{"meta":{"query_hash":"0db9d6c3275b","filters":{"venue":"The Denning Law Journal"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0db9d6c3275b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Denning+Law+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1517602384","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.385","title":"Charkaoui v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 (23 February 2007), Docket 30762, 30929, 31178","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Immigration; Terrorism; Political science; State (computer science); Citizenship; Refugee; Human rights; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.01823670367789918,"score_gpt":0.2712016634716855,"score_spread":0.2529649597937863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517602384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86997557,0.001901827,0.0002233527,0.008515671,0.0037122923,0.00016220947,0.000017918353,0.00003534457,0.115455806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99096775,0.00014536039,0.00012794753,0.0016463563,0.0038872696,0.000003269386,0.000007625867,0.000010886414,0.0032035073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983359,0.0002650324,0.00023687711,0.00009268036,0.0006386465,0.00043087747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991027,0.00023178548,0.00018969581,0.00008360214,0.00016882399,0.00022335425],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018944511,0.000106370586,0.000110625464,0.000031174677,0.0023801422,0.00024078233,0.00024045563,0.00006068882,0.00053224334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013081601,0.00007962292,0.000046376044,0.00008755091,0.00015866783,0.00039652124,0.000030938943,0.00032853478,0.00004813763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044882712,0.00003051481,0.065456696,0.000006389042,0.000114874245,0.000025322428,0.0064786687,0.000028707767,0.0001528989,0.73898554,0.18718934,0.0014861478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012760725,0.000079950245,0.4069321,0.00024001101,0.0001815037,0.00054395676,0.012395544,0.00022220204,0.0007270219,0.03570972,0.5407784,0.0009135387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40664202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5392212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70327586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023785935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025578018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549923724","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v1i1.151","title":"It all started with Gunner James","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Educational Leadership and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11079210244501708,"score_gpt":0.3836954479685347,"score_spread":0.27290334552351764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549923724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31510624,0.002007146,0.00011879932,0.27551374,0.0012154753,0.00010380902,9.936366e-7,0.00004134593,0.40589243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99049664,0.000059777118,0.00061799097,0.0051337997,0.0019053908,0.0000018713032,6.2637497e-7,0.000006872635,0.0017770118],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988009,0.000371455,0.0000957387,0.00004634604,0.00036851707,0.00031706115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990533,0.0005108583,0.00012936606,0.00007500594,0.0000803101,0.00015113998],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022918603,0.0000558915,0.00005707164,0.000018254224,0.0013874684,0.00022150028,0.00022749476,0.000032565637,0.00080868806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001265143,0.000031975953,0.000028309774,0.00009550706,0.0002448058,0.00077088404,0.000009034425,0.00032652696,0.000117386124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010458375,0.0001377679,0.02637964,0.0000050591807,0.00022088822,0.000008820001,0.55549145,0.000043081378,0.00008127947,0.3484909,0.066468455,0.00256807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086655586,0.000018802937,0.0018399146,0.000019415224,0.000041472824,0.000063571824,0.09619891,0.0000015728458,0.000023029645,0.0011582962,0.90047854,0.00006982041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012195157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018294087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83401006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004022232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097633834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551401973","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v20i1.336","title":"SECURED TRANSACTIONS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: SOFTWARE AS COLLATERAL","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Ninth; Intellectual property; Asset (computer security); Business; Power (physics); Security interest; Value (mathematics); Law; Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Political science; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02880097804745789,"score_gpt":0.2301355294191233,"score_spread":0.2013345513716654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551401973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.669868,0.0014235973,0.0073969797,0.0040279324,0.003534289,0.00062911643,0.0000016413838,0.00028665861,0.31283182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936651,0.000018409904,0.00010704463,0.0021457702,0.0017035361,0.000008444289,0.0000019710394,0.0000315224,0.002318191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878454,0.000038284976,0.00030893896,0.00011996583,0.00025563317,0.00049262325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947053,0.00013746976,0.00010301331,0.00014179213,0.00011587834,0.000031315234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071615155,0.00017507905,0.00017746311,0.00015149805,0.0008936072,0.0005589521,0.00033637945,0.00006600305,0.010777185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002125458,0.00008622314,0.00010860705,0.00040982148,0.000103511826,0.0016628187,0.00005066278,0.00062665215,0.0011253356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00442606,0.0022194565,0.0090808105,0.0004054949,0.0009677544,0.00030699198,0.10310817,0.0012512888,0.006056633,0.015033987,0.50911593,0.34802744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093542173,0.000052174277,0.00033259884,0.00018429151,0.00009232446,0.0005662322,0.0026597462,0.008968735,0.00058351073,0.002206015,0.98297626,0.0004426627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011772889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005568522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47386035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067919325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002827402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558716678","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.384","title":"JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES – MEDICAL CARE, MINORS AND THE RELIGIOUS RITE/RIGHT","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Contempt; Rite; Context (archaeology); Convention; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.013142244170280856,"score_gpt":0.2907448767332203,"score_spread":0.27760263256293943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558716678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.843193,0.10903169,0.00014872695,0.011401646,0.0019633963,0.00017706947,5.4156015e-7,0.000050221373,0.034033712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652677,0.030998174,0.00023212402,0.001574644,0.0018039193,0.000005785874,4.6354754e-7,0.0000105365125,0.000106650434],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977075,0.00048554863,0.00025757725,0.00009869046,0.0009704,0.00048028608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873865,0.0005563029,0.00014075697,0.00013453863,0.00012222341,0.00030751553],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039533917,0.000116267525,0.00017239801,0.000019085002,0.003465678,0.00026008495,0.00046847528,0.00011730365,0.00008120298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029505236,0.000056415454,0.00010763227,0.00015735473,0.0015079089,0.00018748938,0.00008573413,0.00044508206,0.00002617923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003807789,0.000023073164,0.0042334124,0.000009205336,0.000086953376,0.000020714968,0.8379864,0.0000023780167,0.000002660315,0.07698596,0.07961698,0.000994151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021469195,0.000031543834,0.008719238,0.00018649994,0.0001562788,0.0009352239,0.42590815,0.000011978028,0.000077965014,0.04233379,0.51908964,0.00040279044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009340535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013354626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43947265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008695009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018807934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573251718","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v2i1.165","title":"Domestic Contribution and Constructive Trusts: The Canadian Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Constructive trust; Perspective (graphical); Law; Constructive; Political science; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018822179042893485,"score_gpt":0.32668791602850183,"score_spread":0.3078657369856084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573251718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5958044,0.0034272138,0.0006156679,0.0912901,0.00076830585,0.0005389761,0.000022523735,0.000038551152,0.30749422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987258,0.0000398776,0.000061050014,0.00041466556,0.00068425864,0.0000049314494,2.4471908e-7,0.0000031270292,0.00006609396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926376,0.00017568601,0.00007633185,0.000047240985,0.00015053603,0.00028645498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931455,0.00019629994,0.00006789447,0.0000658787,0.00014815794,0.00020723345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012660469,0.000045137993,0.000052912626,0.000015287971,0.00598972,0.0002496685,0.00015756338,0.000034209457,0.00005254177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002076261,0.00002503328,0.000026217864,0.00010194566,0.0007617136,0.00018868965,0.000017710912,0.00029729647,0.000015258112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019273534,0.0000026150317,0.0017782289,1.07096945e-7,0.000013361002,8.066421e-7,0.017307568,0.0000025700263,0.000006416021,0.98053664,0.00009400743,0.0002557599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004810513,0.00002402736,0.06437167,0.000027268661,0.00013232342,0.00068805076,0.17125444,0.00006534981,0.000033482283,0.24599765,0.5167131,0.00021162556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34482774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.472674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.734539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039432914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019338584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99530435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586913609","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v19i1.383","title":"THE PROHIBITION OF THE MUSLIM HEADSCARF: CONTRASTING INTERNATIONAL APPROACHES IN POLICY AND LAW","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Law; Secularity; Politics; State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Political science; Oppression; Sociology; Immigration; Human