{"meta":{"query_hash":"2d20533ce450","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics"},"cohort_total":195,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":195,"exported":195,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2d20533ce450","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Law+Medicine+%26+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1491493181","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12010","title":"Is There a Human Right to Private Health Care?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Central European University; Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Right to health; Commodification; Health care; Human rights; Supreme court; Contradiction; Notice; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.11820871847839762,"score_gpt":0.43116786572697063,"score_spread":0.312959147248573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491493181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010667248,0.013243088,0.008791487,0.75900424,0.0011395115,0.000016669164,0.000103449434,0.000026329099,0.20700803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8105844,0.015105014,0.0041166437,0.13176505,0.0055379253,0.0000881628,0.00016641566,0.0000690998,0.03256718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98587996,0.006227498,0.00040559925,0.0016244979,0.0038006897,0.002061847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98455715,0.010669326,0.0009149579,0.0014485657,0.0010464798,0.0013635355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013961821,0.00027077924,0.0008315643,0.0010213864,0.005651429,0.01208081,0.0015742021,0.008361039,0.013022659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022351194,0.00030529362,0.00065745186,0.0011813388,0.061168,0.016258497,0.006396562,0.010814607,0.0016286179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004606899,0.0000061895953,0.00014666848,0.00001749011,0.0000028134993,0.000023901726,0.0008105255,0.000029965215,0.000034967798,0.99103653,0.003819037,0.0040673465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009321493,0.000010511767,0.00047161407,0.00026181786,0.0000053434114,0.00008781307,0.0021299126,0.00010146558,0.00012341891,0.86541253,0.13137336,0.000012932433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017100275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011030172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017100275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00852157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010869504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073838055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504629720","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12272","title":"Antibiotic Resistance is a Tragedy of the Commons That Necessitates Global Cooperation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Antibiotic resistance; Tragedy (event); Resistance (ecology); Commons; Antibiotics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law and economics; Microbiology; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Biology; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.09843187934440875,"score_gpt":0.3411247263883308,"score_spread":0.24269284704392205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504629720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043973375,0.016383449,0.019398721,0.48230842,0.002490794,0.00006656857,0.00007698648,0.00019002346,0.4351116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80854905,0.015644008,0.00793607,0.1253531,0.0037419435,0.00013456262,0.000059655,0.00013142054,0.03845024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288017,0.0032119513,0.00023868613,0.0006817762,0.0018261519,0.0011612576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355,0.0032011068,0.0007191584,0.0010336532,0.0005843026,0.0009118313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006178553,0.00033966475,0.0005375025,0.0006763416,0.0060283397,0.005602266,0.00072127266,0.005464038,0.006896454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055706063,0.0002831063,0.0004656119,0.0008017592,0.03729142,0.008376682,0.007869746,0.006929838,0.001199969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001987081,0.00003914581,0.00075540517,0.00010126746,0.00001746813,0.0005850039,0.006896529,0.0002965191,0.00084597775,0.93422145,0.034829605,0.021391617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010137848,0.00007276794,0.0015281257,0.0003427566,0.000010162746,0.0014051914,0.0070359316,0.00025892706,0.0003315314,0.39922348,0.58974546,0.00003562878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002091968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028247344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006896454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037139761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004677616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032675743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517293257","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00705.x","title":"A Portrait of Nanomedicine and its Bioethical Implications","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Nanotechnology research and applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Beneficence; Nanomedicine; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Medicine; Political science; Nanotechnology; Autonomy; Engineering; Computer science; Materials science; Law","score_opus":0.11693499450390293,"score_gpt":0.38570271848934806,"score_spread":0.26876772398544513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517293257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023144374,0.08228324,0.028289184,0.28579625,0.008808847,0.00009238831,0.00014746512,0.00009183104,0.5921763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30513662,0.14283298,0.048006173,0.25595924,0.035768487,0.0016443076,0.00027311343,0.0006952888,0.20968382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951638,0.0025869755,0.0001755139,0.0004900483,0.0013202605,0.0002634253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995155,0.0036283098,0.00022451946,0.000289744,0.00045094022,0.0002514844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005665383,0.0008496119,0.00061354204,0.0024310516,0.0053131,0.009973871,0.0019224543,0.009245885,0.004939145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066434,0.0004413911,0.00063501723,0.002260786,0.03205373,0.009215811,0.0034438726,0.014502694,0.0020601833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054430343,0.000007151554,0.000032169184,0.00004138633,0.000001456407,0.000062383304,0.0011657675,0.00011945316,0.00006369146,0.9805778,0.013713259,0.004209982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006407532,0.000014447779,0.00010484638,0.00026012017,0.0000018733537,0.0002160078,0.0006983925,0.0002477207,0.000056812893,0.45463738,0.54374665,0.000009286682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035655606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031716921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009973871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006145424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056408704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044588327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529963181","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12278","title":"Effective Global Action on Antibiotic Resistance Requires Careful Consideration of Convening Forums","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Political science; Collective action; Enforcement; Public relations; Law and economics; Action (physics); Resistance (ecology); Politics; International Action; Public administration; Business; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.11415108276795702,"score_gpt":0.3817754375542245,"score_spread":0.26762435478626745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529963181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050276846,0.006308927,0.057028517,0.5477906,0.0068069617,0.001229909,0.000052373824,0.00046228225,0.33004355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.859319,0.0031770852,0.05202319,0.048199236,0.0024530322,0.0014630859,0.00005457497,0.00031461785,0.032996263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9160786,0.058941416,0.0028988267,0.0040529417,0.010227637,0.0078006145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9136945,0.054996226,0.0060836123,0.006303279,0.007189234,0.011733175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08408322,0.000902043,0.0010886468,0.0023046404,0.018815828,0.020895153,0.002937702,0.01125285,0.009647839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0631091,0.00066083844,0.00144284,0.0010091945,0.026469614,0.020507703,0.02523965,0.014006861,0.0015986344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047763522,0.00026399054,0.004357824,0.00041315766,0.00004719626,0.0010509343,0.058545996,0.0008863281,0.0024134163,0.77840656,0.03810142,0.115465395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050074043,0.0001758362,0.0034707726,0.0014791791,0.00003294837,0.00044211582,0.081394404,0.0008226879,0.00067327387,0.3935615,0.51778156,0.000115683426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016507194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028376617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08408322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006742464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025077369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44467992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576218015","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12005","title":"Protecting Rights and Building Capacities: Challenges to Global Mental Health Policy in Light of the<i>Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; Human rights; Mental health; Political science; Global mental health; Legitimacy; Flourishing; Health policy; Deliberation; Public relations; Public administration; Medicine; Law; Psychology; Health care; Politics; Psychiatry; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10326259449947287,"score_gpt":0.4255227238896256,"score_spread":0.3222601293901527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576218015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010079401,0.011682535,0.0037346778,0.89706594,0.0006898778,0.000023066099,0.000022405158,0.000025878695,0.07667616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75025636,0.021798432,0.006834693,0.20479593,0.0031710274,0.00026795318,0.00006437098,0.0001128203,0.012698484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786926,0.014921976,0.00049398676,0.0011576954,0.0018871952,0.002846543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979687,0.015398504,0.001338789,0.0011530544,0.0007495693,0.0016731941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028232045,0.0006810069,0.00079888257,0.0016740304,0.010749229,0.027883545,0.002392828,0.01989155,0.0048002396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018473437,0.0004053183,0.0008207189,0.0020092127,0.09259615,0.025139969,0.023202512,0.018406222,0.0008454428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040826376,0.000008898686,0.00010380433,0.00004303089,0.000002372475,0.00006397041,0.0084887985,0.00017947877,0.00003821677,0.9802547,0.005184649,0.0056280657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009181207,0.000012959312,0.00025972468,0.0005193513,0.000004845359,0.00009393381,0.01703204,0.00021720956,0.00009282476,0.89133286,0.09040556,0.000019512612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076404447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006882109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028232045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011327481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018477825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14930713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1727540652","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00621.x","title":"Paying Human Subjects in Research: Where are We, How Did We Get Here, and Now What?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Community Based Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Gratitude; Referral; Drug Company; Medicine; Psychology; Family medicine; Medical education; Management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.9159793065780372,"score_gpt":0.6790635662192508,"score_spread":0.23691574035878638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1727540652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025268781,0.08608198,0.011641693,0.8785811,0.009056717,0.000094672556,0.000016618364,0.000045696863,0.0119547015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21547782,0.10937923,0.03220659,0.6078367,0.022209184,0.0011109726,0.00007328442,0.00019364817,0.011512552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.72955424,0.21761957,0.008498902,0.012879281,0.025258346,0.0061896443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7355009,0.21056312,0.01226187,0.013510179,0.014593186,0.013570771],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2130393,0.0012192341,0.0026342773,0.0034450167,0.01815784,0.040670846,0.005219618,0.03963814,0.0035158026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17121547,0.0014147728,0.0012943125,0.004157829,0.16161984,0.05737309,0.020261666,0.042792458,0.0016086096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040278825,0.00006978252,0.0016487149,0.0010631349,0.000032309836,0.00025652137,0.07345077,0.00013615383,0.00024187034,0.822622,0.04056081,0.059877586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000400108,0.0001387806,0.0016741677,0.007884028,0.000039690043,0.0006797708,0.03629608,0.00016075619,0.00025261703,0.5064617,0.44622108,0.00015127404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006701692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0083712535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7869607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013243314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046290133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9704627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1766634659","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12066","title":"Corruption of Pharmaceutical Markets: Addressing the Misalignment of Financial Incentives and Public Health","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Language change; Value (mathematics); Financial market; Public economics; Public health; Finance; Economics; Microeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.37081870959387464,"score_gpt":0.42308298481208667,"score_spread":0.05226427521821203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1766634659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18544903,0.0090226885,0.16609722,0.49496493,0.0011278667,0.00025351444,0.00010542254,0.00016628436,0.14281316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775384,0.0015740673,0.007861786,0.009837181,0.00057141756,0.00008559365,0.000012013809,0.000025142108,0.002494367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97201794,0.018090546,0.0007704444,0.0013402567,0.0042627994,0.0035181313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95308226,0.02347319,0.012331212,0.0042825793,0.004324602,0.0025061183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022890331,0.0005047094,0.0010095802,0.0019349571,0.003666956,0.008523395,0.0012602534,0.006444194,0.002718687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06310975,0.0006176826,0.0008163513,0.0013429801,0.020363588,0.0119882785,0.00735255,0.008390199,0.00029551276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043986747,0.000054826614,0.0043771975,0.000071629904,0.000037362734,0.00012971477,0.0009663345,0.004435287,0.00025404865,0.97317696,0.0022547045,0.014198035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009050282,0.00010229956,0.004726067,0.00030794015,0.000039407656,0.00015127273,0.0008683976,0.009673749,0.0008521041,0.959306,0.023820296,0.00006193555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004087427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031905216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01015731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015399328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12105709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792748370","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00672.x","title":"Do Physicians/Researchers Trade Stock Based on Privileged Information? A Closer Look at Trading Patterns Surrounding the Annual ASCO Conference","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Stock (firearms); Medical education; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Family medicine; Psychology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.6822906063687372,"score_gpt":0.5913044223327633,"score_spread":0.09098618403597392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792748370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7798885,0.004666976,0.0026017013,0.12736759,0.0006665756,0.00015733292,0.0008878064,0.0001287976,0.08363463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98051834,0.0016274207,0.0009848024,0.009181744,0.00068307045,0.000057287336,0.00027645536,0.000059395818,0.00661153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98398083,0.0082026,0.0012047392,0.0010104685,0.0039866557,0.0016146171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87216777,0.06669207,0.04195192,0.003557412,0.006647325,0.008983552],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016432624,0.00013561179,0.00032661387,0.0026061025,0.004323518,0.008293512,0.0008615473,0.0028351436,0.0064728875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1070126,0.00029624617,0.0002646362,0.0045628403,0.002353823,0.0041751144,0.0024710207,0.0036771968,0.0011255146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015937513,0.00040818847,0.52778476,0.0005169494,0.00022045097,0.0060822424,0.06390591,0.0010535207,0.0039231954,0.05793367,0.13615838,0.20041908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009954582,0.0004425991,0.585966,0.00065677846,0.00006762498,0.0043173917,0.13334545,0.0031150673,0.0025018847,0.01757347,0.25165588,0.00025827068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045938394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078052166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99716485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028348297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002491771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08690506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1811835946","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12293","title":"Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; National Human Genome Research Institute; Mayo Clinic","keywords":"Research ethics; Institutional review board; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.9101725605391843,"score_gpt":0.6518857430719983,"score_spread":0.25828681746718596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1811835946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008606034,0.0037537827,0.002099254,0.9232787,0.003973089,0.00017507552,0.00010485739,0.00006140702,0.057947833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26858371,0.0067828596,0.0072178524,0.6484985,0.0016708587,0.00039879375,0.00019620641,0.0002030383,0.066448174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8478788,0.066256896,0.0049253316,0.00665912,0.05317822,0.02110169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64373577,0.15409721,0.011784405,0.009396952,0.115677394,0.06530832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12134069,0.00059973245,0.00088156085,0.0027978788,0.03809877,0.016730249,0.0055332514,0.0136568155,0.008426393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23764059,0.0010816472,0.0010666396,0.0036401455,0.026898054,0.005177259,0.009529814,0.025219496,0.0010693984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005429696,0.000059719026,0.0055564125,0.00027933094,0.000036585392,0.0010866231,0.045394905,0.00032663916,0.0004634255,0.18063287,0.7229051,0.04320407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045644992,0.000033868695,0.007145957,0.0010448856,0.000028163791,0.0006571535,0.021332616,0.00036511346,0.00031866785,0.020670848,0.9481896,0.00016751971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8626632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93803304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1444626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3951803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875500872","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12007","title":"A Survey of International Legal Instruments to Examine Their Effectiveness in Improving Global Health and in Realizing Health Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Political science; International law; Field (mathematics); International health; Health law; Global health; Right to health; Law and economics; Health policy; Law; Human rights; Sociology; Health care","score_opus":0.09542119232085679,"score_gpt":0.4019873730784733,"score_spread":0.30656618075761655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875500872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5643438,0.03386408,0.014426636,0.02873674,0.0007665067,0.0014624915,0.0014541546,0.00026571588,0.35467982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395784,0.024498153,0.020616837,0.0047668875,0.00021129486,0.00096399896,0.0010883193,0.00020550576,0.008070602],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95166564,0.024195889,0.0050272504,0.0014527941,0.014921618,0.0027369189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80962116,0.12245101,0.030714616,0.008466181,0.023479445,0.0052676033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07945028,0.00045072247,0.00066060136,0.015888682,0.0028728682,0.00720245,0.0010991377,0.0018832799,0.005941137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16015059,0.0004441597,0.0007895601,0.019237803,0.006989755,0.011268517,0.004874909,0.0036613613,0.00093224284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019748382,0.0005511425,0.22382787,0.001904446,0.00009688644,0.00028747405,0.033377584,0.0005821933,0.00096232723,0.22012734,0.022686176,0.49539912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006575927,0.00093583483,0.40284,0.007044023,0.00012340982,0.0010805532,0.08938295,0.0018759201,0.0022232884,0.027788443,0.46644372,0.00019604944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013288093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015205562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07945028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037167312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050996197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42017823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1882808860","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00712.x","title":"Beyond Human Subjects: Risk, Ethics, and Clinical Development of Nanomedicines","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.13046886095892102,"score_gpt":0.43092883840784907,"score_spread":0.30045997744892805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882808860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052825278,0.0674953,0.027429601,0.82150984,0.0023722616,0.00011761905,0.000026956193,0.000052244235,0.07571369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56556135,0.055229664,0.028945899,0.31491253,0.01148394,0.0010337867,0.000054540746,0.00020715088,0.02257115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8705528,0.10156373,0.0038913847,0.0046772165,0.016582543,0.0027324168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8068947,0.16115402,0.0073411227,0.00996473,0.008958577,0.0056868903],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12873556,0.00069915294,0.0012846538,0.0015981245,0.0069163516,0.016307265,0.0025805717,0.023428977,0.0029856083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13597679,0.00071564835,0.0006848524,0.0012996563,0.107724406,0.016571404,0.0106023885,0.020580048,0.0010463812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026549727,0.000035741046,0.00052915956,0.00013807125,0.000013318709,0.0001672942,0.004804842,0.00020608491,0.000088104236,0.964531,0.012378988,0.017080884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028897832,0.00008145136,0.00030883463,0.0010655964,0.0000119266315,0.00042803332,0.0023007381,0.0002809961,0.00021027219,0.89989066,0.095360555,0.0000321579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004174272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031447217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007619757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023466378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68082684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1883095706","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12288","title":"Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Cancer Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Participant observation; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.9094334095054257,"score_gpt":0.6971338435979062,"score_spread":0.21229956590751953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1883095706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007335323,0.007802823,0.027644198,0.9347602,0.0030648871,0.005321198,0.0011592417,0.00033772743,0.012574404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16276771,0.04759211,0.37780493,0.34610677,0.006832716,0.03441554,0.0032839188,0.0008823629,0.020313883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6787013,0.2567431,0.025361609,0.008012861,0.020255474,0.010925727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27826557,0.56469977,0.016768299,0.020981649,0.10234527,0.016939538],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.31027433,0.0032162764,0.003549526,0.010357657,0.010210875,0.018195676,0.013697553,0.020766309,0.020057462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.656702,0.0025072943,0.0058262176,0.008935451,0.009979244,0.03574939,0.013722533,0.017942542,0.007692148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013069937,0.00091980933,0.033624604,0.014355969,0.00093715254,0.0034563434,0.03790447,0.0024173988,0.00064599945,0.05942386,0.46022332,0.38478416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010632488,0.0004357464,0.017006006,0.11932965,0.002824896,0.0028879412,0.14210366,0.009820222,0.0018504208,0.2878206,0.4138133,0.0010443478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038975544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065083876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017076239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114572726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8505545},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1888473541","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12277","title":"Some Global Policies for Antibiotic Resistance Depend on Legally Binding and Enforceable Commitments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Inclusion (mineral); Antibiotic resistance; International community; Resistance (ecology); Antibiotics; Public administration; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.10627009178454509,"score_gpt":0.3656738449237537,"score_spread":0.2594037531392086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1888473541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075788028,0.0053265034,0.037285045,0.39240688,0.0038860831,0.0003081264,0.00023474172,0.00043915524,0.5525346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26479247,0.009681273,0.09599949,0.49690235,0.0037399994,0.001436729,0.00044351563,0.00059705856,0.12640719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719207,0.011367401,0.002359923,0.0026114245,0.008586536,0.0031540405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584306,0.020017942,0.004618712,0.008752575,0.005513716,0.0026665488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03220465,0.00077155605,0.00074071594,0.0012165456,0.0057651587,0.009002876,0.002263746,0.015544245,0.01265903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042316582,0.0007653083,0.0015408994,0.0012105128,0.02273044,0.009565631,0.008368119,0.020308562,0.0035638756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012187309,0.0000520883,0.0005347476,0.00020377373,0.000013781507,0.000073970434,0.0015200106,0.00021506054,0.00054603815,0.95339316,0.028820537,0.014614657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037343958,0.00010490596,0.0015009468,0.0008340506,0.000035724057,0.00025060013,0.001163293,0.00033423692,0.0013224573,0.2942339,0.7001032,0.000079352576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067665237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00683035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03220465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035653457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018703552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17031646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893210756","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12114","title":"Defining the Scope of Public Engagement: Examining the “Right Not to Know” in Public Health Genomics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill Genome Centre; McGill University; McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Genomics; Public engagement; Public health; Need to know; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Biology; Genetics; Genome; Medicine; Computer science; Philosophy; Gene","score_opus":0.370608804154424,"score_gpt":0.5259535673690982,"score_spread":0.15534476321467416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893210756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1381706,0.007680727,0.03433567,0.3297062,0.00042199067,0.00018455004,0.000058192156,0.000023034008,0.4894191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823272,0.0014526598,0.0023298902,0.010980594,0.00018166189,0.00026144224,0.000016634634,0.000026279447,0.0024236501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8948127,0.08885335,0.0014319881,0.0028824871,0.006232621,0.005786914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7830774,0.1916375,0.007960077,0.004385809,0.0069423006,0.00599696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08480644,0.0005239862,0.00088294194,0.0043109446,0.018440347,0.024708765,0.0038697973,0.016087763,0.0048145046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10115073,0.00078951946,0.0010899818,0.0035342788,0.13447984,0.038341694,0.02765204,0.016261762,0.0005253432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013224095,0.00002878942,0.0013006765,0.000055399676,0.0000054759657,0.0000995238,0.04579093,0.00017361365,0.00004719558,0.9487143,0.00057640765,0.0031944334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021099017,0.000026002448,0.0024014509,0.0007740188,0.000016035876,0.00012547831,0.12339285,0.0005629705,0.0001744952,0.8486371,0.023847302,0.0000212373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0089848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00866333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08480644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018580262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027542569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4485047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1898400040","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12016","title":"Global Trade and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Regulatory Challenges in International Surrogacy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Phenomenon; Reproductive technology; Key (lock); International law; Law and economics; International trade; Business; Law; Economics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.17160863234610832,"score_gpt":0.39803163704751526,"score_spread":0.22642300470140694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1898400040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007328399,0.026596053,0.004360384,0.9030559,0.0036927375,0.00003867834,0.000016829095,0.000029949992,0.05488102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34000108,0.04598604,0.010505322,0.56430197,0.010902326,0.00025425098,0.00004946468,0.0001630333,0.027836606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96485186,0.022996327,0.0017500147,0.0019629986,0.006294615,0.0021441712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94111323,0.05093898,0.002204328,0.0018165834,0.0019585013,0.0019684762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045402206,0.00044339173,0.001024102,0.0011130827,0.010580732,0.018466668,0.002113902,0.033805966,0.005497572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042612772,0.0006206888,0.0012890833,0.0021152755,0.040072113,0.018724624,0.0122784255,0.029947188,0.0006661891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023405812,0.000057755842,0.00084379176,0.00024824342,0.000010631455,0.001275788,0.01676867,0.00029568892,0.0002981257,0.90339285,0.038582157,0.0382029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027806256,0.00008256395,0.0008866875,0.0017836211,0.000020334917,0.0029558605,0.023384877,0.00042847364,0.00043166743,0.42208958,0.54782844,0.000080056474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025680854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053227223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045402206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005122616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010488681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24011272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1911642338","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12058","title":"Caring for Elder Parents: A Comparative Evaluation of Family Leave Laws","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Life expectancy; Family Leave; Gerontology; Depression (economics); Psychology; Medicine; Demography; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Population","score_opus":0.7454023821961644,"score_gpt":0.5811514008620684,"score_spread":0.164250981334096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1911642338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98987573,0.003125537,0.00013234091,0.00051544263,0.000053623862,0.00042637018,0.00042480615,0.0000025991326,0.005443633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947017,0.002838722,0.00019063012,0.0003525956,0.000055872773,0.00064322946,0.000417754,0.0000041486032,0.00079534046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.981013,0.013801686,0.001195926,0.0005246103,0.0022530279,0.001211734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94789475,0.035559222,0.0082882205,0.0014823733,0.005085124,0.0016903278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019456647,0.0004436173,0.0009129094,0.004515105,0.0034433345,0.001758577,0.0011756569,0.0013459835,0.005270033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068644725,0.00030618618,0.001264003,0.004267866,0.0020802766,0.0039401054,0.0027213828,0.0014220921,0.0003978084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021209015,0.027324554,0.4814445,0.006667415,0.0020065398,0.0018938747,0.18772614,0.0010227265,0.00068039127,0.011315429,0.00797437,0.25073507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023655908,0.025063047,0.5435069,0.0036450543,0.0012568778,0.00073215796,0.39927495,0.00048188854,0.0006788224,0.0018828828,0.020970894,0.00014076119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0164705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039200027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019456647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006371303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004054729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10289776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914281890","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12006","title":"The Role of Law in Ameliorating Global Inequalities in Indigenous Peoples' Health","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Legitimacy; State (computer science); Inequality; Political science; International law; Law; Sociology; Development economics; Economic growth; Law and economics; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.05632741293165228,"score_gpt":0.39842970245647163,"score_spread":0.34210228952481936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914281890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10380374,0.024116434,0.017350493,0.39195794,0.0020174573,0.00015641662,0.000075876946,0.00018337494,0.46033818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606259,0.0069396403,0.005423293,0.017739682,0.00095844467,0.0000991174,0.000020620864,0.00004566156,0.008147548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909957,0.004807751,0.00027458355,0.0005930504,0.0014964142,0.0018325666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839611,0.010511977,0.0016591663,0.0011568727,0.0012431607,0.0014677951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02054279,0.0003042038,0.00040193714,0.0018446713,0.006536245,0.0072370134,0.0014263509,0.0046046283,0.006654959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02770495,0.0002608158,0.00046870275,0.0011325766,0.036355432,0.0072414796,0.010284422,0.0062939236,0.00038351162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001696384,0.000106556094,0.0044343704,0.00028692957,0.000022263319,0.0003035709,0.02110349,0.0004606991,0.00047688725,0.9078833,0.006979365,0.057925504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048978538,0.00020971267,0.016843237,0.0026318794,0.000087444925,0.0003667069,0.029599229,0.0010994625,0.000958278,0.7258586,0.22221711,0.00007934072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021637384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036246497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021637384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054539987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018447641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10864192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914360813","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12113","title":"From the Right to Know to the Right Not to Know","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill Genome Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Right to know; Need to know; Medicine; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.06403950677489002,"score_gpt":0.38146439787312975,"score_spread":0.31742489109823974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914360813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004191335,0.0034696062,0.006156798,0.2548708,0.004823829,0.000039023296,0.0003139951,0.00014845606,0.72598606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37373754,0.006372016,0.005857359,0.15879703,0.0030928417,0.00014497654,0.00044667377,0.00052245066,0.4510291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899075,0.0041216644,0.00045317865,0.0010161535,0.002938319,0.0015632107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98918146,0.0039187646,0.00054412836,0.0020766533,0.0023872475,0.001891811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066847373,0.00033106646,0.0005798048,0.0006404555,0.005894552,0.010117705,0.001091778,0.007650611,0.04257256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028985709,0.0004224716,0.00051818736,0.000480987,0.019533983,0.012119832,0.00873729,0.01352903,0.014834206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019874056,0.000015986563,0.0002489602,0.00006931134,0.0000056476815,0.00012813882,0.0052571543,0.000039973555,0.0002099094,0.8108033,0.16587222,0.017329521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008507892,0.000014841664,0.00030799472,0.0003251528,0.000007787084,0.00030259372,0.0024598208,0.000045339755,0.0003300994,0.19850458,0.7976653,0.0000279078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008419878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008788687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04257256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027176102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009230004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1424194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928379713","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00698.x","title":"Too Fast or Not Too Fast: The FDA's Approval of Merck's HPV Vaccine Gardasil","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Cervical Cancer and HPV Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration","keywords":"Gardasil; Food and drug administration; Political science; Drug approval; HPV vaccines; Marketing authorization; Cervical cancer; Medicine; Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Environmental health; Cancer; HPV infection; Sociology; Drug; Pharmacology; Biology; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.20068448331623837,"score_gpt":0.4426623340933842,"score_spread":0.24197785077714581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928379713","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005832244,0.26672643,0.00088610995,0.6848978,0.0059036016,0.000027152095,0.000054135857,0.00002466899,0.035647944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18491295,0.2660915,0.0032074957,0.5139946,0.011621337,0.00008595155,0.00010251805,0.000058291436,0.019925354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879516,0.005555279,0.00083729,0.0005538605,0.0036784168,0.0005800529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773942,0.017917132,0.001388975,0.0004038564,0.0023465913,0.0005492179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015103161,0.00025796116,0.000598695,0.0009785383,0.0015393068,0.004576433,0.0010059582,0.010869109,0.0027858897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03206113,0.00021497135,0.0007017449,0.00094827526,0.0043965005,0.004148792,0.00097184,0.0068490338,0.0006030966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003727847,0.00011032103,0.0023622895,0.0030973938,0.000094219235,0.0019844477,0.004163065,0.00017816742,0.0033770856,0.36445445,0.3018357,0.3179701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094153365,0.0002903712,0.0041143624,0.0040643625,0.00013257015,0.0019540808,0.0030185333,0.00012600122,0.0024167353,0.04960555,0.9341088,0.00007462897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003294963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006465468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015103161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026003208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004609428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0798741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1930071406","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00622.x","title":"Currents in Contemporary Bioethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Research Resources","keywords":"Bioethics; Transferability; Prenatal diagnosis; Psychology; Informed consent; Medicine; Family medicine; Law; Political science; Pregnancy; Fetus; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.47698736879390213,"score_gpt":0.44436095580425417,"score_spread":0.03262641298964797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1930071406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031601805,0.038055327,0.0043599657,0.78567684,0.0033777985,0.000026739,0.00004688931,0.000029387502,0.16526684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43244168,0.04562022,0.007997595,0.44041577,0.017500717,0.00040348808,0.00013534304,0.00020844555,0.05527671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736475,0.01585988,0.0009184764,0.0025549817,0.0049668844,0.0020523563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96760434,0.023433292,0.001306571,0.002479455,0.0032822716,0.0018940768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037345782,0.0006338306,0.0009459087,0.0028301198,0.015855521,0.022652535,0.0027951526,0.02124696,0.011120099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042174216,0.00068499276,0.0008065305,0.0028339024,0.0950109,0.020681838,0.008005649,0.032744355,0.0018556463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034807722,0.000008820167,0.000059313214,0.000023328372,0.0000017838504,0.00002369755,0.0022664045,0.00005395335,0.000015899528,0.9799048,0.014823144,0.0028153993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008959231,0.000007871022,0.0001355321,0.00048965355,0.0000024626258,0.00007059412,0.0038705687,0.00015895738,0.00003007047,0.75792515,0.23728749,0.000012635915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012086468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00983492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037345782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022180613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020255579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19750571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1961848869","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12267","title":"What Will it Take to Address the Global Threat of Antibiotic Resistance?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health and Long Term Care","funders":"","keywords":"Antibiotic resistance; Resistance (ecology); Antibiotics; Business; Intensive care medicine; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Biology; Microbiology","score_opus":0.09351948488377047,"score_gpt":0.36206690588583956,"score_spread":0.2685474210020691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1961848869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001369516,0.012117379,0.0014164384,0.9758822,0.0031919442,0.000021589267,0.000035617977,0.000045993416,0.0059193117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13956407,0.061281085,0.014293591,0.7594504,0.017003465,0.00045832034,0.00017053932,0.00015522067,0.0076232273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97871953,0.010562128,0.0010264069,0.0010600862,0.004377939,0.004253985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9197673,0.036116663,0.0048496965,0.0028485423,0.018093916,0.018323837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040612224,0.0009686665,0.0015074621,0.0021769663,0.005043375,0.016498152,0.0039594634,0.032043763,0.0131249465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08538827,0.00042828746,0.001953932,0.0010693611,0.013471494,0.022735517,0.0072698947,0.019424506,0.0038800288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032742196,0.00074349175,0.009116014,0.0031766437,0.00034538718,0.0012465128,0.0042379657,0.0018987601,0.0014708311,0.27593544,0.41058642,0.29091516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013209271,0.0006141913,0.010053782,0.010992924,0.0003023056,0.0015402653,0.02588688,0.0016825533,0.0015731079,0.3377542,0.60916793,0.0002996648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009395213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009262476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040612224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062194234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03553438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21478051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963992014","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01974.x","title":"The ELSI Genetics Regulatory Resource Kit: A Tool for Policymakers in Developing Countries","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Context (archaeology); Health care; Political science; Global health; Economic growth; Public health; Law; Medicine; Economics; Biology; Nursing","score_opus":0.07631348126369585,"score_gpt":0.381880875935002,"score_spread":0.3055673946713061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963992014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011376621,0.0024983687,0.32368195,0.16586442,0.0050705955,0.0076041026,0.018610138,0.058712203,0.4065817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04198993,0.0022691607,0.77413225,0.020024592,0.0009658425,0.012743863,0.009136093,0.007848676,0.13088961],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98516047,0.008676797,0.0014822449,0.0006630983,0.0033119142,0.0007055155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9218482,0.05153661,0.003660892,0.0060476107,0.011763177,0.0051435633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05735178,0.0010373628,0.0011303622,0.00726209,0.0029755149,0.008517973,0.0031210764,0.0050718305,0.09412188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091432914,0.0013946354,0.0006506373,0.005489264,0.0024090298,0.017545218,0.008504252,0.0050121243,0.03744246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015627115,0.00030259666,0.0016425841,0.00044374497,0.0000142770605,0.00062599586,0.0029227906,0.0010963046,0.0010908679,0.044747315,0.6841778,0.26277944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010366847,0.000057770616,0.0008274465,0.000652405,0.0000168839,0.00021978137,0.0024343026,0.002030184,0.00083751685,0.024742143,0.968002,0.000075788135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030519064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00409265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09412188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030618021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016071944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31486905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966723289","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00241.x","title":"What<i>Is</i>Medical Ethics Consultation?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Medical ethics; Curriculum; Medical education; Health care; Test (biology); Medical advice; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.31734282199512415,"score_gpt":0.5773276296606016,"score_spread":0.25998480766547744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966723289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003973709,0.012137907,0.001176095,0.9711109,0.0054156203,0.000025159872,0.00001628818,0.00003527207,0.009685433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062820904,0.058245637,0.008335878,0.827774,0.03347158,0.00031090697,0.00011561404,0.00017811752,0.00874738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93736345,0.04325624,0.0033386527,0.0027325577,0.00871412,0.004594975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90629417,0.032310426,0.0064219614,0.002707554,0.019166572,0.03309936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040445566,0.0010160122,0.001907426,0.0040567303,0.013090668,0.022239696,0.0043068985,0.032722283,0.008905813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103487894,0.0010377873,0.0014408372,0.0031206936,0.035866346,0.03045709,0.007407805,0.030127816,0.0052496972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010750228,0.00037585088,0.00423547,0.0035626919,0.00013176694,0.0037713808,0.011676504,0.0002998394,0.00057477655,0.14103262,0.6813259,0.15290563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005889735,0.00009337627,0.004268297,0.018414795,0.00005950728,0.010996618,0.035729542,0.00050094223,0.0003035582,0.20986268,0.7194466,0.00026507082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00896078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014462356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040445566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015188692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025814286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21389914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972111052","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00531.x","title":"Legislating and Litigating Health Care Rights around the World","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Political science; Patient rights; Environmental health; Law and economics; Law; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.108730139807355,"score_gpt":0.4217354055491919,"score_spread":0.3130052657418369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972111052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039795816,0.006814944,0.009870592,0.4168683,0.001164983,0.00017541165,0.00012422676,0.00006167172,0.52512413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8262586,0.004121647,0.0053762486,0.1269073,0.0010470941,0.0002820477,0.0000763368,0.00007566758,0.035855077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95497257,0.027215518,0.0018810817,0.0027817732,0.0065008914,0.006648046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525562,0.03714902,0.0025607836,0.0019471636,0.003149223,0.0026377288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049916726,0.00041364503,0.00068380206,0.0019381763,0.012550356,0.017967505,0.002249516,0.021912903,0.006989944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065658204,0.00076706684,0.0006575885,0.0019539485,0.03226271,0.009030362,0.009399811,0.0139860455,0.00093328534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013708726,0.000031137228,0.0011370674,0.00004702563,0.0000141201135,0.00019786735,0.009227915,0.00029254387,0.0002621331,0.9524914,0.027233714,0.009051385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006507427,0.00006421299,0.0033087383,0.0013843101,0.00006355537,0.00024645092,0.023045111,0.0010314959,0.0011168872,0.54322934,0.4263494,0.00009534051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038354382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046163306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049916726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010058349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029785812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26398808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973624853","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00103.x","title":"The Human Subjects Trade: Ethical and Legal Issues Surrounding Recruitment Incentives","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Context (archaeology); Duty of care; Statute; Business; Tort; Political science; Safeguarding; Incentive; Enforcement; Law and economics; Duty; Law; Public relations; Liability; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.7509528946360123,"score_gpt":0.645536590896026,"score_spread":0.10541630373998634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973624853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012719191,0.008471112,0.031839356,0.87387353,0.00488027,0.00048955495,0.00006577058,0.00012762306,0.06753366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23899609,0.0038119715,0.035376742,0.6855467,0.015093105,0.0022989153,0.00006032735,0.0001535397,0.018662618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6430912,0.28516978,0.012991745,0.011388832,0.041880254,0.00547829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30732855,0.6287544,0.01875157,0.023988483,0.014441317,0.0067357067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37461552,0.0008041629,0.0014973811,0.0017956721,0.012161082,0.016875993,0.0049327514,0.057331163,0.0051048435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42974585,0.0016438923,0.0013211154,0.0026066506,0.043872412,0.013606787,0.0072479686,0.029878428,0.0025676177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022858911,0.00019963697,0.0046052295,0.0003483265,0.00006884848,0.0016573895,0.013452539,0.0004403079,0.0007735644,0.7998487,0.11403555,0.064341344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035306896,0.00046043427,0.0049224775,0.0028486494,0.00010664663,0.0039810766,0.007841152,0.0037971993,0.0014574009,0.52887094,0.44509822,0.00026278885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024886867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003974625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62538445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005206164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018945163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77121043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975822629","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00669.x","title":"A Survey of Physician Training Programs in Risk Management and Communication Skills for Malpractice Prevention","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; U.S. Public Health Service; Health Resources and Services Administration","keywords":"Malpractice; Lawsuit; Defensive medicine; Medical malpractice; Medicine; Health care; Psychology; Family medicine; Medical emergency; Nursing; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.3445429284045792,"score_gpt":0.5368101843556289,"score_spread":0.1922672559510497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975822629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862279,0.0039387885,0.00034559035,0.002863137,0.000044331686,0.000116687654,0.00055522606,0.000044044453,0.0058643166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98959714,0.004839419,0.0008805704,0.0016278449,0.00006496561,0.00011046429,0.00041948433,0.000014537624,0.0024455776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820614,0.00047609027,0.00016701395,0.00015498397,0.00070567447,0.00029007852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769383,0.0065959617,0.0060447357,0.00054386334,0.0041794083,0.005697647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017362136,0.00015676128,0.00019830669,0.0020426558,0.0005539102,0.0005425624,0.00040755895,0.0007039305,0.0045873006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011622751,0.00026064503,0.0002593916,0.0021018733,0.00033336648,0.0008545838,0.0005824227,0.00070336554,0.0011027014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009158201,0.000588186,0.92099667,0.00023049332,0.000028175999,0.0001858765,0.0015402836,0.00009553969,0.0009951473,0.000217608,0.005290084,0.06974036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080637465,0.00021783383,0.9923429,0.00007169107,0.00000928839,0.00033045266,0.00090653024,0.0001214416,0.00009986532,0.000023980983,0.0058637355,0.000004242105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004604945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011294095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004604945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008163817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019794663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01534605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978177029","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00628.x","title":"Biobanks and the Return of Research Results: Out with the Old and in with the New?