{"meta":{"query_hash":"32f273833c09","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship"},"cohort_total":68,"direct_labels_cover":2,"predictions_cover":68,"exported":68,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/32f273833c09","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Academic+Librarianship"},"results":[{"id":"W1501189164","doi":"10.1016/s0099-1333(01)00276-2","title":"Unobtrusive evaluation of reference service and individual responsibility: the canadian experience,","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Urban forest; Environmental planning; Stakeholder; Business; Environmental resource management; Urban planning; Urban climate; Greenhouse gas; Psychological resilience; Ecosystem services; Stakeholder engagement; Forest management; Urban ecosystem; Geography; Political science; Ecosystem; Ecology; Economics; Public relations; Forestry","score_opus":0.15048177334989443,"score_gpt":0.3249665904533331,"score_spread":0.17448481710343866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501189164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70329326,0.011296171,0.0028273803,0.0758466,0.00070525735,0.00047783696,0.00053370354,0.00021644449,0.2048033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946349,0.0055946335,0.0032225177,0.0033716105,0.00007569823,0.000097891956,0.00014786165,0.00012859852,0.041012093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756621,0.008731701,0.0010181154,0.0010396029,0.0107249655,0.002823442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.933607,0.017188098,0.0023905633,0.0022208334,0.035511564,0.009081939],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025741898,0.0005023542,0.00050100946,0.0028274243,0.028961087,0.007935632,0.0036996203,0.0032020707,0.007095252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07820669,0.00049062533,0.00032799746,0.0067763594,0.012780281,0.0035367685,0.0071947724,0.0032066768,0.0006351598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036067487,0.0006289663,0.042061433,0.00052065944,0.000031687294,0.0013955507,0.6127952,0.0004857815,0.0009432229,0.019313976,0.06596379,0.25549906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061944906,0.0003352317,0.08569159,0.00052183267,0.000061160725,0.0007912042,0.507511,0.00056295533,0.0018460671,0.003417093,0.39898428,0.00021561471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9738507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99069864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11898392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2665419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8632928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972664802","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2011.03.004","title":"Keeping Moving: Smart Phone and Mobile Technologies in the Academic Library","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Preparedness; Mobile phone; Library management; Mobile device; Phone; Perception; Computer science; Academic library; Multimedia; Mobile technology; World Wide Web; Medical education; Library science; Business; Psychology; Medicine; Management; Marketing; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04198657034816538,"score_gpt":0.2570298935849484,"score_spread":0.215043323236783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972664802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30617714,0.056919266,0.008167874,0.1995126,0.0033612407,0.00008502142,0.0005502534,0.00065317034,0.42457342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89696956,0.01874511,0.002951333,0.01529375,0.0024477772,0.000040553183,0.00016412517,0.00020431238,0.063183516],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756795,0.0013283308,0.00011709958,0.00019909491,0.00048469912,0.00030269715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539536,0.0022213096,0.0007104968,0.00021326727,0.00066507014,0.0007943853],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021281342,0.0002621668,0.00033249077,0.0021083471,0.004431364,0.016449943,0.0010520112,0.0041432814,0.016392412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008660936,0.00030429053,0.00042930726,0.0039536566,0.0032671276,0.017811153,0.0032644132,0.0026197287,0.0039387285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078418694,0.00029389013,0.051069718,0.00090375385,0.00011373182,0.0034068644,0.071954384,0.0009280781,0.0024991464,0.11023441,0.20141773,0.55639416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058079007,0.0003446715,0.04120497,0.001159045,0.00024877093,0.004237616,0.22895597,0.0018506586,0.002050662,0.035331387,0.6843055,0.00025272512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008891847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015198403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021418524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023258708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05483806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972694649","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2005.04.005","title":"The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Researchers in the Humanities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Digital humanities; Exploratory research; Psychology; Information seeking; Sample (material); Humanities; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.1920541147815348,"score_gpt":0.3791034512942355,"score_spread":0.1870493365127007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972694649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975157,0.00021253375,0.000021164347,0.0004284996,0.000006011114,0.0000073257843,0.000022274779,0.0000027595393,0.0017836434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975472,0.00043207628,0.00009504237,0.00041386427,0.000017742466,0.00000997849,0.00005135128,0.000004928672,0.0014278372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820256,0.0008366068,0.00020043855,0.00014374209,0.00035677114,0.00025998583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96926636,0.017593777,0.0052468367,0.0007959295,0.0028314618,0.00426564],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037415547,0.00016085934,0.00035919005,0.0031095848,0.001987796,0.004835214,0.00043266077,0.0014990931,0.0033507308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032228246,0.0003510087,0.000344929,0.0022607385,0.0013829507,0.00315922,0.0019459308,0.0015543131,0.00083959795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040673485,0.00071575743,0.76950675,0.00011702642,0.0000696848,0.00031137405,0.19558644,0.00004109228,0.0013779347,0.0006172757,0.0010920432,0.030157736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000431891,0.0006455585,0.71282965,0.00013726606,0.00007402816,0.0005228115,0.27655604,0.0002116476,0.00064914976,0.00082912866,0.0074370895,0.00006436648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006207119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124401655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008094596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001455257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01978743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983613172","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2010.10.009","title":"The Revolution Will be Streamed Online: Academic Libraries and Video","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Cyberpsychology; Academic library; Order (exchange); World Wide Web; Page view; Public relations; Computer science; Sociology; Advertising; Business; Library science; The Internet; Political science","score_opus":0.020995341315251083,"score_gpt":0.24596901468385823,"score_spread":0.22497367336860716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983613172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011384244,0.034281604,0.004648396,0.40498665,0.07534779,0.0000759464,0.0013852332,0.0013154558,0.4665747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17791784,0.03581523,0.007402233,0.116930746,0.08153807,0.00007834606,0.00202707,0.001158891,0.57713157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983911,0.0003975127,0.00004620448,0.00011144229,0.00064989366,0.00040392476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909031,0.0016550934,0.00047809046,0.00060977205,0.0030897604,0.0032641503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035960225,0.0004999642,0.0005272138,0.0020611628,0.003107021,0.021702517,0.0012504143,0.007978791,0.09543458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010459655,0.0002397984,0.00047593683,0.002845248,0.0029589057,0.015072154,0.0025752971,0.004194897,0.029735401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007780518,0.000062966756,0.00047529186,0.00011818094,0.000009574586,0.00006708698,0.00037229457,0.000053173713,0.00046208216,0.049286697,0.862504,0.08651081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014278371,0.000043820928,0.0013442313,0.00015873121,0.000011229529,0.000116194155,0.0013516395,0.00026386903,0.00026121727,0.013023035,0.9833905,0.00002114943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006215799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011620308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09543458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029468674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028929901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31926048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985150930","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2013.05.001","title":"The Space Race","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Space (punctuation); Computer science; Sociology; Gender studies; Operating system","score_opus":0.018527255413178872,"score_gpt":0.2407950084401019,"score_spread":0.22226775302692303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985150930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016257487,0.025365269,0.0015576575,0.3814018,0.0045798123,0.000011540915,0.00013168536,0.0000734621,0.57062125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54918367,0.011631986,0.00074658165,0.12641266,0.006736847,0.00008486532,0.00014380427,0.00027348186,0.30478618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993588,0.0028952996,0.00016016123,0.0010065811,0.0012857509,0.0010643074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319696,0.0027791515,0.00041562883,0.0009909819,0.0009761556,0.0016411872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006397538,0.00033014076,0.00068027555,0.001371159,0.011822114,0.01933332,0.0011697911,0.009166122,0.039862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015300504,0.00031023554,0.0004824085,0.0022042391,0.026456004,0.01734929,0.009025771,0.008286244,0.0065783225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003046186,0.000020475361,0.00046984595,0.000025598572,0.00000510097,0.000041793723,0.0053998027,0.000048125847,0.00007386489,0.8739885,0.1050184,0.014877972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008318319,0.000012294873,0.00067611784,0.00012601097,0.000003793661,0.000042413736,0.006767078,0.000053913376,0.000085265085,0.13170622,0.86050457,0.000014030263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009184234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009982694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046746596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077022407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13335168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988312087","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.009","title":"Language Learning in the Library: An Exploratory Study of ESL Students","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Reading (process); Learner autonomy; Language acquisition; Mathematics education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Exploratory research; Library instruction; Psychology; Language education; Comprehension approach; Linguistics; Information literacy; Sociology; Communication","score_opus":0.05212212112438381,"score_gpt":0.2862939763242726,"score_spread":0.2341718551998888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988312087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99808466,0.00005811618,0.000056452416,0.00015563305,0.0000049491077,0.000027614833,0.000019132485,0.0000054251013,0.0015880006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466276,0.00014546006,0.00019027774,0.00027085553,0.000011721705,0.000055774017,0.00003885575,0.00001199311,0.0046122726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697137,0.0011492278,0.00014100528,0.00029782346,0.00050215673,0.0009384314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99004376,0.0030553709,0.000992485,0.00030989607,0.0019418924,0.0036566295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034641987,0.00049638643,0.0010912961,0.0029660452,0.0100912545,0.010154372,0.0015591714,0.001563837,0.0072145304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010289836,0.0005972192,0.00044313082,0.0025313701,0.0033823426,0.0038275295,0.0054602535,0.003031888,0.0021919112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005291768,0.010365863,0.1444564,0.00014899024,0.000026809765,0.001845944,0.810713,0.000058249843,0.0023112157,0.0008993496,0.00091345515,0.027731495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047097998,0.001560004,0.055215154,0.000042449265,0.00002407899,0.0005110787,0.93428713,0.00011611919,0.0013482489,0.00028432996,0.0065264595,0.00003799144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009568794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01594618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010154372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002226536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004496749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024134934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994284648","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.012","title":"Applying Open Access to Library Technologies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library automation; World Wide Web; Access to information; Library science; Information access","score_opus":0.10149430007072857,"score_gpt":0.33303264032708896,"score_spread":0.2315383402563604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994284648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06433912,0.0063041584,0.21974668,0.036607537,0.001824923,0.00031728923,0.00019875572,0.0013915321,0.66927004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81915385,0.008067577,0.06010941,0.0048667616,0.0019419772,0.00032832584,0.0002876663,0.00070158904,0.10454281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893936,0.0044375905,0.00056469475,0.0005169622,0.0042576357,0.000829439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95864797,0.025309589,0.0013294746,0.009216355,0.0038945442,0.0016020032],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008180784,0.0003437372,0.00046778197,0.0029863238,0.002890142,0.01810382,0.0018570765,0.0044592363,0.027323226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047696836,0.00053909153,0.0008725613,0.0029887483,0.009460617,0.034807626,0.016578237,0.0034837453,0.0037403621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008338786,0.0002405115,0.002049601,0.00028214027,0.000038878192,0.0003322561,0.005130833,0.0007139977,0.0019523529,0.81381035,0.008070499,0.1672952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035502384,0.00009473191,0.0012557158,0.0003890579,0.000048843212,0.0003151139,0.0041594068,0.003495649,0.0023776875,0.80758196,0.18020262,0.000043773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022546141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002150556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021250015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029569287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09140527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998253418","doi":"10.1016/s0099-1333(02)00341-5","title":"Print sources in an electronic age: a vital part of the research process for undergraduate students","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Computer science; Completeness (order theory); Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); World Wide Web; Multimedia; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1270862924907781,"score_gpt":0.34354467221652346,"score_spread":0.21645837972574536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998253418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18651694,0.06514543,0.037329298,0.37706184,0.00697362,0.00088053296,0.0008074289,0.0017348273,0.32355008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54930454,0.090384685,0.092621036,0.05104136,0.012008661,0.0006587019,0.0009812322,0.0023983046,0.20060143],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98264194,0.005905991,0.0014359712,0.0009793715,0.008208952,0.0008277704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8767981,0.061787006,0.0102822995,0.010124644,0.025986452,0.015021453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026265092,0.00054148515,0.0009627889,0.005550807,0.01179376,0.0413982,0.0015349253,0.004749095,0.029137872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092295095,0.0009150068,0.00035426812,0.009321278,0.0068920883,0.036073294,0.009863426,0.0061044088,0.014474098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073888135,0.0006626503,0.01452456,0.00065868656,0.00001751187,0.00044434407,0.038586438,0.00008097854,0.002569781,0.026918361,0.07150888,0.84395397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026398391,0.00029261532,0.021642812,0.00214868,0.000046318917,0.0017749339,0.109448016,0.00028005196,0.003906406,0.058020946,0.80229163,0.00012126653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010884186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004234922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9737349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020345477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01145096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13890481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020637674","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.07.011","title":"International Open Access Week at Small to Medium U.S. Academic Libraries: The First Five Years","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Quarter (Canadian coin); Medical education; Plan (archaeology); Library science; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06713800596436659,"score_gpt":0.29826794654347905,"score_spread":0.23112994057911246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020637674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24650776,0.03016259,0.0020902143,0.31155747,0.06681835,0.0005333623,0.013768677,0.0030060569,0.32555553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33346364,0.016715351,0.0013676966,0.03901696,0.016867947,0.00047586436,0.0063689263,0.0015023422,0.5842213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961235,0.00045467683,0.00021460583,0.00025315752,0.0018399509,0.0011140525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581527,0.0032811607,0.0034673966,0.0017773941,0.0059822635,0.027339038],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073088156,0.0008631796,0.0007619809,0.0032941864,0.0107083,0.021130942,0.0019730455,0.0054504275,0.10083906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019633975,0.00060818606,0.00074340706,0.003239923,0.0026482793,0.010708095,0.010197929,0.0060874936,0.040612374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002674117,0.00073773006,0.022854134,0.00039065597,0.000025626723,0.0005237103,0.0062773293,0.00005206943,0.0005901042,0.0038154114,0.87146366,0.09300224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015126916,0.00014115786,0.06500696,0.00044423036,0.000012438269,0.00024017443,0.012655404,0.00011313293,0.00030983955,0.00080664275,0.92019874,0.00005603986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023352036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06890227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99802697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045644497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100653125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3373403},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2032072590","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.03.011","title":"Re-framing Librarians' Identities and Assumptions around IT","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Gender and Technology in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Stereotype (UML); Stereotype threat; Point (geometry); Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05893501922064356,"score_gpt":0.3269826984606908,"score_spread":0.26804767924004724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032072590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25456712,0.007999943,0.03296857,0.2957506,0.0031834843,0.00011208408,0.00011494481,0.00024399578,0.40505925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711539,0.001146858,0.0019758383,0.011404236,0.00044306446,0.000046481513,0.00003973068,0.00016258615,0.01362735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.917154,0.06145981,0.0030110024,0.003186499,0.010091358,0.0050972872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8893902,0.073140934,0.0061814818,0.009318133,0.015104698,0.0068645966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06480877,0.00082047057,0.0009382461,0.010507677,0.032397974,0.054955736,0.0035170421,0.008725086,0.006930911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06984502,0.000954789,0.0007657843,0.0074382625,0.0751831,0.04146429,0.026908422,0.014986931,0.0021345182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008244793,0.000032277407,0.0020123355,0.00011651321,0.000021293228,0.00022540345,0.5604779,0.000076315526,0.00027042584,0.41207054,0.008695288,0.015919246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026486476,0.00003687087,0.0016130027,0.00066639757,0.000051167248,0.0002597309,0.5791406,0.00024832552,0.0010518365,0.16549271,0.2513525,0.00006042427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012027822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009570489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06480877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01991721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018937642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34274566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032445638","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2012.02.005","title":"Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been? The Evolution of the Academic Library Web Site","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Web site; Academic library; World Wide Web; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Information retrieval; The Internet","score_opus":0.02001504202129596,"score_gpt":0.22936556362547825,"score_spread":0.2093505216041823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032445638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3370166,0.017730126,0.0108443275,0.18058734,0.0023802002,0.000102134894,0.0010624507,0.00086412224,0.4494127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8603853,0.009666206,0.010931551,0.016043138,0.0015367314,0.000078221376,0.0006263935,0.0015994969,0.09913296],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324167,0.0030948617,0.00032906965,0.0007272946,0.0019433179,0.0006637881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95829797,0.013619145,0.002616068,0.0031608874,0.01224998,0.010055948],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010893266,0.00022727835,0.0003764573,0.004855182,0.005449841,0.024654804,0.002287887,0.0047739036,0.021327177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039224237,0.000655641,0.0004315363,0.0071895965,0.009635226,0.021358032,0.005277175,0.005765413,0.005881041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040993752,0.00047455935,0.04085008,0.00036380574,0.000055136956,0.000512185,0.038417716,0.0005640252,0.0019088152,0.32132196,0.09740685,0.497715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029918287,0.00011478699,0.057160094,0.0006570436,0.000034798086,0.0009313427,0.034551136,0.0012069914,0.00096697966,0.03179244,0.8724195,0.00013499749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029626274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04844779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008746628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007450153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07134646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040741092","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.11.011","title":"Promoting Academic Library Research Through the “Faculty-Member-In-Residence” Program","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Academic library; Context (archaeology); Library science; Sociology; Productivity; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.16458244497420466,"score_gpt":0.42886018859761343,"score_spread":0.2642777436234088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040741092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5606646,0.0020548427,0.011195686,0.20154487,0.005615212,0.0038127785,0.0007580854,0.004849933,0.20950408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75289667,0.0017523232,0.032092854,0.04291501,0.0049502095,0.002127662,0.0006604252,0.0005415403,0.16206338],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275875,0.003821145,0.0002745835,0.00057191664,0.0009695565,0.00160399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92867213,0.00597341,0.003489242,0.0019014875,0.004686149,0.055277582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01090093,0.0005638814,0.0004597453,0.0032264781,0.009996965,0.005167611,0.0044135903,0.0030831688,0.040075213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022414645,0.0005597787,0.00077284453,0.0016274877,0.0020356963,0.004442131,0.013332448,0.0031243954,0.009524622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005704648,0.016503273,0.057209264,0.00072189275,0.00006301644,0.0007202811,0.011026136,0.00024384542,0.008739981,0.007905111,0.25426194,0.64203477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007736466,0.005411655,0.30346128,0.00045065075,0.00022983844,0.0019090299,0.033829316,0.0015223882,0.009741616,0.005486161,0.63690627,0.00027830352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004151989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02446923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040075213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029150958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041926537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13406491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041468707","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2015.02.011","title":"The Copyright Librarian: A Study of Advertising Trends for the Period 2006–2013","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Intellectual property; Scholarly communication; Officer; Advertising; Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law; Publishing","score_opus":0.08036968015808808,"score_gpt":0.2684322547940843,"score_spread":0.18806257463599618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041468707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98911357,0.0015745243,0.0000434952,0.0009857671,0.000014022284,0.000013298612,0.0018939312,0.00001396121,0.0063474574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178314,0.0017558226,0.000093533505,0.0003268126,0.000044888224,0.000011686455,0.0016284911,0.000015552208,0.004339942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895215,0.00013797164,0.00018319649,0.00012322218,0.00040710464,0.00019631804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869862,0.0023889404,0.006669581,0.00023061053,0.0026017148,0.0011228642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016736112,0.000118811535,0.0003132967,0.0055432706,0.0010817394,0.0029022994,0.0006404351,0.00076917565,0.0040278938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009870102,0.00021257153,0.0003675587,0.016912518,0.000553512,0.0035074162,0.0011408019,0.000822502,0.0008426323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014072869,0.00014270021,0.9575171,0.00013601805,0.000042424283,0.0002895195,0.009108263,0.00004293149,0.00016603112,0.0003742629,0.0034280599,0.028611895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015163251,0.000020747491,0.9851621,0.000035286816,0.000014888138,0.00018241789,0.007954096,0.000074941236,0.00011922915,0.000015133933,0.006413286,0.000006249121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106432624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19496123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106432624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003228887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027586375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21162623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043238404","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2008.10.012","title":"Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Specialty; Workplace learning; Complement (music); Point (geometry); Mobile device; Nursing; Medicine; Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.2210852437639308,"score_gpt":0.48463679587161534,"score_spread":0.26355155210768455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043238404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031328738,0.08826876,0.07558151,0.4677617,0.0046594907,0.00017149722,0.00011264,0.00038223364,0.3317334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82819474,0.0356742,0.04404635,0.04514992,0.0030604869,0.0004387806,0.0001353454,0.00030914583,0.042991064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667126,0.02874652,0.00046185928,0.00084904255,0.0024509733,0.0007789396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9371945,0.048206393,0.0020454703,0.004971614,0.002964929,0.004617066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020943327,0.00041984257,0.0008489904,0.001562101,0.0069417404,0.020184932,0.0021331545,0.007976943,0.0059461375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04549516,0.0003257652,0.00050183944,0.0019346882,0.07608168,0.018428966,0.011446708,0.009220855,0.0013188048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037094895,0.000081324775,0.0007399266,0.00040715162,0.000019480902,0.00014299972,0.059050746,0.00025296008,0.00013271936,0.8490898,0.029707562,0.060338207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016874777,0.000023689941,0.00023268447,0.00058511953,0.000004651517,0.000115278264,0.016894456,0.00018786338,0.0001120913,0.8071764,0.17463581,0.000015037521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026793808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004198741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020943327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050356193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015885528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11076021},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2048799509","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.06.004","title":"Champions of Digital Literacy: Fostering a World of Informed Digital Producers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Digital literacy in education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Digital literacy; Information literacy; Sociology; Business; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03600598465008612,"score_gpt":0.2829485807665487,"score_spread":0.2469425961164626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048799509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24759,0.0012595629,0.040608402,0.16579416,0.001483278,0.00035463722,0.00006160596,0.0006899295,0.5421585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307104,0.00040629134,0.00896918,0.0065756333,0.00036455842,0.00018838984,0.000059667847,0.00022616959,0.05249982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98710585,0.008330889,0.00027355299,0.0011450379,0.002138754,0.0010058323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94685274,0.02672666,0.004669886,0.0066646915,0.0053399866,0.009746077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01687994,0.00061871397,0.00041344733,0.0026923646,0.015127203,0.030834837,0.002664665,0.00655849,0.024630409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05519026,0.0007680407,0.0004130575,0.0016576123,0.02313847,0.029990006,0.026183266,0.008049866,0.0037024287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016027255,0.00067516335,0.010118367,0.00021903006,0.000027666862,0.0008604455,0.15143672,0.00076997693,0.0021742505,0.6896835,0.04244112,0.10143339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010841339,0.00021486313,0.002092907,0.0003706739,0.000050793045,0.0003597069,0.104800776,0.0022957125,0.0032748359,0.3714569,0.51488876,0.00008565203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001103833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021164173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030834837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033224958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012643413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08927077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052428354","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2012.09.019","title":"Thinking About Discovery Layers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03534979991019609,"score_gpt":0.26312969221464905,"score_spread":0.22777989230445295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052428354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034268953,0.0066382447,0.5968194,0.095032245,0.001594828,0.0001320082,0.00039395728,0.0015225875,0.26359782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73684716,0.0046196626,0.18587486,0.010544303,0.0019841164,0.00032840532,0.0005371418,0.0011061437,0.05815822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436647,0.002224652,0.0003113599,0.00097210286,0.0014825377,0.0006428183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97996885,0.010167095,0.0007982939,0.0060603656,0.0019155545,0.0010899511],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008111627,0.0010887557,0.0010732664,0.0036859824,0.005444341,0.018492566,0.00352963,0.0052002524,0.015789244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025930187,0.0017051899,0.0014424936,0.0028527689,0.021485468,0.06848491,0.009202046,0.0095596695,0.0033882067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012648826,0.000005165103,0.00012286413,0.000024796656,0.000008123654,0.000025148862,0.000462171,0.00018621274,0.00008738634,0.9949511,0.0011336389,0.0029806981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059440836,0.0000029549956,0.000033808556,0.00002328677,0.000010505653,0.00003203605,0.00017215425,0.0010909139,0.00019825019,0.98969406,0.00872963,0.0000063225884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029367483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025467046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036262758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024769774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052820265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053535946","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.015","title":"Google in the Research and Teaching of Instruction Librarians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Royal Saskatchewan Museum","funders":"","keywords":"Library instruction; Exploratory research; Higher education; Library science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Information literacy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.1746854913647616,"score_gpt":0.37947840467144783,"score_spread":0.20479291330668623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053535946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07985688,0.122292265,0.001631302,0.33482546,0.0045899586,0.000047812566,0.000204181,0.00035135204,0.45620078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7806711,0.05717427,0.0028967282,0.02186816,0.003978522,0.00006837922,0.00019564733,0.00051003625,0.13263713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910535,0.004503501,0.00036053805,0.00046395478,0.0025715225,0.0010469496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739204,0.018261181,0.0011283093,0.0012692028,0.0025070969,0.0029138552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006390243,0.00035964453,0.00074542535,0.0064029926,0.0070275203,0.015926415,0.0013050907,0.006083046,0.012312969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020997738,0.00040987096,0.00039831465,0.00963262,0.016015442,0.015946703,0.007664373,0.004808231,0.0023565344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025372455,0.00012864782,0.007533694,0.000947268,0.000022285905,0.0004870322,0.05984132,0.00027751038,0.00045519273,0.5099223,0.15469493,0.26543608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000548,0.0000744128,0.008479864,0.0019340691,0.00003967551,0.0005343964,0.07768652,0.00027648738,0.0007828387,0.10599229,0.8040889,0.00005568018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039040975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06376785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039040975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077084717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019235834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07762748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058232347","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.06.011","title":"Data Sharing and Discovery: What Librarians Need to Know","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Data sharing; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Data management; Computer science; Bridge (graph theory); Knowledge