{"meta":{"query_hash":"56f2f990dcd5","filters":{"venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof"},"cohort_total":38,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":38,"exported":38,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/56f2f990dcd5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+International+Journal+of+Evidence+%26+Proof"},"results":[{"id":"W1966623002","doi":"10.1350/ijep.9.2.73.64809","title":"The Contextualised Court: Litigating ‘Culture’ in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Multiculturalism; Legal culture; Law; Contextualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Cultural issues; High Court; Cultural diversity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.06074616941425492,"score_gpt":0.34884126494175843,"score_spread":0.2880950955275035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966623002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6872143,0.0144841075,0.002946144,0.10306985,0.00047872725,0.00011032993,0.00021092522,0.000030206022,0.1914554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188906,0.0022597937,0.00040458507,0.003181002,0.000023860632,0.000010520784,0.000020847549,0.0000073642727,0.0022029176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867677,0.0035643524,0.00045696952,0.0009814607,0.004898611,0.0033308312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98234,0.007049073,0.0015090602,0.00056694716,0.0053566867,0.0031783357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071843397,0.00023237224,0.0005728738,0.002186188,0.031157415,0.015725017,0.0023742984,0.0028545966,0.00336897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027568344,0.00048236898,0.00033820458,0.006171334,0.026336493,0.004412662,0.008313872,0.005733611,0.00010823003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012387408,0.00008057896,0.03552126,0.0003557873,0.00012159358,0.002392706,0.35216314,0.0014779879,0.001052994,0.5135749,0.017079389,0.076055735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075045224,0.000102719336,0.10009362,0.0019080795,0.00022508575,0.0006793268,0.50172013,0.0023757713,0.0014897094,0.076349705,0.31459033,0.0003904142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98868483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99473476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15697125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15697125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22604108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000251237","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.212","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Henry</i> : A Welcome Retreat from an Overly Broad Interpretation of S. 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03020607224087154,"score_gpt":0.31135709387155686,"score_spread":0.28115102163068534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000251237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049552677,0.0022854605,0.0010749099,0.97060454,0.014935222,0.000019792595,0.00008698649,0.00007462677,0.010422921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021145945,0.0023426705,0.004044268,0.93044394,0.012538073,0.00007764294,0.00007174131,0.0003106461,0.02902506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706041,0.006515519,0.001711655,0.0026437677,0.01461506,0.003909981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939726,0.033033747,0.0018738284,0.0025931783,0.017426986,0.005346176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035243638,0.0012077861,0.0021324432,0.0020375145,0.021739759,0.023510225,0.010203476,0.041659687,0.004577185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077542774,0.0011442585,0.0013887223,0.002676984,0.05520723,0.012086281,0.0054731225,0.075473346,0.002163525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015964362,0.000008208053,0.000093064395,0.000050384726,0.0000083884415,0.00009289122,0.0034469692,0.000059374113,0.00010540018,0.1144626,0.8773672,0.004289411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033181717,0.000021357366,0.00076947,0.00047965275,0.00001918858,0.00013795173,0.0057161055,0.00035204805,0.00032501126,0.06394181,0.9280077,0.00019652554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7998619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8711781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20013809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031982977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080395006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40263343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007912515","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.106","title":"The Common Enterprise Exception to the Hearsay Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Principal (computer security); Common law; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Agency (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Philosophy; Computer security; Data mining","score_opus":0.10403258259634907,"score_gpt":0.4238262595036901,"score_spread":0.319793676907341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007912515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15551126,0.0024008555,0.102471046,0.028676089,0.0012462664,0.00025127982,0.00013642694,0.00019782934,0.7091089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9332748,0.000702846,0.013673423,0.00639771,0.00045653983,0.00016485542,0.000060478385,0.00005422643,0.045215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9590018,0.008413567,0.0028293193,0.0043436587,0.020760594,0.0046509886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97075844,0.015740097,0.0019990343,0.0036622726,0.0070204968,0.0008196919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015759291,0.00024055775,0.0010200547,0.001860348,0.0059229047,0.0104725985,0.0021475386,0.006349987,0.0034252328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060396902,0.00050226535,0.0011105626,0.0010071386,0.01697345,0.004987501,0.00559382,0.008022981,0.0010194271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013176969,0.000007171823,0.0004121202,0.000022669356,0.0000051337192,0.00020103146,0.0010312378,0.0002562351,0.00018720081,0.99240124,0.0011603374,0.0043023415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006601004,0.00014753314,0.004311094,0.00035380071,0.000057730416,0.0010033172,0.0032202727,0.0025973734,0.0018271442,0.84370035,0.14258093,0.00013445414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023797141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029705947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023797141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041541858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015250261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0833441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013505516","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.11.1.49","title":"Filling in the Blanks for Litigation Privilege: <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Blank; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Privilege (computing); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.0961047505531322,"score_gpt":0.3825391091228876,"score_spread":0.2864343585697554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013505516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019100722,0.0035214713,0.014300163,0.32814345,0.0068420786,0.0008548905,0.0018236941,0.0010667518,0.62434673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3425153,0.0023384993,0.026486307,0.31526428,0.0017935847,0.0006131772,0.0008333632,0.00095648406,0.309199],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693661,0.003643674,0.0013780837,0.0019038842,0.0133140655,0.010394156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492253,0.01902963,0.0018616758,0.0030230752,0.020189287,0.006671093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021345109,0.0007094554,0.0014879332,0.004592516,0.030550478,0.019408645,0.0051541505,0.020670034,0.031368475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0848051,0.0015760334,0.0015082986,0.0031176764,0.012499114,0.0076238904,0.005442075,0.015459277,0.004633589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039992,0.00006212469,0.0020818624,0.000098299985,0.000020100766,0.00040367115,0.003933059,0.00019141957,0.00045024737,0.29687214,0.66710615,0.028740957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007368029,0.000047028647,0.00964657,0.0007999762,0.00009056056,0.00044665413,0.008341546,0.0010576276,0.0019027385,0.08763144,0.88963944,0.00032268738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87089646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9435877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12910354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0483184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23176892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35057616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018345762","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.4.322","title":"Litigation Privilege: Transient or Timeless? <i>Blank</i> v <i>Canada (Minister of Justice)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Adversarial