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ontario Genomics","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Typology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.6838472246947249,"score_gpt":0.5910022817143065,"score_spread":0.09284494298041845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978177029","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027245078,0.013930602,0.0046748323,0.96275705,0.0015609079,0.000025727006,0.000021155698,0.000034823614,0.014270399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21235648,0.034124743,0.012102444,0.7129699,0.010533112,0.00037193633,0.00008063011,0.0003105649,0.017150253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.72480816,0.22562198,0.0078152055,0.009832067,0.024779556,0.007142951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5829149,0.35168153,0.017540712,0.02200131,0.014393641,0.01146792],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2528081,0.0005464632,0.0017125336,0.002221455,0.015054913,0.044434853,0.005941207,0.035720903,0.008622131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2944648,0.0011376761,0.0012368673,0.003968178,0.112349205,0.06381765,0.016897423,0.029553099,0.0030064476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006943346,0.000051772167,0.000908788,0.00019845297,0.000020956062,0.00033795094,0.018523421,0.00008363317,0.000108943066,0.89576375,0.05695308,0.02697986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006736385,0.00008236009,0.0008750351,0.0015606666,0.000020460382,0.0009488612,0.021876132,0.00020793008,0.00027304457,0.5514462,0.42255467,0.00008729717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038875071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036169083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010187087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024467455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92142063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983463486","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00721.x","title":"I Need a Placebo like I Need a Hole in the Head","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical trial; Psychological intervention; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Research ethics; Psychology; Law; Political science; Psychiatry; Pathology","score_opus":0.17582632097528722,"score_gpt":0.4225300756598662,"score_spread":0.246703754684579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983463486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027065774,0.0008066804,0.00013224523,0.987071,0.009008595,0.000013346657,0.000020351143,0.000022414308,0.0026547238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014994589,0.00030298598,0.00024722202,0.98679173,0.0062372233,0.000021948941,0.000004642133,0.000016124544,0.004878657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921733,0.0033515461,0.0007658264,0.0011069736,0.001931625,0.0006707124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97567505,0.019733343,0.00087767956,0.0005533988,0.0017310224,0.0014295208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009801525,0.0010074951,0.0016770668,0.0006622788,0.0075464086,0.006916862,0.0025494134,0.07855763,0.0060993424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05169409,0.0010091898,0.0015065094,0.0009022644,0.0068843057,0.008653299,0.0018088579,0.06154054,0.004851463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050483974,0.00004972078,0.00048658453,0.00008176341,0.000015455675,0.0013895419,0.00059416937,0.0000471548,0.00023527537,0.012777606,0.9751295,0.009142802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011491887,0.00013298355,0.0009780525,0.00046738834,0.000037485057,0.0023809925,0.0022396545,0.00046585884,0.00035551045,0.02273335,0.96998614,0.00010764273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008363384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016387308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07855763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003974476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059445086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051836014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983973208","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00266.x","title":"Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":701,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Human research; Informed consent; Psychology; Participant observation; Institutional review board; Medical education; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Sociology; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.8173813325809884,"score_gpt":0.6894667605983835,"score_spread":0.12791457198260492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983973208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001222441,0.14651476,0.027361983,0.80101556,0.009737886,0.006021557,0.0006073796,0.00039626108,0.007122198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026407592,0.41602984,0.33316532,0.17986879,0.011382926,0.023117473,0.0010230476,0.0002461924,0.0087587815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6120259,0.2844212,0.050124753,0.0054317457,0.04419644,0.003799825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24395202,0.5310445,0.04837747,0.021641407,0.14621134,0.008773275],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.32346672,0.0035501667,0.006387882,0.0155206155,0.004248622,0.01338541,0.010697976,0.020394435,0.005351321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58779377,0.0033807727,0.0052423566,0.013448194,0.011262265,0.028452953,0.0077747847,0.018298484,0.0046285163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047427285,0.00028094483,0.0039464077,0.038687896,0.0005731094,0.001040151,0.0041636047,0.0010766061,0.00039943832,0.028324502,0.311275,0.6097581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009708041,0.00039882696,0.0060132155,0.32687348,0.0027500251,0.002706352,0.012205048,0.004168253,0.0011987046,0.1265811,0.51552165,0.0006125894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014725478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026555553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012547477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077181816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.834286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984548986","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01969.x","title":"Leopards in the Temple: Restoring Scientific Integrity to the Commercialized Research Scene","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Commercialization; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Business; Scientific evidence; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.9397550317288685,"score_gpt":0.7356368478235283,"score_spread":0.2041181839053402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984548986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034012871,0.01022854,0.0059414133,0.9244393,0.00802971,0.000048209142,0.00003911926,0.00021650246,0.047655832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14217262,0.011088816,0.009522212,0.7180156,0.016687268,0.00027678927,0.00013577596,0.00054177904,0.10155903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94001096,0.027952323,0.0025777773,0.0051096412,0.019146955,0.005202389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8799508,0.063379385,0.0064814663,0.02241336,0.014946498,0.0128284395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07698096,0.00072789256,0.001434939,0.0020296383,0.021442423,0.04694645,0.003802162,0.03123319,0.011754871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13647304,0.0011583108,0.0013871586,0.0017337953,0.051674318,0.03492386,0.016621938,0.047444552,0.0053224145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000867616,0.00006915154,0.00045869278,0.000102626946,0.000044892367,0.0006547377,0.0076750834,0.0001262256,0.000736304,0.6452461,0.31560212,0.029197305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005492768,0.00007639456,0.00046414568,0.00040707004,0.000021488418,0.0004440768,0.0030890694,0.00031660043,0.00073740113,0.19436638,0.79996794,0.000054383927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037863026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046483474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9687668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008669647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028684538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1984743713","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00088.x","title":"Cognitive Barriers in Perception of Nanotechnology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biotechnology and Related Fields","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Nanotechnology; Cognition; Applications of nanotechnology; Polarization (electrochemistry); Societal impact of nanotechnology; Psychology; Political science; Chemistry; Materials science; Psychiatry; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.032945103376923544,"score_gpt":0.3387759706689053,"score_spread":0.3058308672919818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984743713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68578416,0.00508017,0.012848821,0.03915276,0.0003493496,0.000067056964,0.00007780094,0.000055998866,0.25658384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694985,0.0003737914,0.000411161,0.0012004888,0.000047179685,0.000013459244,0.000016258327,0.000013814788,0.0009740792],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906313,0.0043899817,0.00024167486,0.0007117096,0.003392698,0.00063276343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97694176,0.0148846805,0.0027628927,0.0010288232,0.0028551372,0.0015266452],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085916445,0.0003556776,0.00035547282,0.002391019,0.0029992699,0.009158148,0.0009862526,0.0035721904,0.0056653316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039159864,0.00034976655,0.0004976703,0.00089244463,0.018298445,0.009783146,0.006770925,0.0047328165,0.00037943517],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024115233,0.00024253318,0.026881171,0.00048343866,0.00008360303,0.0007760192,0.5241144,0.0011558755,0.0032902432,0.39726993,0.0069090915,0.038552534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092148,0.00027245327,0.055069257,0.0007321831,0.00006927799,0.0010063286,0.34527066,0.004019491,0.0011437242,0.4969747,0.09508396,0.0002658185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063789263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023297532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99700075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035145916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019700788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045437455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985927387","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00627.x","title":"Familial Communication of Research Results: A Need to Know?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"BRCA gene mutations in cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Ontario Genomics","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance; McGill University","keywords":"Confidentiality; Genetic testing; Context (archaeology); Disease; Genetic counseling; Genetic discrimination; Informed consent; Breast cancer; Health professionals; Psychology; Medicine; Health care; Cancer; Genetics; Alternative medicine; Biology; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.2072235652891657,"score_gpt":0.45251999563195894,"score_spread":0.24529643034279325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985927387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037680473,0.0046921615,0.004348513,0.97860515,0.0013600579,0.000016917495,0.000010711705,0.00003643628,0.007162089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39650923,0.016163206,0.010825098,0.5621008,0.00696459,0.00018176822,0.000048153357,0.00014056292,0.0070665185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8841319,0.09449154,0.0059806574,0.0035241288,0.007905306,0.0039665643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7248423,0.2184644,0.0151793985,0.016270706,0.01628752,0.00895567],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13097125,0.000577612,0.0014184031,0.0018457869,0.011816372,0.012034789,0.0032745665,0.026615337,0.0065500448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21882656,0.0011161743,0.0010531729,0.0012110278,0.04866679,0.050407954,0.009630155,0.025437247,0.0018734159],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011909866,0.0001285886,0.006494355,0.0012005619,0.00009554809,0.005672194,0.20459996,0.00014407145,0.001031692,0.51126295,0.12831615,0.1409349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057078276,0.0001560004,0.003735637,0.005274658,0.00010798209,0.018898705,0.21419278,0.00054490706,0.00090929214,0.3680806,0.38779655,0.00024583418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004953788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005660703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007005537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144269485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69265044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988045541","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00194.x","title":"Ethics at Phase 0: Clarifying the Issues","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Food and drug administration; Drug development; Clinical trial; Agency (philosophy); Psychological intervention; Translational research; Exploratory research; Medicine; Drug approval; Investigational Drugs; Engineering ethics; Political science; Drug; Pharmacology; Sociology; Internal medicine; Engineering; Pathology; Nursing; Social science","score_opus":0.5065398651351934,"score_gpt":0.5796213906381787,"score_spread":0.0730815255029853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988045541","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004706321,0.15587614,0.022668054,0.76833063,0.010030088,0.0004089084,0.000037830363,0.000040850697,0.037901144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24463008,0.09048739,0.03651365,0.60096455,0.014251381,0.0023735636,0.000055042037,0.00011015722,0.010614151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.71805066,0.24081576,0.009849722,0.0047805523,0.0232077,0.0032956994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6416609,0.32219645,0.010804029,0.0077897585,0.0150737,0.0024750512],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.28012112,0.00079722924,0.0021371096,0.0017424047,0.005462732,0.00988454,0.0040151146,0.019648748,0.0019156374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27077186,0.0009519455,0.0013577569,0.0024115085,0.04301691,0.022510434,0.007164315,0.023394067,0.00096615165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059048696,0.000055751563,0.00050897186,0.002345642,0.00003005868,0.0004080827,0.0115399305,0.00014996882,0.00023422264,0.83309674,0.044016056,0.10755559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012799597,0.00018830264,0.0015735811,0.011724878,0.000074465264,0.0014048241,0.008448154,0.00030330083,0.00056591275,0.5100203,0.46550012,0.000068140536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004073398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052717556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28012112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007924862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037536148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8877388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988583704","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00625.x","title":"Return of Research Results: General Principles and International Perspectives","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval; McGill Genome Centre; Ontario Genomics","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Biobank; Pace; Data science; Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Political science; Computer science; Biology; Bioinformatics; Geography","score_opus":0.8626087148929631,"score_gpt":0.6567269589365216,"score_spread":0.20588175595644154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988583704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043724864,0.048950642,0.050325237,0.52856565,0.0032635797,0.00022917074,0.00010976998,0.00008843014,0.36409512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5153099,0.06585166,0.06950048,0.28121814,0.017339207,0.0029855515,0.0002607634,0.0004932749,0.047041066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86915874,0.08971103,0.007755242,0.008142998,0.019127171,0.006104905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8791483,0.09751469,0.005101841,0.0071810116,0.008411859,0.00264236],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15369208,0.001459175,0.0024373922,0.0048805396,0.010444682,0.03308601,0.0061057922,0.02937624,0.0042202026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0870947,0.0013364791,0.0022058275,0.0059969127,0.12814419,0.030074788,0.016568795,0.032441016,0.0012802186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056158456,0.000010836683,0.00006670492,0.00005532617,0.000004872677,0.000050016934,0.001795706,0.000073125535,0.0000159827,0.9928197,0.0028400426,0.002261928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023100985,0.00004085844,0.00021730101,0.0007507213,0.000015025332,0.00035867392,0.0028398347,0.0002011048,0.00012768754,0.8946137,0.10078539,0.000026691916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002952575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015123053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84630793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012013834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016207797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81281114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990531111","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12108","title":"Workplace Health: Engaging Business Leaders to Combat Obesity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Workplace Health and Well-being","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Absenteeism; Health promotion; Obesity; Incentive; Health care; Environmental health; Medicine; Workplace health promotion; Population; Gerontology; Business; Public health; Nursing; Psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.1725135947828413,"score_gpt":0.46839204940351464,"score_spread":0.2958784546206733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990531111","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24053833,0.04292938,0.029124452,0.4537211,0.039426107,0.00096202677,0.0003072691,0.0026532651,0.19033799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65862167,0.030452445,0.054352164,0.1383178,0.011926506,0.0012647023,0.00050400547,0.0005382679,0.104022406],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795157,0.0011434135,0.000034120687,0.00012516827,0.0003029172,0.000442849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960448,0.0007474625,0.0002930971,0.000087913206,0.00025882333,0.0025679239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031118826,0.0006902839,0.0003165579,0.00062257214,0.0034207578,0.0037712727,0.001110688,0.0027026641,0.012515296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043931645,0.00026421645,0.0006750141,0.00026588785,0.0011763698,0.002947456,0.0055502933,0.004335506,0.0045454493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000218919,0.0038249851,0.0068091983,0.0014035469,0.00008065248,0.0007393637,0.02328633,0.00017252522,0.0040841536,0.0054001696,0.34888655,0.6050936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039931686,0.0023931174,0.018874593,0.0034568857,0.00014442203,0.0009317352,0.06408472,0.0007502834,0.0020654649,0.016816184,0.8899681,0.00011515964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053935446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026928473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012515296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064393325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028888118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041867852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994184927","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00246.x","title":"Teaching Health Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brother; Officer; Liability; Law; Private practice; Health care; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.37632004586405543,"score_gpt":0.5700524962173158,"score_spread":0.19373245035326037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994184927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041184807,0.016021693,0.0031818172,0.7640227,0.009498509,0.000054664335,0.000084552485,0.00018090216,0.20283668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108088784,0.019235015,0.0046491805,0.35314265,0.009248076,0.00012318861,0.000102012855,0.00016613794,0.5052451],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685425,0.0010632881,0.00008843976,0.00040736585,0.00088772835,0.00069897727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98368317,0.0035992612,0.0005502053,0.0005990961,0.001718317,0.009850067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004225454,0.0005024361,0.00036744607,0.0009869542,0.009171759,0.005182357,0.00088768103,0.0056594172,0.06877217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014447486,0.00051725446,0.00039114305,0.00050645944,0.00787522,0.004631452,0.0041297474,0.011864865,0.016145395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009538594,0.00014815704,0.00084475154,0.000090642956,0.0000057631914,0.00023493354,0.0050887135,0.00008083516,0.000311605,0.05001569,0.8915492,0.051620193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009175079,0.000048817434,0.0012185281,0.00038724352,0.0000029131143,0.00041166722,0.0055608316,0.00012114068,0.00016022565,0.03346807,0.95860165,0.000009729745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009383132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023041734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06877217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007720605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016662812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23006582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994719100","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00013.x","title":"Conflict over Conflicts of Interest: An Analysis of the New NIH Rules","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Conflict of interest; German; Drug Company; Neutrality; Political science; Management; Technology transfer; Law; Business; Economics; History","score_opus":0.7359341548031622,"score_gpt":0.6185349666823107,"score_spread":0.11739918812085148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994719100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08600922,0.009822219,0.028675878,0.17118849,0.0020170228,0.0005785109,0.00067546597,0.00007784095,0.70095533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93330127,0.003934639,0.011816758,0.032175172,0.0022402785,0.0005786974,0.00019044134,0.000087600136,0.01567518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92820984,0.025316456,0.0041652964,0.0044430248,0.030008325,0.007857235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7104778,0.23760295,0.016995577,0.008526261,0.020740647,0.0056567057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074700594,0.00057107175,0.0012904654,0.006658525,0.009850767,0.016492205,0.0034362678,0.00936261,0.011941127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17538933,0.00075266784,0.0018323174,0.005313014,0.022733187,0.010968616,0.006835201,0.01328101,0.0006705786],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004454677,0.00003930391,0.0042495094,0.000048555983,0.000027219676,0.0003086119,0.0011698545,0.00033033328,0.00004213663,0.97318596,0.012161993,0.008392003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092438415,0.00013514356,0.013333576,0.00079319323,0.0002133374,0.0017656363,0.006811784,0.0048094876,0.0004980531,0.83005065,0.14136384,0.0001328379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010262057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012134039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99063736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090097785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013308676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39505923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999803760","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00626.x","title":"Pediatric Research and the Return of Individual Research Results","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics; McGill Genome Centre; Université de Montréal; Ontario Genomics","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychology; Duty; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Pediatric research; Social psychology; Research ethics; Political science; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Pediatrics","score_opus":0.6355969445831219,"score_gpt":0.5519063948138195,"score_spread":0.08369054976930235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999803760","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056161925,0.024179222,0.13289587,0.5883312,0.0047123465,0.0023347682,0.00038069088,0.0003185056,0.19068553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6819986,0.015479281,0.12557124,0.13176104,0.0033403416,0.005494932,0.0002957972,0.00037828783,0.03568056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.45634755,0.484128,0.016069548,0.010130835,0.027522765,0.0058011916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47911522,0.38184926,0.034421243,0.06664826,0.02583935,0.012126632],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3803379,0.00057624886,0.0012291219,0.0018720699,0.007875142,0.0119296545,0.004385163,0.014639306,0.006823716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39593664,0.00115066,0.0015301942,0.0021840502,0.049171824,0.012932154,0.014657532,0.015632015,0.0024986928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029866575,0.00021219048,0.0074486188,0.0010875119,0.0001350519,0.002595447,0.078501835,0.00047935202,0.0010249384,0.76916593,0.035588685,0.103461914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020735506,0.0010328279,0.0069714193,0.0062221535,0.00016980541,0.010689315,0.03835567,0.00078574003,0.004138903,0.36429796,0.5669584,0.00017036484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020625698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024824527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005341508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032586392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7641537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005590473","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00154.x","title":"Why Can’t We Do What They Do? National Health Reform Abroad","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life expectancy; Per capita; Health care; Gross domestic product; Infant mortality; International health; Health policy; Economic growth; Population; Product (mathematics); Health insurance; Business; Demographic economics; Medicine; Environmental health; Economics","score_opus":0.1744479968077542,"score_gpt":0.39586398427227865,"score_spread":0.22141598746452446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005590473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054222564,0.0050343727,0.0005699732,0.9336977,0.0026699363,0.000034536664,0.000096831376,0.000036293728,0.05243804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24292581,0.008783626,0.0024451364,0.6942765,0.0029053122,0.00019222932,0.000197704,0.00006831913,0.048205342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936348,0.0032201791,0.00015068952,0.00041716907,0.0009853488,0.0015917466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99203616,0.001961833,0.00058472186,0.00088782026,0.0014425293,0.0030869988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0123995,0.00031376956,0.00047520158,0.00091931754,0.0034856778,0.005786185,0.0010462462,0.007849978,0.022125604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02784103,0.00021402526,0.0006624483,0.0009468204,0.005693987,0.008575718,0.0053526736,0.009164359,0.0021083492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060229257,0.00030183405,0.0042022713,0.00021894678,0.000062733554,0.00010144026,0.0011640708,0.00035706253,0.00018973598,0.50697434,0.39696342,0.089404024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014057466,0.0001530726,0.012158626,0.0015594254,0.000048036658,0.000088819106,0.0034373496,0.0005528163,0.00039638882,0.14031082,0.84110385,0.000050225648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01782291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015727688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022125604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065456307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0146714905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074017525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005819759","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00583.x","title":"Care, Compassion, or Cost: Redefining the Basis of Treatment in Ethics and Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CARE Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Subject (documents); Point (geometry); Psychology; Reflection (computer programming); Law; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.5393472845086709,"score_gpt":0.5020031631075207,"score_spread":0.03734412140115018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005819759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025619915,0.05623811,0.05361859,0.6550585,0.0029647548,0.0000844117,0.000045135428,0.00005330139,0.20631723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92308307,0.011521004,0.0147117665,0.04090953,0.003851734,0.0002627227,0.000020090343,0.00006190197,0.0055781426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971048,0.022936862,0.0006695688,0.0009640517,0.0029513952,0.0014301499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741061,0.020839239,0.0014791758,0.0015023835,0.0012695368,0.00080351136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020098828,0.0006247679,0.0011563447,0.0029737174,0.008335952,0.013433051,0.002864413,0.01498176,0.0019863728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031052997,0.00054293434,0.0008145746,0.0019383054,0.1380789,0.028174357,0.008201974,0.015042699,0.0002674068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038774474,0.0000050359877,0.000053293476,0.000022315466,0.0000013565349,0.000018345178,0.0019619819,0.000059212573,0.000011526864,0.9953088,0.0007083672,0.0018457735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005575985,0.000008385375,0.00009606918,0.00017485298,0.0000026984283,0.000048853533,0.0016768023,0.00019698491,0.000027215709,0.9826173,0.015136739,0.00000850357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004965997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004239292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020098828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012824727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009379644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10629398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005883942","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01971.x","title":"What are the Limits of Bioethics in a Culturally Pluralistic Society?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Autonomy; Environmental ethics; Individualism; Personhood; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Teleology; Multitude; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3739205005058326,"score_gpt":0.5632298073795943,"score_spread":0.18930930687376168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005883942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055749128,0.039468184,0.0019972015,0.9322589,0.0016580728,0.0000115674275,0.000019069501,0.000020559746,0.018991543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57896936,0.091993876,0.012455615,0.2973906,0.0128092095,0.0004041053,0.00006530387,0.00016216995,0.005749748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9388457,0.045055445,0.001967864,0.0025406515,0.00820565,0.0033846402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8751521,0.08232347,0.008022617,0.0056987563,0.010958429,0.017844563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07387074,0.0007604264,0.0019298475,0.0030488016,0.014136036,0.04007936,0.0046671885,0.020758878,0.004303775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105780184,0.0010060717,0.0010005335,0.0031370032,0.14161171,0.073167495,0.014722554,0.030189976,0.0013996237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004404596,0.00010072899,0.0012526485,0.0005970446,0.000052010357,0.00025961443,0.03519204,0.00019587683,0.00022136269,0.89464045,0.025132263,0.042312063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019859766,0.00003532959,0.000793646,0.0022572568,0.000017175103,0.00028044003,0.034776125,0.00014963179,0.000077183555,0.8739725,0.08757244,0.00004843696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008234968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009886663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07387074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011084647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025629785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39067048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006415548","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00663.x","title":"Expert Testimony by Persons Trained in Ethical Reasoning: The Case of Andrew Sawatzky","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Expert witness; Relevance (law); Witness; Economic Justice; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.17947767329125724,"score_gpt":0.533239634608322,"score_spread":0.3537619613170648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006415548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07081413,0.010494169,0.0020178896,0.84153193,0.0018418637,0.000083705185,0.00003281148,0.00003463693,0.07314894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7026976,0.008638209,0.004561853,0.25292635,0.0014636703,0.00016274756,0.000024975552,0.00007519671,0.029449493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873318,0.0057200002,0.0004913299,0.0011104955,0.002666519,0.0026799159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98528165,0.009442938,0.0012645698,0.00042638974,0.00088770315,0.002696802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011118594,0.00047076828,0.00080836006,0.0009266015,0.03918191,0.0047568227,0.002230199,0.022160321,0.0032695683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041302394,0.00071650103,0.0009433958,0.0010337826,0.016339086,0.005011435,0.007911307,0.036009695,0.0008017328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019360665,0.00015640035,0.003554247,0.0003747696,0.00009046942,0.09721521,0.22300461,0.0008126369,0.0015698487,0.322074,0.32139626,0.02955796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102281025,0.00011409707,0.003939352,0.0017344854,0.00007851153,0.055643052,0.16235638,0.0010842907,0.0009817363,0.08132836,0.6923851,0.0002523659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048054807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10823591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048054807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006576428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01672722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09555018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008051457","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01967.x","title":"Institutional Conflicts of Interest: Protecting Human Subjects, Scientific Integrity, and Institutional Accountability","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Clinical trial; Government (linguistics); Conflict of interest; Accountability; Public relations; Medical research; Clinical research; Pharmaceutical industry; Variety (cybernetics); Public trust; Public interest; Political science; Business; Medicine; Law; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.8229343966421379,"score_gpt":0.62578126932492,"score_spread":0.1971531273172179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008051457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009916564,0.014008057,0.05822735,0.5780538,0.003777936,0.0004460469,0.00014490169,0.00012311633,0.3353023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76399237,0.010703058,0.03227654,0.15375453,0.0075624776,0.0016679352,0.00018275349,0.0001633432,0.029696876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.78772026,0.16061497,0.010400598,0.010404085,0.021203646,0.009656463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6248346,0.23910871,0.037591856,0.038776252,0.03919396,0.020494621],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16208939,0.0008217025,0.0015423027,0.0028377494,0.012179816,0.027533488,0.004709966,0.030905219,0.0074618724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25410748,0.0012201832,0.0011846337,0.004045454,0.073706746,0.020068118,0.01790702,0.01912749,0.0022251552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026632355,0.000031083273,0.0010487199,0.00012816061,0.000030355262,0.00015183858,0.0027273053,0.00029993133,0.00006558964,0.96062064,0.01924117,0.015628653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007281732,0.00006345664,0.0010152336,0.001257684,0.00005080633,0.00034933968,0.002195583,0.00082805613,0.00031637007,0.8789296,0.114860795,0.000060158945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005649163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004865535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96909475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010012219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05795791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8572209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008980185","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00483.x","title":"Currents in Contemporary Ethics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institute of Health Economics; Lawson Health Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Clinical trial; Context (archaeology); Inclusion (mineral); Public relations; Conflict of interest; Alternative medicine; Pharmaceutical industry; Informed consent; Incentive; Clinical research; Medicine; Business; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Pharmacology; Law; Pathology; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.8714327061402337,"score_gpt":0.6782194867681663,"score_spread":0.19321321937206737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008980185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034935276,0.04207058,0.009235534,0.6959289,0.0047882693,0.00004365681,0.00005599292,0.000047225785,0.24433634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45266116,0.04829418,0.012116595,0.37088528,0.038954664,0.00046828666,0.00014061441,0.00027425122,0.07620497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761628,0.014941514,0.00087677024,0.0021962833,0.004148948,0.0016737469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96910393,0.021945883,0.0016726824,0.0024004644,0.0032498126,0.0016271952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027292741,0.0005980922,0.00080920436,0.0018988313,0.01146176,0.018247964,0.0020596215,0.016598867,0.009971371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03521854,0.00054392003,0.0007838293,0.0021768555,0.07560527,0.015973499,0.005581748,0.025748046,0.0024358241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028409042,0.000006360906,0.00006919843,0.000023622162,0.0000016127152,0.000022370581,0.0013011113,0.000039631424,0.000012003562,0.97599787,0.019433694,0.0030896808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071287586,0.0000079615675,0.00014379786,0.00026952807,0.0000018940054,0.00009588664,0.0013847349,0.00014958817,0.00002094132,0.7561237,0.24178621,0.000008659823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005221329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040825675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027292741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013895451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009710278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14433956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010621605","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00755.x","title":"Quarantine in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and other Emerging Infectious Diseases","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarantine; Public health; Isolation (microbiology); Medicine; Communicable disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Suspect; Monkeypox; Pandemic; Disease; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Environmental health; Family medicine; Virology; Political science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.0792479491182584,"score_gpt":0.4083408567862442,"score_spread":0.3290929076679858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010621605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11470775,0.07138569,0.002031829,0.5463676,0.0019395985,0.00013726875,0.0001727687,0.00004084761,0.26321658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88125694,0.034157958,0.0010121051,0.042126924,0.002639898,0.00006976403,0.0000981701,0.000012264553,0.03862597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958066,0.0024354395,0.000213333,0.000101627615,0.000980286,0.00046268618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920189,0.004752437,0.00095290254,0.00021097089,0.0010213465,0.0010434353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044169817,0.00010644481,0.00015402697,0.00064575265,0.0027122754,0.0016570883,0.00042259527,0.0024859551,0.0024389382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011999377,0.00013361951,0.00012298203,0.0005174182,0.005053526,0.00089343544,0.0011052892,0.0013926963,0.00021153575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019772214,0.00025675035,0.11283595,0.0008689568,0.000025249079,0.0059119863,0.03648431,0.000869166,0.001568976,0.32750615,0.2884787,0.22499606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008835997,0.00026885417,0.16286188,0.0011598356,0.000027086966,0.0042388886,0.023346735,0.0008678706,0.000525839,0.0770839,0.7294898,0.000041041818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19329573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41749734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19329573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072505353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016389798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38434124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013561895","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00316.x","title":"America's Uninsured: The Statistics and Back Story","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Health care; Health insurance; Population; Private insurance; Medicine; Medical care; Public health; Environmental health; Health care reform; Family medicine; Business; Gerontology; Health policy; Economic growth; Nursing; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.31735078970620373,"score_gpt":0.415015902143616,"score_spread":0.09766511243741227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013561895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005614202,0.08984111,0.00025828357,0.8650469,0.018539025,0.000018854964,0.0041482626,0.000116952666,0.016416444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085733764,0.31417292,0.0010849478,0.52455527,0.052474797,0.00011132232,0.007368177,0.00021004198,0.014288857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779224,0.0004089547,0.00022139474,0.00022170448,0.00095208077,0.0004036505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99187803,0.0029049127,0.0009340896,0.00034625587,0.001697026,0.0022396664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003913777,0.0006863003,0.0006019314,0.0021542748,0.0024910741,0.0051011927,0.0010824007,0.0056792605,0.0076598194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012526315,0.00042671402,0.0008008121,0.0028292143,0.0024963515,0.0077083004,0.0027027028,0.011381915,0.002223995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005933081,0.000054106134,0.008102743,0.00032364452,0.000026107811,0.00020877873,0.00043868204,0.000056817502,0.00005866817,0.012410297,0.9031767,0.075084254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034505145,0.000097585034,0.036116213,0.0033663448,0.00005721244,0.00067243964,0.0028047806,0.00016758582,0.00014488054,0.0133520635,0.9431048,0.00008154001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031817187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03920043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031817187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033685921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071673174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06326401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021637549","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00205.x","title":"Biobanking: International Norms","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Humanity; Human rights; Normative; Political science; International law; Declaration; Subject (documents); Human cloning; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Law; Declaration of Helsinki; Research ethics; Environmental ethics; Informed consent; Medicine; Biology; Genetics; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.2973922252508069,"score_gpt":0.5036888275477195,"score_spread":0.2062966022969126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021637549","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00057033775,0.84720415,0.005598774,0.043016262,0.0014554467,0.000045228528,0.000024503288,0.000032611577,0.1020527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040285863,0.90641004,0.006741512,0.031404596,0.0029217415,0.0002888008,0.000089772715,0.00003957233,0.011818128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872113,0.0057126624,0.0010488959,0.0010777692,0.0045908266,0.00035842313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908819,0.005891049,0.0010375917,0.0006528584,0.0012406457,0.00029594792],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0157975,0.0006948208,0.001100235,0.001985541,0.0017138183,0.0084599145,0.0016753856,0.0062079225,0.0037562987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014814623,0.00045641902,0.00035779053,0.0035631997,0.0150677785,0.011564241,0.005149698,0.008303056,0.001278822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010607568,0.000026988308,0.00014757119,0.0016752182,0.000012981962,0.0001408334,0.0019913742,0.00017622519,0.00020516777,0.74137187,0.031095676,0.22314548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054476923,0.000014366755,0.00047735314,0.005083538,0.000009920783,0.0003716331,0.0009992177,0.000050607156,0.00013214207,0.10739372,0.8854484,0.000013771015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032061525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027791525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044621187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011629157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08354616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025053585","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00049.x","title":"Fiduciary Obligation in Clinical Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Subject (documents); Foundation (evidence); Obligation; Bioethics; Law; Criticism; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.8759906318538984,"score_gpt":0.7350642375789104,"score_spread":0.140926394274988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025053585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021865647,0.029994903,0.11169614,0.5648362,0.0041943663,0.00023958384,0.00005166615,0.00013256805,0.266989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8516929,0.0076145283,0.03417005,0.08896023,0.005148873,0.00074238406,0.0000341964,0.00010259943,0.011534183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7754727,0.17328915,0.008548877,0.010812664,0.026487986,0.005388581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78096795,0.16879843,0.010793536,0.01981914,0.012446532,0.007174404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17283131,0.0005667922,0.001918306,0.003203849,0.015040905,0.020577703,0.003046256,0.022085054,0.0023248529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21295856,0.0010517021,0.0010074544,0.0020140747,0.1351157,0.019518344,0.014555052,0.021835186,0.0009498504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006315678,0.00000793436,0.00010204514,0.000027723525,0.000003328189,0.000042262443,0.0025683092,0.00006679818,0.000025094007,0.99239844,0.0018549707,0.0028968044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000215037,0.000025988726,0.0001474274,0.00026803205,0.000006006694,0.00012716031,0.0007824895,0.00024454825,0.00008158464,0.9666231,0.031650744,0.000021310389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026494963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016375585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17283131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008808819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0235925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91403025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027177214","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00686.x","title":"The Ethical Analysis of Risk","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":186,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Informed consent; Institutional review board; Confidentiality; Research ethics; Balance (ability); Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Subject (documents); Psychology; Task (project management); Actuarial science; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Business; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.7203642937941083,"score_gpt":0.6826195619799805,"score_spread":0.03774473181412774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027177214","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004822143,0.2782299,0.23932044,0.22003701,0.0064108865,0.0025252888,0.00040930498,0.00012623897,0.2481187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40319142,0.21967137,0.24855392,0.078157276,0.010728463,0.011235004,0.0003857483,0.00026079314,0.027816037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81584215,0.13727884,0.008013619,0.0043887813,0.03276711,0.0017096134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7922743,0.1680515,0.009366452,0.011901221,0.017182797,0.0012237332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.116246104,0.0011230642,0.002415712,0.0050113495,0.0031421175,0.008803329,0.002646104,0.0068218024,0.0034707056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19978723,0.0007399276,0.0012083132,0.004060961,0.029541599,0.0072253374,0.005918687,0.008667406,0.0012641167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017679506,0.000021749856,0.00052399037,0.0013988822,0.00007965765,0.00016796177,0.0020722786,0.00036200977,0.000107625194,0.9129653,0.020484563,0.06179834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025089255,0.0000602552,0.00087017455,0.0076622884,0.00007064487,0.00091012625,0.0022910254,0.0005351402,0.00033027455,0.7405724,0.24663089,0.00004168743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002349812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018650522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116246104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006818696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021733258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61477554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028440416","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00273.x","title":"Bridging