{"meta":{"query_hash":"d279af7f52ba","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Legal History"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d279af7f52ba","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Legal+History"},"results":[{"id":"W2007696805","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2012.698885","title":"Equity in English Contract Law: the Impact of the Judicature Acts (1873–75)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; English law; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Equity (law); Common law; House of Commons; Political science; Economic Justice; Unconscionability; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.043258160093453665,"score_gpt":0.35684425839838735,"score_spread":0.31358609830493367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007696805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620299,0.0078513315,0.00001071875,0.0055428105,0.0012587945,0.00030514266,0.000010109399,0.000011664301,0.32297948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778515,0.00013000511,0.000008326918,0.00035060145,0.0009355861,0.0000015537646,1.2300958e-7,0.000006431374,0.0007822113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984583,0.00046720967,0.00029977766,0.000043109016,0.00045356652,0.00027799036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985755,0.0003589114,0.0005270119,0.00026732456,0.00016304274,0.00010823051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035594443,0.000079404876,0.00016190665,0.000025110541,0.00033999307,0.000017421778,0.0009617469,0.00007339168,0.00013377951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003608942,0.000034212593,0.00022082076,0.00015476276,0.0006704423,0.00041821925,0.000091908514,0.0007261192,0.0000048270645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024656494,0.0007316203,0.008121475,0.000014546134,0.00015539497,0.000002897808,0.23899773,0.0003558439,0.006378372,0.6284802,0.11457256,0.0019427965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022450711,0.000034809043,0.074933834,0.00002731132,0.000048425016,0.000007483248,0.0013297189,0.0000044286744,0.00010731605,0.0007554386,0.9224615,0.00006521679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009549597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002368059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8078889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009487829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006446449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008089985","doi":"10.1080/01440360500162676","title":"Defence counsel in early modern Scotland: A study based on the High Court of Justiciary","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dawson College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Professionalization; Scots; High Court; Political science; Right to counsel; Legal service; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03331678790176151,"score_gpt":0.20639622551877362,"score_spread":0.1730794376170121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008089985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97979516,0.0062451297,0.00089970964,0.0017987236,0.000585995,0.000164516,0.000010960302,0.0000043458363,0.010495452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984855,0.00014911556,0.000045205317,0.00055519235,0.0001953168,0.000003265454,1.01331146e-7,0.000011392755,0.0005549153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885434,0.0000771118,0.0007293159,0.000098561104,0.00008901817,0.00015165514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871165,0.00032460937,0.0006889985,0.0001861444,0.0000497096,0.000038916416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017628281,0.00010425908,0.00042519084,0.00013116791,0.00011016119,0.000006345106,0.0003737212,0.000043087723,0.00009285361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012408146,0.000073774005,0.000108989014,0.00008178702,0.00016183856,0.00012155879,0.000019096702,0.00035307725,0.00004037565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004054244,0.008410997,0.14186949,0.000116152805,0.00095401576,0.00012336776,0.28173614,0.13598745,0.00009386386,0.24843532,0.17257495,0.005644031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007470752,0.0037051255,0.27617756,0.00020012923,0.00025245012,0.000016282213,0.004927075,0.031528436,0.000017102982,0.016618095,0.65802646,0.0010605319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016654443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041214767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48545152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011688147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009679591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30564097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130476025","doi":"10.1080/01440360903353948","title":"Felony Forfeiture in England,<i>c.