system; Governor; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0981673817290953,"score_gpt":0.3851083503480055,"score_spread":0.2869409686189102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018345762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008630313,0.014310427,0.00350357,0.8490163,0.004581877,0.000040186384,0.00016963319,0.00012729729,0.11962032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54819125,0.0093782665,0.002313236,0.36059162,0.0077819214,0.000089900466,0.00017103787,0.00017821322,0.07130456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98399746,0.0027378039,0.00097913,0.002447215,0.005318817,0.0045195315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976823,0.01155577,0.0021195218,0.0016721702,0.0044387025,0.0033908307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015703082,0.00032849124,0.001017311,0.0014536101,0.010342428,0.028745474,0.004215532,0.014043707,0.00904984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043739278,0.00049818034,0.0005488942,0.0014146098,0.038670644,0.019449476,0.0069083553,0.021150578,0.0013655911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021052707,0.000015327496,0.0014701518,0.000081030885,0.0000070851283,0.00030183615,0.004710068,0.000029221153,0.00018212867,0.8556741,0.11425706,0.023251025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020062784,0.000057054658,0.0064271274,0.001349017,0.000029659017,0.00093301595,0.016714513,0.00030081364,0.000614613,0.2109848,0.7624077,0.0001616759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24022728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4132047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7597727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027777443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035797298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47765803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032902571","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.447","title":"Judging, Fast and Slow: Using Decision-Making Theory to Explore Judicial Fact Determination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.118251817099726,"score_gpt":0.32528523306925483,"score_spread":0.20703341596952884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032902571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27716783,0.00763862,0.5609025,0.023383642,0.0005153345,0.00046910645,0.00018805703,0.00011107838,0.12962388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244527,0.0010781236,0.071948566,0.000694424,0.00015242402,0.00021776359,0.000059131733,0.000031716532,0.0013650549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735444,0.020420546,0.0008132789,0.0018844394,0.0022972918,0.0010399933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87845117,0.107028924,0.0059984736,0.0042562205,0.0030595246,0.0012057491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031502232,0.00080977014,0.001078639,0.004427005,0.0027123063,0.0103461975,0.002655579,0.0033504982,0.004159081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10522743,0.000732259,0.0015654488,0.0029515575,0.025292665,0.015021718,0.003882149,0.0049454486,0.00035510497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011276063,0.00009359549,0.004991717,0.0001697427,0.0001071276,0.000228237,0.011225907,0.011649048,0.00025932657,0.94373864,0.00073311967,0.026690634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003199156,0.000036303154,0.0014997477,0.000085344196,0.000022048143,0.00005016232,0.0016655999,0.020604799,0.00017323728,0.9732386,0.0025608998,0.00003133616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042415205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031209947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031502232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052741165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003654934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16660172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045457203","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.2.104","title":"Delayed Complaints in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions—A Comparative Evaluation of Admissibility Determinations and Judicial Warnings","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Jury; Law; Political science; Legislature; Criminology; Sexual assault; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.14656008187054412,"score_gpt":0.4188097431467664,"score_spread":0.2722496612762223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045457203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92512244,0.023627492,0.0051383283,0.007977647,0.00057582645,0.00023150291,0.000061227256,0.00003759353,0.03722795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900636,0.004994632,0.0017348081,0.0013604022,0.00025851114,0.00007082672,0.000025119676,0.000016408643,0.0014757031],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94933575,0.030344144,0.0051529347,0.001512327,0.011415137,0.002239732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53742456,0.39628872,0.04296604,0.005387469,0.015677348,0.0022558945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054738805,0.00026091753,0.00065273565,0.0035992793,0.0029463994,0.0033239361,0.002099014,0.0042267176,0.0031849549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3444499,0.00064200535,0.0007507316,0.002305802,0.0062809763,0.0038596732,0.0042147096,0.0051228222,0.0002572749],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055830176,0.0014366594,0.20940816,0.006064194,0.00043962296,0.010464242,0.18025112,0.0027446423,0.0050167707,0.12606433,0.0065307114,0.44599643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065419177,0.010578322,0.62355566,0.01241863,0.0011297158,0.022088418,0.16646057,0.0033832765,0.009906983,0.030396804,0.11885909,0.00056837924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042161164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010038925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054738805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032886579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038719354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28948992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061777057","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.1.75","title":"Judicial Independence and Anti-Terrorism Legislation in Canada: Blurring the Investigative and Judicial Functions: <i>Re an Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Judicial independence; Political science; Judicial discretion; Criminal code; Law; Independence (probability theory); Judicial review; Terrorism; Penal code; Code (set theory); Judicial activism; Criminal law; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language; Supreme court","score_opus":0.08279000444014531,"score_gpt":0.33144560875058204,"score_spread":0.24865560431043673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061777057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07920517,0.009139593,0.0027315554,0.6661624,0.0033455081,0.00038988562,0.001467084,0.00019003166,0.23736884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5426208,0.00652406,0.005348168,0.3094667,0.001670246,0.00021226474,0.0005167504,0.000143942,0.13349718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97685975,0.001516748,0.0007059146,0.0011119934,0.009686967,0.010118633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794118,0.006761205,0.0014538509,0.0005626989,0.0090051135,0.0028053923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008334304,0.000643283,0.0008871441,0.0024378095,0.03070535,0.012771933,0.0054718093,0.025203854,0.006061781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027957896,0.0011977827,0.0017344325,0.0028910225,0.013137132,0.00310974,0.0035077995,0.018123986,0.00067380315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017218848,0.00015234402,0.012699662,0.0002872423,0.00013163168,0.0012313644,0.012970428,0.0013419711,0.0016414357,0.4665549,0.47087437,0.0319423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003696373,0.00015371582,0.12556913,0.0012865682,0.00071180385,0.00048532797,0.018910756,0.0041102944,0.005938783,0.05537335,0.78628695,0.0008036648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99795306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87651014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12348985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38927758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8959858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080502037","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.3.213","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Khelawon</i> —Continuing Reform of the Law of Hearsay in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08338161060927719,"score_gpt":0.35798841743720233,"score_spread":0.27460680682792515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080502037","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1457699,0.012412586,0.0045622536,0.5472909,0.0037926163,0.00039645727,0.0008669492,0.00023951664,0.2846688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71124744,0.0053414996,0.006095835,0.08391994,0.0006439052,0.000120890814,0.00021669209,0.00017451495,0.19223933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914171,0.00070793834,0.00025414737,0.00066643127,0.0030195878,0.003934932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877688,0.002739902,0.00041544254,0.0003096225,0.0053878003,0.0033784537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006554282,0.0003525794,0.00077915034,0.0018534792,0.028687831,0.013613439,0.0046435357,0.010753321,0.011920418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018766465,0.0008204069,0.0007876607,0.0024251994,0.010825498,0.0037463794,0.0042952276,0.013034482,0.0006027234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016794141,0.000115969626,0.0061856806,0.0003569851,0.000054957345,0.00088464224,0.01344676,0.0014436225,0.0019915872,0.78212875,0.14397654,0.049246553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021591602,0.00008820486,0.022877948,0.0005959956,0.000112426074,0.00018974445,0.021851046,0.0035037857,0.0024165276,0.054107152,0.89365554,0.00038564237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99674475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99835664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18478633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18478633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44924548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9455323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084963802","doi":"10.1350/ijep.10.4.280","title":"Without Fear or Favour? Trends and Possibilities in the Canadian Approach to Expert Human Behaviour Evidence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Scientific evidence; Political science; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.22137268798868695,"score_gpt":0.4527667752722754,"score_spread":0.23139408728358843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084963802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007712788,0.042513266,0.005498633,0.8583188,0.0013894237,0.00004435716,0.0002066857,0.00005438828,0.08426165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5684222,0.07325331,0.017833907,0.31250158,0.0030609642,0.00017366582,0.00027889083,0.00018980229,0.024285674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9139148,0.0200765,0.0030368795,0.008063138,0.044373363,0.010535297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8686313,0.060616627,0.003641439,0.004737683,0.052342005,0.010030923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06531967,0.00077076454,0.0017852129,0.0102924965,0.027295519,0.03168588,0.008357217,0.014766187,0.0058029313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12779279,0.0010839604,0.0012167877,0.014791945,0.061436605,0.015739717,0.008819146,0.02496948,0.00054804055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064991036,0.00002987289,0.0020689212,0.00040054464,0.000040221916,0.00022134422,0.010942735,0.00021944582,0.00015424548,0.8979763,0.041978404,0.045903023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010753797,0.000060557817,0.011293235,0.0025070517,0.00013570835,0.00044999638,0.020504951,0.0013690578,0.0004642671,0.3758666,0.586819,0.00042210682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9687312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97913057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18938658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18938658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25385928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9401967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094858247","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.4.329","title":"Reasonable Doubt in Credibility Contests: Sexual Assault and Sexual Equality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Credibility; Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.1403326277753384,"score_gpt":0.410591200654629,"score_spread":0.2702585728792906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094858247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08957842,0.018422592,0.03282699,0.24767578,0.0011066456,0.0000885416,0.00009962037,0.00003613424,0.61016536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885039,0.0015111713,0.00139081,0.0037792297,0.00056608353,0.00003308371,0.000011439836,0.000012002482,0.0041922852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97504497,0.014886336,0.0008572526,0.001413713,0.004852533,0.0029451791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93625313,0.0519102,0.0037360063,0.0020171741,0.0045870584,0.001496394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025386963,0.00046792557,0.0011356587,0.0033668464,0.011196419,0.015415843,0.0028708281,0.018055005,0.0074690026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08017664,0.00053109694,0.00091392425,0.0031609011,0.06615902,0.020186711,0.008931997,0.010636964,0.00041110476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011986082,0.0000045331626,0.00020529446,0.000017304541,0.0000036545969,0.00019803582,0.0031206661,0.000092702176,0.000023193496,0.9939719,0.00078071695,0.0015700826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020276553,0.000008768138,0.0006050777,0.0001577223,0.000011683143,0.0002064421,0.0038252391,0.000519176,0.00010340682,0.9846075,0.0099118715,0.000022721033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041479245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041091576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041479245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015234622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010098296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13426065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121600658","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2007.11.2.75","title":"Improperly Obtained Evidence in the Commonwealth: Lessons for England and Wales?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; English law; Jurisdiction; Law; Convention; Scots law; Common law; Conformity; Legislation; Political science; Position (finance); High Court; Human rights; Sources of law; Economics","score_opus":0.3150991231661772,"score_gpt":0.46799635396163064,"score_spread":0.15289723079545342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121600658","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062408194,0.40261298,0.0023902408,0.4729132,0.0037697484,0.00009001159,0.000103372164,0.000015982028,0.055696305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63444716,0.24442819,0.0032930912,0.096964195,0.0015069913,0.00014467853,0.00008163462,0.0000450265,0.019089041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828126,0.00918125,0.0017179478,0.001079748,0.0028374076,0.0023711396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9455185,0.035466887,0.0027631174,0.002662713,0.009534086,0.004054766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03313495,0.00047886203,0.0015885019,0.004450965,0.0051210024,0.014865192,0.0024729995,0.012213614,0.0037404026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07131706,0.00079721975,0.0007847486,0.0043049296,0.023057826,0.019093603,0.008761719,0.010204064,0.00048678642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022943613,0.00013137184,0.0067303386,0.0038906324,0.00009574893,0.0051558306,0.073375285,0.00054037076,0.00062976626,0.6181669,0.037341174,0.25371313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010132028,0.0004808841,0.039350037,0.02590035,0.00018601533,0.0043105637,0.1321764,0.0005303429,0.0006773241,0.25639063,0.5394795,0.00041669433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34232152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4900426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34232152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02365621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0454714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.680658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132652996","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2006.10.3.157","title":"Expert Evidence of Delay in Complaint in Childhood Sexual Abuse Prosecutions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Plaintiff; Counterintuitive; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Sexual assault; Mythology; Affect (linguistics); Criminology; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Political science; Law; History; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.08593711193608469,"score_gpt":0.3764056797921512,"score_spread":0.29046856785606656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132652996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3990071,0.16613519,0.021877695,0.1753845,0.0046295514,0.000571838,0.0007886361,0.000092595226,0.2315129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535496,0.029130297,0.0038042674,0.009082829,0.0010386194,0.000058085432,0.00013130788,0.000020470878,0.0031844815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94381154,0.030738797,0.008764939,0.0019549346,0.013041501,0.0016883669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3931514,0.5290797,0.04414587,0.008591225,0.022805823,0.0022259867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049181204,0.00022917106,0.0006341744,0.004804182,0.0014771959,0.0038863327,0.0017484331,0.0062156287,0.00537174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44419348,0.00051091955,0.0005519689,0.001562078,0.0051681404,0.0065053944,0.0038525225,0.0046730647,0.0004397509],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002764308,0.00059942424,0.16905263,0.018001629,0.0009404326,0.033813402,0.070471376,0.0023045654,0.0017490392,0.22775695,0.038422104,0.43412426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043981758,0.0023900692,0.22829372,0.059190065,0.0015121788,0.062449567,0.05775303,0.0034467187,0.008780937,0.17668632,0.39845076,0.0006067555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022554905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040676505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049181204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023272897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035493607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26009822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166165129","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2010.14.4.361","title":"Doubting What the Elders Have to Say: A Critical Examination of Canadian Judicial Treatment of Aboriginal Oral History Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Oral history; Notice; Law; Mandate; Supreme court; Sovereignty; Objectivity (philosophy); Rules of evidence; Judicial review; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Common law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20065081271940535,"score_gpt":0.4318830265874217,"score_spread":0.23123221386801637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166165129","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30447504,0.051787615,0.0052268594,0.3454032,0.0023223662,0.00051415345,0.00026865822,0.0000512544,0.28995082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93886554,0.013126181,0.0035871312,0.028186833,0.00044042672,0.000086866465,0.000044773824,0.000033235534,0.01562904],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694244,0.0073634796,0.0017228745,0.0018970065,0.013849879,0.005742362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89905494,0.061017785,0.0024830196,0.0014139417,0.033561967,0.0024683464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04531685,0.0006195504,0.0010295013,0.009218454,0.06537222,0.017970031,0.005532588,0.009001893,0.0017273994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10992273,0.00092288636,0.00077388884,0.009308024,0.04730463,0.006330772,0.0067470153,0.012985755,0.000153481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006435614,0.000027873615,0.00572787,0.00067671225,0.00004820508,0.0031631954,0.48829117,0.00036815408,0.00061926275,0.4388198,0.02941614,0.032777313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006099361,0.00005252861,0.022417465,0.003787754,0.00034279132,0.00097339106,0.4242629,0.0011834914,0.0016683245,0.081473306,0.46332964,0.000447416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97798425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15636638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15636638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26803875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9784954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209528132","doi":"","title":"Doubting