.0006415443,0.00038417534,0.0005190944,0.12322885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7556978,0.0076500964,0.009552285,0.07761188,0.005990545,0.00097613636,0.000423349,0.00040217923,0.14169578],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860931,0.0057022315,0.00043874673,0.00061187247,0.0020233497,0.0051307753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92777413,0.0063086217,0.0018550472,0.0019455343,0.0054369797,0.056679733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019830616,0.0005182099,0.0010869239,0.0019422604,0.02430924,0.014147664,0.003149317,0.007494039,0.02565144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024323381,0.0007436033,0.0010273302,0.0018547438,0.0049090963,0.014870906,0.028435618,0.010358776,0.0055208234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031060574,0.0029886179,0.023703372,0.001334953,0.000039407565,0.0029155246,0.15155827,0.000087776214,0.0012052385,0.03984206,0.3411372,0.43487707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010707964,0.001119634,0.059642937,0.0016670587,0.000040749383,0.00090595783,0.21749221,0.0001415788,0.0013065421,0.00946391,0.7080072,0.000105154046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008938593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06644883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02565144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007268349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047392387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104875565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977745968","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2006.10721863","title":"<b>Focuses on the benefit to the individual: Rubin, Rhea J<i>Demonstrating results: using outcome measurement in your library.</i>PLA results series. Chicago: American Library Association, 2006. 176p US$50.00 (US$45.00 ALA members) soft cover ISBN 0838935605</b>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Outcome (game theory); Cover (algebra); Library science; Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; History; Engineering; Psychology; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Biology","score_opus":0.05051649923834206,"score_gpt":0.24251085337637784,"score_spread":0.19199435413803578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977745968","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002697622,0.7937571,0.0034858154,0.12443134,0.019736819,0.000422542,0.0009161603,0.0004568688,0.05652361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00641604,0.80476564,0.0056367135,0.06339704,0.01636979,0.0010053292,0.0011794744,0.00043915768,0.10079087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98576397,0.0067266254,0.0012192851,0.0008894557,0.0050013405,0.0003992945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95753586,0.020570451,0.0040363367,0.001893977,0.014482729,0.00148053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016540855,0.0013749818,0.001613062,0.005873552,0.0011935709,0.005671914,0.0017663614,0.0044415197,0.07532964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064159535,0.0009176841,0.0014832491,0.0075976243,0.0020509376,0.008394477,0.003238688,0.0036068764,0.06334549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018837987,0.000009067557,0.00015652689,0.00244951,0.000024832963,0.000013300167,0.00006525628,0.000020221642,0.0000888078,0.0010335653,0.90947914,0.08664086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019921637,0.00003542364,0.0018568034,0.007611681,0.000078657285,0.0002460044,0.00020562476,0.000034700668,0.00022064673,0.0020925628,0.9875673,0.000030571002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011905538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015405924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07532964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031694178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059821843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25200272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981045347","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2013.771764","title":"The continuing relevance of the library as a third place for users and non-users of IT: the case of Canada Bay","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); The Internet; Precinct; World Wide Web; Digital library; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.015495779571621241,"score_gpt":0.26541137934710063,"score_spread":0.2499155997754794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981045347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83651716,0.001900834,0.00122283,0.030053008,0.00011810108,0.000081454666,0.000073413896,0.000045499943,0.1299877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863148,0.00048635478,0.00027247175,0.0010063623,0.000011468865,0.000018030309,0.000012989904,0.000020548769,0.011856958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326766,0.0025147384,0.00010283432,0.0003294114,0.00088028127,0.0029052566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970944,0.003512033,0.00042682065,0.00047185458,0.0018212716,0.004058493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003974534,0.00041391305,0.0005914115,0.002297278,0.05639234,0.021221085,0.0027391608,0.0039483556,0.008823052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010217046,0.00050946453,0.00050371693,0.0055373646,0.028764477,0.008675449,0.014911652,0.004333195,0.0005755622],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007094037,0.000068478534,0.013241026,0.0001156019,0.0000136590015,0.006343657,0.88500774,0.00017797181,0.000413432,0.074090645,0.004194241,0.01626259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000090533385,0.000014850326,0.0049055764,0.0001362968,0.000015785763,0.00041892222,0.9369903,0.0001610346,0.00019079339,0.0029222206,0.05419979,0.000035419096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9621444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9621444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09430255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09704282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6842161},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1991917344","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2010.10736025","title":"Assessing