{"meta":{"query_hash":"2c2c3d47ac4e","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Politics"},"cohort_total":41,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":41,"exported":41,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2c2c3d47ac4e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1554840154","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00219_8","title":"The United States and Chile: Coming in from the Cold<i>The United States and Chile: Coming in from the Cold</i>. By David R. Mares and Francisco Rojas Aravena. (New York: Routledge, 2001. Pp. 145. $70.00 cloth, $17.95 paper.)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cold war; Politics; Coming out; Political science; Economic history; Library science; History; Law; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01790922787343166,"score_gpt":0.27609287295049584,"score_spread":0.25818364507706415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554840154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96101576,0.016128154,0.00007494361,0.020216273,0.0002504826,0.00040102666,0.0004645257,0.0000135063665,0.0014353142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466787,0.042670317,0.000092876275,0.009429692,0.0005919635,0.0000058276596,0.000039741877,0.00003394001,0.00045692374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581504,0.0019604138,0.0007079222,0.0001874999,0.0005174422,0.0008116825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870481,0.011870765,0.00040250237,0.00028285565,0.00011200388,0.0002838098],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024269824,0.00028234354,0.0004304243,0.00004523084,0.0021149423,0.00042495603,0.00069546024,0.00014959474,0.0000623727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010686325,0.00013581953,0.000066010136,0.0005693649,0.0022203259,0.00013965245,0.00013379093,0.0010799619,0.0000011946283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004069746,0.00047588572,0.13411419,0.000036768684,0.0007964754,0.000045354413,0.34531245,0.0011240614,0.0005086458,0.33526692,0.1794158,0.0024964744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025104196,0.00024016657,0.043861955,0.00044214714,0.00029185062,0.000021772745,0.15117341,0.004338235,0.00006469513,0.16990659,0.6265719,0.00057688355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12221415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015075965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44715607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012629331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027356195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897605808","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00581.x","title":"The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United<i>The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States</i>. By Pradeep K. Chhibber and Ken Kollman. (Princeton University Press, 2004.)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Competition (biology); Politics; Public administration; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01124519873198463,"score_gpt":0.22277675158765287,"score_spread":0.21153155285566824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897605808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98749614,0.0024875775,0.00018219893,0.007389982,0.000143489,0.0008581884,0.0007173913,0.0000041682447,0.0007208579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969805,0.0022051076,0.0000033027816,0.0004985584,0.00010422183,0.000005305842,0.000055031487,0.0000075351263,0.00014046716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566096,0.0017923783,0.00088165025,0.00012452209,0.001107282,0.00043320656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956359,0.0024296427,0.0010082255,0.00011538915,0.00063979166,0.00017099583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051781633,0.00018420407,0.00039245092,0.00010035711,0.0009467127,0.0001820319,0.00022712903,0.000098951125,0.0000015638682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003402928,0.000104102146,0.000030368314,0.00029296664,0.0010628452,0.0005565975,0.00007592618,0.00036309662,5.549529e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047148825,0.000051621446,0.03142573,0.0005007923,0.00014047838,0.000013026877,0.022064295,0.0015894372,0.000008714931,0.93378323,0.009874538,0.00007666653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020296358,0.000273647,0.46854442,0.0024141595,0.00040314364,0.00089259236,0.20317645,0.061994992,0.00011664632,0.026343552,0.2144872,0.0010568537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98369384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9573868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90743965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012671854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009748033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7281444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919795422","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00652_4","title":"<i>Anamnesis: On the Theory of History and Politics</i>. By Eric Voegelin. Translated from the German by, M. J. Hanak. Edited with an Introduction by David Walsh. The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Volume 6. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2002. Pp. 438. $39.95.)<i>Order and History, Volume 4, The Ecumenic Age</i>. By Eric Voegelin. Edited with an Introduction by, Michael Franz. The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Volume 17. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2000. Pp. 444. $39.95.)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"German; Politics; Order (exchange); George (robot); Classics; History; Humanities; Art history; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009134725447757034,"score_gpt":0.19837025137929198,"score_spread":0.18923552593153495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919795422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9004705,0.074805185,0.0012169076,0.018034238,0.0012198949,0.0023255756,0.0015015927,0.00008625256,0.0003398637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8939458,0.05824416,0.00061246497,0.0014026065,0.0018075417,0.000014916632,0.0003586928,0.00025185064,0.043361947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990787,0.0048236134,0.0013473588,0.0006628387,0.0014847722,0.0008943648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917533,0.0013104086,0.0029619543,0.0013031297,0.002275466,0.00039577202],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026987367,0.00061222765,0.0011687913,0.00008984786,0.0018184975,0.00013671251,0.0017245144,0.0005924305,0.0006043528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005203408,0.0004270845,0.00032362723,0.0016309258,0.0061225006,0.00064761325,0.00010455898,0.0018028143,0.0000014202233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011394417,0.00092875777,0.00030583845,0.000055549703,0.0010919176,0.000004152249,0.024779016,0.00031040993,0.00474854,0.00011249671,0.966448,0.000075873926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039389003,0.0019848417,0.0023689799,0.00036048045,0.0037286172,0.00008038812,0.048826862,0.003332023,0.00048781888,0.00047862035,0.9335858,0.0008266694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07763726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008728457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06890881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009299554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011759478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043975160","doi":"10.1017/s0022381608080754","title":"The Perils of Unearned Income","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Economic rent; Public good; Politics; Economics; Natural resource; Resource curse; Public economics; Market economy; Political economy; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.033381897149327086,"score_gpt":0.21451867252820275,"score_spread":0.18113677537887568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043975160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98653007,0.0036846306,0.00007402506,0.0015679419,0.00039777547,0.000039282328,0.000009937294,0.0000018723158,0.0076944446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474597,0.0020062076,0.00018212388,0.00015463361,0.00016545947,2.68915e-7,1.7724375e-7,0.000007672329,0.0027374884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989723,0.000017067494,0.00072859594,0.000042717904,0.000043081745,0.00019623143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988148,0.00020322847,0.0006989411,0.00017103873,0.00005142204,0.00006056503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009124804,0.000065891596,0.00023303303,0.000065967804,0.00019385152,0.000014511991,0.0003819422,0.000033304026,0.00006530997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016709755,0.000038915747,0.000105326675,0.00007454941,0.00015446644,0.000060720336,0.00005123133,0.0001690293,0.00004965246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018220939,0.00013291335,0.1755081,0.00005318508,0.0006217007,0.000022955453,0.012955715,0.0006710412,0.0000973744,0.7969514,0.010456158,0.0023472272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001116379,0.00028888683,0.2765557,0.000039339047,0.000022926428,0.00050566444,0.001268904,0.0006308754,0.0008538313,0.1191496,0.5993024,0.0002654775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006176181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029752377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67780185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007644267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046243582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1586938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049615761","doi":"10.1017/s0022381609090501","title":"The Consensus School, Its Critics, and Welfare Policy: A Study of American Political Discourse","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Welfare; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Public discourse; Political economy; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041498796764110585,"score_gpt":0.4182879770505953,"score_spread":0.37678918028648467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049615761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910385,0.00017632722,0.000006065288,0.10635118,0.0001084137,0.00016776107,0.000008125695,0.0000063187254,0.0021373285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827355,0.000024940493,0.000012219749,0.0004983226,0.00095743244,6.6104315e-7,9.3846786e-8,0.0000064097767,0.00022638557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738777,0.0008958515,0.0005356683,0.00006002293,0.00052255567,0.000598132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978272,0.0007929073,0.0002861166,0.00016063258,0.00046396191,0.0004691878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012665375,0.0000977063,0.00025398625,0.00006507886,0.0007155406,0.000069673566,0.00026519148,0.000037200894,0.0000073792853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002533382,0.000054343418,0.000055991924,0.00021347478,0.001001913,0.00006730718,0.000023025921,0.00024996672,0.0000021983856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027442497,0.00016648228,0.004864872,0.0000046741065,0.000031403542,0.0000043468012,0.0042352173,0.000003777594,0.00005422774,0.98998904,0.00030499487,0.0003135167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020100886,0.007596943,0.3711886,0.00015450022,0.0007284688,0.00014021691,0.3811586,0.00010494818,0.00038519438,0.22249255,0.013536754,0.0005031668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013060055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014079869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013470618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038181597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99351203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094621010","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00504.x","title":"Making