{"meta":{"query_hash":"0db9d6c3275b","filters":{"venue":"The Denning Law Journal"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0db9d6c3275b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Denning+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1517602384","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.385","title":"Charkaoui v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 (23 February 2007), Docket 30762, 30929, 31178","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Immigration; Terrorism; Political science; State (computer science); Citizenship; Refugee; Human rights; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.01823670367789918,"score_gpt":0.2712016634716855,"score_spread":0.2529649597937863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517602384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01392658,0.00594638,0.00038331855,0.05278318,0.0008634576,0.00019077821,0.0028442235,0.00014042895,0.9229217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.103627875,0.0032848036,0.00076299126,0.08055955,0.0002031756,0.00019657407,0.00088499754,0.000075661985,0.81040436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975212,0.0001057508,0.000051368454,0.0001514507,0.001110836,0.0010592809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984681,0.0002507454,0.000051271883,0.00004173641,0.00082130247,0.00036675314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010228748,0.00045790305,0.00028311223,0.0009170281,0.024176953,0.006412805,0.0013686487,0.009734693,0.029017204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041212062,0.00080211414,0.00036970802,0.0015479589,0.002740736,0.0013518969,0.0016665576,0.005153884,0.0039099534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030338662,0.000033006385,0.002776101,0.000070624315,0.000007641427,0.0005260533,0.0022373393,0.000114989125,0.0003128375,0.13884915,0.84287345,0.012168454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003831927,0.000014233039,0.010408879,0.0002308855,0.00001919474,0.000117716234,0.002242684,0.00020400948,0.0003806687,0.005906434,0.98038334,0.00005377961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99712926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048105713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048105713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14582795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34903306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549923724","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v1i1.151","title":"It all started with Gunner James","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Educational Leadership and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11079210244501708,"score_gpt":0.3836954479685347,"score_spread":0.27290334552351764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549923724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028241477,0.0091099255,0.0029134012,0.7054633,0.09769988,0.00007661733,0.0001074284,0.00036590188,0.1814395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028553288,0.002200243,0.0015177297,0.24697159,0.009049257,0.000065009386,0.00004557223,0.00041669878,0.71118057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574995,0.0008411171,0.00013203145,0.0008386929,0.0016780106,0.0007602586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98884356,0.0010793942,0.00029902204,0.00036880266,0.0035114943,0.0058976444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002825805,0.0008155121,0.00068322656,0.0015515817,0.010865424,0.009797166,0.0011077784,0.00687887,0.042262718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01570623,0.00060499273,0.0005205629,0.0008216414,0.00565081,0.006831913,0.007031807,0.019724485,0.018562654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002745825,0.00004335853,0.00033703845,0.00004292382,0.000008217225,0.00015496813,0.0015123428,0.00003695687,0.00023164335,0.044710785,0.9307418,0.022152571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008962366,0.000017080076,0.00022298271,0.00013691201,0.0000050768945,0.00008594617,0.0016395664,0.000041915948,0.00018183305,0.0102202995,0.98741364,0.00002582931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01804037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03240571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042262718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006881571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009834248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14138281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551401973","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v20i1.336","title":"SECURED TRANSACTIONS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SOFTWARE AS COLLATERAL","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Ninth; Intellectual property; Asset (computer security); Business; Power (physics); Security interest; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02880097804745789,"score_gpt":0.2301355294191233,"score_spread":0.2013345513716654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551401973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01439569,0.16445859,0.029601458,0.025156775,0.001186986,0.00005246285,0.0002591015,0.0003419897,0.7645469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43459576,0.20701621,0.009229959,0.0016286556,0.002976434,0.00008782583,0.000404945,0.0002942825,0.34376597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916923,0.00024989963,0.000047720154,0.00008828743,0.000348164,0.00009664589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982969,0.0008647682,0.0002192717,0.0002579339,0.00022084337,0.00014023647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089604885,0.0005006696,0.00042954882,0.0011753652,0.00096883584,0.010163333,0.00057636335,0.0021818765,0.038680825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034583597,0.00040195187,0.00026898118,0.0029545086,0.0055885944,0.013118963,0.0026242363,0.0017122119,0.006746686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003014788,0.000018068391,0.00039622007,0.00019678919,0.000008586796,0.00027805316,0.00078978296,0.00093242654,0.0004024297,0.83995277,0.05766035,0.09933445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012039764,0.000024922503,0.0010115532,0.0009153712,0.000012341958,0.0007448462,0.0009339145,0.0017072891,0.00034295776,0.42804506,0.5662281,0.000021630385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006379631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108000785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038680825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043849233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030824419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12940025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558716678","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.384","title":"JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES – MEDICAL CARE, MINORS AND THE RELIGIOUS RITE/RIGHT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Contempt; Rite; Context (archaeology); Convention; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.013142244170280856,"score_gpt":0.2907448767332203,"score_spread":0.27760263256293943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558716678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59686357,0.015292085,0.0011132967,0.105169274,0.00097254995,0.000065129454,0.00005991035,0.000013941607,0.28045017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977442,0.0023259206,0.00019453198,0.008959936,0.00009312878,0.000012977651,0.000008058514,0.0000048287557,0.010958648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989215,0.00056347175,0.000041532647,0.00007681577,0.00010292298,0.00029373597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826115,0.0008578176,0.000259308,0.0001033241,0.00010855693,0.00040984375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014980164,0.00013962142,0.00015498577,0.00034058385,0.008351015,0.0030737473,0.00039894204,0.0030718178,0.0030531208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044962196,0.0002587563,0.00012550615,0.00030418724,0.011978168,0.0024538133,0.004286537,0.0037426353,0.00014701246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003932358,0.000051142604,0.011772315,0.00015086046,0.000016905587,0.0040163677,0.17968176,0.000053778545,0.0014546188,0.753244,0.017503,0.032015834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002068164,0.00008473278,0.024154916,0.0013986173,0.00002388433,0.006672519,0.27397144,0.00008893422,0.0008053412,0.05676335,0.6359614,0.000054164015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032138582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062324747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032138582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017182276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004247815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063903034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573251718","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v2i1.165","title":"Domestic Contribution and Constructive Trusts: The Canadian Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Constructive trust; Perspective (graphical); Law; Constructive; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018822179042893485,"score_gpt":0.32668791602850183,"score_spread":0.3078657369856084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573251718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028349677,0.017694464,0.004187448,0.16415994,0.00055352226,0.00004342181,0.00016568185,0.000027892102,0.784818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93776166,0.015609823,0.0015269314,0.0093128225,0.0003956359,0.000043858454,0.00005702606,0.000035884274,0.035256397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98937166,0.0023281917,0.00019122064,0.0007608491,0.0035713748,0.003776681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857196,0.0038834175,0.000727726,0.0004970856,0.005423991,0.003748126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063845655,0.0008902433,0.0010166425,0.005604368,0.026716646,0.020250598,0.003305431,0.009587001,0.009856513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127143245,0.0005683857,0.0006957617,0.0081856605,0.04932764,0.009469285,0.006859495,0.008028629,0.00049458107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005739461,0.000008395865,0.00033344474,0.00002316716,0.000003900022,0.00008467263,0.0044158753,0.00019543742,0.000016705322,0.9871049,0.0049106334,0.0028971217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004141876,0.000017531118,0.005897652,0.0007604408,0.000054797834,0.00024631305,0.036891505,0.0012946129,0.00009184457,0.6910166,0.26356405,0.00012321849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97696006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98082834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16669539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16669539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18749784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96651524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586913609","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.383","title":"THE PROHIBITION OF THE MUSLIM HEADSCARF: CONTRASTING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES IN POLICY AND LAW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Law; Secularity; Politics; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Immigration; Human