{"meta":{"query_hash":"2c2c3d47ac4e","filters":{"venue":"The Journal of Politics"},"cohort_total":41,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":41,"exported":41,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2c2c3d47ac4e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=The+Journal+of+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1554840154","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00219_8","title":"The United States and Chile: Coming in from the Cold<i>The United States and Chile: Coming in from the Cold</i>. By David R. Mares and Francisco Rojas Aravena. (New York: Routledge, 2001. Pp. 145. $70.00 cloth, $17.95 paper.)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cold war; Politics; Coming out; Political science; Economic history; Library science; History; Law; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.01790922787343166,"score_gpt":0.27609287295049584,"score_spread":0.25818364507706415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554840154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037655078,0.2725918,0.00010552255,0.5205128,0.003351767,0.000022468099,0.0005212733,0.000027499758,0.16521183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64116263,0.20258938,0.00029642216,0.05215633,0.0035489681,0.00012073305,0.000625409,0.00009056425,0.09940958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895465,0.00040107683,0.000026613532,0.000064867956,0.00014611948,0.00040671392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989041,0.00023759095,0.00016520092,0.000033387307,0.00013948482,0.00052031956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010794407,0.00043552346,0.00045968388,0.0012882026,0.0069016283,0.008423442,0.00064845016,0.0020530957,0.01890237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002299003,0.00038250172,0.00032465957,0.0038338199,0.0062879324,0.00843561,0.0078847185,0.0036981623,0.001397641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096837706,0.00008464583,0.015481005,0.0005939776,0.000056920784,0.0009343844,0.08752885,0.00013258506,0.00025644587,0.11366464,0.7189187,0.06225105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017887622,0.000016082586,0.028254779,0.0011218743,0.000019026244,0.00015259343,0.15175976,0.000025505371,0.00008400883,0.020011667,0.7985012,0.0000356706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12221832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21299529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12221832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00682527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008616212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24301386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1897605808","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00581.x","title":"The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United<i>The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States</i>. By Pradeep K. Chhibber and Ken Kollman. (Princeton University Press, 2004.)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Competition (biology); Politics; Public administration; Economic history; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01124519873198463,"score_gpt":0.22277675158765287,"score_spread":0.21153155285566824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1897605808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3698994,0.14350535,0.0017343545,0.16031748,0.0006781006,0.00009408131,0.00245503,0.000058189893,0.321258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723672,0.016917191,0.0003510258,0.0009621258,0.00012877176,0.00001869086,0.0004606703,0.000010368957,0.008783951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846894,0.00035256243,0.000024066721,0.0000708258,0.0003251394,0.00075836916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847335,0.0005219032,0.0002561291,0.00003690108,0.00037146773,0.00034019919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013446312,0.00025973312,0.00030980547,0.0023103037,0.0066929176,0.006014031,0.0008911824,0.0011954068,0.0047878064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031932555,0.00022781795,0.00026119157,0.0079861395,0.008873099,0.0022734918,0.0016539342,0.0016266946,0.00025263458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001172965,0.00007439334,0.04625317,0.00024452424,0.000058865917,0.00019987772,0.02525045,0.0023085875,0.00017902866,0.74887073,0.11609218,0.060350984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006685116,0.000038186805,0.45706245,0.0006628285,0.00008954908,0.00017031922,0.035709426,0.0032935617,0.00045105923,0.23247239,0.26988533,0.00009807776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90529734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95405555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09470266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041343216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034273416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2999674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919795422","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00652_4","title":"<i>Anamnesis: On the Theory of History and Politics</i>. By Eric Voegelin. Translated from the German by, M. J. Hanak. Edited with an Introduction by David Walsh. The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Volume 6. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2002. Pp. 438. $39.95.)<i>Order and History, Volume 4, The Ecumenic Age</i>. By Eric Voegelin. Edited with an Introduction by, Michael Franz. The Collected Works of Eric Voegelin, Volume 17. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2000. Pp. 444. $39.95.)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"German; Politics; Order (exchange); George (robot); Classics; History; Humanities; Art history; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009134725447757034,"score_gpt":0.19837025137929198,"score_spread":0.18923552593153495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919795422","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010645367,0.84752625,0.0020123303,0.042117003,0.009414218,0.000021995957,0.00031357733,0.000072779316,0.09745733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08173244,0.65089214,0.0064917826,0.011113944,0.01688767,0.00018407016,0.00078836165,0.00024477765,0.23166487],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995449,0.00020694087,0.00003203352,0.000059551472,0.00012241073,0.000034107703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996612,0.00016909959,0.000058661488,0.00002324821,0.0000577615,0.000030065401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007294873,0.0011038019,0.000539035,0.0023294585,0.0017660351,0.0036910323,0.0008972137,0.0013014631,0.015250592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016026786,0.00036992028,0.00037633517,0.003219993,0.00416832,0.0051158983,0.0011800848,0.0022285837,0.0055807587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002466821,0.000025251347,0.00031053482,0.000661584,0.000016704387,0.00009583841,0.002419609,0.00013485139,0.00015520796,0.18576212,0.71483326,0.095560424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000453524,0.000009339039,0.0007696395,0.00061921554,0.0000042336833,0.00012223837,0.00091292156,0.000058733283,0.00005775415,0.07928791,0.9181473,0.0000061268115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007928852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0131939845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015250592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002968237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021279329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051018298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043975160","doi":"10.1017/s0022381608080754","title":"The Perils of Unearned Income","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Natural Resources and Economic Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Economic rent; Public good; Politics; Economics; Natural resource; Resource curse; Public economics; Market economy; Political economy; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.033381897149327086,"score_gpt":0.21451867252820275,"score_spread":0.18113677537887568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043975160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6173848,0.002660639,0.053260073,0.026490651,0.00033506865,0.00017729786,0.0010743742,0.00032688546,0.29829013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97959703,0.00042899433,0.0009631973,0.00034633375,0.000093556184,0.000027645716,0.0000676327,0.000023178476,0.018452372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988808,0.00030151618,0.000056065048,0.0001899498,0.00024360028,0.00032797104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421036,0.0021685467,0.0019560074,0.0005113163,0.00039042736,0.00076332653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019865194,0.00035333246,0.00057863526,0.00071549835,0.0014293398,0.005229204,0.0008290487,0.0026580722,0.022812366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01295956,0.00039583776,0.0005475231,0.0006935116,0.003341646,0.004731869,0.0028835877,0.0036705555,0.0013076669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045036804,0.00033430866,0.027113333,0.00018888232,0.00008027965,0.0008785939,0.0010855194,0.0233943,0.0010280412,0.89942926,0.006930413,0.03908676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010113208,0.00033120997,0.02560878,0.00013315589,0.00006536307,0.00079382467,0.0013182458,0.028253574,0.0010091641,0.909896,0.032419574,0.000069917456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012372148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019302415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022812366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021837738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093257416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076314986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049615761","doi":"10.1017/s0022381609090501","title":"The Consensus School, Its Critics, and Welfare Policy: A Study of American Political Discourse","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Politics; Welfare; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Public discourse; Political economy; Positive economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041498796764110585,"score_gpt":0.4182879770505953,"score_spread":0.37678918028648467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049615761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48506364,0.005134736,0.016175084,0.110505834,0.00045685098,0.00008675805,0.00007971,0.00005979177,0.38243762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944924,0.0008813461,0.0006360257,0.00095210795,0.00014011646,0.000047347814,0.000016971573,0.000026611286,0.0028070959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792474,0.01612627,0.00034253468,0.0009029455,0.002452282,0.00092867995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974637,0.020312969,0.0016966087,0.00069392216,0.0019484374,0.0007110532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020306122,0.00033577514,0.00057947997,0.0054420414,0.01569942,0.0125894705,0.0012593343,0.0041189874,0.0033619201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03201958,0.00030916464,0.000376495,0.008246828,0.03312822,0.013223868,0.005433755,0.007302173,0.00029124704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000213891,0.000040286377,0.0016002915,0.00005396381,0.0000058163864,0.00005964153,0.15625575,0.00017444752,0.00010201862,0.8311596,0.0021230422,0.008403661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044119945,0.000055899785,0.0062962486,0.0004648687,0.000029574552,0.000112165064,0.33343497,0.0026572016,0.0003847434,0.5411446,0.1153336,0.000041988642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008779125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006741758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020306122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011171224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006879721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107390344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094621010","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00504.x","title":"Making