{"meta":{"query_hash":"62c488d23342","filters":{"venue":"The Design Journal"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/62c488d23342","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Design+Journal"},"results":[{"id":"W1974903503","doi":"10.2752/175470710x12735884221050","title":"<i>Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World</i> by Alastair Fuad-Luke","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Sustainable Design and Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Sustainable design; Strangeness; Sociology; Sustainable development; Library science; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.012614145635675415,"score_gpt":0.21465519043384976,"score_spread":0.20204104479817434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974903503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023336262,0.017538883,0.010358445,0.13165806,0.03576808,0.00024113995,0.00051092455,0.0033700143,0.7982209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014375536,0.0075227227,0.0039041967,0.0151648875,0.006362324,0.00021579214,0.0003524837,0.0013691329,0.9507329],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999383,0.00017384159,0.00002049479,0.00009325654,0.00026497187,0.00006444911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982078,0.00059289066,0.00009241618,0.00013246444,0.00040003238,0.00057433295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095950044,0.00088753604,0.0003529894,0.0009237749,0.0029086499,0.0055336035,0.00077209,0.0022474516,0.19073033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031843947,0.00034103973,0.00040610848,0.0006879518,0.0017553671,0.003937217,0.0034183005,0.0031530724,0.06579067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055616943,0.0000063769758,0.000053283733,0.000035124584,7.338241e-7,0.000015392825,0.00045880722,0.0000088013585,0.00018349162,0.0020452118,0.97954756,0.017639792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023352159,0.0000092703385,0.00017615104,0.000113126094,0.0000010485187,0.000092725895,0.000820571,0.000030773932,0.000116535586,0.0009301915,0.9977035,0.0000038240296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030302396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013251062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19073033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015307771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010136135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6380565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991403969","doi":"10.2752/146069201790718649","title":"Living with Mickey: In Search of the Boundaries of the Theme Park","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Media, Gender, and Advertising","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Theme park; Assertion; Theme (computing); Nothing; Aesthetics; Process (computing); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; History; Computer science; Art; Tourism; Philosophy; Archaeology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.06782641102366146,"score_gpt":0.3065632646663971,"score_spread":0.23873685364273564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991403969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49383625,0.0035458629,0.007123153,0.028966611,0.0010593449,0.00003442699,0.000035647106,0.00005641577,0.4653422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836573,0.0005770433,0.0007912388,0.0008771187,0.000097073425,0.00001275846,0.000010076078,0.00003208731,0.013945153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784946,0.001447568,0.000035957873,0.00015854121,0.00024642024,0.00026200898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983191,0.00096018973,0.00019707216,0.00015003975,0.00015025596,0.00022324217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025081914,0.00032142305,0.00025010947,0.0010131935,0.008498589,0.01007081,0.0007602239,0.0019466848,0.0067982464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053436104,0.00027072505,0.00025082397,0.0007151524,0.016277729,0.010704483,0.0060733184,0.0038646008,0.0006143856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013432777,0.000039850005,0.0026884496,0.00009750249,0.000005416683,0.0007162863,0.40412447,0.000053598833,0.00092267425,0.5639806,0.005628747,0.021608096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016741466,0.00011400743,0.003992083,0.00029979422,0.000016500095,0.0014238189,0.6202629,0.0002837051,0.0010101101,0.058096472,0.3144412,0.000042639556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032647033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058456887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01007081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020402798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001392071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02274239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020169686","doi":"10.2752/146069210x12580336766284","title":"The Chimera Reified: Design, Meaning and the Post-consumerism Object","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consumerism; Sociology; Sustainability; Meaning (existential); Object (grammar); Goods and services; Sustainable design; Industrial design; Product (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Law; Economics; Ecology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0208245565232371,"score_gpt":0.25271721768547417,"score_spread":0.23189266116223706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020169686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12040938,0.008512949,0.16291407,0.043784358,0.0005573568,0.00012882444,0.000049535498,0.0002565267,0.66338706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94903094,0.0011438489,0.017840594,0.0014999474,0.00007123988,0.00013809896,0.000020674554,0.00013653224,0.030118072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990871,0.0063909446,0.00018818099,0.00074667356,0.0013072417,0.0004958968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966934,0.0016079838,0.00018524291,0.0010268245,0.00029024365,0.0001963561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007871142,0.00053792074,0.0006039341,0.0012434615,0.006022006,0.01302203,0.0017687692,0.004434668,0.0041406048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006228859,0.00045059534,0.0006465652,0.0012695398,0.07690435,0.011983118,0.008292709,0.004293305,0.00046108363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059343247,0.0000049146447,0.00006638562,0.0000136767985,0.0000013294222,0.000038729224,0.009542942,0.00011868627,0.00007098309,0.98773754,0.00028375263,0.0021150764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017191047,0.000041366005,0.0001848945,0.00012205754,0.000009606943,0.0002813916,0.011625673,0.0010243938,0.0006604091,0.8430157,0.14299747,0.000019865467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035514308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023750644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01302203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009745382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042631184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07070798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037098141","doi":"10.2752/146069203789355462","title":"The ‘Interanimation’ of Worlds: Creative Metaphors in Art and Design","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Salient; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics; Similarity (geometry); Style (visual arts); Function (biology); Perception; Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Communication; Epistemology; Computer science; Visual arts; Art; Artificial intelligence; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04345578647233734,"score_gpt":0.30172132428202514,"score_spread":0.2582655378096878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037098141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16926143,0.031127438,0.2719234,0.026704142,0.0011065063,0.000117980846,0.000093580355,0.00047649417,0.49918908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96444935,0.0019694492,0.025249153,0.00077690324,0.00010735398,0.00010908523,0.00002176563,0.000110743495,0.0072061345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497473,0.004113083,0.00010058335,0.00016852496,0.00042506022,0.00021802573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973449,0.0019003233,0.00019293565,0.00027135602,0.00012491313,0.00016552342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038512854,0.0008769209,0.0003863705,0.002892839,0.003584888,0.008160107,0.0010570966,0.0023386166,0.0031842736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059957528,0.0004973981,0.00068709865,0.002165014,0.037532493,0.01435286,0.0052167564,0.0026818577,0.00053447275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030034364,0.000014239618,0.00019905182,0.000114955306,0.00000622955,0.00024774548,0.08479507,0.00024717106,0.0004963841,0.9008829,0.0016430321,0.011323182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007214985,0.00010993599,0.00073322933,0.00040728028,0.000022261318,0.0020743778,0.062822446,0.002472797,0.0006705563,0.7297536,0.20079887,0.000062566505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012183418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011378266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008160107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023903046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012086055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020367742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044731821","doi":"10.2752/146069210x12766130824894","title":"Evaluative Criteria of Denim Jeans: A Cross-national Study of Functional and Aesthetic Aspects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Fashion and Cultural Textiles","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Denim; Context (archaeology); Purchasing; Conformity; Marketing; Product (mathematics); Advertising; China; Consumption (sociology); Perception; Psychology; Order (exchange); Appeal; Consumer behaviour; Sociology; Business; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.12661475657961394,"score_gpt":0.33163908236726347,"score_spread":0.20502432578764954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044731821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99704474,0.000040146362,0.00006730584,0.00002349499,0.0000031320108,0.000013925897,0.00000965204,5.922902e-7,0.0027970606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986325,0.00006691252,0.00020610861,0.00002904487,0.0000032768069,0.000019011124,0.00002761832,0.000002907315,0.0010126611],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992086,0.0002955107,0.000053964974,0.00006946005,0.00024342937,0.00012904871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977944,0.0004940271,0.0005519468,0.00012396568,0.0007820928,0.00025362833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003169525,0.00020935344,0.000248254,0.001374235,0.0019349967,0.001286999,0.0002447041,0.00023988163,0.0011723243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046906034,0.00012975512,0.00019960442,0.0008225204,0.0011896074,0.000663661,0.0011990789,0.0004564514,0.00008890915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018054017,0.00015333647,0.62396,0.00017227691,0.000031147738,0.0007572027,0.33711466,0.00006725044,0.0073310994,0.0015168538,0.00051269523,0.028202936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004300535,0.00014757326,0.69365835,0.000061144994,0.00001395666,0.0006233239,0.29687577,0.0001946463,0.0010071337,0.00019587568,0.0071932166,0.000024751904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020627495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05036708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020627495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001315193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009320306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04101485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277247448","doi":"10.2752/146069205789331574","title":"L'Eclipse De L'Objet Dans Les ThéOries Du Projet En Design","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Gestalt psychology; Object (grammar); Product (mathematics); Sociology; Focus (optics); Ideology; Product design; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.25155900958731053,"score_gpt":0.30409737262814546,"score_spread":0.05253836304083492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277247448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024169639,0.071582414,0.3308324,0.06254069,0.003185128,0.00011819918,0.00024923,0.00030044164,0.50702196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7042445,0.06915768,0.11386496,0.009703629,0.005569255,0.00077638135,0.00038006043,0.0009820072,0.09532162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9698359,0.021978252,0.0006049389,0.0018307067,0.0049799113,0.00077032164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96829915,0.025184374,0.0010655586,0.003246168,0.0016350022,0.00056978187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019753044,0.0018771805,0.0015241433,0.0061042355,0.0049694735,0.02154357,0.0026264002,0.006256891,0.005671761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020129794,0.0012837584,0.0016392119,0.00553653,0.052338693,0.023420123,0.0060919207,0.011524168,0.0022799324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008445172,0.000010491289,0.00016941079,0.00009467705,0.0000067201963,0.00004698212,0.006446472,0.00030026303,0.000042984673,0.98625714,0.00095538626,0.0056609972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026624199,0.00004887879,0.00065025635,0.0009944227,0.000019596868,0.00027298668,0.004515211,0.002440538,0.00032791676,0.66221875,0.32845572,0.000029179566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008845398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063292277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02154357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009509267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050759967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104465306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750928525","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352746","title":"Health Design: Mapping current situations, envisioning next steps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Persona Design