the collective wealth of Australian research libraries: measuring overlap using <i>WorldCat Collection Analysis</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"State Library of New South Wales","keywords":"Software; Data collection; Order (exchange); Computer science; Library science; Bibliographic database; World Wide Web; Research data; Database; Business; Sociology; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.1192533248206169,"score_gpt":0.34094806494304636,"score_spread":0.22169474012242946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991917344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516165,0.0015716179,0.006524291,0.00083334575,0.000040234758,0.00042312598,0.0020095762,0.00013053964,0.03685066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787965,0.0012277951,0.012668469,0.00012256688,0.0000737897,0.0005643197,0.0021899976,0.00005810835,0.00429852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582701,0.012494335,0.005839158,0.0025004498,0.019267172,0.001628873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87775445,0.039629266,0.034165096,0.015085318,0.029323857,0.004042052],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030324897,0.00037662926,0.0011192685,0.039066207,0.006083706,0.008265979,0.0023564321,0.000542007,0.0046556205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08651001,0.00069323933,0.0007266011,0.050825693,0.003263929,0.0073856795,0.015706524,0.00077699387,0.00085056934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023430998,0.00014161957,0.67818797,0.001241824,0.00033394597,0.00062461,0.1330393,0.0006804933,0.0014441209,0.0039224606,0.0036281243,0.17652121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073012866,0.00011408245,0.9045156,0.00034452643,0.00010925137,0.00040773884,0.06596673,0.0010631059,0.0009755793,0.0016195355,0.024786834,0.00008959328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049009446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080694675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043570194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005938403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1603753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014573773","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2002.10756004","title":"Business, knowledge, information: where's the value proposition?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Value proposition; Proposition; Power point; Project commissioning; Publishing; Value (mathematics); Management; Point (geometry); Power (physics); Library science; Engineering; Operations research; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Mathematics; Epistemology; Physics; Philosophy; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.03880395425120205,"score_gpt":0.3094526200898139,"score_spread":0.27064866583861186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014573773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005095383,0.053897202,0.023422439,0.51256084,0.008700404,0.000055600703,0.00040391876,0.00010929322,0.39575487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69554895,0.09213346,0.017367339,0.05401017,0.013947754,0.00025529435,0.0005743879,0.0003776483,0.12578498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670047,0.0016705547,0.00012746154,0.0002647586,0.0009568769,0.0002798425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941355,0.0036110869,0.0003800247,0.00026182688,0.0011754167,0.00043606214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037619432,0.0006226126,0.0010545604,0.001888948,0.0031833474,0.023617215,0.001128317,0.006399187,0.016802387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014845381,0.00042401915,0.0004043868,0.0046763127,0.01879192,0.026242882,0.0023621854,0.004900248,0.004621661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001782112,0.000008007879,0.000093584604,0.00020256768,0.000008131404,0.00010934368,0.0016020763,0.00007343228,0.00008823108,0.9422853,0.036403053,0.019108577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066581406,0.000012857447,0.00044223494,0.0009785689,0.000010358142,0.00014807591,0.004697908,0.00032791117,0.00016820582,0.7666417,0.22654557,0.000020001136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00638655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006189255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023617215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054115844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005561208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056209624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024264357","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10736059","title":"Website Accessibility: a Comparative Analysis of Australian National and State/Territory Library Websites","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Web accessibility; Screen reader; Ranking (information retrieval); World Wide Web; Web Accessibility Initiative; Guideline; Work (physics); Compliance (psychology); Computer science; Web standards; Web page; Internet privacy; Engineering; Political science; Web development; Psychology; Visually