{"meta":{"query_hash":"78c6d215392a","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine"},"cohort_total":54,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":54,"exported":54,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/78c6d215392a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Medicine+and+Philosophy+A+Forum+for+Bioethics+and+Philosophy+of+Medicine"},"results":[{"id":"W1757378269","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhv063","title":"Beyond (Models of) Disability?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Oppression; Medical model of disability; Value (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Ontology; Disability studies; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Gender studies; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1243529322203259,"score_gpt":0.3817393267353224,"score_spread":0.2573863945149965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1757378269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02352757,0.0058364184,0.0009226064,0.9557637,0.0005287192,0.0004850598,0.000041175528,0.0000067811206,0.012887944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882019,0.008492715,0.00012973182,0.0010194043,0.002101428,0.000002572114,0.0000022852214,0.000011583611,0.000038335682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974552,0.00032226442,0.0009698287,0.00016806615,0.0008570203,0.0002276608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954017,0.002681225,0.0008363641,0.00025103986,0.0005980495,0.00023164372],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056694024,0.00018206093,0.00067959144,0.00012798393,0.00031784564,0.0000044837016,0.00032773256,0.00017929316,0.000050552997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009310084,0.00007464114,0.000121174,0.00020954252,0.027955469,0.00026348207,0.000048527447,0.00023951121,1.431171e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064048625,0.00009519745,0.00066921115,0.00026137911,0.00009857987,6.535437e-7,0.012719227,0.0000013201774,0.0006188765,0.97248834,0.0008363028,0.011570446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003210932,0.0026303038,0.00009780797,0.0010717924,0.00027190958,0.000013488505,0.0056770802,0.000014714247,0.00014867261,0.9837956,0.0029717358,0.00009596948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008050653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001324017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96467435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023421706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009433868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9746899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967037242","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.417.3009","title":"Shifting the Autonomy Debate to Theory as Ideology","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Autonomy; Ideology; Criticism; Feminism; Sociology; Epistemology; Nothing; Ideal (ethics); Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.11985743494541266,"score_gpt":0.3925853119336358,"score_spread":0.27272787698822315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967037242","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0100891795,0.008908409,0.0009889536,0.9367627,0.0007113332,0.0005590036,0.0000126350515,0.000016042399,0.04195178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93957126,0.005464562,0.00014105153,0.048501514,0.0062044323,0.0000077182585,0.0000025277843,0.000023971203,0.000082987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962289,0.00091841526,0.0010983034,0.000239615,0.00093144306,0.00058334105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901113,0.007610067,0.0007082107,0.0003384679,0.00066865404,0.0005632829],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015072308,0.00031639743,0.00082652125,0.00029025978,0.0010882515,0.00001583441,0.00076737767,0.00034523747,0.00006971521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055557783,0.0001589219,0.00014691662,0.00047892716,0.015856948,0.00016942952,0.0001368646,0.0012042312,0.0000022296026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009603497,0.000037373833,0.00015391895,0.0001019862,0.0001388675,0.000010992243,0.03529055,0.0000036685162,0.000059359634,0.95799917,0.000774106,0.0044696704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019751566,0.003364136,0.00005543212,0.0008142526,0.0003884351,0.00018992586,0.009411156,0.000015921634,0.000027574712,0.93017846,0.053415485,0.00016407989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010512193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010566121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92948204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004128482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003364351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98682135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986756938","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr025","title":"What Is Human in Humans? Responses from Biology, Anthropology, and Philosophy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Technoscience; Humanity; Context (archaeology); Philosophy of science; Environmental ethics; Galileo (satellite navigation); Ideology; Philosophy of biology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Biology; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.21904526492963544,"score_gpt":0.374995550624123,"score_spread":0.15595028569448754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986756938","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40966308,0.060310397,0.00002362038,0.51976407,0.0017379913,0.00070980756,0.00025585655,0.00001593075,0.0075192237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645669,0.026474344,0.00004208466,0.0058766357,0.0029486823,0.000005822924,0.000017390688,0.000029480036,0.00003864557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973754,0.00036008903,0.0012435094,0.00032434482,0.00036280506,0.0003338128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708444,0.001014264,0.00091336714,0.00031011348,0.0004563506,0.00022144897],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028861342,0.0004006408,0.0011172912,0.00055754895,0.0006210338,0.000027354716,0.0003620991,0.00025489813,0.00043513818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022584591,0.00023411591,0.00011066293,0.00011010606,0.01900848,0.00038341316,0.00012820789,0.000786594,6.31046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015645628,0.00016122035,0.0037181687,0.00028548032,0.00030066463,0.000014353043,0.062319957,4.2328782e-8,0.0006519335,0.927899,0.0015102619,0.0015743502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051122224,0.0074615427,0.000660862,0.0018507907,0.00036194542,0.00003120321,0.011961139,0.0000074948202,0.0001950655,0.964372,0.0077516255,0.00023413282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028954835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011623075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5549038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016184986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048428235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98366123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993666335","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr026","title":"How Should Political Philosophers Think of Health?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Politics; Metaphysics; Political philosophy; Health care; Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Epistemology; Equity (law); Public health; Perspective (graphical); Health policy; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.39674692275604484,"score_gpt":0.4834581242385131,"score_spread":0.08671120148246825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993666335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068210834,0.015742356,0.0005553807,0.96495557,0.0015013788,0.00095922244,0.00006522682,0.000013087437,0.009386722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494573,0.0062844055,0.00046919516,0.038608715,0.0050728065,0.000012060885,0.000013864723,0.00003823893,0.000043443724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995102,0.0008640519,0.0022126501,0.00022225681,0.0008275935,0.0007714769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925998,0.0026244111,0.0025269075,0.00042807515,0.0011080808,0.000712722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009653438,0.00035099866,0.0014808408,0.00047110775,0.00068638084,0.000002992844,0.00044595503,0.00042159908,0.000064464366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019047266,0.0001913853,0.00013771048,0.00035739678,0.005853816,0.00019570244,0.000104278995,0.0014645329,4.3750265e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007873586,0.000115523995,0.0007507886,0.002913375,0.0001591647,0.0000010555763,0.034622394,1.3389551e-7,0.00006924323,0.944093,0.013488294,0.0029996724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004810171,0.008031309,0.00042503118,0.0034197092,0.00023570702,0.0000634584,0.032954887,0.000024605435,0.00003302495,0.93582666,0.014021267,0.00015418555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027017514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032752105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9426362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006228563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006610415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994542369","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr033","title":"Toward a Hermeneutical Conception of Medicine: A Conversation with Charles Taylor","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Library science; History of medicine; Sociology; Bioethics; Classics; Art history; History; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.20514589663387803,"score_gpt":0.33130822744303795,"score_spread":0.12616233080915992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994542369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053735856,0.025061326,0.00046837082,0.89032245,0.0021086873,0.0013509667,0.00012613405,0.00002042007,0.026805796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858859,0.00406056,0.00012383076,0.005785695,0.0040815417,0.000006256193,0.00001679586,0.000021497985,0.000017932884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976592,0.00015777365,0.0011200425,0.00017138114,0.0006416922,0.0002499165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722767,0.00055632705,0.0011823012,0.00019464828,0.00056694035,0.0002721196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022482455,0.00028236656,0.00087537395,0.00027217082,0.00024233478,0.000003417465,0.00022162325,0.00013857229,0.0003337813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012565638,0.0001379331,0.00007461088,0.00009629774,0.011979133,0.00014515052,0.000027696311,0.00046851212,4.1030475e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051035793,0.00011091265,0.00036818106,0.0018480475,0.00020887794,0.0000039767397,0.11527803,1.8671405e-7,0.00014924094,0.8714925,0.0017812414,0.0036552423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0120081855,0.029214516,0.00011919441,0.0037950613,0.00089236005,0.00017831122,0.046308044,0.000051670206,0.00015184381,0.90189886,0.0051863627,0.00019561555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056324963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000071203016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012708972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006922399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994632969","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr012","title":"Parental Wisdom, Empirical Blindness, and Normative Evaluation of Prenatal Genetic Enhancement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Virtue; Psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.3494471633912644,"score_gpt":0.4154664060065492,"score_spread":0.0660192426152848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994632969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7002933,0.0096207475,0.0030854545,0.28038546,0.001204615,0.0018759385,0.00013323217,0.00001483353,0.0033864016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907627,0.004455083,0.00031753886,0.0037438718,0.0006783524,0.000013187743,0.0000066918396,0.000018210774,0.0000043509663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962034,0.0004258107,0.001390878,0.00024818032,0.0014813637,0.00025035982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585557,0.0013831238,0.0014464018,0.0002619469,0.0008450257,0.00020796013],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004255692,0.0002818172,0.00068827777,0.0003875397,0.0002463532,0.0000049885293,0.00033390985,0.0001636736,0.000077930425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021147886,0.00016556715,0.00006563771,0.00037279679,0.011518164,0.00017459848,0.00013091163,0.0006576106,2.908951e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008762641,0.002346283,0.002908371,0.0050407792,0.0008602934,0.00003093024,0.1155629,0.000009097729,0.13402134,0.6705375,0.004206757,0.055713136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008186004,0.011233914,0.00043448084,0.0018945107,0.000745774,0.00020276822,0.0025103274,0.0004912218,0.037567057,0.93631285,0.00023004312,0.00019101941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046603483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005830742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2904694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020806763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012478507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014395762","doi":"10.1080/03605310490882975","title":"The Difference that Difference Makes: Bioethics and the Challenge of ?Disability?