{"meta":{"query_hash":"c680e37b2c87","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c680e37b2c87","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Criminal+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W2034200278","doi":"10.1350/jcla.68.6.533.54144","title":"The Rape of a Label Why it Would Be Wrong to Follow Canada in Having a Single Offence of Unlawful Sexual Assault","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Conviction; Criminology; Psychology; Sentence; Phenomenon; Law; Social psychology; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.08122440415282858,"score_gpt":0.33609702391828705,"score_spread":0.2548726197654585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034200278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96135324,0.0005288007,0.00050265406,0.030822331,0.00040143335,0.00017390757,0.000007368144,0.000004511807,0.006205776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977565,0.000039290386,0.0003605132,0.0015067203,0.000094357936,0.0000013032909,1.840256e-7,0.0000065586146,0.00023458728],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979644,0.00022571579,0.0005158296,0.00007319893,0.0009664873,0.00025440622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826515,0.00055349694,0.0004219312,0.00012080481,0.00055746146,0.00008116619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017949146,0.00009817818,0.00026358705,0.000049432405,0.00043717225,0.000029884986,0.0004768292,0.00006561113,0.000014687769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005288565,0.000059854232,0.000040019386,0.0003836903,0.00034347948,0.00016684658,0.000058551377,0.00029412776,3.5194898e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036634344,0.0018046673,0.009477415,0.00026548718,0.0008156233,0.00018851628,0.7389029,0.030064816,0.026808728,0.13756506,0.028432434,0.022010924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00395409,0.002738223,0.00689673,0.0007497988,0.00062703335,0.00006546299,0.81238323,0.00008187645,0.013115404,0.0056340573,0.15311219,0.000641895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4516987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9018822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4501835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020273509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069493655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5519525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054564770","doi":"10.1350/jcla.2013.77.2.832","title":"Condom Use, Viral Load and the Type of Sexual Activity as Defences to the Sexual Transmission of HIV","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Position (finance); Condom; Supreme court; Transmission (telecommunications); Sexual transmission; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Law; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Virology; Business; Engineering; Telecommunications; Microbicide","score_opus":0.03771501912121661,"score_gpt":0.320594511415465,"score_spread":0.2828794922942484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054564770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98774886,0.001159341,0.000053518335,0.0072470075,0.00017270207,0.00018540537,7.445564e-7,0.0000032709631,0.0034291407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826616,0.00026084782,0.00007056572,0.00020642628,0.00014515113,6.511313e-7,7.538395e-8,0.0000045435895,0.0010455848],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982835,0.0006839938,0.00026087798,0.00006112304,0.00055682246,0.00015369308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982505,0.00096594566,0.00027617023,0.00011927781,0.00030860287,0.000079542486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018486531,0.00008348893,0.00022526765,0.00002203977,0.0003769433,0.000052634754,0.00040158146,0.00006734631,0.00012911552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019299747,0.000032243453,0.000042922722,0.00013862713,0.0012340258,0.0002436004,0.000034569453,0.0002665414,0.000009257947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008772123,0.00033549085,0.0009983046,0.00009656067,0.00048099752,0.000013048965,0.83507234,0.0006267826,0.044150796,0.0525461,0.008019042,0.048888393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005990331,0.00719933,0.021098986,0.0005921944,0.0032705239,0.00030019906,0.731935,0.0004358195,0.038254093,0.030029675,0.1601674,0.0007264203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00979793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027683648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15214835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014651384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014346323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097360202","doi":"10.1350/jcla.2014.78.4.932","title":"Necessity as a Defence to Murder: An Anglo-Canadian Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excuse; Harm; Jurisprudence; Law; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Criminal law; Element (criminal law); Political science; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.03329576168943179,"score_gpt":0.2921734807090918,"score_spread":0.25887771901966006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097360202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9054518,0.000048998652,0.00026156925,0.005940041,0.00025458034,0.00007274965,0.0000036929632,0.000009930644,0.08795669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99168825,0.000010479517,0.00017735708,0.007643924,0.00027604765,5.681609e-7,5.1158253e-8,0.000008708147,0.00019461509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878144,0.00029626244,0.00018579303,0.00012993868,0.0003290303,0.00027756035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988922,0.00014836731,0.00012626933,0.00022943527,0.0001521768,0.000451558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058650755,0.0001061147,0.00014275532,0.00008412285,0.00036234834,0.0000643688,0.00071043987,0.000030029014,0.00030369012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005137875,0.00006665183,0.00006578202,0.00017333485,0.00017739245,0.0002710911,0.000039511233,0.00025252483,0.00012383923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045428713,0.00018468608,0.00015995046,0.000017092194,0.000010796675,0.00033407134,0.017976105,0.0003000414,0.096972756,0.8755122,0.0017319123,0.0063461144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019461688,0.011904167,0.023939032,0.00041944577,0.0006558178,0.012356387,0.02446787,0.0010809876,0.44653556,0.2937898,0.18136488,0.0015398965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03430104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04077872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5817224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000740729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012551522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97672457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604136451","doi":"10.1177/0022018317694715","title":"Unlawful and Dangerous","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Law; Criminal law; English law; Constructive; Criminal code; Political science; Order (exchange); Common law; Criminology; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.061549430636889876,"score_gpt":0.37031241595851433,"score_spread":0.30876298532162444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604136451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412879,0.00034499363,0.00024622754,0.020043558,0.00014827267,0.00006006656,0.0000017448965,0.0000048122693,0.23786244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838084,0.0001660998,0.00021200198,0.00023276608,0.0003698333,2.8878688e-7,2.9116197e-8,0.0000023638256,0.00063576706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957,0.000052426032,0.000098146214,0.00002629457,0.000165319,0.00008777351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994404,0.00007288541,0.00020141607,0.00014213056,0.00007823894,0.000064931315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080775406,0.000030176883,0.000062396306,0.000006913462,0.0014657788,0.0001412293,0.000396675,0.00001910217,0.000022673348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007207576,0.00001811354,0.000026335432,0.000010756909,0.0005409711,0.00020224186,0.000045696524,0.00010480615,0.0000066764583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001891576,0.00001344681,0.000088046276,0.0000030385902,0.0000074535974,0.0000055044097,0.0064948485,0.000001171446,0.00019227563,0.9867157,0.0005622103,0.0058974195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018090896,0.00007020096,0.0055599706,0.000021002312,0.00012468072,0.00007476145,0.0050807805,0.0000039652114,0.00031423036,0.026387,0.9621185,0.0000640201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002289072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013307789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96155626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012746067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040490773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737305188","doi":"10.1177/002201830206600406","title":"Criminalising Child Pornography—A Canadian Study in Freedom of Expression and Charter-Led Judicial Review of Legislative Policy-Making","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislature; Political science; Law; Child pornography; Supreme court; Possession (linguistics); Legitimacy; Pornography; Sociology; Politics; The Internet","score_opus":0.060131008836190214,"score_gpt":0.3677081718447056,"score_spread":0.3075771630085154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737305188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622203,0.013182372,0.0000104966575,0.0013171099,0.00024933496,0.00033346988,0.000012772673,0.000006120721,0.022668011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987872,0.00049585855,0.00006168433,0.00045046696,0.00016360731,0.0000029208536,5.1905926e-7,0.000015116687,0.000022593294],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978405,0.00055276207,0.00088831445,0.00013568632,0.00028456666,0.00029814415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844736,0.00014570371,0.00080097344,0.00033506678,0.00018003874,0.00009086816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001213754,0.00016807776,0.0006216218,0.00060655776,0.000111218214,0.0000075977805,0.00038395234,0.000105224266,0.00021038462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101351325,0.00012231071,0.00010191367,0.00035031282,0.00044530226,0.00011283852,0.00004906993,0.00047172172,0.0000011030723],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002467926,0.007494676,0.112418704,0.0032793628,0.0010646968,0.0018679306,0.49247885,0.000009655908,0.013070571,0.30636385,0.004100948,0.05538282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017401969,0.020874817,0.6392525,0.050975952,0.007968262,0.010186953,0.21780427,0.000028804507,0.0070861606,0.009008115,0.01729793,0.0021142676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06682033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027168842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5268338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004270113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003724383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99058276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793711437","doi":"10.1177/0022018317753033","title":"Did the Individual Consent to the Risk of Harm? A Comparative Jurisdictional Analysis of Consent in Cases of Sexual Transmission/Exposure to HIV","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Harm; Legislature; Bespoke; Extant taxon; Sexual intercourse; Order (exchange); Psychology; Business; Law; Political