Candidates Count: The Logic of Electoral Alliances in Two-Round Legislative Elections","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Alliance; Electoral system; Political science; Voting; Single non-transferable vote; Single-member district; Focus (optics); Political economy; Public administration; Economics; First-past-the-post voting; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.10804744632106808,"score_gpt":0.44891523707318154,"score_spread":0.3408677907521135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094621010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821927,0.0005433599,0.00083466264,0.0034632294,0.0003191922,0.000137051,0.00000390819,0.0000051154157,0.012500788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865973,0.000019865378,0.000039731753,0.00020182002,0.00069029763,6.288332e-7,2.022623e-7,0.0000044669846,0.00038327984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983392,0.00040156898,0.0004545991,0.000039640992,0.00035947046,0.00040553295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983194,0.00094116066,0.0003441555,0.0000761136,0.0002571587,0.000062030245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028294392,0.00006536431,0.00015611899,0.000062758816,0.00030291965,0.00003224034,0.00022780726,0.000036203663,0.000030357996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038865718,0.000036434943,0.00005291037,0.00034142548,0.00037347942,0.00014128294,0.000010536924,0.00024484555,0.0000031403943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053039978,0.00007699529,0.1301305,0.000012087461,0.00005020074,0.000005518708,0.021350514,0.00032609518,0.00089342607,0.84645647,0.0004769572,0.0001682169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015892913,0.0012164223,0.33563486,0.0005701168,0.00039607624,0.000105382635,0.025565589,0.00070659025,0.0066113067,0.5659389,0.061075665,0.0005897842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027522849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.101649344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28051755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023171467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000255195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97895294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115365533","doi":"10.1017/s0022381614000085","title":"Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Ideology; Social psychology; Public opinion; Political science; Politics; Sample (material); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06102927442900199,"score_gpt":0.3473653025244689,"score_spread":0.28633602809546693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115365533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743494,0.0000531555,0.01153878,0.005768231,0.0002787827,0.00006542154,0.0000022361523,0.0000122052625,0.007931826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984413,0.000014294966,0.00037802843,0.000109009314,0.0007767463,2.1183607e-7,4.219888e-7,0.000004399172,0.00027560518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849397,0.0006365328,0.0003291772,0.000025367448,0.00030039775,0.00021455162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880624,0.00034218212,0.00023597314,0.000080966805,0.0004047504,0.0001299012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020796056,0.000039277253,0.00010727876,0.000053716427,0.00023745158,0.000026087155,0.00015657804,0.00004789243,0.000051213756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080765446,0.000026768183,0.000051358547,0.00015019854,0.0001230104,0.00013574229,0.0000080926875,0.00009858962,0.000009132947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014269823,0.000048021764,0.015881049,0.000014979924,0.000018817378,8.141414e-8,0.0055834893,0.000030121922,0.0011969017,0.97676444,0.00019188505,0.0002688093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016513891,0.001390958,0.16509429,0.0003122744,0.0008148138,0.000050792863,0.01415465,0.0065713553,0.004904796,0.4245546,0.37980232,0.00069776754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011604397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031417486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5522098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070001224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013886455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18263096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135787387","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00548.x","title":"Individualism and Intellectual Liberty in Tocqueville and Descartes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"Brown University","keywords":"Individualism; Politics; Order (exchange); Negative liberty; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.02424282034528777,"score_gpt":0.3275856297157728,"score_spread":0.3033428093704851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135787387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97974753,0.0007076008,0.00010893814,0.001071375,0.000069833135,0.00003936683,0.0000014557834,0.0000033689787,0.018250514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982025,0.00044728463,0.00013098239,0.00080340996,0.00021353157,8.813752e-8,3.2880596e-8,0.0000029299185,0.00019925435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990562,0.00023112947,0.00022966863,0.000034596524,0.00016582086,0.0002825452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761814,0.002046048,0.00006526409,0.000047588084,0.000055518394,0.00016742457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032767013,0.00004924872,0.00010608805,0.00006703482,0.00016720867,0.000030233543,0.00013823381,0.000049930022,0.000030440433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001833061,0.000031902793,0.000017367429,0.00009723517,0.0007121898,0.00015536316,0.00003820234,0.0002001907,0.0000018104639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025945154,0.000024764997,0.0037936529,0.000006070947,0.000011455959,0.00001083769,0.067726,9.774426e-7,0.000106556785,0.9252425,0.0002450068,0.0028062288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006179441,0.00031832434,0.048142105,0.00014191371,0.00005955029,0.00021515685,0.048438285,0.000013362877,0.002138875,0.84775454,0.051947918,0.00021201091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028229825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118226286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077487946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038092297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075473516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2624093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152366088","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00494.x","title":"Polarization and Publicity: Rethinking the Benefits of Deliberative Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Publicity; Politics; Political science; Polarization (electrochemistry); Deliberative democracy; Openness to experience; Scholarship; Public opinion; Law and economics; Democracy; Public relations; Public policy; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.055137459475231444,"score_gpt":0.3471324301915791,"score_spread":0.2919949707163476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152366088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849865,0.0002488519,0.001322312,0.011170386,0.00013332725,0.000073849245,0.000001859109,0.0000034758004,0.0020594415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987747,0.000018578668,0.00009351535,0.0003967505,0.00051051937,9.499642e-8,2.1234875e-7,0.0000037039108,0.00020189249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987619,0.0003259203,0.00033986408,0.00002687861,0.00033000825,0.0002154197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998245,0.00087345764,0.00029993692,0.00006230261,0.00042969902,0.00008963224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035150305,0.000043173288,0.0000989002,0.000039903287,0.00044595823,0.000038353177,0.00013397116,0.000050797316,0.000008321981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087410776,0.00002337538,0.000028327686,0.00015877967,0.0002386361,0.00017588858,0.000016620197,0.00016258242,6.2725354e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009080576,0.000014450743,0.021123316,0.000005898594,0.000018554001,3.0974974e-7,0.02340842,0.000020573021,0.00040405226,0.95403457,0.000118591444,0.0008422161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044696796,0.00035906734,0.38406166,0.00016967132,0.0002301734,0.000041802417,0.009843097,0.0001571183,0.00688041,0.5930776,0.004554589,0.00017786854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028699976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014535772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36293834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049564842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107602275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4338597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161490657","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00135","title":"The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Voting; Similarity (geometry); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Logit; Politics; Variation (astronomy); Test (biology); Voting behavior; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06822017273372011,"score_gpt":0.35141700459349096,"score_spread":0.28319683185977085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161490657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912001,0.00065539934,0.000024321052,0.007155774,0.0001958589,0.0000759862,0.0000067671094,0.0000051070997,0.0006806997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983234,0.00034300055,0.000009907728,0.00021440773,0.0007544124,5.413927e-7,2.5554812e-7,0.000006427977,0.00034767608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984523,0.0003952089,0.00042260694,0.000036358622,0.00034366196,0.00034987397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981139,0.0010788607,0.00031770114,0.000099048746,0.00023671328,0.0001537839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011337646,0.00006791493,0.00016278055,0.000030836523,0.00043687224,0.000048408227,0.00021520426,0.000057812125,0.00002759927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005999008,0.000038150716,0.00006430833,0.00011861026,0.000552613,0.000083932195,0.000016074626,0.00019741763,0.000002573615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025579533,0.00015543302,0.33693668,0.000056324483,0.00022550317,0.000004562772,0.015047157,0.0000045906027,0.0014912974,0.6340254,0.008864578,0.0031628967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086234685,0.0010936656,0.5637827,0.00015985628,0.00077122805,0.000076037344,0.0033891036,0.0011044167,0.00065634097,0.055244267,0.37236154,0.0004985225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019271652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012135815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5787811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042668475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054278356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33601123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168592881","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00126","title":"Selecting