{"meta":{"query_hash":"2d20533ce450","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics"},"cohort_total":195,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":195,"exported":195,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2d20533ce450","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Law+Medicine+%26+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1491493181","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12010","title":"Is There a Human Right to Private Health Care?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Central European University; Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Right to health; Commodification; Health care; Human rights; Supreme court; Contradiction; Notice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.11820871847839762,"score_gpt":0.43116786572697063,"score_spread":0.312959147248573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491493181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29283673,0.0018490021,0.00028810033,0.6185066,0.00073036324,0.00048419644,0.0000010464413,0.000023709043,0.08528025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956274,0.00037878403,0.00040188682,0.03983053,0.0010283175,0.0000018337652,3.654552e-7,0.000010661073,0.0020736658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974279,0.00060130225,0.0004883735,0.00007614749,0.0011127233,0.00029360052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827725,0.00034895973,0.0003321119,0.00017875257,0.0005296086,0.00033329564],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051205885,0.00010109569,0.00026895714,0.000054738375,0.0014602175,0.00003891244,0.00053376216,0.00009562417,0.002108792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014188643,0.000045637826,0.00004641995,0.00013093297,0.0005851426,0.00011869944,0.000041337207,0.0008739883,0.00008225689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066185967,0.000014896953,0.00005893972,0.000019810801,0.000025307907,0.000005394201,0.6664696,0.0000011637228,0.00006232939,0.2964197,0.03639919,0.0005170654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030869944,0.00037394962,0.0013655976,0.0003261432,0.000019441186,0.000007923302,0.015271389,2.4901098e-7,0.00007987496,0.050056618,0.9321075,0.000082621846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007787302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056269597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017460997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005670686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504629720","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12272","title":"Antibiotic Resistance is a Tragedy of the Commons That Necessitates Global Cooperation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Antibiotic resistance; Tragedy (event); Resistance (ecology); Commons; Antibiotics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law and economics; Microbiology; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Biology; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.09843187934440875,"score_gpt":0.3411247263883308,"score_spread":0.24269284704392205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504629720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7878347,0.050814822,0.0012434456,0.14188825,0.002686332,0.00026851866,0.0000328325,0.000017046912,0.015214054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956428,0.00058980595,0.000041192867,0.0025871445,0.00007980898,6.244773e-8,0.000001781567,0.000006605933,0.0010507914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824387,0.0008618667,0.0004561155,0.0000737846,0.00019682682,0.00016753559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980053,0.00060729653,0.00057728303,0.00030384338,0.00047365887,0.00003267065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002719881,0.000121823155,0.00034727785,0.000018857701,0.00028456075,0.0000059554777,0.00052564876,0.00022663361,0.00003423315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051814725,0.000052489788,0.0000749376,0.00017905953,0.0016883436,0.00007915776,0.000049113918,0.0010490849,0.000008607697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050817733,0.00081630424,0.023927158,0.00077264087,0.0019831723,0.00007493352,0.15500942,0.0002097966,0.21251011,0.22310302,0.3757864,0.0007252878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022509383,0.0047495523,0.052154154,0.016325453,0.0045513194,0.0033137915,0.06138296,0.000035141325,0.4566896,0.0378455,0.33934572,0.0010974075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022710301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012017281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24417949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037437054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000278526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6220772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517293257","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00705.x","title":"A Portrait of Nanomedicine and its Bioethical Implications","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Nanotechnology research and applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Beneficence; Nanomedicine; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Medicine; Political science; Nanotechnology; Autonomy; Engineering; Computer science; Materials science; Law","score_opus":0.11693499450390293,"score_gpt":0.38570271848934806,"score_spread":0.26876772398544513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517293257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63440555,0.04899353,0.013120844,0.29472727,0.00039681423,0.0004563068,0.000021424159,0.00010568031,0.007772614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958835,0.00315532,0.00024302295,0.00041496335,0.00026769916,0.0000029143391,9.820502e-7,0.000010882366,0.000020704048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904567,0.00006289961,0.00038422298,0.000034239245,0.000281838,0.00019114063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840313,0.0009129801,0.00011400728,0.00017446822,0.00023692167,0.00015851765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027152214,0.00007685288,0.00021610198,0.00008934574,0.00008900878,0.0000015775239,0.00023223438,0.00018007313,0.00003121016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055031315,0.000043571552,0.000025048055,0.00021898266,0.0007160869,0.00007455124,0.000029226561,0.0015003167,0.0000026611126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000319452,0.00007670302,0.00048727918,0.00021375835,0.00015788901,0.0000021953151,0.0062946896,0.000041802745,0.36805215,0.61880267,0.003092134,0.0027467948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009040594,0.0042605787,0.041610755,0.003002681,0.0021903887,0.0091442885,0.008165067,0.0017757971,0.22957006,0.15247251,0.5376643,0.0011029837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012412779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007660284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5345722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001540898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053654756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65182126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529963181","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12278","title":"Effective Global Action on Antibiotic Resistance Requires Careful Consideration of Convening Forums","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Political science; Collective action; Enforcement; Public relations; Law and economics; Action (physics); Resistance (ecology); Politics; International Action; Public administration; Business; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.11415108276795702,"score_gpt":0.3817754375542245,"score_spread":0.26762435478626745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529963181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9539431,0.014055105,0.0017449643,0.016474374,0.0030339162,0.00031302037,0.000011233823,0.000020443676,0.010403846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983549,0.0002989729,0.000052910647,0.00087808387,0.0001550309,1.4488893e-7,0.0000035742903,0.0000071706177,0.0002491955],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981964,0.0008707144,0.00048313595,0.000099493496,0.00018478499,0.00016543845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971109,0.0012987116,0.0006939068,0.00022889282,0.00063417497,0.00003340737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003191556,0.00012248175,0.00038007824,0.000038557853,0.00018958021,0.0000040880086,0.00017273659,0.0002656803,0.000012206951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017748108,0.00006795864,0.000058601858,0.00010439182,0.0010715688,0.00008961674,0.000022418126,0.0008845063,0.000009210554],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015587411,0.00040331203,0.004003588,0.0008373183,0.0016967108,0.0001329483,0.045356404,0.00041164792,0.5361989,0.3513091,0.04074898,0.0033136804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016955175,0.013217463,0.012756802,0.013229198,0.0019292122,0.00198011,0.035411023,0.000017283743,0.80653036,0.034883473,0.06245366,0.00063622306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018379942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000511386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31642562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009639881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021382833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.394824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576218015","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12005","title":"Protecting Rights and Building Capacities: Challenges to Global Mental Health Policy in Light of the<i>Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Human rights; Mental health; Political science; Global mental health; Legitimacy; Flourishing; Health policy; Deliberation; Public relations; Public administration; Medicine; Law; Psychology; Health care; Politics; Psychiatry; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10326259449947287,"score_gpt":0.4255227238896256,"score_spread":0.3222601293901527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576218015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7275643,0.0005598521,0.000027258666,0.26662466,0.00028378863,0.0004884635,0.000007101809,0.0000032289636,0.0044413586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997985,0.00006272938,0.00005908157,0.0015318862,0.000265672,0.000005901261,1.0852629e-7,0.0000077457835,0.000081872364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658597,0.0017354727,0.00065381546,0.00011805233,0.0006523447,0.0002543305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966711,0.0021276595,0.00060012954,0.00030581313,0.00017826298,0.0001170326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053369957,0.00013538306,0.00036505438,0.00008082088,0.00038612276,0.0000058634305,0.00030694896,0.0001261181,0.000034491084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067131716,0.00004968798,0.000053137905,0.0002114161,0.0009009352,0.000048562666,0.000033550445,0.001278464,0.0000010598922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003662498,0.00016111735,0.000092128124,0.00024822186,0.00011103433,0.000008131752,0.67183536,0.000017419521,0.0003083085,0.32354635,0.0004734107,0.0028322788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041663134,0.010669734,0.008761253,0.025789991,0.000101207144,0.0033046473,0.62211436,0.000028939447,0.00087632216,0.29540205,0.028426321,0.00035890006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026058847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052785557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2704207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014916626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017425201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1727540652","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00621.x","title":"Paying Human Subjects in Research: Where are We, How Did We Get Here, and Now What?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Community Based Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Referral; Drug Company; Medicine; Psychology; Family medicine; Medical education; Management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9159793065780372,"score_gpt":0.6790635662192508,"score_spread":0.23691574035878638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1727540652","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000087761924,0.8356796,0.000008141337,0.15946765,0.00059055875,0.0009435218,0.000004552272,0.00001535802,0.00320287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009368456,0.9919633,0.00013525889,0.0014924222,0.0024418551,0.000016714694,0.000005863657,0.00017180898,0.0028359012],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814786,0.008595025,0.002704876,0.00059810944,0.0054949974,0.0011284153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86573917,0.1235784,0.0026084117,0.0019606217,0.004917406,0.001196018],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12520447,0.0006781039,0.0043331822,0.0009210743,0.0005922625,0.00015539936,0.001801413,0.0033166744,0.00018187206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05110656,0.00035341692,0.00046355638,0.0010715387,0.005667769,0.00039904407,0.00081760954,0.06844927,0.000023942463],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012178802,0.0009716678,0.00058177224,0.42896503,0.0019675405,0.0072547756,0.044025008,5.864579e-7,0.000040203977,0.12084917,0.025314435,0.36881194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012502562,0.0016829014,0.00002265283,0.3450117,0.0008041026,0.0011134353,0.005391089,6.200708e-7,0.000001978192,0.036941335,0.60757095,0.00020897259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003721497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010766728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5822565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004427895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003786306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1766634659","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12066","title":"Corruption of Pharmaceutical Markets: Addressing the Misalignment of Financial Incentives and Public Health","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Language change; Value (mathematics); Financial market; Public economics; Public health; Finance; Economics; Microeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.37081870959387464,"score_gpt":0.42308298481208667,"score_spread":0.05226427521821203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1766634659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66627026,0.021018999,0.0016244851,0.30141023,0.0008193257,0.00036950328,0.00004407633,0.000004498191,0.008438624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787998,0.0095111,0.00009031419,0.011300276,0.00026341024,0.0000014660335,8.6797075e-7,0.000009034158,0.000023713732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817765,0.00023999035,0.0011572716,0.00008523311,0.000110963636,0.00022888275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971227,0.001080271,0.0013280533,0.00015903125,0.00014350479,0.00016640793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073876483,0.00010326332,0.0004750328,0.00008563817,0.00014389529,0.00001796864,0.00029285916,0.00008625524,0.00025967025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088733115,0.00006258331,0.00006776855,0.00010508248,0.0010058538,0.00018027566,0.00007498485,0.0007871475,0.000004682549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019928259,0.00025403872,0.004366017,0.0004221369,0.0001833901,0.0000011945461,0.023582086,0.000029972305,0.00075803767,0.94253963,0.005336305,0.02232792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073206285,0.001758206,0.07146114,0.0012494962,0.00017921704,0.00021154496,0.004204023,0.009198556,0.0012053826,0.26311088,0.6395943,0.00050661573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048021288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000151284485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67942876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006222311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014171023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.370611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792748370","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00672.x","title":"Do Physicians/Researchers Trade Stock Based on Privileged Information? A Closer Look at Trading Patterns Surrounding the Annual ASCO Conference","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Stock (firearms); Medical education; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Family medicine; Psychology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.6822906063687372,"score_gpt":0.5913044223327633,"score_spread":0.09098618403597392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792748370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6871888,0.0010934913,0.0008636036,0.29517958,0.0031379596,0.0008699062,0.00013458058,0.000042696985,0.011489386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.944634,0.00030154406,0.0000123824875,0.053262275,0.0016714408,0.000008474979,0.000009049946,0.000017767305,0.00008304133],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928872,0.004410261,0.00078277703,0.000100077996,0.0010503936,0.0007692936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898346,0.008370014,0.0005851206,0.00026987458,0.00036021497,0.00058016327],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017057352,0.00026101293,0.0003978342,0.000102353195,0.0011711301,0.000029957579,0.00076258776,0.00057200517,0.0011210644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009766605,0.0001424558,0.00011976963,0.00024174555,0.0011074771,0.00068526145,0.00007381211,0.011125972,0.000026214202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011246111,0.0018500066,0.06974293,0.0017521344,0.0015480059,0.00013050361,0.6404657,0.0037060885,0.00950562,0.1381898,0.081236206,0.040626947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010586124,0.0029233512,0.025328765,0.0022142066,0.0016843968,0.0005453831,0.04949105,0.013295945,0.012026186,0.002250896,0.8788165,0.0008372346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043804223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003379456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79758024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027428367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035196502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1811835946","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12293","title":"Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; National Human Genome Research Institute; Mayo Clinic","keywords":"Research ethics; Institutional review board; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9101725605391843,"score_gpt":0.6518857430719983,"score_spread":0.25828681746718596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1811835946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20059359,0.004474029,0.00005175453,0.7863877,0.00034391222,0.00093523157,0.000026501244,0.0000086763785,0.0071786116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686123,0.0055882535,0.0009318553,0.02172592,0.0015548206,0.000010417941,0.000002327762,0.000055776087,0.0015183055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728591,0.01145017,0.0020158293,0.00045351763,0.011790983,0.0014304203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67474014,0.28613725,0.00056354585,0.0027899868,0.03141255,0.0043565566],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35620713,0.00026721347,0.00086842873,0.0010653997,0.0009795957,0.000075851196,0.0021744594,0.0013186693,0.00002845276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44908008,0.00012706315,0.0001009542,0.00190969,0.0068158116,0.00008842762,0.00075398776,0.037862852,0.000039498496],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053279526,0.00022681264,0.009866835,0.0016791695,0.0005568754,0.0002564659,0.8276511,0.00020210225,0.0030275763,0.04244574,0.10618021,0.0025791882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072149155,0.030513862,0.04450022,0.021627394,0.00035904124,0.00091597915,0.40626076,0.00005861066,0.0040716543,0.1537161,0.33020577,0.000555671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11170625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47860438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7680187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005672149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014628557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875500872","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12007","title":"A Survey of International Legal Instruments to Examine Their Effectiveness in Improving Global Health and in Realizing Health Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Political science; International law; Field (mathematics); International health; Health law; Global health; Right to health; Law and economics; Health policy; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Health care","score_opus":0.09542119232085679,"score_gpt":0.4019873730784733,"score_spread":0.30656618075761655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875500872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8498347,0.00048846996,0.00019389432,0.1475955,0.0005142231,0.0003225048,0.000003997638,0.0000047971266,0.0010419313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556693,0.00018659074,0.00004454709,0.043757636,0.00032530085,0.0000025380941,0.000006171898,0.000006161685,0.0000017685612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971788,0.0008481302,0.0011200128,0.00011954501,0.0003474026,0.0003861417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732834,0.0010891664,0.0009450294,0.00013027982,0.0004204415,0.00008671453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021357166,0.00013636015,0.00062046223,0.00020505473,0.00011321273,0.000025150164,0.00033141495,0.00008767,0.000008997965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027101806,0.0000793002,0.000021987724,0.00044921684,0.0001737225,0.00046774824,0.00016988137,0.0006726309,0.0000014487962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001954953,0.0005397241,0.6215565,0.004115465,0.00019404136,0.000019471865,0.009703966,0.0023522668,0.00020081943,0.27358863,0.026344622,0.05942953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019996122,0.00038952538,0.9629235,0.0015758949,0.000005725239,0.00003812183,0.0012855392,0.0024423401,0.000001351838,0.006130895,0.023105014,0.00010242496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68541086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072329536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61308134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026834424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030193044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.944598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882808860","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00712.x","title":"Beyond Human Subjects: Risk, Ethics, and Clinical Development of Nanomedicines","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.13046886095892102,"score_gpt":0.43092883840784907,"score_spread":0.30045997744892805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882808860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8376618,0.017980045,0.00047715585,0.13801046,0.0018321521,0.00020092679,0.0000012294912,0.00002379646,0.003812458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807817,0.010918092,0.0014921904,0.005354306,0.0012944394,4.4855275e-7,0.0000023026887,0.00001774304,0.00013879],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967128,0.0008267395,0.0013887703,0.00009841527,0.00070147286,0.00027178234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410176,0.003820664,0.0009845346,0.00029853583,0.00053758605,0.00025694372],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025748344,0.00017511396,0.0007386935,0.00013998267,0.00046107438,0.0000017916888,0.00022615617,0.0033004559,0.000068806345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004711049,0.000086371525,0.00008780712,0.00017128311,0.0032396207,0.000072607516,0.00008244578,0.02239036,0.0000032778382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041172933,0.0026202663,0.2145653,0.0027345275,0.006882664,0.00021798282,0.49322724,0.0000060108136,0.04219063,0.19445544,0.016819892,0.022162734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029230598,0.017285118,0.37467498,0.014384483,0.014149426,0.00823325,0.044173755,0.00003268093,0.033491917,0.013741996,0.4495614,0.0010404247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008389849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000794434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4490535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026839869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035909782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883095706","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12288","title":"Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Cancer Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Participant observation; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9094334095054257,"score_gpt":0.6971338435979062,"score_spread":0.21229956590751953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883095706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27420497,0.001365471,0.0012637856,0.7076376,0.0002445904,0.00035665868,0.0000065914646,0.000014799789,0.014905486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98596317,0.0030346343,0.0037426653,0.0046726917,0.00076275435,0.0000036218125,0.0000049532005,0.000023915534,0.001791587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99049515,0.0035775963,0.0015765,0.0002542861,0.0036043117,0.0004921866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88153845,0.10740333,0.0006194103,0.00096720876,0.007993066,0.0014785334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1665347,0.00014260886,0.00071532425,0.0006347437,0.0004403032,0.000032780707,0.000478104,0.00044376336,0.000055809396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2718719,0.000080250495,0.00010674242,0.0017183312,0.0019271179,0.00011925455,0.0003209712,0.013739598,0.000024028783],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016470972,0.0005210806,0.0074453857,0.00047347587,0.0051424103,0.0004685232,0.74060464,0.00072779757,0.012817406,0.17317341,0.03987732,0.002277566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02259071,0.034692936,0.041077897,0.013393339,0.014457554,0.0014321,0.20370512,0.0018153976,0.0017652757,0.44660923,0.21764949,0.0008109534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081133173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019847937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7117582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021521126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001779941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98853576},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1888473541","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12277","title":"Some Global Policies for Antibiotic Resistance Depend on Legally Binding and Enforceable Commitments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Inclusion (mineral); Antibiotic resistance; International community; Resistance (ecology); Antibiotics; Public administration; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.10627009178454509,"score_gpt":0.3656738449237537,"score_spread":0.2594037531392086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888473541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8692779,0.045852393,0.00076712185,0.05854539,0.0035773048,0.0005542906,0.00005369466,0.000036298443,0.021335592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270827,0.0013555614,0.000118929645,0.0027658415,0.00025400898,1.8468626e-7,0.0000043750715,0.000010712683,0.002782112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881995,0.00026300098,0.00040236305,0.000092458824,0.00015094859,0.00027130172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983155,0.00082581077,0.00037693244,0.00018171762,0.00024081848,0.000059209688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025329946,0.00014578558,0.00036366843,0.00004316369,0.0003586914,0.0000120819295,0.00029215624,0.00023170486,0.000004738125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005647393,0.00007884606,0.000047915382,0.00007630796,0.000763113,0.0001116514,0.000042670603,0.0007091967,0.000010441182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057442533,0.00025976688,0.0014328228,0.0004730158,0.0010710455,0.000058760885,0.019449003,0.00007513928,0.046794787,0.8522601,0.07196516,0.000416155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02712649,0.010981146,0.002958875,0.008682258,0.0020316201,0.0021011815,0.021492183,0.000015702026,0.061894402,0.07350423,0.7882609,0.0009510526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019931118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038047362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77875584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006740309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016438476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3215249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893210756","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12114","title":"Defining the Scope of Public Engagement: Examining the “Right Not to Know” in Public Health Genomics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill Genome Centre; McGill University; McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Genomics; Public engagement; Public health; Need to know; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Biology; Genetics; Genome; Medicine; Computer science; Philosophy; Gene","score_opus":0.370608804154424,"score_gpt":0.5259535673690982,"score_spread":0.15534476321467416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893210756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10005294,0.002362948,0.0016816284,0.8727057,0.0021907194,0.00064859336,0.0000029371195,0.000013025547,0.020341503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83839744,0.0030083659,0.00026768426,0.15638688,0.0017070466,0.000016347898,0.0000031898169,0.000028491917,0.00018451817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.982578,0.012737473,0.0023376725,0.00015259856,0.001108128,0.00108614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976537,0.01956254,0.0019623432,0.00071333797,0.00076016784,0.0004646246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12757522,0.00018273201,0.0005725224,0.00025677515,0.0022971113,0.000024697458,0.0012155455,0.00021169183,0.00014740553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153128365,0.000079447076,0.00004957381,0.000735651,0.00051285716,0.00020709728,0.00024814942,0.0054157563,0.000027250711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038984424,0.00006494052,0.00084597245,0.0003092593,0.00003794393,4.6578094e-7,0.3911169,0.000053918422,0.0000808261,0.5548226,0.037263934,0.015364267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007850995,0.0005627549,0.011250917,0.0010535839,0.000026966447,0.000016698388,0.044925764,0.00011363316,0.000009642405,0.0019069022,0.93926394,0.00008408948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038813073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027921612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046778994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004796537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898400040","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12016","title":"Global Trade and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Regulatory Challenges in International Surrogacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Phenomenon; Reproductive technology; Key (lock); International law; Law and economics; International trade; Business; Law; Economics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.17160863234610832,"score_gpt":0.39803163704751526,"score_spread":0.22642300470140694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1898400040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3538426,0.023129513,0.000018243134,0.61763,0.0004413417,0.00031486567,7.8625214e-7,0.00007610617,0.0045465515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810988,0.017015057,0.00056391186,0.000907283,0.0003710145,0.000006283485,6.3218135e-7,0.000010053754,0.000027002572],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980748,0.00019891218,0.0006247543,0.00023683038,0.0006389446,0.000225709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794054,0.0005690266,0.0004282289,0.0005351363,0.00045205135,0.000075027216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039821286,0.00015498413,0.00046281758,0.00017007258,0.0000823072,0.00000686185,0.0003058062,0.0003018927,0.00001399301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073972465,0.00008475579,0.00004150311,0.0002494004,0.0015841968,0.00019510045,0.00009165199,0.001699516,0.0000017835955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002496101,0.00097429106,0.05285574,0.0012351471,0.00086861395,0.00048248103,0.03245308,0.000017670262,0.0077854753,0.39338022,0.0094959,0.49795526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044114343,0.0026976014,0.71216726,0.0019208977,0.0002240753,0.007928405,0.055493917,0.00002336686,0.0014846699,0.18012427,0.03329179,0.0002322942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022806873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007467954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65931153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000177229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001969028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88557297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911642338","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12058","title":"Caring for Elder Parents: A Comparative Evaluation of Family Leave Laws","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Life expectancy; Family Leave; Gerontology; Depression (economics); Psychology; Medicine; Demography; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.7454023821961644,"score_gpt":0.5811514008620684,"score_spread":0.164250981334096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911642338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93076754,0.0010129566,0.0009335227,0.014791954,0.00077472994,0.0009873158,0.0000016788096,0.0000065668587,0.05072374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998444,0.0002492544,0.00011123456,0.0007179711,0.00039671504,0.000011175005,7.523271e-7,0.0000046432647,0.00006420758],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966821,0.0011078616,0.00052018394,0.000064899796,0.0014586757,0.00016625454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959286,0.0012467313,0.00048666794,0.00013242541,0.0021215568,0.00008401451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014854409,0.00007872584,0.0002702329,0.000028191373,0.00031136448,0.0000113815495,0.000279276,0.000085471765,0.0001444512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012980562,0.000045120963,0.00006966654,0.000091109396,0.0010192762,0.00016698058,0.000020847592,0.00037968424,0.0000028205195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013885388,0.00020680086,0.004169648,0.000107972846,0.000210727,2.2080995e-7,0.9136294,0.00028707096,0.0018619874,0.072058834,0.004558345,0.0027701522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047737006,0.0024313133,0.020182345,0.0014687527,0.0017298755,0.0000042465845,0.6360576,0.00071929756,0.0017832284,0.31423557,0.016320094,0.000293929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010695214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003574781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27757174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013137948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031318457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99589264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914281890","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12006","title":"The Role of Law in Ameliorating Global Inequalities in Indigenous Peoples' Health","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Legitimacy; State (computer science); Inequality; Political science; International law; Law; Sociology; Development economics; Economic growth; Law and economics; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.05632741293165228,"score_gpt":0.39842970245647163,"score_spread":0.34210228952481936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914281890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89164925,0.00787284,0.000012817941,0.03864901,0.0007034899,0.00052617124,0.0000023311363,0.000007167999,0.060576953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808433,0.016918894,0.000065999964,0.0013352126,0.0006954927,0.0000010347319,7.4066935e-7,0.0000066072457,0.0001327368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483794,0.0026318089,0.0010527943,0.00006890079,0.0009289003,0.0004796835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952685,0.0029361343,0.0009089248,0.00017227454,0.0005696358,0.00014448531],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019160427,0.00010074933,0.0003519112,0.00006055094,0.0032077224,0.000027067481,0.0005147826,0.00015706851,0.00002291189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023084352,0.000049503386,0.00003672057,0.00036910255,0.0012755822,0.0002047753,0.0000041900894,0.0011245047,0.0000034210036],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010180467,0.000029769048,0.0007510977,0.00002721672,0.0000039451234,5.0858705e-7,0.5544851,0.0000096571775,0.0000016296962,0.44444048,0.0000123108275,0.0002281143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005141807,0.00056705857,0.0030443533,0.00078394305,0.000015585369,0.000022916996,0.6759988,0.0000060511297,0.000025002315,0.18409093,0.13482623,0.00010496369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8474992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26034954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041112438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01608162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99808997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914360813","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12113","title":"From the Right to Know to the Right Not to Know","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill Genome Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Right to know; Need to know; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.06403950677489002,"score_gpt":0.38146439787312975,"score_spread":0.31742489109823974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914360813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031073702,0.0002670311,0.0025726962,0.9074482,0.0022292074,0.00038068794,0.0000043334408,0.000017863083,0.056006324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8397974,0.00025794518,0.00073673925,0.14118192,0.009702467,0.000004818316,8.486575e-7,0.00002136936,0.008296538],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955214,0.0015023871,0.00057132373,0.00014959168,0.0018629719,0.0003922758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99333626,0.004913797,0.00024772185,0.00046232124,0.00058668177,0.00045322313],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016909929,0.00017198773,0.00034497806,0.000053309865,0.0020285244,0.00009058127,0.0016885113,0.00013889444,0.0012201545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021748194,0.000057013807,0.000079647376,0.0003132824,0.0006308444,0.00008728991,0.00014373033,0.0013059777,0.00037711044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007823876,0.00002250369,0.000011310172,0.0000027580995,0.000040117302,0.000008446474,0.41990355,0.00005539021,0.00019032431,0.2443847,0.33337033,0.0019323468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023391911,0.00025678467,0.00043972302,0.00030667245,0.00007333944,0.000006721022,0.0045920303,0.000003750908,0.00029654423,0.023816619,0.9698643,0.00010959503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003954972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03640433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8087237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011965945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039501677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928379713","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00698.x","title":"Too Fast or Not Too Fast: The FDA's Approval of Merck's HPV Vaccine Gardasil","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Cervical Cancer and HPV Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration","keywords":"Gardasil; Food and drug administration; Political science; Drug approval; HPV vaccines; Marketing authorization; Cervical cancer; Medicine; Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Environmental health; Cancer; HPV infection; Sociology; Drug; Pharmacology; Biology; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.20068448331623837,"score_gpt":0.4426623340933842,"score_spread":0.24197785077714581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928379713","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16036491,0.018609216,0.002843906,0.6156035,0.003453787,0.0017965987,0.00003672276,0.00006737711,0.19722399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97682536,0.0023144323,0.00017547468,0.013679032,0.0042723506,0.00000428294,0.0000036165923,0.000042837422,0.0026826267],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488187,0.0006449008,0.001090124,0.00013832183,0.0026315902,0.00061321683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934091,0.0033742667,0.0005361007,0.00068344356,0.0014939278,0.00050317484],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011765492,0.00026815984,0.0009277596,0.00012331303,0.00027927736,0.000013591335,0.0007235949,0.00026358562,0.0040960927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029911906,0.00010577312,0.0002259379,0.0004357422,0.0009327901,0.00016008869,0.00018745856,0.004094465,0.00002188694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.085394785,0.0030851664,0.0053954422,0.0053747264,0.0037318156,0.0004898355,0.22004615,0.00012878297,0.04166674,0.06736751,0.2049554,0.36236364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02495879,0.014617696,0.13892375,0.001372287,0.0049018115,0.008146307,0.026566971,0.000302607,0.020724501,0.0019356582,0.75683695,0.00071263855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005009936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020541412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81646043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012279184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006459559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930071406","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00622.x","title":"Currents in Contemporary Bioethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Research Resources","keywords":"Bioethics; Transferability; Prenatal diagnosis; Psychology; Informed consent; Medicine; Family medicine; Law; Political science; Pregnancy; Fetus; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.47698736879390213,"score_gpt":0.44436095580425417,"score_spread":0.03262641298964797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1930071406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48177844,0.037446633,0.0038132432,0.16223037,0.0044838265,0.0009535312,0.00001710188,0.00010863861,0.3091682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99123913,0.0011024234,0.0005077342,0.0066273212,0.00043754923,6.5277635e-7,0.0000029276005,0.000016647831,0.00006563207],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779814,0.00038783875,0.0007187911,0.000082256636,0.0008106039,0.00020236723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964989,0.0021589156,0.0003921313,0.00028183043,0.0004448546,0.0002234039],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005947385,0.00014393729,0.00044261353,0.00012390496,0.00007821157,0.0000034858065,0.00029697292,0.00025339553,0.00007383243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044760257,0.00007627559,0.00007170432,0.00020688545,0.0012130811,0.000107296364,0.000061491286,0.0034512558,0.000011537362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013976149,0.002942716,0.21889952,0.0016421956,0.000926975,0.0061932513,0.35016078,0.000046834837,0.002141286,0.33937943,0.051516667,0.012174191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07793761,0.044432323,0.30003092,0.07003817,0.0048419097,0.018998064,0.06046134,0.0009928565,0.022102872,0.1815119,0.21630514,0.0023468945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021116002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013805118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5094606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003969084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040872526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1961848869","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12267","title":"What Will it Take to Address the Global Threat of Antibiotic Resistance?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health and Long Term Care","funders":"","keywords":"Antibiotic resistance; Resistance (ecology); Antibiotics; Business; Intensive care medicine; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Biology; Microbiology","score_opus":0.09351948488377047,"score_gpt":0.36206690588583956,"score_spread":0.2685474210020691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1961848869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30994108,0.15497145,0.0012129701,0.4924292,0.010428169,0.0006449805,0.00003380563,0.000031512267,0.030306857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867128,0.0036000698,0.00005343313,0.006966817,0.0002743292,1.420537e-7,0.0000021769167,0.00001137875,0.0023788563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791926,0.0007476252,0.000652658,0.00011149692,0.00028854614,0.00028042015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971989,0.0009930204,0.0005457107,0.00045583444,0.0007317462,0.00007482421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044742483,0.00017053039,0.0004972705,0.00003469412,0.00022908687,0.000012402403,0.00080287474,0.00029067817,0.00006600953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009074528,0.0000733121,0.00009221465,0.00023238518,0.001756113,0.00017291472,0.0000927739,0.0011544838,0.000031553824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010645353,0.0006357434,0.0028045613,0.0006750483,0.0025982938,0.00025012868,0.16424549,0.0002782679,0.06142265,0.32152975,0.4330896,0.0018251017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006550108,0.0032465216,0.0031491471,0.010617113,0.001624541,0.0016965475,0.07790147,0.0000016875904,0.026785161,0.022411058,0.84555304,0.00046361733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001935348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001415483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6767717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059778635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028444853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64704716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963992014","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01974.x","title":"The ELSI Genetics Regulatory Resource Kit: A Tool for Policymakers in Developing Countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Context (archaeology); Health care; Political science; Global health; Economic growth; Public health; Law; Medicine; Economics; Biology; Nursing","score_opus":0.07631348126369585,"score_gpt":0.381880875935002,"score_spread":0.3055673946713061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963992014","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09775833,0.0063285977,0.0057582203,0.8886086,0.00047943668,0.00046321235,0.0000020057296,0.000013240744,0.00058840425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93083036,0.008729639,0.0024793183,0.05550905,0.002136369,0.00000560323,0.0000049720184,0.00004583915,0.0002588747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972571,0.00023262035,0.00089409034,0.00010267104,0.0011999999,0.00031351016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959883,0.0024507835,0.00045261258,0.0003033654,0.00067178154,0.00013315349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011265069,0.00015523547,0.00037737374,0.000101406644,0.0004566158,0.000016807686,0.00027816143,0.0004008377,0.0000046429873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013845671,0.00007136764,0.000091104885,0.00025188745,0.0031612162,0.000047106063,0.000043611137,0.001767277,0.0000010697718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016212732,0.00006165671,0.00014676794,0.0005062058,0.00018621297,0.000045127552,0.040507134,0.0005707752,0.001755438,0.9469707,0.0026959786,0.0049327444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060119377,0.0011053751,0.0056181927,0.0030413417,0.00032452226,0.0007965751,0.0023521793,0.00012768163,0.0012460281,0.094831385,0.8843786,0.00016617577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008155781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002488299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88168263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025881297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014915357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966723289","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00241.x","title":"What<i>Is</i>Medical Ethics Consultation?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Medical ethics; Curriculum; Medical education; Health care; Test (biology); Medical advice; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.31734282199512415,"score_gpt":0.5773276296606016,"score_spread":0.25998480766547744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966723289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011088817,0.0057005906,0.0044668424,0.9284661,0.010271885,0.00041084515,0.0000028238505,0.00005339373,0.03953874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41023505,0.08358629,0.00071889855,0.4980546,0.004985926,0.0000067268224,0.0000033971203,0.00005574373,0.0023533818],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9663373,0.022258997,0.0025315676,0.00021427279,0.007992167,0.00066565035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67579967,0.31411186,0.0022523622,0.000742933,0.006202059,0.0008911159],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13074854,0.00026909204,0.00073151215,0.00011601431,0.0045936215,0.000011099458,0.0013001123,0.002554522,0.0031289821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31355,0.00015054193,0.00011322686,0.00042558392,0.0067054373,0.0007106623,0.0002277587,0.082538694,0.00031473985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004464463,0.00013751925,0.00033701322,0.00059021503,0.00017701402,0.00043016442,0.6370632,0.000007914241,0.00014526662,0.24268588,0.1176419,0.00033742233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053828205,0.0008180475,0.00038517953,0.008774599,0.0004714469,0.0023734504,0.112313956,0.00009051398,0.00007063706,0.12829612,0.74073255,0.00029066642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006624379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005204478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6230907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015708529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00884557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972111052","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00531.x","title":"Legislating and Litigating Health Care Rights around the World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Political science; Patient rights; Environmental health; Law and economics; Law; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.108730139807355,"score_gpt":0.4217354055491919,"score_spread":0.3130052657418369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972111052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12841408,0.008714809,0.0001695513,0.6747541,0.0006750186,0.00024533164,7.198555e-7,0.000020832058,0.18700553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98342216,0.0003063183,0.00079574325,0.011055955,0.0031525788,4.1905915e-7,2.5619835e-7,0.000005647618,0.0012608998],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761117,0.00077136984,0.0004610043,0.000061132,0.0008609071,0.00023441107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971078,0.0019421703,0.00044058022,0.00010415341,0.0002624626,0.0001428312],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009531902,0.00008312565,0.00019684716,0.000037188598,0.0029615397,0.00005225324,0.0002722564,0.000051384053,0.00007011152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025920186,0.000033107168,0.000027815448,0.00012167855,0.001160687,0.00015300307,0.00003016736,0.0011793094,0.0000021874068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058543847,0.0000042801526,0.000039632345,0.000011603913,0.000013838289,0.0000025626764,0.6558639,0.000013932896,0.000004211985,0.3390071,0.0018099339,0.0032231715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031496736,0.00010353807,0.00017881866,0.00051690626,0.000029196159,0.000024919536,0.06212794,0.000012886016,0.000017626964,0.028028155,0.9085782,0.00006684011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038582005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091344304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90676826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013538077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051893806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973624853","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00103.x","title":"The Human Subjects Trade: Ethical and Legal Issues Surrounding Recruitment Incentives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Duty of care; Statute; Business; Tort; Political science; Safeguarding; Incentive; Enforcement; Law and economics; Duty; Law; Public relations; Liability; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.7509528946360123,"score_gpt":0.645536590896026,"score_spread":0.10541630373998634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973624853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39275604,0.022028195,0.000041112584,0.57079947,0.0029298412,0.0005767947,0.000005441936,0.000027639606,0.010835453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556016,0.009597265,0.000024177669,0.033226456,0.0009887401,0.0000054171983,0.0000010631832,0.000017135157,0.0005381581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99067396,0.007285457,0.00078188535,0.00014221456,0.0006068892,0.00050960516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901448,0.008627401,0.0004120884,0.00018127558,0.00023285992,0.00040160463],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024373464,0.00022336398,0.00039729854,0.000044721797,0.0022549266,0.00003543744,0.0004188041,0.000981326,0.00021494625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020313165,0.00011413513,0.00007271962,0.0001640076,0.0027260042,0.00013271939,0.000055369193,0.016199738,0.0000038659746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053126685,0.00013098726,0.00091340934,0.0001340062,0.00029312613,0.00016161338,0.017595788,0.000018827484,0.012133573,0.9572919,0.008537988,0.0022574961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017656425,0.00065850944,0.00054427906,0.00021373075,0.00040491374,0.0008120006,0.004632983,0.000029434494,0.009909104,0.020023534,0.9608611,0.00014477367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006874116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107520296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095981224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025667166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975822629","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00669.x","title":"A Survey of Physician Training Programs in Risk Management and Communication Skills for Malpractice Prevention","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; U.S. Public Health Service; Health Resources and Services Administration","keywords":"Malpractice; Lawsuit; Defensive medicine; Medical malpractice; Medicine; Health care; Psychology; Family medicine; Medical emergency; Nursing; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3445429284045792,"score_gpt":0.5368101843556289,"score_spread":0.1922672559510497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975822629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350966,0.0017669476,0.0007619053,0.051240798,0.00018546636,0.0014551723,0.000004853709,0.000009375169,0.009478836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881151,0.00719023,0.0023205976,0.0018663724,0.00014446759,0.000016892325,0.0000089067335,0.00001053725,0.00032692705],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248177,0.0058620507,0.0009504297,0.00007344365,0.000444005,0.00018830635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820866,0.016036572,0.001127695,0.000268359,0.00040768998,0.00007307016],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03680466,0.00008510595,0.0003586663,0.000046176076,0.00029040422,0.0000033888643,0.0002292184,0.00014535872,0.00009803865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051305383,0.000051092265,0.00003181047,0.00017609553,0.0003517332,0.00020125376,0.000031875,0.00206878,0.0000020944012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002318947,0.0011743665,0.018039607,0.00206247,0.00028568108,0.0000043986697,0.46018848,0.0000356563,0.000025138617,0.018002013,0.0011598092,0.49670345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012348375,0.004946809,0.32493994,0.018887749,0.0019204927,0.000023829798,0.22473235,0.00055386405,0.000014240187,0.08445261,0.32685733,0.0003224399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024490913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026467843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.496381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033892997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012711348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978177029","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00628.x","title":"Biobanks and the Return of Research Results: Out with the Old and in with the New?