rights","score_opus":0.054627436617493065,"score_gpt":0.31406249022491767,"score_spread":0.2594350536074246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586913609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15062289,0.05402511,0.0048577986,0.09855411,0.0011910656,0.00014971523,0.00014455564,0.000051204697,0.6904035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94491386,0.025608214,0.0024002022,0.015608737,0.00057280844,0.00019876867,0.00014577969,0.00006073566,0.010490959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873935,0.0071858857,0.00063402904,0.0007523217,0.0019483707,0.002085827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157035,0.0055217673,0.0007205105,0.00047663433,0.0010047029,0.00070604245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153278215,0.000494847,0.00050869543,0.004363909,0.0055694,0.014706625,0.0015987311,0.005397956,0.003416016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011543417,0.0004429699,0.00057962997,0.005521543,0.024271557,0.006489219,0.005889675,0.0076913843,0.0003519313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028855582,0.000056653385,0.0010604428,0.00023267636,0.000011178738,0.00010659814,0.021659771,0.00040025194,0.00019205589,0.95495313,0.002223342,0.019075014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007182311,0.00034660895,0.027795525,0.008051199,0.00009188805,0.0005852539,0.27592173,0.00129167,0.0023813918,0.2846125,0.39867353,0.00017688202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011733493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011558242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153278215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012885302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010175251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093489826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590185570","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v3i1.168","title":"Co-ownership Trusts in the United Kingdom - The Denning Legacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constructive trust; Confusion; Constructive; Law; Kingdom; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.13440605068451353,"score_gpt":0.3858696663556629,"score_spread":0.2514636156711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590185570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44800708,0.047187835,0.003060082,0.17087144,0.0017488779,0.000064309555,0.0004931643,0.000047141006,0.32852012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736772,0.0026788854,0.00019380027,0.004792472,0.00012636479,0.000012512118,0.000033170243,0.000012641836,0.018472942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936488,0.0017699425,0.0004172816,0.0008240548,0.0011970445,0.0021427728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819365,0.007031523,0.0032163046,0.0016638838,0.0032296476,0.002922068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00360108,0.00017621809,0.00047765506,0.0010166169,0.005793566,0.010214172,0.0007123618,0.0049234475,0.009165785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018771542,0.00043934656,0.00040845526,0.0018003962,0.0067100674,0.007240862,0.005937491,0.004024859,0.00062225334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014930323,0.000045792287,0.023591114,0.00017572788,0.000051547264,0.0017718766,0.0150400875,0.00051671115,0.00016627873,0.8715729,0.05282433,0.03409426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014401415,0.00015370645,0.09312476,0.0023512288,0.00014544836,0.0026067386,0.0435397,0.0016134074,0.00044886975,0.12325199,0.73241514,0.00020501767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30462596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38123223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30462596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020236975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014307182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6057057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837475297","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v18i1.310","title":"DOUBLE INVOICING IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE: THE FRAUD AND NULLITY EXCEPTIONS IN LETTERS OF CREDIT – ARE THE AMERICA ACCORD AND THE UCP 500 CROOKS’ CHARTERS!?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Court decision; Status quo; Charter; Business; Accounting; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03424499126394215,"score_gpt":0.2510262339857747,"score_spread":0.21678124272183258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837475297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26383376,0.013199324,0.010915176,0.29176414,0.005262939,0.00006568997,0.00009807015,0.00013995108,0.41472095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445795,0.0025746124,0.002813986,0.027273977,0.0020680865,0.00004338048,0.000041883326,0.000064565764,0.020540038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98824173,0.0043638726,0.0007515088,0.00084737706,0.0044774483,0.0013180977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97620493,0.014193601,0.0037306391,0.0021184098,0.0030693372,0.0006830321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071403887,0.00018587185,0.00026958348,0.0009753894,0.004738676,0.018326145,0.0014338237,0.00878548,0.0016798761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03570206,0.00030382554,0.00036658518,0.0014103786,0.018079042,0.009826506,0.0036691204,0.010085049,0.00043060182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006786515,0.000047638117,0.0040137707,0.000049728686,0.0000067291026,0.00057522685,0.0067936745,0.00031048566,0.00020963752,0.9204689,0.03378661,0.033669736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050986408,0.00016500466,0.017729169,0.0012265749,0.00005631815,0.001373582,0.018616268,0.0033724455,0.0024231412,0.31106123,0.64370066,0.00022465279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026130458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02725634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026130458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049676676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007015213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051956713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173127874","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v27i0.989","title":"THE MODEL FOR A PATH FORWARD. A PROPOSAL FOR A MODEL LAW DEALING WITH CYBER-SQUATTING AND OTHER ABUSIVE DOMAIN NAME PRACTICES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Goodwill; Domain Name System; The Internet; Cyberspace; Law; E-commerce; Intellectual property; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09352065687713078,"score_gpt":0.3500815640146488,"score_spread":0.256560907137518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173127874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008510906,0.001963539,0.11146069,0.26935357,0.0021330588,0.00041791386,0.0005272437,0.00024190068,0.6053912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5581927,0.0024317745,0.07049001,0.094874576,0.0033103148,0.0019456673,0.00032261174,0.00031521523,0.26811716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962393,0.0009631908,0.00011991705,0.00095237297,0.0011262452,0.0005989786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954282,0.002154703,0.00037998255,0.0006225224,0.00090338284,0.00051116536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006287968,0.00086175173,0.00088091503,0.001670018,0.006691995,0.010179296,0.0032621827,0.021006558,0.0239925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112488875,0.00057422277,0.0021726452,0.0010905521,0.019567061,0.016641317,0.005194804,0.016957276,0.0042284243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002906101,0.000007817702,0.00004090912,0.0000046252576,0.0000012442943,0.000029206918,0.000084296575,0.00014033086,0.000012412016,0.99621826,0.0029345613,0.0005234206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020965786,0.0000120174755,0.000046667563,0.00004112103,0.000003570254,0.00007288943,0.00011120068,0.0013503708,0.000034029337,0.9569503,0.041345056,0.000011944794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013749315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009887172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0239925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008035784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011826359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08026296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905397250","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i1.1655","title":"UNDUE INFLUENCE: TOWARDS A UNIFYING CONCEPT OF UNCONSCIONABLITY?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Law; Legislature; Commonwealth; Political science; Parliament; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03659715602216373,"score_gpt":0.3503688528253154,"score_spread":0.31377169680315165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905397250","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06020231,0.009997769,0.13594387,0.07411153,0.0013252947,0.00018556103,0.000066247485,0.00008768218,0.7180798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820216,0.0015419102,0.003964427,0.0047587054,0.0007769751,0.00013614033,0.000015217903,0.00003606345,0.0067489776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98583,0.0054470147,0.0006823914,0.0015683107,0.0044998596,0.00197235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866679,0.0083502345,0.0015121201,0.0013676744,0.0013179943,0.0007840229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010156567,0.0006061372,0.0011367595,0.0032848842,0.0058135595,0.013738593,0.0041116416,0.011021832,0.0034088613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024637185,0.00045075215,0.000834033,0.0020481308,0.080807656,0.018326785,0.010793214,0.00940399,0.00045741705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002112458,0.0000037399657,0.00017267595,0.000006303953,0.0000019521735,0.000052230145,0.0009885929,0.00006840459,0.00001844677,0.9970872,0.00017677709,0.0014216317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008419197,0.000023132896,0.00066339085,0.00011761171,0.000011818406,0.000158428,0.0015816458,0.0007147297,0.000121653204,0.9777154,0.01885975,0.000024185152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005916078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004591945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013738593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060923365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057164184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05371374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967130248","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i2.1701","title":"‘CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION? INTERPRETATION, (MIS)CALCULATION, WRONGS RIGHTED OR REACTION & REITERATION’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Referendum; Aotearoa; Law; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Context (archaeology); Politics; Brexit; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; European union; History","score_opus":0.05316565827189108,"score_gpt":0.34108904335866214,"score_spread":0.28792338508677107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967130248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007978489,0.011684429,0.03092803,0.5824643,0.016147945,0.00008419725,0.0001542721,0.00030531661,0.35025305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63455135,0.0071315533,0.023188874,0.1729447,0.0102290725,0.0003178715,0.00019364267,0.0012826965,0.15016013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9458409,0.033473887,0.0020764626,0.0046213004,0.011182453,0.00280494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97537327,0.015486649,0.0016833314,0.0041159526,0.0028673073,0.00047359822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026286425,0.00083811715,0.00069735723,0.0016538453,0.007642741,0.016015692,0.0027990097,0.010823497,0.007156515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06794318,0.00062582665,0.0005877911,0.0017118974,0.064157344,0.018994957,0.007118058,0.018015256,0.0034254799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057722223,0.000004052777,0.000090584086,0.000043313594,0.000004314817,0.00010554378,0.011442945,0.000056914454,0.00008789647,0.92674965,0.05273082,0.008678187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010475457,0.000006899025,0.00018015952,0.000294722,0.000007087487,0.0002129219,0.0063870484,0.00021665519,0.0004743064,0.3882668,0.6039011,0.000041776217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013733625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0136699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026286425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009646371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0095290225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13901758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997765047","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v31i1.1793","title":"Non-Apology in the Age of Apology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Redress; Political