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Medical model of disability; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.24437225337803403,"score_gpt":0.45920561693320083,"score_spread":0.2148333635551668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014395762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011431686,0.040844288,0.0011922433,0.9414936,0.0009848756,0.0012127827,0.000038773862,0.000010981963,0.0027907952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.887503,0.09901877,0.00020724405,0.01116161,0.0020319293,0.00002188617,0.0000036988574,0.000030662704,0.000021170426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99263936,0.0026908838,0.0020885337,0.00033015865,0.0017144535,0.0005365845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94212675,0.053243652,0.0024952188,0.0007451402,0.00103364,0.00035558542],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03200014,0.0004459666,0.0014198365,0.00014455037,0.0020585726,0.000008876281,0.00091957615,0.0006724483,0.000018773362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017370986,0.0001746123,0.00015171841,0.00030181877,0.07751419,0.00012011575,0.0003227674,0.0066952454,4.0421457e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031643475,0.00010188844,0.0007832463,0.0019372423,0.00023565095,0.0000026721204,0.024719559,8.235563e-7,0.00008608047,0.96459275,0.00016969461,0.00420604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012491357,0.004015568,0.0005432036,0.005724135,0.0007116244,0.00006975333,0.028471386,0.0000459779,0.00003996183,0.9467623,0.0009645471,0.00016015251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013707404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040081592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93033195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045035034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031170115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018307866","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jht056","title":"The Hippocratic Thorn in Bioethics' Hide: Cults, Sects, and Strangeness","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hippocratic Oath; Bioethics; Strangeness; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Traditional medicine; Law; Medicine; Political science; Physics; Particle physics","score_opus":0.183002663332198,"score_gpt":0.46208021500487245,"score_spread":0.27907755167267445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018307866","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023655768,0.043703906,0.00033090307,0.9261416,0.0011885241,0.0014505422,0.000021191869,0.000012182821,0.0034953912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91967136,0.05895452,0.00030732542,0.017944619,0.002993108,0.000036286783,0.000006682502,0.000041231644,0.000044869576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99326324,0.0025513784,0.002089807,0.0002975823,0.0012031463,0.0005948564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96452504,0.0318178,0.001628271,0.00045207015,0.0011299854,0.00044681123],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026411366,0.00040408075,0.0010964689,0.0003160371,0.001596342,0.000013770959,0.00056905084,0.00070899486,0.000057257017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011712464,0.00018999561,0.00008186957,0.00040696553,0.015852869,0.00027101408,0.00018928823,0.006395249,0.0000017671475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015865866,0.000103861574,0.0028152177,0.003462219,0.00031000178,0.000013461955,0.024093388,0.0000020283335,0.00066098373,0.9458445,0.009180074,0.01192771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006265209,0.0031543872,0.00056414976,0.0048337216,0.0003918327,0.00011349722,0.028647829,0.00019976345,0.000027255792,0.9510324,0.004582166,0.00018776972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015032394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034265497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.908197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003933734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003062539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029475285","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr024","title":"Multicultural Medicine and the Politics of Recognition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Cultural Competency in Health Care","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Personhood; Vision; Negotiation; Politics; Cultural diversity; Value (mathematics); Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.23716766263478095,"score_gpt":0.3899814229674855,"score_spread":0.15281376033270455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029475285","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05349854,0.045963783,0.00003549662,0.890525,0.0009945784,0.0009652893,0.000046890233,0.00001100222,0.0079594115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96647346,0.025258008,0.00022644554,0.004493518,0.0035037766,0.000005155294,0.000007575358,0.000013285047,0.000018802612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699277,0.00045465352,0.0012182954,0.00016253315,0.0008647272,0.0003069969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368745,0.003194423,0.0012668946,0.00019838926,0.0013547842,0.000298053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061050314,0.00025080072,0.00093296217,0.00019385944,0.00067766383,0.0000041853627,0.00035389696,0.00020967872,0.00004763921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032135108,0.00010679271,0.000100845966,0.00028391066,0.022233604,0.00014878446,0.000061527346,0.0006377858,1.5188589e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017834441,0.000043524662,0.00026866753,0.0008272756,0.00018466794,0.0000033816798,0.19483155,2.878998e-7,0.00018701638,0.79702574,0.002190902,0.002653549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007953996,0.0044098804,0.00017077492,0.0027992988,0.0007405044,0.00011435714,0.0635641,0.000033472457,0.000065201886,0.91727823,0.002737613,0.00013258183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041105105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018471644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020905622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008767704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033923131","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhp054","title":"Clinical Research in Context: Reexamining the Distinction between Research and Practice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Clinical Practice; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.6997599043628012,"score_gpt":0.6058049002541721,"score_spread":0.09395500410862911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033923131","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11637536,0.010707931,0.00007726626,0.867667,0.0003856672,0.0010990198,0.000013233606,0.000005028679,0.0036694733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639046,0.019934068,0.00022982228,0.008903943,0.006956512,0.0000116370975,0.000008193819,0.000027858838,0.000023338234],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922706,0.0020537388,0.0017762564,0.00033821876,0.0026461827,0.0009150143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943759,0.050489843,0.0006194984,0.0004932121,0.0024715487,0.0021668538],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1195559,0.00024421213,0.0011084946,0.000790097,0.00062494725,0.000015102004,0.00036926035,0.00046812065,0.000016383816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13291483,0.00011313989,0.00007175314,0.00083445734,0.023150532,0.00017550816,0.00019297973,0.00723633,6.1177826e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.032398142,0.0008883326,0.03917123,0.004835869,0.0006535968,0.00021880261,0.018558385,1.9406785e-7,0.0020377499,0.43384302,0.029015977,0.4383787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018484714,0.04789251,0.0074843764,0.007323524,0.00043957063,0.0016426843,0.022954395,0.00008203165,0.000059579386,0.8128908,0.08056843,0.0001773628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008457385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012011301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8587631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038357408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010925268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061815728","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr034","title":"Questions in Contemporary Medicine and the Philosophy of Charles Taylor: An Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Epistemology; Theme (computing); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political philosophy; Philosophy; Politics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.20226637052442897,"score_gpt":0.37637807841744847,"score_spread":0.1741117078930195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061815728","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026631372,0.04661547,0.00007704997,0.9194265,0.00067256094,0.00092074944,0.000026089852,0.0000125216275,0.0056177084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96696895,0.024969187,0.00015086925,0.0024389755,0.005423209,0.000011579295,0.0000074663963,0.00001815664,0.000011630574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640226,0.0008002949,0.001361053,0.0002579962,0.00088396977,0.0002944056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955288,0.0017999548,0.0013436201,0.00026699665,0.0008008562,0.00025973548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00841456,0.00032865943,0.001248127,0.00032191892,0.0006778099,0.0000064387077,0.00042485303,0.00024027418,0.00003292969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023789462,0.00015326653,0.00010240787,0.00041280218,0.028834237,0.0003330113,0.000088838024,0.00077237096,1.1904816e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022744718,0.00010828364,0.0011035132,0.00033899638,0.00022038496,0.0000033456622,0.12253835,7.100531e-7,0.00023028608,0.86967707,0.0013677478,0.0021368393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009451447,0.004797872,0.0006957371,0.0014749246,0.00049231754,0.000046495607,0.041052442,0.0000341339,0.000047089135,0.9371348,0.0045901905,0.00018253132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007127458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043095212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94033754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003195897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008019626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070274352","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.5.523.10321","title":"Conflicting Interests, Social Justice and Proxy Consent to Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Ignorance; Mandate; Research ethics; Normative; Institutional review board; Law; Economic Justice; Proxy (statistics); Political science; Clinical equipoise; Veil of ignorance; Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Clinical trial; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.7009016491116048,"score_gpt":0.5976475664850377,"score_spread":0.1032540826265671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070274352","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02787514,0.016470235,0.00017794373,0.946479,0.00038533518,0.0010658883,0.000027640132,0.000010224557,0.007508585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562761,0.022927755,0.0004982097,0.014876681,0.0052036275,0.000010548564,0.0000042607326,0.00004159179,0.00016118743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949266,0.00047984152,0.0015504976,0.00036879003,0.0021288267,0.000545476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741777,0.02158327,0.000608863,0.00035835677,0.0025488443,0.0007229303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02158161,0.00031699488,0.0012086999,0.0006711376,0.00065326574,0.000016119031,0.0003856165,0.00049472554,0.00006532995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024832709,0.00018038684,0.00011280048,0.0005145108,0.013488663,0.00008420177,0.00029497241,0.0038453483,0.0000013019043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006291624,0.00033177284,0.0009258171,0.008497991,0.0005633587,0.00007226384,0.024587594,7.044357e-7,0.0028429285,0.92228746,0.021327218,0.012271235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0113224,0.025003092,0.00019745872,0.009392156,0.001240963,0.00090282696,0.009916194,0.00026548337,0.00022562938,0.92750037,0.013810441,0.00022296517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014454228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003364158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9316023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039326547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017831875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070516711","doi":"10.1080/03605310600712851","title":"Bioethics as Ideology: Conditional and Unconditional Values","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Bioethics; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Positive economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.31058607821292833,"score_gpt":0.5363035263583699,"score_spread":0.22571744814544153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070516711","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010177761,0.6185794,0.00022656874,0.37441406,0.0010938921,0.0009766435,0.00037691754,0.000012540893,0.0043098014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003506901,0.96295244,0.00045003268,0.02172438,0.010650611,0.00004364848,0.00047870583,0.00008915314,0.0001041451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98943174,0.0038167988,0.003701551,0.00051106623,0.0019132608,0.0006255569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417439,0.050536312,0.0050667343,0.00047384488,0.0016799646,0.00049924257],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026193842,0.00084160967,0.0038172961,0.00082477654,0.0017521549,0.000008251684,0.00068029785,0.0022230027,0.00017517958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014539691,0.00045953348,0.00032135413,0.00043354754,0.034963183,0.00021703407,0.00031586055,0.011511203,0.0000043624455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047190383,0.00008155598,0.000042906922,0.02938092,0.00074815593,0.00002587028,0.0018381652,3.5155543e-7,0.0000013347477,0.92071915,0.0339539,0.012735761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033182313,0.0030986848,0.0000047509884,0.032530785,0.0031815385,0.0006877812,0.0017199168,0.0000049929804,3.112969e-7,0.6319085,0.3233012,0.00024330968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004937539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038826463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35268965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007619151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001276837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082973924","doi":"10.1076/jmep.28.4.427.15966","title":"Subjectivity and Values in Medicine: The Case of Canguilhem","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Philosophical