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ontario Genomics","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Typology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.6838472246947249,"score_gpt":0.5910022817143065,"score_spread":0.09284494298041845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978177029","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19040999,0.0043008206,0.00007883012,0.78576994,0.00007979038,0.00068479404,0.000002325887,0.000005174153,0.018668316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793547,0.009957719,0.00024151613,0.0076050786,0.00051177887,0.0000033773088,3.313645e-7,0.000025931622,0.0022995844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914899,0.0030360552,0.0009145653,0.0002024767,0.0039443593,0.00041265672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.866985,0.1271775,0.0007950567,0.0014129383,0.0032962158,0.00033324017],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.120811515,0.00017037008,0.0005762622,0.000121398385,0.00039040577,0.000022225679,0.0008944036,0.00037976116,0.00002420413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036101338,0.000043946722,0.000045490306,0.0005182069,0.018411139,0.00007580392,0.00026215508,0.017602675,0.0000011160874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10742388,0.00025772254,0.004132989,0.0007835374,0.00072831335,0.0003643981,0.5892504,0.000005425503,0.0011266608,0.2800976,0.014192531,0.0016365962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.09685675,0.04640064,0.05070177,0.035749502,0.0028536967,0.0058124624,0.25877368,0.00024619247,0.004674812,0.44248006,0.054809067,0.0006413557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029568067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015435742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7889447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004043771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001311282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9846638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983463486","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00721.x","title":"I Need a Placebo like I Need a Hole in the Head","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical trial; Psychological intervention; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Research ethics; Psychology; Law; Political science; Psychiatry; Pathology","score_opus":0.17582632097528722,"score_gpt":0.4225300756598662,"score_spread":0.246703754684579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983463486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016294258,0.018480418,0.000044671964,0.95943034,0.0020487343,0.00078018126,0.000009713373,0.000022161963,0.017554337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061507713,0.008881596,0.00012788245,0.8995931,0.027032258,0.000009417396,0.000028058192,0.00009894689,0.0027209893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897083,0.0032576565,0.0020055873,0.00027833623,0.0039553465,0.00079476857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98347914,0.012511846,0.0013189876,0.0011750488,0.0012637109,0.0002512692],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020786854,0.0005708348,0.0016213104,0.00043931647,0.0003453658,0.000040709278,0.0013439598,0.0028276932,0.00026802928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042963484,0.00026603273,0.00033211257,0.000762003,0.0013806358,0.00010112647,0.00009876322,0.053458415,0.000034780867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040895087,0.000085248284,0.000100598045,0.0012477462,0.00014137001,0.0042858934,0.07796875,0.000011119072,0.0000124906255,0.0009606132,0.91448236,0.0002948392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003555231,0.0021716198,0.00007611239,0.003982429,0.0010500666,0.0035044688,0.004854579,0.000054248074,0.0000021572323,0.0018530972,0.9786524,0.0002435518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003515594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044228096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07311417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025049245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011440918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983973208","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00266.x","title":"Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":701,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Human research; Informed consent; Psychology; Participant observation; Institutional review board; Medical education; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Sociology; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.8173813325809884,"score_gpt":0.6894667605983835,"score_spread":0.12791457198260492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983973208","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040278866,0.94837856,0.000044636814,0.045319006,0.00019761133,0.0005663311,0.0000049565415,0.000009434555,0.0050766626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033948114,0.99376285,0.0002005348,0.0010339468,0.00073776615,0.0000072711,0.000029883277,0.000058407768,0.00077454373],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867609,0.0049525355,0.0027254934,0.00035975446,0.0046053347,0.0005959647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8905308,0.105079845,0.0009889419,0.00086885673,0.0020430214,0.00048848666],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08608113,0.00034908007,0.002986086,0.0026579595,0.0007434829,0.00003587627,0.0009844904,0.0013716699,0.00017295901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05294266,0.00019948572,0.00051448384,0.0031693853,0.0036920467,0.00012735023,0.00053128775,0.039948788,0.000008949878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011109228,0.0018809519,0.0031810114,0.13392586,0.020476915,0.011313749,0.121212766,0.000014239982,0.00008165363,0.21676755,0.019645596,0.4703888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024505034,0.0025000265,0.00041246935,0.17718752,0.0106762955,0.004752963,0.0035779357,0.000012742125,0.0000060123316,0.049345244,0.7486584,0.00041984345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016674998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006279385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72901285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005888611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022741752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984548986","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01969.x","title":"Leopards in the Temple: Restoring Scientific Integrity to the Commercialized Research Scene","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Commercialization; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Business; Scientific evidence; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.9397550317288685,"score_gpt":0.7356368478235283,"score_spread":0.2041181839053402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984548986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39890528,0.0024025452,0.00004545671,0.59215844,0.0027420134,0.00052439945,0.0000071562995,0.000010304694,0.0032044163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9527627,0.0006714792,0.000046729903,0.04415939,0.0021796366,0.000012106514,0.0000016768142,0.000013696692,0.00015258625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98543805,0.010974778,0.00091893726,0.00018800415,0.0016818596,0.00079839164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894225,0.00829348,0.00024743585,0.0004897463,0.0011326225,0.00041422131],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11452812,0.0001844983,0.00037082218,0.00017684301,0.0028354763,0.000054166714,0.0019859462,0.0005598376,0.00020845044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005944247,0.00008072623,0.00007808976,0.0012235089,0.0030342666,0.00012815994,0.00020234335,0.027002009,0.000042300628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005794755,0.0012237969,0.0033477233,0.00038416564,0.00022325889,0.0006106613,0.43733764,0.0032174997,0.025055015,0.40398705,0.10185674,0.016961705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027347873,0.00073906535,0.0021030293,0.0005601044,0.00018024241,0.00040439723,0.0136094745,0.000052819632,0.0048741368,0.028500535,0.94610226,0.00013916327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013888302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024985834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8442455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030633164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001090719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996789},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1984743713","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00088.x","title":"Cognitive Barriers in Perception of Nanotechnology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Nanotechnology; Cognition; Applications of nanotechnology; Polarization (electrochemistry); Societal impact of nanotechnology; Psychology; Political science; Chemistry; Materials science; Psychiatry; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.032945103376923544,"score_gpt":0.3387759706689053,"score_spread":0.3058308672919818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984743713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78066653,0.0018917697,0.0011548342,0.2114918,0.00025926385,0.00012935513,8.8134493e-7,0.000016696584,0.0043888907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99506664,0.0017773804,0.00014080403,0.002757722,0.0001449602,4.6372836e-7,0.0000014324902,0.0000083738905,0.00010222873],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876285,0.00016919608,0.0005542967,0.000063715386,0.00030637084,0.00014357825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986146,0.0005563948,0.0003285904,0.0001380507,0.00031992124,0.00004246202],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002250927,0.00009303155,0.00037583546,0.00021460744,0.00006740091,6.288529e-7,0.0001365689,0.0025572113,0.000117040356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088552857,0.000050042057,0.00005638133,0.00026318306,0.001874677,0.000034380366,0.000022438091,0.007962818,0.0000028556476],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007438035,0.00071963767,0.014183411,0.0006903791,0.0008004904,0.0011651263,0.0449566,0.0001572119,0.55599886,0.35184455,0.0051418217,0.016903894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06950006,0.037266906,0.10254809,0.03256322,0.009419269,0.038133252,0.16549791,0.0008152966,0.26200998,0.20571607,0.07517701,0.0013529208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033328382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000111807756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29398888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034688284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015592767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985927387","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00627.x","title":"Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"BRCA gene mutations in cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Ontario Genomics","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance; McGill University","keywords":"Confidentiality; Genetic testing; Context (archaeology); Disease; Genetic counseling; Genetic discrimination; Informed consent; Breast cancer; Health professionals; Psychology; Medicine; Health care; Cancer; Genetics; Alternative medicine; Biology; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.2072235652891657,"score_gpt":0.45251999563195894,"score_spread":0.24529643034279325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985927387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7684501,0.012903046,0.003476206,0.1251887,0.0011277262,0.00065602496,0.000034903103,0.000010536224,0.08815279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365175,0.0019713899,0.0024243828,0.0012221917,0.0003956878,0.0000022707188,0.0000052791825,0.00001187248,0.00031515234],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980263,0.00077537005,0.0004914868,0.00007297241,0.00050355913,0.00013027668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970989,0.00042067489,0.0002568189,0.0005787655,0.0015748915,0.00006993004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009233882,0.000065975575,0.00014276804,0.00007516017,0.00012945052,0.0000026426364,0.0006506071,0.00015044564,0.000013949242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025217414,0.000041654646,0.000037478007,0.00019957687,0.00083176995,0.0000031617117,0.00014740234,0.0008391749,0.0000026376547],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050217784,0.00018578151,0.000107824926,0.000084259314,0.0002314852,0.000005660294,0.12373152,0.00024326112,0.75978976,0.0134900985,0.09383239,0.0032761623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033535825,0.005981889,0.0009921807,0.0009465501,0.00017915801,0.0001873274,0.020386605,0.000019947436,0.47830877,0.009123396,0.48032445,0.0001961422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005311246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004965117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38649207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003838253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037793268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3645844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988045541","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00194.x","title":"Ethics at Phase 0: Clarifying the Issues","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Food and drug administration; Drug development; Clinical trial; Agency (philosophy); Psychological intervention; Translational research; Exploratory research; Medicine; Drug approval; Investigational Drugs; Engineering ethics; Political science; Drug; Pharmacology; Sociology; Internal medicine; Engineering; Pathology; Nursing; Social science","score_opus":0.5065398651351934,"score_gpt":0.5796213906381787,"score_spread":0.0730815255029853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988045541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037508005,0.78806937,0.0006504381,0.20685872,0.001609476,0.0005380974,0.0000050472977,0.000020063027,0.002245043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000113858296,0.9742702,0.00020063737,0.016978601,0.006662793,0.00000275429,0.000040572813,0.00009289738,0.0016376862],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901379,0.0025179768,0.0025476231,0.00024600438,0.0040424764,0.0005080706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97988844,0.0146687785,0.002510409,0.0009163221,0.0015541236,0.0004619013],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04924525,0.00058123027,0.0026791184,0.000270666,0.0010319228,0.000026063068,0.00092053605,0.003894306,0.00028627014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047257855,0.00021320028,0.00075295253,0.0006702767,0.007381808,0.00007188752,0.00022482323,0.031588085,0.000031449596],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048748052,0.00030348965,5.404423e-7,0.035314754,0.0014031366,0.0004919725,0.033705153,0.0000019337108,0.000040537045,0.067920215,0.015253974,0.8450768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015535295,0.001077391,8.772499e-7,0.052862678,0.006870804,0.0050624213,0.00050087995,0.000010995227,0.000007309859,0.0030579218,0.92879856,0.00019665912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014363068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110057954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91354454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033848008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021455449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99739885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988583704","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00625.x","title":"Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval; McGill Genome Centre; Ontario Genomics","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Biobank; Pace; Data science; Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Political science; Computer science; Biology; Bioinformatics; Geography","score_opus":0.8626087148929631,"score_gpt":0.6567269589365216,"score_spread":0.20588175595644154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988583704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51306766,0.005771272,0.00018521842,0.28478208,0.0007282368,0.00037145303,0.000011672328,0.000015549173,0.19506684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707653,0.020280039,0.0029663367,0.00093186885,0.0013896199,0.0000010164799,0.000001227092,0.00001970627,0.0036448878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937456,0.0011462406,0.0011831704,0.00017551109,0.0034800705,0.00026939542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.952587,0.036039896,0.0006727214,0.0006335689,0.009729456,0.0003373274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0707727,0.00011170888,0.00042390218,0.00024993037,0.00017042796,0.000008199528,0.00065505144,0.00042997874,0.00016231733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12088291,0.000058756275,0.000080191836,0.00024863618,0.005915289,0.00009960004,0.00029522236,0.010376258,0.0000024041112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007923217,0.0003639545,0.0025351923,0.0004237515,0.00043169424,0.00016142962,0.18826753,0.0000025592974,0.006888531,0.79108465,0.0014853119,0.00043214695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015933288,0.020215198,0.04291011,0.014658086,0.0006971619,0.0033659732,0.12500134,0.0003611289,0.013957395,0.72180814,0.040734034,0.00035816027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005881218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034403877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4576976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009842405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010494565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99679005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990531111","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12108","title":"Workplace Health: Engaging Business Leaders to Combat Obesity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Absenteeism; Health promotion; Obesity; Incentive; Health care; Environmental health; Medicine; Workplace health promotion; Population; Gerontology; Business; Public health; Nursing; Psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.1725135947828413,"score_gpt":0.46839204940351464,"score_spread":0.2958784546206733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990531111","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13238195,0.0026410113,0.0048815166,0.8466531,0.0036495351,0.0011589163,0.0000010790992,0.00005541247,0.008577501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77872527,0.0014534302,0.00079184625,0.21469603,0.002767743,0.000013627442,0.000002301184,0.000048971393,0.001500795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919695,0.0042305226,0.0015679816,0.00016080802,0.0010671626,0.0010039798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98599285,0.010056928,0.0010865672,0.00046000638,0.0015042735,0.00089936913],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02112616,0.00024957585,0.0007635366,0.00016568958,0.0028550748,0.000011327989,0.0006185635,0.00034721012,0.0005302364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003582687,0.00014563021,0.000060156937,0.00064001174,0.00046279086,0.00024298938,0.0001371661,0.008228996,0.00034940382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000595816,0.00014523082,0.014049241,0.003102539,0.000099568584,0.000029437706,0.4803126,0.0007263068,0.00037499986,0.023761125,0.4714598,0.0053433417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073638135,0.0017740516,0.065223806,0.030842818,0.00028206914,0.00030048078,0.2292664,0.00022760985,0.000055829794,0.02084097,0.6430434,0.00077871414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006604143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091627386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6463433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034331958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016285692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994184927","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00246.x","title":"Teaching Health Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Officer; Liability; Law; Private practice; Health care; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.37632004586405543,"score_gpt":0.5700524962173158,"score_spread":0.19373245035326037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994184927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04369509,0.0021308735,0.00070610543,0.8716548,0.0017151934,0.0002745527,0.0000012793884,0.00003113549,0.07979094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8166837,0.001642688,0.0004892535,0.17617884,0.003649559,0.0000016899472,0.0000011697966,0.000017910468,0.0013351566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032253,0.006555941,0.0013282264,0.000092581344,0.0012673704,0.00043335147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813266,0.016223965,0.0011775953,0.00038199575,0.00047998223,0.00040989488],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03344935,0.00013747904,0.0005697509,0.00004475444,0.0025689483,0.000002030942,0.00044327238,0.00025780106,0.00068107614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009398194,0.00006761453,0.000067148765,0.00009550626,0.0011192436,0.0002007953,0.00007580878,0.0109942965,0.00007775239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023372445,0.00012624319,0.0005536654,0.0005609611,0.000061224906,0.00005977466,0.3616251,0.0000048295997,0.00012163476,0.54956853,0.086416356,0.00066796975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009984619,0.00088776625,0.00035537675,0.0013939847,0.00007016863,0.000273631,0.020152012,0.00001012057,0.000006177046,0.011232249,0.96455115,0.00006889868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012637411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009892683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8781348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118254444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010646348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994719100","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00013.x","title":"Conflict over Conflicts of Interest: An Analysis of the New NIH Rules","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Conflict of interest; German; Drug Company; Neutrality; Political science; Management; Technology transfer; Law; Business; Economics; History","score_opus":0.7359341548031622,"score_gpt":0.6185349666823107,"score_spread":0.11739918812085148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994719100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461137,0.0026489857,0.000113349204,0.045184635,0.0009453447,0.00019276809,0.000053875552,0.00000950591,0.0047378363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849479,0.00058978796,0.00002353294,0.013144146,0.00083803694,5.489801e-7,0.000006597569,0.00001295698,0.000436499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558353,0.0022818842,0.0012123083,0.00011290058,0.00050872035,0.00030065078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942598,0.003235298,0.0011850365,0.00034504992,0.0006374454,0.0003373852],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064028203,0.00019459437,0.0007218653,0.00014719351,0.00023206974,0.000004959687,0.000835009,0.000661305,0.0013616469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005713009,0.00010093668,0.00023951312,0.00048482936,0.0018464271,0.00011067294,0.00008702165,0.005143006,0.0000022578422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005101297,0.0014267304,0.046045903,0.0006897064,0.007091899,0.00009456049,0.06061771,0.010093246,0.19236538,0.6433741,0.029337693,0.0037617642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068448433,0.0018687891,0.06632589,0.00073768303,0.020709205,0.00023753472,0.002694045,0.0045747976,0.11744252,0.01722979,0.7609176,0.0004172791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015984537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009941311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73157996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004726271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035403346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999803760","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00626.x","title":"Pediatric Research and the Return of Individual Research Results","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics; McGill Genome Centre; Université de Montréal; Ontario Genomics","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Duty; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Pediatric research; Social psychology; Research ethics; Political science; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.6355969445831219,"score_gpt":0.5519063948138195,"score_spread":0.08369054976930235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999803760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49969462,0.050668217,0.000028856502,0.3527013,0.0010935738,0.0012144207,0.000020711954,0.00001780158,0.0945605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676396,0.026541019,0.00029265686,0.001722371,0.0033535173,0.0000026848768,0.0000020382538,0.000025618021,0.0004204567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869275,0.005446328,0.0015355524,0.00019273972,0.0053259972,0.0005718727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623711,0.02858082,0.0006608963,0.0008128338,0.0071759527,0.00039839055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1767091,0.00015569478,0.000663073,0.0004583428,0.00068757444,0.000016332355,0.00090742524,0.0005209559,0.000055026652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02991387,0.00006705885,0.00008120549,0.00115076,0.0071740723,0.00009517699,0.00033838217,0.015831089,0.000004156021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012776843,0.0002922374,0.0029381684,0.0014345036,0.00023098906,0.00029373515,0.65233094,6.5668314e-7,0.00009972378,0.30469224,0.023626877,0.0012831208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.045817778,0.042354397,0.030895451,0.0053556412,0.0032279359,0.004969405,0.13884938,0.00006754509,0.001599161,0.5726687,0.15360649,0.00058814685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030552074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017213816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51348156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005656375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001327163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005590473","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00154.x","title":"Why Can’t We Do What They Do? National Health Reform Abroad","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life expectancy; Per capita; Health care; Gross domestic product; Infant mortality; International health; Health policy; Economic growth; Population; Product (mathematics); Health insurance; Business; Demographic economics; Medicine; Environmental health; Economics","score_opus":0.1744479968077542,"score_gpt":0.39586398427227865,"score_spread":0.22141598746452446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005590473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021888588,0.019293582,0.0010332881,0.9567917,0.0010828599,0.00016082248,0.000016381633,0.000010091082,0.019422427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73453367,0.061814044,0.00026014505,0.2019858,0.0011945236,0.0000025959814,0.0000029467262,0.00002136699,0.00018488134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804366,0.0001080373,0.0010958448,0.0001260398,0.0003093233,0.00031712124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805033,0.00025902968,0.0010094716,0.0002513125,0.00022474029,0.00020510062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010091857,0.00013849595,0.00045561758,0.00019316518,0.0003115451,0.00005013528,0.00042254466,0.00012915488,0.00008908421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037982795,0.00009180761,0.000080850754,0.00015333752,0.00020728461,0.00034096852,0.000055082506,0.0012860361,0.000034497367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002850537,0.000038656828,0.000023979957,0.00009938096,0.000054671946,0.0000043840128,0.028400427,0.0003109689,6.8175865e-7,0.96562535,0.0041669207,0.001246105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008213361,0.00038349032,0.0001892671,0.0005089489,0.000007188278,0.000063401305,0.0023650962,0.000005383664,0.0000034695597,0.43917352,0.5563995,0.000079392004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02466279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007157014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75480586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008933602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004178311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005819759","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00583.x","title":"Care, Compassion, or Cost: Redefining the Basis of Treatment in Ethics and Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Subject (documents); Point (geometry); Psychology; Reflection (computer programming); Law; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.5393472845086709,"score_gpt":0.5020031631075207,"score_spread":0.03734412140115018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005819759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76440305,0.05454869,0.00048166187,0.098545484,0.0010212985,0.0010462896,0.000026051535,0.0000237908,0.0799037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800421,0.0151782865,0.0008371892,0.0036676147,0.00018644345,0.000002457448,0.0000020390908,0.000015219107,0.000068676185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976036,0.0007572266,0.00076506723,0.000086584754,0.0006221339,0.00016540401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924352,0.0058387197,0.0005701215,0.00028343458,0.00075896055,0.00011353677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004386045,0.0001606627,0.0006931823,0.00007739672,0.00014963915,0.0000024872597,0.00018817514,0.0002197746,0.00006459268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002213034,0.000063465995,0.00007525149,0.0001791061,0.0013806481,0.0000491538,0.000041378906,0.0019091101,6.5337093e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031869097,0.00020185605,0.017873295,0.0006113119,0.00040647184,0.00015355693,0.9122833,0.000018552022,0.0013432672,0.060245056,0.0006257642,0.0030506433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025088586,0.02863387,0.025059156,0.049361635,0.0053858804,0.0015547556,0.4657304,0.00013107617,0.0644311,0.010857497,0.32320783,0.0005582187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005164203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002830384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44655293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009922371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004496545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82942396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005883942","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01971.x","title":"What are the Limits of Bioethics in a Culturally Pluralistic Society?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Autonomy; Environmental ethics; Individualism; Personhood; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Teleology; Multitude; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3739205005058326,"score_gpt":0.5632298073795943,"score_spread":0.18930930687376168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005883942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04402462,0.0060650436,0.0006877813,0.9420453,0.0034064935,0.000459396,0.0000027116434,0.000016097985,0.0032925992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873205,0.024877049,0.0005793213,0.099785745,0.0013236536,0.0000045659654,0.0000013822702,0.000028381286,0.00019491214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875661,0.0074881325,0.0018724592,0.00013854011,0.0024625103,0.00047227324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9274899,0.0667648,0.0025683357,0.000548534,0.0024338376,0.00019462519],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.064355366,0.00021701767,0.0006399106,0.000057344398,0.0012578536,0.000013762245,0.0011670762,0.0010035951,0.00008724475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06302316,0.00009387987,0.0001494841,0.0004862799,0.0053190817,0.0005082174,0.000163447,0.03524645,0.00001945889],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031173992,0.00012566075,0.000296666,0.0009889096,0.00014286595,0.00005292625,0.5323244,0.00046660128,0.0009940423,0.4602827,0.0038968679,0.000116616466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004026478,0.00069518195,0.0009751704,0.021208046,0.00052456156,0.00019198039,0.5978591,0.000042799482,0.00016092183,0.3535174,0.020606807,0.00019158017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020503781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049023526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8422595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002777728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001687888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006415548","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00663.x","title":"Expert Testimony by Persons Trained in Ethical Reasoning: The Case of Andrew Sawatzky","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Relevance (law); Witness; Economic Justice; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.17947767329125724,"score_gpt":0.533239634608322,"score_spread":0.3537619613170648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006415548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12420302,0.004999588,0.00038564118,0.820731,0.0007754388,0.0005123221,0.000010052082,0.000024320361,0.048358623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9071066,0.003403076,0.00061058573,0.08698609,0.0010275544,0.000007610118,0.0000016465045,0.000037060923,0.00081977237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97939986,0.016597679,0.0017632819,0.00017168782,0.0015295147,0.0005379703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.891535,0.10576748,0.0010287395,0.00059781864,0.0007356365,0.00033536815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.075107016,0.00022882168,0.0006844697,0.00007498108,0.0014612746,0.000005943425,0.00083615957,0.0014280066,0.0021132235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071272455,0.000108679866,0.000097434524,0.0004176921,0.0034737347,0.00014463463,0.00007894509,0.046232022,0.000017884266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001539867,0.00031120336,0.0002410342,0.00040021882,0.00016163608,0.0020077063,0.7255767,0.00005078075,0.0020116987,0.07350251,0.18888842,0.0053082528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013651912,0.0036840674,0.00049966795,0.014243719,0.0011091242,0.017229382,0.31869173,0.0016693989,0.00025279404,0.074724495,0.55356115,0.0006825861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068282937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020446999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013488457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011173177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008051457","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01967.x","title":"Institutional Conflicts of Interest: Protecting Human Subjects, Scientific Integrity, and Institutional Accountability","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Clinical trial; Government (linguistics); Conflict of interest; Accountability; Public relations; Medical research; Clinical research; Pharmaceutical industry; Variety (cybernetics); Public trust; Public interest; Political science; Business; Medicine; Law; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.8229343966421379,"score_gpt":0.62578126932492,"score_spread":0.1971531273172179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008051457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646018,0.0013367654,0.00027887628,0.029955368,0.0014916253,0.00032000907,0.00002170044,0.00001480565,0.0019790204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951281,0.00014557553,0.00009715942,0.003931753,0.00065536733,0.0000031521372,0.0000053955723,0.000007462244,0.000026019852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681264,0.0012853866,0.0009210775,0.0001662804,0.00051223417,0.00030239476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99625593,0.0016403644,0.00053759385,0.00017081226,0.0010455974,0.0003497009],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017351486,0.00018247862,0.00038557706,0.00011949609,0.0017025365,0.000019151916,0.0004489947,0.0006211005,0.0002223203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024228196,0.000116304866,0.00006753218,0.0002563042,0.0073614093,0.00027420095,0.00014095634,0.012361182,0.0000037670209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014664801,0.0006943871,0.0040118643,0.0011319589,0.00030067682,0.00009615042,0.03923403,0.0011046008,0.16953,0.7790801,0.00021135897,0.003138429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023524601,0.004579372,0.021288225,0.006363596,0.0019236945,0.007896081,0.01042288,0.0005527849,0.29669005,0.29523277,0.3304758,0.0010501583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051613693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062882074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4838473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019240058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011755726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008980185","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00483.x","title":"Currents in Contemporary Ethics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institute of Health Economics; Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Clinical trial; Context (archaeology); Inclusion (mineral); Public relations; Conflict of interest; Alternative medicine; Pharmaceutical industry; Informed consent; Incentive; Clinical research; Medicine; Business; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Pharmacology; Law; Pathology; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8714327061402337,"score_gpt":0.6782194867681663,"score_spread":0.19321321937206737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008980185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29921108,0.016648514,0.00028723414,0.64997756,0.006204328,0.00052791106,0.000021728329,0.000042426822,0.027079208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9270655,0.0030254216,0.000035802743,0.06857504,0.0011812627,0.000002403164,0.000003333408,0.000018136381,0.00009309147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99419713,0.0033657728,0.001109409,0.00013473518,0.00073662633,0.0004563252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927618,0.00545792,0.00051528454,0.00020412027,0.00054435077,0.00051654864],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019870453,0.00022543158,0.0004926039,0.000118046046,0.0004465037,0.000007230062,0.0006660477,0.0013560306,0.00036826942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025580039,0.00013994079,0.00008732262,0.00030974808,0.0015549345,0.00019865173,0.000081018436,0.027908757,0.00003582863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008346411,0.0026632927,0.015672611,0.0018702641,0.000850706,0.0028266672,0.30616122,0.00931869,0.01764701,0.5995219,0.0260736,0.009047683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014475941,0.0016932848,0.0015868912,0.002033585,0.00045191866,0.001113334,0.0059224074,0.00016613497,0.009249995,0.0894677,0.8734021,0.00043671645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037879968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001769041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8473285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017383543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013741067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010621605","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00755.x","title":"Quarantine in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and other Emerging Infectious Diseases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarantine; Public health; Isolation (microbiology); Medicine; Communicable disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Suspect; Monkeypox; Pandemic; Disease; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Environmental health; Family medicine; Virology; Political science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.0792479491182584,"score_gpt":0.4083408567862442,"score_spread":0.3290929076679858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010621605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791832,0.0039926227,0.0001889591,0.009885243,0.00025392175,0.00020806369,0.0000035085275,0.000016321372,0.006268142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282014,0.0009818627,0.000024668698,0.005752804,0.00019540988,0.0000017959552,4.217091e-7,0.000024298302,0.00019859729],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979045,0.0005822328,0.00052854785,0.00010508521,0.0006267083,0.00025297055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985201,0.00060807925,0.00020456474,0.00020272892,0.0002850106,0.00017954303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003254789,0.00014830935,0.0004550242,0.00025345158,0.00018965564,0.000011903774,0.00009044432,0.00013968936,0.00015248603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009267772,0.00008235611,0.0000686734,0.0003714272,0.000520342,0.000118929514,0.000028143288,0.0018849014,0.000005485434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004299168,0.0021846448,0.72867954,0.0024155453,0.0031787246,0.009659878,0.040348258,0.00056775415,0.07443205,0.11269186,0.0116942525,0.0098483525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05194409,0.025349583,0.16817401,0.011984153,0.005275432,0.13467997,0.011334395,0.0004062245,0.003796229,0.023685168,0.5619435,0.0014272449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037862567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019166227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5605055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006224343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023504213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81890637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013561895","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00316.x","title":"America's Uninsured: The Statistics and Back Story","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Health care; Health insurance; Population; Private insurance; Medicine; Medical care; Public health; Environmental health; Health care reform; Family medicine; Business; Gerontology; Health policy; Economic growth; Nursing; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.31735078970620373,"score_gpt":0.415015902143616,"score_spread":0.09766511243741227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013561895","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.513415e-7,0.9525455,0.0019552018,0.03629505,0.0007366493,0.00026065533,0.00009993492,0.00000399508,0.008102466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000025012607,0.9904112,0.00034682095,0.0072537856,0.0009289898,0.0000027383799,0.00000651204,0.000035734196,0.0009891703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973443,0.0006697709,0.0014075134,0.00014193157,0.0001768359,0.00025965692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935295,0.0034284228,0.0023239977,0.00044328006,0.00012854536,0.0001462632],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059489873,0.00025986927,0.0015832772,0.00015549232,0.00036429384,0.000016547101,0.00061146467,0.0002535353,0.00011131208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001201686,0.00013562293,0.00013888905,0.00020458655,0.0011167255,0.000057315305,0.00010424179,0.0034711116,0.00011353863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009770288,0.000025285175,0.0000016778237,0.004718218,0.00037531502,0.000033378743,0.0080011105,0.000004948452,4.4120063e-9,0.60859954,0.07872064,0.29951012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018610452,0.00023450718,0.0000053062645,0.0021185798,0.00020139826,0.00029858865,0.00017171564,0.000006204868,4.9007998e-9,0.0077896845,0.9888605,0.0001273985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016060472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009744079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91013986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012294714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027115768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021637549","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00205.x","title":"Biobanking: International Norms","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Humanity; Human rights; Normative; Political science; International law; Declaration; Subject (documents); Human cloning; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Law; Declaration of Helsinki; Research ethics; Environmental ethics; Informed consent; Medicine; Biology; Genetics; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.2973922252508069,"score_gpt":0.5036888275477195,"score_spread":0.2062966022969126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021637549","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000010147926,0.8898022,0.0003300824,0.10086689,0.0023527227,0.00025033485,0.0000056458266,0.000014177636,0.006376936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00012205837,0.984347,0.0003105369,0.0051588076,0.0091280285,0.0000014062181,0.00005350467,0.000049609076,0.00082908326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513084,0.00043450642,0.0017307748,0.00015389494,0.0023077813,0.00024220727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948454,0.0017368937,0.0017337844,0.00040673962,0.0009962107,0.0002809894],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008414611,0.0003516412,0.001795782,0.00030303665,0.00016794844,0.000016020473,0.0006863553,0.0012875146,0.0004520936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010179695,0.00014609125,0.00051777303,0.00032642824,0.002628498,0.00007942343,0.000103769074,0.0076689795,0.000028772627],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008043577,0.000088268265,3.0233775e-7,0.0037791536,0.00058234105,0.00008350514,0.0017521012,0.0000010976999,0.0000049586797,0.027091205,0.004722364,0.9618143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075266225,0.0005177012,0.0000026362052,0.039584003,0.0032362686,0.004339932,0.00007100833,0.000009502205,8.343563e-7,0.0019667088,0.9493883,0.00013041143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004033821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001875984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96168387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002244704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013043435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025053585","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00049.x","title":"Fiduciary Obligation in Clinical Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Subject (documents); Foundation (evidence); Obligation; Bioethics; Law; Criticism; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.8759906318538984,"score_gpt":0.7350642375789104,"score_spread":0.140926394274988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025053585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4912759,0.0028173807,0.00020955334,0.440942,0.0008886542,0.0004264326,0.0000010374999,0.0000152564435,0.0634238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98179084,0.0054814983,0.000573378,0.0064191567,0.0040759174,0.0000019892095,0.0000029625755,0.000028207975,0.0016260355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98498994,0.0049015223,0.0028743122,0.0002360228,0.0064421473,0.0005560542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80038077,0.19074696,0.000721289,0.0010109539,0.0067413035,0.00039874637],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23665781,0.00013382109,0.00066033064,0.00034094774,0.00023854995,0.000015479163,0.00067245605,0.0010465807,0.00015261096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13672894,0.000073449795,0.00015475445,0.00080354983,0.0040423363,0.00011800094,0.00016822884,0.030264005,0.000040580504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043056565,0.0015462238,0.048385322,0.0009764238,0.00015573559,0.0012562738,0.008790234,0.000111850786,0.004546771,0.88629115,0.03985602,0.0037783599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005924001,0.0050647757,0.094351895,0.0060383747,0.00017187295,0.0006190564,0.002122339,0.00013579227,0.0007518798,0.8530871,0.03159059,0.00014230765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020151068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037007767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49051496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019208719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002587852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027177214","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00686.x","title":"The Ethical Analysis of Risk","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Informed consent; Institutional review board; Confidentiality; Research ethics; Balance (ability); Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Subject (documents); Psychology; Task (project management); Actuarial science; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Business; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.7203642937941083,"score_gpt":0.6826195619799805,"score_spread":0.03774473181412774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027177214","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000014200516,0.9498634,0.000097817065,0.041217007,0.00048552017,0.00041431878,0.0000278508,0.000009866279,0.007870044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002686608,0.9939068,0.00013688648,0.0032024756,0.0016591368,0.0000037596653,0.000012919509,0.0000686294,0.00074074866],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97739613,0.00876887,0.00500374,0.0003101679,0.007955515,0.00056558533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.531806,0.4565518,0.004504796,0.0022491578,0.004306915,0.00058133656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1469609,0.00048464292,0.0055085686,0.00057262287,0.0005832205,0.00002368351,0.0022737114,0.004611129,0.0005245803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20236349,0.00018080733,0.00236986,0.002360991,0.007704555,0.0000348405,0.00025245186,0.084223285,0.00002488855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001514576,0.00034624332,0.000026500249,0.026820803,0.032184727,0.00033248143,0.011504771,0.000044491073,0.0000012401501,0.15826175,0.0049284766,0.7640339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057604606,0.0010293601,0.000018081395,0.037385404,0.076381676,0.000316442,0.00028371962,0.000013579923,6.345506e-7,0.01774872,0.8661151,0.00013125934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049784454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014115454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019232728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058343615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028440416","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00273.x","title":"Bridging