and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Knowledge management; Health professionals; Face (sociological concept); Process management; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.23167690703643612,"score_gpt":0.3552518129859218,"score_spread":0.12357490594948567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750928525","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036111634,0.005709298,0.8083072,0.040679023,0.0004768032,0.0014693183,0.00043547025,0.0011536316,0.105657615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34569952,0.0046827984,0.63804543,0.0013550182,0.00008319212,0.0010302706,0.0004721977,0.00027655333,0.008354967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825491,0.013757144,0.00072882563,0.0011014063,0.001233796,0.0006297786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98994434,0.0063010734,0.0006367719,0.0011268881,0.0010509704,0.0009399174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01728811,0.001728032,0.000640076,0.004101427,0.0045009903,0.017889533,0.0027127012,0.0050465493,0.007281574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02219888,0.0016944427,0.0012139776,0.0024770636,0.014870171,0.023047483,0.008338542,0.003228302,0.0019132559],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012058308,0.00028607485,0.011620901,0.0020792482,0.00011312683,0.0010977791,0.13069123,0.012904614,0.0021318675,0.65821767,0.013622998,0.1671138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055795288,0.00017782542,0.0022217818,0.0022664517,0.00008796234,0.0012623675,0.1325912,0.021109864,0.0015495426,0.5839746,0.25455442,0.00014817798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073635564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007302892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017889533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005503829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00884978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09142935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751704299","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352976","title":"Breathing Games: Promoting Respiratory Health Through Co-creation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Biomedical and Engineering Education","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Commons; Knowledge management; Breathing; Public relations; Business; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04964956894707619,"score_gpt":0.3255877385747244,"score_spread":0.2759381696276482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751704299","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22902507,0.0069004763,0.50323504,0.018523788,0.002803018,0.0047791842,0.0015794827,0.013827122,0.21932682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5563952,0.003709527,0.36808783,0.003916601,0.00055023265,0.0041971314,0.0016540362,0.0014052686,0.06008411],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971046,0.0017487698,0.00010363322,0.0002772874,0.00053005456,0.00023574769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626476,0.0019178365,0.00020981384,0.00036858363,0.00021279501,0.0010261151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031453706,0.0010401336,0.00030185818,0.0011718867,0.0011247322,0.003500889,0.0018811185,0.0018489223,0.01124543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072098286,0.00031921818,0.0010118271,0.00038678656,0.001728091,0.0027460493,0.010376404,0.0017163712,0.0028605042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013121605,0.006403553,0.009757396,0.0039450563,0.00033451477,0.0007383125,0.014963772,0.0036274255,0.027334264,0.06320101,0.102656916,0.7657256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013499821,0.0044135517,0.015615401,0.001882231,0.00045563982,0.002677133,0.006765516,0.018491633,0.024682008,0.10664663,0.81670976,0.00031063255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053448085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013837893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01124543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051483634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013702348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03761971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751809286","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352779","title":"Fashion Design for Short Male Consumers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Fashion and Cultural Textiles","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Mainstream; Fashion design; Order (exchange); Advertising; Sociology; Qualitative research; Phase (matter); Marketing; Psychology; Business; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.225533493670305,"score_gpt":0.30167084345731976,"score_spread":0.07613734978701475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751809286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59954,0.0016144293,0.07168395,0.007774399,0.0007944034,0.00120309,0.0002743763,0.0007328269,0.31638253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.792184,0.0012903317,0.058398247,0.0025254171,0.0002452458,0.00092186313,0.00024232618,0.00037404042,0.1438186],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987531,0.0007706449,0.0000378534,0.00006422619,0.00024029658,0.00013386615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869823,0.00046328158,0.00011156081,0.00014246111,0.0002506516,0.00033377513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022670266,0.00036935188,0.0001738265,0.00046398214,0.0022375027,0.0021829896,0.00037823204,0.0006029518,0.035788354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002793003,0.00020570672,0.00035716486,0.0004760151,0.0007755351,0.001402097,0.0016160889,0.0007605235,0.005266857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009866476,0.0022719398,0.03043733,0.0013877939,0.00002911725,0.0017617274,0.18022157,0.00056886097,0.02116089,0.051688332,0.09067686,0.6188089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011786961,0.0027974814,0.028493682,0.0004978536,0.000047464247,0.0014766307,0.12564781,0.0016024588,0.007906161,0.011129305,0.82020426,0.000079031335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059868133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024633526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035788354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008777651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009448819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119723976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751932443","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352982","title":"Desirability in design for safety: Developing life jacket through creative problem solving method of TRIZ","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIZ; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Usability; Product design; New product development; Order (exchange); Engineering; Architectural engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Manufacturing