science; Law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04235436020793623,"score_gpt":0.3283755924567253,"score_spread":0.28602123224878906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997765047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074430905,0.013710034,0.012513496,0.21181121,0.0025685662,0.00004403463,0.000029038685,0.000099618155,0.68479306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9341215,0.0023143836,0.0009671577,0.02544327,0.0008823573,0.000027910259,0.000008414487,0.000060968585,0.036174037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940274,0.003685362,0.00012745705,0.0005278005,0.0009546875,0.00067727733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878442,0.007702944,0.0011871207,0.0010648269,0.0012292095,0.00097170897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00837115,0.00026766062,0.00027931505,0.0007545261,0.008256673,0.007070728,0.0009210044,0.0058301855,0.005998032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024165265,0.00023709258,0.00017965092,0.00038654142,0.04837504,0.009965521,0.0040125167,0.00963216,0.0008508345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010434849,0.000020920243,0.0005814084,0.000021597956,0.0000026327934,0.0002371552,0.029845173,0.000028388136,0.00007756878,0.9491609,0.01232917,0.0076846066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014130604,0.00003386295,0.0010906276,0.00027922768,0.0000047361304,0.00057230284,0.018782841,0.00018790866,0.00021248864,0.6794785,0.29932,0.000023410861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025380745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003208663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00837115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003647666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003063331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04427135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152624","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2212","title":"Legal Relationship between Universities and their Students – How Accountable and to what Extent in Law are Universities Liable for Student Suicides?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.035682557447261676,"score_gpt":0.3381746291294324,"score_spread":0.30249207168217074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408152624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.630393,0.0042184363,0.012766373,0.16785364,0.00055405445,0.00008598324,0.000076933444,0.00006137636,0.1839902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331206,0.0003401579,0.00033358406,0.0029575452,0.000080595186,0.000013125323,0.000007260093,0.000004871189,0.002950812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757263,0.014711425,0.0010693412,0.0014483178,0.0035214587,0.0035231553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97000307,0.010323673,0.008546598,0.0018531005,0.0034635386,0.0058099767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011203284,0.00017602967,0.00047190097,0.0016741332,0.011262198,0.015077217,0.001588793,0.0058516217,0.004785158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05168794,0.0002750884,0.00038983198,0.0015610296,0.027218794,0.009264057,0.009478489,0.006529898,0.00086839584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004728252,0.0001440233,0.044537652,0.00007064478,0.00003987173,0.0010619663,0.07714267,0.00046646394,0.00042743073,0.8348207,0.0061473004,0.035094086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004019674,0.00032941424,0.0548922,0.0010823369,0.000086924556,0.0024406242,0.21549216,0.0025831987,0.0013369207,0.5609495,0.16045949,0.00030699748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016285311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013331807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016285311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008580568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0130777685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062256634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152637","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2230","title":"Role for Parliament in Independent Judicial Appointments: Insights from the Comptroller and Auditor General","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Audit; Accounting; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.012294563459142907,"score_gpt":0.23463622944166035,"score_spread":0.22234166598251745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408152637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32201466,0.0038625381,0.0041682348,0.07815775,0.00047013655,0.0000508284,0.000041678126,0.000030304054,0.59120375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98327005,0.00051451114,0.00026143173,0.00281675,0.00011231178,0.0000105369245,0.000008882496,0.000018114159,0.012987428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98186815,0.012030321,0.00024826324,0.00067849306,0.0013702564,0.0038044949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864725,0.009652155,0.0011565373,0.00048310304,0.0010571446,0.001178481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00958409,0.00018469103,0.00038267294,0.00131226,0.015663223,0.012328445,0.0016303034,0.005110865,0.0047057075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142657375,0.0004491129,0.00043713747,0.0017647326,0.020628346,0.0062548104,0.004384578,0.0061013084,0.0007855491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004136005,0.00004139541,0.0024157108,0.000037327154,0.000004137005,0.00080958556,0.06827212,0.00016249115,0.000110932524,0.91617554,0.005790324,0.0061390377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013788507,0.00016033373,0.022532083,0.00058644504,0.00005807766,0.0008781396,0.21749939,0.002069151,0.000570809,0.21058536,0.5448177,0.000104628176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07789055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13363454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07789055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017135156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012049096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15487432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}