what the Elders have to say","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Law; Mandate; Objectivity (philosophy); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Oral history; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Rules of evidence; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.17541120754902445,"score_gpt":0.4751415685260832,"score_spread":0.29973036097705874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209528132","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03563401,0.014696274,0.0029790634,0.8595072,0.007613333,0.000026221483,0.00017469081,0.00003558912,0.07933374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51056486,0.015644744,0.002927903,0.43293384,0.0048808297,0.0000354104,0.00014360565,0.0000640073,0.03280485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248976,0.0032995848,0.000607092,0.0006533577,0.0019467236,0.0010034617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97177774,0.014262759,0.0023962448,0.0017119522,0.0070873774,0.0027638876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020494632,0.0003609916,0.0010687419,0.000983225,0.010205451,0.0074194833,0.001356487,0.008820334,0.0073122415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06077567,0.0004159297,0.00057381263,0.00065889896,0.030755008,0.014303794,0.0053497376,0.011002997,0.002151416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016993035,0.000100084086,0.013191472,0.00091117306,0.00012928506,0.004280705,0.19173187,0.00017936056,0.001520473,0.4032826,0.27510494,0.10939812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033668235,0.000064171734,0.003920662,0.0023454416,0.00010405219,0.0018924454,0.1641777,0.00013448618,0.0009128104,0.21270148,0.6135844,0.0001287132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034772854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051900756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034772854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003905339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015023925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10838723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225482477","doi":"10.1177/1365712715613485","title":"Confessions to Mr Big","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Scrutiny; Legislation; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Common law; Political science; High Court; History","score_opus":0.37595815438136426,"score_gpt":0.4723487127284619,"score_spread":0.09639055834709764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225482477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33377233,0.009016468,0.009090466,0.13746211,0.009218268,0.0003205161,0.0006930617,0.0003522804,0.50007445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85342926,0.0018561161,0.0024369457,0.047132686,0.0015469448,0.00006644376,0.0001849526,0.00007583537,0.09327085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584585,0.0014746411,0.00024567766,0.0004155844,0.0013134142,0.0007049011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926805,0.003226107,0.001238222,0.0006465308,0.0015221011,0.0006865274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034825008,0.0003192273,0.00039119748,0.00083380536,0.0073005175,0.0023030196,0.0008433709,0.0032739206,0.006748875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026816506,0.00034342328,0.00043045552,0.00058657274,0.005165322,0.0018940638,0.0036980934,0.0061324863,0.0014104062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034270014,0.00007260024,0.010765917,0.0005134062,0.00008330568,0.017785251,0.17898393,0.00021303182,0.005335404,0.34289357,0.3166154,0.12639546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018021861,0.00022158887,0.011964773,0.00064436183,0.000052720083,0.015182849,0.04030983,0.0003667811,0.0040668705,0.022608306,0.90440696,0.00015701799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034650233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06315193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034650233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031107024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040840316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06889713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2225487473","doi":"10.1177/1365712715613479","title":"The expert witness’s duty of impartiality in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Supreme court; Duty; Law; Expert witness; Political science; Trial court; Prejudice (legal term); Witness","score_opus":0.3275671409319637,"score_gpt":0.5168705083783651,"score_spread":0.18930336744640142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2225487473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02669197,0.058694553,0.013503,0.33675167,0.0062519256,0.00025204357,0.0003032941,0.00008922546,0.5574623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6986017,0.043174572,0.010081607,0.15459572,0.0029472609,0.00014885985,0.00014699374,0.00007459504,0.090228714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805993,0.0025088126,0.00089780823,0.0012987142,0.009798812,0.0048966315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98143345,0.009471417,0.000743926,0.0005438738,0.0063428427,0.0014644903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01089824,0.0004521691,0.00075831404,0.0020188487,0.012863069,0.00893681,0.0033998387,0.012687998,0.0049829287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03864114,0.00060665363,0.0010901879,0.002410824,0.011173115,0.004359057,0.0042566056,0.009340995,0.000447495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026000269,0.0000157832,0.001426351,0.0002347501,0.000028017175,0.0016454387,0.004224549,0.00050032156,0.00021935815,0.89521694,0.06597919,0.030483237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007594473,0.000044334265,0.006544554,0.0023014443,0.0001801737,0.0013599647,0.00542162,0.001575904,0.00079468236,0.13696553,0.8445064,0.00022941132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9513289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.972772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059408717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059408717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18440673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43104243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264043653","doi":"10.1177/1365712715591462","title":"Aging witnesses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Witness; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Psychology; Criminology; Population; Order (exchange); Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.31055819875318924,"score_gpt":0.4578514390084516,"score_spread":0.14729324025526236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264043653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6624046,0.06757792,0.012088705,0.061734203,0.011540679,0.0003714174,0.0013946244,0.00014300174,0.18274483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8820045,0.03978717,0.0039712344,0.015824594,0.0029264793,0.00014743026,0.0006433701,0.00006654969,0.054628715],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856925,0.00049372186,0.00014078508,0.00025105698,0.0003471757,0.00019798348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938956,0.0018208215,0.0012285658,0.0007217433,0.0010860891,0.0012471919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034024345,0.00045480704,0.00044647092,0.0013194613,0.00326833,0.002198558,0.0005979885,0.0015098318,0.016982716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020431342,0.00026248346,0.0004472063,0.00070986693,0.0016336186,0.00477196,0.0042979755,0.0025371148,0.0027995664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000521762,0.0002358965,0.11146255,0.0016195823,0.0001927499,0.018131576,0.18050545,0.00021891952,0.006692498,0.09625622,0.14382495,0.4403378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028806717,0.00031522475,0.052774042,0.0020377426,0.00011337826,0.025851173,0.10614307,0.00015977815,0.0015826421,0.024439234,0.7864749,0.000080114034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018318127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036150825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016982716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007859186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090967934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056812823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312190782","doi":"10.1177/136571270200600103","title":"The Trouble with <i>Teixeira</i>: Developing a Principled Approach to Entrapment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrapment; Supreme court; Covert; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Authorization; Computer security; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.224766889043869,"score_gpt":0.3583476129868369,"score_spread":0.13358072394296794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312190782","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023071874,0.007495318,0.278554,0.49815014,0.0022749125,0.00073740835,0.00020061246,0.00020780426,0.189308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6935428,0.0027133063,0.18460877,0.09965287,0.002190183,0.0015571328,0.00007426313,0.00021321562,0.015447395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9066071,0.045059834,0.006894856,0.012185033,0.02567634,0.0035768726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938949,0.036646068,0.0046870387,0.012231245,0.0065989504,0.0008876987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09620736,0.0007516279,0.0019159019,0.0030780523,0.010937834,0.021250248,0.007663503,0.024207508,0.0014695995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08730268,0.0015580656,0.002628108,0.0015917843,0.117772415,0.019703925,0.014007915,0.0381404,0.00071515917],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006922332,0.000007834685,0.00009574904,0.000043011813,0.000008168488,0.00003569037,0.0015732214,0.00017321782,0.00006902296,0.99343044,0.0018757466,0.002681029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024333805,0.00001989377,0.0001883315,0.0003260631,0.000013355511,0.000119878496,0.00063511013,0.0005687249,0.00034030763,0.9739105,0.023815908,0.000037466354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0127225155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013752115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09620736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011010699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02959566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5087992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338304353","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.448","title":"Hearsay by Implication: <i>R</i> v <i>Baldree</i>","year":2014,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0907127877805838,"score_gpt":0.3793831550748223,"score_spread":0.2886703672942385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338304353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006325491,0.002331703,0.0082770735,0.5504589,0.032602,0.00008893224,0.0004018233,0.00041489,0.3990993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2675777,0.0012054573,0.0036042056,0.37575874,0.015150016,0.00014399576,0.00018263265,0.00042354202,0.33595374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964761,0.0010037931,0.0002106327,0.00097192655,0.0008349942,0.0005025419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919709,0.0045636054,0.00046195177,0.0005510599,0.0020541216,0.00039832114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037427119,0.00046991825,0.0007210376,0.0007762819,0.005832372,0.0063247276,0.0021797856,0.010959313,0.036965057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036509275,0.00042055675,0.0005868767,0.00054576725,0.005205554,0.004504936,0.0026300563,0.013166782,0.009639668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054509586,0.000014575193,0.00043375295,0.00007393216,0.000021137565,0.00059337536,0.0028432067,0.000046045567,0.00047412366,0.3704295,0.6123701,0.012645734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039595674,0.000029422677,0.0011455405,0.00027473475,0.000052390602,0.0011516853,0.003050635,0.0005829236,0.0016742464,0.15476447,0.83714694,0.00008751004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03735504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041382704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03735504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036966025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045393645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123660386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753352173","doi":"10.1177/1365712717725536","title":"The diverging dictionaries of science and law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Notice; Scientific evidence; Phenomenon; Scientific terminology; Scientific literature; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19170868311105088,"score_gpt":0.44679948621731846,"score_spread":0.2550908031062676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753352173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5073721,0.013741072,0.23371333,0.04533835,0.0034876273,0.00084910047,0.003962538,0.00074905064,0.19078693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9214,0.003418338,0.06243628,0.0052245357,0.00047928767,0.0004741999,0.001694763,0.00034715826,0.0045253327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9707822,0.014693999,0.004779418,0.0016303047,0.007671846,0.00044224743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85334766,0.09448501,0.01857035,0.017501708,0.013983985,0.0021112538],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012073721,0.0003848429,0.0007652555,0.00823387,0.00221214,0.0058204043,0.001192756,0.0012093391,0.004495144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11199492,0.0004891579,0.0003169517,0.009513324,0.009045219,0.0072575193,0.005404239,0.0033319832,0.0012448794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004966331,0.0001540346,0.04710255,0.003041842,0.00012632125,0.0008304378,0.115125194,0.00089443807,0.010400894,0.54900116,0.023884926,0.24894154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069188674,0.00022613407,0.12749709,0.00474843,0.00012990384,0.0038325088,0.07480417,0.0063222013,0.004846954,0.36166477,0.41564614,0.00021242154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019276224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031345868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99778783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022272344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023945053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06385273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2776141614","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746420","title":"<i>R</i> v <i>Bradshaw</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Supreme court; Reliability (semiconductor); Test (biology); Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.268432360058455,"score_gpt":0.458226880767542,"score_spread":0.18979452070908698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2776141614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013244171,0.0034979957,0.0072292974,0.6191052,0.010798873,0.00027033922,0.0015665249,0.0008323723,0.3434553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10689364,0.0011088524,0.0071370797,0.77878106,0.0024622232,0.00014871906,0.00030323822,0.00024811193,0.10291705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843424,0.0012710909,0.0009210941,0.0019945044,0.0071491646,0.004321804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854935,0.0061441096,0.000600898,0.00079788006,0.0058019008,0.0011617603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010515241,0.0006722676,0.0012475455,0.0014402693,0.016165996,0.012889221,0.0064535425,0.033630546,0.009319738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030045563,0.0014310866,0.002544817,0.0018416861,0.011246422,0.002997206,0.0030465543,0.028846022,0.00411915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045568206,0.000026888296,0.0009856311,0.00007689559,0.000029985851,0.00047278093,0.0018302386,0.00021585797,0.0007375397,0.36746517,0.62205184,0.00606155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069436996,0.000055212582,0.0045168637,0.0004847752,0.000114200484,0.000382467,0.002442258,0.001098678,0.003381639,0.05471176,0.9324028,0.00033994118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8597223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9283252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8597223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03222956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059068676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28220755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779496185","doi":"10.1177/1365712717746419","title":"Unconfirmed accelerants","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arson; Fire investigation; Forensic engineering; Accidental; Flammable liquid; Computer security; History; Engineering; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Waste management","score_opus":0.355893954199186,"score_gpt":0.5025763803040952,"score_spread":0.14668242610490922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779496185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4984065,0.005262158,0.07424992,0.05339667,0.007825648,0.00086165784,0.0010382126,0.0003540877,0.35860518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92243904,0.0016547,0.024113752,0.014498866,0.0008720812,0.00013330708,0.00022869368,0.00004714458,0.03601228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810891,0.0054533696,0.0017237434,0.0023776523,0.008075896,0.0012802159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91406673,0.0562197,0.008436338,0.0065082195,0.0136151565,0.0011538444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025913414,0.00068378675,0.0005804053,0.0018763614,0.0028481216,0.0029823724,0.0025114801,0.005034649,0.006475504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10614712,0.0003604153,0.00057515636,0.00087079714,0.0031464535,0.002375869,0.0027488663,0.004630953,0.0023568335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013209031,0.0003683645,0.096941,0.0035323605,0.00036060804,0.029919306,0.077573195,0.0009800567,0.02793268,0.3667236,0.094627075,0.2997209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012945768,0.0013657366,0.055110916,0.007107883,0.0012308946,0.034944728,0.042682245,0.006510066,0.09771842,0.11218784,0.6407289,0.00028291476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016978428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004091414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025913414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011701303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028716624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1370449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804938249","doi":"10.1177/1365712718782990","title":"Gender discrimination and juries in the 20th century","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Political science; Politics; Franchise; Law; Inequality; Sociology; Jury