{"meta":{"query_hash":"a822a24dbf6b","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies"},"cohort_total":79,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":79,"exported":79,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a822a24dbf6b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Peasant+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1667426471","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2015.1053875","title":"Bolivia's soy complex: the development of ‘productive exclusion’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Agrarian society; Capital (architecture); Agriculture; Production (economics); Frontier; Business; Means of production; Economics; Agricultural economics; Market economy; Financial capital; Geography; Human capital","score_opus":0.14555975706365962,"score_gpt":0.29584892901973103,"score_spread":0.15028917195607142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1667426471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97032344,0.001462098,0.00028193605,0.0012354632,0.000009294218,0.000014040237,0.000073514806,0.000010984308,0.026589269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750984,0.00031726318,0.00015061673,0.00007653871,0.0000038618896,0.0000055198857,0.00004510425,0.0000035677078,0.0018877398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995999,0.00009490755,0.000009492742,0.000049612394,0.000046635076,0.00019953107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964225,0.00006259108,0.00014642658,0.000036123587,0.000035586105,0.00007696339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069446996,0.00018726206,0.00029059936,0.0007316651,0.0034272678,0.0029299257,0.0006883233,0.00035616703,0.002503918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008464842,0.00018510022,0.0001552002,0.00095660426,0.0043775705,0.00096303155,0.0039850683,0.0007213033,0.000115471215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009382701,0.0002261384,0.4072618,0.0007754091,0.00017003971,0.0048648687,0.19546856,0.0024831458,0.015500642,0.20960031,0.005126928,0.15758397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037825586,0.00012194388,0.80214435,0.00039246018,0.000036421356,0.0005890966,0.049983468,0.0005705991,0.0010559323,0.0070163277,0.13801426,0.000037289297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14470479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19801919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14470479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007804338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029868179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28772503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999938129","doi":"10.1080/0306615031000169116","title":"Whither Lula's Brazil? Neoliberalism and ‘Third Way’ Ideology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; St. Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Ideology; Agrarian reform; Economics; Politics; Liberalization; Agrarian society; Free trade; Free market; Political economy; Pension; Political science; Market economy; Agriculture; Law","score_opus":0.04601220797455118,"score_gpt":0.2734182606686072,"score_spread":0.227406052694056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999938129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22596909,0.019060843,0.0047256295,0.25546324,0.00033038223,0.000025498242,0.00005545219,0.000062081184,0.49430773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862315,0.002019271,0.0004909516,0.0039595137,0.00007390125,0.000015281305,0.000007732566,0.000014669676,0.007187104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988555,0.00048312472,0.000018311368,0.0001043741,0.00021459395,0.00032410416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873775,0.00056920515,0.00020014535,0.00014087546,0.00017048989,0.00018158872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025344302,0.00016149667,0.00028503436,0.0006723342,0.0029939718,0.005505782,0.0004449978,0.0013271361,0.0019106579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035797856,0.000112645605,0.0002828368,0.0007352508,0.011584262,0.0031808217,0.0023242491,0.002265072,0.00018746966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006884564,0.00000766302,0.00074083946,0.000029437617,0.0000031411082,0.000059503516,0.0065509574,0.00008381151,0.00015779158,0.9831359,0.001521277,0.0077028796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021082706,0.00005113328,0.007917122,0.00075698015,0.000018315051,0.0002960907,0.014631815,0.0010150155,0.00075489527,0.52359563,0.450912,0.00002996811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02272543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0324623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02272543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007397753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005088935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053674698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002038884","doi":"10.1080/03066150701516674","title":"Rural poverty and impoverished theory: Cultural populism, ecofeminism, and global justice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Capitalism; Poverty; Sociology; Ecofeminism; Globalization; Feminism; Gender studies; Power (physics); Political economy; Politics; Political science; Economy; Environmental ethics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03769297124245119,"score_gpt":0.39403634763680156,"score_spread":0.3563433763943504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002038884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3865589,0.015881844,0.0075192912,0.09769024,0.0004392856,0.000039787683,0.00004628358,0.000033764085,0.4917906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961201,0.0010697157,0.00010896421,0.00073486165,0.00006214179,0.00000842834,0.000003402273,0.000003859559,0.001888715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814713,0.0013312434,0.000021152937,0.00011867788,0.00013831755,0.000243573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767953,0.0014994871,0.00026473624,0.00015682458,0.00015489895,0.0002445836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002130137,0.00034904407,0.00027130175,0.0020545705,0.004446912,0.005108722,0.0009924822,0.001677459,0.0042848093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002172022,0.000087953995,0.00018937042,0.001997822,0.050207894,0.0037965956,0.007743829,0.0019664096,0.0001320887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005276303,0.000027477601,0.00079258985,0.0000344483,0.0000031284683,0.00013258004,0.029426817,0.00013223468,0.000032204018,0.9652942,0.0009098772,0.0032091474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011649013,0.000030191648,0.0023457725,0.0002261525,0.000005462084,0.00012956759,0.09127607,0.00051154505,0.00011378149,0.85046947,0.054871444,0.000008894937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033007374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031856347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005108722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004113227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014998771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029843688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002278951","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2013.876623","title":"Farmers, foodies and First Nations: getting to food sovereignty in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Sovereignty; Indigenous; Food systems; Right to food; European union; Agrarian society; Political science; Sociology; Sustainability; Political economy; Economic growth; Agriculture; Food security; Economics; Law; Geography; International trade; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.025346495443721168,"score_gpt":0.20823029485037464,"score_spread":0.18288379940665347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002278951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32242462,0.019908588,0.0015881789,0.23152107,0.0008770682,0.00010635368,0.0012116671,0.00006686859,0.42229563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396878,0.0070965034,0.00077098294,0.007356157,0.000043554577,0.000024171131,0.00019969943,0.00002958483,0.04479159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620336,0.00050654804,0.00006193558,0.00031443947,0.0011408523,0.0017727236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547017,0.0010262585,0.00022440152,0.00011191761,0.0018386802,0.0013286343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025925213,0.00027866813,0.00036380175,0.0015560767,0.027662145,0.010107586,0.0013728262,0.0018510909,0.009267838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063636187,0.00025523678,0.0002566717,0.0053664157,0.00959307,0.0027450938,0.004412482,0.0037245776,0.00018421651],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009780381,0.00004783677,0.035789315,0.0004060998,0.00004373815,0.0017918922,0.17784064,0.0013402944,0.0007451145,0.5840278,0.123918615,0.07395073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021179305,0.000017843118,0.07011632,0.0007381431,0.000035272107,0.00015291787,0.22043276,0.0009679049,0.00042848365,0.021202257,0.6857433,0.00014370099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9985964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21815087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21815087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2818479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9068342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013693163","doi":"10.1080/03066150902820297","title":"Agrarian change and peasant studies: changes, continuities and challenges – an introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Peasant; Pace; Scope (computer science); Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Agrarian system; Political science; Agrarian reform; Sociology; Economic system; Political economy; Economic growth; Agriculture; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.17174071378312747,"score_gpt":0.28116397062776904,"score_spread":0.10942325684464158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013693163","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051863194,0.5809846,0.0067528686,0.18027681,0.0069543496,0.00017922361,0.0003516807,0.00009207939,0.17254514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4511854,0.4802132,0.011435426,0.014390521,0.0122075975,0.0003201004,0.0003026369,0.000072640134,0.029872399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881256,0.0006184996,0.00008144484,0.00012669957,0.00026558418,0.000095178904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958956,0.003129386,0.00021283001,0.00015767252,0.0003946963,0.0002097669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025136683,0.00039248154,0.00047738172,0.003718775,0.004065426,0.008214055,0.00076468755,0.0024877696,0.0032208946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003373092,0.0002663849,0.00025488512,0.011483186,0.01047337,0.0062243943,0.0035839295,0.0034120479,0.0002589261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025236033,0.00011931434,0.004904442,0.001762164,0.00001608392,0.0006506671,0.09783833,0.000396289,0.0005617367,0.7605907,0.041940305,0.09119478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005957583,0.000069667316,0.008097799,0.0020132547,0.000005733714,0.00044156204,0.06594337,0.00027586796,0.00012200414,0.15544707,0.7675504,0.000027409431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057123443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008327186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008214055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041228505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030011896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029913545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025910106","doi":"10.1080/03066150903142964","title":"The<i>2008 World Development Report</i>and the political economy of Southeast Asian agriculture","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Agriculture; Boom; Southeast asia; Politics; Work (physics); Political science; Economy; Agrarian system; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Sociology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.02697423833012689,"score_gpt":0.3142348073800242,"score_spread":0.2872605690498973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025910106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35189122,0.032840073,0.0021240136,0.17290664,0.0007323519,0.00002234396,0.0006812827,0.00002536059,0.43877682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612711,0.016710967,0.0005158305,0.005983987,0.0002888105,0.000020573272,0.00017438036,0.00001343016,0.015020991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949276,0.00028157898,0.00002112209,0.000026865955,0.000081715894,0.0000959102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858946,0.00062942953,0.0003937778,0.000053555843,0.0002125279,0.00012129921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016222601,0.00010944115,0.000092333925,0.00072799006,0.001076289,0.0039858483,0.00014144182,0.00048212858,0.0037936876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017438219,0.000065894485,0.00007008164,0.0021103634,0.002440757,0.0015232023,0.001337078,0.00087811146,0.00025230506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036812584,0.000032542495,0.051453095,0.00022253847,0.000012482746,0.00043030575,0.018104475,0.0005771526,0.0005056952,0.82989,0.052800726,0.04593414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008282486,0.000026734488,0.12464476,0.0007399489,0.000015737645,0.0002639757,0.038627047,0.00096750807,0.00054054096,0.12087738,0.7132605,0.000027624012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01808793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04214728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01808793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027365386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003535379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035965264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035860357","doi":"10.1080/03066150412331333252","title":"Caste, Class and Peasant Agency in Subaltern Studies Discourse: Revisionist Historiography, Elite Ideology","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Elite; Ideology; Caste; Subaltern; Historiography; Agency (philosophy); Gender studies; Masculinity; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Political science; Social science; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.11112400735485099,"score_gpt":0.3919500571772843,"score_spread":0.2808260498224333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035860357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89328825,0.0045201825,0.0007997473,0.010197265,0.00008384537,0.000011340205,0.000029855046,0.000012442397,0.091056995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919564,0.0002937967,0.000024615814,0.000052326515,0.000015525799,0.0000018341595,0.0000022705312,0.0000016396267,0.00041238184],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843806,0.0011255217,0.000049635324,0.00010407648,0.00013402113,0.00014869588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896632,0.008697672,0.0006997442,0.00035776064,0.00032753433,0.00025415156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004414793,0.0002511863,0.00033272922,0.0033782881,0.004830664,0.009262927,0.0004893438,0.00088447484,0.0028398482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060899435,0.0001413209,0.00008321783,0.003166194,0.028531414,0.0036820108,0.0029502052,0.0019607104,0.00008536555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031744683,0.00002323882,0.005316059,0.000071207425,0.000007795827,0.00022072783,0.7583644,0.000068232766,0.00017972226,0.22902334,0.00039594987,0.00629767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015916963,0.00006216541,0.021344619,0.0004712259,0.000024355286,0.00027105544,0.83906484,0.00043209663,0.0005078148,0.0881144,0.049667545,0.000023913295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007983843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009885478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009262927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040589636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024822187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02944994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036944594","doi":"10.1080/03066150108438767","title":"Are Latin American peasant movements still a force for change? Some new paradigms revisited","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; St. Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Latin Americans; Political science; Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10421897788612948,"score_gpt":0.2977425710265113,"score_spread":0.1935235931403818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036944594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053598132,0.053143173,0.006111699,0.6172984,0.0016150159,0.000044806136,0.00008939926,0.00005848031,0.26804075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91458786,0.026491275,0.003099295,0.035171334,0.003971144,0.00023150643,0.00007501649,0.00008174693,0.016290821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996326,0.0019821771,0.00008896104,0.0005167944,0.00047845946,0.000607601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995129,0.0030917837,0.00041897886,0.00042385943,0.00057407434,0.0003623374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010446919,0.000706752,0.00096820423,0.0037377456,0.0088277655,0.016284617,0.0034422742,0.0062017213,0.007349475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005969761,0.0002807375,0.0008041553,0.004334034,0.07342713,0.016248913,0.0067657,0.008508081,0.0005158596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013545703,0.000030906933,0.0007683673,0.00010206387,0.000006536863,0.00008052062,0.037501495,0.000059685965,0.000057485435,0.9450355,0.0031241805,0.013219628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028068976,0.00003265929,0.003184031,0.0008357254,0.000012465883,0.00012443203,0.11525832,0.00035545084,0.000083583385,0.68559957,0.19446065,0.000025144747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020354766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021420758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020354766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013120642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060486943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09519738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038359735","doi":"10.1080/03066150902928306","title":"‘Almost idiotic wretchedness’: a long history of blaming peasants","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Backwardness; Capitalism; Famine; Colonialism; Modernity; Political economy; Rhetoric; Capital (architecture); Bulgarian; Laziness; Political science; Politics; History; Economy; Sociology; Economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.09654264912073707,"score_gpt":0.26030903740803474,"score_spread":0.16376638828729767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038359735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39321777,0.05005622,0.015378242,0.13503203,0.0068200263,0.000096280935,0.00008211558,0.00039776135,0.39891952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93951887,0.0056076916,0.0017882274,0.019426592,0.0011257888,0.000046299778,0.000026825865,0.00030046765,0.032159165],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919469,0.005481298,0.00016320501,0.00066179555,0.0009379179,0.00080889446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928825,0.0049298196,0.00057577144,0.0004697002,0.00073355745,0.00040853955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006575036,0.0010580568,0.00080359186,0.0026369346,0.017360471,0.008315342,0.0017766596,0.0065765497,0.0032423385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011021282,0.00064075715,0.00032748,0.0024061438,0.065499656,0.008851136,0.0070444,0.013432917,0.0009046036],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002763697,0.00001916909,0.0006332234,0.00011271479,0.000008813573,0.00068069337,0.86289024,0.00004913309,0.00041020592,0.116128184,0.009814714,0.009225309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013443684,0.0000656444,0.0015761886,0.00088734203,0.000009723877,0.0013710923,0.28518495,0.0003037275,0.00063549157,0.023590697,0.68629235,0.0000694149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0130122015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01730792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017360471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008862806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025054726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06430447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038591955","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2014.978140","title":"Energy, governance and security in Thailand and Myanmar (Burma): a critical approach to environmental politics in the South","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Environmental governance; Corporate governance; Environmental security; Political science; Environmental politics; Energy security; South asia; Development economics; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Economics; Ethnology; Renewable energy; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.02148617630786514,"score_gpt":0.2719855052679304,"score_spread":0.25049932896006527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038591955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.749949,0.02157283,0.0014829811,0.101425216,0.00017436234,0.00005580518,0.00008793632,0.000013241436,0.12523861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99157965,0.003778612,0.00022435593,0.0008987606,0.000024037818,0.000029126482,0.000011836359,0.0000047082954,0.0034489739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932885,0.00045676893,0.000011749185,0.00003401231,0.00003495877,0.00013373567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999231,0.00045715953,0.00014545379,0.000020763715,0.00004082238,0.00010485349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013995157,0.00029248948,0.00015462618,0.00079329504,0.006830693,0.0056770523,0.00036187939,0.0014824381,0.0025266635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008643512,0.00018656006,0.00014483779,0.0012587527,0.011493573,0.0045637367,0.0031248617,0.0027176284,0.00008255666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043968153,0.000034893066,0.0091406815,0.00031652284,0.000021638774,0.0010580587,0.2823086,0.00084853463,0.000794807,0.68778986,0.003779829,0.01386249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014071943,0.000064779786,0.0417376,0.00089432136,0.000025742467,0.0005203671,0.68485737,0.0009799546,0.000909367,0.11998715,0.14995913,0.00005013352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031919748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06399045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031919748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008554192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004618216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06346792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038860745","doi":"10.1080/03066150902820339","title":"Development