{"meta":{"query_hash":"78c6d215392a","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine"},"cohort_total":54,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":54,"exported":54,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/78c6d215392a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Medicine+and+Philosophy+A+Forum+for+Bioethics+and+Philosophy+of+Medicine"},"results":[{"id":"W1757378269","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhv063","title":"Beyond (Models of) Disability?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Oppression; Medical model of disability; Value (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Disability studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Gender studies; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1243529322203259,"score_gpt":0.3817393267353224,"score_spread":0.2573863945149965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1757378269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013033112,0.010162903,0.10128381,0.33505747,0.00207606,0.00008725215,0.00015843108,0.00011859559,0.53802246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.906294,0.008692384,0.02235781,0.023609469,0.0018838809,0.0004346934,0.00017226569,0.00010672082,0.036448937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930386,0.004536848,0.0001982955,0.0005077551,0.0009655482,0.0007530408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939644,0.0029428806,0.00048255484,0.001050784,0.00070547813,0.00085392455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009488191,0.00095260324,0.00091700675,0.0024491188,0.0040725297,0.011595039,0.0026516493,0.005831595,0.006243303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009359268,0.00032912978,0.0009226781,0.0014688405,0.045309216,0.022092393,0.008839234,0.009648016,0.0011873732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015466294,0.0000039240995,0.000027406715,0.000011078532,8.806388e-7,0.000011991093,0.00085431244,0.0000693805,0.0000059440317,0.99701774,0.00082511257,0.0011707078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030649205,0.0000036351666,0.00003315656,0.00006338468,0.0000016168597,0.000036639558,0.0011562903,0.00024173853,0.000016234395,0.97175914,0.026680995,0.0000041818257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074726227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005118785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011595039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00809898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078222295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05876243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967037242","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.417.3009","title":"Shifting the Autonomy Debate to Theory as Ideology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Autonomy; Ideology; Criticism; Feminism; Sociology; Epistemology; Nothing; Ideal (ethics); Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.11985743494541266,"score_gpt":0.3925853119336358,"score_spread":0.27272787698822315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967037242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03057958,0.028968662,0.030416755,0.3702438,0.0033383854,0.000029235112,0.0000696283,0.00006812579,0.53628576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390778,0.008559782,0.004650272,0.018213777,0.0049667684,0.00011163911,0.00005527232,0.00016240544,0.024202304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844653,0.010243459,0.00023270809,0.001322936,0.0024624963,0.0012731254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887038,0.00860742,0.0005767538,0.0007177663,0.0007152883,0.0006789796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013007665,0.00073900615,0.000774393,0.0036032367,0.007986253,0.013383768,0.0021090375,0.0076410924,0.0045474824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011270797,0.00041152726,0.0008914452,0.0020108952,0.08373064,0.019432373,0.0087840855,0.013216129,0.00086885644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002033731,0.0000037093148,0.000028665701,0.000008887897,6.298259e-7,0.000014440534,0.002998667,0.000045708035,0.000015909816,0.99529064,0.0007837978,0.000806861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007687898,0.000007228106,0.00006697147,0.000085749445,0.0000016349678,0.000020379051,0.0023574128,0.00020192606,0.00005027694,0.9490215,0.048174143,0.0000050984177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061640795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002604472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146808475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146808475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061476757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10651749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986756938","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr025","title":"What Is Human in Humans? Responses from Biology, Anthropology, and Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Technoscience; Humanity; Context (archaeology); Philosophy of science; Environmental ethics; Galileo (satellite navigation); Ideology; Philosophy of biology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Biology; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.21904526492963544,"score_gpt":0.374995550624123,"score_spread":0.15595028569448754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986756938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01216841,0.024504153,0.0020797702,0.9056609,0.0019725396,0.000014678924,0.00001663789,0.000014624207,0.053568296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7582158,0.03120026,0.002349808,0.191741,0.0036798045,0.00008758116,0.00003149123,0.00005281253,0.012641411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886175,0.009291843,0.0002077614,0.0006107021,0.000824291,0.0004479552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98597175,0.011208022,0.0007925614,0.00043883227,0.0007317708,0.0008570408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013333659,0.0006512688,0.0007890475,0.0019247193,0.010107004,0.008898636,0.0009812439,0.009655624,0.0033733982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010916801,0.00037304184,0.00046113133,0.0014768478,0.10393877,0.015349976,0.0074746283,0.014481691,0.0004854056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001743521,0.000021878664,0.0003962833,0.000104799976,0.000008264623,0.00019127998,0.17307454,0.00010408374,0.00014830404,0.79965067,0.016957946,0.009324411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128813745,0.00003091844,0.00068150373,0.0005859488,0.0000067194005,0.00041328234,0.20748231,0.00015023268,0.00016377504,0.516654,0.27378577,0.00003269948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035594874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003152957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013333659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056580007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033224865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07051599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993666335","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr026","title":"How Should Political Philosophers Think of Health?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Politics; Metaphysics; Political philosophy; Health care; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Equity (law); Public health; Perspective (graphical); Health policy; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.39674692275604484,"score_gpt":0.4834581242385131,"score_spread":0.08671120148246825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993666335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010730644,0.012756885,0.0049896063,0.95608604,0.0024096265,0.0000119757,0.00003694676,0.00001954365,0.022616386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36155573,0.04910685,0.014496663,0.5229426,0.031379476,0.00030515,0.00014472942,0.00014641423,0.019922314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921955,0.005045963,0.00021767647,0.000531288,0.0013260369,0.00068356993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98304534,0.012784806,0.00080737524,0.00067701377,0.0013391732,0.0013461999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016046967,0.0009322899,0.0014059098,0.002667991,0.0054683206,0.013032906,0.0021466897,0.013440801,0.0061130915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021609021,0.0006512685,0.0008186412,0.0020114293,0.042223588,0.016309071,0.0035391976,0.026754398,0.0018168386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000869426,0.000020276237,0.00012956529,0.000066652465,0.00000935153,0.000031513173,0.0017795658,0.00019631881,0.00002417923,0.97454774,0.019195527,0.00399058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012843037,0.000005026759,0.00008332443,0.00010311019,0.0000031315942,0.000021102218,0.00095889263,0.00013406793,0.000014699444,0.9557404,0.042917255,0.00000618421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025312013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016046967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006239482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005034083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08486551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994542369","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr033","title":"Toward a Hermeneutical Conception of Medicine: A Conversation with Charles Taylor","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Library science; History of medicine; Sociology; Bioethics; Classics; Art history; History; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.20514589663387803,"score_gpt":0.33130822744303795,"score_spread":0.12616233080915992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994542369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010936451,0.015868366,0.005833922,0.9462702,0.0025568109,0.00005293696,0.000020192416,0.00002718275,0.01843392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5060389,0.018493537,0.01405955,0.43584657,0.0033656692,0.00033720818,0.00003317133,0.00019640088,0.021628976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554403,0.03672374,0.00049723656,0.0011189849,0.00428093,0.0019388262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536073,0.040538296,0.0009834191,0.00033336622,0.0026038017,0.0019337323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036807526,0.0007109627,0.0012939988,0.0024070344,0.02720679,0.011052655,0.0025504793,0.016838131,0.0016120317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0385911,0.0011183386,0.0008981939,0.0028399657,0.069379225,0.019626917,0.0053197234,0.036467306,0.00045504665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040098093,0.000041859726,0.00034927498,0.00014693804,0.000012195569,0.0007702609,0.45710742,0.00042803207,0.00054804934,0.44561645,0.08919248,0.0057469183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003561369,0.00006612762,0.00046950058,0.0009266898,0.00001142226,0.0008363705,0.25542513,0.001404589,0.00039452978,0.12831923,0.6119307,0.00018009137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05586519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033342984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05586519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026905138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021853408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19521135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994632969","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr012","title":"Parental Wisdom, Empirical Blindness, and Normative Evaluation of Prenatal Genetic Enhancement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Virtue; Psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.3494471633912644,"score_gpt":0.4154664060065492,"score_spread":0.0660192426152848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994632969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26808998,0.009438796,0.0816149,0.18231529,0.0013676919,0.00013049631,0.00008990709,0.00013730835,0.4568157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888342,0.00058143836,0.0056820908,0.0035225933,0.0001411773,0.00006037178,0.00001146964,0.00001899367,0.0011477213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96484375,0.021273063,0.001346729,0.0023028515,0.009136048,0.0010975356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9029233,0.0688951,0.0073436126,0.0098610865,0.009398447,0.0015784359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04440775,0.0003713164,0.00068090274,0.0022071367,0.0030484623,0.0055277417,0.0016584196,0.0045937174,0.0015522239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13405217,0.00029097474,0.00032138324,0.0008034211,0.06445998,0.008668271,0.006894517,0.005904614,0.00011223357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023343471,0.000018470186,0.0013360027,0.00004074541,0.000008326388,0.000101461905,0.0046877246,0.00019448006,0.00018510241,0.98482174,0.00059114315,0.007991598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011185394,0.00001714923,0.0010205746,0.0000840471,0.000007990449,0.00014300071,0.0021036156,0.00040599774,0.00036468793,0.9913073,0.00452024,0.000014203658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013949363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012693275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04440775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039851516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044390745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23485345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014395762","doi":"10.1080/03605310490882975","title":"The Difference that Difference Makes: Bioethics and the Challenge of ?Disability?