{"meta":{"query_hash":"32f273833c09","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship"},"cohort_total":68,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":68,"exported":68,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/32f273833c09","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Academic+Librarianship"},"results":[{"id":"W1501189164","doi":"10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00276-2","title":"Unobtrusive evaluation of reference service and individual responsibility: the canadian experience,","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Urban forest; Environmental planning; Stakeholder; Business; Environmental resource management; Urban planning; Urban climate; Greenhouse gas; Psychological resilience; Ecosystem services; Stakeholder engagement; Forest management; Urban ecosystem; Geography; Political science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Economics; Public relations; Forestry","score_opus":0.15048177334989443,"score_gpt":0.3249665904533331,"score_spread":0.17448481710343866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501189164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97621584,0.000561529,0.000006101075,0.018199934,0.00006067613,0.00020287793,0.0000054694437,0.0000027860196,0.00474479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637556,0.00028799722,0.00007573701,0.00301634,0.000089209585,0.0000021738115,7.5883423e-7,0.000006561025,0.00014567068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765295,0.00076767034,0.0003882567,0.000103078295,0.00085393566,0.00023413885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987425,0.00037056184,0.00038489784,0.00024269437,0.000057209498,0.0002021393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059073074,0.00009256505,0.00013864752,0.000068360394,0.00027661212,0.000026934698,0.0007559224,0.00013845747,0.000669789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026550447,0.000050543968,0.000021773401,0.00048858864,0.00030657952,0.00067717803,0.000117540374,0.00076356746,0.000015916552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022976738,0.00001012564,0.95892256,0.0000050623244,0.000020232264,0.0000025769118,0.029845154,0.00020900604,0.00057260157,0.00061614433,0.0029658638,0.006600902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037661768,0.00009701054,0.9794069,0.0000374403,0.000102787795,0.00014419781,0.0048021176,0.00030635434,0.00013506279,0.009018259,0.005496113,0.00007711952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024648074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08469093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060042854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001469403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005731365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98184687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972664802","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2011.03.004","title":"Keeping Moving: Smart Phone and Mobile Technologies in the Academic Library","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Preparedness; Mobile phone; Library management; Mobile device; Phone; Perception; Computer science; Academic library; Multimedia; Mobile technology; World Wide Web; Medical education; Library science; Business; Psychology; Medicine; Management; Marketing; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04198657034816538,"score_gpt":0.2570298935849484,"score_spread":0.215043323236783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972664802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494837,0.013884391,0.0085876295,0.023362502,0.0007410805,0.0004331077,5.8012165e-7,0.00024772334,0.0032592642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885417,0.0035495525,0.0061896727,0.00138629,0.00021593262,0.000016934813,2.6814038e-7,0.00001793771,0.00008166578],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978794,0.00064619625,0.00062815537,0.00018144182,0.00034069267,0.00032410814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977433,0.0010970267,0.0005835559,0.0004971625,0.00002086507,0.000058055837],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026124327,0.00016212903,0.00021406602,0.0003116537,0.0001400246,0.00012299923,0.0041880617,0.00032425282,0.00001926024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036100534,0.00009378723,0.000049579165,0.00085064524,0.0002267426,0.0043989727,0.0005036448,0.0034540263,0.00001276596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027778847,0.00019720601,0.29649302,0.00013752209,0.00011126946,0.00008002314,0.2804163,0.00043399975,0.004961705,0.082651995,0.025136404,0.30910274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001933374,0.00096204696,0.33038765,0.0017636218,0.00012586499,0.0040107006,0.052694272,0.006092521,0.025254449,0.5430131,0.03270168,0.0010607513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006195443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.4327424e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46036106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002172984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019891202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972694649","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2005.04.005","title":"The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Researchers in the Humanities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Digital humanities; Exploratory research; Psychology; Information seeking; Sample (material); Humanities; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.1920541147815348,"score_gpt":0.3791034512942355,"score_spread":0.1870493365127007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972694649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7313092,0.0012062852,0.00006889394,0.19356878,0.00041800697,0.00043281913,0.0000036159884,0.000015429885,0.07297699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901147,0.0014947935,0.0000585527,0.007125777,0.0005397188,0.000002538779,6.2260483e-7,0.0000030595163,0.0006602362],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963711,0.0010406128,0.00087164296,0.00003267815,0.0013796905,0.0003042801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696296,0.002026254,0.0006680665,0.0001641755,0.00012922595,0.00004930435],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012830188,0.00007335062,0.00011335504,0.0001660834,0.0009768418,0.0005138107,0.0025732245,0.000070475784,0.000041929085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008096304,0.00003264534,0.000067034176,0.00065589335,0.00078495225,0.025203822,0.00008579463,0.0010316602,0.000020094756],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059669874,0.000012308821,0.0069318265,0.0000075217413,0.000015038336,4.0104305e-7,0.71385,0.00024166323,0.000008871027,0.24950224,0.018029258,0.011341206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032662088,0.000071569775,0.066070236,0.00008950461,0.000009675378,0.000009329507,0.31103992,0.00014399645,0.000091137765,0.011744218,0.6103254,0.000078391044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007354028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015934811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5922961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044709763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005604338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98843014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983613172","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2010.10.009","title":"The Revolution Will be Streamed Online: Academic Libraries and Video","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Cyberpsychology; Academic library; Order (exchange); World Wide Web; Page view; Public relations; Computer science; Sociology; Advertising; Business; Library science; The Internet; Political science","score_opus":0.020995341315251083,"score_gpt":0.24596901468385823,"score_spread":0.22497367336860716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983613172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7726157,0.011772482,0.0021641064,0.21054423,0.0017342266,0.00022001272,0.000010681981,0.00012731728,0.0008112684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97550684,0.007207119,0.006373008,0.007371026,0.0026402131,0.0000026477323,0.0000030337717,0.000033848562,0.0008622659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758285,0.000455137,0.0007834295,0.00020967839,0.0005387199,0.0004301617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961891,0.0021096554,0.0007749432,0.00059309794,0.00006219971,0.00027096833],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018255062,0.00023428592,0.00026693035,0.00013241448,0.0005366604,0.00040449956,0.004522233,0.00040282455,0.000018718523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000365589,0.00012124439,0.000081520884,0.0005356298,0.00040823335,0.010942469,0.0006792947,0.0041758455,0.0000048221045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004471827,0.000055981916,0.027972136,0.000070410155,0.00018979468,0.000022009013,0.009784006,0.000049150265,0.020062542,0.8174546,0.07260075,0.051291436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013963114,0.00042794965,0.15861487,0.00027356338,0.00013498844,0.0014376419,0.0017105063,0.006194066,0.006323979,0.45012593,0.37274483,0.00061535987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010144113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000505856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36732867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009798263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040636907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985150930","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2013.05.001","title":"The Space Race","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Space (punctuation); Computer science; Sociology; Gender studies; Operating system","score_opus":0.018527255413178872,"score_gpt":0.2407950084401019,"score_spread":0.22226775302692303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985150930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59914345,0.0021084687,0.023816304,0.34425625,0.0022493175,0.0005403405,0.0000021332714,0.000035820445,0.027847925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918349,0.000077079334,0.00014513556,0.00023451926,0.0016774299,0.0000025408435,6.886502e-7,0.000010760834,0.0060169515],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991695,0.00018727755,0.0002700037,0.00003879552,0.000194207,0.00014020281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989347,0.0004206911,0.0003668609,0.00014201875,0.000065511,0.000070241964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061361375,0.000075223375,0.00009056636,0.000027248123,0.0002350262,0.00010221736,0.00043067825,0.000046417248,0.00034998567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002680408,0.000033229724,0.00006704055,0.00013591799,0.000080677164,0.00090407714,0.000033910044,0.0005894365,0.00012348221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092522074,0.000025300258,0.03166326,0.000003683394,0.00016569035,3.595795e-7,0.0048192204,0.00091123313,0.0068740267,0.32438397,0.5978804,0.033180308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001748834,0.00014522992,0.0985336,0.00011623955,0.0001464576,0.000041366573,0.023944344,0.0030511718,0.01838146,0.48934296,0.36416104,0.00038730275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010625893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.4034909e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39269146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008027042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007645332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38320976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988312087","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.009","title":"Language Learning in the Library: An Exploratory Study of ESL Students","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Reading (process); Learner autonomy; Language acquisition; Mathematics education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Exploratory research; Library instruction; Psychology; Language education; Comprehension approach; Linguistics; Information literacy; Sociology; Communication","score_opus":0.05212212112438381,"score_gpt":0.2862939763242726,"score_spread":0.2341718551998888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988312087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903436,0.001116158,0.0000045410966,0.00080378266,0.00015751182,0.00013984888,0.0000011867473,0.00003440985,0.007398974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966046,0.000033749708,0.000011290637,0.00037893854,0.0015470532,0.0000021144176,0.0000023030445,0.000029420708,0.0013905274],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961514,0.002398099,0.0006209751,0.00008984742,0.0005387348,0.00020098443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986007,0.0005860154,0.000556891,0.00019709159,0.000020389893,0.000038897448],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033180965,0.00013672076,0.0002449404,0.00018716877,0.0002784922,0.00020068519,0.001336379,0.000067964436,0.00026271646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008587104,0.00007311235,0.00005987196,0.00011087047,0.00011272857,0.0017473537,0.000086829954,0.0024618637,0.000006495586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013957063,0.0003570969,0.1244116,0.000014763281,0.000038945327,0.000030336034,0.8620159,0.0009467551,0.00014341106,0.0077501074,0.0035480247,0.0006034745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012188406,0.00091440254,0.046524275,0.00015353519,0.00008683758,0.000023497334,0.93653744,0.000045987068,0.00007243127,0.002124549,0.012143795,0.00015438089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012012563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005591008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07788732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009740338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060179227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994284648","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.012","title":"Applying Open Access to Library Technologies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library automation; World Wide Web; Access to information; Library science; Information access","score_opus":0.10149430007072857,"score_gpt":0.33303264032708896,"score_spread":0.2315383402563604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994284648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23052843,0.02432639,0.08064396,0.5613859,0.004937353,0.0031872347,0.000011779105,0.001683466,0.09329544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95169616,0.0005237135,0.026562462,0.01940288,0.0009800874,0.000029123685,7.03291e-7,0.000033588294,0.00077129365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822116,0.0002631161,0.00053697336,0.00014349859,0.0003528216,0.00048243345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815845,0.000507424,0.00045753858,0.00061457173,0.000019691173,0.00024231075],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012794011,0.0001776987,0.00027560204,0.0002973316,0.00018431946,0.001646201,0.023191767,0.00018505649,0.000063577965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085780004,0.000105691695,0.000056965142,0.001310548,0.000050451934,0.05933254,0.007977018,0.0010824528,0.00006467347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002516631,0.000102028906,0.13098852,0.00006893607,0.00013893619,0.000020058784,0.0065413914,0.00017594376,0.0022786495,0.38451076,0.33343953,0.14148358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006539557,0.00023821449,0.05263569,0.00034716155,0.00004809935,0.0005137869,0.0017512776,0.00029071767,0.046826042,0.1407215,0.7553969,0.0005766609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041466096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.252363e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72116774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011203386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020746521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998253418","doi":"10.1016/s0099-1333(02)00341-5","title":"Print sources in an electronic age: a vital part of the research process for undergraduate students","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Completeness (order theory); Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); World Wide Web; Multimedia; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1270862924907781,"score_gpt":0.34354467221652346,"score_spread":0.21645837972574536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998253418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98605543,0.00066419743,0.0007857056,0.010725052,0.00015498704,0.0003975135,8.236227e-7,0.000018651956,0.001197652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972083,0.00016521745,0.000108677654,0.0002539286,0.00016252011,0.000010768622,1.9199331e-7,0.0000121954945,0.0020782156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972477,0.0005170055,0.0006078905,0.00016208598,0.0010141497,0.000451145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984489,0.0006784893,0.00038044163,0.0002853884,0.00010304216,0.000103752565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023074485,0.00012316628,0.00020167597,0.0002854986,0.00020895235,0.00029754287,0.0041581956,0.00010289512,0.000010074758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024814907,0.00006738897,0.000086595974,0.0014039067,0.00015502342,0.0030286538,0.0003832327,0.0010873544,0.0000022320755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019053646,0.0018671266,0.6481246,0.000417115,0.0005581777,0.000045643537,0.12643833,0.0035920765,0.003778476,0.14451416,0.03793767,0.030821258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049870987,0.0023227362,0.116002545,0.0008162859,0.000048292273,0.00024979952,0.0036500196,0.007938258,0.036791448,0.7945091,0.031983454,0.00070092996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014720696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026995529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64999497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055137727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033860956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77270305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020637674","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.011","title":"International Open Access Week at Small to Medium U.S. Academic Libraries: The First Five Years","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Quarter (Canadian coin); Medical education; Plan (archaeology); Library science; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06713800596436659,"score_gpt":0.29826794654347905,"score_spread":0.23112994057911246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020637674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2400961,0.0012637585,0.015061325,0.71348614,0.004874718,0.00079123094,0.00001596056,0.00014857386,0.024262182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.871951,0.0012431002,0.006297165,0.108606786,0.005838982,0.000024031224,0.000006672779,0.00008184791,0.005950429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971593,0.00050442794,0.0008512347,0.00031030865,0.0007194197,0.00045530454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618477,0.0018384783,0.00081794447,0.0007477337,0.000072434545,0.0003386293],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026139577,0.00025608423,0.00034742182,0.00023191737,0.0003559854,0.0017810868,0.036948353,0.00026859136,0.00022259796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030203167,0.00014631481,0.00010844913,0.00080833025,0.00014465014,0.013627508,0.0100080995,0.0019180088,0.00014791182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010906062,0.00008650939,0.029403264,0.000059362646,0.00040822782,0.0000407459,0.041037913,0.0024973666,0.0007600677,0.14457078,0.7591947,0.020850493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084595836,0.000240045,0.08986497,0.00023220849,0.000042920976,0.0002266094,0.00034922062,0.0023112083,0.002124369,0.048141275,0.85529524,0.0003259621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044671127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009422725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6318549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005086541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003547965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992552},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2032072590","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.03.011","title":"Re-framing Librarians' Identities and Assumptions around IT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Gender and Technology in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Stereotype (UML); Stereotype threat; Point (geometry); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05893501922064356,"score_gpt":0.3269826984606908,"score_spread":0.26804767924004724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032072590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71701914,0.0026047183,0.004614045,0.1950267,0.0019114224,0.00018480097,0.000002148904,0.000101663456,0.07853533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99281824,0.0017787706,0.0004968298,0.0013266804,0.0014080027,0.0000015180027,5.376557e-7,0.000010855898,0.0021585473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843687,0.00057405216,0.0003656444,0.000082897146,0.00030438375,0.0002361679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840075,0.0009606163,0.00032487736,0.00015347543,0.000048649898,0.00011161048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029136192,0.000087964785,0.00014947678,0.0001652426,0.00062015065,0.00015083334,0.00071834144,0.000285081,0.00010677495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092977285,0.00006542737,0.00004768928,0.00025176475,0.0004926412,0.0016787136,0.00006207517,0.00095555955,0.000014635625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000516006,0.00004716047,0.10227102,0.0000377374,0.00013488495,0.0000027433223,0.15226468,0.000034127403,0.00048223784,0.6511173,0.08031882,0.013237635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003575174,0.00007598713,0.036237862,0.000098589444,0.00014809331,0.000062783794,0.16281497,0.00004449539,0.0002805239,0.7217147,0.07798898,0.00017554736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004563432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023189237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2757991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028772785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023483837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.476976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032445638","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2012.02.005","title":"Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? The Evolution of the Academic Library Web Site","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Web site; Academic library; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Information retrieval; The Internet","score_opus":0.02001504202129596,"score_gpt":0.22936556362547825,"score_spread":0.2093505216041823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032445638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6924723,0.1157401,0.0015488685,0.17871389,0.002642757,0.000599313,0.00004388028,0.00018113515,0.008057771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866901,0.0036276595,0.00059740234,0.0031017875,0.002741758,0.0000035985556,0.0000011032464,0.00005120062,0.0031853616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541795,0.0014793565,0.0011585748,0.00024234712,0.0009824665,0.00071931246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995569,0.0008732511,0.002108346,0.0010935116,0.00006212488,0.00029374842],"candidate_categories":["open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022913055,0.0003651689,0.00044764968,0.00018070341,0.00044170796,0.00019591945,0.008202852,0.0005460468,0.00013055511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009046751,0.00017374393,0.00030264407,0.0010629477,0.00030131757,0.013514573,0.0014288009,0.0038962371,0.00005716534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018802255,0.00006387202,0.8014988,0.00017810262,0.00016636158,0.0000044701455,0.013910179,0.0002474297,0.0038061293,0.046932112,0.13134839,0.0016561642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017133801,0.0002949923,0.6378713,0.0024975874,0.00039412276,0.0009490753,0.0081343055,0.006079019,0.006889324,0.03993848,0.2943827,0.00085572473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020184403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047359167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29421782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005784499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060617214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040741092","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.011","title":"Promoting Academic Library Research Through the “Faculty-Member-In-Residence” Program","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Academic library; Context (archaeology); Library science; Sociology; Productivity; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.16458244497420466,"score_gpt":0.42886018859761343,"score_spread":0.2642777436234088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040741092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5217473,0.0016066909,0.000054530406,0.37590045,0.00079936825,0.0012190765,0.0000047849844,0.0001536968,0.09851414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98038644,0.0018881662,0.000878471,0.009194722,0.0034393228,0.000020594454,0.0000038671456,0.00002808258,0.0041603143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920736,0.003659802,0.0012641879,0.00018432329,0.0018818888,0.00093622383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505377,0.0034316357,0.0007831109,0.00034547175,0.00013254835,0.00025346802],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016550876,0.00018033017,0.00027658706,0.00026166043,0.0013127362,0.00056779216,0.0044584586,0.0003878122,0.00029098245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027423438,0.00009435133,0.00012409252,0.0025560155,0.0013058466,0.041230734,0.00034621198,0.0048493533,0.00010945182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000182398,0.00005782203,0.03485485,0.000049224982,0.00002533023,0.000006833118,0.41588813,0.00011438141,0.00014329773,0.36044496,0.1252254,0.063007385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042115437,0.00020980494,0.015776208,0.00047301324,0.00001452924,0.000039474395,0.026757224,0.00057309115,0.0006593148,0.1814719,0.77340883,0.00019545085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090034904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021165208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6481834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004962537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011299832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041468707","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2015.02.011","title":"The Copyright Librarian: A Study of Advertising Trends for the Period 2006–2013","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Intellectual property; Scholarly communication; Officer; Advertising; Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law; Publishing","score_opus":0.08036968015808808,"score_gpt":0.2684322547940843,"score_spread":0.18806257463599618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041468707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62764436,0.035984207,0.0034959815,0.21896428,0.008325445,0.003200014,0.000014548131,0.00020334637,0.1021678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990829,0.00017770438,0.000036440793,0.0013317374,0.0037969656,0.000010780838,0.0000012810335,0.0000445182,0.0037715712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977557,0.0001490417,0.0009548174,0.0001427077,0.0006221556,0.00037558153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970337,0.0011601513,0.0010111508,0.0004225936,0.0003291431,0.000043226824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032236231,0.0002392194,0.0003615357,0.00020746153,0.0006934441,0.00048510334,0.0021501775,0.00013190127,0.00035564153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008055981,0.00008986325,0.00019613277,0.0007549332,0.0002318037,0.0033571934,0.00030084696,0.00096144935,0.000026765196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002498567,0.00012613526,0.0016342723,0.00002910718,0.00028577488,0.0000031718241,0.0056061973,0.0001399609,0.00014867367,0.0024912024,0.97015816,0.016878769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041260766,0.0006630428,0.0041522332,0.00016437437,0.0008505789,0.000070427726,0.022048257,0.024511013,0.00035802796,0.017697839,0.92499435,0.00036374986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013791602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025436591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36318463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026511594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015496345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53334814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043238404","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2008.10.012","title":"Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Specialty; Workplace learning; Complement (music); Point (geometry); Mobile device; Nursing; Medicine; Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.2210852437639308,"score_gpt":0.48463679587161534,"score_spread":0.26355155210768455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043238404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18274252,0.007581084,0.0004199305,0.64660037,0.0028720228,0.00068873767,0.0000010380879,0.000070524125,0.15902378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9197474,0.00920589,0.0002812296,0.06667339,0.0036116156,0.0000025680313,0.0000010148241,0.000019857713,0.00045701073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798999,0.01711487,0.0013556118,0.00011191302,0.0009823596,0.0005353384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740894,0.024070144,0.001245208,0.00032497477,0.000115525996,0.00015475697],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041396696,0.00015172336,0.00029826415,0.00014951437,0.0009113528,0.000021842576,0.0019249254,0.00070426456,0.00024993933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02778058,0.000075860706,0.000077625664,0.00056982355,0.00023573324,0.0010264703,0.0001132172,0.03572922,0.00011007659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009788638,0.00013919087,0.027552122,0.00013904349,0.000075910415,0.00010867932,0.33691594,0.0002981967,0.0015723371,0.3973512,0.21051513,0.024353389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021715458,0.000372724,0.07386392,0.0013469943,0.00014468058,0.00031801066,0.24103215,0.00007091607,0.00004487198,0.27721307,0.4031769,0.000244195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013433098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013405876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73700494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009212313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072617875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98708385},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2048799509","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.06.004","title":"Champions of Digital Literacy: Fostering a World of Informed Digital Producers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Digital literacy in education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Digital literacy; Information literacy; Sociology; Business; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03600598465008612,"score_gpt":0.2829485807665487,"score_spread":0.2469425961164626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048799509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9053456,0.00044720375,0.037899602,0.010076823,0.0015942736,0.0003698643,0.00003645975,0.000071971466,0.04415821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677473,0.000014668848,0.0020880713,0.00019759625,0.00034278617,0.0000014700487,0.0000032826217,0.000014885166,0.00056252506],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978681,0.000075683616,0.0011472388,0.00013216256,0.00051809504,0.00025870974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966125,0.0012037198,0.0013125262,0.0005268127,0.00020101646,0.00014340923],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007775071,0.00016373524,0.00032527652,0.00041129114,0.00004249929,0.0004042478,0.0022218274,0.00007124051,0.000005271731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001146452,0.00011203159,0.00013989734,0.00084678514,0.00014976025,0.014801172,0.00047741414,0.0005488956,0.0000073041115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052580505,0.00043783698,0.049554266,0.0005453494,0.00031957222,0.000004830588,0.0808564,0.0006983043,0.0035562064,0.13564761,0.008221758,0.7196321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045590596,0.0028557496,0.08706539,0.0060240375,0.00022967349,0.0018244961,0.0027374248,0.009141081,0.06406675,0.6756176,0.14398663,0.0018921088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.6932974e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.0784496e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71773994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003808029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003583713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052428354","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2012.09.019","title":"Thinking About Discovery Layers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03534979991019609,"score_gpt":0.26312969221464905,"score_spread":0.22777989230445295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052428354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046662096,0.0026050112,0.93026245,0.0041414727,0.0013338772,0.00007041631,3.5445416e-7,0.00006482638,0.014859476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725266,0.00017785604,0.022457963,0.0033805317,0.0011062832,3.7887528e-7,1.9751718e-7,0.0000106188745,0.00033953818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818885,0.00015348209,0.00071379694,0.000054642707,0.0005584445,0.0003307568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980736,0.00048372085,0.0009895028,0.00026253963,0.00005766372,0.00013297619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003939435,0.00012144387,0.00018668688,0.00013107384,0.00024057193,0.00039728152,0.0024538203,0.00010259725,0.000014773013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025546798,0.00007223586,0.00008510508,0.00028959944,0.00005352827,0.013337197,0.00030403284,0.000884419,0.00002423116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002371285,0.000042188232,0.006525165,0.00014444813,0.000074631214,0.000002090191,0.094973005,0.0006377479,0.0003721997,0.8568717,0.021006264,0.01932683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002252562,0.00024090795,0.03134011,0.0023421755,0.0002052968,0.0030842656,0.0073564975,0.06762599,0.019305913,0.7990097,0.06584812,0.0013884708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.31717e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.6042176e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9258645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028211363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015136278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96691453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053535946","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.015","title":"Google in the Research and Teaching of Instruction Librarians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Royal Saskatchewan Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Library instruction; Exploratory research; Higher education; Library science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Information literacy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.1746854913647616,"score_gpt":0.37947840467144783,"score_spread":0.20479291330668623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053535946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9291688,0.00038594802,0.0000354858,0.031235758,0.00017246277,0.00013590713,0.0000012365443,0.0000067459346,0.038857654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963504,0.0011203856,0.00027871763,0.0012384849,0.0005225491,8.393551e-7,3.985026e-7,0.000003982247,0.00048425913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967167,0.0015941511,0.0005604686,0.0000582448,0.00082496455,0.00024547626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979434,0.0014558336,0.00032927605,0.0001347041,0.000058336638,0.00007847164],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009159663,0.000059867634,0.00012833595,0.00028444853,0.00075587496,0.00008917328,0.0011996978,0.00011939812,0.00003620368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007654072,0.000032195658,0.000034231507,0.00063538656,0.0009548985,0.016659815,0.00006885133,0.0015909335,0.0000036552212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010621592,0.000029212926,0.06728591,0.000011614006,0.000007752598,0.0000046194878,0.39501163,0.000022863114,0.00014039555,0.5213716,0.0108700665,0.005138082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012810966,0.00051182194,0.2934649,0.00027995423,0.0000147454575,0.000574586,0.2510411,0.00016017475,0.0005926535,0.17875831,0.27311018,0.00021048661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013689436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001306477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3426133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017586619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047591436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058232347","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.06.011","title":"Data