management; Data science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Political science; Publishing; Engineering","score_opus":0.16812559109209152,"score_gpt":0.3566202742845169,"score_spread":0.1884946831924254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058232347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002816932,0.07850882,0.012360064,0.89406836,0.0032051434,0.0000589759,0.0000942079,0.00024073308,0.008646772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22734456,0.3195933,0.093287535,0.30708894,0.03566502,0.00048192134,0.00078827894,0.00080560136,0.014944853],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460889,0.032000743,0.0039544203,0.0024708956,0.012991184,0.002493855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5824614,0.3120189,0.013691413,0.024862647,0.045924433,0.021041203],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090917595,0.00094462535,0.002909863,0.0069700605,0.013835267,0.05604535,0.005300874,0.019201543,0.010647818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14685124,0.0017644328,0.0016968643,0.010946653,0.034897864,0.12834914,0.014034004,0.018257555,0.0060004294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018343912,0.00042669915,0.009863181,0.0064262245,0.00019868936,0.0004240222,0.02970648,0.000312652,0.0006526094,0.115391,0.28070232,0.5557127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006434839,0.00007723029,0.0020088172,0.0073510427,0.00010713542,0.0010437252,0.08273693,0.00088948203,0.0005742813,0.36345944,0.5414603,0.00022731868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071738856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011902056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072406637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033367172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48082393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063011099","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2004.06.007","title":"Academic Libraries and the Semantic Web: What the Future May Hold for Research-Supporting Library Catalogues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; World Wide Web; Computer science; Semantic Web; Linked data; Exploit; Semantic Web Stack; Information retrieval; Web standards; Web 2.0; Library science; Web service","score_opus":0.07704686381396345,"score_gpt":0.32726411074830947,"score_spread":0.250217246934346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063011099","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008001722,0.16040862,0.009647534,0.7698742,0.0066274605,0.000019139645,0.0005008013,0.00035699792,0.044563495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3731343,0.42359045,0.03416096,0.118525125,0.028274337,0.00011880293,0.0016084395,0.00025626778,0.020331306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961074,0.001865363,0.00020584013,0.00033114175,0.00082437013,0.0006659744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689181,0.0189567,0.0016227148,0.0019274149,0.004425641,0.0041493787],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015765911,0.0005866686,0.001141471,0.002687483,0.0043629725,0.02874212,0.0023719277,0.016145736,0.016503215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017664475,0.00050170626,0.0013401309,0.006211112,0.015488758,0.08793351,0.004787009,0.00716247,0.0029485254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002480086,0.00015565325,0.0022903855,0.0011628926,0.000084869345,0.00018147848,0.0016893898,0.0009594623,0.00029664295,0.769188,0.11706991,0.10667325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002577959,0.00003231632,0.0010527516,0.0012564999,0.000046468802,0.00017041762,0.0076328483,0.0013698596,0.00015705958,0.6797682,0.30839863,0.000089227964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011695099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013784354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97125787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054589305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010991063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08337909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067975548","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2010.01.005","title":"Are Bibliographic Management Software Search Interfaces Reliable?: A Comparison between Search Results Obtained Using Database Interfaces and the EndNote Online Search Function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Interface (matter); Online search; Information retrieval; Database search engine; Search engine; Online database; Software; Bibliographic database; Function (biology); World Wide Web; Database","score_opus":0.1045205109167798,"score_gpt":0.33740268059443057,"score_spread":0.23288216967765077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067975548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445379,0.0085238665,0.020192908,0.0017707313,0.0001948819,0.00038528297,0.003275363,0.0037573928,0.017361615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98378307,0.0015938681,0.009777496,0.00021596905,0.00013446563,0.00013515705,0.002304064,0.0009248649,0.0011309533],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94570345,0.023603411,0.009876465,0.0020297607,0.017238509,0.0015483211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3710534,0.50438935,0.042419735,0.029578706,0.050211485,0.0023473757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045950484,0.0009359171,0.0016296267,0.017035764,0.00086668105,0.0060837846,0.0019472417,0.0023290794,0.0054065054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46603596,0.0009236165,0.0012209441,0.014072039,0.0015205374,0.009600924,0.0032015503,0.0009594608,0.0030791718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019866671,0.0012588568,0.40752783,0.004163656,0.0013014359,0.00047673806,0.006720787,0.0023052176,0.0051276423,0.0032381495,0.008565196,0.5394478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002241183,0.01034101,0.83913714,0.0027278354,0.005996547,0.0030944315,0.015634427,0.050862316,0.030217333,0.010428663,0.028759498,0.0005596835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026023658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002135963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010180513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017680622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24301231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073672668","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2013.02.003","title":"By Librarians, For Librarians: Building a Strengths-Based Institute to Develop Librarians' Research Culture in Canadian Academic Libraries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; Library science; Order (exchange); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Scale (ratio); Business; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.21825581810606492,"score_gpt":0.4915406569367635,"score_spread":0.2732848388306986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073672668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18541361,0.0053809695,0.0057888096,0.7016937,0.002598984,0.0009942554,0.0002457471,0.00071616616,0.09716764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8331039,0.0037915835,0.028744224,0.09183269,0.00039202656,0.0005563533,0.000290812,0.00043619805,0.040852223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9332986,0.024829209,0.002666027,0.0036424983,0.020321243,0.015242357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7227681,0.021076921,0.010833542,0.0073571363,0.07522077,0.16274346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08366861,0.0009801418,0.001061129,0.0072443048,0.08675233,0.047344163,0.008992582,0.0063499506,0.006411237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090240955,0.0015440866,0.0010802535,0.007231459,0.043685395,0.021747254,0.042099264,0.014104627,0.0019958226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017513124,0.0006084969,0.06013663,0.0010499485,0.00015126202,0.0010583692,0.45250311,0.00025109368,0.0025311955,0.048178874,0.22864088,0.20471497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059009013,0.00016194157,0.0358488,0.0010934346,0.00011456719,0.0003895509,0.51520056,0.00023247763,0.001437682,0.011154795,0.43403614,0.00027109013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8442901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92826736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95265585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19024311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.7061145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9392032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076457796","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2009.08.001","title":"Chinese Graduate Students and the Canadian Academic Library: A User Study at the University of Windsor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Academic library; Graduate students; Perception; Information literacy; Library science; Medical education; Psychology; Post graduate; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.04089685402032089,"score_gpt":0.3041141778425129,"score_spread":0.263217323822192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076457796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891964,0.00035046262,0.00004200305,0.0013044502,0.0000130458575,0.00006247261,0.00047532932,0.000018933322,0.008536904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986406,0.00083309197,0.00019462616,0.0007216166,0.000015430027,0.000042031974,0.00043149115,0.000037254747,0.011318402],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966216,0.0008392886,0.000159733,0.00023739487,0.0012866206,0.0008553019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97898257,0.007082425,0.001456295,0.0005938752,0.007231163,0.0046535665],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043203924,0.00037744196,0.00084982003,0.0044113863,0.019024877,0.0059886496,0.001432785,0.0014552203,0.009312418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016838731,0.0005344246,0.000521301,0.012834601,0.003546072,0.0031429583,0.003964399,0.0013887355,0.0011628484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038838052,0.00040283613,0.21112216,0.00020467053,0.000043231037,0.0012729395,0.75364864,0.000054098866,0.0005189444,0.00094244425,0.008270131,0.023131656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026499874,0.00013260466,0.2105563,0.000070611015,0.000046446938,0.00031382957,0.7652521,0.00013586029,0.00030705245,0.000066226974,0.023014084,0.00007831581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9383299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9748457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99401134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027894296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0391673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20238823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085286573","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2014.01.009","title":"Flipped Librarians: Assessing Our Own Need to Understand Our Users","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Computer science; Point (geometry); Multimedia; Perspective (graphical); Cultural heritage; Task (project management); Process (computing); Content analysis; World Wide Web; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.062653163304776,"score_gpt":0.31043457166245564,"score_spread":0.24778140835767964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085286573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99370134,0.0001506782,0.0006400752,0.0008339995,0.000039242146,0.00009078391,0.000035401008,0.00003404121,0.004474505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941703,0.00013405377,0.0021211258,0.0006347388,0.000022591134,0.00010509345,0.000069923386,0.000021442487,0.0027205735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893835,0.0052257976,0.00080570765,0.0007692792,0.0030176416,0.0007981753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9021062,0.04048735,0.012588004,0.005600121,0.027400348,0.011818029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014458374,0.00040870046,0.00043342897,0.002856913,0.0041691456,0.005681916,0.0014012514,0.0024235605,0.0054154126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119382896,0.0005203719,0.0005155725,0.0010980697,0.004417187,0.0066070566,0.007640019,0.0025658794,0.0012879911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011218302,0.0024304597,0.5080061,0.0004325688,0.00016645774,0.0010124834,0.33597717,0.00021843493,0.0028075087,0.0019484718,0.0064589847,0.13941957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020525091,0.0031126307,0.25630498,0.00046759102,0.0003511233,0.002262434,0.69905347,0.0016620592,0.004354217,0.005098369,0.02684421,0.00028373764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033611117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058222306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014458374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020303396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005017266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07646412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086487392","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2009.06.003","title":"What Qualifications and Skills are Important for Digital Librarian Positions in Academic Libraries? A Job Advertisement Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":214,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Academic library; Digital library; World Wide Web; Position (finance); Library science; Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.033916368606871264,"score_gpt":0.33108550559689015,"score_spread":0.2971691369900189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086487392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935853,0.00013127174,0.00006623888,0.0014316362,0.000019468567,0.000014609358,0.00008701466,0.0000048915435,0.004659663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987166,0.000037200833,0.00005180976,0.00019454515,0.000029467205,0.000008161277,0.00007344323,0.0000059838803,0.000882758],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972613,0.0010629187,0.0002011973,0.00014642038,0.00058573927,0.0007425076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91438186,0.052899856,0.0097556515,0.00092673156,0.005031985,0.017003883],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044377977,0.00024564427,0.00042261684,0.0028722303,0.0022807221,0.0034533478,0.0011496465,0.0016693256,0.0154030165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027572624,0.0002722631,0.0006677773,0.0020365869,0.0018065814,0.0022420518,0.0020867963,0.0021161616,0.0015936935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000518886,0.00039788618,0.98376137,0.00006158275,0.00003264904,0.0001805444,0.0045519685,0.000059786038,0.0003080195,0.0007125458,0.0008590478,0.00855584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028779807,0.00019733713,0.9699626,0.000045616525,0.0000419606,0.00011089145,0.02729939,0.00032703872,0.000107714564,0.0004201638,0.0014416146,0.000016892107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085082045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013350368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014374673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034251038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051528156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089853757","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.008","title":"Not on the Same Page: Undergraduates' Information Retrieval in Electronic and Print Books","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Western University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Think aloud protocol; Library instruction; Computer science; Qualitative research; Academic library; Qualitative analysis; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Information literacy; Psychology; Library science; Sociology","score_opus":0.021171158250547058,"score_gpt":0.2182960151405739,"score_spread":0.19712485689002684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089853757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7837742,0.0064771897,0.0007210539,0.06784845,0.0030087582,0.00006244776,0.0004491621,0.00034919832,0.13730958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86020166,0.0032021746,0.000800312,0.008127496,0.0007991798,0.000018730338,0.00047381024,0.00016106306,0.12621559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978229,0.00044233544,0.0002083196,0.00017458705,0.00103246,0.00031948386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858897,0.0042377356,0.0013193118,0.0006679969,0.0041163904,0.003768861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030395414,0.00018412135,0.00040870006,0.0018144405,0.0035175488,0.00938941,0.0006636293,0.0022784034,0.037513826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023951815,0.00032065882,0.00030564485,0.0030412206,0.0014504776,0.009856597,0.0021276958,0.0014249309,0.0074065183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005524029,0.0014259728,0.14532848,0.00035583973,0.000037878668,0.0010291645,0.073384225,0.00011586241,0.0019979626,0.010239,0.3924612,0.37307194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008348367,0.0005510406,0.44028613,0.0004975166,0.00017631389,0.0026310747,0.17991492,0.0007640882,0.004123234,0.0060543898,0.36480784,0.00010998331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014889106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045126118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037513826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018894695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003258092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12549621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095220078","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2006.02.008","title":"Toward Improved Collections in Medical Humanities: Fiction in Academic Health Sciences Libraries","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Digital humanities; Medical humanities; Subject access; Selection (genetic algorithm); Library science; The arts; Field (mathematics); Humanities; Computer science; Art; Medicine; Medical education; Visual