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Medical model of disability; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.24437225337803403,"score_gpt":0.45920561693320083,"score_spread":0.2148333635551668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014395762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00607631,0.027212854,0.003940266,0.9075487,0.0026378194,0.000012035345,0.000011317325,0.0000129218215,0.05254781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78513175,0.024233596,0.0047449917,0.16456747,0.007109991,0.00012782736,0.000024700976,0.00007146483,0.013988205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97537225,0.019451883,0.0005350517,0.0008296729,0.0025334551,0.0012776374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748794,0.020506982,0.00091312727,0.0010527215,0.0012794316,0.0013684068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02116716,0.0004515449,0.00083846267,0.0020648679,0.011141618,0.017385397,0.0015453479,0.013976599,0.0029176832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033889607,0.0002913945,0.00049505744,0.0015179162,0.089841336,0.022764422,0.010362077,0.016319003,0.00068908435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011600405,0.000013100841,0.00012060644,0.0000593226,0.0000030189028,0.00007171693,0.0077300905,0.000042384552,0.000043529304,0.9723885,0.008441757,0.011074406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015450605,0.000018303848,0.00022617838,0.00063904986,0.000005279427,0.00017993894,0.013948912,0.000109745626,0.00007417691,0.8552723,0.12949249,0.000018083667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046702996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004601486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02116716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009114955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011630823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11194396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018307866","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jht056","title":"The Hippocratic Thorn in Bioethics' Hide: Cults, Sects, and Strangeness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hippocratic Oath; Bioethics; Strangeness; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Traditional medicine; Law; Medicine; Political science; Physics; Particle physics","score_opus":0.183002663332198,"score_gpt":0.46208021500487245,"score_spread":0.27907755167267445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018307866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014243956,0.05378314,0.005198487,0.8359397,0.009174899,0.000013452245,0.000023354649,0.00007412458,0.08154889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7844671,0.022791507,0.0042239367,0.14354096,0.014282731,0.000051745476,0.000026358723,0.00029451097,0.030321136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886092,0.006613488,0.0003271381,0.00056405814,0.0031408297,0.00074525585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96907157,0.023439912,0.0021944772,0.0019725729,0.0017425246,0.0015789781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015347107,0.0004007824,0.00085094635,0.0019830188,0.01239999,0.014203972,0.0012712113,0.0069889673,0.0024755485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02990425,0.00046568247,0.0004706985,0.0019029151,0.111096725,0.019885322,0.009047167,0.017169062,0.0007480857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021094687,0.000007670622,0.00017375042,0.00006521895,0.0000068762693,0.00009674044,0.03063346,0.000043363474,0.00006414637,0.9320276,0.029162742,0.007697272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025142555,0.000018816612,0.0004656888,0.0004105443,0.000008794904,0.00024502026,0.017673235,0.00017558552,0.00013193155,0.71860325,0.26221216,0.000029882332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048273774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007911681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015347107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006967546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007085135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08116424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029475285","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr024","title":"Multicultural Medicine and the Politics of Recognition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Cultural Competency in Health Care","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Personhood; Vision; Negotiation; Politics; Cultural diversity; Value (mathematics); Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.23716766263478095,"score_gpt":0.3899814229674855,"score_spread":0.15281376033270455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029475285","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07388338,0.021293659,0.0059967116,0.48533502,0.0031158868,0.00006196633,0.0000129248165,0.0000359404,0.41026452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9480146,0.0024525102,0.001396202,0.03581893,0.0011002378,0.000045249002,0.000006684248,0.00002682004,0.011138608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679832,0.022394795,0.0007765099,0.00220532,0.0029119859,0.0037283604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832545,0.0085972445,0.0015948131,0.0013268011,0.0014540019,0.003772617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031183852,0.0003694799,0.0006591499,0.0016262346,0.026446985,0.017015215,0.0016826359,0.008811451,0.004241728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02171013,0.00051116996,0.00054053066,0.0011263372,0.10657852,0.010702277,0.02084042,0.013794754,0.00044529076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010820408,0.000027591012,0.00069754024,0.00003736244,0.0000070359124,0.00018562289,0.056137268,0.000054678,0.000084490675,0.92414325,0.0071597383,0.011454571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039547805,0.000066193235,0.0013824652,0.00045794388,0.000014161283,0.0006539381,0.07356379,0.00031367078,0.0002283744,0.6694491,0.25378364,0.00004728822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011392784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012070088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031183852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013152632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01797874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16491795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033923131","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhp054","title":"Clinical Research in Context: Reexamining the Distinction between Research and Practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Clinical Practice; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.6997599043628012,"score_gpt":0.6058049002541721,"score_spread":0.09395500410862911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033923131","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02732122,0.1333094,0.078302845,0.5783393,0.00732301,0.00033306237,0.000086117405,0.00008453256,0.17490052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628705,0.03264532,0.04469896,0.048338696,0.0069920663,0.0010742267,0.00005920583,0.00012919685,0.0031917712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86165166,0.120634645,0.00293163,0.0042544096,0.007990313,0.0025372787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.895235,0.08743609,0.0047972724,0.0044780253,0.0050092135,0.0030443296],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07224812,0.0012850564,0.0022814386,0.007368587,0.013350456,0.03326569,0.004254967,0.015041033,0.001959524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07815045,0.0012762697,0.00090822706,0.0053864573,0.15448076,0.040921062,0.020983972,0.02500008,0.0004904362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021452,0.000011702626,0.0002987605,0.00022528668,0.000007806856,0.00010423526,0.023303647,0.00008218132,0.00008146894,0.96972734,0.0008384657,0.005297657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005634236,0.000070038,0.0009503059,0.0018571677,0.000031943244,0.00032874141,0.024812246,0.00032774036,0.00020069905,0.88385075,0.0874803,0.000033708686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057024835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008570031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014110516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024423601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38208914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061815728","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr034","title":"Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Epistemology; Theme (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.20226637052442897,"score_gpt":0.37637807841744847,"score_spread":0.1741117078930195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061815728","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030261935,0.5111504,0.014186426,0.32824063,0.023639303,0.00011880566,0.00011378042,0.000055700304,0.119468756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14616147,0.5227501,0.030664228,0.11690379,0.11758744,0.0007422746,0.00022014535,0.0002650727,0.06470557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949745,0.0029536975,0.00027495605,0.0003482061,0.001171008,0.0002776575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988315,0.009962507,0.00034098083,0.00019151911,0.00087392074,0.00031611294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005699183,0.00085446774,0.00096723286,0.004823949,0.0054276073,0.006483089,0.001433881,0.008078003,0.0042945324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010000414,0.00057162833,0.0007706702,0.0040566646,0.020545969,0.011227879,0.0031064542,0.009362726,0.0011005863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001893534,0.000042552983,0.00014190092,0.00042275,0.0000056397553,0.000115131406,0.00855469,0.00025767818,0.00014457939,0.884761,0.08353967,0.021995513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048357238,0.000016206632,0.00018308955,0.00076140277,0.0000029865394,0.00015027837,0.0016857319,0.00020290764,0.00006054235,0.2830544,0.7138615,0.000016142309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004144311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032357324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008078003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077869818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054696715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056498706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070274352","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.5.523.10321","title":"Conflicting Interests, Social Justice and Proxy Consent to Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Ignorance; Mandate; Research ethics; Normative; Institutional review board; Law; Economic Justice; Proxy (statistics); Political science; Clinical equipoise; Veil of ignorance; Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Clinical trial; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.7009016491116048,"score_gpt":0.5976475664850377,"score_spread":0.1032540826265671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070274352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016775932,0.035645068,0.21570094,0.23199378,0.0028540466,0.0014763369,0.00023192803,0.00012219232,0.49519977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.760158,0.015709812,0.09353728,0.093157016,0.0043788976,0.004870214,0.00017391525,0.00016868909,0.0278462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.64177716,0.28947148,0.011055977,0.01999694,0.028988551,0.008709891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67111677,0.27517188,0.018419838,0.01826112,0.012488687,0.0045417934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23438549,0.0015653364,0.0029594374,0.0040375176,0.011605968,0.016725779,0.0065663517,0.026448028,0.006530275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23613721,0.0013349112,0.0018247763,0.0051718047,0.13522707,0.022584418,0.019685453,0.019074548,0.0012222328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013911802,0.000010147572,0.00014670947,0.00006357499,0.0000114892455,0.000102044454,0.0025497905,0.00012978206,0.000020278012,0.9924826,0.0012635195,0.0032061888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027834927,0.00001964159,0.00011244788,0.00023334654,0.000009686344,0.00013841063,0.00066882424,0.0002430306,0.000056577785,0.98023075,0.01824177,0.000017790922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006283593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005962394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.973552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013856793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02795155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.944139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070516711","doi":"10.1080/03605310600712851","title":"Bioethics as Ideology: Conditional and Unconditional Values","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Bioethics; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.31058607821292833,"score_gpt":0.5363035263583699,"score_spread":0.22571744814544153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070516711","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003276058,0.7097952,0.013499851,0.14837974,0.003033254,0.000029629942,0.000028554301,0.000028792721,0.12192894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42374858,0.48907518,0.011613009,0.04388941,0.009616873,0.00034432247,0.0000659828,0.00007347476,0.021573074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843225,0.010652602,0.00046704058,0.0006709097,0.0034672525,0.00041968378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984703,0.01203858,0.00097175705,0.00074972387,0.0011450428,0.00039185793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010888021,0.0004427911,0.0010813881,0.0025777442,0.0025500427,0.0122192055,0.0011965693,0.004869152,0.0037169044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018197205,0.00043654867,0.00037552108,0.0045548314,0.04005988,0.018114489,0.005875281,0.008330908,0.0010966507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008821974,0.000008036254,0.00010239385,0.0005026322,0.000008729737,0.000034438384,0.002508305,0.00005079723,0.00005494774,0.9622134,0.005231443,0.029276153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010498773,0.000016803091,0.0004485729,0.0027024387,0.00001106542,0.00016907133,0.0027569684,0.000114949136,0.000064688626,0.7856447,0.20804758,0.000012740496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017568928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019312458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122192055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048269997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00905752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05758208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082973924","doi":"10.1076/jmep.28.4.427.15966","title":"Subjectivity and Values in Medicine: The Case of Canguilhem","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophical methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12881465024448802,"score_gpt":0.35818786199085273,"score_spread":0.2293732117463647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082973924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040133674,0.047951188,0.00933845,0.25687537,0.0018388892,0.000057656787,0.000029828027,0.00004539252,0.6437297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505296,0.0060317223,0.002868733,0.024010938,0.0009260983,0.00010362787,0.000009882965,0.000054126638,0.015465393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895097,0.008299213,0.00012588801,0.0004799752,0.00082918396,0.00075613207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947299,0.0041459543,0.00019977192,0.00035013416,0.00025152398,0.00032271564],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010286519,0.0004405712,0.000659824,0.0016916889,0.012173588,0.00940153,0.0010244035,0.007961035,0.0018026533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009248091,0.00036497068,0.00040907954,0.0016320049,0.093798995,0.007994197,0.0077992957,0.009347537,0.00029404066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009703206,0.0000053003378,0.000069570735,0.000012367264,0.0000023599873,0.000113526774,0.012128135,0.00004686241,0.000015937625,0.98331934,0.0024495993,0.0018273329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001555691,0.000010518123,0.00011037157,0.00011602892,0.0000051763004,0.00016098899,0.004460923,0.00016040371,0.000069049864,0.9095203,0.08535955,0.0000111466225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009272927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011432294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007836512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005658505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056858122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092322817","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhp016","title":"Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Reproductive Freedom, and Deliberative Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Stanford Law School; University College Dublin; University of Exeter; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Egalitarianism; Normative; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Libertarianism; Deliberation; Harm principle; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Harm; Politics; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.09174335687241228,"score_gpt":0.36633599804919253,"score_spread":0.2745926411767803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092322817","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044760358,0.007623891,0.25321323,0.2566325,0.00082835794,0.0001568173,0.0000761852,0.000084135245,0.43662456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95375717,0.0016981845,0.01940677,0.014697454,0.00033871294,0.00024171521,0.000026969768,0.000024898467,0.009808119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98596185,0.009962519,0.00029677816,0.0010188735,0.0016231834,0.0011367484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883972,0.008237718,0.00119135,0.0010756275,0.0005724089,0.00052577636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019578004,0.0004413846,0.0005216189,0.0009470175,0.004480089,0.0051869783,0.0013983586,0.006435815,0.003048942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012808571,0.00026092774,0.00072191225,0.00080383354,0.049553864,0.0057539227,0.0059133023,0.0068113506,0.00036303158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030786894,0.0000046402974,0.000052132353,0.000007682662,0.0000014797034,0.000012711221,0.00043073928,0.00019289699,0.0000142640365,0.9983107,0.00024057779,0.0007290775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007442746,0.00000807975,0.000060362963,0.000028849638,0.0000018141532,0.000031655498,0.00025662055,0.0002493386,0.00007305592,0.98989373,0.00938487,0.0000043166438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016661016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001568306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019578004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004375657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051893606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103539646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092623743","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.3.319.2984","title":"Human Cloning: Three Mistakes and an Alternative","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Reproductive Biology and Fertility","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Framing (construction); Human cloning; Cloning (programming); Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Human enhancement; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering); Law and economics; Computer science; Business; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1989171554816026,"score_gpt":0.3801533712915784,"score_spread":0.1812362158099758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092623743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005078325,0.01852844,0.018528488,0.8981804,0.0070097498,0.000022756121,0.000037536967,0.00007026727,0.052544016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5910712,0.022616917,0.029186092,0.31714275,0.013217137,0.00035392266,0.000050440733,0.00020197469,0.026159568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626784,0.024193132,0.001239782,0.002394299,0.008008819,0.0014857138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649876,0.023170467,0.0015319249,0.004374582,0.0043058284,0.0016296562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039975233,0.001128924,0.0013754135,0.0023624855,0.006969572,0.010659751,0.004422202,0.024151973,0.002622815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04253004,0.0005396509,0.0013445184,0.0017961988,0.10137066,0.019133579,0.010375561,0.02190322,0.0010011123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020131707,0.000005704293,0.000055652836,0.000047141362,0.0000043843115,0.00009489836,0.0024289961,0.00007283565,0.00004400978,0.9882109,0.0048668836,0.0041484083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019449926,0.000019741978,0.00007026238,0.00023451593,0.000008214093,0.00017346627,0.002378531,0.00023423787,0.00006928821,0.9262174,0.07055569,0.00001926815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029691828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022187773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039975233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006621299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006868284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21141183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093020889","doi":"10.1080/03605310701255735","title":"Equipoise and the Duty of Care in Clinical Research: A Philosophical Response to Our Critics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Constructive; Presupposition; Clinical equipoise; Duty; Epistemology; Sociology; Dimension (graph theory); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine; Clinical trial; Computer science","score_opus":0.5969553625238638,"score_gpt":0.6108084616549729,"score_spread":0.013853099131109103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093020889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010925195,0.0046006264,0.0026772106,0.98489887,0.0018083774,0.000011062889,0.0000024693447,0.000009792422,0.0048990836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23344499,0.0076733185,0.007103556,0.7318934,0.016359383,0.00033787484,0.000010005603,0.0001052982,0.003072225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.74312115,0.21007112,0.00806581,0.0076328567,0.027155265,0.0039537856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57072544,0.3762591,0.010143887,0.011480968,0.022167418,0.009223185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22701874,0.00096263754,0.0027065356,0.0035600183,0.016003147,0.021292897,0.0053131627,0.044964753,0.0016199534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22720051,0.001366343,0.0017271134,0.0032413185,0.23904395,0.030670322,0.016647076,0.08460211,0.0005935738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033597385,0.000028601806,0.00019669633,0.00014335792,0.000014180096,0.00011328967,0.015147133,0.00013259023,0.000075327276,0.95348287,0.025759114,0.0048731095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091496644,0.000052867,0.00028226175,0.0008618593,0.000020317904,0.00031316403,0.008600444,0.00047928563,0.00014406872,0.85131174,0.13777739,0.00006499968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029510763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002539254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7729813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01300086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018538011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9532235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102334346","doi":"10.1076/0360-5310(200010)25:5;1-w;ft569","title":"The Ends of Medical Intervention and the Demarcation of the Normal from the Pathological","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Intervention (counseling); Context (archaeology); Normality; Fallacy; Naturalism; Epistemology; State (computer science); Mainstream; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Computer science; History; Nursing","score_opus":0.08657771627797028,"score_gpt":0.33721749075292495,"score_spread":0.25063977447495467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102334346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07480624,0.018140975,0.07005717,0.23734465,0.0021036577,0.00013692866,0.00005369598,0.00014850007,0.5972082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703544,0.0028572008,0.009726121,0.00837735,0.0006104323,0.00016024637,0.000023459046,0.00005567075,0.007835176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9706552,0.02023109,0.0008161681,0.0017619347,0.004931441,0.0016041527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829244,0.011010045,0.0018374628,0.0017799028,0.0012982243,0.0011499393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140221715,0.00039804098,0.00062111777,0.002121718,0.0056563835,0.00967117,0.0011127377,0.0051099146,0.0015050531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021853657,0.00031195872,0.00039294668,0.0006748777,0.12508796,0.010986958,0.008213588,0.008808285,0.00033290533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010905923,0.000007740157,0.00010019437,0.000014441416,0.0000010763667,0.00003049729,0.0030480674,0.00004811644,0.000054039156,0.99322176,0.0005001708,0.0029629942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080279315,0.000015634954,0.000236214,0.00009600525,0.0000021586086,0.00009408793,0.0024137134,0.000115152914,0.00017066866,0.9700549,0.026784709,0.000008689326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010593816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094852503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140221715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055252756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074345698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07415724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105789017","doi":"10.1080/03605310490503579","title":"Collective Moral Imagination: Making Decisions for Persons With Dementia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Dementia; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.22548346325782545,"score_gpt":0.4765568570658505,"score_spread":0.25107339380802507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105789017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3795105,0.019902049,0.01670935,0.381911,0.0030603237,0.0002012008,0.00006192462,0.00012898754,0.19851474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767039,0.0033773493,0.00481018,0.008482508,0.0003544135,0.000090422895,0.00003506118,0.000020603386,0.006125556],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771088,0.019920653,0.00033689148,0.0005437013,0.0010716441,0.0010184161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98781335,0.006107072,0.0018556247,0.00052764744,0.0009301087,0.002766173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015471375,0.0010139699,0.0006271259,0.0011285718,0.011632506,0.012804765,0.0020877756,0.0077471673,0.0037512593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037414648,0.0003766806,0.0010480434,0.00054237153,0.033023063,0.009670591,0.0128240455,0.011146868,0.0011666974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015675444,0.00026935234,0.005234008,0.00029798868,0.000068923786,0.0028541472,0.81990683,0.00054554077,0.00044739584,0.0799405,0.024567036,0.0657115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058665926,0.00018035618,0.0019837448,0.0006282916,0.00004852387,0.0024877156,0.7154731,0.000799166,0.00040727193,0.16608211,0.11178719,0.00006385092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002044697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036364428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015471375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044620717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062544844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08182138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115124278","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.343.3011","title":"Feminist Ethics and the Metaphor of AIDS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Bioethics; Dominance (genetics); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.11412974651012273,"score_gpt":0.37683984978225243,"score_spread":0.26271010327212974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115124278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023318773,0.04797499,0.014543259,0.20994744,0.0013005144,0.00003072459,0.00006019795,0.000040748986,0.7027834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91541374,0.014841848,0.0049824174,0.0225615,0.0010125666,0.00011034163,0.000025292486,0.00006358803,0.04098877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933756,0.0055416124,0.00006942474,0.00018088045,0.00048385165,0.00034867413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969606,0.0023310818,0.00025515418,0.000108194676,0.00017235757,0.00017266258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003949631,0.0005904608,0.00033541856,0.0013640962,0.0062286844,0.004655408,0.00070153666,0.004031961,0.004781204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004730661,0.00021882549,0.00028634202,0.0008634597,0.039944954,0.004807512,0.0037752844,0.00361827,0.0006656915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040838963,0.0000026419114,0.000042757274,0.000024988807,8.8752336e-7,0.000084577165,0.008103597,0.000047215504,0.00004699189,0.98748255,0.0023020122,0.0018577307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012499386,0.000014399717,0.00017537127,0.00032638892,0.000002727976,0.00053901906,0.0130189955,0.00016175846,0.00013685974,0.64318055,0.34242263,0.000008750144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021806508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002056471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062286844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045354166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025176923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03290695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120330028","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr029","title":"Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Agency (philosophy); Informed consent; Sketch; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Social science; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30407202282453744,"score_gpt":0.36062012122232934,"score_spread":0.0565480983977919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120330028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03743551,0.0188691,0.25133833,0.14019437,0.0008586033,0.00027156438,0.00009675057,0.00009482451,0.550841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476202,0.0048753535,0.026935527,0.00828686,0.00072127127,0.00035518644,0.00004766805,0.000049416558,0.011108562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9610409,0.027740536,0.001367024,0.00271439,0.0053087454,0.0018284596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97654754,0.017085494,0.0019831858,0.0020394058,0.0015115984,0.0008327444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02911281,0.00056083663,0.0006066854,0.0018536594,0.0050702374,0.007989532,0.0015880723,0.005629822,0.0034904496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029726243,0.0004506018,0.0009684035,0.0014251935,0.07839587,0.014932981,0.008571418,0.007872091,0.00055608543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033202862,0.0000024451313,0.0000361792,0.000011308632,0.0000016727992,0.000022641467,0.002143877,0.00007818315,0.000019309691,0.9963122,0.00019922107,0.0011695446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010516895,0.000009594535,0.00006706769,0.000065246386,0.000004044255,0.00008255486,0.0006508182,0.00019212566,0.000066174776,0.9847648,0.014079182,0.000007779999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029872765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016366856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02911281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007134289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007212812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15396512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122034985","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.3.339.2978","title":"Extending the Human Life Span","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Life expectancy; Life span; Demise; Natural selection; Longevity; Harm; Senescence; Biology; Human life; Disease; Environmental ethics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolutionary biology; Psychology; Sociology; Genetics; Medicine; Demography; Political science; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09592613166548251,"score_gpt":0.32239327607304946,"score_spread":0.22646714440756693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122034985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076550804,0.16490851,0.043827314,0.17743866,0.0044097863,0.00008881479,0.0002969499,0.0003315731,0.53214765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82947826,0.07658462,0.018243512,0.030164393,0.0027727233,0.00017400616,0.00012357078,0.00007651953,0.04238247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994723,0.00022896042,0.000020129819,0.00010869113,0.000106094965,0.00006388403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913234,0.0002125226,0.00008392876,0.00014550325,0.00014449959,0.0002811646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018043846,0.00028975197,0.00034582953,0.00051011133,0.0013117584,0.0020555016,0.0003665878,0.001655222,0.006391215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021121386,0.0000965549,0.00030514813,0.00021361526,0.005679072,0.0031789686,0.0028537945,0.0015141951,0.0015138636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005998777,0.000065399334,0.0015783932,0.00025453247,0.000024047877,0.00017116521,0.002803916,0.00061023544,0.0041429135,0.85289025,0.019804677,0.11759464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001502511,0.00015378992,0.0020807597,0.0002896779,0.000021411557,0.0004985451,0.0007079966,0.00017885616,0.000753274,0.41379258,0.58149064,0.000017508499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071454776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007362675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006391215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010505139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001604989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021380782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127835924","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.1.35.3035","title":"On Risk and Decisional Capacity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Competence (human resources); Appeal; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Mental capacity; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.16789518111240703,"score_gpt":0.41461682597166627,"score_spread":0.24672164485925924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127835924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042461827,0.010717689,0.039269067,0.13238789,0.00065622065,0.000066730354,0.00013172803,0.000051734864,0.7742571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765768,0.003023649,0.0032591275,0.007118392,0.0006971087,0.000114158676,0.000028054093,0.00003847819,0.009144355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985565,0.0071633398,0.0005460923,0.0013671388,0.0035497833,0.0018086274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747148,0.018596526,0.00157657,0.0020432514,0.0019169947,0.0011519691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012697773,0.0005726088,0.00064277067,0.0017719084,0.004520097,0.010295976,0.0017221959,0.005397958,0.0061134333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03192132,0.0003618285,0.0008042633,0.0011506446,0.06386856,0.0122453,0.009036935,0.0075608976,0.00075441535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003829547,0.0000038797357,0.000069277936,0.000007156187,0.0000017851422,0.000016467857,0.00033176123,0.00019656334,0.0000133666745,0.9980812,0.0003927583,0.00088194356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050881763,0.0000038862086,0.00007732397,0.000032568812,0.0000014421655,0.00001603198,0.00015605654,0.00019190944,0.000023219192,0.99527526,0.0042128856,0.0000043216655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034661205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017162651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012697773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065311915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005108114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06715304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130179557","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.3.285.3022","title":"Acculturating Human Experimentation: An Empirical Survey in France","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Transactional leadership; Psychology; Aptitude; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Social science; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.6591876307650544,"score_gpt":0.5955553106546103,"score_spread":0.06363232011044406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130179557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943052,0.0014653619,0.00094825635,0.0008885234,0.000011593221,0.0000616766,0.000038242364,0.000015747306,0.0022653155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996646,0.0011403892,0.0006064227,0.0004887898,0.000018447261,0.00008255324,0.000045854165,0.000009889601,0.00096161995],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9533317,0.03744583,0.0014908569,0.0015106137,0.004407063,0.0018139115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85444486,0.112734936,0.016531209,0.0033960473,0.00836936,0.0045236303],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025340201,0.00048922416,0.00064520293,0.0037286617,0.004053922,0.0048237504,0.0013428516,0.003237443,0.002264294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072209,0.00061147194,0.00038272547,0.0030185606,0.0059162066,0.0024012523,0.001838437,0.0022928799,0.00037366807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029062136,0.0011037341,0.2894225,0.0007100034,0.00008846009,0.002714562,0.62989575,0.00030517697,0.0045260885,0.0053964686,0.0013217251,0.06422497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033172408,0.0018629412,0.40774998,0.00070611027,0.00005001571,0.0036296435,0.52719676,0.001167431,0.0021029676,0.00087650015,0.054504998,0.00011945363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011872113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012592008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99594605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049148044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038771636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13401341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132418305","doi":"10.1080/03605310591008603","title":"ICU Psychosis and Patient Autonomy: Some Thoughts from the Inside","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Connaught Fund; University of Alberta","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychosis; Personal autonomy; Psychology; Patient rights; Psychoanalysis; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Political science; Law; Health care","score_opus":0.12518138804955395,"score_gpt":0.3782367023058621,"score_spread":0.2530553142563081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132418305","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068549695,0.88131285,0.00023561994,0.113716014,0.002510158,0.0000036670583,0.0000043564587,0.000003768339,0.0015280823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03571281,0.8745185,0.00056187075,0.078685515,0.009347885,0.00005040659,0.000010302098,0.000008715663,0.0011040372],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973769,0.0017790875,0.000166933,0.00019247687,0.00035995644,0.00012466044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284065,0.005856692,0.00040097686,0.00011534187,0.0004943373,0.00029196235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058563394,0.00062109204,0.0016683287,0.0014388053,0.0026838137,0.00459695,0.0015918495,0.0073605105,0.0020383215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008422123,0.00033292532,0.0008241797,0.002422937,0.011448143,0.01211695,0.003928979,0.010530606,0.0004825863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002674088,0.0001563736,0.002474695,0.015712738,0.00018129851,0.0076469523,0.076633304,0.0006319315,0.0008783623,0.24717723,0.18448521,0.46375456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057847832,0.00020975538,0.0021891664,0.019562816,0.00006188271,0.01062871,0.051433858,0.00024274291,0.00025986542,0.12556335,0.7896599,0.00013014236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024435215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003046873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073605105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020406856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031330478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030971646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146685042","doi":"10.1080/03605310500499203","title":"The Ethics and Science of Placebo-Controlled Trials: Assay Sensitivity and the Duhem–Quine Thesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Appeal; Placebo; Clinical trial; Assay sensitivity; Aside; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Alternative medicine; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.3941801818369858,"score_gpt":0.5096282646228812,"score_spread":0.11544808278589547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146685042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008150959,0.07956189,0.32322454,0.52402943,0.006931689,0.0006989077,0.00031470286,0.00013401928,0.056953866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45106682,0.024652041,0.21176706,0.2750927,0.026434245,0.0050352197,0.00014971656,0.000240224,0.0055619422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5749667,0.35716072,0.011607697,0.017128324,0.03655988,0.0025765928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2479278,0.6966096,0.015040761,0.028627014,0.01010884,0.001685885],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37319893,0.001612649,0.0059542153,0.00502471,0.003842246,0.013094119,0.004178885,0.017571079,0.0021893845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45330504,0.0016640044,0.0027809278,0.002654901,0.088698916,0.016018027,0.00843346,0.024949085,0.00078448467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015074747,0.000027139426,0.0005066858,0.00046814862,0.00018890019,0.000108329245,0.00094827625,0.0005864076,0.00009503182,0.984373,0.003733928,0.008813423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017605415,0.00007948621,0.00025486483,0.0003926554,0.000045556037,0.00011565442,0.00006939665,0.0012259299,0.00017157174,0.98328537,0.014148691,0.000034706318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014674844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006515215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6268011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071703135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008296862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7729573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146787238","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhv013","title":"A Family-Oriented Decision-Making Model for Human Research in Mainland China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Peking University; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Mainland China; Harmony (color); China; Informed consent; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.6488557554326542,"score_gpt":0.5878811024293545,"score_spread":0.06097465300329963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146787238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2501041,0.0036055658,0.2975524,0.05401496,0.0003360784,0.0015456614,0.00037473167,0.00009610951,0.39237034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583689,0.0009119001,0.026966888,0.0008765953,0.0000567433,0.0004569883,0.00004677001,0.00000880414,0.012306326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317026,0.004662636,0.00021740918,0.0006493116,0.0007672037,0.0005332152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960687,0.0022662103,0.00043998176,0.00039015253,0.00042496793,0.00040993778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012288962,0.0005858199,0.00047774593,0.0011528098,0.0031015584,0.003600194,0.0018843282,0.0023554359,0.004457651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072548813,0.00023413113,0.0007918038,0.0010557969,0.012882949,0.0037662333,0.0025327504,0.0017780886,0.00037281305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027695034,0.000028284341,0.0013058021,0.000035911133,0.000015434083,0.00028956318,0.0028074312,0.006287391,0.000087340115,0.98357266,0.00065417186,0.0048882687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009634365,0.000100659905,0.0016141844,0.00008934105,0.00003486628,0.00026573316,0.0015702432,0.03211311,0.00019094716,0.9463694,0.017522916,0.000032303964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015206526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010168515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015206526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010324994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014249467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07491344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148510017","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhu020","title":"Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Referent; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relative