Philosophical and Practical Implications of Incidental Findings in Brain Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; National Human Genome Research Institute; Greenwall Foundation","keywords":"Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Empirical research; Duty; Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Identification (biology); Clinical Practice; Medicine; Political science; Epistemology; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.8623315041943624,"score_gpt":0.7203860233605791,"score_spread":0.14194548083378333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028440416","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022933877,0.797734,0.0105596585,0.17522798,0.0020082253,0.0000644386,0.00000906115,0.000013408536,0.012089719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14089696,0.78378844,0.020749472,0.046225302,0.0058124904,0.0004826733,0.000019420779,0.00003155203,0.0019936506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.85951436,0.11454014,0.0052120592,0.002030049,0.017467609,0.0012358044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6479745,0.3282865,0.008697759,0.004769546,0.008775295,0.0014963667],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1318316,0.0010371266,0.0021822294,0.0062215105,0.0039475905,0.010372497,0.0042927954,0.012602008,0.0014148065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19302256,0.000997953,0.0007127387,0.005649377,0.0530086,0.021528032,0.011125799,0.012480123,0.00044358725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004594147,0.00005148764,0.0011139971,0.010672956,0.000084341824,0.0018924562,0.016983712,0.00077379105,0.0002989707,0.71219647,0.0110413795,0.24484456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030359233,0.00007308558,0.0017870751,0.031390958,0.00006261646,0.0057075364,0.016174272,0.0006188542,0.0004028807,0.73268443,0.2109902,0.00007778971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002254392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004328961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98739797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071143387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017269777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6972005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030327247","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.295.x","title":"Popular Representations of Race: The News Coverage of BiDil","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law); Race (biology); Tone (literature); Public health; News media; Frame (networking); Key (lock); Science communication; Social media; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Biology; Computer science; Medicine; Media studies; Science education; Law","score_opus":0.06047493643865253,"score_gpt":0.35820285773870497,"score_spread":0.29772792130005243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030327247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19932047,0.034110226,0.0012909789,0.4138765,0.011494885,0.000042232285,0.0028019906,0.0002156069,0.3368472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88581896,0.013135625,0.0005566131,0.048497085,0.016505219,0.000054862703,0.0010135556,0.00024485358,0.03417331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965203,0.0015576717,0.00019514823,0.00025498896,0.0010444074,0.00042747924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566162,0.030672329,0.0062010004,0.0012766246,0.0038094677,0.0014244072],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052077943,0.00032369685,0.00035980283,0.004117292,0.0038404781,0.008952408,0.0006357018,0.0031358313,0.008296274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030329958,0.00032345284,0.00022567784,0.0036250474,0.0030022284,0.005058112,0.0031198394,0.0034154786,0.0014325326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001012553,0.0001320202,0.03390201,0.0016123989,0.00012780762,0.0034599914,0.10253243,0.0001996777,0.0027945517,0.10141564,0.6059355,0.14687543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044662815,0.00007551618,0.040746532,0.0015917093,0.00009803651,0.0012762998,0.026842484,0.0005398296,0.0015838967,0.00419239,0.92291725,0.000091376154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008474386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008959493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030475785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008530449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02775383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030508869","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00335.x","title":"(Uncontrolled) Donation after Cardiac Determination of Death: A Note of Caution","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.049438849937730074,"score_gpt":0.3508566561325656,"score_spread":0.30141780619483555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030508869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027029745,0.009014166,0.0026285644,0.9626291,0.015871748,0.00005091294,0.000071808,0.00007192856,0.0069587715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024062026,0.005433363,0.0048339614,0.9462972,0.015648523,0.0001112439,0.000028601775,0.00006282134,0.0035221807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747356,0.014553111,0.0033325811,0.0021835703,0.0043458706,0.00084926485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.924175,0.053282525,0.003099515,0.0053324206,0.01055911,0.0035513756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048928156,0.00053510943,0.0015871229,0.00082636275,0.0053865267,0.0056596156,0.0065717413,0.034334462,0.0030305595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08586953,0.00085070636,0.0021971317,0.0011036778,0.0125325695,0.0083576,0.0036585932,0.058944926,0.002661429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015425905,0.00006899602,0.004769847,0.0008966144,0.000103264414,0.013569743,0.011525396,0.00024536188,0.0005310112,0.05096614,0.86716056,0.050008733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006299139,0.0000801283,0.0029216325,0.0065337447,0.00007813774,0.02389745,0.0071853884,0.00083242304,0.0005378937,0.07828315,0.87939817,0.0001888451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010391849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023384029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048928156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030076397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009853791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25875992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030636164","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00452.x","title":"Realization of the International Human Right to Health in an Economically Integrated North America","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; World War II; Political science; Communism; Right to health; International trade; Economic growth; Development economics; Economic history; Law; History; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.15199343346281638,"score_gpt":0.5121691553014839,"score_spread":0.36017572183866753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030636164","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06190645,0.0035377648,0.0047073513,0.3760368,0.0013939142,0.000086174325,0.000036282112,0.000029969005,0.5522653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7877221,0.0024129006,0.0070924596,0.13661665,0.00095652055,0.0002321722,0.000056826782,0.0000235098,0.06488684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932846,0.0026156395,0.00023384797,0.0006280086,0.0015728532,0.0016651405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99572194,0.0012746374,0.00040877963,0.0003549793,0.0006157331,0.0016239295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009280803,0.00027224908,0.00043808715,0.0005771811,0.009965441,0.009256308,0.0007260958,0.008792476,0.0054101553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006257573,0.0002482907,0.00055268325,0.0003679503,0.01762672,0.0047751316,0.011080131,0.00998423,0.0005760594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013583856,0.0000825783,0.0012369063,0.000022053233,0.000009486244,0.00026841546,0.0086953435,0.00015809789,0.00029907894,0.96541625,0.013699599,0.0100986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008198199,0.00012421093,0.005713937,0.00054480147,0.000022863114,0.00046245253,0.017358882,0.00047345992,0.0003624304,0.3617106,0.6130859,0.00005832558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021097433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03672021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021097433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004805402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02978617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04908216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032084453","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00624.x","title":"Return of Results: Towards a Lexicon?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation; McGill University; McGill Genome Centre","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Biobank; Terminology; Lexicon; Harmonization; Population; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Computer science; Environmental health; Bioinformatics; Biology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.7728062379282206,"score_gpt":0.606678043059822,"score_spread":0.16612819486839858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032084453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015694294,0.013816435,0.25067508,0.42097157,0.008247278,0.00043096868,0.00072402006,0.0007858182,0.28865454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6852573,0.016362347,0.16422762,0.09879843,0.008782236,0.002595363,0.0014764301,0.0022617942,0.020238457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9011013,0.07127444,0.010488,0.0038608836,0.010992918,0.0022824705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8695762,0.09280253,0.0068156403,0.010733956,0.01711825,0.0029533317],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06474321,0.0011865682,0.0022916377,0.0083444305,0.007864233,0.034148265,0.005907489,0.012900437,0.0034141706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10639381,0.0012547192,0.0011608364,0.009902845,0.062200762,0.046720337,0.009481131,0.017180879,0.0021865324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010735082,0.0000064724745,0.00015650384,0.000105442006,0.0000034959862,0.000056992743,0.01455723,0.00006435327,0.00006614358,0.97288966,0.006920133,0.0051628347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017221544,0.000022923516,0.0003564028,0.0010907616,0.00001774317,0.00039250287,0.017954683,0.00086363207,0.00018470867,0.719455,0.2595924,0.000051982937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007874352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004591067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9870996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010568484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018477747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34239894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034995418","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00456.x","title":"Legal Enforcement of Xenotransplantation Public Health Safeguards","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Xenotransplantation and immune response","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Xenotransplantation; Virology; Transplantation; Immunology; Biology; Public health; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Medicine; Disease; Pathology","score_opus":0.2769259309147401,"score_gpt":0.4783765163357004,"score_spread":0.20145058542096028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034995418","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034494634,0.9678764,0.0006725598,0.004780905,0.0003959484,0.000020034988,0.000016347652,0.000014851839,0.025878007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011117526,0.9793292,0.0009275608,0.0038719177,0.00039795306,0.000049393322,0.000035957546,0.000005963699,0.004264422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974195,0.00095365394,0.00019543202,0.00019193222,0.0010938719,0.00014553514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958692,0.0026456392,0.0005384849,0.00015008048,0.0007007853,0.0000957706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040005404,0.0005417221,0.0010229402,0.002078992,0.0009017057,0.0018756284,0.0011431332,0.0038688858,0.004060762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00811545,0.00023456082,0.00046362003,0.0021007163,0.0022847098,0.0019570747,0.0009932478,0.001989669,0.0014504899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025838568,0.00006460822,0.0003970682,0.007146937,0.00003855189,0.00061857724,0.0005247229,0.0004976448,0.0005041365,0.09374988,0.07618013,0.820252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086438395,0.000021445305,0.00054114626,0.008117399,0.000027638345,0.0010153549,0.00023213627,0.000052580228,0.00030827525,0.011579307,0.97808516,0.000010924086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033791922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038770242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004060762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020553528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064071347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021157146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036541548","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00102.x","title":"Discourse Ethics as an Ethics of Responsibilty: Comparison and Evaluation of Citizen Involvement in Population Genomics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Genomics; Confidentiality; Diversity (politics); Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Population; Research ethics; Population genomics; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Biology; Genetics; Law; Genome; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.8466123644531133,"score_gpt":0.7078092672645994,"score_spread":0.1388030971885139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036541548","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120432295,0.6657474,0.007171307,0.02734796,0.000641706,0.0007351248,0.00006281601,0.000016222895,0.17784509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78404033,0.2031276,0.003355885,0.0031587286,0.00019228626,0.0008577618,0.000036368463,0.000025143405,0.005205981],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8892345,0.09399767,0.0021000735,0.0009952553,0.01249826,0.0011741795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8666872,0.11247242,0.0066955457,0.0018515209,0.011400821,0.000892438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0554401,0.0005400885,0.0016181968,0.0048850183,0.0028165209,0.0073330174,0.001315411,0.0028788245,0.0019126802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12718993,0.0003464874,0.00061544107,0.00900046,0.010674257,0.0093491,0.0057952222,0.0017350577,0.00026798798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003921253,0.00016861442,0.007130874,0.010076564,0.00018184222,0.0009991665,0.19282247,0.00050819415,0.0002339599,0.3306355,0.0077080745,0.44914266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002258701,0.0008974905,0.0333603,0.04194229,0.00067015743,0.0039198752,0.29871857,0.0011964812,0.0015250101,0.13966428,0.477722,0.00015770664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008955357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010473479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0554401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01277123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01699109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29319876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038289525","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00546.x","title":"Toxic Legacy: Mustard Gas in the Sea around Us","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"U.S. Army","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Toxicology; Forensic engineering; Medicine; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.16083554096735178,"score_gpt":0.31468108673920786,"score_spread":0.15384554577185608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038289525","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121452026,0.10507967,0.0009886014,0.56109345,0.028397018,0.00006565234,0.00094378705,0.0004350018,0.18154487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3375519,0.13382886,0.0012410599,0.35274962,0.008233692,0.000049116712,0.0010929178,0.0002949484,0.16495791],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994103,0.0001031295,0.000034659384,0.000061817336,0.00025599712,0.00013407093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994326,0.00010559161,0.00007909056,0.000027628932,0.00019878798,0.00015618262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006846286,0.000513587,0.00027382348,0.0009328506,0.008180772,0.0030987745,0.00044632112,0.0033086136,0.010865808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016129921,0.00021985735,0.00044667543,0.0012817145,0.0021074312,0.002739713,0.0027998432,0.00478066,0.0018723897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001759798,0.00016491793,0.014353511,0.0005649897,0.000051315175,0.0047691423,0.024028571,0.00015212932,0.0022053036,0.017168814,0.76404154,0.1723237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071836457,0.000110456924,0.0045415335,0.00040929738,0.00002389915,0.0019005836,0.017187314,0.000044630677,0.0005340214,0.0025366358,0.9726786,0.000025815181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06508675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11412238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06508675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004485688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005335927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12941581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038541767","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00090.x","title":"In Whose Interest? Current Issues in Communicating Personal Health Information: A Canadian Perspective","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Technology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Health care; Perspective (graphical); Principle of legality; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Population; Service (business); Phenomenon; Medicine; Nursing; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.2682819815562391,"score_gpt":0.47236004716515256,"score_spread":0.20407806560891345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038541767","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00063238037,0.8412347,0.00038998132,0.13041449,0.0011739536,0.000020375628,0.000032692027,0.000011890883,0.026089588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022528086,0.9549342,0.0007365297,0.018028364,0.00060746813,0.000025457366,0.000022944483,0.000011886233,0.003105028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881235,0.0038142477,0.0006635632,0.00058296137,0.0059860446,0.0008297761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96698576,0.0146874115,0.0016625957,0.0005948484,0.013782935,0.002286459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021895811,0.00058785104,0.0017426884,0.0062689665,0.006426367,0.016297188,0.0032417974,0.0076681636,0.004642216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03707301,0.0004906815,0.0005680418,0.016927961,0.017569894,0.009913964,0.0029871059,0.0056090388,0.0011899116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056196186,0.000063721265,0.0013809121,0.007952097,0.000045743855,0.0010341133,0.018562596,0.00036317552,0.00022345402,0.1379586,0.20465158,0.6277078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016029677,0.00002318466,0.0017691542,0.010199666,0.00005190303,0.0007350514,0.016526517,0.00011022128,0.00009314176,0.018111682,0.95230067,0.00006284653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7974839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83346725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20251608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044052575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13012591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40741742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041055423","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12139","title":"Toward a Jurisprudence of Drug Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada","keywords":"Scrutiny; Clinical trial; Transparency (behavior); Harm; Drug approval; Medicine; Product (mathematics); Drug development; Drug; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Internet privacy; Pharmacology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08973355495433408,"score_gpt":0.37846561262972206,"score_spread":0.288732057675388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041055423","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009758015,0.0066537033,0.12960409,0.6636837,0.0024872737,0.00022482895,0.00007540586,0.00014979694,0.18736318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62629014,0.004374403,0.11857741,0.22248745,0.005711171,0.001021334,0.00009397388,0.0002658332,0.021178326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9034478,0.053267084,0.0041015525,0.011664931,0.022782102,0.0047365157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.882507,0.08634771,0.0065779774,0.010644821,0.0107156,0.0032069634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.100276,0.00095726474,0.0021922158,0.0028957867,0.012203113,0.020586941,0.0041038934,0.034682386,0.0027702544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1057031,0.001452219,0.0024999161,0.0016921487,0.09486645,0.024452966,0.013587499,0.048049558,0.0016282294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002518378,0.000010397246,0.000045717876,0.000010018624,0.0000025424567,0.000024251907,0.0006803935,0.000102548365,0.000044743658,0.99670756,0.001475521,0.0008937444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027300031,0.000018569835,0.00009088796,0.0001000232,0.000005908327,0.000048822792,0.00031594187,0.000492282,0.00014356687,0.95971394,0.039021496,0.000021261245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053050616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028892062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011596236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02177976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53031653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045873505","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00063.x","title":"A Comparative Study of the Law of Palliative Care and End-of-Life Treatment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Supreme court; Common law; Palliative care; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.5618015661068936,"score_gpt":0.558248244656404,"score_spread":0.0035533214504895883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045873505","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003757542,0.9972134,0.000035642828,0.00023294348,0.000049268838,0.0000049864652,0.0000018775548,4.051117e-7,0.002085655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008073014,0.99121714,0.0001029945,0.00034333853,0.00007169051,0.0000128613965,0.000004480443,6.624341e-7,0.0001739056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641883,0.002392737,0.00022407921,0.00020400736,0.0006773091,0.00008309256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250424,0.0062087877,0.00047453784,0.00009711617,0.00062375574,0.00009154089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029872283,0.00037223208,0.0013284999,0.0044498416,0.00060952187,0.0017603223,0.0005212235,0.0015495997,0.0014688323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009700218,0.00031301813,0.0005060211,0.008417,0.0016479933,0.0022410292,0.00083092664,0.0012501446,0.00024568106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022090279,0.00014727189,0.0012153339,0.06486759,0.00036571416,0.0005778856,0.0028587775,0.00047772052,0.000777322,0.07371375,0.013129443,0.8416483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119213946,0.0008469873,0.017228693,0.058031447,0.00058870413,0.004023061,0.0049014585,0.00023903316,0.0005994034,0.009865575,0.9035075,0.000048824582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066958447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014866721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066958447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002814708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046488065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02042222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045892628","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2010.00490.x","title":"Stem Cell Research and Economic Promises","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Government (linguistics); Ethos; Public policy; Shadow (psychology); Economics; Political science; Public administration; Economic policy; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.21110044862445443,"score_gpt":0.448089071323689,"score_spread":0.2369886226992346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045892628","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0138789,0.020385245,0.010846937,0.5643114,0.0014776202,0.000033546185,0.00006781494,0.000031405238,0.3889672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81998986,0.018823156,0.0066033904,0.110680945,0.004749841,0.0002654852,0.000069716174,0.00007136753,0.03874616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826868,0.009982664,0.00039322497,0.0012868745,0.0044427183,0.001207633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798364,0.0151077565,0.0011118369,0.0011001256,0.0019640804,0.0008797304],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022617655,0.00037726332,0.00052806747,0.0014696444,0.005361966,0.009184859,0.0010063952,0.009138801,0.0078077503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030122077,0.00034128872,0.0005288157,0.0010056248,0.031247921,0.010040986,0.0048168744,0.008174642,0.0012247675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043247614,0.00000382451,0.000038156548,0.000009760659,0.000001198764,0.000011707564,0.00015337006,0.00007178596,0.000018397464,0.9959996,0.002431862,0.001256109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010513095,0.000010152064,0.00014288326,0.00012602852,0.000003147543,0.000028304368,0.00038136286,0.00024993948,0.000092826805,0.91778266,0.0811646,0.0000075220805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017754717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015965414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006378939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073475265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11961502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047047663","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00545.x","title":"Waiting to Exhale: Chaos, Toxicity and the Origins of the U.S. Chemical Warfare Service","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Chemical warfare; Offensive; Chemical Warfare Agents; First world war; Military service; Battle; Toxicology; Law; Environmental ethics; Medicine; History; Political science; Engineering; Operations research; Philosophy; Ancient history; Biology; Biochemical engineering","score_opus":0.09071217356671932,"score_gpt":0.3310056823867113,"score_spread":0.24029350881999198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047047663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07101546,0.028263293,0.0035411555,0.7214643,0.0048237713,0.000041828593,0.00015917573,0.00013345102,0.17055756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76589197,0.017051594,0.0018088093,0.15104355,0.0027563022,0.00008275699,0.00009126661,0.00016043596,0.06111333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646205,0.0009698758,0.00019173136,0.0005650883,0.0009116007,0.0008997549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152315,0.004510584,0.00089583005,0.0003695833,0.0013081589,0.0013927238],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00629336,0.00039303995,0.0004433987,0.0015128029,0.014691522,0.008720889,0.0009277897,0.007403953,0.006574958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010352844,0.0004716383,0.00041174603,0.0012907579,0.03443932,0.008013984,0.006617935,0.015779316,0.0008197044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006634188,0.00008714342,0.005696382,0.00005894287,0.000008484184,0.0005038582,0.030701721,0.00015136115,0.0004042112,0.83279026,0.070780136,0.058751214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018697892,0.00015313033,0.007535888,0.0005237334,0.000014920771,0.0005443541,0.017366633,0.0004023289,0.00070165395,0.16599534,0.80663407,0.00010918691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072418734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07643399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98530847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013485609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015266912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14399445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047597988","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01979.x","title":"Storing Newborn Blood Spots: Modern Controversies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dried blood; Newborn screening; Dried blood spot; Medicine; Spots; Screening test; Pediatrics; Parental consent; Test (biology); Family medicine; Intensive care medicine; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.5237864926188983,"score_gpt":0.5659134955683258,"score_spread":0.042127002949427506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047597988","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027882329,0.13773592,0.006050838,0.8297749,0.00420663,0.000017248127,0.0000632844,0.00005410653,0.019308874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15722233,0.21588792,0.013609906,0.5660081,0.030455468,0.00020853132,0.00014866615,0.00028512327,0.016173994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608401,0.02067249,0.0034554827,0.0042789895,0.009694774,0.0010582003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8270693,0.14235234,0.00558054,0.009556282,0.013018154,0.002423312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06595489,0.00044292852,0.001112459,0.0017327813,0.006117557,0.011590569,0.0038728425,0.019427698,0.0057801777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12560432,0.0007497297,0.00080403493,0.0027067622,0.049907424,0.021640461,0.0057865037,0.020962924,0.0025876607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084114705,0.000036615253,0.0007691189,0.0005209715,0.000030869676,0.00031533165,0.005738587,0.00013640319,0.0002612789,0.77386427,0.09838266,0.11985982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022710192,0.00006409093,0.0009042162,0.0030269534,0.000041808777,0.0016188615,0.0043240115,0.00019340463,0.00079280126,0.3012967,0.68764,0.000074381525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055134925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043367487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06595489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072644763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006619634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34880692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048304143","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.305.x","title":"Rethinking Risk in Pediatric Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Informed consent; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Individualism; Clinical trial; Risk assessment; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.39502234154293586,"score_gpt":0.5081220877619163,"score_spread":0.11309974621898039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048304143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005900401,0.032610673,0.06478425,0.87202376,0.008207414,0.0003013146,0.00005723508,0.0001067843,0.016008267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27191234,0.022265868,0.09369321,0.58510506,0.021808824,0.0021111784,0.000056442106,0.00025267317,0.002794404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3238642,0.55978227,0.031096995,0.019118687,0.06125239,0.004885455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.113047995,0.8299591,0.016649814,0.019228777,0.017410023,0.0037043835],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.630521,0.00185447,0.0041983905,0.005825853,0.010778435,0.02753792,0.011053339,0.028436324,0.0021196776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.626318,0.002264249,0.0025656095,0.003328519,0.13409069,0.05087211,0.022278897,0.05534907,0.00076323806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001322183,0.000056069333,0.002444366,0.0011801921,0.00018413679,0.00039651408,0.031757582,0.00045977446,0.00028556786,0.9058861,0.0144393,0.04277817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001513045,0.00023816412,0.0012036823,0.0065634735,0.0001817603,0.00058131135,0.00877689,0.0006945002,0.00066292426,0.85041296,0.13038819,0.00014488542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058132424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006574846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.369479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014448818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037055954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45563346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048642965","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00629.x","title":"The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Obligation; Research ethics; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Population; Social psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Psychiatry; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.9150050019928753,"score_gpt":0.6812514782486067,"score_spread":0.2337535237442686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048642965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39866066,0.016636098,0.16074908,0.27791214,0.0068078185,0.0026337083,0.0009468387,0.00046455069,0.13518918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.865113,0.004924014,0.045278806,0.037435465,0.001352879,0.0021061152,0.0003379027,0.00017706968,0.043274842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87919253,0.09137751,0.008879754,0.005176321,0.011991022,0.0033828684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8716083,0.059520237,0.015087655,0.036402803,0.013888083,0.003492904],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09206557,0.0006479992,0.0012337446,0.0014720073,0.006448463,0.0072195423,0.0036414512,0.008632495,0.004610841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21648249,0.00081189803,0.0016154151,0.000971384,0.01281553,0.0050651864,0.007437111,0.008522851,0.0032926553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011051494,0.0004770154,0.027879411,0.0015678323,0.00028641784,0.021398459,0.30629414,0.00080586877,0.0076756775,0.39329016,0.05034193,0.18887793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002036825,0.0014945559,0.017810654,0.0070174164,0.00039282924,0.05131556,0.1917682,0.0022554188,0.019121943,0.19754449,0.51065457,0.00042079188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014844213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014438529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024391878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064596147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48689508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052157301","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01978.x","title":"Commentary: Social-Ethical Values Issues in the Political Public Square: Principles vs. Packages","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.2969103568746272,"score_gpt":0.5593492760638783,"score_spread":0.2624389191892511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052157301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013202794,0.0011474928,0.000082962455,0.9829092,0.014514711,0.0000063689677,0.00004396512,0.000009703951,0.0011535027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003509384,0.00107728,0.00020154937,0.97054255,0.022020297,0.00004205012,0.0000180081,0.000038805647,0.0025500432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98004615,0.009022139,0.0012625275,0.00277465,0.005175889,0.0017186954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8601629,0.11456123,0.0030709808,0.0013759232,0.016954482,0.0038744737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016606528,0.0017019762,0.0023479203,0.0023303032,0.016429957,0.008999953,0.009624785,0.09021675,0.009278326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10636439,0.0014987692,0.0019248896,0.004173644,0.018095424,0.011421865,0.0053870864,0.09132095,0.005775327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028106573,0.0000054291636,0.00004752414,0.000103197,0.0000072617404,0.00015311076,0.0010752052,0.000053837477,0.000048632028,0.008400138,0.98829925,0.0017783913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008420249,0.00003083254,0.00044061977,0.0014212695,0.00003832596,0.00039385582,0.0048618126,0.00037815474,0.00031669653,0.023705848,0.9682217,0.00010675778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085685186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08820701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09021675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019531759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021984745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1703729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052478540","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb01968.x","title":"Legal and Ethical Approaches to Stem Cell and Cloning Research: A Comparative Analysis of Policies in Latin America, Asia, and Africa","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Public Health Ontario; Ontario Genomics; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Human cloning; Convention; Human rights; Globalization; Latin Americans; Biomedicine; Political science; Politics; Legislation; Bioethics; Economic growth; Law; Public administration; Biology","score_opus":0.6343430186605621,"score_gpt":0.501168914473883,"score_spread":0.13317410418667908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052478540","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018506011,0.95369864,0.00020280456,0.008338743,0.000081431754,0.000027239203,0.000033850436,0.000003037291,0.0191083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1369583,0.86071867,0.00021607941,0.0011508749,0.000076529584,0.000064844535,0.00002650885,0.0000029206726,0.00078531326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525625,0.0027847465,0.00020795227,0.00016872076,0.0013152165,0.0002671385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905096,0.006745701,0.0012812639,0.000091784845,0.0011839158,0.00018766081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070358664,0.0002548494,0.000674616,0.004411288,0.0012831467,0.003164127,0.00064707315,0.0011565048,0.0022372396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014152487,0.00019957645,0.0003166068,0.014215602,0.0027340841,0.0022915266,0.001539449,0.0007561121,0.0001453149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027512593,0.00013068749,0.022987934,0.015653081,0.00023637559,0.0016669321,0.02737719,0.0010730597,0.0006577041,0.1978872,0.014360151,0.71769464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014514859,0.00031994248,0.09218703,0.035432003,0.00047285203,0.002343842,0.05486971,0.00027820515,0.00048407598,0.019102694,0.7943103,0.000054305656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013733929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017172081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013733929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048803524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010594469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03720969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054201636","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00134.x","title":"The Injustice of Enforced Equal Access to Transplant Operations: Rethinking Reckless Claims of Fairness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Law and economics; Health care; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.2548835074351541,"score_gpt":0.4776474864161039,"score_spread":0.2227639789809498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054201636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24077664,0.003603283,0.06304839,0.39329302,0.0017866275,0.00012581114,0.00005930481,0.00014209292,0.29716486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713647,0.00042064497,0.0035543696,0.020473422,0.00039024252,0.00007109122,0.000007739353,0.00007274053,0.0036450878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9516233,0.028193397,0.0018245655,0.0048571,0.009041032,0.0044605383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9170288,0.056541197,0.0059858514,0.013092731,0.0055354587,0.0018159514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06075098,0.00052007416,0.0011966645,0.0015016154,0.011615927,0.014922862,0.004436989,0.018186606,0.002920692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10644284,0.00062458275,0.0010381824,0.0008852856,0.13404416,0.016552106,0.016881183,0.027409406,0.00045261433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043177602,0.000021334077,0.0005323281,0.000019965377,0.000016249594,0.0000961678,0.009325366,0.00043829242,0.000139284,0.9833614,0.0017594097,0.0042470386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054433298,0.000026106596,0.0005904135,0.00013746438,0.000028292212,0.00005974241,0.0026445538,0.0014315418,0.00044372305,0.9816907,0.012857963,0.000034974622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013011173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010106918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06075098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008632173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012002865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32128572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061034634","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00623.x","title":"Return of Research Results: How Should Research Results Be Handled?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; McGill University; McGill Genome Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.9445344664982588,"score_gpt":0.6907955419862786,"score_spread":0.2537389245119802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061034634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039732386,0.004821131,0.067460015,0.8785789,0.008283184,0.002390183,0.0004983923,0.0009118373,0.033083156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19409813,0.015837552,0.27867898,0.44659585,0.015635047,0.013948235,0.0010339518,0.0026382583,0.031533957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.29103807,0.56718135,0.052706797,0.010577138,0.07018899,0.008307583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11467534,0.6671642,0.038013395,0.07912184,0.08958031,0.011444947],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.64273924,0.0014768351,0.00428486,0.006368864,0.008282397,0.030695982,0.009869673,0.024127182,0.018973917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.85239965,0.0023293865,0.003898282,0.006753144,0.018989475,0.03425956,0.010627784,0.020009346,0.018807132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065925124,0.0002520917,0.0071591632,0.004493581,0.00039851337,0.0011064581,0.017562509,0.0005159921,0.0008691608,0.15646793,0.47616667,0.33434865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005439466,0.00035034277,0.009956329,0.016518492,0.00045227175,0.0025079658,0.018661615,0.002815724,0.0021297883,0.30281097,0.6427818,0.0004708395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008552268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005352222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012697062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06421526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44056618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061725400","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00367.x","title":"Compulsory Licensing in Canada and Thailand: Comparing Regimes to Ensure Legitimate Use of the WTO Rules","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Declaration; TRIPS architecture; TRIPS Agreement; Developing country; Dilemma; International trade; World trade; Business; Public health; Civil society; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.24349041560173337,"score_gpt":0.2821170867045921,"score_spread":0.03862667110285875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061725400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8443377,0.0033563892,0.0013640856,0.0039748484,0.000052742645,0.00022653533,0.00041097193,0.000035414057,0.14624138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952531,0.0010647217,0.00056871714,0.00031895627,0.000006872604,0.00003468555,0.00011070326,0.000008948711,0.0026332324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889993,0.0012096901,0.0004025248,0.0003824281,0.0055142506,0.0034918338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803964,0.0054940567,0.0034013935,0.0007787379,0.0077865734,0.0021428233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046705594,0.00021907265,0.0004585412,0.004163175,0.008437294,0.0073859165,0.0013051361,0.0011854995,0.0019705307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027394049,0.00027295132,0.00047184722,0.0069085313,0.007263448,0.0019713936,0.0026818502,0.002426817,0.00010824489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067677064,0.00041095412,0.2666829,0.00082300085,0.00031413027,0.0018542527,0.03733736,0.013444151,0.0030174053,0.5595638,0.00814186,0.10773338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022009034,0.00033861148,0.77681005,0.0010032326,0.00038312265,0.00059794675,0.072306484,0.012225109,0.004692606,0.019819422,0.111187026,0.00041629115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97689056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.987158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0864028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0864028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12989272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6268991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066750608","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00398.x","title":"Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research: Addressing the Issue of Physician Remuneration","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Glycomics Centre; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Conflict of interest; Public relations; Political science; Pharmaceutical industry; Business; Medicine; Finance","score_opus":0.9778403133530816,"score_gpt":0.7411442212063043,"score_spread":0.23669609214677734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066750608","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011862582,0.02015826,0.0034557707,0.9609866,0.0034617574,0.000034630797,0.0000045035263,0.000012913979,0.010699294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16119246,0.041106287,0.014385373,0.7366975,0.03905914,0.00033112153,0.000017505474,0.00007766729,0.007132969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7005692,0.23824263,0.015926683,0.006314398,0.03316217,0.0057849702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40528858,0.49753198,0.0314791,0.009587229,0.03344691,0.022666259],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22482266,0.0010189625,0.0017899642,0.0032983378,0.014260079,0.026027877,0.004277593,0.051998854,0.003523112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41343668,0.001052199,0.0011623418,0.0031720432,0.050989956,0.024271982,0.014840596,0.04971473,0.0012505495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005203692,0.00009870636,0.0041909157,0.0012217732,0.00011269911,0.0020349657,0.020831572,0.0006157075,0.00047964978,0.64293325,0.21476455,0.11266414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116057774,0.00018930713,0.0031093687,0.0051958626,0.00009631865,0.004048827,0.015221186,0.0011359759,0.0004303723,0.39556545,0.57474476,0.00014655458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035800168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006657273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94800115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011043127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05630093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95593166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073456561","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00391.x","title":"Assessing Coordination of Legal-Based Efforts across Jurisdictions and Sectors for Obesity Prevention and Control","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Control (management); Business; State (computer science); Obesity; Local government; Public administration; Public economics; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.08014599189065863,"score_gpt":0.41983875607691806,"score_spread":0.33969276418625943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073456561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8687192,0.001355946,0.014811766,0.027988333,0.000109640256,0.003397966,0.0010245227,0.00008811767,0.08250439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879701,0.00030045485,0.009267966,0.000812997,0.000035149566,0.000701452,0.00031099372,0.000017311282,0.0005835238],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8777449,0.065688044,0.010417604,0.0051250476,0.029797442,0.011226966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6923984,0.12581125,0.075622566,0.01684428,0.07052868,0.018794836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11027687,0.0005720971,0.001151218,0.013339575,0.009290045,0.011216661,0.0039929417,0.0026520719,0.00552509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2909506,0.00091354374,0.0009180978,0.012325432,0.0061003743,0.013224614,0.015085325,0.0029853727,0.0003891816],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020796129,0.00096660724,0.7408014,0.0004628295,0.0007039417,0.00037918225,0.02317151,0.0121877715,0.00064718176,0.1118134,0.008031351,0.100626804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021273436,0.0007007887,0.81522024,0.0009944616,0.0005256586,0.00024231349,0.082203716,0.022470215,0.0011707256,0.047862977,0.028242258,0.00015392104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09556771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12220252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11027687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027480667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053456895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5832068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075878075","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2003.tb00087.x","title":"Resisting a Genetic Identity: The Black Seminoles and Genetic Tests of Ancestry","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Allotment; Possession (linguistics); Tribe; Constitution; Genealogy; Reservation; Commission; Descent (aeronautics); Government (linguistics); African descent; Apportionment; Law; History; Voting; Political science; Geography; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.13371225123226474,"score_gpt":0.41316751923596223,"score_spread":0.27945526800369747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075878075","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000054314463,0.9976271,0.00002230333,0.0012156806,0.00019641432,0.000001359119,0.000001434875,0.0000010830759,0.00088040094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012050428,0.99677366,0.00005550822,0.0011817149,0.00021402643,0.000005390685,0.00000476555,7.5358963e-7,0.0005591752],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929976,0.00033250093,0.000050307728,0.000072734634,0.00020085054,0.00004387554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874985,0.0009250765,0.00008101577,0.000025223657,0.00016919502,0.0000497348],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020564592,0.00071044895,0.0013869433,0.0020778736,0.00087561575,0.0014370395,0.0011468874,0.0033664333,0.0023486554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039482825,0.00030515308,0.0003270189,0.0015959023,0.0029298367,0.002709473,0.0010386513,0.0032265242,0.0011365246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008955633,0.00007760594,0.0004460776,0.0071084257,0.000048474096,0.00053035555,0.0006512821,0.00012845012,0.00016825265,0.021784704,0.08775345,0.8812133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031820244,0.00007168759,0.00092237396,0.00915791,0.00003907963,0.001990271,0.00063226133,0.000032153384,0.00012116523,0.006895643,0.9800869,0.000018664727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005736031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01366382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016684334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031459837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012105405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079195441","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00535.x","title":"Just Medicare: The Role of Canadian Courts in Determining Health Care Rights and Access","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Deference; Supreme court; Health care; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.15965054558550393,"score_gpt":0.38385396345008005,"score_spread":0.22420341786457612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079195441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04001964,0.017782094,0.010854889,0.4485085,0.0015967829,0.00015018259,0.00040850457,0.0000939298,0.4805855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88120896,0.010799989,0.0071250703,0.06497626,0.0008662576,0.00007681547,0.00018311018,0.00009036671,0.03467316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9529178,0.00822953,0.0012056954,0.0030196882,0.024123339,0.010503874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94240916,0.020211324,0.0021534269,0.0019261285,0.02755058,0.0057495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025820926,0.00058815785,0.0008065362,0.004693017,0.034328658,0.022927795,0.0032817912,0.008170649,0.005353837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06700462,0.0007304115,0.0008416717,0.0048529776,0.030942814,0.00796825,0.0066850507,0.010034254,0.00047758882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022042077,0.000009579705,0.0038459394,0.00007527998,0.000022965905,0.00025099478,0.008507745,0.0003913656,0.00018199705,0.92434865,0.035722498,0.02662095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007754345,0.000037863487,0.01879145,0.0012709415,0.00017397,0.0003502208,0.021101112,0.0021755928,0.0008092842,0.36519495,0.5896761,0.00034100027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98604786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13769485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13769485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2818336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084110496","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2010.00521.x","title":"Bridging the Divide between Genomic Science and Indigenous Peoples","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Indigenous; Dilemma; Harm; Political science; Developing country; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Biology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.43129665857964933,"score_gpt":0.5592949160361488,"score_spread":0.12799825745649945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084110496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2932081,0.022759378,0.009874659,0.4976771,0.0029551361,0.00028976635,0.000050033053,0.00008684733,0.173099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118127,0.0099655995,0.007007433,0.05315465,0.0011498887,0.00027536904,0.000029175675,0.00006243959,0.016542725],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784636,0.013149429,0.0006561645,0.0014964901,0.0028805397,0.00335384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97688955,0.012275056,0.0013006262,0.0019903518,0.0020082763,0.0055361367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02956757,0.00033513695,0.0008877859,0.002010986,0.030994311,0.008705305,0.0028975867,0.0059133195,0.0068257716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026079997,0.00043091024,0.00048080637,0.0016146062,0.046822745,0.011357361,0.027518937,0.010028264,0.0005529309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035853354,0.00008780341,0.0035541907,0.00027982946,0.000017266646,0.0016869722,0.78759646,0.000055926594,0.00073034153,0.15236834,0.004796227,0.04879081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024234181,0.00010285603,0.0064853695,0.001204271,0.000031673473,0.0011723619,0.6110722,0.00018464273,0.00034961296,0.14363702,0.2356574,0.000078303536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044473056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066791445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008343109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030659812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1563701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085846327","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00170.x","title":"Informed Consent: Physician Inexperience is a Material Risk for Patients","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Informed consent; Full disclosure; Medicine; Family medicine; Medical emergency; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Computer security","score_opus":0.19648080162929085,"score_gpt":0.5343820095796147,"score_spread":0.33790120795032386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085846327","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074900046,0.008456955,0.058255967,0.6138252,0.0016178067,0.0002364466,0.0000668438,0.00008832947,0.24255243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8770722,0.0022021167,0.009794874,0.0999548,0.0016609835,0.00016294142,0.00002904095,0.000028989427,0.009094137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92235374,0.050912376,0.0038799348,0.0033953828,0.016339842,0.0031187364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85379314,0.10526844,0.015359842,0.014158714,0.0074753272,0.0039445097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046935078,0.00046424707,0.0006753358,0.0009146128,0.005110552,0.0049908296,0.0015814609,0.013927398,0.0045167855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12529302,0.0004374103,0.0006978236,0.0006089987,0.028787972,0.008144915,0.008239693,0.0108607,0.0009498581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085553605,0.00009170828,0.0069155428,0.00020292093,0.000050220704,0.0031715683,0.019563533,0.0006084006,0.00072809047,0.8884766,0.017712904,0.06239287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091663715,0.00020087905,0.0033556866,0.0015695848,0.000070153576,0.013688635,0.008073996,0.0010371839,0.0011703027,0.81743145,0.15319784,0.00011273056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013403038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014973711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046935078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022336196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011644084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24821943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087654732","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00040.x","title":"Ethical Issues in Secondary Uses of Human Biological Materials from Mass Disasters","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Dna testing; Terrorism; Identification (biology); Medical emergency; Criminology; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Political science; History; Genealogy; Biology","score_opus":0.5433539662869171,"score_gpt":0.5920760353292333,"score_spread":0.04872206904231613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087654732","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058671847,0.010940191,0.06312717,0.6899182,0.009800749,0.002488466,0.00013984925,0.00020823054,0.1647053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47091004,0.004443991,0.047755614,0.42360163,0.008147962,0.00467705,0.00010710846,0.00021170071,0.04014494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6134282,0.34129938,0.012085072,0.007579219,0.020130834,0.005477411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6033499,0.31063983,0.0135623645,0.03795717,0.023842681,0.010648056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2767305,0.00077513093,0.0015117006,0.0015978934,0.011665533,0.013832418,0.0049139275,0.024019653,0.0066001876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26247257,0.0011119414,0.0014802578,0.0014489065,0.029588211,0.008352192,0.009594918,0.019713119,0.0034220484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047304403,0.0005257273,0.0066758017,0.00095771876,0.00014474243,0.0064090416,0.18756773,0.00043410412,0.0038333235,0.5344344,0.14965403,0.108890444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001608254,0.0005536678,0.0038891474,0.0043001235,0.0000867722,0.012603193,0.055780653,0.0018102521,0.0043927925,0.18402347,0.7322474,0.00015167438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011251678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018104826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97598034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031733946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012619084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89192003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089880976","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00099.x","title":"The Balm of Gilead: Is the Provision of Treatment to Those Who Seroconvert in HIV Prevention Trials a Matter of Moral Obligation or Moral Negotiation?