{"meta":{"query_hash":"56f2f990dcd5","filters":{"venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof"},"cohort_total":38,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"exported":38,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/56f2f990dcd5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+International+Journal+of+Evidence+%26+Proof"},"results":[{"id":"W1966623002","doi":"10.1350/ijep.9.2.73.64809","title":"The Contextualised Court: Litigating ‘Culture’ in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Multiculturalism; Legal culture; Law; Contextualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Cultural issues; High Court; Cultural diversity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.06074616941425492,"score_gpt":0.34884126494175843,"score_spread":0.2880950955275035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966623002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29253653,0.018068008,0.00006525426,0.67016417,0.0029035576,0.0005118,0.0000092155915,0.000013221314,0.015728233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99185926,0.0017383273,0.00009357764,0.0026281828,0.0014026423,0.000006931599,2.3357475e-7,0.0000035507765,0.002267286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787235,0.00022816035,0.00039078877,0.0000682449,0.0012525165,0.0001879311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997977,0.00076845416,0.0003857563,0.00007947408,0.0007267988,0.00006250801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002362339,0.00006885105,0.00009877144,0.0000055215323,0.00041164836,0.00018632514,0.0013506756,0.000037401212,0.000086017106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016829838,0.000031820073,0.000084512554,0.00011711912,0.00022189095,0.00049454503,0.000048665137,0.0003776294,0.000003337238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038296313,0.00013361275,0.017469255,0.000011966934,0.0004746939,0.00012913419,0.1985203,0.0030997586,0.001029217,0.10651385,0.43798265,0.2342526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040859001,0.000028623457,0.0025383313,0.00053140224,0.000020214979,0.00004242964,0.055657394,0.0001571316,0.000968932,0.007169513,0.93234205,0.0001353677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16748779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87240505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70491725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008939597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83805597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000251237","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.212","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Henry</i> : A Welcome Retreat from an Overly Broad Interpretation of S. 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03020607224087154,"score_gpt":0.31135709387155686,"score_spread":0.28115102163068534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000251237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98576486,0.0012587653,0.000032308977,0.010964774,0.00052129495,0.00019479876,0.000035922403,0.0000026576597,0.0012246468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991523,0.000073066345,0.00012252957,0.00013374438,0.0003283768,0.0000023026143,0.0000010622573,0.00000413655,0.00018250114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799085,0.00022489663,0.00055573595,0.000101145146,0.0009962771,0.00013108163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975545,0.00036148145,0.00086942327,0.00012452733,0.0010260022,0.000064074855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077300606,0.00009742848,0.00023512065,0.00006276724,0.0001972013,0.000055532695,0.0008617291,0.000059270555,0.000058799495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036796925,0.000048502698,0.00013173543,0.00012617842,0.0007505421,0.00065039104,0.00006398821,0.0001676601,7.414035e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016623444,0.0006695493,0.56347364,0.0000972072,0.0017609308,0.000038363043,0.3017876,0.0011423036,0.061091937,0.029007228,0.013675422,0.025593478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015163367,0.0006196582,0.87880814,0.003461699,0.00036624016,0.00002915019,0.006798818,0.00070121075,0.031529274,0.06819762,0.0075716367,0.00040020683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6498553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6572653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31533453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021337265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020945095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35247633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007912515","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.106","title":"The Common Enterprise Exception to the Hearsay Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Principal (computer security); Common law; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Agency (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Philosophy; Computer security; Data mining","score_opus":0.10403258259634907,"score_gpt":0.4238262595036901,"score_spread":0.319793676907341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007912515","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45278996,0.0030233583,0.006900095,0.52998376,0.0037401984,0.00042378993,0.0000018363506,0.000016055044,0.0031209516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993754,0.0007050676,0.00009275081,0.0020359326,0.0018161315,0.0000044537883,1.338385e-7,0.0000058153455,0.001585679],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973178,0.00027522436,0.00047066982,0.00009646285,0.0015785057,0.00026133377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996593,0.0020265828,0.00035633158,0.00020611724,0.0007091268,0.00010885653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010348711,0.00008486416,0.00010221428,0.00005419117,0.0007958731,0.00037843094,0.0022950298,0.00003434565,0.00009074559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020744668,0.000035695575,0.00013989561,0.00017283778,0.0003079853,0.0005382005,0.00015656352,0.00031293815,0.00008087162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024464906,0.00018609325,0.015722191,0.000009188714,0.00020244687,0.00012490738,0.053517394,0.0005880776,0.0039283335,0.03692634,0.11551303,0.7708355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016254236,0.00023401456,0.029182281,0.0007217639,0.000054873635,0.00014821228,0.0078066885,0.000033404034,0.0021337902,0.019338455,0.9400357,0.00014824631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009740572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065382686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8245227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002507924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001895201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6121293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013505516","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.11.1.49","title":"Filling in the Blanks for Litigation Privilege: <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Blank; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Privilege (computing); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0961047505531322,"score_gpt":0.3825391091228876,"score_spread":0.2864343585697554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013505516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7388827,0.0063124737,0.02352893,0.19144756,0.009338157,0.002045784,0.000038738362,0.00001556316,0.028390095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647105,0.00010352428,0.00015184628,0.0015775822,0.0015237851,0.000004744318,5.5270584e-7,0.0000041901462,0.00016273298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790835,0.00010931774,0.0005938371,0.00007277587,0.0011515984,0.00016410727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961708,0.0022066485,0.00063901057,0.00007789756,0.0008697779,0.000035865472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005758525,0.000064131855,0.00013327078,0.00005361189,0.00014256444,0.00008326137,0.0009860741,0.00004023674,0.000016268425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022805945,0.000034039578,0.0000702717,0.00016587715,0.00012197608,0.0004033691,0.000025529354,0.00017445134,4.818927e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056360676,0.0010511414,0.05524099,0.001301346,0.00083063473,0.0004469172,0.24255979,0.003805065,0.017325005,0.344851,0.19937892,0.12757313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019215493,0.0008822672,0.011662915,0.0073009604,0.00035363797,0.00017642073,0.058809638,0.00035492764,0.030333193,0.051673982,0.83595526,0.0005752682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042874657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2433392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6365763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000144578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094745576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96349895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018345762","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.322","title":"Litigation Privilege: Transient or Timeless? <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Adversarial