{"meta":{"query_hash":"e8d52144d36e","filters":{"venue":"The Good Society"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e8d52144d36e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Good+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W2055686356","doi":"10.1353/gso.2003.0013","title":"The Future of Public Laws for Private Marriages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Quarter (Canadian coin); Safe haven; Haven; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; History; Philosophy; Metaphor; Theology","score_opus":0.04826127840374358,"score_gpt":0.28072200986930385,"score_spread":0.23246073146556026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055686356","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010907042,0.02348783,0.0019745994,0.8263648,0.0030511008,0.000023865485,0.00013313346,0.00012010494,0.13393748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7067183,0.02822301,0.0030118248,0.1759933,0.01349866,0.00020932459,0.00023920808,0.00014913744,0.07195732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267876,0.002792822,0.00018911927,0.0006342213,0.0015691395,0.0021359874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761455,0.011606709,0.0017266028,0.0025065567,0.0028778703,0.0051367376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011926766,0.00027443006,0.0005632835,0.0016848368,0.009229257,0.012096031,0.0015686047,0.017227376,0.041388325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02607339,0.0004056722,0.0008025698,0.0010917869,0.020507349,0.01477189,0.006269605,0.011898664,0.0033796998],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030042778,0.00010193655,0.0006255467,0.00006994114,0.000004385577,0.000060817743,0.0008029355,0.0001502566,0.00006261972,0.9178576,0.0495987,0.030635247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036580546,0.000050516694,0.0022767868,0.00059556373,0.000011217397,0.00009687008,0.0019014062,0.0004085631,0.00016543233,0.38851178,0.6059115,0.000033804547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014896186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01777954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041388325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009787452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024257557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13845778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060070353","doi":"10.1353/gso.2010.0001","title":"Democracy After Secularism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Democracy; Skepticism; Secularization; Entitlement (fair division); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science","score_opus":0.008068081393096848,"score_gpt":0.3028471482333685,"score_spread":0.29477906684027166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060070353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023521189,0.017516406,0.003298618,0.30432633,0.0069542746,0.000027814629,0.00012434709,0.00007516449,0.6441558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69457275,0.0073298477,0.0011398835,0.03987456,0.0029001131,0.00005604099,0.00013347481,0.00016187954,0.2538314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613637,0.0020681475,0.00006699065,0.0003848904,0.0005228679,0.00082078204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764097,0.0006569846,0.0002695645,0.00029735378,0.00046438762,0.00067075243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034671086,0.00023237997,0.00033696165,0.00073621765,0.006638968,0.007839523,0.00043311136,0.0020818263,0.018712077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053958874,0.00016361284,0.0003517795,0.000982842,0.00965415,0.004986576,0.0057076253,0.0055520544,0.0024659822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016758577,0.000010196485,0.00027082695,0.000021524804,0.0000027817612,0.000036773727,0.0016558036,0.00012855382,0.00004611557,0.9322331,0.0564457,0.0091319205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011046012,0.000021228305,0.00071692216,0.00011574561,0.0000029024939,0.000041707062,0.0016810583,0.000236101,0.0001538931,0.3703941,0.6266146,0.000010709105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061968006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009173427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018712077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006375518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055336794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06259811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119094321","doi":"10.1353/gso.2005.0015","title":"Reconsidering the Rule of Law: Reflections on Power, Politics, and Partisan Gerrymandering","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Gerrymandering; Rule of law; Redistricting; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Law and economics; Due process; Public law; Constitutionalism; Politics; Private law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.14884785290208205,"score_gpt":0.34176169364824255,"score_spread":0.1929138407461605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119094321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17574316,0.018111628,0.021588398,0.16237263,0.0014267407,0.0000414549,0.000029284198,0.000042002925,0.6206447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765489,0.0014312365,0.0009428615,0.008531678,0.0006312027,0.00001843366,0.000005915037,0.000033492342,0.011856263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206865,0.0040679695,0.00013187807,0.00093754835,0.0012441861,0.0015498868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943098,0.004496284,0.00026046328,0.00036890572,0.00031552176,0.0002490585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007995162,0.00035432586,0.00051973865,0.0016074704,0.012890478,0.015114912,0.001758489,0.0072848243,0.0028836164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005611617,0.00048775828,0.00056072226,0.0010424758,0.053432003,0.009995086,0.0052246023,0.011074238,0.00036987494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032538155,0.0000070696447,0.00010516861,0.000005714993,0.0000014456052,0.00008041372,0.010468211,0.00012684062,0.00004425225,0.9865161,0.0009944633,0.0016470228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009086128,0.00001976113,0.00044006293,0.00008087812,0.000004652155,0.00006621117,0.009912599,0.00068078766,0.00029017843,0.900697,0.08777771,0.000021111058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015846863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019625258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015846863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012935246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00444184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09385222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141211820","doi":"10.1353/gso.2010.0010","title":"Secularism Minus Exclusion: Developing a Religious-Friendly Idea of Public Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Public reason; Politics; Public sphere; Liberalism; Political science; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Environmental ethics; Law; Religious studies; Social science; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.024510394541263403,"score_gpt":0.31795334229809047,"score_spread":0.29344294775682706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141211820","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050048497,0.01842561,0.131294,0.42828944,0.0027686215,0.00010188245,0.0000798485,0.00012935845,0.36886278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95464253,0.0028813975,0.015169894,0.01359698,0.0024696873,0.00016343559,0.00003606452,0.00009842079,0.0109416265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930922,0.0049762353,0.00013350126,0.0005580328,0.000819154,0.00042091546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943297,0.003715024,0.00052565424,0.0006370943,0.00039605238,0.00039643233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010401396,0.0005911238,0.00069158926,0.0019673393,0.0042398977,0.011160226,0.0017697867,0.0074262875,0.0028478196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00667498,0.00035088471,0.0007382087,0.0016420565,0.068639845,0.024337208,0.007486297,0.011967005,0.00055425905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036365343,0.0000039207043,0.00003347094,0.000005823887,7.7263127e-7,0.000005802211,0.00078016886,0.000035645877,0.000014316128,0.99808455,0.000328108,0.0007038408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068666664,0.000009794139,0.00006693986,0.000029122179,0.0000016922003,0.000014972311,0.00050607295,0.00022436622,0.000040715695,0.98520213,0.013892872,0.000004596939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011375188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009011543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011160226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00483389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003675246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05500853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496009610","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.20.1.0073","title":"Constitutional Artisanship and Institutional Diversity:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Library science; Politics; Political science; Search engine optimization; Publishing; Media studies; World Wide Web; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Search engine; Algorithm","score_opus":0.09882504941416737,"score_gpt":0.26870447130229036,"score_spread":0.169879421888123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496009610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15817714,0.040972922,0.0012365314,0.101800695,0.0007279203,0.00002601947,0.00040914371,0.00002282584,0.6966268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97299945,0.006084729,0.00016788479,0.0012568212,0.00049046404,0.000011937676,0.00009329904,0.000015628977,0.018879823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977087,0.0010829563,0.000060892336,0.0001942684,0.00045705133,0.0004960987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973949,0.0011205816,0.00038955067,0.00024044172,0.00020273827,0.0006518323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024028006,0.00016744937,0.00031755117,0.0013762631,0.0048469594,0.00715522,0.0006035529,0.0011621033,0.019959519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00704308,0.00014179334,0.00023199899,0.003130138,0.009134217,0.004284927,0.006010933,0.001726017,0.00067116716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056726647,0.00007393203,0.013798908,0.00012823047,0.000022702488,0.00019497566,0.010726173,0.00036748912,0.00008197246,0.8716261,0.059996165,0.042926643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005045565,0.000061135004,0.07542526,0.0010698705,0.000032498418,0.0005604114,0.03897772,0.0004833136,0.00021205258,0.4274848,0.4555968,0.000045670684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006644086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012140334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019959519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037188316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037591332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06677121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905909896","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.26.2-3.0255","title":"Democracy as Group Discussion and Collective Action: Facts, Values, and Strategies in Canadian and American Rural Landscapes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Collective action; Salient; Democracy; Action (physics); Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Public administration; Public relations; Politics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.012307929975288364,"score_gpt":0.27599884385837625,"score_spread":0.2636909138830879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905909896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56182194,0.00652959,0.0036857931,0.057637848,0.00029856976,0.00018960312,0.00010167575,0.000079175574,0.36965582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853135,0.0008363596,0.00055234047,0.0006548923,0.000015153848,0.000022672448,0.000014926979,0.000013653697,0.009358569],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909083,0.0037471738,0.00013305862,0.000729715,0.0015493243,0.0029324142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931084,0.0033363448,0.00050220714,0.0002473392,0.0008490063,0.0019567178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008978977,0.0003942517,0.00045268683,0.0034751843,0.060703818,0.014443439,0.0020185104,0.0028563943,0.0043313806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010169859,0.00034828385,0.00027759606,0.005334745,0.055087216,0.004091859,0.009106212,0.0037821252,0.00013637713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045932633,0.00005739001,0.005769518,0.000098387776,0.000009115672,0.00031065548,0.6729234,0.00037281783,0.00024289767,0.2840233,0.0051469523,0.030999638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026498474,0.00003257314,0.01472448,0.0002210989,0.000018280907,0.00008954698,0.7346096,0.0004293146,0.00026949827,0.045405615,0.2041071,0.00006632941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97611415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99008906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13913688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13913688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15546906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W485916494","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.21.1.0132","title":"<i>Possessive Individualism</i> at 50:","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possessive; Individualism; Marxist philosophy; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03446593544990206,"score_gpt":0.31170716198642445,"score_spread":0.2772412265365224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W485916494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021083986,0.0144937765,0.0012318991,0.2983756,0.0053003514,0.00005993851,0.00054414646,0.00023640509,0.65867394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3000218,0.006223082,0.00046699206,0.072521165,0.0019408742,0.00010635331,0.00022093124,0.00022366602,0.6182751],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988918,0.00020751808,0.000019518655,0.00018851845,0.00025302716,0.00043960536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990927,0.00014707433,0.00007475096,0.000041923493,0.00017682901,0.00046663475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082940585,0.000707191,0.0003278511,0.00082522415,0.01946386,0.01071391,0.0007829712,0.0042096535,0.011992138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018286451,0.00034173278,0.00028137982,0.0012276407,0.0124636255,0.0045044716,0.0022579902,0.0062922686,0.0041257683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004648347,0.000018206627,0.0015853939,0.0000721489,0.0000061918463,0.0005660756,0.060886044,0.000039005656,0.00030351992,0.30017915,0.6269154,0.009382374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000543088,0.0000140448465,0.0046380716,0.00013476399,0.000005253569,0.00018964901,0.017320368,0.00004126463,0.0002707694,0.010492109,0.96686614,0.000022194123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45841372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.701068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45841372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02435558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008127472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9114909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}