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Obligation; Argumentation theory; Moral obligation; Foundation (evidence); Psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Family medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5655638644755424,"score_gpt":0.5921062218582996,"score_spread":0.02654235738275723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089880976","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012578983,0.0063184565,0.00094938185,0.98331255,0.0030955316,0.000042191023,0.00001580619,0.000025260968,0.00498289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033084616,0.004389058,0.0021633029,0.94598657,0.00972402,0.00023083482,0.000017862938,0.00006967023,0.0043340926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82434994,0.14759095,0.007319867,0.0039615626,0.013220495,0.0035572196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60730743,0.3351043,0.018118618,0.011847878,0.009022751,0.018598923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.25613016,0.00053378165,0.0022193505,0.00093790697,0.008889494,0.015800964,0.0021608945,0.023061972,0.005849306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33976078,0.0010646787,0.00083580834,0.00148112,0.031036975,0.013178175,0.0063663963,0.02705666,0.002113703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000939156,0.00012308054,0.0031868706,0.00061648356,0.00017597833,0.00061251264,0.009452964,0.00014632675,0.00068271573,0.1547157,0.71832526,0.111023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001311877,0.0005647212,0.0072434507,0.0036315373,0.00024937978,0.0011235293,0.006495251,0.0008431334,0.0009844039,0.15261202,0.82472515,0.00021545518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040553086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014961674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.976938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008423171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02244097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91732395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090272539","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00336.x","title":"Organ Donation after Circulatory Determination of Death: Lessons and Unresolved Controversies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Organ donation; Circulatory system; Donation; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine; Political science; Law; Transplantation","score_opus":0.09369940201089316,"score_gpt":0.35233482088195384,"score_spread":0.2586354188710607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090272539","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006295028,0.11842014,0.00060857914,0.86252683,0.014140911,0.000004224511,0.000017770375,0.000010774125,0.0036413104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03698335,0.31573412,0.0020370441,0.5579073,0.08405563,0.00005507751,0.00005387039,0.000060300565,0.0031133757],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898477,0.0053116893,0.0008790735,0.0010571143,0.0021301827,0.0007740939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92529726,0.06334769,0.001696632,0.0013103407,0.005017232,0.0033309013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031242965,0.00075146096,0.0014252017,0.0026803052,0.007442823,0.011988732,0.003792787,0.023341278,0.0040045837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060855813,0.0005648674,0.0011225728,0.0033586381,0.026383365,0.030340025,0.0062134233,0.03710219,0.0010919783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007041738,0.0001329626,0.00068492483,0.0012917366,0.000038173665,0.00077033805,0.0043158014,0.00041905526,0.00008565819,0.3031802,0.5094682,0.17954254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000646428,0.00006423573,0.00085614534,0.004654852,0.00003081494,0.0014370802,0.011509757,0.0003479967,0.00011037812,0.5204103,0.46041074,0.00010312862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005052332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011156485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031242965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007678043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010150303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16523057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092857265","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00542.x","title":"Health Legacies of War on and beyond the Battlefield","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Battlefield; Content (measure theory); Health information; Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; History; Health care; Law; Ancient history","score_opus":0.19912303658088276,"score_gpt":0.4081927285764285,"score_spread":0.20906969199554576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092857265","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09067888,0.008340412,0.00096916914,0.60334057,0.0025307531,0.00002558283,0.0001470243,0.000021086857,0.29394662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92486775,0.0030616573,0.00020641417,0.056074742,0.0010778231,0.00001864769,0.0000355092,0.00001725577,0.014640301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961604,0.0021548716,0.000049848186,0.00016056854,0.0002406331,0.0012337292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703693,0.0014498521,0.00022191009,0.00011233593,0.00015903077,0.0010199442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037649113,0.00023331908,0.0003074586,0.0008548961,0.012241655,0.0067956,0.00049250334,0.006126116,0.019925678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063234787,0.00018815177,0.0002809086,0.0006331236,0.023910055,0.0048459545,0.00509829,0.008115753,0.00080019113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009670075,0.000041626186,0.0017195164,0.000066237066,0.000019877529,0.0006049177,0.03395521,0.00021040645,0.00017904319,0.88779765,0.062288187,0.013020627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059824022,0.000110758505,0.007027019,0.0009757226,0.000025569552,0.0009189742,0.12922259,0.00026108228,0.0004407037,0.42582735,0.43507436,0.000056018664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017541775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031226162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019925678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067512253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055378107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06665808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093637618","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00520.x","title":"The Physician/Investigator's Obligation to Patients Participating in Research: The Case of Placebo Controlled Trials","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; York University; Montreal Children's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Mistake; Blame; Obligation; Miller; Medical ethics; Clinical trial; Psychology; Medical research; Medicine; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.8696628941207356,"score_gpt":0.6883546163501844,"score_spread":0.18130827777055125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093637618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011219495,0.029184198,0.048291072,0.8524325,0.0030173284,0.0005329013,0.000097295786,0.000048946258,0.05517621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5396857,0.016668163,0.066034,0.35200143,0.016807087,0.0036510725,0.00006612233,0.00014232768,0.0049441233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3590284,0.56029785,0.017168393,0.017855318,0.038534217,0.0071159215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27138942,0.652059,0.021803455,0.033999596,0.012661081,0.008087446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5512985,0.0013794558,0.005830083,0.0034102418,0.012853869,0.015570648,0.0060302545,0.06933512,0.0049750223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5768119,0.0029083898,0.004143443,0.0033255003,0.06925686,0.028314702,0.012487024,0.052434016,0.00119189],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050947553,0.00009403516,0.0020014248,0.0007639404,0.00040019734,0.0024192564,0.0074052266,0.0005207212,0.00021410441,0.9478953,0.016333964,0.021442415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012571212,0.0002708914,0.0010526475,0.0023223897,0.0002972137,0.0032717495,0.0019672804,0.0019389733,0.00039380655,0.9239632,0.06316301,0.000101769394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00309801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024867472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9306649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008962961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02230086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5533289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100718954","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00666.x","title":"Rebuttal: Expert Ethics Testimony","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Expert witness; Aside; Normative; Witness; Epistemology; Meta-ethics; Medical ethics; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Nursing ethics; Political science","score_opus":0.37919074699965116,"score_gpt":0.575161824747878,"score_spread":0.19597107774822686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100718954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042939317,0.0009628775,0.00015610448,0.96702576,0.021599777,0.000026540074,0.00005921143,0.00003475238,0.009705652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026794337,0.00032596482,0.0001990361,0.9746407,0.009863805,0.000057325127,0.00001778358,0.000016825019,0.012199117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875481,0.0031757653,0.0013740236,0.0020908476,0.0044544633,0.0013568449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734202,0.018335843,0.00095758896,0.0010736482,0.0048915977,0.0013212258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008622853,0.001368437,0.0016069685,0.001235695,0.011519638,0.009183583,0.005903685,0.13648225,0.008725524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06983964,0.0010441715,0.0020139138,0.0013881451,0.0074116983,0.0075786966,0.0032384633,0.08656851,0.009452317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037319263,0.00001754336,0.00016324109,0.00008915236,0.000010018017,0.001079389,0.00067944184,0.00006507248,0.0003109632,0.0234608,0.96969944,0.0043874946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057799683,0.000043909327,0.00080702984,0.00069982663,0.0000227952,0.0007449612,0.001861769,0.0005622646,0.0003080638,0.023405036,0.97142696,0.000059631264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025428329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02794092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13648225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008719376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008960822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063263774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103375340","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00544.x","title":"Clinical Guidelines and Policies: Can they Improve Emergency Department Pain Management?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Emergency and Acute Care Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"MAYDAY Fund","keywords":"Emergency department; Medicine; Pain management; Pain control; Prospective cohort study; Emergency medicine; Physical therapy; Intensive care medicine; Anesthesia; Surgery; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.14599935925956992,"score_gpt":0.4605565779955941,"score_spread":0.31455721873602416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103375340","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038040366,0.011660901,0.003762468,0.9560166,0.0035897556,0.0004271594,0.00019970865,0.00022124249,0.020318137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19652836,0.058172684,0.10312761,0.6168406,0.012567073,0.003308507,0.0008715328,0.0002720692,0.008311522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8914229,0.080159016,0.006245078,0.002107731,0.016070588,0.003994716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58695555,0.26023057,0.030734688,0.018340724,0.061764482,0.041973926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12394577,0.0012070029,0.0016989892,0.00754852,0.003123123,0.013714205,0.0044980594,0.018145889,0.018821916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4347418,0.001193609,0.0015255597,0.0074488064,0.0050746966,0.0172426,0.0066335327,0.012832638,0.0038237898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016789215,0.0013413152,0.014783951,0.0021132745,0.00026945813,0.00045967833,0.0031606536,0.0016003092,0.00010509049,0.0700046,0.5553218,0.35067195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021564655,0.0011800111,0.04830304,0.035565592,0.00054004596,0.00065808697,0.015511778,0.0036476126,0.0003223612,0.19048871,0.7012065,0.0004197972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019505445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03570593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8760542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01059238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058756273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65549576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103664762","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00365.x","title":"An Economic Justification for Open Access to Essential Medicine Patents in Developing Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Incentive; Developing country; Deadweight loss; Market power; Profit (economics); Economics; Price discrimination; Business; Public economics; Welfare; International economics; Industrial organization; Market economy; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.4485429453282304,"score_gpt":0.4317477491349125,"score_spread":0.01679519619331793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103664762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1339157,0.0025357755,0.052052405,0.12708372,0.0006879011,0.00026257997,0.0005084736,0.0001093148,0.68284416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724511,0.00060438726,0.004118716,0.009547359,0.0006308773,0.0001862282,0.000046728885,0.000022975342,0.012391752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542916,0.0012708033,0.00023604275,0.0005089905,0.0018016357,0.000753357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849952,0.010273568,0.0016506602,0.0009596543,0.0016360303,0.00048482962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062138564,0.0003070008,0.00055083446,0.001883643,0.0034751778,0.0052305385,0.0011581779,0.010162004,0.0068920595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023670122,0.00040268805,0.00078650715,0.0007699516,0.011114862,0.0040121144,0.0040203524,0.0076827453,0.0005473796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000131623065,0.000009123657,0.0002464185,0.000009436965,0.0000034873115,0.00011533003,0.000058042595,0.00023097672,0.000078845376,0.99694353,0.0011469298,0.0011447711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019964337,0.000042212112,0.0019083571,0.00015410908,0.0000233412,0.0004871866,0.00019083344,0.0039665187,0.00077088864,0.9384839,0.05373169,0.000041360934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032344747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023696057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010162004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033352585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035099706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032862425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108648985","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12036","title":"Privacy and Anonymity Challenges When Collecting Data for Public Health Purposes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Geospatial analysis; Internet privacy; Public health; Identification (biology); Masking (illustration); Health data; Health care; Confidentiality; Protected health information; Data science; Computer science; Business; Computer security; Medicine; Health policy; HRHIS; Geography; Political science; Nursing","score_opus":0.915997858554037,"score_gpt":0.64349162953136,"score_spread":0.27250622902267707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108648985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05782518,0.009215787,0.26266643,0.55604744,0.0026338936,0.00082429877,0.0008536347,0.00042309458,0.10951029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75273883,0.006960666,0.12356522,0.097700536,0.004311149,0.0016729711,0.0005252463,0.00032805672,0.012197363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6480879,0.26428646,0.017577821,0.014997099,0.04982315,0.0052275094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40925395,0.469241,0.02524508,0.06897235,0.022766598,0.004521039],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19934808,0.00062517,0.001627759,0.0033336878,0.009532034,0.02107843,0.004648288,0.012089099,0.002867122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.290616,0.001529406,0.0015814579,0.004979238,0.029507512,0.028191723,0.014887462,0.015852785,0.0017610682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038627392,0.00011801448,0.011338945,0.00083942374,0.00018147095,0.0038116162,0.055567145,0.0018664662,0.0015639007,0.7720104,0.040759124,0.11155713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001029358,0.000118251264,0.0030691372,0.001950746,0.0001440581,0.006928449,0.021734769,0.00401951,0.0041648136,0.756208,0.20136185,0.0001974027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00305371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018832799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19934808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004628536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014209482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98734635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110317886","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00209.x","title":"Accountability in Population Biobanking: Comparative Approaches","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Population; Accountability; Genetic epidemiology; Data science; Geography; Political science; Biology; Computer science; Sociology; Genetics; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.8670998930707845,"score_gpt":0.6425848308600702,"score_spread":0.22451506221071427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110317886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041345514,0.023779998,0.38247994,0.11037728,0.0014139238,0.0005911263,0.00042316862,0.00012247599,0.4394666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90727496,0.0074055865,0.069443926,0.005012777,0.0011222035,0.0013905471,0.00019192304,0.00009123437,0.008066823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.84008646,0.14188285,0.0021070568,0.00430871,0.009029337,0.0025855056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7732175,0.18819545,0.009612922,0.013733691,0.013252888,0.0019875749],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12299982,0.0007445102,0.0012257046,0.009422242,0.006511363,0.01417953,0.0038056688,0.0052789045,0.01036218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20520894,0.0006270757,0.0008971756,0.012055937,0.03160933,0.02887667,0.012818281,0.004358898,0.00057900767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017343515,0.00001658393,0.0012636511,0.00008171534,0.000024252093,0.000047105463,0.0022143729,0.0004170717,0.000011428934,0.9830009,0.0013649748,0.011540625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001839797,0.000032209173,0.002182046,0.00046724902,0.000044636115,0.0001796989,0.0063175433,0.0029548304,0.000075420314,0.9672209,0.0204852,0.000021828035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066078953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059675565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012032815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104489215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.650493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111246646","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00547.x","title":"Clinical Trials Registries: A Reform that is Past Due","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Clinical trial; Public relations; Pharmaceutical industry; Political science; Business; Medicine; Law; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.9006711429736375,"score_gpt":0.7121728028780399,"score_spread":0.18849834009559763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111246646","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072318857,0.005963331,0.013550459,0.9585391,0.012618517,0.00013151472,0.00016092866,0.0004969902,0.007815969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029740676,0.007060538,0.03394266,0.8775732,0.036584884,0.00083611044,0.00044274534,0.0007038789,0.013115422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7407476,0.118289016,0.031833187,0.030486722,0.068070754,0.010572758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34183627,0.418974,0.022424692,0.09691017,0.07883966,0.041015197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37438935,0.0016526515,0.004585888,0.00952195,0.010877294,0.03843659,0.011403074,0.049792122,0.015922448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5077431,0.00307457,0.0042944327,0.009168591,0.052960962,0.06332917,0.01537167,0.07950246,0.008651385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106460924,0.00012787171,0.00084192626,0.00030621167,0.000074935546,0.00017587945,0.0013988841,0.00028508782,0.0002293533,0.5348503,0.40379527,0.05780787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026962077,0.00016688595,0.0012692679,0.0013663814,0.00006316378,0.00042004144,0.0011592619,0.0009646788,0.00018753974,0.17655002,0.8174112,0.00017185457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008998967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067671323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62561065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015710123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041154705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7714893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114670517","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12008","title":"Human Rights and Maternal Health: Exploring the Effectiveness of the <i>Alyne</i> Decision","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Georgetown University","keywords":"Complaint; Convention; Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; Government (linguistics); Medicine; Law; Human rights; Political science; Environmental health; International human rights law","score_opus":0.08360769659932403,"score_gpt":0.37484245177073366,"score_spread":0.2912347551714096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114670517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17285408,0.005492346,0.0037746434,0.15115964,0.00032120777,0.00023950674,0.00006316192,0.000008032089,0.6660873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98189366,0.001236588,0.0008672848,0.0119241085,0.00016131987,0.0001093512,0.000009644288,0.000008942914,0.0037891632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.916831,0.061076503,0.0013820635,0.0029458036,0.009259425,0.008505176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8083827,0.17338666,0.00754934,0.0020442964,0.0064187315,0.0022183082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.085674495,0.0004900204,0.0008158381,0.0022864498,0.011598127,0.017586725,0.0026882475,0.011197037,0.0049375608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115588896,0.00043933233,0.0009374392,0.002119258,0.055248618,0.011729949,0.00815498,0.010417984,0.00025748397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054941505,0.00005400745,0.003141961,0.000076350996,0.00003538276,0.00020687343,0.0108823525,0.00032855995,0.00005879553,0.9790182,0.0013445198,0.0047978982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003302532,0.0006025467,0.025646325,0.0025013243,0.00043258403,0.0004799637,0.14320391,0.003725571,0.0014192152,0.7117824,0.109723546,0.00015240513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036477756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039457887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085674495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021314062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01874749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45309544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123984172","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12298","title":"Disclosing Secondary Findings from Pediatric Sequencing to Families: Considering the “Benefit to Families”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; National Institutes of Health; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Cancer Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Genetic testing; Discretion; Family history; Psychology; Medicine; Family medicine; Developmental psychology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.18024751056936258,"score_gpt":0.40731138456883426,"score_spread":0.22706387399947167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123984172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035671107,0.004005177,0.01583838,0.90588605,0.0020335477,0.00017280044,0.00014848984,0.0000964156,0.036147986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5165634,0.0068412484,0.027560156,0.4355582,0.0063634366,0.00059807725,0.00016839005,0.00011265975,0.0062344237],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92236155,0.061129127,0.0048924806,0.0020248399,0.0067725102,0.0028195002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6905044,0.2587421,0.011986637,0.015123495,0.01497146,0.008671997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.099348225,0.00052818755,0.00089537626,0.0010316157,0.0066795372,0.005879065,0.0021363432,0.017003575,0.0040293764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2608293,0.0007638497,0.00095976697,0.0006829841,0.009958147,0.010169457,0.007354974,0.014594588,0.0010253477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044625832,0.00032067476,0.062165104,0.0008215696,0.0002554936,0.034789164,0.05571502,0.0022726422,0.0032060961,0.2577157,0.28463548,0.29765671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016271634,0.0006100383,0.017055472,0.007570114,0.0004204538,0.044706523,0.035046805,0.00390501,0.0051747537,0.3778722,0.5071482,0.00032768014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035885212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055861943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099348225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033021963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016654924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52540994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124098500","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12020","title":"Evaluating Equity Critiques in Food Policy: The Case of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Public economics; Distributive justice; Social equality; Economics; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.528410649619467,"score_gpt":0.6505038381134185,"score_spread":0.12209318849395145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124098500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21810779,0.007868196,0.02389945,0.2997958,0.0009599773,0.00037915155,0.000078308854,0.00003238133,0.4488789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97116953,0.001345961,0.003497267,0.018229451,0.0005077574,0.00031760833,0.0000108803515,0.000030208414,0.004891258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9404077,0.044327013,0.0009893934,0.0024595058,0.007206532,0.004609683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8307577,0.15003054,0.0064151413,0.0037205615,0.007141404,0.0019346265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06613905,0.00088646304,0.001343259,0.0029616063,0.0141509045,0.015574974,0.0030338361,0.017905988,0.0049798493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10234384,0.00061580894,0.0010794274,0.0024863915,0.06342927,0.01786231,0.014976721,0.014881548,0.00025575733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033743912,0.000037712038,0.0006785568,0.000053072043,0.000015054339,0.0001827046,0.005695915,0.0006897696,0.00006142636,0.9882257,0.0015992117,0.0027271486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013316116,0.00006273265,0.0011863393,0.0004057909,0.000053778476,0.00005446442,0.01471351,0.0024779646,0.000567,0.94823563,0.032068092,0.000041528063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017871832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014018949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06613905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025019076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013288611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34978092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126219239","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12068","title":"Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Business; Language change; Agency (philosophy); Authorization; Clinical trial; Pharmaceutical industry; Drug; Public relations; Public economics; Medicine; Political science; Pharmacology; Economics; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.46437308014716894,"score_gpt":0.5875157409265235,"score_spread":0.12314266077935454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126219239","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007919171,0.005515594,0.0060229735,0.9211144,0.0021171246,0.000041488103,0.000034425895,0.000057842517,0.057177007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58283937,0.0073222658,0.0057411436,0.38132024,0.006194019,0.00023649582,0.000045559053,0.00017544617,0.016125508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8957775,0.06574741,0.005095239,0.0069308295,0.019034993,0.007413978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8138495,0.10954907,0.021286307,0.024568958,0.016610913,0.014135213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08467762,0.0005202234,0.0013847701,0.002075651,0.0117667755,0.025369389,0.0027160353,0.01632492,0.006588105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12703498,0.0007827735,0.0013249826,0.0016375943,0.09710323,0.017114403,0.0140226865,0.028742803,0.0011819589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000386368,0.000053204647,0.0008686832,0.00007512387,0.00003168154,0.00012457657,0.0025828846,0.0003436921,0.00010840919,0.959021,0.026986381,0.009765719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013695366,0.00010141316,0.0017385101,0.0006278942,0.00003521799,0.0002603952,0.0024467555,0.0008095412,0.000502062,0.7363535,0.25690246,0.00008528792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046827784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036805698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98367506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01400929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024762817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4478234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127502681","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12019","title":"Medical Tourism's Impact on Health Care Equity and Access in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Making the Case for Regulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medical tourism; Equity (law); Health care; Tourism; Economic growth; Developing country; Business; Low and middle income countries; Medical care; Developed country; Low income; Medicine; Political science; Socioeconomics; Family medicine; Economics; Environmental health; Population; Law","score_opus":0.2253626129090279,"score_gpt":0.5737565557528306,"score_spread":0.34839394284380265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127502681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26323235,0.030197332,0.0017828459,0.53741777,0.0010345979,0.000111647205,0.00016861038,0.000025194939,0.16602969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700513,0.005243044,0.00038723875,0.022493908,0.00056602794,0.000049548245,0.000024094079,0.0000050784934,0.0011797867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895291,0.0064042276,0.00036354148,0.0002832903,0.0014786045,0.0019412161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97096103,0.018993435,0.004606486,0.0009059828,0.0019098915,0.0026231885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01296557,0.00014783564,0.00032123312,0.0012379162,0.0021818057,0.0069142357,0.0009539925,0.0029691078,0.0043713986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023422463,0.0001586748,0.00070539047,0.0015185175,0.014268534,0.003814396,0.0074573564,0.0041417195,0.00010484747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015431529,0.00025566714,0.09690871,0.0011888385,0.00013846353,0.0009156538,0.01659619,0.0011775082,0.0003668868,0.7579685,0.02110501,0.10322416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017462039,0.00057804113,0.43401575,0.0141033465,0.00024189208,0.0010279805,0.08246728,0.0022237736,0.0011993784,0.24607225,0.21772604,0.0001696256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016856905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02302713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016856905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005776463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012995128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06856936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128234613","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2011.00594.x","title":"Multi-Professional Recommendations for Access and Utilization of Critical Care Services: Towards Consistency in Practice and Ethical Decision-Making Processes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Nursing; Variety (cybernetics); Medicine; Work (physics); Critical care nursing; Position (finance); Position paper; Psychology; Business; Health care; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.5572284833785622,"score_gpt":0.6071744814463653,"score_spread":0.04994599806780309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128234613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015683295,0.0040534353,0.12654233,0.8056662,0.0051336135,0.0064600823,0.00015097036,0.0007861825,0.035523865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25190625,0.004731725,0.59949106,0.11632712,0.0029143698,0.012105177,0.0004376297,0.00063225726,0.01145439],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.4011786,0.40364435,0.07096677,0.013110043,0.09952298,0.011577244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22694533,0.37759787,0.0485933,0.051227815,0.24698928,0.048646428],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.49127817,0.0013087322,0.0024392202,0.010589322,0.016010905,0.027133731,0.012404581,0.02535124,0.004696787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6545163,0.002226016,0.0031194598,0.005925814,0.017703937,0.021601556,0.022841504,0.0326604,0.0026209287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021343931,0.0018900202,0.02459133,0.002660102,0.00040523818,0.0016305017,0.077714905,0.0038864724,0.0016812072,0.12971517,0.4259018,0.32970977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076443737,0.0005939347,0.0334825,0.017711524,0.0002663678,0.0019221804,0.07990447,0.0156792,0.0026794972,0.3429962,0.502685,0.0013147115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012766157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01790581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49127817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022753503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1776856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6273446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128446358","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12015","title":"Transnational Trade in Human Eggs: Law, Policy, and (In)Action in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Irritability; Nausea; Bloating; Production (economics); Vomiting; Abdominal pain; Anger; Economics; Medicine; Business; Psychology; Psychiatry; Anxiety; Anesthesia; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.1201635566585165,"score_gpt":0.41529205719812184,"score_spread":0.2951285005396054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128446358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38025793,0.02999498,0.0013420514,0.34343088,0.000842157,0.0002622451,0.0011899015,0.00010599723,0.24257387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8835103,0.010111575,0.0014124963,0.046481952,0.00008846626,0.000057735164,0.00025625504,0.00003524752,0.05804594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465513,0.00054239517,0.00016956609,0.00030765915,0.0017714985,0.0025537657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859001,0.0031386428,0.00074336387,0.00021067762,0.0041684327,0.0058387965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036332342,0.00023338805,0.00038651194,0.001539976,0.0140429735,0.009435634,0.001865559,0.0049069445,0.007626932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009772703,0.0004726672,0.00045144442,0.0034125876,0.0071632364,0.0018858013,0.003300955,0.003802716,0.00022273851],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002092812,0.00023902576,0.08312462,0.0009259413,0.00010279498,0.0046185716,0.030610416,0.0024910334,0.0022870393,0.62150395,0.14069425,0.113193125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012104916,0.00013966102,0.1740334,0.0021051124,0.00013156638,0.0008534377,0.07997207,0.004701972,0.0012122666,0.023737026,0.71271235,0.00028010004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99727964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99835676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2096977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2096977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35394868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9166387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128462155","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12013","title":"Patents and Human Rights: A Heterodox Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Human rights; Intellectual property; Law and economics; Conceptualization; International human rights law; Political science; Framing (construction); Law; Opposition (politics); Rhetorical question; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Property rights; Dominance (genetics); Right to property; Sociology; Politics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24723553758132272,"score_gpt":0.31094708725742654,"score_spread":0.06371154967610382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128462155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04074641,0.040826626,0.04908485,0.11329176,0.001141432,0.00011403281,0.000095149306,0.000023470027,0.7546762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90825933,0.01629755,0.0091181705,0.018419506,0.0045099594,0.00017520817,0.000042025542,0.000048787224,0.04312938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965699,0.0016626992,0.000064193206,0.00027948074,0.0010294773,0.00039429174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651474,0.0028394815,0.00013300862,0.0001576866,0.00024705028,0.00010798716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004259877,0.0004832455,0.0005607856,0.0044402126,0.0033500064,0.0069595566,0.00079185364,0.0050435043,0.005005416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039283163,0.00027025386,0.0007100209,0.0016893977,0.029215716,0.009475637,0.0031477308,0.0042425618,0.00034866625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011665799,0.0000032628302,0.000023913428,0.0000039038673,9.228178e-7,0.000015789163,0.00024025905,0.00005408858,0.000008383498,0.99863905,0.00035875716,0.0006504368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008843988,0.000009351213,0.00015725294,0.000059333197,0.0000036445012,0.000032543892,0.00041779233,0.0004929877,0.000042148553,0.97715205,0.021620989,0.0000032071307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029140771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002081345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069595566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005950296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026210581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043172657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131829871","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12096","title":"Another Look at the Legal and Ethical Consequences of Pharmacological Memory Dampening: The Case of Sexual Assault","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Promulgation; Witness; Psychology; Sexual assault; Obligation; Ethical issues; Criminology; Medicine; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Political science; Law; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Engineering ethics; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.13325344450066245,"score_gpt":0.42093757994636477,"score_spread":0.2876841354457023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131829871","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108151905,0.06544289,0.0104242,0.7269126,0.003674785,0.00019583858,0.000121098536,0.000047517122,0.08502921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71254367,0.05884099,0.009064839,0.18818806,0.008147552,0.00028092475,0.000055583623,0.00008021433,0.022798134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174994,0.0056615355,0.00037256078,0.00036261944,0.00091750856,0.0009357726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706981,0.025007498,0.0019851236,0.00065454317,0.0010180023,0.0006368282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008764076,0.0005587882,0.0011609691,0.0020840256,0.008126284,0.0062801247,0.0016706509,0.023068344,0.0038628222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03131121,0.00047876296,0.0014336032,0.0013377309,0.017356161,0.007616,0.0038928492,0.016531704,0.0004363785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021146527,0.00030542188,0.0067972587,0.0011940094,0.00010592849,0.13656145,0.06974333,0.00059682626,0.002480819,0.7143529,0.029273057,0.038377494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011803727,0.00080064626,0.010040781,0.0046055275,0.0002229745,0.13448879,0.16166194,0.0017451062,0.0038399054,0.2892199,0.39301684,0.00023958419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005616709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0099501675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023068344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004805767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004415212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046349406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132792397","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12275","title":"Addressing Antibiotic Resistance Requires Robust International Accountability Mechanisms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health and Long Term Care","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Accountability; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Action (physics); Resistance (ecology); International law; Political science; Business; Public relations; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.18978963851627687,"score_gpt":0.3969869804667321,"score_spread":0.20719734195045522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132792397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020963639,0.015418232,0.21516265,0.38232738,0.005167095,0.0014254885,0.000203921,0.001243855,0.3580878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7514499,0.010195982,0.13596594,0.06935828,0.0030435165,0.0022630582,0.00023509527,0.00034827233,0.027139952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89671624,0.051002696,0.008788347,0.006836784,0.02813509,0.008520988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86609936,0.058517203,0.023816248,0.025687229,0.019548938,0.006331048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09988492,0.0010129937,0.0012983308,0.002186681,0.003409438,0.011517619,0.0042877826,0.013341239,0.0073628384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14297679,0.0007385968,0.0017119176,0.0015518818,0.0154313315,0.020222127,0.01616943,0.01168392,0.0018920691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019761386,0.00010402794,0.0015537518,0.00049597205,0.00006541231,0.0001824193,0.0016313348,0.0012857864,0.0010450348,0.9272561,0.012926668,0.05343375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006509919,0.000182051,0.0030824363,0.002267435,0.00008541823,0.00025010225,0.0016495505,0.0015697405,0.001444864,0.6897566,0.29952672,0.00011991412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002105021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015889723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09988492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064296834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02459885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52824825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133882079","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12253","title":"What Will it Take to Address the Global Threat of Antibiotic Resistance?