Appeals for Judicial Review in Canada: A Replication and Multivariate Test of American Hypotheses","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Appeal; Supreme court; Test (biology); Political science; Certiorari; Replication (statistics); Law; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.0659736452785146,"score_gpt":0.32696655501715616,"score_spread":0.26099290973864153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168592881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89214176,0.03798772,0.0004022797,0.054721296,0.0002498071,0.00084060914,0.00006213722,0.000008560648,0.013585855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917522,0.007398774,0.00009201731,0.0005558531,0.00018120994,0.000001416222,5.6761053e-8,0.0000017661481,0.000016714954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993318,0.00008340041,0.00026243998,0.000035037967,0.00016135036,0.00012599347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985,0.0009205201,0.00032443373,0.00004159043,0.00017914454,0.00003431294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075747067,0.000035111454,0.0001689746,0.000020348898,0.00018672831,0.0000033553615,0.00008623027,0.000007570208,0.000003596568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033308254,0.000024450483,0.00002089454,0.0001451918,0.00017112297,0.000031153475,0.000010864412,0.000057564335,1.385753e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097033735,0.00051064993,0.31284574,0.0006487861,0.00038128108,0.000012462956,0.03760538,0.0001256941,0.0019146927,0.49422047,0.019172408,0.1324654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002444105,0.0012734652,0.60381895,0.0075908178,0.0012120529,0.00013771925,0.06471737,0.0010426446,0.0013032252,0.1718129,0.14369443,0.0009523155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80904883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59813267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32240757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014894437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039988014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40920037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323504528","doi":"10.1017/s0022381613001205","title":"<i>Secessionism: Identity, Interest, and Strategy</i>. By Jason Sorens. (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2012.)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.021525976075346162,"score_gpt":0.2742017191619312,"score_spread":0.252675743086585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323504528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236571,0.0008973026,0.00025339224,0.012746794,0.00055332104,0.00022864285,0.0001289437,0.000021737815,0.06151272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815294,0.0010424929,0.00002442115,0.00022774728,0.00026282624,1.505384e-7,2.569554e-7,0.000005614273,0.016907092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998767,0.00029077282,0.00021989271,0.00006013159,0.0003305424,0.00033166545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899566,0.00018577704,0.00026320235,0.00009802913,0.00017182367,0.0002855138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051194924,0.00008058961,0.000154031,0.000018224751,0.00041523392,0.0001002668,0.0003771788,0.0000738316,0.00008603059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011292972,0.00005462575,0.00004848002,0.000054165113,0.00038339416,0.00089087186,0.00008618231,0.00022376483,0.000012331178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048472193,0.000033853674,0.00036003662,0.000013541009,0.000023819664,0.000005119559,0.00047808414,0.0000012643179,0.00018229336,0.8952599,0.1033744,0.0002628328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044434163,0.00012067761,0.008574213,0.00013079184,0.00007976587,0.000025553189,0.0043254327,0.00001529488,0.00048552293,0.046489023,0.9391293,0.00018007084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062328417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003123846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8487709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012489592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086567525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9439156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494990583","doi":"10.1017/s0022381600008367","title":"Liberalism, Nationalism, Citizenship: Essays on the Problem of Political Community<i>Liberalism, Nationalism, Citizenship: Essays on the Problem of Political Community</i>. By Ronald Beiner. (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2002. Pp. 256. $85.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Citizenship; Politics; Liberalism; State (computer science); Political science; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Media studies; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.024351167309857487,"score_gpt":0.24909371795911173,"score_spread":0.22474255064925425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494990583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6903405,0.0015689037,0.0001115918,0.063019395,0.0005494074,0.0018527338,0.00821946,0.00009047404,0.23424749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887885,0.00034046432,0.00030276758,0.0047997455,0.00050100224,0.000006496327,0.000028458593,0.00006376871,0.0051688394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878367,0.005969457,0.0016472384,0.00023895917,0.0028662963,0.0014413573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862057,0.008515203,0.001586163,0.0008656355,0.0021772792,0.00065003673],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060314653,0.00040374204,0.0009987163,0.0000678042,0.0019010049,0.0001922241,0.002807808,0.00042541733,0.0003233326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013468245,0.00034634385,0.00049466954,0.0005891658,0.0049641873,0.0003131106,0.00037148368,0.0025496364,0.0000073481856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006624855,0.00057831494,0.0002134728,0.00013246303,0.00023715803,0.0000084319345,0.00328974,0.00010986854,0.00007644575,0.77791005,0.21736413,0.0000136524695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026647595,0.0008854406,0.0047958475,0.0018238913,0.0003731859,0.00009890726,0.015544628,0.000021979435,0.00053019624,0.8987794,0.07388287,0.0005988866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4136795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049555257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36412427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009600732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001418892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896125822","doi":"10.1086/710014","title":"The Populist Appeal: Personality and Antiestablishment Communication","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Duisburg-Essen; Universität Mannheim; Universität Wien; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Pennsylvania; York University; Temple University","keywords":"Agreeableness; Personality; Persuasion; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Big Five personality traits; Appeal; Population; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Law; Extraversion and introversion","score_opus":0.04532229680181439,"score_gpt":0.32442938483971867,"score_spread":0.2791070880379043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896125822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85749465,0.0019548535,0.00006903862,0.13465425,0.00021089801,0.00011886509,0.000008684369,0.000013444665,0.00547528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953603,0.0016658886,0.00011648226,0.0022368303,0.000353747,3.0272753e-7,5.489679e-7,0.000005377619,0.00026052588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844,0.0005950477,0.00026020771,0.000038951875,0.00045333648,0.00021240287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989657,0.00031857108,0.00027476516,0.00015106009,0.00013486466,0.0001550427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001955413,0.0000580942,0.00010042259,0.000012301432,0.0012267868,0.00013516238,0.0005759928,0.000028573178,0.000010273926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045888228,0.00003192057,0.000039460076,0.00009199218,0.00050857686,0.00016290214,0.00008749103,0.00023186635,0.0000027054875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008312888,0.00010159363,0.020487273,0.000033973225,0.0001696121,0.0000056649624,0.2549993,0.000017975559,0.00016047455,0.662479,0.059116144,0.0023458502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006301161,0.00015703717,0.045141783,0.000062607294,0.0001686849,0.000015537436,0.077990234,0.00008981071,0.00017698573,0.06083589,0.8145509,0.000180419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016305413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031519396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75543475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010869065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012033845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94355756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903655207","doi":"10.1086/699915","title":"The Credibility of Party Policy Rhetoric Survey Experimental Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Credibility; Skepticism; Reputation; Face value; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Incentive; Political science; Order (exchange); Rhetoric; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.18120591251513796,"score_gpt":0.46183441342538073,"score_spread":0.2806285009102428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903655207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99381196,0.0005649308,0.000054046912,0.003143736,0.0005409921,0.000089268426,0.00000543123,0.0000041873086,0.0017854342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971494,0.000035899408,0.00001077514,0.00009709042,0.002173472,6.48613e-7,1.0098501e-7,0.000004193945,0.00052843185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970343,0.0016029791,0.00046816567,0.00004413174,0.00050052704,0.00034991233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965646,0.0020989592,0.00033899897,0.00019012476,0.00064552063,0.00016178843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057276357,0.00006043583,0.00014215095,0.000026660795,0.0005776424,0.000035589008,0.00038210375,0.0000448315,0.00003614968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004562115,0.00003135566,0.00006548904,0.00023879184,0.0010704952,0.00014171572,0.00003232782,0.00012125592,0.000011066972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025642946,0.00026152455,0.14825068,0.000026999503,0.00009851213,0.0000012159999,0.038451448,0.000009756323,0.00583248,0.7913851,0.014949255,0.0004765776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064230926,0.0027809835,0.8050028,0.00031170185,0.00014073256,0.000023608154,0.008262676,0.00016486636,0.05682282,0.0865686,0.03890589,0.00037302956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033264138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039556785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7048165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021853686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058673264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97317344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920771684","doi":"10.1086/702231","title":"How