strategies and rural development: exploring synergies, eradicating poverty","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Industrialisation; Poverty; Agriculture; Economic growth; Argument (complex analysis); Latin Americans; Rural development; Development economics; Rural poverty; Development studies; Political science; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.06708505261060388,"score_gpt":0.25008423119921186,"score_spread":0.18299917858860798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038860745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11615461,0.17841893,0.02504428,0.10304182,0.00044084465,0.00013003696,0.00007606735,0.0000703506,0.5766231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8928029,0.08976555,0.0059499526,0.0024237046,0.00020325278,0.00012250985,0.000025720612,0.000026294452,0.008680096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976051,0.0017518057,0.00004208411,0.00012743035,0.0001784005,0.00029511214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986401,0.0009088407,0.00018191658,0.000054841425,0.00009782678,0.00011644982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026113756,0.00094507774,0.0005871475,0.0029548388,0.0023063559,0.0077891955,0.00094854314,0.002299991,0.0030006773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015337105,0.00027293232,0.0003670905,0.0042678127,0.019145397,0.007778682,0.00569057,0.0016984305,0.00029831973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011220223,0.000038308386,0.00081446755,0.00041221708,0.000013542023,0.00025130145,0.009424609,0.0006985704,0.00021598558,0.9626671,0.0010401524,0.024412513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020455107,0.00011136133,0.0021810532,0.0007656812,0.000015178475,0.00033755065,0.056135207,0.0007006262,0.00037492844,0.7671563,0.1721888,0.00001286279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012832058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022518088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077891955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040570498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003400529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029436111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038900650","doi":"10.1080/03066150903353991","title":"Reworking the metabolic rift: La Vía Campesina, agrarian citizenship, and food sovereignty","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":286,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Food sovereignty; Citizenship; Political economy; Political science; Environmental degradation; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Agriculture; Law; Ecology; Food security; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.0346956886096989,"score_gpt":0.2394200306029088,"score_spread":0.2047243419932099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038900650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5420407,0.007854332,0.0049792933,0.042821087,0.00014368503,0.000033414508,0.000032906977,0.000040286566,0.40205428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958752,0.00044769887,0.00030551787,0.00048353066,0.00002470157,0.000009563979,0.000004984829,0.0000030737335,0.0028457933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999081,0.0004917446,0.000014292261,0.00012910792,0.000073500305,0.00021033212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935013,0.00031440318,0.00012813942,0.00007341319,0.000050307815,0.000083580395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018466024,0.00015213687,0.00021077653,0.0005802891,0.0043268898,0.006568919,0.00058276363,0.0014419649,0.0020944073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014849487,0.00012907934,0.00011642027,0.0006595967,0.02582129,0.003767092,0.0044208625,0.0022573369,0.00011210735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030623683,0.000021820946,0.0034645367,0.000045929704,0.0000044565804,0.00045933248,0.051027656,0.00020466642,0.00022165685,0.9276854,0.0013154326,0.015518463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029742796,0.00014319057,0.026701095,0.00071841304,0.000022218996,0.0010714384,0.13285819,0.0014211319,0.0005710222,0.4794908,0.35690272,0.000070033995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017086783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029182607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017086783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004879618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024300723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035404325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044272113","doi":"10.1080/0306615042000322402","title":"Indigenous Struggles for Land and Culture in Cauca, Colombia","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Oppression; Militarization; Population; Collective action; Human rights; Political economy; Political science; Politics; Sociology; Constitution; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.04038134783593175,"score_gpt":0.38606145906997796,"score_spread":0.3456801112340462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044272113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92983586,0.0051294505,0.00011184065,0.0020228536,0.00004161283,0.000017095697,0.000039073744,0.00001080687,0.06279147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962463,0.00075336196,0.00005466782,0.00005900064,0.0000072171197,0.0000044169783,0.0000069116454,0.0000020283626,0.0028659017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960166,0.00013787528,0.000009310767,0.000037172846,0.000047179885,0.00016685505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966383,0.000093608025,0.00005852262,0.000013696391,0.000053479365,0.000116886455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033668932,0.00021326198,0.00021972197,0.00085089967,0.004310564,0.00313862,0.00037603462,0.00039585322,0.0031703461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082532957,0.00006875297,0.000059978345,0.00061998726,0.0031976767,0.00090359396,0.0022798325,0.00061482866,0.00013001471],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019132794,0.00010031289,0.050867964,0.0005145003,0.000023348648,0.0043751067,0.7928566,0.00031873366,0.00483359,0.047465846,0.0038931065,0.09455953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012440122,0.000056689856,0.09482141,0.00023106631,0.000014768955,0.0007839295,0.77726996,0.0001800705,0.0005424668,0.0027825825,0.123272076,0.00003261105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17159009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34271866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17159009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054143597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021845938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34118265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059112733","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2014.990894","title":"‘Pinstripes on the prairies’: examining the financialization of farming systems in the Canadian prairie provinces","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Financialization; Agriculture; Geography; Agricultural economics; Agroforestry; Economics; Environmental science; Archaeology; Market economy","score_opus":0.11953526656848942,"score_gpt":0.26665196720395806,"score_spread":0.14711670063546864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059112733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865146,0.0006097763,0.00018660969,0.0009611251,0.000007835968,0.00004055394,0.0007779046,0.0000042432794,0.010897259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734676,0.00030897814,0.00028364218,0.0000739503,0.0000021764863,0.000015023986,0.00025735563,0.000002714458,0.0017094357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987489,0.0001380666,0.000035020013,0.000161077,0.00036573704,0.0005511389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974382,0.00033927363,0.00041200253,0.00012922943,0.001238531,0.00044283483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013589109,0.00023383733,0.00026991422,0.002545707,0.0064769,0.002718638,0.0016157558,0.00045750907,0.0035055333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038660015,0.00026137117,0.00024281463,0.0059756977,0.0034941419,0.0010261451,0.0023369463,0.00076670875,0.000104297236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014530566,0.000063964464,0.7225247,0.0002992417,0.00010190813,0.0009948864,0.19774179,0.001090851,0.0019704106,0.01589378,0.0059809773,0.053192213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032648045,0.00001358098,0.89221877,0.00007337993,0.000013252442,0.00006472774,0.09128719,0.00041249456,0.00015608768,0.0003138578,0.01541692,0.000026494887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99909604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06750526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06750526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052691773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48978728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062483258","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2012.656236","title":"Gender and agrarian reforms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Agrarian reform; Agrarian system; Political science; Economic history; Sociology; Economics; History; Agriculture; Archaeology","score_opus":0.15657890365248547,"score_gpt":0.3811540483338732,"score_spread":0.2245751446813877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062483258","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028027331,0.53050596,0.00052333885,0.14736131,0.0014973462,0.000020034326,0.00016992546,0.000029396753,0.29186538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66504705,0.18618895,0.00055671274,0.01717691,0.0013916856,0.00003518831,0.00009859746,0.000042791977,0.12946214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993018,0.00028604775,0.000015049862,0.00008883922,0.00011159971,0.00019673709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998136,0.000074943724,0.000031153213,0.000015304353,0.000030429894,0.000034707748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009038123,0.00032476295,0.00023202508,0.0005273301,0.00281136,0.003513668,0.00035094327,0.0014963889,0.0049770055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013333616,0.00014307625,0.00013352119,0.0016071277,0.010680821,0.003546389,0.0022053134,0.0013192691,0.0007292427],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003691449,0.000039454564,0.0013576315,0.000215011,0.000008413124,0.00020409201,0.02686815,0.00025068672,0.00039903217,0.73264694,0.15726784,0.08070585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006889889,0.000022018688,0.0069534667,0.00036319043,0.0000038291437,0.00012706289,0.016800188,0.000055341046,0.00018403523,0.09689222,0.8785808,0.000010908569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0305363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063909985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0305363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005230374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037346715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060717106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073964236","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2012.725539","title":"Food sovereignty: reconnecting food, nature, and community","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Sovereignty; Food systems; Food security; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Agriculture; Geography; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.07298648504197941,"score_gpt":0.26715536716576344,"score_spread":0.19416888212378403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073964236","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008898473,0.7731903,0.0017279985,0.10376544,0.004061116,0.000015988826,0.000058621503,0.00004310064,0.10823898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3834645,0.54052836,0.0022687758,0.01321241,0.0051375334,0.00007031735,0.00015648402,0.00008593249,0.055075705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990633,0.0005244891,0.000027206643,0.000076389995,0.00016117995,0.00014757397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898714,0.0005600269,0.00009395682,0.00006767049,0.00009989964,0.0001913178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019304171,0.0006479952,0.00059886934,0.0009711148,0.0026809205,0.0069665797,0.0009364046,0.0021206078,0.0052163783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025595655,0.00030308493,0.00024997312,0.0021997541,0.01359595,0.009138318,0.0035498617,0.0028270185,0.000580126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003805406,0.00003231969,0.0013034137,0.00077680114,0.00002984104,0.00040125058,0.044898547,0.0003892204,0.00031202243,0.47619644,0.29092643,0.18469566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009397654,0.000019887359,0.0031106244,0.0014746987,0.00000929281,0.00022009405,0.026817884,0.00014689192,0.00014954532,0.19639632,0.7716281,0.000017212027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027444933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0553311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027444933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044051604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009238798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054570377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114497701","doi":"10.1080/03066150903143012","title":"Unjustified optimism: why the World Bank's 2008 ‘agriculture for development’ report misses the point for South Africa","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Agriculture; Poverty; Optimism; Agrarian society; Development economics; Economic growth; Sustainable development; Productivity; Political science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.06850550137980804,"score_gpt":0.2732940884804543,"score_spread":0.20478858710064624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114497701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003341448,0.005009214,0.00017709415,0.98284745,0.0025780133,0.000005391717,0.000016960203,0.000012689589,0.0060117277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3315209,0.018463053,0.001213546,0.6310026,0.0064183264,0.00004064275,0.00006660292,0.00017706305,0.011097275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99216014,0.0043378416,0.00026785253,0.0003921065,0.0015475283,0.0012945273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835947,0.008237115,0.0013724983,0.0006347908,0.0034292815,0.002731587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015663024,0.0004297108,0.00040042476,0.0007107716,0.0043156673,0.009599718,0.001005504,0.007390397,0.0051121865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040647633,0.00029105326,0.00036214408,0.00106481,0.013130624,0.010388049,0.003662715,0.018528095,0.0009669247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081783255,0.000062890635,0.004056033,0.00041790263,0.000043255066,0.0007296189,0.02433101,0.00026626675,0.00058713363,0.168604,0.74274933,0.058070853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006028905,0.0000608548,0.0077974675,0.0017776723,0.00003504503,0.000488918,0.05240322,0.00039651408,0.0006787022,0.13611262,0.80007255,0.000116055235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018499194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017296204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018499194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004731696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010193551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08283502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116503121","doi":"10.1080/03066150008438738","title":"Weak weapons, strong weapons? Hidden resistance and political protest in rural ecuador","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Politics and Society in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Covert; Resistance (ecology); Politics; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Political science; Collective action; Political economy; Underpinning; Sociology; Action (physics); Development economics; Law; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.029790980095332018,"score_gpt":0.34598883866709174,"score_spread":0.3161978585717597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116503121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924576,0.0005078971,0.000057086956,0.00078819646,0.000005262872,0.0000043141063,0.000005224666,0.0000010911006,0.0061733285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988825,0.00030506562,0.00002135191,0.000055078148,0.0000057196694,0.000005830661,0.000004673091,9.4096805e-7,0.000718863],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995359,0.0002318626,0.000014091968,0.000034574205,0.000024667728,0.00015888628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918216,0.000489861,0.00017711829,0.000020627467,0.000041415708,0.00008873731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008800506,0.00020257011,0.00028530814,0.0007781872,0.0021318041,0.0025119663,0.00051956775,0.00066793995,0.0045499043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026226568,0.00013806754,0.00008145638,0.00080684747,0.0030997852,0.0016630223,0.0022213408,0.00072271685,0.00012982813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005020169,0.0010281806,0.17212039,0.0006039752,0.000081394326,0.011262554,0.6836139,0.00089341344,0.002666099,0.061890077,0.002665057,0.062672846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006355304,0.00026196524,0.20034842,0.0002285213,0.00003390449,0.00068284397,0.77207094,0.0006518027,0.00035546935,0.0073256786,0.017955884,0.000021063825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01016258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016238406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01016258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015167855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005509151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020206869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119870742","doi":"10.1080/03066150902928363","title":"The World Bank on ‘agriculture for development’: a failure of imagination or the power of ideology?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Mary's University; Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Poverty; Modernization theory; Agency (philosophy); Agriculture; Power (physics); Rural poverty; Market failure; Sociology; Political economy; Economic system; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Social science; Politics; Neoclassical economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.03412607082543428,"score_gpt":0.3573312999102584,"score_spread":0.32320522908482413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119870742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018903428,0.040225964,0.0018289044,0.892908,0.0067375866,0.00000893415,0.00005484058,0.000020244976,0.05632517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41494307,0.10171569,0.007271481,0.42343432,0.021933198,0.00024525466,0.00017589769,0.00025059757,0.030030504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903167,0.006223275,0.0003139512,0.00045719618,0.0019021749,0.0007867493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877532,0.008775041,0.00069671,0.000720735,0.0015222641,0.0005319894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015648518,0.00089842756,0.0009652578,0.0021605971,0.004371058,0.011220141,0.002267884,0.008805068,0.0040236553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017694006,0.00030431896,0.00039244693,0.0038606063,0.029494392,0.014640702,0.0055446457,0.01461508,0.0010588972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023575696,0.000020693637,0.00013410454,0.00012798738,0.0000067228416,0.000059103797,0.0034805958,0.00007871361,0.000057835176,0.8702715,0.10423254,0.021506593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025301943,0.000025750807,0.00061956845,0.0014710857,0.000008046552,0.000065861735,0.0044630608,0.00018660388,0.00016694696,0.41126275,0.5816682,0.000036779227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075914394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071562366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015648518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004826867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008699879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08275825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136520112","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2010.512451","title":"Forests, food, and fuel in the tropics: the uneven social and ecological consequences of the emerging political economy of biofuels","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Biofuel; Land grabbing; Natural resource economics; Agriculture; Sustainability; Politics; Economics; Business; Economy; Political science; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.03780129967091151,"score_gpt":0.2659798586908432,"score_spread":0.22817855901993167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136520112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88608176,0.012699077,0.00093653024,0.026151564,0.00012566644,0.000011102145,0.00017081786,0.000009945144,0.073813565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919882,0.0051823067,0.00024690706,0.0012377024,0.00008903562,0.0000043602827,0.000026419115,0.000006815821,0.0012183492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973816,0.00010086981,0.0000032522348,0.00002346527,0.000046746576,0.000087523535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994899,0.00022306043,0.00012288084,0.000022873604,0.00003894896,0.000102372476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064362644,0.00016239849,0.00013008379,0.0007487212,0.0024375245,0.003428483,0.00028338362,0.0006705994,0.0024148033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080195745,0.00009580915,0.00018068975,0.00142322,0.005072795,0.0031175308,0.0016945871,0.0012618738,0.00009948847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024695403,0.00018413171,0.1956465,0.00092368876,0.00018831788,0.007098819,0.1681721,0.0063511087,0.00939866,0.43596122,0.011890711,0.16393779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027691782,0.00017781902,0.39246947,0.00069923245,0.00009596825,0.0019022966,0.2971532,0.0026307467,0.0014509616,0.14873396,0.15459074,0.00006787468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012610988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059717145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012610988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020571963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010796876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025075197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145762315","doi":"10.1080/03066150008438752","title":"Mike