system; Governor; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0981673817290953,"score_gpt":0.3851083503480055,"score_spread":0.2869409686189102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018345762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74507064,0.0014458214,0.026348023,0.1921844,0.0036225943,0.0010043008,0.00005268447,0.000025476085,0.030246027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630463,0.00018005568,0.0004598742,0.0012112067,0.0007723358,0.0000030052502,8.3910663e-7,0.000005669911,0.0010623735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977721,0.00007376545,0.00059339567,0.0000893366,0.0013044807,0.00016691402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749064,0.0007900377,0.0005808102,0.00012394846,0.0009205377,0.00009401897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022660142,0.00007437906,0.00013221953,0.00004936357,0.0001551637,0.000062281906,0.0009763879,0.000037490285,0.00017217115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059176004,0.000042912136,0.00008200528,0.00017495755,0.00018496363,0.0003837623,0.000042820804,0.00018712586,0.0000033791773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055334345,0.0017051375,0.012198602,0.00040846545,0.0012313301,0.00053972244,0.078605175,0.0028683622,0.06626744,0.42045888,0.15837152,0.25181192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006528276,0.00024238012,0.007214715,0.0010903268,0.00022212064,0.00010092958,0.0070158783,0.00010420473,0.040097144,0.003092636,0.9399147,0.00025212526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012920129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1300231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7815432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021413332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014278363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99365294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032902571","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.447","title":"Judging, Fast and Slow: Using Decision-Making Theory to Explore Judicial Fact Determination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.118251817099726,"score_gpt":0.32528523306925483,"score_spread":0.20703341596952884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032902571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7117842,0.0007677656,0.28266457,0.0013893327,0.0020966257,0.00016405001,0.0000069141,0.0000068318095,0.0011197492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957538,0.00010511131,0.0019948138,0.0007015995,0.0013902754,0.0000038362436,3.0097098e-7,0.000017433818,0.000032824493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984748,0.00005545334,0.00093919184,0.00020768456,0.00015172447,0.00017115286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784416,0.000644302,0.0010533171,0.00016407942,0.00021682726,0.00007729409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031506296,0.00011220167,0.00033149062,0.00030226886,0.00013686497,0.00024895315,0.0006854656,0.00005617427,0.000080385595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020735348,0.000098785655,0.00012001398,0.000082803446,0.00009096052,0.000755066,0.00014265119,0.00015654565,0.00003873256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001123616,0.00015533234,0.11815003,0.000045479243,0.0004250468,0.00003929117,0.0115230065,0.007866719,0.0010194042,0.21893437,0.0013802062,0.6393375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006775257,0.0003448989,0.024151785,0.0019112402,0.000037054237,0.00028819175,0.0006435457,0.026024861,0.00053697574,0.9385766,0.00637843,0.0004289258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006269352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003058308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71964216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022182184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041855055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4028362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045457203","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.2.104","title":"Delayed Complaints in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions—A Comparative Evaluation of Admissibility Determinations and Judicial Warnings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Jury; Law; Political science; Legislature; Criminology; Sexual assault; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.14656008187054412,"score_gpt":0.4188097431467664,"score_spread":0.2722496612762223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045457203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965953,0.0009224863,0.0002232001,0.0010205476,0.00031169562,0.00040837712,0.000012461625,0.0000047456465,0.00050119014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994606,0.000012733085,0.0001558407,0.000065640525,0.0002436589,0.000015830305,0.000004863889,0.0000056487033,0.000035198816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977612,0.00036746752,0.0007420657,0.0001634161,0.0008429231,0.00012291271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755573,0.00050397654,0.00068883057,0.0001457992,0.0010678503,0.000037788654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023315104,0.00011001812,0.00021955147,0.00021092265,0.000070408925,0.00003495355,0.00040219232,0.00005045709,0.00020735084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032904677,0.00007469593,0.000059703612,0.00016204407,0.00016680475,0.0003150171,0.000037900372,0.00028892953,0.0000058398186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006122145,0.0070758234,0.49213174,0.00005220097,0.0019046617,0.0001648363,0.31466684,0.006737932,0.011467471,0.015272235,0.0050080707,0.13939606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020981135,0.00034128528,0.98398644,0.00034072134,0.0001374645,0.00031561975,0.0017121227,0.001496898,0.0014151633,0.007953836,0.00009611031,0.000106209925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003284208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009306274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49185473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013303428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019498546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30460113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061777057","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.75","title":"Judicial Independence and Anti-Terrorism Legislation in Canada: Blurring the Investigative and Judicial Functions: <i>Re an Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial discretion; Criminal code; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Terrorism; Penal code; Code (set theory); Judicial activism; Criminal law; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08279000444014531,"score_gpt":0.33144560875058204,"score_spread":0.24865560431043673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061777057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587672,0.00085836457,0.0007540253,0.03862791,0.00044481244,0.00026693376,0.0000056700587,0.0000032001262,0.00027189346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869925,0.00016436221,0.000045526023,0.00048504423,0.0005644509,0.00000868374,5.1129666e-7,0.00000531072,0.000026862712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746215,0.00031193998,0.00049162866,0.00015531572,0.0014217551,0.00015722611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799514,0.0005244218,0.00062725466,0.00013162733,0.00067051133,0.000051043953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022948196,0.0001027009,0.00015354707,0.00006276739,0.00038305047,0.00009987576,0.0007215595,0.000049658993,0.000009568556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065311923,0.000057355886,0.000040163795,0.00020975697,0.0007601729,0.0009002747,0.0001093302,0.0003605306,3.3630351e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001058039,0.00034638244,0.68741035,0.00008975546,0.00021704737,0.000053872063,0.05831274,0.02121472,0.03100943,0.1412437,0.0049755094,0.054068428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053962873,0.00014837354,0.87961465,0.001300933,0.00021536899,0.00013463272,0.035970367,0.0019746372,0.004041961,0.07299607,0.0027826333,0.00028076125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62293804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.915563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29262495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039047358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017832911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37957287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080502037","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.3.213","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Khelawon</i> —Continuing Reform of the Law of Hearsay in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08338161060927719,"score_gpt":0.35798841743720233,"score_spread":0.27460680682792515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080502037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9160594,0.0012169828,0.000073669835,0.044379387,0.003149366,0.0003271126,0.00001659042,0.000002088643,0.03477544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974658,0.00028294546,0.000043100415,0.001280385,0.00030274712,0.0000011842302,1.8787249e-7,0.0000078014,0.0006158431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951418,0.00034900624,0.00151333,0.0001216549,0.0025885643,0.0002856229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957671,0.00082131004,0.0018077088,0.00022472037,0.0012927614,0.00008639906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007877673,0.00013094705,0.00032515594,0.00008537003,0.0000967542,0.00005521377,0.002227916,0.00006443983,0.000116675066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000754266,0.00007135579,0.00021978858,0.0003945266,0.000581024,0.0006145123,0.00020333397,0.00042565278,0.0000016500903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016392365,0.00061235914,0.042233825,0.00022558328,0.0005171093,0.00012109726,0.07840832,0.00070204725,0.008259793,0.78607124,0.0034560508,0.07775335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004525687,0.00078726624,0.3235819,0.031006048,0.00058355875,0.0002800286,0.18239513,0.0002451024,0.26499155,0.06724499,0.123036034,0.0013227203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80091685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94811946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71882623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013370056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015908013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4140059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084963802","doi":"10.1350/ijep.10.4.280","title":"Without Fear or Favour? Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Scientific evidence; Political science; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22137268798868695,"score_gpt":0.4527667752722754,"score_spread":0.23139408728358843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084963802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9292521,0.0024719017,0.00019738571,0.062751405,0.00039103415,0.0003202189,0.0000040408167,0.000011574677,0.004600336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942497,0.000076406846,0.00078520883,0.0010719287,0.0005990216,0.000017169275,3.0928717e-7,0.000008384406,0.0031918902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970645,0.0003606207,0.0004889722,0.00018677289,0.001634447,0.00026472076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979748,0.00080619927,0.0002785576,0.00018378434,0.0006416969,0.00011496027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046688844,0.00012107759,0.00017117386,0.00038739733,0.0004510037,0.0007407045,0.0020501513,0.000059351558,0.00007866348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020988532,0.00005977058,0.00006319647,0.00043557642,0.00031404884,0.0009381112,0.0000796013,0.00030304503,0.0000035474452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015096278,0.0007662597,0.38363478,0.000047242436,0.00014728835,0.0005312892,0.3310824,0.0012841771,0.0010350116,0.05493966,0.06685647,0.15816578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010025414,0.0009267733,0.85531276,0.004808109,0.000107363216,0.00095007365,0.051306322,0.00011572624,0.00066022645,0.04476157,0.039193396,0.0008551516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14850801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5165382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47167796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004093134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009019488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8571621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094858247","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.4.329","title":"Reasonable Doubt in Credibility Contests: Sexual Assault and Sexual Equality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Credibility; Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.1403326277753384,"score_gpt":0.410591200654629,"score_spread":0.2702585728792906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094858247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92293185,0.002479623,0.000114015835,0.07104459,0.000418768,0.00018972141,0.00000465029,0.000012615759,0.0028041555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958198,0.0003596633,0.00022235376,0.001375382,0.0007285321,0.0000021371914,5.4360197e-7,0.000002708843,0.0014888438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976273,0.00036306132,0.00042838717,0.00014958801,0.0012394837,0.00019214077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813014,0.0005191428,0.00033773153,0.00011716708,0.00080619374,0.000089647954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006205503,0.000090565016,0.00017065753,0.000014161541,0.00018692571,0.00018217508,0.0008103005,0.00010518775,0.000087423185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025158983,0.000053828287,0.000054246673,0.00014778317,0.00033657425,0.000944007,0.000054788383,0.00046347635,0.0000027042659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027221297,0.0018070381,0.2667227,0.000071125156,0.00047899876,0.00028635623,0.2413787,0.0005536565,0.014082757,0.18953481,0.06874443,0.2136173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035830643,0.0021871538,0.32433656,0.0020993787,0.00018339381,0.0004580334,0.1504968,0.0005998578,0.002921099,0.35170582,0.16031154,0.0011173426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092470495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001547895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21249996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025091093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035032196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3011947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121600658","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.75","title":"Improperly Obtained Evidence in the Commonwealth: Lessons for England and Wales?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Jurisdiction; Law; Convention; Scots law; Common law; Conformity; Legislation; Political science; Position (finance); High Court; Human rights; Sources of law; Economics","score_opus":0.3150991231661772,"score_gpt":0.46799635396163064,"score_spread":0.15289723079545342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121600658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6263308,0.0071285404,0.0028299207,0.36187822,0.0008000954,0.00062451925,0.0000031800064,0.000008195746,0.0003965527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556947,0.0017016708,0.00039780032,0.0011672627,0.00095245405,0.000011541236,2.2091798e-7,0.000006092081,0.00019347241],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763906,0.00030657742,0.0005411144,0.00013949623,0.0010801217,0.00029361623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224997,0.006325942,0.00041485523,0.00015052689,0.0007717578,0.00008698121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016071642,0.00010410414,0.00016857772,0.00010468387,0.00034981396,0.00025817417,0.0016578415,0.000055153363,0.000017642862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061298274,0.000051979445,0.00009370935,0.0001779672,0.00037485667,0.0009777576,0.000075710435,0.000331142,0.0000023138405],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059381835,0.00040180862,0.046800263,0.00016703822,0.0001853847,0.0003882072,0.20846644,0.00011765023,0.006370736,0.14637011,0.009133078,0.57566106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036963194,0.0033061907,0.22794971,0.012891611,0.000419836,0.0015129028,0.081004955,0.00061275973,0.004100678,0.10201564,0.5614082,0.0010812036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015067429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010812229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5745799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016960781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035914726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73384184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132652996","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.157","title":"Expert Evidence of Delay in Complaint in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Counterintuitive; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Sexual assault; Mythology; Affect (linguistics); Criminology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Political science; Law; History; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.08593711193608469,"score_gpt":0.3764056797921512,"score_spread":0.29046856785606656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132652996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869962,0.0064189504,0.000281715,0.0050019557,0.0005837672,0.0002691391,0.0000036504214,0.0000057852776,0.00043886874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873185,0.00018543392,0.00022384577,0.00031282366,0.00041795374,0.000017179185,9.4841255e-7,0.000010824109,0.00009911495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978387,0.00018867581,0.00095658284,0.00017530414,0.00063871976,0.00020204493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818325,0.0007038653,0.0005258003,0.00023888134,0.00031180712,0.000036378904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011575185,0.00013277905,0.00024924477,0.0003299256,0.00003154033,0.000035994963,0.001024983,0.00006098359,0.00025940285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023592592,0.000085799176,0.00010042624,0.00025464615,0.00013269209,0.00043183976,0.00006070529,0.00043385036,0.000021007569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070979283,0.010432247,0.6595432,0.000085804735,0.0009968809,0.0031282012,0.15548374,0.013119916,0.029108923,0.05312397,0.016527575,0.051351584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027234475,0.0007466312,0.97456354,0.0056681046,0.000039439044,0.0020859498,0.002942076,0.00020088874,0.0046476577,0.004610343,0.0014751008,0.00029682033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010870977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019435339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3150203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015309636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001322881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34987888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166165129","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.361","title":"Doubting What the Elders Have to Say: A Critical Examination of Canadian Judicial Treatment of Aboriginal Oral History Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Oral history; Notice; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Rules of evidence; Judicial review; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Common law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20065081271940535,"score_gpt":0.4318830265874217,"score_spread":0.23123221386801637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166165129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7945558,0.0043970766,0.0003018198,0.19422165,0.004626565,0.00046701028,0.000004809601,0.0000072043886,0.0014180754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963145,0.001474824,0.0004889459,0.0005119825,0.0009442363,0.000010353775,2.4287394e-7,0.000007394865,0.0002474885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716896,0.00031929888,0.000607924,0.00015429495,0.0014789082,0.0002705939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99498886,0.0022319036,0.00048092374,0.00020176411,0.0018822192,0.00021430977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038831343,0.0001263894,0.00023667722,0.00034538208,0.00022434632,0.00013825607,0.0013059711,0.00007157836,0.00029449761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048029083,0.00007409984,0.00016591237,0.00023321834,0.0007996398,0.0016007868,0.000036646685,0.0002704628,0.000006087587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019826377,0.0006359358,0.013233401,0.00009288182,0.00042312682,0.00029384383,0.2639153,0.0004673163,0.05691799,0.15893699,0.012760606,0.49033996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012777384,0.0049009174,0.05831066,0.013107699,0.001034364,0.00054230343,0.07355303,0.0005566609,0.044186193,0.012384872,0.78915054,0.0009950147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.135381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34295338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77638996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008831605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023312047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8703766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209528132","doi":"","title":"Doubting