Sharing and Discovery: What Librarians Need to Know","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Data sharing; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Data management; Computer science; Bridge (graph theory); Knowledge management; Data science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Political science; Publishing; Engineering","score_opus":0.16812559109209152,"score_gpt":0.3566202742845169,"score_spread":0.1884946831924254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058232347","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02066506,0.003138588,0.72429293,0.24821454,0.00075953,0.0003140824,0.0000112140215,0.00006666133,0.002537405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8578446,0.048053462,0.063808694,0.020800473,0.003861216,0.000007834427,0.000026595526,0.00011563516,0.005481513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972473,0.0006397978,0.00055049575,0.00041763598,0.000725119,0.00041968818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528575,0.0015046943,0.0004663617,0.0023763408,0.000038266404,0.00032857686],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008379388,0.00016963932,0.00024968467,0.00030154665,0.00018559225,0.009729943,0.018153796,0.00009311194,0.0000066306657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021932141,0.0001091813,0.000032797274,0.0006904204,0.00008698679,0.25564864,0.009282369,0.0012381972,0.000019646923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024597583,0.000045356137,0.0076766475,0.000078692516,0.00017974136,0.00003063527,0.0019599604,0.0002479335,0.0016143628,0.8516715,0.08559506,0.0506541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014796748,0.00062364264,0.01454066,0.0009885154,0.00015730404,0.00046105002,0.0024174813,0.046460632,0.0010782194,0.07480623,0.85632485,0.00066172006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009299724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020046657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83717954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017992126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013128636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063011099","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2004.06.007","title":"Academic Libraries and the Semantic Web: What the Future May Hold for Research-Supporting Library Catalogues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; World Wide Web; Computer science; Semantic Web; Linked data; Exploit; Semantic Web Stack; Information retrieval; Web standards; Web 2.0; Library science; Web service","score_opus":0.07704686381396345,"score_gpt":0.32726411074830947,"score_spread":0.250217246934346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063011099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16424781,0.09669563,0.0074300217,0.7283491,0.001815088,0.00097160356,0.0000068283794,0.00016504913,0.00031885834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535889,0.030307835,0.0037409575,0.008396022,0.0034732157,0.000023290864,0.0000036524211,0.000047570305,0.0004185373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958437,0.0011869253,0.0010264748,0.0003055301,0.0008151559,0.00082220376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914511,0.0066856183,0.00082729,0.0007630687,0.000089225374,0.00018373867],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085376445,0.00029364644,0.00047897443,0.00022690473,0.0010730955,0.0014779101,0.006456403,0.0004238983,0.0000056028475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092712045,0.00012248968,0.00020587456,0.00081657287,0.0016063809,0.011762902,0.0012856488,0.004012749,0.000011286536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006851658,0.000021466065,0.0024322094,0.000119313365,0.00017121961,0.000035714045,0.029918684,0.00010526233,0.0004485441,0.903891,0.048094433,0.014076984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029255305,0.00024989818,0.0055429093,0.00066529965,0.00012882995,0.001410869,0.026899768,0.0011650015,0.00420084,0.9235036,0.03298456,0.0003228867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000764519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000205069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7893411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023092565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089743856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067975548","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2010.01.005","title":"Are Bibliographic Management Software Search Interfaces Reliable?: A Comparison between Search Results Obtained Using Database Interfaces and the EndNote Online Search Function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Interface (matter); Online search; Information retrieval; Database search engine; Search engine; Online database; Software; Bibliographic database; Function (biology); World Wide Web; Database","score_opus":0.1045205109167798,"score_gpt":0.33740268059443057,"score_spread":0.23288216967765077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067975548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9201387,0.0005204219,0.07032683,0.007945545,0.0004231553,0.00047310593,0.000056753513,0.00006002996,0.00005547042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894411,0.0007830242,0.008896056,0.00035594127,0.00036718778,0.0000019720724,0.000011284235,0.000018198083,0.000125224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556476,0.0009741884,0.0011639765,0.0002701039,0.0014534413,0.0005735594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967396,0.0013719661,0.00058410165,0.00067232497,0.0003588527,0.00027311282],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010028907,0.0002526057,0.0004196068,0.0017770866,0.00061449234,0.00067989307,0.0029858446,0.00021154644,0.00001937769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025930084,0.00013795908,0.000103015685,0.003154293,0.0005971099,0.0034212314,0.0014609365,0.004540919,0.000011728121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.040180076,0.0010781403,0.44863445,0.002539076,0.0032263712,0.0002503256,0.09414141,0.027351165,0.034316175,0.033762567,0.025841549,0.28867868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020728095,0.0018369234,0.6385822,0.0026460981,0.00095443364,0.0008505656,0.029229224,0.25440753,0.03809865,0.0057469476,0.0053467974,0.0015725185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010192117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007544897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28710616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003301869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017035262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99775565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073672668","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2013.02.003","title":"By Librarians, For Librarians: Building a Strengths-Based Institute to Develop Librarians' Research Culture in Canadian Academic Libraries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; Library science; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Scale (ratio); Business; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.21825581810606492,"score_gpt":0.4915406569367635,"score_spread":0.2732848388306986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073672668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4270976,0.010643432,0.0046487018,0.53284174,0.005270454,0.010646062,0.00036758065,0.0002322141,0.008252249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88140804,0.0037577422,0.035134844,0.056506384,0.009241686,0.0018091594,0.00023136492,0.00034681012,0.011563959],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987865,0.0030936694,0.0028533898,0.0006512957,0.0015871264,0.003949556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98464566,0.008863468,0.0008579493,0.0007354671,0.00094726065,0.003950176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014272733,0.00052801374,0.0008327501,0.0023993272,0.0024430663,0.00045122087,0.0049970583,0.0016969654,0.00073488447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016128564,0.00037237006,0.00013138706,0.0068946877,0.0006020619,0.0128293615,0.0004336053,0.01115757,0.00026771877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042076374,0.00004369363,0.030547995,0.0003027354,0.000034568813,0.000006436409,0.01623137,0.00013310226,0.001917689,0.020113003,0.92721945,0.0030291737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022437407,0.00053150096,0.015223469,0.0022609995,0.000027995191,0.000017616348,0.0155790895,0.0010094325,0.0016314602,0.036583092,0.92427075,0.00062082894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025116738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029783244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47633535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008305322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045292005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076457796","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2009.08.001","title":"Chinese Graduate Students and the Canadian Academic Library: A User Study at the University of Windsor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Academic library; Graduate students; Perception; Information literacy; Library science; Medical education; Psychology; Post graduate; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.04089685402032089,"score_gpt":0.3041141778425129,"score_spread":0.263217323822192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076457796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85463053,0.0016784697,0.000008722146,0.13813198,0.00022013174,0.0005200578,0.000014292817,0.000014617598,0.0047811936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868717,0.004222346,0.000015067107,0.003714978,0.00064131443,3.1899592e-7,0.0000010347397,0.0000115623625,0.0045216717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947026,0.0030853897,0.0005196525,0.00014340425,0.0011189843,0.00042997926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968408,0.0018559819,0.0006572388,0.00024117224,0.00007334232,0.0003315129],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009910535,0.0001882011,0.00037017144,0.0001338533,0.0018755782,0.00008702099,0.003336103,0.0006911675,0.0001869022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073754217,0.00008953991,0.00013002791,0.00062869926,0.0013618785,0.0014306817,0.00023157733,0.0063949153,0.000017021848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019361881,0.000052846324,0.5189479,0.000007536726,0.00027180728,0.000028743598,0.37851852,0.000047981117,0.000037757003,0.020709367,0.0777933,0.001648077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033168688,0.00022677756,0.8094187,0.00013789699,0.00044618762,0.00008607305,0.08110197,0.00003471566,0.00003051466,0.04876593,0.056168105,0.00026629007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020277593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010418675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29741654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001055372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092783436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085286573","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.01.009","title":"Flipped Librarians: Assessing Our Own Need to Understand Our Users","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Computer science; Point (geometry); Multimedia; Perspective (graphical); Cultural heritage; Task (project management); Process (computing); Content analysis; World Wide Web; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.062653163304776,"score_gpt":0.31043457166245564,"score_spread":0.24778140835767964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085286573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15840742,0.00025910945,0.3955696,0.41853717,0.004085754,0.00031908162,8.0853016e-7,0.00020405016,0.022617033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760417,0.000055285513,0.014248239,0.006971982,0.0013363293,8.704006e-7,5.442906e-7,0.000030754338,0.0013143499],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970138,0.0010067588,0.0007024873,0.00021984501,0.0005911931,0.00046587887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979071,0.00042679408,0.0006512844,0.00046251842,0.00009133323,0.00046098165],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033358873,0.00022029916,0.00033153733,0.0003337403,0.0003623584,0.001081439,0.0032026554,0.00020496875,0.000018581377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079254195,0.0001516496,0.00011659805,0.0009267457,0.000021984886,0.00594946,0.00033078965,0.0017902178,0.00010192866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000389282,0.00020773221,0.025876269,0.00011461799,0.00038198172,0.00003085609,0.09137482,0.01246845,0.015136352,0.36629173,0.44230077,0.045427125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061690654,0.0016766369,0.08739607,0.0019223174,0.00035766076,0.0016236505,0.5785092,0.028558634,0.009793131,0.10682395,0.17463425,0.0025354456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000072076455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.7215892e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8176342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056804816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086487392","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2009.06.003","title":"What Qualifications and Skills are Important for Digital Librarian Positions in Academic Libraries? A Job Advertisement Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Academic library; Digital library; World Wide Web; Position (finance); Library science; Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.033916368606871264,"score_gpt":0.33108550559689015,"score_spread":0.2971691369900189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086487392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5923613,0.007476482,0.003343764,0.39062107,0.00074445416,0.0012406235,0.00014426713,0.00010171453,0.003966333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770748,0.009361595,0.0006988737,0.0111097675,0.0005902122,0.000009539914,0.000029367297,0.000011355855,0.0011145023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970838,0.00029894168,0.0014191739,0.00017124543,0.0005786858,0.00044814605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723464,0.0009770285,0.0011153359,0.00022998507,0.00008646815,0.0003565656],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002186099,0.00017608613,0.00036608326,0.00070108916,0.00057395815,0.0011657364,0.0012000882,0.0002740594,0.00007369444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064404146,0.00012683553,0.00019452945,0.00212287,0.00031414352,0.070477314,0.0000638576,0.0008494783,0.000004555826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031955086,0.00016800109,0.21950491,0.0000279587,0.0003137798,0.000007808752,0.16407135,0.00035326325,0.00015668463,0.57856625,0.019588495,0.016921956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014200018,0.00031941992,0.5735562,0.00052835635,0.00046225634,0.000035048964,0.07905074,0.0008945827,0.00021474753,0.24866098,0.09429059,0.0005671099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010047875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031507368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3847135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051900977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058993837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089853757","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.008","title":"Not on the Same Page: Undergraduates' Information Retrieval in Electronic and Print Books","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Western University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Think aloud protocol; Library instruction; Computer science; Qualitative research; Academic library; Qualitative analysis; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Information literacy; Psychology; Library science; Sociology","score_opus":0.021171158250547058,"score_gpt":0.2182960151405739,"score_spread":0.19712485689002684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089853757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92475957,0.0001486981,0.0014717941,0.06537129,0.00030761785,0.00018436558,4.8100145e-7,0.000034812158,0.007721392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945483,0.00018933909,0.00018108512,0.00438932,0.00009491992,0.0000010005512,2.5053794e-7,0.0000049782197,0.0005907685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987058,0.00015248157,0.00044206125,0.00007521062,0.00038589147,0.00023853547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849755,0.0008968473,0.00031746243,0.00019352899,0.000028204311,0.000066431116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015406283,0.00011142554,0.000119635886,0.00020899654,0.00013760646,0.00040988845,0.0011562693,0.000110910245,0.000011818986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040821332,0.00005751273,0.000037410828,0.00048540623,0.000076416814,0.0043617184,0.00019077674,0.0018194036,0.000011439427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006466138,0.000026928315,0.0049878485,0.0000144323785,0.000047002017,0.0000048215643,0.008372332,0.00007142761,0.002465204,0.9562581,0.007860608,0.019244673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022296149,0.0007037047,0.114509046,0.00016814301,0.000022164879,0.00060261495,0.0008449174,0.0062629646,0.042397067,0.69510484,0.13660434,0.0005506168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018599369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.8777597e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2611533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027208756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036871922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79045045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095220078","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2006.02.008","title":"Toward Improved Collections in Medical Humanities: Fiction in Academic Health Sciences Libraries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Digital humanities; Medical humanities; Subject access; Selection (genetic algorithm); Library science; The arts; Field (mathematics); Humanities; Computer science; Art; Medicine; Medical education; Visual