arts; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08829006557525743,"score_gpt":0.3463475688356364,"score_spread":0.25805750326037896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095220078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41066152,0.009654287,0.018744966,0.3354562,0.0019401623,0.0005402907,0.0003846175,0.0017351825,0.2208829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8704812,0.0073794555,0.046753325,0.028392205,0.0018998282,0.0003294561,0.00057433563,0.00054669386,0.04364345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9788936,0.013552661,0.0010685249,0.0009200471,0.004165657,0.0013993953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9274006,0.032971606,0.0071490635,0.006316212,0.016706841,0.009455746],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027754419,0.0004902212,0.0006894131,0.00618971,0.01367046,0.028175017,0.0029456164,0.004831778,0.019907849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11616658,0.0004910542,0.0006410589,0.006638109,0.0064869383,0.016453175,0.021859892,0.0046443054,0.003943936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003219438,0.0016613476,0.021375582,0.002050496,0.00007953141,0.0003996081,0.1501704,0.00069301325,0.0028370111,0.09398903,0.14286162,0.58356047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001664174,0.00062871014,0.046112668,0.0019647866,0.00023017479,0.0011902042,0.16092311,0.0018129384,0.012868673,0.052119277,0.7218094,0.0001736667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051177773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009761279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.971825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067771813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022902519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14678109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114728401","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.007","title":"Collaborative Print Repositories: A Case Study of Library Directors' Views","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Business; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026002529137638876,"score_gpt":0.26086035171001626,"score_spread":0.2348578225723774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114728401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98091507,0.00040501214,0.0006300689,0.0023984395,0.00003439961,0.00006214617,0.000048786256,0.000026300999,0.015479826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903694,0.00040681142,0.00072046526,0.0004721179,0.00004009345,0.000037706217,0.000037771,0.000028344964,0.007887365],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863404,0.0089120185,0.0005194778,0.000624173,0.0018831114,0.0017208355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631352,0.026392069,0.003424168,0.0013239286,0.0026391584,0.0030855155],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011643733,0.00041936775,0.00047669103,0.0031545279,0.015633328,0.008536118,0.0024934995,0.0039300853,0.0067079384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027252361,0.0006386312,0.0004502615,0.003303003,0.0041689947,0.00515451,0.00567751,0.002983046,0.00088952004],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003299784,0.0017624369,0.056338925,0.0002081092,0.00004042291,0.027958669,0.84985363,0.0002193975,0.00119114,0.006616227,0.0076899175,0.047791168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049799444,0.0003315067,0.01455129,0.00012894187,0.000052952062,0.0067642843,0.9477488,0.0003953184,0.0015393539,0.00044797282,0.027939567,0.000050256556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012267363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031037027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056176013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050446023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06157869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171678869","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2015.09.010","title":"Comparison of Native Chinese-speaking and Native English-speaking Engineering Students' Information Literacy Challenges","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Information literacy; Literacy; Psychology; Academic writing; Mathematics education; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Medical education; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.06409231670194487,"score_gpt":0.3647401362378244,"score_spread":0.30064781953587955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171678869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984971,0.000040144692,0.000011401686,0.000049119273,0.000004654684,0.0000053613257,0.000021568283,0.0000017651607,0.0013688595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987669,0.000043469412,0.000015357948,0.000063144136,0.000002769118,0.0000068931326,0.000034599736,0.0000020252965,0.0010649255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998872,0.00013377794,0.0001217601,0.000117662865,0.00031347096,0.00044119768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953667,0.001220334,0.0005919002,0.000093760165,0.0013077103,0.0014196889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010198127,0.0002881973,0.0005224374,0.0019287713,0.0017081432,0.003345453,0.00045419642,0.00049127097,0.0046073585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056266757,0.0002007326,0.00043510474,0.0014637267,0.00088876777,0.0013762914,0.0018197439,0.0007032563,0.00087868015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052693987,0.0008739041,0.8061543,0.00011715632,0.000050968076,0.0013062526,0.16001089,0.0000621591,0.003245186,0.00054181454,0.001111155,0.025999304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025518197,0.0006205734,0.7849657,0.00005709793,0.000051537652,0.0005918756,0.20869778,0.00031754712,0.0013573748,0.0002281246,0.0030432327,0.000043696244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030714484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04486148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030714484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011962781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003434908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061071396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198805780","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2015.08.006","title":"A Survey of Online Library Tutorials: Guiding Instructional Video Creation to Use in Flipped Classrooms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; McGill University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Library instruction; Flipped classroom; Multimedia; Instructional design; World Wide Web; Information literacy; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.33682286606433715,"score_gpt":0.4210633655399425,"score_spread":0.08424049947560536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198805780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963599,0.00039201943,0.0003711112,0.00021419625,0.000017487482,0.00013073291,0.0002350391,0.000017116305,0.0022624484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950223,0.0008077427,0.0010807647,0.00038660347,0.000016106158,0.00015869141,0.00037589614,0.000022698943,0.0021292951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564064,0.0016887835,0.00067060493,0.0003079963,0.0010702398,0.00062172837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741392,0.00971149,0.0050733723,0.0006108417,0.007464291,0.0030008843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006273849,0.00019100394,0.00035372598,0.0023008992,0.00093856576,0.0016831333,0.00055812474,0.00083544006,0.0034064713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02739547,0.0003412477,0.00036473904,0.0018001702,0.00034600054,0.0016058437,0.0011585855,0.000811265,0.0010602721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027201086,0.0016988782,0.8591171,0.00042836805,0.00003886172,0.00024718523,0.028944707,0.00005825362,0.0017019929,0.00020828506,0.0037323055,0.10355221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021054822,0.00072926126,0.9223432,0.00036187583,0.000044629756,0.00037640403,0.0633643,0.00030933256,0.00093289453,0.000065813365,0.011417573,0.000033625332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005091816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009658136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006273849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011204467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022580998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0331797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469279126","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2016.04.020","title":"Geoskills Among Academic Librarians in Greece, Cyprus and Spain","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geospatial analysis; Academic library; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.029323346386551465,"score_gpt":0.2777325302771648,"score_spread":0.24840918389061337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469279126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905528,0.0013739831,0.00004530096,0.0014235359,0.000016584576,0.000018675906,0.000113478425,0.000014412228,0.006441283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943811,0.0010370347,0.000053585456,0.00076443906,0.000021978534,0.000014508966,0.00007952233,0.000008850818,0.0036390065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963176,0.0013301853,0.00044091043,0.0004223047,0.0007670432,0.0007220184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844626,0.0052095866,0.0045895674,0.0005509801,0.0025302542,0.002656941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040389425,0.00021130472,0.0008356992,0.006000955,0.0049319603,0.006493906,0.00092357124,0.0013005214,0.006048852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013611307,0.00028920663,0.000316768,0.010879479,0.0026313122,0.0023989289,0.003733614,0.00068021653,0.0010078494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028329494,0.00026121436,0.6116491,0.0005146236,0.000074490184,0.002199315,0.3052296,0.00012969458,0.00038830066,0.0023913158,0.007515405,0.06936375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015122798,0.00010515679,0.46715814,0.00023685483,0.000035462926,0.00065588445,0.5116807,0.0001038436,0.00025958958,0.0003030938,0.019407723,0.00003836853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050442874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057979446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050442874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006239243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005427906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100298524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510392278","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2016.08.011","title":"Understanding Academic E-books Through the Diffusion of Innovations Theory as a Basis for Developing Effective Marketing and Educational Strategies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Concordia Hospital; Manitoba Health","funders":"University College London; University of Denver","keywords":"Academic library; Diffusion of innovations; Diffusion theory; Sociology; Marketing; Diffusion; Computer science; Innovation diffusion; Business; Library science","score_opus":0.0812657359642796,"score_gpt":0.28886678530971527,"score_spread":0.20760104934543566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510392278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.212842,0.0064059407,0.47440517,0.042110298,0.0003978438,0.00076069124,0.0001782232,0.0002441623,0.26265568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91947514,0.005281949,0.06713713,0.0010998878,0.00015989656,0.000290428,0.00009501924,0.000044633223,0.0064158672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600804,0.0022913807,0.00019638921,0.00027094572,0.0009925766,0.00024065733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964047,0.031670406,0.0013395721,0.00089773256,0.0015722698,0.00047302898],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006717047,0.0006037744,0.0005598422,0.0034841823,0.0013898025,0.0087357415,0.0015465476,0.0038761308,0.0058866837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02443912,0.0004082244,0.0004775943,0.0028365597,0.006574133,0.02056819,0.0027333405,0.0032394505,0.00067560654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023960298,0.00023316333,0.006206087,0.00029260467,0.000025157804,0.00015012393,0.00936958,0.0033555112,0.0004594541,0.9099133,0.0014150253,0.06855596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003654252,0.000108783715,0.0030976937,0.0004865487,0.00003183167,0.0001915544,0.011780207,0.02182601,0.0011920445,0.93785495,0.023357594,0.000036201476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021653406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020794799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9912643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023023062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031772766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035523534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2660852010","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2017.06.004","title":"Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Open science; Open research; Gold standard (test); Citation impact; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Political science; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.8704276285011111,"score_gpt":0.6422364638488748,"score_spread":0.22819116465223632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2660852010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145892,0.0022173715,0.0035754498,0.0034225697,0.00036787425,0.00009129716,0.0011900498,0.00019651717,0.07434965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948427,0.0003047157,0.0016811473,0.00018877623,0.00009339551,0.000018449653,0.00054205477,0.00004325532,0.0022855806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9478626,0.011162342,0.0017733778,0.0026785762,0.033173095,0.0033500472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7789862,0.14787655,0.019973125,0.014383994,0.029257229,0.009522866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022658248,0.00060859194,0.0009814542,0.010820715,0.0016337072,0.010934708,0.0013542656,0.0020546322,0.007520323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15937038,0.00026732168,0.0010844924,0.013005677,0.005611332,0.009998578,0.0060246354,0.0020981012,0.0013481067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003968823,0.0017126088,0.5226332,0.0016150585,0.0010458196,0.000581334,0.005704152,0.011550272,0.0081962515,0.113190584,0.011405944,0.3183959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003261739,0.003354085,0.7126459,0.00084686064,0.0012454612,0.0008956128,0.020811114,0.023980351,0.033676498,0.14269368,0.059177153,0.00034720238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069258227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008431053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059414976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004812017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119829655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777825896","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2017.12.018","title":"When Librarians Hit the Books: Uses of and Attitudes Toward E-Books","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.07840369875309182,"score_gpt":0.2710877370899241,"score_spread":0.1926840383368323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777825896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99113476,0.00073321967,0.000065215274,0.001800157,0.000026908025,0.000018862416,0.000110426365,0.000008629957,0.0061016944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994858,0.00069218094,0.00012689186,0.0010363522,0.00003702941,0.000018337252,0.0001488976,0.000018106031,0.003064248],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99313015,0.0025565254,0.0007961062,0.00033639203,0.0021258916,0.0010549763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9394467,0.023976067,0.01817425,0.0015361564,0.009369278,0.007497639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006818027,0.00021420818,0.00047402963,0.0041919923,0.0034398704,0.010420546,0.0012278588,0.0025461863,0.007244243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04656248,0.0007956291,0.0007352361,0.0041547245,0.0026818414,0.007251551,0.003963669,0.0029033276,0.0021726678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046440345,0.0006958138,0.8836011,0.00010884555,0.00013583031,0.00037611587,0.08539843,0.00003582444,0.00032949922,0.00057319377,0.0039418368,0.02433899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028445496,0.00020059204,0.7272804,0.00018736378,0.00010788279,0.00054524955,0.26384872,0.00014420516,0.00042090987,0.00042518094,0.0067355474,0.00007559381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021993611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037830494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021993611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022198246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021251948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043731153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797365097","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2018.03.001","title":"Demonstrating Library Impact Through Acknowledgment: An Examination of Acknowledgments in Theses and Dissertations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Texas A and M University; University of Oklahoma; Northwestern University; Western Alliance Health Research; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Collection development; Academic library; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05162499195692903,"score_gpt":0.36697216923459447,"score_spread":0.3153471772776654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797365097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80013233,0.0017145766,0.0064260955,0.011968208,0.00049018126,0.00032921095,0.00021712542,0.00020441055,0.1785179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832682,0.001003582,0.0029095577,0.0010043557,0.0001970051,0.00017695903,0.00014031706,0.000098005126,0.011201944],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96998954,0.016120542,0.0018670859,0.0011285726,0.00931042,0.0015838493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7084138,0.1825485,0.042253055,0.010816182,0.043319784,0.012648727],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0336791,0.00032031632,0.00044829916,0.0060027535,0.006533075,0.010868228,0.0017041374,0.0011693683,0.0066028987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23481973,0.00038088957,0.00036316,0.005290488,0.0039794226,0.007098243,0.012643585,0.0033246155,0.0009478529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031441875,0.00060695887,0.1453238,0.00091704266,0.000097309676,0.00059362117,0.5720127,0.00025759317,0.0022764248,0.044800483,0.0122405635,0.22055908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034260316,0.00036718414,0.18646719,0.001305386,0.00016267861,0.00048813378,0.63463557,0.0007360577,0.0027827872,0.014410527,0.15850922,0.00010093414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023502032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053605647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003312747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008007621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17811424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2882976718","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.001","title":"The