Candidates Count: The Logic of Electoral Alliances in Two-Round Legislative Elections","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Alliance; Electoral system; Political science; Voting; Single non-transferable vote; Single-member district; Focus (optics); Political economy; Public administration; Economics; First-past-the-post voting; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.10804744632106808,"score_gpt":0.44891523707318154,"score_spread":0.3408677907521135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094621010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61202914,0.00060161995,0.14713335,0.0095851915,0.00015454895,0.0003219036,0.00023241823,0.00021300426,0.22972888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804849,0.000092512615,0.012741096,0.0001822984,0.00006707311,0.000118004944,0.00006663459,0.000025325622,0.0062222797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98466647,0.010209628,0.0005186457,0.0017848606,0.0013446546,0.0014758104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689799,0.019993579,0.0041926564,0.0030591777,0.0021558423,0.001618971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011330477,0.00030213688,0.0006757891,0.0029026568,0.004958298,0.0077535887,0.0017111396,0.002589022,0.011749975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056771494,0.0005545103,0.00092648447,0.0018978862,0.0075602382,0.00908036,0.0047643096,0.002594526,0.001653569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020985628,0.00006728963,0.006382366,0.00007039139,0.000035672354,0.000348599,0.0048787864,0.0029067027,0.00064286054,0.958285,0.0013602508,0.02481219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011438295,0.00013503079,0.005704011,0.00006417318,0.00006121305,0.00035682262,0.0035858473,0.026099958,0.0010188251,0.9494047,0.013391062,0.0000639727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017798532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023834216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011749975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001643673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015372473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05992198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115365533","doi":"10.1017/s0022381614000085","title":"Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Ideology; Social psychology; Public opinion; Political science; Politics; Sample (material); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06102927442900199,"score_gpt":0.3473653025244689,"score_spread":0.28633602809546693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115365533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99307853,0.000038685317,0.0006599351,0.00025738086,0.00001206852,0.0000062367694,0.000026142267,0.0000069978314,0.005914041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949276,0.000022733704,0.00017807723,0.00005390804,0.000009843361,0.000004818579,0.000022785971,0.0000029036544,0.00021206145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998103,0.00085985777,0.000111554735,0.00023091411,0.00055130065,0.00014333286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815553,0.007115558,0.006054872,0.002689583,0.0019063206,0.0006784243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034104008,0.00025348846,0.00022543289,0.0008574373,0.00068897335,0.0022623462,0.00017443486,0.0007014177,0.0023171536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018860579,0.00026856555,0.0001898334,0.0003750948,0.001528558,0.0011513397,0.0012013911,0.0011316356,0.00028287992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008497651,0.00042987557,0.8667308,0.00013753807,0.00014718984,0.00043373537,0.04247732,0.00050882617,0.024023347,0.007881257,0.0009884003,0.055392038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035918016,0.00034695488,0.94911385,0.00006872921,0.00007418342,0.00054226286,0.027745593,0.0021607208,0.006459462,0.010071454,0.0033215012,0.000059353075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007238311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093859126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034104008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042960697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000261273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018036127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135787387","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00548.x","title":"Individualism and Intellectual Liberty in Tocqueville and Descartes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"Brown University","keywords":"Individualism; Politics; Order (exchange); Negative liberty; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.02424282034528777,"score_gpt":0.3275856297157728,"score_spread":0.3033428093704851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135787387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039720148,0.0064842165,0.0059249657,0.023302093,0.0003139043,0.000020942716,0.000028188037,0.000029181982,0.92417634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738961,0.001122241,0.0014153185,0.0017366034,0.00026489724,0.00003685889,0.000011720105,0.000020699581,0.021495616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803466,0.0009504598,0.00004585014,0.00022793659,0.0003961766,0.00034494128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988833,0.00057263445,0.00008619455,0.00014781962,0.00016357367,0.00014637988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021774813,0.00027481993,0.0003219745,0.0013612827,0.0055201217,0.0058297156,0.00046989386,0.0021644968,0.0028204047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033684417,0.0001526629,0.00032360613,0.0009049075,0.031705447,0.0029795323,0.0030507077,0.0033525294,0.000308656],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017011571,0.0000017213181,0.000027693137,0.0000016547441,4.8169073e-7,0.000009903329,0.0008228573,0.000039202732,0.000006539823,0.99822086,0.00030589773,0.0005614593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006226996,0.0000033645733,0.00012931184,0.000008415362,0.0000015455495,0.00001713356,0.00036028094,0.000093342576,0.000038210732,0.97101676,0.028320983,0.0000043316377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017384166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010998041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017384166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008089092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029864828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058690786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152366088","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00494.x","title":"Polarization and Publicity: Rethinking the Benefits of Deliberative Democracy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Publicity; Politics; Political science; Polarization (electrochemistry); Deliberative democracy; Openness to experience; Scholarship; Public opinion; Law and economics; Democracy; Public relations; Public policy; Public economics; Public administration; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.055137459475231444,"score_gpt":0.3471324301915791,"score_spread":0.2919949707163476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152366088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3700474,0.002026283,0.12021072,0.13630888,0.00096810993,0.00015402905,0.00012845472,0.00020949828,0.36994663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99376833,0.0002770172,0.003088942,0.0013176821,0.00021113988,0.000048444494,0.000011360346,0.000038180406,0.0012390872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825248,0.012523904,0.0003469608,0.0010784251,0.0021256898,0.0014002571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92190194,0.061299596,0.004191444,0.008692198,0.0027219418,0.001192869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019766811,0.0003898316,0.0007768265,0.0012260134,0.003600252,0.008986151,0.0014898564,0.0038261735,0.0064119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080199495,0.00041024503,0.00092983356,0.0015840492,0.021082764,0.012606096,0.010229948,0.0063091153,0.0005768066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013015096,0.00005411011,0.0020367398,0.00008058224,0.000026080786,0.00008252577,0.0038031607,0.0021217861,0.00041152653,0.9728914,0.00095924083,0.017402561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004048809,0.000035346853,0.001292377,0.000056644538,0.000024967312,0.000031395328,0.0009806752,0.0030900752,0.0005269841,0.9876979,0.006208597,0.00001459847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009816029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008927036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019766811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030719563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025226872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10453814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161490657","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00135","title":"The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":224,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Voting; Similarity (geometry); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Logit; Politics; Variation (astronomy); Test (biology); Voting behavior; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Positive economics; Psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06822017273372011,"score_gpt":0.35141700459349096,"score_spread":0.28319683185977085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161490657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8059194,0.017138578,0.050520197,0.08543025,0.0006171282,0.00021661306,0.0042880825,0.00020637889,0.035663404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98928636,0.001592527,0.003987628,0.0022200968,0.0002640581,0.00003556071,0.00036201047,0.000013406676,0.0022383672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983367,0.00081882364,0.00006946725,0.00022775607,0.0003436716,0.00020351794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871731,0.009486386,0.0012305176,0.0005111778,0.0006627938,0.0009360704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026734497,0.00056883495,0.00085774704,0.0015073688,0.0013909804,0.0021716747,0.0010295995,0.0020425625,0.009408633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015194314,0.0001950782,0.0007150284,0.0020066956,0.005122536,0.0030727247,0.0016639702,0.0015978736,0.0004883173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048041902,0.00017305858,0.750956,0.00042791176,0.0006712297,0.00052430294,0.0020613105,0.0026715426,0.0006057962,0.14653428,0.006288225,0.08860594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014003224,0.00077032053,0.67231673,0.00054114714,0.00067752023,0.0011778012,0.006192271,0.012791121,0.0007184352,0.27723703,0.027262714,0.0001749148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066462316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06443974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066462316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019988175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00210335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13215089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168592881","doi":"10.1111/1468-2508.00126","title":"Selecting