arts; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08829006557525743,"score_gpt":0.3463475688356364,"score_spread":0.25805750326037896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095220078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8465,0.011240417,0.00033426034,0.13153355,0.0010649827,0.00047674723,0.0000032402947,0.00004263971,0.008804166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865608,0.0036892905,0.00026243422,0.006537512,0.00171291,0.000008904428,0.000005222915,0.00001610959,0.001206776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971302,0.00041563294,0.001201536,0.00014149786,0.0007194403,0.00039165255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984187,0.00075113814,0.00047094052,0.000105671745,0.00004089847,0.0002126491],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004287913,0.00013913735,0.00038717416,0.0006650027,0.00021228814,0.000033954333,0.00045357534,0.0004167189,0.0002063623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014511085,0.00009152464,0.00007172436,0.0014196964,0.0004915565,0.00097552955,0.00004540335,0.003430238,0.0000026624853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044006975,0.0016945503,0.17092724,0.0011682482,0.00015193032,0.00018588663,0.31812015,0.00052414206,0.0026591716,0.06925734,0.40658662,0.024324024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01630849,0.004942785,0.487458,0.010004216,0.00026442664,0.006042985,0.24662316,0.0050667524,0.004403171,0.1634231,0.054541398,0.00092152914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038691916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034357712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3520452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020507441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040648873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114728401","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.007","title":"Collaborative Print Repositories: A Case Study of Library Directors' Views","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Business; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026002529137638876,"score_gpt":0.26086035171001626,"score_spread":0.2348578225723774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114728401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98682624,0.0005138208,0.0007027995,0.001490652,0.0012392179,0.0003424397,0.0000015502728,0.00006934563,0.008813955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443287,0.000061031726,0.0032231126,0.00022014492,0.00039459107,0.000004931034,2.1301032e-7,0.000016685244,0.0016464383],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768025,0.00043868893,0.0009879612,0.00017353453,0.0005132361,0.00020635557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731344,0.0009475391,0.0010118755,0.0004520505,0.00011120714,0.00016388007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008516732,0.00018702082,0.00034901215,0.00028154717,0.00021024673,0.00035105122,0.0019464022,0.00014258726,0.000033285258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019759031,0.00011138629,0.000082504615,0.0017637401,0.00010171271,0.0067695733,0.000512645,0.0011648384,0.0000030424103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015871873,0.0018968629,0.34484622,0.0001494782,0.0011696517,0.004728235,0.45145333,0.00018629812,0.012279466,0.05015361,0.09016006,0.0413896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008012072,0.0058091334,0.081109926,0.00049115665,0.00032478245,0.036903393,0.07576834,0.0008436447,0.17180297,0.033030234,0.58396876,0.0019356268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009378116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022642648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4938087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009937354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5060708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171678869","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.010","title":"Comparison of Native Chinese-speaking and Native English-speaking Engineering Students' Information Literacy Challenges","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Information literacy; Literacy; Psychology; Academic writing; Mathematics education; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Medical education; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.06409231670194487,"score_gpt":0.3647401362378244,"score_spread":0.30064781953587955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171678869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97063607,0.0033774322,0.0007708194,0.0037061144,0.00097513717,0.00026187018,0.000004825578,0.000040505412,0.020227248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752396,0.0007705257,0.00047192388,0.0004446171,0.00074830244,0.0000012223359,0.0000016999944,0.0000061458113,0.000031579788],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728245,0.00041671025,0.0009610983,0.00006184563,0.0010349959,0.00024290501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968787,0.0010412128,0.0012512606,0.000101005324,0.0005367941,0.00019101547],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004489681,0.00013492913,0.00029964457,0.000327483,0.00022654554,0.00019217376,0.0009712912,0.00014469447,0.000018232324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030057535,0.000087609464,0.000052906264,0.0005621873,0.00019548366,0.04469497,0.00016164783,0.0008753023,0.0000032506723],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061307546,0.000011003362,0.03830323,0.000027245149,0.000029556448,2.9794424e-7,0.93424225,0.0003769976,0.000007926377,0.02007361,0.00018209413,0.006684492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002205747,0.00044699485,0.15165478,0.0009662026,0.000069178,0.000018897488,0.59172016,0.004266859,0.00044657337,0.006897683,0.24082485,0.00048208918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023097538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.076775e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3425221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060375827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027850625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9686664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198805780","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2015.08.006","title":"A Survey of Online Library Tutorials: Guiding Instructional Video Creation to Use in Flipped Classrooms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; McGill University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Library instruction; Flipped classroom; Multimedia; Instructional design; World Wide Web; Information literacy; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.33682286606433715,"score_gpt":0.4210633655399425,"score_spread":0.08424049947560536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198805780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846788,0.00016587155,0.0030120893,0.008174763,0.0016259415,0.00022364254,0.00002499825,0.000028425286,0.002065492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675374,0.00009727942,0.028796865,0.0007631599,0.0021220518,0.0000014750939,0.0000099239505,0.00002985546,0.0006419578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897355,0.007820111,0.0011748374,0.0001259044,0.0008563976,0.00028728257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941462,0.0042193905,0.00093457877,0.00016671159,0.00032823192,0.00020487302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0222251,0.00013504119,0.0003820555,0.0004919391,0.00012737009,0.00008936651,0.0009881636,0.00028708653,0.00006226194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02551737,0.00010079537,0.000056153687,0.0018367227,0.00022728273,0.0038211045,0.00013518077,0.00102242,0.0000030570845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014193254,0.000080449325,0.8987511,0.0000106372045,0.00006176442,0.0000044516,0.031039486,0.0005344524,0.0027296918,0.039115503,0.017816562,0.008436623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010725867,0.00018214555,0.9412986,0.0002889234,0.000026004855,0.000017765034,0.004991612,0.00008685897,0.0010348642,0.02669708,0.024101757,0.00020181628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001647064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019001384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042547528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001734642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018085241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469279126","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2016.04.020","title":"Geoskills Among Academic Librarians in Greece, Cyprus and Spain","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geospatial analysis; Academic library; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.029323346386551465,"score_gpt":0.2777325302771648,"score_spread":0.24840918389061337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469279126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93500674,0.00307101,0.00047048065,0.04277711,0.00071167387,0.00041871858,0.000008384143,0.000056823545,0.01747908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98824245,0.008278674,0.00007650903,0.0007795679,0.00085004035,0.0000048621528,2.0745567e-7,0.000016700693,0.0017509764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655855,0.0009871387,0.0011066849,0.00012193477,0.0006978153,0.0005278561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644756,0.0021460364,0.0009134757,0.00017280733,0.00008733472,0.00023276346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077108596,0.00018067828,0.0003670972,0.0004619036,0.00038323543,0.000066764806,0.0010579914,0.00046107385,0.00008127573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014114191,0.00009886209,0.00008892974,0.0007439301,0.0009479864,0.0042742034,0.00016598983,0.0012634301,0.000024065015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010828711,0.000009659565,0.84539586,0.000022129878,0.00007208164,0.000010363414,0.06879991,0.0000077992645,0.0001809564,0.06564447,0.0063090883,0.013439366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019554608,0.00010469565,0.8297087,0.0011895726,0.00007161146,0.00010321582,0.0353062,0.00001533979,0.00012352534,0.074558176,0.056450486,0.00041301738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000299751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009118006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053235743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006393906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027784155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54890454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510392278","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2016.08.011","title":"Understanding Academic E-books Through the Diffusion of Innovations Theory as a Basis for Developing Effective Marketing and Educational Strategies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Concordia Hospital; Manitoba Health","funders":"University College London; University of Denver","keywords":"Academic library; Diffusion of innovations; Diffusion theory; Sociology; Marketing; Diffusion; Computer science; Innovation diffusion; Business; Library science","score_opus":0.0812657359642796,"score_gpt":0.28886678530971527,"score_spread":0.20760104934543566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510392278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29368567,0.0010371427,0.6492143,0.048379686,0.00033861928,0.00046196877,0.0000036199933,0.000029465853,0.0068494785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937184,0.0004428826,0.003950725,0.00080836826,0.00022746288,0.000012929683,3.1941704e-7,0.000011373624,0.000827535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983664,0.00043551944,0.0005559246,0.00013148352,0.00031401755,0.00019665276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98616445,0.012926053,0.0006420652,0.00012955912,0.00009620904,0.000041683372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024245852,0.00013484272,0.00017279525,0.00018919742,0.0003560018,0.00015797462,0.0009554421,0.00011994936,0.000010887644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014838986,0.000062643674,0.00005815016,0.0005915838,0.00021991176,0.0040680533,0.00024395356,0.0004046877,8.074296e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002649689,0.0000055409832,0.001995971,0.000029033508,0.00006763124,2.0553962e-7,0.007322953,0.0000073272927,0.0020532412,0.9808407,0.0015455933,0.0058668423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049360254,0.00007767651,0.01578611,0.00060458516,0.000022188684,0.00007981213,0.0037775356,0.00005594365,0.0038363237,0.9731066,0.002034928,0.00012467268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000011898375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.787992e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7000327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084246065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009900335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29492405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660852010","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.004","title":"Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Open science; Open research; Gold standard (test); Citation impact; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.8704276285011111,"score_gpt":0.6422364638488748,"score_spread":0.22819116465223632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2660852010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729984,0.0022059283,0.00018982691,0.014044317,0.00023438201,0.00020703772,0.000011551309,0.000001967888,0.010106633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99712116,0.0012351519,0.000058128426,0.0001179297,0.00026634053,6.486191e-7,5.8869706e-8,0.000008542472,0.0011920728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936311,0.00069574267,0.0009396191,0.0001814704,0.0042033335,0.00034873263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881222,0.0073282393,0.0021488974,0.0011044609,0.0009748852,0.00032131825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05795656,0.00011823864,0.0003776174,0.006742869,0.00056171976,0.008236693,0.032161273,0.00012947332,0.000151574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036045738,0.000043298354,0.0001710421,0.015083974,0.00051628717,0.008460115,0.006610274,0.0011908304,0.00000963509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030922,0.000026747943,0.8356892,0.0000051173415,0.00010213853,0.000007223821,0.0008031295,0.00008098707,0.001600054,0.001080284,0.03414887,0.12614706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047615202,0.0001352228,0.91052204,0.000036624708,0.000016826692,0.00008370529,0.00025159598,0.000481826,0.0009921212,0.08596311,0.00097516505,0.00006560057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000790887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004361332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12608147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003632934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005343167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99279284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777825896","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2017.12.018","title":"When Librarians Hit the Books: Uses of and Attitudes Toward E-Books","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.07840369875309182,"score_gpt":0.2710877370899241,"score_spread":0.1926840383368323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777825896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6030131,0.014566415,0.020693269,0.18967532,0.0019141842,0.00083053845,0.000012892273,0.00021789393,0.1690764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866538,0.0006953495,0.002338169,0.0014589916,0.00039419552,0.000001997358,1.8822736e-7,0.000016293056,0.008440999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827725,0.00021556158,0.00060602895,0.00015224554,0.0004968004,0.00025211423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997348,0.0008434775,0.0010091721,0.0005960496,0.000054823253,0.00014845228],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010165639,0.0001797779,0.0002906598,0.0001430972,0.0005604914,0.0011336062,0.00457112,0.00013042943,0.000027893535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035789437,0.000092928494,0.000107206535,0.00012131935,0.00043540806,0.007393306,0.00096655195,0.00068365614,0.00000558659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007052312,0.000109266795,0.2784329,0.000181601,0.0007578349,0.000051865973,0.04676494,0.00006673758,0.0013792391,0.37657902,0.23615523,0.058816154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021189663,0.00055859424,0.4028164,0.0006484764,0.000135915,0.0007077865,0.00097371865,0.00068704475,0.01753524,0.38076732,0.19239385,0.00065667817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009637628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.412913e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3836407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000116006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039846488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797365097","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2018.03.001","title":"Demonstrating Library Impact Through Acknowledgment: An Examination of Acknowledgments in Theses and Dissertations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Texas A and M University; University of Oklahoma; Northwestern University; Western Alliance Health Research; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Collection development; Academic library; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05162499195692903,"score_gpt":0.36697216923459447,"score_spread":0.3153471772776654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797365097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96603,0.00036224278,0.00009632398,0.0017266801,0.00017678108,0.00013541627,0.0000041088124,0.00001332203,0.0314551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997575,0.0004932848,0.00081484433,0.0003841545,0.00045288846,0.0000010117728,0.000002601119,0.0000070238884,0.000269224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981403,0.00062516524,0.00062883715,0.000072887604,0.0003261431,0.00020671557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985656,0.00057175,0.00054162036,0.000109731525,0.000094267416,0.00011700477],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018124342,0.000092869785,0.00015681042,0.00018171288,0.00029991128,0.00013484128,0.00066355855,0.00011278178,0.00031605957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000472855,0.000058812573,0.00004106281,0.0007370707,0.00044593378,0.04011768,0.00005011024,0.00034752305,0.0000072851544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001590116,0.00010105296,0.20038792,0.00003252519,0.000036033707,0.0000012210693,0.6268858,0.000025343914,0.0014682547,0.1351482,0.001305547,0.03444911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007579565,0.0006621205,0.8174845,0.00050455396,0.000036711517,0.00001712064,0.12181613,0.0007869425,0.0068346197,0.047094073,0.0037742103,0.00023105333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024080908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007165789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6170966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019160138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042303125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9733077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2882976718","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.001","title":"The