Cowen (1945–2000)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Australian Indigenous Culture and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06871803785484244,"score_gpt":0.3547231895696674,"score_spread":0.286005151714825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145762315","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007253616,0.54721516,0.001181238,0.20180766,0.13621645,0.000060429193,0.00091101584,0.00010534838,0.10524913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03566105,0.098609634,0.0008607863,0.022241227,0.015632955,0.000045573044,0.00029756606,0.000097129814,0.82655406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962604,0.000069516114,0.000021664615,0.0000958811,0.00013762878,0.000049265826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919075,0.00014296305,0.000077142045,0.000040785908,0.00029454258,0.0002537908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000931647,0.00054289546,0.0002838376,0.0018868624,0.0017509551,0.0016082021,0.00048316605,0.001365006,0.023457736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031702467,0.00029882244,0.00017934012,0.0017498694,0.0006901356,0.0023006925,0.0019119222,0.0020415538,0.0060824757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050172654,0.000018241355,0.0010302387,0.00030755793,0.000008599121,0.00027891048,0.001749652,0.000055021497,0.0002857946,0.0073862216,0.86432785,0.12450171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011957255,0.00000503608,0.0013673593,0.0001136712,0.0000018075643,0.000100911784,0.00027202925,0.000009004622,0.000091169415,0.000426933,0.9976069,0.0000040040204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018176204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045636818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023457736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021679343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020911759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078473926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151432556","doi":"10.1080/03066150008438757","title":"Academic populists, the informal economy and those benevolent merchants: Politics and income security reform in Newfoundland","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03881730995222826,"score_gpt":0.2730696851922275,"score_spread":0.23425237523999926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151432556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57586336,0.0046940832,0.00045883938,0.19650903,0.00013522293,0.000024951018,0.00010721443,0.000018148425,0.2221891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98149234,0.0007750249,0.0000506066,0.0033067048,0.000051536757,0.000007965048,0.000010332073,0.0000034992493,0.014301999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866056,0.00028831707,0.000021590668,0.00007520139,0.00013504377,0.00081938814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822456,0.0005917824,0.00027497535,0.000076772936,0.00023066821,0.0006012111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015450837,0.00015674393,0.00020971226,0.0010155297,0.013553119,0.008854629,0.00052813516,0.001595932,0.0038183425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023587102,0.00013766199,0.00009968001,0.001287882,0.022286592,0.0015951184,0.004375578,0.0028184042,0.00015877983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008802044,0.00006582695,0.019304195,0.000079578254,0.0000149809575,0.0007114194,0.042289622,0.0007130945,0.00034048248,0.8860217,0.033645257,0.016725775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055863336,0.000053284533,0.12317131,0.0005878902,0.00003752058,0.00016405781,0.17183812,0.001109314,0.0008297455,0.10143111,0.60065603,0.00006571747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70911044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8141869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29088956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04294054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022526087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5852053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159541081","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2013.824744","title":"The global farms race: land grabs, agricultural investment, and the scramble for food security","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Agriculture; Race (biology); Investment (military); Natural resource economics; Land grabbing; Business; Agricultural land; Agricultural economics; Economics; Ecology; Political science; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.02122996968963326,"score_gpt":0.2377508060398203,"score_spread":0.21652083635018704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159541081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60694927,0.00487836,0.00048539403,0.18142112,0.00018956375,0.000010131412,0.00029947254,0.000010836215,0.20575577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339217,0.00067435374,0.000057670546,0.0026998778,0.00007230803,0.0000054188267,0.000029480467,0.0000054945212,0.0030631344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996056,0.00011659664,0.000007518477,0.000043624157,0.000052567008,0.0001741093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990959,0.0003824469,0.00016659831,0.000047212397,0.00006454819,0.0002432135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011284174,0.00015589209,0.00025092086,0.0006232062,0.0021134575,0.004044377,0.00031534908,0.0018000355,0.014441173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021067143,0.00009394269,0.00015188899,0.0010716501,0.0069208955,0.0057730167,0.002734621,0.0017794416,0.00029730695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035480558,0.0001464521,0.11644188,0.00010742904,0.000050869494,0.00067233696,0.029507125,0.00046889661,0.0008231229,0.7554925,0.035106197,0.06082839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006949152,0.00014864879,0.27410564,0.00043187934,0.00004055342,0.00039711568,0.183376,0.0007537995,0.00047980435,0.371225,0.16891871,0.000053331787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009073724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032987505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014441173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016373339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016717552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04831052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296912469","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2013.863818","title":"Hungry for change: farmers, food justice and the agrarian question","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Aston University","keywords":"Agrarian society; Capital (architecture); Economic Justice; Relations of production; Agriculture; Agrarian system; Production (economics); Economics; Political science; Political economy; Neoclassical economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0618299821782682,"score_gpt":0.2690964867269923,"score_spread":0.20726650454872414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296912469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051766828,0.048901085,0.0008460014,0.66671175,0.002438759,0.000015471607,0.000037024663,0.000018426614,0.22926466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81653035,0.016649341,0.00036060275,0.11132851,0.002749909,0.000034881337,0.00002193168,0.000026737283,0.052297745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866474,0.000735631,0.000019774321,0.000092615395,0.00020987948,0.00027737374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998184,0.0013507964,0.00012225713,0.000052121064,0.00012000193,0.00017092562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022316927,0.00015969099,0.00026316405,0.00036083194,0.00639024,0.0056717633,0.00054899027,0.0041659377,0.00634329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041163145,0.0001030518,0.00012032553,0.0011118804,0.020281298,0.006422848,0.002334453,0.0033759035,0.0003871968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004125208,0.00006201618,0.0019906897,0.00011234253,0.000010766103,0.0006629487,0.04749478,0.00013696248,0.00019825825,0.7750103,0.13963237,0.034647398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021167361,0.000034943005,0.0049509625,0.00024283351,0.0000047083527,0.00027111318,0.063332655,0.00011584535,0.0001560208,0.35656163,0.5742906,0.000017681085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004049477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009382355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00639024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031460477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022749938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022826314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326578311","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2016.1164518","title":"Food security and scarcity: why ending hunger is so hard","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","keywords":"Pleasure; Scarcity; Food insecurity; Food security; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Psychology; Agriculture; History; Market economy","score_opus":0.3417525537885243,"score_gpt":0.48138052620156635,"score_spread":0.13962797241304203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326578311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004243865,0.116480835,0.0012438229,0.7937997,0.014727262,0.000013382344,0.00010106673,0.00008651953,0.06930355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2261302,0.18233645,0.0033470276,0.42678112,0.021991802,0.000102904705,0.0002018233,0.00032821795,0.13878058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990958,0.00033863174,0.000030419853,0.000088809385,0.0002650269,0.00018137027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864227,0.0006899629,0.00012061637,0.00006750902,0.00021667591,0.00026300078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016364347,0.00046553087,0.00073276344,0.00048298252,0.002676173,0.0063098692,0.0005840022,0.0044391756,0.011433016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004638243,0.00027768235,0.00037261072,0.00075897627,0.010314363,0.009623362,0.0022773393,0.006806684,0.0038784533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005132693,0.00003931103,0.0009997349,0.00044625858,0.000040055347,0.00017958735,0.0027565076,0.0001536495,0.00032055876,0.14487793,0.7806893,0.06944584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021186323,0.00004220083,0.0026176793,0.0008485346,0.000012401058,0.00028175223,0.0055628335,0.00011037375,0.00018438295,0.17997101,0.81031674,0.000030873314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037491159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070061767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011433016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018630135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018747038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038247228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2383134270","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2016.1164517","title":"Grabbing power: new struggles for land, food and democracy in northern Honduras; Land grab: green neoliberalism, gender and Garifuna resistance in Honduras","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Democracy; Resistance (ecology); Threatened species; Power (physics); Land grabbing; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Development economics; Sociology; Political economy; Economic growth; Gender studies; Politics; Geography; Agriculture; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.0374529923521461,"score_gpt":0.2407048093858721,"score_spread":0.203251817033726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2383134270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530954,0.0017000937,0.000098622724,0.011773977,0.00004984676,0.00000734981,0.000014643366,0.0000048266324,0.03325523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954476,0.00043023058,0.000028483024,0.00052293757,0.000011530132,0.0000043820155,0.000003974073,0.000002322163,0.0035484312],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939346,0.00021374032,0.000008093251,0.000049041522,0.00003809103,0.00029749228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995561,0.0001400674,0.0000905129,0.000019496018,0.00003364227,0.00016015109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009570281,0.00022997329,0.00020829102,0.000408118,0.011396571,0.004219203,0.00059558556,0.0011198743,0.0027143105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008225192,0.00013696254,0.00008896089,0.0007959931,0.012491899,0.0023845125,0.00335974,0.0018325443,0.000119850425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006110257,0.000050263232,0.019574,0.000075229866,0.000008033777,0.0018175185,0.9149807,0.00010076388,0.0011896399,0.029940762,0.0040257685,0.028176224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010377878,0.000038262046,0.06010061,0.00009796195,0.0000053928834,0.00020631665,0.8673232,0.000097553326,0.00015536985,0.005406033,0.06653821,0.000020705116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18670863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44613308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18670863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065240473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030678252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37124372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507259540","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2016.1187137","title":"Struggling for food sovereignty in the World March of Women","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Sovereignty; Political science; Political economy; Food security; Development economics; Geography; Economy; Agriculture; Economics; Politics; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.055818403248537686,"score_gpt":0.27099471780158807,"score_spread":0.2151763145530504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507259540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7045423,0.003768982,0.0055168355,0.04809389,0.00037671527,0.000025234147,0.0000396229,0.00003335899,0.23760308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930934,0.00040625202,0.00029801932,0.0007187178,0.00004017383,0.000008518547,0.0000066405933,0.00001076991,0.005417745],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974534,0.0016977497,0.00004390504,0.00021244065,0.00021844801,0.0003741343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977235,0.001369492,0.00029610746,0.00017253982,0.00014831792,0.00028992034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051463423,0.0001978551,0.00026692924,0.000670594,0.009223339,0.00772048,0.0005173728,0.0016348695,0.0045363596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005596874,0.00017219811,0.0001796708,0.001085782,0.018410152,0.0058002793,0.0062546264,0.0021881922,0.00023768876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000297258,0.000011089534,0.004476223,0.0000428107,0.000007692052,0.00060617353,0.5919919,0.00007298454,0.0005450494,0.3822039,0.0028493216,0.01716308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073152164,0.000046586967,0.0047362274,0.0002213592,0.0000075488083,0.0004558964,0.5784687,0.0001404878,0.0003810799,0.080207735,0.33530048,0.000026589423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004206438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009409198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009223339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002734348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024285123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027216792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539230660","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2016.1237097","title":"Land's End: Response by Tania M. Li","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Sociology; Style (visual arts); Media studies; Environmental ethics; Political science; Geography; Archaeology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.025224869229579224,"score_gpt":0.24035373947877717,"score_spread":0.21512887024919794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2539230660","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022132968,0.002449324,0.00010486668,0.9539293,0.04051085,0.000025216797,0.00008900819,0.000081440645,0.002588808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024526587,0.0023086688,0.00022729627,0.9515689,0.013251508,0.000068380796,0.00006741998,0.00008494559,0.029970167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768305,0.00059515337,0.00020490968,0.00048437773,0.0007434052,0.00028898276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929924,0.0022343283,0.00036421278,0.0002800811,0.0023520335,0.0017769056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035534764,0.0013916112,0.0013317202,0.00059613615,0.003887415,0.0035672467,0.0023287614,0.018805074,0.02588072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017456383,0.0005784257,0.0008311499,0.0005780185,0.0022368024,0.0041030436,0.003527015,0.026355855,0.016611513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019676003,0.0000070937454,0.00008758031,0.000046995287,0.0000029595503,0.00012696208,0.0001332114,0.000012756436,0.00007455577,0.0004039201,0.99656266,0.0025217661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113425,0.000022205166,0.0004697688,0.00012426432,0.00000447671,0.00024995874,0.0009015974,0.000044211105,0.000110709276,0.0004412981,0.9975955,0.000024740726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006322034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011016449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02588072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023972655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004644032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08657962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600880694","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2016.1257988","title":"Land control dynamics and social-ecological transformations in upland Philippines","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Indigenous; Scholarship; Shifting cultivation; Agriculture; Palm oil; Agroforestry; Land tenure; Land use; Social control; Geography; Ecology; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.031160008944412038,"score_gpt":0.26036747619853373,"score_spread":0.2292074672541217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600880694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98829424,0.00026848377,0.00032984003,0.00058028765,0.000001977788,0.000010342037,0.000022765626,0.000007851601,0.010484174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995926,0.00007974136,0.000045292145,0.000009709465,0.0000015035941,0.0000035839682,0.0000050476974,0.0000013381102,0.00026120714],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950683,0.00018997607,0.000014330105,0.00005997603,0.000078596255,0.00015030953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909925,0.0002279757,0.00032975883,0.000053104526,0.00012488631,0.00016494682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007008427,0.00018489189,0.0001304853,0.0015219244,0.002390729,0.0025823468,0.0005013143,0.00028786366,0.0031556766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016026588,0.00014169412,0.00007650041,0.0015711534,0.0066556525,0.002057864,0.0027929777,0.00052857865,0.00010004301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113128124,0.00017675933,0.24217978,0.00023236382,0.00005370381,0.0035396467,0.5826427,0.0025911652,0.0038557125,0.09920415,0.0012008772,0.06421011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127879375,0.000100763405,0.56195885,0.000120154415,0.000015546519,0.00037732194,0.3863667,0.002875606,0.0006398892,0.01919084,0.028304039,0.000037469377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045704033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057843264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045704033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004040289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013930857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09087604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752603920","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2017.1351432","title":"Rethinking food regime analysis: an essay on the temporal, spatial and scalar dimensions of the first food regime","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Articulation (sociology); Repeal; Scalar (mathematics); Economics; Sociology; Political economy; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Law; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05986772381039077,"score_gpt":0.2554165717450173,"score_spread":0.19554884793462654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752603920","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11194159,0.12705438,0.13536018,0.24555786,0.008742653,0.000057477453,0.00034295247,0.0001966598,0.3707462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383435,0.020943152,0.013252691,0.005496374,0.0036317501,0.00006654021,0.00009250572,0.00018980869,0.017983684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845195,0.00083176274,0.000053383774,0.0002501824,0.00024649894,0.00016614389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708885,0.0022329702,0.00020335216,0.00022040746,0.00018341297,0.00007104734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002925669,0.00037939107,0.00038929385,0.0017891055,0.0023711277,0.004881158,0.0009451075,0.0018510768,0.0017136502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045804037,0.00022632234,0.00049169327,0.0022253436,0.024750441,0.009238763,0.0018567275,0.0039762957,0.00022610063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009423412,0.00000709976,0.00043144188,0.00005844619,0.0000065931736,0.00004354679,0.011107636,0.00029763428,0.00021604696,0.9699102,0.00563251,0.012279329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005467835,0.00001426153,0.0019165528,0.0002698222,0.000004902841,0.00007928367,0.005352478,0.0006309115,0.00020462755,0.7869964,0.20450369,0.000021582111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045972425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006269237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005191835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005191835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020698858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03766954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765442801","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2017.1351435","title":"Land, development