{"meta":{"query_hash":"2aeaa68e1f98","filters":{"venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2aeaa68e1f98","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+B+E+Journal+of+Theoretical+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W139784905","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1606","title":"Status, Inequality and Intertemporal Choice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Pareto principle; Inequality; Externality; Elasticity of substitution; Intertemporal choice; Econometrics; Distortion (music); Microeconomics; Distribution (mathematics); Production (economics); Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.022473998815325674,"score_gpt":0.238402203698055,"score_spread":0.21592820488272935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W139784905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7696857,0.0024031901,0.1251905,0.008519659,0.00010045046,0.00008747986,0.0003944527,0.00004531078,0.09357323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864878,0.00062403374,0.0039470103,0.00011004456,0.000023646773,0.00003016771,0.00006197278,0.000006129082,0.008709269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999534,0.00026891043,0.00001471019,0.000056700097,0.000055182758,0.000070563074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868506,0.0007058175,0.00027715886,0.00012988514,0.00007461949,0.00012740574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011110409,0.00046948506,0.00039377055,0.00043098908,0.0006178445,0.001897806,0.00055715395,0.0010582983,0.0051266877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033862654,0.00026573552,0.00035882057,0.00060084986,0.0016506425,0.0028678526,0.0010262242,0.0010875786,0.0004124925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014391729,0.00009422282,0.009412623,0.0000374864,0.000039581297,0.0002381255,0.0006330622,0.034953725,0.0004614031,0.94166785,0.00068552286,0.01163258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055014472,0.00008542598,0.007325442,0.000044813634,0.000034736524,0.00014161241,0.00038091792,0.08118376,0.000182105,0.9044235,0.006116828,0.000025901045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038051342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034822708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051266877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015755885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058384915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017150462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509914498","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2015-0106","title":"Sellers’ Implicit Collusion in Directed Search Markets","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Microeconomics; Comparative statics; Order (exchange); Mechanism (biology); Economics; Complete information; Mechanism design","score_opus":0.039315535609013,"score_gpt":0.3337670656636441,"score_spread":0.2944515300546311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509914498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.639117,0.00055458455,0.33546332,0.0013673055,0.00003962656,0.00018055533,0.00015568882,0.000098613535,0.023023289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99054974,0.00014430661,0.0075461925,0.000064166496,0.000017480505,0.000051535386,0.000021947639,0.000008229752,0.001596322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955641,0.0026502358,0.00021359859,0.00048086827,0.000685264,0.0004059664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96642685,0.024872022,0.0042657014,0.002306333,0.0012062605,0.0009228948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007247066,0.00053761015,0.0015672252,0.0010826224,0.0007806136,0.003911374,0.002167461,0.0026312773,0.0044457577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030281257,0.0006874262,0.00089142146,0.0009932839,0.0030135438,0.005787126,0.002799879,0.001738266,0.00040270493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041584682,0.00018270328,0.0027279183,0.00023333475,0.00015781702,0.0007407557,0.00074762607,0.11566514,0.0033460644,0.86292404,0.0007686721,0.012090055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002160163,0.00013647058,0.0007915444,0.000045738787,0.000045269677,0.00027937262,0.00021960793,0.38557267,0.0008859227,0.6103006,0.001453909,0.000052799678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008626029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046749355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007247066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013298139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078452576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03832656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580201307","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1345","title":"Mixed Oligopoly under Demand Uncertainty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Oligopoly; Microeconomics; Economics; Commit; Outcome (game theory); Nash equilibrium; Pareto principle; Volatility (finance); Production (economics); Cournot competition; Econometrics","score_opus":0.09075719410335807,"score_gpt":0.2712184317699497,"score_spread":0.1804612376665916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580201307","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20068412,0.0015951782,0.7504783,0.0024216434,0.00017326564,0.00010912481,0.00069752306,0.00023055458,0.043610226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969638,0.00052463985,0.020917041,0.0001972201,0.00010278931,0.00009481775,0.00009624866,0.00002359998,0.008405696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863905,0.00056923553,0.000049930204,0.00026728553,0.0002300832,0.00024443716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979563,0.00095318723,0.00047845274,0.00023622531,0.00016525095,0.00021056611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001069652,0.0010224496,0.0014150896,0.0005275302,0.0008303429,0.0025617857,0.0011736394,0.0016540146,0.004392439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030130195,0.00070802314,0.0010663881,0.00094400183,0.0015757191,0.0028855337,0.0016372965,0.0017450368,0.00041726188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008565001,0.000047744295,0.0006771682,0.000063805266,0.000054583084,0.00030658132,0.000090711175,0.3136813,0.0008260343,0.6792866,0.0007374109,0.004142392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003650606,0.00005037923,0.00022227022,0.000013368008,0.000015744154,0.00006585464,0.0000347106,0.70399374,0.00014283965,0.29340288,0.002000829,0.000020907344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004097837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033940165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004392439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018072168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095935416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014694214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968689576","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1363","title":"Counter Marginalization of Information Rents: Implementing Negatively Correlated Compensation Schemes for Colluding Parties","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Economic rent; Private information retrieval; Outcome (game theory); Production (economics); Microeconomics; Payment; Constraint (computer-aided design); Economics; Principal–agent problem; Moral hazard; Compensation (psychology); Business; Finance; Computer