{"meta":{"query_hash":"e8d52144d36e","filters":{"venue":"The Good Society"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e8d52144d36e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Good+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W2055686356","doi":"10.1353/gso.2003.0013","title":"The Future of Public Laws for Private Marriages","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hyperbole; Quarter (Canadian coin); Safe haven; Haven; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; History; Philosophy; Metaphor; Theology","score_opus":0.04826127840374358,"score_gpt":0.28072200986930385,"score_spread":0.23246073146556026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055686356","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40941945,0.016907008,0.0027232103,0.4377262,0.003840948,0.0025331508,0.00010604507,0.00023857217,0.12650542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849197,0.003964718,0.00055876997,0.00024678768,0.0005631381,0.000026686219,0.0000022619058,0.000008542505,0.009709391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992703,0.00013516181,0.00011334071,0.00007488812,0.00019266723,0.00021361494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916613,0.00046497752,0.00008492277,0.0001824617,0.0000676053,0.000033889584],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014204548,0.00005033077,0.000065069355,0.00000383975,0.0018458365,0.00007300693,0.00036685463,0.00009471958,0.00002398596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007433203,0.000026160633,0.00018162496,0.00018195128,0.00038782766,0.00006109239,0.00003407498,0.00012394681,0.000006338706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.232342e-7,0.000021866686,0.0013816626,0.0000056389176,0.000048521473,2.0159872e-8,0.018877376,0.0000047381236,0.000030496585,0.9426472,0.030230736,0.006750913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018458796,0.000016587948,0.0038456249,0.0000043310097,0.00001990516,1.2608432e-7,0.030496636,0.0021345087,0.0000044736053,0.03947388,0.92374504,0.00007431188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003566154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038490727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9031733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028881022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027959692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060070353","doi":"10.1353/gso.2010.0001","title":"Democracy After Secularism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Democracy; Skepticism; Secularization; Entitlement (fair division); Politics; Sociology; Epistemology; Hegelianism; Philosophy; Law; Religious studies; Political science","score_opus":0.008068081393096848,"score_gpt":0.3028471482333685,"score_spread":0.29477906684027166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060070353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7657754,0.00009218578,0.0003919251,0.07933035,0.0029639879,0.00029471825,0.000006106239,0.00023249813,0.15091284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97790086,0.00021683268,0.000670469,0.0057267267,0.0006380588,0.000026068383,0.0000014181605,0.000009872334,0.0148097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909604,0.00009317994,0.000112218615,0.00013037935,0.00029564617,0.00027253537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936044,0.0001472786,0.00004635279,0.0002684186,0.000078221,0.00009929483],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067150645,0.00007809765,0.00007703655,0.000004820609,0.0013534783,0.00012809971,0.00030051102,0.0001732936,0.0009353207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007466636,0.00005605682,0.00037932672,0.00017568705,0.00040535402,0.00014068263,0.00004593986,0.00061045564,0.00036018624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000818099,0.00014006265,0.0066887774,0.000006567318,0.0001707222,0.0000029997063,0.38334352,0.0000026548194,0.003228452,0.16206741,0.44188088,0.0024597556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012951264,0.0000065595304,0.0052421093,0.0000036119552,0.0000260632,0.0000022899862,0.025239049,0.000058551563,0.00009746466,0.0152515285,0.9538089,0.00013436127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011103674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074428326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.511928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003620634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001119861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119094321","doi":"10.1353/gso.2005.0015","title":"Reconsidering the Rule of Law: Reflections on Power, Politics, and Partisan Gerrymandering","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Gerrymandering; Rule of law; Redistricting; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Law and economics; Due process; Public law; Constitutionalism; Politics; Private law; Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.14884785290208205,"score_gpt":0.34176169364824255,"score_spread":0.1929138407461605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119094321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67384994,0.00069646066,0.00007369203,0.03218789,0.00027968906,0.00017077813,0.0000067528063,0.00005543133,0.29267934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823576,0.00032206174,0.00006952027,0.0011570693,0.00010546655,0.000006833591,1.4973446e-7,0.0000027633168,0.00010035843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994677,0.000038259666,0.00009327498,0.00008113282,0.00015132598,0.00016835803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996816,0.0001354082,0.000039524886,0.00008089451,0.00003339995,0.0000291605],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003243673,0.00005174313,0.000075266624,0.0000037209363,0.0021649895,0.000026588894,0.00008866695,0.00003255191,0.00001022593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044878125,0.0000320017,0.00007297592,0.00007523449,0.0011911199,0.00004621203,0.00004423933,0.00010466149,0.0000044748904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010571512,0.000014794966,0.00011870895,0.0000012651674,0.000035674988,1.3311634e-7,0.06707464,0.00003374551,0.000101584235,0.9324574,0.000090622416,0.000070358925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003096639,0.000065119355,0.004551327,0.00005917865,0.000049272076,0.0000036046308,0.10179723,0.000001966506,0.0010581549,0.82963175,0.06231623,0.00015652885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008025055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036707714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32438582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005461344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007780669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141211820","doi":"10.1353/gso.2010.0010","title":"Secularism Minus Exclusion: Developing a Religious-Friendly Idea of Public Reason","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Public reason; Politics; Public sphere; Liberalism; Political science; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Environmental ethics; Law; Religious studies; Social