and contract farming on the Guatemalan oil palm frontier","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Gambling Research Exchange Ontario; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Livelihood; Peasant; Agriculture; Palm oil; Frontier; Shifting cultivation; Contract farming; Business; Agricultural economics; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Economics; Agroforestry; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.06343413307071814,"score_gpt":0.263250912454861,"score_spread":0.19981677938414283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765442801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924321,0.00017787174,0.000018234157,0.0007851232,0.0000020212465,0.000003845002,0.000029675726,9.227389e-7,0.0065502296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983695,0.00019603726,0.00003988147,0.000059814673,0.0000013073699,0.000005993478,0.000018107836,8.633922e-7,0.00130857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996625,0.00014758448,0.0000030500291,0.000017628268,0.000028056429,0.00014121638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962366,0.00012813942,0.00008473926,0.000022262791,0.000043260607,0.000097945915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032709874,0.00014025712,0.000119718155,0.00043258324,0.002302269,0.0009791044,0.0002746154,0.00025204202,0.0029139481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008919681,0.000046433597,0.000047300815,0.001166208,0.001777673,0.00068754115,0.0015665002,0.00027345197,0.00016986998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007058325,0.00051033066,0.52124727,0.00028291473,0.00003785844,0.013273191,0.21965292,0.0012902252,0.010976261,0.087007806,0.010124394,0.13489106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018152989,0.00020201174,0.73960346,0.00014157969,0.000017069135,0.00065761793,0.19967161,0.00078915246,0.00073700876,0.0033198588,0.054824714,0.000017754865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14063726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35823444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14063726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004354782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002639818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27963734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789690499","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2018.1428953","title":"Natural capital must be defended: green growth as neoliberal biopolitics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Neoliberalism (international relations); Natural (archaeology); Natural capital; Capital (architecture); Sociology; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Development economics; Geography; Politics; Biology; Philosophy; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.03540962079117169,"score_gpt":0.28982808305376473,"score_spread":0.254418462262593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789690499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11265373,0.0066820607,0.033817146,0.101468325,0.0006919808,0.00004469556,0.000014545217,0.000051813055,0.7445757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767571,0.0007190048,0.0025024682,0.0040369383,0.00013153945,0.000023261578,0.0000021965757,0.000015203465,0.015812224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976483,0.0014362085,0.000040832692,0.00020661164,0.00037820457,0.0002898606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980373,0.0009768492,0.00020844686,0.00028445775,0.00025310987,0.00023996709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005003393,0.00024181195,0.0001934731,0.00042215057,0.0039028025,0.0053999578,0.0006721132,0.0031053808,0.0019427107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002567614,0.00011527846,0.00017944787,0.00038777152,0.05002205,0.0070711267,0.004485473,0.0035324693,0.00024709405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002450761,0.000005790596,0.00009135852,0.000006898724,6.372435e-7,0.000046101388,0.0033964533,0.000096370415,0.000078259654,0.9939031,0.0004859978,0.0018865047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005072194,0.000018613342,0.00025760685,0.000059883812,0.0000017728254,0.00007153135,0.0033807973,0.00050163345,0.0003262542,0.9242045,0.071162336,0.000009972805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022185661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041974937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053999578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004827467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035551516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035025895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789978704","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2018.1439929","title":"Keeping ‘our’ land: property, agriculture and tensions between Indigenous and settler visions of food sovereignty in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Sovereignty; Vision; Indigenous; Scholarship; Colonialism; Agriculture; Political economy; Land tenure; Political science; Sustainable agriculture; Capitalism; Private property; Property rights; Relation (database); Environmentalism; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Politics; Food security; Law; Geography; Ecology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.038454439059528306,"score_gpt":0.23598727005103007,"score_spread":0.19753283099150176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789978704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8791672,0.0026849927,0.00041406057,0.021179542,0.00004985618,0.000019560115,0.00011562275,0.000009913718,0.096359186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962353,0.0006093003,0.000085351254,0.0004282233,0.000004355702,0.0000026717873,0.000014977261,0.000004119144,0.0026157429],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773514,0.00032990272,0.00005095256,0.00019600202,0.0006162544,0.0010718614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964432,0.0011061315,0.00035380127,0.000137477,0.0011557817,0.00080370274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002332053,0.00015513392,0.0004074721,0.001397591,0.026436735,0.010139228,0.0014062136,0.0011809247,0.0035367734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059156264,0.00018752384,0.00018593567,0.0033274228,0.021412408,0.0022472388,0.0038438619,0.0026141775,0.00008487367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007981906,0.00004933603,0.04382166,0.00015195827,0.000036141577,0.0010981587,0.654703,0.0005389251,0.0009058751,0.25184146,0.0076245936,0.039149035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014073847,0.000023195355,0.08834451,0.00032735223,0.000035235673,0.00018677519,0.7907226,0.0004550055,0.0003640651,0.012233473,0.10720926,0.00008449883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12534516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12534516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12591194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.909447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888315238","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2018.1499093","title":"Power and dispossession in the neoliberal food regime: oil palm expansion in Guatemala","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Racism; Land grabbing; Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); State (computer science); Political science; Economics; Political economy; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.028485860452621293,"score_gpt":0.2613817967722425,"score_spread":0.2328959363196212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888315238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99637467,0.00014013248,0.000016450223,0.000718268,0.0000018350281,0.0000035770292,0.00001290954,0.0000010729215,0.0027311963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951565,0.00009393484,0.000012030953,0.000047706028,0.0000011669559,0.0000028001668,0.000006773061,6.3045195e-7,0.00031918526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996755,0.000112401125,0.000005449712,0.000023320179,0.00001871477,0.00016462506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997055,0.00009463837,0.0000895843,0.000012365668,0.000026003472,0.00007183055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028245331,0.00012903972,0.0001473303,0.00063018606,0.0026418336,0.0013051535,0.00037094665,0.0003764668,0.0034757324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007339309,0.00009285363,0.00008926911,0.0011194432,0.003130574,0.0009740113,0.002279027,0.000562169,0.00012848304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023013835,0.00022777982,0.40914032,0.0001983224,0.000033146367,0.01063877,0.507627,0.0002941572,0.0042215534,0.025591068,0.0026949118,0.03910274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009471332,0.00006357463,0.6320431,0.00012958048,0.000015725083,0.0007742967,0.35077488,0.00032628918,0.00040870486,0.002026713,0.013407201,0.00002040321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11518388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2589881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11518388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036407695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012253235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22902691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893983651","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2018.1512488","title":"People, power, change: three pillars of a food sovereignty research praxis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Coventry University","keywords":"Praxis; Food sovereignty; Transformative learning; Autoethnography; Sovereignty; Power (physics); Situated; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Social science; Food security; Law; Politics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.16884800755235835,"score_gpt":0.33915910180133213,"score_spread":0.17031109424897378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893983651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34853664,0.009297169,0.095301904,0.24331437,0.0008941302,0.00064820156,0.00007884111,0.00019468834,0.30173397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878071,0.0009513908,0.006967543,0.0016708937,0.000106087035,0.00019833623,0.000010924086,0.000018855393,0.0022689234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9563996,0.03426188,0.0011802847,0.0022269804,0.0044393223,0.0014919912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96164,0.029124133,0.0026103274,0.002846169,0.0016457369,0.0021337057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05092063,0.0005655616,0.0009014047,0.0035571845,0.015507455,0.021854546,0.0017004911,0.004914858,0.0023835294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028800748,0.0005863693,0.00042414566,0.0044300286,0.18786475,0.023888167,0.017714523,0.010904709,0.00027232332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011523782,0.000039650633,0.0009217984,0.000089832894,0.0000062149365,0.00010540659,0.44931749,0.00008630959,0.00023279201,0.54215175,0.00060514326,0.0064320792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033543238,0.00009345856,0.0014916582,0.0004313336,0.00000947221,0.00028211428,0.40168715,0.00036577965,0.00037945164,0.52031034,0.07487446,0.00004121547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025787044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022601138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05092063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006625456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013019001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2692973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894852710","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2018.1512487","title":"The curious case of ecological farm interns: on the populism and political economy of agro-ecological farm work","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","keywords":"Agrarian society; Populism; Negotiation; Agriculture; Politics; Work (physics); Political ecology; Political science; Ecology; Economy; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Social science; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.04038172438713012,"score_gpt":0.2725816027281669,"score_spread":0.23219987834103678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894852710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75675076,0.0017387877,0.0009592275,0.053837173,0.0000869665,0.000015319685,0.000039707564,0.0000071071936,0.18656498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935407,0.00044041092,0.00005797194,0.0010030931,0.000029509827,0.0000040624745,0.000004212477,0.0000046971354,0.004915374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851865,0.00047755553,0.000012988995,0.00012873289,0.00024342278,0.0006186868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802387,0.0010147293,0.00021309797,0.000091571135,0.0001583371,0.00049842824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022270554,0.0001432943,0.00021428558,0.0007688859,0.018178191,0.0070378096,0.0008283301,0.002072485,0.0036035413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002427461,0.0001663532,0.00009827281,0.001166508,0.05171828,0.0025829806,0.0050034095,0.0021296416,0.00016618561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042698473,0.000023092098,0.025216853,0.000036895228,0.0000058630812,0.0011998329,0.48888594,0.00024718404,0.00045066202,0.46582088,0.006615493,0.011454594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017309652,0.000020778398,0.04091006,0.00016615419,0.000009928083,0.00036535953,0.70333195,0.00039808138,0.00020840365,0.049037132,0.20549901,0.000035853536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61071455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82803994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61071455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01914146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012336756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78315604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898093327","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2018.1515737","title":"Neoliberal developmentalism, authoritarian populism, and extractivism in the countryside: the Soma mining disaster in Turkey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam; Boğaziçi Üniversitesi","keywords":"Developmentalism; Dissent; Authoritarianism; Political economy; Political science; Neoliberalism (international relations); Social movement; State (computer science); Nationalism; Politics; Populism; Democracy; Development economics; Economy; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07145476188351693,"score_gpt":0.39372021509779254,"score_spread":0.3222654532142756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898093327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97264344,0.0010093246,0.00011378989,0.0034796747,0.000039791845,0.000005253904,0.0000070314795,0.0000042087586,0.022697594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986234,0.0001811359,0.000033636275,0.0001704858,0.000003867742,0.0000016190451,0.0000028207714,0.000001795565,0.0009813653],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955696,0.00018811291,0.000013474353,0.000039027615,0.000033686898,0.00016864199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981016,0.000055347708,0.000052568837,0.000014298559,0.000021048512,0.000046558667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072909327,0.00030241095,0.0002251734,0.00055644993,0.0070659057,0.0030222882,0.000390772,0.0012910124,0.0013090931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031480088,0.00018737816,0.00016226753,0.0005932859,0.0086452365,0.0013214231,0.0026292359,0.0015020982,0.00013859873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003829007,0.00020341814,0.050754707,0.00033020842,0.00003921896,0.013131778,0.5901045,0.0013526451,0.0040955367,0.28399348,0.009829517,0.04578204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003977361,0.00018730896,0.09448724,0.00023266736,0.000025310741,0.0036038957,0.7807866,0.0008136124,0.0020475304,0.018092718,0.09960632,0.0000771765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00917559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021156102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00917559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00522688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021500855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037923872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903525601","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2018.1534834","title":"Limits to biofortification: farmer perspectives on a vitamin A enriched Banana in Uganda","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Banana Cultivation and Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Department for International Development; Dalhousie University; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Biofortification; Green Revolution; Agriculture; Micronutrient deficiency; Staple food; Micronutrient; Economic growth; Agricultural economics; Biotechnology; Economics; Business; Development economics; Geography; Malnutrition; Biology","score_opus":0.10507092180513668,"score_gpt":0.35084196905678167,"score_spread":0.245771047251645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903525601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90426844,0.0031892944,0.0011341313,0.042819615,0.000059244798,0.00003673762,0.0000425618,0.000008611854,0.04844124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926017,0.0018746001,0.000429231,0.0019142176,0.000018834065,0.000027151409,0.0000087839,0.0000052835726,0.0031201858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969164,0.0019108126,0.000070445494,0.00021616371,0.00026446566,0.0006217389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949727,0.0036392119,0.00049576967,0.00008777905,0.00050910126,0.0002954722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004828358,0.00039443176,0.00038988807,0.0008751712,0.010948779,0.0065259705,0.0013790507,0.0038334087,0.0043515535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007315735,0.00036344954,0.0002152981,0.0010089888,0.008757752,0.004696194,0.0058972235,0.0032064905,0.00024668165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006060866,0.0002305853,0.028743712,0.00070676825,0.000036374142,0.02313319,0.72542787,0.00092307816,0.009916637,0.16384582,0.005890463,0.040539373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022101207,0.00026553147,0.01085519,0.0005948647,0.000025826857,0.001432142,0.861371,0.00073284627,0.0019855003,0.042634536,0.08001641,0.00006402477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0153696565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01846917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0153696565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037562628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030493857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030560374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936475662","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2019.1568246","title":"Hybrid Realities: making a new Green Revolution for rice in south India","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Indian Council of Agricultural Research","keywords":"Green Revolution; Agrarian society; Food security; Context (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Natural resource economics; Business; Economics; Development economics; Political science; Agriculture; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.04256870443785415,"score_gpt":0.2628895121180446,"score_spread":0.22032080768019047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936475662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87628096,0.00055799563,0.0010890852,0.01137039,0.000051900195,0.000025501906,0.00003522436,0.000026392621,0.11056248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563855,0.0001890067,0.00023394123,0.00041693915,0.000008589895,0.0000046651794,0.000006455112,0.0000053984654,0.0034966364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992887,0.00028848273,0.00001257876,0.00006849079,0.00009083253,0.00025078878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994838,0.00023750607,0.00006199712,0.00007550803,0.00003071396,0.00011044343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010704038,0.00014556648,0.000118965036,0.0003824408,0.0052983556,0.0044971565,0.00055763713,0.00084565027,0.0028479847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085086,0.00012187509,0.00023673342,0.00062496896,0.009815835,0.0018782557,0.0050367373,0.001958285,0.00016649267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003159398,0.00015263366,0.018061424,0.00019969321,0.000044026714,0.0072100726,0.26478958,0.0010892398,0.007154816,0.63258,0.005521982,0.06288075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044472563,0.00036428223,0.08105163,0.00015048133,0.00006683787,0.0021867359,0.5266718,0.000928665,0.003135279,0.117153734,0.26812664,0.00011950895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010741378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040618517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010741378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042622946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025845584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030925274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2968566647","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2019.1604511","title":"Vertical farming: tin mining and <i>agro-mineros</i> in Bolivia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation; Center for Latin American Studies, University of California, Berkeley; American Council of Learned