Changing Research Data Landscape and the Experiences of Ethics Review Board Chairs: Implications for Library Practice and Partnerships","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Data management; Public relations; Information ethics; Sociology; Publishing; Knowledge management; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Data curation; Political science; Data science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.376242050844426,"score_gpt":0.4451902331335945,"score_spread":0.06894818228916849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2882976718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019502587,0.09483511,0.013772792,0.8884113,0.0001754673,0.00047384333,0.00001092808,0.000044050135,0.000326242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37290573,0.52183586,0.09263723,0.010955454,0.0013947464,0.000103249615,0.0000067761976,0.00004202856,0.000118932294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965082,0.0018530855,0.0005640367,0.00023788944,0.00047807023,0.0003587312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960087,0.03323851,0.0008623191,0.005461471,0.00026173794,0.00008895005],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027809614,0.00010915926,0.0002271147,0.00011488468,0.0009659343,0.00029199242,0.03270452,0.00017023734,0.00000237398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104047455,0.00004877004,0.00003076128,0.00089281594,0.0019690923,0.004435284,0.03598166,0.0019735852,7.3493936e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030802866,0.000014708205,0.00037236133,0.00026901337,0.000100687816,9.2331965e-7,0.029946178,1.4613686e-7,0.00004559687,0.25774428,0.690902,0.020296099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008222769,0.0002962165,0.00035343508,0.0018862188,0.00011855022,0.0004376301,0.03256651,0.0076330006,0.0008402739,0.75621045,0.19864574,0.00018970863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000015729512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.0491366e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87745583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005962896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033096748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897090906","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.019","title":"Graduate Student Use and Non-use of Reference and PDF Management Software: An Exploratory Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; Citation; Variety (cybernetics); Software; Learning Management; Reading (process); World Wide Web; Principal (computer security); Annotation; Information retrieval; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2137086867527114,"score_gpt":0.2988402864237691,"score_spread":0.08513159967105768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897090906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978811,0.00028289531,0.00006977708,0.00061825867,0.00026141905,0.00021166322,0.000008684844,0.000022142305,0.0006440446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962308,0.0007231899,0.000287826,0.00061290676,0.0011190642,0.0000025204952,0.0000011882688,0.000022465436,0.0010000592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804986,0.0004424393,0.0006566657,0.00015751872,0.00046867298,0.00022485438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831176,0.00055735424,0.0005666477,0.00022530832,0.00018327797,0.00015566006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002430987,0.00017354779,0.0002866148,0.00017303652,0.00032852907,0.000517034,0.00058835436,0.00009713232,0.000070560985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018828004,0.00011193755,0.000028835657,0.00006796734,0.0004857081,0.005443866,0.00027195658,0.0011351575,0.0000051227557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007107729,0.0003335592,0.17333466,0.00017418258,0.00055809633,0.00003947686,0.74726945,0.000012291664,0.0001829891,0.02854804,0.04143519,0.0074013215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037301034,0.0036770673,0.42025593,0.0012649839,0.001109362,0.00014011415,0.4950435,0.00009114163,0.00030771497,0.017339977,0.056195132,0.00084499066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042549666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021890566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25222594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013304701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042023876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49857703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917052520","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.01.007","title":"Geography, the Academy and Libraries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Geography Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Geographic information system; GIS and public health; Work (physics); Information literacy; Order (exchange); Data science; Local information systems; Location; Computer science; Geography; World Wide Web; Cartography; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.043985271638508835,"score_gpt":0.32327744458894087,"score_spread":0.279292172950432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917052520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7639931,0.010380063,0.000019491288,0.19385123,0.0010364747,0.00024431906,0.0000021026858,0.00002691151,0.03044634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864413,0.005082957,0.000080739315,0.005312277,0.0010942594,0.0000013374656,2.8698918e-7,0.000010233104,0.001976575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802566,0.00084110873,0.00034983022,0.00008242322,0.00042285575,0.000278128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770606,0.0016021308,0.0003583777,0.0001317495,0.000040612904,0.00016109669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029656596,0.00010138624,0.00015925411,0.00013992756,0.0004939754,0.00016183466,0.0011228351,0.00021615873,0.00058532495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022204542,0.0000525956,0.00010468049,0.0003921737,0.0007164216,0.0012849491,0.00007315842,0.0013105694,0.000030927116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098441546,0.000014271037,0.60178334,0.00001145857,0.00008032542,4.748768e-7,0.049609717,0.0000070226843,0.00009733527,0.32243657,0.02016451,0.0056965533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024975935,0.000045455177,0.34514862,0.00003944298,0.000057699137,0.000030487872,0.02788806,0.0000028331133,0.00007005349,0.08154336,0.5448214,0.00010283502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011148777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036117945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5246569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000066515745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033356555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64088976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945856675","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.05.007","title":"An exploratory study of the relationship between the use of the Learning Commons and students' perceived learning outcomes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.18175210247379914,"score_gpt":0.36024927438639287,"score_spread":0.17849717191259373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945856675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962017,0.00013531357,0.000011409698,0.0023396672,0.00022052553,0.00047288675,6.53779e-7,0.0000120906025,0.0006057425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979948,0.00004312573,0.000005701887,0.00007699597,0.00016944835,0.0000016111077,1.7259786e-7,0.000015145441,0.0016929919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343264,0.0048766043,0.0005721753,0.00009952236,0.0008220691,0.00019699143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941459,0.0044826446,0.0009155653,0.00032195883,0.00007412651,0.00005982924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005403482,0.00012024748,0.0002788594,0.000080951766,0.0010812593,0.00013199596,0.0021008507,0.000114954666,0.000021431282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017375986,0.00005265504,0.00010856111,0.0004407615,0.00034445125,0.0011767895,0.00047952475,0.0021026735,0.0000025618808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001883801,0.000027088112,0.84276974,0.0000069941784,0.000068990346,1.15021734e-7,0.15519598,0.0006082844,0.000035287427,0.0010603805,0.00005770995,0.00015060324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003795319,0.000088154055,0.86382383,0.000089128414,0.00016339197,4.3014117e-7,0.13396151,0.00003354741,0.000006526953,0.0006903356,0.0007066106,0.00005699006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090014946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000108783235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021234471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029087447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095675045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9135187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981308303","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071","title":"Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Business; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.586007628064981,"score_gpt":0.5768068421870614,"score_spread":0.009200785877919615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981308303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98608,0.001987934,0.00039718862,0.008577469,0.00056561246,0.00026778132,0.0000185573,0.0000084182875,0.002097033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996233,0.0011381947,0.00066193304,0.00078214286,0.00023199871,0.0000023480707,0.0000011447099,0.000016524029,0.00093273784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825663,0.0019819257,0.001560044,0.00039235305,0.0072287726,0.0005802693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98698366,0.009817259,0.0011198933,0.0005388342,0.0009259174,0.0006144507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07693311,0.00017257904,0.0004379715,0.021675637,0.00011510109,0.002167461,0.005583235,0.00044624897,0.00031022623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018168142,0.00009597199,0.00008560489,0.037663165,0.00021282602,0.020877028,0.0008246407,0.0049161273,0.00003401636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110947214,0.000045189787,0.96635365,0.0000049152527,0.000012570899,0.000009906228,0.0024068533,0.00006818322,0.0014812114,0.004700064,0.008522986,0.016283495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094986794,0.0003855586,0.9272992,0.000047315603,0.000010925506,0.00007631391,0.009791281,0.0010907435,0.0003070541,0.05641089,0.003488936,0.00014191883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021235095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015205205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058764968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012753888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079200516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985187396","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102070","title":"Issues with criteria to create blacklists: An epidemiological approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Data-Driven Disease Surveillance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Odds; Epidemiology; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Actuarial science; Medicine; Mathematics; Logistic regression; Business; Political science; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.0506870482131276,"score_gpt":0.3416379293872782,"score_spread":0.29095088117415063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985187396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719957,0.0012492064,0.00078893465,0.014000974,0.00016686342,0.00055131095,0.000039736293,0.000078158715,0.011129076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789545,0.00029682697,0.009015452,0.008006355,0.0012621776,0.000004309878,0.00003255474,0.000049270282,0.0023785634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725276,0.0008876259,0.0007143505,0.00025216278,0.00049407186,0.0003990206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771523,0.00049022515,0.0004082032,0.00065246056,0.00012839839,0.0006054799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029445882,0.00025049283,0.000786923,0.000135726,0.000053792166,0.000039724408,0.0009064904,0.00021344885,0.000598206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072539365,0.00012244434,0.000112108704,0.00033414448,0.00015986872,0.000857424,0.0001200237,0.0012950388,0.00014609647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024533866,0.0004982014,0.7119076,0.00040738675,0.00068344886,0.00022310088,0.0047545116,0.00056301587,0.016216932,0.005083098,0.2323665,0.0027622913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041664336,0.0044378373,0.91469675,0.0009089616,0.00049449643,0.0028487497,0.0025049997,0.001091167,0.0012306529,0.0037266568,0.06330959,0.0005836871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011145398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.8014486e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20278913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047336365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019899102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65499365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999917663","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102103","title":"Library and learning experiences turned mobile: A comparative study between LIS and non-LIS students","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"University of Hong Kong; University Grants Committee","keywords":"Recreation; Library science; Psychology; Mobile device; Mobile technology; Medical education; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05250697127446948,"score_gpt":0.31972683735319507,"score_spread":0.2672198660787256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999917663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99102587,0.0010997147,0.0025600595,0.0044997036,0.00017323502,0.00038875808,4.5615332e-7,0.00005330191,0.00019889718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968092,0.00022931209,0.0015411542,0.000657692,0.0006236316,0.000017347314,5.666424e-7,0.000014654194,0.00010644857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972069,0.0012072795,0.00057024084,0.00025986866,0.0005316728,0.00022401301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757105,0.0012997732,0.0006216399,0.00018330589,0.000028767723,0.00029547705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010225091,0.00018935566,0.00038296945,0.00011822251,0.0002769962,0.0004905273,0.0020186072,0.00010922755,0.000021204984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016235188,0.00012845229,0.000035891637,0.00057358394,0.00014998465,0.00474395,0.00073131535,0.001955533,0.00000430954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005560085,0.000038928712,0.505925,0.000012770577,0.000072355826,0.0000060085263,0.48963505,0.00020830322,0.0001259825,0.00006508184,0.0008285921,0.003026368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016484176,0.0032049345,0.7469208,0.00016954193,0.00012378179,0.00009745922,0.23855898,0.004082655,0.0012580093,0.0007267934,0.002810662,0.00039795242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000025668737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.2768767e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25107607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008825304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013116712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8495926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W300947135","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.014","title":"Book review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07058666602331214,"score_gpt":0.28924364347635717,"score_spread":0.21865697745304502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W300947135","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055820425,0.95009446,0.00008395744,0.036289763,0.00029795297,0.00025193387,0.000007417754,0.00006502118,0.007327474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026034473,0.7939002,0.00032416233,0.16534841,0.0024479418,0.000003167153,0.0000021240824,0.00016842608,0.01177112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966114,0.0009370602,0.0011329878,0.00010396132,0.0008288714,0.00038570655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997324,0.0006605371,0.0012162052,0.0004175892,0.00011353726,0.00026813376],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032456238,0.00021518218,0.0005041382,0.00015058983,0.00019692574,0.000012436286,0.0018303252,0.00018177631,0.0022133836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082417735,0.00012294503,0.00023326761,0.0006031649,0.00029921046,0.0022254318,0.00011270271,0.0026786625,0.00185108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001305485,0.000013970383,0.00068439636,0.00008651816,0.000058209116,0.00005376806,0.00048520436,0.000009706183,0.0011027267,0.00026457844,0.99690574,0.00020462614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057782436,0.00009780157,0.003864675,0.0020420528,0.00023479934,0.009195839,0.000037009333,0.0000074584063,0.0016190223,0.0011828023,0.9809645,0.00017623774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013123521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.5608474e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15619427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006271113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004652859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160689881","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102392","title":"Less money, less children, and less prestige: Differences between male and female academic