Appeals for Judicial Review in Canada: A Replication and Multivariate Test of American Hypotheses","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Appeal; Supreme court; Test (biology); Political science; Certiorari; Replication (statistics); Law; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.0659736452785146,"score_gpt":0.32696655501715616,"score_spread":0.26099290973864153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168592881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99395645,0.00009540951,0.00044826398,0.0005219917,0.000018582647,0.00009373918,0.0005026398,0.000015428272,0.0043475297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978448,0.00005676315,0.00041393444,0.00011042784,0.000010630517,0.000026001475,0.0005218643,0.000014298528,0.0010013465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98663205,0.0044285906,0.00045481077,0.002054951,0.0040143416,0.0024152275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94448334,0.018188564,0.0076920358,0.0058781705,0.018278388,0.0054795165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015352297,0.0007529505,0.001103301,0.0022167999,0.0097120665,0.0039838552,0.0032549114,0.0009386359,0.0068067904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05641546,0.00044672826,0.0011741464,0.005141496,0.0057501597,0.0017283617,0.0029741402,0.0027449904,0.00049011305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009951313,0.00061081594,0.96538836,0.00004421395,0.00036554973,0.00018242301,0.008886939,0.00083982793,0.0004677044,0.0038697075,0.0043452475,0.0140041895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021764854,0.00015781836,0.97482556,0.00003567748,0.00029269885,0.0000737468,0.013818254,0.004517988,0.00045754618,0.0013681278,0.0041512265,0.00008378664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.983888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98554254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03178809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03178809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06004063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23063982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323504528","doi":"10.1017/s0022381613001205","title":"<i>Secessionism: Identity, Interest, and Strategy</i>. By Jason Sorens. (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2012.)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Law; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.021525976075346162,"score_gpt":0.2742017191619312,"score_spread":0.252675743086585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323504528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038057056,0.75065756,0.00057557784,0.19849244,0.019594034,0.000016187323,0.00021591333,0.000059077545,0.03000862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02731053,0.6940293,0.0015982016,0.07207946,0.049189664,0.00011851192,0.00052931625,0.0002312504,0.15491389],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946636,0.00022679672,0.00003393029,0.000079040765,0.00014593995,0.00004794947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895716,0.0005971935,0.00010393236,0.000038046237,0.00015789893,0.00014577048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010788661,0.0020240692,0.0008355452,0.0025865803,0.0020757872,0.004177506,0.0012362695,0.003507466,0.011946635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023074085,0.0009587795,0.00059370336,0.0032246355,0.004150804,0.0072663883,0.002532873,0.0057182643,0.0072891917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013835774,0.000009760321,0.00019849787,0.00020925942,0.000007851558,0.000038134167,0.0005657569,0.000037798993,0.00003874289,0.009791652,0.96054715,0.02854152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011037726,0.000012537848,0.002250628,0.0011192759,0.000010902092,0.00040310516,0.0013267933,0.00017954543,0.00011877815,0.030667689,0.96387756,0.000022185823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01658165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033884373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01658165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023182826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013992845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03996551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494990583","doi":"10.1017/s0022381600008367","title":"Liberalism, Nationalism, Citizenship: Essays on the Problem of Political Community<i>Liberalism, Nationalism, Citizenship: Essays on the Problem of Political Community</i>. By Ronald Beiner. (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2002. Pp. 256. $85.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Citizenship; Politics; Liberalism; State (computer science); Political science; Classical liberalism; Sociology; Media studies; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.024351167309857487,"score_gpt":0.24909371795911173,"score_spread":0.22474255064925425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494990583","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066233412,0.35064536,0.0025237906,0.3283953,0.006248264,0.000018023115,0.000113041795,0.000041815016,0.30539107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47120172,0.2807246,0.0031772626,0.04033538,0.021981439,0.00015703829,0.00031452742,0.00015168464,0.1819564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987978,0.0006481498,0.000039729875,0.000115583774,0.00025110223,0.00014757484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977691,0.0014963245,0.00014225516,0.000115330025,0.00021149515,0.00026552874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020213951,0.0005833677,0.00058395404,0.0013015877,0.0034223627,0.0059595145,0.00086227205,0.003863611,0.007067425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040975176,0.00030618437,0.0003815519,0.0029536828,0.017232848,0.0071886503,0.0028322157,0.003278115,0.0013856487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016363487,0.000036328503,0.00041071494,0.00017892552,0.000016292386,0.00007398331,0.0061001354,0.00022113007,0.000091091504,0.58258224,0.3813616,0.028911246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016568947,0.000007867597,0.0013722877,0.0005123915,0.00000769973,0.000074453295,0.003551975,0.0001069813,0.00007172727,0.6099241,0.38434336,0.000010652678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007172942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011155332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007172942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042381207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035505667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030749798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896125822","doi":"10.1086/710014","title":"The Populist Appeal: Personality and Antiestablishment Communication","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Duisburg-Essen; Universität Mannheim; Universität Wien; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Pennsylvania; York University; Temple University","keywords":"Agreeableness; Personality; Persuasion; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Big Five personality traits; Appeal; Population; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Law; Extraversion and introversion","score_opus":0.04532229680181439,"score_gpt":0.32442938483971867,"score_spread":0.2791070880379043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896125822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972481,0.00003420548,0.00013773798,0.00018075797,0.0000068243307,0.0000033464598,0.0000095795385,0.0000011413752,0.0023783708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995714,0.000023490975,0.000069533264,0.00005253278,0.0000067417827,0.0000021452195,0.0000066904536,6.747169e-7,0.00026665273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989942,0.00061404414,0.000030561416,0.000074011296,0.00018589181,0.000101249476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407095,0.0026554882,0.0019657116,0.00035380907,0.00028856267,0.0006655129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016993233,0.00017163454,0.00019558199,0.0006641374,0.0010028597,0.0020052781,0.0001539995,0.0004826781,0.0031242485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007984444,0.0001551863,0.0001561066,0.0004905774,0.0014048577,0.00066416746,0.0008481745,0.0010119742,0.00032076795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030855474,0.00036777882,0.9547486,0.000033142183,0.00008211433,0.0002911553,0.019767513,0.00013518122,0.0020314036,0.0026692685,0.00037698922,0.019188333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014368411,0.0001516194,0.98318845,0.000018599036,0.000024285537,0.00023643945,0.012853686,0.00059655966,0.0003684891,0.0015944194,0.0009347502,0.000018325742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019296454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002640265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031242485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029395294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025961577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010451615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903655207","doi":"10.1086/699915","title":"The Credibility of Party Policy Rhetoric Survey Experimental Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Credibility; Skepticism; Reputation; Face value; Argument (complex analysis); Value (mathematics); Incentive; Political science; Order (exchange); Rhetoric; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.18120591251513796,"score_gpt":0.46183441342538073,"score_spread":0.2806285009102428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903655207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91608685,0.0027367077,0.008296084,0.0032901622,0.00027685353,0.00036964973,0.00083524035,0.00004927568,0.06805918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587137,0.0006712569,0.0013022214,0.00052249583,0.00014655806,0.00015517986,0.0002854867,0.000020475178,0.0010248568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.945806,0.038782485,0.0029438117,0.0035332157,0.008063895,0.00087059126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36692393,0.54154205,0.05169182,0.022923958,0.0156541,0.0012640646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048601683,0.0005638159,0.0008223041,0.0018957703,0.000927967,0.002901182,0.0010286861,0.0021068198,0.015406098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26806822,0.0005667979,0.0006027533,0.0014440207,0.0039948844,0.0028011121,0.0019688762,0.002439466,0.0017342666],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035334047,0.017686807,0.4559372,0.010129144,0.0051977797,0.00077178865,0.026131324,0.006679487,0.043973472,0.12934689,0.009901946,0.25891015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058255,0.022871628,0.69017166,0.0032733085,0.003995725,0.0015791563,0.015527165,0.022669561,0.05645325,0.11378376,0.0632975,0.0005517727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007897993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059572066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048601683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012479145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006289264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25703335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920771684","doi":"10.1086/702231","title":"How