Societies; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Agriculture; Tin; Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.016640640048886636,"score_gpt":0.23336367687347606,"score_spread":0.21672303682458943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2968566647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992455,0.0006544913,0.00005782079,0.00043776882,0.0000045316524,0.0000053872527,0.00003385712,0.0000015709019,0.0063495818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983352,0.00027602742,0.00004479903,0.000041125746,0.0000020082032,0.000002307265,0.00002350943,0.000001081278,0.0012740637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996112,0.00008116006,0.000008004139,0.000052160005,0.000025279764,0.0002222485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997863,0.000032956938,0.00009502045,0.000011232468,0.000017635497,0.000056900775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004678299,0.00013436888,0.00018197353,0.00080308126,0.0019845748,0.0016671076,0.0005689985,0.00031233788,0.002065253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049540156,0.0001415707,0.00009767161,0.0012464646,0.0029498152,0.0008473618,0.002428517,0.0005392853,0.00009195907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032999055,0.00032396062,0.7034984,0.00026484727,0.00006835995,0.0026000882,0.18174845,0.00048588114,0.004484282,0.04488984,0.0018024856,0.05950342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015127076,0.00012060329,0.80447,0.00022711867,0.000015312076,0.0003619895,0.16361311,0.00019252126,0.00030991674,0.0016899116,0.02897133,0.000013106708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14806315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27701864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14806315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005238705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015984207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29440266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969129662","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2019.1637044","title":"Nightmarch: among India’s revolutionary guerrillas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Audience measurement; Political science; Feature (linguistics); Media studies; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06092259488240639,"score_gpt":0.3564744550528131,"score_spread":0.29555186017040674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969129662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48170298,0.0063143866,0.00030465095,0.11745987,0.002974588,0.000039827166,0.0002528708,0.00013813455,0.39081267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7991695,0.0016672593,0.00021468209,0.018226305,0.000343133,0.000023776527,0.00007888048,0.000122036705,0.18015452],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990759,0.00022934309,0.000008052675,0.00006336186,0.0000673811,0.00055589335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993231,0.000151174,0.00006351853,0.00006948776,0.00007399403,0.00031871558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009617804,0.00042307717,0.00030098658,0.00057087967,0.02131244,0.0053085354,0.0010495166,0.0020450377,0.011455489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001532571,0.00027423262,0.00022629042,0.0009890138,0.0077512157,0.0019343826,0.0045684855,0.0050456556,0.0013151799],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025448872,0.00007967173,0.008664527,0.00018048199,0.00002320619,0.0037972773,0.52697086,0.00006845886,0.0011169645,0.16142328,0.265404,0.032016817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008220961,0.000022026297,0.010763382,0.00010913905,0.000007566999,0.0004119481,0.22008811,0.00002894068,0.00020356866,0.0018688834,0.76645964,0.000028560798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121314496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29183838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121314496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005440712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036146427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24121672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981469175","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2019.1675646","title":"Scholar-activists in an expanding European food sovereignty movement","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social movement; Movement (music); Sovereignty; Politics; Representation (politics); Food sovereignty; Identity (music); Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Collective identity; Free movement; Public relations; Media studies; Law; Food security; Aesthetics; Business; Agriculture","score_opus":0.0473679613597655,"score_gpt":0.26596935031161006,"score_spread":0.21860138895184456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981469175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86657524,0.0066837408,0.0049168034,0.037320435,0.0011502254,0.00016975067,0.000037757585,0.00004366298,0.08310242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980885,0.00079506513,0.0010510591,0.0028433914,0.00033215137,0.000064276726,0.000023054707,0.000020826166,0.013985155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728827,0.020393368,0.00050643913,0.0019916794,0.0014608173,0.0027649754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506132,0.038873553,0.0029310794,0.0015941323,0.0015542844,0.0044336934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044639472,0.00039434378,0.00062017044,0.0025539438,0.01495875,0.01153259,0.0014738252,0.0056423205,0.0027365242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028536022,0.00038867016,0.00043297993,0.0025211952,0.01972435,0.0057264282,0.01569237,0.0042663137,0.0002552677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032162538,0.00021604238,0.009009126,0.00020181233,0.000031256128,0.0019332652,0.71523154,0.00022827565,0.0022350503,0.22356528,0.004942605,0.04208411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010851468,0.00049814314,0.009423469,0.00054761424,0.000035859564,0.0009316747,0.4438029,0.00048337734,0.0021124254,0.029995127,0.51198816,0.00007281059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017712681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045162947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044639472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043728016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060613644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23607892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049066859","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2020.1786812","title":"Food sovereignty, gender and everyday practice: the role of Afro-Colombian women in sustaining localised food systems","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Victoria","funders":"Universidad de los Andes; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Provisioning; Autonomy; Sovereignty; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Politics; Everyday life; Sociology; Food systems; Food security; Political science; Political economy; Gender studies; Social psychology; Geography; Psychology; Agriculture; Law","score_opus":0.03933697730959447,"score_gpt":0.23733192005991016,"score_spread":0.1979949427503157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049066859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96111757,0.0015231302,0.0005038225,0.0015061506,0.000019583254,0.000012432441,0.000034846897,0.000008128968,0.035274446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841845,0.00022749577,0.00012765909,0.00006362476,0.000003401166,0.00000535634,0.00000674667,0.0000024150975,0.0011449029],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910945,0.00045663075,0.000020048075,0.00010342008,0.000060161754,0.00025028366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989261,0.000517523,0.00020311653,0.00008057427,0.000089430316,0.00018322594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015171177,0.0002836599,0.0002712847,0.00074788043,0.0063595288,0.0038895388,0.00054647774,0.0006280839,0.0039550653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021714845,0.00013075383,0.00010483609,0.00071055087,0.009129756,0.0021983103,0.0035700628,0.00066691963,0.0001486035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006644872,0.00004176597,0.048852306,0.00014462585,0.000009989239,0.0008551822,0.9027992,0.00006120394,0.0011387949,0.013236224,0.0008150503,0.03197921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004645108,0.00004619193,0.06504015,0.00021562491,0.000008842676,0.00031426962,0.9015387,0.0000898794,0.00020320437,0.0022446902,0.03027391,0.00001986944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053401306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13081835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053401306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003432803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001674106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10618091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092190230","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2020.1823838","title":"This food crisis is different: COVID-19 and the fragility of the neoliberal food security order","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":406,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Recession; Food security; Fragility; Food systems; Order (exchange); Economics; Food prices; Development economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economic system; Agriculture; Geography; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.043939302918637235,"score_gpt":0.24776690415938515,"score_spread":0.20382760124074792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092190230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52754045,0.0044595734,0.0039438703,0.12488028,0.00065671775,0.000025313206,0.00017610472,0.000057217836,0.3382605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926438,0.0007718881,0.00032294058,0.0028475362,0.00010079698,0.000008042794,0.000035754565,0.000019874524,0.003249406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929416,0.00019051944,0.000021781121,0.00009910607,0.00011646331,0.00027788625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901474,0.00024730232,0.00017151808,0.0001144237,0.00016653679,0.0002855636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015037268,0.00014673054,0.0003691252,0.00085558917,0.0040170164,0.0075268596,0.00053782103,0.0017742284,0.004822819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002634108,0.00012589726,0.00020794416,0.001156224,0.0120595675,0.006087326,0.0046548336,0.0036386114,0.00024731705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007485249,0.000026199028,0.004140868,0.00005054919,0.000007801304,0.0007834008,0.01919063,0.00040004659,0.00052292476,0.95869565,0.004963031,0.011143973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002365869,0.00008498577,0.0238149,0.00040057677,0.000010838237,0.00075647724,0.08530505,0.0011473385,0.0006459993,0.58574766,0.3019876,0.000074983014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008020985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010516312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008020985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005629542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025213053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040845335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094279467","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2020.1803842","title":"Bringing the city to the country? Responsibility, privilege and urban agrarianism in Metro Vancouver","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Urban Agriculture and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Agrarianism; Solidarity; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Urban agriculture; Agrarian society; Environmentalism; Citizenship; Sovereignty; Environmental ethics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Agriculture; Politics; Food security; Geography","score_opus":0.036775025988989546,"score_gpt":0.24541443518961695,"score_spread":0.2086394092006274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094279467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794606,0.00039731222,0.00012644324,0.0027567141,0.000018170227,0.00001250342,0.000013008631,0.0000026259681,0.017212631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974267,0.00019954838,0.000037559053,0.0001443027,0.0000022457275,0.000003375985,0.000005103422,0.0000019392605,0.0021791481],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985751,0.0005076134,0.000024218298,0.000086797256,0.00017197235,0.00063434406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985977,0.00033721828,0.00015670476,0.000043998734,0.0002222863,0.00064214855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010385306,0.00016771303,0.00028934755,0.0006341717,0.0181773,0.0049619297,0.0007160038,0.00075893005,0.0020423487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019373648,0.00020956235,0.00010177074,0.0010453371,0.011435328,0.0011472382,0.0041691633,0.0015094358,0.00010276535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031992717,0.000052214396,0.044859648,0.000051914398,0.0000076259716,0.00087215175,0.9263795,0.00008670824,0.000620226,0.011964894,0.0014615351,0.013611701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023585667,0.000008511843,0.018396521,0.000042299635,0.0000027561607,0.00010878079,0.96376294,0.000038290596,0.000062950465,0.00067870837,0.0168852,0.000010676689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87722325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96253234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12277675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017096773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017482819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24699956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123704354","doi":"10.1080/03066150412331311209","title":"Introduction: The opening-up of China's countryside","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"China; Rural area; Political science; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.025546074047200933,"score_gpt":0.3181826885579678,"score_spread":0.29263661451076683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123704354","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006095389,0.39085737,0.0012159167,0.26756632,0.15978661,0.00023782496,0.018623598,0.00040471286,0.15521236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08819639,0.30671385,0.0026204714,0.11338619,0.076595366,0.0006040373,0.019690251,0.0005413048,0.39165223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973685,0.000043205306,0.000021456493,0.000047236466,0.000093718474,0.00005760474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994418,0.00012399783,0.000067239496,0.00002639198,0.00020363597,0.0001370041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006214375,0.0011107213,0.00045529677,0.0020461758,0.0017194811,0.002285573,0.0010259731,0.0025691688,0.03784392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093482225,0.00035459775,0.00058826664,0.004259248,0.00085169624,0.0026199277,0.0017863655,0.0036181048,0.0068499837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019768164,0.000014059271,0.0005961977,0.000579806,0.0000051397583,0.00013435584,0.0007901304,0.00012652874,0.00013391119,0.007997516,0.9661356,0.023466993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008475249,0.000016528284,0.008267521,0.0010575777,0.000004402906,0.00007625172,0.0008313421,0.00004810365,0.00010867249,0.0023422048,0.98721886,0.00002005666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043010917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0711918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043010917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003089003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042479523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1266005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138103850","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2021.1891669","title":"Fields of gold: financing the global land rush","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Gold rush; Finance; Business; Economics; Political science; Natural resource economics; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03216657666104749,"score_gpt":0.25358880258966615,"score_spread":0.22142222592861865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138103850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043423664,0.023634933,0.0022873715,0.36931425,0.0054671327,0.00007481607,0.00036310783,0.00019583612,0.55523884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5486646,0.009795393,0.0025263287,0.046558596,0.0014314366,0.00008949321,0.00021889454,0.00019018613,0.39052507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989416,0.00023409877,0.00002293817,0.000099253535,0.0003411315,0.0003608882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916685,0.00023635449,0.000060274786,0.000090612186,0.00015388388,0.00029200222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017044628,0.00044739625,0.00023783339,0.0007599468,0.0028641773,0.00627582,0.0007971647,0.006070501,0.015691545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047781966,0.00019049304,0.00025114464,0.00083413994,0.0033377793,0.0052375174,0.005431009,0.0029229023,0.0016301799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060323844,0.000026941598,0.001861707,0.00015006866,0.000015662168,0.00036760114,0.0022924864,0.00055556686,0.00072822656,0.7431653,0.19316739,0.057608716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017476095,0.0000373146,0.0018252534,0.00019416865,0.0000045340457,0.000094987205,0.0022093982,0.00025794873,0.00039557798,0.04549751,0.94945115,0.000014665825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024458233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056581687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024458233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049250945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072535286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052493453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139393679","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2021.1873292","title":"Heroes of the developing world? Emerging powers in WTO agriculture negotiations and dispute settlement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Negotiation; Subsidy; China; Agriculture; International trade; Developing country; Settlement (finance); World trade; Political science; Emerging markets; Business; Economy; Economic growth; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0269723380687167,"score_gpt":0.2882251871990683,"score_spread":0.2612528491303516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139393679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21665414,0.01877741,0.005248666,0.11853662,0.0005239336,0.000049643535,0.000047592344,0.000020738444,0.6401412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98682123,0.005033846,0.00042260386,0.0016435736,0.0001390057,0.000013160588,0.000007294548,0.000009874512,0.005909399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976781,0.0015085017,0.00004197227,0.000092450246,0.00025022033,0.00042880917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645054,0.0023857076,0.00042324164,0.00017273874,0.00021185778,0.00035581834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042985696,0.00018322222,0.00020263056,0.0009085295,0.0071716616,0.012751447,0.0005602946,0.0019772348,0.0029087425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004131727,0.00013316885,0.00015165571,0.0017877318,0.02104909,0.010066129,0.003640602,0.0050745737,0.0002921606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013724937,0.000017210692,0.0012903571,0.000022527887,0.0000021410565,0.0003916508,0.03949666,0.00014654432,0.000057122757,0.9500739,0.0025400426,0.0059481147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016637572,0.00002994092,0.0046362244,0.00057818467,0.000007054661,0.0004132657,0.29425138,0.00077992043,0.00033702818,0.37200943,0.32692075,0.000020193822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061136275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008808677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012751447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057974677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038452006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042063713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176057548","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2021.1923010","title":"The ties that bind? Agroecology and the agrarian question in the twenty-first century","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Agroecology; Productivity; Agriculture; Agrarian system; Peasant; Economic system; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Geography; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.024729510524594305,"score_gpt":0.23984601650157913,"score_spread":0.21511650597698484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176057548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17233725,0.121369444,0.003382695,0.17811905,0.0010409983,0.0000107305095,0.000065377615,0.000027052292,0.52364737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96931386,0.011034331,0.00045239567,0.0055557596,0.0005062625,0.000008850385,0.000014180447,0.000011687466,0.013102662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992625,0.00038479152,0.000017861177,0.00011626564,0.000072604824,0.00014586163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933714,0.00036415327,0.00008594431,0.000044874538,0.000069850175,0.0000980915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457163,0.0001601428,0.00020973687,0.0008785224,0.0038385193,0.0049271258,0.00036535066,0.0016308964,0.0027608422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001500092,0.00013998015,0.00009909601,0.0015423056,0.031131458,0.0051925075,0.0020506508,0.0018218186,0.00023754829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006918067,0.000009386184,0.0005835082,0.000020794052,0.0000024959156,0.00010139282,0.0076361913,0.000112918395,0.000047278794,0.982825,0.0015052392,0.007148955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009724924,0.000013930696,0.0043483763,0.00016485335,0.0000034726384,0.00016313301,0.013088429,0.00011666443,0.00006628696,0.6719696,0.31004053,0.000014997154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072052875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009362292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072052875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004534827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019873995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0329026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194809971","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2021.1961224","title":"I will follow? Authoritarian populism, past and present","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Authoritarianism; Peasant; Political economy; Politics; Hegemony; Political