selection","score_opus":0.1937705289059404,"score_gpt":0.4461225939343225,"score_spread":0.25235206502838214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804938249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61325616,0.031895753,0.001685467,0.06298696,0.0012459289,0.00004545196,0.00008687503,0.000015669444,0.2887817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707111,0.004047664,0.00027085454,0.006448144,0.00038659765,0.000034714507,0.000022472655,0.000018208946,0.018060243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823642,0.0071738744,0.0011048366,0.0015673621,0.0040246705,0.0037652026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98785967,0.0055323415,0.0022167682,0.0004986923,0.002151397,0.0017411016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022261305,0.0002478099,0.0008358016,0.002230889,0.018959083,0.008458899,0.0010505875,0.0036736678,0.0061220936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030047316,0.0004108311,0.0002846965,0.0014819123,0.035628103,0.0045058215,0.007871432,0.004862853,0.000614965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019091705,0.000114062896,0.010326733,0.000158918,0.000020324283,0.00071167084,0.36525953,0.00011504765,0.000577294,0.5845543,0.0058642193,0.03210693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005727954,0.0002984798,0.044994287,0.001265566,0.000015735899,0.0008314798,0.14943595,0.00011838018,0.0010019618,0.101730496,0.70013386,0.0001165681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032418888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053001385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032418888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012668461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009681342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11773044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887570016","doi":"10.1177/1365712718787523","title":"Social science and humanities evidence in <i>Charter</i> litigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Charter; Sociology; Humanities; Political science; Digital humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.3473604263806609,"score_gpt":0.5234327946804664,"score_spread":0.17607236829980555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887570016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05737198,0.0107344575,0.005125755,0.5209102,0.0016859688,0.00012652208,0.0001441455,0.000054435724,0.40384644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85853076,0.0051424126,0.0037336373,0.11873203,0.0013013474,0.00006317616,0.00006238234,0.000025946216,0.012408381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9592802,0.016363502,0.0015784317,0.0017340715,0.012503558,0.008540178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8928191,0.08865608,0.0048397463,0.0020973505,0.0074457084,0.004141953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044357758,0.00035268767,0.0007342817,0.0040419684,0.029049646,0.022424804,0.0032301622,0.019583363,0.003526328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10005597,0.00062121695,0.0007299745,0.004014335,0.04275089,0.011142563,0.0062041907,0.016505945,0.000324301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001316246,0.000021705926,0.0018126566,0.000096543255,0.00001095193,0.0011111787,0.020190757,0.00014943618,0.00009776051,0.9434599,0.025236556,0.007799334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007645098,0.000081848804,0.010237699,0.002970092,0.000116537914,0.0012430983,0.058722362,0.0011012674,0.0014991655,0.44333977,0.4803932,0.00021851278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46563995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61522794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46563995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03639674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074717276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9258592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914773908","doi":"10.1177/1365712718824123","title":"The ‘Corroborative Rule’ from a comparative and critical perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Convict; Mistake; Law; Jury; Statute; Reasonable doubt; Order (exchange); Common law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.16362823244949623,"score_gpt":0.4585632105028251,"score_spread":0.2949349780533289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914773908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070827636,0.07740225,0.1897823,0.14725882,0.0082391435,0.00043946205,0.00063431356,0.00017518208,0.5689859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65725636,0.047576085,0.1635186,0.057891775,0.020344429,0.002249474,0.00074635627,0.00030122837,0.05011572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95936334,0.02608429,0.0025009424,0.0042558573,0.0066382713,0.0011572228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9383528,0.049829405,0.002747099,0.0040449905,0.004556119,0.00046958143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042930987,0.0010869389,0.0014348323,0.006193829,0.0055127554,0.013038255,0.0037835878,0.010965187,0.0061984393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04854865,0.0008882102,0.0016884055,0.0038198065,0.04750474,0.021251027,0.0046087303,0.010513817,0.0018727677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055822356,0.0000030223464,0.000035770303,0.00014604998,0.0000087422895,0.000099493474,0.0009094054,0.00008149149,0.0000660639,0.9934673,0.0026599593,0.0025170948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013733093,0.00003193012,0.00017320873,0.000685078,0.000025730282,0.00031460228,0.00069934054,0.00036286275,0.00039854101,0.7782592,0.21900326,0.000032519114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036496834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029407777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042930987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006911597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061248126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22704351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915908076","doi":"10.1177/1365712718813795","title":"Taking the dialectical stance in reasoning with evidence and proof","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Dialectic; Probabilistic logic; Probabilistic argumentation; Computer science; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Deductive reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.21378075721919323,"score_gpt":0.44687740980815743,"score_spread":0.2330966525889642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915908076","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066567827,0.001189107,0.95554245,0.008455078,0.00019279413,0.00008854717,0.00008047432,0.000105488136,0.027689327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42219707,0.0011765136,0.5705655,0.0011406369,0.0003290824,0.0004287116,0.000120754135,0.00009486991,0.0039468952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776464,0.014647642,0.0013903008,0.0018524779,0.003985523,0.0004777441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9603273,0.029825326,0.0022212176,0.004378799,0.0024254837,0.0008217855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021314595,0.0012433669,0.0013587245,0.0065871133,0.0037550319,0.011109747,0.00379836,0.005622028,0.0054377792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04398066,0.0011403712,0.0026116364,0.0038845707,0.02412361,0.030452244,0.0116333775,0.005788429,0.000876294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075780686,0.0000061022297,0.000109671135,0.000039031278,0.00001280269,0.000038210543,0.00040689192,0.0009850265,0.000046223126,0.99499303,0.00013412045,0.0032214168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007651112,0.00000764845,0.000036584395,0.000028977036,0.000011538818,0.000040270323,0.000094884366,0.00348915,0.00010791625,0.9932852,0.0028825197,0.0000076337365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001671557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016121945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021314595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038339563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025056254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11272371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947122861","doi":"10.1177/1365712719851133","title":"The detection of deception during trials: Ignoring the nonverbal communication of witnesses is not the solution—A response to Vrij and Turgeon (2018)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Credibility; Nonverbal communication; Psychology; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Lie detection; Trustworthiness; Epistemology; Developmental psychology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.12923555786404836,"score_gpt":0.4052362004551724,"score_spread":0.276000642591124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947122861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014470553,0.0038068097,0.0029641218,0.9858716,0.0045358287,0.000012581493,0.000034671564,0.000029507146,0.0012978218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04912897,0.004971346,0.004905972,0.9297505,0.009458276,0.000072185496,0.000034363085,0.00009081382,0.0015875896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9042664,0.05823114,0.007166011,0.011549913,0.01700592,0.0017805718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.367438,0.5452966,0.028152743,0.013816515,0.0413969,0.0038993077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11186648,0.0012088703,0.0016613187,0.0019645772,0.0073141977,0.012235788,0.0057256846,0.034118004,0.00455415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36487395,0.0011574466,0.0013108798,0.0017660528,0.030645339,0.023146823,0.007779668,0.057231408,0.0038623232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032123193,0.00010162084,0.004052454,0.0017870563,0.00019236217,0.001275885,0.0594074,0.00039951262,0.001796218,0.11243987,0.6934278,0.124798544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011908187,0.00025956595,0.005998009,0.008953574,0.00020174553,0.00619445,0.061575174,0.0016625082,0.0039031443,0.21002589,0.70055526,0.00055155397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006025523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006495337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11186648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053681796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007675878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59161353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082028856","doi":"","title":"Social