impaired; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.07150974705608026,"score_gpt":0.35400253230517326,"score_spread":0.282492785249093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024264357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99102014,0.00047955257,0.00019063208,0.00009218859,0.0000057808465,0.000040228413,0.0001629319,0.000014457223,0.0079941135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985739,0.00032865134,0.00023943117,0.000024911758,0.0000042854977,0.000025445044,0.00017742148,0.0000068493428,0.00061912625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943832,0.0018394517,0.0006226364,0.00023046132,0.0025107905,0.0004134311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97877926,0.008949547,0.003444798,0.0007340602,0.0069525475,0.001139711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005936855,0.00015187307,0.000509686,0.008675014,0.0014014229,0.0026936517,0.00051735283,0.00036293623,0.003521087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028263126,0.0002016576,0.0006960877,0.009294294,0.0011964366,0.0023552172,0.0023866494,0.00033535398,0.00047459477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007278608,0.00035579727,0.8068093,0.001510416,0.00031726246,0.0008969758,0.086016364,0.00034778268,0.0012774563,0.001244791,0.0017378664,0.0987581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040566897,0.00021237797,0.9744985,0.00009985359,0.000064113665,0.00025416954,0.022550564,0.00028273358,0.00017702638,0.000097611206,0.001747426,0.000011525154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028500438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047249034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028500438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016777192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001791459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056669116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047275852","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2003.10721576","title":"<b>Fresh and original in a well-trodden field: Eva Hemmungs Wirten<i>No trespassing: authorship, intellectual property rights, and the boundaries of globalization.</i>University of Toronto Press ISBN: 080208835X (hard cover) [2003?] np</b>","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Globalization; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Cover (algebra); Publishing; Sociology; Engineering; Political science; Management; Law; Economics; Mechanical engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017919341524308813,"score_gpt":0.20386119269693678,"score_spread":0.18594185117262796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047275852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010722633,0.10741086,0.0024970514,0.2711093,0.032495566,0.000038466118,0.00046622127,0.00041725457,0.584493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011871387,0.030936463,0.0009623938,0.02289811,0.0067939,0.000023734248,0.0002429796,0.00039005154,0.925881],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993356,0.00016516307,0.000035341283,0.00007774434,0.00030385156,0.00008216946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861646,0.00054808415,0.000078486264,0.00011135249,0.0004303866,0.00021530877],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095821015,0.0006117081,0.00041812353,0.0011376668,0.004151374,0.009530462,0.00072939805,0.0036062612,0.14826375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031973256,0.00035878073,0.0002625623,0.0021471218,0.0036250302,0.010563728,0.0020587838,0.003762385,0.050964177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057203706,0.0000031339125,0.00003307277,0.000059191156,0.0000011192825,0.000026109925,0.00041636155,0.000011166922,0.0000620379,0.023472136,0.9569598,0.018950079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.942268e-7,0.0000018879872,0.00018111234,0.00008693355,8.9801034e-7,0.000051270155,0.0005286966,0.0000144297255,0.000047116748,0.005990534,0.9930928,0.000003296774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016165813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06291585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99639374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027138472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028711108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49599165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049032469","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2000.10755925","title":"Racist disinformation on the World Wide Web: initial implications for the LIS community","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Office of the Chief Medical Examiner","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; The Internet; Racism; Pornography; Censorship; Terminology; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Computer science; Social media; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10754721372139829,"score_gpt":0.3752327489862959,"score_spread":0.2676855352648976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049032469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50611234,0.005333646,0.0011269448,0.2234833,0.00028289366,0.00012426736,0.00013265283,0.00002622885,0.26337773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879512,0.0026053132,0.0002066826,0.0030193555,0.00019095976,0.000041866402,0.000024611283,0.000011907891,0.005948084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98950773,0.0063437982,0.00024838193,0.00043494155,0.001632545,0.0018326337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95111704,0.032487497,0.0037701547,0.0011684492,0.0070890007,0.004367848],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014081139,0.00035888236,0.00043591534,0.00616332,0.021330178,0.01678748,0.0014881904,0.005180421,0.016427454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038987752,0.00044437655,0.00033130485,0.0051407646,0.021064714,0.022922957,0.0145275835,0.005327268,0.0010431897],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014623915,0.00021374745,0.024280673,0.00037995665,0.000008676906,0.0022579902,0.7644142,0.000055121513,0.00034613104,0.14172126,0.009526937,0.056649137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010075943,0.000039579638,0.015433506,0.0005650117,0.000008905914,0.0003628689,0.9242033,0.00013711656,0.00021958437,0.016279416,0.04272165,0.000019025465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028434899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04608479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98321253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008323856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008597272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07446903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052299855","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2011.10722670","title":"<i>Mentoring in the Library: Building for the Future.