science; Incentive; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.07205836130744285,"score_gpt":0.33843598201726355,"score_spread":0.2663776207098207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968689576","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45562616,0.00036025516,0.51440483,0.0013178629,0.000060065377,0.00036315204,0.00008897811,0.00020772824,0.027570942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97711015,0.00008208708,0.020875683,0.00007162945,0.000017708291,0.00009317995,0.000013747766,0.000013751909,0.0017219922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945693,0.0032092135,0.00029523947,0.0004340991,0.00072288845,0.0007693666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98444426,0.008382418,0.0022937115,0.0034608806,0.0007990748,0.0006197101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00815856,0.0010408856,0.0014164147,0.0007725791,0.00096071576,0.0030778502,0.002799188,0.0023809355,0.0058407886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024137309,0.0005435958,0.0011533068,0.00077584,0.0033624235,0.0036917094,0.004370342,0.0019573402,0.00046684564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014315749,0.00062749145,0.0027560822,0.00020913719,0.00021558543,0.0003478155,0.0006397575,0.17950289,0.007360784,0.7583946,0.0010739249,0.047440402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042045594,0.00049060455,0.00084931724,0.00009418835,0.00012290501,0.00015895748,0.00022694835,0.61610687,0.0042647743,0.37564254,0.0015663349,0.00005600094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007396286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007073123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00815856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016792663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002063046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043147147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996999179","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1591","title":"A Theory of Credibility under Commitment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Credibility; Bayesian game; Microeconomics; Economics; Stochastic game; Class (philosophy); Rationality; Contingency; Bayesian probability; Mathematical economics; Repeated game; Game theory; Computer science","score_opus":0.07087454318798433,"score_gpt":0.3530560288480631,"score_spread":0.2821814856600787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996999179","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033801246,0.004688228,0.57220894,0.020300776,0.0006489169,0.00016550875,0.00054784486,0.00015974973,0.3674789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8960374,0.004012416,0.056926277,0.0020869235,0.0016379965,0.00044995404,0.00019481049,0.000110718014,0.038543478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946325,0.0026060857,0.00022138422,0.0007593543,0.0012754127,0.0005052947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98649395,0.009323898,0.0011763036,0.0014131106,0.0010946317,0.00049808424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058481335,0.0007433288,0.0009440923,0.0015721194,0.0020354379,0.0054381066,0.0019853313,0.0052933316,0.015145629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022642778,0.0005998779,0.0010334271,0.001720914,0.0076856436,0.008878289,0.0027138623,0.0044511193,0.0015163659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035555895,0.0000034415777,0.000035175606,0.000013764867,0.0000038970634,0.000020767746,0.000058648402,0.0012910342,0.000035599987,0.996582,0.00056680397,0.0013853312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007672728,0.00000652459,0.000046741854,0.000017833674,0.0000033685346,0.00003075731,0.000019959685,0.0055204914,0.000025547433,0.99161583,0.0027008674,0.0000044481367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021332612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008671056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015145629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032997052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021720435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050667167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998613972","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1276","title":"First-Degree Discrimination by a Duopoly: Pricing and Quality Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Duopoly; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics; Price discrimination; Pareto principle; Quality (philosophy); Contrast (vision); Function (biology); Welfare; Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Cournot competition; Operations management","score_opus":0.036501543649315966,"score_gpt":0.2591406847898846,"score_spread":0.22263914114056865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998613972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96497923,0.00018876624,0.016297702,0.0005969587,0.0000119491115,0.000028743101,0.00002226834,0.00000776298,0.017866597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905235,0.00003355987,0.00045710482,0.000024898178,0.0000034556936,0.000002817761,0.000003499217,8.1917887e-7,0.00042160723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986877,0.00051746756,0.000049842714,0.00018430616,0.00018401076,0.00037655706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945831,0.002645812,0.0013191333,0.00055376225,0.0002725556,0.00062561623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001806626,0.00026576794,0.0006378149,0.00025000126,0.0009214854,0.002887819,0.0006342515,0.0013680161,0.0026520276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00826411,0.00023567786,0.00045407476,0.0003983207,0.0021608153,0.0022671851,0.0013237983,0.0015770654,0.00016499464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013737467,0.00093510083,0.054449778,0.00016258204,0.00015699984,0.0013749255,0.0017142289,0.033340722,0.016659256,0.85376453,0.0012272472,0.03484081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029317828,0.00071275246,0.046059504,0.00008338989,0.00008561977,0.00137195,0.0027379051,0.18985754,0.005062179,0.74977773,0.0038501427,0.00010809408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025629716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019880135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002887819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013683536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048683165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009928167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031320758","doi":"10.2202/1534-598x.1250","title":"Likely Events and Possible States","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Recipe; Monotonic function; Preference; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03492388371377373,"score_gpt":0.3302847674715733,"score_spread":0.29536088375779956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031320758","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017491454,0.0037483266,0.88917637,0.0072986637,0.00037034386,0.0001901332,0.0007415758,0.00023566814,0.080747455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5584811,0.003964433,0.41934523,0.0011603673,0.00096418074,0.0006420235,0.0011733737,0.00012971852,0.014139653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940224,0.0027608806,0.0004917598,0.0012094395,0.0011966329,0.00031891148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914436,0.005972709,0.0006131114,0.00090409664,0.00072715455,0.00033935506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006663447,0.0009877312,0.00076616026,0.003635653,0.0022316044,0.007564798,0.0018329212,0.0026651642,0.013909917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01882064,0.0010959593,0.0017165313,0.0014977562,0.0074691717,0.01626084,0.0042689317,0.0038192263,0.0014202102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010083946,0.0000052773325,0.00012922032,0.00002803972,0.000009653345,0.000058134232,0.00019281647,0.00090475695,0.000071088645,0.9948068,0.00039991332,0.0033841266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004526371,0.0000057024426,0.00006854052,0.000025486917,0.0000062114086,0.000054253625,0.00006019601,0.0018922532,0.00009717845,0.99263215,0.0051462506,0.0000074020854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008205046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085947535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013909917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001486873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009173501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046533287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052493330","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1522","title":"Optimal