rights","score_opus":0.054627436617493065,"score_gpt":0.31406249022491767,"score_spread":0.2594350536074246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586913609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6179782,0.00086526026,0.00018520677,0.01498363,0.00087889895,0.00024066074,0.0000017480503,0.000011920935,0.36485445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987188,0.00008597858,0.000036144065,0.00017706139,0.00088368554,0.0000038747835,3.0833513e-7,0.00000407739,0.00009010143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989571,0.00030719742,0.00017794933,0.000044368113,0.0003040191,0.0002093496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940026,0.00027318,0.00016832224,0.00006295413,0.000054567598,0.00004073106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025698212,0.0000480609,0.00005787886,0.000022770948,0.0014182994,0.00015260525,0.00024196816,0.00003320785,0.0000025633217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003318396,0.000023431785,0.000039405542,0.000106285384,0.00058163004,0.00023168701,0.000044596316,0.00018115164,6.0049405e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008942824,0.000015937032,0.0038586478,0.0000017855868,0.000008428777,1.9029055e-7,0.027536154,0.00003055093,0.00013236616,0.9652497,0.00007858984,0.003078663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027929798,0.00009937792,0.16422594,0.0006480556,0.00013173418,0.00039872757,0.27623412,0.002479855,0.0025897701,0.52670443,0.023195447,0.0004995744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007141264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008501899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43854532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007305739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004553969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590185570","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v3i1.168","title":"Co-ownership Trusts in the United Kingdom - The Denning Legacy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Constructive trust; Confusion; Constructive; Law; Kingdom; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.13440605068451353,"score_gpt":0.3858696663556629,"score_spread":0.2514636156711494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590185570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8983741,0.0003007045,0.00027431428,0.029218335,0.00028920066,0.00023169731,0.0000012351197,0.000033678407,0.071276724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99577296,0.00002656255,0.00008224716,0.0022228353,0.0016706971,0.000013588138,0.0000013345328,0.000011236845,0.00019856081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977354,0.0008955267,0.00024054709,0.00008262663,0.00049734063,0.0005485526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858123,0.00082202937,0.0001812095,0.00025609334,0.00005062227,0.00010879847],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006451923,0.000100893376,0.000096214055,0.000046741075,0.0046443394,0.00078016514,0.0011246902,0.00005991632,0.000105624014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019893427,0.000045602203,0.00008553694,0.00055592647,0.00045638607,0.00047816892,0.000042966436,0.0008983067,0.00006415324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008696431,0.00003457084,0.006497792,0.0000012449345,0.00001659093,0.000004261624,0.064293824,0.00015457056,0.0000871745,0.92680943,0.0013497671,0.00074206345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027899168,0.0000126086,0.01926222,0.00004407598,0.00004488445,0.00011215212,0.0542908,0.00012247455,0.00006168847,0.005751331,0.9198687,0.00015005663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008322498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019958706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9210581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009520264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006689662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837475297","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v18i1.310","title":"DOUBLE INVOICING IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE: THE FRAUD AND NULLITY EXCEPTIONS IN LETTERS OF CREDIT – ARE THE AMERICA ACCORD AND THE UCP 500 CROOKS’ CHARTERS!?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Court decision; Status quo; Charter; Business; Accounting; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03424499126394215,"score_gpt":0.2510262339857747,"score_spread":0.21678124272183258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837475297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92528945,0.00049953756,0.00057821465,0.068124294,0.0011286748,0.00020237529,0.0000035209569,0.000011284791,0.0041626208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928772,0.00012719978,0.00003249878,0.004960548,0.0019589667,0.000009722627,0.000002129625,0.000010142357,0.00002161828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989964,0.00006677476,0.0003355777,0.00009790969,0.00028419826,0.00021913798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913955,0.000321248,0.00035772205,0.00013800719,0.00003096341,0.0000125372735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013715609,0.000114548886,0.0001548311,0.00007260739,0.0004898416,0.000375972,0.00047332875,0.000028201459,0.000043975295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099049175,0.000053239804,0.000057835678,0.00013357673,0.0008472359,0.00063512137,0.00014324806,0.0004596275,0.0000032218834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088751625,0.00022086369,0.5562172,0.00007049085,0.0002813424,0.00001622081,0.015194572,0.0012697752,0.0008444524,0.41233134,0.007260772,0.005405435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036919825,0.000012256928,0.91100574,0.00029768643,0.00011675086,0.0001248077,0.014842554,0.0063419803,0.000037671853,0.012902005,0.050369162,0.0002574113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015015834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050619646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39942935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032219752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005974194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3767515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173127874","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v27i0.989","title":"THE MODEL FOR A PATH FORWARD. A PROPOSAL FOR A MODEL LAW DEALING WITH CYBER-SQUATTING AND OTHER ABUSIVE DOMAIN NAME PRACTICES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Goodwill; Domain Name System; The Internet; Cyberspace; Law; E-commerce; Intellectual property; Business; Internet