</i>By Marta K. Lee. ALA Guides for the Busy Librarian. Chicago: American Library Association, 2011. 122 pp. US$50.00 (US$45.00 ALA members) soft cover ISBN9780838935934 (available from In<i>books</i>)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Cover (algebra); Association (psychology); Sociology; Publishing; Media studies; Management; Engineering; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.026045165278596603,"score_gpt":0.2580350651730031,"score_spread":0.23198989989440652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052299855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018781928,0.38961348,0.0037574498,0.22136863,0.018118026,0.00018567395,0.0006785372,0.0020918963,0.36230817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015460776,0.15850388,0.004628666,0.022746008,0.003876409,0.0001800439,0.00068001536,0.0004904964,0.7934337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865735,0.0004875598,0.00008023884,0.00012076978,0.0004891981,0.0001648858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765176,0.00042459348,0.00021360972,0.0001073925,0.00061798695,0.0009847214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017499344,0.00092932425,0.00046615527,0.0010792711,0.0021413553,0.007155742,0.0010276649,0.0021934551,0.1285121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038418542,0.0005647439,0.00050966465,0.0023964,0.001235832,0.008569926,0.0040277275,0.0034189585,0.08620617],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054427182,0.000011560692,0.00010306409,0.00018249227,0.0000022507745,0.000020053856,0.00035560486,0.000011269317,0.00007072556,0.00063567655,0.93053055,0.0680713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002271272,0.000013024193,0.0007523935,0.0004481655,0.0000032317296,0.000106427215,0.0010865042,0.000019369621,0.000074429234,0.00081978017,0.99666506,0.000009285567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068051075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020131154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1285121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021447642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050614364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4299158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066570519","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2009.10735879","title":"<b>Essential and timely text for business case writers:<i>Business cases for info pros: here’s why, here’s how</i>. By Ulla De Stricker. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2008. 107 pp. US$39.50 soft cover ISBN 9781573873352.</b>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Business information; Publishing; Library science; Management; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Law; Mechanical engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.034964326167850494,"score_gpt":0.259916594607766,"score_spread":0.2249522684399155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066570519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013866994,0.032196283,0.019673921,0.13688087,0.068443336,0.0010079811,0.0056973672,0.008989438,0.7257241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008080733,0.021369977,0.012254848,0.03233763,0.016816875,0.00087033334,0.005679567,0.0036125185,0.8989775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563897,0.0014319619,0.0005149849,0.00026706644,0.0019163485,0.00023061376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96962726,0.016950477,0.0020386842,0.001705761,0.006266422,0.0034114507],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004790659,0.0020378325,0.0011769762,0.0037911371,0.0020395275,0.013914714,0.0018964054,0.0053797,0.36618304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02830244,0.001055832,0.00061798794,0.004319831,0.002650037,0.013966529,0.0044860994,0.004790184,0.3875976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006505913,0.0000072071743,0.000013589637,0.00008255185,6.9322977e-7,0.000025540785,0.00007046491,0.000010178226,0.00010420725,0.00065025326,0.98345816,0.015570697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006019337,0.0000088786455,0.00018968542,0.0002924348,7.892234e-7,0.0001271854,0.000292706,0.00004430483,0.00008567568,0.0015155642,0.99742955,0.000007120258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001477751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026575753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36618304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019101324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034641528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.904063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078823204","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2009.10735925","title":"Making a difference –<i>Better Beginnings</i>Family Literacy Program","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rio Tinto; Edith Cowan University","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Project commissioning; State (computer science); Literacy; Library science; Publishing; Public administration; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Media