{"meta":{"query_hash":"a3030f52f59b","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a3030f52f59b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Legal+Pluralism+and+Unofficial+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1504609123","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2013.857537","title":"Who Owns the Stock? Collective and Multiple Property Rights in Animals","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Stock (firearms); Business; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Geography; Political science; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009778196910186906,"score_gpt":0.20060771582968667,"score_spread":0.19082951891949976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504609123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48135868,0.0010735407,0.010481937,0.04213514,0.00029903132,0.00003561845,0.00009842619,0.000035746296,0.46448186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9651521,0.00027084467,0.0015636252,0.0014482139,0.00011853413,0.0000277995,0.000018270312,0.000018496046,0.03138213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892455,0.00039526462,0.00004945506,0.00015661318,0.00024109402,0.0002329663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950689,0.003081176,0.000531442,0.00048473928,0.0003330351,0.0005006166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038972357,0.00008255162,0.00022091327,0.00047021668,0.0027394786,0.0030544577,0.00056172226,0.0024189914,0.027795082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008413387,0.00016164966,0.00022012352,0.00036434823,0.0059669004,0.0052512316,0.0019868861,0.0017644101,0.0011182101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001630379,0.0002950559,0.041635294,0.00005501346,0.000033997116,0.0010374435,0.021143215,0.00037394406,0.0037921644,0.81160706,0.021861548,0.09800227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008445814,0.00023067108,0.08152854,0.00040342938,0.000082579754,0.0022502407,0.042535543,0.0037188383,0.0046268296,0.6072592,0.25716627,0.00011342692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007126727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01680966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027795082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009230355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091886136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09298378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299369703","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2002.10756562","title":"Indigenous Rights and Customary Law Discourse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Precedent; Customary international law; Indigenous; International law; Comparative law; Sociology; Human rights; Public international law; Legal realism; Politics","score_opus":0.012707198636407619,"score_gpt":0.26371512133125585,"score_spread":0.25100792269484823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299369703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26828966,0.014132355,0.002194599,0.03887485,0.00067805493,0.000050230123,0.0001877644,0.00006965673,0.67552274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96998906,0.0019832568,0.0005961257,0.0021196045,0.000074032665,0.000013738645,0.000038823633,0.000033754142,0.025151646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379575,0.0012012176,0.00018723517,0.0009103075,0.0018410442,0.0020645084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99483347,0.0021594658,0.00040536138,0.0003529608,0.0012187267,0.001029949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00608533,0.00047585656,0.00050862366,0.002677925,0.029680712,0.013394973,0.0029552488,0.003673125,0.006155684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061175833,0.00035141868,0.00034932917,0.0034545232,0.07713075,0.005993872,0.007883905,0.004545287,0.00029002837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119406,0.00001565508,0.0012820428,0.000076426506,0.000006822209,0.0005164182,0.2874994,0.00022893025,0.0002827475,0.69438845,0.0055927685,0.010098483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019539828,0.00002237532,0.008431269,0.0009761248,0.00002866649,0.0003228747,0.34403268,0.0004785236,0.0005254601,0.07514693,0.56988716,0.00012844121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9680742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9753307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12909117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1084591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93662643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316113921","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2015.1007814","title":"Declaration of Interdependence: A Legal Pluralistic Approach to Indigenous Rights, by Kirsten Anker","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Indigenous; Political science; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03215963150003473,"score_gpt":0.2844659928703187,"score_spread":0.25230636137028395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316113921","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037406383,0.16820672,0.014206056,0.63851374,0.009801025,0.00013322597,0.000059848408,0.00005577847,0.1652829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47531468,0.18750109,0.043095477,0.12946765,0.012206495,0.0005241064,0.00014592531,0.0002291886,0.1515154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858549,0.008747101,0.0007073219,0.000793098,0.0031934339,0.00070401083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991569,0.0056898454,0.0006358286,0.00034189702,0.0012278935,0.00053557684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017791111,0.0007003827,0.0006620192,0.0021843142,0.007895207,0.009595471,0.0024232862,0.0075230324,0.0024129958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015975837,0.00059816486,0.0006450025,0.0018753615,0.025934702,0.016154215,0.007833017,0.01390374,0.00051004905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001378381,0.000022631364,0.00010077746,0.00014622955,0.000009233623,0.00018468231,0.01662964,0.00033127936,0.00012793764,0.8631973,0.10214081,0.017095638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012117631,0.00001687486,0.00058407435,0.0012775332,0.000010239845,0.00019219653,0.008091881,0.00047649597,0.00018708942,0.4056465,0.5834459,0.000059076083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022944355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03886521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022944355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008038243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013915741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09408951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322860346","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2007.10756611","title":"After<i>Marshall</i>: Implementation of Aboriginal Fishing Rights in Atlantic Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Livelihood; Constitution; Political science; Natural resource; First nation; Treaty; Fishing; Population; Colonialism; Law; Indigenous; Public administration; Geography; Sociology; Ecology","score_opus":0.010082175231909749,"score_gpt":0.3409372679045676,"score_spread":0.33085509267265784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322860346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50928426,0.0030012657,0.0012786721,0.16370304,0.0005805549,0.0002638878,0.0003009926,0.00005201606,0.32153535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91101474,0.0009333278,0.0009976744,0.012129428,0.00004749474,0.00004717914,0.00005647692,0.000017695518,0.074756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936871,0.00053771946,0.00009070326,0.00027378654,0.001577931,0.0038326962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359894,0.0007964288,0.00027952512,0.00022687248,0.0029385642,0.0021596677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047023385,0.00015381665,0.00018905036,0.0007483731,0.020394487,0.0055120206,0.0018157916,0.0020291032,0.0063206083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072758365,0.00015363796,0.00023707224,0.00086210115,0.006883693,0.0013068906,0.003723553,0.004006935,0.00023762668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109360604,0.00024431187,0.07551844,0.00023925902,0.00003991767,0.0021494864,0.23670523,0.00096694834,0.002692763,0.43718496,0.094127215,0.15002209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004396407,0.00014106804,0.14694756,0.0006498761,0.00006362318,0.00036311062,0.198161,0.0011934688,0.0027292864,0.013415569,0.63615847,0.00013304023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99112564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99620616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08352449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08352449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21680239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60601544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406526351","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2015.1072387","title":"Indigenous legal traditions and Canadian<i>Bhinneka Tunggal Ika</i>: Indonesian lessons for legal pluralism in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Legal Studies and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Indonesian; Legitimacy; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Law; Legal research; Politics; Comparative law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029191637343065804,"score_gpt":0.27526257483950756,"score_spread":0.24607093749644177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406526351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3344178,0.021070927,0.00093429245,0.24026017,0.0010193379,0.00012349024,0.0003894499,0.000065749264,0.40171874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92855686,0.0103058405,0.001399351,0.012532515,0.000101502286,0.00003155473,0.0001050958,0.000048044698,0.046919327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701935,0.0003017348,0.00007428121,0.00030802863,0.00091837405,0.0013781964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490863,0.00080456305,0.00025365737,0.000120786885,0.0019326824,0.001979679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00258768,0.0002717991,0.00044658882,0.0014497021,0.04956769,0.010847271,0.0019742,0.0022681744,0.0068640155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039387154,0.00035086164,0.00036550933,0.003026236,0.014809425,0.0026004813,0.0043614605,0.0076113176,0.0002502211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010249526,0.00014838378,0.017197138,0.00038905672,0.000046665926,0.0024826184,0.21835484,0.0006392308,0.000982615,0.6028169,0.0838296,0.07301057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003829354,0.000039643208,0.042809524,0.00096626376,0.00008855255,0.0005408921,0.27680886,0.0010286956,0.00074174063,0.026959073,0.64973307,0.00024543545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99887437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18412422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18412422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26749885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94630027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414777334","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2016.1157377","title":"Aboriginal healing lodges in Canada: still going strong? Still worth implementing in the USA?