Auctions with Simultaneous and Costly Participation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Common value auction; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Microeconomics; Revenue equivalence; English auction; Information asymmetry; Auction theory; Vickrey auction; Economics; Forward auction; Private information retrieval; Reverse auction; Generalized second-price auction; Profit (economics); Mathematical economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03199326494438292,"score_gpt":0.3361245097220525,"score_spread":0.30413124477766956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052493330","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4000846,0.0007751496,0.5670519,0.00228338,0.000106843545,0.00032521333,0.0003125285,0.00023965567,0.02882086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447007,0.00026711114,0.050015673,0.00014458128,0.00008258044,0.00023050413,0.000118386044,0.000049839702,0.0043905787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887377,0.0066694897,0.00054527266,0.0012561723,0.0013562586,0.0014351308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718426,0.01834214,0.0041390406,0.0029462313,0.0015840679,0.001145916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009874879,0.0012836776,0.003176096,0.0008202411,0.001082836,0.004859017,0.0035944597,0.003349193,0.0030761345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040835515,0.0013558833,0.0014141458,0.001779278,0.0029665357,0.0070638256,0.0027838715,0.0025554493,0.0005002284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000823271,0.00057327806,0.0017963313,0.00034532262,0.00021480814,0.00072840345,0.00052576355,0.35328215,0.0024376807,0.61064523,0.0020642476,0.026563518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033958312,0.00014288019,0.0004898849,0.000034980556,0.00004967152,0.00020421937,0.00013218935,0.5389141,0.00076207134,0.45784262,0.0010392248,0.00004851727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015340676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010811336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009874879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025289995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031077066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05222398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076195851","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1417","title":"Comparative Statics and Welfare in Heterogeneous All-Pay Auctions: Bribes, Caps, and Performance Thresholds","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative statics; Microeconomics; Common value auction; Economics; Stochastic game; Vickrey auction; Preemption; Revenue; Welfare; Set (abstract data type); Mathematical economics; Auction theory; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.07783051250226952,"score_gpt":0.33536814034625745,"score_spread":0.2575376278439879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076195851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5097239,0.005737727,0.3030437,0.0043716505,0.00019987454,0.00034244187,0.000870519,0.0003265231,0.17538369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98425126,0.0011145715,0.0075395335,0.00022621706,0.000097249664,0.00017625601,0.00015311227,0.00006128092,0.0063804565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951704,0.0026390068,0.00014744063,0.0004494428,0.0005626727,0.001030977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808934,0.012232154,0.0032694929,0.0014051163,0.00084887893,0.0013508864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104371,0.0019953079,0.0025812786,0.0026102692,0.0018926437,0.008693614,0.0024802138,0.0040085283,0.012420217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032515187,0.0009443981,0.0022029686,0.002049087,0.0045982418,0.011492153,0.0028016276,0.0030061302,0.0011237288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005307896,0.00016953061,0.002066611,0.00020625589,0.00015292784,0.00047436438,0.0003489359,0.13001691,0.0016956094,0.8485709,0.0027056485,0.013061564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107476335,0.00033055767,0.002597575,0.00017907814,0.00010850809,0.00054848095,0.0006271943,0.14109172,0.0006472119,0.85073847,0.0029232127,0.00010054861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012491298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082579954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012420217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046582394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014827324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0551973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094045559","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2012-0006","title":"A Simple Bargaining Procedure for the Myerson Value","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Component (thermodynamics); Value (mathematics); Negotiation; Graph; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Statistics","score_opus":0.021792430562208653,"score_gpt":0.2233797024792038,"score_spread":0.20158727191699516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094045559","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042756073,0.00015533292,0.879254,0.0010978752,0.00016065425,0.0003796209,0.00009789963,0.00021245956,0.07588611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7157019,0.00018036307,0.26169387,0.00027139325,0.0001210666,0.00058764714,0.00006703778,0.00011452402,0.021262167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966101,0.0019423168,0.00011394914,0.00038003788,0.0007167186,0.00023684667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645895,0.002403678,0.00023525018,0.00046331264,0.00028627092,0.00015252194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049438556,0.0008416717,0.000769484,0.0011153012,0.0017082813,0.0023248552,0.0021331364,0.0027301994,0.014922877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014535307,0.00050529203,0.0010197826,0.0010659427,0.0042957678,0.004949472,0.0023926105,0.0022138192,0.0017214229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033851593,0.000019041305,0.000058478538,0.000020954407,0.0000096797285,0.00003555464,0.000093111914,0.008492842,0.0010033756,0.9829366,0.00076047925,0.0065360144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042068194,0.000030938278,0.00006581322,0.000016195163,0.000008894314,0.000034547866,0.000030385803,0.06999684,0.00081819185,0.92537475,0.003562177,0.000019356472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069881324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007564036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014922877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019562682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014128919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04992205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103447210","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2013-0071","title":"Academia or the Private Sector? Sorting of Agents into Institutions and an Outside Sector","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Sorting; Compensation (psychology); Distribution (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Private sector; Value (mathematics); Economics; Labour economics; Promotion (chess); Business; Microeconomics; Economic growth; Statistics; Market economy; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.055260161691315514,"score_gpt":0.27000595984143366,"score_spread":0.21474579815011816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103447210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80702436,0.0004518772,0.108402945,0.01213492,0.00011463543,0.00014476855,0.00031567027,0.00011974799,0.07129103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98558724,0.00013796696,0.0038686134,0.00036753036,0.000037422084,0.000039636572,0.000036810296,0.000010163022,0.009914566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987405,0.00056353834,0.00003807261,0.00015394855,0.0001114307,0.00039244918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99694985,0.0012436655,0.00059516024,0.0003056965,0.00025395924,0.00065164466],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002254406,0.0003654245,0.0011872596,0.0005930476,0.0015152509,0.0036324335,0.0008538195,0.0022007036,0.0138145285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046624797,0.00032895443,0.00059155613,0.0006965662,0.0021671287,0.0026352585,0.0011588549,0.0009531266,0.0014032945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067438226,0.0004147344,0.009300793,0.000076186014,0.000058354828,0.00037758445,0.0005403067,0.071185336,0.0027295663,0.8855215,0.0041257967,0.0249954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008272246,0.0003301851,0.0051125684,0.00007261565,0.000065641514,0.00022496685,0.0019505798,0.29420528,0.0013241608,0.6842304,0.011584654,0.000071702816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061660926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004667439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020401864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015896132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046214223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113598455","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1663","title":"A Property of Solutions to Linear Monopoly Problems","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Boundary (topology); Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Mathematical optimization; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Null (SQL); Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.15432580318414915,"score_gpt":0.32718631583710406,"score_spread":0.1728605126529549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113598455","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14136647,0.0012387336,0.74596107,0.004881673,0.00017317483,0.0002055361,0.0006846207,0.0005463923,0.10494234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802142,0.0013413677,0.09761462,0.00084309094,0.000316931,0.00058058795,0.0008563362,0.00030220835,0.017930575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997964,0.00074110867,0.00013174782,0.00038459798,0.0004757089,0.00030288633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99139637,0.0056226654,0.0010265919,0.00072420505,0.0008223161,0.00040786815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002640274,0.00071911,0.0013660177,0.0010476939,0.0014543412,0.0030753918,0.0017131976,0.0020119136,0.016340848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025994077,0.00061592105,0.0011479569,0.0016434251,0.0025881135,0.0060973912,0.0027145725,0.0032672551,0.0017759823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001154319,0.00006157261,0.00046122327,0.0002650063,0.00003784893,0.00011082614,0.0005045863,0.010582198,0.0017578636,0.9581478,0.003918784,0.024036909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010736532,0.000090911795,0.00024048633,0.00007653292,0.000013022407,0.00022618829,0.00016756725,0.038317434,0.0008521794,0.9524142,0.0074750525,0.000019060764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042524017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020813836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016340848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006152338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067468156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054665565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127116288","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1687","title":"Existence Advertising, Price Competition and Asymmetric Market Structure","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Canterbury","keywords":"Duopoly; Bertrand competition; Microeconomics; Competition (biology); Economics; Stage (stratigraphy); Strategy; Oligopoly; Game theory; Cournot competition","score_opus":0.0059632242382532934,"score_gpt":0.2051056065160548,"score_spread":0.1991423822778015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127116288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8396501,0.00047918386,0.095316,0.0013050031,0.000035636247,0.00012638606,0.00010843693,0.000057225687,0.06292215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951609,0.00009583564,0.0027543777,0.000034262066,0.000014327969,0.000025083975,0.000014761966,0.0000030540793,0.001897402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859685,0.00066468405,0.000040445193,0.0001423907,0.0002115215,0.0003440504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99301684,0.0047951033,0.0011527502,0.0003345211,0.00030383436,0.00039691222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016400581,0.00056321884,0.00075808575,0.0006562925,0.000860245,0.002366258,0.0011604086,0.0017630131,0.0035217365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008079246,0.00063194986,0.00049954886,0.0005110623,0.0023034601,0.0035435373,0.0013061869,0.0013164951,0.00025075607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005079052,0.00041260204,0.0050657466,0.00013573731,0.0000572392,0.00078353233,0.00040062354,0.09192561,0.0043789595,0.8825423,0.00097062375,0.012819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024376952,0.00025675714,0.005200769,0.00003448059,0.00006860004,0.00062139716,0.00031941547,0.5804271,0.0017294447,0.4087682,0.0022604426,0.00006957303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030427666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025549352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035217365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020789446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009995459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015083909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129798231","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1490","title":"Advice from Multiple Experts: A Comparison of Simultaneous, Sequential, and Hierarchical Communication","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Decision maker; Computer science; Preference; Cheap talk; Block (permutation group theory); Transmission (telecommunications); Information transmission; Private information retrieval; Advice (programming); Operations research; Telecommunications; Mathematics; Computer network; Statistics; Computer security; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.02276200164852509,"score_gpt":0.3332219005814686,"score_spread":0.3104598989329435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129798231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66587526,0.0013284712,0.26865017,0.0021429532,0.00007317819,0.00036492653,0.00013131312,0.0002805806,0.061153125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96659255,0.0002727945,0.030229494,0.00011861294,0.000042488733,0.00007456564,0.0000434945,0.000022847493,0.0026032135],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901135,0.0059863483,0.00036690678,0.0007130094,0.002073572,0.00074659137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9016511,0.08466944,0.005141741,0.004444301,0.003025529,0.0010679228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009857439,0.00066722895,0.0009159301,0.0011838457,0.0008450256,0.0019222002,0.0014019809,0.0022671388,0.007848827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061713845,0.0004209936,0.00075373985,0.0012226525,0.0013652958,0.003404411,0.0014548094,0.001095798,0.0006750579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035717515,0.0010492221,0.020657932,0.0013175408,0.0007598115,0.0010836135,0.004500822,0.2821077,0.008609896,0.33461297,0.0044679134,0.3372607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011243487,0.0016882749,0.012783724,0.00019396708,0.0005567088,0.00066955254,0.0020229924,0.7685627,0.005027682,0.20089015,0.0063399943,0.00013986109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036974438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028934567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009857439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015525202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017313962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052131772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150771176","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1664","title":"Optimal Mechanism for Selling Two Goods","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unobservable; Incentive; Order (exchange); Microeconomics; Intermediate good; Complementary good; Economics; Business; Bundle; Price mechanism; Commerce; Production (economics); Market price","score_opus":0.10911844901058032,"score_gpt":0.35490577073855634,"score_spread":0.24578732172797602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150771176","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076125875,0.0007788378,0.87946105,0.002567824,0.00022895147,0.0009951033,0.00055815285,0.00045618546,0.03882803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5709195,0.0010563924,0.3967871,0.0005160105,0.00022336033,0.0019007965,0.0005804055,0.0001440733,0.027872283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956002,0.001999388,0.00030068646,0.0006848619,0.0007735354,0.0006412693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940996,0.0032615897,0.0008584916,0.0008122166,0.0004860076,0.00048210227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005712206,0.0015015648,0.002650038,0.0015704884,0.0012751914,0.0041384795,0.0046585137,0.0070124962,0.01771989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016401364,0.0013463392,0.0022070222,0.0016389686,0.0022157265,0.0071818237,0.0028780813,0.0030958138,0.002000678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037753824,0.00059685315,0.00091649406,0.00057550415,0.00022947097,0.00049188285,0.00039987414,0.16393839,0.003013201,0.78658617,0.007460344,0.03541428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008305275,0.00023735753,0.00040915838,0.000084008825,0.00007758196,0.00034762977,0.00013977356,0.47533578,0.00087329705,0.514371,0.0071988977,0.00009513511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013047303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010967661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01771989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002937283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034576862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059278965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162627038","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1316","title":"Tax Differentials and the Segmentation of Networks of Cooperation in Oligopoly","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental tax; Oligopoly; Incentive; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Industrial organization; International economics; Monetary economics; Cournot competition; Public economics; Tax reform","score_opus":0.022818901277721026,"score_gpt":0.2382159053270639,"score_spread":0.2153970040493429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162627038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817368,0.00019305112,0.008362239,0.00048253484,0.000010176673,0.000025104247,0.00006118432,0.000023354429,0.009105611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991891,0.0000646592,0.00033719634,0.00001595365,0.0000038164085,0.000005262973,0.000013510472,0.0000021763954,0.00036839364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991399,0.00042410722,0.00003319249,0.000113597955,0.00010172081,0.00018738498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895257,0.0055769123,0.0031093212,0.0006123358,0.00036259132,0.0008131015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013662128,0.00018462271,0.000381559,0.0008310719,0.0009587068,0.0018436348,0.0004339892,0.000728955,0.0054113558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011741303,0.00027117968,0.00026454564,0.0009119396,0.002581944,0.0028823004,0.0012625428,0.00069551874,0.0002885913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012715427,0.00042046714,0.05815157,0.0001801382,0.00018562685,0.00045096074,0.0030151843,0.23658285,0.009155641,0.6345582,0.0027627465,0.05326505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003349281,0.00033121923,0.07415655,0.00007611488,0.00011947732,0.0003061891,0.002856244,0.23890899,0.0030745491,0.67327,0.0064860582,0.00007964593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002882196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003540217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054113558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024627564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006941245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018102765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235155228","doi":"10.1515/1935-1704.1837","title":"Outsourcing and Downstream R&D under Economies of Scale","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Outsourcing; Downstream (manufacturing); Incentive; Economies of scale; Upstream (networking); Competition (biology); Industrial organization; Competitor analysis; Business; Scale (ratio); Knowledge process outsourcing; Exploit; Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing","score_opus":0.03720964609886215,"score_gpt":0.21173698847722228,"score_spread":0.17452734237836012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235155228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8380995,0.0014136556,0.064572275,0.004831973,0.000060643924,0.00012271912,0.00027073896,0.0001494387,0.09047913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99617743,0.00029524878,0.00079391693,0.00007097332,0.00002477249,0.000019301317,0.00001673014,0.000006047409,0.0025955392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814403,0.0005884723,0.000073986834,0.0002786257,0.0003549174,0.0005598981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99142504,0.00383318,0.0022659565,0.00082547223,0.00074021815,0.000910079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002364525,0.0007413568,0.0013078575,0.0009183086,0.0013876025,0.0027202452,0.00085233594,0.0016720694,0.013326377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008336783,0.00060266105,0.0010254713,0.0011124929,0.0038426241,0.0039823363,0.0032573782,0.0015290187,0.00070364476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003901959,0.0003412617,0.017970974,0.0004883316,0.00013432858,0.0016390758,0.00049937906,0.3050358,0.008581585,0.64405,0.0031171425,0.017751874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043591135,0.00043189357,0.025272572,0.00022364619,0.00018273134,0.00066497235,0.0017469892,0.23176306,0.0054114894,0.7257379,0.008000951,0.00012794716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004753521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033050491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013326377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027822529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00242137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044581175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240933791","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2014-0079","title":"Managerial