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Health and Long Term Care","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Norwegian; Foundation (evidence); Antibiotic resistance; Political science; Action (physics); State (computer science); Resistance (ecology); Public administration; Public health; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Antibiotics; Engineering; Computer science; Microbiology; Biology; Nursing","score_opus":0.09351948488377047,"score_gpt":0.36206690588583956,"score_spread":0.2685474210020691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133882079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017175631,0.05226261,0.0017347798,0.91748685,0.008043365,0.000056602716,0.000051768933,0.000043173495,0.018603299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15710916,0.1534196,0.0111611225,0.64320266,0.018593613,0.0006262975,0.0001613171,0.00018858675,0.015537606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97740346,0.013346524,0.0011521013,0.0011262204,0.004226487,0.002745198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9477821,0.03738523,0.002373491,0.0017207403,0.0071486714,0.0035897766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0376619,0.00094206876,0.0012119649,0.0021646773,0.004578519,0.016974764,0.0025382265,0.026343213,0.006235323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05593811,0.00048956746,0.0016496425,0.0013601617,0.017636638,0.024509095,0.005453375,0.016273933,0.002334151],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024600924,0.0002814912,0.0021385753,0.0075759916,0.00022873716,0.0010483102,0.016139343,0.00092776434,0.0018997823,0.455642,0.28866586,0.22520615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005197923,0.00020474405,0.002022476,0.0074280715,0.00014268215,0.00040003686,0.022674646,0.00033340123,0.0013073699,0.1907337,0.77458304,0.000117843134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055707623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048875757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0376619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058351704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017203301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1991775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137090334","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00137.x","title":"Genetic Determinism and Discrimination: A Call to Re-Orient Prevailing Human Rights Discourse to Better Comport with the Public Implications of Individual Genetic Testing","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Genetic discrimination; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Stigma (botany); Genetic testing; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Internet privacy; Law; Psychology; History; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1555740498234271,"score_gpt":0.424965349463768,"score_spread":0.2693912996403409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137090334","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013399213,0.9675404,0.00035949028,0.026512107,0.0011733526,0.000003011728,0.0000038213966,0.000007359327,0.0042664623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045063514,0.9789699,0.0006727285,0.011943803,0.0014740782,0.000016276716,0.000011304656,0.000007323614,0.0023982655],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976774,0.0012165143,0.000099348625,0.00016259715,0.00071683706,0.00012743108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465114,0.004106157,0.00025269267,0.00015956457,0.000613419,0.00021715707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057286494,0.0008222206,0.001681417,0.0026417822,0.0013973694,0.0034901795,0.0019219668,0.007520433,0.0036178296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070338817,0.00031901954,0.0006253264,0.0028666311,0.009958109,0.0077166716,0.0023044827,0.0076751765,0.001414686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034448774,0.000055811357,0.00031648728,0.0060119512,0.000057810026,0.0006538598,0.002128191,0.00041859454,0.00030489187,0.21947084,0.15522707,0.6153201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127911335,0.000029539608,0.0005103912,0.0069238683,0.00001911775,0.0011615602,0.0012517011,0.00005933073,0.0000812714,0.06395212,0.92597467,0.000023774142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041829967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064943056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007520433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044136383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007670519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03202331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137840922","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12012","title":"Pharmaceutical Knowledge Governance: A Human Rights Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Misrepresentation; Human rights; Corporate governance; Obligation; Business; Political science; Pharmaceutical industry; Drug control; Public relations; Law and economics; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Law; Medicine; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.20270876457574855,"score_gpt":0.4249189313450158,"score_spread":0.22221016676926725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137840922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02039566,0.0064877835,0.12797524,0.33465394,0.000620252,0.00016181891,0.00015073517,0.000062186686,0.5094924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93402576,0.0037602212,0.017389735,0.02446771,0.00203486,0.00026567088,0.00006926382,0.00005222119,0.017934533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97253823,0.016625619,0.0008825148,0.0026011071,0.004338165,0.0030143445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578208,0.030057285,0.0035565046,0.0037507864,0.0032227375,0.001591848],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032254387,0.0004786797,0.00069946813,0.0023348117,0.0057316325,0.013397438,0.0022485477,0.011073622,0.0052197813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027954593,0.0005045124,0.0011099725,0.0017839082,0.058208898,0.015118852,0.0057681687,0.0078514,0.00069034897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018050771,0.000004622681,0.00006831493,0.000007805451,0.000002396921,0.000019176126,0.00025725193,0.00016204867,0.000015074039,0.99832934,0.00034182306,0.0007903382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009768413,0.000012611933,0.00013691514,0.00008421273,0.000005710867,0.000041755644,0.00040715953,0.00043709032,0.00009204399,0.98077756,0.017986627,0.000008595777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067141494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003085679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99426836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009466262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015402111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1705795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142835555","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00652.x","title":"Currents in Contemporary Bioethics: Open Access as Benefit Sharing? The Example of Publicly Funded Large-Scale Genomic Databases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Genomics; McGill University","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Database; Bioethics; World Wide Web; Computer science; Data science; Internet privacy; Business; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.8888578791030752,"score_gpt":0.6677649895645961,"score_spread":0.22109288953847916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142835555","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017716665,0.0057905056,0.06691277,0.72700906,0.0011364894,0.00019602117,0.00037113487,0.00018955424,0.18067779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84898496,0.006240346,0.055327754,0.0623422,0.00237358,0.0009213082,0.00058410084,0.00043714745,0.022788689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8284667,0.13750185,0.004502815,0.006019743,0.017072579,0.006436255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6650823,0.24939162,0.009757046,0.05089881,0.013638432,0.011231844],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17937273,0.00046014995,0.0014304038,0.0027072576,0.009904047,0.030781096,0.005457535,0.017508449,0.020390868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26540205,0.0009937467,0.001122892,0.0065866043,0.037364755,0.055507764,0.024191057,0.012907513,0.0023767755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002614629,0.000023182916,0.0005256298,0.0000748485,0.00001539407,0.00010161849,0.00334117,0.00021494814,0.00006184505,0.9705138,0.013361176,0.0117403045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049242364,0.000017062475,0.0005124614,0.00046236976,0.000018251205,0.00012787135,0.00400676,0.00067931035,0.00012858587,0.8999432,0.09401686,0.000038120743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073596914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006033322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009472273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028230246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94862497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143368480","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2009.00378.x","title":"Differences in Regulatory Frameworks Governing Genetic Laboratories in Four Countries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian Bioethics Society","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Referral; Genetic testing; Health professionals; Political science; Medicine; Health care; Family medicine; Law","score_opus":0.34027518184704314,"score_gpt":0.5255106534883183,"score_spread":0.18523547164127513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143368480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7811133,0.03240973,0.011214216,0.017216627,0.0005888532,0.00051793363,0.0012582806,0.00023552576,0.15544549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816674,0.003483256,0.0061981953,0.0044242903,0.000056678164,0.00025713388,0.00042669178,0.000054067208,0.003432427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608297,0.019685034,0.0059041525,0.002493475,0.006133489,0.00495411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9087079,0.055271484,0.013577632,0.005449385,0.012754262,0.004239329],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039443117,0.00036072123,0.0006854355,0.004160444,0.0031524145,0.0080599785,0.0020661887,0.0026862998,0.0019502883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056970946,0.0008901983,0.001236691,0.005334654,0.0064488016,0.0021540842,0.005022272,0.0039221006,0.00028030475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000785297,0.00033688574,0.12325058,0.0017328273,0.00048336145,0.0024151877,0.046441723,0.004485059,0.0028109483,0.6837348,0.012647109,0.12087632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046889743,0.0005825464,0.58420193,0.0063640424,0.00069805706,0.004094934,0.059036657,0.0021143078,0.0065756845,0.047180515,0.28797102,0.0007113737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025432974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016698446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008807928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011254983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20859766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144447924","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12095","title":"Supporting Second Victims of Patient Safety Events: Shouldn't These Communications Be Covered by Legal Privilege?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Harm; Ambiguity; Legislation; Malpractice; Statutory law; Health care; Public relations; State (computer science); Law; Internet privacy; Business; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.13602705733149173,"score_gpt":0.49642585992561483,"score_spread":0.3603988025941231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144447924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36906308,0.0036261745,0.006723526,0.5847254,0.0013379715,0.00017498108,0.00006161129,0.00010486511,0.03418241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9193704,0.0011723983,0.0035612942,0.07256002,0.00046091955,0.00013284385,0.00002167781,0.000019221965,0.002701163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767719,0.013247697,0.0013975119,0.0010054536,0.003561321,0.004016151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86587477,0.088773035,0.016878543,0.0077343476,0.010206682,0.010532624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033924486,0.00026070568,0.00046195363,0.0014791384,0.008671107,0.006962477,0.0027747538,0.012731462,0.00441262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14985327,0.00046032015,0.0007886017,0.00071429176,0.011084808,0.010613238,0.007062999,0.009314038,0.00054097496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002579935,0.0010022124,0.16302958,0.00077301194,0.00013278835,0.006097116,0.17660993,0.00085394655,0.00314999,0.29720443,0.08162273,0.2692663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024298737,0.0012173238,0.12587634,0.009938412,0.00036173587,0.010839677,0.3036478,0.003267879,0.0063270726,0.2144987,0.3234021,0.0003800228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012492858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026731355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033924486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032510618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028796632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.179412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144735993","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12003","title":"Law as a Tool in “The War on Obesity”: Useful Interventions, Maybe, But, First, What's the Problem?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Embarrassment; Overweight; Obesity; Law; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Weight loss; State (computer science); Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.2293889332648301,"score_gpt":0.5001847732461911,"score_spread":0.27079583998136103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144735993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023647886,0.013424438,0.006837664,0.86031693,0.0022600559,0.00012909589,0.00002538662,0.00014843154,0.09321011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7648497,0.017385166,0.009838262,0.18092158,0.0023374786,0.00044263375,0.000041641335,0.00011101052,0.024072494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823652,0.012705294,0.0002016755,0.000445295,0.0020771883,0.0022053237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812113,0.012706708,0.001334552,0.00082295306,0.0016384147,0.002286092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013404991,0.0006214224,0.00051803037,0.0015578232,0.010186635,0.0073423916,0.0022084622,0.008800991,0.010111603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026598256,0.0002717219,0.00055373256,0.0010730983,0.0398846,0.013678184,0.0060183336,0.009883765,0.0009891607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008067372,0.0010183663,0.0046186214,0.00078599976,0.000049137405,0.0008068311,0.03460155,0.0005729165,0.00072924246,0.66692096,0.07830179,0.21151394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016942224,0.00044594266,0.0076731867,0.005218904,0.000093228235,0.00075893116,0.11569794,0.0010330335,0.0015679692,0.27119648,0.5959943,0.00015070739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039016876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08512268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039016876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009871076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02218574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07757956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147454229","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00201.x","title":"Connecting Public Health Law with Science","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Greenfield Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Public access; Internet privacy; Access to information; Computer science; Public health; Political science; Law; Public relations; Information access; World Wide Web; Medicine; Mathematics; Nursing","score_opus":0.3914988562211579,"score_gpt":0.574772689439308,"score_spread":0.18327383321815016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147454229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002541708,0.0056663407,0.011991754,0.7940843,0.0018068765,0.000047250447,0.00008010888,0.000059123875,0.18372251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63588184,0.013677818,0.016441457,0.27125,0.01079886,0.0006119173,0.00019972025,0.00022485132,0.050913446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9562168,0.0276456,0.0014492456,0.0036747777,0.007930217,0.0030834246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8584722,0.12004714,0.003101841,0.008351235,0.006116803,0.003910716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050083037,0.0004741148,0.0013547693,0.0040386873,0.011292183,0.028837956,0.0022878991,0.028792726,0.020085158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11298188,0.000953891,0.0010777941,0.0028522154,0.09663106,0.026804013,0.015453524,0.027409887,0.002168082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032485002,0.000011307507,0.00010330947,0.000026004873,0.0000035011324,0.000037378228,0.0007813782,0.00012481147,0.000016845117,0.9851761,0.011211277,0.002504859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065612207,0.0000060903253,0.0000858598,0.00014079521,0.0000023219714,0.0000148926,0.0006120022,0.00019693711,0.000042731157,0.94958603,0.049298603,0.000007110031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013527394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008517325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050083037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01985368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032977324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2648676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150004442","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12009","title":"The Debatable Role of Courts in Brazil's Health Care System: Does Litigation Harm or Help?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Public Health in Brazil","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Right to health; Harm; Sanitation; Duty; Health care; Constitution; Health promotion; Business; State (computer science); Duty to protect; Health policy; Environmental health; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06292470450077095,"score_gpt":0.4324455903590497,"score_spread":0.3695208858582788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150004442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25714135,0.014790621,0.007852888,0.5162267,0.0004197157,0.00012395081,0.000120067954,0.00004242138,0.2032822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862874,0.0018196868,0.0007272866,0.0093256235,0.000104721425,0.000020679461,0.000010642783,0.0000069731473,0.0016969177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844678,0.008274559,0.00061644404,0.0011015335,0.0028856837,0.002653905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756355,0.015275331,0.0033237657,0.0011608182,0.002665319,0.0019391995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015485689,0.00025582637,0.0004728267,0.0014638822,0.008585591,0.009241766,0.0016497116,0.0063693346,0.0029866162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04983453,0.00034159695,0.0006613872,0.0014458329,0.022711998,0.0076928036,0.0052609723,0.005039268,0.00019496403],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015822174,0.000033177526,0.01176541,0.0001558822,0.000034746878,0.0011270546,0.025799474,0.0003772923,0.00051382,0.9388049,0.0044238516,0.016948527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014163755,0.00016939206,0.056701723,0.004050753,0.0002816267,0.003090629,0.07827514,0.0043603918,0.001799141,0.6763511,0.1745571,0.00022145605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082865864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10336875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082865864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014187351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022681184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16476709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155131570","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12151","title":"The Challenge of Informed Consent and Return of Results in Translational Genomics: Empirical Analysis and Recommendations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Informed consent; Exome; Exome sequencing; Genomics; Data sharing; MEDLINE; Medicine; Genome; Alternative medicine; Biology; Genetics; Pathology; Gene","score_opus":0.5588964673533864,"score_gpt":0.5904016193261435,"score_spread":0.03150515197275716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155131570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041500926,0.008683501,0.0093458695,0.96948415,0.0009635034,0.00052098447,0.00010836158,0.000026070422,0.0067174467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35813427,0.020509118,0.087772645,0.52085495,0.0039646323,0.00623426,0.00029111354,0.00017760557,0.0020614231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.2771836,0.64216745,0.03182083,0.011545703,0.03131019,0.0059722355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.034930337,0.91256195,0.010275661,0.016587105,0.021304682,0.004340259],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6974673,0.0016834072,0.0037891583,0.0044693896,0.011138361,0.022472646,0.0106077865,0.030632153,0.009216691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8409902,0.0019087173,0.0024891733,0.0053509986,0.073006645,0.06620119,0.01593093,0.041022874,0.0014838503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005953599,0.00043301578,0.011444272,0.0059918845,0.00053916883,0.0011898632,0.028858185,0.0015751526,0.00014860099,0.67164135,0.11959704,0.15798607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006181116,0.00025403005,0.004467306,0.04354615,0.00046898628,0.0013119298,0.034313407,0.003978309,0.00040482584,0.812152,0.098119155,0.00036574918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013232345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016199451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96936786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01828866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08597604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37307668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156953889","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12073","title":"Key Opinion Leaders and the Corruption of Medical Knowledge: What the Sunshine Act Will and Won’t Cast Light on","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Opinion leadership; Language change; Public relations; Politics; Dissemination; Key (lock); Business; Pharmaceutical industry; Power (physics); Knowledge base; Political science; Marketing; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.5968574857229567,"score_gpt":0.6022996563492857,"score_spread":0.005442170626329013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156953889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054226175,0.0054301443,0.0059935073,0.8749421,0.0016709552,0.00002894736,0.00002749645,0.000024620243,0.05765599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92680556,0.0023078548,0.000890349,0.06406726,0.0014506719,0.000035147048,0.000010799093,0.000038384966,0.0043940977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96624136,0.02462145,0.00063983095,0.0013926531,0.003905738,0.0031990402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90119123,0.070545,0.01179714,0.004287736,0.0068994523,0.0052794046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037674688,0.00026143147,0.0005844025,0.0011547441,0.009224802,0.013748985,0.000927883,0.0082332585,0.0040184148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08856694,0.0003709444,0.00045218138,0.0010889663,0.043865852,0.016931303,0.0051716575,0.009796171,0.00092707796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012588932,0.000050718616,0.006466121,0.0001750262,0.00004433525,0.000439178,0.057748023,0.00021534831,0.00041237383,0.85934097,0.04039755,0.034584463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001034436,0.00012707822,0.007678173,0.0012607203,0.00007513498,0.00051936693,0.076692626,0.0011852728,0.0015338555,0.6682301,0.24247058,0.00012369025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028178524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024057878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99176675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006135969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061943284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19924515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161118953","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00189.x","title":"The Ethics of Restrictive Licensing for Handguns: Comparing the United States and Canadian Approaches to Handgun Regulation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Gun Ownership and Violence Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; State (computer science); Magistrate; Gun control; Political science; Medicine; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.7410801662027258,"score_gpt":0.5310672914460173,"score_spread":0.2100128747567085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161118953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001427752,0.9854225,0.00009478105,0.002713744,0.00011823556,0.0000117804875,0.00001536216,0.0000024518727,0.010193457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021833785,0.97585255,0.00024119385,0.0010087693,0.000068547124,0.000016909065,0.000024909652,0.0000023291477,0.000951067],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930195,0.0016054988,0.0003197744,0.0002520949,0.004411208,0.0003919651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441755,0.0023467848,0.00051202014,0.00009155674,0.002409055,0.0002230583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00486077,0.00038607794,0.00089895463,0.0038081752,0.0015220628,0.0026278857,0.001151495,0.0015838463,0.0009739784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01066477,0.00027415104,0.00048591857,0.007770055,0.0025420783,0.000986983,0.0010529622,0.0013722158,0.0001546781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095912386,0.00005415232,0.0019499487,0.01828643,0.00017447141,0.00036797728,0.0056816083,0.00048417208,0.00040378506,0.05336115,0.03345653,0.8856839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069661255,0.00015564288,0.021109985,0.030088674,0.0005065029,0.0011218857,0.00513174,0.00016439054,0.0005701061,0.006041918,0.93494594,0.0000935224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71249545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.806176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28750455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020556264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056424726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5783954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162857663","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2010.00505.x","title":"Seven Challenges in International Development Assistance for Health and Ways Forward","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Context (archaeology); Developing country; Unintended consequences; Business; Economic growth; Quality (philosophy); Aid effectiveness; Health policy; Development aid; Political science; Public relations; Health care; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.21083790189119395,"score_gpt":0.4135999925232815,"score_spread":0.20276209063208755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162857663","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033708771,0.022060065,0.0028245726,0.9306853,0.0023658653,0.000045205183,0.00004404004,0.00005346422,0.038550653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5358805,0.10407653,0.04601749,0.24492253,0.010066278,0.0013713299,0.00029080667,0.0001842594,0.057190213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762674,0.01254748,0.0010868611,0.0012388277,0.004273599,0.0045858077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97146523,0.016354319,0.0014017615,0.0015146107,0.003752822,0.0055112853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03391294,0.0010479704,0.00093024346,0.002777176,0.011442505,0.03511804,0.0027144614,0.0200369,0.011731514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02967953,0.0007606612,0.0009438409,0.0033698205,0.02151971,0.032059915,0.016449133,0.022026137,0.0017756833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031612566,0.000099335084,0.0007113418,0.0003044716,0.000011024144,0.00027687947,0.0033188455,0.0005425816,0.00008605889,0.9174125,0.042482294,0.034723032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044435394,0.00005983149,0.0006911099,0.0010043563,0.000007845968,0.00031570034,0.025371768,0.0006920597,0.00015218563,0.5652413,0.40634388,0.00007549667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006866825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070506306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03511804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009874931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03371587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17935091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166216486","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00538.x","title":"Ensuring Reasonable Health: Health Rights, the Judiciary, and South African HIV/AIDS Policy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Deference; Right to health; Political science; Human rights; Enforcement; Social rights; Health care; Health policy; Democracy; Judicial deference; Judicial review; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.10637919706711887,"score_gpt":0.3998133078062844,"score_spread":0.2934341107391655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166216486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080467544,0.039320678,0.006145877,0.5657044,0.0007991195,0.000090220485,0.00005478938,0.000022775901,0.30739453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492519,0.0077232667,0.001971047,0.029354898,0.0004650495,0.00008182811,0.000013097143,0.000015135957,0.011123775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931206,0.004053052,0.0002509782,0.00037135673,0.00069469144,0.0015092895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877451,0.0093547655,0.0008266214,0.00038635687,0.00057466433,0.0011126277],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015347699,0.0003319476,0.00040776722,0.0015841268,0.009312502,0.009893981,0.00093548564,0.008517618,0.0070462385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016215555,0.00035335642,0.00028230093,0.0015552287,0.043906238,0.009075585,0.0073500243,0.009328692,0.00041885115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012199791,0.000012380345,0.00042756778,0.00005369188,0.0000034698182,0.00009761104,0.005764953,0.00013906824,0.00009743497,0.98651147,0.002157777,0.004722426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025069257,0.000028475866,0.0020467762,0.00084411574,0.0000100469,0.000115247654,0.0114678,0.0003549045,0.00034780978,0.9215156,0.063222,0.000022207736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02094609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020514749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010144192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017995065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0811674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170209948","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.299.x","title":"Mustard Gas and American Race-Based Human Experimentation in World War II","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Rockefeller University; University of Chicago","keywords":"Race (biology); Chemical warfare; Government (linguistics); World War II; Political science; First world war; Arms race; Engineering; Law; Sociology; History; Economic history; Gender studies; Ancient history","score_opus":0.12318359184055278,"score_gpt":0.3381280313207418,"score_spread":0.21494443948018904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170209948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79843247,0.0070762723,0.0018537984,0.026920699,0.00051341875,0.0000852766,0.000035339985,0.000009085038,0.16507366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99025714,0.0013264321,0.0003153847,0.003256457,0.00006303425,0.000057574405,0.00000744457,0.000006561463,0.0047098747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890392,0.008746279,0.00012211964,0.0005788989,0.0005437697,0.00096975337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501723,0.002831191,0.0007893442,0.00039848496,0.00037026173,0.0005933653],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013012117,0.00022688929,0.00025275938,0.00089729746,0.010925063,0.003969007,0.00063569605,0.0018336165,0.003130736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00994627,0.00027429327,0.00019893164,0.0009148119,0.02726102,0.0027522433,0.0056854407,0.0034919693,0.00013597772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028172482,0.00036938247,0.013999087,0.000082735685,0.000019203913,0.0005924319,0.39629418,0.00017031883,0.0016053729,0.55442077,0.004354743,0.027809964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011555343,0.0009400409,0.09366287,0.0009369295,0.000042995565,0.0010621191,0.38325027,0.000480082,0.004834684,0.13516149,0.37935036,0.00016260258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019136844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022757173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98907495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004199579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031357538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06881547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170385797","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12017","title":"What's Missing? Discussing Stem Cell Translational Research in Educational Information on Stem Cell “Tourism”","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Government of Canada; Ontario Genomics Institute; Genome Canada","keywords":"Distrust; Viewpoints; Stem cell; Tourism; Feeling; Medical tourism; Psychological intervention; Perception; Translational research; Stem-cell therapy; Medicine; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.14612294978179777,"score_gpt":0.40934163990803063,"score_spread":0.2632186901262329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170385797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040683676,0.011052058,0.0061333547,0.8729814,0.02280805,0.0006807287,0.00024077042,0.00037083626,0.045049135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28141674,0.03110054,0.021676302,0.61387956,0.018995425,0.0015566361,0.00050292833,0.00038228492,0.030489534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782588,0.016954366,0.0010977129,0.00033843506,0.0016879636,0.0016628255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9332741,0.04943975,0.0031623824,0.00072418863,0.004647838,0.008751752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022033816,0.00058117224,0.0008175148,0.001513483,0.006256888,0.006239192,0.0012287432,0.009180586,0.019885555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063448265,0.0003364285,0.0009552453,0.00096071936,0.0061510797,0.011915589,0.007340255,0.011701658,0.0048026503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031184775,0.0013726888,0.0069641387,0.0055307387,0.0000640115,0.005278766,0.18784222,0.0002779793,0.0023522996,0.029869515,0.4890902,0.27104566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000786637,0.0005182915,0.003549992,0.006192613,0.00006202761,0.0021664642,0.115783975,0.00027623816,0.0010309295,0.009162441,0.8610352,0.00014313837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001881619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027977338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022033816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048343143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008768389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11652732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172137636","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12149","title":"Youth Sports &amp; Public Health: Framing Risks of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in American Football and Ice Hockey","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology","keywords":"Framing (construction); American football; Traumatic brain injury; Football; Injury prevention; Suicide prevention; Situated; Psychological intervention; Occupational safety and health; Poison control; Ice hockey; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychology; Concussion; Medicine; Medical emergency; Political science; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Psychiatry; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.4880562396939423,"score_gpt":0.495568944372879,"score_spread":0.007512704678936721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172137636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84341055,0.0021617913,0.0020036115,0.088988625,0.00019553035,0.00009949809,0.000209454,0.000021749265,0.06290914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962585,0.0007566701,0.00061152317,0.0011451858,0.00004994875,0.00003662577,0.000040598286,0.0000025741333,0.001098379],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660563,0.0025333029,0.00008455556,0.00011665797,0.00029033492,0.00036945703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930801,0.003666382,0.0014109942,0.00013605168,0.000789938,0.00091651635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047657797,0.00026378955,0.000118665805,0.0017088312,0.0038304727,0.0038160111,0.0006263754,0.001616446,0.0031049247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013299337,0.00021779201,0.00022516673,0.0010842811,0.0051577585,0.002074776,0.003077132,0.0020032895,0.00014859372],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000892113,0.00057642773,0.63379073,0.0002047037,0.00006535228,0.0009280122,0.19227256,0.0005822188,0.00017429501,0.08824955,0.015896548,0.06717034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021837985,0.00013166801,0.4404548,0.0012486227,0.00012042962,0.0005903225,0.48049468,0.001946652,0.0003349759,0.03581745,0.03877422,0.00006430917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20818064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29296008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20818064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008528559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01020745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4139378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209511974","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12312","title":"International Guidelines for Privacy in Genomic Biobanking (or the Unexpected Virtue of Pluralism)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Biobank; Globe; Data sharing; Data science; Pluralism (philosophy); Information privacy; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Biology; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8345066363848103,"score_gpt":0.6551396101271317,"score_spread":0.17936702625767853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209511974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004403906,0.040621303,0.2178857,0.34678486,0.010798779,0.00066789926,0.0003761707,0.00054076576,0.37792066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21428333,0.044179782,0.35886583,0.29177094,0.010982565,0.0035465085,0.0011572734,0.001066204,0.074147604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86517227,0.07729829,0.015004673,0.0074724397,0.030414063,0.0046382924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90274614,0.06550242,0.005078843,0.015076598,0.009184298,0.0024118081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10163076,0.0011696044,0.0012080318,0.0027165844,0.006928211,0.013281059,0.0034230424,0.017798295,0.0035458987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094771214,0.001139952,0.0019266146,0.0035913954,0.038665522,0.014085503,0.011898333,0.020966487,0.0019725836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000623341,0.0000140230595,0.00013131883,0.00012838613,0.0000073595393,0.000082663224,0.004306562,0.00018350415,0.00014809516,0.9556986,0.023127904,0.01616526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114219165,0.000022529008,0.00036449797,0.0014617349,0.000016501166,0.00048433736,0.0016563974,0.00029005017,0.00033786442,0.414354,0.58095306,0.000047604623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051272227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040604365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10163076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049523897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015649797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5374813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209710632","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12315","title":"Privacy and Biobanking in China: A Case of Policy in Transition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Chinese Universities Scientific Fund; Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Academy of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Biobank; China; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Urbanization; Population; Epidemiological transition; Public health; Population ageing; Industrialisation; Business; Health care; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5892120725566127,"score_gpt":0.6150427715447462,"score_spread":0.025830698988133505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209710632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72598183,0.0028728703,0.003050945,0.18133315,0.00041126757,0.00032387115,0.00009126202,0.00006853493,0.08586628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702444,0.00057040463,0.00050219643,0.022039538,0.00008370507,0.00013101863,0.000022034166,0.000011437172,0.0063953274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98156273,0.0054271435,0.00066378707,0.001202409,0.002801148,0.008342721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902997,0.004277939,0.0009929404,0.0007783168,0.0008527879,0.0027982353],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018508853,0.00048012674,0.0007928617,0.0019200579,0.022206934,0.0139604295,0.0028762482,0.012582046,0.0035545875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016185157,0.0005897774,0.0014111397,0.0044199624,0.027361186,0.0070258602,0.013456503,0.010831489,0.00018835925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001443064,0.00015968418,0.018976344,0.00008929018,0.00005256784,0.011315543,0.055263277,0.0016314152,0.00058416673,0.8927981,0.008253375,0.010732059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000661749,0.00051449967,0.05180561,0.00096072943,0.00030406893,0.004098979,0.15173194,0.019119073,0.0024227097,0.4931869,0.2744901,0.00070369756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25467435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15361653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98741794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048528336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08455651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50638396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211056330","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12319","title":"Biobank/Genomic Research in Nigeria: Examining Relevant Privacy and Confidentiality Frameworks","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Biobank; Confidentiality; Context (archaeology); Political science; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Law; Biology; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.7876369288930096,"score_gpt":0.6356200990226238,"score_spread":0.15201682987038578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211056330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34217426,0.023671072,0.012958213,0.29008934,0.00088383694,0.00038903797,0.00007976178,0.000013602911,0.32974085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97870386,0.0047360947,0.002324503,0.01173926,0.000121169745,0.0001356139,0.000012570477,0.000008367803,0.0022184858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95144093,0.038480535,0.0017065553,0.0010475954,0.0033717947,0.0039526904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8867856,0.09760287,0.0074837697,0.0018104791,0.0035492075,0.0027680565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05539954,0.00026172353,0.00049251603,0.002311565,0.018813144,0.019092228,0.0011654787,0.0061541237,0.0027075177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054520234,0.0005167321,0.00027126967,0.0035068411,0.04003321,0.012728662,0.010671071,0.00730902,0.00017122082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020480995,0.00003488044,0.0034592103,0.000116835785,0.0000032680584,0.0004432037,0.047944773,0.00009763233,0.00007017461,0.9396548,0.0010363666,0.0071182805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002870204,0.00006198712,0.008574172,0.0038086448,0.00003369108,0.0010032788,0.47765926,0.0007503422,0.00052280474,0.4403082,0.06719545,0.000053509473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011189284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020601401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013508178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031504713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29298425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213997155","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12310","title":"Harmonizing Privacy Laws to Enable International Biobank Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Biobank; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy; Business; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Privacy policy","score_opus":0.9432144606423886,"score_gpt":0.701093324878355,"score_spread":0.2421211357640336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213997155","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014203974,0.0023509164,0.1780502,0.37031856,0.0042104353,0.0032488392,0.0008856284,0.0011271723,0.4256043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43140525,0.0042039193,0.21388039,0.24215545,0.0051916325,0.00958595,0.0017081813,0.0011791335,0.09069011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.73601717,0.18011133,0.018151851,0.010527149,0.041282985,0.01390949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59756345,0.22880413,0.014722126,0.09936976,0.046231065,0.01330955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3111093,0.00066285377,0.0011009319,0.0036850593,0.0064720726,0.026985522,0.005268304,0.021329546,0.012063748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36290705,0.0018414994,0.0017899693,0.0039935545,0.020031687,0.026787763,0.02386694,0.018883679,0.007668265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005609604,0.000105349536,0.0013779149,0.00015157765,0.000029847382,0.00016948828,0.006549816,0.0006636393,0.00052711857,0.88564444,0.07623012,0.028494673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014662695,0.00013669378,0.0028013778,0.0019995978,0.000057007983,0.00033841195,0.0042305817,0.0019089022,0.0019634266,0.48769778,0.498584,0.00013557776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006261423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066695404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3111093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008436296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06817442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84952486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318982460","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00195.x","title":"Currents in Contemporary Ethics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Genome Canada","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.5649428696029962,"score_gpt":0.6369105774304668,"score_spread":0.07196770782747053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318982460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077384845,0.05153974,0.006151363,0.47368836,0.0027114374,0.000027303066,0.00006435761,0.000044820197,0.45803404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8061554,0.03515094,0.0039787437,0.06876139,0.0077354154,0.00016811879,0.00009249193,0.00018945416,0.07776808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99019355,0.0063669086,0.00026413213,0.0007197039,0.0016448873,0.0008107077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904571,0.006233861,0.0006055552,0.00082109927,0.0012632313,0.0006191044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012437014,0.00039177315,0.0005309395,0.0021430596,0.008519411,0.016278096,0.001064709,0.009118417,0.011982323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019122818,0.00037980144,0.00045366935,0.0022210914,0.05472965,0.014908554,0.0034180149,0.012584777,0.001777443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016353756,0.0000031163431,0.00004869526,0.000013233505,7.8258194e-7,0.000010081125,0.0013744531,0.000022966591,0.000006546277,0.9884637,0.008458737,0.0015959908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047777935,0.000004889641,0.000206086,0.00031308387,0.0000023647553,0.00005331471,0.0032040882,0.00014717181,0.000025228603,0.8277793,0.16825446,0.0000052214564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007995087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006399663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016278096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015449156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008462415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11209202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336708674","doi":"10.1177/1073110516644185","title":"Locating Biobanks in the Canadian Privacy Maze","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Biobank; Receipt; Political science; European union; Research ethics; Privacy law; Data sharing; Public administration; Information privacy; Public relations; Law; Privacy policy; Business; Internet privacy; Medicine; Accounting","score_opus":0.6891928414403071,"score_gpt":0.6093811485400256,"score_spread":0.07981169290028156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336708674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05261606,0.008550607,0.05970473,0.20122084,0.001057629,0.00054465345,0.002743633,0.0008223143,0.67273957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6786805,0.0091257645,0.078581244,0.022096751,0.00034567455,0.00041544368,0.0018260783,0.00053865096,0.20838995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821805,0.0038988893,0.00065230654,0.0019738497,0.0070243515,0.0042701317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768983,0.0084357085,0.0014520066,0.002064957,0.0073954836,0.003753588],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01472512,0.00036027684,0.00048920314,0.005271268,0.029493913,0.021268703,0.002820791,0.004107818,0.020444022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039572965,0.0008374582,0.0005915307,0.010440873,0.012673621,0.006625682,0.013288091,0.0031158451,0.0024022518],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000800405,0.000015396045,0.0062382296,0.00012916754,0.000019771249,0.0014522865,0.018355962,0.0010501709,0.0005393414,0.78570735,0.114891246,0.07152102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018612747,0.00000951232,0.004238093,0.00044494192,0.00002427745,0.00049077196,0.017174648,0.0013107536,0.000523516,0.067393884,0.9082804,0.000090614485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9444124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96339136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09435468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2591657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68459433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340971688","doi":"10.1177/1073110516644205","title":"The European Union's Adequacy Approach to Privacy and International Data Sharing in Health Research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; World Anti-Doping Agency; European Commission","keywords":"Jurisdiction; European union; Data sharing; Data Protection Act 1998; Proportionality (law); Transparency (behavior); Data Protection Directive; Directive; Data quality; Business; Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications; International trade; FTC Fair Information Practice; General Data Protection Regulation; Information privacy law; Information privacy; European Union law; Political science; Law; Privacy by Design; Computer science","score_opus":0.9053631604117635,"score_gpt":0.6803113645551662,"score_spread":0.2250517958565973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340971688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057825125,0.014800697,0.33068305,0.13708833,0.0026813662,0.0010363301,0.00056910526,0.00019647522,0.5071621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46624276,0.013407053,0.34688503,0.11323549,0.005783124,0.006443126,0.0006876555,0.00029336524,0.04702236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6985618,0.22101851,0.021198241,0.014830905,0.03803073,0.006359867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8380047,0.1181131,0.0064150584,0.019897085,0.014861942,0.0027081822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1869146,0.00093619316,0.0024864527,0.006286213,0.008197945,0.018887121,0.0046957084,0.019847622,0.004333176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16363741,0.0012658156,0.002960656,0.0063083,0.04168153,0.015812736,0.01925804,0.013544751,0.0014292506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071493073,0.000005273112,0.00008237946,0.00004039877,0.0000114008,0.0000367409,0.00060563954,0.00014253809,0.000017410675,0.9931452,0.0023815895,0.003524235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030824376,0.000038336537,0.00038606924,0.0007489017,0.000037370628,0.0002269125,0.0004820295,0.0006038059,0.00016251742,0.8663862,0.13085283,0.000044254422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071215266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003442837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1869146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008816366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028393261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98851067},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2460562489","doi":"10.1177/1073110516654123","title":"Raising Genomic Citizens: Adolescents and the Return of Secondary Genomic Findings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Raising (metalworking); Genomic sequencing; Exome sequencing; Citizenship; Exome; Psychology; Political science; Genome; Genetics; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.06464127320205759,"score_gpt":0.32506131368333774,"score_spread":0.26042004048128015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460562489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5477053,0.005861691,0.019468466,0.38832527,0.0008938493,0.000120893455,0.00008843042,0.00006431107,0.037471894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97003573,0.001425337,0.0028255852,0.023180919,0.00020612174,0.00006738182,0.000022607095,0.000025541814,0.0022108553],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97057974,0.023627866,0.000872446,0.0013327949,0.0019233894,0.0016637645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563957,0.02945598,0.0055791033,0.002314155,0.0024525553,0.0038023675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028040849,0.0002040521,0.00036685998,0.0006976826,0.0067797108,0.0065108975,0.00086137827,0.004793943,0.0017844238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047822516,0.0003252801,0.00044287785,0.0004866096,0.019913254,0.0054623405,0.0095224725,0.0073586265,0.00030279436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007418903,0.00014580524,0.11607488,0.00019815732,0.00004406224,0.01058911,0.40489897,0.00025496294,0.0017488272,0.35783538,0.01008162,0.09805402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033026146,0.00033449597,0.03339183,0.0022964568,0.00011660467,0.01856189,0.3808515,0.0010448166,0.0045682257,0.28720316,0.271497,0.00010090168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022982988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002732783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028040849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022605031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050015557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14829594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461217232","doi":"10.1177/1073110516654133","title":"Screening of Newborns for Disorders with High Benefit-Risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Metabolism and Genetic Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Newborn Screening Ontario","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Medicine; Newborn screening; Pediatrics; Psychiatry; Intensive care medicine","score_opus":0.045476121815029795,"score_gpt":0.3209602978835548,"score_spread":0.275484176068525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461217232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10863127,0.012864656,0.043555517,0.666358,0.0037271292,0.00080308726,0.000530905,0.0009064757,0.162623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75899404,0.005914479,0.047646258,0.16655852,0.003795315,0.0006043271,0.00020075857,0.00015709166,0.016129205],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98694104,0.0061058267,0.0010467961,0.000852516,0.0042597884,0.0007940415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94233114,0.038737062,0.0041332534,0.0043377187,0.005800762,0.0046601724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021137936,0.00028987412,0.0008272167,0.0006310353,0.001400237,0.0015668396,0.0009588658,0.007349673,0.005085014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0730557,0.00033076614,0.0005034555,0.0002896291,0.0031294164,0.0023978392,0.001398465,0.00525312,0.0014293989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075224123,0.0010015207,0.084960006,0.0012019663,0.0001806824,0.014066008,0.0040179417,0.0008055465,0.015483869,0.26219162,0.19735812,0.41798043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003212749,0.0017152672,0.11448611,0.0035036595,0.00026347933,0.040052697,0.0026576181,0.002762558,0.013321911,0.3963892,0.4241281,0.00039814253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011159356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00203248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021137936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082635524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052034087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111789465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736362364","doi":"10.1177/1073110517703108","title":"Is There a Particular<i>Ethical Practice and Policy Space</i>in North America for Uncontrolled Kidney Donation after Circulatory Death?