methodology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12881465024448802,"score_gpt":0.35818786199085273,"score_spread":0.2293732117463647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082973924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25381687,0.101056345,0.000038773313,0.61954653,0.0017560023,0.0009461744,0.000087147644,0.0000073414635,0.022744827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857592,0.007357303,0.000038501734,0.0045181536,0.0022686918,0.0000044505573,0.0000034816542,0.00001774731,0.000032448483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976631,0.00036850193,0.001119198,0.00017210557,0.00040797482,0.00026915365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962684,0.0020605216,0.000882195,0.00024893903,0.00031962522,0.00022032],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005874708,0.0002756895,0.000893786,0.00030165294,0.0004406521,0.000005175836,0.00019177629,0.00012213952,0.0000778239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005551702,0.00012576158,0.00006779717,0.00014022828,0.009444784,0.00009815748,0.000033963723,0.0006572057,8.1473864e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008558491,0.000077825534,0.0007281374,0.0013203601,0.000107085936,0.000026756594,0.05103952,5.338148e-7,0.000050502902,0.9407203,0.0026119016,0.0024611854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058168937,0.0067594605,0.000096444885,0.002126404,0.00037256262,0.0013261267,0.033500314,0.000027939317,0.00004928243,0.9424254,0.007365351,0.000133832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036748822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014334318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73194236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000128684715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083942294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99325097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092322817","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhp016","title":"Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Reproductive Freedom, and Deliberative Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Stanford Law School; University College Dublin; University of Exeter; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Egalitarianism; Normative; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Libertarianism; Deliberation; Harm principle; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Harm; Politics; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.09174335687241228,"score_gpt":0.36633599804919253,"score_spread":0.2745926411767803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092322817","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14624287,0.060798295,0.0005257471,0.7903906,0.00029636818,0.0010616458,0.000021581931,0.000020480104,0.0006424008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400458,0.049917977,0.0018635286,0.0053311763,0.0027960422,0.000007806891,0.000010286723,0.000019218838,0.000008196352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975889,0.00014608995,0.0010563907,0.00036707276,0.0005516303,0.00028993146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648094,0.0010352635,0.0009495313,0.00038804917,0.00087581616,0.0002704199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023502102,0.00032594815,0.0010411509,0.00040910207,0.00031233748,0.000005862395,0.00015739769,0.0002298992,0.000006620657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022480995,0.00017649849,0.00007577597,0.00029118522,0.005036979,0.00014820285,0.000045575824,0.00077961426,1.4440442e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01997955,0.0007612071,0.018238267,0.004345159,0.0013586457,0.00012147574,0.023503527,0.00001646238,0.0076904623,0.6854326,0.017198924,0.22135372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071622254,0.024182184,0.008249371,0.0021318553,0.0009585778,0.0020453122,0.0020501302,0.000048892212,0.0011793098,0.9506459,0.001176849,0.00016938096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007674183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036836555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7938029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020185673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009608712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99767077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092623743","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.3.319.2984","title":"Human Cloning: Three Mistakes and an Alternative","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Reproductive Biology and Fertility","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Framing (construction); Human cloning; Cloning (programming); Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Human enhancement; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering); Law and economics; Computer science; Business; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1989171554816026,"score_gpt":0.3801533712915784,"score_spread":0.1812362158099758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092623743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34554094,0.058584783,0.00029763175,0.5899365,0.00042831,0.00080757757,0.000033496242,0.000015727372,0.0043550436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882877,0.004217918,0.00022793905,0.0035143038,0.0036855082,0.0000041206217,0.00000980719,0.000023404462,0.000029332947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778754,0.00018930656,0.0009413032,0.0003306514,0.00048192934,0.00026929963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997248,0.00060605805,0.00077302154,0.00039519832,0.00061951124,0.00035822566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003205936,0.00033281685,0.0010758257,0.00026494794,0.0003606825,0.000005059719,0.00020881892,0.00024884267,0.00004547602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077306567,0.00017468932,0.00009613683,0.00016154874,0.009714251,0.00014118297,0.000044882505,0.0008350326,1.9709935e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027852874,0.0014657328,0.03202623,0.0042930404,0.0029592095,0.00013322849,0.0430146,0.000004128573,0.030536916,0.810476,0.008472618,0.03876544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010843884,0.027252493,0.0066231056,0.0017269934,0.0011494891,0.0010685709,0.0022184378,0.00022633279,0.0005742892,0.9457805,0.0023102993,0.00022558612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012833692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015444979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6427467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014429042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026290802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093020889","doi":"10.1080/03605310701255735","title":"Equipoise and the Duty of Care in Clinical Research: A Philosophical Response to Our Critics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Constructive; Presupposition; Clinical equipoise; Duty; Epistemology; Sociology; Dimension (graph theory); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine; Clinical trial; Computer science","score_opus":0.5969553625238638,"score_gpt":0.6108084616549729,"score_spread":0.013853099131109103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093020889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13922472,0.024568548,0.0001680733,0.8330072,0.00035961322,0.0013581,0.00003288612,0.0000057700927,0.0012750432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649829,0.020678855,0.0006557875,0.010254133,0.003350855,0.000008729885,0.0000041414796,0.000044321696,0.000020264031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978096,0.0021059038,0.0037371216,0.00048359638,0.0031685857,0.0007238095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93292165,0.060987163,0.0008363731,0.00075964944,0.0036206306,0.0008745596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12620343,0.0003758075,0.0021018372,0.001087935,0.00031646306,0.000009552054,0.00068027043,0.0008188114,0.00000783884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08301174,0.00018634848,0.0002612458,0.0009300174,0.021854207,0.00008352371,0.0004530829,0.005902825,4.2775773e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.18345687,0.00040732522,0.003391769,0.0037191766,0.00036933715,0.00013964681,0.016374934,0.0000017484826,0.000932343,0.78304154,0.0009674648,0.0071978215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026521113,0.035051752,0.0020427715,0.00836239,0.0005109159,0.00038066242,0.0154976435,0.00003977147,0.00017087266,0.9100634,0.0011973294,0.00016137694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020591418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015439357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82575816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054576238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000561149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102334346","doi":"10.1076/0360-5310(200010)25:5;1-w;ft569","title":"The Ends of Medical Intervention and the Demarcation of the Normal from the Pathological","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Intervention (counseling); Context (archaeology); Normality; Fallacy; Naturalism; Epistemology; State (computer science); Mainstream; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Computer science; History; Nursing","score_opus":0.08657771627797028,"score_gpt":0.33721749075292495,"score_spread":0.25063977447495467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102334346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117835246,0.045183036,0.00002948056,0.83157545,0.00082894,0.00049281097,0.00007312885,0.0000028572933,0.003979045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724482,0.018493248,0.00001019448,0.006132665,0.0028540944,0.0000057755146,0.000007615335,0.000009224156,0.000038952592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970581,0.0005794543,0.0011573249,0.00011431955,0.0009092852,0.00018153811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951746,0.0032362668,0.0009680942,0.00028062027,0.00022362894,0.00011682623],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074185464,0.00018471696,0.0005247647,0.00004907794,0.00077726855,0.000010154472,0.00055513973,0.00013550221,0.00023931613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004112738,0.000055772838,0.00015618888,0.00007939216,0.013551638,0.00006558863,0.00007910928,0.0007226222,1.6705955e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035546375,0.00009028513,0.0005180591,0.00035967858,0.000174011,7.6080613e-7,0.025461312,6.702631e-7,0.000014837041,0.9381166,0.0028420996,0.028867047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007168427,0.0032883526,0.00072983495,0.002120673,0.00049431884,0.00009195044,0.010323992,0.00015152998,0.000026401425,0.95816964,0.017357307,0.00007757889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093018677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024737336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.854613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005381057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005439826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105789017","doi":"10.1080/03605310490503579","title":"Collective Moral Imagination: Making Decisions for Persons With Dementia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Dementia; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.22548346325782545,"score_gpt":0.4765568570658505,"score_spread":0.25107339380802507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105789017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018015456,0.012366051,0.035030127,0.9390567,0.00085409946,0.0015923277,0.000076102624,0.000014485368,0.009208538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681037,0.0030173787,0.006852129,0.018597681,0.0032966384,0.00004102561,0.00001238371,0.000044495548,0.000034572342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629885,0.0006396054,0.0012911028,0.0002571997,0.0010777747,0.00043549374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97887087,0.017017948,0.0016509044,0.00029404182,0.0018652653,0.00030097106],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012428898,0.00032018428,0.0009200459,0.00038174182,0.0018494109,0.0000057793955,0.00038055624,0.0003559635,0.00003587534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098231,0.00016875997,0.000102271355,0.00040957236,0.0070554777,0.00022402374,0.00009438071,0.0028756293,4.2737724e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056985496,0.00012002321,0.0005878172,0.0010235048,0.000600061,0.000009797945,0.029167753,0.000018993256,0.00011464721,0.9552903,0.005368837,0.0019996779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015571545,0.00863695,0.000102918915,0.0072445073,0.0014332592,0.00014334444,0.017342532,0.00011284805,0.000017609464,0.94459283,0.004634565,0.00016707773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011642235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005501722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96630216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097839715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008677062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115124278","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.4.343.3011","title":"Feminist Ethics and the Metaphor of AIDS","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Bioethics; Dominance (genetics); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.11412974651012273,"score_gpt":0.37683984978225243,"score_spread":0.26271010327212974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115124278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051450413,0.12196193,0.001037094,0.7965661,0.0013379179,0.00095623644,0.00008788155,0.000013355665,0.026589032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675052,0.01942747,0.00014615913,0.010619867,0.0022000757,0.000008855273,0.000008927722,0.000027180411,0.000056270594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966931,0.00077560364,0.0012633187,0.0002242288,0.0007602129,0.0002835772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99214345,0.005437574,0.0012722441,0.00037874992,0.0005641569,0.00020381474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011418358,0.0003240966,0.0011756723,0.00030982992,0.0003714583,0.0000072325156,0.00036698094,0.0003524125,0.00008583152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014706115,0.0001468743,0.00017253439,0.00034044994,0.0122729475,0.0000675672,0.00007311662,0.0014424956,4.0812978e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069735567,0.00011671374,0.00036853,0.0004969102,0.0007710763,0.00001560909,0.039550506,3.630284e-7,0.00036097007,0.9404716,0.0015941041,0.009280098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016301857,0.0073578046,0.00013807739,0.0011985848,0.0020101243,0.0010733347,0.022527616,0.000020188712,0.00012373035,0.94139594,0.0076866015,0.00016614643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003606315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020056956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9160548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000067298893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059970323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120330028","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr029","title":"Informed Consent and Relational Conceptions of Autonomy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Agency (philosophy); Informed consent; Sketch; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Social science; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.30407202282453744,"score_gpt":0.36062012122232934,"score_spread":0.0565480983977919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120330028","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0825585,0.05072378,0.00027728605,0.75058264,0.002460188,0.0012923987,0.00031181335,0.000016916554,0.11177649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868538,0.0063154153,0.00029825376,0.004665915,0.0017796311,0.0000036983656,0.000013247446,0.000011456813,0.000058577793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983031,0.0000795951,0.0010048972,0.00010288263,0.00033905898,0.0001704593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969411,0.0014523146,0.00091343344,0.00013338009,0.00034472204,0.0002150739],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014415515,0.00018552816,0.00055275986,0.0002221932,0.00032290682,0.00000302836,0.00012808146,0.000099579716,0.00021947708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023040175,0.000102366386,0.00006532064,0.000052991687,0.0083370535,0.00012234873,0.000032965134,0.00034908712,2.6709e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009289568,0.000054975757,0.00082326465,0.0010867136,0.000117042764,7.6902865e-7,0.04738236,1.4932972e-7,0.00001989595,0.94627315,0.0023522906,0.0009604207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049658515,0.0067276508,0.00033557168,0.0021894674,0.00034529023,0.00008860795,0.012717103,0.00001769652,0.000024687768,0.9579735,0.014499411,0.00011517023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033338348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014414558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9042953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009644231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025180803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122034985","doi":"10.1076/jmep.27.3.339.2978","title":"Extending the Human Life Span","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Life expectancy; Life span; Demise; Natural selection; Longevity; Harm; Senescence; Biology; Human life; Disease; Environmental ethics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Evolutionary biology; Psychology; Sociology; Genetics; Medicine; Demography; Political science; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09592613166548251,"score_gpt":0.32239327607304946,"score_spread":0.22646714440756693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122034985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14812794,0.09648108,0.002692343,0.7486999,0.0008116793,0.00064489624,0.00003554846,0.000008943672,0.002497645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692177,0.018648434,0.00015184091,0.0076096454,0.0042796,0.0000032686137,0.000011183724,0.000030955383,0.00004734301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807143,0.00016965833,0.0007841918,0.00021409271,0.00048126673,0.00027936237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805456,0.00028575433,0.0006909629,0.00040149095,0.0003305725,0.00023664652],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024213328,0.00029022616,0.000556781,0.00013730125,0.00044806895,0.0000094140505,0.000459417,0.00021248749,0.000034777375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051541056,0.00014820976,0.00012319376,0.000121459685,0.0045408607,0.000010889566,0.00011338576,0.0005036769,3.6709008e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024398922,0.00074468623,0.0062147956,0.0027584538,0.0028139164,0.00003128533,0.039028317,0.00018200574,0.21863599,0.59555393,0.10733047,0.024266217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010860858,0.017694503,0.000565472,0.0013565416,0.001395807,0.00073790556,0.0041212416,0.00046402097,0.005193882,0.91528296,0.041761894,0.00056492176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006404583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012856502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8210898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005844946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028435563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99816823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127835924","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.1.35.3035","title":"On Risk and Decisional Capacity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Competence (human resources); Appeal; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Mental capacity; Sociology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.16789518111240703,"score_gpt":0.41461682597166627,"score_spread":0.24672164485925924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127835924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46734583,0.019524535,0.0012031547,0.50553,0.0013364612,0.0004615401,0.00008835524,0.000010989105,0.0044991383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781072,0.012400389,0.00022502078,0.006611849,0.0025990708,0.000003414517,0.000004404762,0.000025780397,0.00002286681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969971,0.00042376615,0.0011334277,0.0002837838,0.0008199252,0.00034199338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916057,0.0061987387,0.0009568496,0.00035585032,0.0004530593,0.0004298079],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061298874,0.0003212832,0.0008938857,0.00043776567,0.00039173695,0.000006408565,0.0002909678,0.0003429175,0.00008858763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020801579,0.00016304763,0.00010692981,0.00025307343,0.005195911,0.00006108631,0.000053085514,0.0012231782,0.0000012727464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010633464,0.00035840023,0.0018472741,0.00039179056,0.0006490189,0.00025407548,0.015738623,0.000008270931,0.00014042524,0.78960496,0.008889733,0.17148395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006716975,0.010788597,0.001362039,0.0020648874,0.00029757342,0.0028051434,0.0024063406,0.000047822658,0.0000064570863,0.9650324,0.008313284,0.00015846817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033142598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016879207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5107614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000141860655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054246593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130179557","doi":"10.1076/jmep.26.3.285.3022","title":"Acculturating Human Experimentation: An Empirical Survey in France","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Transactional leadership; Psychology; Aptitude; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Social science; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.6591876307650544,"score_gpt":0.5955553106546103,"score_spread":0.06363232011044406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130179557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39719218,0.011976196,0.00029115131,0.5877441,0.00028369276,0.0006830419,0.000017551347,0.000009666885,0.0018023936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786187,0.009293205,0.00052562205,0.008985511,0.0024658928,0.0000075388148,0.000030302692,0.000030180134,0.000043068143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565077,0.0005188492,0.0017511931,0.00030897956,0.0014179685,0.00035225254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98904425,0.008013246,0.0008079678,0.0003999335,0.0012932022,0.00044139507],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016205594,0.0003005736,0.0011507875,0.00037611544,0.00028428336,0.000009502483,0.00037069054,0.00044448412,0.000053020856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068477383,0.00016455715,0.0001014205,0.00051367655,0.006442286,0.00018104112,0.000089710455,0.002323984,2.841668e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017104892,0.0016614285,0.42020506,0.0044494593,0.00093532645,0.00027560926,0.053673986,0.000019790323,0.01973842,0.46303514,0.00412573,0.014775156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015348773,0.021322783,0.022325726,0.004677124,0.00025964138,0.00055360416,0.004737413,0.00012788804,0.0003370524,0.92931676,0.00077248533,0.000220746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005247138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019919417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5814265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030314643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001698247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132418305","doi":"10.1080/03605310591008603","title":"ICU Psychosis and Patient Autonomy: Some Thoughts from the Inside","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; Connaught Fund; University of Alberta","keywords":"Autonomy; Psychosis; Personal autonomy; Psychology; Patient rights; Psychoanalysis; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Political science; Law; Health care","score_opus":0.12518138804955395,"score_gpt":0.3782367023058621,"score_spread":0.2530553142563081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132418305","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008140281,0.65725446,0.000048199036,0.33993822,0.0007125431,0.0012504526,0.00018374521,0.000008514382,0.0005224409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007817899,0.9281788,0.00022571,0.054241147,0.009304491,0.000026060936,0.00010089585,0.00009370995,0.000011298907],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536407,0.0004919875,0.0022215473,0.00047295488,0.0010053421,0.00044407605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98822784,0.0053280103,0.002413909,0.0005987246,0.0029823515,0.00044916253],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002240948,0.0009115331,0.0038425534,0.00059732376,0.00038859973,0.000014072035,0.0004275794,0.0006367009,0.000021882612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034494766,0.00040752708,0.000512198,0.00039470018,0.008782642,0.00014022303,0.00016740778,0.0022602966,7.877617e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016249184,0.00015758713,0.000040198553,0.007851465,0.0026847294,0.000039502233,0.0071926205,1.6782657e-7,0.000008931555,0.03205056,0.02063699,0.9277123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005367718,0.007435589,0.0000141553655,0.05892785,0.009062416,0.000877968,0.0037908964,0.000008076173,0.0000057022908,0.28130358,0.63286704,0.00033901824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014929281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013966558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9273733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069671376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003968669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146685042","doi":"10.1080/03605310500499203","title":"The Ethics and Science of Placebo-Controlled Trials: Assay Sensitivity and the Duhem–Quine Thesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Appeal; Placebo; Clinical trial; Assay sensitivity; Aside; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Alternative medicine; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.3941801818369858,"score_gpt":0.5096282646228812,"score_spread":0.11544808278589547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146685042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02578466,0.05458277,0.0006347906,0.9145099,0.0003408215,0.0016441242,0.000030249916,0.000007463966,0.0024652528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9327902,0.06042447,0.00028698982,0.004047184,0.0023621616,0.000011815729,0.0000025556265,0.000027099844,0.000047518788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891281,0.0037381423,0.0030725119,0.0004041418,0.0031433331,0.00051374594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7919953,0.20271865,0.0020912818,0.0005334745,0.0023446942,0.0003166239],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2566108,0.000408473,0.0029603825,0.00040163705,0.0012306166,0.00002944503,0.00044713973,0.0005452321,0.0000068128884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1577181,0.00014999583,0.00029724545,0.0005087962,0.058214232,0.0001215983,0.00026983352,0.004239298,9.516201e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04188349,0.00012670159,0.0004137482,0.0013320096,0.00067662995,0.00001346573,0.0035746738,0.0000030181566,0.004135542,0.9410676,0.00054229796,0.0062308717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.045030385,0.0055726003,0.00024045965,0.0033750837,0.0021541575,0.00045563863,0.0028121432,0.00090139813,0.0007428669,0.93807817,0.00049651397,0.00014060215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046429326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012353616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9104627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025218158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006065151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99805796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146787238","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhv013","title":"A Family-Oriented Decision-Making Model for Human Research in Mainland China","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Peking University; Medical Research Council Canada","keywords":"Mainland China; Harmony (color); China; Informed consent; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.6488557554326542,"score_gpt":0.5878811024293545,"score_spread":0.06097465300329963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146787238","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117273025,0.024208888,0.015058007,0.8349281,0.0006459151,0.0026035828,0.000076931494,0.000015122334,0.005190437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839143,0.0064747375,0.0034491105,0.0035605875,0.0024656085,0.000023080163,0.000012610193,0.000053597698,0.000046331614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378824,0.000378263,0.0020465045,0.00040867546,0.002752497,0.00062582374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760868,0.018906781,0.0007328858,0.00057430164,0.0030344161,0.00066478964],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04579315,0.0003467616,0.0014978452,0.0011592023,0.00037309068,0.000010578441,0.00053673406,0.0006221924,0.00000612885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021382133,0.00019312839,0.0001726766,0.0007185063,0.008917595,0.0001226138,0.0002382402,0.003589103,2.6925105e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020601647,0.00045411053,0.0022231434,0.0029687712,0.00031107175,0.000054265405,0.011330969,0.00007810453,0.0008752119,0.94719917,0.005912904,0.007990617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018344937,0.017005213,0.00022907185,0.012398136,0.00028395414,0.0001880249,0.0032255563,0.0058430647,0.00002544664,0.94154507,0.0007551159,0.00015638271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020512556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085829306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8666413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008676211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006375611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148510017","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhu020","title":"Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Referent; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Relative