science; Democracy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.038121343775620015,"score_gpt":0.2526155762433732,"score_spread":0.2144942324677532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194809971","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07511082,0.02155507,0.005781204,0.5144397,0.005004103,0.000035489342,0.00011453008,0.0000868133,0.3778722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9297075,0.00649615,0.0012146508,0.033572093,0.0012956139,0.000037222973,0.00005573721,0.00010733306,0.027513612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965432,0.0020323158,0.000057268142,0.0003606812,0.00039428062,0.0006121595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960253,0.002120868,0.00043879516,0.00041937584,0.0005417968,0.00045381073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059867366,0.00033497534,0.00035200614,0.0009970712,0.00913121,0.012748267,0.0009988401,0.0037625977,0.008923395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011683641,0.00019447277,0.0003037398,0.0013270957,0.019383514,0.015806422,0.005620082,0.0067064837,0.0023886326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028701848,0.000036352776,0.0028532832,0.000075002354,0.000010189668,0.00037051004,0.14921427,0.000038716786,0.00010867175,0.773984,0.04791424,0.025366062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001511112,0.00002715448,0.0017992059,0.0005229642,0.000009102188,0.0003280421,0.15645015,0.00012704667,0.0003747813,0.28452915,0.55578446,0.00003284201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036715285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058406806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012748267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003076083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027396881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031661272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237585291","doi":"10.1080/03066150412331333272","title":"Book Reviews","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; York University","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Peasant; Capitalism; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Religious studies; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08391034387453072,"score_gpt":0.2577742069804078,"score_spread":0.1738638631058771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237585291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041827344,0.14707822,0.0015355843,0.01485389,0.024358714,0.0001539589,0.0036697986,0.0008116987,0.8071199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020668495,0.05630326,0.00117334,0.005964321,0.0059415298,0.00009578527,0.0032190566,0.0004777453,0.92475814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985922,0.0001537942,0.00008762896,0.00028935782,0.0007575021,0.000119554345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998288,0.00034224108,0.00010250146,0.00019080995,0.00081318157,0.00026333658],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006788766,0.0011264945,0.0013333553,0.003450833,0.0014958725,0.008086697,0.0025359218,0.0026448295,0.52480006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038619472,0.00048418308,0.00085946056,0.0050316546,0.000981819,0.004793622,0.0025980254,0.0028467851,0.44538376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012197301,0.000018006305,0.000041988063,0.0004496835,0.00000420247,0.000058353948,0.000084024,0.000040323383,0.00012203287,0.0064090197,0.8993612,0.09339892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014744686,0.0000027732083,0.000046342535,0.00017982733,0.0000012446371,0.000059869406,0.000028298675,0.000005969423,0.000014636048,0.00066410186,0.99899334,0.0000020371083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037244041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061871377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52480006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002501303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037336212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.677815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248301178","doi":"10.1080/03066150902949542","title":"Book Reviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.1263333221666409,"score_gpt":0.42531113211287674,"score_spread":0.29897780994623585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248301178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027360834,0.049190808,0.00081906485,0.009400531,0.020037424,0.0000942755,0.0011406514,0.00050177175,0.9185419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005207722,0.009196708,0.00024245631,0.0018051517,0.0021598153,0.000026350817,0.0004623758,0.00012152002,0.9854649],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923134,0.00007704865,0.000023019911,0.0000860378,0.0005218643,0.000060746926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862635,0.00024338777,0.000071532544,0.00015369068,0.0006505064,0.00025461832],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006456034,0.0008537361,0.000867099,0.003406633,0.0011288212,0.004461519,0.0013910984,0.0016912862,0.52218455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028200478,0.00038251939,0.00048470122,0.0038746344,0.0006643267,0.0023391584,0.0016195872,0.0018006432,0.4926404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068811023,0.000011160508,0.000023282177,0.00011812958,0.0000015885068,0.000013888059,0.000018812794,0.000028006825,0.00009391168,0.0023393617,0.93080246,0.06654235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015436002,0.000002964918,0.00005004616,0.000059988943,8.8391033e-7,0.000016557577,0.000013698597,0.000006771991,0.000018770945,0.0005438963,0.9992835,0.0000013667443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003530581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01047759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52218455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001602285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020461495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68154573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248839381","doi":"10.1080/03066150903354197","title":"Book Reviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.10709683484561038,"score_gpt":0.38663530876387353,"score_spread":0.27953847391826314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248839381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037106551,0.04231665,0.00050585077,0.006919161,0.01533064,0.00007861036,0.0005916793,0.00042453504,0.9334617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00058588496,0.006339306,0.00014450391,0.0012533434,0.001320923,0.000015497115,0.00022552589,0.00006811899,0.9900469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949753,0.00004958395,0.000013471755,0.00005907544,0.0003362983,0.000044073466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998919,0.00017364808,0.000049578837,0.00012194991,0.00050751836,0.00022835514],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046729128,0.0008518999,0.00084819144,0.002860258,0.001438664,0.004063388,0.0010542846,0.0014903708,0.5176934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002181925,0.00034204798,0.00041460159,0.0035311345,0.00057777256,0.002127126,0.0014411,0.0017719361,0.4586824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065734534,0.000014747313,0.00003430125,0.00009377615,0.0000013347625,0.000018222732,0.000021460119,0.00002491959,0.00009522249,0.0016688934,0.9297065,0.06831398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019255747,0.000004423007,0.000094585106,0.00006278114,0.0000010845135,0.000022904971,0.000020580304,0.000009345816,0.000022140464,0.00045661058,0.999302,0.0000015287574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003799026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012559867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5176934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012667594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017210894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6879518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309190569","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810","title":"Riverhood: political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Commons; Bureaucracy; Sociology; Politics; Environmental justice; Political ecology; Political economy; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law","score_opus":0.04910075653752516,"score_gpt":0.35791477877971833,"score_spread":0.3088140222421932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309190569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28812075,0.0016073885,0.031573307,0.04089663,0.00012370876,0.00007004566,0.00005873121,0.000060834966,0.63748854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934529,0.00016926619,0.0008056354,0.00036840385,0.000015367927,0.000020670517,0.0000079180445,0.000010559341,0.0051491703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996856,0.0019837772,0.000059744787,0.0003909065,0.00029173782,0.00041776756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979176,0.0009933702,0.00033390473,0.00026178232,0.00014408267,0.00034930132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00405615,0.0001690298,0.00018457415,0.0013524585,0.007875574,0.009653348,0.0006385299,0.001539682,0.005306273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004254801,0.0001591178,0.00018553597,0.0014094978,0.043388434,0.0073780036,0.007956607,0.00166444,0.0001723683],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036118408,0.000006324125,0.0016192183,0.000013474915,0.000002730118,0.000061219594,0.033233427,0.000107230015,0.00010684884,0.95834255,0.0008059281,0.005697521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001106776,0.000048665228,0.009288254,0.0001471244,0.000008591529,0.00022016799,0.14300609,0.00080846413,0.00019088198,0.62019926,0.22604445,0.000027092943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005957052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013576829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009653348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048334817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040257787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035069466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313680944","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2022.2163629","title":"Dynamic farmers, dead plantations, and the myth of the lazy native","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dualism; Subsistence agriculture; Palm oil; Aside; Ethnography; Profit (economics); Politics; Sharecropping; Mythology; Economics; Productivity; Agriculture; Political economy; Economy; Sociology; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Agroforestry; Law; Economic growth; Geography; Anthropology; History","score_opus":0.024156005882085087,"score_gpt":0.25613233237642086,"score_spread":0.23197632649433578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313680944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45009366,0.0070219277,0.006777979,0.07654167,0.0010782826,0.00003086993,0.000039554245,0.00009512381,0.4583209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971805,0.0008706854,0.00047870964,0.0018059077,0.000107651285,0.0000106092075,0.000004163566,0.000021278975,0.024896026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992557,0.0003689657,0.000015043787,0.00014392834,0.000107826134,0.0001085849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919695,0.0003608118,0.00011563966,0.0000773896,0.00006196189,0.0001873142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014222879,0.0002643041,0.00021751289,0.0005765397,0.009889507,0.0055206297,0.0006408042,0.0013161735,0.0026121668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019197508,0.00017724722,0.00011267354,0.0003475154,0.039406613,0.006238935,0.0037334617,0.003115691,0.0002670122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037880644,0.00003779123,0.0018603039,0.00005021592,0.0000042557485,0.0006221651,0.33193645,0.000103170394,0.0004965709,0.6465359,0.006485332,0.011829999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021092721,0.000072491195,0.0034131925,0.0002869889,0.000011266532,0.0014598955,0.34909028,0.0005493965,0.00061748194,0.22999696,0.4144436,0.000037392216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029055232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004876075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009889507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022979905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012087749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016673207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315479729","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2022.2153042","title":"The feminist dimensions of food sovereignty: insights from La Via Campesina’s politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Political science; Politics; Sovereignty; Political economy; Gender studies; Sociology; Food security; Geography; Law; Agriculture","score_opus":0.035616952192450334,"score_gpt":0.24832567791168803,"score_spread":0.21270872571923768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315479729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38184258,0.009402219,0.0021899217,0.048618414,0.00019335478,0.00005689951,0.000058485133,0.00002010022,0.557618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799066,0.001218032,0.00029565112,0.0017338787,0.00008303393,0.00004441223,0.00001239321,0.000010936479,0.016695077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863404,0.0008576946,0.000011428344,0.0001230607,0.000080592195,0.00029311675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987997,0.0009554632,0.00008104709,0.00003509026,0.000040381554,0.0000882669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027374225,0.00025393817,0.0002663765,0.00096929655,0.010700404,0.0061849332,0.00048452936,0.0021731374,0.0050030393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014904432,0.00022556641,0.00016149083,0.0008149574,0.02526061,0.0029780522,0.0044618878,0.0031834943,0.00021372896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044575932,0.000036374393,0.001941128,0.00013749694,0.0000037690206,0.00086056895,0.38520515,0.00014390316,0.0008878893,0.5921414,0.004461717,0.014136016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016127658,0.00007084911,0.008799216,0.00070708984,0.000008516042,0.00049982127,0.3138532,0.00026598523,0.00056758994,0.04283781,0.6323449,0.00002897339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019848265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035481125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019848265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008118287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022099349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05890256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320484427","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2022.2163628","title":"Shaping our collective futures: activism, analysis, solidarity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Solidarity; Agrarian society; Futures contract; Sociology; Food systems; Social movement; Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Sovereignty; Citizen journalism; Political science; Political economy; Food security; Agriculture; Economics; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.09199816308916833,"score_gpt":0.3104186526402641,"score_spread":0.21842048955109575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320484427","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21168493,0.004676172,0.0846632,0.12400424,0.0014099542,0.00047097498,0.000101846446,0.00018575895,0.57280284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738777,0.00091652205,0.0077077574,0.0019113366,0.00023488306,0.00037666163,0.0000431013,0.00010922212,0.014822828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98591787,0.0110874185,0.00017148773,0.00083278015,0.0008697719,0.0011207013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881909,0.009075268,0.00062373787,0.00083605,0.0004529415,0.00082112435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020448573,0.00057140936,0.00049204397,0.0023669614,0.015192772,0.018851448,0.0021858113,0.003635914,0.0056193275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012306819,0.0003745929,0.00041587657,0.002058387,0.058535963,0.013082416,0.012894725,0.006051737,0.00050550234],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016801849,0.00004713332,0.0005542892,0.00008501314,0.0000069492144,0.00026278337,0.42283496,0.00024314571,0.0002269669,0.55574834,0.0039921063,0.015981462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013653474,0.000029878407,0.000551896,0.00039763257,0.000007141758,0.00022381106,0.46799588,0.00068166177,0.00046974793,0.33536658,0.19424161,0.00002061206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017814636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023026078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020448573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005272591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005539061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10814375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381190418","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2023.2221777","title":"Indigenous communal land titling, the microfinance industry, and agrarian change in Ratanakiri Province, Northeastern Cambodia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Agrarian society; Land titling; Microfinance; Debt; Land tenure; Land rights; Economic growth; Business; Investment (military); Agriculture; Geography; Political science; Economics; Environmental planning; Finance; Ecology","score_opus":0.09272687321275733,"score_gpt":0.35004859684548817,"score_spread":0.25732172363273087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381190418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99726105,0.00021674199,0.000007688803,0.00022650186,0.0000015859299,0.0000032983146,0.000008388248,3.0706795e-7,0.0022744464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924517,0.00015962697,0.000011496835,0.000024772919,0.0000012218603,0.0000026841976,0.000006428956,2.5017647e-7,0.0005484614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983,0.00004622886,0.000004199148,0.000015456872,0.000008472123,0.00009569447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967384,0.00010152304,0.00010188015,0.000009254745,0.000013278802,0.00010032111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028598626,0.000099707206,0.00013693473,0.0005417162,0.0029887555,0.0010203205,0.00035689987,0.00030991418,0.003488145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043067322,0.000103643586,0.0000490086,0.0010809123,0.003138538,0.0007074815,0.0016419096,0.0005782292,0.00007335921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001057948,0.00018844502,0.49660853,0.00019484028,0.000024015926,0.009775961,0.43933037,0.00023322052,0.002161727,0.01693288,0.0011967293,0.033247493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005328672,0.000060316474,0.6740434,0.00011070328,0.000006325764,0.0006078968,0.31917536,0.00013214027,0.00013694771,0.0004064104,0.0053070625,0.000008111349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17623964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48910668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17623964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034154186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017174026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35042763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385767230","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2023.2238183","title":"Distress in the fields: Indian agriculture after economic liberalization <b>Distress in the fields: Indian agriculture after economic liberalization</b> , edited by R. Ramakumar, New Delhi, Tulika Books, 2022, xxiv + 484 pp.; ₹1500(Hardback); ISBN: 978-81-950559-0-6.