a Retreat from Global Economic Governance May Empower Business Interests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Corporate governance; Status quo; Global governance; Politics; Power (physics); Political economy; Civil society; Economics; Economic power; Political science; Economic system; Business; Market economy; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.0317896644211377,"score_gpt":0.21778731630071918,"score_spread":0.18599765187958148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920771684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03209354,0.002241795,0.021967234,0.5338574,0.0019683633,0.000038128685,0.000060318886,0.00014139045,0.40763187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85950357,0.0018582749,0.0067481464,0.0920098,0.0012000613,0.00007458321,0.00006221833,0.00016167875,0.038381677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948702,0.002380047,0.00009627596,0.00067454437,0.00075816,0.0012207753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944484,0.0018398768,0.00045988586,0.0012706498,0.0008280089,0.0011531648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009316937,0.00038356078,0.00039288358,0.0008495164,0.0059110355,0.01612467,0.0010162488,0.006966338,0.010117557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014863823,0.00030822403,0.0006591546,0.0010083286,0.025653712,0.015270704,0.0080688195,0.011093154,0.0027943833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013131416,0.000020963582,0.00047570682,0.000014633962,0.0000057785865,0.000054954584,0.001704854,0.00020849406,0.000115660594,0.98057073,0.0100279115,0.0067872214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017852271,0.00002665608,0.0005438592,0.00010411792,0.0000080787895,0.000051474417,0.0017596462,0.00036383604,0.00024709135,0.8167371,0.18012351,0.000016675285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046527092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00722842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01612467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004482925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007050243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049273252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935824294","doi":"10.1086/709434","title":"Bean Counters: The Effect of Soy Tariffs on Change in Republican Vote Share between the 2016 and 2018 Elections","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Soy bean; Economics; Agricultural economics; Business; Food science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.060530989025843994,"score_gpt":0.3529038050469401,"score_spread":0.2923728160210961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935824294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947213,0.00009860101,0.00009401865,0.0006378183,0.00007569005,0.0000051036504,0.0010286098,0.000017466717,0.0033213769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763036,0.000030392563,0.000028989309,0.00006059381,0.000040298564,0.000009055721,0.0006959923,0.00001034622,0.0014940075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991485,0.0003553247,0.00003481241,0.00014298632,0.00011612738,0.00020228016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499655,0.0020580108,0.0017941347,0.00020726689,0.00046645038,0.00047752468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012096594,0.00016912911,0.00029197516,0.00037451382,0.00041113805,0.0008779462,0.0003147121,0.00033146725,0.0054334663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00878047,0.00011801808,0.0003698672,0.00056497863,0.0003283538,0.0005042316,0.00082720845,0.0009672919,0.0008508903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039800936,0.0003977178,0.9604583,0.000058094836,0.00031616547,0.00008476716,0.0012321705,0.0009993868,0.0013917944,0.0012400385,0.008427579,0.0214139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030162644,0.00033753752,0.99319845,0.000009420749,0.000070994625,0.00001406134,0.0011488002,0.0008162646,0.0006303788,0.00015808255,0.0035754882,0.00001017944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02140615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0327066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02140615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047877466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049831305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04256308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971045599","doi":"10.1086/706047","title":"Historical Ownership and Territorial Disputes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Territorial dispute; Arbitration; Sanctions; Outcome (game theory); Argument (complex analysis); China; Political science; Law and economics; Perception; Test (biology); Business; Political economy; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03062217157065185,"score_gpt":0.27746251058043664,"score_spread":0.2468403390097848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971045599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95807374,0.00045921223,0.0014299296,0.00054642226,0.000014780115,0.000015050368,0.000009908848,0.0000023190012,0.039448738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993844,0.00006691777,0.000064466716,0.000021072821,0.00000559817,0.0000032780329,0.0000030246615,4.7660924e-7,0.00045064616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953129,0.0028672128,0.00023744925,0.00032787127,0.0006969955,0.0005575896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857891,0.0068084532,0.0048339954,0.00090825005,0.0005561489,0.0011039575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043667457,0.00016314985,0.00026447073,0.00093281193,0.0029119416,0.0026472392,0.00052441686,0.0007828738,0.008282891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014744102,0.00015164979,0.000212958,0.0008233277,0.0070398357,0.0031650371,0.0033333185,0.0010270468,0.00018008139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038891102,0.0005646132,0.37322444,0.00024849747,0.00010191641,0.0018143796,0.10964794,0.0016977291,0.0034487832,0.42556137,0.0013471127,0.08195424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014519821,0.00073663273,0.4091308,0.0005926656,0.00015952547,0.0037187708,0.29863015,0.0076878145,0.002518969,0.2038342,0.07272187,0.00012338665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015616257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013848237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008282891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013947171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006655859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027709067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991550914","doi":"10.1086/720647","title":"Peaceful Neighborhoods and Democratic Differences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Endogeneity; Geopolitics; Political science; Political economy; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.02670852303551592,"score_gpt":0.29766151726852275,"score_spread":0.27095299423300684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991550914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98861873,0.0001305701,0.0008114503,0.00027011105,0.000009687995,0.0000085843085,0.000117187476,0.000007313664,0.010026278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999564,0.000022944692,0.000084994484,0.0000069244857,0.0000036308688,0.0000026703399,0.000039379967,0.0000014979164,0.00027398145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991659,0.00036394264,0.000050308714,0.00016017669,0.000116386516,0.000143381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926036,0.0021276518,0.0031724724,0.0006602067,0.00037213115,0.0010639817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010509413,0.00008619918,0.00024956994,0.00096408546,0.0012541058,0.0016636931,0.00026323207,0.0002245403,0.006791418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008755919,0.00010668096,0.00017052528,0.0010353023,0.0012039657,0.0010531744,0.0017046916,0.0006386851,0.00024522777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017396407,0.00020297055,0.94384146,0.000030149491,0.00013963057,0.00018628554,0.0041735577,0.0013848802,0.00034272566,0.027988415,0.0008319007,0.020704081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018003891,0.00013130673,0.9733279,0.000027179416,0.000040888972,0.00014619602,0.0056020273,0.0015104407,0.00022331171,0.014696613,0.0042607877,0.000015307389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028904083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066936533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006791418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058026146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024786635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022719562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994814799","doi":"10.1086/707616","title":"Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity: Tests of Predictions from the Bounded Rationality and Expressive Utility Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; European Commission; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; York University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Receptivity; Bounded rationality; Cognitive resource theory; Cognition; Rationality; Psychology; Social psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Identity (music); Cognitive load; Politics; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15801093982410924,"score_gpt":0.37379568805497926,"score_spread":0.21578474823087002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994814799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910199,0.000080565645,0.0032614993,0.00019007365,0.000007065521,0.000052640185,0.000036016274,0.000009273397,0.005342932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990627,0.000028821856,0.0006390178,0.000044875484,0.000006245963,0.000055412977,0.00002524677,0.0000047550507,0.00013302661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934511,0.004161351,0.00033436177,0.0007780812,0.00079881045,0.00047632668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8360281,0.13266063,0.01619394,0.010289455,0.0032179859,0.00160993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02189631,0.0005012686,0.00066701596,0.0014314567,0.0006384532,0.0027958478,0.0008547006,0.0016268945,0.004755346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11337023,0.0005643562,0.0008405737,0.00069914723,0.0033604424,0.0043252367,0.0031822082,0.0016284061,0.0003457949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007832936,0.0026512812,0.79168165,0.0008544487,0.0006954274,0.00046325434,0.039199907,0.0064321985,0.021349462,0.0456797,0.00040142643,0.082758255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051162735,0.002069245,0.8441406,0.00019396287,0.0004877184,0.00030048002,0.018454121,0.03744172,0.0112012755,0.08326701,0.0017376817,0.00019457909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017605528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010224174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02189631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059830316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074321934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1158002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002973931","doi":"10.1086/710785","title":"Electoral