{"meta":{"query_hash":"4471cb93b0f2","filters":{"venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4471cb93b0f2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+International+Journal+of+Environmental+and+Science+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W2111772851","doi":"","title":"The notion of the relationship to knowledge: A theoretical tool for research in science education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Plural; Science education; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Mathematics education; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Knowledge level; Dual (grammatical number); Diversity (politics); Educational research; Sociology; Pedagogy; Scientific literacy; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08386026093728803,"score_gpt":0.47635156868361883,"score_spread":0.3924913077463308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111772851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038581725,0.04766085,0.34772456,0.09401352,0.0011603998,0.0002365216,0.0003368558,0.00020387492,0.47008172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9210537,0.012906428,0.051664624,0.0043218713,0.0009280324,0.0005015862,0.00012255553,0.000081356826,0.008419903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861216,0.010292152,0.00039130036,0.0010776232,0.0015285085,0.00058873807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740673,0.020279543,0.0017707339,0.0019672578,0.0010260446,0.00088925817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015203357,0.00079150323,0.0012503458,0.0087996805,0.0071484996,0.016274706,0.0036255296,0.00422883,0.00487245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012764564,0.00043864417,0.0009470229,0.009829773,0.09422878,0.022526277,0.007504591,0.0061148787,0.0008034927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003434588,0.0000068339737,0.00026419983,0.00006179998,0.000004648562,0.000051888514,0.008723606,0.00008141013,0.000028967444,0.98689926,0.00029865874,0.0035753157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009616051,0.000022578173,0.00077386835,0.00028158238,0.0000094214665,0.00021482562,0.011412072,0.0005733331,0.000070831906,0.9314943,0.055118263,0.000019329898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02321364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018378638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02321364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013264468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009168514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09624094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130085339","doi":"","title":"Ecological Concept Development of Preservice Teacher Candidates: Opaque Empty Shells.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Presumption; Mathematics education; Christian ministry; Literacy; Environmental education; Discipline; Pedagogy; Subject matter; Sociology; Subject (documents); Ecology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Library science; Biology","score_opus":0.006329274266842523,"score_gpt":0.2609609812154788,"score_spread":0.25463170694863624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130085339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896678,0.00016903297,0.0005151072,0.0008246715,0.000035642675,0.00009187043,0.000027423797,0.0000075581834,0.008660884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854689,0.00014255967,0.001148572,0.00021782535,0.0000053069625,0.000079488185,0.000060541013,0.0000071116056,0.012869776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989304,0.00034420373,0.000044948,0.000107089974,0.00030732527,0.00026604522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470395,0.0014462527,0.00071660685,0.00029132958,0.0014615546,0.0013803096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003920328,0.00017503649,0.00025115567,0.00062032504,0.002969917,0.0030640152,0.0005861877,0.00067396247,0.0044455784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01184594,0.00026653428,0.0002692986,0.00032676893,0.0017623118,0.0014159934,0.0026804784,0.0012477362,0.00093059224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021614325,0.001119837,0.19348183,0.00021327376,0.0000063942507,0.0019082217,0.70773226,0.0001032218,0.0046023685,0.006639851,0.008569859,0.07540674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004322189,0.000875685,0.12907779,0.00025557974,0.000017658982,0.0012985674,0.7968776,0.0005366423,0.003139689,0.0031935102,0.06464062,0.00004335118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015065139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049872924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015065139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016605953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055756085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02995491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136355969","doi":"","title":"How One Science Teacher Redefines a Science Teaching Practice around a Theme: A Case Study in the Context of Educational Reform in Quebec.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Context (archaeology); Curriculum; Mathematics education; Science education; Pedagogy; Period (music); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04632018821538882,"score_gpt":0.38915514531653245,"score_spread":0.34283495710114364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136355969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97324413,0.0005851812,0.002509104,0.011755012,0.00017828254,0.00022296692,0.00006930023,0.000050297258,0.011385681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812121,0.00037738233,0.0024784447,0.0014369406,0.00004210026,0.000060452905,0.000043161075,0.000039302577,0.014310034],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933689,0.0035846706,0.00009413209,0.00053169474,0.0007845872,0.0016358908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133533,0.002863908,0.0006894243,0.00033137697,0.0014293282,0.0033506723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043249163,0.000523724,0.00055220386,0.0013127758,0.028083831,0.005143826,0.0039221137,0.0055101546,0.0036581273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010637435,0.0005639693,0.0005301279,0.0015706366,0.011319991,0.0023987703,0.004002323,0.005163673,0.0004957337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000933584,0.0005568389,0.01191565,0.00015253812,0.0000158112,0.014731696,0.94102484,0.00037012104,0.0027972672,0.003661437,0.0055414955,0.019138863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021855516,0.00020572607,0.015130785,0.00019999474,0.000017552527,0.0020982877,0.90831363,0.0007490553,0.00093134714,0.00041163643,0.07186357,0.000056574136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6191638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8654963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3808362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039193805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022952598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.766158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165178050","doi":"","title":"Tensions and Opportunities: A Baseline Study of Teachers' Views of Environmental Education.