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Organ donation; Donation; Kidney donation; Relevance (law); Medicine; Transplantation; Set (abstract data type); Intensive care medicine; Circulatory system; Clinical Practice; Ethical issues; Kidney transplantation; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Family medicine; Surgery; Computer science; Internal medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.051674362174757384,"score_gpt":0.38601001364110094,"score_spread":0.33433565146634353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736362364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065657705,0.0035085597,0.006571637,0.87095183,0.0007634203,0.00004066596,0.000036451027,0.000022362512,0.05244744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8559272,0.0035184205,0.0060688215,0.13076356,0.0005565973,0.000096933945,0.00003031203,0.000030647996,0.0030074692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763907,0.013738195,0.00096635055,0.0023051226,0.002696028,0.0039036684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95745695,0.022768676,0.005810136,0.0016491081,0.005931642,0.0063834167],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02592538,0.0002053105,0.0005416248,0.00084856007,0.021423485,0.018406691,0.0026724073,0.010320084,0.0025537675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036573775,0.0004954446,0.00043488826,0.0015044542,0.04261326,0.008214661,0.007970195,0.013861627,0.00026417765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001720639,0.0000508528,0.0058542322,0.00014439717,0.000014404858,0.0006426493,0.046556424,0.00023556879,0.00028940052,0.91697484,0.014800173,0.014419902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004464171,0.000061251776,0.011130476,0.0022424348,0.000037221016,0.0010128269,0.30956164,0.0010543008,0.0005599729,0.4566199,0.21750121,0.00017412935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22866227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35174146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98967993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025086952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09710486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45466256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772204907","doi":"10.1177/1073110517720649","title":"Covering It Up? Questions of Safety, Stigmatization, and Fairness in Covert Medication Administration","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Covert; Administration (probate law); Relevance (law); Vulnerability (computing); Perspective (graphical); Health care; Economic Justice; Psychology; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Computer security; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.20895358640771133,"score_gpt":0.5592895013098377,"score_spread":0.35033591490212634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772204907","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3846443,0.008687332,0.024609128,0.5103649,0.0006856744,0.000099676916,0.000026485963,0.00002282647,0.07085979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814323,0.0011880896,0.0026196106,0.013698487,0.0002888055,0.000045866025,0.0000039601123,0.000010641764,0.000712285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8745287,0.10514361,0.0038473846,0.0025688885,0.010964192,0.002947156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78015417,0.17800301,0.02351307,0.009605755,0.0056879604,0.0030359635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08120653,0.00023179999,0.0005959802,0.0010155012,0.008512454,0.0064808996,0.0013294169,0.007816606,0.0013406217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21077994,0.0005348705,0.0008145575,0.0008553292,0.053898156,0.011677965,0.0063664927,0.007467811,0.00026108898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000193336,0.0002910909,0.023754861,0.00040436676,0.00008633267,0.0011727334,0.32358074,0.00056870584,0.0011275846,0.5421473,0.004044323,0.10262856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008679086,0.00031994397,0.018733136,0.0031990567,0.000074537296,0.0026041134,0.14852571,0.001918996,0.0025999458,0.7606675,0.061135318,0.00013497155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031974623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001939088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08120653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047256523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009923494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4294663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772207902","doi":"10.1177/1073110517720646","title":"Proof in the Pudding: The Value of a Rights Based Approach to Understanding the Covert Administration of Psychotropic Medication to Adult Inpatients Determined to Be Decisionally-Incapable in Ontario's Psychiatric Settings","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Confusion; Psychiatry; Administration (probate law); Medicine; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.16693375826699017,"score_gpt":0.4351460414337518,"score_spread":0.2682122831667616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772207902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104982816,0.008133548,0.027869912,0.64413595,0.0010913549,0.00016367325,0.00007839779,0.000052296302,0.21349214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963423,0.0031129182,0.007471652,0.015954891,0.00026505312,0.000065831315,0.00002070925,0.000035736743,0.009650164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864374,0.00865463,0.0005177708,0.00051723263,0.0018758506,0.0019971838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96663207,0.02279553,0.0026279863,0.0015393213,0.0036774948,0.0027276222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024082314,0.0004979479,0.0005014017,0.0024123518,0.01795684,0.01524923,0.0041394588,0.009211246,0.004290424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033234086,0.0005927811,0.0006430378,0.0011101321,0.1268016,0.01879308,0.010191525,0.010125592,0.00038000735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033019856,0.000023731403,0.0020439564,0.000099558434,0.000007701087,0.0012042231,0.21563259,0.0003760544,0.00015977923,0.7624129,0.0068557393,0.011150671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032727872,0.000042391886,0.0041798134,0.0013264552,0.000029179899,0.0008320269,0.31423855,0.0014226247,0.00036798112,0.48131555,0.1961335,0.000079192956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51716495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64564097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48283505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07695999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.096772775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9713571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775059644","doi":"10.1177/1073110516684809","title":"Are Military and Medical Ethics Necessarily Incompatible? A Canadian Case Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Military medical ethics; Ethical code; Loyalty; Institution; Medical ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Core (optical fiber); Scope (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Nursing ethics; Code of conduct; Meta-ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.25750419413091996,"score_gpt":0.5425511529818716,"score_spread":0.28504695885095166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775059644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6157583,0.014302372,0.002247864,0.11033029,0.0005564392,0.0004878982,0.00057240773,0.00003678235,0.25570774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96718097,0.006794257,0.0023521732,0.008668269,0.000099416924,0.00011108924,0.000103237544,0.000031047206,0.014659608],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901423,0.0033863988,0.00025204621,0.0005322447,0.0024735525,0.0032135462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902546,0.0038125133,0.00088599813,0.00025823375,0.0020323042,0.0027564394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006031069,0.00066155876,0.00074351014,0.002700787,0.044043157,0.0055128885,0.0026059998,0.0063461643,0.005663366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016974246,0.0005351903,0.00069095095,0.0074660685,0.012816647,0.0026057668,0.0048351176,0.0057524196,0.00037109823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023827211,0.0003141385,0.039438188,0.0006307417,0.00006309032,0.066587776,0.4306365,0.00095546694,0.00094421743,0.35537922,0.06096744,0.04384494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010225009,0.00011018083,0.038880005,0.0015608898,0.00010721522,0.022986844,0.556149,0.0015944969,0.0003867964,0.013733103,0.36413804,0.00025118844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9760359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13917546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13917546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12529269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775648376","doi":"10.1177/1073110516684803","title":"Regulating Information or Allowing Deception? Pharmaceutical Sales Visits in Canada, France, and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec","funders":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; York University","keywords":"Disappointment; Pharmaceutical industry; Public relations; Psychological intervention; Marketing; Deception; Status quo; Viewpoints; Business; Intervention (counseling); Public health; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Psychology","score_opus":0.41414229340718517,"score_gpt":0.5492157354226423,"score_spread":0.13507344201545718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775648376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704104,0.001159076,0.0001393962,0.013867661,0.000024918298,0.000018662371,0.00003369202,0.00000776915,0.014338376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682105,0.00047402232,0.000065573164,0.001516648,0.000011447254,0.000005259731,0.0000129505,0.0000031867673,0.001089928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99092823,0.003708864,0.00021879199,0.00038816532,0.002308656,0.002447275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96572936,0.019935012,0.0064581377,0.0004818383,0.00351161,0.0038841336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00719389,0.0001245278,0.00032466854,0.0012659355,0.011362448,0.006088434,0.0010768202,0.0022432895,0.0022833245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022132754,0.00028321266,0.00029059633,0.0023105456,0.010744306,0.0017554916,0.002334383,0.0033362252,0.00008542719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005877428,0.00054407027,0.35908225,0.0002650541,0.0000732582,0.0029842944,0.50382006,0.0009117021,0.0009626004,0.038352445,0.01568808,0.07672846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034380013,0.00019880185,0.37250382,0.00037346457,0.00004115035,0.000510477,0.5804443,0.00082130486,0.0004892104,0.0012201363,0.043252647,0.000110298635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9091186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.944272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09088141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043212954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040865626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31353337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784176741","doi":"10.1177/1073110517750621","title":"Withholding Information on Unapproved Drug Marketing Applications: The Public Has a Right to Know","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical studies and practices","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Transparency (behavior); Food and drug administration; Business; Drug; Regulatory agency; Public health; Health care; Right to know; Medicine; Public relations; Internet privacy; Marketing; Pharmacology; Risk analysis (engineering); Political science; Nursing; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.19043858330986824,"score_gpt":0.4416201038139402,"score_spread":0.25118152050407194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784176741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023008887,0.0041881828,0.016282758,0.686639,0.0014416937,0.00013308367,0.000160012,0.00014561869,0.2680007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5548322,0.003996398,0.0072262795,0.3981026,0.0032617832,0.00023513995,0.00015503741,0.00013111795,0.032059386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94207615,0.028410444,0.004311047,0.0043809684,0.016557366,0.004264023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7042076,0.23133308,0.016695378,0.027344067,0.015067447,0.0053525814],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059304748,0.00063812075,0.0012252873,0.0014300669,0.008610376,0.015768308,0.0031241118,0.04108378,0.010743957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18035285,0.0010386958,0.0012225541,0.0013985651,0.025879493,0.02677967,0.0088383565,0.02704357,0.003603692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016730213,0.00020701597,0.0041165273,0.00027058975,0.00007240642,0.0023356068,0.010830431,0.00032625895,0.0014126023,0.81669873,0.108902745,0.054659825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001644298,0.00020593341,0.0026431896,0.0016489283,0.00014548349,0.0027616564,0.0051024114,0.0012697192,0.0035139713,0.5036327,0.47871903,0.00019253057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00520752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038421953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95891625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045948885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018932052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3136372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897609641","doi":"10.1177/1073110518804233","title":"Integrating Citizenship, Embodiment, and Relationality: Towards a Reconceptualization of Dance and Dementia in Long-Term Care","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Impact of Dance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Dance; Flourishing; Empowerment; Embodied cognition; Dementia; Psychology; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Creativity; Aesthetics; Psychotherapist; Social psychology; Epistemology; Medicine; Political science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.11061043407246418,"score_gpt":0.40597104822060387,"score_spread":0.2953606141481397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897609641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4668499,0.05272568,0.099926636,0.18046293,0.0017045132,0.00023461838,0.000038582846,0.00019105205,0.1978661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97824484,0.0062661055,0.009905384,0.0029417616,0.00019072389,0.000082986764,0.000013591034,0.00002879934,0.0023258196],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411964,0.004374445,0.00023410551,0.0003277006,0.0005421702,0.00040197384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969247,0.0015683174,0.00038917898,0.00027198248,0.00029829046,0.0005475221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009210127,0.00041115275,0.0004898961,0.002216354,0.00493421,0.011068094,0.001505993,0.002481272,0.0014314505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00764967,0.000294393,0.000537377,0.0010369894,0.041925557,0.00713099,0.013028342,0.004417097,0.00014206128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032103286,0.000109428875,0.005199197,0.00032452124,0.00003097083,0.0009703329,0.6047931,0.00021915829,0.0006825696,0.30648673,0.0014899032,0.07966207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025714939,0.00018381373,0.010195142,0.0018897662,0.00006323652,0.003193451,0.45727184,0.0010235537,0.00054954545,0.403644,0.12188374,0.00007614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042880736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008107393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011068094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004727797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076774326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04870838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909892587","doi":"10.1177/1073110518821975","title":"Myths, Misperceptions, and Policy Learning: Comparing Healthcare in the United States and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Health care; Indigenous; Payment; Health policy; Healthcare system; Control (management); Yield (engineering); Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Economic growth; Business; Economics; History; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.17771413772726555,"score_gpt":0.37668665931358997,"score_spread":0.19897252158632442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909892587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6846827,0.008222403,0.0016342861,0.23618183,0.00040955466,0.000113925584,0.0006499043,0.000036783786,0.06806867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350995,0.001303461,0.0003621856,0.0040690894,0.000033697183,0.000021536005,0.0000761247,0.000013670997,0.0006101685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9409817,0.020132737,0.0020964982,0.00306523,0.025330609,0.008393146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88385874,0.06757273,0.008265007,0.0041171387,0.02969113,0.0064953268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057137407,0.00039463222,0.0011737976,0.006218386,0.01945064,0.016987452,0.0048053153,0.003262983,0.0023577667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17997998,0.0003917911,0.00065108546,0.010947468,0.0372576,0.009949533,0.0117054805,0.0073376005,0.00009550805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003750546,0.0001643605,0.14680068,0.00045164087,0.0005040995,0.00048738552,0.43008697,0.0032659478,0.00016063389,0.29949665,0.023490012,0.094716586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008742169,0.00012263752,0.20017827,0.0022182434,0.00024334666,0.00015858914,0.6379814,0.00369614,0.0006585171,0.098999985,0.055343885,0.00031147155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96737444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83100295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16899702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19633394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9638457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937590025","doi":"10.1177/1073110519840488","title":"Medical Information Commons to Support Learning Healthcare Systems: Examples From Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Health care; Commons; Healthcare system; Medical information; Knowledge management; Public relations; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.13405494210440472,"score_gpt":0.3383294714869853,"score_spread":0.20427452938258056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937590025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6200301,0.0023794293,0.009942311,0.06960464,0.00015034441,0.00041564784,0.0014548559,0.000244792,0.29577783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98592025,0.0007533881,0.0031309894,0.0013640756,0.000022949607,0.000039062208,0.00023719593,0.00002862888,0.008503456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926635,0.0018604266,0.00016053481,0.00025289098,0.0017868307,0.0032757954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838108,0.0050852755,0.0007409959,0.00074641034,0.0047375374,0.0048790677],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049058367,0.00029439185,0.00030147683,0.0024458729,0.012987821,0.004586972,0.0014368102,0.0014252097,0.0037409468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016924487,0.00018477629,0.00046740758,0.005620082,0.006968466,0.0018135504,0.0050751567,0.0018093875,0.0002837735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038256205,0.00044997362,0.19173382,0.0005889047,0.000112548136,0.0037423943,0.0640516,0.022472333,0.0011965078,0.5117765,0.066194944,0.13729788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027652178,0.00021729339,0.18025999,0.00076180795,0.0001419366,0.00089994515,0.13987446,0.029379833,0.0018868941,0.08004374,0.56601137,0.00024625502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9771211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.985466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083162434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14797534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60338855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940062834","doi":"10.1177/1073110519840480","title":"Importance of Participant-Centricity and Trust for a Sustainable Medical Information Commons","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Commons; Trustworthiness; Knowledge management; Participant observation; Public relations; Business; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Social science","score_opus":0.4242096833329446,"score_gpt":0.5541198210985531,"score_spread":0.12991013776560845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940062834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5648865,0.0018241471,0.18485278,0.12789889,0.00053273886,0.0013608941,0.00030070636,0.00040283846,0.11794056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933589,0.00008957968,0.004739054,0.00094407774,0.000025787776,0.00018604616,0.000025461199,0.000023512059,0.0006074953],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8567328,0.11145477,0.005181256,0.0071632955,0.013769952,0.005697928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74460727,0.17304075,0.023887757,0.023593282,0.01987635,0.01499458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.121147506,0.00026178942,0.0008242763,0.0028522129,0.010252322,0.016982283,0.002388828,0.003881885,0.0031772782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18657434,0.00072741933,0.00048222786,0.0022629641,0.026390666,0.018641397,0.022953007,0.004510696,0.000327148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019428863,0.00014210494,0.046528816,0.00078440213,0.00012401542,0.0016833805,0.53519166,0.0012193461,0.002360778,0.3386151,0.0055171475,0.067638986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009298292,0.00035630233,0.020537866,0.0013789561,0.00007870397,0.0016420259,0.3636829,0.0043673855,0.0014904065,0.46701285,0.13916104,0.0001985962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044577145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005689472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121147506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008879706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02481586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6406969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961483213","doi":"10.1177/1073110519857281","title":"Vexed Again: Social Scientists and the Revision of the Common Rule, 2011-2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Rulemaking; Notice; Process (computing); Political science; Common Rule; Law; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.38935832497596984,"score_gpt":0.5582775848073637,"score_spread":0.16891925983139383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961483213","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018768994,0.006646138,0.004533645,0.8795598,0.009947933,0.00015618805,0.00025859385,0.00010475354,0.08002394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34797186,0.003541018,0.0076357867,0.5507284,0.0072126244,0.0005317036,0.0003290657,0.00018430708,0.08186533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87751615,0.040960338,0.011968216,0.016198102,0.037328195,0.016028918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8683937,0.08310995,0.0074949106,0.007357927,0.026261318,0.0073821614],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10412662,0.00059648143,0.00091733225,0.0021894898,0.024056457,0.027893307,0.0036856565,0.047155265,0.0032208276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22829832,0.0011406275,0.0018785791,0.0018021736,0.028972177,0.013172521,0.012533986,0.044047814,0.0011743053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010940443,0.00006170807,0.0019468104,0.00009805631,0.000024322913,0.0004338709,0.01182379,0.00030048372,0.00031634528,0.8286928,0.13988826,0.016304085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011342206,0.00009360423,0.0047133667,0.00072576967,0.000058329522,0.0002295285,0.004428218,0.0005636224,0.0013705603,0.11675942,0.8707286,0.0002155939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1490448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12400886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89587337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045706287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11001246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55068076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975460762","doi":"10.1177/1073110519876166","title":"Cochrane's Linked Data Project: How it Can Advance our Understanding of Surrogate Endpoints","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cochrane","funders":"","keywords":"Surrogate endpoint; Data science; Computer science; Real world evidence; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.23744184286441605,"score_gpt":0.42571706817732763,"score_spread":0.18827522531291158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975460762","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036780227,0.057665065,0.32757285,0.20321207,0.0064703203,0.007878451,0.27247688,0.02394656,0.09709977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020822357,0.039129704,0.77339256,0.020879386,0.0020117536,0.013150699,0.1111625,0.011029632,0.008421397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8474099,0.099447526,0.025215484,0.005748417,0.020369474,0.0018091598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3265794,0.5443191,0.019570492,0.06401379,0.036222067,0.009295179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17796804,0.0021423358,0.0038988744,0.042631045,0.0035247128,0.020339346,0.0058627455,0.011068036,0.039983246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.57185996,0.0028620919,0.007646438,0.048012953,0.0048952885,0.016031794,0.019149553,0.009283784,0.008996368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012699887,0.00021490022,0.0031493043,0.020502074,0.0020600527,0.00036169623,0.0024009775,0.0045998446,0.000484296,0.28295553,0.45871913,0.22328217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079157535,0.00008959042,0.0013825543,0.01948227,0.0010935623,0.00021160282,0.0003664175,0.0026190998,0.00088078936,0.12332084,0.8494946,0.00026723303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04840533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03013691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.822032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008840867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06800215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9411962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000954021","doi":"10.1177/1073110519897725","title":"Introduction: The Promise and Challenges of Microbiome-Based Therapies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Care Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Microbiome; MEDLINE; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Engineering ethics; Political science; Biology; Bioinformatics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.09625654422923012,"score_gpt":0.3497844612953316,"score_spread":0.25352791706610145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000954021","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006568306,0.057362527,0.0024430437,0.8845454,0.03625662,0.000023971017,0.00030542735,0.0001078792,0.01829835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0331891,0.15960015,0.007727469,0.635139,0.1090789,0.0001771702,0.00043985742,0.00028560444,0.054362822],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995144,0.0019738462,0.0002688952,0.00063196913,0.0016437101,0.00033755138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830294,0.011321494,0.0008148515,0.000648993,0.0028287573,0.0013565512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009646139,0.00076108467,0.00076099037,0.0011391622,0.0024382283,0.009247226,0.0014095757,0.009300614,0.02848964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019808166,0.00035509063,0.00070737564,0.000834405,0.0067290706,0.008441371,0.003111294,0.013870736,0.008291744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008478932,0.000034059885,0.00033199953,0.00083026645,0.000023657209,0.0001356336,0.000525262,0.00014692199,0.0004730824,0.096786864,0.81368965,0.08693788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016169168,0.00004823034,0.00037536956,0.0014653488,0.000012294497,0.0003383185,0.0004862582,0.00013771882,0.00020297001,0.03943535,0.9574569,0.000025021665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017735959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022940177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02848964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002808454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035830783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09530735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090656846","doi":"10.1177/1073110520958885","title":"An International Review of Health Technology Assessment Approaches to Prescription Drugs and Their Ethical Principles","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical prescription; Engineering ethics; Health technology; Medicine; Political science; Pharmacology; Health care; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.8274912017830598,"score_gpt":0.5740674379051287,"score_spread":0.2534237638779311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090656846","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025972458,0.9952134,0.0005171041,0.002281999,0.00034229073,0.000032756172,0.000025247253,0.000004087891,0.0015572422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008124919,0.9958118,0.0010522356,0.0017110227,0.00028788944,0.00008843226,0.000028439204,0.000005200789,0.00020255784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769141,0.011038064,0.0039771893,0.00094048533,0.006769751,0.00036044358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9030442,0.081228174,0.0043456485,0.0019112092,0.0088840965,0.0005866038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029333383,0.0012268516,0.002488882,0.010935548,0.0008619107,0.003969667,0.0019812747,0.0041018124,0.005333685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08548578,0.0009906887,0.002295306,0.014172932,0.003518714,0.0041761654,0.0024761104,0.0056913123,0.001405205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000508704,0.000044477263,0.0001749053,0.09664784,0.00050071627,0.00007261971,0.00035822514,0.00041753863,0.00016804493,0.04394607,0.05107782,0.8065408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045709246,0.000063216066,0.0011757021,0.19979131,0.00082349684,0.00038395595,0.00017759675,0.0001322463,0.00019616967,0.015521703,0.7816498,0.0000389798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056343833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008447332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029333383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066747745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018509565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15513164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091337524","doi":"10.1177/1073110520958875","title":"Structural Racism and Maternal Health Among Black Women","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Racial and Ethnic Identity Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Care Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Racism; Black women; Gender studies; Inequality; Health equity; Public health; Sociology; Maternal health; Political science; Medicine; Demography; Health services; Politics; Population; Nursing","score_opus":0.19118519526909733,"score_gpt":0.45906945995590076,"score_spread":0.26788426468680343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091337524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849052,0.0007452253,0.00008209193,0.0065133334,0.000020056825,0.0000036375773,0.000012502963,9.841228e-7,0.0077169253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.0003640288,0.000030945866,0.00013870749,0.0000139278845,0.0000021541061,0.0000026308423,4.9252213e-7,0.00022949265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990319,0.0006049286,0.000013851404,0.000048249378,0.00008678165,0.00021425923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987135,0.0003377328,0.0005718986,0.000043472308,0.00008349274,0.00024991905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012604815,0.000072330586,0.00009121845,0.0005261111,0.0026875813,0.00096118863,0.00019801344,0.0004490658,0.0019359575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033038838,0.000088838395,0.00010369332,0.0003666822,0.0025750436,0.00048317522,0.0013604622,0.00074598496,0.000055480305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015582841,0.00045488667,0.8001618,0.00007350374,0.00006138658,0.0005314103,0.09540979,0.00014940435,0.000828914,0.0542007,0.0019160358,0.04605638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018723766,0.000176299,0.8559913,0.0003361417,0.000055287393,0.00063743885,0.1148305,0.00041987395,0.00045150626,0.01436727,0.012695768,0.000019840109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01867117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036626514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01867117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013962236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016232645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03712493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120023054","doi":"10.1177/1073110520979383","title":"An Ethicolegal Analysis of Involuntary Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Autonomy; Psychological intervention; Commit; Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Medical prescription; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Nursing","score_opus":0.13796347795550903,"score_gpt":0.4025239392578303,"score_spread":0.26456046130232125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120023054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09789212,0.007739333,0.032581933,0.2854199,0.0010879972,0.00034215668,0.00018569591,0.00006518614,0.57468563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90160453,0.0019633742,0.007476716,0.04764883,0.00063671375,0.0003240306,0.000049761034,0.000032047963,0.040264066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98597217,0.008299621,0.00054346764,0.000608425,0.0026666245,0.0019096266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889354,0.00796286,0.00088049914,0.00054831005,0.0012170447,0.00045578674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012186099,0.0001916364,0.00022719668,0.0010669582,0.006278622,0.004744238,0.0011484771,0.0054982575,0.0031717871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016383795,0.00021758759,0.00055030285,0.00076022785,0.0141012585,0.0028201162,0.0030506675,0.0055531287,0.0002485292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070483798,0.000017113498,0.00047570356,0.000015406298,0.000002269724,0.00013767727,0.0021505614,0.00014172935,0.00006453247,0.9901348,0.0032620828,0.003591088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006081893,0.00016751139,0.010102186,0.00097158493,0.00006274193,0.0008193746,0.012298746,0.0034677354,0.0013708051,0.6893615,0.28124568,0.00007131751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022038126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043306574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022038126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007752213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017053021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064446986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120260298","doi":"10.1177/1073110520979391","title":"Generic Competition for Drugs Treating Rare Diseases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Internet privacy; Business; Content (measure theory); Computer science; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.23318470178039563,"score_gpt":0.37127673689967505,"score_spread":0.13809203511927942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120260298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0734061,0.031703737,0.007086775,0.12168036,0.00336821,0.00021369084,0.016722178,0.0007611244,0.7450579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8844642,0.010553775,0.0029698224,0.03305324,0.006014137,0.00013184824,0.0073838485,0.0002963345,0.05513283],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525285,0.0017363772,0.00026538348,0.00042599585,0.001535574,0.00078374933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98562324,0.0061045894,0.0017653957,0.0009889199,0.0016538894,0.0038639943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040536276,0.00019305904,0.00047824052,0.001361614,0.00085383165,0.0027050779,0.00071943423,0.002055933,0.080513254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024997776,0.00017201235,0.0010374611,0.0016902166,0.0007919642,0.0012970979,0.0016460489,0.0019378482,0.0054058977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016530991,0.00021799319,0.010895449,0.0014820405,0.00027775223,0.0009756653,0.00039750693,0.002541213,0.0020273945,0.20906611,0.52289367,0.24757211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001255015,0.00088890997,0.06743627,0.0015915947,0.00033178736,0.003769928,0.00036712817,0.004666238,0.0014227153,0.053141344,0.8650303,0.00009875375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006167545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010374823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080513254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029374198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035065378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26934367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121469507","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00514.x","title":"Reconsidering the Harvard Medical Practice Study Conclusions about the Validity of Medical Malpractice Claims","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malpractice; Carelessness; Medical malpractice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Medical practice; Medical care; State (computer science); Medicine; Law; Psychology; Psychiatry; Family medicine; Political science; History","score_opus":0.5355825756509609,"score_gpt":0.5724324643415336,"score_spread":0.03684988869057271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121469507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023409104,0.009692507,0.0021660882,0.93881,0.0036056691,0.00011692326,0.0002942979,0.000020787775,0.021884585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55703336,0.0045929505,0.003869563,0.40304756,0.026656723,0.0006267784,0.00045641602,0.00007370791,0.0036429132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6724142,0.20866759,0.017868593,0.02042271,0.072475776,0.008151231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.12075088,0.80725497,0.022512423,0.015066296,0.027826479,0.0065889233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3845872,0.0011982026,0.0042729224,0.01659254,0.013301734,0.018528853,0.014948518,0.03041223,0.007816599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6661494,0.0014846468,0.0033650673,0.009184815,0.080643944,0.030460991,0.013170017,0.024570938,0.0012877629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004869601,0.00021557078,0.024718964,0.0007282082,0.000445711,0.0006015371,0.016494596,0.00045032194,0.00008791397,0.85160905,0.07881714,0.025344137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017974045,0.0006206494,0.042396,0.0064353934,0.000643795,0.00030657568,0.01731459,0.0025018794,0.00081177044,0.77849716,0.14834096,0.0003339009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03220727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021824952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3845872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015673261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021256432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7589136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121800677","doi":"10.1111/jlme.12001","title":"Global Health Challenges and the Role of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Political science; Business; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.1015183902886111,"score_gpt":0.3852011302931682,"score_spread":0.2836827400045571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121800677","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004094308,0.013973856,0.00085795566,0.91204154,0.0011191528,0.000016100452,0.000055690754,0.000022243512,0.067819126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5857617,0.025197517,0.002015108,0.3612902,0.008149832,0.00019606462,0.0001278628,0.000116072304,0.01714561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97506726,0.014828589,0.0005437354,0.0015867585,0.0036081786,0.004365426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580549,0.028713375,0.0020935852,0.0021078852,0.0028422712,0.0061879028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033318244,0.00050548016,0.00090682367,0.0025595364,0.009243968,0.018652348,0.0024278737,0.020930834,0.015455271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051495705,0.00042464086,0.00074324734,0.002413803,0.06728369,0.017846681,0.013160402,0.017079929,0.0013474232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009482179,0.000018707566,0.0006477141,0.00006102974,0.000007999284,0.00018459604,0.0035737301,0.00013689013,0.000030900945,0.94514716,0.040348604,0.0098332055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019850822,0.000018086139,0.0010122452,0.0008078593,0.00000736521,0.0002674836,0.008489432,0.00017104328,0.000048105307,0.8253685,0.16376643,0.00002355375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015274442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013345608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033318244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012494924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025515748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17620575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175559548","doi":"10.1017/jme.2021.42","title":"COVID-19 Antibody Testing as a Precondition for Employment: Ethical and Legal Considerations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Novo Nordisk Fonden","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Food and drug administration; Serology; Precondition; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Work (physics); Antibody; Virology; Business; Political science; Medicine; Immunology; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.2514708373460529,"score_gpt":0.5056952669169672,"score_spread":0.2542244295709143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175559548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012047089,0.0017068482,0.011571978,0.9247944,0.0023454644,0.0002540221,0.00006439685,0.000048107537,0.047167763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46958438,0.0028068477,0.029855985,0.47589484,0.004514957,0.0010027976,0.000094345494,0.00008511919,0.016160717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92111003,0.04366249,0.006135839,0.004512686,0.013791288,0.010787697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8265376,0.12591876,0.008740251,0.007278821,0.015339852,0.016184622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09007157,0.0004734807,0.0010587369,0.0009536785,0.010996316,0.012978307,0.0028986712,0.037695803,0.0070969732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12940155,0.0009550697,0.0010132669,0.0005739215,0.032435305,0.014773056,0.009081711,0.027804296,0.0014531361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050452123,0.00020133464,0.003263659,0.00014987926,0.000011298422,0.0020331517,0.009374385,0.00034714644,0.00082737964,0.9271606,0.04409766,0.012483062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011077423,0.0003310233,0.005055558,0.0025692633,0.000035541943,0.0035116207,0.021886913,0.0015270292,0.0016131772,0.7088044,0.2543677,0.00018692981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010787762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014928064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09007157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067835487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056007374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47634965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205841084","doi":"10.1017/jme.2021.67","title":"Transparency of Regulatory Data across the European Medicines Agency, Health Canada, and US Food and Drug Administration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation; National Institutes of Health; Laura and John Arnold Foundation; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Yale University","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Food and drug administration; Agency (philosophy); Business; Regulatory agency; Regulatory science; European union; Regulatory authority; Public administration; Accounting; Medicine; Political science; International trade; Law; Risk analysis (engineering)","score_opus":0.5240008201947381,"score_gpt":0.48388874018134787,"score_spread":0.04011208001339028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205841084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15411517,0.016729562,0.03359913,0.14850701,0.0012857509,0.001971554,0.10231924,0.0023231825,0.5391493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8979865,0.004398702,0.01827161,0.030881781,0.00057173107,0.00090375764,0.027835736,0.0006872019,0.018463068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6791411,0.056000266,0.020379923,0.014119911,0.21257195,0.017786844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17236698,0.5329143,0.07422833,0.043699462,0.16980372,0.006987254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15236555,0.00047882504,0.0012042434,0.014274001,0.0053426023,0.018445406,0.003411279,0.004493695,0.008021891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48050344,0.0011087577,0.0014097563,0.028032135,0.0050065606,0.007107814,0.003238011,0.0061911824,0.001508991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010171487,0.00029546535,0.15069342,0.0022886554,0.0005119466,0.0005264244,0.009459714,0.0031681366,0.002643791,0.36125958,0.3250151,0.14312063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033369588,0.00012298214,0.29634538,0.0040590726,0.00055002014,0.0005342254,0.0044919774,0.0054066414,0.008599537,0.042952754,0.63610625,0.00049748475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56328994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43310267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048256073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.168799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8785639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206412302","doi":"10.1017/jme.2021.68","title":"Global Regulatory Agencies and Data Transparency","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Agency (philosophy); Regulatory agency; Business; Data sharing; Political science; Accounting; Public administration; Public economics; Medicine; Economics; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8939189795273863,"score_gpt":0.6979534736274279,"score_spread":0.19596550589995843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206412302","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023547714,0.9323963,0.0010714026,0.05449076,0.0016503979,0.00006713985,0.000073555035,0.000025718698,0.009989352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02025608,0.91189414,0.003092313,0.06104545,0.0014997078,0.00025863928,0.00013244565,0.000044390144,0.0017768146],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9006095,0.06874604,0.008682014,0.0024747963,0.017169436,0.0023183422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76944697,0.18886964,0.012999354,0.0073665525,0.01948604,0.0018314557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07457062,0.00086970505,0.0013086038,0.008340107,0.002121179,0.007885364,0.002027419,0.00804246,0.0061537763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15049031,0.0007669923,0.0022696208,0.00976529,0.009594746,0.01127617,0.0075626075,0.009808367,0.0009439686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000724899,0.000037801365,0.000556419,0.032071594,0.00048564232,0.00021771074,0.0029648952,0.0003483448,0.00014919622,0.25163218,0.14102013,0.5704436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036149784,0.000028090184,0.0004746308,0.054547366,0.00021672563,0.00037883167,0.0008587899,0.00004059757,0.00014789909,0.023612054,0.9196341,0.000024723915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068607135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009803025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007327376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03281632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39437187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234020633","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00686.x","title":"Medical Responsibility","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Obligation; Moral obligation; Politics; Order (exchange); Heading (navigation); Moral responsibility; Health care; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Political science; Public relations; Epistemology; Business; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.27642298134357546,"score_gpt":0.46277725381702567,"score_spread":0.1863542724734502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234020633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002032274,0.0018399172,0.0040746992,0.7720683,0.021284953,0.00007473877,0.00018490737,0.00017214318,0.19826812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052479587,0.0013135459,0.0029058452,0.77217,0.01690462,0.00021515808,0.00008252451,0.0001674003,0.15376125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98470867,0.0044594775,0.0010818049,0.0020602283,0.0054136715,0.0022761368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96349126,0.02718686,0.0012649517,0.0020278068,0.0049233027,0.0011057899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012786569,0.00071725214,0.0010801496,0.00068549655,0.0073214374,0.006886536,0.004427106,0.035941556,0.025766011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049922843,0.0007479207,0.001674625,0.0006090573,0.011651556,0.0079265265,0.005010215,0.029179614,0.008217093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018322778,0.000020698864,0.00016831694,0.000100997924,0.0000058003952,0.00015189908,0.0029375975,0.000086107444,0.00015494952,0.5329501,0.45803547,0.005369707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005986279,0.000018809047,0.00042995828,0.0001455225,0.0000054890506,0.00017608242,0.0010632286,0.000101718666,0.00015962291,0.02034664,0.97752243,0.00002453658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008300731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012750223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035941556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004699456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052281027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086195886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250240811","doi":"10.1017/s1073110500024499","title":"JME volume 45 issue S4 Cover and Front matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Front cover; Front (military); Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Environmental science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Meteorology; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.10829060572501566,"score_gpt":0.2986840027683809,"score_spread":0.19039339704336528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250240811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016358917,0.0035366686,0.0005422695,0.04545511,0.047263965,0.00017323678,0.003677715,0.0015154768,0.89619964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006085009,0.0020182226,0.00052123936,0.01456184,0.01330242,0.000062506006,0.0010786629,0.00051320967,0.9618569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987437,0.00010940635,0.00006577926,0.00011968612,0.00077731017,0.0001841782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963152,0.0007059685,0.0001477253,0.0003741746,0.0015620701,0.0008949194],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015680298,0.00067246944,0.0006791833,0.0017484198,0.0019733214,0.0052958154,0.0008657315,0.0043767085,0.75862837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009145325,0.00047968983,0.0006599325,0.0008921946,0.0007975837,0.0018843425,0.0016476741,0.0032813512,0.5593586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012584366,0.000032532094,0.00014146778,0.0000422324,0.000002570823,0.000056541718,0.000010520067,0.00001623554,0.000119948265,0.00076730584,0.98209685,0.016701175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008033372,0.000011842271,0.00076116057,0.00013544285,0.0000024961432,0.00009891159,0.00003218443,0.000063630076,0.00015540008,0.00052065833,0.99820566,0.0000046234923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034560876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00731976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24137163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016669584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002592747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34428734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252486837","doi":"10.1017/s1073110500023718","title":"JME volume 48 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.10817167758748349,"score_gpt":0.2747878275354767,"score_spread":0.16661614994799323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252486837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001340044,0.0050583826,0.00045551,0.04817614,0.04960114,0.000126993,0.002099004,0.0012237376,0.891919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055674096,0.0024023012,0.00036806683,0.01590447,0.015161191,0.000047667694,0.00067074713,0.00041080327,0.9594674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985519,0.00013680509,0.00006245822,0.00015131655,0.00090158347,0.00019592747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618715,0.0007405931,0.0001559255,0.00038010383,0.0015221585,0.0010140234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014808711,0.0006625487,0.0006856341,0.0017367351,0.001964983,0.0056464607,0.00092225434,0.0041732555,0.73056424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009600339,0.0004005941,0.00056357885,0.00085040723,0.0008777091,0.0018375805,0.0017661233,0.003374739,0.5560056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012166246,0.000026116943,0.000123646,0.0000502724,0.0000023582352,0.000050162493,0.000011910296,0.000012078949,0.00011625006,0.00081133144,0.9809528,0.01783097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006800783,0.0000097423035,0.00079732685,0.00013789238,0.00000230162,0.000101124926,0.000032871187,0.000046821788,0.00012289305,0.0004741113,0.998264,0.000004121443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029316188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006363673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26943576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016134145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002153907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3843174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288071708","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.47","title":"The Influence of the Commercial Speech Doctrine on the Development of Tobacco Control Measures","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intellectual Property Rights and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tobacco control; Doctrine; Tobacco industry; Convention; Legislation; Negotiation; Control (management); Political science; Business; European union; International trade; Law; Economics; Medicine; Public health; Management","score_opus":0.14513653011864405,"score_gpt":0.36370291967393203,"score_spread":0.21856638955528798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288071708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20082757,0.008257431,0.016503477,0.0712796,0.001255922,0.0001255783,0.00010955129,0.00005969177,0.70158124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829721,0.0011668928,0.0010952874,0.008006507,0.00031825335,0.000048222777,0.000017731069,0.000031608113,0.00634347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9646372,0.020505806,0.0013385807,0.0030262603,0.007785247,0.002706825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88332194,0.10254352,0.005335829,0.0036154299,0.0038809138,0.0013022537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04529941,0.00031040979,0.00042441642,0.0019927677,0.007941953,0.0147625385,0.0015340209,0.008929599,0.0043012584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06522444,0.000438399,0.0005500973,0.0016727216,0.028987164,0.0072147558,0.007786878,0.012723499,0.00058026065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030008941,0.000031143296,0.0014824325,0.000063051135,0.000012667408,0.00037070925,0.014718847,0.00022213522,0.0005377937,0.9670115,0.0027159469,0.012803747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118972566,0.00028015755,0.015539644,0.002792626,0.00019907347,0.0009730347,0.04563809,0.0037443272,0.008269441,0.54765165,0.37457,0.00022308208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007795253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074136453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04529941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00769245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008571936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23956907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288071802","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.52","title":"Balancing the Scales: The Role of the Canadian Supreme Court in Weighing Commercial Speech and Public Health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); Law; Commercial speech; Political science; Public health; First amendment; Medicine","score_opus":0.08208112767814006,"score_gpt":0.34503462867861423,"score_spread":0.26295350100047415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288071802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059575357,0.024403507,0.02974361,0.43050912,0.0022692285,0.0003258241,0.00024401248,0.00010804944,0.4528213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183026,0.004642542,0.012719885,0.052117933,0.0009878473,0.00014743811,0.000055961413,0.00008802756,0.010937759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92447436,0.022460049,0.0023989796,0.0050983327,0.0375456,0.008022666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8837736,0.080349095,0.0028016104,0.002975095,0.0258134,0.0042871917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08671262,0.00076518947,0.0015931414,0.006752619,0.02522502,0.027063929,0.0062956205,0.014770211,0.003536506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17466334,0.0010249428,0.000898048,0.005360865,0.06614528,0.011686553,0.00869317,0.019981707,0.0003012174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032188877,0.000012362728,0.001576689,0.00006486007,0.000036699377,0.00016099306,0.005361599,0.0004471957,0.00016049607,0.9618784,0.009559606,0.02070886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105710205,0.000052778712,0.009914284,0.0016968457,0.0003179581,0.00015045353,0.013996744,0.0040325536,0.0008536542,0.85423905,0.114338145,0.0003018917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8496379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9158765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15036207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09045459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19518583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6562971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309506518","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.98","title":"Mitochondrial Replacement Therapy: In Whose Interests?