risk; Philosophy; Mathematics; Confidence interval; Statistics","score_opus":0.36071696377008716,"score_gpt":0.4750319989977756,"score_spread":0.11431503522768843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148510017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042266816,0.008125085,0.00079211517,0.94317263,0.00058623846,0.0008944039,0.00004434615,0.000012306386,0.004106083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779854,0.012591238,0.00066890736,0.10396515,0.004646489,0.0000103417005,0.0000071997515,0.000051633608,0.000073597315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475425,0.0006191126,0.0018401734,0.00032597315,0.0019489098,0.00051158154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701841,0.025681948,0.0011755885,0.00077187846,0.0014465816,0.00073993276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02365509,0.00042486456,0.0014514261,0.00059505453,0.00049794774,0.000014562277,0.00062698644,0.0005281649,0.000080528036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024556382,0.00019547241,0.0002508702,0.0006076931,0.009725998,0.000089012174,0.00021744591,0.0033609576,9.874253e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015117723,0.0003238338,0.003290232,0.0024996425,0.0013943763,0.00002607528,0.019092754,0.0000098603605,0.0022556533,0.8560651,0.084753975,0.0151707735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00998937,0.021899272,0.00038804684,0.0034433086,0.001315164,0.00048440506,0.003179355,0.00021857982,0.00025640352,0.9159074,0.0427144,0.00020432496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046082624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013241569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8392075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027838665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022162225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152273753","doi":"10.1080/03605310490500545","title":"Minimal Risk as an International Ethical Standard in Research","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration of Helsinki; Harm; Declaration; Commission; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Informed consent; Political science; Research ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.3681491076343622,"score_gpt":0.5496925389063827,"score_spread":0.1815434312720205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152273753","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014932969,0.68770146,0.000025925721,0.3085713,0.0006939523,0.0010766292,0.0001514432,0.0000071782088,0.0016227389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03401095,0.95380545,0.00046916056,0.0029148562,0.008588209,0.000020001207,0.00008819831,0.00008534539,0.000017816497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913942,0.0015458165,0.0031007365,0.0005583811,0.002776632,0.0006242354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98770183,0.006595547,0.0019650967,0.00066535885,0.0022580065,0.0008141408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028145093,0.00067228294,0.0038732442,0.0017676483,0.00035587058,0.00001797539,0.00081393565,0.0020563758,0.000055879806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008335103,0.00036327544,0.00037393952,0.0008508565,0.010207769,0.00014802397,0.00020880465,0.011874546,0.000001045358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064037084,0.0003443478,0.00019280883,0.05927491,0.00096463796,0.0002959114,0.012380672,0.0000012380767,0.0000022220224,0.6336357,0.0014624364,0.2850414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006436965,0.02069854,0.000007737904,0.06558561,0.0017655154,0.001235367,0.0015187062,0.000008751926,0.0000010809299,0.5683023,0.33420613,0.00023332739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00113263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000568279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3327437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001963759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018614879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152662042","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhs057","title":"Human All Too Human Reasoning: Comparing Clinical and Phenomenological Intuition","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"European Science Foundation","keywords":"Intuition; Bioethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.4085742563848706,"score_gpt":0.5316484665720749,"score_spread":0.12307421018720427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152662042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13194206,0.009077329,0.000603927,0.83278096,0.00089051685,0.001252743,0.000010406357,0.000026333133,0.02341574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96528125,0.0060895076,0.00050409045,0.023050498,0.0049795173,0.000017676244,0.000014459472,0.00003190527,0.00003109148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937598,0.0021126394,0.0024482766,0.00031822643,0.0008907172,0.00047031208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98649824,0.009632,0.0020404928,0.00036810036,0.0008888298,0.0005723638],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022079915,0.0003503943,0.0013958905,0.00026333655,0.0014453976,0.000009003389,0.0004296851,0.0007192996,0.00013458257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069064638,0.00019188329,0.0000989577,0.00016136817,0.013629332,0.00024016915,0.00027162227,0.0059979074,0.000001926681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048783692,0.00012572289,0.0058789286,0.0009778981,0.0002631458,0.0000056770386,0.007068537,4.1705997e-7,0.00046360816,0.97241694,0.010834384,0.001476891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00815704,0.008080033,0.0015317177,0.0033087826,0.00058675726,0.00009457346,0.008567788,0.0000969951,0.0000045517227,0.9652594,0.00412986,0.0001825114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047379124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025973322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8333392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002676866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008501385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153910246","doi":"10.1080/03605310590960193","title":"From the Local to the Global: Bioethics and the Concept of Culture","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Sociology; Ethnic group; Scholarship; Socialization; Health care; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Social science; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.14920805538283824,"score_gpt":0.46943378810445924,"score_spread":0.320225732721621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153910246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017738632,0.05401812,0.0028049552,0.93584055,0.0009791568,0.0012261317,0.00015968166,0.000008950272,0.0031885675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564336,0.01823063,0.00040338028,0.11591284,0.008944558,0.000014375267,0.000009745529,0.00002555631,0.000025369096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926843,0.0031359745,0.0018647318,0.00027393698,0.0016048148,0.00043620996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625852,0.03330235,0.00185848,0.0006508275,0.0012423376,0.0003608118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026480436,0.0003868193,0.0011532871,0.00008271482,0.0016161244,0.000008416694,0.0010414179,0.00064179307,0.00005388842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013456163,0.00013264485,0.00014263079,0.00043365813,0.03992346,0.00013248973,0.00035174747,0.005942667,0.0000014557089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030404588,0.000047219863,0.00021545618,0.0003078361,0.00035261296,0.0000021353285,0.06365185,0.000011012538,0.00002383896,0.894462,0.032328762,0.005556802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008824787,0.002441962,0.00006848476,0.0031369207,0.0010531254,0.00007762372,0.06498586,0.00016510926,0.00002509911,0.8487739,0.0703146,0.00013252579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024444566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048571808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8546597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040520852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027839973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156828052","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhr050","title":"The Medical Minimum: Zero","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Health Services Management and Policy","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Forcing (mathematics); Zero (linguistics); Government (linguistics); Health care; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.25792543716913635,"score_gpt":0.45826811349729474,"score_spread":0.2003426763281584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156828052","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073135076,0.02076659,0.00034867102,0.93994164,0.0017460168,0.0010025812,0.000019854146,0.000015343387,0.028845806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90553695,0.038519517,0.00012966685,0.049256776,0.006356532,0.00001883711,0.0000071437557,0.000037942256,0.00013660493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954877,0.0007199521,0.0019286892,0.00018945138,0.0010921989,0.000581989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912464,0.005463899,0.0016182752,0.0004235595,0.00066396815,0.00058391585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013331532,0.00031802265,0.0008998309,0.00027051006,0.0013160668,0.0000032122239,0.00074974797,0.0003945862,0.0001633311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015467963,0.00013941867,0.00010778765,0.00031428656,0.0056782435,0.00011403084,0.00019915705,0.0016493986,0.0000029493892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026482837,0.000073505085,0.0012282357,0.0023250119,0.0003020591,0.000012062008,0.027553987,1.0879205e-7,0.000022615597,0.9166788,0.03850911,0.010646229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063776993,0.004870082,0.0003249137,0.003384788,0.00041652296,0.00006360362,0.0074911625,0.00007487102,0.000006304556,0.89315814,0.08369101,0.00014089003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089104887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001409514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89822346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019219411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026729668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163932426","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jht045","title":"Rethinking Voluntary Euthanasia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Perspective (graphical); Morality; Health care; Personal autonomy; Sociology; Philosophical methodology; Psychology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24420799773242605,"score_gpt":0.4615473046845997,"score_spread":0.21733930695217366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163932426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011992059,0.018737977,0.0009483595,0.95091814,0.0017178876,0.0011603219,0.000019678326,0.000020107034,0.01448548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92970276,0.01345631,0.0010579238,0.046867993,0.008766627,0.000020593232,0.000011796467,0.000050820563,0.00006515856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378055,0.0018497092,0.0021402885,0.0002776164,0.0014001598,0.0005516433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97484046,0.020269599,0.0022281692,0.00048258077,0.0016512303,0.000527984],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02163751,0.00039331973,0.0012286868,0.00039431002,0.0013452008,0.0000056522267,0.00062795606,0.00069906085,0.00030122994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01140492,0.00020949305,0.0001230964,0.00035027,0.010133236,0.00032956613,0.00021217404,0.0064368867,0.0000050375143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012857819,0.000074231844,0.0018826163,0.0029384722,0.00043063436,0.000012333306,0.040514186,0.0000012440929,0.0007833113,0.903842,0.041135795,0.0070993984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057646697,0.0043036845,0.00026080653,0.006009215,0.00064103893,0.00014971054,0.013657626,0.00011887877,0.000022752065,0.958789,0.010094746,0.00018791096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013507138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049882925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9177107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040158553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024330935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167210268","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhn025","title":"Public Health Insurance under a Nonbenevolent State","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Public health; State (computer science); Library science; Philosophy of medicine; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Nursing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3327493158140065,"score_gpt":0.35014575194425274,"score_spread":0.017396436130246218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167210268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013988479,0.05078663,0.0041237674,0.9276,0.0005187881,0.00047039334,0.00013822845,0.00000894239,0.0023647426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099342,0.06199397,0.00024502838,0.026557546,0.0012014061,0.0000060421908,0.000007887392,0.000024435974,0.000029465189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723583,0.000118685035,0.001718066,0.00024125737,0.00025597576,0.00043015505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996724,0.00054719334,0.0017243166,0.00031556655,0.00027004632,0.00041888963],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055719973,0.000270859,0.0011287394,0.0005325059,0.00039299915,0.000006189942,0.0003235931,0.0001236979,0.000019854124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043338846,0.00017694508,0.00011184161,0.00032127867,0.0033252644,0.00016738336,0.00007622879,0.00055852113,0.0000013101716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027404347,0.00009631784,0.0016533993,0.0007206296,0.00020512556,0.0000045634647,0.0066328254,0.000008845613,0.000007114287,0.98292005,0.003331233,0.004145869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045234715,0.004896403,0.0016323877,0.0006430901,0.000024690376,0.00017463109,0.0006838412,0.00009356531,0.000005866206,0.9535922,0.03356463,0.00016522506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015274353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053576343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90104246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000455497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012224601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560663898","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw031","title":"Narrative