studies; Medical education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.08315454155804826,"score_gpt":0.40016049888142324,"score_spread":0.317005957323375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078823204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4649166,0.016431259,0.006933078,0.065405354,0.00091812847,0.008546931,0.00376698,0.0010534871,0.4320282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7248939,0.018080423,0.044909168,0.015493333,0.0003550036,0.0061150673,0.003005494,0.00013035687,0.18701726],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995022,0.00011548849,0.000033049215,0.000048434176,0.000116603034,0.00018428941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872285,0.0000820462,0.000068321126,0.000044101846,0.000158,0.00092464924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014207832,0.00015159397,0.00018252857,0.0006488848,0.0014319816,0.0005158097,0.00056423654,0.00048168434,0.010801193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012957866,0.00018264086,0.00029764586,0.0003714766,0.0004119327,0.0007425167,0.0016521999,0.001099638,0.00078986073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000189703,0.0018445719,0.015280027,0.0012251949,0.000024273579,0.0007610449,0.008912489,0.0004375407,0.0014198584,0.008272212,0.13215995,0.82947314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026553113,0.0020506978,0.2825103,0.0017388649,0.00004044401,0.0011965904,0.0039491346,0.00049534213,0.0013923509,0.0037451626,0.7025594,0.000056095927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03665573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08945557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03665573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025172972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009959577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07288474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089528207","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2013.878269","title":"Developing community-led public libraries: Evidence from the UK and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Library science; Political science; Publishing; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10623490330290203,"score_gpt":0.29835229301309607,"score_spread":0.19211738971019404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089528207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7973105,0.02332712,0.0003854574,0.03894254,0.00027376693,0.00049552246,0.0019666203,0.00007133329,0.13722715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98196006,0.009088922,0.00031460918,0.0029836167,0.000023733397,0.00012068881,0.00037221212,0.000027841144,0.005108274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97809243,0.0046850587,0.0009583042,0.0008300585,0.008781018,0.0066531175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91307706,0.015565591,0.0063367463,0.0022995318,0.044721086,0.017999975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011785332,0.0004457677,0.0010489004,0.0033943937,0.013501007,0.011072417,0.0041122935,0.002323914,0.008184178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06423553,0.0006438246,0.0005882476,0.011485162,0.006928362,0.0039547686,0.008644329,0.0027841905,0.0005534695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018672419,0.001365781,0.39867714,0.0058022304,0.00072334055,0.0027051906,0.23015292,0.0012639645,0.00045882328,0.051186893,0.087648764,0.21814772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006109636,0.00036366802,0.5549101,0.0072475993,0.0005296254,0.00046127214,0.33361018,0.00062228076,0.000416073,0.002819383,0.09816445,0.00024434013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99276817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10261349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10261349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24600652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74451643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095443512","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2011.10722600","title":"<i>Index It Right! Advice from the Experts, Volume 2.</i>Ed. by Janet Perlman and Enid L. Zafran. Medford, NJ: Information Today in association with the American Society of Indexers, 2010. 170 pp. A$40.00 (A$32.00 ASI members) soft cover ISBN 9781573873963","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Cover (algebra); Association (psychology); Library science; Management; Engineering; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Physics; Economics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.01678444859157707,"score_gpt":0.20005970164542844,"score_spread":0.18327525305385137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095443512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007648898,0.11903306,0.0067678094,0.11448434,0.059657004,0.0004611987,0.0038685529,0.00547113,0.6894919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001627515,0.033982344,0.0039217705,0.019674413,0.008323361,0.00016042695,0.001644769,0.0012036721,0.9294618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987452,0.00017689397,0.00009859633,0.00012888803,0.00075874256,0.00009164947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967211,0.00055300817,0.0002110839,0.00016954243,0.0018734789,0.00047168994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015788873,0.0014741984,0.001177805,0.0031620325,0.0020840396,0.005275868,0.0014857429,0.0027551805,0.33464134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095098205,0.0007239135,0.00061931426,0.0026810125,0.0008185975,0.007447238,0.00232632,0.0023448786,0.5096698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000407436,0.0000026800187,0.000032046224,0.000071900344,5.9451804e-7,0.000011212439,0.000039143506,0.0000039639776,0.00006279512,0.00014513994,0.9694518,0.03017468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011197882,0.0000029708765,0.00011008495,0.00012429811,0.0000010964363,0.00006096433,0.00008503234,0.0000073161623,0.000033277618,0.00025050377,0.9993199,0.0000034143159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004963314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012191697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33464134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024086756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9490534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170630960","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2006.10721878","title":"Providing