a Retreat from Global Economic Governance May Empower Business Interests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Corporate governance; Status quo; Global governance; Politics; Power (physics); Political economy; Civil society; Economics; Economic power; Political science; Economic system; Business; Market economy; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.0317896644211377,"score_gpt":0.21778731630071918,"score_spread":0.18599765187958148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920771684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97105926,0.0020534026,0.00016641141,0.00717634,0.0024253554,0.0000840702,0.00072063744,0.000008094723,0.016306423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960986,0.0007317341,0.0002231666,0.00068749243,0.00062592665,3.9567664e-7,0.0000041590597,0.000019435938,0.0016091323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998743,0.000020615027,0.00067423517,0.00016689934,0.00004070209,0.00035452805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984133,0.00008440128,0.000920599,0.00042674632,0.000049575247,0.00010535967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003269046,0.00018193295,0.00050133065,0.00004171463,0.00004860495,0.00016088762,0.00065860903,0.00010484657,0.00035982736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007529808,0.00015583013,0.00017386054,0.00008588437,0.000074695636,0.00045710188,0.00009116079,0.0002078591,0.0010843726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098310345,0.00007782708,0.46133026,0.000023245297,0.00029209725,0.000014844705,0.00030536158,0.000462334,0.000012645128,0.52145475,0.015710462,0.0002178525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017771173,0.00019234838,0.51496685,0.00008949523,0.000056839843,0.00019800097,0.00036731843,0.0005622682,0.000110555025,0.16832484,0.31288484,0.000469504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007921884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090624446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3531299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006248199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007096484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935824294","doi":"10.1086/709434","title":"Bean Counters: The Effect of Soy Tariffs on Change in Republican Vote Share between the 2016 and 2018 Elections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soy bean; Economics; Agricultural economics; Business; Food science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.060530989025843994,"score_gpt":0.3529038050469401,"score_spread":0.2923728160210961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935824294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75599974,0.00055061653,0.0000038719077,0.23933713,0.0002303728,0.00029350692,0.00005196167,0.000007996077,0.0035247789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946828,0.0004391761,0.0000014497004,0.0014611805,0.003279141,0.0000020231435,2.8219185e-7,0.000005202124,0.00012878106],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987818,0.0004717408,0.0002150439,0.000042157364,0.00026932242,0.00021990755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863493,0.0009290952,0.00022102105,0.00007831981,0.000067400615,0.000069207694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013470284,0.00007092353,0.00017891811,0.000031043237,0.00062591344,0.000027655204,0.00030038835,0.000047518228,0.000004717562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006191604,0.0000277681,0.000070071765,0.00020886963,0.0005859574,0.00008567819,0.000049010385,0.0003157968,8.365657e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026040003,0.00007525296,0.13544275,0.00009093928,0.0008533703,0.000006155438,0.69614595,0.000010566764,0.000087176326,0.06542174,0.09510885,0.00649687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023826277,0.005663856,0.740866,0.00054138975,0.0009479301,0.00001944605,0.09746059,0.000060013554,0.0009959025,0.036410384,0.114163995,0.00048788168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055205505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011266344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6054232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057838904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007614063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8345458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971045599","doi":"10.1086/706047","title":"Historical Ownership and Territorial Disputes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Territorial dispute; Arbitration; Sanctions; Outcome (game theory); Argument (complex analysis); China; Political science; Law and economics; Perception; Test (biology); Business; Political economy; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03062217157065185,"score_gpt":0.27746251058043664,"score_spread":0.2468403390097848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971045599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339587,0.0018726317,0.000030642783,0.016343059,0.0059679495,0.00009242602,0.0000013754452,0.000010083427,0.041723143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871204,0.0004563026,0.00011084686,0.00019060176,0.0037446693,1.7053509e-7,6.354972e-8,0.000002839097,0.008374135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994022,0.0000749802,0.00016870814,0.000031533848,0.00017154895,0.00015103183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946415,0.00022801555,0.000119568555,0.000042274743,0.00006887292,0.00007714092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006004774,0.00004459236,0.00012393064,0.00002300017,0.00022152744,0.00002648069,0.00012600429,0.000032752694,0.000026030179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016991327,0.000025453734,0.000034342684,0.000032293556,0.000098433986,0.00008644047,0.000025193636,0.00010247412,0.000007886308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006822675,0.00009560405,0.2900475,0.00003200535,0.00019418764,0.000007313486,0.17727818,0.0000030061708,0.0000809659,0.37933877,0.15136527,0.0014889755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023882242,0.000056901696,0.013431273,0.000013503344,0.000028618542,0.000007689451,0.0133564165,5.542779e-7,0.000017241611,0.012280423,0.9605035,0.0000650442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043310705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014277121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80913824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002117502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101050246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17038323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991550914","doi":"10.1086/720647","title":"Peaceful Neighborhoods and Democratic Differences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Endogeneity; Geopolitics; Political science; Political economy; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02670852303551592,"score_gpt":0.29766151726852275,"score_spread":0.27095299423300684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991550914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540501,0.0010338894,0.00009283292,0.012156528,0.00033714934,0.000049523354,0.0000106448015,0.0000064927817,0.032262802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99372745,0.00018123329,0.000030760493,0.0011581413,0.0003937882,5.8304744e-7,6.397427e-8,0.0000037223892,0.004504263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986924,0.00037935804,0.00018728926,0.00003364165,0.00044797972,0.00025934997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908966,0.0004781824,0.00015968947,0.00007088668,0.000057649402,0.00014392118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009093758,0.000051217485,0.0001169366,0.000026396678,0.0007493915,0.000031022435,0.0003169128,0.000016668499,0.00016720529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034529553,0.000034102028,0.000037981332,0.00008923546,0.00030943635,0.00007704244,0.000076234384,0.00025774867,0.0000015005761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011129886,0.00003427628,0.008771728,0.0000049749888,0.00002227819,0.000008240595,0.0164412,0.0000032875785,0.00004022298,0.97201747,0.0021009562,0.0005442424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064555835,0.00059245026,0.11859118,0.000027167245,0.00018977564,0.00016081233,0.038377956,0.00016272049,0.00008118338,0.49744973,0.3434596,0.00026185767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006128523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050109422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4745677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000758568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022562845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57637894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994814799","doi":"10.1086/707616","title":"Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity: Tests of Predictions from the Bounded Rationality and Expressive Utility Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; European Commission; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; York University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Receptivity; Bounded rationality; Cognitive resource theory; Cognition; Rationality; Psychology; Social psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Identity (music); Cognitive load; Politics; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15801093982410924,"score_gpt":0.37379568805497926,"score_spread":0.21578474823087002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994814799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895901,0.00020376236,0.0009947836,0.0063621234,0.00018536836,0.00014817987,0.000038207498,0.0000050382278,0.002472451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935055,0.000029935702,0.000026827964,0.000056637542,0.0004100831,8.1064735e-7,6.6575444e-7,0.0000031786135,0.00012134011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983706,0.00078867254,0.00027541962,0.000054561464,0.00033724043,0.00017349204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975286,0.001791429,0.0002645589,0.00011572921,0.00021220965,0.000087446126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012504098,0.000053599164,0.00013785856,0.000016083837,0.0003738737,0.000041544194,0.00012143866,0.000045444718,0.00011561642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077626324,0.000031368694,0.00004705751,0.00008903524,0.0005416788,0.00017886702,0.000020061512,0.00016022066,0.0000020045643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003260122,0.00007196531,0.20838746,0.000009592664,0.00007611427,2.6929382e-7,0.05617546,0.000025051062,0.0010086499,0.73319167,0.0009985628,0.000022589336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035888393,0.00016651583,0.48314917,0.00010857187,0.00013734479,0.000003916691,0.0754893,0.0002382938,0.0004490823,0.43823054,0.0015774057,0.00009095428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056716627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022328675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29496112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016105302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021175572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85738957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002973931","doi":"10.1086/710785","title":"Electoral Administration in Fledgling Democracies: Experimental Evidence from