Philosophical and Practical Implications of Incidental Findings in Brain Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; National Human Genome Research Institute; Greenwall Foundation","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Empirical research; Duty; Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Identification (biology); Clinical Practice; Medicine; Political science; Epistemology; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.8623315041943624,"score_gpt":0.7203860233605791,"score_spread":0.14194548083378333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028440416","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005972682,0.6964969,0.00004547737,0.29981852,0.00011565109,0.0006184941,0.000006029936,0.000005190953,0.0022964787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010691105,0.98523533,0.0003521733,0.002195192,0.0013248671,0.000008564503,0.000007046119,0.000062381696,0.00012331687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98529184,0.004839814,0.0033588,0.0003666109,0.0055398922,0.00060305296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7795106,0.21531464,0.0010065885,0.0008061877,0.0028513037,0.00051067077],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0824597,0.00031364677,0.0026521732,0.0008041961,0.00030947136,0.0000152435205,0.0006939761,0.0019538822,0.000056829747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2552936,0.00017664448,0.00032454586,0.0011099031,0.007668418,0.000122053716,0.00057636434,0.047158647,0.000008371475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013804085,0.0015115589,0.0006758292,0.07557928,0.0011802558,0.0035337904,0.020594275,0.000001181352,0.00018400779,0.7719761,0.010569292,0.11281399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034790526,0.004897336,0.00072232896,0.20583451,0.0014281912,0.058766242,0.0007315289,0.00001248077,0.000012078943,0.2326514,0.4910826,0.0003822425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027890087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002651948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53932476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039768138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007432793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030327247","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.295.x","title":"Popular Representations of Race: The News Coverage of BiDil","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law); Race (biology); Tone (literature); Public health; News media; Frame (networking); Key (lock); Science communication; Social media; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Biology; Computer science; Medicine; Media studies; Science education; Law","score_opus":0.06047493643865253,"score_gpt":0.35820285773870497,"score_spread":0.29772792130005243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030327247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97061634,0.00764218,0.0024855009,0.015248825,0.00034521363,0.00012085609,0.00000698381,0.000001613328,0.0035324646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96772575,0.02935057,0.00022938884,0.0016154541,0.0005599717,4.9751753e-7,0.000005019799,0.000010691092,0.00050267566],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850523,0.00035796876,0.00051287876,0.000073882235,0.0004435806,0.00010646519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826366,0.00022298568,0.0005453132,0.0004340392,0.00048307568,0.000050957155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018576316,0.00008686854,0.0002316276,0.000015702915,0.00018636989,0.0000018961547,0.00035106836,0.00015340127,0.000014544225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008447671,0.000045296794,0.00013536814,0.00008202262,0.0010856799,0.0000035836536,0.000056841396,0.0005079646,4.4411402e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046121722,0.0002148902,0.006827119,0.00012710785,0.0005955228,0.000018736471,0.058918703,0.0030000696,0.88183105,0.0050707883,0.042194486,0.00074030046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007564793,0.005655875,0.018598363,0.0005290117,0.0013081967,0.0018635296,0.028115697,0.00013058928,0.48550862,0.010088794,0.44010177,0.00053474185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020719973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008029058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3979073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062155887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001901136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40002328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030508869","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00335.x","title":"(Uncontrolled) Donation after Cardiac Determination of Death: A Note of Caution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.049438849937730074,"score_gpt":0.3508566561325656,"score_spread":0.30141780619483555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030508869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681685,0.0031446205,0.011125081,0.011971079,0.0020228333,0.0003935294,0.0000076242654,0.000008899177,0.0031578536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969622,0.0012496068,0.0005772585,0.00034718926,0.00078735146,0.000002110872,0.00000496012,0.0000116671945,0.00005763874],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767214,0.00035774818,0.00073290465,0.00006344161,0.0010663717,0.00010738206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964429,0.0010779502,0.0007502106,0.0001803308,0.0014751854,0.00007338114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033500276,0.00010634477,0.00055092893,0.00016256426,0.00008395314,0.0000013565568,0.000077208846,0.0001759851,0.000016121461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011890077,0.000060195798,0.00021608968,0.0001803565,0.00046440386,0.00011864381,0.0000147600795,0.0006556104,0.0000011265345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030420551,0.0009919705,0.056912217,0.0032623482,0.0017180388,0.0005243702,0.38590086,0.00084275275,0.46091747,0.023918701,0.0033016067,0.03128911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.037018765,0.008757559,0.8245572,0.010298082,0.011707195,0.0021855277,0.0067480486,0.003933153,0.05632914,0.014951727,0.022767302,0.0007463301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023123513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030628977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76764494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007391416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002769086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28483373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030636164","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00452.x","title":"Realization of the International Human Right to Health in an Economically Integrated North America","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; World War II; Political science; Communism; Right to health; International trade; Economic growth; Development economics; Economic history; Law; History; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.15199343346281638,"score_gpt":0.5121691553014839,"score_spread":0.36017572183866753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030636164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33800456,0.00019285176,0.0011134808,0.64865494,0.0016556573,0.00056072226,0.000016084046,0.000013114808,0.009788574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.856356,0.0004761777,0.00015378131,0.14190586,0.00088422233,0.0000014913726,0.000016815724,0.00000863311,0.00019701188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960188,0.0016976083,0.0013708656,0.00009275252,0.00054722687,0.00027269247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971693,0.0005702254,0.0010045145,0.0002709288,0.000683915,0.00030110023],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050309887,0.00010608799,0.00040826737,0.00009735681,0.00035435442,0.00000243147,0.00067749474,0.00016020871,0.00013837518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010350003,0.000050563907,0.000044265176,0.00028838706,0.00022862149,0.00008465742,0.000047774833,0.0025861003,0.0000044156513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016785412,0.0010459801,0.016802507,0.0004333294,0.00013745851,0.000040979277,0.30771452,0.0011563208,0.0019908736,0.2769517,0.34213516,0.049912624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031649212,0.005196874,0.12828703,0.0052764546,0.00006654915,0.000038348237,0.00949097,0.00019185722,0.000043578886,0.04147054,0.80658025,0.0001926252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055749244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01897255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51835144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033323883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011610046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032084453","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00624.x","title":"Return of Results: Towards a Lexicon?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation; McGill University; McGill Genome Centre","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Biobank; Terminology; Lexicon; Harmonization; Population; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Computer science; Environmental health; Bioinformatics; Biology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7728062379282206,"score_gpt":0.606678043059822,"score_spread":0.16612819486839858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032084453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120454356,0.004726613,0.0011467763,0.39850911,0.0017646927,0.00061425666,0.00001798834,0.00003992757,0.4727263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980678,0.006233192,0.0024488464,0.008058929,0.0010134121,8.243529e-7,0.0000014113823,0.000031050695,0.0015342986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99296904,0.0009033739,0.0020188866,0.00015542179,0.0036247927,0.00032847674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631939,0.028554283,0.0013672881,0.0010688116,0.0053581726,0.0004575221],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059250385,0.00017081521,0.00080534455,0.00014475959,0.000118864526,0.0000040308987,0.0008079619,0.00075824594,0.00033643265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11443531,0.000084771986,0.0001990998,0.00031941998,0.0035218843,0.00009061181,0.00016434562,0.012151229,0.000010154745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029345019,0.0012419566,0.0014036964,0.0028063564,0.0013101657,0.0009772923,0.23324455,0.0000047620542,0.021165626,0.69103616,0.0130712865,0.0043931124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018562037,0.030157307,0.008084846,0.019009802,0.0022602018,0.0032550509,0.014291953,0.000060940896,0.047736082,0.81857115,0.03761619,0.000394455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010311834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004436859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86022365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000723598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025932083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034995418","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00456.x","title":"Legal Enforcement of Xenotransplantation Public Health Safeguards","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Xenotransplantation and immune response","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Xenotransplantation; Virology; Transplantation; Immunology; Biology; Public health; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Medicine; Disease; Pathology","score_opus":0.2769259309147401,"score_gpt":0.4783765163357004,"score_spread":0.20145058542096028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034995418","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010671221,0.9775943,0.0023771494,0.015242747,0.000624597,0.0007273459,0.000037838723,0.000014898084,0.0033704608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027139601,0.99343765,0.00024382363,0.002713303,0.00044365102,0.000003609318,0.00015061669,0.000055945035,0.0002374209],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992984,0.0017015983,0.002911038,0.0001488092,0.0018731185,0.0003814229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374837,0.0018905866,0.0027736719,0.00044939056,0.00080093293,0.00033702713],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011767812,0.00041494935,0.0027750642,0.0004270631,0.00018901298,0.0000121283665,0.00044854247,0.00043494208,0.00031829526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005541382,0.0002164836,0.00055368536,0.00044281874,0.00071482325,0.00014667684,0.00001831683,0.0035235416,0.000009093052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002749533,0.0006898486,0.0000025452098,0.26317638,0.003397591,0.00043949354,0.058732092,0.00004468786,0.00009151803,0.20442468,0.0009722196,0.4652794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002536293,0.0027115778,0.0000061365304,0.090290725,0.00273778,0.006457905,0.00043936542,0.0000010957119,0.000019274838,0.00011389539,0.8945433,0.00014267933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090916496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058291178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042555993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008538777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036541548","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00102.x","title":"Discourse Ethics as an Ethics of Responsibilty: Comparison and Evaluation of Citizen Involvement in Population Genomics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Genomics; Confidentiality; Diversity (politics); Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Population; Research ethics; Population genomics; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Biology; Genetics; Law; Genome; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.8466123644531133,"score_gpt":0.7078092672645994,"score_spread":0.1388030971885139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036541548","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018630158,0.95909005,0.00010711905,0.018531846,0.0006060977,0.0019305557,0.000022568494,0.0000070684137,0.0010745443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03793299,0.9590812,0.0007827042,0.0015466133,0.0004198434,0.000008874345,0.0000725614,0.00008635608,0.00006889486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9439407,0.031620774,0.008323422,0.00063034316,0.014859882,0.000624891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8539591,0.1270189,0.0064514703,0.0017385734,0.010302427,0.00052955607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3061329,0.00049749325,0.0038949698,0.00069253246,0.00021509927,0.00001713564,0.000804547,0.004268066,0.00006443238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17645177,0.0003045262,0.00033956676,0.00070930534,0.0032606109,0.00014436519,0.00022659884,0.04097388,0.0000015980507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004365747,0.0024455043,0.0015595984,0.18969807,0.0020156945,0.00011351358,0.16750716,0.00036159763,0.00021245149,0.49474636,0.00023244988,0.13674186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012308568,0.016538441,0.0008880257,0.3671337,0.030024638,0.000978714,0.027970636,0.0007327392,0.00009355719,0.44098893,0.10128682,0.0010552316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018762525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005178147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17743564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009944806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017254863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038289525","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00546.x","title":"Toxic Legacy: Mustard Gas in the Sea around Us","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Army","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Toxicology; Forensic engineering; Medicine; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.16083554096735178,"score_gpt":0.31468108673920786,"score_spread":0.15384554577185608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038289525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94500136,0.0005385018,0.000011461257,0.0423539,0.0002290101,0.00007813986,0.0000013126828,0.0000061561955,0.011780155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98812777,0.00018642575,0.000028474538,0.010661242,0.00096595846,6.328472e-7,0.0000010706702,7.7387875e-7,0.00002763758],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799365,0.0007396927,0.00039878127,0.000071289134,0.0005839349,0.00021266469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973943,0.0020531644,0.00024826435,0.000082662766,0.00014576809,0.000075821015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00641162,0.00010968081,0.00021840945,0.000011221144,0.0002119871,0.000019327525,0.00066766515,0.00012232822,0.00022597615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059672375,0.000023657838,0.00006501866,0.00022499538,0.00041755574,0.0001608573,0.000036088077,0.0013871529,0.000008097779],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031842,0.002355781,0.1014135,0.00015927265,0.00048281503,0.0024937438,0.27834022,0.00011117216,0.32088134,0.20884266,0.02714029,0.054594994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022402857,0.011730423,0.55969816,0.00095632306,0.0006269767,0.0035414796,0.036385965,0.000075131626,0.012099287,0.19658579,0.17534603,0.0007141605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027176347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006359326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45828465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018218447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030014546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60265666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038541767","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00090.x","title":"In Whose Interest? Current Issues in Communicating Personal Health Information: A Canadian Perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Technology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Health care; Perspective (graphical); Principle of legality; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Population; Service (business); Phenomenon; Medicine; Nursing; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.2682819815562391,"score_gpt":0.47236004716515256,"score_spread":0.20407806560891345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038541767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019080386,0.8840285,0.000006357422,0.11162036,0.0008485043,0.00043181167,0.0000026753128,0.000007798292,0.0030349072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028965725,0.9868561,0.00002176916,0.00918657,0.0009922767,0.000007589848,0.0000086196815,0.000020934858,0.000009567008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966572,0.00062090735,0.0018047732,0.00009706583,0.00041730664,0.00040274765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964551,0.00050600414,0.0020491655,0.0003221653,0.0006109754,0.00005660994],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011760382,0.0002735928,0.0015000387,0.0011363967,0.00023388537,0.000050481944,0.00079709885,0.0003609175,0.000045685534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015228326,0.00016613431,0.00011612734,0.0008004798,0.0002848684,0.00064691674,0.000108033775,0.006294312,0.00002373115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011125535,0.000041967785,0.000030968135,0.020390758,0.000059799335,0.000042358915,0.032471344,8.532382e-7,7.167956e-9,0.47131336,0.00705227,0.4685852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028872173,0.000048879174,0.0000048604384,0.04166934,0.00005976885,0.00015015036,0.010327453,0.000010594447,1.8229669e-9,0.0026832384,0.9446386,0.00011838481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60551536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64746207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010868082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020996488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041055423","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12139","title":"Toward a Jurisprudence of Drug Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada","keywords":"Scrutiny; Clinical trial; Transparency (behavior); Harm; Drug approval; Medicine; Product (mathematics); Drug development; Drug; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Internet privacy; Pharmacology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08973355495433408,"score_gpt":0.37846561262972206,"score_spread":0.288732057675388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041055423","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15001802,0.002790374,0.037851624,0.7946576,0.001454684,0.00032316268,0.000001374585,0.000025816544,0.012877368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930706,0.00056981976,0.00081814156,0.004228653,0.001033187,3.2796666e-7,0.000002270112,0.00001269111,0.00026427885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970831,0.00041971946,0.0007900079,0.00007671407,0.0014927513,0.0001376735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962704,0.0015210817,0.000731088,0.0002755681,0.0010344263,0.00016739329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010249975,0.000109557455,0.00043845596,0.00009725156,0.00009737258,0.000003455282,0.00020908334,0.00026320288,0.00009179276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014531036,0.000053356944,0.0000953941,0.00021773165,0.002284548,0.00007063614,0.000033414526,0.0016731754,0.00000279639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016060742,0.0002951764,0.00036441314,0.0017661019,0.00027012156,0.00002449917,0.084295586,0.0002052721,0.108048044,0.77277166,0.008683987,0.021669075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014920605,0.008570794,0.037710156,0.015970767,0.0035718805,0.003524909,0.005139976,0.008088454,0.038907792,0.5440903,0.31894234,0.0005620561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012541092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022313852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8430526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003362401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024685243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8417512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045873505","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00063.x","title":"A Comparative Study of the Law of Palliative Care and End-of-Life Treatment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Supreme court; Common law; Palliative care; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.5618015661068936,"score_gpt":0.558248244656404,"score_spread":0.0035533214504895883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045873505","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078898305,0.98523194,0.000011518787,0.00048669276,0.0002925019,0.0012251282,0.00006337317,0.0000027179235,0.0047962917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09934327,0.8999987,0.00013718897,0.00021992644,0.00020527768,0.0000069485927,0.000007175667,0.000027838985,0.000053668256],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940767,0.0020019303,0.0021789724,0.000175314,0.0013707308,0.00019631372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880227,0.00532649,0.004085431,0.000578111,0.0018234834,0.0001637751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019749964,0.00047905464,0.0050744684,0.000136572,0.00010243147,0.0000023296698,0.00040521752,0.0003222311,0.000034169483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086651964,0.00019729513,0.00049382617,0.00038402222,0.002146298,0.000038412378,0.000078248224,0.0016510871,4.1168386e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011619512,0.0019165399,0.0019184945,0.04372486,0.011828835,0.00006618894,0.90133756,0.000021235677,0.000047118778,0.01441567,0.00045729626,0.023104256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007017171,0.01785171,0.00015401108,0.14112708,0.0226693,0.00007477647,0.12748812,0.0000013193061,0.00039144832,0.00024573048,0.6827263,0.00025302445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012127412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007245956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7738494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017023049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013053458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8045462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045892628","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2010.00490.x","title":"Stem Cell Research and Economic Promises","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Government (linguistics); Ethos; Public policy; Shadow (psychology); Economics; Political science; Public administration; Economic policy; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.21110044862445443,"score_gpt":0.448089071323689,"score_spread":0.2369886226992346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045892628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68387175,0.0015970542,0.000060388735,0.3028283,0.00083244126,0.00020826701,0.0000010444123,0.000008169229,0.010592598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442464,0.0014071884,0.00018845078,0.0015877237,0.0014833313,6.8631294e-7,8.891708e-7,0.000014580877,0.0008925357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815327,0.00024986526,0.00046053858,0.00008913575,0.00085675245,0.00019042107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667525,0.0019673032,0.00022466965,0.0002408399,0.0006115867,0.00028034244],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013654705,0.00009058639,0.0002879466,0.00010951424,0.00025817932,0.000012595491,0.00017797627,0.00037729423,0.000117306314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013819357,0.00004283869,0.000035652636,0.000091867,0.004591393,0.00006214016,0.000056453533,0.0055459174,0.000007661013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019271825,0.00040449534,0.0008458272,0.0013504685,0.00021223283,0.00015317184,0.053714484,0.000008072351,0.42159185,0.47907454,0.013583731,0.027133951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012804541,0.012041406,0.008607878,0.0027025286,0.0009044513,0.006445919,0.00985149,0.00084380107,0.037788846,0.17813882,0.7294654,0.000404883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016383904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016242781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7158817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032288546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005374095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99811757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047047663","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00545.x","title":"Waiting to Exhale: Chaos, Toxicity and the Origins of the U.S. Chemical Warfare Service","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Chemical warfare; Offensive; Chemical Warfare Agents; First world war; Military service; Battle; Toxicology; Law; Environmental ethics; Medicine; History; Political science; Engineering; Operations research; Philosophy; Ancient history; Biology; Biochemical engineering","score_opus":0.09071217356671932,"score_gpt":0.3310056823867113,"score_spread":0.24029350881999198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047047663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717582,0.0008616852,0.00010182819,0.025079869,0.00019673475,0.00014214823,0.000004894877,0.0000012416,0.001853396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943826,0.00059358793,0.00005960877,0.0043578837,0.00055967225,0.0000011164939,8.104038e-7,0.00000976537,0.00003494599],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987164,0.00031178852,0.00032941348,0.00008325535,0.0003917762,0.00016732962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986291,0.00023669231,0.00021243108,0.00030684553,0.0005214043,0.00009354264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00359434,0.000098884535,0.00021367794,0.000011956843,0.0001546906,0.0000056052113,0.00055669824,0.000144328,0.000031372965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009714537,0.000038563747,0.00005759012,0.000109284956,0.00072846666,0.0000036053323,0.00023110185,0.0007089019,7.3876464e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011336908,0.000038898845,0.0000958367,0.00007845063,0.000079185564,0.0000019692222,0.010093537,0.0000027802712,0.9724706,0.014720784,0.00033674395,0.000947558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004136111,0.0009382142,0.001184691,0.0005017106,0.00023874686,0.00041164702,0.0023533613,0.00008169286,0.89944637,0.002637989,0.08786966,0.00019982317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005325862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016832307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087532915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013718392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120980345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30798653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047597988","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01979.x","title":"Storing Newborn Blood Spots: Modern Controversies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dried blood; Newborn screening; Dried blood spot; Medicine; Spots; Screening test; Pediatrics; Parental consent; Test (biology); Family medicine; Intensive care medicine; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.5237864926188983,"score_gpt":0.5659134955683258,"score_spread":0.042127002949427506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047597988","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24366643,0.0104494225,0.011661485,0.6888629,0.0018420658,0.00053445925,0.000004469802,0.000064434484,0.042914327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96696544,0.008101435,0.0023221285,0.019109143,0.002548132,0.0000010019739,8.96738e-7,0.000041274852,0.0009105586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421895,0.00038827877,0.0010779796,0.00016384906,0.0037226032,0.00042836426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462906,0.048520513,0.00067847065,0.000782609,0.003158863,0.00056894793],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025440982,0.00019994014,0.0007166032,0.00012430846,0.00030545524,0.00001663126,0.00063884683,0.00062321004,0.00008810619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07553049,0.000109569264,0.00018242856,0.00022930029,0.0019595805,0.00015095822,0.00013737877,0.013097028,0.000015072185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061082584,0.0012332464,0.0014302417,0.0018287093,0.0021501954,0.0026246319,0.09180618,0.0020849463,0.042111404,0.84178907,0.0018907171,0.004942417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02941643,0.009698281,0.0017175472,0.012653998,0.0033787498,0.004377589,0.007780493,0.00007273586,0.007553766,0.8746776,0.04830176,0.000371034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005421573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043318476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020191816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021319396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048304143","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.305.x","title":"Rethinking Risk in Pediatric Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Informed consent; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Individualism; Clinical trial; Risk assessment; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.39502234154293586,"score_gpt":0.5081220877619163,"score_spread":0.11309974621898039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048304143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80108607,0.025317179,0.000088071414,0.14901537,0.0010037875,0.0003448902,0.0000016211721,0.000020395699,0.023122624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9069356,0.08281999,0.00052815786,0.004254023,0.00512823,0.0000013642785,0.0000011235613,0.000029644038,0.00030190372],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99204427,0.0028875114,0.0012493519,0.00016577294,0.0031265425,0.00052654964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98488367,0.01131387,0.0005521408,0.00052285247,0.0023725135,0.00035495087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052245118,0.00016865683,0.0006188286,0.0004967543,0.00067681057,0.0000070431433,0.00048240036,0.00058314216,0.00007382636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018111674,0.00009417329,0.00009879067,0.0011320851,0.0013010688,0.000117522635,0.00009885401,0.020371497,0.000015963687],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017895661,0.00042856944,0.17323048,0.0016362519,0.00011704028,0.005117259,0.74225605,0.00013105791,0.00017743035,0.053919926,0.019668192,0.0015281704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021588648,0.020061707,0.1840846,0.0069925115,0.0022818511,0.023903377,0.02254459,0.00048315985,0.00045365264,0.37205297,0.34445566,0.0010972904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003448485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049623806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7197115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019646206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001698266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048642965","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00629.x","title":"The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Obligation; Research ethics; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Population; Social psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Psychiatry; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.9150050019928753,"score_gpt":0.6812514782486067,"score_spread":0.2337535237442686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048642965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63355386,0.0072883377,0.00017729482,0.25198138,0.0011881865,0.00097486784,0.000016502914,0.000017813003,0.10480175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874013,0.00972303,0.00040684492,0.0009990573,0.0005629274,0.0000018268414,7.146985e-7,0.000026136377,0.0008781416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848183,0.003980597,0.0028830995,0.00018743989,0.0074207364,0.0007098519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7774267,0.20302157,0.0018307827,0.0019582373,0.015094398,0.000668305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18967412,0.00014571799,0.00073113077,0.00016280918,0.0003521095,0.0000058452906,0.0013025657,0.00059641816,0.00009766116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28886047,0.00006222084,0.00017290756,0.000608879,0.009190568,0.0000665124,0.00025490078,0.013378726,0.0000070528977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08418901,0.002109745,0.005864597,0.0031638367,0.0018715997,0.00057315256,0.24595147,0.000012490112,0.0729668,0.5532177,0.02587147,0.0042081126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018655986,0.031010441,0.016113866,0.01968922,0.0015670427,0.00048220519,0.030991629,0.00017079532,0.15467711,0.7016945,0.024651866,0.00029534975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012750283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014650824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35384744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069907546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026643388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99350584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052157301","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01978.x","title":"Commentary: Social-Ethical Values Issues in the Political Public Square: Principles vs. Packages","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.2969103568746272,"score_gpt":0.5593492760638783,"score_spread":0.2624389191892511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052157301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018821094,0.0010106403,0.00056597596,0.9612226,0.0011792171,0.0004270739,0.0000045241836,0.00003173953,0.016737139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5955129,0.000997008,0.00032113615,0.39981872,0.0032706587,0.00000690496,0.0000033882377,0.00002457492,0.000044646637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9619834,0.030993205,0.002003996,0.00019613522,0.0037796234,0.0010436808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9123457,0.08450771,0.0010255387,0.0005769892,0.0011749126,0.00036913928],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10417591,0.0002698589,0.0007219917,0.00013050837,0.0029770494,0.0000285433,0.0016031055,0.001450613,0.00027281622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07833539,0.00012826566,0.00012069414,0.00041566143,0.004977331,0.0002837473,0.00028925468,0.05356548,0.000046261604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001388407,0.00015332887,0.00077387964,0.00021492827,0.000052088704,0.000070361435,0.11891862,0.0000035720145,0.00003219459,0.8524404,0.027158579,0.000043184686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002226212,0.00065621757,0.0025288407,0.0014527348,0.00021303562,0.00013174023,0.124926,0.000005571808,0.000019853176,0.610169,0.25753507,0.00013574865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036150804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023688243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57669187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047624833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013763565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052478540","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01968.x","title":"Legal and Ethical Approaches to Stem Cell and Cloning Research: A Comparative Analysis of Policies in Latin America, Asia, and Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario; Ontario Genomics; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Human cloning; Convention; Human rights; Globalization; Latin Americans; Biomedicine; Political science; Politics; Legislation; Bioethics; Economic growth; Law; Public administration; Biology","score_opus":0.6343430186605621,"score_gpt":0.501168914473883,"score_spread":0.13317410418667908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052478540","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019032191,0.9465608,0.00017688151,0.049055994,0.00004278197,0.0004985768,0.000009503945,0.000003871156,0.001748383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16056113,0.838185,0.0005497626,0.00042805498,0.00017406132,0.0000038636363,0.0000073169585,0.000017664368,0.000073112446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944338,0.0020656283,0.0013811546,0.00023855992,0.0015798123,0.0003010034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915441,0.0065471707,0.0008279778,0.00024878787,0.00043308546,0.00039883624],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0135713555,0.00028656994,0.0029284996,0.0011443099,0.00017634282,0.000022550454,0.00019284415,0.0010514478,0.0000058642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005498248,0.00014574802,0.00015383857,0.0019078122,0.0061164857,0.000037233007,0.00018079455,0.008999227,2.6889398e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000853827,0.00038596726,0.000060636412,0.051785745,0.0038051698,0.00018824686,0.477073,0.00016977535,0.00013044679,0.24222377,0.00030913384,0.22301428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034856224,0.006555422,0.0011401386,0.107978314,0.023158368,0.00091405277,0.037129596,0.0008649242,0.000019862795,0.0043762894,0.81378424,0.00059316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009448082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027409746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81347513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010957073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084593246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054201636","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00134.x","title":"The Injustice of Enforced Equal Access to Transplant Operations: Rethinking Reckless Claims of Fairness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Law and economics; Health care; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.2548835074351541,"score_gpt":0.4776474864161039,"score_spread":0.2227639789809498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054201636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23509349,0.0016191073,0.08542053,0.53256476,0.0037737044,0.0008479714,0.000024647841,0.00003548903,0.14062029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99234396,0.0009203795,0.00016474222,0.005495023,0.0010159941,6.592287e-7,5.9868273e-7,0.000008919804,0.00004969916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954593,0.0012087199,0.0011033829,0.00007958135,0.0017902922,0.00035873367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98349583,0.0142820235,0.00039810888,0.0002342903,0.0013653926,0.00022434427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03859187,0.00011247152,0.00035118108,0.00007292486,0.0010506622,0.000029410861,0.0012596841,0.00030739288,0.000020994536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067387465,0.000057965855,0.00008138834,0.00039632618,0.0028295272,0.00027244163,0.00005929725,0.0021740836,9.307802e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025727192,0.000018544155,0.00001289208,0.00005786862,0.000030715695,0.000004513555,0.19776888,0.0002929572,0.0006839689,0.80052185,0.000042804313,0.00030773107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010864788,0.0010673917,0.00033359954,0.0027983217,0.0006217356,0.000043752207,0.06004173,0.000082367995,0.007799891,0.913477,0.012410299,0.00023744447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041987756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007761072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005501865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066169223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061034634","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00623.x","title":"Return of Research Results: How Should Research Results Be Handled?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; McGill University; McGill Genome Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9445344664982588,"score_gpt":0.6907955419862786,"score_spread":0.2537389245119802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061034634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048416622,0.003995371,0.00010876483,0.72362214,0.0009914268,0.00108013,0.0000543838,0.0000379272,0.22169322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608727,0.019360047,0.0016476872,0.0031463976,0.0026642638,0.0000064405344,0.000009733647,0.00008923304,0.0122034745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9588848,0.011795662,0.0039318223,0.00067213963,0.02301605,0.0016995269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5948924,0.34165764,0.0021868215,0.004801216,0.054545015,0.0019169437],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.40612733,0.00032567247,0.0013385788,0.0010339383,0.0008483564,0.000039374936,0.002591775,0.0019958569,0.00020316371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50727475,0.00017543185,0.00029286364,0.0021677813,0.016485926,0.0002463054,0.0008605168,0.054271713,0.000023022843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11557409,0.0022287846,0.00070807606,0.0044418667,0.0012552715,0.00260592,0.27909142,0.000005890295,0.0358895,0.32152915,0.23506537,0.0016046591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.033995934,0.06120285,0.0029541368,0.03902268,0.0009813549,0.0022627832,0.06856086,0.00012378291,0.07546001,0.4840854,0.230702,0.00064818905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028728521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002444326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9124561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003273481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005329187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061725400","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00367.x","title":"Compulsory Licensing in Canada and Thailand: Comparing Regimes to Ensure Legitimate Use of the WTO Rules","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Declaration; TRIPS architecture; TRIPS Agreement; Developing country; Dilemma; International trade; World trade; Business; Public health; Civil society; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.24349041560173337,"score_gpt":0.2821170867045921,"score_spread":0.03862667110285875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061725400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730903,0.00029854942,0.00003988741,0.021500802,0.0003173011,0.00010946084,4.1968568e-7,0.000003425842,0.004639868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98206437,0.000056122048,0.000034539935,0.017457975,0.0003249898,8.274293e-8,4.9421465e-7,0.0000068388704,0.000054620145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988545,0.0000916968,0.00039851473,0.000059786656,0.00043974465,0.00015575178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871564,0.00053473766,0.0003319669,0.00013750803,0.00026277133,0.000017358458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014008622,0.00010930769,0.00029900478,0.00006902365,0.00017633579,0.000034038534,0.00024923007,0.000044049208,0.0000123710715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005705856,0.000050079834,0.000026174674,0.00014706147,0.00013554182,0.00023388659,0.000076252625,0.00076328614,0.0000010987287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01011403,0.00065204955,0.366209,0.0036726787,0.0009037945,0.00071227015,0.18006277,0.07830831,0.023741363,0.13476802,0.16534011,0.035515603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007997117,0.00079882145,0.64770335,0.028895335,0.0012965922,0.0008352516,0.01857369,0.042511996,0.002942865,0.022005334,0.22500846,0.0014311706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49539343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43568683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28149435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003717319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096716365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5746104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066750608","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00398.x","title":"Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Addressing the Issue of Physician Remuneration","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Glycomics Centre; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Conflict of interest; Public relations; Political science; Pharmaceutical industry; Business; Medicine; Finance","score_opus":0.9778403133530816,"score_gpt":0.7411442212063043,"score_spread":0.23669609214677734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066750608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6986266,0.0064352234,0.000023562518,0.27690652,0.0016466147,0.000366973,0.0000091179,0.000006524646,0.015978849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766002,0.0034986786,0.0000149756615,0.018190939,0.0014985235,0.0000012982116,9.825823e-7,0.000010648847,0.00018370526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98834777,0.009197922,0.0015452598,0.00010032879,0.00048588464,0.00032284457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851323,0.012702028,0.00078552536,0.00024340763,0.00093841343,0.00019836404],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03365636,0.00012008959,0.0004838151,0.000099595185,0.00029462008,0.0000048527127,0.00061479595,0.0006130731,0.0005869827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037241208,0.000063816165,0.00008578985,0.00035246043,0.0034327076,0.00010807999,0.00008539911,0.013274441,0.000009829273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074294936,0.0038206454,0.0070533017,0.0020454107,0.0010738543,0.00033471867,0.29730347,0.001471634,0.1611984,0.25507846,0.11891436,0.14427625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007674761,0.0040266463,0.003389833,0.0032392666,0.0007248535,0.00022268853,0.013805896,0.00820588,0.065170765,0.016444163,0.8768158,0.0002794645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013366272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018390658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75790143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004170136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013271032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073456561","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00391.x","title":"Assessing Coordination of Legal-Based Efforts across Jurisdictions and Sectors for Obesity Prevention and Control","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Control (management); Business; State (computer science); Obesity; Local government; Public administration; Public economics; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.08014599189065863,"score_gpt":0.41983875607691806,"score_spread":0.33969276418625943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073456561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72280246,0.0003739281,0.033251062,0.2421219,0.00035358564,0.00024285271,0.0000019330546,0.000010543134,0.00084175507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97880036,0.000048173144,0.00011376361,0.02032057,0.0006988399,8.1224835e-7,0.0000025187733,0.0000042951224,0.000010642462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998976,0.00010092177,0.000501732,0.000059705817,0.00018642335,0.00017523368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976771,0.0009405187,0.0007627349,0.00007150904,0.00052322156,0.000024915027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007850191,0.000080467646,0.00030088902,0.00006194027,0.0003677186,0.00003824824,0.00007638379,0.000107979504,0.000003458612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013406838,0.000049132293,0.000039733775,0.00010950823,0.0002467279,0.00054143055,0.00001306654,0.00036297532,1.1096709e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012214581,0.00060659315,0.026925318,0.0037203282,0.00029633503,0.000009587438,0.004433624,0.007373674,0.004044473,0.8642199,0.07119709,0.01595159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009939884,0.001517079,0.22275563,0.0015946361,0.0009893916,0.00010703733,0.0022316272,0.047662262,0.000058300582,0.08280678,0.6300465,0.00029091473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010733883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016277579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78141314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019212386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005899356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28282315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075878075","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00087.x","title":"Resisting a Genetic Identity: The Black Seminoles and Genetic Tests of Ancestry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Allotment; Possession (linguistics); Tribe; Constitution; Genealogy; Reservation; Commission; Descent (aeronautics); Government (linguistics); African descent; Apportionment; Law; History; Voting; Political science; Geography; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.13371225123226474,"score_gpt":0.41316751923596223,"score_spread":0.27945526800369747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075878075","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007241951,0.99077606,0.00024588432,0.00059943035,0.00032570428,0.00024843178,0.000008218776,0.0000020330287,0.00055226526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039454913,0.993236,0.000648058,0.00066268555,0.0012269823,0.0000023773584,0.000004801821,0.00004558395,0.00022804043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996652,0.0010407955,0.0011680274,0.00022788295,0.00064564863,0.00026561634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964619,0.0007157566,0.0015782733,0.000666974,0.00046114184,0.00011591318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032137984,0.00034452407,0.0010303115,0.000039086804,0.0003073648,0.000023413579,0.00079234777,0.0006250569,0.000006704304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010547776,0.00017881481,0.00029919855,0.00014818931,0.0022661914,0.0000047240283,0.00016836113,0.0015036339,9.876794e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034063653,0.00061139296,0.0014088398,0.1077777,0.008383786,0.00039763542,0.039497364,0.0006618878,0.024056615,0.0048690094,0.03845397,0.77354115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052866957,0.00076368434,0.00023533315,0.010830184,0.0033900084,0.0017565322,0.0010580283,0.0000041937856,0.00018640199,0.0011765945,0.97974235,0.00032799397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030106099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008340232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9412884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002008917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005527285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8349877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079195441","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00535.x","title":"Just Medicare: The Role of Canadian Courts in Determining Health Care Rights and Access","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Health care; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.15965054558550393,"score_gpt":0.38385396345008005,"score_spread":0.22420341786457612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079195441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14250377,0.042616285,0.00007514544,0.7781358,0.00051623734,0.00031925342,0.000029923116,0.0000046945406,0.035798926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97863835,0.0034176018,0.00006881816,0.017447561,0.00039607345,0.0000012612135,9.1501903e-7,0.0000075974604,0.000021829665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985288,0.0001480595,0.0008611273,0.00008207148,0.00012503819,0.0002548967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838,0.00047125533,0.00065111474,0.00019650938,0.00008814909,0.00021295514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005740625,0.000087917404,0.00037113638,0.0003492026,0.00022342298,0.00001265872,0.00041095752,0.00009223714,0.0000336704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003006796,0.000052717023,0.000028091668,0.00019975351,0.00027199351,0.00012523287,0.000046770514,0.0008741648,0.0000018604851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029031125,0.00002052046,0.00216977,0.00021110968,0.000057190584,0.000013699503,0.22900337,0.00015912496,0.0000012829821,0.74762124,0.0027374069,0.017976258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062783057,0.0002367886,0.004143931,0.0003490761,0.000018175386,0.000046379402,0.0058336253,0.00019488522,0.00001619944,0.0253599,0.96309334,0.00007984372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5239548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6731262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96035594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017528434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003098879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47921523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084110496","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2010.00521.x","title":"Bridging