risk; Philosophy; Mathematics; Confidence interval; Statistics","score_opus":0.36071696377008716,"score_gpt":0.4750319989977756,"score_spread":0.11431503522768843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148510017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011092972,0.0068836585,0.0031503665,0.9815709,0.0027245162,0.000013893011,0.000016886546,0.000017062705,0.004513424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1759242,0.009838584,0.010382447,0.77812475,0.021423178,0.00028343324,0.00006052936,0.0002334522,0.0037293902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81154084,0.13633658,0.00818004,0.01210512,0.025874343,0.00596311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6145626,0.32522118,0.010255057,0.011202334,0.03008179,0.008677116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21227826,0.0012317718,0.0037983782,0.0031670446,0.010526334,0.020045582,0.011707721,0.044064004,0.005280838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28390086,0.0010809421,0.0027299076,0.0030418455,0.11864318,0.06189171,0.013426644,0.06646204,0.0020595442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007811001,0.000030456344,0.00022904295,0.00031254315,0.00003375952,0.00013370728,0.009548241,0.00012725932,0.0001165274,0.9338272,0.046647638,0.008915485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006641776,0.000024715686,0.00019832538,0.00096914097,0.00001930507,0.00012855347,0.0066678217,0.00027063335,0.000113282505,0.92451185,0.06697392,0.000056062276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007965935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004878588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21227826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016456803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019166041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97140115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152273753","doi":"10.1080/03605310490500545","title":"Minimal Risk as an International Ethical Standard in Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration of Helsinki; Harm; Declaration; Commission; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Informed consent; Political science; Research ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.3681491076343622,"score_gpt":0.5496925389063827,"score_spread":0.1815434312720205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152273753","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031717268,0.46449357,0.16346999,0.20521346,0.017619465,0.0013248685,0.000096631564,0.00024174516,0.14436857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21286285,0.22693156,0.34788525,0.16905466,0.016888512,0.011219906,0.00029667493,0.00037303683,0.014487562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6202355,0.27757883,0.0367409,0.007506273,0.054358367,0.0035801427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67528826,0.26106682,0.017430037,0.022688791,0.021124538,0.0024014066],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23088601,0.0010675605,0.0032401755,0.0046431636,0.004348435,0.015314715,0.0050898795,0.016294573,0.0018577608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24029736,0.0013967295,0.0018160094,0.0076200273,0.05147713,0.017261777,0.010647031,0.026714738,0.0013465611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030824078,0.00002949414,0.00031929862,0.002311061,0.000031262047,0.00014647246,0.0036343532,0.00020850083,0.00019422686,0.9176204,0.012950471,0.06252351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000573668,0.0001343864,0.0010440329,0.018096056,0.000080687496,0.0012971371,0.003141793,0.00048953516,0.0005446819,0.6559873,0.3190453,0.00008162911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012861161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016964976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.769114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008145544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03038675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9484545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152662042","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhs057","title":"Human All Too Human Reasoning: Comparing Clinical and Phenomenological Intuition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"European Science Foundation","keywords":"Intuition; Bioethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.4085742563848706,"score_gpt":0.5316484665720749,"score_spread":0.12307421018720427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152662042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32807156,0.026532343,0.22626375,0.05817601,0.0011302041,0.00045261288,0.00039174306,0.00034107553,0.3586408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97986674,0.002801867,0.013261046,0.0024383867,0.00013284918,0.000147278,0.00008720584,0.000040829076,0.0012238174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98390573,0.01261889,0.00056613435,0.0006088197,0.0017740533,0.0005264275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95576423,0.03830046,0.0018797833,0.001933157,0.0015051623,0.0006170677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015122552,0.0004006017,0.00061325263,0.0042129806,0.0018299922,0.0072604096,0.0013257457,0.0024231581,0.0033285678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055682614,0.00034400256,0.000646134,0.0018578803,0.02804757,0.013485393,0.005462613,0.0028606674,0.00030143198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015278648,0.000071873335,0.0030379675,0.0004901974,0.00004609462,0.00032367455,0.11926047,0.0013059956,0.00034242545,0.8528142,0.0018841486,0.02027013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042048716,0.000071626804,0.002740112,0.00044216815,0.000023117302,0.0006161754,0.046877053,0.0018879833,0.00025500494,0.9235897,0.023396045,0.000058875685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012946085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000927849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015122552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037771086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025989139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07997662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153910246","doi":"10.1080/03605310590960193","title":"From the Local to the Global: Bioethics and the Concept of Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Sociology; Ethnic group; Scholarship; Socialization; Health care; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.14920805538283824,"score_gpt":0.46943378810445924,"score_spread":0.320225732721621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153910246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021742178,0.13850765,0.024790512,0.70874083,0.0027013198,0.00004592517,0.000059136237,0.000080525424,0.103331916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8012675,0.064962745,0.017825063,0.1036615,0.0039094994,0.00023706492,0.000064123094,0.00015195554,0.007920543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715791,0.024050761,0.0006442315,0.0009594467,0.0020169911,0.0007495364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97178054,0.021004098,0.0013716792,0.0022854137,0.001488295,0.0020699063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021707226,0.00058930705,0.0012007591,0.0029785694,0.008535089,0.023117978,0.0017284424,0.0076913843,0.0030710062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01831442,0.00047132914,0.00053214154,0.0042938003,0.096945524,0.032180555,0.011297908,0.0151819885,0.0005452296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017355816,0.000028432976,0.0011823546,0.00028913346,0.000022144764,0.00016500382,0.050671987,0.00027762316,0.00017822323,0.89707786,0.011695084,0.038394816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009172375,0.000030979478,0.0008829278,0.0015185811,0.000013957594,0.00020212066,0.03860923,0.00022271939,0.00011085612,0.863388,0.09497758,0.000033799275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048543205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005497238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023117978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078110904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012141604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114800155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156828052","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr050","title":"The Medical Minimum: Zero","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Forcing (mathematics); Zero (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Health care; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.25792543716913635,"score_gpt":0.45826811349729474,"score_spread":0.2003426763281584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156828052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064483886,0.016084768,0.017292961,0.75149053,0.008164768,0.000035565867,0.0001959151,0.00014494352,0.2001421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53929025,0.009021692,0.016534328,0.37313402,0.011499199,0.00031170656,0.00023408879,0.00029306315,0.049681716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98536843,0.006668035,0.000696238,0.0019946573,0.003917327,0.0013553498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99011934,0.0051491037,0.0007248735,0.0011044582,0.001986649,0.0009155276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126655465,0.0005445246,0.0013732734,0.0009742879,0.0050349,0.006503703,0.0016776498,0.010013859,0.01233739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034201544,0.00037389935,0.0007885397,0.00052718335,0.027227607,0.012128411,0.0047377404,0.016257178,0.003404631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001962227,0.000010492012,0.000067763525,0.00006648354,0.00000462666,0.000015179265,0.00032966412,0.0000544929,0.000076785844,0.96906036,0.02470842,0.005586148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002370024,0.000027015745,0.00021721816,0.00034787215,0.000009282006,0.0000722537,0.0003664623,0.00013670881,0.00018308128,0.8538108,0.14478733,0.00001834965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027740428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022229438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126655465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059365374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007568773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06698257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163932426","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jht045","title":"Rethinking Voluntary Euthanasia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Perspective (graphical); Morality; Health care; Personal autonomy; Sociology; Philosophical methodology; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24420799773242605,"score_gpt":0.4615473046845997,"score_spread":0.21733930695217366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163932426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038723346,0.013445023,0.11630731,0.65192133,0.010383052,0.00010559366,0.000028650316,0.00012309176,0.16896257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86672086,0.0045639924,0.018779762,0.09532424,0.0031083073,0.000204902,0.000021040232,0.00013590278,0.011140945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9434962,0.041628238,0.001752424,0.002773839,0.008304136,0.0020450663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93409777,0.05439485,0.0020277016,0.0037821704,0.0046904385,0.0010071085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057177916,0.00046231083,0.0006956812,0.0010725847,0.0073190327,0.009342455,0.003228009,0.01345806,0.0012775273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07062719,0.00041572974,0.00078384357,0.0005420263,0.07932301,0.015175844,0.009669088,0.021303989,0.00038572535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060525804,0.00000729514,0.000071694514,0.00003616438,0.000003630923,0.0000614472,0.01019632,0.00013478988,0.00010820089,0.98296756,0.0021083348,0.0042985664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001430499,0.000018175666,0.00015679083,0.00038860453,0.000007996481,0.00016349771,0.0044277343,0.00045931753,0.0002504555,0.9080627,0.08602693,0.000023482486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052068997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061752102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057177916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059175673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013609278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30238932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167210268","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhn025","title":"Public Health Insurance under a Nonbenevolent State","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Public health; State (computer science); Library science; Philosophy of medicine; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Nursing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3327493158140065,"score_gpt":0.35014575194425274,"score_spread":0.017396436130246218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167210268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6241376,0.0008206828,0.036291745,0.028566984,0.00018669358,0.00006710472,0.00019277587,0.00008290926,0.30965352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540764,0.00014717119,0.0006374853,0.0004550932,0.00008175764,0.000016870934,0.0000142141225,0.000003547067,0.0032361208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976031,0.0008801796,0.000073047464,0.00036146928,0.00041307873,0.00066922675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972554,0.0011312598,0.0005737341,0.00043155503,0.00024249127,0.000365541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035014949,0.00019533504,0.00041887994,0.0004328396,0.0022682867,0.0035062395,0.00044518147,0.0025449926,0.0042221122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047492282,0.0002727172,0.00060006033,0.00033270798,0.0051975846,0.0037736653,0.002324517,0.0024817456,0.00026046566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018227895,0.000022010785,0.00065176515,0.000005163481,0.000005489247,0.00003831449,0.00008948183,0.0012804999,0.00008858875,0.9963362,0.00029485516,0.0011694151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006294335,0.00009080376,0.0018647596,0.000030621624,0.000029252484,0.00008293932,0.00027984256,0.01859437,0.0003025029,0.9716419,0.006999698,0.00002042616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004479551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037439335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004479551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025447807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031027072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018517852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560663898","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw031","title":"Narrative