Kenya","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05326044485072222,"score_gpt":0.3499969001156955,"score_spread":0.2967364552649733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002973931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786395,0.003657156,0.00010158184,0.016447283,0.00028667675,0.000048418988,0.0000032735968,0.0000061421206,0.00080995617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722284,0.00030080936,0.00015857798,0.0007294777,0.0015255016,2.7934917e-7,7.110362e-7,0.000004355308,0.00005744898],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901587,0.00022725941,0.0002517666,0.000048316582,0.00028716153,0.00016962214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931365,0.0002553208,0.00016094313,0.00005768323,0.00007986532,0.00013253742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003902429,0.000054398835,0.00009707455,0.000021592921,0.00024118646,0.000050131945,0.00028071663,0.000035745743,0.00011812003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042628808,0.000041916686,0.00004050203,0.000119680815,0.00009271176,0.00030079257,0.000009759714,0.00015941953,0.0000073487204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027508353,0.00036786022,0.13385874,0.000022085464,0.00009492095,0.000025935597,0.8261107,0.00014767177,0.010906061,0.018487213,0.009020694,0.0006830076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024240024,0.002036881,0.20508386,0.0011098798,0.00046260154,0.00006007568,0.5251833,0.0013510329,0.14840136,0.033928078,0.07883228,0.0011266109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011120116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062821404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3009274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014064576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072110427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18550356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081793755","doi":"10.1086/711406","title":"Beyond the Gender Gap: The Role of Gender Identity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Masculinity; Femininity; Gender identity; Gender studies; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Doing gender; White (mutation); Gender psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07205573751718507,"score_gpt":0.32458160308100253,"score_spread":0.25252586556381745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081793755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76941496,0.013028434,0.000753806,0.14574465,0.0010658768,0.00032631255,0.000024547062,0.000016742802,0.069624685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956108,0.0009610826,0.00002686426,0.002123593,0.0010534916,3.6327575e-7,8.845305e-8,0.0000062595846,0.00021746027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827254,0.0003914058,0.00031603893,0.00004809741,0.00071498676,0.00025692247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990102,0.00015603616,0.00030530294,0.00015266868,0.00028611196,0.0000896993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014773727,0.000074585,0.0001527707,0.000019268007,0.00078940776,0.00007468502,0.0008471111,0.000034307664,0.00004607702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031277334,0.000034296056,0.00015198797,0.00018104711,0.00030340502,0.00017647697,0.00015353199,0.00027009568,0.000016173164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020260295,0.00006459989,0.012339908,0.000025602385,0.00045135975,0.000003376205,0.35521692,0.00013884107,0.00045718712,0.5880565,0.042884704,0.00034075495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002029246,0.000057349276,0.023163002,0.0000051022257,0.00032992853,0.000013194354,0.515594,0.00004090783,0.0003439097,0.41036737,0.049792632,0.00008966014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007831957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034358894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22619586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036082984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016791129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60715663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124940918","doi":"10.1086/700202","title":"Restrained Change: Party Systems in Times of Economic Crisis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Political economy; Politics; Political science; Robustness (evolution); Polarization (electrochemistry); Political change; Economics; Economic system; Law","score_opus":0.0922799068517064,"score_gpt":0.3859770737211724,"score_spread":0.293697166869466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124940918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98495823,0.00024107653,0.000014568496,0.00534169,0.0006561745,0.00012765995,0.000008112982,0.0000043326704,0.008648127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975369,0.000016570999,0.000011136011,0.000093743874,0.0020161865,0.0000011090972,1.5496008e-7,0.000004204766,0.00031999155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872917,0.00040459447,0.00041568448,0.00003176973,0.00016935813,0.00024941558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992072,0.00020557878,0.00025961272,0.000087157976,0.00014248096,0.00009798451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015235696,0.000045947236,0.00016713372,0.0000593879,0.000088230954,0.000017217255,0.00016481418,0.000050388073,0.00009093981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014832402,0.000030855987,0.000039075003,0.00007754642,0.00022828318,0.000114061695,0.000010012611,0.00008098156,0.000018756466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028701585,0.0000461371,0.010345182,0.000033125118,0.00002981185,0.0000021395786,0.023928896,0.00003247523,0.00018242063,0.9569832,0.008303114,0.00008477218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036722198,0.0046233046,0.13739644,0.0014433766,0.00063579454,0.00009925772,0.09725369,0.003104142,0.0073952223,0.56246763,0.18075505,0.0011538835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04453219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003907421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3945156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013097218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016797394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125075266","doi":"10.1086/692736","title":"Does the Gift Keep on Giving? House Leadership PAC Donations before and after Majority Status","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Politics; Public relations; Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Control (management); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06908222192980402,"score_gpt":0.356617086187491,"score_spread":0.287534864257687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125075266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9417844,0.000055472905,0.000018936404,0.056156732,0.00039868068,0.000099087105,0.000015184878,0.000008690602,0.0014628554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962681,0.000021374852,0.000012036986,0.0007173448,0.0012556429,0.000001710702,9.525028e-8,0.000007941879,0.0017157702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868405,0.00034276154,0.00020558857,0.000045503504,0.00034430326,0.0003777902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988216,0.0004075363,0.00023479505,0.0002073851,0.00015045227,0.00017820726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010961037,0.00006744023,0.00010753016,0.000025035592,0.0012558063,0.00020389678,0.00025350915,0.000054327826,0.00003242805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091321615,0.000027881473,0.000049320934,0.000029427718,0.0006204956,0.00018538279,0.000025734387,0.00023830499,0.000008535474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059691516,0.000100303514,0.34399894,0.00004759506,0.00008168311,0.000008004069,0.049329437,0.000010107112,0.00005141698,0.6030068,0.001860622,0.0014454166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022496516,0.00018891705,0.8573108,0.000066660104,0.00008693578,0.000004716898,0.0051205247,0.000023492676,0.000089233086,0.108339325,0.02844935,0.000095111434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057603805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02530184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5133118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008290168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011075623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99248385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155702799","doi":"10.1086/714781","title":"Does International Terrorism Affect Public Attitudes toward Refugees? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Experiment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Terrorism; Refugee; Scale (ratio); Political science; Natural experiment; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology; Geography; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.03978076792313853,"score_gpt":0.37499043869240434,"score_spread":0.3352096707692658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155702799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588009,0.0025526308,0.0010398611,0.030871043,0.0061011408,0.00009213645,0.000048156206,0.00003100153,0.00046312492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99276453,0.0007956838,0.000235344,0.0013608446,0.0035911445,0.0000030697606,0.000003974183,0.000015701322,0.0012296757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967087,0.0007754902,0.00054862263,0.00018811598,0.0011172502,0.00066184736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975133,0.0008966135,0.00032265464,0.00032032418,0.0006082236,0.00033886012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013412938,0.00018701596,0.00030456576,0.000081700986,0.0003773934,0.00025616155,0.0010823135,0.00011776427,0.00055383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011570618,0.00010560452,0.00022718974,0.00015565312,0.0003643243,0.00072033325,0.00020253174,0.0005461067,0.000032255226],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021589048,0.001220563,0.07604433,0.00008306155,0.0008914133,0.00048349166,0.87976605,0.000008290677,0.010939435,0.014123844,0.01301161,0.0032120242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015812579,0.00033394905,0.07206151,0.0016788209,0.00036983957,0.00014694507,0.79383063,0.00027279014,0.014926896,0.01236333,0.10154824,0.00088581466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006182627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005980942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08853663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043138087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006017671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.606405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159957697","doi":"10.1086/715171","title":"Preaching to the Choir? Rhetoric and Identity in a Polarized Age","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Identity (music); Rhetoric; Appeal; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Normative; Democracy; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03012637717705184,"score_gpt":0.3863722596150814,"score_spread":0.35624588243802957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159957697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513389,0.00048319492,0.0009311701,0.03894718,0.0005852932,0.000059268452,0.0000016683356,0.0000039625584,0.007649374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953017,0.0007096654,0.00012539003,0.0016713445,0.00036664456,2.9650056e-7,7.8615145e-8,0.000002614192,0.0018222288],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990424,0.00039450242,0.00016539385,0.000028480199,0.00023194133,0.00013731155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993521,0.00032468655,0.0000745491,0.00007579169,0.000092698036,0.00008014745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012370858,0.000032764197,0.00007924553,0.000025044601,0.0003667999,0.000116510455,0.00017291692,0.000027233875,0.00001899865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079653336,0.000019535033,0.000054767137,0.0002026875,0.00006335459,0.00015029014,0.000037764054,0.00027828332,0.0000049087407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015596679,0.00011861309,0.0056367945,0.000009656244,0.000086214444,0.00005949976,0.5345271,0.000050532573,0.002674885,0.4464309,0.009847593,0.0005426256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009531785,0.00009721109,0.07621341,0.0002002517,0.00016737485,0.00029041286,0.28662834,0.00011162015,0.00023129945,0.09294459,0.54192555,0.00023675291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028761544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041860407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53207797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001090011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001474633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43479043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197004396","doi":"10.1086/716971","title":"Unmasking Accountability: Judging Performance in an Interdependent World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Competence (human resources); Voting; Interdependence; Accountability; Computer science; Business; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing","score_opus":0.07049609973049265,"score_gpt":0.38912134469552495,"score_spread":0.3186252449650323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197004396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99101865,0.00007385374,0.00006881429,0.0023545641,0.0003165083,0.0000368146,6.4233063e-7,0.000004773859,0.006125394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985621,0.000010754098,0.000038169528,0.00028821564,0.00073254516,3.7595302e-7,2.751097e-7,0.0000048564525,0.00036269572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831676,0.0006911465,0.00034993194,0.000044034496,0.0003044017,0.00029372965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923426,0.00020896188,0.00012581648,0.00010427278,0.00021418306,0.00011252412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022812213,0.000048372105,0.00011675172,0.00006081834,0.00015547231,0.000065185995,0.00017444402,0.000025186835,0.00007503827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020180338,0.000035493453,0.00003616364,0.00021102873,0.00008925284,0.0002921798,0.000024334448,0.00022881155,0.0000064508185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002463633,0.00020140625,0.78334826,0.000053902877,0.000023829061,0.000030640967,0.051205542,0.0005693456,0.001022181,0.1599474,0.00011978718,0.0034530836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009487885,0.0003110625,0.88019645,0.00079721434,0.00013347623,0.00008473843,0.033881996,0.0013543189,0.0065693595,0.048510436,0.026766144,0.0004460083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001483789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019641116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111436956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026305465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002342621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216355955","doi":"10.1086/718209","title":"The 2016 Election and America’s Standing Abroad: Quasi-Experimental Evidence of a Trump Effect","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Presidential election; Political science; Politics; Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Natural experiment; National election; Administration (probate law); Foreign policy; Presidential system; Latin Americans; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0403290128798115,"score_gpt":0.40831059422345606,"score_spread":0.36798158134364456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216355955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915288,0.0040767533,0.00023499259,0.0030619754,0.00025952162,0.000071898176,0.0000012969366,0.000003472483,0.0007613074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875873,0.0003389996,0.000017711329,0.000066177476,0.00036399503,8.735723e-7,6.1867745e-8,0.000003801784,0.0004496484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821436,0.00092192035,0.00027844904,0.000038364542,0.00031822472,0.0002286712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979078,0.0015292378,0.00022455046,0.00007451125,0.00016745485,0.00009643133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014119808,0.00005156119,0.00013970619,0.000019115234,0.0004211691,0.000047351994,0.00009896393,0.000030189236,0.000019225829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009098757,0.000027754506,0.0000522384,0.00012943329,0.00028732556,0.00012434949,0.000016680833,0.00011852154,0.0000018298048],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007127878,0.0005902335,0.038044613,0.00024534034,0.000424693,0.000025180992,0.06596024,0.000052683896,0.2895632,0.5874798,0.009565609,0.007335565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023898701,0.015015701,0.026956638,0.0028541465,0.0009098791,0.00035072525,0.05123553,0.0007334287,0.7641274,0.0564006,0.07825378,0.00077231054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022665046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003242286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53107923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013609388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002216809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34262922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317379369","doi":"10.1086/723810","title":"Pork versus Policy: Experimental Evidence on Majoritarian Bargaining with Real-World Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; Ohio State University; Tamkeen; Ecolab","keywords":"Economics; Political science; International economics","score_opus":0.1050885986163601,"score_gpt":0.3059834360734402,"score_spread":0.2008948374570801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317379369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8427949,0.0010262182,0.000060732917,0.0055362782,0.0020159334,0.00017858735,0.000067156565,0.000040644314,0.14827955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652886,0.00053880294,0.00007344853,0.0004104111,0.0016478592,0.0000023594807,0.0000013694574,0.00002694153,0.0007699343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985129,0.000055418925,0.0007922487,0.00014354366,0.000084957,0.00041089638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982217,0.0005127289,0.00078659755,0.0002730966,0.000048708054,0.00015714878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013386654,0.0001325997,0.0004294688,0.00038476565,0.00023220229,0.00008368839,0.0004185565,0.000052722575,0.000066072025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002304764,0.00011970609,0.000102344544,0.00034182338,0.00034687138,0.00024350766,0.00004590608,0.00021080385,0.00028629857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019155169,0.000025133595,0.006480735,0.0000078009025,0.00011357976,0.000027701702,0.0018642658,0.00029438492,0.00004096325,0.9892903,0.0016410619,0.000022533502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008305295,0.007834537,0.04224998,0.0015209595,0.00017461163,0.0003673553,0.02686971,0.0011039301,0.0074796863,0.8719194,0.03026786,0.0019066975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004904244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025591635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15373397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044534428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019318117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74137825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324132290","doi":"10.1086/724959","title":"Schools of Thought: Leader Education and Policy Outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Download; Association (psychology); Public administration; Library science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045560392405616185,"score_gpt":0.3641881877700159,"score_spread":0.31862779536439967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324132290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9384679,0.00024337508,0.0000074108607,0.031014387,0.00039818164,0.000031429136,0.0000049968567,0.0000069376724,0.029825337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983035,0.00027006774,0.000047926198,0.00069346005,0.0008188653,2.1734459e-7,1.6727083e-7,0.0000032252299,0.015131024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939305,0.00008094079,0.00020322761,0.000024977142,0.00011353091,0.00018428476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994597,0.0001691333,0.00011472011,0.000058193007,0.000067208384,0.00013104416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006370601,0.00003785697,0.000120123346,0.00009750411,0.00018370371,0.000011466348,0.00013786323,0.00003157571,0.000024118604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004271435,0.000024649027,0.000046931786,0.00009173185,0.00024407431,0.000090620175,0.000015502326,0.00009558335,0.000026249729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041222165,0.000038219885,0.0066591445,0.000014587749,0.000025254363,5.66321e-7,0.0147817135,0.0000042130596,0.00004210155,0.9626758,0.013120826,0.0026334128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003351771,0.00009585813,0.10388964,0.000060784652,0.00008360191,0.000021515303,0.055701684,0.000012113988,0.00014691454,0.37911323,0.46040443,0.0001350635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010710079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003836595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5835626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067271845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061491126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16190508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387568091","doi":"10.1086/726934","title":"How Do We Know What We Know? Learning from Monte Carlo Simulations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07808054829798418,"score_gpt":0.36451323599246965,"score_spread":0.2864326876944855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387568091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90275854,0.008609975,0.00015891223,0.08672806,0.0010883049,0.00013304125,0.000013161366,0.00005194684,0.00045805925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98578584,0.004269979,0.000018041264,0.00007035292,0.0020322613,7.895564e-7,0.0000010027928,0.000012557244,0.0078091826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980511,0.0006656034,0.00030214462,0.000062869585,0.00047823868,0.00044006613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979451,0.001211808,0.00023152103,0.000113846516,0.00027179517,0.00022595287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077621173,0.000087591994,0.00018264036,0.00008296735,0.00057853205,0.0003396724,0.00022422927,0.00008522812,0.0000603847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069375883,0.00006167567,0.000096024865,0.00031345812,0.00014840419,0.0004995782,0.000029164656,0.00031779712,0.000056780333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008218762,0.00025641388,0.037961032,0.0001234004,0.0006190899,0.0000721378,0.2808183,0.08367691,0.0041299216,0.4968533,0.034321547,0.06108576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041504056,0.00020396397,0.0035892262,0.0007611391,0.00021383275,0.0000042380775,0.042400505,0.006909702,0.00031219958,0.08578446,0.8591457,0.00025997372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036971443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015102952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82482415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013845657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016435492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55890006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402347977","doi":"10.1086/733022","title":"Front