engineering; Marketing; Business; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics","score_opus":0.25400343939490216,"score_gpt":0.4630095632925829,"score_spread":0.20900612389768075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751932443","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24821788,0.0006717819,0.69563794,0.0018370856,0.0001809969,0.002108867,0.00009870161,0.0020385196,0.049208235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.263515,0.00068050646,0.71526504,0.00031834494,0.00003477018,0.00097637234,0.00016323512,0.00024662534,0.018800158],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"design_other","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701667,0.0015465283,0.00014362404,0.00051020156,0.00063926214,0.00014369379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996548,0.0020812273,0.0003325928,0.0002973154,0.0005498657,0.00019097884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037906596,0.001136347,0.0004074418,0.0013293327,0.0007733882,0.002585065,0.001275011,0.00082373415,0.0068866177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076577244,0.00039270628,0.0008923273,0.000506948,0.0014538005,0.0019991363,0.002019432,0.0011897786,0.001358326],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":"design_other","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003701922,0.0024887554,0.008110544,0.002526665,0.000104257706,0.0009611336,0.0736588,0.0048688166,0.06197057,0.037831098,0.012284724,0.79482436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010548119,0.010166996,0.037907105,0.0035787085,0.0008186037,0.011256982,0.08228475,0.13579963,0.13591564,0.106347956,0.47416952,0.0006992739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035640007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006664225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068866177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071678136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014561727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02303809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752013814","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352945","title":"Scalable Interactive Modular Systems (SIMS): sustainability for digital interfaces","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"","keywords":"Modular design; Sustainability; Interface (matter); Computer science; Scalability; Process (computing); Key (lock); Acknowledgement; Resilience (materials science); Orchestration; Sustainable design; Process management; Human–computer interaction; Systems engineering; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.04444273585109431,"score_gpt":0.2754785122222511,"score_spread":0.2310357763711568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752013814","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032259095,0.0014302668,0.8563934,0.004042078,0.00024912044,0.000593107,0.00031977068,0.0038680595,0.100845166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32176358,0.0013707989,0.65622264,0.00054014486,0.0001113083,0.0008778477,0.00028535974,0.0007898524,0.018038528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969729,0.0017769791,0.00015629349,0.00020052586,0.0007583625,0.00013495475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430805,0.0036258218,0.0003636054,0.0009447568,0.00050736766,0.00025047915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004590838,0.0008124804,0.00028240352,0.0014471393,0.0011690218,0.004207365,0.0011950601,0.0014010032,0.016456123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011954766,0.00042818274,0.00072086934,0.0012413404,0.004393041,0.005374625,0.005880547,0.0012430862,0.0020745913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114373244,0.00007769318,0.0015196875,0.001310518,0.00003193247,0.00039321373,0.012894842,0.009284186,0.013088154,0.66420674,0.011972173,0.2851065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055819673,0.00036093738,0.0015847657,0.0008515787,0.000049057737,0.0008344079,0.0035584532,0.025183486,0.014113545,0.32656604,0.62675184,0.00009013166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005953066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088554964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016456123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015694167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014143143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055051208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752559259","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352915","title":"A case of values conflict in the video game design field. A critique of Schön’s appreciative system.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Casual; Conversation; Field (mathematics); Appreciative inquiry; Game design; Value (mathematics); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Computer science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Multimedia; Mathematics; Political science; Communication; Philosophy; Pedagogy; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.1148632409938129,"score_gpt":0.31281674848835683,"score_spread":0.19795350749454393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752559259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25935072,0.009010948,0.14770801,0.27595598,0.0017690486,0.00039433455,0.000076161734,0.00033282218,0.305402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96289915,0.00094202126,0.017043939,0.008935927,0.00013301698,0.00038477022,0.000016037515,0.00015272902,0.009492313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89694613,0.08525161,0.0016683566,0.00456146,0.0078813005,0.003691136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9288179,0.059894886,0.003125524,0.0037933132,0.0024170035,0.0019513543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042733997,0.0012592905,0.0008716019,0.0034856233,0.023218982,0.019946985,0.003694634,0.017083667,0.0038110493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06400363,0.0015941763,0.0012755018,0.0029887338,0.08440231,0.029887302,0.016922185,0.015013605,0.0005378474],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005863143,0.00003574128,0.00051492953,0.00010703458,0.000010051234,0.0018063139,0.32166666,0.00027326558,0.0003926402,0.6620285,0.0041745664,0.008931657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008861298,0.00011836463,0.00072674383,0.0006877533,0.00002625099,0.0042960364,0.27841145,0.0025259128,0.0015149893,0.46649656,0.24498053,0.0001268364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006639352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007313235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042733997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016067142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006112747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22600168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752569977","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352832","title":"Infrastructuring Place. Citizen-led Placemaking and the Commons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Urban Agriculture and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Placemaking; Commons; Public relations; Citizen journalism; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Peer production; Narrative; Sociology; Political science; Participatory design; Urban planning; Knowledge management; Business; Engineering; Geography; Urban