what the Elders have to say","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Mandate; Objectivity (philosophy); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Oral history; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.17541120754902445,"score_gpt":0.4751415685260832,"score_spread":0.29973036097705874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209528132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08978157,0.00018654016,0.00069348974,0.89722323,0.0056813993,0.0001738487,4.0457684e-7,0.000007085728,0.006252425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830831,0.00017165283,0.0005260544,0.011470663,0.0022189438,0.0000073718693,1.8450685e-7,0.0000048420393,0.0025171645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983174,0.00016772335,0.0003314594,0.00007371416,0.0009761052,0.00013359188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962169,0.0016064417,0.00043081722,0.00014864323,0.001522529,0.000074696676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799584,0.00005826388,0.00006570255,0.000091123125,0.0004463197,0.0012056003,0.001439551,0.00003545353,0.00069028116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009247792,0.00002927622,0.00006897324,0.00023264227,0.00017891974,0.002775607,0.000064289794,0.0007250585,0.000053741514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029945874,0.0002265307,0.0063853953,0.0000051639654,0.00027120535,0.000021381182,0.2058366,0.00039413178,0.017148983,0.28035387,0.13629347,0.3527638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094850366,0.000037802198,0.0014222098,0.00016045825,0.000022467577,0.00005743525,0.031083459,0.000021858497,0.0020023417,0.01025265,0.9547641,0.00008033209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078798743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002726991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89330155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082218205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009124151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225482477","doi":"10.1177/1365712715613485","title":"Confessions to Mr Big","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Scrutiny; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Common law; Political science; High Court; History","score_opus":0.37595815438136426,"score_gpt":0.4723487127284619,"score_spread":0.09639055834709764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225482477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5908178,0.0015385367,0.05171985,0.22807048,0.07041447,0.0004953015,0.000010409642,0.00006404617,0.056869097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981208,0.000015974283,0.00029737223,0.0058494546,0.0014236682,0.000009445039,3.2573647e-7,0.000009193011,0.011186535],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853486,0.00015888982,0.00043578216,0.00012113448,0.00060875074,0.00014059703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980468,0.00020245307,0.00031815455,0.00022990287,0.0010143955,0.0001883072],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013657695,0.00008479744,0.00013586081,0.0002150228,0.000037295056,0.000047635822,0.0008787813,0.000054419477,0.0014602132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000881076,0.00004732526,0.00009855343,0.00015805295,0.00009858517,0.00014151419,0.00008222368,0.000274426,0.00096348155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001925919,0.00024961322,0.002725215,0.000001301222,0.00031898517,0.00018408844,0.0065926327,0.00014572343,0.003445431,0.011939163,0.73728997,0.23518196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019047683,0.0012790862,0.018018851,0.00034744063,0.0000539282,0.0046258518,0.0040545547,0.00004135786,0.001969153,0.011077292,0.9563924,0.00023528052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023232082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020537482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39039025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008416798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012586566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225487473","doi":"10.1177/1365712715613479","title":"The expert witness’s duty of impartiality in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Expert witness; Political science; Trial court; Prejudice (legal term); Witness","score_opus":0.3275671409319637,"score_gpt":0.5168705083783651,"score_spread":0.18930336744640142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225487473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7804182,0.0021296213,0.00014266948,0.21437368,0.002167808,0.00026299513,0.0000021263002,0.0000023137386,0.00050056964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976208,0.00028300102,0.000045714816,0.0012147787,0.00058314373,0.000019465651,2.008426e-7,0.000004074061,0.00022882101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966856,0.00085181,0.00094364927,0.000071361974,0.0012657753,0.00018177614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99309665,0.004381434,0.0008660671,0.00020753883,0.0013287808,0.000119540644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068357107,0.000068460315,0.00018926786,0.000030105877,0.00009879156,0.000010795502,0.0009885267,0.00003882516,0.00017392563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015169833,0.000029355902,0.00004592415,0.00009319625,0.00013528207,0.00029959888,0.00013838559,0.00063904416,0.000004737049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042395457,0.0002651806,0.7639708,0.00010306347,0.00025410406,0.000120228964,0.01931385,0.00037517594,0.0005577756,0.0068916166,0.15587589,0.048032787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031825642,0.0005412743,0.31645763,0.0053846687,0.00009064619,0.000120461205,0.09088451,0.0011469317,0.0040121633,0.035091538,0.5427296,0.00035798995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58105063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6111103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44751316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065300753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004898385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264043653","doi":"10.1177/1365712715591462","title":"Aging witnesses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Witness; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Psychology; Criminology; Population; Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.31055819875318924,"score_gpt":0.4578514390084516,"score_spread":0.14729324025526236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264043653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73382187,0.006621665,0.03826258,0.11892222,0.05329398,0.00032332432,0.0000041033686,0.00007787227,0.04867239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921509,0.000037866394,0.0002176219,0.0019938694,0.0012167499,0.0000044279277,2.5255724e-7,0.000008298072,0.004369981],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987071,0.00013477642,0.00038572433,0.000101058344,0.00055180816,0.00011952592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982586,0.00019466983,0.00040487386,0.00017690325,0.00087838457,0.000086598484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014033717,0.00007701043,0.00011904662,0.00015234947,0.000030408057,0.000053801672,0.00078548124,0.00004107973,0.0011976828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005604368,0.00004315237,0.00008949642,0.000121130346,0.00014295954,0.00029445783,0.000054465272,0.00024929046,0.00032142954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029705504,0.00047923037,0.017885461,0.0000064323485,0.0010188251,0.00061084796,0.012301826,0.00046363485,0.0028622122,0.028244555,0.6053326,0.32782382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00375003,0.0013664457,0.03303792,0.00061523967,0.00012519362,0.016170071,0.0069625988,0.00011759362,0.0041384944,0.05122761,0.88207227,0.00041650544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016369942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007956665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32740733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007059985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087875225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312190782","doi":"10.1177/136571270200600103","title":"The Trouble with <i>Teixeira</i>: Developing a Principled Approach to Entrapment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Supreme court; Covert; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Authorization; Computer security; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.224766889043869,"score_gpt":0.3583476129868369,"score_spread":0.13358072394296794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312190782","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28369614,0.00573696,0.2983642,0.3554751,0.0036599976,0.0028422258,0.000006746646,0.00009542768,0.05012322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903683,0.0011468414,0.004663417,0.0012897091,0.00089631806,0.000020014018,2.9427602e-7,0.000009865064,0.0016052201],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795663,0.00021111664,0.00032235598,0.00011328365,0.001194198,0.00020244115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851614,0.00034520566,0.00030849254,0.00013976688,0.0006086511,0.00008176649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024443956,0.000082619496,0.000089774425,0.000060050454,0.0005328138,0.0003590334,0.0013401073,0.00001938865,0.00003106453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008994125,0.000037415964,0.000051436215,0.00018840781,0.00013639679,0.00057563174,0.000098992394,0.00021453865,0.000031624673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047731693,0.00096171274,0.0030813236,0.000106784,0.001231205,0.0002728891,0.18097535,0.004996035,0.004868831,0.270845,0.04743035,0.48045737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007735155,0.0007138648,0.0016351738,0.0013234707,0.00017421179,0.00040209678,0.02097624,0.0006273702,0.0033797426,0.0015582563,0.9680763,0.00035978708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000109561704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001840271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021669273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017541254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40980265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338304353","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.448","title":"Hearsay by Implication: <i>R</i> v <i>Baldree</i>","year":2014,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0907127877805838,"score_gpt":0.3793831550748223,"score_spread":0.2886703672942385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338304353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071927965,0.023370303,0.0070376163,0.8778459,0.008207883,0.0006688153,0.000031916417,0.000038319435,0.010871289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98254424,0.0045988215,0.0002440477,0.0048117386,0.0038980874,0.000007405371,0.0000015458338,0.000020946516,0.0038731445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946864,0.0006766608,0.0011276432,0.0003094429,0.002755423,0.00044440737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938444,0.0020901635,0.0014112563,0.00042139628,0.0019605218,0.00027227355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069047865,0.00025744026,0.00038544514,0.00009111891,0.00047056348,0.00060413755,0.003988841,0.00014024063,0.0006933303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029714017,0.00016054326,0.0003614017,0.00032524197,0.00070543645,0.0015101332,0.00027439103,0.0006449015,0.00028306033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006051832,0.00032550865,0.0025181593,0.00004708611,0.00033087737,0.000029095087,0.0082656685,0.00013338099,0.020636097,0.023568416,0.8466197,0.09692078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037099706,0.00049702585,0.0010291077,0.0016609905,0.00019490316,0.00028039608,0.0011404594,0.000116360374,0.006921395,0.0096071595,0.9778745,0.00030671057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008607164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016282382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003422248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005839387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75914806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753352173","doi":"10.1177/1365712717725536","title":"The diverging dictionaries of science and law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Notice; Scientific evidence; Phenomenon; Scientific terminology; Scientific literature; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19170868311105088,"score_gpt":0.44679948621731846,"score_spread":0.2550908031062676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753352173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69818336,0.0031231195,0.001368036,0.25449532,0.007862703,0.00039136098,0.0000041479702,0.000015199501,0.034556724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820143,0.0007219363,0.00011651797,0.00016072359,0.0004897533,0.0000015852746,1.2574353e-8,0.0000025450558,0.00030550797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765426,0.00007814871,0.0003192572,0.00008157382,0.0017186626,0.00014809919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567217,0.0010011873,0.00075290544,0.00020583686,0.0023121026,0.00005580911],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065129604,0.000050911494,0.00008306832,0.000043345513,0.0036201372,0.0007395906,0.0029098813,0.000020369995,0.000024435845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009926088,0.000025422778,0.00004700682,0.000071665985,0.011544893,0.0018001032,0.00033035877,0.00015226174,0.0000026833634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089349065,0.000016619708,0.0061385515,0.000001716504,0.00003571811,0.000005793364,0.008144126,0.000047086294,0.0020661545,0.94563746,0.00042847352,0.037388943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022174188,0.0002923029,0.024637027,0.0014518714,0.000091783455,0.000109953835,0.028655905,0.0008116365,0.089574605,0.61801684,0.23584192,0.00029440262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017106973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00169522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3276206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011871532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053006737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99841374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776141614","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746420","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Bradshaw</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Supreme court; Reliability (semiconductor); Test (biology); Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.268432360058455,"score_gpt":0.458226880767542,"score_spread":0.18979452070908698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776141614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17476235,0.0036393953,0.0011823656,0.76400095,0.008059603,0.00031463456,0.000004308083,0.000026213324,0.048010204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930639,0.0010535523,0.00024393028,0.0011521229,0.002090655,0.0000023434056,8.152361e-8,0.000005737471,0.002387648],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788165,0.00011910342,0.00034264807,0.00009889013,0.001372132,0.00018558285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737334,0.00050055893,0.0007932623,0.00030921862,0.0009230031,0.00010060049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032108014,0.000079071244,0.00013186761,0.000044565582,0.00088144495,0.00073087955,0.003961404,0.000040023697,0.00022688629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047781756,0.000045302277,0.00015213816,0.00003546655,0.0005701418,0.0018721087,0.00019523276,0.0002425607,0.000049239137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017103254,0.00039416362,0.05293356,0.000040500334,0.00054337806,0.0009307323,0.031837653,0.0001749079,0.010995557,0.22415446,0.31732753,0.35895723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003321978,0.00015706339,0.008550142,0.0012728358,0.00008196696,0.00018983104,0.0018323982,0.00002580233,0.0049634865,0.03052011,0.95187366,0.00020050019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010216614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008382899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81830156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115833594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041256283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779496185","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746419","title":"Unconfirmed accelerants","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arson; Fire investigation; Forensic engineering; Accidental; Flammable liquid; Computer security; History; Engineering; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Waste management","score_opus":0.355893954199186,"score_gpt":0.5025763803040952,"score_spread":0.14668242610490922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779496185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72071016,0.0007711417,0.008612301,0.21979067,0.018410722,0.0004101686,0.00000250252,0.000036856447,0.031255502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365973,0.00024497797,0.0023661465,0.0003948036,0.0015951706,0.0000024082096,3.6578363e-8,0.0000058721444,0.0017308209],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980033,0.0002365009,0.00033358234,0.00008868098,0.0011875494,0.0001503771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971533,0.0005824849,0.000878833,0.00026871954,0.0010444631,0.000072200695],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051794546,0.0000679686,0.00012618995,0.00007675978,0.0006599765,0.00051149586,0.0027265537,0.000045765442,0.0003900607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010678592,0.000040100524,0.00012379893,0.000045409077,0.0005381116,0.0010495352,0.00014196824,0.00027152503,0.000027670038],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007366103,0.0000946117,0.023414938,0.000009096321,0.00036030787,0.00018308252,0.01331038,0.00013991054,0.009344952,0.023684636,0.012594955,0.91612655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017931964,0.00046259735,0.15538068,0.0024691087,0.00015897375,0.0004752459,0.004645606,0.00038436774,0.07732625,0.1469488,0.6093252,0.0006300083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074826326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006521659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9154965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001568763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004062177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99765486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804938249","doi":"10.1177/1365712718782990","title":"Gender discrimination and juries in the 20th century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Political science; Politics; Franchise; Law; Inequality; Sociology; Jury