privacy; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09352065687713078,"score_gpt":0.3500815640146488,"score_spread":0.256560907137518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173127874","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08702134,0.0012368051,0.82565373,0.02457403,0.0002842614,0.0032300043,0.000025198824,0.0001242635,0.05785039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9103199,0.00001914984,0.0870668,0.0012222531,0.00050325517,0.00010239839,4.0555062e-7,0.000054674318,0.0007111466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981037,0.00025323077,0.00029760835,0.00020894744,0.0005302387,0.0006063235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734336,0.0011420172,0.0006163511,0.00015749759,0.00055352953,0.00018725263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065182135,0.00017365112,0.00019715162,0.00002078404,0.005758499,0.0008999164,0.0004587926,0.00008543399,0.0000026440725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010399186,0.00008544612,0.00008849204,0.00007317395,0.0007493099,0.0004987849,0.000062212974,0.00037242827,0.0000022358083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008117871,0.000019418374,0.000009833617,0.000010168087,0.00009526751,0.0000026595226,0.10163522,0.016021943,0.00007684558,0.88011724,0.00031866887,0.0008809688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008931874,0.00021777632,9.263119e-8,0.000108083266,0.000089433684,0.00009867067,0.024776177,0.647111,0.000049956318,0.3074084,0.01906593,0.00018133562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016583658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016207423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8232986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013496335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005883392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99553585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905397250","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i1.1655","title":"UNDUE INFLUENCE: TOWARDS A UNIFYING CONCEPT OF UNCONSCIONABLITY?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Undue influence; Law; Legislature; Commonwealth; Political science; Parliament; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03659715602216373,"score_gpt":0.3503688528253154,"score_spread":0.31377169680315165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905397250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85429054,0.00019730642,0.0010349608,0.0074611627,0.00025558352,0.00011830383,0.0000063203333,0.00003308046,0.13660274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798745,0.000018794526,0.00051621516,0.0004200969,0.00067495165,0.0000020049217,2.4864596e-7,0.0000047776207,0.0003754503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999038,0.0001533919,0.00020513359,0.000073531926,0.00031945077,0.00021048148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991795,0.000110453766,0.00017237576,0.00014038688,0.00030569357,0.00009161457],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013105397,0.000053445034,0.00008992555,0.000022102351,0.0021639601,0.00013382766,0.0004581349,0.000044094548,0.00019060679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015958982,0.000036520614,0.000055421304,0.00025694174,0.0013119127,0.00021912159,0.00006344993,0.00023377886,0.00002461934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006178771,0.00001432526,0.00055962126,0.0000017392507,0.00001888533,0.0000016300761,0.020293983,0.00008598376,0.00057810755,0.97503424,0.00040743925,0.0029978547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048653485,0.00010299387,0.0072131166,0.00013774793,0.00005799742,0.00006327307,0.02413176,0.00010478409,0.0044423095,0.10237704,0.8606483,0.00023417268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059742257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033841373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059690716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024242386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967130248","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v30i2.1701","title":"‘CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION? INTERPRETATION, (MIS)CALCULATION, WRONGS RIGHTED OR REACTION & REITERATION’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Referendum; Aotearoa; Law; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Context (archaeology); Politics; Brexit; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; European union; History","score_opus":0.05316565827189108,"score_gpt":0.34108904335866214,"score_spread":0.28792338508677107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967130248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.781815,0.0010519477,0.0022024994,0.061139006,0.0049110497,0.0017837558,0.000006915295,0.00025590643,0.14683394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437094,0.00008414993,0.0002362317,0.000758441,0.0010284723,0.000019612382,0.000005387751,0.0000061646015,0.0034906305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834746,0.00048198705,0.0002964315,0.00013053174,0.00049727375,0.00024632004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987287,0.00035848533,0.00028212517,0.00014236217,0.00042723762,0.00006106938],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014029293,0.000113242546,0.00012935516,0.00002530454,0.005039061,0.00047481715,0.00028528186,0.000072551746,0.00033511053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035993988,0.00005312135,0.00008808297,0.00025369608,0.0005034039,0.0008445066,0.000031901636,0.00037093728,0.0002860587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003106216,0.000069230664,0.010558599,0.000018788784,0.00037676745,0.000009674988,0.48523346,0.00038772274,0.0014331181,0.47796765,0.015375184,0.00825918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061875896,0.000045258294,0.02231907,0.00018319912,0.00011454436,0.000091730886,0.021464845,0.000508612,0.000050921884,0.0029875222,0.95133924,0.00027627315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004316551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009779982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9359641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003012944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057752644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99625623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997765047","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v31i1.1793","title":"Non-Apology in the Age of Apology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Redress; Political