Changing Research Data Landscape and the Experiences of Ethics Review Board Chairs: Implications for Library Practice and Partnerships","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Data management; Public relations; Information ethics; Sociology; Publishing; Knowledge management; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Data curation; Political science; Data science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.376242050844426,"score_gpt":0.4451902331335945,"score_spread":0.06894818228916849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2882976718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1117412,0.0059294016,0.010079723,0.8447275,0.0053953975,0.000382293,0.0001228703,0.00019909498,0.021422528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8096407,0.0031446884,0.0071934457,0.15783882,0.002681871,0.0012988372,0.00013995833,0.0005211332,0.017540496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.40250152,0.51250064,0.017689914,0.010517092,0.026497299,0.03029351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26048186,0.4601864,0.05140964,0.023117378,0.06331298,0.14149174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3729118,0.0006076168,0.0014736735,0.0050107935,0.04279398,0.051986434,0.0069276267,0.016829498,0.014475729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5685565,0.002553305,0.0015029015,0.0074359775,0.042180374,0.034056783,0.047028217,0.03115501,0.0029635474],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033669555,0.00040195178,0.018581158,0.00087832194,0.000121903686,0.0040819426,0.72248083,0.00024309495,0.0008423515,0.08877678,0.09577446,0.06748041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009752304,0.000144126,0.0051184744,0.0013778849,0.000029977551,0.0011598456,0.7321582,0.00030614567,0.00040126624,0.033116523,0.22588618,0.00020393037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010757934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020698577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94801354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027833713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098386474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7733114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897090906","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.019","title":"Graduate Student Use and Non-use of Reference and PDF Management Software: An Exploratory Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; Citation; Variety (cybernetics); Software; Learning Management; Reading (process); World Wide Web; Principal (computer security); Annotation; Information retrieval; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2137086867527114,"score_gpt":0.2988402864237691,"score_spread":0.08513159967105768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897090906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989649,0.00003884551,0.000041220737,0.00010047576,0.000003793514,0.000009253273,0.000023480128,0.000004780292,0.00081327837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801815,0.00012632743,0.00012275642,0.00019231722,0.000009514071,0.000015458894,0.00006894969,0.000008480717,0.0014380376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578226,0.0012471855,0.0004340747,0.0003936352,0.001483266,0.00065955764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629007,0.015897902,0.006489526,0.0016476538,0.0074170413,0.00564711],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053113312,0.00022229721,0.0005703801,0.002684812,0.00213431,0.004322609,0.0010666914,0.0014006617,0.003316613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033777256,0.0004661104,0.0005207639,0.0020367922,0.0013963251,0.002783378,0.0025065027,0.001909226,0.0011774573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034591288,0.00437925,0.8313291,0.00010058774,0.0000679249,0.00067553733,0.12097292,0.00004741569,0.0016888176,0.0005184486,0.00084365456,0.03903041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028587438,0.0027924574,0.74915147,0.0000900984,0.000069856826,0.0011243444,0.23891467,0.0004014508,0.0014365322,0.00024827998,0.00568537,0.00005687943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030476972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049764034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008070121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002049693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028089285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917052520","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.01.007","title":"Geography, the Academy and Libraries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Geography Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Geographic information system; GIS and public health; Work (physics); Information literacy; Order (exchange); Data science; Local information systems; Location; Computer science; Geography; World Wide Web; Cartography; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.043985271638508835,"score_gpt":0.32327744458894087,"score_spread":0.279292172950432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917052520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0126740765,0.14696293,0.0003623331,0.33808574,0.0044160597,0.000013889104,0.00006941103,0.00005883028,0.49735674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.621664,0.09737142,0.0005128067,0.05021354,0.015655022,0.000058207643,0.00007784023,0.00011900308,0.21432807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531376,0.002731109,0.00025588632,0.00034040207,0.00070140976,0.00065738015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991734,0.003974039,0.00071995624,0.00041142188,0.0005192836,0.0026413202],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048238235,0.00043857013,0.00073922524,0.004194917,0.013460283,0.03427328,0.0009535498,0.008525963,0.02761085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009564602,0.00034183706,0.00030623228,0.0083421115,0.040709823,0.014216725,0.009416498,0.0067301444,0.0029738704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031324613,0.00009550703,0.0017670859,0.0001843571,0.0000127514895,0.00013596285,0.010742609,0.00010900995,0.00004241171,0.87904865,0.08429244,0.023538055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023790797,0.00002637976,0.0028008134,0.00041859105,0.000010917991,0.00010389976,0.027136566,0.000035394132,0.00003710214,0.19962981,0.7697568,0.000019886334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024554402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05136012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96572673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011584627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027880935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09236747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945856675","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.05.007","title":"An exploratory study of the relationship between the use of the Learning Commons and students' perceived learning outcomes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.18175210247379914,"score_gpt":0.36024927438639287,"score_spread":0.17849717191259373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945856675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993894,0.000010392196,0.000038946793,0.00003478264,0.0000020001999,0.000020720003,0.000018924233,0.0000013958346,0.00048329332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993544,0.000017332519,0.000098039236,0.000024826384,0.0000028611983,0.000040322226,0.000023204511,0.0000013544866,0.00043760848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996894,0.001497765,0.00022144851,0.00022812228,0.00065200345,0.00050671946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9371148,0.041628037,0.009502381,0.0016071774,0.0032272078,0.006920428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070132595,0.00026836232,0.00048400727,0.001581113,0.0019591835,0.0030883309,0.0006926526,0.00079926854,0.00541083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02610834,0.00034486683,0.0005597237,0.0014803904,0.0018076856,0.0016272826,0.0023557083,0.0024326723,0.00048156476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016036613,0.019341182,0.9001278,0.0001456316,0.00016854909,0.0003228976,0.05212121,0.0001992584,0.0024308385,0.0008834406,0.0003366166,0.022318907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010255733,0.006854499,0.90067416,0.000049254075,0.00009854023,0.00013989721,0.08828088,0.0006528497,0.0014856843,0.00048760607,0.0011250617,0.000049034967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028882695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045293565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070132595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000889212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023177974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037090123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981308303","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102071","title":"Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Business; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.586007628064981,"score_gpt":0.5768068421870614,"score_spread":0.009200785877919615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981308303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905275,0.0009211275,0.0006194729,0.00037853484,0.000007752433,0.00004348271,0.00003378376,0.000007472348,0.0074608414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997884,0.00055498217,0.0006875345,0.00010240635,0.00001597831,0.000033175307,0.000027836148,0.0000034021211,0.0006906384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947825,0.0023667922,0.00032744848,0.00026416773,0.0019891,0.00027001253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.936372,0.04254915,0.012458559,0.0020218426,0.004368972,0.0022294316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006715762,0.00021986512,0.00048825977,0.003051007,0.0014228352,0.0025876064,0.00065558637,0.0013660229,0.0028812469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033074267,0.00024269658,0.0006327116,0.0019561548,0.0029265524,0.0022083425,0.002228903,0.0007216986,0.00027006946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071807485,0.0005089894,0.9337874,0.0002918042,0.00023903856,0.00031072323,0.0067697954,0.00039909143,0.0017703286,0.0034617067,0.00022114982,0.051521834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003398038,0.0011125668,0.9762902,0.00014306465,0.00018229308,0.0010725221,0.012002253,0.0030739936,0.00068280584,0.00325428,0.0020970472,0.000054953147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032803973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006169585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016173811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017199551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03551674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985187396","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102070","title":"Issues with criteria to create blacklists: An epidemiological approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Data-Driven Disease Surveillance","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Odds; Epidemiology; Statistics; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Actuarial science; Medicine; Mathematics; Logistic regression; Business; Political science; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.0506870482131276,"score_gpt":0.3416379293872782,"score_spread":0.29095088117415063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985187396","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2803799,0.009409936,0.39062878,0.21608272,0.0040549776,0.0056985123,0.0033669854,0.00053928513,0.089838915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7926635,0.0016505885,0.17382184,0.01884067,0.0011325822,0.0023496335,0.001055596,0.00025193577,0.008233604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8039513,0.12530157,0.019115467,0.009300081,0.03842915,0.003902494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42523623,0.37901887,0.05376512,0.03165089,0.10305551,0.007273331],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.26293916,0.00084406673,0.001588005,0.018672962,0.007850517,0.01437224,0.0089505715,0.0049263122,0.0074506924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5553905,0.0011540668,0.001283245,0.013513028,0.007649402,0.012192806,0.0065006595,0.0064559244,0.0011584222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003951364,0.0009856132,0.54585207,0.0010930796,0.00035149153,0.000591389,0.024263425,0.000859504,0.00051906327,0.2061139,0.0397871,0.17918828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043309733,0.0010659159,0.25701237,0.0127024865,0.001046574,0.0056074844,0.11900008,0.049812593,0.0067365,0.3570775,0.1890801,0.00042527338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01800475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022723142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006182832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012374759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90892726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999917663","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102103","title":"Library and learning experiences turned mobile: A comparative study between LIS and non-LIS students","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Mobile Learning in Education","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"University of Hong Kong; University Grants Committee","keywords":"Recreation; Library science; Psychology; Mobile device; Mobile technology; Medical education; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05250697127446948,"score_gpt":0.31972683735319507,"score_spread":0.2672198660787256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999917663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99645567,0.000114770315,0.000023768343,0.00011540184,0.000005488026,0.0000070166416,0.00002450974,0.0000042032634,0.0032493225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997761,0.00013520548,0.000022238648,0.00007626074,0.000005007608,0.000007260543,0.000022250148,0.0000041510175,0.0019665558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869174,0.00044226588,0.00007101667,0.00009702793,0.0002443722,0.00045346995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215174,0.0030160581,0.0010131707,0.00014872328,0.0012318646,0.002438509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015684187,0.00020215989,0.0006626482,0.0029184963,0.0039456054,0.00709454,0.00075354666,0.00094305346,0.009309305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008583618,0.00028042425,0.00035235696,0.003067936,0.0018039863,0.0029592533,0.0038510754,0.0012464611,0.0014840114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009740189,0.0025860278,0.34641153,0.00028753022,0.000046139652,0.0019748777,0.5980051,0.000055262764,0.0014996477,0.0014169695,0.0012744135,0.045468397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016144782,0.0006811802,0.14318126,0.000059430306,0.00002713874,0.00024229543,0.85117173,0.000047612077,0.00037497436,0.000088877554,0.0040886505,0.000020682206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007864557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016325656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009309305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015583838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020490726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031142712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W300947135","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.014","title":"Book review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07058666602331214,"score_gpt":0.28924364347635717,"score_spread":0.21865697745304502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W300947135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006473485,0.06998554,0.0011857495,0.043032758,0.095385596,0.00036172007,0.001181645,0.001006413,0.7872133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010281424,0.013896945,0.00028158762,0.0055036307,0.008292224,0.000052399373,0.0004349132,0.00012535742,0.97038484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911124,0.00007929711,0.000028450613,0.00007187698,0.00063751516,0.000071530834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955497,0.0005218966,0.00018036856,0.00029884875,0.0026194274,0.0008297215],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008070851,0.0006335564,0.0009010401,0.0039101983,0.0013993351,0.004099349,0.0013050945,0.0022404992,0.44075102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005883835,0.00037677973,0.0005146673,0.0035024667,0.0006772278,0.0017721874,0.001289432,0.0023044487,0.3960624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045981606,0.000009828952,0.000024448154,0.00007638501,0.000001325502,0.000017650824,0.0000055876712,0.00001308276,0.000043519252,0.00040834377,0.9635008,0.03589442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027028718,0.000004790153,0.000097185526,0.00008452358,0.0000019652225,0.000040238487,0.0000121556595,0.000010762899,0.000024581488,0.00020833856,0.9995109,0.0000019362294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036974049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011423717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44075102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001493416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034741622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79770076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160689881","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102392","title":"Less money, less children, and less prestige: Differences between male and female academic librarians","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Psychology; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.18879629056911856,"score_gpt":0.305243910910971,"score_spread":0.11644762034185241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160689881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99407923,0.00033027376,0.000017317027,0.00093794893,0.000010680498,0.000002200024,0.000052015996,0.0000014432059,0.0045688623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987047,0.00009684069,0.000010353283,0.00015019735,0.000014737271,0.00000204608,0.000026333431,0.0000021107699,0.0009926852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907804,0.00025491646,0.00008661169,0.000070711714,0.00023078,0.00027890847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940984,0.0020264697,0.0018030577,0.00009168461,0.00043576735,0.0015446038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065764674,0.00014123617,0.00034502023,0.0015619203,0.001302457,0.003213796,0.00039329147,0.00073094555,0.01581618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073886756,0.00018759466,0.00028626423,0.0021456175,0.001177726,0.0016346569,0.0014150236,0.00067512377,0.001396671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000574843,0.00026541116,0.95493203,0.000062145584,0.000060539714,0.0003907935,0.01782976,0.000036169193,0.0004512274,0.0018426921,0.0017477424,0.02180663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024497076,0.00010669823,0.94959325,0.000041279585,0.000035452616,0.0003302844,0.047029614,0.000058678794,0.00014235286,0.0008041004,0.0018221271,0.000011675299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058920295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011259983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006390687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096462615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052910388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185564031","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102424","title":"Information