selection","score_opus":0.1937705289059404,"score_gpt":0.4461225939343225,"score_spread":0.25235206502838214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804938249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88968813,0.0046214513,0.0015009744,0.096423954,0.001760871,0.00024274822,0.0000017259013,0.000008872755,0.00575125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968737,0.0010036045,0.00024215513,0.00090607035,0.0008371599,0.0000024098345,1.0645601e-7,0.000003228389,0.00013157022],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815,0.00023719379,0.00027356436,0.00007918705,0.0011505145,0.00010954014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980258,0.00084415235,0.00027514808,0.00008518094,0.0007440708,0.000025699352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485133,0.00005548476,0.00007303263,0.000101266276,0.00019659082,0.0002646514,0.001078583,0.000027735281,0.000069406946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028781195,0.000025944679,0.000033956647,0.00016760544,0.000436522,0.00080879004,0.00007453947,0.00015974062,0.0000067861033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006598383,0.00023966504,0.040535655,0.000026244576,0.000119359116,0.00008112573,0.30695683,0.000034709366,0.00068509777,0.19411716,0.019162731,0.4373816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062736165,0.00039319874,0.3808137,0.0013239268,0.00008875352,0.00028779154,0.054841314,0.000102824044,0.0011662655,0.28343683,0.27662155,0.00029649018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007356226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056958565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43708512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006544963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023444681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887570016","doi":"10.1177/1365712718787523","title":"Social science and humanities evidence in <i>Charter</i> litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Digital humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.3473604263806609,"score_gpt":0.5234327946804664,"score_spread":0.17607236829980555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887570016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85523605,0.0006387475,0.00013163275,0.14053984,0.0011762062,0.00027042988,8.966606e-7,0.000007793633,0.0019984324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992539,0.00022782854,0.00011903701,0.004433319,0.0023258387,0.000011769744,1.10038485e-7,0.0000046383284,0.00033849076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971575,0.0003918431,0.000647307,0.00013926104,0.0014391718,0.00022492895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939104,0.002518597,0.0005825357,0.00011772056,0.0028073392,0.000063450105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009436835,0.00007807812,0.00015429908,0.00017308976,0.0004634449,0.000077654746,0.0008592203,0.00005142278,0.00031849483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017160587,0.000045167093,0.000029883533,0.00021931574,0.0011406061,0.0019884568,0.00021112621,0.00057929824,0.000037634945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003761207,0.0005093171,0.30482247,0.0006640973,0.00018282724,0.0001377947,0.31267083,0.0000036307756,0.06528212,0.12634264,0.07439002,0.11123305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028719855,0.0028092738,0.50684613,0.033104293,0.00019758947,0.00030930334,0.06274467,0.0010169423,0.017119303,0.109996274,0.2622017,0.0007825318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012563453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010650498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24992616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026593075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008847253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914773908","doi":"10.1177/1365712718824123","title":"The ‘Corroborative Rule’ from a comparative and critical perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Convict; Mistake; Law; Jury; Statute; Reasonable doubt; Order (exchange); Common law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.16362823244949623,"score_gpt":0.4585632105028251,"score_spread":0.2949349780533289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914773908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6333557,0.011627294,0.0006534419,0.3440513,0.002302905,0.0003651725,0.000009554744,0.000010978454,0.0076236892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975303,0.0006236015,0.0002415235,0.00039771208,0.0006234543,0.00000371225,1.245383e-7,0.0000034823358,0.0005760934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810725,0.0003544741,0.00028042545,0.00012937866,0.0009694141,0.00015903295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99252814,0.0052964846,0.00025262157,0.000109106775,0.0017347474,0.00007891936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016630535,0.00008621127,0.00015545364,0.000033151726,0.0003892073,0.0003731404,0.0009759626,0.00003344294,0.00015540312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029589278,0.00004177501,0.000079890604,0.0000900613,0.00082285696,0.0009073557,0.000113089016,0.00030902904,0.000042776344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019189693,0.00013184988,0.011093438,0.000006604792,0.00038878492,0.00006849509,0.18659514,0.00008876293,0.0028867577,0.7779797,0.010744012,0.008097502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067957345,0.0007965811,0.02350653,0.002005009,0.00020900184,0.00012572457,0.38455456,0.0005282162,0.003588568,0.50587213,0.07772271,0.0004113668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015577711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001070035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36417463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020110878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035051967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35982016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915908076","doi":"10.1177/1365712718813795","title":"Taking the dialectical stance in reasoning with evidence and proof","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Probabilistic logic; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Deductive reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.21378075721919323,"score_gpt":0.44687740980815743,"score_spread":0.2330966525889642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915908076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89752835,0.003341518,0.009861049,0.08334347,0.0014273428,0.0005549406,7.181222e-7,0.000015886955,0.003926754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967407,0.0003260243,0.00078539853,0.00049834215,0.0014464727,0.000009496169,2.3658275e-8,0.000008310959,0.00018521104],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973949,0.00040149558,0.0004486029,0.0001653385,0.0013297657,0.00025986234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576926,0.002265255,0.00059228425,0.00015933193,0.0011435432,0.00007033945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005359668,0.00010281534,0.00014530055,0.0000782065,0.00040734754,0.00031628954,0.001349612,0.00004558205,0.00020585737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01027728,0.000050018294,0.0000434999,0.0003380877,0.0017569084,0.0013149749,0.00012192773,0.0004076438,0.000008863095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003892688,0.00029436307,0.268727,0.000034612367,0.00029789392,0.00036273676,0.15160526,0.0010052514,0.00386896,0.22232041,0.0016030517,0.34598777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017640175,0.0071603307,0.25556368,0.07403203,0.0005908249,0.0022445102,0.08670582,0.013727582,0.17190363,0.2855646,0.0979664,0.0027765762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010652734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008908401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34321117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024306768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005415533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947122861","doi":"10.1177/1365712719851133","title":"The detection of deception during trials: Ignoring the nonverbal communication of witnesses is not the solution—A response to Vrij and Turgeon (2018)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Credibility; Nonverbal communication; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Lie detection; Trustworthiness; Epistemology; Developmental psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.12923555786404836,"score_gpt":0.4052362004551724,"score_spread":0.276000642591124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947122861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96155065,0.0019289933,0.0021525482,0.031160936,0.0026314512,0.00041362742,0.000004004169,0.0000069352427,0.00015083682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976096,0.00069896685,0.000040138155,0.00041757635,0.00021788439,0.00002083802,2.312847e-7,0.000009606462,0.0009851196],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967266,0.001429383,0.00094807445,0.0001404342,0.00061467616,0.0001408859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937494,0.003551528,0.0013766038,0.000535952,0.0007516776,0.000034887795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00892222,0.00011292293,0.0002334952,0.00014984909,0.00024403875,0.00006452792,0.0010064824,0.000071169394,0.0002246536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019795028,0.000049346032,0.0001664875,0.00021843702,0.0003508185,0.00025053785,0.00014551955,0.000342621,0.000031160285],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.045460183,0.000190591,0.004254873,0.000024621955,0.0009633795,0.0000030339468,0.027559849,0.00045749554,0.61985487,0.0014582158,0.0030529934,0.29671988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047323178,0.0022032482,0.7002834,0.0014717916,0.00036859576,0.0020364888,0.01656432,0.0006405845,0.2146666,0.0062070373,0.050410938,0.0004146671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086690605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009856191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69602853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104070874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006926474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30922812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082028856","doi":"","title":"Social