the Divide between Genomic Science and Indigenous Peoples","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Indigenous; Dilemma; Harm; Political science; Developing country; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Biology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.43129665857964933,"score_gpt":0.5592949160361488,"score_spread":0.12799825745649945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084110496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8044665,0.0008904626,0.00026563898,0.19178735,0.00042067893,0.00020599607,0.000001374112,0.000008901835,0.001953139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98518115,0.0031088798,0.00027719987,0.0083146,0.0029183878,8.634318e-7,3.4536177e-7,0.000021109643,0.00017747426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940821,0.0003767228,0.00080844713,0.00017112526,0.0041195457,0.00044203637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89337116,0.099298924,0.0007994693,0.0011669442,0.0046306057,0.00073287723],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09676061,0.0001429514,0.00044552295,0.00014082166,0.001158395,0.000049653638,0.0011667212,0.00034534017,0.000033595483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11951454,0.000062161176,0.00006169068,0.0003878962,0.0107011255,0.00012455064,0.00037453862,0.016667137,0.0000071297054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007869144,0.00021429053,0.114031725,0.0013353677,0.00052217493,0.00029037206,0.37378415,0.000014567822,0.33750972,0.14295842,0.0017788584,0.026773438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068751145,0.0065487516,0.73882514,0.005608803,0.002555558,0.008005154,0.013898969,0.00013344594,0.012993058,0.17584535,0.028113112,0.0005975193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068033166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019044993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6247934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079742545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047791163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99199116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085846327","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00170.x","title":"Informed Consent: Physician Inexperience is a Material Risk for Patients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Informed consent; Full disclosure; Medicine; Family medicine; Medical emergency; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Computer security","score_opus":0.19648080162929085,"score_gpt":0.5343820095796147,"score_spread":0.33790120795032386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085846327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118702,0.00011096477,0.001303149,0.072818555,0.0038139033,0.00077287445,0.000024520557,0.000018594452,0.009267284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94858795,0.0006598989,0.0003829157,0.04725101,0.002919029,0.000006492493,0.000005012497,0.00001499393,0.0001727012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659073,0.0007877503,0.0012294878,0.00008354601,0.0008911587,0.00041733374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626356,0.034276005,0.001451702,0.0002590164,0.0011370862,0.00024062968],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012536401,0.0001372239,0.00040134863,0.00005248657,0.0007743145,0.00000493382,0.00034799826,0.00026890775,0.00042201616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035851825,0.000070540395,0.00006598535,0.00012343397,0.00074747734,0.00020385697,0.0000606153,0.0022303557,0.000023529648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066077937,0.0004568861,0.013367938,0.0021690058,0.000181732,0.000010973665,0.86154246,0.0000015356043,0.00072504074,0.035399202,0.07635156,0.0031858466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048370156,0.0026216696,0.004535154,0.0023386702,0.00034097445,0.0000075840285,0.06522861,0.00001078775,0.00038753275,0.010455434,0.90907854,0.0001580017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066955877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069350237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.832727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008352757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008805505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9722696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087654732","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00040.x","title":"Ethical Issues in Secondary Uses of Human Biological Materials from Mass Disasters","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Dna testing; Terrorism; Identification (biology); Medical emergency; Criminology; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Political science; History; Genealogy; Biology","score_opus":0.5433539662869171,"score_gpt":0.5920760353292333,"score_spread":0.04872206904231613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087654732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8554939,0.0015267273,0.00007740236,0.13824552,0.0003771367,0.00018003971,0.000017302016,0.000010615626,0.004071348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885894,0.0021398093,0.00073280814,0.0064470344,0.0015553029,0.0000014400323,0.000014901904,0.00002488503,0.00022487104],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927321,0.0023528892,0.0020888657,0.00019610091,0.0022900796,0.00033993527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95477355,0.042732567,0.0007346471,0.0005151347,0.0010588508,0.00018524124],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03367797,0.00020356035,0.0011545193,0.00013967179,0.00011413823,0.000013293817,0.0006290574,0.0016446922,0.00090539624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025026692,0.0001041877,0.00012853096,0.00019661512,0.0041213445,0.00006571302,0.0001486511,0.013772164,0.000007913957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002389663,0.00039918366,0.0069621503,0.0006369178,0.00018363423,0.0004346091,0.010054484,0.00001244605,0.79545605,0.18136753,0.0019394819,0.00016385883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063175717,0.0060414053,0.053766817,0.0077304193,0.0003495687,0.00018243637,0.0049946094,0.000004030274,0.105048895,0.8113051,0.0040089483,0.00025020444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054620737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017629123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69040716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007859495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004992273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089880976","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00099.x","title":"The Balm of Gilead: Is the Provision of Treatment to Those Who Seroconvert in HIV Prevention Trials a Matter of Moral Obligation or Moral Negotiation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Obligation; Argumentation theory; Moral obligation; Foundation (evidence); Psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Family medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5655638644755424,"score_gpt":0.5921062218582996,"score_spread":0.02654235738275723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089880976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5485784,0.001080794,0.0009679701,0.4453481,0.00025428203,0.0021568607,0.00001542257,0.000005080781,0.0015930923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99132603,0.0019686236,0.00042984114,0.0033161843,0.0004849349,0.000011844448,0.000004567233,0.000021600226,0.0024363508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921341,0.0023447014,0.0028133625,0.00014772394,0.0023289416,0.00023116496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96511704,0.030266933,0.0019148221,0.0005476573,0.0020441802,0.000109365246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037282694,0.00016774265,0.0009702693,0.00012844832,0.00011630033,0.000009651681,0.00045277315,0.0003430622,0.00017020968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01754795,0.00006233903,0.00023397554,0.0004505627,0.00091678946,0.0001036086,0.000082264574,0.0019448445,0.000003995885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.10072578,0.0056997007,0.1126006,0.008901671,0.0026801922,0.000085791515,0.28950125,0.006068023,0.12814903,0.23696563,0.08613615,0.022486174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.056582462,0.07623457,0.12663575,0.051593177,0.0057022283,0.00027721134,0.030947799,0.005461652,0.17387278,0.4583206,0.01367512,0.0006966705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012588083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011791572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44274765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001541575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012377928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090272539","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00336.x","title":"Organ Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death: Lessons and Unresolved Controversies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Organ donation; Circulatory system; Donation; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine; Political science; Law; Transplantation","score_opus":0.09369940201089316,"score_gpt":0.35233482088195384,"score_spread":0.2586354188710607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090272539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94889563,0.0014020114,0.0067771645,0.041489955,0.00021468928,0.00016374481,0.0000042382844,0.000010878936,0.0010416609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956186,0.0013969284,0.00044750705,0.002339789,0.0001401401,5.19103e-7,0.000004385749,0.000010240654,0.000041888794],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873716,0.00013347129,0.00040055832,0.00005613759,0.0005944728,0.00007818416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977758,0.0010778018,0.00032253715,0.00009839611,0.00065311074,0.00007238063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012597771,0.000084434905,0.00025024556,0.0000950104,0.00012951654,0.0000031138634,0.00005597515,0.000111360525,0.00005342783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005882446,0.000052227944,0.000039064307,0.00009298836,0.00053828885,0.00012802158,0.000006952564,0.0004980362,8.923179e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008912569,0.000768049,0.13720511,0.0023284536,0.00088820263,0.0008314357,0.38698345,0.000059404643,0.37264732,0.07982835,0.00090420694,0.008643434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014247431,0.0019827774,0.9339227,0.0017512733,0.0021628265,0.0064603817,0.0027130845,0.0005277442,0.027637796,0.0037132998,0.0046543037,0.00022635928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004982608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045032495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79671764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038938982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017074106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21637471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092857265","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00542.x","title":"Health Legacies of War on and beyond the Battlefield","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Battlefield; Content (measure theory); Health information; Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; History; Health care; Law; Ancient history","score_opus":0.19912303658088276,"score_gpt":0.4081927285764285,"score_spread":0.20906969199554576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092857265","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030225387,0.009525175,0.000174621,0.72997105,0.001989683,0.00019803562,0.0000029927214,0.000013885087,0.22789915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654362,0.006567032,0.00007303804,0.026768498,0.0007823038,2.5264333e-7,1.3517015e-7,0.000006740229,0.00036576376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997387,0.0010488186,0.00041510188,0.000059200775,0.00090100284,0.00018886007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543357,0.003453314,0.0005074978,0.0001836188,0.00029414147,0.00012786397],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014795311,0.00008509855,0.0002803601,0.000031469834,0.00073149125,0.0000071432,0.00041399917,0.00017569732,0.00009589529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015847811,0.00003804589,0.00004916167,0.00009055912,0.0035233984,0.0000975999,0.00002843642,0.0018980849,0.0000011662861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005445599,0.00001947815,0.0000715118,0.000022079324,0.000021725338,0.000001992456,0.43594554,8.2353984e-7,0.000014766283,0.559276,0.0036927296,0.00087891927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009431643,0.0030464432,0.0023573674,0.00069667166,0.00019865237,0.00007085986,0.18943337,0.000003184971,0.00036089562,0.21792383,0.5847985,0.00016703438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070095155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009394102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022121949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004058482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093637618","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00520.x","title":"The Physician/Investigator's Obligation to Patients Participating in Research: The Case of Placebo Controlled Trials","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; York University; Montreal Children's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Mistake; Blame; Obligation; Miller; Medical ethics; Clinical trial; Psychology; Medical research; Medicine; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.8696628941207356,"score_gpt":0.6883546163501844,"score_spread":0.18130827777055125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093637618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63072014,0.00086299947,0.000048097434,0.36458427,0.00025284744,0.0013164972,0.0000023987,0.0000046330547,0.002208118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846131,0.0012478487,0.00020133099,0.012115955,0.0015769053,0.000058586047,7.229143e-7,0.000025330555,0.00016022465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97205466,0.017335571,0.004319107,0.00021230997,0.005380041,0.0006983097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3219117,0.6636098,0.0026426243,0.0013369274,0.009707963,0.0007909743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3373176,0.00017587224,0.0013429545,0.0001892802,0.0006909847,0.000033133463,0.0007404962,0.00036069192,0.000034035525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.66770566,0.00006489876,0.00023227451,0.0007698523,0.0030538698,0.00010593921,0.00018742606,0.010618235,0.000010313926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07499543,0.0020934618,0.0042263544,0.00116602,0.0020490645,0.0007760446,0.26727048,0.0035301207,0.016470768,0.55889964,0.02907762,0.039444998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.15681298,0.027435854,0.006564052,0.03246737,0.0041378546,0.0009775228,0.08026911,0.007564816,0.02556669,0.6142407,0.043183114,0.00077989727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010064702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056808433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65014297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020184227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018845603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100718954","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00666.x","title":"Rebuttal: Expert Ethics Testimony","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Expert witness; Aside; Normative; Witness; Epistemology; Meta-ethics; Medical ethics; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Nursing ethics; Political science","score_opus":0.37919074699965116,"score_gpt":0.575161824747878,"score_spread":0.19597107774822686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100718954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018754887,0.008096631,0.00063854066,0.8475861,0.00903595,0.0005778542,0.000014076567,0.00008624415,0.13394582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005338087,0.028879827,0.001104008,0.9021399,0.05776863,0.000014885072,0.000033348984,0.00022996946,0.009295645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9364216,0.049425002,0.0040882863,0.00044643268,0.008215319,0.0014034038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6927528,0.29708844,0.0043067574,0.0016530425,0.003743019,0.00045593292],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12578093,0.00079541025,0.0019097201,0.00029511494,0.004370783,0.000022516302,0.0031686602,0.013377403,0.004966636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18176773,0.00044085114,0.0003133021,0.00046096492,0.0060338276,0.00033417696,0.0003604502,0.38417047,0.00055639184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019580981,0.00003463152,0.0000045515026,0.001042182,0.00020276425,0.0009662813,0.08547673,0.000005020293,0.00003237303,0.0059793773,0.9057517,0.00030856975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012486313,0.0006809852,0.0000055061905,0.012489147,0.00082800665,0.0007091384,0.004821287,0.000009493779,0.000005070399,0.06982262,0.9090098,0.0003702972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030246843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034103062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37079307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052539614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006720763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103375340","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00544.x","title":"Clinical Guidelines and Policies: Can they Improve Emergency Department Pain Management?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Emergency and Acute Care Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"MAYDAY Fund","keywords":"Emergency department; Medicine; Pain management; Pain control; Prospective cohort study; Emergency medicine; Physical therapy; Intensive care medicine; Anesthesia; Surgery; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.14599935925956992,"score_gpt":0.4605565779955941,"score_spread":0.31455721873602416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103375340","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14541599,0.04037138,0.0007640554,0.7855328,0.0027247951,0.00063709146,0.000013505873,0.000042193482,0.024498217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7379559,0.2013922,0.0018269252,0.050442606,0.0067362,0.0000047721715,0.0000045149973,0.000035274225,0.0016015683],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968396,0.0004927858,0.0015160266,0.00013844483,0.000736848,0.00027630958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730253,0.00073135,0.00050325185,0.00031423062,0.00093065755,0.00021799965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0119754085,0.0002109976,0.0005726193,0.00007083751,0.00026030387,0.000003758295,0.0002206321,0.00013670913,0.00009360893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022500216,0.000105512154,0.0001522221,0.00010806976,0.0004800583,0.00006201124,0.00010684668,0.0011829144,0.0000028422546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012538264,0.0005515545,0.014566994,0.0010436772,0.0039398144,0.0002660463,0.050761245,0.00004112503,0.001295778,0.046795785,0.7353723,0.14411184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003500997,0.0034922394,0.0043842415,0.0012448257,0.002676275,0.00037205176,0.014202509,0.000097537966,0.00011231253,0.0064943093,0.9631591,0.0002636211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024408729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007800112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73509014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040847743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008146409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.513924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103664762","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00365.x","title":"An Economic Justification for Open Access to Essential Medicine Patents in Developing Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Incentive; Developing country; Deadweight loss; Market power; Profit (economics); Economics; Price discrimination; Business; Public economics; Welfare; International economics; Industrial organization; Market economy; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.4485429453282304,"score_gpt":0.4317477491349125,"score_spread":0.01679519619331793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103664762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30349863,0.00033711843,0.023162443,0.65784824,0.0032048551,0.0015630043,0.0000028532336,0.000029378616,0.010353479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9308943,0.0002114579,0.00012457807,0.06619421,0.0024893803,0.0000036769677,0.000012365577,0.000013571377,0.000056439527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855787,0.000074620766,0.00070015213,0.00012930568,0.0003268496,0.0002112141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983483,0.00036392212,0.000498707,0.00018348859,0.00057918613,0.00002641992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062318672,0.00014240404,0.00034153066,0.00021544783,0.0003175867,0.0002309032,0.0015399765,0.000096017866,0.00016470673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007166625,0.000079996964,0.000024204204,0.00019912371,0.00015352652,0.0019576708,0.00012219232,0.00043243883,0.00002405762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01157176,0.0003733391,0.0026634713,0.0011402381,0.00022781827,0.000048786318,0.052079253,0.008055958,0.005502585,0.76803744,0.13100885,0.019290479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010318015,0.0018746649,0.019978162,0.0064299414,0.0008310446,0.00008176481,0.004662266,0.010152334,0.0024327803,0.12766129,0.81463426,0.0009434629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021555496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010568132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6836254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007896724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012856607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32621816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108648985","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12036","title":"Privacy and Anonymity Challenges When Collecting Data for Public Health Purposes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Geospatial analysis; Internet privacy; Public health; Identification (biology); Masking (illustration); Health data; Health care; Confidentiality; Protected health information; Data science; Computer science; Business; Computer security; Medicine; Health policy; HRHIS; Geography; Political science; Nursing","score_opus":0.915997858554037,"score_gpt":0.64349162953136,"score_spread":0.27250622902267707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108648985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017579913,0.019652992,0.001255578,0.95656544,0.0003456421,0.0010201484,0.0000081962,0.000019776173,0.0035522983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8332992,0.11203483,0.012824482,0.037844043,0.0028364167,0.000014892913,0.00001444553,0.000068619935,0.0010630405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948267,0.0011167421,0.0011966546,0.0002627921,0.00208583,0.0005113167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8450386,0.1442979,0.0014804761,0.0021721374,0.005779668,0.0012312174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.076153874,0.00017129446,0.00075680716,0.00012373317,0.00055089383,0.00004659851,0.0010878696,0.0004333626,0.000111423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1876997,0.00009182683,0.000060203474,0.00015110214,0.0015418036,0.0003265491,0.0005617962,0.0069792285,0.0000036936246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022424036,0.0015043817,0.0028709325,0.016974898,0.0020091254,0.000093449205,0.19060844,0.0000022751253,0.0024050395,0.5394646,0.13120995,0.11061449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009466459,0.012357122,0.004188025,0.0067320555,0.0004500481,0.0016648081,0.018628277,0.00058184244,0.000107596716,0.663326,0.28218898,0.00030872875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006754412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011018608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91872144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010613831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030942757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99531174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110317886","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00209.x","title":"Accountability in Population Biobanking: Comparative Approaches","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Population; Accountability; Genetic epidemiology; Data science; Geography; Political science; Biology; Computer science; Sociology; Genetics; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.8670998930707845,"score_gpt":0.6425848308600702,"score_spread":0.22451506221071427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110317886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78195333,0.0014983233,0.00033449667,0.19741029,0.00023655691,0.00035632343,0.0000011242715,0.000012640673,0.018196903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926653,0.00050843594,0.00096903316,0.004582549,0.0011106401,0.0000015474876,0.0000031512088,0.000012921453,0.00014643696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948405,0.0009972368,0.001271722,0.00015039051,0.0024758813,0.00026427815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697108,0.027906286,0.00052639545,0.00048162186,0.0011866973,0.0001881716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043517828,0.00014412473,0.0006293933,0.00013702671,0.00013894153,0.000010706603,0.0003952395,0.000520702,0.00012503772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018629866,0.00007680095,0.00009193554,0.0003383249,0.0013840056,0.00017228295,0.00008163863,0.01024259,0.000010676501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009279359,0.0022271024,0.11610823,0.0016026077,0.000440937,0.00009210415,0.23578563,0.0027338583,0.0030875513,0.6198704,0.0015034387,0.0072687506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016385313,0.006995677,0.4292999,0.011042784,0.0010301671,0.0013910761,0.025140198,0.005028395,0.0032846073,0.47477952,0.024976224,0.00064613554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010106767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00486098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31319168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028739698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005869166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111246646","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00547.x","title":"Clinical Trials Registries: A Reform that is Past Due","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Clinical trial; Public relations; Pharmaceutical industry; Political science; Business; Medicine; Law; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.9006711429736375,"score_gpt":0.7121728028780399,"score_spread":0.18849834009559763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111246646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05660955,0.008035271,0.00025197226,0.894764,0.004640152,0.00050002016,0.000047173213,0.000047140642,0.035104692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7920326,0.009986241,0.00010046143,0.18657124,0.00973047,0.0000034349816,0.0000036930662,0.00002477488,0.0015470884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848979,0.010629018,0.0027962695,0.00020326421,0.00086995075,0.00060357107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97801924,0.018050764,0.0018577281,0.0004002681,0.0007095832,0.0009624292],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09146803,0.00029551575,0.0012630152,0.00007992604,0.0006803884,0.00001507217,0.00089174154,0.001677621,0.0032046763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005635556,0.00015697192,0.00034040402,0.00021543019,0.0023097368,0.00023556876,0.00010660361,0.01710992,0.000094464616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013713547,0.0013215786,0.003814606,0.0006103178,0.0028256746,0.00066512957,0.05514252,0.00014937975,0.0030568505,0.096008606,0.666952,0.15573977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003876141,0.0008290065,0.00026354718,0.0002917817,0.0013002154,0.00086386624,0.0024915442,0.00015960122,0.0033267268,0.003525473,0.9829021,0.00016997346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111478825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009112785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.735423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020919534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058083393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114670517","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12008","title":"Human Rights and Maternal Health: Exploring the Effectiveness of the <i>Alyne</i> Decision","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Georgetown University","keywords":"Complaint; Convention; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Government (linguistics); Medicine; Law; Human rights; Political science; Environmental health; International human rights law","score_opus":0.08360769659932403,"score_gpt":0.37484245177073366,"score_spread":0.2912347551714096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114670517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615826,0.0012546389,0.00006107823,0.035170123,0.00066477625,0.0003897697,0.0000012227872,0.0000057099305,0.0008700705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934262,0.00035359224,0.000045730565,0.0056029926,0.0005055698,0.000002805565,2.2016818e-7,0.000011433389,0.00005143081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710435,0.0010620521,0.0006841319,0.0000852117,0.000838479,0.00022580278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967851,0.0017649336,0.00051841396,0.00032995048,0.00042078516,0.00018080471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073249843,0.00014527021,0.00048545425,0.00003642438,0.0005804526,0.000011030628,0.00035648808,0.00007260285,0.0000335778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022302567,0.00004712699,0.000081125196,0.0001185602,0.0006439323,0.000104920735,0.00009985479,0.0014641986,0.0000036657016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011470702,0.001342728,0.13164258,0.015365977,0.0019941586,0.00023933819,0.104196586,0.00033434905,0.09995514,0.58274937,0.026454551,0.024254544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004138907,0.0027449788,0.8230576,0.0149023915,0.00035238033,0.0028660486,0.0006986041,0.000014555721,0.005359568,0.13452627,0.011217532,0.00012119248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071159205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021314995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.691415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006061549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009586198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123984172","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12298","title":"Disclosing Secondary Findings from Pediatric Sequencing to Families: Considering the “Benefit to Families”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; National Institutes of Health; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Cancer Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Genetic testing; Discretion; Family history; Psychology; Medicine; Family medicine; Developmental psychology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.18024751056936258,"score_gpt":0.40731138456883426,"score_spread":0.22706387399947167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123984172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7225777,0.0070166774,0.0009441725,0.25982726,0.0020980253,0.0005018285,0.000018309216,0.00003805656,0.006978014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92941207,0.0017987617,0.002075941,0.06060213,0.005842632,0.000004273574,0.0000048506427,0.000058952985,0.00020040933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520886,0.0004971087,0.0013576243,0.0002674048,0.0021030416,0.00056599075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120104,0.004913003,0.00043845698,0.0007174503,0.0016744194,0.001055656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120455315,0.0003412209,0.0008509121,0.00028663277,0.0005471471,0.000050246246,0.0006691502,0.0003939784,0.00007206398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009612728,0.00017783859,0.00013510414,0.00077707204,0.0004394041,0.0001823665,0.00025687617,0.006223086,0.000035647357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010633336,0.000072628354,0.0074321567,0.00069977826,0.00027917733,0.00060240476,0.9443718,0.001532778,0.002761588,0.014279375,0.02348645,0.0034185364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007986321,0.007873653,0.005686546,0.0059933783,0.0037667293,0.0025872171,0.3948846,0.00030713234,0.0016452728,0.037065152,0.5309519,0.0012521048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005826372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010862204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54948723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048219346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021642926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124098500","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12020","title":"Evaluating Equity Critiques in Food Policy: The Case of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Public economics; Distributive justice; Social equality; Economics; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.528410649619467,"score_gpt":0.6505038381134185,"score_spread":0.12209318849395145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124098500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6132941,0.0020798512,0.000084715095,0.3758222,0.00041040135,0.0005390109,0.000003077291,0.0000090061785,0.007757652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96664447,0.002198917,0.00040266686,0.02920615,0.0013818939,0.000010285144,5.004829e-7,0.000015771087,0.00013935384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884473,0.0087316865,0.0015154952,0.00008942598,0.0007564107,0.00045969765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96574944,0.030219706,0.0017781749,0.00038148309,0.0016993689,0.00017179611],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043647036,0.00014245143,0.00051458506,0.00012796762,0.0012846766,0.000008401667,0.0004979781,0.00032681835,0.0005444895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01764169,0.00006720942,0.000058443555,0.0002659777,0.0006046283,0.00039410885,0.00022354808,0.005973293,0.000019396226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007031768,0.0003390441,0.002768558,0.005115066,0.00021990866,0.00023336177,0.71801484,0.00013710222,0.0029064661,0.24481793,0.013288036,0.01145651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009678251,0.0120336125,0.032410726,0.018119436,0.0008867631,0.0027847413,0.32269087,0.0011797689,0.00068737403,0.57708114,0.02192139,0.00052588875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049596466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02874929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39532396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014594481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016673035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99631995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126219239","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12068","title":"Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Language change; Agency (philosophy); Authorization; Clinical trial; Pharmaceutical industry; Drug; Public relations; Public economics; Medicine; Political science; Pharmacology; Economics; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.46437308014716894,"score_gpt":0.5875157409265235,"score_spread":0.12314266077935454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126219239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7840018,0.011460187,0.0002559679,0.19528815,0.0010557881,0.0009939782,0.000021965518,0.000008594616,0.0069135088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709077,0.0060604797,0.000042796008,0.022505105,0.0004155904,0.000007744002,0.0000013008879,0.00000759994,0.000051692303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956163,0.0028203067,0.00079462596,0.00009610092,0.0004441085,0.00022856313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98833203,0.009944575,0.00060208014,0.000117242525,0.000719024,0.00028501553],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104288515,0.00016079172,0.0005147098,0.00006114292,0.0003685876,0.0000051508755,0.00024903906,0.0004220839,0.0003938423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011849005,0.000078880475,0.00006334781,0.00014362848,0.006523797,0.0001584343,0.00009106778,0.0044802786,0.0000038080093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012567012,0.00058647577,0.002991577,0.002167603,0.0015755757,0.000030270885,0.076222315,0.000542975,0.07996755,0.73327893,0.0065549146,0.08351477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.074365325,0.0059319925,0.022793178,0.0034870396,0.0097489795,0.004019419,0.018434606,0.015070228,0.13570113,0.20805341,0.5013766,0.0010180715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001717098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039928314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5252255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034079345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018474997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99781644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127502681","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12019","title":"Medical Tourism's Impact on Health Care Equity and Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Making the Case for Regulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medical tourism; Equity (law); Health care; Tourism; Economic growth; Developing country; Business; Low and middle income countries; Medical care; Developed country; Low income; Medicine; Political science; Socioeconomics; Family medicine; Economics; Environmental health; Population; Law","score_opus":0.2253626129090279,"score_gpt":0.5737565557528306,"score_spread":0.34839394284380265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127502681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4362484,0.006873034,0.00029731714,0.5531151,0.0009133912,0.001400405,0.000012877309,0.000012065798,0.0011273725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935853,0.0026581895,0.00004718584,0.05982481,0.0015459289,0.000017232689,0.0000021856986,0.000016230102,0.000035248086],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513507,0.0019348471,0.0011706543,0.00013632282,0.0010645926,0.00055853924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98833126,0.009381804,0.0008188928,0.00025354125,0.00067351665,0.0005410112],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0162245,0.00018089285,0.0005503378,0.00008675158,0.0011922854,0.000020316184,0.00036958136,0.00044906404,0.00013840437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034809418,0.00007787049,0.000047391946,0.0001488335,0.0006268099,0.00019226412,0.0002526665,0.0036252802,0.0000021589467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046575097,0.00023893794,0.010916713,0.038938925,0.00033482804,0.0018630815,0.6181631,0.00010224599,0.0000060831285,0.0974237,0.16344462,0.063910246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030208081,0.015891429,0.1857663,0.20001258,0.0006180278,0.010617512,0.20607845,0.003947135,0.000010970487,0.23573886,0.1100211,0.0010895522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014469111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073097274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49960458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037659457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016312269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128234613","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00594.x","title":"Multi-Professional Recommendations for Access and Utilization of Critical Care Services: Towards Consistency in Practice and Ethical Decision-Making Processes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Nursing; Variety (cybernetics); Medicine; Work (physics); Critical care nursing; Position (finance); Position paper; Psychology; Business; Health care; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5572284833785622,"score_gpt":0.6071744814463653,"score_spread":0.04994599806780309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128234613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5058537,0.10080234,0.079831354,0.3019498,0.0023007526,0.0020892976,0.00011834245,0.000036846348,0.007017535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954028,0.0053985505,0.036413033,0.0040473924,0.000092950395,0.0000031045643,0.000004498781,0.000009970615,0.000002478535],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835324,0.00030591685,0.00069736614,0.000096946795,0.00043823227,0.00010828075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98417366,0.011846823,0.00044388988,0.000111672234,0.0033394177,0.00008454135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027786742,0.00010266358,0.00040695583,0.000109089204,0.00011186795,0.000005194413,0.00013631576,0.00025371244,0.000021502734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02533263,0.000059580936,0.000027811688,0.00018095109,0.00066901254,0.00020791023,0.000067216264,0.0010319059,5.6309833e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006409467,0.0006604678,0.02373617,0.0185149,0.0002429998,0.00005731279,0.8917585,0.0000051031657,0.0006534704,0.036519594,0.00023797691,0.02120405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016735675,0.006551354,0.032960486,0.15115406,0.005220568,0.0012049914,0.7024621,0.0012542754,0.005029398,0.0571625,0.019739984,0.0005246261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019801596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003683602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4481743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002272885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047725957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98287743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128446358","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12015","title":"Transnational Trade in Human Eggs: Law, Policy, and (In)Action in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Irritability; Nausea; Bloating; Production (economics); Vomiting; Abdominal pain; Anger; Economics; Medicine; Business; Psychology; Psychiatry; Anxiety; Anesthesia; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.1201635566585165,"score_gpt":0.41529205719812184,"score_spread":0.2951285005396054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128446358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63061893,0.00049361004,0.000005321438,0.36751652,0.00007023061,0.00015905808,3.9361035e-7,0.0000033026795,0.001132652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934223,0.00045679533,0.000044096116,0.0058364873,0.00021086486,0.0000034013422,9.613794e-7,0.0000071954532,0.000017841057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985274,0.00016547939,0.00054965913,0.0000864626,0.00047734525,0.00019362949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899083,0.00053723564,0.00015901988,0.00012926504,0.000099590885,0.00008405857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020901675,0.000088408335,0.0003104848,0.00020998185,0.00005656153,0.0000028235277,0.000094276795,0.000118021795,0.000021921518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006277318,0.00005267195,0.000014447123,0.00023741262,0.00036447617,0.000109496636,0.000008475035,0.0018831069,1.216277e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006452159,0.00024137583,0.047452234,0.0007355984,0.000052786923,0.0002557175,0.016352355,0.00020704452,0.01875401,0.9084242,0.0009372609,0.0059421808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059959604,0.000981396,0.877837,0.00084221485,0.0000520216,0.0011988435,0.007913061,0.00009592353,0.0019469692,0.090333715,0.012657635,0.00014524015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7150206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88144326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8303848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048770302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011682996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81812674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128462155","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12013","title":"Patents and Human Rights: A Heterodox Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Human rights; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Conceptualization; International human rights law; Political science; Framing (construction); Law; Opposition (politics); Rhetorical question; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Property rights; Dominance (genetics); Right to property; Sociology; Politics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24723553758132272,"score_gpt":0.31094708725742654,"score_spread":0.06371154967610382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128462155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509282,0.00044763132,0.00077070465,0.019376159,0.000442684,0.0001838287,3.8383294e-7,0.00002018893,0.027830217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976773,0.00002904961,0.000019377128,0.008785406,0.001003484,8.339847e-7,0.0000025700358,0.000009474193,0.00038204956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986943,0.00009127203,0.00045549462,0.000080585494,0.0005059687,0.0001723978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985181,0.00026676495,0.00040774353,0.00016417682,0.00061891414,0.000024284305],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022969618,0.00013018839,0.0003155096,0.00020195438,0.0005410384,0.00008387214,0.00030879033,0.00009460245,0.0009821627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021066824,0.000058707876,0.000080811296,0.0003377834,0.00028920893,0.00056110293,0.00008468066,0.0008290537,0.0000851778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020190345,0.0016028319,0.0708217,0.0028295242,0.017400226,0.00042554244,0.081129186,0.0017619279,0.028824164,0.49711558,0.28859243,0.007477842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007977297,0.0015585471,0.046780575,0.0024162582,0.016844835,0.00030166542,0.0035606308,0.011610351,0.0008243237,0.23927449,0.66743267,0.0014183817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012523853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005393881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3788402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010755422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006259919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131829871","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12096","title":"Another Look at the Legal and Ethical Consequences of Pharmacological Memory Dampening: The Case of Sexual Assault","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Promulgation; Witness; Psychology; Sexual assault; Obligation; Ethical issues; Criminology; Medicine; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Political science; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Engineering ethics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.13325344450066245,"score_gpt":0.42093757994636477,"score_spread":0.2876841354457023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131829871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6019146,0.0027349496,0.00005232434,0.37889585,0.00073879684,0.00030753986,0.0000041395756,0.000009011291,0.01534278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801116,0.00073990365,0.000044118184,0.017174201,0.0009582977,0.0000020629448,2.3762e-7,0.000009311289,0.000960292],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365526,0.0039468296,0.000709738,0.00011824761,0.0013044996,0.0002654308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840884,0.013813457,0.00082964974,0.00021566688,0.00091248757,0.00014030024],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023994524,0.00014882752,0.00041388403,0.000027724189,0.0010399495,0.00002934552,0.0006665451,0.00061396894,0.0008395563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038864028,0.00005700371,0.00007013264,0.00013820696,0.021541012,0.00012376107,0.00010873764,0.0047748904,0.0000025977763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043831542,0.00010404142,0.00034495976,0.000109117274,0.00045513496,0.00040295103,0.4719803,0.00007172543,0.036821306,0.45944372,0.027970241,0.001858186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050662355,0.0044103903,0.001080821,0.0007605316,0.003482243,0.009230294,0.53009975,0.00015488692,0.012106891,0.08904976,0.3438734,0.00068476214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01916149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011811462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37819698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040975952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066213025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99752116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132792397","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12275","title":"Addressing Antibiotic Resistance Requires Robust International Accountability Mechanisms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health and Long Term Care","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Accountability; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Action (physics); Resistance (ecology); International law; Political science; Business; Public relations; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.18978963851627687,"score_gpt":0.3969869804667321,"score_spread":0.20719734195045522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132792397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88061124,0.0051441053,0.048818145,0.03589895,0.005275991,0.0002875099,0.000017805614,0.0000213158,0.023924958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921177,0.00043842755,0.004122336,0.0017074611,0.0011721662,1.7847232e-7,0.000009584104,0.000020924148,0.00041120127],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790204,0.00039900155,0.0005816052,0.00015398092,0.00076835003,0.00019503327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768376,0.00020362627,0.0005860567,0.0004203386,0.0009788683,0.00012733373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056376876,0.00015468914,0.00025634698,0.000034452143,0.00013246824,0.0000299224,0.000708839,0.00022491133,0.000025806221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024336972,0.00009479712,0.00006640979,0.00007629805,0.0007782281,0.00002212903,0.00012017321,0.00066210376,0.0000027791534],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043894267,0.00024707968,0.003115582,0.00025203955,0.0005068865,0.00008825703,0.007810341,0.0008415889,0.908625,0.03613159,0.03746356,0.0005286309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014269261,0.005403189,0.017162945,0.00835874,0.0014094348,0.0028256876,0.029767817,0.0003023448,0.4064132,0.098376185,0.41365397,0.0020572382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050681854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002677095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5022118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064320884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003178433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38657144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133882079","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12253","title":"What Will it Take to Address the Global Threat of Antibiotic Resistance?