literacy skills: Investigating differences between native and non-native English-speaking students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Information literacy; Test (biology); Significant difference; Psychology; Mathematics education; First language; Empirical research; Higher education; Pedagogy; Political science; Linguistics; Mathematics; Biology; Statistics","score_opus":0.03271928043987804,"score_gpt":0.3239674687799527,"score_spread":0.29124818834007465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185564031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991309,0.00003121822,0.000013610464,0.000018349252,0.000003759337,0.0000058563896,0.00003176492,0.0000012662288,0.00076321507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849916,0.000037871036,0.000032262556,0.000045102548,0.0000035388077,0.00001274787,0.000060380247,0.0000016281381,0.0013072679],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937564,0.00008131547,0.00006370088,0.00010511108,0.000165788,0.00020843616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603707,0.0010498733,0.00055361225,0.000088736226,0.0009360743,0.0013345948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007175041,0.00031876657,0.00051397143,0.0013864355,0.0011318184,0.0023876592,0.00036738144,0.0005572546,0.004670495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004463544,0.00029396807,0.00047039217,0.00088022335,0.0006892814,0.0013784978,0.00120353,0.0010060761,0.0012859373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010034973,0.0027966057,0.9112096,0.00013094576,0.00008880909,0.00070816017,0.058758594,0.000042974727,0.0051583247,0.00020907618,0.0004979052,0.01939563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024237974,0.0012693736,0.94762677,0.000027701499,0.000038653092,0.00035815185,0.04869479,0.00011445743,0.00088819925,0.00011841041,0.0008215534,0.000017804256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012135572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014729161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012135572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004684781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001003381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024129868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199898089","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102449","title":"Love Data Week in the time of COVID-19: A content analysis of Love Data Week 2021 events","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Context (archaeology); Tracking (education); Qualitative property; Content analysis; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); World Wide Web; Psychology; Public relations; Medical education; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Social science; History; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.5707753550266078,"score_gpt":0.45022210471394514,"score_spread":0.12055325031266267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199898089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81242925,0.0011034188,0.0038289062,0.008341988,0.0012279275,0.0020330264,0.061391287,0.00052508496,0.109119095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8604208,0.0012990162,0.005970974,0.0029639762,0.0009679521,0.0028361706,0.06482683,0.0013108572,0.0594034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951196,0.001474078,0.0004280039,0.00040772933,0.0019240836,0.0006464663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9490525,0.022821035,0.0064567784,0.0027981056,0.011790394,0.007081233],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006597333,0.00019732214,0.0003236592,0.0052775578,0.004201699,0.0055028303,0.0007293108,0.0008150059,0.009620599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047616668,0.00031904355,0.00032992274,0.007306948,0.00095466216,0.0032322095,0.0049544275,0.0018135174,0.0030410904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013844607,0.0006123179,0.31063095,0.0012151913,0.000095809715,0.000694827,0.17440592,0.00028162065,0.0024200776,0.008995916,0.34821215,0.15105075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019868114,0.00009788293,0.5368015,0.0004329399,0.0000244122,0.00012555417,0.100165986,0.00029051994,0.0007853987,0.0005144055,0.3606723,0.00006925916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021454018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045617852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036868074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003326724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04265827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203733951","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102448","title":"Learning and change through diversity, equity, and inclusion professional development: Academic librarians' perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Denver","keywords":"Transtheoretical model; Psychology; Professional development; Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Equity (law); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Sociology; Behavior change; Political science","score_opus":0.09789034874388354,"score_gpt":0.36116702597428324,"score_spread":0.2632766772303997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203733951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066825405,0.024727602,0.0030524486,0.69213724,0.0012157022,0.000068267815,0.000028830891,0.0000610002,0.21188346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93652123,0.009154366,0.0011463563,0.037134856,0.0022492597,0.0000729179,0.000015806054,0.000031489417,0.013673667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730217,0.018427107,0.0007577202,0.00078179664,0.0032735993,0.0037381223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95942295,0.026777787,0.001873745,0.0010401865,0.005078118,0.0058071716],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033010446,0.0003717246,0.00094266224,0.0044782395,0.018253338,0.038291782,0.002157923,0.009464416,0.005112206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026033506,0.00039261454,0.0005337302,0.003953811,0.051566567,0.015917577,0.022658844,0.008421801,0.00055621425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074720585,0.0002552286,0.006112724,0.00044382227,0.00003093668,0.00039124282,0.27944127,0.00013986707,0.000159828,0.6155482,0.026452538,0.07094968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007308994,0.00014118393,0.0051939636,0.00089933205,0.000058436,0.0005516237,0.46382126,0.00024353183,0.0007209241,0.22364536,0.3046043,0.000047110865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013160216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015393436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9617082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013217087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029588277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17457795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283809087","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102568","title":"Unexpected collaborations: A science librarian and a reference archivist co-teaching","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Archivist; Library science; Archival science; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.14298465435887386,"score_gpt":0.3649692715701778,"score_spread":0.22198461721130391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283809087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5080603,0.0030846898,0.039599277,0.30913335,0.009042683,0.00028269517,0.00016286712,0.0023748484,0.1282592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9093332,0.00053805445,0.009184863,0.01984067,0.00077971356,0.00011491001,0.00008902706,0.0007380128,0.059381474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9390378,0.037214983,0.001905487,0.005175977,0.009912238,0.0067535476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88962287,0.032857835,0.0072781797,0.010059647,0.014730535,0.04545098],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027223429,0.0007209153,0.00083186507,0.003437707,0.05395951,0.03153941,0.0065275445,0.011591269,0.01671967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07784142,0.0012449803,0.0013944814,0.0027030304,0.019618073,0.018336365,0.029733779,0.019428091,0.006020516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004510553,0.0010279049,0.020123478,0.00024328199,0.00012720632,0.015890867,0.6925449,0.00036468156,0.001999593,0.072053045,0.10936063,0.08581333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008735604,0.00027376795,0.0024743269,0.00028425193,0.00006615093,0.009003328,0.657167,0.0014249078,0.0018632216,0.026530944,0.30064815,0.00017660178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039281077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011885256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96846056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010984456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02369634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14397293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297679278","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102593","title":"Relational practice of Canadian academic librarians: Exploratory content analysis using relational-cultural theory","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Content analysis; Exploratory analysis; Academic library; Exploratory research; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Social science","score_opus":0.21111555226470155,"score_gpt":0.3291294091882248,"score_spread":0.11801385692352326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297679278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648366,0.0011570536,0.001116003,0.003068694,0.000027368122,0.00055699743,0.00077314134,0.0000288024,0.028435254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99344444,0.0012400349,0.0014229869,0.00048432886,0.000009442261,0.00035655932,0.00028751473,0.000023640043,0.0027311197],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898319,0.0037636906,0.0007179431,0.00087934465,0.0033830975,0.0014240146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95518625,0.025126245,0.0033461791,0.001108708,0.012132629,0.003099894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010299809,0.0004609206,0.00070061494,0.0116966795,0.021805575,0.011175106,0.0024247805,0.0013633079,0.004626366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054465313,0.000528725,0.0003940969,0.028366832,0.009040185,0.004237527,0.0057021133,0.0019262101,0.00027553696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063407795,0.00008981537,0.027700031,0.00045187835,0.00001738877,0.00021792036,0.938518,0.00008842443,0.00036588745,0.005960413,0.0017758362,0.024750935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137967845,0.000030155099,0.040147785,0.0003919302,0.000034439912,0.00007126363,0.9330616,0.0002049403,0.0003170166,0.0007151486,0.024975657,0.00003618581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93930185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9507736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11150478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19862972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80902755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313621144","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102659","title":"Cabells' Predatory Reports criteria: Assessment and proposed revisions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Publishing; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6199549595361636,"score_gpt":0.5971259394288214,"score_spread":0.022829020107342224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313621144","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10803444,0.02097228,0.31166556,0.304899,0.03216753,0.02042868,0.005703984,0.0033411693,0.19278733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.331804,0.0034570077,0.6126224,0.014754211,0.005458767,0.007094009,0.0020987787,0.0008174714,0.021893358],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6114186,0.09116975,0.08009487,0.011944391,0.19770281,0.00766963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13263886,0.3330748,0.035256024,0.03452446,0.45638642,0.008119429],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26055992,0.0019158071,0.0030254736,0.039198652,0.011903817,0.02645902,0.019298531,0.011454351,0.008333216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.77017885,0.0021439318,0.0048823883,0.02642033,0.015185561,0.013280478,0.009165161,0.010419847,0.0024754852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013230176,0.0007325721,0.06796423,0.006062961,0.00065872783,0.00082750217,0.015917022,0.001970209,0.00296692,0.23003358,0.17326133,0.49828187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014458772,0.0015710754,0.09542805,0.020928504,0.003961967,0.0029895087,0.023146773,0.045744814,0.019115219,0.21354148,0.570155,0.0019717223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0320907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049036764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98854566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019476097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04950966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9118613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366254145","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102714","title":"Universal research index: An inclusive metric to quantify scientific research output","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; McGill University; Krembil Foundation; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Toronto Western Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS","keywords":"Index (typography); Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Metric (unit); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Disadvantage; Statistics; Data science; Library science; Social science; Sociology; Mathematics; Business; Marketing; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.8635694832816184,"score_gpt":0.6586222012123094,"score_spread":0.204947282069309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366254145","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23502463,0.024401048,0.54160476,0.005486999,0.0027251623,0.0012870694,0.0341022,0.0071492502,0.14821902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70495546,0.0063590026,0.2595837,0.0007184519,0.0014313713,0.0011231068,0.012854822,0.0007759195,0.01219809],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755833,0.0040959036,0.0030701188,0.001234301,0.0153783625,0.0006378903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96155924,0.013346457,0.00597796,0.003967632,0.012532337,0.0026162923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014221931,0.000978689,0.0023298985,0.03972484,0.0012381278,0.0071468716,0.0014696122,0.001242828,0.0042464454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061118208,0.0002806219,0.0012495434,0.03768132,0.0013527502,0.0076951445,0.005318571,0.0009237596,0.0019326076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005459625,0.00043216583,0.12217469,0.0030988338,0.0011161297,0.00022620375,0.0016184459,0.0044498434,0.010127956,0.08396883,0.03887317,0.73336774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018545815,0.001876438,0.28015313,0.0018597416,0.0016282034,0.002945471,0.004747282,0.06285457,0.030190175,0.27165183,0.34126058,0.00064723036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012126906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018439104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018602967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040375656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07521367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378218022","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102738","title":"Patterns and trends of equity, diversity and inclusion programs in academic libraries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Diversity (politics); Library science; Inclusion (mineral); Equity (law); Academic library; Professional association; Strategic planning; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Social science","score_opus":0.1750793149273653,"score_gpt":0.35659917160601895,"score_spread":0.18151985667865364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378218022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960562,0.00047664455,0.000054291453,0.00085954,0.0000049886985,0.000009763542,0.00029071805,0.0000063411876,0.002241389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940884,0.00010144619,0.000024858135,0.00004432811,0.000008813827,0.000004996304,0.00009934675,0.0000017156364,0.00030563038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784124,0.0005089948,0.00027164668,0.00022027675,0.0004076955,0.00075018936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98618686,0.0037203624,0.0046057026,0.0003845338,0.0026479647,0.0024544825],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025137435,0.00007576642,0.0003033069,0.004040896,0.0013871421,0.0025230448,0.0010151351,0.0005998702,0.0044843173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012591142,0.00019116372,0.0002905736,0.0068288334,0.0012233615,0.0025024347,0.0035272343,0.0007798464,0.00039492126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014654186,0.00008170678,0.9819526,0.000045249206,0.000023415481,0.000033366516,0.003375074,0.00005342715,0.00014689713,0.00085955113,0.00041035414,0.0128717385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037050722,0.000048970825,0.9911418,0.000025011945,0.0000067750384,0.000050043236,0.0076551847,0.000107860986,0.000083069186,0.00023377672,0.000638492,0.000005237961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045796316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04825004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99747694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021511938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003855913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091059506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387030000","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102790","title":"Exploring