{"meta":{"query_hash":"4471cb93b0f2","filters":{"venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4471cb93b0f2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+International+Journal+of+Environmental+and+Science+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W2111772851","doi":"","title":"The notion of the relationship to knowledge: A theoretical tool for research in science education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Plural; Science education; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Mathematics education; Set (abstract data type); Field (mathematics); Knowledge level; Dual (grammatical number); Diversity (politics); Educational research; Sociology; Pedagogy; Scientific literacy; Psychology; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08386026093728803,"score_gpt":0.47635156868361883,"score_spread":0.3924913077463308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111772851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94868374,0.000057613735,0.00002790629,0.04264125,0.005124524,0.0003121288,0.0000014355172,0.000001135019,0.0031502768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983108,0.000039901148,0.00026527158,0.00020270345,0.0005236158,0.000018362947,2.4773695e-7,0.000002296853,0.0006367966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979197,0.00018166077,0.00028671633,0.00015084304,0.0012515584,0.00020953715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997831,0.0012348209,0.00017775914,0.00018291734,0.00046935,0.000104195155],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015190506,0.000048132137,0.00004958984,0.00030725918,0.0018658765,0.0002688013,0.0017009807,0.000028580429,0.00003887764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004951393,0.000026267979,0.00003409831,0.00081258314,0.006643986,0.00053195294,0.00012892557,0.00030770057,0.0000066042376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027010237,0.00024415297,0.033392806,0.0000010884646,0.0000012622419,1.3868038e-8,0.020282606,0.0000051951547,0.03708062,0.8269325,0.00025993117,0.08177285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010614794,0.00005087289,0.8451504,0.00004333565,0.0000041037024,0.000013871375,0.046595775,0.00006831987,0.0025854332,0.08921492,0.016105242,0.00006159238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000093647104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036651103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81175756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034401493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007522686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130085339","doi":"","title":"Ecological Concept Development of Preservice Teacher Candidates: Opaque Empty Shells.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Presumption; Mathematics education; Christian ministry; Literacy; Environmental education; Discipline; Pedagogy; Subject matter; Sociology; Subject (documents); Ecology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Library science; Biology","score_opus":0.006329274266842523,"score_gpt":0.2609609812154788,"score_spread":0.25463170694863624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130085339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951668,0.000042991505,0.000025643409,0.001434829,0.0007302176,0.000119860706,0.0000028134416,0.0000023679868,0.002474499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971759,0.000025478668,0.0018218985,0.0003112325,0.00008847992,0.0000048862757,0.000002890136,0.000004012463,0.00056525844],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853545,0.000036613943,0.00038666488,0.00018104455,0.0007173562,0.00014287984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933726,0.000051825362,0.0002959533,0.00015928864,0.000020502266,0.0001351567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009768467,0.00009807259,0.000098738,0.000054891396,0.00019409665,0.000046443594,0.00083435734,0.000038206996,0.0052091167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009941478,0.00006466631,0.00003753489,0.00008456765,0.0014416062,0.00046189644,0.00031630835,0.00022897669,0.000032972133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007600979,0.0021418505,0.34469023,0.000004764906,0.000026619,0.0000015790112,0.0129216695,0.000117839176,0.52651787,0.00039057745,0.0009206993,0.11219031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017175233,0.000050696905,0.96313167,0.0000064709493,0.000008131844,0.00005949652,0.0040605464,0.00008896543,0.022353318,0.0006102931,0.009368508,0.000090176145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050500214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040984538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6184414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003361707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027607122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99570024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136355969","doi":"","title":"How One Science Teacher Redefines a Science Teaching Practice around a Theme: A Case Study in the Context of Educational Reform in Quebec.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Context (archaeology); Curriculum; Mathematics education; Science education; Pedagogy; Period (music); Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04632018821538882,"score_gpt":0.38915514531653245,"score_spread":0.34283495710114364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136355969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9038346,0.000082252925,0.0000021975927,0.08965118,0.00057915703,0.00029608092,4.2674688e-7,0.0000010668978,0.005553046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790853,0.00003075443,0.00039606806,0.00059883745,0.00024897093,0.00001883937,2.9506086e-7,0.0000026953528,0.000794999],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971624,0.00031495446,0.00035698767,0.00020540717,0.0017564174,0.0002038222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981739,0.000535107,0.0006647748,0.00015081558,0.0004092647,0.000066171575],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011731735,0.00008074981,0.000094680094,0.00059119356,0.00095713174,0.0009386093,0.0012909598,0.000017547947,0.00007911843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038948278,0.000050243063,0.00001955581,0.00085473806,0.0039973008,0.005357934,0.00010863506,0.0003794386,0.0000037760308],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059246642,0.0054877456,0.1304988,0.0000036358908,0.000019649533,0.000008875963,0.6570518,0.0000075524454,0.021516649,0.102357745,0.00012483,0.08286344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015772581,0.000068610076,0.2205031,0.000026776923,0.000006501954,0.00022117268,0.7766721,0.000027247941,0.000078486104,0.0008051576,0.001376609,0.00005649416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057264846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005268092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119620286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012356878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036619038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165178050","doi":"","title":"Tensions and Opportunities: A Baseline Study of Teachers' Views of Environmental Education.