science; Medicine; Environmental health; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.09767599286971997,"score_gpt":0.37101972147632345,"score_spread":0.2733437286066035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793711437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901126,0.00041346598,0.000235464,0.0074992245,0.00010576411,0.00019874988,0.00014584455,0.0000020450516,0.001286814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988194,0.00011580612,0.00022392554,0.0005096301,0.00018134853,0.0000022071913,0.0000013403384,0.0000031242957,0.0001431843],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970803,0.0011469075,0.0006060269,0.00008698751,0.00091068336,0.00016908087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689,0.0017086981,0.00057672034,0.00016456195,0.00055960735,0.00010038739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029005662,0.0001051627,0.0004020881,0.00003809535,0.00045676014,0.000018809365,0.0005941737,0.00006247135,0.00020285246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015850866,0.000047209178,0.00021567364,0.00071131537,0.0016584613,0.000066896944,0.000046490884,0.00027377703,0.0000020776574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014246032,0.00041464207,0.0032581137,0.00003044619,0.0020129893,0.0000072292337,0.94187754,0.004794038,0.0020847472,0.024073603,0.019659234,0.00036279185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012617358,0.0035499218,0.08467331,0.00030486428,0.0123099135,0.00008219063,0.8168154,0.00009056878,0.011941753,0.0022506462,0.0664213,0.00029841074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023223711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010862412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12506218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003575479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032730476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61106694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010873488","doi":"10.1177/0022018320908668","title":"Is It Really a Risk? The Parameters of the Criminalisation of the Sexual Transmission/Exposure to HIV","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Bespoke; Legislature; Transmission (telecommunications); Extant taxon; Sexual transmission; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Criminology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.05476405242901615,"score_gpt":0.3155647466064342,"score_spread":0.260800694177418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010873488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8798926,0.0005171594,0.00020637945,0.115422316,0.00022168257,0.00022369131,0.0000045893257,0.0000042123884,0.0035074009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957961,0.00020980781,0.00019802686,0.00322132,0.00018997431,8.054909e-7,1.1858579e-7,0.000008754441,0.00037508964],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710417,0.0012041802,0.00051608856,0.00008483943,0.00090849726,0.00018221613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982089,0.00052270514,0.0006620704,0.00024503015,0.00025643458,0.0001049044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018638498,0.00011089368,0.00021938565,0.000020027615,0.00066955056,0.000033736138,0.0011984609,0.00008810716,0.00010458849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003392075,0.000040997424,0.00022322616,0.00036001104,0.0007146484,0.000092949726,0.000056641697,0.00049867923,0.000004092519],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006558456,0.0000691581,0.00056196103,0.000043864315,0.00015720593,0.0000026511168,0.97263205,0.0018274952,0.0029846628,0.0043084123,0.0117823435,0.004974353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010936904,0.0019241027,0.014056109,0.00069496164,0.0038257376,0.00006869475,0.8099151,0.00023575628,0.037304,0.006618279,0.12392395,0.00033958134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016452059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001400777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16271691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002496625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017412065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5149709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020824894","doi":"10.1177/0022018320925010","title":"The Unconstitutional Nature of the Criminalisation of the Purchase of Sex in Canada: <i>R v Anwar &amp; Harvey</i> 2020 ONCJ 103","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.023548106021849792,"score_gpt":0.27669815443455986,"score_spread":0.25315004841271005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020824894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958297,0.0029203617,0.000012973835,0.03238128,0.0006194138,0.00017755742,0.0000141162445,0.0000019809472,0.00557528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859846,0.0002861908,0.000030915937,0.00073691364,0.00021359553,5.4732845e-7,5.8769774e-7,0.0000050298845,0.0001277916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973668,0.000788122,0.00057488814,0.000070824295,0.0010208938,0.00017848825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980602,0.0005733708,0.0007542375,0.00019644146,0.00034733783,0.00006841165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001620835,0.00010065691,0.00023583029,0.000016319218,0.00047640348,0.000015880762,0.0009888514,0.000099565776,0.000050233557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058140664,0.000042379917,0.00015043541,0.00039767084,0.0013940629,0.00010469387,0.000081024125,0.0007245201,6.1675706e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029539464,0.00045289707,0.02116121,0.00038476154,0.0007319772,0.00005952767,0.4299668,0.016868467,0.013244275,0.473241,0.03640483,0.004530301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002597764,0.0005306174,0.03881072,0.0015475071,0.0019790065,0.00030016206,0.38321638,0.00023516634,0.06397587,0.023066794,0.4831494,0.00059062033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23030303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36079845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4501742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013110266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021147772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7748224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292470331","doi":"10.1177/00220183221118408","title":"One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Court