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental education; Baseline (sea); Happening; Intervention (counseling); Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Psychology; Sample (material); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022137858437485763,"score_gpt":0.2870325749176012,"score_spread":0.2648947164801154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165178050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99607927,0.00013595013,0.000097947915,0.00043233324,0.0000072904413,0.0000311343,0.00014573752,0.00000275207,0.0030677507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659485,0.000187134,0.00011110206,0.00011903835,0.0000060858274,0.00004967347,0.00012085425,0.0000046603977,0.002806757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975858,0.0007447437,0.00014180092,0.00021324062,0.0006401433,0.000674368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935774,0.0018170915,0.0014420938,0.00024234968,0.0017545301,0.0011666426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033061113,0.00027013666,0.0003817385,0.0015902618,0.007898771,0.0030710208,0.0007414529,0.00074418815,0.00256313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008766263,0.00057753467,0.00027933446,0.0024976674,0.003146184,0.0019328716,0.0028148526,0.0015346009,0.0002971389],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000290219,0.00004955726,0.051100977,0.00003697677,0.0000026804175,0.00024935993,0.94417375,0.000008585602,0.00046301144,0.00018651968,0.000363522,0.0033360154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030359142,0.000047502825,0.075753964,0.000027398666,0.000002951843,0.000047854854,0.9188094,0.000017342758,0.00008692676,0.00003994036,0.0051560635,0.0000075337207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57883716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7993761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57883716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01600157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011555753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84728634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273101443","doi":"","title":"Student's Interest in Science and Technology and its Relationships with Teaching Methods, Family Context and Self-Efficacy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Digital literacy in education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Psychology; Mathematics education; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Quality (philosophy); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03991946916891029,"score_gpt":0.3358057393370179,"score_spread":0.29588627016810765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273101443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989472,0.000030488396,0.000031656662,0.000029142464,0.0000020744528,0.0000054390985,0.000016150365,0.0000016492405,0.00093640835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993327,0.00003014888,0.000037906048,0.000006706127,0.0000027080323,0.000005835593,0.00003303183,9.622959e-7,0.0005499837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993765,0.00020729529,0.00007714116,0.00006756471,0.00016235454,0.000109086504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853845,0.00819433,0.00279457,0.00052119046,0.00068492506,0.002420503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017883852,0.00016145463,0.0002463594,0.00090887403,0.00044754404,0.0013410648,0.00031872312,0.00061873667,0.0055931304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072417464,0.00016415227,0.0005865389,0.0005132665,0.00075862487,0.0005148852,0.00062167924,0.0010825647,0.0005944116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069915186,0.00076256244,0.99457526,0.0000136858,0.00004202061,0.00006711378,0.0011506708,0.00009493125,0.00031212668,0.000114663584,0.000057820285,0.0027391396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004107983,0.00020107966,0.996951,0.000009105671,0.000017000344,0.00008719908,0.0017745219,0.0004434898,0.00020297007,0.000079339196,0.00022502549,0.000005338744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015680977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022419004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055931304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026813571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000407449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018710852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414138373","doi":"","title":"International Peer Collaboration to Learn about Global Climate Changes.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Global warming; Political economy of climate change; Curriculum; Sustainable development; China; Ecological forecasting; Science education; Political science; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Pedagogy; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.059983733063326966,"score_gpt":0.42521228564399355,"score_spread":0.36522855258066655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414138373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42314416,0.0046982667,0.06796469,0.016106803,0.0028511474,0.0035759832,0.00041207386,0.0010828306,0.48016405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90026593,0.0025504343,0.025339762,0.0025813323,0.0007388972,0.0019574915,0.00032497483,0.0001987306,0.066042386],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98924327,0.007230072,0.00022034351,0.0006765041,0.00173075,0.00089914084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842741,0.0065931208,0.0013185261,0.0015657055,0.0017928951,0.0044557136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006341249,0.0005796062,0.00036686592,0.00093134225,0.0034631898,0.0030689132,0.0011169151,0.0012261297,0.02095111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016216217,0.00015063591,0.00053930277,0.00090223993,0.0013700814,0.0027781785,0.009528438,0.0014980128,0.0040434296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021320234,0.0022899278,0.028034056,0.0014029762,0.00017123073,0.0013110942,0.19948289,0.0009163918,0.0050355764,0.022161573,0.11433512,0.6246459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010662911,0.0010199643,0.022301426,0.0005658989,0.00007756982,0.0012606464,0.13334079,0.0011697719,0.0025230483,0.018516425,0.8190461,0.00007175233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072678906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002341217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02095111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000875741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003033184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070088506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993044123","doi":"","title":"Science Teachers and the Dissection Debate: Perspectives on Animal Dissection and Alternatives.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissection (medical); Work (physics); Science education; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering; Surgery","score_opus":0.04533675926318806,"score_gpt":0.36571392500282096,"score_spread":0.32037716573963293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993044123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88537383,0.0071623134,0.0035380966,0.0482138,0.0003886914,0.00005459869,0.000027091954,0.000022196551,0.05521938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98768425,0.0022978955,0.00051865913,0.0025730804,0.0000627426,0.000021158921,0.000009361415,0.000011565485,0.0068212296],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884558,0.0071853274,0.000407125,0.0005386038,0.002114879,0.0012982729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681884,0.024208516,0.0030129105,0.0004264878,0.0018944575,0.0022692152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014847138,0.00022365572,0.0004115202,0.001997283,0.019058447,0.008709252,0.00084334833,0.003776084,0.00373127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022884646,0.0005835323,0.0003036159,0.0015830165,0.022532314,0.0048989714,0.006091176,0.0053637745,0.00028971414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002318529,0.000040413,0.007622328,0.000103023274,0.0000032166463,0.00063255854,0.96899647,0.000054329128,0.00047126377,0.013618216,0.0016614292,0.0067735836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005761128,0.000037995098,0.0029375197,0.0001654848,0.000004532664,0.00025926833,0.92677504,0.000070808,0.00012803795,0.0016037128,0.06799743,0.000014497128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036282554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081330515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036282554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100418115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010479044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07852012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}