librarians","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.18879629056911856,"score_gpt":0.305243910910971,"score_spread":0.11644762034185241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160689881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714607,0.0073023373,0.00026142134,0.018324282,0.00025421692,0.000176439,0.000053864176,0.000031812786,0.0021349401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98632455,0.010156895,0.00013688265,0.0006193781,0.0012950217,9.4279545e-7,0.000005219825,0.000016926166,0.0014441861],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960992,0.001752066,0.000660451,0.00028027888,0.0007049062,0.0005031047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747306,0.0011928539,0.00056038017,0.00021267912,0.00009216671,0.00046884848],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027244787,0.0002311828,0.0005013575,0.00011316174,0.00089927163,0.00024297783,0.0011824853,0.00061474077,0.00007363448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004677322,0.00017729086,0.0000946238,0.00040998933,0.0008992848,0.0023283323,0.00044832472,0.0023059468,0.0000034338989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055576493,0.000018163177,0.95316696,0.00003328691,0.00011412375,0.000012530684,0.027549906,0.0000047220783,0.0001435742,0.010403325,0.0018639717,0.0066338717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006479335,0.000055908476,0.91577524,0.00016798399,0.00024189173,0.0001188094,0.062964566,0.0000056322115,0.00063954334,0.018369304,0.0007500855,0.00026308038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004462638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004091838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03739169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003116395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006573485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185564031","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102424","title":"Information literacy skills: Investigating differences between native and non-native English-speaking students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Information literacy; Test (biology); Significant difference; Psychology; Mathematics education; First language; Empirical research; Higher education; Pedagogy; Political science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.03271928043987804,"score_gpt":0.3239674687799527,"score_spread":0.29124818834007465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185564031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98050797,0.0002193384,0.00043843494,0.0050478596,0.00048145725,0.0001578424,0.000009909782,0.00002221372,0.013114993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341625,0.00055557094,0.0005848315,0.0039445865,0.0012150377,0.0000015161564,0.0000062757813,0.000005055535,0.00027086848],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694496,0.0008944919,0.0009083028,0.00007290097,0.0008832717,0.0002960982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587137,0.0021420305,0.0011197751,0.000104890954,0.00053430605,0.00022763251],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031994467,0.00013424904,0.00025074804,0.00019836075,0.0007984474,0.0006851854,0.00097071606,0.00016753569,0.00007814821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003700599,0.00008941121,0.000056905013,0.00084911915,0.00041462362,0.055557914,0.00022798448,0.0011227912,0.000007853815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006834803,0.000005585476,0.29725316,0.000013439537,0.000031922034,7.5742264e-7,0.68959147,0.0000046473265,0.000011566485,0.005890548,0.0003877012,0.006802354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078335876,0.0000885108,0.7311812,0.00065382157,0.000055913504,0.0000088153465,0.21159509,0.00008847789,0.00075478543,0.022170795,0.03236788,0.00025132945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028436863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.8087265e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4779964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048734793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006593709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9576515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199898089","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102449","title":"Love Data Week in the time of COVID-19: A content analysis of Love Data Week 2021 events","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Context (archaeology); Tracking (education); Qualitative property; Content analysis; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); World Wide Web; Psychology; Public relations; Medical education; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Social science; History; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.5707753550266078,"score_gpt":0.45022210471394514,"score_spread":0.12055325031266267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199898089","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25967696,0.015829416,0.07428411,0.6181332,0.0015654939,0.001532966,0.017268918,0.000015674024,0.011693287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591189,0.0045264717,0.0019052383,0.022558346,0.000602074,0.0000010747461,0.0011481649,0.00003748664,0.010102265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910856,0.004451714,0.0027611468,0.00048876513,0.0028737397,0.00031607365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825438,0.010030517,0.0025876854,0.004389184,0.00022921753,0.00021954115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038964503,0.00019103634,0.00092921994,0.0006304071,0.00005116238,0.00013634558,0.015224085,0.00015597709,0.0032927638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020001786,0.000102346436,0.00021954264,0.0037126772,0.00028457728,0.0030120711,0.0038483082,0.0010264132,0.00017640866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017335785,0.0016441128,0.019028338,0.00012568504,0.004934935,0.0002421376,0.032434035,0.0031118651,0.0015784819,0.008799617,0.9163235,0.010043725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064332727,0.0008543325,0.10909293,0.00065591146,0.010126855,0.00028783086,0.23960443,0.031150399,0.0010598185,0.15259364,0.44722196,0.00091859716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014548739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008872429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6994419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039620892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009185158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203733951","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102448","title":"Learning and change through diversity, equity, and inclusion professional development: Academic librarians' perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Denver","keywords":"Transtheoretical model; Psychology; Professional development; Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Equity (law); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Sociology; Behavior change; Political science","score_opus":0.09789034874388354,"score_gpt":0.36116702597428324,"score_spread":0.2632766772303997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203733951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8220609,0.016377049,0.00012853877,0.13995323,0.000896855,0.00026677496,0.0000035785968,0.000059496524,0.020253576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716418,0.015577518,0.00074779714,0.007821842,0.0010222837,0.0000015240004,0.0000029483924,0.000009670894,0.0031746372],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972451,0.00074297644,0.0004722327,0.00014485522,0.0010625493,0.00033229688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850065,0.000614368,0.00047550144,0.00007093999,0.00011232799,0.00022620623],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003278412,0.00013372288,0.00020331824,0.00012016374,0.0051586595,0.00019441097,0.0009971582,0.00027217856,0.00020941251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005577135,0.0000931943,0.000041600826,0.0005367327,0.00049941224,0.027893893,0.018747533,0.0016354967,0.0000051948846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006050369,0.000013988028,0.027420413,0.000024601219,0.000020772623,0.000006864609,0.88716614,0.0000011434254,0.00014328498,0.061113566,0.0015362664,0.022492433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010911187,0.00013069257,0.07764316,0.0006572717,0.000059605092,0.00019051302,0.30945256,0.000056354707,0.0010182429,0.21721116,0.39207155,0.000417777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021777405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012413427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5777136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004498725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008506295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283809087","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102568","title":"Unexpected collaborations: A science librarian and a reference archivist co-teaching","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Archivist; Library science; Archival science; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.14298465435887386,"score_gpt":0.3649692715701778,"score_spread":0.22198461721130391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283809087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47824448,0.0033877855,0.22877611,0.19376619,0.0009993239,0.0015848839,0.000094568524,0.00035302137,0.09279364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852406,0.0006246645,0.011408369,0.001194578,0.00016370896,0.000012186995,0.0000034834063,0.000013926461,0.0013385296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539286,0.001901973,0.0005406782,0.00028812513,0.0014751496,0.00040120338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658793,0.001634316,0.0007233583,0.0007385789,0.000079669706,0.00023615475],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010662862,0.00013287034,0.00018138604,0.00065342174,0.0016849106,0.0026264114,0.008327195,0.00002698882,0.00003756685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021309117,0.00009633426,0.00002641559,0.0019097149,0.00043111513,0.051582456,0.002935084,0.0027634597,0.0000062266117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001637905,0.000060724244,0.0009920719,0.000018824756,0.000051779327,0.000050090035,0.004796631,0.00023558197,0.010671552,0.9654166,0.009466956,0.008075362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003330852,0.0024035312,0.07642866,0.00024918668,0.0001551362,0.0031775378,0.014198994,0.032441124,0.0033136057,0.09943953,0.7636768,0.0011850224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015591226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.41911e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8659771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008191773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013214983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297679278","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102593","title":"Relational practice of Canadian academic librarians: Exploratory content analysis using relational-cultural theory","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Content analysis; Exploratory analysis; Academic library; Exploratory research; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Social science","score_opus":0.21111555226470155,"score_gpt":0.3291294091882248,"score_spread":0.11801385692352326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297679278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7543292,0.009023026,0.003518585,0.15842406,0.0026827815,0.0009169328,0.0002595118,0.000083699364,0.07076222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98216707,0.0010083327,0.0022145554,0.011938627,0.0007949844,0.000005215965,0.000031642347,0.00001653855,0.0018230207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993569,0.0030497771,0.0013352548,0.00013162142,0.0015254425,0.00038888922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464184,0.0025203205,0.0019283893,0.00020512677,0.00031895883,0.0003853891],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010221882,0.00014720285,0.00030374102,0.0015560796,0.001526566,0.00008464332,0.0014242296,0.00020516131,0.0016304882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022655318,0.00010964902,0.00024573875,0.00482605,0.0004874856,0.0376287,0.00014648587,0.0021310046,0.000010197642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025887816,0.000017633012,0.015605817,0.0000046735827,0.00035931982,0.0000050734807,0.1027316,0.01663869,0.00017646597,0.8557116,0.008176158,0.00031408865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071652536,0.00012820066,0.01911859,0.00006560288,0.0009275143,0.000121796926,0.27979028,0.0017405218,0.000121197896,0.032798097,0.6641043,0.0003674012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019499533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003361497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8229135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002532253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036211289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313621144","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102659","title":"Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Publishing; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6199549595361636,"score_gpt":0.5971259394288214,"score_spread":0.022829020107342224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313621144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606272,0.0037363588,0.0011817375,0.026763055,0.0016184582,0.00034274845,0.000016386452,0.000038693073,0.0056753713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920241,0.003769332,0.0007092323,0.00039461383,0.00039749275,9.5153797e-7,0.0000010293493,0.000015574547,0.0026876295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899387,0.0011310016,0.0015734481,0.0003085183,0.006572269,0.00047608349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98849624,0.008296584,0.0010685731,0.0006600844,0.00097191636,0.000506621],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07262318,0.0001327652,0.00035496018,0.016319284,0.0003738522,0.0011577412,0.0022961802,0.00020390998,0.0005381386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026050027,0.00006759281,0.00011824022,0.0584506,0.00027175422,0.0018802027,0.00094959454,0.0014431734,0.000052340758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008664405,0.000052120402,0.14953664,0.000027725468,0.000065752676,0.00036559455,0.0011301455,0.000057321395,0.011135441,0.001709098,0.77438706,0.061446484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006622461,0.00044489827,0.7459517,0.0001343849,0.00005432624,0.0012679226,0.0022329765,0.0023165776,0.0018808106,0.13404301,0.11074906,0.00026207464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043703935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.5782818e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.663638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052110798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076053006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366254145","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102714","title":"Universal research index: An inclusive metric to quantify scientific research output","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; McGill University; Krembil Foundation; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Toronto Western Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS","keywords":"Index (typography); Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Metric (unit); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Disadvantage; Statistics; Data science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Mathematics; Business; Marketing; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8635694832816184,"score_gpt":0.6586222012123094,"score_spread":0.204947282069309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366254145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521487,0.0010890316,0.0014846859,0.03744654,0.002034461,0.00063570583,0.000033306227,0.000047580448,0.005080041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839227,0.0005249439,0.0002765352,0.00020585697,0.0009986975,0.000004415974,0.0000027091453,0.000040133516,0.014023967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93048084,0.013029949,0.0022948245,0.0011492936,0.05019634,0.0028487793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90559834,0.07002694,0.000778846,0.0024531714,0.018414611,0.002728094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.42668134,0.00023521393,0.0005714404,0.25093636,0.0028981224,0.0060763326,0.020071652,0.00051046204,0.0003451921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19116697,0.00013678183,0.00022259564,0.58419365,0.0016954426,0.0047162753,0.006486565,0.0072826045,0.0028108677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009331298,0.0001848143,0.075583376,0.000014565559,0.00006937236,0.00024211677,0.0120853,0.0018112486,0.006797703,0.01885875,0.77676684,0.10665276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014408728,0.0021832304,0.32802686,0.00012443923,0.000022354025,0.00018498357,0.054686204,0.008813922,0.0039390004,0.29145703,0.30862412,0.0004969753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013056412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001318018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46814275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005038028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003467832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378218022","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102738","title":"Patterns and trends of equity, diversity and inclusion programs in academic libraries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Diversity (politics); Library science; Inclusion (mineral); Equity (law); Academic library; Professional association; Strategic planning; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Social science","score_opus":0.1750793149273653,"score_gpt":0.35659917160601895,"score_spread":0.18151985667865364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378218022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761239,0.00050136924,0.000010748803,0.02201532,0.00013276286,0.0000852562,0.0000038204016,0.000022711612,0.0011040942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534667,0.0037211394,0.000034487995,0.0002888904,0.00023191069,4.865876e-7,0.0000018321706,0.000004951162,0.00036965113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822575,0.00038043642,0.00040316785,0.00010383272,0.0006265945,0.00026023327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989761,0.00042721207,0.0003504416,0.000072571995,0.0000189586,0.00015469546],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034996544,0.000086939675,0.00018528699,0.00029085035,0.0013145268,0.000054248456,0.00089805375,0.00021987174,0.000022159187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018284573,0.000059908038,0.000034154637,0.0010145032,0.000492652,0.0042252475,0.0055028354,0.0007283027,6.3049447e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079727935,0.000010891388,0.7930899,0.000023049177,0.0000073218994,0.0000068555987,0.15212624,0.0000032068008,0.00025764605,0.017051922,0.00043842438,0.036904804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005120761,0.00023281152,0.80996084,0.0002553252,0.000031091848,0.000015648597,0.023322798,0.00007439509,0.0004406554,0.1633712,0.0016466649,0.00013650671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018636308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004097747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14631929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014786102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018569232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387030000","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102790","title":"Exploring