Administration in Fledgling Democracies: Experimental Evidence from Kenya","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Political science; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05326044485072222,"score_gpt":0.3499969001156955,"score_spread":0.2967364552649733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002973931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99511576,0.00014134504,0.00026078854,0.00020299408,0.000016232922,0.00023775657,0.00009338114,0.000004443585,0.003927227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953784,0.00038335324,0.0012094554,0.00024874715,0.000020021685,0.00058408774,0.00017787672,0.0000055769638,0.001992483],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549794,0.0033127626,0.00017381088,0.0003027297,0.00031820766,0.00039458816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98310596,0.009554841,0.0041935407,0.0018383368,0.0005342872,0.00077315717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009029606,0.000548433,0.00073061057,0.0005550846,0.0038202384,0.0011661963,0.0007293678,0.0008897514,0.010266688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012551112,0.0004661877,0.00042759883,0.00074480474,0.003692911,0.0011889356,0.0009118997,0.0012167727,0.00086625543],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08563638,0.26603028,0.30017504,0.0034368052,0.0019123805,0.0011402352,0.032623734,0.00503658,0.04688918,0.040694773,0.009831437,0.20659308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.043606892,0.15499869,0.67536557,0.0010876284,0.0016880933,0.0004838558,0.029049704,0.0067681554,0.024649149,0.018109009,0.043771192,0.00042204428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013690637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031550903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013690637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019299248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019106233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04775375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081793755","doi":"10.1086/711406","title":"Beyond the Gender Gap: The Role of Gender Identity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Masculinity; Femininity; Gender identity; Gender studies; Identity (music); Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Doing gender; White (mutation); Gender psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07205573751718507,"score_gpt":0.32458160308100253,"score_spread":0.25252586556381745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081793755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33612722,0.034614373,0.021103011,0.11634563,0.0020283747,0.000062667285,0.00015694674,0.00004644743,0.48951527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879871,0.003200081,0.0009789478,0.0033081695,0.00035223275,0.000030380852,0.000014495727,0.00001772054,0.0041109156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937289,0.004090768,0.0001046147,0.0005811055,0.0007751905,0.00071938115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877834,0.009028337,0.0010058108,0.00049332675,0.0006754078,0.0010137266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007967666,0.0003745354,0.0006491641,0.0018663061,0.004861448,0.0063349074,0.0010658843,0.0018398217,0.005764741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010832857,0.00016468264,0.00032033646,0.0014874997,0.020409416,0.0122025395,0.005973828,0.002908964,0.00047902938],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005368898,0.000047159017,0.0096394215,0.00013266319,0.000012833063,0.0004078621,0.073776945,0.00008300838,0.00031218637,0.8733136,0.0022833075,0.039937284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022740214,0.00017556659,0.023146171,0.001075128,0.000030055786,0.001002097,0.18875645,0.000411379,0.00060625054,0.6520121,0.13271715,0.000044877175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033565243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037149729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007967666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020307503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029491028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042137563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124940918","doi":"10.1086/700202","title":"Restrained Change: Party Systems in Times of Economic Crisis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Political economy; Politics; Political science; Robustness (evolution); Polarization (electrochemistry); Political change; Economics; Economic system; Law","score_opus":0.0922799068517064,"score_gpt":0.3859770737211724,"score_spread":0.293697166869466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124940918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759245,0.00026991684,0.0016558972,0.001416978,0.000017692437,0.000021986029,0.00012055642,0.000015842772,0.020556595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994537,0.000028308885,0.000099967656,0.000039904793,0.000007995784,0.0000059306963,0.000040374678,0.000003049148,0.00032072037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817204,0.0009102306,0.00008899218,0.0002356153,0.00020781241,0.00038536574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938881,0.0025346233,0.001603936,0.0008367791,0.00052120816,0.00061539025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025970505,0.00009042272,0.0003544448,0.0016102974,0.0022962224,0.0032691145,0.0005834347,0.00080739195,0.00726632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013267244,0.00013837793,0.00022264698,0.0019046058,0.004540201,0.0034532282,0.0036920125,0.0012606207,0.0003946578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012142805,0.00024692365,0.5954699,0.0002457413,0.00016336043,0.0012445591,0.107815266,0.0038435934,0.0030696376,0.18719082,0.0054035047,0.09409257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006561386,0.00020408357,0.8056986,0.00010173566,0.000033996093,0.00045007045,0.07784829,0.007024998,0.0006571856,0.08050921,0.027353302,0.000052983305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022362715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023483783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00726632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012078108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036081494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024308264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125075266","doi":"10.1086/692736","title":"Does the Gift Keep on Giving? House Leadership PAC Donations before and after Majority Status","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Politics; Public relations; Power (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Control (management); Public administration; Political economy; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06908222192980402,"score_gpt":0.356617086187491,"score_spread":0.287534864257687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125075266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92045134,0.00039603008,0.00042322668,0.007093924,0.00023601578,0.000018681383,0.00014141697,0.000031770767,0.07120762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951658,0.00006279478,0.000053256706,0.00025779396,0.000056233454,0.0000036168585,0.000027483838,0.000008136931,0.0043648765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982863,0.00065580715,0.00004687859,0.00012206203,0.00024758012,0.00064135593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249,0.0021555834,0.0018056269,0.0005981756,0.0008052768,0.0021453956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003142409,0.0001060155,0.00033385374,0.0005676716,0.001519041,0.0022913716,0.00028310926,0.0006114239,0.019621579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017245315,0.00008441286,0.00019290227,0.00058789,0.0014427307,0.0015935509,0.0011370471,0.0010842201,0.002233443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022164609,0.0009721076,0.610847,0.00012116438,0.00008971592,0.0006110639,0.013139081,0.00057684217,0.001364616,0.06606479,0.030932304,0.27306482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105153,0.00060561084,0.902223,0.00012508694,0.00005285414,0.00040448995,0.019656356,0.0006182083,0.00090426044,0.017031226,0.058231004,0.000042726933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039838646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005297757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019621579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010569788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009506498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06564075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155702799","doi":"10.1086/714781","title":"Does International Terrorism Affect Public Attitudes toward Refugees? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Experiment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Terrorism; Refugee; Scale (ratio); Political science; Natural experiment; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychology; Geography; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.03978076792313853,"score_gpt":0.37499043869240434,"score_spread":0.3352096707692658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155702799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976653,0.000017491333,0.00016233069,0.0001366925,0.000016970587,0.00018712823,0.00010084169,0.0000063391717,0.0017069225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973787,0.000049601484,0.00047843883,0.00032867305,0.000024395375,0.00061201927,0.00016529698,0.0000036653573,0.00095925236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660385,0.002477128,0.00008983262,0.00035079007,0.00024922827,0.00022910924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98120594,0.011223968,0.0038305807,0.0024172745,0.0004521687,0.0008700403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042179725,0.00036266458,0.0003346944,0.0002761895,0.0011327702,0.0011297,0.0004277309,0.00092558947,0.005228621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01023529,0.00035017077,0.0005418967,0.00021386736,0.0018918612,0.0006930039,0.0008050335,0.0013499311,0.00059159525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030513912,0.19294544,0.65777504,0.0006505039,0.001305766,0.00076799735,0.021663435,0.0013229761,0.027642151,0.0031401387,0.005864079,0.056408457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020480182,0.034828845,0.94273293,0.000056701712,0.00024465524,0.000112351656,0.008475699,0.0012966304,0.004193753,0.0011440334,0.004784518,0.00008188089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040464457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00483814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005228621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059664657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005658012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022307038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159957697","doi":"10.1086/715171","title":"Preaching to the Choir? Rhetoric and Identity in a Polarized Age","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Identity (music); Rhetoric; Appeal; Politics; Deliberative democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Normative; Democracy; Political