design; Civil engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.0201169434323796,"score_gpt":0.21371862018667273,"score_spread":0.19360167675429313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752569977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19921301,0.009116261,0.09381749,0.014270141,0.00048623627,0.000270315,0.00016693026,0.00037875303,0.68228084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664579,0.0012367326,0.009755001,0.00046797303,0.00004345411,0.000107796,0.000047237463,0.00005221017,0.02183179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997957,0.0012222274,0.00005902996,0.00022172842,0.00029654359,0.00024344694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984654,0.00067771296,0.00021874579,0.0003508106,0.00007093581,0.00021631528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019067725,0.00026508138,0.00018446399,0.0010854226,0.003384782,0.0064645987,0.00079901464,0.0014805532,0.008256232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016450485,0.0002089088,0.0002824544,0.0015600065,0.023998106,0.005320274,0.008078103,0.0008881061,0.0007850231],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043189528,0.000046966998,0.0027552422,0.00044833447,0.000009867593,0.0004633821,0.06564595,0.0010286632,0.0019537741,0.8396819,0.003180775,0.08474197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015609701,0.00009967138,0.0041600442,0.00054019206,0.000012911694,0.0007374824,0.093183346,0.0008165339,0.0018874456,0.47658408,0.42193058,0.00003203178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026613798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006575534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008256232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002300049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002581184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027619839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753658688","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2017.1352958","title":"Understanding Collaborative Design Through Activity Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Teamwork; Multidisciplinary approach; Knowledge management; Activity theory; Computer science; Outcome (game theory); Value (mathematics); Collaborative design; Management science; Psychology; Engineering; Sociology; Cognitive science; Systems design; Software engineering; Management","score_opus":0.3234556605034867,"score_gpt":0.3450487194714577,"score_spread":0.021593058967971035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753658688","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013995175,0.0025920032,0.9148074,0.0036982938,0.00015786987,0.00027541188,0.00004832497,0.00011230471,0.06431328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56203955,0.0039388854,0.42388794,0.00057977845,0.0001827823,0.0016117173,0.00017975796,0.00010685629,0.007472803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853603,0.011203631,0.0005498225,0.001124991,0.0012997374,0.00046142662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827642,0.01409786,0.0006428031,0.0014377901,0.0006699916,0.0003872968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012858165,0.0012293854,0.0009535495,0.004201767,0.0028523905,0.01147719,0.0023700309,0.0034678765,0.0036012016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014268501,0.00077460485,0.0015603787,0.0023565982,0.020649802,0.013411904,0.0054628123,0.003136101,0.0006675851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067534866,0.00002376325,0.00035604858,0.00015223028,0.000012552269,0.00006788314,0.0075311423,0.004235143,0.00015736485,0.9767299,0.0003678875,0.010359268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002350785,0.000029207511,0.00020229863,0.0002150328,0.00001481314,0.00010829359,0.0025612665,0.012074275,0.0002750251,0.9502449,0.034234144,0.00001722177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024826545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001243882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012858165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044840276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004188202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06800133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2925875616","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2019.1595422","title":"Designing in highly contentious areas: Perspectives on a way forward for mental healthcare transformation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Context (archaeology); Mental healthcare; Mental health service; Health care; Service (business); Process management; Management science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Business; Psychiatry; Marketing","score_opus":0.21252647091394217,"score_gpt":0.4099393791373162,"score_spread":0.19741290822337404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2925875616","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10409975,0.011571218,0.30276197,0.37550974,0.0021344274,0.0016125676,0.00009501051,0.0006360114,0.2015794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8413397,0.0053702137,0.11984175,0.015732607,0.00028338155,0.0015155678,0.000066807836,0.00051552994,0.015334505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.864457,0.12245708,0.0019713843,0.0017754486,0.005324863,0.0040142303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93302774,0.05074196,0.002245365,0.004658298,0.004678866,0.0046478566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.076273255,0.0017268027,0.0009520539,0.0036940074,0.021984585,0.028338939,0.00469512,0.013195492,0.0066445647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0445427,0.0015710576,0.001666618,0.0027203166,0.08369961,0.023848172,0.02093833,0.012967713,0.0012291208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004266325,0.00014753737,0.001076889,0.00070245255,0.000024307534,0.0006481759,0.5945868,0.00062269345,0.0006658576,0.37095457,0.004677538,0.025850464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006204493,0.00016979563,0.00043604113,0.0013398287,0.00003427957,0.0010379825,0.5689233,0.0012548551,0.0009635113,0.20437233,0.22133948,0.00006649534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059446436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006205731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076273255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017262489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027914856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40337634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947165264","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2019.1594968","title":"Tools for building consensus on goals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Process management; Knowledge management; Management