library resources to 37 medical students at eight remote sites across 2600 km","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Metropolitan area; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); The Internet; Medical education; Internet access; Library science; Geography; Business; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Archaeology","score_opus":0.022672173454050117,"score_gpt":0.32312517040553995,"score_spread":0.30045299695148986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170630960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922416,0.00024212243,0.00021832882,0.0012764244,0.000026014655,0.00038105412,0.00014321318,0.00004772172,0.005423472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97768915,0.0008524396,0.0022601504,0.0016027355,0.0000937566,0.0003395788,0.00027658278,0.0000331225,0.016852627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987268,0.0002706223,0.00008170047,0.000119562246,0.00011604063,0.00068521756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656796,0.00026357797,0.00024793015,0.000085820255,0.00024121691,0.002593518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011274043,0.00081236317,0.00087932596,0.0014711062,0.011536879,0.0027100346,0.0013519343,0.001389823,0.03626409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002619128,0.0013349615,0.0005790551,0.0027980823,0.00195805,0.0012589782,0.0071120155,0.001133284,0.009453397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002222661,0.008191609,0.54558575,0.0014196002,0.0001336474,0.03016838,0.15808414,0.001210673,0.007846317,0.0015892264,0.026243739,0.21730427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068402936,0.0081584165,0.36288062,0.00063499715,0.00018569505,0.011310646,0.47896144,0.0019401995,0.005409913,0.0019255754,0.12763606,0.0002724512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021186413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08498112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03626409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039191903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009384102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12131548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241707088","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2012.10722697","title":"<i>Implementing Technology Solutions in Libraries: Techniques, Tools and Tips from the Trenches.</i>By Karen C. Knox. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2011. 173 pp. US$35.00 soft cover ISBN 9781573874038","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.021620214832116173,"score_gpt":0.22303194013332692,"score_spread":0.20141172530121074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241707088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015679471,0.31792873,0.070636235,0.1358822,0.016854376,0.00056767464,0.00068458635,0.007579704,0.44829854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012913602,0.1968118,0.07151499,0.026741471,0.0039971964,0.000513084,0.0010892268,0.0024135404,0.68400514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607205,0.0011348587,0.00028164507,0.00024494497,0.001997297,0.0002690995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651057,0.0014612105,0.00031850976,0.0002751222,0.0009914234,0.00044311295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029628512,0.0019360497,0.00075046666,0.002502131,0.0023863667,0.013289654,0.0017074002,0.0039000544,0.06529713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061069005,0.0012319302,0.0009385706,0.004996338,0.0035387082,0.022241961,0.0052929525,0.0066545396,0.0790804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013319342,0.000026351758,0.00014591895,0.0008088137,0.00001177664,0.00006238213,0.0011208579,0.000081852726,0.0006164757,0.010143143,0.7630475,0.22392161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003287125,0.00001833058,0.00034125894,0.00081051857,0.000005984299,0.00024655732,0.00096015196,0.000082070685,0.00029859968,0.0060036667,0.9912142,0.000015249807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003641595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009292024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06529713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022784488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004898774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21844065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314106763","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2008.10722455","title":"<b>Where we came from:<i>Uniting a Profession: The Australian Institute of Librarians, 1937–1949,</i>by Jean P Whyte and David J Jones. Canberra: Australian Library and Information Association, 2007. 