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health and Long Term Care","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Norwegian; Foundation (evidence); Antibiotic resistance; Political science; Action (physics); State (computer science); Resistance (ecology); Public administration; Public health; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Antibiotics; Engineering; Computer science; Microbiology; Biology; Nursing","score_opus":0.09351948488377047,"score_gpt":0.36206690588583956,"score_spread":0.2685474210020691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133882079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30994108,0.15497145,0.0012129701,0.4924292,0.010428169,0.0006449805,0.00003380563,0.000031512267,0.030306857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867128,0.0036000698,0.00005343313,0.006966817,0.0002743292,1.420537e-7,0.0000021769167,0.00001137875,0.0023788563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791926,0.0007476252,0.000652658,0.00011149692,0.00028854614,0.00028042015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971989,0.0009930204,0.0005457107,0.00045583444,0.0007317462,0.00007482421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044742483,0.00017053039,0.0004972705,0.00003469412,0.00022908687,0.000012402403,0.00080287474,0.00029067817,0.00006600953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009074528,0.0000733121,0.00009221465,0.00023238518,0.001756113,0.00017291472,0.0000927739,0.0011544838,0.000031553824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010645353,0.0006357434,0.0028045613,0.0006750483,0.0025982938,0.00025012868,0.16424549,0.0002782679,0.06142265,0.32152975,0.4330896,0.0018251017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006550108,0.0032465216,0.0031491471,0.010617113,0.001624541,0.0016965475,0.07790147,0.0000016875904,0.026785161,0.022411058,0.84555304,0.00046361733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001935348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001415483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6767717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059778635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028444853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64704716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137090334","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00137.x","title":"Genetic Determinism and Discrimination: A Call to Re-Orient Prevailing Human Rights Discourse to Better Comport with the Public Implications of Individual Genetic Testing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Genetic discrimination; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Stigma (botany); Genetic testing; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Internet privacy; Law; Psychology; History; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1555740498234271,"score_gpt":0.424965349463768,"score_spread":0.2693912996403409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137090334","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10930766,0.8688516,0.008439737,0.011048749,0.0002652744,0.0014727992,0.00003880518,0.0000066558396,0.00056871236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28326797,0.68603903,0.017945863,0.0071493927,0.004939913,0.00006424591,0.0000924945,0.00017936037,0.00032168502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973035,0.00041855997,0.0010148998,0.00027970193,0.0006852196,0.000298117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969528,0.0004888874,0.00095135224,0.000671065,0.00068381877,0.0002521274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00310438,0.0003248452,0.0007369093,0.00008660146,0.0005152625,0.000035767654,0.0008185381,0.0003076529,0.0000029110738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024502157,0.00015846945,0.00013897532,0.0002097324,0.00089610746,0.000005295661,0.0002432332,0.00094432716,4.8544393e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018809889,0.00084344734,0.0017425129,0.015408569,0.004414806,0.00014487912,0.13372764,0.00034784334,0.007667238,0.003481247,0.013855164,0.81817853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066325674,0.0033877003,0.0027431815,0.006535826,0.003853196,0.0014109549,0.0015012821,0.000003072224,0.00014739418,0.00035308715,0.97887915,0.00052186963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003259925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070032524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.965024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032708878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6462197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137840922","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12012","title":"Pharmaceutical Knowledge Governance: A Human Rights Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Misrepresentation; Human rights; Corporate governance; Obligation; Business; Political science; Pharmaceutical industry; Drug control; Public relations; Law and economics; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Law; Medicine; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.20270876457574855,"score_gpt":0.4249189313450158,"score_spread":0.22221016676926725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137840922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07920286,0.016217792,0.00034945383,0.16504818,0.001580149,0.00033377163,0.000028766477,0.0000213452,0.73721766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870358,0.00092156226,0.000057582853,0.009235853,0.0016784909,0.0000035444273,6.5181905e-7,0.000021970116,0.0010445118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998224,0.00012956488,0.0010358383,0.00016035471,0.00010219992,0.00034804447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975289,0.00082896015,0.0007505528,0.0002710045,0.0003238472,0.00029675034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034357617,0.0001889152,0.0005773825,0.00008443371,0.00038609782,0.0000377888,0.00062859687,0.00017314963,0.0026358452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003525775,0.00012667206,0.00014959583,0.00014888962,0.00082492776,0.00029699143,0.000084853054,0.0020638455,0.00070760417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023369212,0.000082625265,0.00005493822,0.000019381408,0.00010327692,0.0000037176435,0.007009004,0.000008407913,0.00013177544,0.9781338,0.014328573,0.000101162936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011651871,0.00020399077,0.00045051804,0.0000593353,0.00004298225,0.00007064985,0.00018927283,0.00040941226,0.0001550525,0.47710705,0.5200123,0.00013421747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026866498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016521844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.907833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002664809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059149297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142835555","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00652.x","title":"Currents in Contemporary Bioethics: Open Access as Benefit Sharing? The Example of Publicly Funded Large-Scale Genomic Databases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; McGill University","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Database; Bioethics; World Wide Web; Computer science; Data science; Internet privacy; Business; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.8888578791030752,"score_gpt":0.6677649895645961,"score_spread":0.22109288953847916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142835555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.752466,0.012862381,0.00038927284,0.20233338,0.0015345959,0.0014822576,0.00006250247,0.000019908202,0.028849695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97853506,0.0055267643,0.0002738395,0.013908241,0.0010388807,0.000008788657,0.0000240897,0.00004986007,0.0006344507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921872,0.001039646,0.0022387304,0.00031370588,0.003489233,0.0007314533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94147146,0.05117421,0.0017448436,0.0021110936,0.0027817457,0.0007166251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.097677246,0.00026728044,0.0010284611,0.00024895024,0.0003242716,0.000096503914,0.0046613105,0.00053722097,0.0005657028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034014996,0.00013435305,0.00015084882,0.00064075866,0.003038963,0.001203839,0.0033740161,0.013386672,0.00001902105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028181765,0.0014005138,0.31227362,0.0011397293,0.0003971249,0.000048866117,0.030401545,0.000016647198,0.00097385945,0.6468561,0.0032849847,0.00038878983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02763312,0.005545154,0.16512775,0.02157709,0.0014394477,0.0012340841,0.03560363,0.00031433968,0.005368036,0.49191827,0.24331398,0.0009251088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041714206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016158277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24002899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001538752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018486446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143368480","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00378.x","title":"Differences in Regulatory Frameworks Governing Genetic Laboratories in Four Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian Bioethics Society","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Referral; Genetic testing; Health professionals; Political science; Medicine; Health care; Family medicine; Law","score_opus":0.34027518184704314,"score_gpt":0.5255106534883183,"score_spread":0.18523547164127513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143368480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.825223,0.007257056,0.0002811832,0.16444477,0.00040444778,0.0001798118,0.0000014618514,0.000010682163,0.0021975648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97106564,0.01225314,0.00067311805,0.014972788,0.0008383328,9.957427e-7,3.8586697e-7,0.000016176567,0.00017944732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993989,0.0009826268,0.0013244811,0.00016218079,0.0031515046,0.00039023338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95934355,0.03757758,0.00058956596,0.0005329145,0.0017086377,0.00024772916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025947131,0.00018411517,0.00076433044,0.00017250693,0.0001266992,0.000021666536,0.00053021125,0.0012418417,0.000086080116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054185256,0.00010440952,0.00006138637,0.0005284523,0.0016699915,0.000115774215,0.000062124156,0.020083228,0.0000052413184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004101798,0.00043222302,0.5205107,0.0011360876,0.00017796675,0.0022369418,0.080904655,0.00021831004,0.0018975781,0.38526505,0.0010325437,0.002086198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003311725,0.0033404117,0.7394977,0.011636376,0.00014777985,0.00021635102,0.004055638,0.000106469,0.00023187515,0.23412322,0.0031431646,0.00018927729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023864544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020417585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21898706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019997802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001771596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9821775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144447924","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12095","title":"Supporting Second Victims of Patient Safety Events: Shouldn't These Communications Be Covered by Legal Privilege?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Harm; Ambiguity; Legislation; Malpractice; Statutory law; Health care; Public relations; State (computer science); Law; Internet privacy; Business; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.13602705733149173,"score_gpt":0.49642585992561483,"score_spread":0.3603988025941231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144447924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37139708,0.0014078361,0.0004148662,0.5998161,0.0010328128,0.00105794,0.000041866268,0.000022020466,0.024809485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728155,0.0010235121,0.00038620338,0.024549017,0.00034056537,0.000012559761,0.000016923283,0.000022222375,0.00083348574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173814,0.0042317067,0.0023111945,0.00010737129,0.0012031746,0.00040843769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740866,0.020380437,0.0027475054,0.0010154002,0.0014513066,0.00031875705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013562182,0.00017519998,0.000630799,0.00005413378,0.0006266134,0.0000051510606,0.0009395215,0.0003436957,0.0069553307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012920858,0.00009531955,0.0000973893,0.0001726454,0.000897806,0.00043617754,0.00028761846,0.00546359,0.000033897853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010207908,0.0014171237,0.008287339,0.0020925135,0.0006969571,0.000011941756,0.5771041,0.000022026263,0.01000735,0.083299726,0.31305736,0.002982794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012976273,0.0009083545,0.0008748244,0.001421453,0.00024172317,0.000029964554,0.058556978,0.00007442966,0.00019409877,0.004850867,0.93143445,0.000115238734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025017152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060962775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109646426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063346257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144735993","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12003","title":"Law as a Tool in “The War on Obesity”: Useful Interventions, Maybe, But, First, What's the Problem?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Embarrassment; Overweight; Obesity; Law; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Weight loss; State (computer science); Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.2293889332648301,"score_gpt":0.5001847732461911,"score_spread":0.27079583998136103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144735993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23256443,0.0045011663,0.00007088022,0.7367072,0.0013342629,0.0017676795,0.0000021765486,0.000021471522,0.023030698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81337893,0.013006929,0.00015123983,0.1695604,0.0018355023,0.00007206796,0.0000024682645,0.000030693558,0.0019617446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910236,0.0073389304,0.0016220176,0.00014357013,0.0012392335,0.00055387703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759911,0.020964256,0.0015704051,0.0006345678,0.0007108535,0.00012885313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03239274,0.00021816744,0.0004849385,0.00009935764,0.0029953218,0.000054414424,0.001165837,0.00040204244,0.0019014636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022463864,0.000090253976,0.00014792668,0.00028103794,0.00071984105,0.0011503729,0.00014881359,0.010443901,0.0009280462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052202673,0.0007787745,0.0013075965,0.0030299018,0.00013775735,0.000070097405,0.35013226,0.000048438145,0.000022460728,0.55044556,0.09256934,0.0009358313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025025015,0.0023833718,0.010171994,0.020805843,0.00035968202,0.00022150489,0.18968682,0.000029285984,0.000010100201,0.12020919,0.65342134,0.00019836026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011751587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014175165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58081454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001459403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046154702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147454229","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00201.x","title":"Connecting Public Health Law with Science","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greenfield Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Public access; Internet privacy; Access to information; Computer science; Public health; Political science; Law; Public relations; Information access; World Wide Web; Medicine; Mathematics; Nursing","score_opus":0.3914988562211579,"score_gpt":0.574772689439308,"score_spread":0.18327383321815016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147454229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12249293,0.0005155323,0.0023904901,0.8445866,0.0019602797,0.0002996685,0.0000012627953,0.000027738863,0.027725488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8491163,0.0003038876,0.0005840127,0.14796484,0.0019532782,0.0000026696007,9.3099624e-7,0.00001616969,0.00005791985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99570715,0.0010799378,0.0010069988,0.000109398614,0.0012147204,0.0008817885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930801,0.0027380786,0.0013480405,0.00034553808,0.001773696,0.0007145525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04093218,0.00012310436,0.00036194635,0.00014231088,0.0046561975,0.000017182845,0.00058224937,0.00013482632,0.00008512422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035542406,0.000060445447,0.0000244234,0.00067771313,0.0013897927,0.0004460311,0.000069693575,0.0038703275,0.000016544542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028363027,0.000039665407,0.00007751691,0.00017856825,0.000011400211,0.0000016478085,0.22970991,0.000058942547,0.00007038598,0.7679629,0.0014194591,0.00044128438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030169256,0.0022284267,0.0011780785,0.0029762986,0.00003996437,0.000430864,0.15767765,0.000021041053,0.000026414922,0.02367885,0.80856645,0.00015905837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023043044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005843057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80714697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008055841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013789832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150004442","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12009","title":"The Debatable Role of Courts in Brazil's Health Care System: Does Litigation Harm or Help?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Public Health in Brazil","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Right to health; Harm; Sanitation; Duty; Health care; Constitution; Health promotion; Business; State (computer science); Duty to protect; Health policy; Environmental health; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06292470450077095,"score_gpt":0.4324455903590497,"score_spread":0.3695208858582788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150004442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1385485,0.011282935,0.00010544715,0.82122225,0.0023207162,0.001105626,0.000008918312,0.000035194586,0.025370438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906568,0.0024709404,0.0001156127,0.0054870667,0.0009830962,0.0000071768864,0.0000011282546,0.000012359301,0.00026580985],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409944,0.0026719952,0.0011010775,0.00008793184,0.0015698383,0.00046972415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922189,0.004747724,0.0011145632,0.00027013232,0.0013557611,0.00029289635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023791337,0.0001089095,0.00039819645,0.00007702559,0.0011448781,0.000046466634,0.0007489252,0.00018198023,0.00008258114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040462883,0.00004499368,0.00004002909,0.0003351555,0.0012211738,0.00038610675,0.000046208064,0.0013547667,0.000005932975],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013896172,0.00005003045,0.0010074361,0.0007414512,0.000040081548,0.0000061925753,0.690386,0.000041786963,0.00018331532,0.28293273,0.013291511,0.011180507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011447067,0.00067186105,0.002231671,0.0025696557,0.000043103115,0.000046749687,0.5947826,0.000104609026,0.00019485664,0.016338745,0.38174278,0.0001286767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0657377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034382306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8521083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005208297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035374209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155131570","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12151","title":"The Challenge of Informed Consent and Return of Results in Translational Genomics: Empirical Analysis and Recommendations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Informed consent; Exome; Exome sequencing; Genomics; Data sharing; MEDLINE; Medicine; Genome; Alternative medicine; Biology; Genetics; Pathology; Gene","score_opus":0.5588964673533864,"score_gpt":0.5904016193261435,"score_spread":0.03150515197275716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155131570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21090062,0.0019196487,0.00062652025,0.78052425,0.00009299505,0.00019877356,0.000011357031,0.0000022978322,0.0057235276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601713,0.037615694,0.00072992966,0.0012835644,0.00013329872,6.737896e-7,0.000003994071,0.0000062944555,0.00005526031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962022,0.0008353465,0.0015906723,0.0000962972,0.0011308304,0.00014467086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8651013,0.13269037,0.00068390026,0.00030105954,0.0010834999,0.00013991086],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036625322,0.000088097615,0.0005383665,0.0001892506,0.000120381774,0.000004906883,0.00019865195,0.00028581524,0.000017349892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06244738,0.000043015818,0.00008106852,0.0003084971,0.0023980115,0.000042203043,0.00005503311,0.0033891075,1.5503434e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023595212,0.0010240233,0.068424135,0.004028668,0.0055857613,0.00003614129,0.37213233,0.00029952644,0.0041942964,0.49060598,0.0026506025,0.02742331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030692253,0.012828119,0.20353024,0.009468253,0.0061025308,0.0003893587,0.02036,0.0069121844,0.0013851735,0.6549299,0.052985437,0.00041656196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021885784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011543198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77924067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003110146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009886926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156953889","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12073","title":"Key Opinion Leaders and the Corruption of Medical Knowledge: What the Sunshine Act Will and Won’t Cast Light on","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Opinion leadership; Language change; Public relations; Politics; Dissemination; Key (lock); Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Power (physics); Knowledge base; Political science; Marketing; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.5968574857229567,"score_gpt":0.6022996563492857,"score_spread":0.005442170626329013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156953889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13758464,0.036548883,0.000028980929,0.8216498,0.0021391716,0.00045591418,0.0000032722635,0.000009195161,0.0015801378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096407,0.052993868,0.000003738322,0.035852984,0.0013446419,0.0000069334146,0.0000015379977,0.000013156979,0.00014243732],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99438274,0.0037522153,0.00070879643,0.00012193811,0.00072759175,0.00030670423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878497,0.01064578,0.00045936104,0.00020070534,0.0004224184,0.00042202568],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015325033,0.00021180886,0.0005188796,0.000048835616,0.0006068961,0.000025956062,0.0005280258,0.0007666955,0.0011238401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014461873,0.000081242055,0.000084763036,0.00014273058,0.00473189,0.0003015559,0.00011520202,0.008604049,0.000008795388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011431654,0.0010607234,0.0018056625,0.0020125038,0.0044424804,0.00008981419,0.4092076,0.0002737485,0.0051533394,0.35742572,0.0941671,0.11292966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017388524,0.0030496207,0.0023741308,0.0024819195,0.004527016,0.0026882188,0.045317024,0.0054314295,0.0032771025,0.018581709,0.8944478,0.00043549747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018824067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010763544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8002807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033692362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021616022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161118953","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00189.x","title":"The Ethics of Restrictive Licensing for Handguns: Comparing the United States and Canadian Approaches to Handgun Regulation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Magistrate; Gun control; Political science; Medicine; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.7410801662027258,"score_gpt":0.5310672914460173,"score_spread":0.2100128747567085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161118953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000246519,0.9120706,0.0009855746,0.08337741,0.00035563429,0.0012153485,0.000007737801,0.000005701096,0.0017355141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0089152455,0.98948705,0.00007522945,0.0006443576,0.00074520847,0.000004707653,0.0000078497205,0.000020366631,0.000099966805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932434,0.0038465585,0.00084155815,0.00012693,0.0013981047,0.00054347405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629999,0.034280427,0.0008622517,0.00026144017,0.0012473179,0.0003486902],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.062352754,0.00019679792,0.00076009857,0.000308919,0.002977009,0.00009499173,0.0008403678,0.0005162556,0.0000022599643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010456653,0.00008040278,0.00012679388,0.00092953496,0.0028212639,0.0000806926,0.00006067331,0.0039628586,4.585275e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024770043,0.000023218054,0.000040004525,0.0033036324,0.00045692356,0.000005495304,0.47326276,0.00021105596,9.841013e-7,0.26773965,0.0012455632,0.25346303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016898825,0.00020021193,0.000028650726,0.012076448,0.0005017605,0.000017022672,0.042778835,0.00009844816,0.0000015330801,0.005185692,0.9388464,0.000095972384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16864994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3867797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93760085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030340094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031226818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162857663","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2010.00505.x","title":"Seven Challenges in International Development Assistance for Health and Ways Forward","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Context (archaeology); Developing country; Unintended consequences; Business; Economic growth; Quality (philosophy); Aid effectiveness; Health policy; Development aid; Political science; Public relations; Health care; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.21083790189119395,"score_gpt":0.4135999925232815,"score_spread":0.20276209063208755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162857663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033029255,0.0013868621,0.0009973581,0.95523876,0.0014757392,0.00014261447,7.3452577e-7,0.0000075525327,0.0077211196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7924867,0.0027003142,0.0018733962,0.19916376,0.0037170327,0.0000057475754,0.0000044360318,0.000014612675,0.00003396763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878484,0.000042081396,0.00060108345,0.000073516065,0.0002536798,0.00024477878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814785,0.00085132517,0.00055554585,0.00008810537,0.00031471043,0.000042472217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011298414,0.00008551468,0.0002793129,0.00009332599,0.00016952172,0.000014096378,0.0002650949,0.00009831353,0.000013462188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025979807,0.00004953891,0.000021756323,0.00006311482,0.00016777246,0.00020771875,0.000064679865,0.00084200833,0.000001587621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018910531,0.000045467605,0.00075244,0.00058189983,0.000041409887,0.0000026760513,0.008226724,0.00004569413,0.000028403127,0.9142621,0.05936379,0.0164603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006271027,0.00004829566,0.0030630664,0.00016766589,0.000007168662,0.000023641665,0.00162252,0.00034439832,5.4017494e-7,0.020462507,0.9735867,0.000046423476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008725191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039598034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036795034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017648903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39158273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166216486","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00538.x","title":"Ensuring Reasonable Health: Health Rights, the Judiciary, and South African HIV/AIDS Policy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Deference; Right to health; Political science; Human rights; Enforcement; Social rights; Health care; Health policy; Democracy; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10637919706711887,"score_gpt":0.3998133078062844,"score_spread":0.2934341107391655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166216486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016156238,0.0051157763,0.000266605,0.9394052,0.0002956528,0.00024191111,0.000002668206,0.000022950984,0.03849302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660558,0.0030820202,0.00055103074,0.025440063,0.0034640622,8.965915e-7,5.2062126e-7,0.000011103244,0.0013944724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961724,0.0013901965,0.000654587,0.00010449125,0.0011994588,0.0004788674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738085,0.0011375679,0.0006685369,0.00019331035,0.0002303141,0.00038943588],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019556316,0.0001317336,0.0003792732,0.000091437905,0.0031613684,0.000041774536,0.00044147886,0.00008825052,0.00008698644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004466589,0.000055899316,0.00004479683,0.00024479415,0.0014931733,0.00012986221,0.000054693945,0.0013016316,0.000007077601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002158082,0.000016988608,0.000031409098,0.000011497891,0.000024368355,0.000002805027,0.45758742,0.000011553073,0.0000012357647,0.53196424,0.008112445,0.0022144218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051257515,0.00032271715,0.000668125,0.00038709372,0.0000261109,0.000056306348,0.026256423,0.000008350728,0.000004539049,0.07970024,0.89196634,0.00009115972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030701423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017477838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031647517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022437288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170209948","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.299.x","title":"Mustard Gas and American Race-Based Human Experimentation in World War II","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Rockefeller University; University of Chicago","keywords":"Race (biology); Chemical warfare; Government (linguistics); World War II; Political science; First world war; Arms race; Engineering; Law; Sociology; History; Economic history; Gender studies; Ancient history","score_opus":0.12318359184055278,"score_gpt":0.3381280313207418,"score_spread":0.21494443948018904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170209948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83810276,0.0018631878,0.000010806854,0.15772687,0.00011941985,0.00004479752,4.0420375e-7,0.000005982489,0.002125781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935228,0.001341699,0.000036166453,0.0031628988,0.00061431294,0.000001129103,0.0000010315969,0.0000061058386,0.0013138131],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988504,0.00019403822,0.00037726166,0.00005946512,0.00039715806,0.00012166001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990011,0.00037184858,0.00028830583,0.00006796442,0.00020885796,0.00006194721],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008030758,0.00009684895,0.0003282367,0.00006431234,0.0025571783,0.000006423771,0.00010807161,0.00002213232,0.00016155197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008470542,0.000048317648,0.00005994139,0.00008099949,0.0016565291,0.00007650534,0.000021375956,0.0006252852,0.0000010159436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056513312,0.00006298152,0.00016008283,0.000015019519,0.000056643225,0.000024384139,0.9750394,0.0000336046,0.0003324723,0.019468939,0.004494479,0.0002554435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031887365,0.0029045932,0.0006476186,0.0004389477,0.0005480943,0.00003581673,0.2226984,0.00008947152,0.00021230466,0.00608227,0.7627632,0.00039051467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043325247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019767776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7582688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025581234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020998625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170385797","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12017","title":"What's Missing? Discussing Stem Cell Translational Research in Educational Information on Stem Cell “Tourism”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Government of Canada; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Distrust; Viewpoints; Stem cell; Tourism; Feeling; Medical tourism; Psychological intervention; Perception; Translational research; Stem-cell therapy; Medicine; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.14612294978179777,"score_gpt":0.40934163990803063,"score_spread":0.2632186901262329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170385797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1292105,0.002549738,0.00080854015,0.85598725,0.0013032092,0.00052194146,0.0000016736988,0.000009486828,0.009607661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916387,0.0008881976,0.00029249847,0.0051708133,0.001149211,0.000004193093,0.000017613476,0.000017523378,0.0008212011],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490595,0.0008223154,0.0010854831,0.000110436085,0.0027678038,0.00030802394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464685,0.003028716,0.00047126316,0.00024787078,0.00131182,0.00029346262],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0103730615,0.00016311905,0.0003586088,0.00044836654,0.000351761,0.00009454922,0.00025092534,0.00044668603,0.0002142538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077544064,0.00008383639,0.00008516782,0.00048456606,0.0014652235,0.0009754338,0.000026964333,0.0043898528,0.000040050494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027138828,0.0026624284,0.0008995419,0.0059596496,0.00022332283,0.00008015671,0.42071587,0.0019678255,0.034671735,0.13359855,0.036128994,0.36037806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03185321,0.010785329,0.0692099,0.05376828,0.0010081795,0.001652676,0.16725153,0.01650934,0.014937597,0.38251847,0.24899329,0.0015122134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016332071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019644503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86242825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016033379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011800177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99790704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172137636","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12149","title":"Youth Sports &amp; Public Health: Framing Risks of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in American Football and Ice Hockey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology","keywords":"Framing (construction); American football; Traumatic brain injury; Football; Injury prevention; Suicide prevention; Situated; Psychological intervention; Occupational safety and health; Poison control; Ice hockey; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychology; Concussion; Medicine; Medical emergency; Political science; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Psychiatry; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.4880562396939423,"score_gpt":0.495568944372879,"score_spread":0.007512704678936721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172137636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.839542,0.00080918736,0.0014365357,0.15668577,0.0001501619,0.0003535854,0.000005624246,0.0000139553185,0.0010031792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98612106,0.0007513969,0.0018107214,0.010878755,0.00035004198,0.000001963657,0.0000052889036,0.000040772346,0.00003999767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373865,0.0018169819,0.0016960175,0.000183694,0.0020176184,0.00054703985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916837,0.0052163,0.0014028263,0.0005980071,0.0005472495,0.00055191276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029408181,0.0002414824,0.001269685,0.0004624678,0.00014802502,0.000014446511,0.00040079452,0.0001839023,0.000049981627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009108311,0.0001472596,0.00009102335,0.0006511058,0.001999402,0.0001310353,0.00008084539,0.0036310316,0.0000017477845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002576922,0.0010605089,0.051681112,0.0049564694,0.00060436566,0.00005808406,0.7332528,0.00003019459,0.0023798794,0.010203078,0.00495631,0.18824022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025389548,0.03150716,0.64640164,0.03203701,0.0013875114,0.0034483166,0.19229507,0.0011531321,0.00053542294,0.016499495,0.04817427,0.0011714352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034828472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009857528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5947205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013781898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069539057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209511974","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12312","title":"International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking (or the Unexpected Virtue of Pluralism)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Biobank; Globe; Data sharing; Data science; Pluralism (philosophy); Information privacy; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Biology; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8345066363848103,"score_gpt":0.6551396101271317,"score_spread":0.17936702625767853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209511974","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1856695,0.001542999,0.002081918,0.8057863,0.0014468667,0.00059630367,0.0000072521298,0.000011055917,0.0028578027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97381103,0.003026093,0.00544194,0.01412083,0.0027942376,0.0000057194543,0.0000048525258,0.000035386343,0.00075991114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949715,0.00045130757,0.0017941538,0.00012592996,0.0024296683,0.00022740717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522546,0.03697234,0.0009525796,0.00054253393,0.009078832,0.00019913154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04242436,0.00014218391,0.0005458532,0.00016951276,0.00008656131,0.0000112791295,0.0011128366,0.00037002267,0.000057647005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20598234,0.000054256296,0.00012586075,0.00028703816,0.0013221174,0.00008409418,0.00021373629,0.004541816,0.000002178098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035137635,0.001341837,0.007510087,0.0016210759,0.0020362916,0.00040648368,0.20362064,0.001976883,0.12349286,0.56811243,0.046396893,0.008346877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04306685,0.013680465,0.0056417664,0.018749358,0.001453684,0.0024154664,0.047825653,0.005726034,0.009867819,0.4519473,0.3990492,0.00057639665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006200258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008838098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7916655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018127223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021155472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99775475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209710632","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12315","title":"Privacy and Biobanking in China: A Case of Policy in Transition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Chinese Universities Scientific Fund; Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Academy of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Biobank; China; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Urbanization; Population; Epidemiological transition; Public health; Population ageing; Industrialisation; Business; Health care; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5892120725566127,"score_gpt":0.6150427715447462,"score_spread":0.025830698988133505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209710632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8174056,0.0014230653,0.00018516893,0.17866158,0.00007531204,0.00015413568,9.055812e-7,0.000002771478,0.002091468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370825,0.0028407539,0.00038514182,0.00262111,0.00040726629,6.0170606e-7,4.647949e-7,0.0000127848725,0.000023626371],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672747,0.0007489343,0.0009893351,0.0000925742,0.0012378256,0.00020385407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864843,0.0119289365,0.00032386836,0.0002718457,0.0007456134,0.00024546866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037968487,0.00009830557,0.00050162274,0.00034467463,0.000039551534,0.0000040504606,0.00017950125,0.0003847086,0.000009939995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054963022,0.000056105346,0.000041482126,0.0004813474,0.0011912348,0.00008895885,0.00006240259,0.006687829,4.809462e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059667616,0.0008441424,0.008958937,0.0028503973,0.00014499335,0.011969245,0.7038325,0.0002642384,0.008781463,0.25097874,0.00021513185,0.005193423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028476913,0.0110638635,0.017072462,0.022928024,0.0004264934,0.04182403,0.030977864,0.00091525953,0.0019816938,0.8429626,0.0010939607,0.000276837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007300002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004686477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67285466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014106302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001554862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211056330","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12319","title":"Biobank/Genomic Research in Nigeria: Examining Relevant Privacy and Confidentiality Frameworks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Biobank; Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Political science; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Law; Biology; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.7876369288930096,"score_gpt":0.6356200990226238,"score_spread":0.15201682987038578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211056330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8202067,0.005701365,0.0004563627,0.16661748,0.0007767151,0.00038416244,0.0000012133418,0.000012358217,0.0058436375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841891,0.008806585,0.0008919427,0.004463043,0.0013439124,0.000002302098,0.0000011838475,0.00003421509,0.0002677192],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910314,0.0036297366,0.0016185483,0.0002726104,0.0047828676,0.00059309497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88149446,0.10895432,0.00071867445,0.001304141,0.0063748606,0.001153543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17331663,0.00017909663,0.0007865868,0.0003258254,0.00022382464,0.00004132303,0.0007339754,0.0015286334,0.000062466075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.130397,0.00010419118,0.000055783672,0.0005418524,0.0044248137,0.00013009444,0.00050250115,0.036144067,0.000014370042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017086115,0.0013308689,0.061166447,0.0039599272,0.00088914245,0.0034914853,0.5520935,0.00010981496,0.04154969,0.2995425,0.011579075,0.0072014765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013714098,0.011394661,0.026624668,0.018270144,0.00036098683,0.002682962,0.05765277,0.00018937807,0.0011178023,0.84312266,0.02447822,0.00039167347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001424784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013959396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5435802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029223986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029942011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213997155","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12310","title":"Harmonizing Privacy Laws to Enable International Biobank Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Biobank; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy; Business; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.9432144606423886,"score_gpt":0.701093324878355,"score_spread":0.2421211357640336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213997155","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06458149,0.0016364191,0.0009663631,0.8345759,0.0020780184,0.00043270845,0.0000024490962,0.000026038037,0.0957006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597231,0.0026556149,0.004073366,0.022197574,0.004923915,0.000004288703,0.000002667543,0.00005010439,0.0063693747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98817796,0.0014180942,0.0011793594,0.0002179758,0.00843944,0.00056716264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435065,0.03960153,0.0003653297,0.0009177749,0.014342006,0.0012668719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12257156,0.00015935874,0.00051499304,0.00037130917,0.00029372884,0.00004654189,0.0015235426,0.00052943855,0.00024398786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21914896,0.00008818557,0.00010346656,0.00066311617,0.0017632438,0.00017229964,0.0006413459,0.016044965,0.00015423588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008045325,0.00085791753,0.0027208654,0.00070763496,0.0007583941,0.0013872223,0.12782207,0.00016375522,0.03514757,0.5684753,0.2501266,0.0037873266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046078432,0.005707956,0.00037162768,0.0044501126,0.00017317082,0.0011274072,0.0086836815,0.00009433547,0.0063133156,0.2534329,0.7148688,0.00016882888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007880581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027099607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043799472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033664696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98622507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318982460","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00195.x","title":"Currents in Contemporary Ethics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Genome Canada","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5649428696029962,"score_gpt":0.6369105774304668,"score_spread":0.07196770782747053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318982460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03496484,0.0076239966,0.009548856,0.6350794,0.010870789,0.0006894859,0.00000304108,0.000044518958,0.30117512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9030767,0.002128774,0.00039234187,0.09159611,0.0024066032,0.0000015651755,0.000001758169,0.000032805867,0.00036332806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747704,0.018044347,0.002850202,0.000167272,0.0034714884,0.00069623435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8015224,0.19352372,0.0019904082,0.00052806636,0.0020114775,0.0004239577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26910925,0.00020521514,0.0006047738,0.00019785338,0.001293799,0.000004195427,0.0009276109,0.0014888021,0.00030529062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14920853,0.000116000694,0.000069995745,0.00043101443,0.0020433408,0.00029582618,0.00018407064,0.083438665,0.0000748498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001605225,0.00027173036,0.009845206,0.0011565945,0.0001117032,0.0004906479,0.44613,0.000015165889,0.00061149907,0.5022496,0.036534313,0.000978299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060480065,0.00093501026,0.004471983,0.010764933,0.00019903273,0.00020364576,0.091905415,0.000034559445,0.000074251664,0.22507715,0.66000384,0.0002821513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001698663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019688348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86811185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023692181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025796753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336708674","doi":"10.1177/1073110516644185","title":"Locating Biobanks in the Canadian Privacy Maze","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Biobank; Receipt; Political science; European union; Research ethics; Privacy law; Data sharing; Public administration; Information privacy; Public relations; Law; Privacy policy; Business; Internet privacy; Medicine; Accounting","score_opus":0.6891928414403071,"score_gpt":0.6093811485400256,"score_spread":0.07981169290028156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336708674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090364054,0.0012723698,0.00018882797,0.8864019,0.00038922927,0.00027922794,0.0000016927363,0.000006751185,0.021095958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958709,0.001775142,0.00022982815,0.037549205,0.0011425036,0.000001743458,4.1342392e-7,0.000020665193,0.0005715113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944981,0.0009462358,0.0010271404,0.00013227164,0.002918586,0.00047771464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9214201,0.07446047,0.00048363663,0.0009986149,0.002090707,0.0005464932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.067880884,0.0001421889,0.00040069278,0.00018115972,0.00025594872,0.000017456401,0.0011165378,0.0005783885,0.0001990238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11153626,0.000049335427,0.00008609883,0.0003819035,0.0022215787,0.00008470761,0.00008445044,0.010420714,0.00003279009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011559747,0.00030106434,0.015907325,0.0009098617,0.00025825368,0.0018124575,0.13982806,0.0000072478133,0.00902901,0.79746646,0.00980333,0.023520948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012622787,0.007061786,0.04762076,0.024363762,0.00076992414,0.0053344434,0.012480015,0.000051389554,0.0017670458,0.62773377,0.25970805,0.0004862969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063619785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4074004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8683449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034790597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045551006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340971688","doi":"10.1177/1073110516644205","title":"The European Union's Adequacy Approach to Privacy and International Data Sharing in Health Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; World Anti-Doping Agency; European Commission","keywords":"Jurisdiction; European union; Data sharing; Data Protection Act 1998; Proportionality (law); Transparency (behavior); Data Protection Directive; Directive; Data quality; Business; Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications; International trade; FTC Fair Information Practice; General Data Protection Regulation; Information privacy law; Information privacy; European Union law; Political science; Law; Privacy by Design; Computer science","score_opus":0.9053631604117635,"score_gpt":0.6803113645551662,"score_spread":0.2250517958565973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340971688","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010985026,0.0016018044,0.0036414491,0.951488,0.00033339625,0.000376558,0.000004223493,0.000008709362,0.031560827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640275,0.023944233,0.0014192691,0.006510004,0.0017075203,0.0000016827853,0.0000032202493,0.000036222027,0.0023503348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825728,0.008551246,0.0019210794,0.000502156,0.00567945,0.0007732706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.911539,0.08260694,0.00045660828,0.002167125,0.0025319627,0.0006983298],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33922866,0.00011482317,0.00033112458,0.0002136287,0.0004307975,0.000045058747,0.003168971,0.0001609972,0.000018729168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17214599,0.00004469594,0.00002862034,0.00037326574,0.0019900005,0.00017771391,0.0024411133,0.009427346,0.00001170071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020600907,0.0005748126,0.007530388,0.00093174196,0.00033047274,0.00017338665,0.048923396,0.000018634879,0.0024699026,0.7803083,0.024050413,0.13262846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010446576,0.0046079312,0.039904226,0.023536121,0.0000848111,0.0014276281,0.01059666,0.00044391013,0.00008500125,0.31012666,0.598456,0.00028444137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004541268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005902702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020897368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011559441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99285793},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2460562489","doi":"10.1177/1073110516654123","title":"Raising Genomic Citizens: Adolescents and the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Genomic sequencing; Exome sequencing; Citizenship; Exome; Psychology; Political science; Genome; Genetics; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.06464127320205759,"score_gpt":0.32506131368333774,"score_spread":0.26042004048128015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460562489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9336148,0.0077079064,0.0010014704,0.05466927,0.00036508258,0.00020700475,0.000008428863,0.000010508018,0.002415524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99044406,0.0033546211,0.00014493188,0.0053030066,0.00062870083,4.1170873e-7,8.0039655e-7,0.000021102938,0.00010233604],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806184,0.00036480263,0.00069443416,0.000094447416,0.00057139056,0.00021306514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945595,0.0041474113,0.00051734684,0.0002992933,0.00031664473,0.00015979695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057248473,0.0001517628,0.00054134644,0.00007163946,0.00016904871,0.0000072977346,0.00027937844,0.00015782403,0.00004974053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038322646,0.00005705206,0.00009612056,0.00007726173,0.001932799,0.00006648445,0.00011311826,0.0013900152,0.0000030874512],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.032948863,0.00033516018,0.05011785,0.002596531,0.0020096013,0.000657211,0.10886948,0.000024464282,0.6612528,0.05633271,0.020289171,0.06456614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1641949,0.010350632,0.48420486,0.09522776,0.010500777,0.02687678,0.009127806,0.0002512777,0.04110728,0.11074164,0.04607709,0.0013392075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014087665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017004442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62014556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055077107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022872389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71214783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461217232","doi":"10.1177/1073110516654133","title":"Screening of Newborns for Disorders with High Benefit-Risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Metabolism and Genetic Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Newborn Screening Ontario","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Medicine; Newborn screening; Pediatrics; Psychiatry; Intensive care medicine","score_opus":0.045476121815029795,"score_gpt":0.3209602978835548,"score_spread":0.275484176068525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461217232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6778304,0.006182409,0.2714166,0.042625103,0.00045009292,0.00042292272,0.0000789133,0.000005618314,0.0009879369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883297,0.0057042246,0.0030556829,0.0021353993,0.0004894482,0.0000034521802,0.000009342007,0.00002622762,0.00024652062],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998766,0.00014589622,0.00040610394,0.00011340182,0.00039384564,0.00017477317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841774,0.00035720557,0.00050364423,0.0003022521,0.00033397612,0.00008521541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020153907,0.00014052735,0.00026895115,0.00003581828,0.00012262788,0.0000036948911,0.00031701216,0.00015251814,0.000028260902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004768842,0.00006320237,0.00007737952,0.000053482156,0.0005810289,0.0000071990607,0.000038942333,0.00026754782,1.8806165e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012496044,0.00047805166,0.01407758,0.00053662114,0.0026702234,0.000006559932,0.012579466,0.0036870597,0.70610964,0.07412156,0.02896834,0.14426886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017566586,0.009066401,0.008026644,0.0009508444,0.0019087321,0.00009172368,0.0039390614,0.000032122327,0.13486655,0.017790118,0.805152,0.00060920505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012459583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066020945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77618366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000021328017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012066574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2577318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736362364","doi":"10.1177/1073110517703108","title":"Is There a Particular<i>Ethical Practice and Policy Space</i>in North America for Uncontrolled Kidney Donation after Circulatory Death?