Matter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Binghamton University; University of California, San Diego; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Universität Mannheim; Università di Bologna; National University of Singapore; Universitat de Barcelona; Universitetet i Bergen; King's College London; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Lunds Universitet; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Washington; Uppsala Universitet; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; European University Institute; Université de Genève; York University; Auburn University; Michigan State University; Emory University; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of Otago; Georgetown University; University of Oklahoma; Washington University in St. Louis; University of Pennsylvania; University of Southern California","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02337829797613352,"score_gpt":0.3098761271412688,"score_spread":0.2864978291651353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402347977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076314737,0.032477584,0.00016473501,0.0038798938,0.017997462,0.00021139637,0.0019417412,0.000021242064,0.9356745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012268227,0.00045410197,0.00014411358,0.0015851889,0.010282218,7.5895144e-7,0.000016608057,0.00034258602,0.9749062],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973807,0.00032783704,0.0008869394,0.00009636431,0.00075946294,0.0005487325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787366,0.00022466673,0.00085547863,0.000498935,0.00033918055,0.00020805039],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009779152,0.00035336684,0.00061574916,0.00036404355,0.00007434645,0.0001316932,0.0009915795,0.00024375692,0.039629895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043470216,0.00019717152,0.00037676108,0.00009803131,0.00019626626,0.000077249184,0.00017162623,0.0020915614,0.82483476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020642767,0.000025783367,0.0000034740006,0.00014779306,0.00041878675,0.000052719995,0.0006890355,0.00010121606,0.00015990516,0.0002746972,0.99809796,0.000007990553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016680814,0.00008650688,0.00004191971,0.00070307,0.0011025612,0.0018137605,0.00021123784,0.000012820431,0.00040270766,0.003563568,0.99166954,0.00022547721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006340533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000296632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7852049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005527772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000605391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96124804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402554515","doi":"10.1086/732976","title":"Political Divisions in Large Cities: The Socio-Spatial Basis of Legislative Behavior in Chicago and Toronto","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; Political science; Geography; Regional science; Economic geography; Law","score_opus":0.041045396169693826,"score_gpt":0.3837248141595892,"score_spread":0.3426794179898954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402554515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841145,0.0007950498,0.00010136351,0.008354761,0.00024767598,0.0001586929,0.000033101587,0.0000047221906,0.0061901207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991592,0.000041369807,0.0000105868,0.00012693914,0.00044634863,0.0000035354878,3.470618e-7,0.0000062747254,0.00020539999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811614,0.00062996,0.00044310594,0.000053451637,0.00033645693,0.00042090466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984107,0.0012236614,0.00008001433,0.00007765177,0.00008536677,0.0001226065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016944942,0.000069882386,0.00018812968,0.00005124037,0.00014632795,0.000040100407,0.00015677158,0.00007364158,0.000076772274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003805807,0.00003969421,0.00006375809,0.00011913983,0.00038232532,0.0001684441,0.00003348733,0.00026377497,0.0000014708611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071763047,0.000058738187,0.03716575,0.000016139515,0.000011928715,0.0000046566993,0.036240116,0.000001139875,0.000047184305,0.92613995,0.00010182496,0.00020538195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097510073,0.00073829695,0.69051576,0.00069721445,0.00032620408,0.000028554405,0.10438643,0.000937116,0.0003269049,0.1901758,0.010562244,0.0003303712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07006849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05841162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7359642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028435522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002693793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9587699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402558231","doi":"10.1086/732993","title":"The Nonconsequences of COVID-19 on Left–Right Ideological Beliefs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Ideology; Left and right; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Virology; Medicine; Law; Politics; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.051448107738161886,"score_gpt":0.3859733989011309,"score_spread":0.33452529116296903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402558231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8515618,0.0027865383,0.00033622712,0.11410157,0.002914584,0.00022577024,0.000030969244,0.000051102536,0.027991472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99334306,0.000635863,0.00006746985,0.0018371547,0.0008273681,4.3151456e-7,1.8867699e-7,0.0000069955245,0.003281454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976492,0.0006902947,0.00045425788,0.00007179786,0.00078196527,0.00035248345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669933,0.0025560185,0.00024644524,0.0001670134,0.00011502369,0.00021616196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035808086,0.00009396125,0.0001712296,0.000072172945,0.0007574382,0.00008892701,0.0008165734,0.00007608511,0.00016280463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014502705,0.00004110123,0.00012780937,0.000153072,0.0013615516,0.000107429565,0.00004852939,0.0003563259,0.0000274128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029099565,0.00005447674,0.00074598467,0.000022468459,0.00011277619,0.000097432865,0.023035694,0.00008591376,0.0002715484,0.9577663,0.017438143,0.00034014182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002105376,0.0003671966,0.0013784735,0.00013760534,0.00010065928,0.00007643608,0.00624443,0.000030022436,0.0011458709,0.52924776,0.4609396,0.00012140935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011364353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069902954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44350144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029372206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011535625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5825679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402568645","doi":"10.1086/732973","title":"A Gladiatorial Arena: Incivility in the Canadian House of Commons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"American Political and Social Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Incivility; Commons; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024009163677453045,"score_gpt":0.251814486873998,"score_spread":0.22780532319654495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402568645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92743695,0.00050089095,0.00001503046,0.0092036445,0.0015745761,0.00010265308,0.00027219913,0.000012609576,0.060881454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972313,0.000016323955,0.0000043792857,0.00071387197,0.0017625896,4.5628522e-7,6.627889e-7,0.00000983505,0.00026059017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990012,0.00019707876,0.00031498112,0.00003062321,0.00021456495,0.0002415379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910206,0.0005097353,0.00007262186,0.00011375506,0.00010129938,0.00010052452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006786446,0.00006825423,0.00016109861,0.00008174714,0.00018877616,0.000075926786,0.00029574276,0.000030838495,0.00009408779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012468375,0.00003505368,0.00009442556,0.000056718927,0.0007144623,0.00006341431,0.00001651222,0.0003794493,0.000009161771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004399149,0.00002249326,0.00019072916,0.000016438707,0.000023748096,0.000016170923,0.052751534,0.000005104477,5.977507e-7,0.94351673,0.0033800637,0.0000720099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003628463,0.00040295997,0.006023066,0.00016521866,0.00028375193,0.00007788287,0.04959561,0.0005899115,0.000008879591,0.4271628,0.5151034,0.00022369568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2248816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58225054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5163539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015576564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006676485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402568682","doi":"10.1086/732975","title":"Addressing Risk by Doing Good: Business Response to Government Policy Initiative","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Economic, financial, and policy analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.04768692357683814,"score_gpt":0.28520197632857736,"score_spread":0.23751505275173923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402568682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93796587,0.0062299813,0.014317519,0.017954724,0.0008033835,0.00012971205,0.0021445907,0.000021979498,0.020432262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940049,0.00095877406,0.00036189813,0.0017239073,0.0012739137,0.0000018689564,0.000001555741,0.00003460278,0.0016386001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982823,0.00013453614,0.0009475875,0.00015238236,0.00008903861,0.00039412876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813175,0.00072249566,0.0006425572,0.00026287188,0.000071124006,0.00016921156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00239818,0.00017303268,0.00044241745,0.0003591206,0.00022041649,0.00018960777,0.0003736955,0.00007826965,0.00008423766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008603382,0.0001486601,0.00019248111,0.0005492115,0.000077726734,0.00028631184,0.00008333286,0.00035244424,0.00025376974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009528011,0.00031397873,0.012321033,0.0002501009,0.0019130347,0.00009253674,0.041161407,0.006163369,0.0012472916,0.839622,0.08925488,0.00670756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006989328,0.00031015338,0.021059923,0.00031548244,0.00022789038,0.000114382085,0.0014848385,0.0012410097,0.0014894509,0.059123613,0.9133763,0.00055807375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008870328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025087784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82412136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071123784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021206679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6062183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405350584","doi":"10.1086/734285","title":"Legislature