279pp. $42.50 soft cover ISBN 978086045658</b>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Australian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Cover (algebra); Publishing; Media studies; Sociology; Management; Engineering; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.021895168176070064,"score_gpt":0.24135843700409743,"score_spread":0.21946326882802736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314106763","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011646231,0.6924136,0.0006661569,0.09871838,0.013218224,0.00006792185,0.001110451,0.00016199388,0.19247857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017569438,0.28272042,0.0016102069,0.0206152,0.004670869,0.0001248755,0.0011438949,0.00023561725,0.6713095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988103,0.00022896288,0.000105123174,0.0001379898,0.0005647808,0.00015287194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987244,0.0002667545,0.00014926186,0.00006223341,0.00050235796,0.00029495652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001499872,0.0008108914,0.0005802527,0.003268824,0.003252332,0.007860272,0.0009866073,0.0029129095,0.10936173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030824156,0.0007485218,0.00046616836,0.00838494,0.0029392582,0.010099417,0.0030762148,0.0036608793,0.058362402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011821855,0.000009491883,0.00034205927,0.00040974602,0.000004945365,0.000029867037,0.0017854377,0.000020642214,0.00010870885,0.0039219027,0.93754834,0.055806972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011239977,0.0000033667602,0.0017410527,0.00037923476,0.000002597374,0.000042289346,0.0010299222,0.000006114553,0.000035248617,0.0006061252,0.99614704,0.0000059731483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08014078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15767428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10936173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070626815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007131706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36585146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3141362884","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2001.10755938","title":"Losing the quality battle in Australian education for librarianship","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Battle; Publishing; Discipline; Political science; Identity (music); Quality (philosophy); Project commissioning; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Social science; Geography; Art; Law","score_opus":0.09317000433473416,"score_gpt":0.37945637284523887,"score_spread":0.2862863685105047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3141362884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04229866,0.0096251145,0.0017281404,0.8799424,0.004382929,0.000051950024,0.000013007264,0.00009184835,0.061865903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6377925,0.008654079,0.004339324,0.2558607,0.002847966,0.00011590018,0.00003116268,0.00019038677,0.09016797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9470623,0.024513924,0.002474464,0.0016215532,0.017476505,0.0068512894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9191117,0.026567213,0.0054596476,0.0027003346,0.01774771,0.028413419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043150987,0.0003085089,0.00077438715,0.002950337,0.029497169,0.02399745,0.0020339128,0.009986587,0.0074374108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07302403,0.00070042006,0.0007480355,0.0044930126,0.020166319,0.0114524225,0.018696953,0.013312479,0.0012237966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011644677,0.00039302625,0.010999364,0.001074702,0.000073207586,0.0010015251,0.20743038,0.0003191734,0.000487807,0.2729918,0.19247763,0.31263494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005319007,0.00033156405,0.03066338,0.00094459,0.000035394263,0.00045215053,0.08598265,0.00037679463,0.00037675438,0.078795694,0.8018781,0.00010970348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07803294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09398595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07803294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029813308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058109928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22820699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244472377","doi":"10.1080/00049670.2002.10755972","title":"Letters","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Library Journal","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.046639308418055025,"score_gpt":0.2302576674741694,"score_spread":0.18361835905611437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244472377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001640475,0.0030889057,0.00032208278,0.42992094,0.12256479,0.00015525974,0.0006141801,0.0004020753,0.44129136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003955685,0.0006785879,0.000101322374,0.13802294,0.007977341,0.000042223757,0.00010469304,0.00006436709,0.84905285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981146,0.00023001939,0.00009542858,0.00029880516,0.00082503504,0.00043608277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957611,0.0012236458,0.00015897803,0.00027142448,0.0016797442,0.00090517197],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012477718,0.0005844006,0.00061548036,0.0010993257,0.0059552,0.0067603476,0.0014191124,0.011810632,0.29303932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013316638,0.00045597783,0.0010125422,0.0007158397,0.001250771,0.0021307424,0.0020147574,0.009206012,0.16050442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024073692,0.000012669743,0.00009767212,0.000030576728,0.0000023639323,0.00013300571,0.00005284792,0.000009800582,0.00007484205,0.0019406823,0.9925047,0.005116682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001298774,0.00001508312,0.00045100515,0.00004808579,0.00000494477,0.00011873323,0.00021364033,0.000028762779,0.00012694945,0.0012452313,0.99772733,0.000007264509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009597687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021502724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7069607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031474421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003948646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}