media-Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.31877108067362686,"score_gpt":0.4632453971916218,"score_spread":0.14447431651799492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082028856","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29805186,0.000736897,0.00020866508,0.6797245,0.019963024,0.00034780978,0.0000034060424,0.000010664067,0.0009531529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902457,0.00038496495,0.00006966251,0.0007186431,0.008399184,0.000034873276,1.0965897e-7,0.000005796932,0.0001410643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973187,0.00028035225,0.00038418925,0.00007357738,0.0017566219,0.00018656743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906169,0.007462498,0.0005273603,0.00006771726,0.0012219063,0.00010358189],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002356837,0.000059177975,0.00010997832,0.00005763995,0.0002481285,0.000050646053,0.00114946,0.0000441561,0.00027510992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024041556,0.00002970229,0.00006276303,0.00013415227,0.00025868535,0.00049601693,0.00003968155,0.00014300358,0.0000105453955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018421386,0.000057980054,0.01720159,0.000006163502,0.00009267794,0.000025307168,0.03292861,0.0000015456188,0.00042873982,0.021036612,0.07886099,0.8491756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051091774,0.00006274969,0.10149526,0.0008351182,0.00005843928,0.00003671511,0.00821648,0.0000016630266,0.0028006306,0.040761027,0.8449598,0.00026121605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045901027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2517957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8489144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009980932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036290719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124354858","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.1.308","title":"Weaknesses of Adjudication in the Face of Secret Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Secrecy; Acknowledgement; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Confidentiality; Law and economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Masking (illustration); Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.19723020262983734,"score_gpt":0.4376579170917017,"score_spread":0.24042771446186437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124354858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7734457,0.009696345,0.0022330633,0.21246418,0.0005369163,0.0003874858,0.0000027804533,0.000006243077,0.0012272237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962984,0.0026975016,0.0001943346,0.00045322726,0.0002653423,0.0000028435254,1.8711265e-7,0.0000027147205,0.00008547427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969513,0.000412688,0.00068867585,0.0001030954,0.0016978079,0.00014647866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957744,0.0020057845,0.000952488,0.00019913638,0.0010303963,0.00003780283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055242935,0.00008373532,0.00019535681,0.0001181693,0.000086495966,0.000060252678,0.0023039542,0.000045084,0.00007296402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005578804,0.00004499115,0.00012344416,0.00034646914,0.00035447246,0.0011289397,0.000047171612,0.00023155099,0.000002844273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00446281,0.0016369483,0.07643048,0.00027085922,0.00032577568,0.00018266912,0.28439787,0.005108954,0.11227334,0.2132139,0.021635305,0.28006107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016403022,0.003983005,0.51148796,0.03887073,0.00060864637,0.00068226765,0.108442806,0.0008036491,0.09269403,0.20145433,0.03832798,0.0010042829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000829306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005500329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4350575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009545051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004514403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66787523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124416878","doi":"10.1177/1365712717690752","title":"Loosening the law’s bite: Law, fact, and expert evidence in <i>R</i> v <i>JA</i> and <i>R</i> v <i>NS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Framing (construction); Law; Face (sociological concept); Status quo; Hearsay; Political science; Sociology; History; Social science","score_opus":0.21898713318697063,"score_gpt":0.4240047522478299,"score_spread":0.20501761906085927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124416878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47996065,0.046330947,0.00026932787,0.46011165,0.0023197217,0.00068378437,0.0000060183693,0.000026815616,0.010291088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98264,0.010235156,0.00019755658,0.005680802,0.00084859604,0.00001100123,1.0724505e-7,0.000011696857,0.00037506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714947,0.00033915884,0.0005746919,0.00025396224,0.0013484403,0.00033430217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959784,0.002203714,0.00076284324,0.00038755886,0.00052038534,0.00014706705],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051398445,0.00018281952,0.00026649798,0.00005670565,0.001362819,0.0013612433,0.0025305806,0.00007637092,0.000028854163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028460897,0.000100631194,0.0001039562,0.00007821491,0.0019863443,0.0033835815,0.00049864256,0.0005099921,0.000005344966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032489055,0.00039969207,0.07729454,0.00016440632,0.0004463595,0.0012677968,0.14083043,0.00018122586,0.038677048,0.5227394,0.02567953,0.18907064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018782349,0.00071113475,0.01628766,0.017596008,0.0002577682,0.0016245143,0.019235795,0.00028026474,0.01887596,0.063554466,0.85851085,0.001187315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014307602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011765016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022895008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161670791","doi":"10.1177/13657127211011236","title":"The exclusion of prison informant evidence for unreliability in New Zealand","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Gatekeeping; Jury; Suspect; Supreme court; Deference; Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.1801210453341474,"score_gpt":0.4501539560224675,"score_spread":0.2700329106883201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161670791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.880636,0.0067218393,0.012166182,0.08790822,0.010880963,0.00061388593,0.00000536156,0.000012165099,0.0010553811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917823,0.00074838364,0.000363303,0.0006440374,0.00042622906,0.000010550338,6.009992e-7,0.0000070840574,0.006017532],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981915,0.00018649011,0.0008378841,0.00013388452,0.0004959717,0.00015430168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960808,0.001967434,0.00068234565,0.00029393446,0.00092388026,0.000051606075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002678232,0.00008748916,0.00017820856,0.000097486074,0.000056935,0.000042517077,0.00076752284,0.000067290166,0.00037375683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029518667,0.00004576077,0.0001615446,0.00018149473,0.00014964808,0.00030277824,0.00010449155,0.00028464507,0.00001539863],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012582617,0.0004904738,0.06369124,0.000035719844,0.00043488483,0.000070977076,0.011741753,0.00050320895,0.011180351,0.008168349,0.18162185,0.70947856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055240784,0.0021385697,0.5057414,0.0031512654,0.00012283387,0.0024596641,0.00418641,0.0006624629,0.018491661,0.058070622,0.39907062,0.00038036003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007004555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027401524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7090982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097253156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003565287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4092375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239874989","doi":"10.1177/1365712718765194","title":"Case commentaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.19834108773363063,"score_gpt":0.4309837070251528,"score_spread":0.2326426192915222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239874989","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4009228,0.0019245549,0.0017172501,0.57065153,0.0061299955,0.00027219483,0.000006556753,0.000018940802,0.01835615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453187,0.00013409216,0.00027615184,0.0013561142,0.0026160623,0.0000013632325,9.856356e-8,0.000002652016,0.0010815959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895054,0.00009891265,0.00021944179,0.00004731927,0.000582881,0.00010091332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981209,0.00048603883,0.00021568658,0.00006944326,0.0010639289,0.00004396901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001210829,0.000043615903,0.000068940244,0.000042096966,0.0006140607,0.00012691123,0.0004727773,0.000018739882,0.00035337376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010062732,0.000022447566,0.00007064715,0.0000907782,0.0006556506,0.00044769322,0.00008312369,0.00010404418,0.000014308083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006731609,0.0002851132,0.013859364,0.000010012714,0.0010380069,0.0039542005,0.18814343,0.000088275236,0.0005968586,0.22078794,0.4721202,0.09844343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027232393,0.00024883123,0.00088764087,0.00022188351,0.00006628003,0.002997333,0.013984514,0.000051767616,0.00095605507,0.0124186035,0.9677861,0.00010867253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011930476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038317344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59360904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011773623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019001258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.472292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240803306","doi":"10.1177/1365712719893192","title":"Case