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Politics; Indian country; Appropriation; State (computer science); Culturally appropriate; Law; Recidivism; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Indigenous rights; Public administration; Sociology; Medicine; Criminology; Nursing; Gerontology","score_opus":0.018143185657892785,"score_gpt":0.30693434767516714,"score_spread":0.28879116201727434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414777334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4466142,0.021857165,0.0007751973,0.42124492,0.0017516237,0.00023518408,0.0011352561,0.00017596743,0.10621055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282349,0.017832682,0.002802172,0.023871273,0.00013861516,0.000090803886,0.0005871124,0.00007228706,0.026370065],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957755,0.000449527,0.00007634146,0.00021901552,0.0011233573,0.002356365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873504,0.0005112927,0.00043091766,0.00022400831,0.0064234505,0.005059957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027470381,0.0003046287,0.00045318677,0.001330071,0.01702395,0.0066984957,0.0017082017,0.0017746473,0.006079928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00835139,0.00024280121,0.00040685863,0.0031279828,0.0043033725,0.0023088919,0.002715405,0.003561399,0.0003528491],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004955428,0.0005665527,0.16844405,0.001592736,0.00019461324,0.0019751647,0.046743087,0.0009969864,0.0019548193,0.06691877,0.25387967,0.45623803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092234855,0.00022259138,0.3764882,0.0030201676,0.0003334403,0.00037686643,0.2323973,0.0009973418,0.0011995492,0.0060282354,0.37854308,0.00030088707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08987345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08987345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3657805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65208054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752015618","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2017.1371476","title":"Human rights encounter legal pluralism. Normative and empirical approaches, edited by Giselle Corradi, Eva Brems and Mark Goodale","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Legal research; Legal realism","score_opus":0.03822617743444392,"score_gpt":0.3002624874961289,"score_spread":0.262036310061685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752015618","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017477504,0.69092655,0.0028618842,0.17310311,0.015777986,0.000019842171,0.00013198558,0.000056040506,0.11537479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11860989,0.658472,0.005097658,0.037177373,0.04435952,0.00013618673,0.0003011089,0.00020573253,0.13564056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985134,0.0007383194,0.000047144436,0.0001604167,0.00045145498,0.00008918576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967423,0.0025483863,0.00014023218,0.000113782895,0.00030042854,0.00015495399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023618,0.0011112939,0.0007057516,0.0026217203,0.002928157,0.008299974,0.0011266286,0.0036259552,0.008484882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055891355,0.0006047287,0.00047066287,0.003536229,0.011400531,0.009709141,0.0025802942,0.006868262,0.0016186445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001711577,0.000035078174,0.00023616193,0.00050752726,0.0000147628525,0.00008055214,0.0046147136,0.00022535751,0.00013418528,0.6590458,0.2968524,0.03823634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010281698,0.000014990873,0.0010529839,0.0012999082,0.000007718752,0.00016275924,0.0038934613,0.00019620682,0.00010211151,0.33314788,0.66008943,0.000022225482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057834233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008666063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008484882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044094035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037936051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031992614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796048373","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2018.1450596","title":"Law and the question of the animal: a critical jurisprudence, edited by Yoriko Otomo and Ed