Aversion: Challenges for the Illness Narrative Advocate","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Personal narrative; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12160019695443787,"score_gpt":0.3678191349692532,"score_spread":0.24621893801481537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560663898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01977925,0.049391568,0.0011141385,0.9268204,0.0010568777,0.0011063521,0.000025392648,0.000009321118,0.0006967103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9347753,0.05273627,0.00015858728,0.0073529175,0.004828947,0.00003119452,0.0000083932155,0.000028758386,0.00007962743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751556,0.00018593002,0.00097428716,0.00025249156,0.0007521404,0.00031957807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99214107,0.0050476436,0.0009544691,0.00032798585,0.0011542646,0.00037458644],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046698763,0.00034198374,0.0009952572,0.00023499707,0.00054725126,0.0000035568862,0.00028737122,0.00025839554,0.000049049217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027916352,0.0001269182,0.00017977566,0.00019742406,0.0075541404,0.00013808445,0.000052685868,0.0005654096,3.1896317e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012715762,0.00031252397,0.00007108064,0.002240959,0.0012371029,0.000011069749,0.5679508,9.670558e-7,0.0017227122,0.3030212,0.013856925,0.09685894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016566975,0.01772531,0.00013944646,0.006782878,0.001488324,0.0005176356,0.26367602,0.00003824557,0.00081831415,0.6721053,0.019923966,0.00021755461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041038988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009178021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91946745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030947533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022085891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99514675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586441227","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw039","title":"What Does the Patient Say? Levinas and Medical Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing ethics; Obligation; Face (sociological concept); Analogy; Medical ethics; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Situational ethics; Military medical ethics; Subject (documents); Applied ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Nursing; Medicine; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.13699469174769502,"score_gpt":0.36980896477177144,"score_spread":0.23281427302407642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586441227","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058222003,0.044355813,0.0003207671,0.89481556,0.0009581508,0.00063152646,0.000027492099,0.0000104405235,0.0006582418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86580944,0.10149324,0.000095289884,0.03022928,0.0023045172,0.000006476477,0.0000056704084,0.00002867841,0.000027416241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958318,0.0004576945,0.001300036,0.00027505175,0.0017681497,0.00036727477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98931694,0.00785424,0.0009646336,0.00045919826,0.0008355804,0.00056940527],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072557204,0.00039379112,0.0010955554,0.00027592553,0.00045494773,0.000013772251,0.0003687155,0.000501387,0.0000671105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006095388,0.00013372015,0.00014838077,0.00022739179,0.0112929605,0.00028328339,0.0001889336,0.0015392972,5.0713595e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012651803,0.00054086157,0.004024267,0.004747775,0.0016679809,0.00011872924,0.05788001,5.069249e-7,0.0030337318,0.72192675,0.011642832,0.18176475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011810314,0.015756913,0.0003210508,0.016252026,0.0011776554,0.0014983151,0.0069266963,0.000027349948,0.0005124856,0.9194995,0.025978468,0.00023918871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008271704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031737494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8645863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021378168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026663943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99139774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588017142","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhw066","title":"The Ethical Principles of the Portuguese Psychologists: A Universal Dimension","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Counseling Practices and Supervision","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Psychological Association","keywords":"Portuguese; Dimension (graph theory); Adaptation (eye); Engineering ethics; Ethical values; Bioethics; Point (geometry); Ethical issues; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.12549758831952607,"score_gpt":0.38464363858456274,"score_spread":0.2591460502650367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588017142","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03352134,0.043458216,0.00037278704,0.91837484,0.0014466922,0.00039767718,0.000026565622,0.000006492769,0.0023953638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95612955,0.037479274,0.0000600429,0.00492,0.0012930098,0.000002618061,0.0000012616904,0.000020178091,0.000094034796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970485,0.00057580235,0.0011047295,0.00021175502,0.00079063274,0.0002685862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991636,0.0056539616,0.0013504447,0.00057481887,0.00062691036,0.00015791235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007857801,0.00024903033,0.00062094297,0.00014067885,0.00036795653,0.0000038753037,0.0005954955,0.00036483406,0.000042987413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016531635,0.000082227685,0.00016210422,0.00022878045,0.008618888,0.00007719971,0.00012171506,0.0010616644,4.6158584e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0073842006,0.00014539549,0.00059025176,0.0002161032,0.00047019994,0.000014676826,0.00984178,0.0000015025838,0.0024674018,0.9045716,0.006253953,0.06804295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01088932,0.010417626,0.0014298154,0.0036623606,0.00083683775,0.0006782609,0.0057667024,0.00004048286,0.0001240227,0.90293604,0.06301238,0.00020616117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015894396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002228833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92260826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011479367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071080736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605486355","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhx006","title":"Truth or Spin? Disease Definition in Cancer Screening","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reductionism; Epistemology; Disease; Objectivity (philosophy); Appeal; Philosophy of medicine; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Philosophy of science; Scope (computer science); Medicine; Philosophy; Pathology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Biology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.31234651308899136,"score_gpt":0.41019338829126945,"score_spread":0.09784687520227808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605486355","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0355749,0.031742632,0.00006368658,0.9199762,0.0021745597,0.00057197106,0.00018125451,0.0000072629223,0.009707553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752332,0.011967904,0.000082413964,0.0066175954,0.0060220067,0.000009025625,0.000011696995,0.000019732744,0.0000364133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981573,0.000098110366,0.0008663346,0.00015887823,0.0004569971,0.00026232883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744695,0.00063548604,0.0010893653,0.0002735133,0.00023169983,0.00032296497],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021563354,0.00023653623,0.0006295546,0.00024894075,0.00085276255,0.00001914503,0.00031534216,0.00009015113,0.00015348998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040416335,0.00011982426,0.0000770664,0.000042219726,0.0049567916,0.00020770016,0.000049750277,0.0005191717,2.4675055e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005916161,0.00009299867,0.0018389259,0.0014997646,0.000091238835,0.000012253667,0.010125774,9.787486e-7,0.000009600991,0.9695705,0.0019242725,0.008917543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008172951,0.00485275,0.00087897654,0.006422376,0.0003527716,0.00003692073,0.004843581,0.00007257261,0.000006810729,0.9645004,0.009695675,0.00016418009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001196015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054900785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9396583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001224084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100725425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2832492673","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhy009","title":"An Epistemic Argument for Research-Practice Integration in Medicine","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Elitism; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Order (exchange); Sociology; Transformation (genetics); Health care; Politics; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.6201752658057844,"score_gpt":0.6017771940372039,"score_spread":0.01839807176858055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2832492673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010556099,0.013356654,0.002519579,0.966853,0.0006549526,0.0017473695,0.000026286529,0.000011054825,0.0042750086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953392,0.02336779,0.0021461719,0.012390261,0.008538743,0.000029669613,0.00002854411,0.00005289265,0.000053881424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931229,0.0008704517,0.002378243,0.00047486127,0.0025410203,0.00061252026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609239,0.030669224,0.0011100337,0.00071221765,0.0059509273,0.00063366024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059333954,0.000380063,0.001519069,0.0011135448,0.00043651514,0.000010934623,0.000619946,0.0006410149,0.00004652415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046456758,0.00020230169,0.00012804066,0.0007722862,0.02221415,0.00027002653,0.000121040524,0.0034821369,7.680867e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018944781,0.00044624446,0.00037935036,0.002152537,0.00028480354,0.000023451617,0.012478366,0.0000011697123,0.0076537565,0.9385972,0.0049798386,0.01405847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014499745,0.065098755,0.0001274353,0.011339901,0.0005712786,0.00039615986,0.010816715,0.00043449755,0.00061448396,0.89066243,0.0052817236,0.0001568626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053501246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000181051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9544627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009809948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040758628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946744580","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab041","title":"Reconciling Regulation with Scientific Autonomy in Dual-Use Research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Normative; Dual (grammatical number); Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Censorship; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Risk analysis (engineering); Positive economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Business; Economics; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.6377498291168069,"score_gpt":0.5415566889946979,"score_spread":0.096193140122109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946744580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16483578,0.014681342,0.00027879223,0.8162993,0.00039876802,0.0007900987,0.000017729892,0.000008280231,0.0026899136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862761,0.007620245,0.0014645188,0.0025478306,0.0017569758,0.000007854473,0.000022219781,0.00003546979,0.00026876596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944891,0.00059550785,0.0015802231,0.00042765433,0.0024357913,0.00047173272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756047,0.018068792,0.00063009997,0.0006150234,0.0046616257,0.00041972054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033622753,0.00025976528,0.0010821978,0.0008679174,0.00042153784,0.000027772725,0.00022273381,0.00044186178,0.0000456107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017984789,0.00014225587,0.000101630896,0.0011584609,0.014932963,0.00021215963,0.00015766788,0.0035829141,4.7529466e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010149237,0.00045883196,0.0089868875,0.004310879,0.0004726437,0.00031309098,0.012918254,0.000023812801,0.008930277,0.9442822,0.0020660926,0.007087846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010588457,0.009476391,0.0011973238,0.011865791,0.00030511696,0.0010214628,0.0037311532,0.00026558797,0.0010972631,0.95653635,0.0037682608,0.00014682532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017141196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019881113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82144034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085025524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014597961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998798653","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhz029","title":"Ethical Issues in Physician Billing Under Fee-For-Service Plans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Taboo; Solidarity; Order (exchange); Dimension (graph theory); Public relations; Service (business); Medical ethics; Professional responsibility; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Business; Law; Political