Collusive Behavior under Asymmetric Incentive Schemes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Collusion; Incentive; Compensation (psychology); Microeconomics; Information asymmetry; Asymmetry; Industrial organization; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.02660275569530965,"score_gpt":0.2367631097851773,"score_spread":0.21016035408986766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240933791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478818,0.00025988073,0.031865638,0.0013514257,0.000018028788,0.000102378785,0.00003932269,0.000033633423,0.018447911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985,0.00004703683,0.0010299952,0.000040009087,0.000012218454,0.000016971071,0.000003972396,0.0000016331219,0.0003480342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98963165,0.0065806396,0.00048032627,0.0005004069,0.0015407585,0.0012662946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.901238,0.06294439,0.024442632,0.006214963,0.0027736966,0.0023863206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012807094,0.0004842842,0.0008982829,0.0010300374,0.00089953427,0.0031731187,0.00088789884,0.0021516248,0.0041131587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046939515,0.00047190543,0.0004301409,0.0005470479,0.0027294543,0.002959145,0.0018387117,0.0018869387,0.00027584896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018652459,0.0010410611,0.03887457,0.0003187452,0.000301613,0.0013356952,0.0028300502,0.10456917,0.009947034,0.79947406,0.0016472734,0.037795603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005511163,0.00080391695,0.016138367,0.00015015982,0.00015507614,0.0006311585,0.0015132274,0.40174928,0.0029305876,0.5733109,0.0019437416,0.00012249914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065380934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041490837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012807094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017695441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011035821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06773114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266097679","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2014-0017","title":"Dynamic Information Revelation in Cheap Talk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Sequence (biology); Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Cheap talk; Sobel operator; Stochastic game; Monotonic function; State (computer science); Test (biology); Binary number; Upper and lower bounds; State space; Private information retrieval; Mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Mathematical economics; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; Arithmetic; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.05031811203408015,"score_gpt":0.33901316038608964,"score_spread":0.2886950483520095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266097679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5139879,0.0014247088,0.4232125,0.0053156326,0.00010694114,0.0002321048,0.00029810422,0.00020597024,0.055216175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98549783,0.00015203134,0.010876319,0.00017555113,0.000039542705,0.00007853102,0.000027060612,0.000011921822,0.0031412423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98986757,0.007338525,0.00028218687,0.0007513989,0.001039587,0.00072079216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958462,0.035022996,0.002811696,0.0021185,0.0007112352,0.00087355915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01066229,0.0006673656,0.0018247883,0.0008875863,0.0009051157,0.0032326488,0.0015484102,0.002387743,0.0056909397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031354517,0.0008152747,0.000960373,0.00071683293,0.0035321165,0.0044756955,0.0025805617,0.002311666,0.00041289156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066154246,0.00014743773,0.0013677492,0.00029523324,0.00015606575,0.00038950524,0.00065591466,0.09050509,0.001546464,0.88945484,0.0011120967,0.013707989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016325904,0.00018846779,0.0007669046,0.00004929133,0.000036443726,0.0001601456,0.000124639,0.23046075,0.0007109761,0.7654996,0.0017880705,0.00005140173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011561486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006341061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01066229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023065468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001282121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05638826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282734469","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1264","title":"Free Cash Flow and Managerial Entrenchment: A Continuous-Time Stochastic Control-Theoretic Model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Cash flow; Free cash flow; Cash management; Shareholder; Cash flow forecasting; Equity (law); Dividend; Business; Stochastic control; Operating cash flow; Cash flow statement; Finance; Cash; Control (management); Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Corporate governance; Optimal control","score_opus":0.006507428408845903,"score_gpt":0.1827964085878545,"score_spread":0.1762889801790086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282734469","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17437497,0.0019333963,0.75071526,0.011917764,0.00036101983,0.00019445679,0.000883903,0.0004553858,0.059163876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95514655,0.0010496931,0.016235698,0.00040349536,0.00022714544,0.00022343415,0.00016794159,0.000038810118,0.026507154],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899155,0.00035021958,0.000036762194,0.00019943132,0.00017603832,0.00024594282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967615,0.0019727924,0.00059870456,0.00009237817,0.00020937562,0.00036525022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019097676,0.0013590675,0.0014747137,0.0009840843,0.0008379211,0.003548929,0.0024706833,0.0047516064,0.0074754707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00439164,0.0008658024,0.0009702505,0.00091402,0.002785316,0.0025134196,0.001280318,0.002383561,0.00070076453],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079118654,0.00013424155,0.00081464776,0.000059739494,0.000040915285,0.00031020993,0.00015580672,0.65214944,0.0005996699,0.34146795,0.0012096866,0.002978549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060884722,0.000046766603,0.00022279524,0.000014653781,0.00001809799,0.000031206768,0.000037490856,0.94110835,0.000059614198,0.057478435,0.00089999643,0.00002173468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012867769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062811906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012867769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002910877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025786685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02558577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303867337","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2014-0043","title":"The Dynamics of Incentives, Productivity, and Operational Risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Incentive; Production (economics); Matching (statistics); Economics; Nash equilibrium; Microeconomics; Risk analysis (engineering); Service (business); Computer