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agricultural Economics and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Distress; Agriculture; Liberalization; Development economics; Economics; Business; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Political science; Market economy; Psychology; Geography; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.015184043956210688,"score_gpt":0.2377233962655709,"score_spread":0.22253935230936023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385767230","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028788695,0.5747322,0.00039892617,0.15981515,0.010240081,0.00003222725,0.00033744719,0.000121198515,0.22553414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37804812,0.42697173,0.00061973144,0.021477347,0.0038543083,0.000051401577,0.00044763123,0.00009349731,0.16843615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999582,0.000087664645,0.000017414628,0.00004196051,0.00010503597,0.00016598095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954873,0.0001644901,0.00007166761,0.0000275424,0.0000737976,0.00011382676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006605114,0.00042272123,0.0002488156,0.0014116404,0.0020928362,0.007127173,0.00069817115,0.0016717224,0.008864377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009992527,0.00024140098,0.0002682201,0.0054613594,0.004480172,0.0046474272,0.0021136357,0.002535683,0.0013297551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009050056,0.00006543019,0.0018608157,0.0006693039,0.000014739895,0.0005779351,0.025681859,0.00027360098,0.0005016217,0.14264308,0.6247045,0.20291668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057166676,0.000016516362,0.013164126,0.00059597316,0.000007131389,0.00023100202,0.019739008,0.000050200208,0.00014486058,0.015594184,0.9504277,0.000023617613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093595564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124187924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093595564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0094533665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009319544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18610156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388410964","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2023.2254724","title":"Threatening dystopias: the global politics of climate change adaptation in Bangladesh","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Dystopia; Politics; Climate change; Adaptation (eye); Climate change adaptation; Global warming; Political science; Environmental ethics; Development economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Ecology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.09548283014777778,"score_gpt":0.2907419896328296,"score_spread":0.19525915948505182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388410964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10819105,0.017046422,0.0005451748,0.53834194,0.0009883777,0.00004293505,0.00018211469,0.000029298908,0.33463258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9208423,0.010845738,0.0001939413,0.040385205,0.0003493418,0.000037375587,0.00004684155,0.00004079686,0.027258607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892753,0.000530307,0.000025283396,0.000067627225,0.00013597556,0.0003133252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988856,0.00059028063,0.000120817655,0.000064757776,0.00010465414,0.00023384845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027334783,0.00027011143,0.0002449595,0.0005209131,0.005523248,0.0053173625,0.00043666773,0.0035800233,0.009026309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033008594,0.00016158185,0.00013171804,0.0013147522,0.009925752,0.0030012282,0.004119359,0.0035024881,0.0006902862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001911605,0.00004475809,0.006795902,0.00037052308,0.000036181133,0.0027129669,0.064284034,0.0012645192,0.002829103,0.7295366,0.14576286,0.046171367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053766595,0.00006203743,0.011744046,0.0003464869,0.000018024708,0.00043847898,0.097812004,0.00032827188,0.0004556791,0.16695206,0.72169363,0.00009555015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039395753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064361386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039395753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006790517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004764662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0783329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388562946","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2023.2277748","title":"Land struggle and Palestinian farmers’ livelihoods in the West Bank: between de-agrarianization and anti-colonial resistance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS","keywords":"Agrarian society; Livelihood; Proletarianization; Indigenous; Colonialism; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Resistance (ecology); Land grabbing; Agrarian system; Economy; Geography; Development economics; Ethnology; Political economy; Sociology; Agriculture; Economics; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03731048905838578,"score_gpt":0.2595775853157416,"score_spread":0.22226709625735583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388562946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98711175,0.00048373872,0.000027948961,0.0012425238,0.0000058436553,0.0000039343613,0.000010038671,6.732742e-7,0.011113487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989053,0.00025223574,0.000011550006,0.000090895235,0.0000036080037,0.000003419712,0.000004590789,7.554303e-7,0.00072752126],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994911,0.00016868862,0.0000127074645,0.000040143823,0.000047087513,0.0002402747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994741,0.0001819078,0.00017268503,0.000015508398,0.000037479844,0.000118308264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091947615,0.00015098549,0.00019857081,0.00074169494,0.0041299793,0.0040905825,0.0003507344,0.00067737495,0.0034533264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014747566,0.0001777592,0.0000639566,0.0015756943,0.008638634,0.0020311098,0.0029900798,0.0012937648,0.00019312662],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032005232,0.00043052286,0.2019228,0.00015761987,0.000029476027,0.004367246,0.6686209,0.00033410513,0.0022075167,0.07148495,0.002275995,0.04784877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022829236,0.00009636596,0.33144173,0.00019886592,0.000009707153,0.0004608616,0.6390601,0.00018944638,0.0004093261,0.006797256,0.021295896,0.00001773103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02286142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047561627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02286142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039738417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024584983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045456707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388834939","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2023.2282172","title":"Climate change beyond technocracy: citizenship and drought practices in the Indian Himalayas","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Climate change; Technocracy; Climate justice; Political science; State (computer science); Vulnerability (computing); Economic Justice; Narrative; Geography; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.10937631713550716,"score_gpt":0.3832503861784845,"score_spread":0.27387406904297734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388834939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99191564,0.00013685561,0.000112035734,0.0011889859,0.0000061664746,0.0000032414935,0.000005110115,0.0000025010606,0.0066294493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996562,0.000053329528,0.000015473432,0.0000466676,0.0000021975984,8.150703e-7,0.0000012501421,5.56222e-7,0.00022355822],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905044,0.00051031384,0.000022977607,0.00005627665,0.000100904486,0.00025910724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998618,0.0008125406,0.00019321509,0.00009764528,0.00007554025,0.00020297297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011703131,0.00014947023,0.00018407604,0.00061018043,0.0063530053,0.0046072816,0.00041424404,0.00063690793,0.0013552462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019512316,0.00014304841,0.00011141591,0.0010880387,0.010629494,0.0020910327,0.0032062544,0.0014509652,0.00007206868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012683835,0.000024859904,0.013775555,0.000018973553,0.0000055502596,0.0004967507,0.9734933,0.00006626937,0.0003208564,0.0066114534,0.00023190516,0.0049418756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002196056,0.000022963135,0.021475844,0.00003195775,0.00000547153,0.00017374786,0.97013885,0.00011760763,0.00012556766,0.00212159,0.005773474,0.000010760122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03032801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047751147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03032801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024904725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019854722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060302973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389247129","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2023.2287107","title":"Accumulation through destabilization: manufacturing indigenous consent for industrial mining in Latin America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latin Americans; Indigenous; Commons; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.2324407114077752,"score_gpt":0.3487294569791971,"score_spread":0.11628874557142191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389247129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273693,0.00036436797,0.002239377,0.004084251,0.000017694912,0.000042955995,0.000007404254,0.000009980307,0.06586481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980842,0.000090396934,0.0002026537,0.00016383952,0.0000056200215,0.000008573531,0.0000026550645,0.0000028312386,0.0014391755],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976252,0.0013315323,0.00006349714,0.00022483713,0.00024074642,0.00051421666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727494,0.0012803411,0.000625909,0.00031196192,0.0002982433,0.00020861706],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005297609,0.00014629787,0.00016794507,0.0007705634,0.005483792,0.0035636586,0.0006531367,0.00082892383,0.0028788585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009716951,0.00013067506,0.00013064666,0.0005703779,0.016098266,0.002489795,0.005935909,0.001183477,0.00009305502],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009079683,0.00010951676,0.03342541,0.00010441038,0.000019242532,0.0017477863,0.7371404,0.0003054738,0.0035281766,0.17589007,0.0008316041,0.046807144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049369362,0.000120188866,0.06627291,0.00028235334,0.000025752857,0.00066133897,0.7500656,0.0012007778,0.0016975707,0.08867016,0.09090276,0.000051147093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014466862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022628373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037242076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003264438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02876532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392743264","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2024.2326564","title":"The indebted woman: kinship, sexuality and capitalism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Capitalism; Human sexuality; Sociology; Gender studies; Anthropology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06618580506976914,"score_gpt":0.40479848549703645,"score_spread":0.33861268042726733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392743264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08599551,0.048936922,0.0028943452,0.14152718,0.0023345994,0.000018898896,0.00006541229,0.00002175208,0.7182054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300451,0.010351983,0.00041618227,0.005244371,0.0013198456,0.000022795166,0.00002000837,0.000012387739,0.052567318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966455,0.00022435996,0.000003730736,0.00002444443,0.00003840862,0.00004460461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919456,0.0005585376,0.00007574781,0.00003702273,0.000040291714,0.00009382231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054944854,0.00017644273,0.00019316215,0.00033909985,0.0022995567,0.0033286992,0.00056118396,0.0010074471,0.003458332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015446888,0.00008532778,0.00007490442,0.0006657337,0.010253116,0.0032719525,0.0011502249,0.0015570534,0.00030473995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016579395,0.000014955513,0.0011372602,0.000028860348,0.0000032968119,0.0001394646,0.0124228485,0.00012044059,0.000025845638,0.95675915,0.021992115,0.0073391576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018880282,0.000060844894,0.0076412875,0.00037801763,0.000010548541,0.00040279794,0.030504914,0.00075914635,0.00018004568,0.5961573,0.3638659,0.000020332069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004569186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072040563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004569186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013665089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000864117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011569262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392945852","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2024.2309297","title":"The ‘agropopulist shift’ toward authoritarianism: the conflict between the MAS government and coca growers from the Bolivian Yungas","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Coca; Government (linguistics); Political science; Business; Geography; Democracy; Philosophy; Politics; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.04578973447977114,"score_gpt":0.2601812872975299,"score_spread":0.21439155281775873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392945852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95959073,0.0001924532,0.00026834215,0.0027069168,0.000015370339,0.00001048444,0.000006166012,0.0000028454024,0.037206735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998676,0.00003510319,0.000052883603,0.00013714284,0.0000034692882,0.000004136468,0.0000023253833,0.000001512974,0.0010874268],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910104,0.00043491938,0.000016901875,0.00007557873,0.000056460183,0.00031512862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999542,0.00021765557,0.00010406712,0.00003309885,0.000031563428,0.00007167956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014299189,0.00017633945,0.0001582247,0.00047162414,0.006163811,0.003623997,0.00055968633,0.0012135601,0.0018262906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001371556,0.00010921409,0.000100778176,0.00049003947,0.011179006,0.0013369585,0.003542135,0.0017017866,0.000085901724],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020240019,0.00009232726,0.027852625,0.000074424584,0.00001883849,0.004641686,0.5079161,0.0006484185,0.0046691853,0.4346757,0.0016286671,0.01757969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004774694,0.000111376154,0.05982032,0.00021072043,0.00001586566,0.0009677271,0.8356229,0.0009405544,0.0016878933,0.035978302,0.064556055,0.000040529994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029609328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051528994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029609328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005361495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018496414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05887395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401212274","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2024.2380505","title":"The struggle for land in coastal Ecuador during the PAIS alliance pink-tide governments: trapped in patronage, corruption, and violence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Elite; Agrarian society; State (computer science); Alliance; Language change; Autonomy; Political science; Political economy; Mobilization; Development economics; Sociology; Politics; Geography; Economics; Law; Agriculture; Archaeology","score_opus":0.019229524552473544,"score_gpt":0.24982368712972342,"score_spread":0.23059416257724988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401212274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99253935,0.00017363956,0.000053545562,0.00073234335,0.0000069436287,0.0000045721326,0.0000062025883,0.0000017554636,0.006481582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973041,0.00021522501,0.00006781655,0.00012444667,0.000005121008,0.000009566911,0.000008096884,0.0000020523287,0.002263529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996215,0.0001194771,0.000010764102,0.000025695863,0.000029288867,0.00019323743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996599,0.000112267495,0.00009599469,0.000017960965,0.00004242986,0.00007134638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000807801,0.0001586028,0.00017949169,0.00054313673,0.005528683,0.0026230074,0.00049527484,0.0006421381,0.0027534557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016247049,0.00012564997,0.0000712866,0.000701295,0.0028754796,0.0014444683,0.0029940712,0.000826175,0.00015421126],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020423332,0.00024213092,0.14985244,0.00015149248,0.00002603602,0.012590726,0.75071657,0.00021559901,0.0034323756,0.026695017,0.0035066048,0.05236673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009942819,0.00007858313,0.0818965,0.00010768673,0.000011121505,0.00053332467,0.87968504,0.00013786719,0.00041959333,0.0011382942,0.035970297,0.00001184551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02072859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05107524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02072859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023650078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001192137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041215897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402354962","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2024.2392695","title":"Becoming a young farmer: young people's pathways into farming: Canada, China, India, and Indonesia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan","keywords":"China; Agriculture; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Political science; Geography; Agricultural economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.016602136701591788,"score_gpt":0.2340918456980377,"score_spread":0.21748970899644593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402354962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881511,0.00089957274,0.000023144452,0.0044259946,0.000043578533,0.00003306748,0.00020182149,0.0000029860578,0.0062187747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933861,0.0015846989,0.000056946206,0.0007291155,0.000008330314,0.000026643002,0.00013077351,0.0000037836887,0.0040736822],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993274,0.00007653716,0.00001584308,0.000031975887,0.00008118199,0.00046706985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982332,0.00012861892,0.00013708959,0.000013325215,0.0002904374,0.0011972189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068009406,0.00019369129,0.00027263767,0.0008225302,0.010626109,0.0031211046,0.00085782586,0.0009076595,0.0034907914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013922044,0.0002015442,0.00025751416,0.0017185131,0.0018318092,0.0016330944,0.0024216855,0.0019556491,0.00025530564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012885469,0.00029637667,0.4537014,0.00011559353,0.000015744434,0.002051986,0.50286955,0.00005428227,0.0003471093,0.0020900867,0.0071849027,0.03114416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009724419,0.000048781872,0.26792073,0.0001584517,0.0000141964165,0.00015295297,0.7224485,0.00006122931,0.00006841087,0.00021103483,0.008884293,0.000021636917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9287215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9731651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07127851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013629654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03951311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1433965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403231689","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2024.2399138","title":"The political economy of agroecological transitions: key analytical dimensions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Agroecology; Key (lock); Politics; Economic system; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Geography; Agriculture; Ecology","score_opus":0.03950305698319897,"score_gpt":0.27772714031927,"score_spread":0.238224083336071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403231689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36405432,0.014219105,0.16392191,0.0949292,0.000375499,0.0006108966,0.00058326306,0.00006299719,0.36124283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855004,0.0027913589,0.008778258,0.00048206095,0.00018817364,0.00026715093,0.000058732698,0.000014030465,0.0019197537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798787,0.0011662596,0.0000702326,0.00018469412,0.00027466327,0.00031631495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953797,0.0032746142,0.0005626236,0.00021168705,0.00026474788,0.00030661016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035753436,0.00039665197,0.0006442395,0.0040683947,0.0028001573,0.011487042,0.00096066075,0.0015795535,0.0032273433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005115355,0.00029534826,0.0005232378,0.0053533236,0.017895408,0.0057283724,0.004219431,0.0023911337,0.00016666105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006891234,0.00002627414,0.0027226924,0.000042146385,0.000006489676,0.00005955696,0.001389103,0.0020411229,0.000076083394,0.989092,0.00034030023,0.004197301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005790138,0.000011901685,0.006547944,0.000105147104,0.000009480547,0.000057207522,0.006654003,0.009408147,0.00012591087,0.9648254,0.01223478,0.000014460147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023314196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029703928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011487042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064105233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029319713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04651183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403673442","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2024.2407177","title":"Land struggles, livelihoods, and trajectories of agrarian change in the Polochic valley, Guatemala","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Livelihood; Agrarian society; Agrarian reform; Geography; Agrarian system; Political science; Peasant; Land grabbing; Political economy; Agriculture; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.058290152168166603,"score_gpt":0.27714117227427326,"score_spread":0.21885102010610666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403673442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99887055,0.00007183472,0.000018441175,0.00021279807,8.0377833e-7,0.0000039597744,0.000033598622,9.988493e-7,0.00078702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996455,0.00005365616,0.00001838074,0.000015683903,5.48601e-7,0.000005141256,0.00002668423,5.807797e-7,0.00023378588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957496,0.000117675845,0.0000071272757,0.00004238177,0.000027471324,0.0002303298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995352,0.00008227677,0.00014606086,0.000017818391,0.000040083887,0.0001785504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003981068,0.00013834072,0.00016869168,0.000803613,0.0022267501,0.0020649845,0.00045564113,0.00057413545,0.001955449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010792378,0.00014571175,0.00010088028,0.0013038918,0.0027667496,0.0011113262,0.0024807318,0.00055584934,0.00016874734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025508666,0.0001683833,0.79797435,0.000074887204,0.00003297588,0.001902971,0.16796914,0.0007038885,0.002258008,0.0062027164,0.00073382404,0.021723794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005230123,0.000061245926,0.8900988,0.000024887497,0.0000038271587,0.00019174878,0.10549856,0.00032054418,0.00012590757,0.0007214514,0.002935248,0.000012491493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11463969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26092592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11463969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032187952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012886573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22794485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404795247","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2024.2429480","title":"The ‘terms and conditions’ of surveillance capitalism: theorizing agricultural data policy and governance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of British Columbia","funders":"Stewart Blusson Quantum Matter Institute, University of British Columbia; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Capitalism; Corporate governance; Agriculture; Economics; Political science; Economic system; Political