science; Engineering","score_opus":0.444947288614178,"score_gpt":0.4542605018730726,"score_spread":0.009313213258894615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947165264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015257718,0.000052351763,0.99370277,0.00022071962,0.00003438119,0.00009329516,0.00007600628,0.0008535525,0.0034411126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09509699,0.000105016705,0.9014137,0.00013642972,0.000030055728,0.00063425896,0.00041656103,0.00028901928,0.001877986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831891,0.008372566,0.0017604388,0.0021786462,0.0038818754,0.00061736954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9302557,0.050866324,0.0028395283,0.008586597,0.0063091456,0.001142615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018211106,0.0018674913,0.0019050064,0.007832198,0.0023387724,0.0076739285,0.0034335959,0.003008668,0.018548004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09116663,0.0014020978,0.0025775444,0.0045499546,0.0034341982,0.010990995,0.009526962,0.0043674405,0.004836168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018385245,0.00019441065,0.0013365402,0.0005345454,0.00020517295,0.00018134437,0.0017755877,0.0705422,0.0015136075,0.52204704,0.007102259,0.39438346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006207515,0.0000704072,0.00018179975,0.00021439356,0.00006721058,0.0000661658,0.00047848502,0.25218937,0.0026183699,0.73302466,0.010972041,0.000055043285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002166897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026310445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018548004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020834825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043018153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096310735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947525865","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2019.1594975","title":"Co-design in mental health; Mellow: a self-help holistic crisis planning mobile application by youth, for youth","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.058639637762448765,"score_gpt":0.3339288222318306,"score_spread":0.2752891844693819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947525865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114582464,0.064765245,0.31967658,0.048008993,0.010354508,0.0044885366,0.014637119,0.06416091,0.35932565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21925034,0.03286779,0.33182234,0.0098850615,0.0013585143,0.0068406914,0.00776686,0.0067297826,0.38347855],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994468,0.00024230556,0.00004355176,0.00005723084,0.00014750508,0.00006250239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998998,0.00031261958,0.000075618955,0.00007619976,0.00010931049,0.0004283035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015328258,0.0009236606,0.00036419908,0.0006293956,0.0008306222,0.002382678,0.0006516482,0.0011581255,0.026665486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035601403,0.00041733347,0.00051650265,0.00035308197,0.00074443925,0.0024357382,0.0035806375,0.001252255,0.007159555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000354057,0.00017478834,0.0016278896,0.0015364712,0.000042511503,0.00020132765,0.0029058405,0.00029796793,0.004848197,0.0050824923,0.43550384,0.5474246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017439318,0.00033592587,0.0034190048,0.00071198295,0.00006458224,0.0007212751,0.0012003105,0.0008855703,0.0022498432,0.003693448,0.98647064,0.00007308335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019116001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00610252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026665486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006676828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020821334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08920491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947646117","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2019.1595002","title":"Climate Anticipation: working towards a design proposal for urban resilience and care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Resilience (materials science); Urban resilience; Climate change; Psychological resilience; Psychology; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Geography; Social psychology; Engineering; Economics; Urban planning; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.05367617112499075,"score_gpt":0.26170191177078583,"score_spread":0.2080257406457951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947646117","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02383547,0.00026341286,0.7921545,0.04357861,0.0013818395,0.0022426143,0.00030391512,0.0019564244,0.13428323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4093022,0.00030309198,0.55041826,0.0038828768,0.00018641406,0.00307716,0.0002441759,0.0006137797,0.031972107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936591,0.0036153472,0.00024903275,0.0004543425,0.0012876013,0.0007347105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187696,0.0032014893,0.00044985663,0.00094491814,0.0022598319,0.0012668802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010288651,0.0014350907,0.00043339183,0.0017534574,0.0044750837,0.009673729,0.003520137,0.0062507805,0.024499634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012914236,0.0008174603,0.0014440846,0.0009869495,0.007903952,0.0066951844,0.006018593,0.003991067,0.0025099698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016646305,0.00041427044,0.0023862615,0.0007526276,0.000060501694,0.00040709524,0.0151832905,0.020779477,0.004166199,0.870165,0.026202762,0.059316073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016187794,0.00053975993,0.0015775426,0.00089148845,0.00018225498,0.00045653258,0.024991639,0.041598026,0.008461475,0.40853417,0.5123616,0.00024371009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004975679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007773306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024499634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042015077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094418675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08195943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947843646","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2019.1595864","title":"Models of Collective Working. Insights on the Scottish Context","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.19298372112908097,"score_gpt":0.35553421366819293,"score_spread":0.16255049253911197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947843646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23995878,0.002413423,0.062076446,0.027629685,0.0001623228,0.000075027354,0.0001892712,0.000110150315,0.66738486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916727,0.00033821785,0.0018761206,0.00013479183,0.000021251579,0.00002203684,0.000022186412,0.000011063807,0.0059016007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680364,0.0021360056,0.000070911075,0.00023507742,0.00038939252,0.0003649168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946668,0.0030047377,0.00060111145,0.00076746044,0.00039319234,0.0005666783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044048424,0.00055870385,0.0004127948,0.0010428418,0.00404747,0.008345642,0.0018806959,0.0016141944,0.013173736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008834457,0.00026575555,0.00068357564,0.0015636404,0.010739159,0.004790891,0.003967978,0.0013500154,0.00092166406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002596824,0.00002943025,0.0009918716,0.000026257714,0.000007723037,0.0001122188,0.006322969,0.0034553763,0.00006816399,0.98167956,0.0012030317,0.0060774502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043597374,0.000051724895,0.003748737,0.00009223194,0.000022322429,0.00011179079,0.01023597,0.015007745,0.00009302822,0.94158405,0.028984763,0.00002397484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03458796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027693642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03458796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005251214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026437154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06877327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947876972","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2019.1594977","title":"Considering