of Appeal for Ontario Clarifies Canada's Sex Work Laws but Ultimately Delivers a Blow in Attempts to Challenge the Constitutional Validity of Canada's ‘end Demand’ Model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Work (physics); Constitutional court; Political science; Constitution; Engineering","score_opus":0.0900061726093025,"score_gpt":0.3079956207078195,"score_spread":0.217989448098517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292470331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9301018,0.00010429266,0.0019060214,0.035031646,0.00048515177,0.0008389406,0.00032986145,0.000004142276,0.03119813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781907,0.000014201186,0.00027413695,0.0011389625,0.00006397667,0.000012327849,0.0000037773848,0.0000067172405,0.0006668604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669075,0.00068224786,0.00063742994,0.0001147451,0.0015208939,0.00035392432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801,0.0007754425,0.0004998086,0.00017849356,0.0004023953,0.00013385086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00459626,0.00013282438,0.00035205483,0.000042242747,0.0010483818,0.000030722887,0.0008110405,0.000037895385,0.000201112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101626356,0.00008706197,0.00011996217,0.0001458722,0.0008235635,0.00010653945,0.00011418278,0.00040216182,2.511441e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016503305,0.00030946813,0.00046751712,0.00009283125,0.00022240724,0.000015878339,0.0626218,0.08265804,0.000036812435,0.83967984,0.011368168,0.00087690784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010089639,0.0020939752,0.021174517,0.00079417985,0.0029354813,0.00015178935,0.54859436,0.008866,0.0016573294,0.054350328,0.34752703,0.0017653826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98715425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7853295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009443612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006461183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362518776","doi":"10.1177/00220183231165719","title":"Women Who Kill Abusive Men: The Limitations of Loss of Control, Provocation and Self-Defence in England and Wales and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Law; Diminished responsibility; Criminology; Domestic violence; Deadly force; Gun control; Poison control; Common law; Statute; Political science; Suicide prevention; Sociology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.019037997054240856,"score_gpt":0.24940927655446962,"score_spread":0.23037127950022876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362518776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960162,0.00035982285,0.0000046439377,0.0027219623,0.0000315553,0.000117847005,0.000006403185,0.0000021108385,0.0007394683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656755,0.0032161504,0.000017058062,0.00012802304,0.00004647157,0.0000013833193,2.000144e-7,0.000002912295,0.000020252188],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913925,0.00021274149,0.00024698715,0.000046049634,0.00022972056,0.00012524029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843514,0.0010574716,0.00023985983,0.000057731795,0.00015864713,0.000051173127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001276992,0.000052861054,0.00016313992,0.000038202725,0.00018978273,0.000018983263,0.00011965842,0.000022621141,0.0000016895822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021666111,0.000031052423,0.000011903733,0.00009897567,0.00044592514,0.00013077886,0.000015859685,0.00009307586,7.145049e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004084921,0.00007399547,0.04141711,0.00012491488,0.00013378623,0.000025222633,0.8895939,0.00015625182,0.001049049,0.06369272,0.00026001298,0.003064573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025776734,0.00052496244,0.6763605,0.00029099427,0.00036792387,0.000079781785,0.29675108,0.00033309284,0.00074393343,0.011779456,0.009980129,0.0002104723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094109066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49903256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63494337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030490923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002155165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91192335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398221148","doi":"10.1177/00220183241251920","title":"Double Jeopardy and Successive Prosecutions Based on the Same Prohibited Conduct: Equivalence of Approaches to Determining the Same Offence Dilemma in Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Double jeopardy; Dilemma; Equivalence (formal