{"meta":{"query_hash":"d279af7f52ba","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Legal History"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d279af7f52ba","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Legal+History"},"results":[{"id":"W2007696805","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2012.698885","title":"Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Equity (law); Common law; House of Commons; Political science; Economic Justice; Unconscionability; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.043258160093453665,"score_gpt":0.35684425839838735,"score_spread":0.31358609830493367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007696805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26465848,0.018005015,0.00091483933,0.024675481,0.00040998944,0.000055614477,0.00023808859,0.000013087352,0.6910294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395392,0.0022439444,0.00019450589,0.004254522,0.00021586359,0.000036198904,0.000052530842,0.000016646976,0.053446554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599564,0.0010447707,0.00014780303,0.00031884562,0.0011121017,0.0013808609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975126,0.0014228901,0.00024794895,0.00011581414,0.0004356155,0.0002651629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042177164,0.00028488517,0.0002875052,0.0018858659,0.0066490453,0.0064527933,0.00087189936,0.0037174642,0.006017546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069322344,0.00028552202,0.00027995356,0.002365711,0.01369575,0.0044935034,0.0035294036,0.004485718,0.00051145017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033956017,0.000024646204,0.001427631,0.000029810933,0.000006665765,0.00044926043,0.03133714,0.00017519604,0.000097753466,0.9494157,0.009568561,0.007433632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061010825,0.00008398715,0.05762367,0.00078718504,0.000035028956,0.00037196086,0.026556367,0.000638939,0.0009890893,0.13831533,0.77444065,0.000096741285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23581332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30866057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23581332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025865996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007659265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4688815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008089985","doi":"10.1080/01440360500162676","title":"Defence counsel in early modern Scotland: A study based on the High Court of Justiciary","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Professionalization; Scots; High Court; Political science; Right to counsel; Legal service; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03331678790176151,"score_gpt":0.20639622551877362,"score_spread":0.1730794376170121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008089985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940369,0.000527794,0.000037375725,0.0011198553,0.000023874132,0.000020927908,0.000066144974,0.0000015913696,0.0041655716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422026,0.0010588163,0.00006146335,0.0007806354,0.000045251785,0.000022883441,0.00005726568,0.0000056913505,0.003747777],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966528,0.0007394668,0.000097912576,0.00015956808,0.00087930844,0.0014710472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949012,0.0012598407,0.0012683923,0.00011464517,0.0009250015,0.001530881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002068096,0.00035144883,0.0008251514,0.004569789,0.011160284,0.0048249178,0.0013473969,0.0016113964,0.0055550328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070360266,0.00074751885,0.00023192554,0.007759475,0.004916843,0.002824979,0.0037740043,0.0026829843,0.00061060395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006126522,0.0002264883,0.07654447,0.00009107197,0.000006730199,0.0023401834,0.9028892,0.00001737627,0.00030547925,0.003934679,0.0020381254,0.011544977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014420909,0.00019904638,0.20760457,0.00015812561,0.0000087436365,0.0008319957,0.7640537,0.000041065206,0.00006402099,0.00028046587,0.026718298,0.000025546306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35671958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6498761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35671958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015003046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012523933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70928645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130476025","doi":"10.1080/01440360903353948","title":"Felony Forfeiture in England,<i>c.</i>1170–1870","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Continuation; Criminal law; Legal history; Political science; Criminology; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.025022164324472677,"score_gpt":0.19789427508003563,"score_spread":0.17287211075556294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130476025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75702137,0.04517758,0.00070997345,0.017841598,0.0005804352,0.00007250201,0.0018640552,0.000042115615,0.17669043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9243584,0.007640413,0.00017331056,0.0014426338,0.00011359157,0.000036232548,0.0002817232,0.000028007637,0.065925755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990049,0.00020347534,0.00006902463,0.00013756439,0.00016974109,0.0004153534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869484,0.00036337925,0.00038262928,0.00007157306,0.00021198048,0.0002755539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084032625,0.0001994317,0.00036473398,0.0013176064,0.0052353586,0.0019600024,0.0005264821,0.001698327,0.008704012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030980587,0.00048725877,0.00012096459,0.0018174872,0.0048615085,0.0018527921,0.002738929,0.0024462964,0.00073282246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039715593,0.00014413352,0.077756524,0.0014078668,0.000052220767,0.011344439,0.30349743,0.0008238457,0.001068734,0.35536197,0.12558042,0.12256522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028151719,0.00014933673,0.37281176,0.0012908281,0.000028403923,0.0026664878,0.038024537,0.00021013533,0.00048402158,0.0077372696,0.5764846,0.00008448936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4843561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.780754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4843561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018585607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005389054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308441574","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2022.2140481","title":"‘Weak’ Legal Pluralism and the Eighteenth-Century English Ecclesiastical Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Politics; Discipline; Economic Justice; Legal history; Classics; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016182867591545826,"score_gpt":0.19128104335382698,"score_spread":0.17509817576228115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308441574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58594567,0.013506502,0.0017674047,0.030820884,0.00028634863,0.000020110037,0.00004451275,0.000011173778,0.36759737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99245304,0.0007339328,0.00010909478,0.00036801092,0.00005332378,0.000004583688,0.000004396611,0.0000018676209,0.006271744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665207,0.0016521366,0.00015218736,0.0002283677,0.000803688,0.00051156746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956239,0.0020358611,0.0006906623,0.00022824592,0.0010611886,0.00036014046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003869036,0.00012235671,0.00015552819,0.0012272262,0.0041419184,0.00498365,0.0004617179,0.0008752121,0.0034708523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005919366,0.00012004944,0.00008586037,0.0007630697,0.018572738,0.0029700806,0.0034805536,0.0021332074,0.00016816428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001203998,0.000019639054,0.0018175296,0.000029260433,0.0000024135413,0.00024699428,0.059507795,0.000045620298,0.00014185961,0.9293983,0.0018826579,0.0068958704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070987226,0.000108085085,0.030605176,0.0010372548,0.000015709116,0.00080702204,0.096473485,0.0008964351,0.0010199235,0.32259122,0.54632187,0.000052890755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009542854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018434832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009542854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061124046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00259994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044348836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406919552","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2025.2456268","title":"Jurisdiction over <i>Infangthief</i> in England: The Case of John Milksop","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01138246775021285,"score_gpt":0.27994912713641446,"score_spread":0.2685666593862016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406919552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72602934,0.004534834,0.0015356377,0.043015398,0.00019929535,0.00005657417,0.000041188072,0.000016546692,0.22457115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759379,0.0006546146,0.00018217413,0.0034837497,0.000028452101,0.000021867034,0.000005147739,0.000010855236,0.019675272],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936021,0.00261855,0.00023095834,0.00059990876,0.00055366254,0.0023948364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99056304,0.006664807,0.00070062967,0.00033598646,0.00077462225,0.0009609791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057330374,0.00021928958,0.0005812155,0.0006933784,0.042537246,0.0089457985,0.0017518305,0.00860579,0.006553729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01238109,0.0009978879,0.0002074206,0.0010586048,0.04232665,0.005033283,0.009433843,0.011928344,0.00042321993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051489067,0.000021771508,0.0021242818,0.00007305465,0.0000075241396,0.007314835,0.6658405,0.00012682247,0.0003775892,0.31543663,0.0046476726,0.0039777597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000405772,0.000056819634,0.0058717546,0.00084695616,0.00003694177,0.0022758003,0.62388825,0.00020915111,0.0008831898,0.039726917,0.32599518,0.00016852403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45028433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58782715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45028433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019885013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017840665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8953268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}