Aversion: Challenges for the Illness Narrative Advocate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Personal narrative; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12160019695443787,"score_gpt":0.3678191349692532,"score_spread":0.24621893801481537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560663898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039157905,0.0053491783,0.007224081,0.9486373,0.0019740742,0.000030209141,0.000007994509,0.00003671013,0.03282466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5456259,0.012000925,0.01927511,0.38713396,0.0062521244,0.00041485575,0.000035968795,0.00020659852,0.029054526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94911236,0.036726065,0.0014845988,0.0027828612,0.0070954026,0.002798756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91949236,0.05971332,0.0037185475,0.0028570986,0.0057571284,0.008461418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08278402,0.0007122892,0.0011984508,0.0017240125,0.021739671,0.024794908,0.004371847,0.026988802,0.007152054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08573387,0.0007013137,0.0011556834,0.0009735874,0.082744725,0.03698399,0.027327282,0.051544085,0.0019951076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016536398,0.000036135698,0.00017582529,0.00009184729,0.0000066699895,0.00026767922,0.04711428,0.00009892983,0.00009761766,0.9132865,0.029033544,0.009774399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004112202,0.000025555313,0.00009766037,0.00070338574,0.000011787973,0.00062609336,0.0572889,0.00050050317,0.00012328062,0.7039301,0.23661314,0.00003843118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043771365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034589106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08278402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009545531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023198362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.437809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586441227","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw039","title":"What Does the Patient Say? Levinas and Medical Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing ethics; Obligation; Face (sociological concept); Analogy; Medical ethics; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Situational ethics; Military medical ethics; Subject (documents); Applied ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.13699469174769502,"score_gpt":0.36980896477177144,"score_spread":0.23281427302407642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586441227","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04787405,0.02299086,0.02128734,0.6835289,0.0012334604,0.00009265367,0.00003712445,0.00005365641,0.22290199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93575454,0.0048553175,0.005727846,0.041489538,0.0003984216,0.0001533533,0.000013734793,0.000033184468,0.011574005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718004,0.024510482,0.0005073193,0.0010047806,0.0011745654,0.0010024634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988245,0.009513929,0.00073577877,0.00036558014,0.00054622843,0.00059343735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012357608,0.00044509475,0.0005425417,0.0008374278,0.008297615,0.0075562326,0.001121568,0.009646394,0.0015296725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016519677,0.00029608182,0.0005015884,0.0007187134,0.08839971,0.009800285,0.006502695,0.008683765,0.00043430727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009006104,0.000007684861,0.00015038703,0.000038576898,0.0000033093647,0.0002182125,0.053831894,0.00007142603,0.00008298494,0.9412238,0.0022326224,0.0021301478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012442263,0.000022084567,0.00016175538,0.00030094056,0.0000047047806,0.00048075768,0.025739636,0.00022441325,0.00015220602,0.8984201,0.07445935,0.000021634994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044033416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030606133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012357608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008853763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070969258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06535405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588017142","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw066","title":"The Ethical Principles of the Portuguese Psychologists: A Universal Dimension","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Portuguese; Dimension (graph theory); Adaptation (eye); Engineering ethics; Ethical values; Bioethics; Point (geometry); Ethical issues; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.12549758831952607,"score_gpt":0.38464363858456274,"score_spread":0.2591460502650367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588017142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16996998,0.034917504,0.038800016,0.29319236,0.0022786355,0.00027630964,0.00012209837,0.0000914785,0.4603515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95424855,0.005858408,0.015890798,0.013706924,0.0004244958,0.000117512995,0.000023098846,0.000036939742,0.009693168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97296584,0.01599599,0.001313501,0.0011824729,0.0061037326,0.0024384472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826318,0.009647997,0.0019560768,0.0014362193,0.0022635816,0.0020642828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020733448,0.0002959921,0.00045128955,0.0010304133,0.0070271175,0.009477276,0.0007881116,0.0037478483,0.0011408172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02749001,0.00039666292,0.00032087593,0.0010399474,0.028389797,0.0028800482,0.00424285,0.004867309,0.00019513383],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019966634,0.000060798262,0.0026966848,0.00021539936,0.000011296835,0.00042016085,0.060409706,0.00021462633,0.00059579546,0.88172245,0.0078047686,0.0458283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004314323,0.00009552658,0.017663008,0.0029979958,0.000028858733,0.0023899213,0.06276014,0.00064113305,0.0012095065,0.4063536,0.50570714,0.00010991488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007288912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011412247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020733448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053846445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021935789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109650254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605486355","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhx006","title":"Truth or Spin? Disease Definition in Cancer Screening","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Epistemology; Disease; Objectivity (philosophy); Appeal; Philosophy of medicine; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Philosophy of science; Scope (computer science); Medicine; Philosophy; Pathology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Biology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.31234651308899136,"score_gpt":0.41019338829126945,"score_spread":0.09784687520227808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605486355","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024761692,0.0463552,0.04305521,0.8134738,0.0039270525,0.00006308293,0.00019887378,0.000058152753,0.06810689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89573574,0.011266333,0.016841777,0.06766579,0.0047151786,0.00014713469,0.00015115933,0.00006331993,0.0034135636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826266,0.011529979,0.0010076968,0.0017473671,0.002385677,0.00070263364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97108805,0.022883223,0.0013931813,0.0014534645,0.0021130366,0.0010690982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029545702,0.0004965826,0.001517536,0.002967845,0.0050547053,0.007942719,0.002003732,0.007309197,0.0019032918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042866554,0.0005530848,0.001008787,0.0015261758,0.07046921,0.019907672,0.005259597,0.012522223,0.00029582452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000189014,0.000008250184,0.00042888572,0.000060758455,0.000008275259,0.00005310233,0.002921432,0.00008368673,0.00005667347,0.9896868,0.0023582722,0.004314989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012943757,0.000009194513,0.0002131434,0.000098550634,0.000010988546,0.00010342152,0.0008992189,0.00019583962,0.000051801057,0.989075,0.009319702,0.000010299665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051724794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025487682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072402996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046146093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15625453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2832492673","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhy009","title":"An Epistemic Argument for Research-Practice Integration in Medicine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Elitism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Order (exchange); Sociology; Transformation (genetics); Health care; Politics; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.6201752658057844,"score_gpt":0.6017771940372039,"score_spread":0.01839807176858055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2832492673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010185557,0.004062388,0.06401052,0.6675739,0.0034237946,0.00022843645,0.0000844704,0.00012400783,0.25030684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.771502,0.001612728,0.0421262,0.16029328,0.0060497117,0.001202472,0.00006935975,0.00012810122,0.01701619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8705367,0.090052366,0.005330138,0.009076795,0.020498382,0.0045056925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8007586,0.15487589,0.008420697,0.016920488,0.012447596,0.006576688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11848775,0.0009057347,0.0017154645,0.0035831598,0.015893506,0.021386206,0.0030921868,0.033004425,0.008456479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19059305,0.0012325335,0.0028639296,0.002402028,0.09291544,0.036015615,0.02452376,0.02581996,0.002106559],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024051258,0.000020087453,0.00009339774,0.00004491661,0.000009167039,0.000052748037,0.0010079407,0.000086789005,0.000029947576,0.99530494,0.0020606022,0.0012654242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012367628,0.000024638914,0.00013740269,0.00021955819,0.000023720811,0.000094538846,0.000489218,0.00043531973,0.00013911174,0.96517175,0.0331145,0.000026501826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017696013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009954756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0097918715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014462356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62663066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946744580","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab041","title":"Reconciling Regulation with Scientific Autonomy in Dual-Use Research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Normative; Dual (grammatical number); Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Censorship; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering); Positive economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Business; Economics; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6377498291168069,"score_gpt":0.5415566889946979,"score_spread":0.096193140122109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946744580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045729216,0.004749044,0.47903287,0.2972705,0.0017556992,0.00042283346,0.000088505105,0.00030853544,0.17064281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8872299,0.0009678726,0.06143764,0.041852266,0.001303414,0.0014554911,0.000040053095,0.0001415306,0.0055717067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.75008094,0.17386255,0.01014125,0.017340986,0.042997256,0.0055769826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62002087,0.2896002,0.019366963,0.04704274,0.018031072,0.0059381556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24148841,0.00094914663,0.0021520813,0.0028955953,0.007995574,0.017283354,0.0057933265,0.022647124,0.0033320454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25609913,0.0015748199,0.0020981738,0.0015909396,0.09985725,0.023722103,0.02344174,0.02306901,0.00097088394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019050573,0.00001651823,0.00023688651,0.000044588716,0.000014174178,0.0000529972,0.0027967247,0.00039126907,0.0001988395,0.99233305,0.0005548947,0.0033409966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034258832,0.000023374861,0.0000926522,0.00011853279,0.000013203246,0.00005437462,0.000308206,0.0006753695,0.0003291124,0.9892517,0.009078349,0.000020863004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017816739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012346738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99200445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008084039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017653292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93537986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998798653","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhz029","title":"Ethical Issues in Physician Billing Under Fee-For-Service Plans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Taboo; Solidarity; Order (exchange); Dimension (graph theory); Public relations; Service (business); Medical ethics; Professional responsibility; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Business; Law; Political