media-Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.31877108067362686,"score_gpt":0.4632453971916218,"score_spread":0.14447431651799492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082028856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008878496,0.008323472,0.0010562676,0.054223318,0.005039979,0.00047979812,0.10449647,0.0011378697,0.8163642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029960137,0.0035336944,0.00123369,0.0042311507,0.00024838332,0.00016110226,0.014797074,0.00034789642,0.94548684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515885,0.000248181,0.0001200947,0.00046753418,0.002716261,0.0012891574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882782,0.0006319122,0.00018848859,0.00031589568,0.00755926,0.003026234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020441583,0.0009284755,0.00075490656,0.0033248889,0.009121391,0.010661364,0.001789316,0.002557521,0.17792484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007374826,0.0006471167,0.00091565656,0.0054878327,0.0015363253,0.002458234,0.0028958102,0.0031878203,0.034969196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012732057,0.00008195972,0.0028398118,0.00017398942,0.00001673951,0.00010760658,0.00021250523,0.00015291953,0.0001478802,0.023079835,0.923614,0.049445372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005038143,0.000019882818,0.008154796,0.00015754523,0.00001339782,0.000039221122,0.00066812313,0.00021863313,0.00025185454,0.0013452542,0.98905355,0.000027420163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98802584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99223197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8220751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054894276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23823588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5952179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124354858","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.1.308","title":"Weaknesses of Adjudication in the Face of Secret Evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Secrecy; Acknowledgement; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Confidentiality; Law and economics; Strengths and weaknesses; Masking (illustration); Internet privacy; Law; Computer security; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.19723020262983734,"score_gpt":0.4376579170917017,"score_spread":0.24042771446186437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124354858","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034515128,0.013518439,0.43722093,0.41371447,0.007002552,0.0038381156,0.00044790455,0.000516982,0.089225486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59216726,0.0063335174,0.2794445,0.09786073,0.0064731007,0.005824499,0.00018447965,0.00039819002,0.011313711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.26944077,0.5034856,0.059597034,0.022952704,0.13852315,0.006000711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1575002,0.7048834,0.024195984,0.054870956,0.05592322,0.0026262724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.58430034,0.0011938262,0.0036160853,0.009216721,0.012801234,0.021127785,0.01270007,0.020828702,0.0028165288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.73612964,0.002639288,0.0022075744,0.0068408065,0.052157026,0.022553245,0.019636434,0.030481191,0.0028342947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038003622,0.00008136186,0.0043483158,0.0023244864,0.0002899405,0.0009308837,0.028450193,0.0014881899,0.0010397339,0.7772672,0.02942338,0.1539762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018067635,0.00011155366,0.0014844028,0.004612408,0.00013967765,0.0013344504,0.0057936953,0.005111721,0.0015443504,0.84106743,0.13830844,0.0003111568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004939328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045362865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58430034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009057155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022246664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5126318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124416878","doi":"10.1177/1365712717690752","title":"Loosening the law’s bite: Law, fact, and expert evidence in <i>R</i> v <i>JA</i> and <i>R</i> v <i>NS</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Framing (construction); Law; Face (sociological concept); Status quo; Hearsay; Political science; Sociology; History; Social science","score_opus":0.21898713318697063,"score_gpt":0.4240047522478299,"score_spread":0.20501761906085927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124416878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043212213,0.015646886,0.015006315,0.7318355,0.0016749746,0.00009122285,0.000119758864,0.00005068584,0.19236243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8641071,0.006493478,0.007980099,0.10482662,0.0017425161,0.00008208467,0.000060860748,0.00008252918,0.014624769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97388136,0.011256578,0.0010546583,0.0018958249,0.0078091775,0.0041024406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94119465,0.04809109,0.001883381,0.0020679084,0.005257064,0.0015058983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040594295,0.0006239405,0.0012049525,0.004232084,0.023629496,0.032515645,0.0044630948,0.023982752,0.0038371775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08163026,0.001131937,0.0009874547,0.003082281,0.090344064,0.032400344,0.008508516,0.026754802,0.00041272966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001730876,0.00001208072,0.0005488668,0.000062376246,0.000011998978,0.0007057288,0.01633218,0.00013238277,0.00012245215,0.9636953,0.010719816,0.007639628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042517822,0.000028935852,0.0025005655,0.0012170494,0.000058712543,0.00053630647,0.03295133,0.0009431062,0.0006004177,0.7894349,0.17152318,0.00016297736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44659105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55569875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44659105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033344224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035813324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8879832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161670791","doi":"10.1177/13657127211011236","title":"The exclusion of prison informant evidence for unreliability in New Zealand","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Gatekeeping; Jury; Suspect; Supreme court; Deference; Criminology; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.1801210453341474,"score_gpt":0.4501539560224675,"score_spread":0.2700329106883201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161670791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.738574,0.017387427,0.012346394,0.11039846,0.0009831511,0.00044342462,0.00029661,0.000029581703,0.119540974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757907,0.0063320957,0.006912571,0.004649111,0.00015476729,0.000078949,0.00006025895,0.000025115785,0.005996483],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98701465,0.0036755418,0.0022167463,0.0008989325,0.0053771143,0.0008169912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96083516,0.02075901,0.0071596163,0.003116211,0.0069294022,0.0012006201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026889563,0.00023400414,0.00065584475,0.0026385265,0.0032922628,0.0058267703,0.0015708767,0.0016999656,0.0022149908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09727756,0.00050278194,0.0005604439,0.0013925398,0.009500433,0.004111177,0.0053839777,0.00400909,0.00021561694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001136237,0.00014116276,0.08781964,0.0034065323,0.00022607819,0.023625206,0.23392494,0.0007925657,0.013129858,0.28283983,0.018236523,0.3347214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020919208,0.0005739081,0.33941886,0.015696188,0.0006744391,0.019744035,0.10697719,0.0019964154,0.008924123,0.0933995,0.41179922,0.00058695336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28055292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47903296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28055292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009192382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01891709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5578399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239874989","doi":"10.1177/1365712718765194","title":"Case commentaries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.19834108773363063,"score_gpt":0.4309837070251528,"score_spread":0.2326426192915222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239874989","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008785628,0.0036593482,0.0020190887,0.7032442,0.0753872,0.0006110866,0.0007476612,0.00023908439,0.20530665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04894894,0.0020724733,0.00096179626,0.72949684,0.0158354,0.0008978788,0.00024060825,0.00015499009,0.20139104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98317873,0.0042266995,0.0016737714,0.003100771,0.004261154,0.0035587829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94844115,0.036726683,0.002558707,0.0032919152,0.0070395293,0.0019419692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012929725,0.001295902,0.001245616,0.0037097812,0.013181462,0.006239937,0.006651187,0.06362189,0.04755514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1232374,0.0010703666,0.0026371102,0.0021311105,0.005569154,0.0045310487,0.006136475,0.04140317,0.013382565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001053428,0.000050695708,0.00059737364,0.00022826159,0.000030170571,0.016858539,0.003793855,0.0000899405,0.0004497565,0.043072846,0.92808455,0.0066388077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039323906,0.000023276834,0.0006397856,0.00064923504,0.0000511867,0.0051750084,0.0041900566,0.0001652007,0.00051780813,0.010771274,0.9777231,0.000054796557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0109194275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019236935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06362189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007014087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007816599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15908784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240803306","doi":"10.1177/1365712719893192","title":"Case