science; Aesthetics; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03012637717705184,"score_gpt":0.3863722596150814,"score_spread":0.35624588243802957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159957697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5166011,0.0021175821,0.012325089,0.080722414,0.000683222,0.00003601314,0.000029498124,0.000059337086,0.3874257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581355,0.00018641734,0.00042897442,0.00076778745,0.00008192329,0.000008756419,0.0000037523691,0.000015940717,0.0026929495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99178207,0.0067035616,0.00009567736,0.0003529641,0.0005309178,0.00053471426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116135,0.006387546,0.00074374524,0.0005250052,0.00048232995,0.0006999352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010326515,0.00024046878,0.00032695997,0.001196314,0.011837883,0.011414744,0.00063991034,0.0029283895,0.0025031203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015207405,0.00026967167,0.00021968826,0.00084677024,0.031500705,0.010094297,0.0061231814,0.0039843037,0.00049899536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004254658,0.00003070884,0.0017323976,0.000035472396,0.00000412434,0.00019804356,0.3355098,0.000054701584,0.0005518508,0.65338004,0.0014461905,0.0070139966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036753052,0.000093883,0.00370596,0.00036016965,0.000023460232,0.00032109165,0.46483755,0.00085087185,0.0017489736,0.36318073,0.16480124,0.0000394002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015485361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016422842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011837883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002594278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001736864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054612517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197004396","doi":"10.1086/716971","title":"Unmasking Accountability: Judging Performance in an Interdependent World","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Benchmarking; Competence (human resources); Voting; Interdependence; Accountability; Computer science; Business; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing","score_opus":0.07049609973049265,"score_gpt":0.38912134469552495,"score_spread":0.3186252449650323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197004396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823591,0.00004457288,0.00932663,0.00026679205,0.00001231465,0.000045080833,0.000033104203,0.00002755376,0.00788488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976528,0.000015640539,0.002072851,0.000028118357,0.0000050510066,0.000014459795,0.0000243197,0.000006910468,0.00017976749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98983264,0.007126787,0.00036326633,0.0011481316,0.0011671684,0.0003620142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507744,0.029820917,0.010869931,0.004853186,0.0019963987,0.0016852168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01206418,0.00037857745,0.0006041972,0.00093709404,0.00088682934,0.0031793476,0.0006425887,0.0011825535,0.0024571877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08386697,0.00030577194,0.00038775642,0.0006300077,0.0037214453,0.0035181069,0.0022632107,0.001358694,0.00028656842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061738477,0.001182751,0.52271897,0.00087439356,0.0006113701,0.0005197183,0.024158873,0.03331705,0.085266866,0.08636511,0.0014705809,0.23734048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038991042,0.0046213525,0.6443148,0.00026099652,0.00030377667,0.0004147081,0.010065983,0.12270371,0.044539034,0.165648,0.0063173804,0.00042030428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017116853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017669811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01206418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001102683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073181605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06380218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216355955","doi":"10.1086/718209","title":"The 2016 Election and America’s Standing Abroad: Quasi-Experimental Evidence of a Trump Effect","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Presidential election; Political science; Politics; Public opinion; Government (linguistics); Natural experiment; National election; Administration (probate law); Foreign policy; Presidential system; Latin Americans; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0403290128798115,"score_gpt":0.40831059422345606,"score_spread":0.36798158134364456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216355955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99290097,0.00005295965,0.00039598296,0.00033520217,0.00009178996,0.00020221592,0.00038269843,0.000014709451,0.0056236023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945914,0.00005644712,0.00054510456,0.00033455502,0.0000539773,0.00067951024,0.00029266693,0.000012423944,0.003433826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967784,0.0020033966,0.00014846501,0.00050819136,0.00026696824,0.00029463487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706966,0.014887185,0.008849557,0.003349005,0.00077723875,0.0014403993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070714653,0.0002498061,0.00047940755,0.00024786894,0.0012314528,0.0017876712,0.0005940738,0.00091792195,0.015440275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015111923,0.00038804443,0.00048301727,0.00032002295,0.0017685082,0.0009415949,0.00090697483,0.0014778136,0.0013982534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07185366,0.14186105,0.60231084,0.0012559249,0.0019168311,0.0006552349,0.013710823,0.002070144,0.03378308,0.029599579,0.018680137,0.08230267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006950422,0.051286682,0.88571477,0.00016056967,0.000692898,0.00017221698,0.0061961473,0.0036677413,0.008627796,0.011099158,0.025254617,0.00017685705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025359867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025474667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015440275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005405018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008896344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05165291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317379369","doi":"10.1086/723810","title":"Pork versus Policy: Experimental Evidence on Majoritarian Bargaining with Real-World Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; Ohio State University; Tamkeen; Ecolab","keywords":"Economics; Political science; International economics","score_opus":0.1050885986163601,"score_gpt":0.3059834360734402,"score_spread":0.2008948374570801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317379369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971796,0.00019908677,0.0055970717,0.00068461185,0.00010828208,0.0001842028,0.00011961389,0.000029982742,0.021281108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937808,0.00017960957,0.0031456274,0.00034622138,0.00006059988,0.00034336184,0.0000911613,0.000025629422,0.0020270029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935988,0.004431097,0.00030912494,0.0007341567,0.00064172136,0.0002850401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289693,0.053812932,0.008983902,0.006386977,0.00069572433,0.0011510968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013883369,0.00073360436,0.0007207409,0.00037811758,0.0007659423,0.0021647762,0.0010989216,0.0014963348,0.01705043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039427962,0.00045320578,0.00034166322,0.00043596126,0.003059406,0.0018448699,0.0011649788,0.001911137,0.0012345156],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07664362,0.12282126,0.07915345,0.0040400084,0.0023681049,0.00082347967,0.009614693,0.035529435,0.12263253,0.34857076,0.011828433,0.18597421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026326943,0.09273428,0.16409351,0.0006978018,0.0013243024,0.0009343993,0.006053349,0.11382791,0.047851454,0.51599145,0.029722322,0.0004423963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023304584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002025647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01705043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046636572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004203876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07342315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324132290","doi":"10.1086/724959","title":"Schools of Thought: Leader Education and Policy Outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Download; Association (psychology); Public administration; Library science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045560392405616185,"score_gpt":0.3641881877700159,"score_spread":0.31862779536439967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324132290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93574953,0.00065504096,0.0015901043,0.010716169,0.000107868145,0.000111905385,0.00025926463,0.00006143235,0.050748684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808806,0.000091854294,0.00012234683,0.0002166579,0.000042892727,0.00003567627,0.00006162884,0.0000065228346,0.001334428],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99423766,0.0024587451,0.00025738138,0.0004629599,0.0007989829,0.0017842696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9261832,0.03408422,0.021004347,0.0022507042,0.0041189967,0.0123585975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077737765,0.0002313906,0.00047886293,0.0027860207,0.0026923518,0.0047765207,0.00063891156,0.002072987,0.019964447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04829624,0.00020667358,0.0003470936,0.0019898147,0.0035795083,0.0027978853,0.0026747088,0.003377073,0.0021427018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005721544,0.0026982096,0.8858412,0.00016333653,0.000096128344,0.0004757979,0.015019904,0.0010041135,0.00042717616,0.047437456,0.0077071907,0.0385574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058486103,0.00077928643,0.8287923,0.00031102655,0.000079193785,0.00032729478,0.039198533,0.0025939357,0.0010818258,0.09922206,0.026966626,0.000063121086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029128846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025044302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019964447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028063837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029473577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06678778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387568091","doi":"10.1086/726934","title":"How Do We Know What We Know? Learning from Monte Carlo