science; Business; Economy","score_opus":0.039103924355165944,"score_gpt":0.32283341172430274,"score_spread":0.2837294873691368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303867337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57191414,0.00069582846,0.36630124,0.00736819,0.00010710878,0.00015701808,0.00030207058,0.00015978717,0.052994594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905352,0.00018285342,0.0051956656,0.000058552636,0.000022394279,0.0000292839,0.0000147653545,0.00000806151,0.003953112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836,0.0008216142,0.00006227327,0.00020568405,0.00023684092,0.00031367168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992084,0.0045319274,0.0017410261,0.0004224871,0.00056041405,0.0006601324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032750582,0.00045134465,0.00071307673,0.0005805635,0.00065692415,0.0034046182,0.0011734237,0.001885759,0.005306801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013980555,0.00048016175,0.0004557623,0.0005627866,0.0019547988,0.0037525957,0.0011975801,0.0017303654,0.000499727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018455167,0.00018652386,0.0046818075,0.000060035665,0.000035595203,0.0003596528,0.00041126416,0.28076336,0.002259367,0.6957065,0.0013246586,0.014026708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009041054,0.00013115423,0.0027383668,0.000039175233,0.000023280498,0.00016305852,0.00029859546,0.57202923,0.000569438,0.4207227,0.0031408106,0.00005376792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002286416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009268585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005306801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002479985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011781798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017993629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547964728","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2015-0079","title":"Risk-Averse Managers, Labour Market Structures, Public Policies and Discrimination","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Wage; Equity (law); Labour economics; Economics; Variance (accounting); Wage inequality; Inequality; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.018652293693586636,"score_gpt":0.2956353585588658,"score_spread":0.2769830648652792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547964728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8064532,0.00090376445,0.09162381,0.013127437,0.00015355104,0.00021387156,0.0006973212,0.00015859232,0.086668424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891962,0.00024980624,0.0015124611,0.00018588507,0.000045474702,0.000051165855,0.000033991942,0.000005358672,0.008719648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992867,0.00026267002,0.000020756954,0.000092187205,0.00010189121,0.00023588155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712354,0.0013467869,0.00094620575,0.00016788508,0.00011048828,0.00030500742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014776256,0.0005405317,0.00064959575,0.0005256635,0.0007211019,0.002386334,0.00096063653,0.0024632239,0.00991594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004244559,0.00029758457,0.0005975825,0.0004686121,0.0018944542,0.001667946,0.0009832296,0.0014867698,0.0008442939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033720114,0.0009204602,0.038738985,0.0001062778,0.00008770165,0.00058103737,0.001233941,0.2548822,0.0014957559,0.6789836,0.0037072054,0.018925596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030366197,0.0005144614,0.019458873,0.000092917275,0.000087382075,0.00023007994,0.0011641624,0.52494466,0.0004820142,0.4459192,0.0067181913,0.00008445179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008852956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053125955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00991594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021663588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001492703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03317213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2568131403","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1581","title":"Universal Service Obligations and Competition with Asymmetric Information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Universal service; Competitor analysis; Economic rent; Regulator; Constraint (computer-aided design); Business; Competition (biology); Obligation; Service (business); Industrial organization; Shadow (psychology); Information asymmetry; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Telecommunications; Finance; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.003281526915396181,"score_gpt":0.17462566264202078,"score_spread":0.1713441357266246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2568131403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38853765,0.0012969725,0.35788262,0.016143663,0.00025062973,0.0002711607,0.0005656745,0.0002802445,0.23477136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877539,0.00031418542,0.004918086,0.000543994,0.0001681213,0.00008684734,0.00004144786,0.0000163593,0.0061570276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180436,0.0041040415,0.0002926623,0.0008123286,0.0015542698,0.0014323877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670049,0.021003317,0.006067946,0.0025425444,0.0016046872,0.0017767325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008439942,0.0006526772,0.001431355,0.0010632261,0.0014697675,0.0044024303,0.0020699233,0.0046012593,0.0116152875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028225644,0.00071104465,0.0010201115,0.0011622068,0.006129165,0.0066312742,0.0033969965,0.0034283444,0.00081038615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069019625,0.000041045463,0.000501952,0.00004887913,0.00001605191,0.00017611471,0.000117869444,0.021001052,0.000383523,0.9723198,0.0012542956,0.0040704417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103037986,0.000044100987,0.0005821833,0.000030764764,0.000016093416,0.00012087099,0.000075679614,0.07569255,0.00024387593,0.9188693,0.0041887765,0.000032727592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035011703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024794482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116152875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036577883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027711291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044635236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792599612","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2016-0152","title":"Limited Liability and High Bids in English Auctions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Central University Basic Research Fund of China","keywords":"License; Bidding; Monopoly; Common value auction; Business; Microeconomics; English auction; Revenue; Product (mathematics); Externality; Dutch auction; Unique bid auction; Revenue equivalence; Auction