commentary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07591591282140106,"score_gpt":0.34522714230786683,"score_spread":0.2693112294864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240803306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018602684,0.007949333,0.0004162623,0.8452526,0.061418287,0.000060913655,0.00012746765,0.000060533177,0.0828543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0736688,0.013250555,0.0010797222,0.69174856,0.14779149,0.00021537411,0.00019888859,0.000085734544,0.07196089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626166,0.0010468971,0.00038636307,0.00062053115,0.0010262127,0.00065834075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860444,0.0071958485,0.001254152,0.0007419682,0.0027879523,0.0019757724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002913778,0.0005991531,0.0009868296,0.0023201462,0.004196555,0.0039729304,0.0027579556,0.03093036,0.04210642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05489111,0.00060386275,0.0011208582,0.0011599659,0.003813996,0.0035283023,0.0027434297,0.016871594,0.01087987],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002087137,0.000014608046,0.0008045233,0.0002508749,0.000020585348,0.0575209,0.00044862268,0.0000632034,0.0000869123,0.019520678,0.9078518,0.013396414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025244488,0.000010632397,0.0004518275,0.0012458713,0.0000309281,0.06936268,0.0011108683,0.00010062841,0.00008434868,0.013463887,0.91408706,0.000026115751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029418725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006075667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04210642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042988528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065005547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14086002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240971876","doi":"10.1177/1365712719853154","title":"Case commentary","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Child Abuse and Related Trauma","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.07591591282140106,"score_gpt":0.34522714230786683,"score_spread":0.2693112294864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240971876","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018602684,0.007949333,0.0004162623,0.8452526,0.061418287,0.000060913655,0.00012746765,0.000060533177,0.0828543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0736688,0.013250555,0.0010797222,0.69174856,0.14779149,0.00021537411,0.00019888859,0.000085734544,0.07196089],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626166,0.0010468971,0.00038636307,0.00062053115,0.0010262127,0.00065834075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860444,0.0071958485,0.001254152,0.0007419682,0.0027879523,0.0019757724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002913778,0.0005991531,0.0009868296,0.0023201462,0.004196555,0.0039729304,0.0027579556,0.03093036,0.04210642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05489111,0.00060386275,0.0011208582,0.0011599659,0.003813996,0.0035283023,0.0027434297,0.016871594,0.01087987],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002087137,0.000014608046,0.0008045233,0.0002508749,0.000020585348,0.0575209,0.00044862268,0.0000632034,0.0000869123,0.019520678,0.9078518,0.013396414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025244488,0.000010632397,0.0004518275,0.0012458713,0.0000309281,0.06936268,0.0011108683,0.00010062841,0.00008434868,0.013463887,0.91408706,0.000026115751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029418725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006075667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04210642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042988528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065005547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14086002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243586645","doi":"10.1177/1365712719874633","title":"Noticeboard","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.11548024713816081,"score_gpt":0.36593201499132005,"score_spread":0.25045176785315926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243586645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059033296,0.00069879164,0.0033031397,0.018933728,0.029256392,0.0005301432,0.008861758,0.006904365,0.93092126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026214512,0.00034903345,0.0010309016,0.004755661,0.0033385896,0.00017726049,0.0034018974,0.0017003404,0.9826249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619615,0.0006365214,0.00021094136,0.00040958435,0.0020972379,0.00044967484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795929,0.0054739597,0.0008388843,0.002877606,0.008010654,0.0032058756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037788514,0.0011095168,0.0009036986,0.0029877024,0.0026008415,0.0081683155,0.0019885944,0.0038039754,0.8441926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036860213,0.0006377997,0.00081522414,0.0017657317,0.00079116545,0.004543029,0.0040679327,0.004176937,0.63493973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035449855,0.000012115644,0.000036750956,0.000043063606,9.401947e-7,0.000020922858,0.000024594794,0.000009311515,0.00007093518,0.0013570702,0.97820115,0.02018769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010249173,0.0000063060215,0.000096464006,0.000030691288,0.0000011469277,0.000016367514,0.0000393563,0.000020851581,0.000060796978,0.00091281,0.9988003,0.0000046333157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004349395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007195631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15580738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015669514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039515616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22224021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310248845","doi":"10.1177/13657127221139506","title":"The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.16063495164697966,"score_gpt":0.401471797130705,"score_spread":0.24083684548372536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310248845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4694578,0.09778178,0.0020477944,0.067235224,0.001021457,0.00004526496,0.00037342808,0.00009574516,0.36194152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639595,0.027979843,0.0004914964,0.0029146483,0.0003566267,0.000012713147,0.00009164208,0.000018202476,0.0041753454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725133,0.00051562383,0.00019676452,0.0003139003,0.0012119809,0.0005103411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934307,0.0032638274,0.0013581577,0.00035644032,0.0013371275,0.0002538343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020257093,0.00015179157,0.00022291887,0.0038030634,0.0049866517,0.009658647,0.0011684535,0.0016048134,0.0029911688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00663655,0.0003418468,0.0002817223,0.0041417177,0.012551478,0.002854747,0.0025764583,0.0034448595,0.0003153019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008635648,0.000057457837,0.017577522,0.001234192,0.000030217687,0.0019689652,0.047036767,0.0005511861,0.0022726825,0.7865444,0.0074921637,0.1351482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016394262,0.00016660114,0.12230148,0.0037168744,0.0001584535,0.0062846285,0.09361873,0.0005437039,0.0027698106,0.06809045,0.7020914,0.00024143493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027482256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0344031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027482256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008756233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009177051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06353122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408557619","doi":"10.1177/13657127251326782","title":"Beliefs about deception in Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14903274049711543,"score_gpt":0.46555814504628235,"score_spread":0.3165254045491669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408557619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991928,0.00069232535,0.00014734126,0.0011386237,0.000021413434,0.000017737028,0.000020264746,0.0000026277492,0.006031795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832755,0.00049340475,0.00007093649,0.00024330823,0.0000071263826,0.000008577511,0.000009144629,0.0000015095237,0.0008384581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981463,0.0007117585,0.00014647417,0.00015824904,0.0006395782,0.00019767608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99262154,0.00191063,0.0022638252,0.0003467954,0.0018432899,0.0010138187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028953063,0.00017291351,0.00032959075,0.0008865977,0.0015788781,0.0013195687,0.0004834482,0.00045276879,0.0028893652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014960494,0.00022544556,0.0002011729,0.0006501479,0.0016020797,0.0010235289,0.0016759352,0.0015774725,0.0002446108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015180136,0.0003978525,0.534092,0.00040340063,0.000111821835,0.0010237249,0.34998184,0.00013616927,0.0018057735,0.0035948486,0.0024218042,0.10587893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135404525,0.0004566442,0.9141547,0.00046711936,0.000056466895,0.000758912,0.071000546,0.00039398388,0.00028433942,0.0014237785,0.010942182,0.000047833382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06355036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053090725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06355036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022228304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002011273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1263609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}