Simulations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07808054829798418,"score_gpt":0.36451323599246965,"score_spread":0.2864326876944855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387568091","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08050716,0.031136962,0.682308,0.15995307,0.0014009305,0.0004982623,0.001971326,0.00064707914,0.041577227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7801825,0.015831653,0.18345709,0.014372852,0.0016709996,0.0006384266,0.001077884,0.0002439127,0.0025246984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95120776,0.03894351,0.0014140892,0.003458663,0.0040383087,0.0009377013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6302157,0.33505496,0.008262465,0.013807543,0.009521573,0.0031378248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057893373,0.0011314776,0.0036785074,0.0030665437,0.0016212225,0.0096431235,0.0034394946,0.0039182184,0.007290924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36071384,0.0009235162,0.0013156534,0.003444814,0.008187317,0.022296786,0.0036932656,0.008112812,0.00177286],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007789381,0.00050404936,0.038014013,0.0037401246,0.0020622648,0.00046539214,0.005745275,0.071811825,0.0004510722,0.4651111,0.029587468,0.38172844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006700599,0.000091111804,0.0021233603,0.0012901266,0.00013730902,0.000119443575,0.0007629389,0.043497793,0.00030772708,0.93962705,0.01189748,0.000078751575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039852066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030895288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057893373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003051725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005112977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30617315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402347977","doi":"10.1086/733022","title":"Front Matter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Binghamton University; University of California, San Diego; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Universität Mannheim; Università di Bologna; National University of Singapore; Universitat de Barcelona; Universitetet i Bergen; King's College London; Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Lunds Universitet; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of Washington; Uppsala Universitet; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; European University Institute; Université de Genève; York University; Auburn University; Michigan State University; Emory University; London School of Economics and Political Science; University of Otago; Georgetown University; University of Oklahoma; Washington University in St. Louis; University of Pennsylvania; University of Southern California","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02337829797613352,"score_gpt":0.3098761271412688,"score_spread":0.2864978291651353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402347977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027439688,0.00061367895,0.00009450996,0.004421726,0.0033879294,0.000025235353,0.000973459,0.00020064032,0.9900085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008765629,0.00024905833,0.0000383863,0.0011402782,0.00041966097,0.000012543311,0.00014990353,0.000082183615,0.99703145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939966,0.000064463835,0.000023927327,0.00014400028,0.0002312119,0.00013668563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998511,0.0003291347,0.00008545604,0.00008999312,0.00034665622,0.0006377382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006678447,0.0017352774,0.0010520759,0.0023172174,0.0033707444,0.012336705,0.0010687119,0.0090268245,0.91809136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031394674,0.000864745,0.00063032453,0.0022525662,0.0017147477,0.0040546497,0.0032758461,0.0030931365,0.8692114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028661774,0.000034220822,0.00016130178,0.00010378781,0.0000046988002,0.000077955,0.000054395474,0.000039816015,0.00015904533,0.014110775,0.9450477,0.040177602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015744674,0.000013713223,0.00033063054,0.00015373285,0.000002947607,0.00004375715,0.0001150892,0.000048089416,0.000052455125,0.0023625619,0.99685526,0.0000060647544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004960042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008442345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08190864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001829987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027227015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11683273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402554515","doi":"10.1086/732976","title":"Political Divisions in Large Cities: The Socio-Spatial Basis of Legislative Behavior in Chicago and Toronto","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Legislature; Political science; Geography; Regional science; Economic geography; Law","score_opus":0.041045396169693826,"score_gpt":0.3837248141595892,"score_spread":0.3426794179898954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402554515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988581,0.00004317161,0.000016087943,0.000055233868,0.0000010006646,0.000002927539,0.00008702685,0.0000012101485,0.00093531987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996014,0.000029931976,0.000014965711,0.000005252787,0.0000013341222,0.0000024746926,0.00009972437,0.00000100497,0.00024398464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946696,0.00012353578,0.000020699332,0.000074602816,0.00011177666,0.00020245292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997459,0.000509662,0.0007299134,0.00012622391,0.00047339275,0.0007018244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005005057,0.00012375115,0.00020807942,0.001805547,0.002200627,0.0016500416,0.0004188997,0.0002802329,0.0019461957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002499456,0.00019061042,0.00014881804,0.0030666906,0.0020640986,0.00041532252,0.0014117903,0.00034382998,0.00013601338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010043632,0.000020902593,0.959615,0.00001727309,0.00003267255,0.00012769758,0.033831954,0.00028457542,0.00076320936,0.000857831,0.0007118012,0.0036367213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013792102,0.0000076144383,0.9832982,0.000005560571,0.000004909672,0.000012358533,0.015995542,0.00013996128,0.00003948332,0.000023932727,0.00046698458,0.00000424597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85649544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96111786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14350456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01128602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033993267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28869933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402558231","doi":"10.1086/732993","title":"The Nonconsequences of COVID-19 on Left–Right Ideological Beliefs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Ideology; Left and right; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Virology; Medicine; Law; Politics; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.051448107738161886,"score_gpt":0.3859733989011309,"score_spread":0.33452529116296903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402558231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95806444,0.0000717817,0.000667067,0.00069968886,0.000031705764,0.000020981708,0.000044891403,0.0000063521265,0.040393088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990921,0.00001654552,0.00006600113,0.00011625125,0.00000816507,0.000006290191,0.00001887978,0.0000039154243,0.0006716986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610245,0.001733502,0.0001984995,0.00060049136,0.0006897401,0.00067522377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761397,0.013067187,0.004519906,0.003791669,0.0012394739,0.0012419777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041122097,0.00021419408,0.00036500758,0.0003800557,0.0015956016,0.001725543,0.0003326826,0.0009865293,0.01265555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01961445,0.00024200846,0.00022557288,0.00035924962,0.0034983016,0.0012891532,0.0022213906,0.0021978647,0.0007912763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074612643,0.002310584,0.56028646,0.00065086305,0.0002647076,0.0013102184,0.17012337,0.0007315017,0.05112546,0.07963243,0.0035758591,0.12252725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025910043,0.0010717125,0.9266307,0.0001402137,0.000090468006,0.0002995339,0.037712198,0.0010388746,0.0050019682,0.01395042,0.013739392,0.000065521905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025582595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004494796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01265555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009080691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005236846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04233706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402568645","doi":"10.1086/732973","title":"A Gladiatorial Arena: Incivility in the Canadian House of Commons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"American Political and Social Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Incivility; Commons; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.024009163677453045,"score_gpt":0.251814486873998,"score_spread":0.22780532319654495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402568645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98755765,0.00025249374,0.00038205893,0.0016138438,0.000011565128,0.000029535235,0.0004760708,0.0000147655555,0.009661953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861383,0.00007325632,0.000080799655,0.000047768644,0.000004579297,0.000004632278,0.0001374404,0.00000338098,0.0010343939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970789,0.00037930167,0.00007353203,0.00024195266,0.0011334498,0.0010928514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881485,0.0018111821,0.00459885,0.00069644634,0.0024679513,0.0022770257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610705,0.0002047959,0.00028808604,0.0020112386,0.00617588,0.0023118476,0.0012984056,0.00060936215,0.0036181477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014056012,0.00016960358,0.0002303426,0.003913541,0.004824442,0.0010746436,0.0026543783,0.0015888301,0.00021020274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108294305,0.00007432624,0.95237505,0.000025978665,0.000029068127,0.00017400473,0.015896805,0.00078966207,0.0002348731,0.005458709,0.0044743204,0.0203588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002729086,0.000019288304,0.977736,0.000022488564,0.000008868401,0.00004331111,0.014031148,0.0007430987,0.00017871431,0.0005677287,0.0066245524,0.000022052525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9662238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98592234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033776224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033359174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020756515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24203885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402568682","doi":"10.1086/732975","title":"Addressing Risk by Doing Good: Business Response to Government Policy Initiative","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Economic, financial, and policy analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.04768692357683814,"score_gpt":0.28520197632857736,"score_spread":0.23751505275173923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402568682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8955994,0.0005147437,0.0020714793,0.0179655,0.000085931286,0.000060215945,0.00008557073,0.00005040721,0.083566636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811256,0.000078602425,0.000098385986,0.00055357936,0.00002113301,0.000008318218,0.000013127141,0.0000040917685,0.0011102608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955303,0.0023695882,0.0001143368,0.00032776184,0.000516442,0.0011416198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97366774,0.011120773,0.010310386,0.0011354709,0.0011213922,0.002644272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042816754,0.0001768893,0.00024810233,0.0008020595,0.0015764987,0.0047348095,0.00047763187,0.002195255,0.00502201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024379427,0.00013520391,0.00021350408,0.000854949,0.0027797997,0.00202211,0.002182817,0.0019781205,0.00054905826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089504046,0.0015058023,0.58374554,0.00038436643,0.0002590499,0.0019590484,0.05258734,0.0037831753,0.0073150382,0.12883139,0.020705434,0.19802873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001269103,0.0006253464,0.6679921,0.00031877292,0.00011058066,0.0003486861,0.115990266,0.006739628,0.0034899702,0.09777212,0.10635987,0.00012581536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002176224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031972514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00502201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015834951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013460983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022643924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405350584","doi":"10.1086/734285","title":"Legislature