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Mitochondrial Function and Pathology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill Genome Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.06827368115008718,"score_gpt":0.34954615230449154,"score_spread":0.28127247115440435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309506518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037381338,0.011384693,0.00039899765,0.97553945,0.0043845605,0.0000063426987,0.000026000875,0.0000144682435,0.007871775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045547284,0.036247358,0.0018032648,0.8790139,0.019781431,0.00010028863,0.00010719517,0.0001211775,0.017278112],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849968,0.008139331,0.0008098402,0.0010180986,0.0032580025,0.0017780008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541987,0.023886973,0.0022991404,0.0014051296,0.007963042,0.01024702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025890218,0.00059240893,0.0019449791,0.0011691494,0.0078123547,0.017488096,0.0023368997,0.026290854,0.01433464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07854283,0.00044312995,0.0007080852,0.0012203582,0.020420393,0.025407583,0.0058071082,0.03162311,0.0073689325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007229572,0.00011289228,0.0015175977,0.00037255787,0.000043985485,0.0010496374,0.0049385517,0.00008808652,0.00029521462,0.18243858,0.68512493,0.12394575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002853875,0.000029349683,0.00037378332,0.0021563538,0.000031643187,0.0014549857,0.0093963435,0.00010639594,0.00013366897,0.17581727,0.81039876,0.00007278665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052322354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009334202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026290854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060977554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018878741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13692218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309512763","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.94","title":"Revisiting the Ethics of Circumvention Tourism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Tourism; Morality; Context (archaeology); Medical tourism; Political science; Law; Abortion; Public relations; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.19130663454933897,"score_gpt":0.4262815866412449,"score_spread":0.23497495209190591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309512763","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012092135,0.0046305843,0.0012476171,0.8728012,0.0014181349,0.000010630611,0.000008856427,0.000013705464,0.10777719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45494905,0.0042601186,0.00073282653,0.50274324,0.0040650647,0.000069419846,0.0000110656765,0.00003478951,0.03313451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911404,0.005607411,0.0001831895,0.00042190458,0.0014533211,0.001193819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913087,0.0066296146,0.0004287322,0.00040208286,0.00075349247,0.00047740052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007951196,0.0003081976,0.00045493,0.0004976969,0.010358249,0.007674633,0.0014371386,0.03336117,0.0022759952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014455826,0.00033891742,0.00045098248,0.00051261176,0.042864844,0.0075428025,0.0066306493,0.027002003,0.0007563525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011839587,0.000024393803,0.00042398524,0.00004011328,0.0000034470938,0.0017837597,0.011641068,0.00028666726,0.00012281231,0.9226175,0.056563362,0.0064810314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019598237,0.000024798179,0.00073648,0.00050974824,0.000006143649,0.0015154314,0.016635595,0.000884031,0.00017706116,0.4831818,0.49627241,0.000036893332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013953125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021387208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03336117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075949463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011105684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055105448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309515964","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.85","title":"<i>Trans</i>porting the Burden of Justification: The Unethicality of Transgender Conversion Practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Transgender; Gender identity; Presentation (obstetrics); Identity (music); Transition (genetics); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Gender studies; Law; Medicine; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.30221281733851285,"score_gpt":0.49792881413414253,"score_spread":0.19571599679562968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309515964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038653698,0.0058199344,0.017493987,0.5392214,0.0027750593,0.00007185692,0.000025681997,0.00008294694,0.39585546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8211754,0.002337397,0.004065923,0.14294428,0.0013509826,0.00017135829,0.000011795396,0.000071654445,0.02787126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849139,0.010450312,0.00043732152,0.0008924686,0.001951183,0.0013549017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97956526,0.013551701,0.0024443013,0.0018323973,0.0016950299,0.0009112322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015354645,0.00029227984,0.00040585088,0.0007775179,0.009301669,0.017154055,0.0018186192,0.0140217235,0.0039103674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02277281,0.0003248162,0.00047168866,0.0006136728,0.07917644,0.009856123,0.009535685,0.014573174,0.00091682374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092932305,0.000010743788,0.00039973276,0.000039175735,0.000004076614,0.00019543982,0.018478978,0.00003800658,0.00018776093,0.9657091,0.010427195,0.0045005353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021961047,0.000058301222,0.001704525,0.0012710771,0.000028029257,0.0017487232,0.053276595,0.0007548723,0.0015807167,0.71416634,0.22530937,0.000079420504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006528704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005637178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017154055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004444515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075196046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08120412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642543","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.75","title":"A Pandemic Instrument Can Start Turning Collective Problems into Collective Solutions by Governing the Common-Pool Resource of Antimicrobial Effectiveness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Novo Nordisk Fonden; Novo Nordisk; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada; University of Cambridge; Wellcome Trust; York University; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete","keywords":"Pandemic; Resource (disambiguation); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.040764436500346675,"score_gpt":0.2870752564154143,"score_spread":0.24631081991506765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642543","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017169055,0.0029359614,0.0636653,0.6610407,0.005944009,0.00024765145,0.00008519281,0.00029107626,0.24862099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6534157,0.00295394,0.03939734,0.22424555,0.003705848,0.0006332151,0.00011847781,0.00039273468,0.0751372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98950994,0.0045462744,0.00047045504,0.001534628,0.001956997,0.0019817536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848043,0.005640897,0.0014663795,0.0031039405,0.0019776241,0.0030068846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023554385,0.00071907847,0.0007645182,0.00089909206,0.0078070704,0.009816494,0.0020012134,0.011489131,0.0159957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025539106,0.00047270278,0.0009204149,0.0005537313,0.037285496,0.0155316135,0.013273768,0.01397993,0.0026048212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031389452,0.00010040382,0.0010897729,0.00009008005,0.00003183485,0.00014293155,0.0024346702,0.0007652932,0.000613607,0.940478,0.033922702,0.020299293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033136865,0.00011153251,0.00078367285,0.0002864955,0.000014996043,0.00011557334,0.0032476825,0.00073386315,0.00043731002,0.6899918,0.30417755,0.00006634844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045468193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004865168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023554385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055369996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01639901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642547","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.30","title":"Embed Multisectoral Governance Mechanisms in the Pandemic Instrument for One Health Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada; Government of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Pandemic; Action (physics); Corporate governance; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.2878280212821326,"score_gpt":0.45025932720554607,"score_spread":0.16243130592341348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06281051,0.0035663748,0.27355328,0.21716899,0.0013718938,0.0007823401,0.0001130465,0.0003692117,0.4402643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95582336,0.00046958617,0.023653835,0.0081900805,0.00024614137,0.00035418352,0.000024691777,0.000042336076,0.011195842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781787,0.01279728,0.0009029068,0.0027067566,0.002685741,0.0027286871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800657,0.009498714,0.0026953113,0.0034441536,0.0015241411,0.0027720276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03997651,0.00048571458,0.00059721555,0.0012435574,0.0053618057,0.011088609,0.0017372716,0.007005713,0.0036400089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020295544,0.00060672767,0.0008808555,0.00088329375,0.03531161,0.01050115,0.012900201,0.008411025,0.00042119971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041810404,0.000012677494,0.00021639424,0.00001340454,0.0000061054525,0.000029912784,0.00095507124,0.00046501996,0.000067121466,0.9953401,0.00076883513,0.0021211521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033427958,0.000060831135,0.0004582337,0.00023137974,0.000014859761,0.00006229497,0.0014292782,0.0016114312,0.0002828197,0.9373424,0.05843401,0.000039130842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037741777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042743282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03997651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009083539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02696765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21141851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642548","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.73","title":"<b>Introduction:</b> AMR Belongs in the Pandemic Instrument","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Pandemic; Political science; Scholarship; Corporate governance; Preparedness; Negotiation; Public health; Multidisciplinary approach; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Inclusion (mineral); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Social science; Law; Business; Disease; Engineering; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing","score_opus":0.1029098664113411,"score_gpt":0.3796279557966257,"score_spread":0.27671808938528464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029846341,0.008980713,0.0035408004,0.7344211,0.042310826,0.00003974608,0.00031965988,0.00011142823,0.20729116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21726473,0.01291155,0.0048751663,0.5330993,0.059317205,0.00021567273,0.00034474727,0.00037040448,0.17160122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974843,0.0012926075,0.00011053427,0.00033397213,0.0005275493,0.00025093733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950572,0.0032410126,0.00032614314,0.00022554312,0.00084077613,0.00030936208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028512296,0.00037544055,0.00031556142,0.00064251124,0.0035515253,0.0061072735,0.00074994937,0.008131851,0.019770026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056023807,0.00016851161,0.00033320158,0.00073705695,0.009733572,0.004940055,0.0024578902,0.009152551,0.004595837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017759718,0.000011944912,0.00025727926,0.00012446233,0.0000028029378,0.00011089361,0.0030870463,0.000068931025,0.00040586686,0.39180455,0.59275454,0.01135393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029639486,0.00001251473,0.00052469777,0.00030663988,0.0000018796269,0.00010843003,0.0016494179,0.00009301191,0.00016698771,0.027185526,0.96993285,0.000015038369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052987123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004803147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019770026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022998892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022827587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066137314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642552","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.74","title":"Antimicrobial Resistance Must Be Included in the Pandemic Instrument to Ensure Future Global Pandemic Readiness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada; Government of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Pandemic; Stewardship (theology); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Business; Antimicrobial stewardship; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Dual (grammatical number); Political science; Antibiotic resistance; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.10752285550702846,"score_gpt":0.39697916341275397,"score_spread":0.2894563079057255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642552","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050291494,0.0031404882,0.06228813,0.6037477,0.0045777513,0.000623893,0.0001234744,0.0006379783,0.27456912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6854828,0.0021583703,0.07656526,0.19473761,0.0025997488,0.000759754,0.000113889706,0.00020050237,0.03738221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98397994,0.0073936274,0.0012117358,0.0012057753,0.004319483,0.0018895798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96903795,0.012971451,0.0036246453,0.006329218,0.005181652,0.002855008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023501128,0.00034872608,0.0005338414,0.0005404887,0.0031494864,0.0064018643,0.0012752947,0.011547695,0.0044786646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033382952,0.00040573155,0.0006775051,0.0002888082,0.014598361,0.009635008,0.0069722915,0.009930688,0.0019499933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004603363,0.00021684062,0.003923607,0.00024597286,0.000024037974,0.00077109033,0.004676623,0.0012902236,0.004287031,0.8972804,0.03443709,0.052801054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041119118,0.00043045747,0.0047417316,0.0010727005,0.000044066106,0.0013240373,0.004499265,0.0017283827,0.0035567533,0.3705554,0.61187327,0.00013280606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011442117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015266475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023501128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018801141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01487043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12428731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642620","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.80","title":"Governance Processes and Challenges for Reservation of Antimicrobials Exclusively for Human Use and Restriction of Antimicrobial Use in Animals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Antimicrobial; Reservation; Corporate governance; Antimicrobial stewardship; Biology; Microbiology; Business; Political science; Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotics; Law","score_opus":0.20187672547795615,"score_gpt":0.35003766801352726,"score_spread":0.1481609425355711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642620","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06689245,0.00414771,0.039606553,0.7870769,0.0009801504,0.0003145966,0.00007294071,0.00013729493,0.10077143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91805214,0.002054859,0.011615074,0.056249462,0.0007426459,0.00031712675,0.000045729113,0.00008784323,0.010835179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9428452,0.036659207,0.0022707835,0.0048741517,0.0080850655,0.0052656503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9082259,0.052105144,0.011054919,0.0075395047,0.00968891,0.011385605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08350595,0.000326093,0.0004275695,0.0015440639,0.00868108,0.014437107,0.0026122092,0.008653712,0.004555597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07419804,0.0005888141,0.0007020426,0.0014784844,0.03376448,0.010341052,0.011098344,0.012463145,0.0006519989],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023664772,0.00008871722,0.006678105,0.0001366699,0.000028817372,0.0006030504,0.016597724,0.00092311995,0.0006246422,0.91754717,0.02549893,0.031249436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044341334,0.00010666739,0.0068330406,0.0011706174,0.000020542124,0.00057789555,0.023667151,0.0018665142,0.00051049003,0.70505404,0.26001838,0.00013029996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011503506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010248268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08350595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012628111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03786978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44162697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642621","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.76","title":"A Pandemic Instrument can Optimize the Regime Complex for AMR by Striking a Balance between Centralization and Decentralization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; York University","keywords":"Decentralization; Balance (ability); Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Medicine; Market economy; Physical medicine and rehabilitation","score_opus":0.21839720190880582,"score_gpt":0.4218539245042292,"score_spread":0.20345672259542338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0875989,0.0024448545,0.23224193,0.10493941,0.0013580336,0.0012265238,0.0003420374,0.0010375362,0.56881076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8916456,0.00091397535,0.069444336,0.016071107,0.00072837685,0.0009211323,0.00014234245,0.0002668616,0.019866254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900338,0.0040658014,0.00056751654,0.001373869,0.0023263483,0.0016326343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895326,0.0034359798,0.0017866066,0.0023783024,0.0014928582,0.001373753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01643718,0.0005039688,0.0005049146,0.0015664175,0.0026604359,0.0058789756,0.0013595433,0.0043017017,0.011818967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021610336,0.0004651858,0.0007949766,0.0010315021,0.008017426,0.009346243,0.0079001915,0.0047830017,0.0017366334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067536035,0.0001272897,0.0021551168,0.00014199625,0.000058777587,0.00008614405,0.0006672933,0.005022705,0.0022851082,0.94843376,0.009111087,0.031843293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017356576,0.00026015457,0.0071060914,0.0004693671,0.00006514808,0.00015542704,0.0010808903,0.0065574786,0.0013992944,0.8242924,0.15831912,0.00012107175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002594938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049341205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01643718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062592337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012060538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0869292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642626","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.101","title":"Adopting a Global AMR Target within the Pandemic Instrument Will Act as a Catalyst for Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Preparedness; Pandemic; Action (physics); Global health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Global strategy; Process (computing); Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Business; Public relations; Global challenges; Politics; Computer science; Medicine; Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Economic policy; Health care; Marketing","score_opus":0.07319873629519136,"score_gpt":0.3508129540890265,"score_spread":0.27761421779383516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023262324,0.0021236322,0.058010057,0.6919961,0.0040878276,0.0003989639,0.000054079126,0.00027505428,0.21979189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77586657,0.001236793,0.048259895,0.14939004,0.002151642,0.0005613485,0.0000481836,0.00021202989,0.02227361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794867,0.01075455,0.00077469466,0.0020861214,0.0037769305,0.003120936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723803,0.010513354,0.0032538802,0.004075819,0.004514511,0.0052621015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037095252,0.0006135512,0.00058997754,0.00074571336,0.0041476577,0.012613078,0.0015082333,0.013659432,0.0060647526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027742546,0.0004238118,0.00078001583,0.00040809292,0.028300289,0.010587748,0.013177324,0.016088556,0.0017494181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002405132,0.00007221519,0.0010443148,0.000083091916,0.00001606415,0.00015380364,0.0027439327,0.00048127168,0.0009982529,0.9641885,0.019564493,0.01062999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003778125,0.00019426797,0.0019105186,0.00044805268,0.000023867684,0.0003257384,0.005689079,0.0015035829,0.0016335183,0.71604466,0.2721035,0.00008547142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012418482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014856424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037095252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051703546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017167615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19618076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323642633","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.79","title":"Using the International Pandemic Instrument to Revitalize the Innovation Ecosystem for Antimicrobial R&amp;D","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Antibiotic Use and Resistance","field":"Immunology and Microbiology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Novo Nordisk Fonden; Novo Nordisk; Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada; University of Cambridge; Government of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Antimicrobial; Ecosystem; Medicine; Ecology; Microbiology; Biology; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.1946031943511072,"score_gpt":0.3881048052368267,"score_spread":0.19350161088571952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323642633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0276287,0.0053375224,0.02978061,0.6140912,0.0042930096,0.00016088197,0.000049354243,0.00022225776,0.3184364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62208974,0.0051962123,0.042238217,0.26395792,0.0033619471,0.00036193975,0.000060064565,0.00014976076,0.06258418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98403543,0.007392719,0.0005922876,0.001234434,0.0044403737,0.0023046893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775768,0.009705547,0.002717645,0.0031906136,0.0029554088,0.0038540526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02788535,0.00047228683,0.00031724252,0.0013651138,0.005052143,0.012066988,0.0011121342,0.011052807,0.0046799523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017206743,0.00038327553,0.00085903367,0.00060943945,0.024738185,0.010226537,0.0119892,0.012562434,0.0009809994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001810503,0.00007021127,0.0012167855,0.00006432542,0.0000062933045,0.00019861148,0.002230585,0.00023315962,0.0010334873,0.95897555,0.016134068,0.0198188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003556878,0.00018308952,0.0018512313,0.00037409936,0.000009848876,0.0005102921,0.0033406275,0.00074365735,0.0015609527,0.21943633,0.77188665,0.000067559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015549634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002523525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02788535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006380586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017278966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14747357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378171960","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.40","title":"Gender and Stand Your Ground Laws: A Critical Appraisal of Existing Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Gender discrimination; Political science; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.6545615323359109,"score_gpt":0.6115662286275612,"score_spread":0.0429953037083497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378171960","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043883272,0.8453462,0.0026430245,0.13464998,0.008321187,0.0008125614,0.00013943009,0.000019296343,0.003680046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17297469,0.7150033,0.008808493,0.08973434,0.010005757,0.0022692534,0.00016986596,0.00011381965,0.00092056295],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.80695957,0.13873975,0.021684146,0.0065348074,0.022942394,0.0031392556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17160293,0.78326887,0.014339237,0.0051312004,0.024283234,0.0013745582],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27991912,0.0020858343,0.005562413,0.024247108,0.008288305,0.01568081,0.007122305,0.009308254,0.004398377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.542478,0.0023197664,0.0039233696,0.01432653,0.031098079,0.026044521,0.01033159,0.015339759,0.0007457969],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071583485,0.00014891056,0.007202679,0.22587927,0.0020302047,0.002160952,0.13626297,0.00072003127,0.0003157064,0.19849253,0.061073255,0.36499768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008270735,0.00023053585,0.0042885924,0.6236915,0.0016410147,0.0009403347,0.10764281,0.0004746054,0.0003437119,0.06613902,0.19432962,0.00019562842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013854994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03290551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72008085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032820832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0558564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8879879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386347261","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.67","title":"When Public Health Goes Wrong: Toward a New Concept of Public Health Error","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Public health; Political science; Environmental health; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine","score_opus":0.9298105689546217,"score_gpt":0.6537840275045939,"score_spread":0.2760265414500278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386347261","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068024243,0.010420893,0.045728326,0.87537587,0.00547903,0.000087410095,0.000093498646,0.000069309426,0.05594326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68747133,0.016464084,0.05526471,0.2118004,0.020558862,0.00085442164,0.00016328538,0.00032911057,0.007093747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8952301,0.06988111,0.0057258885,0.0069893673,0.018649051,0.0035243926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64248365,0.29699108,0.013796339,0.015572625,0.024694037,0.0064623607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11763006,0.0014416917,0.002575047,0.0122179575,0.013796961,0.034158017,0.007734136,0.029855326,0.004065818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.176316,0.0011821571,0.0016683398,0.0063112862,0.23056343,0.09886729,0.01809251,0.040165983,0.0007462743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013965413,0.000016260528,0.00037368826,0.0000591425,0.000007500412,0.000049629496,0.004833577,0.00015528449,0.000013973114,0.9871889,0.0038974853,0.0033905567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016889944,0.000013947986,0.00015665409,0.00034092704,0.000010572623,0.00006901919,0.0045467713,0.00038136766,0.0000449813,0.9786668,0.015724802,0.000027211652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007006701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004449666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11763006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015766999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0362426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62209463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389691596","doi":"10.1017/jme.2023.110","title":"<b>Harvey and Gurvir’s Law:</b> Ontario Bill for Quality Prenatal Information about Down Syndrome: Terminology, Feasibility, and Ethical Issues","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Legislature; Law; Context (archaeology); Stigma (botany); Quality (philosophy); Political science; Psychology; Psychiatry; History; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17658649483751532,"score_gpt":0.4293212488697803,"score_spread":0.252734754032265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389691596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040272954,0.0048502903,0.0012673426,0.8090216,0.0050574834,0.00015736387,0.0007705162,0.00011840682,0.17472962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043627374,0.0024485972,0.00339892,0.79546434,0.001681875,0.00018961975,0.00024863912,0.00010401478,0.15283665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868793,0.0018952235,0.0007733905,0.0007741838,0.0070284996,0.0026494449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814325,0.008405851,0.0008581461,0.00069088186,0.0066662426,0.0019463398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069571976,0.00049217883,0.00038064746,0.0007835888,0.012210968,0.0069800904,0.0022546751,0.029246688,0.008246644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02873975,0.0008384027,0.0007278569,0.0014329827,0.012903353,0.003420158,0.0019849865,0.014135346,0.0022448325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022171995,0.000014985336,0.00087677984,0.000052309348,0.0000055045275,0.00021229012,0.0037070778,0.000033005537,0.00032539188,0.12925537,0.860257,0.0052379887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030880907,0.000012152828,0.0057085142,0.0002587598,0.000017724047,0.00020158134,0.0020319219,0.00011943971,0.00029461135,0.008828115,0.98242354,0.00007272766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9257875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9647563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07421249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030147497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08213838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21873641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392418850","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.28","title":"JME volume 51 issue S2 Cover and Front matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Geography; Physics; Engineering; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.10673230479149719,"score_gpt":0.2900780967715451,"score_spread":0.1833457919800479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392418850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011646044,0.0025940598,0.00039460705,0.02758285,0.035772704,0.00014430973,0.0032802094,0.0014121635,0.9276545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041514183,0.0013918484,0.00036158742,0.010268648,0.0098480545,0.000051300383,0.0010249423,0.00043835168,0.9724638],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892575,0.000085829,0.000051693165,0.0001145289,0.00067100517,0.00015112411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689734,0.0006090999,0.0001198533,0.0003260689,0.0012786632,0.00076889177],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012904763,0.0007185312,0.0007069009,0.0017647604,0.0019255466,0.0054486417,0.00080461404,0.0042712246,0.7959904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007214189,0.0004868857,0.0006334903,0.0009484558,0.000738349,0.001868761,0.0015602658,0.003178624,0.6382368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012359332,0.000030690568,0.00011423044,0.000041187755,0.0000020785806,0.000050285962,0.000008970399,0.0000147038845,0.00013482734,0.00061272265,0.98433566,0.014642336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009661792,0.000013112835,0.0008490548,0.00013735458,0.0000022951876,0.00008973396,0.000029174167,0.00006618663,0.00016057075,0.0004316571,0.9982064,0.0000048005822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030979381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070188935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20400959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015095581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020448947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29099488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392778751","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.20","title":"Aducanumab, Accelerated Approvals &amp; the Agency: Why the FDA Needs Structural Reform","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Food and drug administration; Hard core; Drug approval; Public administration; Political science; Business; Drug; Medicine; Pharmacology; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering)","score_opus":0.3608648809949944,"score_gpt":0.4087868544371139,"score_spread":0.04792197344211946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392778751","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013026281,0.0031370546,0.0026148355,0.9569385,0.00046560037,0.000032668788,0.000037262274,0.000027789303,0.023720004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59292984,0.0047112755,0.0057092374,0.38108262,0.0028798706,0.0001817028,0.000046488178,0.00007842557,0.012380513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823778,0.009107851,0.0006098372,0.0015383144,0.003517035,0.0028492154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95120627,0.035399158,0.0033498728,0.002179941,0.005174312,0.0026905024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026375249,0.00028629752,0.0005958825,0.0010691824,0.0069881137,0.012509087,0.0013909454,0.020250704,0.0065702195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055167675,0.00046441532,0.00088151207,0.0011753729,0.01981364,0.014789763,0.0039455025,0.019599281,0.0011539728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090941,0.000047193018,0.00092154887,0.00006739078,0.000009205988,0.00019144369,0.00090029615,0.00033848517,0.00038211804,0.93990153,0.045771252,0.011418555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028373234,0.00014087517,0.0034318704,0.00050423364,0.000039958428,0.00039414695,0.0023620687,0.0018164983,0.0012760697,0.61886007,0.3708088,0.00008155874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01628739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012722091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026375249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012768368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019154597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13948733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392778805","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.7","title":"Taking the Long Way Around: Towards A Depathologized Ethical Framework of Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Environmental ethics; Criminology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.2924269060232357,"score_gpt":0.4975051261047562,"score_spread":0.20507822008152055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392778805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08886587,0.005545519,0.026458783,0.8015312,0.003100465,0.00008357965,0.00003076457,0.000065784734,0.07431812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942141,0.0013082396,0.008676546,0.09002469,0.00072064885,0.00013447752,0.000011253267,0.00010147838,0.004808666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9500475,0.042216342,0.0007310537,0.0013941585,0.0028310493,0.0027799106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97552466,0.0129192015,0.0017526383,0.0010773102,0.0032152731,0.005510991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047361657,0.0004619866,0.00056190084,0.0011211748,0.017346038,0.020476526,0.0029686661,0.013509704,0.0017875078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0286348,0.0004211202,0.0005761165,0.0007280785,0.09602188,0.012912217,0.013378926,0.026306892,0.0004743277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001722089,0.000041955554,0.0010043478,0.00005672765,0.000005547529,0.0003868811,0.20605047,0.00012927559,0.0002624663,0.7774322,0.0083304215,0.0062823747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020037267,0.000066878405,0.00064350787,0.0010476459,0.000019462412,0.0007825741,0.31528777,0.0008135811,0.00068454887,0.57037127,0.11019766,0.00006496274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0122369975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016416555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047361657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009431129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027760532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25047535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399239882","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.77","title":"Pre-Mortem Interventions for the Purpose of Organ Donation: Legal Approaches to Consent","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Psychological intervention; Donation; Jurisdiction; Harm; Organ donation; Medical law; Informed consent; Law; Medicine; Political science; Transplantation; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Surgery","score_opus":0.4283625463614697,"score_gpt":0.4438104927610721,"score_spread":0.015447946399602397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399239882","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019068735,0.023540867,0.106793374,0.6102438,0.0021741008,0.0006636073,0.00023145776,0.00012405142,0.23716003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7225796,0.02046131,0.059411585,0.16244307,0.0020223993,0.0007425233,0.00016754234,0.0001575469,0.03201436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9411054,0.029780906,0.0037214742,0.0048605967,0.016187463,0.0043440796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9099727,0.06701503,0.0049336487,0.005654601,0.010654303,0.0017697191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06589964,0.0006529478,0.0008382094,0.0020656185,0.014271224,0.01206833,0.0049890326,0.01846013,0.003027216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10216359,0.0008838005,0.00086126087,0.0021646824,0.08210762,0.00903317,0.0077924314,0.019532973,0.0006441158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012098338,0.000011085914,0.0005418057,0.0001732033,0.0000076150172,0.00036216996,0.013057238,0.00016663376,0.00020823083,0.9649121,0.008171237,0.012376536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004982842,0.000053923737,0.0033025756,0.0041719256,0.00006676389,0.0014488575,0.013569659,0.0008791851,0.0012067154,0.5849333,0.39015877,0.00015848658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36089432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47965392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36089432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04775125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115393534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71758735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399240704","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.51","title":"“A Most Equitable Drug”: How the Clinical Studies of Convalescent Plasma as a Treatment for SARS-CoV-2 Might Usefully Inform Post-Pandemic Public Sector Approaches to Drug Development","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Pandemic; Convalescent plasma; Drug development; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Drug; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Medicine; Public sector; Virology; Intensive care medicine; Political science; Pharmacology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Internal medicine; Disease","score_opus":0.6659967042477206,"score_gpt":0.49953500104615983,"score_spread":0.16646170320156078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399240704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04684988,0.004482661,0.01965587,0.88852406,0.0012695253,0.0005466246,0.000045753386,0.00004120195,0.038584385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83280516,0.0022621164,0.013115613,0.14602256,0.0006330084,0.0007538724,0.000025081337,0.000056969966,0.004325753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85691094,0.13165836,0.0018589355,0.0032963245,0.003252859,0.003022651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86790967,0.09633499,0.008722992,0.007821372,0.009284452,0.00992661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14101313,0.00041573803,0.00067243614,0.0010291046,0.012140872,0.013576645,0.002125742,0.010180209,0.0041264757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117611445,0.0004691703,0.0005009956,0.0007934667,0.07039611,0.021801643,0.011233009,0.011799473,0.00057153276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001363276,0.00021247545,0.0027420348,0.0006636234,0.000041161027,0.0010134656,0.13100319,0.00025888055,0.0014486271,0.8227926,0.019705271,0.019982394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017251323,0.00067680224,0.0027273989,0.002389605,0.00005928865,0.0011383372,0.30049908,0.00075624895,0.0028295312,0.39402553,0.29460308,0.00012264209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002422137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034962278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98785913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010452009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030968506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74575764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403647139","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.100","title":"Challenges of Uncertainty in Prenatal Decision-Making: Skeletal Dysplasias","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Birth, Development, and Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Dysplasia; Prenatal diagnosis; Genetic counseling; Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Fetus; Pathology; Pregnancy; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.10524135318970351,"score_gpt":0.41541399762430914,"score_spread":0.3101726444346056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403647139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041891955,0.01755859,0.025245098,0.8816618,0.0012096153,0.00007965687,0.00009605375,0.000038800896,0.03221844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.873177,0.020392863,0.029758558,0.07233067,0.0022246132,0.00015154081,0.00006393668,0.00005170881,0.0018491053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95502716,0.03675402,0.0015146235,0.0013822899,0.0036222958,0.0016996546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85175526,0.12940915,0.006004734,0.0016142653,0.0053882813,0.005828308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056218456,0.00046982736,0.0010619835,0.0016501687,0.007404724,0.00797721,0.0020133934,0.009313197,0.0030648196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14263363,0.0006033415,0.0007368982,0.00094414037,0.021160098,0.007414021,0.0077417963,0.013374817,0.00044059218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033302102,0.0002308147,0.026927818,0.0010152932,0.00030154997,0.02484675,0.08240198,0.0063344636,0.0008951727,0.5369964,0.060653716,0.25906298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005153591,0.00009482358,0.0040955255,0.003690315,0.00007216694,0.010965506,0.039864507,0.0038647472,0.0004387214,0.87455124,0.06217685,0.00013399613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007742803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009273496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056218456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065980516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013872368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29731518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403647613","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.109","title":"Vaccine Procurement: The Changes Needed to Close Access Gaps and Achieve Health Equity in Routine and Pandemic Settings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Equity (law); Pandemic; Public health; Procurement; Rhetoric; Vaccination; Business; Health equity; Global health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Political science; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing; Marketing","score_opus":0.16996374645375287,"score_gpt":0.48932081369021824,"score_spread":0.3193570672364654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403647613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011196708,0.0026460332,0.0064941025,0.9499082,0.0015822962,0.00004520869,0.000051031355,0.000083261715,0.027993256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5882477,0.0041404776,0.015667474,0.37437272,0.0042520855,0.00022867031,0.000104297374,0.00015004305,0.012836536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98227525,0.010374022,0.0006775106,0.0008788304,0.0028891228,0.0029052617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95007,0.029453287,0.0033561634,0.0034641128,0.0049397233,0.0087167425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038363345,0.00029741865,0.00045292315,0.0007787733,0.003849217,0.0077038957,0.0019951037,0.009268346,0.011204033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08152658,0.00037350674,0.00054635224,0.00068535714,0.012419767,0.015616224,0.0062057073,0.011745154,0.0014057711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011385852,0.0002395092,0.0062285615,0.00037313267,0.000038440026,0.00031480275,0.005879594,0.001375181,0.0010685328,0.72666824,0.119717725,0.13798244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095931384,0.00022239123,0.008343085,0.0011969013,0.00003958974,0.0005338176,0.009636859,0.001509874,0.001264791,0.5834036,0.39367658,0.00007647579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006683816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006531216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038363345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054583685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032463145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20288724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403650421","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.114","title":"A Proposed Research Agenda for Ethical, Legal, Social, and Historical Studies at the Intersection of Infectious and Genetic Disease","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"BRCA gene mutations in cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Genomics; Genome-wide association study; Pandemic; Public