science; Politics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.18517127295437744,"score_gpt":0.46282952329284294,"score_spread":0.2776582503384655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998798653","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04123144,0.008945184,0.0138063105,0.846392,0.0014975365,0.00007612519,0.000017991322,0.000027590495,0.088005915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86467516,0.0041549965,0.013295759,0.10707138,0.0033102739,0.00017905944,0.000012726388,0.000057265384,0.007243343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89575446,0.0780879,0.004118649,0.0022845427,0.015643194,0.0041111903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8786361,0.106267065,0.0054141083,0.0021372244,0.0046415497,0.0029039874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08131531,0.00036024113,0.0005378592,0.0012823397,0.012838299,0.012817822,0.001896113,0.02195047,0.0012425238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12565479,0.00067848945,0.00091835763,0.0012047534,0.04075575,0.0073848646,0.005176959,0.016308153,0.00033784108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027185493,0.000045297256,0.0016437473,0.00006362153,0.000015931388,0.0009202881,0.017251512,0.00074475183,0.0001700619,0.9522013,0.011869709,0.015046605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035203815,0.000059231777,0.0023641668,0.0006254661,0.000021315367,0.0015370728,0.015772698,0.0021230325,0.0003305842,0.8896936,0.08737279,0.000064828564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004811974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052404176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08131531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007907157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014581188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4300416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001641223","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhz040","title":"Transhumanism, Moral Perfection, and Those 76 Trombones","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transhumanism; Humanism; Sociology; Human enhancement; Epistemology; Dystopia; Environmental ethics; The Imaginary; Ideology; Ethos; Posthuman; Technoscience; Futurist; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.17960803173427153,"score_gpt":0.366423868914119,"score_spread":0.18681583717984745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001641223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03583934,0.035607807,0.006676238,0.15384401,0.0017261928,0.000025256082,0.000029792956,0.000052874362,0.76619846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9110749,0.00763624,0.0023062197,0.015945394,0.00053752254,0.00005341751,0.000018284925,0.000044022756,0.062384013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964941,0.002289226,0.00006108572,0.00032132876,0.0004541824,0.00038019542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975358,0.0011319967,0.0002894873,0.00036310536,0.00030789853,0.00037170728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049268357,0.00034960685,0.00029196736,0.0008074081,0.0069059962,0.00850016,0.00061277766,0.0031579817,0.0052570333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054588267,0.00018553261,0.00021248542,0.00057116215,0.0705678,0.0066056484,0.0061475737,0.0055230306,0.00047216847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060098223,0.00000638063,0.00014060175,0.000020734251,0.0000019077538,0.000042489348,0.005794649,0.000036845566,0.00004896005,0.9853403,0.004462945,0.0040982626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011652689,0.000020199723,0.000527133,0.00023082242,0.0000043710716,0.00017269148,0.008741323,0.0001394798,0.00016009841,0.7431748,0.2468023,0.0000151720205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004562784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006649486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00850016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004116287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004143734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029865861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146720863","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaa037","title":"Religion at Work in Bioethics and Biopolicy: Christian Bioethicists, Secular Language, Suspicious Orthodoxy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Dignity; Deference; Orthodoxy; Law; Sociology; Secularism; Legislation; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.1860090117620325,"score_gpt":0.4661395546763774,"score_spread":0.2801305429143449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146720863","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033323586,0.03392066,0.0018445053,0.8680072,0.0015056294,0.000012690584,0.000014130514,0.000013156513,0.06135845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90331846,0.008992231,0.0014161033,0.07453133,0.0028877833,0.000053102533,0.000011544799,0.000035036494,0.008754376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98634166,0.010914848,0.00024498012,0.0005429744,0.0012882985,0.00066723925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730588,0.021081004,0.0015834636,0.0010786171,0.0012211846,0.0019768581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017269414,0.00028348173,0.00051221735,0.0018739392,0.0107310265,0.012218406,0.0015738388,0.01107003,0.0031840042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023090584,0.00035957375,0.00035975344,0.0016781074,0.1047115,0.0139797805,0.007999213,0.01410773,0.00042514593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015166666,0.000034305936,0.0005537928,0.000052707157,0.0000028485015,0.000121675796,0.022405056,0.00004324456,0.000059061083,0.9611169,0.00850204,0.0070932643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002797174,0.00002180628,0.0009061596,0.0005620965,0.0000053032686,0.00018659489,0.022093691,0.00023043701,0.00010555579,0.9241824,0.051659517,0.000018473353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057075303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070437067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017269414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006722607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008780084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09133053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157483961","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab004","title":"A Genealogy of Autonomy: Freedom, Paternalism, and the Future of the Doctor–Patient Relationship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Paternalism; Teleology; Bioethics; Obligation; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology; Beneficence; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.1370333197505721,"score_gpt":0.42713013597232924,"score_spread":0.29009681622175715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157483961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07113504,0.02101629,0.044115104,0.5974831,0.0014380416,0.000036620433,0.00003142059,0.00003961282,0.26470476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737303,0.003737154,0.0037751999,0.0124624735,0.0005553136,0.00003502765,0.0000074752693,0.000024036874,0.0056730104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870078,0.010427956,0.00020540619,0.000538472,0.0012177408,0.0006025036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875516,0.00940973,0.00076294923,0.0006305617,0.000503779,0.0011413594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012809263,0.00019410874,0.0003385136,0.0008570983,0.0068801376,0.0092537375,0.0008667541,0.0043390784,0.0018196321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014024724,0.00030952707,0.00027964465,0.0005563304,0.07977207,0.010515359,0.006366339,0.0087483525,0.00030657407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011476673,0.000008843747,0.00022596323,0.000012610141,0.0000020219932,0.00007263074,0.009782501,0.00007728163,0.000042733747,0.9853123,0.001088962,0.0033627863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013870997,0.000015730195,0.00026403973,0.00008926852,0.0000026117498,0.00022300228,0.0042168633,0.00024759266,0.0000668489,0.9621241,0.03272481,0.000011366604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024418323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021456543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012809263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045314743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060743545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067742646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172249225","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab007","title":"The Most Good You Can Do with Your Kidneys: Effective Altruism and the Organ-Shortage Problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Economic shortage; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.03308947230173553,"score_gpt":0.30351106997037425,"score_spread":0.2704215976686387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172249225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03367896,0.010463935,0.037899926,0.76220804,0.0016736094,0.000049118582,0.00003309019,0.00003135511,0.153962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90823686,0.004135011,0.01250308,0.059375837,0.0015480267,0.0001314097,0.000019050442,0.000050641553,0.014000142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841351,0.012028902,0.00041375737,0.00089138024,0.001399611,0.0011312095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98519105,0.009374535,0.0016054052,0.0011614442,0.0010964014,0.0015710226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021936951,0.00037534162,0.00079442596,0.0007289391,0.00719357,0.006046032,0.0014568376,0.0095190015,0.0033874742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019904332,0.0003609025,0.00070838054,0.00052361144,0.050189424,0.009186373,0.007734737,0.010792098,0.0005500037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013651513,0.000024246012,0.0003258415,0.000042980057,0.000007907779,0.000093011855,0.0018422382,0.00027219806,0.00006462928,0.9884213,0.004451634,0.0044404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013696968,0.000019135752,0.00025630373,0.000088719076,0.000006177936,0.00017941155,0.0012411256,0.00041301173,0.00007549213,0.976005,0.021687875,0.000014013988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015150338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018429916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021936951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004198604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005092094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11601508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184708473","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab012","title":"Children, Fetuses, and the Non-Existent: Moral Obligations and the Beginning of Life","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Morality; Wonder; Transformative learning; Miscarriage; Right to life; Philosophical methodology; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Human rights; Pregnancy; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.09379288870561692,"score_gpt":0.3611559250063823,"score_spread":0.26736303630076536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184708473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09742279,0.08775569,0.01710288,0.37287253,0.0021430126,0.000042182248,0.00009301879,0.000031092204,0.42253682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629636,0.013627412,0.0026428388,0.008544195,0.0007706797,0.000029791523,0.000017712257,0.000015786678,0.011387894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956065,0.0034146134,0.00008314969,0.00015958279,0.0005160408,0.00022005691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98884225,0.008528311,0.0008499374,0.00031223777,0.00062092434,0.00084645505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057806084,0.0002110808,0.00031975488,0.0007347332,0.003653674,0.0066847126,0.0007543665,0.0047101784,0.003378383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008650636,0.00016274168,0.00016454954,0.00059607567,0.03634477,0.00596827,0.004174976,0.0062631825,0.00022870436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007465482,0.0000106802545,0.0002501451,0.00003645445,0.0000014111258,0.00016609012,0.009301294,0.00005572934,0.000054194705,0.9836013,0.0030718753,0.0034435538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008503286,0.000021956119,0.0008636955,0.00047333975,0.0000039311844,0.000498423,0.011589405,0.00013526443,0.0001880581,0.8599737,0.12622908,0.000014640555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014802444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019765105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066847126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037099256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032992396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030571163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211001172","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab034","title":"Access-to-Care and Conscience: Conflicting or Coherent?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.19335777814042027,"score_gpt":0.45513883347965883,"score_spread":0.26178105533923857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211001172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03484593,0.018934408,0.042404138,0.59813887,0.0027374527,0.000114230344,0.00009062954,0.00008549137,0.30264884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94709396,0.0035431308,0.008476241,0.03217162,0.0019900056,0.0002131329,0.000042738557,0.0000638467,0.0064053973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597371,0.025043327,0.0023104076,0.0025921487,0.0072696735,0.0030473587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95601183,0.027402572,0.003964701,0.004212572,0.0041212733,0.004287114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03211041,0.0005836594,0.0014778352,0.0029596146,0.0081955455,0.018785352,0.0031599968,0.011771573,0.0051487917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06271608,0.00073531107,0.0009087828,0.0023969999,0.117998876,0.032750066,0.018221488,0.01689385,0.00065275276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008767428,0.0000108887125,0.00020510217,0.00004066408,0.0000054798015,0.00006842072,0.005407249,0.00004260405,0.00002829615,0.9890675,0.0015244858,0.0035905747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016537753,0.000012070259,0.00046099385,0.00021304442,0.0000059190465,0.000104256316,0.004533848,0.00021383115,0.000030404184,0.98245484,0.011931385,0.000022875858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043296004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037337702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03211041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066365316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010187356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1698181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308059422","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhac029","title":"Can a MacIntyrian Care about Severely Disabled Strangers?