{"meta":{"query_hash":"2b6a27767b24","filters":{"venue":"The Educational Discourse a collection of scientific papers"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2b6a27767b24","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Educational+Discourse+a+collection+of+scientific+papers"},"results":[{"id":"W4399782108","doi":"10.33930/ed.2019.5007.46(10-11)-1","title":"METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH OF SOCIAL COHESION IN CONTAMPORARY FOREIGN SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Educational Discourse a collection of scientific papers","topic":"Cultural, Linguistic, Economic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2769688400016258,"score_gpt":0.4805716225677094,"score_spread":0.2036027825660836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399782108","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04028939,0.0046016313,0.8469631,0.005086231,0.0008913474,0.023962116,0.0014797113,0.00034410646,0.076382324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27164704,0.0023728434,0.64335203,0.001161712,0.00039662817,0.06559618,0.000969775,0.00018199581,0.014321832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.902996,0.08305657,0.0033186683,0.004473745,0.005312323,0.0008426364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446088,0.03844061,0.003633451,0.0068182913,0.0057443157,0.0007545285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061912086,0.0010035846,0.0011332213,0.011486419,0.003359981,0.0073505184,0.0025708252,0.0014595767,0.009171898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06896208,0.00066997175,0.0011985697,0.010023071,0.011779335,0.004309848,0.006459819,0.002071837,0.0020450046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020762319,0.00030519403,0.009066014,0.0027707973,0.00012284232,0.00041782705,0.11733532,0.0009954799,0.002490268,0.6269167,0.007435496,0.23193644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021222807,0.00070837,0.019657074,0.0036497843,0.00015059725,0.0008136515,0.092315085,0.0065253126,0.0057324315,0.49220058,0.3778717,0.00016309603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021794806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018116737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061912086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053335535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009790434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3274263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155018057","doi":"10.33930/ed.2019.5007.54(5-6)-7","title":"PHILOSOPHY OF CHILDHOOD AS OPPOSED TO ADULTHOOD IN LITERARY REPRESENTATION","year":2025,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"The Educational Discourse a collection of scientific papers","topic":"Themes in Literature Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Normative; Representation (politics); Literary criticism; Value (mathematics); Openness to experience; Space (punctuation); Subjectivity","score_opus":0.013865973211580255,"score_gpt":0.30057956339062364,"score_spread":0.2867135901790434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155018057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08391188,0.03426987,0.012943666,0.016163826,0.0018740369,0.00008645659,0.00014212406,0.000118486205,0.85048956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591434,0.0048946072,0.0012892701,0.0005244929,0.0006313157,0.00006240596,0.00006376044,0.00007740727,0.033313338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.0013660602,0.00009606197,0.0001747505,0.0001849975,0.00014085535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997835,0.0011178396,0.00028786043,0.00023352298,0.00018853965,0.00033731342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016741555,0.00047053996,0.00034662665,0.0015848752,0.0033172213,0.009885132,0.0006500215,0.0013294182,0.009430212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022302459,0.00017276319,0.00022561912,0.0015124831,0.014476133,0.004693601,0.0030317195,0.002058245,0.0012741388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030356,0.000014459977,0.00044864588,0.0001418543,0.0000032461417,0.00022358928,0.074768975,0.000058623424,0.000253205,0.9112914,0.0036733306,0.009092351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002459964,0.00014629093,0.003852094,0.0015157241,0.000022168144,0.0022527995,0.13798653,0.0005980849,0.0011223283,0.20726107,0.64519364,0.000024655303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000922992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010366436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009885132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00515873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013728294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037429452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}