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Organ donation; Donation; Kidney donation; Relevance (law); Medicine; Transplantation; Set (abstract data type); Intensive care medicine; Circulatory system; Clinical Practice; Ethical issues; Kidney transplantation; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Family medicine; Surgery; Computer science; Internal medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.051674362174757384,"score_gpt":0.38601001364110094,"score_spread":0.33433565146634353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736362364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24460532,0.0009761593,0.00234807,0.74984634,0.00018054064,0.00046767827,0.000010557712,0.0000086889495,0.0015566134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411615,0.0015162933,0.0004930433,0.056167245,0.0005704947,0.000006785301,0.000004593125,0.000017158862,0.00006286533],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983138,0.00030011463,0.0004573409,0.000106698964,0.0006581963,0.00016385186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677384,0.001467591,0.0005818719,0.00026022902,0.0007019862,0.00021447933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028214166,0.00012922482,0.000364029,0.00009805102,0.00025224715,0.000027953922,0.00012346197,0.00020480888,0.000035960376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068348204,0.000075743155,0.00006999352,0.00008347204,0.00044179085,0.00021102325,0.000013793047,0.0013923218,0.0000023713503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06717192,0.0018940441,0.25181088,0.0044542234,0.0038877246,0.0018476686,0.4379233,0.00021235949,0.01750395,0.194298,0.006461209,0.0125347255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.046868227,0.0032141283,0.694933,0.002535728,0.004477438,0.0023435836,0.0034160896,0.0016338154,0.0007482055,0.011073344,0.22833532,0.00042113694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032817584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032008474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6965562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006714711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004968207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8182412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772204907","doi":"10.1177/1073110517720649","title":"Covering It Up? Questions of Safety, Stigmatization, and Fairness in Covert Medication Administration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Covert; Administration (probate law); Relevance (law); Vulnerability (computing); Perspective (graphical); Health care; Economic Justice; Psychology; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Computer security; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.20895358640771133,"score_gpt":0.5592895013098377,"score_spread":0.35033591490212634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772204907","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043627173,0.0011743595,0.07363331,0.8332676,0.003790477,0.0006836214,0.000010103785,0.000018223353,0.04379508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98733795,0.0067110173,0.0003880344,0.004836023,0.00051118055,0.0000033318743,0.00000422514,0.000013354463,0.00019486455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381965,0.003298305,0.0014264164,0.00009627223,0.0011800862,0.00017929601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97416025,0.021324063,0.0026349383,0.00046477022,0.0012665021,0.00014947233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03846381,0.00010979932,0.0003725433,0.00008372139,0.0016911008,0.000009919469,0.00050649745,0.00043406794,0.00013180768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09588038,0.000070972,0.000021821841,0.00009083057,0.0016052255,0.00049385097,0.00011630657,0.0063940813,0.000003963517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074788154,0.00009927458,0.010421035,0.0015614199,0.000074750016,0.00001541935,0.10552745,0.0001062269,0.0012409996,0.8751302,0.0038591134,0.0012162719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012269204,0.0017047847,0.15813872,0.04395712,0.0011333519,0.00036057658,0.072967686,0.0022506353,0.00051501207,0.59043115,0.11574079,0.00053097855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012791845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043912437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9437108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010725162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011878167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772207902","doi":"10.1177/1073110517720646","title":"Proof in the Pudding: The Value of a Rights Based Approach to Understanding the Covert Administration of Psychotropic Medication to Adult Inpatients Determined to Be Decisionally-Incapable in Ontario's Psychiatric Settings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Confusion; Psychiatry; Administration (probate law); Medicine; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.16693375826699017,"score_gpt":0.4351460414337518,"score_spread":0.2682122831667616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772207902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79400855,0.00004283534,0.014499199,0.18577069,0.0007933109,0.0010952725,0.0000049122355,0.0000027541228,0.0037824628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870061,0.0000063355906,0.00095754914,0.011789297,0.00016854415,0.000022544467,0.000002366485,0.0000134232,0.00003383277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490404,0.0014122826,0.0013972477,0.00022105224,0.001763815,0.0003015818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99297595,0.004252425,0.0012176422,0.0009896943,0.00041492126,0.00014939564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131734675,0.00018381399,0.00042415044,0.00028636615,0.000524061,0.000030769486,0.0017211343,0.00022379357,0.000029259514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035514848,0.0000752348,0.000081783845,0.00043955006,0.00034002372,0.000079276586,0.000054984528,0.0016411823,0.0000017557223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01205571,0.0022801936,0.009345195,0.0002669632,0.00025003657,0.00015427488,0.7920139,0.0038792458,0.0005359659,0.16392705,0.00951951,0.0057719625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016724506,0.018570725,0.5178966,0.012606623,0.0007434176,0.0017877165,0.085911505,0.0025974545,0.00031636812,0.3214775,0.020420277,0.00094731996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012748405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057080816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7061024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022370492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068591913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775059644","doi":"10.1177/1073110516684809","title":"Are Military and Medical Ethics Necessarily Incompatible? A Canadian Case Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Military medical ethics; Ethical code; Loyalty; Institution; Medical ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Core (optical fiber); Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Nursing ethics; Code of conduct; Meta-ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.25750419413091996,"score_gpt":0.5425511529818716,"score_spread":0.28504695885095166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775059644","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3086283,0.0024816082,0.0006368726,0.67993814,0.0023272869,0.0005468463,0.000009357894,0.000024899848,0.005406711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8908123,0.0028858306,0.00015855642,0.10404317,0.0018767567,0.0000063813295,4.0796792e-7,0.00003862459,0.00017797029],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96565485,0.02748388,0.0018583918,0.0002423688,0.004052708,0.0007078237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8112812,0.1820308,0.0014112846,0.0007048031,0.0026968701,0.0018750143],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14743274,0.0002805405,0.00077474536,0.00022376365,0.003686084,0.000005874125,0.00088696706,0.0017612665,0.0010015984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25847062,0.00012787437,0.00005447132,0.00030397286,0.0033252134,0.00030935908,0.0002820403,0.042392306,0.000035879824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076984597,0.00046206944,0.075602725,0.0015149838,0.0006502032,0.041265365,0.7808589,0.0000036933814,0.00006337875,0.054381657,0.04179952,0.002627687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011653152,0.003083198,0.011766845,0.018185075,0.0014306644,0.022022204,0.7146993,0.000074567215,0.000004028781,0.07858994,0.13790491,0.0005860753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4089331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88896745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.582184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034279504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008427735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775648376","doi":"10.1177/1073110516684803","title":"Regulating Information or Allowing Deception? Pharmaceutical Sales Visits in Canada, France, and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; York University","keywords":"Disappointment; Pharmaceutical industry; Public relations; Psychological intervention; Marketing; Deception; Status quo; Viewpoints; Business; Intervention (counseling); Public health; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Psychology","score_opus":0.41414229340718517,"score_gpt":0.5492157354226423,"score_spread":0.13507344201545718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775648376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.679927,0.0013898441,0.00033845502,0.31655866,0.00088604074,0.00032518365,0.000017574977,0.000012501927,0.0005447364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389913,0.0050951703,0.000026404126,0.055378497,0.00040762566,0.0000038382327,0.00000504778,0.000009190626,0.000082937346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955293,0.0025233205,0.0009531066,0.00008030058,0.0005241614,0.0003897994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98625064,0.012484829,0.0004155713,0.00012046982,0.00040922337,0.00031926756],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096416045,0.000175159,0.00035858635,0.00009542066,0.00047502527,0.000011343775,0.0003371486,0.0002980712,0.00030459787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018110592,0.0000699097,0.000034121964,0.0002979077,0.0010592666,0.0003370879,0.00007057001,0.0040720124,0.000005013608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06372875,0.00044292654,0.09342711,0.002405375,0.0022631672,0.0006732564,0.2231151,0.018091429,0.014686125,0.24227113,0.045158986,0.29373664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028038958,0.00045933065,0.009847227,0.0018871434,0.0008072957,0.000946396,0.010697842,0.017920382,0.0035476729,0.008600436,0.91682285,0.00042444342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0455411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077658184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87166387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019750508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080806884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784176741","doi":"10.1177/1073110517750621","title":"Withholding Information on Unapproved Drug Marketing Applications: The Public Has a Right to Know","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical studies and practices","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Transparency (behavior); Food and drug administration; Business; Drug; Regulatory agency; Public health; Health care; Right to know; Medicine; Public relations; Internet privacy; Marketing; Pharmacology; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Nursing; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.19043858330986824,"score_gpt":0.4416201038139402,"score_spread":0.25118152050407194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784176741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0095293615,0.0015135647,0.001236296,0.9319349,0.00038921204,0.0005556762,0.0000015243477,0.000013991282,0.0548255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96120864,0.0021594649,0.00025723805,0.03497753,0.0011689214,0.000013562757,0.0000011549693,0.000010079491,0.00020338022],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792343,0.0003993884,0.0005319059,0.00006839129,0.00086052844,0.00021634379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930184,0.0046628257,0.0009508879,0.0004938758,0.0006720389,0.00020197906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015503162,0.00012979245,0.0002792846,0.00005490294,0.002198358,0.00014325144,0.00056412834,0.00007135934,0.000076088436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009620186,0.00005361144,0.00005916001,0.00011572682,0.00064679416,0.0004971118,0.00012565072,0.0020607293,0.000028400606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014102427,0.0007309218,0.0020696877,0.0017191627,0.0022800686,0.00010091665,0.10904936,0.00012277019,0.0062779514,0.252595,0.2952882,0.31566352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001079052,0.00026638102,0.00084830564,0.0006737385,0.0003304684,0.00020053553,0.0021403208,0.00013141277,0.00026368123,0.0009994362,0.99300236,0.00006432704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009035167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006854417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006653424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001454852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897609641","doi":"10.1177/1073110518804233","title":"Integrating Citizenship, Embodiment, and Relationality: Towards a Reconceptualization of Dance and Dementia in Long-Term Care","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Impact of Dance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Dance; Flourishing; Empowerment; Embodied cognition; Dementia; Psychology; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Creativity; Aesthetics; Psychotherapist; Social psychology; Epistemology; Medicine; Political science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.11061043407246418,"score_gpt":0.40597104822060387,"score_spread":0.2953606141481397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897609641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9689735,0.006487749,0.0015200254,0.0043006856,0.0003719745,0.00008794767,0.000004975672,0.000003384969,0.018249767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980999,0.00037094537,0.00022458872,0.0010819572,0.00016993516,2.1724179e-7,0.000002530522,0.0000045882625,0.000045337656],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988304,0.0003798273,0.00036073322,0.00006930603,0.00026314243,0.00009662052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986613,0.0004415934,0.0004102736,0.00010268659,0.00033675617,0.000047415815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020985901,0.00007247793,0.00019597018,0.000057195866,0.00010199609,0.000006690781,0.00012144381,0.00010077465,0.00015304338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047772322,0.00004852945,0.000015919197,0.00009362391,0.0009423123,0.00010846435,0.000037382222,0.000517479,7.4261595e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057133404,0.000049199956,0.27004674,0.0002393791,0.00027675118,0.000017920507,0.5343518,0.0000037117225,0.00077538274,0.18514891,0.0009009261,0.0076179234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00513741,0.002897061,0.9079849,0.0039196773,0.0005574482,0.0003102011,0.051220145,0.00002629826,0.00081524457,0.026162608,0.0007583963,0.00021062102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023199464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031920397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63793814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001954363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050653132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3471989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909892587","doi":"10.1177/1073110518821975","title":"Myths, Misperceptions, and Policy Learning: Comparing Healthcare in the United States and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Health care; Indigenous; Payment; Health policy; Healthcare system; Control (management); Yield (engineering); Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Economic growth; Business; Economics; History; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.17771413772726555,"score_gpt":0.37668665931358997,"score_spread":0.19897252158632442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909892587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46407354,0.001842645,0.00009286777,0.53152764,0.000110162946,0.0000810593,0.0000035876303,0.0000025241877,0.0022659558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549953,0.008780221,0.000025435766,0.035704523,0.00042879986,6.843082e-7,0.000002439282,0.000006403611,0.000056217585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886215,0.0002648811,0.00051583006,0.00007225532,0.00009604223,0.00018884784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998801,0.000583286,0.00030819324,0.00012215249,0.00009291354,0.000092474875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048979283,0.00007815892,0.00024513973,0.00016539734,0.00031357922,0.000017574048,0.0001736328,0.000054228527,0.000010786396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060190307,0.000048444384,0.000010738389,0.00019351841,0.00036044128,0.00005078116,0.00003995856,0.0010150134,0.0000013466104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047158283,0.000016587943,0.017707618,0.000178,0.000035334382,0.000009622623,0.11367901,0.00012311219,0.000001571341,0.8633798,0.0040670503,0.0007551626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079919124,0.0005475029,0.037361596,0.00024274035,0.000016122493,0.00011802608,0.029632306,0.0012179643,0.0000011849868,0.031610105,0.8983458,0.00010746004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94339526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8156459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89427876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001051406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001510396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44097847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937590025","doi":"10.1177/1073110519840488","title":"Medical Information Commons to Support Learning Healthcare Systems: Examples From Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Health care; Commons; Healthcare system; Medical information; Knowledge management; Public relations; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.13405494210440472,"score_gpt":0.3383294714869853,"score_spread":0.20427452938258056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937590025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1925496,0.0024042563,0.0032678244,0.77294147,0.003916559,0.00048899243,0.00009615629,0.000019859675,0.024315301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96299964,0.0004904434,0.000038694314,0.03587401,0.00043866868,0.0000019411518,0.000015349819,0.000009116632,0.00013213432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784654,0.00021948606,0.0012306743,0.000074532254,0.00037994934,0.00024880734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739504,0.001082652,0.00077329535,0.0002391505,0.00018562257,0.0003242289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073274546,0.00010362948,0.000460397,0.00011159749,0.000167501,0.000020759493,0.00041751,0.00013979877,0.00032504144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015158049,0.00007527182,0.000033026347,0.00013160692,0.00006292843,0.00018964586,0.000074020776,0.0014687369,0.00010941904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006618896,0.000014155482,0.008705501,0.000411573,0.000107041655,0.000015766671,0.027714703,0.0011874184,0.0000012596013,0.9381529,0.0218164,0.0018070622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046875267,0.00043751867,0.0027583772,0.00033945087,0.0000113880815,0.00002921349,0.0040031835,0.0002469254,0.0000015374443,0.002416077,0.9891996,0.00008801755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9369842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55788404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96738315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025739378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069756265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6381013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940062834","doi":"10.1177/1073110519840480","title":"Importance of Participant-Centricity and Trust for a Sustainable Medical Information Commons","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Commons; Trustworthiness; Knowledge management; Participant observation; Public relations; Business; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Social science","score_opus":0.4242096833329446,"score_gpt":0.5541198210985531,"score_spread":0.12991013776560845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940062834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.815903,0.001235207,0.0014765043,0.17328922,0.00022728996,0.000830559,0.000004037769,0.000009788852,0.0070244097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011815,0.0017867459,0.00024865798,0.0072028064,0.00023775458,0.0000030288834,0.0000029846697,0.0000113295955,0.00038853998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514043,0.00031284642,0.0014077147,0.0000820694,0.0027004262,0.00035651386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541303,0.03992743,0.0009161187,0.00044603308,0.004145553,0.0004345497],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04219222,0.000113091,0.0006468652,0.00010232676,0.0001318088,0.0000097214015,0.0003543199,0.00046477237,0.00016607704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10987882,0.00006106526,0.0000911055,0.00021528438,0.0013782601,0.00024390836,0.00013030984,0.0046080244,0.000002844893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047022025,0.0003198541,0.04036053,0.007448062,0.00038500573,0.000079023885,0.023542913,0.000030599418,0.00042181567,0.9173491,0.0044388124,0.00092210976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.055458978,0.034945764,0.059579123,0.018498482,0.0041984534,0.003044912,0.07759646,0.007566008,0.0030763496,0.54636306,0.18889838,0.00077406334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028334372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023406986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37098604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006219372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019165067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961483213","doi":"10.1177/1073110519857281","title":"Vexed Again: Social Scientists and the Revision of the Common Rule, 2011-2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Rulemaking; Notice; Process (computing); Political science; Common Rule; Law; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.38935832497596984,"score_gpt":0.5582775848073637,"score_spread":0.16891925983139383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961483213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5020812,0.0035667599,0.00004553328,0.47667116,0.0013740578,0.000610866,0.0000032432495,0.000006366633,0.015640829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806654,0.0047003045,0.00008866298,0.01181366,0.0008745906,4.3957579e-7,6.8028874e-7,0.000020100659,0.0018361834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926739,0.0020272222,0.0011005548,0.00014342538,0.0037864218,0.00026848627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95192814,0.044065967,0.0010778955,0.00084893877,0.0019145863,0.00016444523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06598111,0.00014500221,0.00073512446,0.00006264613,0.00049010856,0.00001701215,0.0009372938,0.00046137805,0.00018927813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0237157,0.000051820974,0.00019568326,0.00025595547,0.007748598,0.00006901057,0.00040920568,0.008754232,0.000018589712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010109286,0.0004267789,0.008721786,0.0035521833,0.00068034924,0.000059519658,0.07451155,0.000015956392,0.01637639,0.83461124,0.044526655,0.0064082965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04944235,0.007318333,0.0733862,0.029448712,0.0034087338,0.0020461266,0.011675862,0.00051080645,0.00480902,0.6646755,0.15271275,0.00056564907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026765614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015681694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47858417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006108489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975460762","doi":"10.1177/1073110519876166","title":"Cochrane's Linked Data Project: How it Can Advance our Understanding of Surrogate Endpoints","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cochrane","funders":"","keywords":"Surrogate endpoint; Data science; Computer science; Real world evidence; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.23744184286441605,"score_gpt":0.42571706817732763,"score_spread":0.18827522531291158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975460762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48665985,0.020203501,0.025060363,0.45455313,0.0048193703,0.0008453073,0.00018209302,0.000037376496,0.0076390128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390876,0.0028681378,0.00077105453,0.0015731758,0.00045821903,3.3318966e-7,0.000027840422,0.000014291378,0.00037818024],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839497,0.0003094939,0.00038611627,0.00015307896,0.0005504003,0.0002059719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981315,0.00040580315,0.0005259474,0.00061141094,0.0002508938,0.000074415664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039885975,0.00013573696,0.00036336263,0.00004215965,0.000078632125,0.0000074033424,0.00082295685,0.00025587733,0.0000080206455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00216364,0.00007686733,0.000051363906,0.000100522,0.0005061442,0.00000770249,0.0001984908,0.00085099094,9.01421e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026425945,0.00026842882,0.0014312249,0.0015810875,0.0011478214,0.00011392079,0.02542834,0.00013490596,0.8892566,0.008558265,0.064071044,0.0053657936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01590734,0.01526033,0.00061208557,0.008825695,0.0013236727,0.0023030774,0.18491855,0.0007235795,0.078862526,0.00830345,0.68173486,0.0012248327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008683589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002813201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81039405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002377613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003319517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36971796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000954021","doi":"10.1177/1073110519897725","title":"Introduction: The Promise and Challenges of Microbiome-Based Therapies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Care Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Microbiome; MEDLINE; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Engineering ethics; Political science; Biology; Bioinformatics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.09625654422923012,"score_gpt":0.3497844612953316,"score_spread":0.25352791706610145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000954021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5644771,0.025233446,0.000007235178,0.40881768,0.00024215602,0.00025953987,0.0000014373121,0.0000050792264,0.00095633126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811422,0.015737277,0.000050244147,0.0012076872,0.0015389214,0.0000014151251,0.0000012148881,0.000018110262,0.00030290513],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803895,0.0003679258,0.00049746846,0.00011119845,0.000796373,0.00018808444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969541,0.0014315462,0.00033055313,0.00044394212,0.00074615836,0.00009373352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004801484,0.00014078946,0.00045064377,0.00009940889,0.00011814781,0.0000073285,0.00024914122,0.00013184697,0.00025042964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000550615,0.000059817856,0.00008481343,0.00018054756,0.0011337211,0.0000445697,0.000045674624,0.0014750476,0.000006605106],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005098648,0.0004569412,0.00041042975,0.002388503,0.00076900824,0.00003804381,0.037064757,0.00004517312,0.91874856,0.018397786,0.0072928076,0.00928934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013675588,0.012825824,0.0033632957,0.0030082525,0.0014564113,0.0032277,0.028107721,0.00013148515,0.3667949,0.0013588597,0.5657154,0.00033456035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006489353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017028065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55842257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038475526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031962257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.640843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090656846","doi":"10.1177/1073110520958885","title":"An International Review of Health Technology Assessment Approaches to Prescription Drugs and Their Ethical Principles","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical prescription; Engineering ethics; Health technology; Medicine; Political science; Pharmacology; Health care; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.8274912017830598,"score_gpt":0.5740674379051287,"score_spread":0.2534237638779311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090656846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007709383,0.6244596,0.0035308278,0.37020838,0.00042750663,0.00071613956,0.00006338476,0.000008849,0.0005776069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00042348527,0.958849,0.0021961129,0.037733834,0.0006899912,0.000027942971,0.000027138547,0.000036538295,0.000015957412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858725,0.0037233524,0.00939996,0.0003698979,0.00037494875,0.000259354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846489,0.0031006294,0.011118137,0.00059821404,0.00026956003,0.00026454925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11190385,0.00031712596,0.004429066,0.00043001055,0.00016887262,0.000021560827,0.0010701831,0.00063470687,0.0000592194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008905109,0.00021566632,0.00020616644,0.00030097086,0.000453072,0.00018486453,0.00015668929,0.003708364,0.000014449978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010291017,0.00006903854,0.000029742447,0.098225914,0.00038653248,9.0718595e-7,0.011904802,0.000009746047,9.224911e-8,0.8115272,0.0023059654,0.075529784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020892179,0.00053741393,0.000023183056,0.07061023,0.00010034103,0.00010371681,0.0016791695,0.000103783874,7.028625e-8,0.005455678,0.9210313,0.00014618007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001354745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020408546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9187254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056840683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013919562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091337524","doi":"10.1177/1073110520958875","title":"Structural Racism and Maternal Health Among Black Women","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Racial and Ethnic Identity Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Care Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Racism; Black women; Gender studies; Inequality; Health equity; Public health; Sociology; Maternal health; Political science; Medicine; Demography; Health services; Politics; Population; Nursing","score_opus":0.19118519526909733,"score_gpt":0.45906945995590076,"score_spread":0.26788426468680343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091337524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7405666,0.0004893168,0.000034412566,0.2549075,0.00020656094,0.00007689193,8.091551e-7,0.0000068909835,0.003711046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98779464,0.0022528204,0.0000169835,0.007707731,0.0017189754,2.533417e-7,1.5488142e-7,0.00000599821,0.00050246087],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698836,0.0010080405,0.00036308944,0.00006570512,0.0012564965,0.00031833348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835414,0.000563905,0.00028468654,0.00006845689,0.00025640512,0.00047241373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009480104,0.00007157831,0.0002554109,0.000029486811,0.0007375309,0.000049147035,0.00040131542,0.000092582064,0.00024205331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001335266,0.000040413826,0.000029246254,0.0001573538,0.002476869,0.00023298328,0.00006704017,0.0015273078,0.000006934568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016518433,0.0000051199067,0.0029965509,0.00009895891,0.000042689324,0.000028645774,0.96522397,0.000017253971,0.00012187602,0.024165243,0.0035485844,0.003585942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050287587,0.0049592233,0.16170315,0.0013018228,0.00016811673,0.00022038404,0.46096322,0.0007458658,0.00014418234,0.16969657,0.19446597,0.00060272997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009129857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021276213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5042607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000832561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035653624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120023054","doi":"10.1177/1073110520979383","title":"An Ethicolegal Analysis of Involuntary Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Autonomy; Psychological intervention; Commit; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Medical prescription; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Nursing","score_opus":0.13796347795550903,"score_gpt":0.4025239392578303,"score_spread":0.26456046130232125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120023054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8350457,0.0034081626,0.006391485,0.15287407,0.00035085104,0.0014714797,0.00008826452,0.00003091437,0.00033906952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857312,0.002551993,0.0017772027,0.009365025,0.00040315933,0.0000148272875,0.00008230731,0.000038858914,0.000035441586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728227,0.00042164794,0.0009546915,0.00018726094,0.00090364553,0.00025047592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570024,0.0021346684,0.0006469907,0.0004745899,0.0006566738,0.00038684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016041213,0.00027344242,0.0011474804,0.00022027733,0.00014998288,0.000010077253,0.0002804957,0.00022341196,0.00008348895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088033464,0.00014770728,0.00044310736,0.00062616594,0.0005500348,0.00018164753,0.000025308298,0.00092130894,0.0000011431969],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023924302,0.0067136856,0.08777913,0.0021037864,0.044665467,0.00019157871,0.7505863,0.010537822,0.040284272,0.022542898,0.002974358,0.0076964446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07075621,0.19275717,0.13360316,0.0031811458,0.28981215,0.00034819893,0.082211405,0.023467142,0.017933713,0.00729304,0.17701824,0.0016184296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022951881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010971647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66837484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001376335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005622773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6023328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120260298","doi":"10.1177/1073110520979391","title":"Generic Competition for Drugs Treating Rare Diseases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Internet privacy; Business; Content (measure theory); Computer science; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.23318470178039563,"score_gpt":0.37127673689967505,"score_spread":0.13809203511927942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120260298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10976196,0.018984096,0.020424927,0.80174494,0.0014026564,0.00048369783,0.00043907567,0.000036056048,0.046722617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94669586,0.0015346191,0.00023704763,0.049512397,0.0019483424,0.0000022765407,0.000007659994,0.000018204302,0.000043580654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989384,0.000049426333,0.0007035479,0.00009235745,0.000052930736,0.00016332611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803734,0.000948254,0.00061888114,0.00010689835,0.00008727072,0.000201384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011451861,0.00010161465,0.0003978352,0.00004346568,0.00016736223,0.000018639364,0.00026696202,0.00006860667,0.00019394363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000739831,0.00007377878,0.0001171393,0.000089111774,0.00019395209,0.000114199654,0.000029861316,0.0005059908,0.000024629842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015656333,0.000031116662,0.00032847948,0.00012571088,0.00008811449,0.0000025059674,0.009062247,0.00044036537,0.00010044813,0.9844147,0.004343164,0.0009066073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027910043,0.0007444367,0.00025028715,0.000120067496,0.00015428431,0.000028860586,0.0011595646,0.010363831,0.00015232086,0.20703144,0.77698785,0.00021607964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007642897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065263125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8369339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004436878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047336984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30086112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121469507","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00514.x","title":"Reconsidering the Harvard Medical Practice Study Conclusions about the Validity of Medical Malpractice Claims","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malpractice; Carelessness; Medical malpractice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Medical practice; Medical care; State (computer science); Medicine; Law; Psychology; Psychiatry; Family medicine; Political science; History","score_opus":0.5355825756509609,"score_gpt":0.5724324643415336,"score_spread":0.03684988869057271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121469507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12027207,0.0009388175,0.00062751066,0.8635051,0.0024163618,0.00097577495,0.0000030513488,0.00002849716,0.011232765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87375635,0.006147305,0.0002508528,0.1131095,0.0063786926,0.000019730613,0.000001206924,0.000034987952,0.00030136254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544036,0.031566974,0.0036062817,0.00026555796,0.009435804,0.0007218055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70198447,0.2885495,0.0041470313,0.0015127897,0.0028927375,0.00091349194],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16742423,0.0003148884,0.0010020128,0.00007395673,0.0026234398,0.000021435035,0.002509286,0.0008669905,0.010732667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31586847,0.000121765246,0.00017868383,0.00042422404,0.0031132295,0.00064265874,0.0008192777,0.020399524,0.0001661199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002255208,0.0029984736,0.0047885855,0.0007233169,0.0013464015,0.0004912318,0.70166945,0.000058675756,0.00011295346,0.09790616,0.17836049,0.009289072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020224391,0.0009974563,0.0007711511,0.0015624238,0.0012222856,0.00082557515,0.21128051,0.0001877633,0.000014102071,0.0017525059,0.7792495,0.00011430196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016142966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037870542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7534843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014368944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038039896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121800677","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12001","title":"Global Health Challenges and the Role of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Political science; Business; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.1015183902886111,"score_gpt":0.3852011302931682,"score_spread":0.2836827400045571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121800677","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0106255235,0.02784397,0.000033664815,0.86041534,0.00039121162,0.00018301501,7.1731387e-7,0.000008704702,0.10049787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79679096,0.008048962,0.000026450653,0.19346267,0.00165428,0.0000013004045,4.808381e-7,0.0000059902277,0.00000892249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981444,0.00034065862,0.00075090886,0.00006759189,0.00038355376,0.00031286903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969424,0.0012834482,0.001017598,0.00020275246,0.00050526415,0.00004852535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011918616,0.00011560028,0.0005228102,0.000030601084,0.00026802384,0.000017403387,0.00038091006,0.00010861906,0.00004217633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012682576,0.000048823553,0.000052860672,0.00010137031,0.0013354495,0.0002806107,0.00013286166,0.00065002544,0.000008754586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004363017,0.000011801905,0.000041676238,0.0001392167,0.000026945152,3.3453995e-7,0.0014799815,0.000030302916,0.000001759621,0.97601104,0.01849404,0.003719278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080534467,0.000084431864,0.0014312689,0.00014897065,0.00004321478,0.000042270785,0.003679674,0.00039065653,1.8734906e-7,0.33671537,0.65662146,0.000037136873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07930171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019671554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7861654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026543517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083100276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9268293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175559548","doi":"10.1017/jme.2021.42","title":"COVID-19 Antibody Testing as a Precondition for Employment: Ethical and Legal Considerations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Food and drug administration; Serology; Precondition; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Work (physics); Antibody; Virology; Business; Political science; Medicine; Immunology; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.2514708373460529,"score_gpt":0.5056952669169672,"score_spread":0.2542244295709143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175559548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3371758,0.0032405013,0.008810213,0.64205545,0.0004776224,0.00074531534,0.000013823491,0.000047183712,0.0074341167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.551649,0.000060178034,0.00083553704,0.44664103,0.00073245,0.000005761968,0.000005058747,0.000018775,0.00005224548],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974567,0.0005683548,0.00063233956,0.00016252592,0.0009212383,0.00025882284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831084,0.014428988,0.00028391584,0.00024783905,0.0016951768,0.00023564932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006539748,0.00014694006,0.00043948286,0.00010881909,0.0005616569,0.000045208388,0.00010213501,0.0003348052,0.000066968125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05602394,0.000092164904,0.000082206425,0.00021107096,0.00086756516,0.000115517156,0.000056588382,0.003050543,0.0000034130196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019783082,0.00043107252,0.0028765574,0.0018904452,0.00073250715,0.0030085356,0.024431333,0.000028889928,0.6192917,0.33030176,0.01407034,0.0009585367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016157323,0.0075462214,0.0011868117,0.0026341097,0.0019323529,0.061325986,0.006092489,0.0010350513,0.05388208,0.15189868,0.69591933,0.00038956653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040814638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002497419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.681849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011836628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004458254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205841084","doi":"10.1017/jme.2021.67","title":"Transparency of Regulatory Data across the European Medicines Agency, Health Canada, and US Food and Drug Administration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation; National Institutes of Health; Laura and John Arnold Foundation; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Yale University","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Food and drug administration; Agency (philosophy); Business; Regulatory agency; Regulatory science; European union; Regulatory authority; Public administration; Accounting; Medicine; Political science; International trade; Law; Risk analysis (engineering)","score_opus":0.5240008201947381,"score_gpt":0.48388874018134787,"score_spread":0.04011208001339028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205841084","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41882753,0.03878427,0.00057894306,0.5396086,0.00063659647,0.0001878846,0.00026413187,0.0000037141222,0.0011083478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96932775,0.004699947,0.00015098588,0.02515998,0.00056554255,6.363331e-7,0.000017236493,0.000015024262,0.00006289608],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938334,0.001979447,0.0034633635,0.00020443022,0.00030639095,0.00021296633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292254,0.0029487086,0.0030412448,0.0006856817,0.00021812046,0.00018367908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07578414,0.00012451186,0.00072619587,0.000035878555,0.000375151,0.000017102502,0.00045182277,0.000057103854,0.00002808413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00434472,0.00008612255,0.000026063677,0.0001052785,0.0005644628,0.00020473967,0.00007417755,0.0006704138,9.3542764e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021050725,0.00024605438,0.03661706,0.006420055,0.0010151644,0.00006280386,0.46701634,0.00018314898,0.00009324938,0.26810458,0.21392426,0.0061067655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006129478,0.002180198,0.5010286,0.003989281,0.00030498972,0.0018075181,0.06837979,0.00087450625,0.000103033075,0.041675154,0.37281343,0.00071400165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08102035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51993525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5505002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009240622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015171247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206412302","doi":"10.1017/jme.2021.68","title":"Global Regulatory Agencies and Data Transparency","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Agency (philosophy); Regulatory agency; Business; Data sharing; Political science; Accounting; Public administration; Public economics; Medicine; Economics; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8939189795273863,"score_gpt":0.6979534736274279,"score_spread":0.19596550589995843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206412302","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008583707,0.9701825,0.00017123282,0.0224639,0.0008020496,0.00036157772,0.00006531172,0.0000121591165,0.005932704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00010189378,0.99377227,0.00050908356,0.002676774,0.00216921,0.0000016250672,0.00006118066,0.0000496413,0.000658344],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895143,0.0024558585,0.0026027795,0.00043849272,0.004573725,0.000414857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9236661,0.06711659,0.0018187641,0.0036491412,0.002940575,0.0008087884],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05678276,0.00042981503,0.0034291507,0.00010418904,0.00025721043,0.000026640046,0.002076301,0.0019403618,0.0002149872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067530684,0.00021280894,0.00034842527,0.0005297585,0.0039657815,0.00012409937,0.0006910812,0.01785862,0.000006087692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026651516,0.00026978026,0.000042553525,0.17134085,0.0035144105,0.0029019576,0.0063617034,0.0000011422586,0.0000029792632,0.23038135,0.023936834,0.5609799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006120421,0.00067247974,0.000016035214,0.1324898,0.0067309104,0.0049051424,0.0005019261,0.0000018351711,2.2424167e-7,0.008781045,0.8451386,0.00014996089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014474327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062967726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82120174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002591459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011514174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234020633","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00686.x","title":"Medical Responsibility","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Obligation; Moral obligation; Politics; Order (exchange); Heading (navigation); Moral responsibility; Health care; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Public relations; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.27642298134357546,"score_gpt":0.46277725381702567,"score_spread":0.1863542724734502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234020633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7470795,0.00572327,0.0009393174,0.20543157,0.0015812708,0.0002007641,0.000001549426,0.000024277451,0.039018482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741036,0.00056698476,0.00023562457,0.022755966,0.002123479,3.8975412e-7,0.0000014799076,0.000012186021,0.00020024859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597883,0.0010413086,0.0006925602,0.00005989501,0.0019328651,0.000294523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355745,0.004540102,0.00034318172,0.00041915834,0.0005184544,0.00062165974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022269735,0.00012416745,0.00042700514,0.00007111093,0.00016712953,0.000002835447,0.0003168444,0.00027879997,0.0008664296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017665602,0.000059998983,0.00010190065,0.0001725855,0.00096235436,0.00016701387,0.00007162788,0.0031856967,0.00003186438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02602329,0.004358244,0.09997809,0.0018134995,0.0016535876,0.0009526292,0.40369567,0.000009518691,0.01740158,0.3087629,0.1111174,0.024233572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009615317,0.005763903,0.058666073,0.0037450183,0.0019541883,0.011937846,0.0042683915,0.00004813477,0.0037976902,0.022289867,0.8775711,0.0003424623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007859886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015575128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060004437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005369823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250240811","doi":"10.1017/s1073110500024499","title":"JME volume 45 issue S4 Cover and Front matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Front cover; Front (military); Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Meteorology; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.10829060572501566,"score_gpt":0.2986840027683809,"score_spread":0.19039339704336528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250240811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03429164,0.0062608793,0.00042315986,0.11082979,0.0066175414,0.00011231588,0.000056629677,0.0000059798726,0.84140205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67983496,0.0034097352,0.00016185264,0.008662978,0.001269961,8.5896954e-7,7.166888e-7,0.000018026565,0.30664092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902934,0.000028122098,0.0005548278,0.00013016911,0.00007725032,0.00018031472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829036,0.00018082985,0.00094885915,0.00040425223,0.00008648431,0.00008923572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00439907,0.00010863053,0.00044219047,0.000057089306,0.0006012833,0.000086902895,0.00049630704,0.00009438668,0.013682549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004083282,0.00007364277,0.00005913389,0.0000148940235,0.0010467379,0.00030779722,0.00015700537,0.00057396706,0.008631932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051527695,0.00002256713,0.0137159955,0.00003812104,0.00016440041,0.000010526478,0.0155777205,0.000020199393,0.000008461703,0.035710894,0.93452644,0.0001531342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007081925,0.00009239767,0.010792713,0.000073395015,0.000043009222,0.00003978896,0.0008759541,0.000107804044,0.0000058438836,0.011593852,0.97556716,0.00009989488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006637293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029700352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64554334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037987404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018850444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99213994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252486837","doi":"10.1017/s1073110500023718","title":"JME volume 48 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.10817167758748349,"score_gpt":0.2747878275354767,"score_spread":0.16661614994799323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252486837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01789417,0.011981081,0.0015202513,0.32107627,0.004564041,0.00014880528,0.000079215395,0.000012379855,0.6427238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72592694,0.0035372684,0.0003282193,0.081771776,0.0022830346,0.0000011310028,0.0000017783296,0.00003052256,0.18611936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903196,0.000033609133,0.0005806691,0.00012611227,0.00007370883,0.00015392683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990223,0.00018004363,0.00047485423,0.00013520189,0.00006769508,0.00011992894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023460118,0.00010084165,0.00042257068,0.00004179183,0.00015778393,0.000027743416,0.0002556599,0.00007383859,0.027215878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030129295,0.000069306545,0.00005408146,0.000050349267,0.00050887873,0.00016755481,0.00009250497,0.0005685259,0.019971766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045100143,0.000010267397,0.0024857074,0.000034416076,0.00009641163,0.0000060052444,0.026810884,0.000039942843,0.000009172644,0.013059978,0.9573519,0.000050180424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005765279,0.00011307758,0.00094988727,0.000034289576,0.0000375406,0.000022980037,0.0017332776,0.00028726982,0.0000057727016,0.003193096,0.9929609,0.00008543227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016700778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004145015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7080327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027645421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017419678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288071708","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.47","title":"The Influence of the Commercial Speech Doctrine on the Development of Tobacco Control Measures","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property Rights and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tobacco control; Doctrine; Tobacco industry; Convention; Legislation; Negotiation; Control (management); Political science; Business; European union; International trade; Law; Economics; Medicine; Public health; Management","score_opus":0.14513653011864405,"score_gpt":0.36370291967393203,"score_spread":0.21856638955528798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288071708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7201163,0.00067362556,0.00004058783,0.25714594,0.0011410306,0.0004638378,0.0000029540058,0.0000048354154,0.020410895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925383,0.00030712064,0.00001387551,0.006277244,0.00039551427,0.0000030596534,9.023899e-8,0.000006233976,0.00045856577],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941316,0.0024875195,0.0006894438,0.000057368798,0.0024140368,0.00021999866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98925793,0.008895524,0.00070758647,0.0002687547,0.00081102556,0.00005917483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024259597,0.00010105049,0.00026531518,0.000027656934,0.002777676,0.000011795392,0.0015122923,0.00006179448,0.00017083042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067670913,0.000029339964,0.00008889463,0.0002661064,0.0024583363,0.00004240919,0.000113943126,0.0019425327,0.0000015580948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001278194,0.00014550149,0.0003028363,0.000017712082,0.00026303084,0.0000046701684,0.67642224,0.0009723982,0.003701197,0.29512367,0.007819657,0.013948929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010124998,0.00073452236,0.001670213,0.00029493577,0.0001712178,0.000020824458,0.035816986,0.000009232421,0.004031554,0.008419167,0.9477155,0.00010331495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014582983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056090336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93989587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010298753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012374278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288071802","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.52","title":"Balancing the Scales: The Role of the Canadian Supreme Court in Weighing Commercial Speech and Public Health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); Law; Commercial speech; Political science; Public health; First amendment; Medicine","score_opus":0.08208112767814006,"score_gpt":0.34503462867861423,"score_spread":0.26295350100047415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288071802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1261888,0.003726195,0.000068306246,0.85847276,0.0013338253,0.00033204877,0.000008411926,0.000005218573,0.009864439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842911,0.0006396626,0.000010372333,0.014133438,0.00084847776,0.0000013310266,4.1805603e-7,0.000008110052,0.00006712981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941699,0.0034014364,0.0004947334,0.00007173612,0.0014661257,0.0003960891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966976,0.0021763192,0.00047304385,0.0002508496,0.00021149151,0.00019069202],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030691765,0.000089550536,0.00026128703,0.00005715907,0.0044654678,0.000044109376,0.0011963597,0.0000788345,0.00007788104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008750646,0.000034703855,0.000057241075,0.00039495956,0.010648694,0.00011342728,0.000117925505,0.002512681,3.109383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001525348,0.000020711397,0.00716022,0.000008848006,0.000024500476,0.0000038348703,0.3613604,0.00002952359,0.000023076136,0.62749344,0.0018317582,0.0020284513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008254622,0.0002658821,0.0076475255,0.00020863967,0.00006908534,0.00013276974,0.25901896,0.00016661844,0.000012189218,0.08692676,0.64460796,0.00011812894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45372766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9095689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85810226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038131198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00241216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309506518","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.98","title":"Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy: In Whose Interests?