languages); Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.2998617292917014,"score_gpt":0.38958038436194864,"score_spread":0.08971865507024723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398221148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96968716,0.00010441876,0.000081660546,0.012680646,0.00012475485,0.00047389185,0.000012463589,0.0000061758237,0.016828801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912393,0.0000028475044,0.000063577536,0.00030775214,0.00014720543,0.00001367655,4.279851e-7,0.000005037829,0.00033554854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984673,0.0004134116,0.00028617063,0.000119387594,0.00053906103,0.00017464724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795294,0.0013354548,0.00019866166,0.000108041844,0.00035384475,0.00005108507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014993494,0.00010787307,0.00018309818,0.00008393134,0.0005358514,0.0001522761,0.0004917333,0.000030265452,0.00006045033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108531356,0.00004815902,0.000066388515,0.00015685485,0.0009944425,0.00023015367,0.00004428292,0.00035305636,0.0000036986346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027515972,0.000053164353,0.00003284073,0.000013674171,0.000021598127,0.0000071415257,0.08530128,0.00025337565,0.000120034194,0.91385174,0.000049982165,0.000019998164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030896056,0.0044187037,0.024324542,0.005017846,0.001025431,0.00013409689,0.3318555,0.010393455,0.02627974,0.5874259,0.004989973,0.0010452075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013370808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034208132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32642585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115168565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024141086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.412139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403041044","doi":"10.1177/00220183241278094","title":"Prisoner Health and Well-Being in Historical Perspective, 1850–1900: Exploring Experiences of Illness and Disability in the Victorian Convict System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Leverhulme Trust; McGill University","keywords":"Convict; Perspective (graphical); Sociology of health and illness; Criminology; Psychology; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science; Law; Health care; Computer science","score_opus":0.04929494489736628,"score_gpt":0.35021375353331297,"score_spread":0.30091880863594667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403041044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963421,0.015845247,0.000102904,0.0057738833,0.002990015,0.0001499989,3.5611205e-7,0.0000077918,0.011708813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992131,0.00017052348,0.000036029418,0.0001560121,0.00037589166,0.00001147269,7.4975205e-8,0.000007419012,0.000029455949],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768144,0.0010235547,0.00060285977,0.00016218949,0.00032852683,0.00020142467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821943,0.0012451241,0.00021950169,0.00015400167,0.00003607462,0.00012584527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029902451,0.000113431626,0.00034095463,0.000066085595,0.00013872018,0.00002435656,0.0002239539,0.000055952536,0.000029851179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014437895,0.000060869435,0.000052085,0.00020893282,0.000395498,0.0002801418,0.000027592621,0.0006463447,0.0000014849712],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005472361,0.00018408064,0.0005152453,0.00032550225,0.000021474463,0.00007167912,0.7263824,0.0000011627122,0.000010874243,0.2707457,0.00017745669,0.0010172379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005284518,0.00088114676,0.0024456996,0.000488141,0.00009227339,0.0007138046,0.9112935,0.000028493618,0.000009659295,0.0019095595,0.081482545,0.00012673836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014710361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018530525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26883614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065131724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28080818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409689670","doi":"10.1177/00220183251336101","title":"The Criminal Cases Review Commission - A Quarter of a Century On","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Commission; Political science; Criminology; Law; History; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04902798316237291,"score_gpt":0.38338424633758017,"score_spread":0.3343562631752073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409689670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19577068,0.1841128,0.0001902456,0.21389335,0.0031486298,0.0010910521,0.000013482013,0.000040550647,0.4017392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781765,0.018776407,0.00003957643,0.0021193414,0.00018651219,0.0000017618408,1.8376602e-7,0.0000049047917,0.000694854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975741,0.00080812594,0.00057992584,0.00007823323,0.00070313417,0.00025647954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967653,0.0020187588,0.0004516441,0.0002784739,0.00038850727,0.00009730409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034361556,0.0001211481,0.00029668296,0.000043135813,0.0009993222,0.000053602864,0.0008016165,0.0000469213,0.000099501194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073973986,0.00005958051,0.00021540593,0.00019177717,0.0007727159,0.00016644508,0.00005259719,0.00034224865,0.000009175227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015518119,0.0002053477,0.000026094056,0.0009867534,0.00006677981,0.000092868206,0.009560271,0.0000052050773,0.0002524248,0.86719716,0.10061382,0.019441472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022241034,0.000762871,0.0003780907,0.007119669,0.0012048808,0.00018592003,0.02271175,0.000002531773,0.0006510422,0.005423435,0.9612187,0.00011870219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014363136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068509736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8617737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074820644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027265822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7686079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}