science; Philosophy; Democracy","score_opus":0.024510394541263403,"score_gpt":0.31795334229809047,"score_spread":0.29344294775682706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141211820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8322533,0.0004808162,0.0024501958,0.06971587,0.0018992333,0.00047319478,0.0000102626855,0.00024966098,0.09246747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905553,0.0015275165,0.003972211,0.0012545944,0.0003789815,0.000023009523,0.0000054483116,0.000017047074,0.0022659078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982585,0.00021542159,0.00030043905,0.0002201117,0.00059391174,0.00041165133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986285,0.0003018451,0.00020838225,0.00041367454,0.0003092161,0.00013837707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018659375,0.000132754,0.00019010548,0.000017741659,0.0014048357,0.00012423571,0.00060344517,0.00029261844,0.00013950757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041757032,0.00010246615,0.000476143,0.0005429169,0.00059679465,0.00019590647,0.00014495339,0.0006071767,0.000050563864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005890311,0.000120064826,0.0015239386,0.000024999466,0.0002051975,0.0000026282662,0.32117686,0.0000022388804,0.0062480737,0.39135087,0.2742936,0.005045655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000310919,0.000027561027,0.0013215775,0.0000306747,0.00003809062,0.00001035821,0.0796604,0.00007987016,0.0006887618,0.011323444,0.9062537,0.00025466812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002848905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014258787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63196003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112190515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005437664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496009610","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.20.1.0073","title":"Constitutional Artisanship and Institutional Diversity:","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; Diversity (politics); State (computer science); Library science; Politics; Political science; Search engine optimization; Publishing; Media studies; World Wide Web; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Search engine; Algorithm","score_opus":0.09882504941416737,"score_gpt":0.26870447130229036,"score_spread":0.169879421888123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496009610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18290277,0.0011073378,0.0020430097,0.0045917276,0.0005324278,0.00023677378,0.000030080184,0.00011931968,0.8084366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802727,0.0003107371,0.0002943618,0.00093565654,0.00022688329,0.000006330215,0.0000014436797,9.070052e-7,0.00019640313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992738,0.000055899367,0.00007579784,0.00011817483,0.000292415,0.00018391883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970996,0.00007500275,0.000029827435,0.000055883433,0.000063840525,0.0000655072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044954623,0.00006491653,0.00007328172,0.000004711643,0.005394103,0.000020894146,0.00015827452,0.000053833824,0.00016445972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005338818,0.000048137805,0.000078713296,0.000121972174,0.0073836492,0.0001406121,0.00023401885,0.00010793146,0.00004427104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004602514,0.000021206642,0.044795185,9.852942e-7,0.000043754968,0.0000011990958,0.019640276,5.2931375e-7,0.0000038682697,0.9336974,0.000949652,0.00084131304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005721339,0.000032669537,0.3139743,0.000028045082,0.000120781966,0.000012843418,0.032210194,0.000016281925,0.000032762106,0.42637053,0.22627865,0.00035081568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046010786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007836794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8151245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055360724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019020693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99590075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905909896","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.26.2-3.0255","title":"Democracy as Group Discussion and Collective Action: Facts, Values, and Strategies in Canadian and American Rural Landscapes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Collective action; Salient; Democracy; Action (physics); Political science; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Deliberative democracy; Public administration; Public relations; Politics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.012307929975288364,"score_gpt":0.27599884385837625,"score_spread":0.2636909138830879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905909896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96980745,0.00036317698,8.6341805e-7,0.014528482,0.00011452679,0.00013712354,0.000015360996,0.000011355849,0.015021662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99183446,0.001893419,0.000016993541,0.00012785393,0.000086944085,0.000004521115,0.0000012876931,0.00000428863,0.006030236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941766,0.000078905105,0.000056496257,0.0001182279,0.00010342068,0.00022531515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995803,0.000043995995,0.00006157616,0.00009964306,0.000014346492,0.00020011824],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030893568,0.000060720686,0.00010175673,0.00003932108,0.0048690657,0.00091770256,0.00010926683,0.000051528623,0.00002279066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045345416,0.000047050376,0.00002522177,0.000073204195,0.0012659276,0.0003944364,0.000033823824,0.00013143198,0.0000016070849],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039577728,0.000035044806,0.19694953,0.00004723195,0.00011028661,0.000014438501,0.6895618,0.000002361933,0.00011401617,0.023325108,0.03497455,0.054826092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023885172,0.000036488087,0.68113434,0.000018486493,0.00001861812,0.0000031191787,0.23339832,0.000026269347,6.39648e-7,0.013831061,0.0711667,0.00012712074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98446363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4841848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041114268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087265536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99642646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W485916494","doi":"10.5325/goodsociety.21.1.0132","title":"<i>Possessive Individualism</i> at 50:","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Good Society","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possessive; Individualism; Marxist philosophy; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; Media studies; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03446593544990206,"score_gpt":0.31170716198642445,"score_spread":0.2772412265365224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W485916494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30272567,0.0007082145,0.00008173902,0.021797288,0.0008485384,0.00025630224,0.000029809384,0.00013786952,0.6734145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980904,0.00011866551,0.00015074386,0.00907169,0.0010798579,0.000018284773,0.000003328363,0.000007182162,0.0086462945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988465,0.00015455578,0.000104199746,0.00009460278,0.00019241213,0.0006077379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924105,0.00030707577,0.00005344484,0.00016913518,0.000020606118,0.00020868063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011304072,0.000075700336,0.00009709843,0.0000037459417,0.0011283746,0.00004173874,0.00028878744,0.00011302195,0.00052105373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071156916,0.000054555123,0.00016221243,0.000086954424,0.0005411144,0.00025789358,0.00014427345,0.0001490235,0.0004532424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001913893,0.000057535748,0.0052576084,0.0000047776866,0.00005480527,1.6493982e-7,0.11940194,3.4179e-7,0.00003753707,0.7857402,0.08847522,0.0009679514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120897304,0.00000578212,0.004046312,0.0000029943608,0.000025965137,9.4803175e-7,0.011258923,0.0000011285478,0.00019156246,0.009841423,0.97439593,0.00010815473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061793893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011864912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8859207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014474442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008173507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8678659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}