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Mitochondrial Function and Pathology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill Genome Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.06827368115008718,"score_gpt":0.34954615230449154,"score_spread":0.28127247115440435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309506518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357234,0.004792014,0.0023981496,0.041443132,0.009373579,0.00040878143,0.000007353557,0.0000073817205,0.0058462103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785881,0.0014040145,0.00021294996,0.01610557,0.0024513253,0.000009443428,0.000015146063,0.000021140455,0.0011922807],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978374,0.0010706468,0.0004471408,0.00011173587,0.00037391132,0.00015916741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990649,0.0001813688,0.00028141233,0.00028134155,0.00012982107,0.00006112656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029693376,0.00010227294,0.00019197974,0.0000588028,0.00016008079,0.000004403301,0.00034403845,0.00010440729,0.0004219111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005109123,0.000063664505,0.00006595967,0.00009250527,0.00020477496,0.0000030879341,0.00012516305,0.0011978527,0.000002040938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009565322,0.00019029234,0.0004166131,0.000013512358,0.000104061546,0.000060094113,0.010599181,0.00060592825,0.9242634,0.0040253457,0.04918414,0.000972107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046262234,0.007949849,0.00009950029,0.000037064252,0.000037486207,0.0008086418,0.0022228095,0.00001156573,0.012261811,0.0011010483,0.97072643,0.000117587246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008937793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002069714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9215423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032014177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001701077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52041405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309512763","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.94","title":"Revisiting the Ethics of Circumvention Tourism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Tourism; Morality; Context (archaeology); Medical tourism; Political science; Law; Abortion; Public relations; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.19130663454933897,"score_gpt":0.4262815866412449,"score_spread":0.23497495209190591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309512763","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012928799,0.016300777,0.0002309402,0.9754683,0.0016270054,0.0004665691,0.000005994355,0.000033900855,0.0045736777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038313705,0.015618573,0.0002584019,0.9186251,0.025964621,0.000008989099,0.000030899875,0.00008632952,0.0010933453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229896,0.002420326,0.0016680629,0.00022810632,0.0029888304,0.00039569236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856611,0.008311993,0.0030768774,0.0011788529,0.0016991878,0.000072002345],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028996201,0.00030091315,0.001137705,0.00024100585,0.0006407919,0.000008335306,0.00087510224,0.0013417447,0.00028580276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01798626,0.00014061647,0.0003091957,0.00041199208,0.0019708702,0.00006494294,0.00019440679,0.044703875,0.000002680707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000639862,0.000052381278,0.00010346275,0.006215925,0.00074041047,0.0013182872,0.018070038,0.000018141463,0.0008249836,0.015047326,0.9492189,0.0077502434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007404244,0.0014385366,0.00015531793,0.003646267,0.0013045958,0.003002611,0.0025946517,0.0000029922344,0.00019918606,0.014124161,0.97267467,0.00011656378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032018035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000382822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05684312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018656068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001163018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309515964","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.85","title":"<i>Trans</i>porting the Burden of Justification: The Unethicality of Transgender Conversion Practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Transgender; Gender identity; Presentation (obstetrics); Identity (music); Transition (genetics); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Gender studies; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.30221281733851285,"score_gpt":0.49792881413414253,"score_spread":0.19571599679562968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309515964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16012771,0.0052844184,0.00084512366,0.8156196,0.0020806831,0.00033168422,0.000016266658,0.000008468776,0.015686063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99126464,0.0013586011,0.00001853401,0.005785655,0.0011482621,0.0000026831367,0.0000019339857,0.00001235887,0.00040732804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298084,0.004257838,0.0011923317,0.000101220176,0.0012654411,0.0002023084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98863804,0.0070621697,0.0031314362,0.00054312503,0.00055575895,0.00006948608],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025706328,0.0001095748,0.00032679402,0.000050014678,0.0008154057,0.0000060236816,0.00095209747,0.00014638536,0.000921458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012040923,0.00005044409,0.00012285209,0.00030631365,0.0012884686,0.00007559602,0.00004744835,0.0038064658,0.0000017853893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017436971,0.00035750185,0.0012643926,0.0019698339,0.0006140764,0.000023962806,0.7914463,0.0014747189,0.008604681,0.15689652,0.034256827,0.0013474631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004447354,0.0026415351,0.009610106,0.0002719743,0.005010798,0.0015223281,0.1861783,0.00024728113,0.00042508068,0.03667224,0.75267833,0.00029468597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014729998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018868063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83113694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003498729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004004074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642543","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.75","title":"A Pandemic Instrument Can Start Turning Collective Problems into Collective Solutions by Governing the Common-Pool Resource of Antimicrobial Effectiveness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Novo Nordisk Fonden; Novo Nordisk; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada; University of Cambridge; Wellcome Trust; York University; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Pandemic; Resource (disambiguation); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.040764436500346675,"score_gpt":0.2870752564154143,"score_spread":0.24631081991506765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9769577,0.008389797,0.001172362,0.010591456,0.00082519714,0.0007255846,0.000092946495,0.000019057748,0.001225901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977991,0.0002874801,0.0000112318585,0.0011367246,0.000060042163,0.000006387383,0.000014904018,0.000019394101,0.00066472875],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945567,0.0040564844,0.00064091425,0.00014582227,0.00027639378,0.0003236858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934879,0.004962804,0.0009866288,0.00023823178,0.00029368416,0.000030729956],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067768274,0.00019131807,0.0005683151,0.000076663906,0.0024984772,0.0000069604685,0.0005823999,0.00017569377,0.00006841716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057545677,0.000105928324,0.00011290385,0.00041456398,0.0017341636,0.000045183235,0.00026731082,0.0034796705,0.0000013914591],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033962214,0.00034325826,0.0026290754,0.00023306349,0.0016446282,0.000013380381,0.18798535,0.004032859,0.77915394,0.0018330899,0.018433703,0.00030142858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03640396,0.021858238,0.01012898,0.01062996,0.0056367023,0.006376635,0.21795414,0.00025684788,0.27337548,0.012344717,0.4032445,0.0017898194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019085743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007460089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50577843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006070539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009801873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642547","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.30","title":"Embed Multisectoral Governance Mechanisms in the Pandemic Instrument for One Health Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada; Government of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Pandemic; Action (physics); Corporate governance; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.2878280212821326,"score_gpt":0.45025932720554607,"score_spread":0.16243130592341348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2132044,0.0026602445,0.008899703,0.7705389,0.002019516,0.0017197382,0.000042896478,0.000022689817,0.00089189265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94585323,0.0012345018,0.0005312561,0.051640414,0.0006184302,0.000020332027,0.000010323723,0.000016509955,0.00007502605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655706,0.0009489813,0.0007422461,0.00010253293,0.0013421904,0.00030697876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735695,0.0012984985,0.0007246649,0.00026452666,0.00016690732,0.00018846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014108253,0.00011908889,0.00043210856,0.00005371179,0.00040827604,0.000007393807,0.00031073508,0.00006322391,0.00021164416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074313773,0.00006270026,0.00009250075,0.00021797602,0.00013190949,0.0000715068,0.000040664025,0.002109007,6.5306654e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010271165,0.0028399846,0.0017062911,0.0025841463,0.00048384006,0.00010324355,0.14232965,0.0012385215,0.0021644328,0.6895313,0.022785543,0.123961836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.050415155,0.04913732,0.06300219,0.00426251,0.0015346817,0.005212478,0.12486433,0.0055466564,0.00012910017,0.119747505,0.5754605,0.0006875501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017742052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006688541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7326488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048404685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013832727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91627026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642548","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.73","title":"<b>Introduction:</b> AMR Belongs in the Pandemic Instrument","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Pandemic; Political science; Scholarship; Corporate governance; Preparedness; Negotiation; Public health; Multidisciplinary approach; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Inclusion (mineral); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Social science; Law; Business; Disease; Engineering; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing","score_opus":0.1029098664113411,"score_gpt":0.3796279557966257,"score_spread":0.27671808938528464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26332575,0.0019874643,0.00006599117,0.7230444,0.0013496284,0.00015878021,7.333448e-7,0.000009250612,0.010057993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98198307,0.0019555686,0.000018099872,0.011708532,0.0037883776,0.000003036888,6.0568027e-7,0.0000059261583,0.0005368152],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959517,0.0019699312,0.0004266526,0.00007047062,0.0013790826,0.00020217664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980781,0.0012046862,0.00031163677,0.00019331816,0.00016157865,0.00005064995],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019478282,0.00007415372,0.0001869292,0.000061020593,0.0013242825,0.000016485094,0.0007375094,0.000054984743,0.00088356284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008642518,0.000038233746,0.000054565728,0.00038389317,0.00017181278,0.00014094416,0.000058539223,0.0023657382,0.0000039456327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018556336,0.00011586891,0.005373676,0.000015018068,0.000040804855,0.00006396397,0.64731383,0.00029963226,0.00022689746,0.2773002,0.06574066,0.0033238356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006664208,0.00043594526,0.0027972476,0.000035536137,0.0000807732,0.00023206246,0.09005695,0.0000039566003,0.000006368525,0.02763435,0.8779869,0.000063474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00200816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039666775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81224626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001784644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039977193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642552","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.74","title":"Antimicrobial Resistance Must Be Included in the Pandemic Instrument to Ensure Future Global Pandemic Readiness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada; Government of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Pandemic; Stewardship (theology); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Business; Antimicrobial stewardship; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Dual (grammatical number); Political science; Antibiotic resistance; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.10752285550702846,"score_gpt":0.39697916341275397,"score_spread":0.2894563079057255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5613379,0.0014547704,0.00006025332,0.43009463,0.001188888,0.0005126115,0.000046849313,0.000017568436,0.0052865585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921655,0.0008840137,0.00008822203,0.104874745,0.0018112155,0.000007098355,0.000016026383,0.000016960987,0.00013624027],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514556,0.0014755192,0.0009962332,0.00018097616,0.0017624155,0.0004392972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974121,0.0008992801,0.0004850452,0.000517551,0.00035163882,0.00033440389],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013320406,0.00021970377,0.00061988883,0.00010140792,0.0005126965,0.000016589363,0.0007646355,0.00015887838,0.00020510821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009512448,0.00011239215,0.00011251456,0.00080135517,0.0003086492,0.00007539888,0.0001692096,0.003407221,0.0000017996191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026999274,0.0026689973,0.071707666,0.002752843,0.0008440499,0.0026613304,0.29683137,0.0012672052,0.0027195977,0.14229722,0.41805023,0.031200226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074960655,0.0020388928,0.035817847,0.001321197,0.00066278694,0.00487341,0.043733228,0.0000221446,0.00000761667,0.0033647707,0.900384,0.00027801434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069407455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018823966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4823338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005364737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015579772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642620","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.80","title":"Governance Processes and Challenges for Reservation of Antimicrobials Exclusively for Human Use and Restriction of Antimicrobial Use in Animals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Antimicrobial; Reservation; Corporate governance; Antimicrobial stewardship; Biology; Microbiology; Business; Political science; Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotics; Law","score_opus":0.20187672547795615,"score_gpt":0.35003766801352726,"score_spread":0.1481609425355711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790474,0.012485697,0.0002492554,0.0076380055,0.0001502744,0.0003214896,0.00009695451,0.000002368879,0.000008557747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97648436,0.02296813,0.00020220288,0.00021766195,0.00004001816,0.0000014602418,0.000005745394,0.00000951911,0.00007089933],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988472,0.0002962283,0.00056294625,0.00009843302,0.00007513748,0.000120081706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961693,0.0022883418,0.00093594374,0.00009800417,0.0004991842,0.000009197144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002413931,0.0000890656,0.0003797908,0.000067721114,0.00025170308,0.0000047882727,0.00014273995,0.00012634524,0.0000031906438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015722526,0.000060165923,0.00002978307,0.00009853299,0.0005439644,0.00019350958,0.00006130777,0.0004025647,1.5487721e-8],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020142314,0.00010822788,0.0014805165,0.0013993,0.00009539253,0.000001751573,0.0070323213,0.000024770055,0.96434695,0.022683198,0.0007332511,0.00008008332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023926917,0.013693662,0.16715416,0.008313166,0.00134065,0.0007918854,0.011788656,0.000013559912,0.70103306,0.010469809,0.060842924,0.00063152873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037082925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070208556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2633139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018282606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010930727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24534951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642621","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.76","title":"A Pandemic Instrument can Optimize the Regime Complex for AMR by Striking a Balance between Centralization and Decentralization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; York University","keywords":"Decentralization; Balance (ability); Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Medicine; Market economy; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","score_opus":0.21839720190880582,"score_gpt":0.4218539245042292,"score_spread":0.20345672259542338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642621","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15990171,0.0033398736,0.0075118598,0.82412916,0.0012122942,0.0013119229,0.00009093714,0.0000428315,0.0024593957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98993236,0.0051082205,0.000047164594,0.003972895,0.0008340378,0.0000051626935,0.000008798267,0.0000071748764,0.00008420042],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979835,0.0007797992,0.0003170009,0.00005726665,0.00064643397,0.00021598767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979351,0.0013253076,0.00044441322,0.00006276113,0.00016761091,0.00006476163],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047766087,0.00007461468,0.00019869546,0.000020352385,0.002832131,0.000018446664,0.00025831195,0.00005812666,0.000011088907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068995624,0.000038938164,0.00003545768,0.00018341256,0.00083378615,0.000063622785,0.000051556395,0.00051425176,2.58878e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020066118,0.000039882034,0.013117315,0.0000566726,0.00027924162,0.0000010861746,0.7060153,0.00066161616,0.00020072641,0.25696245,0.018974109,0.0034909844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047536506,0.0010067992,0.0058500697,0.00032502733,0.00093570293,0.00003938426,0.24435726,0.0006240653,0.00006614642,0.121816546,0.61987615,0.00034918234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026713698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008931533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8300306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014814574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017199454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642626","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.101","title":"Adopting a Global AMR Target within the Pandemic Instrument Will Act as a Catalyst for Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Preparedness; Pandemic; Action (physics); Global health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Global strategy; Process (computing); Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Business; Public relations; Global challenges; Politics; Computer science; Medicine; Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Economic policy; Health care; Marketing","score_opus":0.07319873629519136,"score_gpt":0.3508129540890265,"score_spread":0.27761421779383516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89576596,0.013986352,0.0030389687,0.07963895,0.005320853,0.00059361645,0.00004131629,0.000037552014,0.001576445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944627,0.0004018184,0.000106476,0.0043089204,0.00023348433,0.0000024563958,0.000011515307,0.000009415262,0.00046317396],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983635,0.00067427364,0.0004788232,0.00009125236,0.00018533677,0.00020682969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980208,0.00089823676,0.0007079388,0.0001968627,0.00015266362,0.000023451983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005063076,0.00012209092,0.0002710555,0.000024129351,0.0011441018,0.0000057380425,0.00044949976,0.00014036059,0.000110128094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005000223,0.000057069075,0.00009433143,0.00012450459,0.0005974185,0.0000714755,0.00009504885,0.0019098814,0.000004818514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023586603,0.0011102158,0.009999446,0.0008610668,0.007149675,0.00014796031,0.23170233,0.0051529626,0.32465276,0.32401228,0.055536903,0.01608778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007089051,0.0048151664,0.0010464742,0.0007611517,0.0014639341,0.008576104,0.072359495,0.000044392295,0.0063149463,0.015487195,0.8816911,0.0003510029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004093263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026635552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8261542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013901049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003443301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8799622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642633","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.79","title":"Using the International Pandemic Instrument to Revitalize the Innovation Ecosystem for Antimicrobial R&amp;D","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Novo Nordisk Fonden; Novo Nordisk; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada; University of Cambridge; Government of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Antimicrobial; Ecosystem; Medicine; Ecology; Microbiology; Biology; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.1946031943511072,"score_gpt":0.3881048052368267,"score_spread":0.19350161088571952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8415005,0.0015001785,0.0090521285,0.14189029,0.0051177535,0.00048374437,0.00003765863,0.000009541385,0.00040820194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98677707,0.00018272697,0.0001192525,0.012034018,0.00037180155,0.0000020400446,0.0000107375645,0.000009740694,0.0004926223],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853086,0.0005321863,0.00054900744,0.00007301962,0.0001676315,0.00014730929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979418,0.0009602415,0.0005400397,0.00019802182,0.00035080436,0.000009107205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006628212,0.00009093158,0.00019342503,0.00005876679,0.00096801814,0.000009842667,0.000689932,0.00007865188,0.000110957415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046870456,0.00003784514,0.000058552112,0.0001971922,0.00025410947,0.000038387512,0.00014484867,0.0011380486,0.0000038309936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015242096,0.00009159733,0.00033165986,0.0000924037,0.0007486853,0.000003728707,0.031517636,0.0010764261,0.81973416,0.084579386,0.059218828,0.0010812554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015071247,0.00038271144,0.00007305763,0.0004510025,0.0002661417,0.0015607049,0.0072737113,0.00002201092,0.0059154998,0.0014093178,0.98103887,0.00009981951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007721272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001337151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92182004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010582563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017418168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7445311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378171960","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.40","title":"Gender and Stand Your Ground Laws: A Critical Appraisal of Existing Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Gender discrimination; Political science; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.6545615323359109,"score_gpt":0.6115662286275612,"score_spread":0.0429953037083497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378171960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29862398,0.006938989,0.0013817763,0.03565309,0.0024276318,0.0002634481,0.000009040274,0.000050924606,0.6546511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643344,0.0021215447,0.00014943483,0.00026839372,0.0008770373,5.9096465e-7,2.2642121e-7,0.000008371642,0.00014094905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959866,0.0015087721,0.0004073785,0.00007897414,0.0016755979,0.00034268247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98393524,0.014544397,0.00012682579,0.000117570526,0.0011294363,0.00014652092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033917528,0.00006860561,0.00022697716,0.00009893899,0.00083267206,0.000026738533,0.0003296447,0.00013258736,0.000036938694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014815335,0.000041326304,0.00003103262,0.00041400615,0.004411234,0.0001409083,0.000083748535,0.0015257827,0.000004993675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006440427,0.000016059605,0.00012283171,0.00011003803,0.000017288748,0.000030665535,0.17671007,0.0000046735377,0.0008506539,0.8203725,0.0014900123,0.00021081044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013359733,0.0011753392,0.0110380035,0.0021649082,0.00022049317,0.00016321524,0.65998477,0.00029799,0.000166757,0.22599365,0.09721848,0.00024040903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012351624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006166298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69780946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029125898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039140403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386347261","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.67","title":"When Public Health Goes Wrong: Toward a New Concept of Public Health Error","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Political science; Environmental health; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.9298105689546217,"score_gpt":0.6537840275045939,"score_spread":0.2760265414500278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386347261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02098886,0.008742949,0.002663054,0.9616895,0.0031363522,0.0009885629,0.000029530805,0.00013245158,0.00162876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7346689,0.00926465,0.0011139575,0.2490829,0.0038367033,0.000012402961,0.000032516768,0.00010646727,0.0018815234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95167214,0.036579184,0.0054375,0.00037962495,0.0037012622,0.0022302803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965612,0.02151319,0.006895423,0.0009783315,0.0026206097,0.0023804556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12858829,0.00035986895,0.0016727607,0.00047650162,0.0016113321,0.000023875753,0.0014034911,0.0005684654,0.000804915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03212586,0.000220044,0.00017266878,0.0011817876,0.001266636,0.0007874964,0.0003513296,0.009689801,0.000116481744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015681492,0.00014335642,0.0018049696,0.0025403572,0.00021027273,0.000018529938,0.6570163,0.000008162777,0.00002857041,0.07937292,0.24232326,0.01637649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027343843,0.0026615898,0.0052572195,0.0028007105,0.00006433087,0.0000911372,0.15315682,0.00004351757,0.000005154823,0.010380371,0.8225947,0.00021007794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024679307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070800856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087208615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030787287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389691596","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.110","title":"<b>Harvey and Gurvir’s Law:</b> Ontario Bill for Quality Prenatal Information about Down Syndrome: Terminology, Feasibility, and Ethical Issues","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Legislature; Law; Context (archaeology); Stigma (botany); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry; History; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17658649483751532,"score_gpt":0.4293212488697803,"score_spread":0.252734754032265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389691596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87868047,0.0016353099,0.0005908119,0.116762936,0.00045314926,0.00061235204,0.00005667717,0.000067406654,0.0011408763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894671,0.0012291528,0.0006672225,0.008126916,0.00023638026,0.0000047178114,0.0000555681,0.0000134305665,0.00019955702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975282,0.00041775394,0.0009006739,0.00013424453,0.00073253544,0.00028660474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928838,0.0055743214,0.00043126836,0.00030342556,0.0005718215,0.00023538047],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010323856,0.00019322222,0.00062987773,0.00010855848,0.00029851633,0.000033970246,0.0001948701,0.0005763455,0.00002335454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008251269,0.00010047697,0.00007047155,0.00013124499,0.0014530849,0.00024959064,0.00016513112,0.0028489232,0.000005106915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015856989,0.00051579607,0.11724725,0.008913928,0.0015413833,0.00084314955,0.27939612,0.000094739575,0.0013012883,0.50983584,0.040906925,0.023546597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018816086,0.011707911,0.70491207,0.0064185336,0.0019607143,0.011702683,0.0049302303,0.00037382243,0.0006613027,0.109971516,0.12788498,0.0006601565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026000775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01636768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5876648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088754605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002777553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392418850","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.28","title":"JME volume 51 issue S2 Cover and Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Geography; Physics; Engineering; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.10673230479149719,"score_gpt":0.2900780967715451,"score_spread":0.1833457919800479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392418850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08072895,0.008823701,0.00048996275,0.1499793,0.0103228055,0.00020396867,0.000121772355,0.000032643053,0.7492969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4302287,0.005950608,0.000114922055,0.014878191,0.0014778492,0.0000018638327,0.0000032984226,0.00003098033,0.5473136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989414,0.000036337547,0.0005980728,0.00013023739,0.00008666828,0.00020728959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886036,0.00033905052,0.00044811136,0.00019800005,0.0000732086,0.000081288345],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049396283,0.000104515915,0.00041382966,0.0001224049,0.0002199616,0.000030625593,0.00025868,0.00008634561,0.014148085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027484522,0.00007216633,0.000057808425,0.0000991703,0.00055878796,0.00016797887,0.00011163179,0.0005230481,0.027508143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002516047,0.000010063743,0.0036917625,0.000030253594,0.00009901428,0.000009096507,0.015523976,0.00008103254,0.000006919088,0.016826186,0.96362597,0.000070575006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005402834,0.000090035704,0.004942801,0.00005802592,0.000033635464,0.000031196203,0.0020948937,0.00027722173,0.000004164546,0.011150449,0.9806841,0.000093167655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002937663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000142922145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34949976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038833383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001825523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392778751","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.20","title":"Aducanumab, Accelerated Approvals &amp; the Agency: Why the FDA Needs Structural Reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Food and drug administration; Hard core; Drug approval; Public administration; Political science; Business; Drug; Medicine; Pharmacology; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering)","score_opus":0.3608648809949944,"score_gpt":0.4087868544371139,"score_spread":0.04792197344211946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392778751","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3376101,0.004029643,0.00012902275,0.5869254,0.0025756424,0.00029980598,0.000052707786,0.000031804255,0.068345904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443243,0.004624176,0.000020824209,0.04771532,0.0018185602,0.000004430052,0.0000071980553,0.00003391647,0.0014512439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979121,0.00018964567,0.0011849322,0.00012666467,0.00016307247,0.00042360026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969035,0.0012710764,0.0009534783,0.00055312226,0.00016555689,0.0001532788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010002775,0.00020440204,0.00050039106,0.00016566554,0.00065898057,0.000078499295,0.0012828944,0.00016630116,0.0004616684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007954405,0.00009259426,0.0001662771,0.0006832688,0.0007890163,0.00019617725,0.00014884729,0.0023010417,0.00023302814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010024677,0.000014035333,0.00012912505,0.000038710154,0.00024712915,0.000004225426,0.03311123,0.00043442732,0.0001243896,0.9270605,0.03750348,0.0012325227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068839104,0.00011145423,0.0010199004,0.000042379124,0.000059426136,0.00010824743,0.0011566515,0.0013229668,0.00005298857,0.23218922,0.76310533,0.00014306125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018613361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031960628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72560185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015327153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013242323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392778805","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.7","title":"Taking the Long Way Around: Towards A Depathologized Ethical Framework of Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2924269060232357,"score_gpt":0.4975051261047562,"score_spread":0.20507822008152055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392778805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68081886,0.008922877,0.035298172,0.25407952,0.006557579,0.0009244399,0.000065641616,0.0000962476,0.0132366745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868288,0.0014846904,0.00028606795,0.008477853,0.0027740085,0.000004930355,0.0000057066422,0.000042213473,0.00009574421],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955792,0.0017526024,0.0010311065,0.0001660478,0.00094121695,0.00052984105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037784,0.007340341,0.00095070514,0.00050895644,0.0006697857,0.00015237425],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013209547,0.00021472487,0.0006468957,0.00015459229,0.00069921714,0.000019112851,0.0008697211,0.0009800635,0.00009369988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004078755,0.00011138128,0.00026914178,0.00042713818,0.0011028401,0.000055286135,0.000058396658,0.0060142605,0.000007656412],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000908337,0.00006052681,0.0012550724,0.0015818018,0.00027700994,0.00010485432,0.88197523,0.00013344528,0.00016338706,0.1062068,0.0010053831,0.0063281646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014277082,0.0068257754,0.086170346,0.0040020575,0.00866711,0.0026546528,0.55128103,0.00021663358,0.00023624972,0.3102555,0.014276931,0.0011366227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033244058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009467795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33069417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071527764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038417525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399239882","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.77","title":"Pre-Mortem Interventions for the Purpose of Organ Donation: Legal Approaches to Consent","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Psychological intervention; Donation; Jurisdiction; Harm; Organ donation; Medical law; Informed consent; Law; Medicine; Political science; Transplantation; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Surgery","score_opus":0.4283625463614697,"score_gpt":0.4438104927610721,"score_spread":0.015447946399602397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399239882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038776312,0.008695556,0.24320133,0.70262426,0.0018924485,0.0013909463,0.000031400054,0.000041676263,0.0033460776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952479,0.00055613875,0.00065734773,0.0021060857,0.00059881527,0.0000063216607,0.000009257915,0.000016512791,0.0008016197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985217,0.00013489171,0.0006113956,0.000069529466,0.0005710605,0.00009145351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703825,0.0021344388,0.0001860793,0.00015310524,0.00040765846,0.000080451806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035781867,0.00009061623,0.00023735044,0.000119862416,0.00012107426,0.000015533431,0.0001555577,0.00007363057,0.00010395063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006348224,0.000042609954,0.00015080515,0.00022728188,0.0002931508,0.0000810119,0.000012705346,0.000682868,0.0000031097914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019071986,0.00036441055,0.00018506349,0.0058949017,0.0011295595,0.000060790495,0.09093526,0.00043110404,0.009821082,0.8654825,0.010312952,0.013475144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017338665,0.0152102895,0.022931024,0.04340438,0.021362897,0.012034632,0.034094334,0.006181301,0.05687878,0.0262137,0.74364746,0.00070253847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006198398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023489703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95647156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040040937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031508502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29667598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399240704","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.51","title":"“A Most Equitable Drug”: How the Clinical Studies of Convalescent Plasma as a Treatment for SARS-CoV-2 Might Usefully Inform Post-Pandemic Public Sector Approaches to Drug Development","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Pandemic; Convalescent plasma; Drug development; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Drug; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Medicine; Public sector; Virology; Intensive care medicine; Political science; Pharmacology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Internal medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.6659967042477206,"score_gpt":0.49953500104615983,"score_spread":0.16646170320156078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399240704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7293919,0.0061608013,0.00032216043,0.26099673,0.00086029124,0.0013001041,0.000014770855,0.000029790282,0.00092349574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98855186,0.002836371,0.00043952398,0.0046460964,0.00097382924,0.000048523452,0.000009775488,0.000038682098,0.0024553358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656606,0.00039600534,0.0011860505,0.00019519369,0.0011635916,0.0004930859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249655,0.00491831,0.00034665232,0.0003399361,0.0016742472,0.00022429989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012334534,0.00027910378,0.0008776882,0.00024304444,0.0004385146,0.0000602981,0.00034136308,0.00016083074,0.000016447491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029753777,0.00011467564,0.00023628375,0.00046980174,0.0009418196,0.00017524675,0.00017307543,0.0015691429,0.0000123033105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0147566125,0.0034905032,0.004875267,0.008517197,0.023253633,0.00037164963,0.5039376,0.00011389034,0.049161665,0.08857585,0.17512552,0.12782061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007951467,0.011636122,0.0005452865,0.0044898,0.0020400924,0.0018026094,0.039433718,0.0005693313,0.048415728,0.0008854916,0.88188213,0.00034820437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002393255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014831917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70675665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004578999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029348135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68172324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403647139","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.100","title":"Challenges of Uncertainty in Prenatal Decision-Making: Skeletal Dysplasias","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Birth, Development, and Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dysplasia; Prenatal diagnosis; Genetic counseling; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Fetus; Pathology; Pregnancy; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.10524135318970351,"score_gpt":0.41541399762430914,"score_spread":0.3101726444346056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403647139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5482369,0.11478718,0.0012047128,0.26008385,0.0038090874,0.0007289276,0.000008993667,0.00006334734,0.07107702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8872344,0.1099616,0.0004910789,0.0016617986,0.0006137354,9.2736536e-7,0.0000010855098,0.000021031214,0.000014374513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712193,0.0002605849,0.0010265703,0.0001394258,0.001186857,0.0002646535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535835,0.0035282397,0.00031303108,0.000256857,0.00038404783,0.00015946152],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007861534,0.00017114652,0.00062605087,0.00026455274,0.000074286574,0.0000058959395,0.0002566672,0.00025070948,0.000097690754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016860759,0.00008921974,0.00009445789,0.0002725375,0.00052176754,0.00009523376,0.000052497726,0.0027663417,0.0000067096503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014111209,0.00022042847,0.00026663646,0.003594692,0.0003124794,0.0010364214,0.09482849,0.00013660059,0.00053550175,0.83964247,0.0019579334,0.056057215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011077743,0.011130093,0.033513762,0.13310324,0.0014607002,0.016938712,0.030421892,0.0020135904,0.0007915864,0.69983464,0.059039243,0.0006747643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008868757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006163114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33899748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013861472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012054992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403647613","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.109","title":"Vaccine Procurement: The Changes Needed to Close Access Gaps and Achieve Health Equity in Routine and Pandemic Settings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Equity (law); Pandemic; Public health; Procurement; Rhetoric; Vaccination; Business; Health equity; Global health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Political science; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing; Marketing","score_opus":0.16996374645375287,"score_gpt":0.48932081369021824,"score_spread":0.3193570672364654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403647613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28941286,0.023987105,0.00006354449,0.6849602,0.00026386738,0.00031214833,0.000001671063,0.000015456595,0.0009831488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9406365,0.023226684,0.000021345955,0.03480695,0.0011738625,0.000002762078,4.844742e-7,0.000011013274,0.000120358614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768466,0.00073107943,0.00045707315,0.0001299194,0.00068103865,0.00031621935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770236,0.0015731864,0.0002378918,0.00012991478,0.00017165272,0.00018499391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019669058,0.00012764831,0.00034557306,0.00010556214,0.0005613369,0.0001071198,0.00043272384,0.0001008328,0.000029018112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012770972,0.00006259472,0.00002481758,0.00041348278,0.000094396615,0.00024418143,0.0002037526,0.0014257656,8.654102e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046127688,0.000053117892,0.0051325257,0.0007995155,0.00010539547,0.000059388145,0.87877613,0.000009458295,0.0006319581,0.056943495,0.026061371,0.030966343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062273005,0.005867554,0.03950161,0.016682224,0.0008071418,0.00077490753,0.16904896,0.00015455934,0.00028245887,0.17950918,0.5803517,0.00079237396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004326409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03643715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70972717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012212589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042276643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9811454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403650421","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.114","title":"A Proposed Research Agenda for Ethical, Legal, Social, and Historical Studies at the Intersection of Infectious and Genetic Disease","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"BRCA gene mutations in cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Genomics; Genome-wide association study; Pandemic; Public