Mussawir","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01016795029611096,"score_gpt":0.31704322662919837,"score_spread":0.3068752763330874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796048373","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031863903,0.6263659,0.0065639354,0.27467033,0.0065572686,0.000047534657,0.00008566599,0.000036339847,0.08248658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23657982,0.57102793,0.014296569,0.061544426,0.0180372,0.0002993847,0.00015373719,0.00023703185,0.09782389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729365,0.0015672168,0.0001352368,0.0002550985,0.0005836714,0.00016507307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593496,0.002968882,0.00029314557,0.00012500603,0.00045110693,0.00022684442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004141716,0.00093779655,0.0011172253,0.00234653,0.005671548,0.010570638,0.0020242396,0.006437761,0.005343109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066035585,0.00079035794,0.00053415896,0.0032663932,0.027473051,0.017081596,0.004015952,0.008048347,0.000845838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028380457,0.00003702385,0.0002933402,0.00042521488,0.000008902968,0.0001952303,0.017716007,0.00023041516,0.00026279577,0.76125467,0.1950193,0.024528697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014883478,0.000017424429,0.0012065666,0.001745931,0.000011308098,0.00018713581,0.012938436,0.00034221847,0.00022476328,0.39433745,0.58893836,0.000035474037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019780308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03170172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019780308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066500274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010557166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048249602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170618924","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2021.1925458","title":"Resistance and the paradox of legal entitlement – a theoretical analysis of migrant women’s responses to domestic abuse in the host country","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Hegemony; Resistance (ecology); Portuguese; Power (physics); Economic Justice; Gender studies; Affect (linguistics); Cultural hegemony; Consciousness; Legal consciousness; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.008542880335254951,"score_gpt":0.2957715536041562,"score_spread":0.2872286732689012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170618924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83219177,0.0011289169,0.0034647118,0.019654272,0.00008955828,0.00005455445,0.000015528321,0.000015445245,0.14338525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978516,0.00017547209,0.00014107783,0.0002453475,0.000011717439,0.000014723924,0.0000029454195,0.000004806805,0.0015522242],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431145,0.004412045,0.00007109872,0.00025481204,0.00031276338,0.0006377173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966433,0.0022252772,0.00043122147,0.00023086971,0.00020865617,0.00026068743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005324507,0.0003951685,0.00039192985,0.002069109,0.012456473,0.009177354,0.0014348071,0.0029505389,0.0037246128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061349715,0.00031167097,0.00039739697,0.0012780111,0.038268097,0.006072593,0.006832243,0.003681873,0.00020103213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001718046,0.000026435291,0.001284849,0.000038611197,0.000004431554,0.00072015275,0.7944348,0.00009569925,0.00021766398,0.2004991,0.00036080406,0.002300171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107941605,0.00004590457,0.00225443,0.00012982123,0.000006672069,0.0005427692,0.9436163,0.00047865673,0.00014462233,0.031199595,0.021557031,0.0000134463935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008925491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006827346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012456473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058219163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029645308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042241156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246122024","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2015.1012370","title":"Postface","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04440362861438783,"score_gpt":0.279382289124074,"score_spread":0.23497866050968613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246122024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015001727,0.0012762544,0.0008154672,0.0066770907,0.0052294577,0.0013055111,0.29957658,0.009004175,0.67461544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010993462,0.004450558,0.0043548183,0.0022875192,0.003836815,0.0016155882,0.3225494,0.0097527215,0.6401591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642795,0.0003359014,0.00068689085,0.00052174815,0.0013743145,0.000653192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814563,0.0019240704,0.0013190716,0.0037020466,0.008315731,0.0032829265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031895996,0.0020485774,0.0028692738,0.026270458,0.0032794927,0.01714527,0.0037203438,0.0032861927,0.87196994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022791453,0.0010638123,0.0015037111,0.028734911,0.0021827538,0.009127281,0.00832051,0.0025977755,0.7237395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008163551,0.00003278046,0.00017598813,0.0024175555,0.000022149887,0.00009913626,0.000059974333,0.000029361494,0.00020230644,0.0025576726,0.9697417,0.024579743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009044881,0.00003401863,0.0016856955,0.0021444063,0.00002238669,0.00012946571,0.00021167932,0.0000873318,0.0003253123,0.0058782683,0.98934245,0.000048522383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050351913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006026283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87196994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018662278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00956345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}