</i>1170–1870","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Continuation; Criminal law; Legal history; Political science; Criminology; History; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.025022164324472677,"score_gpt":0.19789427508003563,"score_spread":0.17287211075556294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130476025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46166292,0.13052309,0.0009305538,0.008492408,0.0042059864,0.0002197938,0.000020458101,0.000026676236,0.39391813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99238783,0.0009546095,0.000078933626,0.0011306992,0.00050928275,7.38182e-7,3.6590578e-7,0.000008665602,0.004928877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897933,0.00003077251,0.0006685407,0.00009108793,0.000038214384,0.0001920786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919593,0.000062624655,0.0005225708,0.00012673407,0.00002969827,0.00006241332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008695482,0.000105056984,0.0004310628,0.00013996527,0.00009358037,0.000007226195,0.00029530167,0.00007329015,0.00014082632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102875194,0.00008690589,0.0001507546,0.00008405957,0.000079850455,0.00021386717,0.000015360043,0.00039987202,0.00008365809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084159273,0.0007576411,0.008015181,0.000029005065,0.0002125643,0.00015033028,0.072365865,0.001117434,0.00008634354,0.5363604,0.35422,0.025843656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060454174,0.0001367651,0.010975639,0.000007826088,0.000005499291,0.000015674877,0.00010900487,0.000024435107,0.0000023397868,0.008497389,0.9795124,0.00010848863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049350114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018433754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6252924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013748993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053401407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35953137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308441574","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2022.2140481","title":"‘Weak’ Legal Pluralism and the Eighteenth-Century English Ecclesiastical Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Politics; Discipline; Economic Justice; Legal history; Classics; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; History; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016182867591545826,"score_gpt":0.19128104335382698,"score_spread":0.17509817576228115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308441574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5807978,0.040124897,0.00017440072,0.012444634,0.015550812,0.00046619916,0.00005798117,0.000086915024,0.35029638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920651,0.0003201761,0.0000071375644,0.0012193887,0.0012425835,0.0000026405307,0.0000017007378,0.000012257665,0.005129021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984915,0.00040071164,0.00038144342,0.000060147067,0.0005083506,0.00015784428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911624,0.00017202894,0.0003198444,0.00015085211,0.00016602196,0.00007503347],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012628736,0.00010987365,0.00020311671,0.00006964567,0.0009501062,0.00008998133,0.00033556356,0.000017237631,0.002439751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060218583,0.000056469005,0.0001222916,0.000014136033,0.0007695801,0.00042828268,0.00009857531,0.0007295029,0.000009944381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079551415,0.00008213499,0.0000073073256,0.000011566354,0.0000732913,0.000026204114,0.12116731,0.00006865097,0.000011383498,0.51383203,0.3632331,0.00069150043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009794077,0.000100894125,0.00009788417,0.0000073328097,0.00007660077,0.00018691334,0.007131017,0.0002698125,0.0000015481097,0.00021827647,0.9908484,0.00008191438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003322106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047414258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62761533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028698015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013539594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406919552","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2025.2456268","title":"Jurisdiction over <i>Infangthief</i> in England: The Case of John Milksop","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01138246775021285,"score_gpt":0.27994912713641446,"score_spread":0.2685666593862016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406919552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747801,0.008268927,0.0000966942,0.004874773,0.0023222296,0.00013348514,0.0000018961227,0.000009782796,0.10951208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445945,0.0007443216,0.000011350341,0.0004437622,0.00035333447,0.0000010053118,1.1286416e-7,0.0000039975193,0.003982644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876493,0.00043742493,0.0003757205,0.000050974002,0.0002434248,0.00012751468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990655,0.00031407372,0.00031290122,0.000140341,0.00013182925,0.000035363773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028783185,0.00006415499,0.00015100968,0.00015709826,0.00023919568,0.000010721746,0.00024042594,0.00006454997,0.00012238209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011106644,0.000039254715,0.00010462904,0.00022351339,0.00032707682,0.00021352986,0.0000229597,0.00036726057,0.0000015397228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001969267,0.0006251844,0.0054931715,0.00009330326,0.00029761918,0.0009698341,0.49984342,0.00045581124,0.004662207,0.12696081,0.2573222,0.101307176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045223522,0.000051376064,0.0024657324,0.00004336912,0.000059171132,0.000085564236,0.0019772332,0.00002852724,0.000049230253,0.0003113242,0.99443567,0.00004058805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012169613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012822389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7371135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039372558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047467573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}