Integration and Bipartisanship: A Natural Experiment in Iceland","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Natural experiment; Law; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.02699241034641319,"score_gpt":0.340251709168746,"score_spread":0.3132592988223328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405350584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91401994,0.020916121,0.00004560222,0.009906304,0.0009847619,0.000049986316,0.0000022549054,0.000008180098,0.054066863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960066,0.0009353662,0.00003780939,0.00015545447,0.00046315472,1.834518e-7,1.3718147e-7,0.0000026700798,0.0023986287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994911,0.00011423743,0.00012433731,0.000025700994,0.000161217,0.00008342907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997228,0.0001477782,0.000032119435,0.000021966098,0.00004985179,0.000025493355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000491879,0.000033675013,0.000051612304,0.000044273085,0.000082149294,0.00006156384,0.000076894794,0.000013914301,0.000011263538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011075639,0.000018888959,0.000020339463,0.000056257668,0.000118078424,0.0001176368,0.000013189614,0.00017460856,0.000002914285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012410383,0.000013693909,0.00041799693,0.000005999464,0.000027385624,0.000029445611,0.06780047,0.0000030323927,0.00059836096,0.92507285,0.0050020763,0.0010162921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045771152,0.00023968899,0.020626435,0.0006460989,0.00007235599,0.00011087948,0.052601684,0.0005017379,0.0017161886,0.03784555,0.88498276,0.00019887734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022323697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005110846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8872273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055946934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044018016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07702694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405350794","doi":"10.1086/734279","title":"Quantitative Political Science Research Is Greatly Underpowered","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.4727979840175008,"score_gpt":0.6361406166921519,"score_spread":0.16334263267465116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405350794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60249937,0.003952948,0.007114103,0.12289054,0.00074055674,0.00035270842,0.00003561409,0.000040335402,0.26237386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929,0.00016713794,0.0004065578,0.0002901302,0.00047367864,0.0000010260716,1.7851416e-7,0.000010885467,0.0057503986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99147135,0.0033354757,0.00044852585,0.00015788604,0.003286437,0.0013003261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882544,0.007300004,0.000084987034,0.00023985346,0.0035269028,0.00059385126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027036726,0.000098440934,0.000230185,0.0008952587,0.0014354257,0.0004948748,0.0012741482,0.000050934017,0.00064654177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006886663,0.000061801955,0.00014062738,0.0028900316,0.00875326,0.00055401394,0.00015673638,0.000946248,0.00044351644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001620028,0.00003073226,0.00006896511,0.000009681783,0.0000670493,0.000017630004,0.056358717,0.0000021007131,0.001130853,0.92976445,0.012457702,0.00007593054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011974748,0.000490023,0.0010737142,0.00013432672,0.000058943744,0.000020830885,0.18994235,0.0008826236,0.0030577523,0.7562368,0.047858912,0.00012396016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017964778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017622527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39040068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011606355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050529186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405624910","doi":"10.1086/734530","title":"Buy-in for Buyouts: Attitudes Toward Compensation for Reform","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Business; Leveraged buyout; Accounting; Finance; Psychology; Social psychology; Private equity","score_opus":0.048332768146886834,"score_gpt":0.27326493993787854,"score_spread":0.2249321717909917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405624910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815635,0.00020618491,0.004668105,0.0029322447,0.0010597572,0.00025431148,0.000013554949,0.000018824809,0.009283505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971119,0.0000129121345,0.00026700774,0.0007092734,0.001653674,0.000002179176,0.000006984806,0.000013999247,0.0002220658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943703,4.2002196e-7,0.00029803952,0.00004086271,0.000058902846,0.00016475517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996278,0.00009277884,0.00012391969,0.000055640678,0.00009189125,0.0000079310275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053538627,0.000064861495,0.000121536395,0.00011910641,0.0000467123,0.00039045545,0.00014255414,0.000025555544,0.0000075321004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005597939,0.000040514362,0.000088053035,0.000055168457,0.000020535525,0.0016079058,0.000025860576,0.00006465473,0.000015454858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066504675,0.000033984466,0.00028008473,0.0005222942,0.000049566836,0.0000017604783,0.00015661826,0.0003016414,0.00003860847,0.9921828,0.003179999,0.0031861588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010506272,0.000106044776,0.0027081717,0.00034621355,0.00016843503,0.000027641827,0.0031885738,0.037010755,0.00012423821,0.7971379,0.15790038,0.00023098038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007775984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005123739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19504485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103766426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028697377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3765171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409983290","doi":"10.1086/736464","title":"The Contemporary Landscape of Gendered Personality Traits","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Big Five personality traits; Personality; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","score_opus":0.054535503541680554,"score_gpt":0.33210392689732315,"score_spread":0.2775684233556426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409983290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8075518,0.01548176,0.00017037826,0.07970141,0.0007103656,0.000132038,0.000014980771,0.000006950452,0.09623032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565655,0.0010477824,0.000012207624,0.00023750016,0.00018826914,1.9080863e-7,6.6935115e-8,0.0000017723125,0.00285568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999002,0.0002761298,0.00025890238,0.000026882008,0.0002844397,0.0001516601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920577,0.00023791073,0.00019302715,0.00006972977,0.00025686563,0.00003672352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015719086,0.000042889093,0.00012612013,0.00002812617,0.0006070177,0.000032194817,0.0003273666,0.000026238515,0.0000050413346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002821304,0.000022680488,0.000093843555,0.00010884744,0.00019118529,0.000052459072,0.0000377292,0.00012067561,9.626154e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001083602,0.00016430765,0.0453641,0.000082169616,0.00087037426,0.000005079183,0.14086176,0.000017728635,0.0001735884,0.4720182,0.33834243,0.0019918822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006404521,0.000085158266,0.18586768,0.000058170182,0.00016484095,0.000004303729,0.54851913,0.000015361877,0.00018758052,0.081046194,0.18332297,0.00008817675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097303936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073203904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40765736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027347765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040682216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46687508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410201073","doi":"10.1086/736578","title":"A global scale of economic left-right party positions: cross-national and cross-expert perceptions of party placements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; University of Essex; Lunds Universitet; Tulane University; Syracuse University","keywords":"Perception; Scale (ratio); Political science; Left and right; Political economy; Psychology; Sociology; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.02900592264457516,"score_gpt":0.4181165334619384,"score_spread":0.3891106108173632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410201073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98932725,0.00016238356,0.00019174047,0.0015049529,0.00022332346,0.00009059483,0.00011308062,0.0000035487226,0.008383105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985151,0.000034274773,0.00006859533,0.00016214768,0.00022266882,0.0000011412104,0.0000020045493,0.0000023675987,0.0009916947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987546,0.00020385665,0.0005249038,0.000052239244,0.0002594111,0.00020493953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989781,0.00021309784,0.00024761382,0.00007324227,0.00038767027,0.00010027496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007983323,0.00006206766,0.0001707927,0.000044750053,0.00030929336,0.000044482174,0.00014407857,0.000063241925,0.00022119722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013998215,0.000045416753,0.00007267862,0.000078748366,0.0006530561,0.00018352497,0.000024514615,0.00006898169,0.0000046743926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000425089,0.00013065727,0.5681513,0.00003148617,0.00007641981,2.5586112e-7,0.0023049598,0.00029010393,0.00039255092,0.42566693,0.0028744214,0.000038434562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007393442,0.00016708246,0.89556324,0.00013420064,0.00008978974,0.000011052759,0.0008912053,0.0001841544,0.00091709034,0.09790961,0.0032904642,0.000102744256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024060488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011746803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32775733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002621929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046026177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36372423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}