science; Politics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.18517127295437744,"score_gpt":0.46282952329284294,"score_spread":0.2776582503384655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998798653","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06290998,0.0072575086,0.00029728824,0.9247424,0.00091444544,0.0012518346,0.000043973916,0.000010582993,0.0025720038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9185727,0.006026698,0.00029561404,0.07035635,0.004644685,0.000017482627,0.00001930062,0.00003424821,0.000032876025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960236,0.00070425915,0.0016835235,0.00027863204,0.0008226778,0.00048732117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856149,0.01170656,0.0011905222,0.00036591073,0.0008190225,0.0003030959],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011039793,0.0003314661,0.0013629127,0.00032425352,0.00037333323,0.000003999819,0.00039532006,0.00069221284,0.000070821465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023855646,0.00017761758,0.00010733284,0.00036667899,0.0023983931,0.00014915378,0.00009268523,0.0028617636,0.000002804269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004486887,0.00016536812,0.0038274936,0.0063938173,0.00024621937,0.0000039579218,0.026525853,0.000019228879,0.0012128446,0.9500475,0.0052579124,0.0018129278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009618374,0.005488689,0.00038771192,0.0076960935,0.0003773096,0.000019681027,0.02513544,0.00028992863,0.000038897182,0.91569537,0.03505496,0.00019752061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071862235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013959371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85566276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029648923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001995137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001641223","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhz040","title":"Transhumanism, Moral Perfection, and Those 76 Trombones","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transhumanism; Humanism; Sociology; Human enhancement; Epistemology; Dystopia; Environmental ethics; The Imaginary; Ideology; Ethos; Posthuman; Technoscience; Futurist; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Political science; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.17960803173427153,"score_gpt":0.366423868914119,"score_spread":0.18681583717984745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001641223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20897722,0.0073005743,0.0011088661,0.77710426,0.0014887471,0.0010667301,0.00006415753,0.00002716114,0.0028623072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762189,0.0097117685,0.000104858555,0.012343696,0.0015276413,0.0000058962623,0.0000042940383,0.0000315579,0.000051379484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970975,0.00026253,0.0011138004,0.00033802228,0.00087509933,0.00031305786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594927,0.0022438567,0.00087137707,0.00030505695,0.00038692597,0.00024352608],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028895417,0.00033407172,0.0008375346,0.00044160412,0.0003982053,0.000013744327,0.00034622411,0.00020646957,0.00007187689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010872381,0.00019371866,0.00008844466,0.0003894301,0.008973972,0.0002169382,0.0000775664,0.0010559685,8.52378e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010523038,0.00014963244,0.00030402615,0.0010664167,0.00009518186,0.000008467896,0.0067318943,0.0000027865572,0.096378036,0.88962525,0.0014762311,0.0031097722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069884737,0.010253945,0.00015244239,0.0016607677,0.00030139493,0.00036414544,0.0012739418,0.00016852345,0.005683223,0.969799,0.0031337484,0.00022042877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044747943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005302935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7672417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001370915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006455548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99372303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146720863","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaa037","title":"Religion at Work in Bioethics and Biopolicy: Christian Bioethicists, Secular Language, Suspicious Orthodoxy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Dignity; Deference; Orthodoxy; Law; Sociology; Secularism; Legislation; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.1860090117620325,"score_gpt":0.4661395546763774,"score_spread":0.2801305429143449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146720863","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03482857,0.052345995,0.00041650244,0.9089554,0.0005773851,0.0009713743,0.000048645295,0.000024244642,0.0018319129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8775424,0.044881906,0.0006945655,0.07295207,0.0038174125,0.000011211715,0.000019846057,0.00006128651,0.000019349061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293184,0.0024110402,0.0022490644,0.00045154162,0.0013286181,0.00062788924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98025405,0.015935594,0.0019486415,0.00039718184,0.0006843614,0.00078019075],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01969105,0.0005064058,0.0015203402,0.0004720858,0.0008523993,0.0000071247546,0.00052060944,0.0011322215,0.000042162166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017668623,0.00030457872,0.000117881485,0.0008018619,0.017928703,0.00014999307,0.0003778434,0.007470157,0.0000021919263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00901757,0.00013132044,0.0058393376,0.0069026053,0.00038159278,0.00011798028,0.12708911,0.0000050006333,0.001234386,0.82579654,0.021204483,0.002280053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013100664,0.0070969774,0.00027326206,0.009508439,0.0008578396,0.00024873216,0.043427255,0.0001515406,0.00010862676,0.9127066,0.012073254,0.00044682235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00235502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002879072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8427138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006559585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026007358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157483961","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab004","title":"A Genealogy of Autonomy: Freedom, Paternalism, and the Future of the Doctor–Patient Relationship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Paternalism; Teleology; Bioethics; Obligation; Epistemology; Philosophical methodology; Beneficence; Sociology; Philosophy of medicine; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.1370333197505721,"score_gpt":0.42713013597232924,"score_spread":0.29009681622175715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157483961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049760904,0.048896484,0.00034831837,0.8954598,0.001838053,0.0007785235,0.000061405444,0.0000044256117,0.002852115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694562,0.011472215,0.00035332123,0.015365478,0.003280189,0.000009756795,0.0000060570396,0.000023150804,0.00003364315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931929,0.0033102802,0.001982237,0.00019588869,0.001039262,0.00027944535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732769,0.021783598,0.0027629512,0.0005266723,0.0014460317,0.00020382204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015303458,0.0002590877,0.0010914581,0.00015491032,0.00081645907,0.000002728558,0.00045019915,0.0005036324,0.000047763227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009032083,0.00010864823,0.0001495388,0.00034509238,0.012586165,0.000094631265,0.00026809747,0.003967459,1.6650046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018405535,0.000063634485,0.0034946734,0.0016539805,0.00028613335,0.00000452008,0.03453188,0.0000038355374,0.000237095,0.9544651,0.002043939,0.0013746511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008968361,0.0021131872,0.0007532454,0.0036414827,0.0008929119,0.00013025745,0.013383963,0.00007759512,0.000073501935,0.9635363,0.0063326336,0.000096524986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039818668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007949691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91969526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027023503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005578824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172249225","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab007","title":"The Most Good You Can Do with Your Kidneys: Effective Altruism and the Organ-Shortage Problem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Altruism (biology); Economic shortage; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.03308947230173553,"score_gpt":0.30351106997037425,"score_spread":0.2704215976686387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172249225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021193951,0.035079837,0.00035638805,0.9386602,0.00028655905,0.0012944282,0.000058123303,0.000010817965,0.0030596876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96213835,0.026910564,0.00017034571,0.009167676,0.0014772704,0.000014515202,0.000029489423,0.000034873472,0.00005692819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997541,0.00030433925,0.0008271793,0.00023268619,0.00082956516,0.0002651911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954626,0.0023046916,0.00070408505,0.00030706316,0.00092879456,0.00029276215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003591008,0.00032484357,0.00085744035,0.00016085133,0.0005922073,0.000020429397,0.00018305356,0.0001653538,0.00001528603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006576807,0.00012578287,0.00008548248,0.00040240062,0.006295301,0.00008305717,0.00004261082,0.0009073751,1.508247e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014108106,0.00020438999,0.0035924048,0.0022473014,0.0020323033,0.00010057001,0.030783655,0.000003308028,0.0019984154,0.9258733,0.0017891116,0.017267177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05801208,0.013761535,0.0018515759,0.006357402,0.0051291757,0.0051125684,0.015622902,0.000113069786,0.0022921027,0.88145393,0.009940066,0.0003536045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105674844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005322894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9409444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018609084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021534773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184708473","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab012","title":"Children, Fetuses, and the Non-Existent: Moral Obligations and the Beginning of Life","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Morality; Wonder; Transformative learning; Miscarriage; Right to life; Philosophical methodology; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Human rights; Pregnancy; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.09379288870561692,"score_gpt":0.3611559250063823,"score_spread":0.26736303630076536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184708473","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048575014,0.14098918,0.0001493984,0.80793047,0.0003043527,0.00071504404,0.000040718205,0.000004946074,0.0012908492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91044503,0.071954876,0.00027111967,0.013866383,0.0033925339,0.000006767367,0.00001749022,0.000024915767,0.000020899824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968321,0.00039671225,0.0013810338,0.00023701917,0.00087670004,0.00027645502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928845,0.004099027,0.0011118731,0.0004139764,0.0011276708,0.000362909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007330405,0.00031285375,0.0014463168,0.00021918109,0.0005239379,0.000013198018,0.00023418205,0.00027071792,0.000009793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031134028,0.00013370193,0.0001608235,0.00040366742,0.015074509,0.00008882128,0.00015512893,0.0015413692,6.984199e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005562886,0.00009293509,0.007140825,0.0022502262,0.0008424833,0.000014859841,0.021332031,0.0000034152783,0.00008549194,0.95741874,0.001752014,0.003504098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.037744038,0.0039809668,0.0020414027,0.0035984335,0.002650693,0.0012644248,0.007858839,0.00037398635,0.00005855661,0.9382603,0.0019838582,0.0001844555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006110858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020717434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010667327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028602465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98760587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211001172","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhab034","title":"Access-to-Care and Conscience: Conflicting or Coherent?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Intervention (counseling); Psychological intervention; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.19335777814042027,"score_gpt":0.45513883347965883,"score_spread":0.26178105533923857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211001172","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047474522,0.08516794,0.00027176886,0.86106265,0.00080338394,0.0008582462,0.000058364643,0.000012929005,0.0042901807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353089,0.033893712,0.00085831655,0.026284443,0.0035629529,0.000006575689,0.000014943934,0.000030424926,0.000039782084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969077,0.00019905904,0.0012237345,0.00033258696,0.00096780923,0.0003691278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935735,0.00266199,0.0007287325,0.0003494686,0.001973585,0.00071273325],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035580297,0.00033489065,0.0012209923,0.00035445692,0.0004401577,0.000022592068,0.00028124082,0.0003233127,0.00005427581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036681346,0.00017691327,0.00009813636,0.0005638462,0.004849611,0.00014753801,0.00019829466,0.001282227,2.3668343e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015003177,0.00043097988,0.029683052,0.027090877,0.0013517548,0.00060240447,0.12155504,0.000008260273,0.0047593093,0.6831228,0.01736182,0.09903052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028692517,0.044968266,0.0013994549,0.020205963,0.0033749908,0.006113349,0.056688774,0.00016883707,0.0013502815,0.73369604,0.10258498,0.0007565239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019439026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034969325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025566835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047523124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99785864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308059422","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhac029","title":"Can a MacIntyrian Care about Severely Disabled Strangers?