the experiences of academic library employees with long COVID in the United States and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Empathy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Compassion; Medical education; Public relations; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.17150218608111464,"score_gpt":0.36274656634542396,"score_spread":0.19124438026430932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387030000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97243154,0.001796455,0.000010069173,0.024948612,0.00038905698,0.00024269418,0.000008556251,0.000020520969,0.00015247067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98728776,0.0060478095,0.000006576519,0.0061512403,0.00025775333,0.000026752969,0.00000563813,0.000023735809,0.0001927109],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974357,0.00095868076,0.0006314071,0.000130855,0.00045557343,0.0003877825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540925,0.0037782418,0.00042045128,0.00023779208,0.000015059714,0.00013918408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017891973,0.00016066106,0.00024553548,0.00023853374,0.0001905061,0.000026998996,0.0012175577,0.00009549805,0.000059229078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094609386,0.00007008751,0.000031295087,0.0011137573,0.00031704505,0.00085363793,0.00011654328,0.0017673963,0.0000018346819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014206303,0.000028232267,0.39010015,0.00012757118,0.00009558215,0.00013424411,0.57919997,0.00037484145,0.000050423034,0.002420618,0.024194228,0.0018535366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009557322,0.0004223024,0.39263913,0.00034338012,0.00005635871,0.00029242996,0.5905199,0.00004001257,0.00051215506,0.0018221224,0.012229599,0.00016687012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0485278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005699821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04282798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050452134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010469066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95780814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388036762","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102805","title":"Does one size fit all ages? Results of an international survey on academic library services for non-degree seeking older adults","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lifelong learning; Higher education; Pandemic; Population; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Online learning; Medical education; Psychology; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Demography","score_opus":0.10599609909210646,"score_gpt":0.3493707527650512,"score_spread":0.24337465367294475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388036762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568643,0.0000435935,0.000012658014,0.038427208,0.0013099079,0.00041380047,0.00026777724,0.00007342745,0.0025873098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914217,0.0013361323,0.00035138414,0.0020316904,0.002286271,0.0000042057454,0.00010274674,0.000027519713,0.002438377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965525,0.00075123075,0.0010001012,0.0002561319,0.0010121742,0.0004278423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940248,0.004180602,0.0011927765,0.00024231881,0.000103511265,0.00025596842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055918777,0.00018395438,0.0003026963,0.0002378286,0.00030293944,0.00017760466,0.0027250897,0.0003978298,0.000110429355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011199604,0.00010656991,0.00012768817,0.0007905299,0.00024442672,0.009072144,0.00013328517,0.0010053875,0.000014098103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03208064,0.00079044147,0.35353908,0.0006473311,0.0008980885,0.0000721454,0.40279782,0.00097553764,0.013565902,0.015927054,0.11787014,0.06083584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023054897,0.00056462944,0.9546906,0.0011910179,0.000057354166,0.0000046693626,0.010901778,0.0010362689,0.004856221,0.01467154,0.009392097,0.00032834572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019688038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056966113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6011515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023329743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046093372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6577085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391418369","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102851","title":"Reinventing information literacy instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic: Exploring experiences, evolutions and implications for online information literacy programming","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Literacy; Mathematics education; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Computer science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.12449221874472861,"score_gpt":0.39098865355227475,"score_spread":0.26649643480754615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391418369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89167744,0.0019715496,0.029645734,0.074437335,0.0013106066,0.00060901843,0.000016183794,0.0001503081,0.00018185105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903393,0.0019580552,0.00488872,0.001740207,0.00084927457,0.00011726953,0.000019492843,0.0000071631202,0.00008054473],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984479,0.0002244757,0.0007312676,0.000068653564,0.00028823968,0.00023947535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982338,0.0009813891,0.00030754975,0.000101024685,0.0001983338,0.00017788394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002646385,0.00009514347,0.00010078684,0.0002148056,0.0014664272,0.00078249635,0.00038233254,0.000100454396,0.000017005948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019434514,0.00006175542,0.00006168154,0.0005783363,0.00020993683,0.011298692,0.000055154116,0.00063112634,0.0000026028467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044104112,0.000011845861,0.0075374655,0.00019749158,0.000032255946,1.3585485e-7,0.675941,0.000053575473,0.000030482652,0.10737448,0.00055963185,0.20821752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004385596,0.0000305692,0.012729098,0.00034921576,0.000056952722,0.00019834652,0.12445238,0.0003552633,0.00002339413,0.043098763,0.81810236,0.0001650748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032400603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003056955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81754273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024039646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006837681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399403231","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102905","title":"Creative write-ins at academic libraries: Fostering virtual and in-person space for writers and the potential for multi-directional learning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtual space; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Launched; Academic library; Creative brief; Work (physics); Learning community; Computer science; Creativity; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Library science; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12235698922476547,"score_gpt":0.3665346638163209,"score_spread":0.24417767459155543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399403231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7792155,0.023944039,0.025089394,0.16530421,0.0027276354,0.0015576001,0.000031232346,0.00008635747,0.002044011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98301786,0.005706015,0.0015087721,0.00054827426,0.0014896375,0.00003288747,0.0000023071998,0.000026346182,0.0076679275],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833363,0.0006792791,0.0003378483,0.00014807949,0.00024327445,0.0002579076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959404,0.0036462178,0.00021850716,0.00004777615,0.000036535206,0.000110577785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004069915,0.00012010846,0.00018965156,0.00013262092,0.0008585933,0.00024226813,0.00027191313,0.00017889893,0.00004355121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008442767,0.00007571088,0.00008166956,0.00020068574,0.00039826892,0.0016285622,0.000093518225,0.0012827729,0.0000011752493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069762515,0.00004882618,0.0066375015,0.0002528877,0.0005687985,0.000008984199,0.7025124,0.0017595692,0.003378239,0.21163607,0.02633656,0.039883904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008143259,0.0005619112,0.018078227,0.0011970766,0.00066110154,0.00021446183,0.44936758,0.020174328,0.0005397811,0.02540765,0.47501695,0.00063765247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005898404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010173444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4486804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093571754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000245183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6603692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399564582","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102908","title":"What is ideal EDI learning for academic librarians? Discovering EDI learning stories through appreciative inquiry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University; Canadian Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Appreciative inquiry; Ideal (ethics); Mathematics education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10737077083033746,"score_gpt":0.379290619349631,"score_spread":0.2719198485192935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399564582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53954655,0.0751075,0.049022816,0.27751333,0.03748447,0.0020300995,0.000028402867,0.0008687724,0.018398058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94456047,0.023121689,0.0006274585,0.0021394573,0.01754241,0.000013802506,0.000010451134,0.00006556477,0.011918709],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582,0.0009884371,0.00092079694,0.00033671726,0.0010592655,0.0008747683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956338,0.0031857793,0.0007000397,0.00014361377,0.00008195409,0.00025482968],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005506821,0.00028311915,0.00039094704,0.00019052338,0.0016441067,0.0015378256,0.0015148472,0.0005602,0.00015039697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001176943,0.00020224022,0.000255525,0.00074277,0.0007263564,0.039548058,0.00020870968,0.004033998,0.000025640584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003141133,0.00001583571,0.006480075,0.000118289594,0.00015847223,0.00001706753,0.8189234,0.0013529793,0.0011098254,0.12066515,0.036390074,0.014454723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004195694,0.00043190006,0.00095488364,0.0013120739,0.00015366748,0.00004761319,0.26366737,0.0008270519,0.002668804,0.09264101,0.6364358,0.0004402605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006422698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046420378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60004574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117336014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017703958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401872841","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102942","title":"Comparing generative artificial intelligence tools to voice assistants using reference interactions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"AI in Service Interactions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Generative model; Natural language processing; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.34038389993922186,"score_gpt":0.39404660585536305,"score_spread":0.053662705916141196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401872841","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0970902,0.00045117617,0.8812146,0.01610651,0.0030923143,0.0001357283,0.000006096666,0.00009607661,0.0018073022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603671,0.000054279495,0.03715127,0.001224695,0.001005832,0.000002931045,6.378072e-7,0.00002009607,0.00017315515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976231,0.0004047809,0.000940495,0.000244768,0.00046510852,0.00032175152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970778,0.001772989,0.0003403059,0.00041099483,0.00019218844,0.00020570257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012136111,0.00019682014,0.00025898797,0.00037014228,0.0002782221,0.0009361905,0.0025155488,0.000108067565,0.00006385854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003213584,0.00014007115,0.00010144376,0.001209816,0.00006111262,0.0059882803,0.0004684871,0.0022467119,0.000203916],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003679576,0.000141692,0.0006807313,0.0001041246,0.00056585326,0.00019087842,0.04505448,0.06592375,0.15225935,0.61803645,0.013502806,0.103171945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010240509,0.00030258732,0.0024082072,0.0024738968,0.0002315131,0.00297492,0.005496257,0.7321189,0.06795642,0.15987602,0.02528036,0.0007785221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027112437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017736205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8632769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002207275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000424542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402807832","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102958","title":"Conflicts of neutrality: Exploring definitions, values, and practices among Canadian academic librarians","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Academic library; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.26570101264888474,"score_gpt":0.36256118407800775,"score_spread":0.09686017142912301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402807832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91514385,0.006347407,0.000039455674,0.06209666,0.0009986723,0.00020179928,0.000021481557,0.000050234845,0.015100466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824734,0.014774111,0.0001608765,0.0008224402,0.0012203967,0.0000030989147,0.0000026120551,0.000016283368,0.00052683003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975018,0.00072565634,0.0006730041,0.0001593857,0.00055334874,0.00038678764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970562,0.0015763838,0.00067244156,0.00013830129,0.000050306142,0.0005064053],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004006066,0.00013602347,0.00021835975,0.00033270972,0.00047264062,0.0003255961,0.0008778025,0.00029031766,0.00010550727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094407104,0.00009883648,0.00007678927,0.00077799085,0.0007578514,0.014307096,0.000048797094,0.0015685166,0.000008058607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008709316,0.000015578906,0.09870968,0.00013955415,0.00013383912,0.000071006674,0.15386982,0.00004029945,0.001295976,0.7249018,0.015533864,0.0052014934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006313738,0.0004508618,0.15868875,0.0022280624,0.0005714043,0.00032745188,0.11661585,0.00030732507,0.0055838623,0.42536715,0.28847075,0.0007571673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081569385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011817045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29953465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042965457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002667396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404578467","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102983","title":"What makes students tick? Exploring factors that affect learner motivations and challenges when engaging with optional library workshops on data literacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Literacy; Information literacy; Mathematics education; Library instruction; Psychology; School library; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Communication","score_opus":0.23978309200935433,"score_gpt":0.3383885022935676,"score_spread":0.09860541028421327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404578467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8180198,0.030931996,0.008586521,0.14096777,0.0009799873,0.00013296246,0.000007002581,0.00020486012,0.00016910271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680976,0.026324293,0.0036972095,0.00040320153,0.00072205614,0.0000013338234,0.000008503342,0.000035239205,0.00071051775],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808204,0.00043398121,0.000299103,0.00028793092,0.00065551297,0.00024144251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968107,0.002375969,0.00018746131,0.0004655978,0.000021251673,0.0001390649],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012051575,0.00020149356,0.000212552,0.00029192283,0.00020266163,0.0017908541,0.002291488,0.000091691356,0.000011833289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011239888,0.00011403507,0.000046836696,0.00029347296,0.00007245862,0.017563561,0.00065610115,0.0020337165,0.0000055712003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035318165,0.00031730536,0.20392194,0.00073021324,0.0017287806,0.00039228983,0.1772924,0.009042398,0.00016238507,0.12605347,0.008505912,0.47149974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003001377,0.0017678776,0.534567,0.036417775,0.00091065885,0.0016384256,0.048950512,0.18512756,0.001289454,0.08411505,0.099874154,0.0023401815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.464133e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.999406e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46915954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015549904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012627224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407363674","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103020","title":"The business of transformative agreements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Business Strategies