Haptic Feedback Systems for A Livable Space Suit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Space Exploration and Technology","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Marshall Space Flight Center","keywords":"Haptic technology; Space (punctuation); Human–computer interaction; Computer science; Engineering; Simulation","score_opus":0.03431278532827085,"score_gpt":0.21525399175141358,"score_spread":0.1809412064231427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947876972","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25026742,0.0013763285,0.677889,0.0024389573,0.0005036024,0.00029255098,0.000039862203,0.0003930628,0.06679918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549429,0.0005456176,0.031401385,0.00012542254,0.00006997212,0.000083834435,0.000015416681,0.000020459538,0.012794966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999408,0.00022872964,0.000025037074,0.000077044926,0.00018926761,0.00007185871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995478,0.00025178998,0.000036221172,0.00003507925,0.00008776068,0.00004125376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006042865,0.00041366098,0.00035493745,0.00023432254,0.0011852736,0.0031374504,0.00085102697,0.0029116936,0.0060831415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018004803,0.00026019933,0.0005021488,0.00017684477,0.001976091,0.0020852676,0.0015378892,0.0005675704,0.0005186005],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010317818,0.00023338603,0.0026945942,0.0012714865,0.00009127803,0.00916422,0.016267419,0.14770395,0.292113,0.4448762,0.0026060077,0.08194667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038163687,0.0028548576,0.0034296701,0.00037699647,0.00014717356,0.0036322903,0.011366685,0.73756576,0.037576426,0.09317356,0.10923673,0.0002582858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001851098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011439758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060831415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006166867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038484935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020350099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165989783","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2021.1929683","title":"From Graphic Designer to Agent of Change: Role Transition through the Approach of Entrepreneurial Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Graphic design; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Design education; Entrepreneurship education; Entrepreneurship; Transition (genetics); Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering; Public relations; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Business; Multimedia","score_opus":0.1563302005160459,"score_gpt":0.3667393245594526,"score_spread":0.21040912404340667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165989783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1342871,0.004797852,0.1507723,0.038974,0.0008474949,0.00035676666,0.000040455707,0.00029929035,0.66962475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92834365,0.001978794,0.031702224,0.0018336993,0.00008097511,0.0002496791,0.00002053014,0.000093979004,0.03569653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532866,0.003422364,0.00009794171,0.0003431888,0.00041291156,0.0003949495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659216,0.0019612794,0.00016263805,0.0003366004,0.00025575992,0.00069155294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056636157,0.0003529714,0.00022311707,0.0013200421,0.0045990124,0.011389954,0.0011854034,0.0024683422,0.0048183263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049043447,0.00034153837,0.0004213965,0.00067238935,0.020427477,0.0067966855,0.0077386093,0.003130138,0.00082706386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028866765,0.000115820534,0.001382737,0.00018433979,0.0000059592494,0.00037186913,0.12685557,0.00042695797,0.0005400325,0.81654084,0.0034321041,0.050114904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046163008,0.00013958965,0.001994282,0.00095668994,0.00002174937,0.0010694212,0.11574915,0.0030487427,0.0013396116,0.33707976,0.5385107,0.000044133652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010455677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002135138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011389954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044782413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050843502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0324921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223502949","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2022.2058680","title":"Indigenising design: The Seven Grandfathers’ Teachings as a design methodology","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Architecture, Design, and Social History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering; Engineering ethics; Psychology","score_opus":0.2033966586653373,"score_gpt":0.2888492927243195,"score_spread":0.08545263405898218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223502949","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12100121,0.0059702145,0.5138048,0.0542221,0.0017070834,0.0008846364,0.00007050734,0.000669156,0.30167034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6168053,0.0027787779,0.29463783,0.0050103078,0.00020482126,0.0013322406,0.000078391706,0.00050069403,0.07865163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96761584,0.027586652,0.0004924856,0.0010610232,0.002535205,0.00070875906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806569,0.014599896,0.00040410584,0.0019332711,0.001651186,0.0007546236],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024507105,0.0008214684,0.00049954886,0.002245062,0.006488276,0.0060895337,0.0019527077,0.002452125,0.0062656226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018384697,0.0007220594,0.0006636148,0.0010533243,0.030470263,0.005279528,0.005998976,0.0058436138,0.0011604571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031241154,0.000105626605,0.0006714404,0.00027007345,0.000013540656,0.00034390093,0.29832634,0.0005997885,0.0010987254,0.60957,0.008332878,0.080636345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003299077,0.00018600142,0.00047336324,0.00073404016,0.000015315147,0.000709657,0.06872357,0.001809042,0.0021239507,0.2164553,0.70868963,0.000047147707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032425602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006140635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99351174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066614617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007638634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1296075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283579491","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2022.2088098","title":"Five