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Interpretation (philosophy); Disabled people; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.09599272531328362,"score_gpt":0.3196983156525368,"score_spread":0.2237055903392532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308059422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05152646,0.024571253,0.00009450423,0.912861,0.0014340539,0.0009081732,0.00047786097,0.000022395556,0.0081043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829302,0.005113713,0.000051449017,0.010019836,0.0017919723,0.000011680165,0.0000128011825,0.000033120596,0.00003522274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690896,0.0003672799,0.0009666007,0.00030210312,0.0010813312,0.0003737223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970097,0.0012106264,0.00088946783,0.00033080566,0.00025140969,0.00030801224],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019469053,0.0003430201,0.0008356114,0.00032440975,0.0008177188,0.000008730813,0.00060336996,0.00011461449,0.00012171772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006580227,0.00019654387,0.00015001127,0.0004294311,0.004607529,0.00010849094,0.00016364513,0.0010530053,2.3823132e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055597275,0.0002552511,0.00051548856,0.0020575693,0.00023984138,0.00011520635,0.041274402,0.00006952447,0.01704548,0.9101225,0.008320197,0.014424827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008552226,0.011769408,0.00008068453,0.001004769,0.0005083804,0.00087717763,0.00859951,0.00011725538,0.0012457833,0.95616406,0.010789318,0.00029144427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023336889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027109407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93140376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034949946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001125006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99810135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367856496","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhad019","title":"Evidence-based Medicine and Mechanistic Evidence: The Case of the Failed Rollout of Efavirenz in Zimbabwe","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Evidence-based medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Psychological intervention; Efavirenz; Positive economics; Epistemology; MEDLINE; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Antiretroviral therapy; Law; Economics; Psychiatry; Family medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7936951828489627,"score_gpt":0.5305091262581133,"score_spread":0.26318605659084937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367856496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1255741,0.0763597,0.00083405426,0.7946452,0.0006252784,0.0015355451,0.000042208645,0.0000031418576,0.00038079757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854508,0.010774329,0.000117518204,0.002826148,0.0007588437,0.00001193986,0.0000018358708,0.000018054465,0.000040540872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823047,0.004847571,0.008092318,0.00047257755,0.003963711,0.0003191373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479944,0.040374286,0.0079272,0.0015692555,0.0019037207,0.0002311523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1382145,0.00045749624,0.0040876335,0.00095266465,0.00033314285,0.000022939874,0.0015602857,0.00021516132,0.00017254594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06637534,0.00014315086,0.0005697207,0.002322468,0.0070262207,0.00019555721,0.00022468356,0.00077364553,0.0000010498958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006370095,0.00036396857,0.023914464,0.012233877,0.0026382853,0.0003022973,0.059807513,0.00037666096,0.009266522,0.7832383,0.048071876,0.053416137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042708525,0.0047644977,0.0010131808,0.017201161,0.0024097103,0.00049545435,0.010364069,0.0044733477,0.00016553269,0.9538608,0.00080793514,0.00017343501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034717005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118959615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8598767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000167127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001744259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392282422","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae002","title":"Beyond Conceptual Analysis: Social Objectivity and Conceptual Engineering to Define Disease","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology; Theoretical definition; Conceptual framework; Naturalism; Disease; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09479008579706479,"score_gpt":0.33301231476583715,"score_spread":0.23822222896877238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392282422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12450931,0.101793535,0.00047474104,0.76589936,0.0021693362,0.0007335888,0.00046862784,0.000031554184,0.003919957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98511446,0.0018210565,0.00005443248,0.006219815,0.00670674,0.00000672029,0.000021434558,0.000022351509,0.000032980948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812394,0.000102030615,0.0007719578,0.00022207877,0.0005013118,0.00027867334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979424,0.0009563753,0.0002853243,0.0001330329,0.00021968587,0.00046319657],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001894146,0.00028769256,0.00079463556,0.00046590142,0.00042967196,0.000020501151,0.00015804273,0.00009928277,0.00008524664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016535423,0.00016596551,0.00013688419,0.0002164831,0.0051590037,0.00013533274,0.00005310857,0.0005522702,4.3566365e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009698271,0.000037755224,0.00017769325,0.0009130143,0.00053056085,0.0000073298716,0.051293567,0.000003974399,0.000046179393,0.94131446,0.003169112,0.0015365578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046231574,0.007905334,0.0003250672,0.0022658138,0.00402633,0.00006724441,0.026913596,0.00046465755,0.000015288191,0.9152362,0.037778433,0.00037892952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017002807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060875027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8606052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015322637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008237646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396871968","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae021","title":"Ethical Problems of Observational Studies and Big Data Compared to Randomized Trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta Hospital; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Temptation; Randomized controlled trial; Context (archaeology); Informed consent; Psychology; Medicine; Research ethics; Randomized experiment; Medical physics; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Surgery; Psychiatry; History","score_opus":0.8855603813236204,"score_gpt":0.6170519194353139,"score_spread":0.26850846188830646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396871968","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006133919,0.122313246,0.0013656415,0.8672083,0.0008201031,0.001574876,0.0001593791,0.000010618709,0.00041390842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8873855,0.09510811,0.0016701041,0.011202525,0.00450601,0.000017035916,0.00004379661,0.000035880345,0.000031044463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924024,0.0011711918,0.0035404132,0.000436707,0.0021392659,0.00031006738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90040714,0.09527606,0.0010714047,0.0006001704,0.0021944523,0.00045077523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08838472,0.00035774757,0.0038731582,0.0005926874,0.00017963746,0.000012425189,0.00052042084,0.0005843583,0.000015991072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10442022,0.00016917237,0.00023274666,0.0005118776,0.015359269,0.000098050215,0.0004188621,0.0031007195,2.256075e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06583283,0.00013614786,0.0001947069,0.017134896,0.0033854968,0.000023215096,0.0095189605,0.000005444437,0.0015438459,0.8840068,0.009651606,0.008566079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.053013917,0.0066771726,0.000045336543,0.023014536,0.0026986552,0.0002187474,0.0016518998,0.00049812504,0.00009829613,0.9091794,0.0027676055,0.00013631367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009651568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003174972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8812516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020587626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045357627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403596864","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhae040","title":"The WEIRD Trio: The Cultural Gap between Physicians, Learners, and Patients in Pluralistic Societies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.19073636166236918,"score_gpt":0.4108723786707293,"score_spread":0.2201360170083601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403596864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23607668,0.07826333,0.00001661802,0.6830044,0.0009379648,0.0004728471,0.00007002668,0.00000936353,0.0011488143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97466445,0.02009469,0.000009526,0.0025322705,0.00255525,0.00000701333,0.000016704711,0.000017640785,0.00010248022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979031,0.0002989117,0.0008013391,0.00019858613,0.0005049996,0.00029304976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962062,0.0028299177,0.00043904997,0.00019064959,0.00022785123,0.00010628037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023961414,0.00028384425,0.00063637027,0.000108752,0.00043375586,0.00003165468,0.00033378773,0.0001666647,0.000013508099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030262733,0.000102910744,0.00011995927,0.00024177151,0.0061638854,0.00010964556,0.00007080067,0.0009359348,4.7457235e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015298714,0.000086217675,0.007162396,0.000918231,0.00094626925,0.000008913202,0.075019546,0.0000012742397,0.00014695272,0.8125314,0.05384544,0.047803506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004123864,0.004973013,0.008106632,0.0024882576,0.00072157837,0.00005728129,0.02728154,0.00006650785,0.000008676993,0.9406081,0.011380321,0.00018422138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039413202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003835685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73858774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001427565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024616289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414578599","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaf022","title":"The Role of Empathy in Critical Reasoning and the Limitations of Medical AI Systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Medical diagnosis; Medical practice; MEDLINE; Medical knowledge; Psychiatric diagnosis","score_opus":0.09165996361682326,"score_gpt":0.39588071851242435,"score_spread":0.3042207548956011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414578599","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04099695,0.1264569,0.0003115442,0.8290977,0.0005666089,0.00063224667,0.000012225558,0.0000036545543,0.0019221567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95521885,0.039956648,0.00006677822,0.003821619,0.0008952871,0.000012911071,0.0000047465496,0.0000119076085,0.000011265856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656093,0.00039714965,0.0015398536,0.00015835516,0.0011083775,0.00023530997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872362,0.010768793,0.0006718637,0.00028219676,0.00079020625,0.0002507173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010217453,0.00021293148,0.0010729383,0.00031414343,0.00023969857,0.0000058993496,0.00030024923,0.00027728264,0.0000043147875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014610571,0.00009061284,0.000111217385,0.0004102454,0.012700113,0.00006808292,0.00007939393,0.0010761771,3.8935934e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027652904,0.00016033291,0.0007701364,0.0012358722,0.0002550737,0.0000041165626,0.027259944,0.0000017645677,0.00010178131,0.9529838,0.0007587819,0.013703102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0132062165,0.00409632,0.00065531203,0.012986283,0.0012595349,0.00033696054,0.07009594,0.0016501519,0.00017795395,0.8925257,0.002912388,0.00009727092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046847796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029426605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015101906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003773821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414620189","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaf029","title":"Pellegrino and Thomasma’s Anatomy of Clinical Judgments Revisited","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine","topic":"Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Situated; Process (computing); Clinical Practice; Work (physics); Clinical judgment","score_opus":0.1286161754053852,"score_gpt":0.45325890423457477,"score_spread":0.32464272882918954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414620189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124201655,0.07719898,0.000437378,0.7872979,0.00085715577,0.00096380047,0.000057994213,0.000013280359,0.008971848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94960594,0.03964594,0.0005609421,0.008566733,0.0015268322,0.0000029303442,0.000015331192,0.000019768966,0.000055607463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611825,0.00025809996,0.0023790295,0.00028705038,0.000695621,0.00026196608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98148525,0.015498875,0.0013710945,0.00038982977,0.0008417461,0.00041318606],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007021915,0.00032202934,0.0020317903,0.00041749238,0.00014400372,0.0000044240974,0.00022619047,0.00036129288,0.000022101745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020816814,0.00017159816,0.00022732245,0.00038100535,0.006800794,0.00006054354,0.000119662895,0.0009952628,1.7626411e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017385049,0.0010757657,0.08982448,0.0056741307,0.0026387074,0.00007056673,0.002747206,0.0000017265905,0.0005966754,0.75614625,0.031154111,0.09268534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031616736,0.018877871,0.010323275,0.036615085,0.0040839664,0.00042695747,0.001402871,0.00019307907,0.00022535045,0.8877067,0.0082912715,0.0002368647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008746731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033207448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010101028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019188742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}