commentary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07591591282140106,"score_gpt":0.34522714230786683,"score_spread":0.2693112294864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240803306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109963,0.0014479532,0.00004014897,0.08589975,0.0008900726,0.0001403033,8.926891e-7,0.000004520834,0.0005800414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195933,0.00031256143,0.00014971367,0.006451682,0.00058009196,6.103958e-7,7.7836296e-7,0.0000065084464,0.000538724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990716,0.000027644091,0.0002895175,0.00005998797,0.00047603145,0.00007520689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991048,0.00019537579,0.0001974598,0.00013003043,0.00031997525,0.00005237574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004280191,0.000061829116,0.0001258135,0.000074727315,0.000025920053,0.000023506409,0.0002691303,0.000029192739,0.00046317154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008960243,0.000028913058,0.00012449839,0.00005246437,0.000036766327,0.00021013274,0.00004755363,0.00033974758,0.000061213],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010189127,0.0021627578,0.28268182,0.00021936177,0.007843046,0.10154224,0.010222731,0.0013412052,0.058233943,0.0022097845,0.29851636,0.22483762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00920375,0.0031166212,0.026367323,0.011232959,0.0010558738,0.7590755,0.0021139388,0.0012730033,0.059608907,0.0032885063,0.12322758,0.00043600725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024809748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042088604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6575333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007314508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007006257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50714034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240971876","doi":"10.1177/1365712719853154","title":"Case commentary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07591591282140106,"score_gpt":0.34522714230786683,"score_spread":0.2693112294864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240971876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109963,0.0014479532,0.00004014897,0.08589975,0.0008900726,0.0001403033,8.926891e-7,0.000004520834,0.0005800414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195933,0.00031256143,0.00014971367,0.006451682,0.00058009196,6.103958e-7,7.7836296e-7,0.0000065084464,0.000538724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990716,0.000027644091,0.0002895175,0.00005998797,0.00047603145,0.00007520689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991048,0.00019537579,0.0001974598,0.00013003043,0.00031997525,0.00005237574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004280191,0.000061829116,0.0001258135,0.000074727315,0.000025920053,0.000023506409,0.0002691303,0.000029192739,0.00046317154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008960243,0.000028913058,0.00012449839,0.00005246437,0.000036766327,0.00021013274,0.00004755363,0.00033974758,0.000061213],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010189127,0.0021627578,0.28268182,0.00021936177,0.007843046,0.10154224,0.010222731,0.0013412052,0.058233943,0.0022097845,0.29851636,0.22483762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00920375,0.0031166212,0.026367323,0.011232959,0.0010558738,0.7590755,0.0021139388,0.0012730033,0.059608907,0.0032885063,0.12322758,0.00043600725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024809748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042088604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6575333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007314508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007006257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50714034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243586645","doi":"10.1177/1365712719874633","title":"Noticeboard","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.11548024713816081,"score_gpt":0.36593201499132005,"score_spread":0.25045176785315926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243586645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705698,0.0011452535,0.00049632904,0.02125152,0.003048755,0.00027357318,0.000005433633,0.000020407606,0.0031889458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960706,0.000045959616,0.00061733875,0.0007918604,0.0007717279,0.0000022844079,3.7744442e-7,0.000026742164,0.0016730598],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724454,0.00012804792,0.0005621956,0.00011890129,0.0017725168,0.00017382887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967119,0.00066476205,0.0008173331,0.00026806924,0.0014685987,0.0000693046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023966688,0.00011975789,0.00018549926,0.00017677464,0.000032858,0.0001491276,0.0022115484,0.000033508448,0.001183045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013549521,0.00006245195,0.00018922942,0.00014747263,0.00008443848,0.0011193557,0.00017822714,0.00038173576,0.0038263022],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077059045,0.00074477884,0.16151384,0.00006944935,0.0024422563,0.0006090043,0.004656313,0.01727687,0.5984826,0.01830979,0.13635175,0.051837415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008195362,0.0032833258,0.15552591,0.011850287,0.0007691334,0.010386594,0.002286118,0.009704114,0.35668936,0.050236147,0.38931748,0.0017561637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001764577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008917907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25296572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024359861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025231013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310248845","doi":"10.1177/13657127221139506","title":"The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.16063495164697966,"score_gpt":0.401471797130705,"score_spread":0.24083684548372536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310248845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81932676,0.022405386,0.00009402185,0.13797149,0.003479937,0.00055764645,0.000015105923,0.000011302058,0.016138349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973862,0.0012881474,0.000035166675,0.00048876205,0.00024237765,0.000010649659,2.9365862e-7,0.00000448381,0.00054391904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970577,0.0005191089,0.0005521976,0.000084270425,0.0015726653,0.00021409092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968446,0.0019861117,0.0006277148,0.00012760842,0.00035057217,0.00006338525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005091595,0.00006564947,0.00013811071,0.00009372317,0.00035795206,0.000089526446,0.0017651743,0.00002163767,0.00021411164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002049268,0.000036776015,0.000111169786,0.00023227929,0.00034152667,0.00052791403,0.00022802365,0.000417519,0.0000025239547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077135814,0.0008267563,0.25441468,0.00005294472,0.0005463035,0.00076050253,0.16360652,0.0020079731,0.0052209473,0.34689948,0.080658525,0.13729182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008646782,0.0008391315,0.048188694,0.00088579516,0.000047869027,0.0001231939,0.06830055,0.00009700289,0.0022920868,0.036184452,0.8419053,0.00027125262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002268112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090758724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76124674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025472298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001121927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3428722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408557619","doi":"10.1177/13657127251326782","title":"Beliefs about deception in Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14903274049711543,"score_gpt":0.46555814504628235,"score_spread":0.3165254045491669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408557619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9122011,0.001708565,0.010825172,0.039020736,0.020977076,0.00030784783,0.0000034096824,0.00002372945,0.014932379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821209,0.00010125488,0.00013755262,0.0017507293,0.00039028857,0.000011260238,5.2713426e-7,0.0000049797195,0.015482565],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859965,0.00016430316,0.0006006884,0.00013742312,0.00035076184,0.00014718014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884415,0.00021359055,0.00033669357,0.00018882591,0.00038198667,0.0000347638],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012053846,0.00009114302,0.00014755521,0.00040395773,0.000031797696,0.00004659539,0.0007550347,0.00008429469,0.0029768366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032338413,0.0000578817,0.00011519847,0.0002624854,0.00013277271,0.00022433847,0.00004889192,0.00039347578,0.00024659067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040992526,0.0009622668,0.06767893,0.000018332212,0.0008521028,0.00030939246,0.0064703594,0.0005372777,0.0120708505,0.062325586,0.37541747,0.4692582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024668265,0.00043207733,0.82474416,0.0012131671,0.000053014668,0.0009762538,0.0010537755,0.000053415282,0.0020132319,0.037411097,0.12936993,0.00021302993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007095596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011438232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75706524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013569485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057729787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}