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Interpretation (philosophy); Disabled people; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.09599272531328362,"score_gpt":0.3196983156525368,"score_spread":0.2237055903392532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308059422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04523086,0.012173511,0.003283217,0.8538842,0.0046528745,0.000026520393,0.000015875094,0.00003724094,0.08069565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7456274,0.006077437,0.0015206741,0.21991414,0.0012137905,0.000050465904,0.000011201279,0.00002674719,0.025558226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739563,0.001526884,0.000056049,0.00021011793,0.0002727912,0.0005385902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996626,0.0012100878,0.0004513396,0.00018615159,0.00034850606,0.0011779525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00548106,0.0004078977,0.0006023208,0.0005781421,0.016087689,0.005879728,0.0014245266,0.008720023,0.0056679165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011945036,0.0002228309,0.0003651464,0.0003154354,0.027264867,0.007867701,0.00658902,0.010416048,0.0010391502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070933165,0.0000720335,0.0028652155,0.00011427029,0.000019644733,0.0027911742,0.17046681,0.000085966756,0.0003757252,0.6848544,0.11015631,0.028127573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028621329,0.00011126159,0.002143607,0.0007553895,0.00002410599,0.0036958694,0.21972552,0.00030521437,0.00033876346,0.32500175,0.44778964,0.00008023254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01288913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01856957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016087689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028654495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004023611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02898699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367856496","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhad019","title":"Evidence-based Medicine and Mechanistic Evidence: The Case of the Failed Rollout of Efavirenz in Zimbabwe","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Evidence-based medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Psychological intervention; Efavirenz; Positive economics; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Antiretroviral therapy; Law; Economics; Psychiatry; Family medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7936951828489627,"score_gpt":0.5305091262581133,"score_spread":0.26318605659084937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367856496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044735763,0.12150197,0.010491095,0.808612,0.00097332546,0.00020957278,0.00020258401,0.000026740006,0.013246969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81114835,0.061545547,0.023499561,0.10078415,0.0012396893,0.0003476299,0.00009025276,0.000043842414,0.0013010753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89606696,0.08803998,0.0039778994,0.0026717132,0.0055976226,0.003645841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.637452,0.33852693,0.011404794,0.0057586674,0.0052362876,0.0016214976],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13269956,0.00081123837,0.0024778778,0.003254557,0.0057204044,0.0083066095,0.0034188014,0.015829412,0.0017423085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24347661,0.0010275298,0.0021113337,0.00438812,0.021668779,0.010409552,0.0055893552,0.01464417,0.00011848118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001482548,0.00012868512,0.014099149,0.007403029,0.002688566,0.016344283,0.023027694,0.012330566,0.001128958,0.7734016,0.027198885,0.12076599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000891311,0.0004003022,0.0109169325,0.025068147,0.002847689,0.004157814,0.015006201,0.013330338,0.0016073445,0.769314,0.1561121,0.00034783912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053673066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060398504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9942796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019544689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015979601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70179075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392282422","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae002","title":"Beyond Conceptual Analysis: Social Objectivity and Conceptual Engineering to Define Disease","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Theoretical definition; Conceptual framework; Naturalism; Disease; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09479008579706479,"score_gpt":0.33301231476583715,"score_spread":0.23822222896877238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392282422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02100252,0.0126960855,0.6591485,0.14289154,0.0020425678,0.00031246577,0.0001189998,0.0001949384,0.16159235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8277197,0.0039528734,0.1483903,0.011050826,0.0013033447,0.0010581965,0.00014362013,0.00019309895,0.0061880155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9532303,0.03844395,0.0014205485,0.0019345816,0.0040366543,0.0009339692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572991,0.030955488,0.0028579123,0.004772845,0.0030751599,0.0010395456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050193638,0.0013318215,0.0017296021,0.0067353398,0.006032244,0.01492057,0.0040039388,0.0053150104,0.0031134733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029777441,0.0005883698,0.0020024457,0.003751995,0.11629427,0.025502237,0.010854847,0.010095488,0.00048002377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016619744,0.000004599452,0.000045852034,0.000022686478,0.0000048225106,0.00001199606,0.0016426431,0.00011050735,0.000019499234,0.9971054,0.00019826344,0.00083202444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053617,0.000005501846,0.000035466415,0.00006300644,0.000003478685,0.000025654874,0.0010305116,0.00048907794,0.000055285152,0.9907458,0.0075339186,0.0000069498533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032926823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016707917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050193638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0096030915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009157915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2654525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396871968","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae021","title":"Ethical Problems of Observational Studies and Big Data Compared to Randomized Trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta Hospital; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Temptation; Randomized controlled trial; Context (archaeology); Informed consent; Psychology; Medicine; Research ethics; Randomized experiment; Medical physics; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Surgery; Psychiatry; History","score_opus":0.8855603813236204,"score_gpt":0.6170519194353139,"score_spread":0.26850846188830646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396871968","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075466195,0.054088827,0.42979452,0.4473033,0.017730596,0.0061609456,0.0013282873,0.00035900576,0.035687853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27612153,0.019443717,0.42568904,0.21094495,0.031802136,0.03200148,0.00048103541,0.00052432274,0.002991776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.0730394,0.86198086,0.023468407,0.010992083,0.029509574,0.001009652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03522435,0.89007944,0.022085212,0.038989402,0.012000846,0.0016207214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7888477,0.0024339072,0.00788109,0.007656504,0.0051115854,0.019157259,0.007949384,0.015370522,0.008118862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8774527,0.003517958,0.0040720073,0.0092079,0.06245693,0.024784453,0.016369577,0.026456606,0.001649911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014061538,0.00012713551,0.0029796779,0.004556438,0.0020415054,0.00029104162,0.0054282057,0.0021204578,0.00014078096,0.8842862,0.017754717,0.07886772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091108266,0.00024949395,0.000965639,0.0048013963,0.00029644478,0.00034082241,0.00076215115,0.0032441767,0.00022071584,0.9560467,0.03203757,0.00012389294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002489333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017419917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21115232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011480237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02117029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26038843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403596864","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae040","title":"The WEIRD Trio: The Cultural Gap between Physicians, Learners, and Patients in Pluralistic Societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19073636166236918,"score_gpt":0.4108723786707293,"score_spread":0.2201360170083601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403596864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5511095,0.027528148,0.013570587,0.34513205,0.0020273428,0.00006605074,0.000029057159,0.000060886356,0.06047648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97636306,0.0024102977,0.0018935964,0.017671708,0.00028556303,0.00005112505,0.00000657027,0.00002566457,0.0012923874],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9611879,0.03166474,0.0008511839,0.0014774251,0.003205067,0.0016135281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976577,0.015248758,0.002323902,0.001410451,0.001228604,0.003211358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029139375,0.00043213234,0.00091540534,0.0023330972,0.016073339,0.015634496,0.0019581413,0.0046710647,0.0020331405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029806586,0.0005842513,0.00038755406,0.0017400559,0.08635011,0.019343281,0.022057805,0.0096977735,0.00026474497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003998552,0.000048688576,0.0039142785,0.00011248019,0.0000226013,0.00045406443,0.8283219,0.00004823726,0.000274782,0.14657171,0.0027642117,0.017426929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025290201,0.00008498609,0.0038280704,0.0007078197,0.000019251536,0.0008306843,0.82289386,0.00018020078,0.00015610491,0.12760481,0.0436268,0.0000421424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042416053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005468891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029139375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00581346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009745584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15410554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414578599","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaf022","title":"The Role of Empathy in Critical Reasoning and the Limitations of Medical AI Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Medical diagnosis; Medical practice; MEDLINE; Medical knowledge; Psychiatric diagnosis","score_opus":0.09165996361682326,"score_gpt":0.39588071851242435,"score_spread":0.3042207548956011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414578599","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13293001,0.04756953,0.22900137,0.3541677,0.0009826954,0.00020554253,0.000105888,0.000364264,0.23467289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680701,0.0044571282,0.020540321,0.0045893528,0.00032357255,0.00013704569,0.0000140580305,0.000036674053,0.0018317312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94658214,0.04211501,0.00232773,0.0023136686,0.004879692,0.0017817445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81778735,0.15449852,0.008923136,0.008824003,0.0060908445,0.00387615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06392746,0.0006136982,0.00081522926,0.0024588844,0.0042848033,0.010353626,0.00271181,0.0055833156,0.0036995858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12522003,0.000820862,0.00076240685,0.0010911837,0.044415545,0.02170562,0.012685513,0.006204993,0.000530305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009460724,0.00004524649,0.0024526466,0.00060337863,0.000060378126,0.00036304104,0.037744824,0.0031808177,0.00046348353,0.90483034,0.0025268653,0.047634378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048326972,0.00009804816,0.001321597,0.00078485714,0.000027125114,0.0007506943,0.008552835,0.0067617283,0.00043132555,0.9526595,0.028492628,0.00007140745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002186374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011032153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06392746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005426526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063876365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33808476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414620189","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaf029","title":"Pellegrino and Thomasma’s Anatomy of Clinical Judgments Revisited","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Situated; Process (computing); Clinical Practice; Work (physics); Clinical judgment","score_opus":0.1286161754053852,"score_gpt":0.45325890423457477,"score_spread":0.32464272882918954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414620189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012226777,0.08230719,0.12638335,0.40280974,0.003974287,0.00019268027,0.000090526955,0.00017499072,0.37184048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80672926,0.034939136,0.07316604,0.05023489,0.0076352376,0.000537932,0.00005933394,0.00021618631,0.02648208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9704147,0.021049978,0.0008846159,0.0019733452,0.004656784,0.0010205323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599705,0.034123033,0.0013154647,0.0013327677,0.0026214235,0.00063684717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021315375,0.0011088954,0.0009988638,0.007706848,0.006288338,0.013787783,0.002787097,0.012379639,0.0039623207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04723882,0.0008283818,0.0012375484,0.0039414586,0.09176652,0.022806313,0.0061644795,0.017680999,0.0010107365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074657887,0.000005906472,0.000048070568,0.00003913018,0.0000026033886,0.000049057213,0.004742946,0.00008849613,0.000030119083,0.98792773,0.0021847405,0.0048736995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013557574,0.000010816218,0.00013721161,0.00022659078,0.000004164194,0.00019767426,0.0013261789,0.00041220622,0.000075197306,0.93535775,0.06222059,0.000018053446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005622979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029766907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021315375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012825167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009815251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11272788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}