health; Tuberculosis; Biology; Genome; Genetics; Medicine; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Genotype; Gene","score_opus":0.3533365003066582,"score_gpt":0.5297700293324903,"score_spread":0.1764335290258321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403650421","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094282883,0.9796922,0.00016888668,0.017859915,0.00078080676,0.0004969867,0.000012423893,0.0000024078342,0.000043518678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066374596,0.991017,0.00006109624,0.0004712878,0.0013094964,0.00002954753,0.0000045623406,0.00003451265,0.00043505148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735045,0.0011950793,0.00063424103,0.00018842131,0.00047894934,0.00015285051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706405,0.0013489946,0.0004347503,0.0002230765,0.0008627636,0.00006636866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005074652,0.0001880103,0.00062526803,0.00007614072,0.0004408599,0.000016351987,0.00021640111,0.00043761602,0.00000234189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028201658,0.000088216184,0.0001713177,0.00015968752,0.002042938,0.0000028038328,0.00026043018,0.002254148,3.107607e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014220321,0.00017642975,0.0000071207505,0.10510629,0.0060706027,0.00008861253,0.037581313,0.00002072083,0.0048723803,0.007864943,0.5694399,0.2673497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027204197,0.00095008564,0.0000018466568,0.0035300592,0.0025730957,0.00035734664,0.00048907404,0.0000025130296,0.0000386208,0.001794753,0.98990446,0.00008611745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005689422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023595955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42046458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050944916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012112093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97932774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405416217","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.144","title":"Industry Funding by Itself is Not a Reason for Rating Down Studies for Risk of Bias","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Clinical trial; Placebo; Medicine; Sample size determination; Family medicine; Actuarial science; Alternative medicine; Physical therapy; Psychology; Business; Internal medicine; Statistics; Pathology","score_opus":0.8654811204615468,"score_gpt":0.6813859189261303,"score_spread":0.18409520153541648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405416217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4214964,0.09078529,0.002144243,0.47340482,0.00791466,0.001681675,0.0009938141,0.000078050885,0.0015010774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654938,0.008831384,0.00024593755,0.022115143,0.0025490639,0.000022374452,0.0000063054813,0.00003385523,0.00070216146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963405,0.0014769592,0.0011128542,0.00017102838,0.00043501286,0.0004636576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97055453,0.02731622,0.0007318023,0.00014742921,0.00093558355,0.0003144639],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019602323,0.0002382877,0.00065113424,0.000091180096,0.0006958931,0.000013119128,0.000378269,0.0015642983,0.00018418171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006772667,0.00014131819,0.00019131319,0.00023762447,0.0009136439,0.00014723229,0.000060736216,0.012727335,0.0000023361035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007621802,0.00041074137,0.0016573734,0.009979957,0.0068769166,0.0000692597,0.15415482,0.0005871024,0.087546505,0.082284816,0.60615844,0.042652268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032772208,0.0020373208,0.000027546605,0.0022423884,0.0038992767,0.00018666503,0.01093477,0.0038288855,0.08649823,0.012385411,0.8744387,0.0002435861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000438154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016615139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5439974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107991014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038539048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405416294","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.135","title":"Comparing the Clinical Trial Characteristics of Industry-Funded Trials and Non Industry-Funded Trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Sinai Health System","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Clinical trial; Placebo; Medicine; Physical therapy; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.918740197606595,"score_gpt":0.709484246860061,"score_spread":0.20925595074653403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405416294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8400303,0.005263672,0.00015931531,0.13745335,0.012483596,0.0014595307,0.00007731363,0.000038827693,0.0030341123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728864,0.004415835,0.000026537773,0.0115646375,0.010749468,0.000010450327,0.0000072622843,0.000035233097,0.00030418727],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9669003,0.025246767,0.005962005,0.00029763157,0.0009812922,0.0006120415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9144181,0.0807003,0.0029362543,0.00042760567,0.00070512015,0.00081262924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16703753,0.00040752685,0.0028535707,0.00015215282,0.0006060072,0.00006047006,0.00088498864,0.0044137463,0.00096571195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029242808,0.00020203763,0.00043701637,0.00041396802,0.002952206,0.00018547704,0.00020381849,0.03960805,0.0000103442635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.39032748,0.0034278024,0.021618843,0.004764343,0.01672362,0.0012732472,0.0672876,0.00028938503,0.021994134,0.18687907,0.118958324,0.16645616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11903585,0.009611112,0.0073830923,0.0049237725,0.019759305,0.0013435407,0.0071602487,0.0031513246,0.009235765,0.024864953,0.7925628,0.0009682702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013184936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000385649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6736044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000866924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010769244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407042994","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.169","title":"Far from Home: Managing Incidental Findings in Field Research with Portable MRI","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental Health; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Warrant; Health care; Institution; Field (mathematics); Population; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Internet privacy; Psychiatry; Computer science; Political science; Business; Environmental health","score_opus":0.5440663376908994,"score_gpt":0.6085514382229118,"score_spread":0.0644851005320124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407042994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5008738,0.010518517,0.0008470643,0.4611177,0.0008006578,0.00038276802,0.0000036257438,0.00003203793,0.025423823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97745645,0.012273572,0.00057084934,0.006441079,0.0011424501,0.0000029667858,0.0000034485656,0.000045325327,0.0020638693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992301,0.0008184845,0.0010049089,0.00025884443,0.005083468,0.0005332834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9140304,0.08343241,0.00014815565,0.00060583965,0.0014311161,0.0003520771],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05810669,0.000168472,0.0005648587,0.00046449422,0.00022617492,0.000059076803,0.0006972777,0.0005798494,0.00055738544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019691883,0.000087867265,0.00008496333,0.00092706183,0.0015144851,0.00020315529,0.00024575111,0.026125226,0.000043857388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0129857855,0.00081196,0.05525608,0.0060231728,0.001784308,0.036895745,0.17426796,0.000223722,0.01480735,0.64556956,0.04395778,0.00741655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008229747,0.014964339,0.012949035,0.07062937,0.000897889,0.003434912,0.03615996,0.0011531975,0.0056014974,0.7771722,0.068266235,0.0005416296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006147547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077977376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47658265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026145758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018453682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407043289","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.159","title":"The Realization of Portable MRI for Indigenous Communities in the USA and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; Government of Canada; BRAIN Initiative","keywords":"Indigenous; Neuroimaging; Software portability; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Public relations; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Geography; Computer science; Psychiatry; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.2038572850277208,"score_gpt":0.43499727351318523,"score_spread":0.23113998848546444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407043289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7226815,0.020326743,0.0024864217,0.24475177,0.00084273604,0.0015704068,0.000031250136,0.000010005452,0.0072991564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341583,0.0035955631,0.00004901181,0.0024748875,0.00021140506,0.0000048472716,0.0000049315427,0.000012592771,0.0002309062],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977561,0.0005622878,0.00055008376,0.00003714972,0.00091180607,0.0001825213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987084,0.012005741,0.0001769078,0.00028385865,0.00039778353,0.000051710274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014246228,0.00007863494,0.00024949978,0.00006160291,0.00030041902,0.000018833443,0.00032408236,0.000070563554,0.000018581673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011006496,0.000030114144,0.000027114445,0.00017136124,0.00076439546,0.000049303286,0.000026032612,0.0014142431,1.2753921e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015475765,0.00012484741,0.0079184305,0.0036716096,0.000654024,0.00017707108,0.6011394,0.00017858474,0.0005476547,0.31811225,0.058471188,0.0074573583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005058473,0.0063818106,0.025073143,0.010373545,0.0014121457,0.005514581,0.2915557,0.0016833014,0.00060152326,0.06050246,0.5915779,0.000265413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45497587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8017304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53310674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007569731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001454162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61442614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407043315","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.172","title":"How Did Human Rights Fare in Amendments to the International Health Regulations?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Connaught Fund; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Human rights; Solidarity; Equity (law); Accountability; Political science; Core (optical fiber); Public administration; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1693067182344754,"score_gpt":0.4564706197597991,"score_spread":0.2871639015253237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407043315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028401833,0.00061079976,0.0004305187,0.9517098,0.0017578009,0.00018935592,0.0000019082208,0.000013365138,0.016884595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988359,0.00012347828,0.00009764497,0.0058935527,0.0012388622,0.0000016315252,0.0000016247294,0.0000052649575,0.004278993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775845,0.0004481584,0.00036085208,0.00007476449,0.0011895165,0.00016824686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894047,0.0005045522,0.00014579554,0.00010790356,0.00019181146,0.00010945443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008043982,0.000071539245,0.00014440005,0.000105849,0.0010395197,0.00012340279,0.00051555433,0.000053030282,0.00016978444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015682388,0.000029740635,0.00003302945,0.00018990498,0.00033442967,0.00014124783,0.00004026676,0.00079660147,0.000007757485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008215314,0.000014011785,0.000021043656,0.000007769171,0.000025028668,0.000012260352,0.22023016,0.000021880292,0.000023146547,0.75889677,0.020168636,0.00057105435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015418588,0.0000937349,0.0005509038,0.0004946484,0.000009908305,0.00000926628,0.004736013,0.000009557622,0.000010147876,0.07642966,0.9174609,0.00004104928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031321936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047739204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9599571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029989236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033891018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9696371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407043486","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.162","title":"Conducting Research with Highly Portable MRI in Community Settings: A Practical Guide to Navigating Ethical Issues and ELSI Checklist","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Functional Brain Connectivity Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental Health; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Checklist; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3521342910074726,"score_gpt":0.522861054694109,"score_spread":0.17072676368663642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407043486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3117711,0.0005852411,0.00015636814,0.68413943,0.00024013095,0.00016309538,0.0000016702156,0.00002463906,0.002918322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681968,0.00033690248,0.0016262745,0.029031953,0.0005609686,0.000004566734,2.906491e-7,0.000026704165,0.00021552059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918537,0.0050566248,0.00063083466,0.0002273835,0.0018442267,0.00038720877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87775993,0.120867565,0.00018399692,0.0002905133,0.00073309103,0.00016490262],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05278786,0.00016079795,0.0003866579,0.00013135455,0.0011065103,0.000104245926,0.00033862208,0.00020251115,0.000012938132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1510212,0.00009089339,0.00002629831,0.0008143685,0.002083399,0.00031922694,0.00032828457,0.019049877,0.0000046783575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012060888,0.0002852376,0.00077590503,0.0014067376,0.00015819864,0.0018158115,0.35961738,0.0005052222,0.2862488,0.23957682,0.10750675,0.00089704024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029895452,0.010533684,0.00088753283,0.029804414,0.0003244622,0.0152231455,0.18391997,0.0018377024,0.07206269,0.04742989,0.63417995,0.0008070149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026895332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012181024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6564257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013929003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004392913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9832132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408881852","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.7","title":"Reflections on the SDGs and UHC: Getting Shit Done","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Shit; Accountability; Corporate governance; Political science; Session (web analytics); Public administration; Sociology; Art history; Management; Art; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.2017413595306964,"score_gpt":0.4569523938981917,"score_spread":0.25521103436749526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408881852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025250772,0.0004600325,0.00029202772,0.7961157,0.0007885922,0.000083531675,2.5413004e-7,0.000012970746,0.17699613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56250495,0.00037769083,0.00002914176,0.43467546,0.0021810888,0.0000011051322,4.1737667e-7,0.0000059748822,0.00022417623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986724,0.0002119312,0.0005216916,0.00007035034,0.00026889212,0.00025472452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995715,0.0032857994,0.00044381205,0.00018314284,0.00035086818,0.000021358115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01161519,0.000103365535,0.0002610703,0.00010786727,0.00081860676,0.000038792943,0.00030140608,0.000116116644,0.000053287633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006026924,0.0000457638,0.00004035598,0.00034148686,0.00045811746,0.00015654466,0.00010762701,0.0015392568,0.000009169343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003091874,0.000009429211,0.000056722853,0.00006407288,0.00002675543,0.0000015610403,0.0005071662,0.00009657805,0.000044648354,0.7924585,0.20640494,0.0002987141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002953102,0.000053971817,0.0008250845,0.00032629774,0.00009829789,0.00002243829,0.0024803146,0.00028366435,0.0000018666595,0.07455508,0.9210145,0.00004320977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056276494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005052623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71790344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003054525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070391296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.850736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408914692","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.1","title":"Global Health “With Justice”: The Challenges and Opportunities for Human Rights in Global Health Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Human rights; Global health; Political science; Right to health; Health equity; International human rights law; Public health; Global justice; Equity (law); Politics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Health care; Medicine","score_opus":0.25653560921237406,"score_gpt":0.4776502471010232,"score_spread":0.22111463788864916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408914692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007768135,0.015921144,0.00047719487,0.8637432,0.00060600165,0.0004687566,0.0000075310177,0.000014818665,0.110993214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95928097,0.007939089,0.00016948018,0.03168565,0.000531465,0.0000034944412,9.929298e-7,0.0000038273474,0.0003850425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740785,0.0009634731,0.0005307766,0.000097660544,0.0006713559,0.0003288965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981644,0.00087739417,0.00038450898,0.00013171296,0.00026623363,0.00017575489],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011951756,0.00012097462,0.00036913733,0.000029992023,0.0024654632,0.000031487507,0.00035465113,0.00008939557,0.000009393879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074711366,0.00004985664,0.000027917811,0.0001011456,0.001783521,0.00009432623,0.000035187215,0.0005002314,1.683607e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052891693,0.000024959147,0.000007159918,0.00009950452,0.000030018376,0.0000061023793,0.06166056,0.000003120145,3.978427e-8,0.93378294,0.0020415736,0.0022911245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079510437,0.0005668269,0.00079046085,0.00080411986,0.00005407598,0.000019280293,0.032012675,0.0000017717372,2.2014181e-7,0.5109179,0.45398128,0.000056285113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016290965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48633736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003953218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019158124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409408643","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.21","title":"Global Health Law: Between Hard and Soft Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; Health law; Hard law; Public health law; Global health; Health policy; Political science; Law; Global governance; Corporate governance; International health; Public law; Public health; International law; Public administration; Business; Health care; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.11977588088696842,"score_gpt":0.42881351180492655,"score_spread":0.3090376309179581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409408643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008421903,0.002701132,0.0013896223,0.8898717,0.0011108855,0.0001455444,0.000004448307,0.000028502169,0.096326254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49561402,0.00038002073,0.00006962614,0.501263,0.002604437,5.359996e-7,0.0000030610024,0.0000065668946,0.000058707516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782354,0.00025189636,0.0009394641,0.000118305084,0.00039575424,0.0004710252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973012,0.0012259335,0.0007387789,0.00022477673,0.00043248993,0.0000768201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011870224,0.00016543841,0.0006500643,0.000062033454,0.0006496757,0.00004954811,0.0004188831,0.00018823503,0.000024491555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013484703,0.00009548312,0.000060527695,0.00030736096,0.00094154745,0.00033360004,0.00019515285,0.0010720717,0.000009261977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002704551,0.000008977607,0.000958114,0.00024058808,0.000040027364,0.000002135286,0.0001629847,0.000039281254,8.6294256e-7,0.81946045,0.1782286,0.0008309517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006034846,0.00007929255,0.0035911915,0.00033770356,0.00010387629,0.000020175914,0.0004208769,0.00008863363,1.60636e-7,0.15632935,0.83836573,0.000059518203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07851181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040870374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6631311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009178701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022085744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92762446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409438835","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.16","title":"The 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations: A New Era for Global Health Law in Pandemic Preparedness and Response?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International Health Regulations; Preparedness; Global health; Political science; Solidarity; Equity (law); Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Public administration; International law; Law; Politics; Economic growth; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Health care; Geography; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Economics; Disease","score_opus":0.1326411844325214,"score_gpt":0.5000978524757798,"score_spread":0.3674566680432584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409438835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018403552,0.002326893,0.0016415586,0.9716689,0.0015651761,0.0005490196,0.000004527471,0.0000065205663,0.003833857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125999,0.0031531362,0.00055860233,0.07588971,0.000769847,0.000011563632,0.0000014171488,0.000006147132,0.007009678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975626,0.0009310861,0.00053797924,0.0000837348,0.0006731459,0.00021144992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685544,0.0024151383,0.0002745092,0.00012227948,0.00020365196,0.00012899292],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020577896,0.000069888476,0.00017105417,0.000035156114,0.0014162275,0.0000610967,0.0004642917,0.000050152197,0.0000137744555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009431578,0.000029462384,0.000025178844,0.00018806408,0.00044090004,0.000066795,0.00005826117,0.00044271312,5.718106e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004996319,0.000013210403,0.000099447774,0.000008402585,0.00003329941,5.2311475e-7,0.19169727,0.000037496142,0.0000019578624,0.7562282,0.0463228,0.005057735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006330374,0.00015838211,0.0018654991,0.0004576743,0.000010058058,0.0000066907223,0.016278144,0.000018554558,4.2734624e-7,0.17799284,0.8025472,0.000031449752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007559681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14889707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079218345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00447141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410245268","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.46","title":"Origin of “Conscientious Objection” in Health Care: How Care Denials Became Enshrined into Law Because of Abortion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Conscience; Abortion; Law; Dignity; Duty; Autonomy; Health care; Medicine; Fiduciary; Political science","score_opus":0.04870338325061919,"score_gpt":0.4154452307130344,"score_spread":0.3667418474624152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410245268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81244546,0.023531394,0.0011406544,0.15879011,0.001550471,0.0008883838,0.0000060310936,0.000016058495,0.0016314486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392426,0.0018656971,0.0003193796,0.0032318896,0.0005107347,0.0000039185,0.0000075933585,0.000011489447,0.00012501395],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967781,0.0007360337,0.0012416274,0.00016807402,0.00084527215,0.00023090458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99546266,0.00058580394,0.0011493074,0.0003946523,0.0022685314,0.00013905812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005406353,0.00014792562,0.0007916957,0.0003100915,0.00017164672,0.000005048862,0.0001598338,0.00018208168,0.000017180395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018073033,0.00009488574,0.000100902376,0.0005806382,0.0007541204,0.00011796435,0.000025248111,0.0013160678,5.5357026e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010562514,0.00088291126,0.023804767,0.022618674,0.0006391138,0.000085391795,0.5641905,0.00055478147,0.1576734,0.18604888,0.0030041398,0.02993492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05643695,0.033797625,0.14373907,0.0493708,0.0041354904,0.0014898039,0.2557373,0.0001444045,0.11127934,0.029385688,0.31346852,0.0010149967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00801913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077511696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31046438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039636565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018256756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411100094","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.69","title":"JME volume 53 issue S1 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Cardiff University; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Toronto; Case Western Reserve University; Saint Louis University; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; University of Denver; University of Minnesota; University of Nebraska Medical Center; Villanova University; Ohio State University; George Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Geology; Physics; Oceanography; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.06697990381406246,"score_gpt":0.2849903061043374,"score_spread":0.21801040229027493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411100094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013427814,0.011696706,0.0013680098,0.09713817,0.0059708725,0.0001172626,0.00004466873,0.000007568361,0.87022895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32371986,0.0037888535,0.00021044705,0.028986996,0.0007279432,0.0000014598285,0.0000017136255,0.000015446982,0.6425473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998983,0.00003582524,0.0006267922,0.00012702045,0.00006174839,0.00016556185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989261,0.0003088246,0.00041457315,0.000206693,0.000087460656,0.0000563244],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032011764,0.00010369549,0.00043302763,0.00011238444,0.00021315993,0.000032116637,0.0002681719,0.0000909001,0.016062759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026561477,0.00007171842,0.000056555895,0.00006854348,0.00060888566,0.00014897792,0.000104213046,0.00055500073,0.008254365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003576062,0.000016860347,0.0043465276,0.000040106468,0.0001403546,0.0000033054134,0.0077761197,0.00003293537,0.0000052867817,0.06347878,0.9240283,0.00009567857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000611912,0.00006253615,0.0020664658,0.000099879304,0.000050985138,0.000015595271,0.0013258877,0.00012464651,0.000007459157,0.017703256,0.97785634,0.000075021075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035335525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017656068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31029204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053065196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002928563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411371471","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.50","title":"Response to Comment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Historical and modern epidemiology studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.2336849529634074,"score_gpt":0.4963033408092548,"score_spread":0.2626183878458474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411371471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041933656,0.0013809304,0.0041861646,0.9326299,0.0010244723,0.00006440547,2.8406828e-7,0.000007156928,0.05651333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.645553,0.0010816776,0.0003887979,0.3434242,0.0005702224,0.0000014242942,5.8967967e-8,0.0000036801225,0.008976945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648654,0.0025877056,0.00033209796,0.000044766337,0.00039132134,0.00015754986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893093,0.010024761,0.00013246405,0.000106430576,0.0003287022,0.00009835737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025275156,0.000053973396,0.00023999678,0.00004762673,0.00081127184,0.0000025357647,0.00033829472,0.00009201841,0.000031160846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014892829,0.000027409433,0.000039831368,0.00012964319,0.0010209606,0.000025897834,0.000051288127,0.00078031095,0.0000062491304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006339183,0.000023756029,0.00009271526,0.0000054332513,0.000051028364,0.00000651587,0.22325766,0.000015520081,0.00019798965,0.35621718,0.41858852,0.0009097695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019437145,0.00020535912,0.00017098174,0.000117721225,0.000053639968,0.0000017738812,0.006545074,7.652324e-7,0.000009966335,0.038951,0.95372397,0.000025367619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020421087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015114931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6413596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015877071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024887812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99340516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411371524","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10130","title":"JME volume 53 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Cardiff University; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Toronto; Case Western Reserve University; Saint Louis University; Georgetown University; University of Denver; University of Minnesota; University of Nebraska Medical Center; Villanova University; Ohio State University; George Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Geography; Physics; Engineering; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.06795408838287906,"score_gpt":0.28514909563279384,"score_spread":0.21719500724991478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411371524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011500952,0.012136127,0.0012575819,0.08760812,0.005237497,0.00010147418,0.000034568293,0.000006499203,0.88211715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33103037,0.0029918472,0.00017622116,0.024437726,0.0005844132,0.0000011702406,9.5181014e-7,0.000012259777,0.640765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990304,0.00003496843,0.00060097245,0.000119515455,0.00005800265,0.00015610506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896914,0.00030285504,0.00039635488,0.0001952161,0.00008370707,0.000052725485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003629995,0.00009776483,0.0004117909,0.000107127635,0.00020340619,0.000029808001,0.00025605015,0.000085586435,0.014425272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025846655,0.00006722781,0.000053142452,0.00006520905,0.00059329,0.0001418446,0.00009849131,0.0005284062,0.006209868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003670622,0.000017109973,0.004578872,0.000041075637,0.0001445254,0.000003222164,0.008391779,0.000033641005,0.000005459408,0.062323086,0.9243254,0.00009911438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057700486,0.000059324586,0.0028067264,0.00009453838,0.000047916925,0.000014892877,0.0012782983,0.00011675376,0.0000061538,0.015856719,0.9790713,0.00007037438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032388492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012840093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31952944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049353905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027412938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99456394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412760999","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.64","title":"Moral Permissibility and Desert in the Therapy-Enhancement Distinction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Appeal; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Desert (philosophy); Reflective equilibrium; Law and economics; Politics; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.29352901563460504,"score_gpt":0.4481793063880265,"score_spread":0.15465029075342146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412760999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6757904,0.0006189552,0.0045095654,0.30601302,0.0011351686,0.00046672704,0.0000019502017,0.000015995269,0.011448187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960462,0.001097909,0.000040194616,0.03794883,0.00017183942,0.0000047990784,4.0771718e-7,0.000005852064,0.00026818027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967727,0.0012963358,0.00068739837,0.00016085345,0.0008897982,0.00019293002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456936,0.0044890456,0.0003321629,0.00033928693,0.00022298326,0.000047187867],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085024685,0.00012866003,0.00021574323,0.000103333536,0.00043902046,0.00002878769,0.0005643712,0.00009581572,0.000072997354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055147354,0.000060647326,0.000031810116,0.0005548273,0.0021008358,0.00013399294,0.00007198156,0.002388596,0.0000015591969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006763539,0.0006759095,0.00084250374,0.00018348549,0.000033707143,0.00005566634,0.040444966,0.000018697208,0.40397894,0.5392998,0.003980115,0.009809851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006227249,0.0032020512,0.01904436,0.0016197799,0.00020411029,0.0003388452,0.006371852,0.0006398659,0.13989028,0.7273792,0.09468196,0.00040044214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000886809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000089601184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28467155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060304734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016634226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412810429","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10109","title":"Psychedelic Treatment with Psilocybin: Addressing Medical Malpractice Risk and Physicians’ Concerns","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Psychedelics and Drug Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec; Université du Québec à Rimouski; Jewish General Hospital; Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec; Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches; McGill University","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec; McGill University; Université Laval","keywords":"Psilocybin; Medical malpractice; Liability; Psychiatry; Psychology; Malpractice; Medicine; Hallucinogen; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.20320318637137766,"score_gpt":0.49386043375682687,"score_spread":0.2906572473854492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412810429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25782385,0.052733928,0.0070881452,0.4360324,0.0035746496,0.00040619445,0.000012056978,0.000044588243,0.24228416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97712815,0.008727804,0.00017098317,0.012179017,0.0010033636,0.000005050882,7.95235e-7,0.000018605373,0.00076624245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974627,0.0008248536,0.0005529232,0.00017139134,0.00072097627,0.000267166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994543,0.0039750114,0.0006482168,0.0003381898,0.00036924364,0.00012629839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036515342,0.00022002694,0.00053043803,0.00007800614,0.00046072598,0.000018183446,0.00028869425,0.00020314597,0.00015327049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005159584,0.00010644877,0.00005921184,0.00021369857,0.0013593867,0.00007847273,0.000043140088,0.0016801737,0.0000057751454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077876337,0.0017135274,0.010472792,0.0002682545,0.007962434,0.00070909626,0.32738504,0.000056951692,0.0005029136,0.34933898,0.08103473,0.21276763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020896696,0.008737176,0.009970208,0.0055146688,0.005376269,0.0018462527,0.0847456,0.00020552041,0.00015886924,0.019566996,0.8424091,0.0005726892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014747547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007706979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76137435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005470651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022135468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7299612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414066768","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10158","title":"Constructing Opioid Legitimacy: The Canadian Pain Task Force’s Framing of the Overdose Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Opioid overdose; Opioid; Chronic pain; Public health; Opioid epidemic; Opioid abuse; Public policy; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.03173279057594633,"score_gpt":0.3361861474330212,"score_spread":0.30445335685707486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414066768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16914602,0.010085355,0.001313739,0.7780999,0.0023864328,0.0012501095,0.000026174868,0.000024035548,0.03766821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698053,0.00037779642,0.00023112037,0.028930753,0.00031853002,0.0000033608078,0.0000026814287,0.000021512285,0.000308966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969444,0.0008445078,0.0008150705,0.00011759899,0.00094221847,0.0003361858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468464,0.003182209,0.0006008041,0.0006570281,0.0007065905,0.00016872771],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069087306,0.00021281489,0.0005363532,0.00013776304,0.0006825362,0.000018948918,0.0005630127,0.00019835288,0.00006799152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036227126,0.000089016365,0.0001906706,0.00043634407,0.0011558948,0.00006486171,0.000085484746,0.0023796523,0.0000012448916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012188447,0.00050019374,0.0662693,0.0027033105,0.00482628,0.00032715028,0.3170358,0.0004212152,0.0041961186,0.48870748,0.085933045,0.027861252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022303816,0.0042297374,0.032060437,0.028580578,0.015984511,0.00322974,0.45043692,0.002185922,0.013781422,0.11873858,0.30749944,0.0009688974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0899547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07439994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80065924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040342478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027974169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414175882","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10173","title":"JME volume 53 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Cardiff University; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Case Western Reserve University; University of Toronto; Saint Louis University; Georgetown University; Ohio State University; University of Pennsylvania; Villanova University; University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Denver; Yale University","keywords":"Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Front cover; Cover (algebra); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.06662147618447313,"score_gpt":0.28468061920568977,"score_spread":0.21805914302121665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414175882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011555026,0.012168162,0.0012615325,0.08702807,0.0052733794,0.000101237834,0.00003396981,0.0000064762016,0.8825722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33024055,0.0029989386,0.00017226674,0.024144895,0.0005842461,0.0000011362744,9.2560896e-7,0.000012120958,0.6418449],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903023,0.000034936158,0.00060123316,0.00011946582,0.000058014317,0.00015609426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989712,0.00030027216,0.000396415,0.00019493395,0.00008441838,0.000052721152],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003628416,0.000097751574,0.00041183145,0.00010709318,0.00020338934,0.000029867006,0.00025589496,0.00008557942,0.014087869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025839967,0.0000672113,0.000053139185,0.00006518574,0.00059333065,0.00014194977,0.00009842272,0.00052830216,0.0062748794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037508165,0.00001737521,0.0046580746,0.000042417516,0.00014671597,0.000003311656,0.0085262405,0.000034188684,0.000005559964,0.062953405,0.92347306,0.00010212531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005836302,0.000059136084,0.0027853376,0.00009417232,0.00004741476,0.000014731855,0.0012701292,0.000116719,0.000006270955,0.015871653,0.97908056,0.0000702529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003274256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012924159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31868553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049542567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027427544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99449885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414928066","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10184","title":"Framing, Narratives, and the Overdose Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Framing (construction); Public health; Public policy; Opioid overdose; Narrative review; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.08969683580998891,"score_gpt":0.4362823489027798,"score_spread":0.34658551309279084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414928066","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007847363,0.9322259,0.0000822614,0.061013896,0.00064090703,0.0008962902,0.000007802692,0.0000118309945,0.005113253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007114313,0.9908848,0.00014584235,0.007092218,0.00079502934,0.000012987277,0.000011280874,0.00004317622,0.00094353885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528646,0.0017958771,0.0013518789,0.00019093299,0.0011173532,0.0002575104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99032915,0.006952506,0.0013177298,0.00071581546,0.0005145535,0.00017026089],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061601168,0.0004990665,0.0030382616,0.00018324566,0.00034061022,0.000021047748,0.00047340879,0.00051024405,0.00008450782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002172041,0.00017802179,0.0004760482,0.00035606182,0.001520604,0.000055956156,0.00014470101,0.0050252173,0.000005326166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016903622,0.00064911414,0.000011282047,0.13412958,0.01044125,0.00063562486,0.2584415,0.0000017237982,0.0000010965182,0.13783886,0.085006736,0.37115288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003159369,0.0006132796,0.0000037927387,0.062512785,0.012938483,0.0011529643,0.005705319,7.452365e-7,4.0089108e-7,0.0034698744,0.91032124,0.0001217797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002481178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037155627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82531446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014133782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017512813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415950946","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10187","title":"Oncofertility in Prepubertal Girls: A Qualitative Study of Canadian and French Pediatric Oncologists’ Perspectives on Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian Bioethics Society; Alethia Biotherapeutics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Oncofertility; Ovarian tissue; Infertility; Qualitative research; Fertility preservation; Bioethics; Ovarian tissue cryopreservation; Reproductive medicine; Cryopreservation","score_opus":0.1650252385375709,"score_gpt":0.47726211380329886,"score_spread":0.31223687526572796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415950946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142265,0.002292489,0.000023613393,0.077593006,0.00016943665,0.0006757725,0.000001927204,0.000009714807,0.0050075743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806523,0.0008292881,0.0001527798,0.00067015213,0.00015985419,0.000007413355,8.0777176e-7,0.0000062437616,0.000108254724],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729437,0.0010273688,0.0007664616,0.00019527572,0.00051268004,0.00020386843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957247,0.0024831614,0.00041269045,0.00037794688,0.0008785209,0.00012300727],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00799625,0.00013659334,0.0005611539,0.00087870425,0.00013589194,0.0000042029774,0.00019554936,0.00020982404,0.000013235114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013353375,0.00007947504,0.00002554702,0.0010145709,0.0006135377,0.000084544154,0.000041311956,0.0018871742,2.6047576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019835986,0.0011859119,0.06140717,0.00056121673,0.00016860694,0.000087651664,0.90854377,0.000026038597,0.0003278326,0.023283914,0.0011650367,0.0012592452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034383587,0.009546476,0.52533275,0.0004312569,0.00029341006,0.00004128877,0.45125768,0.000010643803,0.00020193773,0.0084538935,0.0009166632,0.000075634736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17843081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14464438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46392557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028545273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001191921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99495757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7077075712","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10147","title":"JME volume 53 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Cardiff University; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Toronto; Case Western Reserve University; Saint Louis University; Georgetown University; University of Denver; University of Minnesota; University of Nebraska Medical Center; Villanova University; Ohio State University; George Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University","keywords":"Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Front cover; Cover (algebra); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.031211016747056102,"score_gpt":0.30559633885038384,"score_spread":0.2743853221033277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7077075712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037895557,0.0021734976,0.09997864,0.7259274,0.0009388475,0.000066496585,3.9297456e-7,0.00001532437,0.16710982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8657756,0.00032743957,0.002128324,0.05865255,0.0006081231,7.321982e-7,3.7034684e-7,0.0000028369377,0.072504014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989647,0.0001802772,0.00030819792,0.00008902865,0.00031325844,0.00014449637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985466,0.0006312682,0.00018954523,0.00028784553,0.0002837995,0.00006097065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002881457,0.000090511276,0.00020772842,0.000031160518,0.0001639293,0.000025102556,0.0006395624,0.00010892872,0.0005716666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043154432,0.000049684877,0.00002873679,0.00008774007,0.00033678883,0.00012451566,0.000189728,0.0009999082,0.000080906895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010835375,0.00007965017,0.0031959,0.00047300363,0.00021412662,0.00015030523,0.039829455,0.00062647316,0.0049100392,0.07412762,0.872802,0.0034830223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047866674,0.00012407302,0.001458584,0.0003885587,0.00005531086,0.00030408686,0.00026902618,0.0013674074,0.0005856858,0.032934636,0.9619601,0.00007390034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007153751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004197366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86198604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014837514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008700501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6259348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127890869","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10240","title":"JME volume 53 issue 4 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Hamline University; Arizona State University; Western Michigan University; Georgetown University; Wake Forest University; Ohio State University; George Washington University; University of Colorado Boulder; Stryker; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University; Villanova University; University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Minnesota; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Toronto; Saint Louis University; Case Western Reserve University; Brigham and Women's Hospital","keywords":"Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Front cover; Cover (algebra); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.06717576156611078,"score_gpt":0.2851547693723177,"score_spread":0.21797900780620694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127890869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011518676,0.012226911,0.0012709026,0.08699642,0.0052348957,0.00010145509,0.000033711014,0.0000064931683,0.88261056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3397652,0.0030236205,0.0001738656,0.024368826,0.0005833569,0.0000011457106,9.3374945e-7,0.000012217802,0.63207084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903005,0.00003493171,0.00060144026,0.000119477256,0.00005801074,0.00015611121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897206,0.00030082944,0.00039647805,0.00019503263,0.000082903585,0.000052723593],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036312193,0.00009775814,0.0004119253,0.00010714129,0.00020348707,0.000029882352,0.00025607675,0.000085586405,0.013863261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002549113,0.000067223635,0.000053143158,0.00006517769,0.00059343356,0.00014196981,0.00009845896,0.0005282863,0.0061518913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003796775,0.00001742172,0.0046783024,0.000042188673,0.00014703961,0.0000033300498,0.008553152,0.000033801953,0.0000054896564,0.065217346,0.9211617,0.00010227201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005832642,0.000060301973,0.0028071469,0.00009469224,0.00004791249,0.000014927249,0.0012779394,0.00011748568,0.0000061661754,0.016076341,0.97884333,0.000070493086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032461897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012975354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3282465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049358478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027328277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99462193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127935147","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10195","title":"End-of-Life Care and Organ Donation: Rethinking Legislative Separation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Organ donation; Legislation; Separation (statistics); Separation of powers; United Network for Organ Sharing","score_opus":0.07120080370517691,"score_gpt":0.39840752070882274,"score_spread":0.32720671700364584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127935147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46874675,0.01608711,0.03528868,0.33511767,0.001809222,0.00080393103,0.000011935868,0.000054254422,0.14208044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316365,0.0013563437,0.00067364256,0.004426718,0.00022662578,3.8521765e-7,0.000010998687,0.0000070824535,0.00013454416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857926,0.00022432457,0.0004924177,0.00006242117,0.0005715945,0.000069990536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973767,0.0010688223,0.00034415576,0.00010571686,0.001045311,0.000059304162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017472105,0.000086714455,0.00026721513,0.0001368844,0.00014896515,0.000006085259,0.000075536016,0.00012801809,0.000063826104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007495971,0.00005230436,0.000033261716,0.00022654222,0.00038344483,0.00011712225,0.00001046546,0.00085067574,6.8576077e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015701529,0.0000768948,0.006644423,0.0015526514,0.0004915367,0.000030691674,0.547268,0.00009212042,0.022394432,0.41240242,0.00090118,0.006575499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06832858,0.013074599,0.21326616,0.033862937,0.014624302,0.0030116574,0.14450464,0.0017066094,0.16410561,0.13653007,0.20577548,0.0012093706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007861668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000168361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5244169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045295503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004875562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.369581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}