the experiences of academic library employees with long COVID in the United States and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Empathy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Compassion; Medical education; Public relations; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.17150218608111464,"score_gpt":0.36274656634542396,"score_spread":0.19124438026430932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387030000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95107305,0.0022426695,0.00014410971,0.0192931,0.0003091204,0.000061140236,0.00022703187,0.000021145102,0.026628587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97907424,0.0016031177,0.00014235366,0.0067122853,0.00005670408,0.000027772721,0.00009824674,0.000029403975,0.01225594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921991,0.0022812327,0.00024884168,0.00032901877,0.0013190114,0.003622696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97204363,0.0038912508,0.002448998,0.00026784465,0.006879227,0.014468978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038800712,0.0003825785,0.0008568485,0.0019206026,0.042873044,0.014248454,0.0026440234,0.002551536,0.007256898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0135833705,0.0006113796,0.0004792164,0.0049330373,0.011721361,0.0037124185,0.011280716,0.005328153,0.000678025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012251895,0.0001480867,0.03748337,0.0001144345,0.000031041134,0.0015835712,0.93410856,0.000052792577,0.0002372072,0.0016954561,0.015196739,0.009226245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022711674,0.000012501741,0.00480858,0.000049990136,0.0000044085878,0.00007761135,0.9850091,0.000013370714,0.00002119208,0.000047305522,0.009942011,0.000011796194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9456706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06840577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06840577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1295513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4963209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388036762","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102805","title":"Does one size fit all ages? Results of an international survey on academic library services for non-degree seeking older adults","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lifelong learning; Higher education; Pandemic; Population; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Online learning; Medical education; Psychology; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Computer science; World Wide Web; Demography","score_opus":0.10599609909210646,"score_gpt":0.3493707527650512,"score_spread":0.24337465367294475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388036762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954507,0.0006759106,0.00010883171,0.0011244933,0.000024002624,0.00003030809,0.0006003298,0.000003897301,0.00198164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876106,0.00020101314,0.00006477645,0.00043475023,0.000014031338,0.0000159559,0.00021186419,0.000004076924,0.00029247126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844605,0.0004978031,0.00025985244,0.00017277843,0.00033567456,0.00028788895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100304,0.0027051205,0.0034915302,0.00048086827,0.0011332994,0.0011861084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042416435,0.00030488407,0.00053676934,0.0012051245,0.00055980246,0.0008031214,0.00094394706,0.00096958934,0.0027067142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023897681,0.0002853024,0.00091309124,0.0015374259,0.0005466539,0.0026447037,0.0010165457,0.00085523626,0.0005545354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006722893,0.00006576,0.9946621,0.00002325806,0.00005265639,0.00003128261,0.0009964169,0.000016241807,0.000042631385,0.000054302967,0.0004480944,0.0035400344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089028235,0.00014435702,0.9947674,0.00003883746,0.00006016124,0.00009083513,0.0042224177,0.000076181444,0.000034483277,0.000069981004,0.00048180312,0.0000045975685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020345844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040876355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020345844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059010746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076337194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040454805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391418369","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102851","title":"Reinventing information literacy instruction during the Covid-19 pandemic: Exploring experiences, evolutions and implications for online information literacy programming","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Literacy; Mathematics education; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Computer science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.12449221874472861,"score_gpt":0.39098865355227475,"score_spread":0.26649643480754615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391418369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91646385,0.00068108755,0.0009712506,0.04511197,0.0004227513,0.00009593014,0.00005787256,0.000073070056,0.036122233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98690945,0.00047904637,0.0013832218,0.0043105376,0.00010330812,0.00007536526,0.00005271463,0.000067094494,0.006619287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960233,0.0019274496,0.00011267341,0.00020708246,0.0005372191,0.0011921615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833003,0.008324331,0.0013530536,0.0006716504,0.0014638384,0.0048867404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006578491,0.00018084918,0.00028045767,0.0010819488,0.007280515,0.009066819,0.0013216749,0.002161829,0.0066422927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028218895,0.00025769888,0.00020267598,0.0013076233,0.00672418,0.009298062,0.012753063,0.0066756154,0.000753523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014419915,0.0009889485,0.03234524,0.0002191228,0.0000070804904,0.0010618276,0.75845796,0.00007972286,0.0010272014,0.02032192,0.011645102,0.17370172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000352765,0.00032465355,0.021684721,0.0005839009,0.000011803892,0.00051084085,0.8151752,0.00027768957,0.0010607408,0.005551501,0.15473278,0.000050930877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009230156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018589899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009230156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003889046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0120281745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034790814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399403231","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102905","title":"Creative write-ins at academic libraries: Fostering virtual and in-person space for writers and the potential for multi-directional learning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Virtual space; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Launched; Academic library; Creative brief; Work (physics); Learning community; Computer science; Creativity; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Library science; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12235698922476547,"score_gpt":0.3665346638163209,"score_spread":0.24417767459155543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399403231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7847778,0.0016323774,0.04720999,0.017681258,0.0004679162,0.0005754079,0.000071198854,0.0012436174,0.14634031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711391,0.00043161417,0.014419275,0.00095963763,0.0001066022,0.0002557049,0.0000303052,0.00014199312,0.012515718],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837303,0.012422499,0.00028523814,0.0007529932,0.0014180521,0.0013909229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97501945,0.011884841,0.001775096,0.0029419023,0.0013836181,0.006995101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01446044,0.0007389019,0.0005117272,0.0021559647,0.017285775,0.019678868,0.003521077,0.0028028893,0.0071477005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021382125,0.0006338276,0.0007637976,0.0017382362,0.014684815,0.01221003,0.035604067,0.0037074324,0.0023416113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002837322,0.00089734123,0.012637455,0.0006146708,0.000035089735,0.001750303,0.74661833,0.00038137182,0.003013347,0.037492994,0.009695066,0.18658043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019160564,0.0006164866,0.0064259013,0.00050435745,0.00004836005,0.0016043142,0.7390672,0.00097505696,0.004696067,0.03149213,0.21425341,0.00012518272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001887547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00575854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019678868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036623806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0092680175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076475024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399564582","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102908","title":"What is ideal EDI learning for academic librarians? Discovering EDI learning stories through appreciative inquiry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University; Canadian Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Appreciative inquiry; Ideal (ethics); Mathematics education; Computer science; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10737077083033746,"score_gpt":0.379290619349631,"score_spread":0.2719198485192935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399564582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8922071,0.0024908148,0.011814311,0.03895765,0.00017229718,0.00017636154,0.00015142065,0.000102963626,0.053927124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941917,0.00082895573,0.002345809,0.0011250608,0.00002441011,0.000057012283,0.000044633784,0.000037132726,0.0013451681],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724993,0.019500846,0.0009380324,0.0010593566,0.0029818316,0.0030206076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95213985,0.031580307,0.0043776855,0.0024183807,0.004316595,0.005167204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025070282,0.000583455,0.0007562098,0.0031043345,0.018706119,0.025393689,0.003492955,0.0026763678,0.0017888969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052393496,0.0008112693,0.0005079853,0.0029644927,0.041199654,0.022537062,0.016160421,0.004970615,0.000403793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017369439,0.000024117446,0.00523167,0.0000747819,0.0000055789656,0.00030800252,0.97838175,0.000032622345,0.00012750136,0.009150681,0.00068257435,0.0059633222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016016735,0.000008111071,0.000691328,0.00006933974,0.000003459651,0.00012252358,0.9851783,0.000062733925,0.00015890592,0.0040826187,0.009612302,0.000008864742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01710991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025676202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025393689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01764133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015457005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13258588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401872841","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102942","title":"Comparing generative artificial intelligence tools to voice assistants using reference interactions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"AI in Service Interactions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Generative model; Natural language processing; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.34038389993922186,"score_gpt":0.39404660585536305,"score_spread":0.053662705916141196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401872841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94755995,0.0012734701,0.024557548,0.00049857894,0.00011114255,0.00077917683,0.000097192315,0.000712689,0.02441023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786386,0.00058356836,0.016206175,0.0005253698,0.000078012476,0.0004796257,0.00023713979,0.00014376098,0.0031077717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9496303,0.03692649,0.003248401,0.0016586232,0.0072352164,0.0013009412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74800605,0.2142189,0.008737876,0.009855719,0.01602408,0.0031573416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021757787,0.00068289915,0.000799392,0.0035156072,0.0010922394,0.0059992946,0.0015310051,0.0018666907,0.0043769847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22361378,0.0002841956,0.0006602904,0.002464622,0.0019469423,0.006568119,0.004647538,0.0011850755,0.0017810287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006065213,0.0029205666,0.093209624,0.003190839,0.00032823614,0.0006936259,0.14123832,0.0035454053,0.011826497,0.014028114,0.004293696,0.7186599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027970804,0.049131513,0.30740172,0.0041194423,0.0018739208,0.0044415956,0.2625503,0.06153113,0.051332664,0.038058776,0.21549241,0.0012694845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015877737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014588604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021757787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010895104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012957107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11506754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402807832","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102958","title":"Conflicts of neutrality: Exploring definitions, values, and practices among Canadian academic librarians","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Academic library; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.26570101264888474,"score_gpt":0.36256118407800775,"score_spread":0.09686017142912301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402807832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96368873,0.0020761897,0.0005279709,0.0062578414,0.00004286386,0.00011633086,0.00006212257,0.000016238007,0.027211653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697304,0.00073760166,0.00025435226,0.0006401255,0.000009588137,0.00003161936,0.00002872892,0.000007593011,0.0013173037],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9606523,0.013844312,0.002176303,0.0014717586,0.015949842,0.0059055123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94483674,0.018649809,0.007799851,0.0013558879,0.01992934,0.007428374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028057978,0.00048842153,0.0009266593,0.010551405,0.038079992,0.018173868,0.0038347945,0.0024235686,0.0017746304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06893943,0.0006814675,0.0005745378,0.018004218,0.028057331,0.0060841367,0.012823985,0.0037143626,0.00018914827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032761967,0.000026645554,0.03035249,0.00009158942,0.000010326446,0.00012323141,0.9486376,0.00003365395,0.0001495729,0.0074592275,0.0011097123,0.011973103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005304474,0.000020211572,0.025550298,0.0001252904,0.000010807771,0.00006974139,0.9597853,0.00011778197,0.00008868692,0.0012067392,0.0129752895,0.000044559765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9213159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9069337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13339864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15576233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9678794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404578467","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102983","title":"What makes students tick? Exploring factors that affect learner motivations and challenges when engaging with optional library workshops on data literacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Literacy; Information literacy; Mathematics education; Library instruction; Psychology; School library; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Communication","score_opus":0.23978309200935433,"score_gpt":0.3383885022935676,"score_spread":0.09860541028421327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404578467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99440444,0.00011443569,0.00056489115,0.0013561965,0.00002674994,0.000032093623,0.000029090002,0.00001282742,0.0034591437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726236,0.00015965349,0.00050984253,0.00038403962,0.000010006474,0.000036672394,0.000025149655,0.000010642678,0.0016017415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941907,0.0037638322,0.00019946646,0.00028248722,0.00068313844,0.0008804307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849376,0.008780193,0.0020887537,0.00028691004,0.0012495806,0.0026568684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066932254,0.00023768241,0.00035646616,0.00082927704,0.0034475685,0.00534765,0.0009877312,0.0009924567,0.0032058763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022142334,0.00028762277,0.00046621123,0.00054704945,0.0019115602,0.0029258055,0.0029173738,0.0016987288,0.0006480112],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024938912,0.00078921154,0.27113295,0.00039448973,0.000060045946,0.0014746531,0.6600673,0.0001747721,0.0025909662,0.0019330578,0.004103216,0.05702997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010500676,0.00017867405,0.04716821,0.00013641868,0.000025140323,0.0002889132,0.9406721,0.00032391815,0.00081087084,0.0005325962,0.009808334,0.000044356715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002486441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064872704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066932254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013876442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019663011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03539759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407363674","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103020","title":"The business of transformative agreements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Business Strategies