science; Law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04235436020793623,"score_gpt":0.3283755924567253,"score_spread":0.28602123224878906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997765047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710272,0.00055294915,0.00013584718,0.008449288,0.00077177945,0.000091331014,0.0000014586115,0.000008644865,0.018961523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977164,0.000020196014,0.00003483261,0.001923436,0.00021407062,0.000004572159,0.000001412736,0.000012405878,0.00007265157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988726,0.00033170302,0.00030925273,0.00010702917,0.00011250601,0.0002669058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946284,0.00013787347,0.00015655898,0.000181304,0.000022140923,0.00003926827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060911785,0.00009254869,0.00020180472,0.00003859974,0.0002039401,0.000016632846,0.00056207884,0.00014193583,0.00062399544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014558787,0.000046887173,0.00009562264,0.0001812758,0.00037324958,0.000028321481,0.000045512057,0.0009278048,0.00008435123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015873561,0.0008887032,0.10942755,0.000051527193,0.00080070226,0.011050457,0.33109543,0.001975389,0.024735862,0.4862032,0.019947581,0.012236238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012148048,0.004359111,0.6725096,0.0002996805,0.00089770666,0.021673288,0.09699793,0.00038711744,0.0018333264,0.019044844,0.1687213,0.0011280428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004726177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009533412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56308204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009845496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014299913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68323123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152624","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2212","title":"Legal Relationship between Universities and their Students – How Accountable and to what Extent in Law are Universities Liable for Student Suicides?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.035682557447261676,"score_gpt":0.3381746291294324,"score_spread":0.30249207168217074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408152624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98546267,0.00199392,0.00027610388,0.006153024,0.00026125516,0.00028406183,0.000005791513,0.000016085158,0.005547096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960821,0.00011532201,0.000029486215,0.00036787477,0.00019617999,0.0000034539376,5.737306e-7,0.000005661713,0.003199336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990469,0.00016009326,0.00013731424,0.0001322526,0.00025577255,0.00026762296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905056,0.00056083023,0.00010618615,0.000068459296,0.0001284394,0.00008550117],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014161145,0.000099200195,0.00019915294,0.000092833034,0.0026795035,0.0019147496,0.00031862909,0.000060734346,0.0000030629963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030863936,0.00007546336,0.00003251587,0.00021660519,0.00028412807,0.001560533,0.00014374341,0.00020336443,5.4581085e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006045562,0.000024989107,0.25246552,0.000049104354,0.0000814278,0.000010662386,0.053563002,0.00009506098,0.000009255447,0.6929043,0.00047883802,0.0002574113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056934904,0.000055739958,0.06003446,0.0006906424,0.000052072108,0.0000036610543,0.86229277,0.0000036739432,0.000030093282,0.0085997265,0.067535006,0.00013282173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01863668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032663357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80872977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031484745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015083519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408152637","doi":"10.5750/dlj.v33i1.2230","title":"Role for Parliament in Independent Judicial Appointments: Insights from the Comptroller and Auditor General","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Denning Law Journal","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Political science; Law; Audit; Accounting; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.012294563459142907,"score_gpt":0.23463622944166035,"score_spread":0.22234166598251745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408152637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91326225,0.0006555961,0.0013469025,0.014839057,0.0022823496,0.0005679569,0.0000042112074,0.000027151546,0.06701453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612301,0.000013526748,0.00019566783,0.035512064,0.0028177348,0.00003155357,0.000011292267,0.000007951522,0.00018012451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992328,0.000026189358,0.00026733274,0.00011658402,0.00021590274,0.00014118046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957895,0.000088584275,0.00015888066,0.000083823805,0.00008136325,0.0000084013645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003107632,0.000103662496,0.00011427907,0.00006242821,0.0006627371,0.0005337688,0.00024195787,0.000031792122,0.00006726495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002773221,0.00005857769,0.000055996323,0.00008465673,0.00006741966,0.0003614061,0.000096146134,0.00019974218,0.000017768221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015359135,0.00006671334,0.0019892987,0.0000049341934,0.000119119424,0.0000033139097,0.00021524788,0.00038435773,0.00083534006,0.98309004,0.0126019325,0.00053610717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039918586,0.000025475132,0.041367285,0.00018950226,0.0001130831,0.000005275533,0.0011080529,0.033242803,0.00026584917,0.4522059,0.46727198,0.00021294727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012431171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016127802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53088415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055718836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018031003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5147145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}