and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Business; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.024620040525921046,"score_gpt":0.24224564137521468,"score_spread":0.21762560084929364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407363674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72512865,0.0034216347,0.014039688,0.12137044,0.0034501292,0.0006091968,0.000004106263,0.00004612846,0.13193001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629635,0.0005303375,0.00003141843,0.0020449627,0.0007436766,0.0000016168761,0.0000020040463,0.000009112573,0.00034050495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986916,0.000033005537,0.00075661513,0.00005224308,0.0002899082,0.00017659055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982515,0.00021927235,0.0008808163,0.0001526358,0.000490482,0.0000053251483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014206438,0.000117641095,0.00019046107,0.00020059613,0.0002705824,0.0001418047,0.0008912233,0.00009485713,0.000033860004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020162686,0.0000582777,0.00006297745,0.0015960042,0.00016115067,0.0030779662,0.000082481805,0.0005092033,0.0000062767886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010779962,0.00006124051,0.010967822,0.0005281279,0.00029436452,0.0000019766348,0.00064216054,0.0005120451,0.0037959875,0.8800371,0.06051922,0.04156196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002801934,0.000040846186,0.34814906,0.0013064989,0.00052312354,0.000020128595,0.009096201,0.0015248827,0.002435479,0.3283072,0.30544475,0.0003498691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037409416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022596698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5517299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014022073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012745317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23764956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408072603","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103027","title":"Academic librarian schedules and workspaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Facilities and Workplace Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Workspace; Computer science; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02943312271236372,"score_gpt":0.30358151899108027,"score_spread":0.27414839627871657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408072603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69331115,0.06992114,0.0030178481,0.16161004,0.003257915,0.00045866522,0.000010186058,0.00009791177,0.06831514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508831,0.0039237407,0.0005181861,0.006409899,0.00080335943,0.000007236985,0.0000013093166,0.00002815248,0.03742501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796325,0.0005269723,0.0006986282,0.00017400998,0.00024279248,0.00039433423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998035,0.0010891773,0.00038850092,0.00032293118,0.000028386863,0.00013601013],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018417366,0.0002094472,0.00032878644,0.0003012388,0.00018285807,0.00008379481,0.0010871474,0.00041914362,0.0004206822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016222881,0.00013584296,0.000091734866,0.00047952787,0.00029470725,0.0007276954,0.00028632834,0.0024789001,0.00003906876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011396037,0.000029209326,0.050092354,0.000069836155,0.00048740488,0.000018256836,0.005483095,0.000072996496,0.000069684014,0.7071868,0.20827909,0.027071653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033882624,0.00039145688,0.14957881,0.0012843795,0.0006399326,0.00020764106,0.04864142,0.00010197275,0.0003618565,0.29325834,0.5015845,0.0005614823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012167432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.033848e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41392848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024749845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108268614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408326546","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103028","title":"Summer of writing: Supporting the research and publishing needs of academic librarians","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Saskatchewan; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Academic library; Library science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.17309476833791337,"score_gpt":0.4246200790287653,"score_spread":0.25152531069085193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408326546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83729845,0.011825224,0.00036324258,0.12628783,0.0006169251,0.00027350674,0.000011287172,0.000011376159,0.023312127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932742,0.0009261304,0.00011921585,0.0010623398,0.00069815933,0.000005608339,0.0000035156843,0.000020451718,0.0038903903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630463,0.0011525841,0.0014899465,0.00012767484,0.0005397592,0.00038541007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992163,0.0057367403,0.0012559994,0.00039157513,0.0003526804,0.000099992416],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011519227,0.00013152853,0.00031176768,0.0006202548,0.00018037292,0.000102030885,0.0016881634,0.00042968034,0.00016338425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019031874,0.000079916295,0.000090035195,0.0014656546,0.0006045791,0.0014776476,0.00021460972,0.0037757321,0.0000030185386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004466723,0.000079176905,0.1819816,0.00012184479,0.00024439595,0.0000010894953,0.045280512,0.000015333706,0.0067797415,0.6456178,0.10622085,0.013210978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014330825,0.00032567108,0.51264936,0.0011311019,0.00025851058,0.00020042897,0.20299801,0.000060588318,0.006951732,0.23434189,0.039426446,0.00022315566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005306446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.20934e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41127592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024789995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053636765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408735192","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103045","title":"What's in a name? Exploring how voluntary library data literacy workshop titles and descriptions affect learner motivations to enroll","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Information literacy; Turnover; Literacy; Adult literacy; Psychology; Library science; Medical education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Management; Medicine; Communication","score_opus":0.10051378855118662,"score_gpt":0.32253655857169433,"score_spread":0.22202277002050771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408735192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5362758,0.0068587735,0.050602563,0.40480974,0.0009086257,0.00016877154,0.0000061138708,0.00008409372,0.0002854964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708206,0.0038791348,0.01714912,0.003126189,0.0004840947,0.0000029132002,0.000006094269,0.000017885484,0.0045139883],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998694,0.00035059598,0.00033815118,0.00020003504,0.00019649841,0.00022074103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809873,0.0010638193,0.00015688447,0.00053886115,0.00002787918,0.00011383701],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009410631,0.00012849987,0.00020440224,0.00047217065,0.00012712134,0.0008523329,0.0021206823,0.000093659655,0.000008328849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005270191,0.00009155295,0.000039878065,0.0010608251,0.000046987516,0.014128731,0.0009447656,0.00136422,0.000005313443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002685701,0.00026610913,0.29558492,0.00021537203,0.00039846762,0.00013093736,0.043490414,0.010874587,0.0014900371,0.068089545,0.18613431,0.39305672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028519935,0.00037099808,0.37234953,0.011912278,0.00032125704,0.00038088148,0.015844326,0.2957655,0.0006798229,0.11515508,0.1831599,0.0012084238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004211504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015097532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43454477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018450508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021118851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410781699","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103081","title":"Corrigendum to “What's in a name? Exploring how voluntary library data literacy workshop titles and descriptions affect learner motivations to enroll” [The Journal of Academic Librarianship 51, issue 3 (2025) 103045]","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Library science; Information literacy; Academic library; Sociology; World Wide Web; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1768599226568424,"score_gpt":0.35356340126601127,"score_spread":0.17670347860916888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410781699","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070939325,0.058526352,0.0019268922,0.78749627,0.06439582,0.0028666505,0.0003588523,0.00016467844,0.013325152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1297881,0.14947002,0.0034800773,0.025445348,0.039204072,0.000053222546,0.00029230825,0.00026260075,0.65200424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924086,0.0029129726,0.0017486045,0.0005139134,0.0015180766,0.00089787017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936529,0.002841287,0.0016163866,0.0009188783,0.00017122313,0.0007993549],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006416734,0.0005564809,0.0009130607,0.0014857809,0.0009553523,0.0022228651,0.007341797,0.0010974304,0.00048845564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040929727,0.00038010572,0.00020982706,0.0033980159,0.0005465254,0.04205326,0.001206916,0.008189287,0.000029779207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002692154,0.00003767036,0.005962112,0.00007129847,0.00009361941,0.000029665105,0.037451442,0.000074282674,0.000072803414,0.0013457981,0.94441754,0.010174573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004204416,0.00023581923,0.012409364,0.0050311238,0.00027107092,0.00008124079,0.045017675,0.00009943453,0.00007754871,0.0051104864,0.93075776,0.00048803687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000096649695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006338394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7620509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013841742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005856505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415711011","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103150","title":"A case for low-stakes collaboration: Increasing access through a mini-assignment in the first-year composition classroom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Composition (language); Desk; Academic library; Reference desk; Library instruction; Process (computing); Service (business)","score_opus":0.06528526164083667,"score_gpt":0.3520295713825352,"score_spread":0.2867443097416985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415711011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69227254,0.000525426,0.0054178103,0.28515327,0.0008392514,0.0010914836,0.000022953063,0.000025443624,0.014651842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828144,0.00020413398,0.00065049325,0.015661117,0.00050903286,0.000013430722,0.000003362215,0.0000043205273,0.0001397553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978059,0.00075005216,0.0006839785,0.00008188259,0.0004328611,0.00024532172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971372,0.0020724118,0.00048467075,0.0001445266,0.00011012043,0.00005106276],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004196546,0.00009870036,0.00016212,0.00014579606,0.00088665436,0.00067553355,0.0012307686,0.00013910649,0.000040814335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039280634,0.00005786766,0.00006701453,0.0012525499,0.00021935279,0.01929982,0.00005397947,0.0004703529,0.000002794089],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012144828,0.00012403922,0.028173005,0.00011791927,0.000060753853,0.000057416222,0.3575372,0.0010091831,0.000088761095,0.4948019,0.115092814,0.0017225207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036665602,0.0003158755,0.012848634,0.0011267163,0.00015722164,0.0005472643,0.3935094,0.0013798581,0.0011318339,0.16525373,0.4196273,0.00043559136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008357642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018211449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32954815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009277214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007742432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415835551","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103159","title":"A qualitative analysis of communication in consortial chat reference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Politeness; Scripting language; Closing (real estate); Perspective (graphical); Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Computer-mediated communication","score_opus":0.10197598965735409,"score_gpt":0.4458925213781364,"score_spread":0.3439165317207823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415835551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804017,0.0025187861,0.00087745383,0.004564257,0.0001382864,0.0000747872,0.000015693287,0.0000044623207,0.011404561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798,0.00078721624,0.00013835254,0.00042577548,0.000022513064,0.0000019826896,0.000005799309,0.0000042565407,0.00063409825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977432,0.0011718109,0.0007567135,0.000064170665,0.00013681797,0.00012730196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747604,0.0014455332,0.0006718669,0.0003146173,0.000063862404,0.000028081975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028602767,0.00007624022,0.00032473405,0.00055052614,0.000037889098,0.000008158432,0.0008133924,0.00016810418,0.00016605448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012925385,0.000052349445,0.00008180951,0.0012316633,0.00016693436,0.00024814848,0.000061187566,0.0010670181,0.0000028833147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022635895,0.00014741368,0.1510895,0.00003630965,0.002389656,0.0000039027714,0.24587812,0.0011751739,0.0007635226,0.58536434,0.0032085294,0.0076799104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001853314,0.0001840006,0.889126,0.00038585273,0.0013360091,0.000017199472,0.054282792,0.0033304787,0.00021480149,0.046178084,0.0029011208,0.00019036587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011564997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002900193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73803645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025549152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011087583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46357223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093086951","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103148","title":"Accelerating the use of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in academic libraries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Identifier; Metadata; Order (exchange); Interoperability; Object (grammar); Plug-in; Digital library; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.26254211656368176,"score_gpt":0.3708845944823355,"score_spread":0.10834247791865376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093086951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5280276,0.011289729,0.2502224,0.19596264,0.0021393867,0.0015124928,0.000030393214,0.00014422103,0.010671105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98829854,0.004304573,0.0027971943,0.0017535659,0.00021381715,0.0000051192847,0.0000019430229,0.000016949274,0.0026082844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996282,0.0010048595,0.0011882285,0.00022519179,0.0008709402,0.00042880353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164665,0.0063039646,0.0010219425,0.0008568826,0.000083332096,0.00008724988],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004871318,0.00017977007,0.00030284523,0.00058124104,0.00019320073,0.003151073,0.0090267,0.00017943862,0.000008396497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055893366,0.00010225784,0.00010667297,0.0019393109,0.0003176864,0.10871297,0.0022794863,0.0032324647,0.000004655052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004663231,0.000069161724,0.071322836,0.00016825223,0.0003794578,0.0000564064,0.0060451957,0.002663055,0.0024601808,0.82797164,0.055397753,0.032999743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048964005,0.00062933925,0.2257461,0.003780261,0.0004364504,0.00041029393,0.01190848,0.038144715,0.027010825,0.4463149,0.23935248,0.0013697692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021080725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001587616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46027094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004504238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059726584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115014548","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103184","title":"Exploring Copyright: A case study in practical copyright education for college educators","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Electronic learning","score_opus":0.1806261290110714,"score_gpt":0.33975439549141295,"score_spread":0.15912826648034156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115014548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540044,0.00059380254,0.00039797195,0.017056484,0.003027413,0.001271879,0.0000016177969,0.000034903784,0.02361153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939156,0.0000625981,0.00017081983,0.0024508738,0.002187243,0.000060615654,0.0000012797965,0.00002651995,0.001124422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823445,0.00012263232,0.00088940165,0.00018478285,0.0002598904,0.00030881475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998018,0.0009961099,0.00047287182,0.0002322405,0.0002489705,0.000031809377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022086336,0.00021378383,0.00035278298,0.00077464397,0.0003106164,0.0001977446,0.0005879672,0.00011900274,0.00033900162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001231365,0.00012712032,0.000109630964,0.0011849047,0.00007766208,0.0056162826,0.000111903544,0.0010923655,0.000026841233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027488738,0.0014735399,0.014125411,0.00034386668,0.00023464221,0.00024709635,0.006580469,0.000013493533,0.0003327132,0.042827502,0.9229033,0.008169095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008886798,0.0006955867,0.008589698,0.0019171584,0.0018670809,0.0026806917,0.24986142,0.010967208,0.00297647,0.11379251,0.5963847,0.0013806879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002676963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053901276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3265186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010455972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008660597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5183816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}