Integration and Bipartisanship: A Natural Experiment in Iceland","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Natural (archaeology); Political science; Natural experiment; Law; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.02699241034641319,"score_gpt":0.340251709168746,"score_spread":0.3132592988223328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405350584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970565,0.0000407882,0.00032886278,0.00009910876,0.000024594572,0.00018492712,0.0005145604,0.00000904499,0.0017416038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99043334,0.000072928146,0.0017378707,0.00038447275,0.00006216933,0.0011244435,0.0019543672,0.000013972189,0.004216394],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953035,0.0034139177,0.00014249177,0.00050226704,0.00017957385,0.00045831918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880959,0.007393275,0.0019854505,0.0013608381,0.00026364953,0.0009008759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009268385,0.0006348726,0.001158548,0.00046155197,0.0021171044,0.0016666808,0.0011080264,0.0014445522,0.0070081903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005151792,0.0004876458,0.00072799873,0.0005533213,0.0031241237,0.00077450625,0.0010298407,0.0016855267,0.0010814355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.097951904,0.12187956,0.6538383,0.00071735703,0.001917478,0.0021336046,0.012610332,0.02300412,0.019983768,0.013791588,0.018002754,0.034169156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007802327,0.03168059,0.9172638,0.00010935366,0.00062189647,0.00021895535,0.0067253886,0.018590245,0.0031175232,0.0046930225,0.009032245,0.00014473667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033773497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059699908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033773497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002482403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015149832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06715381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405350794","doi":"10.1086/734279","title":"Quantitative Political Science Research Is Greatly Underpowered","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.4727979840175008,"score_gpt":0.6361406166921519,"score_spread":0.16334263267465116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405350794","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14436136,0.025128467,0.5905318,0.16218105,0.0102054635,0.006005101,0.0032946372,0.0017564587,0.056535605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8061597,0.0049206004,0.15284269,0.022240585,0.004389807,0.0056287246,0.0009842298,0.0007658402,0.002067798],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.23123117,0.60626787,0.03285912,0.027878217,0.0993151,0.0024485763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.057401508,0.7941529,0.035968866,0.072495475,0.038263056,0.0017181819],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.68705976,0.0019038146,0.00505774,0.015046154,0.0041495566,0.014818764,0.0052279416,0.003988547,0.005407664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8452551,0.002516128,0.0035195183,0.01164245,0.0333672,0.013909533,0.009940218,0.0065674963,0.0028292143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020590995,0.0005752535,0.13016221,0.015822278,0.00855729,0.0010226499,0.024470434,0.008171273,0.0055250702,0.27863488,0.04289805,0.48210153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010232149,0.0010139538,0.041915618,0.0069657024,0.0011552381,0.00157417,0.006768077,0.017012369,0.004701782,0.824619,0.092795625,0.00045522733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022957309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002013312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31294024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00534226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011494536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3859111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405624910","doi":"10.1086/734530","title":"Buy-in for Buyouts: Attitudes Toward Compensation for Reform","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Business; Leveraged buyout; Accounting; Finance; Psychology; Social psychology; Private equity","score_opus":0.048332768146886834,"score_gpt":0.27326493993787854,"score_spread":0.2249321717909917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405624910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984044,0.000081904625,0.00047927353,0.0018918812,0.000030430376,0.00002937693,0.000022182061,0.0000124767075,0.013408502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979367,0.000031957286,0.000084535124,0.00043086134,0.000018706038,0.000010347503,0.000010345293,0.0000047359777,0.0014717656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600154,0.0023415086,0.00019340774,0.0003102643,0.00070421904,0.00044904495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654254,0.0195074,0.00877812,0.0022213885,0.002120157,0.0019475676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009097439,0.00027143216,0.00031774194,0.0010009196,0.0019659933,0.004158431,0.00036650567,0.0023585227,0.011504564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025049603,0.00020445135,0.00026372116,0.00050426816,0.0036556532,0.0027543802,0.0020697264,0.002664229,0.00094991684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032509204,0.0026425426,0.7025547,0.00029435672,0.0001844866,0.0009482466,0.11118567,0.00075942854,0.013521846,0.04024103,0.0083230715,0.11609371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032869092,0.0032228767,0.6448663,0.00023317504,0.00017693303,0.00083655264,0.27072692,0.0057501076,0.0076478156,0.017720517,0.048259526,0.00023071124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015759878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013981682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011504564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011672371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004488471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048112452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409983290","doi":"10.1086/736464","title":"The Contemporary Landscape of Gendered Personality Traits","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Big Five personality traits; Personality; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","score_opus":0.054535503541680554,"score_gpt":0.33210392689732315,"score_spread":0.2775684233556426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409983290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82192737,0.045957882,0.010716773,0.026303012,0.00063315214,0.000047672136,0.00056262163,0.00005008629,0.09380138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98557043,0.008610031,0.001830182,0.0016449427,0.0003612193,0.000042230353,0.000096242555,0.000015322516,0.0018294771],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645966,0.0018584216,0.000117655974,0.0006477269,0.00067538535,0.00024113987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99114436,0.0052758306,0.0013386676,0.0006008868,0.0009463415,0.0006939768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046313205,0.00028533206,0.00041029742,0.0033597606,0.002169116,0.0042866305,0.00048570486,0.00078126555,0.0039632376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087471455,0.00019375703,0.00027110704,0.003221521,0.006572594,0.0025960638,0.0023753413,0.0011853905,0.00033046165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001600006,0.00008738661,0.3526332,0.0004682105,0.000102352824,0.00045765456,0.0583133,0.0003422453,0.0014281536,0.14353056,0.005420667,0.43705627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012154566,0.00017222279,0.75356996,0.00092178193,0.000046836332,0.0014624746,0.046016857,0.0007958255,0.0004810703,0.09584391,0.10058627,0.00009054237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008820892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009809062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008820892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016140222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007617337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024493098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410201073","doi":"10.1086/736578","title":"A global scale of economic left-right party positions: cross-national and cross-expert perceptions of party placements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Zürich; University of Essex; Lunds Universitet; Tulane University; Syracuse University","keywords":"Perception; Scale (ratio); Political science; Left and right; Political economy; Psychology; Sociology; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.02900592264457516,"score_gpt":0.4181165334619384,"score_spread":0.3891106108173632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410201073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99126047,0.000053597472,0.001273858,0.00007002572,0.0000057120546,0.000020671174,0.00080130604,0.000008057071,0.006506473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975471,0.00003475489,0.0008224301,0.000023596038,0.0000050143713,0.000039981733,0.0012080256,0.000006369652,0.00031271856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998071,0.00091933395,0.00014971776,0.00025049085,0.00041829172,0.00019116112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99141043,0.003985852,0.0019613672,0.0011327202,0.0010886337,0.00042102457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037345365,0.00019528458,0.00033193303,0.0027845718,0.00044994187,0.001359518,0.00027399714,0.0003500034,0.0042833607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009758988,0.0001039648,0.00024495856,0.0024347133,0.0012522986,0.0011100216,0.0019987614,0.0005534851,0.00038039713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001296737,0.00007835752,0.9594343,0.00009382425,0.00010797396,0.000095783966,0.013108971,0.0012088055,0.0012973178,0.0035166522,0.0013817953,0.01954669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007889272,0.000034580204,0.98394644,0.000037236423,0.000013117044,0.00006359187,0.009514895,0.0009342534,0.0004311091,0.0014777419,0.0035216499,0.000017497458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041882736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074270577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042833607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048062424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028871212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019750416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}