theory; Economics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.033844050788850964,"score_gpt":0.3183352389619146,"score_spread":0.2844911881730637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792599612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94670445,0.00032105827,0.031158034,0.0013095061,0.000023958333,0.000033011365,0.00005555301,0.000041698608,0.02035275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858284,0.00003143561,0.00036121698,0.000051031413,0.0000066787647,0.0000050858034,0.00000765092,0.000003823434,0.000950171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965951,0.0021218124,0.00018740229,0.0002057403,0.0004117214,0.00047819584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961602,0.023833916,0.009606156,0.0019047199,0.0016657755,0.0013873945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005243142,0.00033250154,0.0009180261,0.00047785588,0.00095861603,0.003592486,0.0009201641,0.0010698619,0.008159667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033600684,0.0004078864,0.0004689544,0.00040575382,0.0020124747,0.0040538027,0.0013847564,0.0017141396,0.00053828233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002588183,0.0019242999,0.080829985,0.0004677969,0.00033017164,0.0050458196,0.003362521,0.1871063,0.0104543585,0.6660794,0.0056743985,0.036136825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060935115,0.0007674665,0.036741957,0.00013102271,0.00015076395,0.0017208286,0.0036356589,0.40887287,0.0033143328,0.53923374,0.0046589053,0.00016318377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002832286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014814707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008159667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010956263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006232481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027728677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808492322","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2016-0058","title":"Optimal Forestry Contract with Interdependent Costs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Microeconomics; Reservation; Interdependence; Private information retrieval; Profit (economics); Economics; Mechanism design; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.028344712043242633,"score_gpt":0.3301481847545738,"score_spread":0.3018034727113312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808492322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6513116,0.00044761057,0.32121766,0.0012201642,0.00006129636,0.00022632006,0.0002545149,0.000074748605,0.025186116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722735,0.00010067593,0.025177233,0.000033789693,0.00001382627,0.00006683369,0.00003969732,0.000011590707,0.0022827985],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997251,0.0014254855,0.00015038504,0.00042277994,0.00041701997,0.0003333439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933559,0.0038001887,0.0011478406,0.00077572616,0.00042564358,0.0004948155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039655515,0.0005677273,0.0012668045,0.00066117925,0.00062019145,0.0021316044,0.0015468893,0.0022415207,0.003404531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013745616,0.0005851223,0.0005546715,0.000628998,0.0016103097,0.0028178496,0.001396961,0.0014290329,0.00027419237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036018257,0.000302096,0.0024854185,0.00015730514,0.00009108431,0.000302723,0.00019350617,0.5098455,0.005431996,0.45766518,0.0009728176,0.022192212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010122942,0.00013621389,0.0012555596,0.00003616203,0.000028860402,0.00014302715,0.000109857516,0.79321367,0.0015086235,0.20209843,0.0013281882,0.00004020539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012197839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007484241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039655515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002728703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022176746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020972133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892327277","doi":"10.1515/bejte-2018-0176","title":"Reverse Bayesianism: A Generalization","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalization; Decision maker; Computer science; State space; Space (punctuation); Mathematical economics; Null (SQL); State (computer science); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Operations research; Epistemology; Algorithm; Philosophy; Statistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.06305214601818537,"score_gpt":0.32314520322189705,"score_spread":0.2600930572037117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892327277","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059381068,0.0016061162,0.66031754,0.013283465,0.00040022843,0.00015471467,0.0005039214,0.00031004095,0.26404285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9139774,0.0013082764,0.063901894,0.002662856,0.0008350485,0.0001896183,0.00023753496,0.00011347565,0.016774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99204904,0.0034090804,0.00034571264,0.0017609827,0.0019108241,0.00052436703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98049337,0.011274409,0.0017412987,0.0040348396,0.0018914782,0.00056450453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008261293,0.00067512057,0.0012772541,0.0011244741,0.0014818099,0.0036573417,0.0020701212,0.0029685604,0.010510651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02930327,0.0006359927,0.002201708,0.001090642,0.0051377467,0.007900524,0.004433132,0.007344005,0.001376157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017414997,0.00001654117,0.00031404462,0.000045666715,0.00002163569,0.00007068198,0.00015534494,0.0035526375,0.00014216724,0.98817134,0.0010336324,0.006458934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009726477,0.0000064479045,0.00010001603,0.0000122353895,0.000008109271,0.00007407687,0.000019316827,0.008553384,0.000043615826,0.9891382,0.0020281815,0.000006690886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036218714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019048379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010510651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018423551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015131566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043690443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241055463","doi":"10.2202/1935-1704.1313","title":"Competing Gatekeepers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Theoretical Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; Competition (biology); Economics; Complete information; Set (abstract data type); The Internet; Infinity; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011763738199689679,"score_gpt":0.22384970271579607,"score_spread":0.2120859645161064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241055463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49651664,0.00082867197,0.21509603,0.004430055,0.0003641797,0.0007975,0.0008142595,0.000328811,0.28082392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401913,0.00030353473,0.013929722,0.00047237653,0.00006349141,0.00026963052,0.00010007414,0.000027091994,0.044642895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829346,0.00041679997,0.00004773638,0.00036137964,0.00043292562,0.0004477587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692935,0.0014000052,0.00038989462,0.00027310895,0.0002895139,0.0007181382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001494606,0.0009571188,0.0015455422,0.0013128826,0.002029195,0.003433294,0.0038487215,0.0032992237,0.02649538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046645403,0.00062598265,0.0012969607,0.0011769482,0.0021412198,0.00448407,0.0026666464,0.00212119,0.0020806023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031286193,0.00044105927,0.0025253352,0.00028016453,0.0001308794,0.002124027,0.00077117735,0.09107559,0.0041509042,0.8741636,0.0058810757,0.018143455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003767861,0.000504512,0.001422593,0.00006873758,0.00011991281,0.0010134414,0.0007622886,0.52694994,0.0011867804,0.44155502,0.02589639,0.00014356118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049987496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005977074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02649538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017759976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016781649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08863586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}