health; Tuberculosis; Biology; Genome; Genetics; Medicine; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Genotype; Gene","score_opus":0.3533365003066582,"score_gpt":0.5297700293324903,"score_spread":0.1764335290258321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403650421","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003289803,0.0064737303,0.002306186,0.97726053,0.008645761,0.00005755162,0.000023404398,0.000024511088,0.0048793657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050486013,0.020233514,0.027899094,0.845146,0.0442748,0.0012688043,0.000160375,0.00012347719,0.010407931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90762186,0.06391705,0.0034596901,0.00699766,0.011227922,0.0067757536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7271277,0.2098532,0.0059633097,0.009324192,0.024702847,0.023028713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15620665,0.0017683416,0.0039138403,0.005878616,0.024406914,0.03703096,0.008695319,0.07745824,0.01592448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1034524,0.0012433276,0.003040073,0.0041690725,0.08329367,0.05073655,0.026228338,0.06901925,0.0030142185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046469828,0.00022318879,0.0006037914,0.0005332257,0.00003191745,0.00042550673,0.008028701,0.0002807082,0.00013558015,0.8220468,0.14419137,0.023452751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007608271,0.000079237034,0.00040368765,0.0023433405,0.000036271304,0.00031991384,0.015915787,0.0004915768,0.000117730364,0.6725749,0.30754858,0.000092913346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039563393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075491127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15620665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10348665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82610965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405416217","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.144","title":"Industry Funding by Itself is Not a Reason for Rating Down Studies for Risk of Bias","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Clinical trial; Placebo; Medicine; Sample size determination; Family medicine; Actuarial science; Alternative medicine; Physical therapy; Psychology; Business; Internal medicine; Statistics; Pathology","score_opus":0.8654811204615468,"score_gpt":0.6813859189261303,"score_spread":0.18409520153541648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405416217","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049513508,0.26697806,0.26383296,0.1982632,0.08436234,0.071219906,0.0093736,0.0017990983,0.054657336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3950781,0.023997124,0.38832986,0.107106686,0.022352884,0.05583173,0.0022687542,0.0011074739,0.0039273915],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.20310119,0.39070022,0.3061296,0.015690347,0.08154239,0.0028362493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.045576915,0.69686943,0.10151437,0.063285455,0.088933356,0.003820461],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.67012584,0.0026558784,0.010271947,0.018993491,0.004730901,0.0136969555,0.0052034357,0.015915621,0.009359095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.89299905,0.0027689845,0.013235582,0.015330024,0.009306847,0.011461993,0.0062186657,0.014990042,0.0028023657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016507203,0.0005258305,0.06790934,0.25609112,0.077231504,0.001732201,0.019523032,0.0017260952,0.0064483113,0.062441546,0.11663368,0.3732301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011632886,0.0032059036,0.04646257,0.28422067,0.051060725,0.0035071943,0.0054512243,0.012256425,0.009391942,0.19451365,0.3767608,0.00153607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022984575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036461325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32987416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071131266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010734803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4067936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405416294","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.135","title":"Comparing the Clinical Trial Characteristics of Industry-Funded Trials and Non Industry-Funded Trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute; Sinai Health System","funders":"","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Clinical trial; Placebo; Medicine; Physical therapy; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.918740197606595,"score_gpt":0.709484246860061,"score_spread":0.20925595074653403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405416294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8322674,0.09014234,0.032957833,0.008501125,0.0011065509,0.007947035,0.014014941,0.00014891429,0.012913859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817493,0.0029182474,0.0056509017,0.0018008435,0.00032757974,0.004579403,0.0024615435,0.00005200433,0.0004601372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6073839,0.21833463,0.12964745,0.012477103,0.029341558,0.002815299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1639724,0.6448084,0.14957044,0.020745179,0.01698565,0.003917883],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24846607,0.00044338222,0.0022796288,0.0059470623,0.0007347626,0.0031968334,0.001233762,0.0023327786,0.004502537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5756931,0.00045942722,0.004840191,0.008772692,0.0017842717,0.0031364085,0.002111161,0.0018194892,0.00042503612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024401417,0.000628108,0.85217285,0.012319468,0.027902555,0.0003528471,0.0014514877,0.0021206026,0.0012339363,0.0055230483,0.003854301,0.068039335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008573162,0.009089629,0.9032942,0.005287152,0.020645559,0.0026638526,0.0017421505,0.005247095,0.0019413735,0.014184163,0.027063206,0.00026850894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060783053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010516824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7515339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001452609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036392359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9267751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407042994","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.169","title":"Far from Home: Managing Incidental Findings in Field Research with Portable MRI","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental Health; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Neuroimaging; Warrant; Health care; Institution; Field (mathematics); Population; Psychology; Medicine; Medical education; Internet privacy; Psychiatry; Computer science; Political science; Business; Environmental health","score_opus":0.5440663376908994,"score_gpt":0.6085514382229118,"score_spread":0.0644851005320124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407042994","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1499973,0.017634006,0.13732319,0.58747077,0.0050185695,0.0014131826,0.00019718154,0.0009761669,0.09996959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67115414,0.01511519,0.16270468,0.13138217,0.0064567775,0.0023455005,0.00019946606,0.00044184696,0.010200295],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9258141,0.0563432,0.0056932964,0.003161305,0.0062041734,0.0027838382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7573873,0.16225408,0.026428081,0.023873802,0.012155569,0.017901203],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08669593,0.00048769556,0.00086064724,0.0023470994,0.008578969,0.01087629,0.0039139236,0.0067741703,0.0057243705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23057455,0.0007620266,0.0008986694,0.001526236,0.0127281,0.015967714,0.014930574,0.008652281,0.0026014438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000519537,0.00093341665,0.07128003,0.0019033594,0.00023826392,0.04267069,0.07464151,0.0010897584,0.004143592,0.06893916,0.15194105,0.5816997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029099194,0.00095126475,0.037412312,0.013058075,0.00031000195,0.06701589,0.08626398,0.002344544,0.0050191325,0.4380002,0.34886432,0.00046921748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022755577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063741016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030121715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018666845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4584974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407043289","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.159","title":"The Realization of Portable MRI for Indigenous Communities in the USA and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; Government of Canada; BRAIN Initiative","keywords":"Indigenous; Neuroimaging; Software portability; Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Public relations; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Geography; Computer science; Psychiatry; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.2038572850277208,"score_gpt":0.43499727351318523,"score_spread":0.23113998848546444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407043289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4993319,0.0031682546,0.010630569,0.40116528,0.0014164338,0.000598678,0.0007266534,0.00012974476,0.08283246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483442,0.0025288344,0.009504967,0.024989255,0.00023042945,0.00025415962,0.00014793815,0.000040967716,0.013959237],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935876,0.0014873787,0.00018183928,0.00058443064,0.002190968,0.0019677328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781497,0.004231827,0.0009747548,0.0011408543,0.0071272086,0.008375677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008210932,0.00021446035,0.00025946583,0.0005705832,0.017211076,0.0044468977,0.0018547218,0.002180269,0.0042674784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02058795,0.00034106278,0.00036289872,0.001004637,0.007508239,0.0024667636,0.005920572,0.0046046735,0.00023233943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036490607,0.0004952482,0.09541916,0.0011271096,0.0001342413,0.011808916,0.25077114,0.0014053948,0.01132097,0.1708722,0.11019815,0.34608257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012649971,0.0004378287,0.16671212,0.0018701663,0.00010724462,0.004067351,0.311339,0.0022416431,0.003039986,0.037164737,0.4725643,0.00032919852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96682626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039364055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039364055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22116794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28560752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407043315","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.172","title":"How Did Human Rights Fare in Amendments to the International Health Regulations?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Connaught Fund; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Human rights; Solidarity; Equity (law); Accountability; Political science; Core (optical fiber); Public administration; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.1693067182344754,"score_gpt":0.4564706197597991,"score_spread":0.2871639015253237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407043315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027856113,0.0074512595,0.024703784,0.5290103,0.0046252464,0.00016702313,0.00017504574,0.000080151716,0.4059312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114015,0.0031014325,0.0055885734,0.1457937,0.0033696357,0.000323829,0.00008558247,0.00015324912,0.030182363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92569566,0.04331739,0.0024125788,0.00876744,0.0105635105,0.00924337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91879284,0.060136344,0.005983672,0.004726676,0.007952815,0.0024077005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1253852,0.0009014618,0.0012768941,0.0031984504,0.010105415,0.020493379,0.0033813433,0.023539826,0.009419474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13928688,0.0008489605,0.0019761568,0.0026784993,0.08350241,0.031185344,0.012160698,0.025400657,0.0012706509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078059675,0.000010108958,0.0002648992,0.000028383061,0.000009647213,0.000031417603,0.0014945224,0.00024505082,0.000021147305,0.99306434,0.0023504044,0.0024723012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000424055,0.0000456669,0.00088587863,0.00042825117,0.000018326076,0.00005018552,0.0039878455,0.00037499928,0.00021439223,0.88547206,0.10840081,0.00007918175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025829202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019520015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017936485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021291953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6631082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407043486","doi":"10.1017/jme.2024.162","title":"Conducting Research with Highly Portable MRI in Community Settings: A Practical Guide to Navigating Ethical Issues and ELSI Checklist","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Functional Brain Connectivity Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental Health; University of Minnesota","keywords":"Checklist; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.3521342910074726,"score_gpt":0.522861054694109,"score_spread":0.17072676368663642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407043486","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016785149,0.005974416,0.5925253,0.13143001,0.0060042515,0.15869582,0.008531654,0.009523987,0.0705294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010485996,0.0053279046,0.7953883,0.022541456,0.0009178696,0.144505,0.0021156522,0.0009964926,0.017721344],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9111326,0.065351106,0.012602962,0.0013639467,0.0073466483,0.002202737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8278445,0.10187368,0.009148222,0.013884676,0.0386032,0.008645715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09824252,0.002770167,0.0024393687,0.005990475,0.0058781533,0.0059256316,0.0055647744,0.009335525,0.029147815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14393947,0.0030205704,0.0026248768,0.0028802839,0.0065535954,0.009082822,0.009112319,0.012659387,0.028054425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021317835,0.0013294823,0.0023844556,0.0028805577,0.000055425156,0.0027664339,0.036871508,0.0011848077,0.003775712,0.018802859,0.6936457,0.23608984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040550155,0.0006272917,0.0049010436,0.0077107484,0.000048534006,0.0043602115,0.036833778,0.0021149341,0.0021013713,0.061012585,0.8794093,0.00047468604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034996634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014755792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09824252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003953567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027437711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51956236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408881852","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.7","title":"Reflections on the SDGs and UHC: Getting Shit Done","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Shit; Accountability; Corporate governance; Political science; Session (web analytics); Public administration; Sociology; Art history; Management; Art; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.2017413595306964,"score_gpt":0.4569523938981917,"score_spread":0.25521103436749526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408881852","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014424835,0.00097410375,0.00008094964,0.99045485,0.0068213455,0.0000030592262,0.000011751787,0.000010574202,0.0014989902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008392676,0.0013184594,0.00036390207,0.9761479,0.0050076065,0.000026429521,0.000014492476,0.000054241234,0.00867432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821904,0.008058207,0.0005736197,0.0010950495,0.004571402,0.0035114177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92713386,0.037197255,0.0019729654,0.0023139715,0.012123621,0.019258397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029000254,0.00087467773,0.0009841532,0.001038088,0.014781873,0.018204609,0.0035619235,0.033720113,0.016172845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08576297,0.00068402593,0.0012579993,0.001518398,0.023899272,0.022623401,0.01259738,0.076209046,0.0037921616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013214165,0.000016341204,0.00014884605,0.00003817171,0.000004854094,0.00010180626,0.002596275,0.00004222858,0.00003820372,0.019348517,0.9729462,0.004705322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019501773,0.000025762896,0.0004910579,0.00042232577,0.0000066909283,0.00009096578,0.019828226,0.0000968105,0.0001642611,0.020956572,0.95783985,0.000058033173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03898185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061956458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03898185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00878845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021484055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15336984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408914692","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.1","title":"Global Health “With Justice”: The Challenges and Opportunities for Human Rights in Global Health Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Human rights; Global health; Political science; Right to health; Health equity; International human rights law; Public health; Global justice; Equity (law); Politics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Health care; Medicine","score_opus":0.25653560921237406,"score_gpt":0.4776502471010232,"score_spread":0.22111463788864916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408914692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008964975,0.009484948,0.01860867,0.8491221,0.0014532876,0.000040159553,0.00003410462,0.000059192113,0.112232514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75419104,0.008233118,0.014493149,0.19778202,0.0053430134,0.00023425445,0.000055003253,0.00016144676,0.019506946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.973956,0.018081583,0.0005360329,0.0017325102,0.0029666661,0.0027271942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646859,0.026515873,0.0014589614,0.0029744082,0.0017529356,0.0026118713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04136987,0.0005625509,0.0009809298,0.0014078934,0.011391178,0.021293756,0.002191447,0.016634554,0.00555571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03255197,0.0004628497,0.00096592976,0.0013295246,0.11387497,0.028645895,0.0133287655,0.017757703,0.0008465387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040095597,0.000010466901,0.0001120105,0.000020050687,0.0000024122476,0.0000412434,0.0028750717,0.00008952554,0.000038182156,0.9874172,0.005189078,0.0042006485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008905445,0.000013406729,0.00014194488,0.00016827477,0.0000033274011,0.000049203834,0.0031197947,0.00019948793,0.00006548376,0.9470424,0.049172252,0.000015464317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057154214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061848513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04136987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067796335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015689924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21878737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409408643","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.21","title":"Global Health Law: Between Hard and Soft Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Soft law; Health law; Hard law; Public health law; Global health; Health policy; Political science; Law; Global governance; Corporate governance; International health; Public law; Public health; International law; Public administration; Business; Health care; Medicine; Politics","score_opus":0.11977588088696842,"score_gpt":0.42881351180492655,"score_spread":0.3090376309179581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409408643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022556454,0.01072148,0.028678777,0.51407605,0.0012197956,0.0000809113,0.00010267923,0.000110781046,0.42245302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85444415,0.005158348,0.008399317,0.108427614,0.0021287908,0.00022716436,0.00010015026,0.00015818435,0.020956207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709863,0.01712147,0.0008377144,0.002233956,0.00597812,0.002842442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638501,0.02605396,0.0023291684,0.0028782818,0.0023156137,0.0025729407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030395474,0.00059788587,0.0007046299,0.003176982,0.0067532267,0.026041819,0.0018410163,0.010821005,0.0058324244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03972395,0.000582265,0.00063838233,0.0022896172,0.08369331,0.024011048,0.012323621,0.012280277,0.00097597647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031881375,0.00000565782,0.00020781906,0.000015650268,0.000001378441,0.000019218058,0.0013905665,0.000056064684,0.000022719334,0.99228513,0.0027496365,0.0032430165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007978497,0.000010327523,0.00041250075,0.00026736423,0.0000036044069,0.000033698085,0.0031809676,0.00027248415,0.00006231424,0.95083976,0.044897065,0.000011881907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007853759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065413998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030395474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010121837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014153052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1607486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409438835","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.16","title":"The 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations: A New Era for Global Health Law in Pandemic Preparedness and Response?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International Health Regulations; Preparedness; Global health; Political science; Solidarity; Equity (law); Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Public administration; International law; Law; Politics; Economic growth; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Medicine; Health care; Geography; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Economics; Disease","score_opus":0.1326411844325214,"score_gpt":0.5000978524757798,"score_spread":0.3674566680432584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409438835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013496195,0.0075978274,0.014973114,0.65616167,0.0072521935,0.00016071506,0.00017556996,0.00015770878,0.30002508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37381214,0.0049337912,0.0175581,0.52885157,0.0046819653,0.0004531181,0.0002376066,0.0001587327,0.06931294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769183,0.009874389,0.0012151897,0.0016627306,0.006758636,0.0035707557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847298,0.008877544,0.0017895178,0.0015416894,0.0020749941,0.0009864548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033387277,0.00062586664,0.0005621093,0.0009804295,0.005353519,0.013233503,0.0021108305,0.016947137,0.004462358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041426677,0.00051449146,0.0011499368,0.0011302512,0.025775535,0.010350919,0.004773532,0.019279575,0.0012277546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006912405,0.000014027376,0.0001604211,0.000027159083,0.0000018766915,0.000048613027,0.0014818582,0.000099527104,0.0000994751,0.972815,0.01891282,0.0063322703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003406301,0.000060763214,0.0009464876,0.0005644279,0.000013032935,0.00011875957,0.003250644,0.00039034858,0.000497348,0.3263703,0.667668,0.00008585486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012009477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0143291745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033387277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00796941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023446577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17657089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410245268","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.46","title":"Origin of “Conscientious Objection” in Health Care: How Care Denials Became Enshrined into Law Because of Abortion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Conscience; Abortion; Law; Dignity; Duty; Autonomy; Health care; Medicine; Fiduciary; Political science","score_opus":0.04870338325061919,"score_gpt":0.4154452307130344,"score_spread":0.3667418474624152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410245268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2649709,0.049129415,0.012962311,0.3658046,0.0016438945,0.00013044638,0.00007047336,0.000097549826,0.30519032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96229506,0.0075800694,0.001125358,0.021685697,0.00055233,0.00007312212,0.000019953452,0.00009095597,0.0065773525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792908,0.015658993,0.0005031218,0.0011173519,0.0015363656,0.0018932768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587606,0.03558095,0.0022054813,0.0012681462,0.0013190451,0.0008656687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020159371,0.00028716467,0.00046696136,0.0018844482,0.010989285,0.011274442,0.00185877,0.009265452,0.004829465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04590294,0.0007030777,0.0007844966,0.0016671988,0.09520554,0.019796865,0.008866673,0.015369909,0.00038176455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002958112,0.000027725358,0.0013581606,0.0000720025,0.00000498795,0.00064492173,0.20018415,0.00007317181,0.00008801309,0.7803123,0.0037539918,0.0134509355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000575074,0.0000644911,0.0062856018,0.002546883,0.000023282735,0.0015550494,0.15530992,0.0005916809,0.0005574087,0.554225,0.27868214,0.000100978985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020356981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014097374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023056226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023056226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012047064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16728538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411100094","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.69","title":"JME volume 53 issue S1 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Cardiff University; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Toronto; Case Western Reserve University; Saint Louis University; University of Cambridge; Georgetown University; University of Denver; University of Minnesota; University of Nebraska Medical Center; Villanova University; Ohio State University; George Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Geology; Physics; Oceanography; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.06697990381406246,"score_gpt":0.2849903061043374,"score_spread":0.21801040229027493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411100094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001087864,0.0026966524,0.00042192353,0.028292382,0.03491442,0.00014518207,0.0036875494,0.001408546,0.9273454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00425551,0.0015687869,0.0003795134,0.010089086,0.010280068,0.000054020886,0.0011468009,0.00046467368,0.9717615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989827,0.000083085,0.000049649425,0.00010528239,0.0006375237,0.00014177337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970091,0.0005941515,0.0001252556,0.00029925234,0.0012358676,0.0007363997],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012003554,0.00068251364,0.00070687296,0.0017289089,0.0017486138,0.005030387,0.0008125857,0.0040022507,0.810398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073764804,0.00046108913,0.00061469513,0.0009382165,0.00068632315,0.0017333679,0.0014952865,0.0029706017,0.64894354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010367499,0.000024916275,0.00009836101,0.000040886523,0.0000018844553,0.000044208286,0.000008198707,0.000013519834,0.000117934855,0.0005618826,0.98425955,0.014818304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080249165,0.00001130602,0.0007875235,0.00013350153,0.000002140916,0.00008787768,0.00002765046,0.000061799365,0.00014452175,0.00043435115,0.9982969,0.0000044943768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030111477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006792939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.810398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014599679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020017219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2704442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411371471","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.50","title":"Response to Comment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Historical and modern epidemiology studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.2336849529634074,"score_gpt":0.4963033408092548,"score_spread":0.2626183878458474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411371471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048457563,0.00038507185,0.00019477567,0.8666321,0.11366511,0.00013425383,0.0020552978,0.00070718245,0.015741587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028391487,0.00034761324,0.00015336472,0.9196239,0.014523867,0.0001992755,0.00046046375,0.00020344804,0.06164885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651223,0.000487946,0.00039508514,0.00049407786,0.0015347468,0.00057595776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880505,0.0037079675,0.00054495403,0.0005004181,0.0061123753,0.0010837534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004187615,0.00093629526,0.0010842821,0.0009110468,0.0029514947,0.0026324538,0.0028294472,0.022297181,0.14758472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03869806,0.0004424706,0.0015850494,0.0008342361,0.0016494289,0.0027237674,0.0024562213,0.014810683,0.09251515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015108179,0.0000031618006,0.00006467761,0.000027023883,0.0000018472808,0.000063203755,0.00002797536,0.0000058472287,0.000026600577,0.0002226258,0.9985808,0.0009611144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035641373,0.000015589092,0.00088752504,0.00015488347,0.00000883651,0.00011497356,0.00036254848,0.00004406998,0.0001969728,0.00060411525,0.99754554,0.00002934308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023144638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017717866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14758472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064511127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006169892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49372005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411371524","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10130","title":"JME volume 53 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Cardiff University; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Toronto; Case Western Reserve University; Saint Louis University; Georgetown University; University of Denver; University of Minnesota; University of Nebraska Medical Center; Villanova University; Ohio State University; George Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Geography; Physics; Engineering; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.06795408838287906,"score_gpt":0.28514909563279384,"score_spread":0.21719500724991478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411371524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013047118,0.0050774384,0.0004696667,0.04741471,0.0460962,0.00012091429,0.0019313549,0.0012188408,0.8963662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005990415,0.0026176674,0.0003835116,0.016475402,0.014911045,0.00004713455,0.00067105365,0.00042020908,0.95848346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985611,0.00013521215,0.00006269954,0.00015442108,0.0008985437,0.00018804886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964059,0.0006810775,0.00015110314,0.00036079562,0.001474729,0.00092627824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014465407,0.00066142064,0.00071456446,0.0017876356,0.0019774719,0.005695002,0.000886689,0.0041584647,0.73187804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009116518,0.00039938954,0.00059341284,0.0008572205,0.00090158504,0.001760577,0.001800308,0.0033862104,0.5626492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011454272,0.000025084344,0.00013285114,0.000051236715,0.0000026234834,0.000056265166,0.000011935459,0.000012867702,0.00012872017,0.000806162,0.98008037,0.01868045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066534103,0.000009494373,0.0008748016,0.00014859988,0.0000026348107,0.00012108571,0.000033701686,0.00005201126,0.00013847968,0.00049222703,0.998116,0.0000043162927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00293912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062529226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26812196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016500194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002110501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38244343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412760999","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.64","title":"Moral Permissibility and Desert in the Therapy-Enhancement Distinction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Appeal; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Desert (philosophy); Reflective equilibrium; Law and economics; Politics; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.29352901563460504,"score_gpt":0.4481793063880265,"score_spread":0.15465029075342146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412760999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08182519,0.003806747,0.09195469,0.055933636,0.000843036,0.0001676188,0.00008729284,0.00010821798,0.7652736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783171,0.00032536598,0.0068194726,0.0033162618,0.00026616702,0.000151241,0.000020076619,0.000034975266,0.010749419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851289,0.009017012,0.00040434132,0.0015694532,0.0029445298,0.000935853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899199,0.006836696,0.0007002308,0.001120654,0.0008091067,0.0006134292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01256719,0.00038755574,0.0007407,0.0010138932,0.004548512,0.005745276,0.0014542609,0.0066359495,0.004590947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014165493,0.00030335723,0.00077356544,0.00044389797,0.057667032,0.0065761325,0.0072765807,0.009467532,0.0005437365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057382144,0.0000069681682,0.000039855575,0.000006943584,0.0000013574338,0.000017942039,0.0004628564,0.00008872704,0.000042080945,0.9983333,0.00025628912,0.0007378329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019338433,0.00001219283,0.00012118608,0.000036955404,0.0000030474662,0.00004020525,0.00026561925,0.00033996685,0.0001234746,0.98765856,0.011371935,0.000007511032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012691383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082327233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01256719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005238151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032901948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06646246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412810429","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10109","title":"Psychedelic Treatment with Psilocybin: Addressing Medical Malpractice Risk and Physicians’ Concerns","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Psychedelics and Drug Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec; Université du Québec à Rimouski; Jewish General Hospital; Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec; Université de Montréal; Université Laval; Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches; McGill University","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec; McGill University; Université Laval","keywords":"Psilocybin; Medical malpractice; Liability; Psychiatry; Psychology; Malpractice; Medicine; Hallucinogen; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.20320318637137766,"score_gpt":0.49386043375682687,"score_spread":0.2906572473854492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412810429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27309483,0.05939618,0.004545344,0.61474234,0.0005770903,0.00018143408,0.000055438693,0.000021264219,0.047386166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940561,0.033210985,0.0034962234,0.06672238,0.0006707716,0.0000687391,0.000029369123,0.0000065910817,0.0017388819],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868486,0.009069512,0.0006082218,0.0004285967,0.0025133095,0.0005317442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465429,0.041506305,0.006296063,0.0010140091,0.0028917368,0.0017489204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02227526,0.00014199305,0.00037785273,0.0010338549,0.00557919,0.0037256766,0.000830066,0.0055685304,0.0029911094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059310444,0.00017897521,0.00041086168,0.00089346647,0.0059111556,0.0031835802,0.0028890069,0.004582304,0.0001925676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006403216,0.001076756,0.07789654,0.004276999,0.0002992641,0.014727505,0.08365467,0.0012765601,0.00336619,0.16552849,0.068065494,0.5791912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044807044,0.00329155,0.10306041,0.02053428,0.0006735661,0.030537482,0.11599973,0.0035655354,0.004092837,0.17065619,0.5468339,0.00030644055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099123735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029280018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02227526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045199427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098600555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11780423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414066768","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10158","title":"Constructing Opioid Legitimacy: The Canadian Pain Task Force’s Framing of the Overdose Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Opioid overdose; Opioid; Chronic pain; Public health; Opioid epidemic; Opioid abuse; Public policy; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.03173279057594633,"score_gpt":0.3361861474330212,"score_spread":0.30445335685707486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414066768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4348927,0.006085332,0.0067794174,0.32029834,0.0010869984,0.00017843388,0.0002358808,0.00004397304,0.23039898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845069,0.0013403586,0.0009840876,0.009174144,0.000080950645,0.000033054614,0.000039155442,0.000027012116,0.0038142446],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98236644,0.008185016,0.0003014291,0.00068316073,0.0053878226,0.003076043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774075,0.013535705,0.000954549,0.0006519983,0.005332355,0.00211791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025058413,0.00055988325,0.00051727,0.0044716946,0.049364883,0.017056786,0.002266206,0.005794882,0.0026473464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028163863,0.00056315365,0.0005590562,0.004099567,0.060285106,0.006459663,0.00900012,0.008817591,0.00014089464],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020819654,0.000017602943,0.0038668292,0.000069268455,0.000008147172,0.0006420031,0.71365875,0.00023071039,0.0002978857,0.26167196,0.01204102,0.00747501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014609663,0.000010956709,0.004906054,0.0005156679,0.000023985094,0.00014705014,0.79935086,0.0005861433,0.00027475783,0.026511038,0.16756585,0.00009296209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.950574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.956962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8498653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15013471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16352007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98572326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414175882","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10173","title":"JME volume 53 issue 3 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Cardiff University; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Case Western Reserve University; University of Toronto; Saint Louis University; Georgetown University; Ohio State University; University of Pennsylvania; Villanova University; University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Denver; Yale University","keywords":"Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Front cover; Cover (algebra); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.06662147618447313,"score_gpt":0.28468061920568977,"score_spread":0.21805914302121665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414175882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012702959,0.0038649393,0.00047081543,0.043682672,0.038413685,0.00011291039,0.001792611,0.0012840648,0.9091081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059451526,0.0019977519,0.00036901212,0.016575905,0.012104914,0.00004296845,0.0005619947,0.00041567328,0.9619867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987342,0.00011040553,0.00005442662,0.0001369477,0.00079336273,0.00017065552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681795,0.00059089664,0.00012497268,0.00033598003,0.0013038458,0.000826363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013506224,0.00062005874,0.000666817,0.0015811748,0.0020089229,0.005529603,0.00083558063,0.004244005,0.7362099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00827096,0.0003746245,0.000606438,0.0007815191,0.0009228297,0.0017025911,0.0017210181,0.0034396693,0.5733668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011916078,0.000024579187,0.00013560649,0.00004442061,0.000002590294,0.00006103549,0.000012214631,0.000012702745,0.00014219503,0.00086568634,0.98151416,0.017172912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071672052,0.000009429644,0.00084367004,0.00013168254,0.0000027291783,0.00012684768,0.000035445453,0.000058040885,0.00015792156,0.000527993,0.99809474,0.000004322244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033397216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069580907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26379007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015996348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021235328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3762645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414928066","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10184","title":"Framing, Narratives, and the Overdose Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Framing (construction); Public health; Public policy; Opioid overdose; Narrative review; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.08969683580998891,"score_gpt":0.4362823489027798,"score_spread":0.34658551309279084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414928066","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006102554,0.99227226,0.00016636649,0.0029863918,0.00023304133,0.000008093156,0.000008431215,0.0000028911247,0.0037124143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012312735,0.9853173,0.00030279363,0.0011796268,0.00023813802,0.000022282897,0.000019606594,0.0000037193597,0.0006036982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974752,0.0017427541,0.00014463655,0.000109542416,0.00041827752,0.00010953887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918247,0.0068421825,0.00064050715,0.00012943431,0.00040929954,0.00015388861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038070905,0.0008316772,0.00083498727,0.0028756752,0.0014339561,0.004741798,0.0007296893,0.002179233,0.0030333933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009265396,0.00031924286,0.0007940415,0.003102169,0.0046778666,0.0058552264,0.0029954966,0.003077704,0.00041734302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008842159,0.00007665545,0.00078897894,0.037898667,0.00021282969,0.00034277746,0.02048008,0.00037477585,0.0002846322,0.14226127,0.03474688,0.7624441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001808494,0.00003592314,0.0016695843,0.070831455,0.00013819108,0.0012714957,0.011721792,0.00008077621,0.00020167793,0.028564554,0.88543075,0.000035749392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00410603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053339936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004741798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028715872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005537236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020834923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415950946","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10187","title":"Oncofertility in Prepubertal Girls: A Qualitative Study of Canadian and French Pediatric Oncologists’ Perspectives on Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Canadian Bioethics Society; Alethia Biotherapeutics (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Oncofertility; Ovarian tissue; Infertility; Qualitative research; Fertility preservation; Bioethics; Ovarian tissue cryopreservation; Reproductive medicine; Cryopreservation","score_opus":0.1650252385375709,"score_gpt":0.47726211380329886,"score_spread":0.31223687526572796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415950946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789883,0.003547121,0.00087942043,0.008228441,0.00017364326,0.00021125481,0.00026213075,0.000018782235,0.0076907855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99237365,0.00173089,0.0006889554,0.002300977,0.00003312525,0.00015149344,0.00008685767,0.000024811252,0.0026092427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888265,0.006318303,0.00025347603,0.0006851389,0.000998764,0.002917813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807536,0.011091681,0.001359824,0.00021118333,0.0029619676,0.0036217938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011833895,0.0008198032,0.0010157431,0.0020683066,0.021292662,0.0052675013,0.002749742,0.0031473867,0.0037562612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014851372,0.0006318899,0.0006020574,0.0020697913,0.0123317735,0.0025612437,0.003915186,0.0042547523,0.00025208722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019266981,0.000015852247,0.0024200832,0.00008578409,0.0000026594305,0.00090194354,0.9934489,0.000021185155,0.0002588198,0.0006745196,0.00066571933,0.0014852611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014713154,0.000016181284,0.0013546525,0.00012500332,0.0000021273638,0.00017209149,0.9902272,0.00002142934,0.0000611549,0.000040354666,0.007967629,0.000010599301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56896716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68181694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43103284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038196158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03599329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86714256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7077075712","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10147","title":"JME volume 53 issue 2 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Cardiff University; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Toronto; Case Western Reserve University; Saint Louis University; Georgetown University; University of Denver; University of Minnesota; University of Nebraska Medical Center; Villanova University; Ohio State University; George Washington University; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University","keywords":"Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Front cover; Cover (algebra); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.031211016747056102,"score_gpt":0.30559633885038384,"score_spread":0.2743853221033277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7077075712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012312762,0.0034899155,0.00040955955,0.050270934,0.032154005,0.000092864124,0.0014264487,0.0011028451,0.9098222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006001823,0.001808121,0.00030743636,0.019809017,0.011376986,0.000044015113,0.0004698493,0.00034681967,0.95983595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848336,0.00015438373,0.00006168577,0.0001715603,0.00091065344,0.00021831914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651897,0.00072184275,0.00012782149,0.00038044827,0.0013311579,0.00091970066],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015114918,0.00066269457,0.0006660834,0.0017020005,0.0023117473,0.0058012805,0.00086611713,0.004636621,0.7348562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00960302,0.00044088962,0.0005693275,0.00086034054,0.0009924287,0.0019081361,0.0019120122,0.0036627338,0.5463216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010581644,0.000023799394,0.0001470423,0.000039460767,0.0000022859547,0.000057556786,0.0000151118675,0.000011671823,0.00011347344,0.00088886265,0.9819355,0.01675475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067317374,0.000008801302,0.0009124707,0.00012657477,0.0000024403998,0.00011514987,0.000043540716,0.00005758699,0.00012646655,0.00048526254,0.99811053,0.0000044564135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037523466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00800875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7348562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016708226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021303836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37819546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127890869","doi":"10.1017/jme.2026.10240","title":"JME volume 53 issue 4 Cover and Front matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universitetas; Hamline University; Arizona State University; Western Michigan University; Georgetown University; Wake Forest University; Ohio State University; George Washington University; University of Colorado Boulder; Stryker; University of Pennsylvania; Yale University; Villanova University; University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Minnesota; College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center; University of Toronto; Saint Louis University; Case Western Reserve University; Brigham and Women's Hospital","keywords":"Front (military); Volume (thermodynamics); Front cover; Cover (algebra); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.06717576156611078,"score_gpt":0.2851547693723177,"score_spread":0.21797900780620694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127890869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012831591,0.003770728,0.0004436408,0.044126313,0.03892322,0.00011258913,0.0018171347,0.0012390492,0.9082841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054782536,0.0018304688,0.000343868,0.014811599,0.011658365,0.000041670315,0.0005501573,0.00038113171,0.96490455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986524,0.00012026646,0.000058231206,0.00014159559,0.0008459765,0.00018159814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966325,0.0006225327,0.00013474535,0.0003521806,0.0013871082,0.0008709515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013913924,0.00064704794,0.0006857595,0.001735331,0.002058626,0.005521211,0.00087909185,0.0042804396,0.7465855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008913869,0.00040167337,0.00060866826,0.0008111499,0.0009370204,0.00176677,0.0017925099,0.0034234247,0.5759235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012057657,0.000025163123,0.00013858803,0.000044942346,0.0000026718535,0.000060709644,0.000011784488,0.000013304559,0.0001374069,0.00084150775,0.9816425,0.017069403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073433584,0.000009664969,0.0008267135,0.0001287794,0.0000027901979,0.00011981075,0.00003510076,0.00005712448,0.00015449106,0.00050957775,0.99814415,0.0000043934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033609776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006868444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7465855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016870406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002175581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36146504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127935147","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10195","title":"End-of-Life Care and Organ Donation: Rethinking Legislative Separation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Organ donation; Legislation; Separation (statistics); Separation of powers; United Network for Organ Sharing","score_opus":0.07120080370517691,"score_gpt":0.39840752070882274,"score_spread":0.32720671700364584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127935147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026290554,0.002697929,0.0012958273,0.9824401,0.002800902,0.000011520657,0.000009959568,0.000013307042,0.008101304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06945036,0.002350759,0.0010779729,0.91890806,0.004333828,0.00009015343,0.000014973829,0.000055578,0.0037182851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9294465,0.036216415,0.0032202965,0.0061837235,0.014461141,0.010471934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84043694,0.13625267,0.004713549,0.0044613243,0.00845333,0.005682126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.099271804,0.00077472,0.0016221281,0.0011399351,0.02264247,0.024511922,0.00826175,0.077513516,0.003432356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1381576,0.0012409822,0.0025460676,0.0014426832,0.09113061,0.02650699,0.01993345,0.11004484,0.00079227256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060599057,0.00010565116,0.00075171277,0.00010458643,0.000044006938,0.00071117945,0.031806417,0.0003487175,0.00027748174,0.77424794,0.18004343,0.011498266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020016756,0.00012559634,0.001833102,0.0018288649,0.00012285165,0.0005972447,0.04026645,0.0007238677,0.0013949216,0.3991449,0.55349934,0.00026265072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040635947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053968996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099271804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014696312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047573645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52500576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}