components of social design: A unified framework to support research and practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Strategic design; Conceptual framework; Social capital; Knowledge management; Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Psychological resilience; Public relations; Management science; Sociology; Process management; Engineering; Business; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Operations management; Social science","score_opus":0.249882304250188,"score_gpt":0.4258389508374606,"score_spread":0.17595664658727259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283579491","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048565967,0.0073156087,0.7996038,0.05643379,0.0006872931,0.0022327895,0.00031207054,0.00074713194,0.12781088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16526219,0.0055090734,0.8124308,0.0027054294,0.0002497575,0.006343744,0.00035031213,0.00030104848,0.0068476056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92320305,0.06329479,0.0034145643,0.0030802074,0.0053957957,0.0016116668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512609,0.03338475,0.0023887604,0.005013648,0.004483466,0.0034684602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06948749,0.0036431784,0.0022511156,0.018751368,0.012046025,0.030694142,0.0072976463,0.011507027,0.007408882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03597801,0.00213263,0.0029370973,0.011773354,0.07280593,0.02710176,0.018212764,0.0103093125,0.002009992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007810119,0.000024891335,0.000315066,0.00027666564,0.00001820096,0.000059500548,0.009279263,0.00064939563,0.00006582971,0.97405136,0.0018287199,0.013423452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027311506,0.000039323655,0.00030895162,0.0013661863,0.000031082276,0.000115044975,0.009794058,0.0024649948,0.00012296092,0.8757488,0.10994634,0.000034853983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013165617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012163161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06948749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027825147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04043086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36748934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403254154","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2024.2405773","title":"Assessing the impact of maker services in Barcelona and Milan towards the 15-minute city model through their accessibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.14187905665346928,"score_gpt":0.40454072928274853,"score_spread":0.26266167262927925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403254154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97449046,0.00012747585,0.004119662,0.00026374197,0.00001831528,0.00006424423,0.00056810223,0.00009014427,0.020257758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996947,0.000055561148,0.0019343228,0.000016444406,0.000003542599,0.000047355847,0.00021545081,0.00001653926,0.00076368393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833316,0.00087327504,0.000053022075,0.00012738272,0.0003051838,0.0003079387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982942,0.00071335636,0.00020888304,0.00013085835,0.00033941783,0.00031337058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093013974,0.0002749615,0.00030717032,0.0010346175,0.0006682723,0.003026124,0.00067575334,0.0005768286,0.0036013525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004548354,0.00020100627,0.0004592341,0.0018803083,0.0011640027,0.0011435214,0.0018758987,0.0005077278,0.0004187302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018169862,0.00032943476,0.5858135,0.00055500976,0.00032259864,0.001421138,0.019209495,0.23174278,0.0035085394,0.07319565,0.006939134,0.075145684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009539216,0.00084140303,0.77501833,0.00020813201,0.00018584025,0.00042735165,0.043727376,0.12798855,0.0013612005,0.012983824,0.037036218,0.00012643302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10555387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18879765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10555387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005444656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016878793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20987892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416067840","doi":"10.1080/14606925.2025.2579120","title":"An evaluation study of <i>AiLoupe</i> : An AI driven design tool to source and select textile materials","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Design Journal","topic":"Material Selection and Properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Design tool; Textile; Software tool; Machine tool; Expert system","score_opus":0.04923285443255159,"score_gpt":0.3171820730795894,"score_spread":0.2679492186470378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416067840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791899,0.00018078975,0.009340081,0.00012644421,0.000026033089,0.0019922305,0.00020230756,0.0001801605,0.008762008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9019615,0.00042572353,0.08356189,0.0003501432,0.000016976113,0.0031349973,0.00067400787,0.0001572141,0.009717522],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943691,0.0033930766,0.0003391737,0.0004555673,0.001156938,0.00028617826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791348,0.013844391,0.0008677979,0.0012731532,0.00408291,0.0007969628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010110744,0.00079344097,0.00055891846,0.00087703275,0.0009902319,0.0022665155,0.001403314,0.0009966699,0.0041489457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021630999,0.00041980593,0.00044691612,0.00047997505,0.0011796969,0.0022316393,0.0015743363,0.00085489324,0.00081042014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011037309,0.037962742,0.048406314,0.010118446,0.00040940972,0.0018693124,0.1133297,0.008013989,0.14233899,0.007844316,0.012206564,0.6064628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040778583,0.22978362,0.17773992,0.0031606157,0.0010898749,0.0034299209,0.09844054,0.055370133,0.19957723,0.004475799,0.22213158,0.00072289165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012875581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002931892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010110744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009320879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093241694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053471386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}