economy; Business; Sociology; Politics; Geography; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.049133279928897954,"score_gpt":0.2943882338429642,"score_spread":0.24525495391406624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404795247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26660362,0.0047177393,0.21775173,0.10297915,0.00024049397,0.00015959768,0.00014001213,0.00007802062,0.40732962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99396944,0.0004758211,0.003354792,0.00046228318,0.00008434509,0.000062062354,0.000012962844,0.0000140669945,0.00156425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920988,0.0047914563,0.00027929744,0.00092179055,0.0011587613,0.0007497747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97540295,0.017234791,0.0026315714,0.002974351,0.0010558498,0.0007005501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013544044,0.00030406663,0.0003664652,0.002247351,0.0030735254,0.00968791,0.0012876666,0.0034326776,0.0028120552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022752816,0.0004702048,0.00037525344,0.0022426012,0.05172238,0.016802654,0.0049696625,0.0037733945,0.00021572717],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029123598,0.0000050245108,0.00040037013,0.0000060573198,0.0000015308993,0.000017437485,0.0014575438,0.00033644924,0.000032407363,0.99638546,0.00012105181,0.001233782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077536715,0.000008835535,0.0008236579,0.000070597205,0.0000040386612,0.000030068977,0.0018453047,0.0016381775,0.0001500368,0.98672545,0.008687275,0.000008816444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004290163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002279736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013544044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075341472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047076126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07162857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405367593","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2024.2424857","title":"Jamaican Ganja farmers face extinction(s): grassroots activists propose ‘Jamsterdam’ resuscitation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Caribbean history, culture, and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Grassroots; Livelihood; Face (sociological concept); Threatened species; Economic growth; Sociology; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Social science; Law; Ecology; Agriculture; Biology","score_opus":0.0518775863941003,"score_gpt":0.36622038820421965,"score_spread":0.31434280181011937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405367593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49443746,0.0029536188,0.0008297342,0.20786844,0.0010056606,0.000057633286,0.00003274889,0.000034866964,0.29277983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640631,0.00058387587,0.00020551556,0.013344503,0.00015943474,0.000012932966,0.000008885459,0.000007592124,0.021614127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999501,0.00016284076,0.000007062499,0.00005081296,0.000045644894,0.00023268317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994004,0.00028367058,0.00006072106,0.000036800255,0.000061677805,0.00015670828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015517066,0.00016046317,0.00010209491,0.00024998217,0.0106438305,0.0043004924,0.00077185384,0.0033278624,0.004516427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022688825,0.000094885305,0.000097952456,0.00021258552,0.011643404,0.002148982,0.0026732641,0.0035114966,0.00023875583],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012141391,0.0001577309,0.016465146,0.0002046415,0.000020543754,0.004493843,0.3990402,0.00026401822,0.003033587,0.4205456,0.08573068,0.069922626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027607088,0.00005240254,0.012110802,0.00021653435,0.000014759645,0.00039443016,0.355878,0.0002961649,0.00066412764,0.040472817,0.58985126,0.000021109958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029195672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10169458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029195672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034486135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031560368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058051467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407127885","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2025.2451792","title":"Gender, land grabbing and agrarian livelihoods: contradictory gendered outcomes of land transactions in Ghana","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Land grabbing; Livelihood; Agrarian society; Land rights; Gender relations; Agricultural land; Business; Natural resource economics; Economic growth; Geography; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Agriculture; Sociology; Gender studies; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.04360844789584991,"score_gpt":0.25892216585300337,"score_spread":0.21531371795715346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407127885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971744,0.00025247724,0.00014802073,0.00017341324,0.0000036517297,0.000007817566,0.000016499955,6.738556e-7,0.0022230905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994923,0.0000981319,0.00007009813,0.000023499268,0.000001786369,0.000007362314,0.0000054612874,9.903312e-7,0.00030040534],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869674,0.0008272307,0.000038475067,0.00011144113,0.00011821906,0.00020794268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720746,0.0017774422,0.00067766383,0.00006652304,0.00013045501,0.00014039532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002530406,0.0001834124,0.00026876456,0.000681386,0.002435151,0.0018586498,0.0002736066,0.00036046063,0.0030063174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045776693,0.00019179542,0.00006863238,0.0011254792,0.0053727976,0.001853631,0.0019406317,0.00042661454,0.00011708202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023629141,0.000092824725,0.19453713,0.00015494197,0.000014824219,0.0012078609,0.77291715,0.00007248817,0.0027523944,0.0063297283,0.0003257965,0.021358602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063356997,0.00009006843,0.1670491,0.00008670821,0.000006232016,0.0002787938,0.8262592,0.000076587916,0.00034414593,0.0019130728,0.0038796363,0.000010096034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068023587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017963745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068023587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016891299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093714806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013525486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407953479","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2025.2462759","title":"‘Who defends us?' Criollo livestock herders amidst commodity frontier expansion in the Paraguayan Chaco","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Livestock; Commodity; Geography; Economy; Economic geography; Economics; Market economy; Forestry; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03262812994583821,"score_gpt":0.26906393264044765,"score_spread":0.23643580269460943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407953479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893917,0.0003053967,0.00007569118,0.002424414,0.000012620432,0.000008414263,0.000009704913,0.000001965245,0.007770108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979195,0.00022456654,0.00006694603,0.00035478765,0.0000062913705,0.0000060376133,0.0000054917446,0.0000015954598,0.0014147528],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968576,0.00013649612,0.000003669151,0.000035334117,0.000018409393,0.000120345336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958235,0.0001634465,0.00007845884,0.000019329278,0.000032400654,0.00012408388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080149836,0.00015165455,0.00015901982,0.00033416992,0.0060761743,0.0020813013,0.00058864214,0.0011966508,0.0032928744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011092515,0.00012646578,0.00006941227,0.0005295713,0.0043038814,0.0014787356,0.0017665379,0.0011673482,0.00013493781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009187025,0.00005797733,0.068508364,0.00007950404,0.000011411884,0.0058387043,0.8900823,0.00008211183,0.0030464083,0.009536429,0.0026408818,0.020024119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051073093,0.00004458825,0.04547865,0.00007335854,0.0000060725224,0.00061383704,0.93695754,0.0001342484,0.00014978035,0.0005996106,0.015926316,0.000010933481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1005749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24546698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1005749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021267869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009429627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.199979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409231310","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2025.2480193","title":"Tiny engines of abundance: a history of peasant productivity &amp; repression","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Productivity; Psychological repression; Abundance (ecology); Natural resource economics; Economics; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Economic growth; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05254357833704988,"score_gpt":0.2978127279886368,"score_spread":0.24526914965158692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409231310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029663144,0.043071546,0.0016405425,0.062580906,0.0008633286,0.000017318907,0.00009216103,0.00007544379,0.8619956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8151895,0.023469383,0.0004702463,0.009477407,0.0008332434,0.00004743679,0.000061727915,0.000095983545,0.1503551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999086,0.00031282008,0.000021765642,0.000108955945,0.00019803853,0.00027237646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992729,0.00033441914,0.00007873328,0.00007548144,0.0001241631,0.00011437395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010706991,0.00025628705,0.00027532977,0.0012075865,0.008804499,0.00570769,0.0007420548,0.001307642,0.0074134907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027866566,0.0001716635,0.00013704001,0.00289945,0.024839833,0.0035630811,0.002800895,0.0030177257,0.00076722185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030719537,0.000014170143,0.000740717,0.0000742667,0.0000064295805,0.00023318286,0.052945666,0.000110960245,0.00015371316,0.87584144,0.034608845,0.035239883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005918111,0.000017066353,0.0028093983,0.00020327063,0.0000030515523,0.000096934076,0.012691198,0.00008695547,0.0001547055,0.056435928,0.9274823,0.000013372291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07931858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11568755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07931858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014688671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049313167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15771377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412059913","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2025.2519636","title":"Deepening the ecological agrarian question: how ecologies of production shape capital accumulation, subsumption and producer agency in the Thai Nam Hom Coconut Industry","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Agency (philosophy); Production (economics); Capital (architecture); Agriculture; Crop production; Capital accumulation; Business; Economic system; Natural resource economics; Economy; Economics; Agricultural economics; Economic geography; Ecology; Geography; Market economy; Biology; Sociology; Human capital; Social science","score_opus":0.07397606588739854,"score_gpt":0.33949047543558564,"score_spread":0.2655144095481871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412059913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99158174,0.00011842679,0.00031911655,0.00037669818,0.0000013167953,0.0000023176492,0.000025484773,0.0000013810443,0.007573567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996213,0.00004151559,0.00007823961,0.000018437073,0.0000010729635,9.211127e-7,0.000008012888,9.951685e-7,0.00022945188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996722,0.0001683813,0.0000075935327,0.000054532993,0.000027297783,0.00007005241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860185,0.00065588905,0.00037363835,0.00008767078,0.000076389304,0.00020445432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006099554,0.0001426447,0.00015639608,0.0006056487,0.00078044075,0.0033727586,0.00023936735,0.0003056288,0.0031017885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015207053,0.00010908211,0.00016954294,0.0010031812,0.0035395038,0.0018526396,0.0021258206,0.00043475957,0.00010866829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028006732,0.0002073211,0.8852504,0.0001020246,0.00013975956,0.0007964384,0.03654706,0.003791733,0.0035984707,0.040694755,0.00036044588,0.02823149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007925363,0.000061166196,0.9409302,0.000041584626,0.000029944058,0.00009040468,0.03546043,0.0019784418,0.00037402936,0.018286088,0.002718704,0.00002114303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014711905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04248403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014711905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012431241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077582523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029252589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412703771","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2025.2528863","title":"‘Capital grabs back’: towards a global research agenda on the land grabbing-land reform/restitution nexus","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Miljø- og Biovitenskapelige Universitet; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of the Western Cape; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Restitution; Nexus (standard); Land grabbing; Land reform; Political science; Capital (architecture); Political economy; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Law; Agriculture","score_opus":0.12088882757202464,"score_gpt":0.34579435757642923,"score_spread":0.2249055300044046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412703771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16550381,0.19735983,0.015970975,0.45765144,0.0016460662,0.000131269,0.00031005955,0.00007977175,0.1613468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89622897,0.07758467,0.0040390017,0.016735237,0.0007635801,0.000091065755,0.00011352387,0.000047005426,0.0043969294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970144,0.0014404079,0.00007183251,0.00031369706,0.00033135165,0.00082833844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918994,0.005497767,0.0010752418,0.00049555127,0.0005413466,0.0004908637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009208665,0.0006539997,0.0009345382,0.0033969241,0.0037522288,0.015192394,0.0012070311,0.0044938424,0.005630337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074278456,0.0002918822,0.00042279816,0.0056223315,0.030588172,0.028154913,0.011361522,0.0047069807,0.00031802623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049131642,0.000046001373,0.0070038405,0.0016984806,0.00003850162,0.0005698621,0.057836585,0.0005306549,0.0009392051,0.828822,0.00926154,0.09320408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014101892,0.00011904789,0.021001495,0.0053954637,0.00004545353,0.0003971261,0.19812098,0.00047635622,0.0009172956,0.45333192,0.32012978,0.000050955907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006624091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013597644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015192394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006534366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009375559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04870063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412984285","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2025.2527232","title":"Mobile pastoralist geographies of care: nomadic relationalities between the global pandemic and environmental risks","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"John Fell Fund, University of Oxford; National University of Mongolia; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Economic and Social Research Council; University of Oxford; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Pastoralism; Pandemic; Political science; Geography; Economic growth; Development economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Socioeconomics; Sociology; Economics; Livestock; Medicine","score_opus":0.023066365402462537,"score_gpt":0.29136332848590674,"score_spread":0.2682969630834442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412984285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730849,0.0005745042,0.0011317672,0.0029043092,0.000022148675,0.00000824063,0.000043759133,0.000003924547,0.02222639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993843,0.0001262646,0.000083367435,0.000032872034,0.00000483039,0.0000026584974,0.000008187133,8.736623e-7,0.00035672475],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923766,0.00054066913,0.000015791305,0.000053538806,0.00004336019,0.00010898111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988856,0.0004904403,0.00029092643,0.000076096345,0.00010246672,0.00015446712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012993756,0.00012390487,0.000119204175,0.001180273,0.003741057,0.0026257145,0.00033169484,0.0005055081,0.0027540738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025003334,0.00010602592,0.00008204793,0.0010376386,0.006335742,0.002314482,0.0026326766,0.00074652536,0.00007821904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045486686,0.000027223137,0.15333472,0.00006417765,0.000025351583,0.00062867184,0.7513541,0.00029027657,0.00055209827,0.07218297,0.001230066,0.020264829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036031731,0.000044816283,0.1166888,0.000109951165,0.000009968938,0.0003586703,0.84806323,0.00033076026,0.00008108002,0.008672731,0.025616214,0.000020307754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022325302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046104193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022325302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020725087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008851472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044390738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414124633","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2025.2549906","title":"The politics of paper landscapes: making sense of ‘bad’ numbers in the global land rush","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Indiana University Bloomington","keywords":"Politics; Land grabbing; Land use; Land reform; Global South","score_opus":0.018855551662706634,"score_gpt":0.27737202580019926,"score_spread":0.2585164741374926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414124633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27001074,0.008923134,0.017970182,0.1465366,0.0009675072,0.000032608772,0.000090493406,0.00009028446,0.55537844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908035,0.0006357214,0.0006416852,0.0024351305,0.00016905404,0.000013497952,0.000011192308,0.000040353665,0.0052499343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927947,0.0047857994,0.00016071826,0.0007036524,0.00094387453,0.00061126245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300766,0.004274191,0.0007139978,0.0009602907,0.00061250007,0.00043135227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011608529,0.00024361092,0.00036938884,0.0017084611,0.0064332793,0.015396401,0.00079418794,0.0022528085,0.004093832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013302446,0.00033431206,0.0002270936,0.00187409,0.056466483,0.017288985,0.006924118,0.0039862306,0.00032067805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011268584,0.000003111461,0.00080812135,0.000020473577,0.0000034702514,0.00004966733,0.0132599035,0.00009307414,0.000082863444,0.97896874,0.0016223256,0.005076887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016696209,0.00002322748,0.0040793465,0.0001823411,0.000011124852,0.00009065247,0.03461753,0.00046314643,0.0003173732,0.81903875,0.1411357,0.000024220872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038277842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059714727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005133926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017979754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061392486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417166000","doi":"10.1080/03066150.2025.2584783","title":"Pharmaceuticals in the Capitalocene: on the metabolic exploitation of life and bodies in the capitalist world-ecology","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Peasant Studies","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Capitalism; Consumption (sociology); Agriculture","score_opus":0.06023206220414006,"score_gpt":0.3073563521957103,"score_spread":0.2471242899915702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417166000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29314995,0.032905195,0.006456668,0.10395902,0.00032863137,0.00005183647,0.00008217148,0.000038531696,0.56302804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977131,0.010498822,0.0006848056,0.0039108237,0.0001764573,0.000017712708,0.000012700104,0.000011941525,0.007555814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897254,0.00051524624,0.000017541966,0.00008186808,0.0001398859,0.00027289102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897134,0.000652734,0.00012964685,0.000063948966,0.00006192823,0.000120349854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001788221,0.000349077,0.00029360817,0.001221506,0.0058461404,0.007459288,0.0005959532,0.002378288,0.003549445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009901668,0.00014250331,0.00019063077,0.0011593528,0.04776796,0.006861321,0.0052922843,0.0019195828,0.00029519288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003365488,0.00003327707,0.0007695694,0.000065150976,0.0000031028926,0.00041727454,0.031340647,0.00014208585,0.00034359226,0.9559813,0.0016238154,0.009246426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003638162,0.00018875141,0.006640636,0.00056401035,0.000014186358,0.0008257491,0.05865171,0.00048567826,0.0018715989,0.47176075,0.45890927,0.000051265768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007962082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013079049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007962082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007306689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035889733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05301404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}