and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Business; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.024620040525921046,"score_gpt":0.24224564137521468,"score_spread":0.21762560084929364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407363674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06529833,0.0031311088,0.08498561,0.09911898,0.001408631,0.00030525902,0.00010083669,0.00047474037,0.74517655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95435154,0.0014620721,0.011504706,0.0039518494,0.00052925834,0.00023941671,0.000067481335,0.00020478865,0.027688848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9529202,0.02904016,0.001208028,0.0029957306,0.009253121,0.0045827725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9207659,0.048736222,0.005501605,0.013135609,0.006552364,0.0053083617],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040655732,0.00076760905,0.0006804551,0.0031484116,0.012356725,0.03342647,0.0030046727,0.007042436,0.017594224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0727985,0.0006353466,0.0010349754,0.0036781542,0.050319467,0.042731274,0.019276887,0.008791267,0.0037578335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011283708,0.000023004104,0.0002250732,0.000032546348,0.000006307959,0.00010961046,0.0045083165,0.00038030252,0.00007104004,0.98339325,0.00250482,0.008734476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011111131,0.000019570954,0.00013090795,0.0001315235,0.000004654418,0.0000746889,0.0072893156,0.0008976201,0.00020321278,0.8752612,0.11595491,0.000021247535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020672923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013281173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96657354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008776499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014898662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21501064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408072603","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103027","title":"Academic librarian schedules and workspaces","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Facilities and Workplace Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Workspace; Computer science; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02943312271236372,"score_gpt":0.30358151899108027,"score_spread":0.27414839627871657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408072603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6274136,0.0029607816,0.012875243,0.0032739346,0.0005280722,0.00046893122,0.010885528,0.0034869604,0.338107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91673106,0.00086996204,0.009447835,0.00023060571,0.00025491035,0.0002176261,0.0046234326,0.00078428,0.06684026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366874,0.0021303575,0.00081698527,0.00065963686,0.00174898,0.0009753618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596113,0.010841989,0.0064082034,0.0045560645,0.009862501,0.008720019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050899955,0.0003720885,0.00046866323,0.007238984,0.0034765617,0.0074999426,0.0019044462,0.000557343,0.07663962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03746142,0.00064384483,0.0006006326,0.0070828176,0.00067442027,0.0043378877,0.0035424684,0.0007584792,0.016732499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030779538,0.0012735439,0.15079893,0.0009818976,0.00011433008,0.00030001643,0.009117727,0.0029043595,0.0037376888,0.018503882,0.087054215,0.72213554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046756997,0.0016104797,0.5411975,0.00057188846,0.00023052526,0.0011209288,0.03059204,0.0021519999,0.0076907407,0.010096377,0.4040203,0.00024968525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005726124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068785707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07663962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002738684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004422716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2563851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408326546","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103028","title":"Summer of writing: Supporting the research and publishing needs of academic librarians","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Saskatchewan; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Academic library; Library science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.17309476833791337,"score_gpt":0.4246200790287653,"score_spread":0.25152531069085193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408326546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4899476,0.014379917,0.020135595,0.25024465,0.010596402,0.0010318635,0.0003415023,0.0020375783,0.21128495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88673705,0.00966405,0.038857665,0.023993012,0.0030449566,0.00086830347,0.0003837898,0.00066449353,0.035786532],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9640626,0.026767274,0.0014540043,0.0011005304,0.004198387,0.002417322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90939087,0.04248536,0.008586421,0.0070135887,0.009301744,0.023222024],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03169184,0.00065473217,0.0010478497,0.001965966,0.023856472,0.016575035,0.0038990169,0.00485623,0.0068644835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076140426,0.00095228065,0.0008032439,0.0030085808,0.011120461,0.01585314,0.018780805,0.006512585,0.0033458236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012542064,0.00037553368,0.005474005,0.0014168209,0.000022594895,0.0019850826,0.78780514,0.00008314993,0.0027965014,0.0103302505,0.07439267,0.11519291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035381305,0.00022798608,0.0058406,0.001215371,0.00002799679,0.0016871414,0.52277124,0.00013897633,0.0008175169,0.008835298,0.45833537,0.00006714998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002532077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008666939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98342496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040628747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027092544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16760445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408735192","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103045","title":"What's in a name? Exploring how voluntary library data literacy workshop titles and descriptions affect learner motivations to enroll","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Information literacy; Turnover; Literacy; Adult literacy; Psychology; Library science; Medical education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Management; Medicine; Communication","score_opus":0.10051378855118662,"score_gpt":0.32253655857169433,"score_spread":0.22202277002050771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408735192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98754984,0.00021668247,0.0030281723,0.0016390741,0.00009647209,0.00015282287,0.000075523916,0.00006105279,0.007180381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254966,0.00022655616,0.0024442342,0.0005836542,0.000026962425,0.00021987347,0.00007057789,0.000054047257,0.0038243847],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833746,0.012818132,0.00063095905,0.00057238736,0.0017378759,0.00086605555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.940217,0.044105746,0.006225683,0.0011794822,0.0045444136,0.0037276822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018660633,0.00027174133,0.00035414792,0.00086465763,0.0029086883,0.0071007265,0.0013885928,0.0011385563,0.0043576728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07894658,0.00030576024,0.00051836495,0.0005686745,0.0021891638,0.005621329,0.004603221,0.0017692005,0.0008931098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004337205,0.00082579383,0.09455628,0.000929571,0.000045831468,0.0009912583,0.82017595,0.00018900678,0.005186544,0.0035731322,0.004254123,0.06883873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026565383,0.00034337223,0.02193139,0.00040741186,0.000039353945,0.00029674615,0.9547115,0.00050336414,0.0019935842,0.00073066173,0.01894329,0.00007269623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001881645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003699067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018660633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020700642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020955808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098688066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410781699","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103081","title":"Corrigendum to “What's in a name? Exploring how voluntary library data literacy workshop titles and descriptions affect learner motivations to enroll” [The Journal of Academic Librarianship 51, issue 3 (2025) 103045]","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Library science; Information literacy; Academic library; Sociology; World Wide Web; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1768599226568424,"score_gpt":0.35356340126601127,"score_spread":0.17670347860916888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410781699","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019540051,0.00070003886,0.00030131,0.21377556,0.7704954,0.0000968089,0.0022971008,0.0008376064,0.0113006355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033523815,0.0020159073,0.0010145429,0.48794717,0.09206875,0.00060679135,0.0025895678,0.00092959066,0.40947533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921286,0.0010196512,0.0011103902,0.0010382083,0.0037088196,0.0009942885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567975,0.009578454,0.0014857409,0.0017457417,0.028216245,0.002176282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006101994,0.0024838797,0.0033134287,0.005907159,0.013453919,0.00960531,0.00590796,0.01850451,0.129859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05993474,0.0019035264,0.0036367367,0.0044946806,0.0033284968,0.003658051,0.005639852,0.016183933,0.09307362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005087897,0.000005837488,0.000029811117,0.000017549068,0.0000021466913,0.00002301363,0.000018231776,0.0000070456535,0.000006637793,0.000103131475,0.99883384,0.00094765885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058109483,0.000039999886,0.003145431,0.00046515831,0.000056574492,0.00007306302,0.0007343195,0.00031120813,0.00013832949,0.0010822555,0.99379927,0.00009637183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27840358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39047134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27840358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011732188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018709276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415711011","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103150","title":"A case for low-stakes collaboration: Increasing access through a mini-assignment in the first-year composition classroom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Composition (language); Desk; Academic library; Reference desk; Library instruction; Process (computing); Service (business)","score_opus":0.06528526164083667,"score_gpt":0.3520295713825352,"score_spread":0.2867443097416985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415711011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5498531,0.00069109525,0.024859788,0.2726661,0.0014720042,0.00077714154,0.0001759199,0.0008399058,0.14866498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96752197,0.00014398883,0.013155887,0.0076778857,0.00023163778,0.00046580366,0.000036700647,0.00011948451,0.010646643],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97448665,0.014677832,0.00052431785,0.0024422552,0.0027546918,0.0051143775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943596,0.022193322,0.0022116066,0.0045828223,0.004019659,0.0233966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019198248,0.00044467958,0.0005801758,0.0014322127,0.01202414,0.010990275,0.004921838,0.008987527,0.032010384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0541904,0.0005185879,0.00073177146,0.0011341474,0.0062763346,0.01489301,0.013422299,0.00843778,0.0037208123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012703297,0.010025802,0.062010225,0.0005653744,0.000085472726,0.008770756,0.15912144,0.00088564126,0.0065397085,0.213213,0.08717649,0.45033583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093551574,0.0027960856,0.0808688,0.0022332512,0.00012985487,0.006293404,0.28861696,0.0077444213,0.0066034333,0.23661712,0.36671823,0.00044296138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010767366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020689135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032010384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044133198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144473845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10708541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415835551","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103159","title":"A qualitative analysis of communication in consortial chat reference","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Politeness; Scripting language; Closing (real estate); Perspective (graphical); Qualitative analysis; Qualitative research; Computer-mediated communication","score_opus":0.10197598965735409,"score_gpt":0.4458925213781364,"score_spread":0.3439165317207823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415835551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656842,0.00022788144,0.017320855,0.0012764174,0.0000727975,0.00050902093,0.0004251598,0.00008520506,0.014398526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98915863,0.00016428428,0.005441539,0.0002202196,0.00001961084,0.0005809722,0.00017627065,0.000049617294,0.0041888678],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98506284,0.011217587,0.00040354993,0.00063825876,0.0017541366,0.00092351827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659296,0.026529942,0.0017879814,0.0010188957,0.0035316143,0.0012019123],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014550279,0.00033632363,0.00038995815,0.0029343795,0.0065467907,0.0029765973,0.0013996883,0.0010039241,0.0040909867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032493398,0.0002861357,0.00026184734,0.0031589034,0.0060715424,0.0030510619,0.004093589,0.0012266174,0.00046652197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007503107,0.000044409524,0.006163471,0.00022501004,0.0000033757494,0.0006435939,0.9762418,0.00010670587,0.0014856855,0.0034440085,0.00078248844,0.010784298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068537306,0.00007371189,0.0047150063,0.00019453844,0.000004503187,0.00023729948,0.979278,0.0004997278,0.0011384626,0.0009815658,0.012852983,0.000017449633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006677943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010207807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050038225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004090559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07695019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093086951","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103148","title":"Accelerating the use of digital object identifiers (DOIs) in academic libraries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Identifier; Metadata; Order (exchange); Interoperability; Object (grammar); Plug-in; Digital library; Identification (biology)","score_opus":0.26254211656368176,"score_gpt":0.3708845944823355,"score_spread":0.10834247791865376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093086951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75340694,0.012160431,0.048506457,0.081801586,0.0010333576,0.0020875353,0.0009139217,0.0020364295,0.09805332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90814304,0.008278085,0.05774443,0.005792423,0.0003234577,0.00048379463,0.00048836344,0.0003010982,0.01844529],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.84550893,0.06900542,0.012289018,0.00711593,0.056356523,0.009724139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5365555,0.22227503,0.072644055,0.0353197,0.117577545,0.015628166],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12922604,0.000555292,0.00082942675,0.019465009,0.014834206,0.023180593,0.0048829117,0.002576701,0.0034213285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35242468,0.0011955947,0.0008379754,0.027422113,0.012755092,0.022160986,0.02045783,0.0041819224,0.0012031621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024465608,0.00019362716,0.15626034,0.0020768528,0.00007664049,0.0013000709,0.3005677,0.0006617856,0.003788619,0.054730672,0.014670529,0.4654284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061664854,0.00031763045,0.12174776,0.003210788,0.00017537303,0.0017105864,0.2764006,0.0019054974,0.0057326024,0.013633523,0.5745041,0.00059985154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39141673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4194126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051720183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11720349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77827686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115014548","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103184","title":"Exploring Copyright: A case study in practical copyright education for college educators","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Electronic learning","score_opus":0.1806261290110714,"score_gpt":0.33975439549141295,"score_spread":0.15912826648034156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115014548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96448517,0.00046046101,0.0035919528,0.0072448533,0.00018432332,0.000524576,0.00003439955,0.000062862244,0.023411399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766376,0.0010233485,0.0052387253,0.0016508191,0.00010597377,0.0002436461,0.000025977519,0.00006687558,0.015007147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99125224,0.0050904066,0.00034702418,0.00055315817,0.00106593,0.0016911487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787617,0.012199031,0.0010973925,0.0011672595,0.0014700034,0.0053046346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009372522,0.0007764791,0.0006653617,0.0020203018,0.017473616,0.0071578296,0.0029550383,0.006082037,0.0061783423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040637676,0.00064162584,0.0007518038,0.002227051,0.009206243,0.005912061,0.008227421,0.006209711,0.00079652003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082976614,0.0033878486,0.010030601,0.00032098655,0.000012116332,0.034461092,0.88175577,0.0003383509,0.0012864711,0.008750406,0.004174255,0.0553991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000416496,0.00073491625,0.004446437,0.00033141545,0.000015801805,0.010662414,0.91623944,0.0007764524,0.0013851052,0.002944029,0.062362988,0.000059466485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071911523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02494281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017473616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005600373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007977855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049567223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}