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental education; Baseline (sea); Happening; Intervention (counseling); Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Psychology; Sample (material); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022137858437485763,"score_gpt":0.2870325749176012,"score_spread":0.2648947164801154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165178050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99694794,0.00025622707,0.00003457392,0.001367102,0.00039757407,0.00023225766,0.0000077597,0.0000018007119,0.0007547347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981303,0.00040705447,0.0004123587,0.00043839577,0.00007089811,0.000007418737,0.0000031844083,0.0000066582516,0.00052372314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813974,0.00014832089,0.0005590907,0.00022117008,0.0008075782,0.00012407459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989531,0.00011447509,0.0005227235,0.00023511036,0.000017942264,0.00015662271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001648135,0.00012903466,0.00017450908,0.00012976928,0.00016644395,0.000028543718,0.00051212107,0.000027681435,0.0007694108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012079444,0.0000927933,0.00004637785,0.00007552741,0.0015073024,0.00046558498,0.00028209924,0.00013303866,0.0000053731824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008207699,0.008203357,0.34423482,0.000011133073,0.00004526881,7.7698826e-7,0.024238752,0.00012540445,0.14559303,0.00042551264,0.0007349677,0.4763049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004302752,0.00044291027,0.9082526,0.00002814498,0.000050135022,0.00009232715,0.08077768,0.00016846914,0.0014549324,0.0008209104,0.007348648,0.00013299484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010278362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011312954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5640178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027503603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016522882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84245086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273101443","doi":"","title":"Student's Interest in Science and Technology and its Relationships with Teaching Methods, Family Context and Self-Efficacy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Digital literacy in education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Psychology; Mathematics education; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Quality (philosophy); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03991946916891029,"score_gpt":0.3358057393370179,"score_spread":0.29588627016810765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273101443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929529,0.0007958487,0.0005832924,0.0048423246,0.0003888797,0.000102653576,5.8681735e-7,0.0000058754285,0.000327683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877656,0.00006869549,0.011923255,0.00017245056,0.000036423156,0.000002792737,2.150543e-7,0.0000024518738,0.000028118144],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989294,0.00006439375,0.00021685686,0.00022296958,0.00045445064,0.000111973735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928844,0.00014988217,0.00018934121,0.00010654504,0.00014200657,0.0001237904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002963357,0.000077571785,0.000079811645,0.00058672536,0.00020220873,0.00053091004,0.0007030026,0.000018149121,3.712382e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036038022,0.000052849926,0.000004691085,0.00031862024,0.0007453596,0.0027154952,0.00036439614,0.00021282102,8.520252e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030715208,0.0011465276,0.13079897,0.0000051147376,0.0000234501,0.0000049344376,0.03297169,0.000011010626,0.034126416,0.19970365,0.000047139583,0.60113037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059695734,0.00028734765,0.95973796,0.0001044839,0.000010889194,0.0011393903,0.020531682,0.0026768397,0.0015397765,0.011850904,0.0013662446,0.00015753263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000616882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003902012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82893896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022392884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045906877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51195776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414138373","doi":"","title":"International Peer Collaboration to Learn about Global Climate Changes.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Global warming; Political economy of climate change; Curriculum; Sustainable development; China; Ecological forecasting; Science education; Political science; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Pedagogy; Environmental science; Ecology","score_opus":0.059983733063326966,"score_gpt":0.42521228564399355,"score_spread":0.36522855258066655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414138373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89116114,0.00010573658,0.0003031505,0.09307288,0.0052934154,0.00014377017,0.00005008235,0.000003926701,0.00986592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956184,0.000044865687,0.0005337912,0.00090680644,0.0009096385,0.0000058872515,0.0000056259737,0.0000034161546,0.0019715587],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482554,0.00008524147,0.0004203532,0.00023191176,0.00425605,0.00018092438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754417,0.00007650975,0.00034126503,0.00017517708,0.0015799185,0.0002829828],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005011121,0.00009204187,0.00010349625,0.00031578896,0.0002281178,0.0010409941,0.0015968041,0.000027060707,0.00019216618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012393221,0.00005804935,0.000034341512,0.0005462388,0.00032486476,0.00126149,0.00045123344,0.00010932171,0.00017209598],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002129018,0.0010901152,0.08012093,0.0000023981986,0.00010049455,0.000025465262,0.0203636,0.0015527522,0.085845314,0.031586297,0.13870813,0.6384755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014330066,0.0013964503,0.38592976,0.000071578404,0.000027483502,0.0007471887,0.117238484,0.0029328782,0.005742801,0.032638356,0.45141584,0.00042617347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009377821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007751642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6380493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066947076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008642965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993044123","doi":"","title":"Science Teachers and the Dissection Debate: Perspectives on Animal Dissection and Alternatives.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Environmental and Science Education","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissection (medical); Work (physics); Science education; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering; Surgery","score_opus":0.04533675926318806,"score_gpt":0.36571392500282096,"score_spread":0.32037716573963293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993044123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99616337,0.0008004974,0.000031997934,0.0014589445,0.0005568875,0.00007459162,0.0000016634766,0.0000042100437,0.0009078552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886084,0.0003723109,0.00012063864,0.00008663938,0.00043046207,0.0000024166575,2.4998388e-7,0.000004157852,0.00012231042],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989805,0.000055249835,0.00015264408,0.00015629706,0.00052358233,0.00013169159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994575,0.00014296216,0.00020225384,0.00006412874,0.00004540269,0.0000877864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014926243,0.00008620148,0.000068960435,0.00016644789,0.0005221983,0.00018474451,0.00029634635,0.000011418261,0.000018980249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020256043,0.00004638939,0.000021430516,0.000102178456,0.002669734,0.0010295043,0.00011663361,0.00016162357,0.000002453689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015786492,0.0007279834,0.10575092,0.0000041423755,0.00006838091,0.000004244953,0.08828505,0.0000074063423,0.6812215,0.048496112,0.00004024673,0.07381539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037501584,0.00054579054,0.9488377,0.000036916565,0.000017139337,0.0016238687,0.044400156,0.0003320561,0.002710786,0.00091332913,0.00012197514,0.00008528736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028613296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.619913e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016907169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075585645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9836746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}